B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 56,98 A11 Anne Marchal -Claire Destin
--- 2 56,94 A.5 Patrick Gilles -Serge Alard
--- 3 56,07 A.3 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens
--- 4 55,72 A14 Noelle Fosse -Philippe van der Gracht
--- 5 55,48 A12 Dominique Darmstaeter -Jean Chabotier
--- 6 53,06 A.1 Mercedes Oostens -Sophie Tilemans
--- 7 52,25 A.9 Christine Defraigne -Michele Berrier
--- 8 51,45 A.2 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Marianne Borsu
--- 9 51,43 A10 Claire Derieuw -Catherine de Moffarts
--- 10 45,62 A.7 Giuseppe Napoli -Elena Valsesia
--- 11 44,34 A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx
--- 12 41,92 A.8 Brigitte Brusselmans -Maryse Gathy
--- 13 41,30 A.6 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger
--- 14 38,64 A13 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 63,05 a12 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne
--- 2 61,74 a11 Pascale Graton -Caroline Lallia
--- 3 60,81 a.5 Thierry Bollansee -Lydia Wildiers
--- 4 57,05 a.9 Myriam de Timary -Christiane Huby
--- 5 54,02 a.4 Brigitte Velge -Brigitte de Jamblinne
--- 6 52,18 a.6 Gerard Cooreman -Michel Lievens
--- 7 50,11 a10 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Chantal de Lichtervelde
--- 8 48,11 a.3 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck
--- 9 47,73 a.7 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille
--- 10 44,85 a13 Caroll Pucher -Marie J. de Wagheneire
--- 11 38,92 a.1 Sybille Gillet -Roselyne Delpon
--- 12 37,14 a.2 Nicole Leclere -Francoise Turin
--- 13 34,51 a.8 Veronique Englebienne -Virginie Van Damme
--- 14 0,00 a14 -
PAIRE A11 Anne Marchal -Claire Destin
a.7 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 47,73 %
1 NS 5K S = 400 13.2 60.00
2 NS 4C W-1 50 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
a.6 Gerard Cooreman -Michel Lievens 52,18 %
3 NS 2C E = -110 4.5 20.45
4 NS 3P W+2 -200 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 12,95 %
a.5 Thierry Bollansee -Lydia Wildiers 60,81 %
5 NS 2S S = 120 14.3 65.00
6 NS 4P E+1 -650 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.3 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 48,11 %
7 NS 2S N = 120 8.8 40.00
8 NS 3S N+1 430 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
a.2 Nicole Leclere -Francoise Turin 37,14 %
9 NS 3P E = -140 12.1 55.00
10 NS 4C S = 620 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
a.1 Sybille Gillet -Roselyne Delpon 38,92 %
11 NS 3S S+2 460 17.5 79.55
12 NS 1S E+1 -120 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a14 - 0,00 %
13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a13 Caroll Pucher -Marie J. de Wagheneire 44,85 %
15 NS 3K N = 110 13.2 60.00
16 NS 3S E-2 200 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
a11 Pascale Graton -Caroline Lallia 61,74 %
21 NS 5K N+1 620 11 50.00
22 NS 4P E+2 -680 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a10 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Chantal de Lichtervelde 50,11 %
23 NS 1S S-2 -200 2.3 10.45
24 NS 4P N+1 450 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.9 Myriam de Timary -Christiane Huby 57,05 %
25 NS 5C E+2 -710 10 45.45
26 NS 5C W-2 200 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.8 Veronique Englebienne -Virginie Van Damme 34,51 %
27 NS 1S S+2 150 17.5 79.55
28 NS 5TcW-2 300 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 89,55 %
Total : 275,8 / 484 = 56,98 %
PAIRE A.5 Patrick Gilles -Serge Alard
a.8 Veronique Englebienne -Virginie Van Damme 34,51 %
1 NS 5K S = 400 13.2 60.00
2 NS 4C W-1 50 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
a.7 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 47,73 %
3 NS 3K S+1 130 15.4 70.00
4 NS 3P W = -140 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a.5 Thierry Bollansee -Lydia Wildiers 60,81 %
9 NS 3P E+1 -170 4.5 20.45
10 NS 4C S-2 -200 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 12,95 %
a.4 Brigitte Velge -Brigitte de Jamblinne 54,02 %
11 NS 3S N+2 460 17.5 79.55
12 NS 1C W = -80 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
a.3 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 48,11 %
13 NS 5T E = -600 16.5 75.00
14 NS 3S S = 400 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
a.2 Nicole Leclere -Francoise Turin 37,14 %
15 NS 3S S+1 630 21.9 99.55
16 NS 3S E+1 -630 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a.1 Sybille Gillet -Roselyne Delpon 38,92 %
17 NS 2P E-1 50 21.9 99.55
18 NS 4CcE-1 100 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a14 - 0,00 %
19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a13 Caroll Pucher -Marie J. de Wagheneire 44,85 %
21 NS 6K N = 1370 20 90.91
22 NS 4P E+1 -650 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
a11 Pascale Graton -Caroline Lallia 61,74 %
23 NS 2C W = -110 19.7 89.55
24 NS 6P N-1 -50 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a10 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Chantal de Lichtervelde 50,11 %
25 NS 6KcS-3 -500 22 100.00
26 NS 4C W = -620 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.9 Myriam de Timary -Christiane Huby 57,05 %
27 NS 3T N = 110 13.2 60.00
28 NS 4TcE = -510 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
Total : 275,6 / 484 = 56,94 %
PAIRE A.3 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens
a.3 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 48,11 %
5 NS 2S S = 120 14.3 65.00
6 NS 4P E+1 -650 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.2 Nicole Leclere -Francoise Turin 37,14 %
7 NS 5P E-2 200 18.6 84.55
8 NS 3S N = 400 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
a.1 Sybille Gillet -Roselyne Delpon 38,92 %
9 NS 3P E-1 100 19.7 89.55
10 NS 3C S = 140 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a14 - 0,00 %
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a13 Caroll Pucher -Marie J. de Wagheneire 44,85 %
13 NS 5T E = -600 16.5 75.00
14 NS 2S N = 120 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a12 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne 63,05 %
15 NS 2C S-3 -300 2.3 10.45
16 NS 3S E+1 -630 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
a11 Pascale Graton -Caroline Lallia 61,74 %
17 NS 2P E = -110 11 50.00
18 NS 5C E-2 100 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a.9 Myriam de Timary -Christiane Huby 57,05 %
19 NS 2P E = -110 4.5 20.45
20 NS 3K S-1 -100 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 45,23 %
a.8 Veronique Englebienne -Virginie Van Damme 34,51 %
21 NS 6K N = 1370 20 90.91
22 NS 4P E+1 -650 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
a.7 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 47,73 %
23 NS 2C W+1 -140 9.9 45.00
24 NS 4P N+1 450 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a.6 Gerard Cooreman -Michel Lievens 52,18 %
25 NS 5C E+2 -710 10 45.45
26 NS 4C W-1 100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.5 Thierry Bollansee -Lydia Wildiers 60,81 %
27 NS 2C E-2 100 11 50.00
28 NS 4T E = -130 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
Total : 271,4 / 484 = 56,07 %
PAIRE A14 Noelle Fosse -Philippe van der Gracht
a13 Caroll Pucher -Marie J. de Wagheneire 44,85 %
1 NS 5K S = 400 13.2 60.00
2 NS 4C W-1 50 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
a12 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne 63,05 %
3 NS 3C W = -140 1.2 5.45
4 NS 4C N = 620 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a11 Pascale Graton -Caroline Lallia 61,74 %
5 NS 2S S-1 -100 6.6 30.00
6 NS 4P E+1 -650 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 32,50 %
a10 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Chantal de Lichtervelde 50,11 %
7 NS 5K S-1 -100 2.3 10.45
8 NS 3S N = 400 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a.9 Myriam de Timary -Christiane Huby 57,05 %
9 NS 3P E+1 -170 4.5 20.45
10 NS 4C S = 620 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.8 Veronique Englebienne -Virginie Van Damme 34,51 %
11 NS 3S N+2 460 17.5 79.55
12 NS 2T W-2 100 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 84,55 %
a.6 Gerard Cooreman -Michel Lievens 52,18 %
13 NS 5T E = -600 16.5 75.00
14 NS 3S N = 400 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
a.5 Thierry Bollansee -Lydia Wildiers 60,81 %
15 NS 3S S = 600 19.7 89.55
16 NS 3S W+4 -720 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.4 Brigitte Velge -Brigitte de Jamblinne 54,02 %
17 NS 2P E = -110 11 50.00
18 NS 5C E-3 150 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.3 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 48,11 %
19 NS 1S N+1 120 21.9 99.55
20 NS 1S W+1 -120 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
a.2 Nicole Leclere -Francoise Turin 37,14 %
21 NS 6K N-1 -100 1 4.55
22 NS 5P E = -650 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a14 - 0,00 %
27 NS BYE 0 0.00
28 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 269,7 / 484 = 55,72 %
PAIRE A12 Dominique Darmstaeter -Jean Chabotier
a.9 Myriam de Timary -Christiane Huby 57,05 %
1 NS 5K S = 400 13.2 60.00
2 NS 3C W = -140 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.8 Veronique Englebienne -Virginie Van Damme 34,51 %
3 NS 4PcW-3 800 21.9 99.55
4 NS 3P W-1 100 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 94,55 %
a.7 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 47,73 %
5 NS 2S S+1 150 20.8 94.55
6 NS 4P E+1 -650 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a.6 Gerard Cooreman -Michel Lievens 52,18 %
7 NS 4K S = 130 13.2 60.00
8 NS 2C N+2 170 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.4 Brigitte Velge -Brigitte de Jamblinne 54,02 %
9 NS 3C E = -140 12.1 55.00
10 NS 4C S-1 -100 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.3 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 48,11 %
11 NS 4C S-1 -50 4.5 20.45
12 NS 3ScE-2 300 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a.2 Nicole Leclere -Francoise Turin 37,14 %
13 NS 3S E+4 -720 1.2 5.45
14 NS 3S N-1 -50 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a.1 Sybille Gillet -Roselyne Delpon 38,92 %
15 NS 2S S = 120 16.5 75.00
16 NS 3S E+1 -630 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a14 - 0,00 %
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a12 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne 63,05 %
23 NS 2C W+1 -140 9.9 45.00
24 NS 4P N = 420 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
a11 Pascale Graton -Caroline Lallia 61,74 %
25 NS 4C E+3 -710 10 45.45
26 NS 4C W-2 200 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a10 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Chantal de Lichtervelde 50,11 %
27 NS 3T N+1 130 15.4 70.00
28 NS 3P N-2 -200 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
Total : 268,5 / 484 = 55,48 %
PAIRE A.1 Mercedes Oostens -Sophie Tilemans
a.1 Sybille Gillet -Roselyne Delpon 38,92 %
1 NS 5K S+1 420 21.9 99.55
2 NS 2S E-1 50 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 89,55 %
a14 - 0,00 %
3 NS BYE 0 0.00
4 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a13 Caroll Pucher -Marie J. de Wagheneire 44,85 %
5 NS 2S S = 120 14.3 65.00
6 NS 4P E = -620 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a12 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne 63,05 %
7 NS 4P E-1 100 5.5 25.00
8 NS 2C N = 110 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a11 Pascale Graton -Caroline Lallia 61,74 %
9 NS 3P E+1 -170 4.5 20.45
10 NS 4C S-1 -100 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a10 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Chantal de Lichtervelde 50,11 %
11 NS 6S S-1 -50 4.5 20.45
12 NS 1S E = -90 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
a.9 Myriam de Timary -Christiane Huby 57,05 %
13 NS 3S E+4 -720 1.2 5.45
14 NS 3S N-4 -200 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 2,95 %
a.7 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 47,73 %
15 NS 2T W-1 50 8.8 40.00
16 NS 4T W+1 -150 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a.6 Gerard Cooreman -Michel Lievens 52,18 %
17 NS 3T N-1 -50 19.7 89.55
18 NS 5T S = 600 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 89,55 %
a.5 Thierry Bollansee -Lydia Wildiers 60,81 %
19 NS 2P E = -110 4.5 20.45
20 NS 1S W+1 -120 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a.4 Brigitte Velge -Brigitte de Jamblinne 54,02 %
21 NS 5K N+1 620 11 50.00
22 NS 4P E+1 -650 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.3 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 48,11 %
23 NS 2T S+1 110 21.9 99.55
24 NS 4P N+1 450 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 89,55 %
Total : 256,8 / 484 = 53,06 %
PAIRE A.9 Christine Defraigne -Michele Berrier
a.3 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 48,11 %
1 NS 5K N = 400 13.2 60.00
2 NS 3C W+1 -170 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.1 Sybille Gillet -Roselyne Delpon 38,92 %
3 NS 3C E-2 200 18.6 84.55
4 NS 4C N-1 -100 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
a14 - 0,00 %
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a13 Caroll Pucher -Marie J. de Wagheneire 44,85 %
7 NS 3P E-1 100 5.5 25.00
8 NS 3S N+3 490 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a12 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne 63,05 %
9 NS 3C N-1 -50 15.4 70.00
10 NS 4C S-2 -200 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a11 Pascale Graton -Caroline Lallia 61,74 %
11 NS 3S S+2 460 17.5 79.55
12 NS 1S E+2 -150 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.9 Myriam de Timary -Christiane Huby 57,05 %
17 NS 2P E = -110 11 50.00
18 NS 5T S = 600 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
a.8 Veronique Englebienne -Virginie Van Damme 34,51 %
19 NS 3P E-1 100 12.1 55.00
20 NS 2P E-1 100 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a.7 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 47,73 %
21 NS 5K N = 600 4 18.18
22 NS 5P E = -650 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.6 Gerard Cooreman -Michel Lievens 52,18 %
23 NS 2C W+1 -140 9.9 45.00
24 NS 4P N = 420 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
a.5 Thierry Bollansee -Lydia Wildiers 60,81 %
25 NS 5C E+2 -710 10 45.45
26 NS 4C W = -620 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a.4 Brigitte Velge -Brigitte de Jamblinne 54,02 %
27 NS 2C E-1 50 8.8 40.00
28 NS 3T E = -110 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 252,9 / 484 = 52,25 %
PAIRE A.2 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Marianne Borsu
a.2 Nicole Leclere -Francoise Turin 37,14 %
3 NS 2C E-1 100 11 50.00
4 NS 4C N-1 -100 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
a.1 Sybille Gillet -Roselyne Delpon 38,92 %
5 NS 2S S-1 -100 6.6 30.00
6 NS 4P E+1 -650 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 32,50 %
a14 - 0,00 %
7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a13 Caroll Pucher -Marie J. de Wagheneire 44,85 %
9 NS 5CcN-4 -800 0.1 0.45
10 NS 4C S = 620 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a12 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne 63,05 %
11 NS 4C S = 420 11 50.00
12 NS 2C W-1 50 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
a11 Pascale Graton -Caroline Lallia 61,74 %
13 NS 6S E-1 100 21.9 99.55
14 NS 3S N-2 -100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
a10 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Chantal de Lichtervelde 50,11 %
15 NS 2S N = 120 16.5 75.00
16 NS 3S W+1 -630 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.8 Veronique Englebienne -Virginie Van Damme 34,51 %
17 NS 2P E+1 -140 1.2 5.45
18 NS 5T N = 600 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.7 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 47,73 %
19 NS 3T N = 110 17.5 79.55
20 NS 1S S-3 -300 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a.6 Gerard Cooreman -Michel Lievens 52,18 %
21 NS 5K N+1 620 11 50.00
22 NS 3S W+2 -660 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.5 Thierry Bollansee -Lydia Wildiers 60,81 %
23 NS 2C W+1 -140 9.9 45.00
24 NS 4P N+1 450 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a.4 Brigitte Velge -Brigitte de Jamblinne 54,02 %
25 NS 5C E+2 -710 10 45.45
26 NS 4C W-1 100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 249,0 / 484 = 51,45 %
PAIRE A10 Claire Derieuw -Catherine de Moffarts
a.5 Thierry Bollansee -Lydia Wildiers 60,81 %
1 NS 4P E-1 50 2.3 10.45
2 NS 4C W = -420 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 10,45 %
a.4 Brigitte Velge -Brigitte de Jamblinne 54,02 %
3 NS 3C W-2 200 18.6 84.55
4 NS 3P E+1 -170 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.2 Nicole Leclere -Francoise Turin 37,14 %
5 NS 2S S+1 150 20.8 94.55
6 NS 4P E = -620 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 92,05 %
a.1 Sybille Gillet -Roselyne Delpon 38,92 %
7 NS 3S N = 600 21.9 99.55
8 NS 4C N+1 450 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 94,55 %
a14 - 0,00 %
9 NS BYE 0 0.00
10 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a13 Caroll Pucher -Marie J. de Wagheneire 44,85 %
11 NS 5C S-1 -50 4.5 20.45
12 NS 1S E+3 -180 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 10,45 %
a12 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne 63,05 %
13 NS 3S E+3 -690 6.6 30.00
14 NS 2S N-2 -100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a10 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Chantal de Lichtervelde 50,11 %
19 NS 3T S = 110 17.5 79.55
20 NS 1S W+1 -120 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
a.9 Myriam de Timary -Christiane Huby 57,05 %
21 NS 6K N-1 -100 1 4.55
22 NS 4P E+1 -650 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.8 Veronique Englebienne -Virginie Van Damme 34,51 %
23 NS 2C W+1 -140 9.9 45.00
24 NS 4P N+1 450 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a.7 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 47,73 %
25 NS 4C E+3 -710 10 45.45
26 NS 4C W-1 100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.6 Gerard Cooreman -Michel Lievens 52,18 %
27 NS 3S S+1 430 20.8 94.55
28 NS 3P N-2 -200 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
Total : 248,9 / 484 = 51,43 %
PAIRE A.7 Giuseppe Napoli -Elena Valsesia
a12 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne 63,05 %
1 NS 5K N = 400 13.2 60.00
2 NS 4C W = -420 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
a11 Pascale Graton -Caroline Lallia 61,74 %
3 NS 3C E-1 100 11 50.00
4 NS 3P W = -140 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a10 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Chantal de Lichtervelde 50,11 %
5 NS 2S S = 120 14.3 65.00
6 NS 5P E = -650 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.9 Myriam de Timary -Christiane Huby 57,05 %
7 NS 3K S+1 130 13.2 60.00
8 NS 2S N+2 180 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.7 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 47,73 %
13 NS 3S W+3 -690 6.6 30.00
14 NS 2C E = -110 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
a.6 Gerard Cooreman -Michel Lievens 52,18 %
15 NS 3S S-3 -300 2.3 10.45
16 NS 3K E+2 -150 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.5 Thierry Bollansee -Lydia Wildiers 60,81 %
17 NS 2P E = -110 11 50.00
18 NS 5CcE-2 300 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a.4 Brigitte Velge -Brigitte de Jamblinne 54,02 %
19 NS 2P E = -110 4.5 20.45
20 NS 1S W = -90 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.3 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 48,11 %
21 NS 5K N+1 620 11 50.00
22 NS 4P E+2 -680 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a.2 Nicole Leclere -Francoise Turin 37,14 %
23 NS 1S E+1 -120 17.5 79.55
24 NS 4P N = 420 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 54,77 %
a.1 Sybille Gillet -Roselyne Delpon 38,92 %
25 NS 5C E+2 -710 10 45.45
26 NS 4C W-1 100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a13 Caroll Pucher -Marie J. de Wagheneire 44,85 %
27 NS 5K S-2 -100 1.2 5.45
28 NS 3S E-1 50 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
Total : 240,9 / 528 = 45,62 %
PAIRE A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx
a.6 Gerard Cooreman -Michel Lievens 52,18 %
1 NS 5PcE-2 300 4.5 20.45
2 NS 3C W = -140 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a.4 Brigitte Velge -Brigitte de Jamblinne 54,02 %
7 NS 3P E = -140 0.1 0.45
8 NS 2S N+1 150 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
a.3 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 48,11 %
9 NS 4C N-3 -150 8.8 40.00
10 NS 4C S-1 -100 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
a.2 Nicole Leclere -Francoise Turin 37,14 %
11 NS 3S N+2 460 17.5 79.55
12 NS 2S E = -120 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.1 Sybille Gillet -Roselyne Delpon 38,92 %
13 NS 5T E = -600 16.5 75.00
14 NS 2S N-2 -100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
a14 - 0,00 %
15 NS BYE 0 0.00
16 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a13 Caroll Pucher -Marie J. de Wagheneire 44,85 %
17 NS 2P E = -110 11 50.00
18 NS 4T S+1 150 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a12 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne 63,05 %
19 NS 2P E = -110 4.5 20.45
20 NS 1S W = -90 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a10 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Chantal de Lichtervelde 50,11 %
21 NS 5K N+1 620 11 50.00
22 NS 5C E = -650 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.9 Myriam de Timary -Christiane Huby 57,05 %
23 NS 2TcS-2 -500 0.1 0.45
24 NS 4P N = 420 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
a.8 Veronique Englebienne -Virginie Van Damme 34,51 %
25 NS 5C E+2 -710 10 45.45
26 NS 3S E-2 200 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.7 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 47,73 %
27 NS 2S S-2 -100 1.2 5.45
28 NS 4K E-2 100 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
Total : 214,6 / 484 = 44,34 %
PAIRE A.8 Brigitte Brusselmans -Maryse Gathy
a14 - 0,00 %
1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a13 Caroll Pucher -Marie J. de Wagheneire 44,85 %
3 NS 3C W = -140 1.2 5.45
4 NS 3P W = -140 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a12 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne 63,05 %
5 NS 2S S-2 -200 1.2 5.45
6 NS 4P E+1 -650 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
a11 Pascale Graton -Caroline Lallia 61,74 %
7 NS 4K S = 130 13.2 60.00
8 NS 3S N-1 -50 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
a10 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Chantal de Lichtervelde 50,11 %
9 NS 3P W-1 100 19.7 89.55
10 NS 4C S-1 -100 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a.8 Veronique Englebienne -Virginie Van Damme 34,51 %
15 NS 3S S-3 -300 2.3 10.45
16 NS 5T W+1 -620 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a.7 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 47,73 %
17 NS 2P E+1 -140 1.2 5.45
18 NS 4T S+1 150 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a.6 Gerard Cooreman -Michel Lievens 52,18 %
19 NS 4K W-1 100 12.1 55.00
20 NS 1S W+2 -150 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a.5 Thierry Bollansee -Lydia Wildiers 60,81 %
21 NS 5K N+1 620 11 50.00
22 NS 4P E+1 -650 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.4 Brigitte Velge -Brigitte de Jamblinne 54,02 %
23 NS 2C W+1 -140 9.9 45.00
24 NS 4P N = 420 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
a.3 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 48,11 %
25 NS 4C E+3 -710 10 45.45
26 NS 2C E+1 -140 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.2 Nicole Leclere -Francoise Turin 37,14 %
27 NS 3S S+1 430 20.8 94.55
28 NS 4K E-2 100 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 89,55 %
Total : 202,9 / 484 = 41,92 %
PAIRE A.6 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger
a10 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Chantal de Lichtervelde 50,11 %
1 NS 5K S = 400 13.2 60.00
2 NS 4C W-1 50 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
a.9 Myriam de Timary -Christiane Huby 57,05 %
3 NS 4K S-1 -50 6.6 30.00
4 NS 3P W = -140 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
a.8 Veronique Englebienne -Virginie Van Damme 34,51 %
5 NS 2S S-1 -100 6.6 30.00
6 NS 4P E+1 -650 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 32,50 %
a.6 Gerard Cooreman -Michel Lievens 52,18 %
11 NS 3C S+2 200 8.8 40.00
12 NS 2C W = -110 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a.5 Thierry Bollansee -Lydia Wildiers 60,81 %
13 NS 3S E+2 -660 11 50.00
14 NS 3S N-3 -150 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
a.4 Brigitte Velge -Brigitte de Jamblinne 54,02 %
15 NS 4P N-2 -200 6.6 30.00
16 NS 5T W+1 -620 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.3 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 48,11 %
17 NS 1P E+1 -110 11 50.00
18 NS 6T S-1 -100 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a.2 Nicole Leclere -Francoise Turin 37,14 %
19 NS 3T N = 110 17.5 79.55
20 NS 2P W = -110 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
a.1 Sybille Gillet -Roselyne Delpon 38,92 %
21 NS 6K N = 1370 20 90.91
22 NS 3S W+2 -660 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a14 - 0,00 %
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a12 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne 63,05 %
25 NS 5C E+2 -710 10 45.45
26 NS 4C W = -620 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a11 Pascale Graton -Caroline Lallia 61,74 %
27 NS 4K S-1 -50 5.5 25.00
28 NS 3S E+2 -460 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
Total : 199,9 / 484 = 41,30 %
PAIRE A13 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart
a11 Pascale Graton -Caroline Lallia 61,74 %
1 NS 6KcS-1 -100 0.1 0.45
2 NS 4C W = -420 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 5,45 %
a10 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Chantal de Lichtervelde 50,11 %
3 NS 3P W-1 100 11 50.00
4 NS 4C S-2 -200 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a.9 Myriam de Timary -Christiane Huby 57,05 %
5 NS 2S S-2 -200 1.2 5.45
6 NS 4P E = -620 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.8 Veronique Englebienne -Virginie Van Damme 34,51 %
7 NS 4P E-2 200 18.6 84.55
8 NS 3S N-2 -100 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a.7 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 47,73 %
9 NS 3P E-1 100 19.7 89.55
10 NS 3C S = 140 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a.5 Thierry Bollansee -Lydia Wildiers 60,81 %
11 NS 6C S-2 -100 0.1 0.45
12 NS 2C W-1 50 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a.4 Brigitte Velge -Brigitte de Jamblinne 54,02 %
13 NS 3S E+3 -690 6.6 30.00
14 NS 3C W = -140 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a.3 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 48,11 %
15 NS 2P W-2 100 11 50.00
16 NS 3S E+1 -630 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a.2 Nicole Leclere -Francoise Turin 37,14 %
17 NS 1P E+1 -110 11 50.00
18 NS 4T S+1 150 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.1 Sybille Gillet -Roselyne Delpon 38,92 %
19 NS 2P E = -110 4.5 20.45
20 NS 1S W+1 -120 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a13 Caroll Pucher -Marie J. de Wagheneire 44,85 %
25 NS 5C E+2 -710 10 45.45
26 NS 3S E-1 100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a12 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne 63,05 %
27 NS 3K S-1 -50 5.5 25.00
28 NS 2T E+2 -130 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
Total : 204,0 / 528 = 38,64 %
PAIRE a12 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne
A.7 Giuseppe Napoli -Elena Valsesia 45,62 %
1 EO 5K N = 400 8.8 40.00
2 EO 4C W = -420 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
A14 Noelle Fosse -Philippe van der Gracht 55,72 %
3 EO 3C W = -140 20.8 94.55
4 EO 4C N = 620 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.8 Brigitte Brusselmans -Maryse Gathy 41,92 %
5 EO 2S S-2 -200 20.8 94.55
6 EO 4P E+1 -650 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
A.1 Mercedes Oostens -Sophie Tilemans 53,06 %
7 EO 4P E-1 100 16.5 75.00
8 EO 2C N = 110 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.9 Christine Defraigne -Michele Berrier 52,25 %
9 EO 3C N-1 -50 6.6 30.00
10 EO 4C S-2 -200 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A.2 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Marianne Borsu 51,45 %
11 EO 4C S = 420 11 50.00
12 EO 2C W-1 50 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
A10 Claire Derieuw -Catherine de Moffarts 51,43 %
13 EO 3S E+3 -690 15.4 70.00
14 EO 2S N-2 -100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A.3 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 56,07 %
15 EO 2C S-3 -300 19.7 89.55
16 EO 3S E+1 -630 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx 44,34 %
19 EO 2P E = -110 17.5 79.55
20 EO 1S W = -90 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A12 Dominique Darmstaeter -Jean Chabotier 55,48 %
23 EO 2C W+1 -140 12.1 55.00
24 EO 4P N = 420 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
A.6 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 41,30 %
25 EO 5C E+2 -710 12 54.55
26 EO 4C W = -620 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 38,64 %
27 EO 3K S-1 -50 16.5 75.00
28 EO 2T E+2 -130 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
Total : 332,9 / 528 = 63,05 %
PAIRE a11 Pascale Graton -Caroline Lallia
A13 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 38,64 %
1 EO 6KcS-1 -100 21.9 99.55
2 EO 4C W = -420 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 94,55 %
A.7 Giuseppe Napoli -Elena Valsesia 45,62 %
3 EO 3C E-1 100 11 50.00
4 EO 3P W = -140 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A14 Noelle Fosse -Philippe van der Gracht 55,72 %
5 EO 2S S-1 -100 15.4 70.00
6 EO 4P E+1 -650 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 67,50 %
A.8 Brigitte Brusselmans -Maryse Gathy 41,92 %
7 EO 4K S = 130 8.8 40.00
8 EO 3S N-1 -50 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
A.1 Mercedes Oostens -Sophie Tilemans 53,06 %
9 EO 3P E+1 -170 17.5 79.55
10 EO 4C S-1 -100 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A.9 Christine Defraigne -Michele Berrier 52,25 %
11 EO 3S S+2 460 4.5 20.45
12 EO 1S E+2 -150 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.2 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Marianne Borsu 51,45 %
13 EO 6S E-1 100 0.1 0.45
14 EO 3S N-2 -100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
A.3 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 56,07 %
17 EO 2P E = -110 11 50.00
18 EO 5C E-2 100 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A11 Anne Marchal -Claire Destin 56,98 %
21 EO 5K N+1 620 11 50.00
22 EO 4P E+2 -680 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.5 Patrick Gilles -Serge Alard 56,94 %
23 EO 2C W = -110 2.3 10.45
24 EO 6P N-1 -50 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A12 Dominique Darmstaeter -Jean Chabotier 55,48 %
25 EO 4C E+3 -710 12 54.55
26 EO 4C W-2 200 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A.6 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 41,30 %
27 EO 4K S-1 -50 16.5 75.00
28 EO 3S E+2 -460 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
Total : 326,0 / 528 = 61,74 %
PAIRE a.5 Thierry Bollansee -Lydia Wildiers
A10 Claire Derieuw -Catherine de Moffarts 51,43 %
1 EO 4P E-1 50 19.7 89.55
2 EO 4C W = -420 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 89,55 %
A11 Anne Marchal -Claire Destin 56,98 %
5 EO 2S S = 120 7.7 35.00
6 EO 4P E+1 -650 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.5 Patrick Gilles -Serge Alard 56,94 %
9 EO 3P E+1 -170 17.5 79.55
10 EO 4C S-2 -200 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 87,05 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 38,64 %
11 EO 6C S-2 -100 21.9 99.55
12 EO 2C W-1 50 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A.6 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 41,30 %
13 EO 3S E+2 -660 11 50.00
14 EO 3S N-3 -150 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A14 Noelle Fosse -Philippe van der Gracht 55,72 %
15 EO 3S S = 600 2.3 10.45
16 EO 3S W+4 -720 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.7 Giuseppe Napoli -Elena Valsesia 45,62 %
17 EO 2P E = -110 11 50.00
18 EO 5CcE-2 300 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A.1 Mercedes Oostens -Sophie Tilemans 53,06 %
19 EO 2P E = -110 17.5 79.55
20 EO 1S W+1 -120 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A.8 Brigitte Brusselmans -Maryse Gathy 41,92 %
21 EO 5K N+1 620 11 50.00
22 EO 4P E+1 -650 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A.2 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Marianne Borsu 51,45 %
23 EO 2C W+1 -140 12.1 55.00
24 EO 4P N+1 450 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A.9 Christine Defraigne -Michele Berrier 52,25 %
25 EO 5C E+2 -710 12 54.55
26 EO 4C W = -620 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.3 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 56,07 %
27 EO 2C E-2 100 11 50.00
28 EO 4T E = -130 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
Total : 321,1 / 528 = 60,81 %
PAIRE a.9 Myriam de Timary -Christiane Huby
A12 Dominique Darmstaeter -Jean Chabotier 55,48 %
1 EO 5K S = 400 8.8 40.00
2 EO 3C W = -140 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.6 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 41,30 %
3 EO 4K S-1 -50 15.4 70.00
4 EO 3P W = -140 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 38,64 %
5 EO 2S S-2 -200 20.8 94.55
6 EO 4P E = -620 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A.7 Giuseppe Napoli -Elena Valsesia 45,62 %
7 EO 3K S+1 130 8.8 40.00
8 EO 2S N+2 180 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A14 Noelle Fosse -Philippe van der Gracht 55,72 %
9 EO 3P E+1 -170 17.5 79.55
10 EO 4C S = 620 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.1 Mercedes Oostens -Sophie Tilemans 53,06 %
13 EO 3S E+4 -720 20.8 94.55
14 EO 3S N-4 -200 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 97,05 %
A.9 Christine Defraigne -Michele Berrier 52,25 %
17 EO 2P E = -110 11 50.00
18 EO 5T S = 600 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
A.3 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 56,07 %
19 EO 2P E = -110 17.5 79.55
20 EO 3K S-1 -100 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 54,77 %
A10 Claire Derieuw -Catherine de Moffarts 51,43 %
21 EO 6K N-1 -100 21 95.45
22 EO 4P E+1 -650 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx 44,34 %
23 EO 2TcS-2 -500 21.9 99.55
24 EO 4P N = 420 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
A11 Anne Marchal -Claire Destin 56,98 %
25 EO 5C E+2 -710 12 54.55
26 EO 5C W-2 200 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A.5 Patrick Gilles -Serge Alard 56,94 %
27 EO 3T N = 110 8.8 40.00
28 EO 4TcE = -510 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
Total : 301,2 / 528 = 57,05 %
PAIRE a.4 Brigitte Velge -Brigitte de Jamblinne
A10 Claire Derieuw -Catherine de Moffarts 51,43 %
3 EO 3C W-2 200 3.4 15.45
4 EO 3P E+1 -170 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx 44,34 %
7 EO 3P E = -140 21.9 99.55
8 EO 2S N+1 150 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
A12 Dominique Darmstaeter -Jean Chabotier 55,48 %
9 EO 3C E = -140 9.9 45.00
10 EO 4C S-1 -100 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.5 Patrick Gilles -Serge Alard 56,94 %
11 EO 3S N+2 460 4.5 20.45
12 EO 1C W = -80 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 38,64 %
13 EO 3S E+3 -690 15.4 70.00
14 EO 3C W = -140 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A.6 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 41,30 %
15 EO 4P N-2 -200 15.4 70.00
16 EO 5T W+1 -620 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A14 Noelle Fosse -Philippe van der Gracht 55,72 %
17 EO 2P E = -110 11 50.00
18 EO 5C E-3 150 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A.7 Giuseppe Napoli -Elena Valsesia 45,62 %
19 EO 2P E = -110 17.5 79.55
20 EO 1S W = -90 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.1 Mercedes Oostens -Sophie Tilemans 53,06 %
21 EO 5K N+1 620 11 50.00
22 EO 4P E+1 -650 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A.8 Brigitte Brusselmans -Maryse Gathy 41,92 %
23 EO 2C W+1 -140 12.1 55.00
24 EO 4P N = 420 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
A.2 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Marianne Borsu 51,45 %
25 EO 5C E+2 -710 12 54.55
26 EO 4C W-1 100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.9 Christine Defraigne -Michele Berrier 52,25 %
27 EO 2C E-1 50 13.2 60.00
28 EO 3T E = -110 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 285,2 / 528 = 54,02 %
PAIRE a.6 Gerard Cooreman -Michel Lievens
A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx 44,34 %
1 EO 5PcE-2 300 17.5 79.55
2 EO 3C W = -140 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A11 Anne Marchal -Claire Destin 56,98 %
3 EO 2C E = -110 17.5 79.55
4 EO 3P W+2 -200 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 87,05 %
A12 Dominique Darmstaeter -Jean Chabotier 55,48 %
7 EO 4K S = 130 8.8 40.00
8 EO 2C N+2 170 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.6 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 41,30 %
11 EO 3C S+2 200 13.2 60.00
12 EO 2C W = -110 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A14 Noelle Fosse -Philippe van der Gracht 55,72 %
13 EO 5T E = -600 5.5 25.00
14 EO 3S N = 400 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
A.7 Giuseppe Napoli -Elena Valsesia 45,62 %
15 EO 3S S-3 -300 19.7 89.55
16 EO 3K E+2 -150 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A.1 Mercedes Oostens -Sophie Tilemans 53,06 %
17 EO 3T N-1 -50 2.3 10.45
18 EO 5T S = 600 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 10,45 %
A.8 Brigitte Brusselmans -Maryse Gathy 41,92 %
19 EO 4K W-1 100 9.9 45.00
20 EO 1S W+2 -150 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A.2 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Marianne Borsu 51,45 %
21 EO 5K N+1 620 11 50.00
22 EO 3S W+2 -660 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.9 Christine Defraigne -Michele Berrier 52,25 %
23 EO 2C W+1 -140 12.1 55.00
24 EO 4P N = 420 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
A.3 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 56,07 %
25 EO 5C E+2 -710 12 54.55
26 EO 4C W-1 100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A10 Claire Derieuw -Catherine de Moffarts 51,43 %
27 EO 3S S+1 430 1.2 5.45
28 EO 3P N-2 -200 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
Total : 275,5 / 528 = 52,18 %
PAIRE a10 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Chantal de Lichtervelde
A.6 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 41,30 %
1 EO 5K S = 400 8.8 40.00
2 EO 4C W-1 50 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 38,64 %
3 EO 3P W-1 100 11 50.00
4 EO 4C S-2 -200 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A.7 Giuseppe Napoli -Elena Valsesia 45,62 %
5 EO 2S S = 120 7.7 35.00
6 EO 5P E = -650 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A14 Noelle Fosse -Philippe van der Gracht 55,72 %
7 EO 5K S-1 -100 19.7 89.55
8 EO 3S N = 400 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A.8 Brigitte Brusselmans -Maryse Gathy 41,92 %
9 EO 3P W-1 100 2.3 10.45
10 EO 4C S-1 -100 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A.1 Mercedes Oostens -Sophie Tilemans 53,06 %
11 EO 6S S-1 -50 17.5 79.55
12 EO 1S E = -90 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
A.2 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Marianne Borsu 51,45 %
15 EO 2S N = 120 5.5 25.00
16 EO 3S W+1 -630 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A10 Claire Derieuw -Catherine de Moffarts 51,43 %
19 EO 3T S = 110 4.5 20.45
20 EO 1S W+1 -120 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx 44,34 %
21 EO 5K N+1 620 11 50.00
22 EO 5C E = -650 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A11 Anne Marchal -Claire Destin 56,98 %
23 EO 1S S-2 -200 19.7 89.55
24 EO 4P N+1 450 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.5 Patrick Gilles -Serge Alard 56,94 %
25 EO 6KcS-3 -500 0 0.00
26 EO 4C W = -620 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A12 Dominique Darmstaeter -Jean Chabotier 55,48 %
27 EO 3T N+1 130 6.6 30.00
28 EO 3P N-2 -200 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
Total : 264,6 / 528 = 50,11 %
PAIRE a.3 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck
A.9 Christine Defraigne -Michele Berrier 52,25 %
1 EO 5K N = 400 8.8 40.00
2 EO 3C W+1 -170 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.3 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 56,07 %
5 EO 2S S = 120 7.7 35.00
6 EO 4P E+1 -650 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A11 Anne Marchal -Claire Destin 56,98 %
7 EO 2S N = 120 13.2 60.00
8 EO 3S N+1 430 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx 44,34 %
9 EO 4C N-3 -150 13.2 60.00
10 EO 4C S-1 -100 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
A12 Dominique Darmstaeter -Jean Chabotier 55,48 %
11 EO 4C S-1 -50 17.5 79.55
12 EO 3ScE-2 300 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A.5 Patrick Gilles -Serge Alard 56,94 %
13 EO 5T E = -600 5.5 25.00
14 EO 3S S = 400 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 38,64 %
15 EO 2P W-2 100 11 50.00
16 EO 3S E+1 -630 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A.6 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 41,30 %
17 EO 1P E+1 -110 11 50.00
18 EO 6T S-1 -100 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A14 Noelle Fosse -Philippe van der Gracht 55,72 %
19 EO 1S N+1 120 0.1 0.45
20 EO 1S W+1 -120 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
A.7 Giuseppe Napoli -Elena Valsesia 45,62 %
21 EO 5K N+1 620 11 50.00
22 EO 4P E+2 -680 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.1 Mercedes Oostens -Sophie Tilemans 53,06 %
23 EO 2T S+1 110 0.1 0.45
24 EO 4P N+1 450 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 10,45 %
A.8 Brigitte Brusselmans -Maryse Gathy 41,92 %
25 EO 4C E+3 -710 12 54.55
26 EO 2C E+1 -140 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
Total : 254,0 / 528 = 48,11 %
PAIRE a.7 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille
A11 Anne Marchal -Claire Destin 56,98 %
1 EO 5K S = 400 8.8 40.00
2 EO 4C W-1 50 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
A.5 Patrick Gilles -Serge Alard 56,94 %
3 EO 3K S+1 130 6.6 30.00
4 EO 3P W = -140 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A12 Dominique Darmstaeter -Jean Chabotier 55,48 %
5 EO 2S S+1 150 1.2 5.45
6 EO 4P E+1 -650 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 38,64 %
9 EO 3P E-1 100 2.3 10.45
10 EO 3C S = 140 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.7 Giuseppe Napoli -Elena Valsesia 45,62 %
13 EO 3S W+3 -690 15.4 70.00
14 EO 2C E = -110 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
A.1 Mercedes Oostens -Sophie Tilemans 53,06 %
15 EO 2T W-1 50 13.2 60.00
16 EO 4T W+1 -150 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A.8 Brigitte Brusselmans -Maryse Gathy 41,92 %
17 EO 2P E+1 -140 20.8 94.55
18 EO 4T S+1 150 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A.2 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Marianne Borsu 51,45 %
19 EO 3T N = 110 4.5 20.45
20 EO 1S S-3 -300 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A.9 Christine Defraigne -Michele Berrier 52,25 %
21 EO 5K N = 600 18 81.82
22 EO 5P E = -650 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.3 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 56,07 %
23 EO 2C W+1 -140 12.1 55.00
24 EO 4P N+1 450 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A10 Claire Derieuw -Catherine de Moffarts 51,43 %
25 EO 4C E+3 -710 12 54.55
26 EO 4C W-1 100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx 44,34 %
27 EO 2S S-2 -100 20.8 94.55
28 EO 4K E-2 100 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
Total : 252,0 / 528 = 47,73 %
PAIRE a13 Caroll Pucher -Marie J. de Wagheneire
A14 Noelle Fosse -Philippe van der Gracht 55,72 %
1 EO 5K S = 400 8.8 40.00
2 EO 4C W-1 50 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
A.8 Brigitte Brusselmans -Maryse Gathy 41,92 %
3 EO 3C W = -140 20.8 94.55
4 EO 3P W = -140 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A.1 Mercedes Oostens -Sophie Tilemans 53,06 %
5 EO 2S S = 120 7.7 35.00
6 EO 4P E = -620 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.9 Christine Defraigne -Michele Berrier 52,25 %
7 EO 3P E-1 100 16.5 75.00
8 EO 3S N+3 490 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A.2 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Marianne Borsu 51,45 %
9 EO 5CcN-4 -800 21.9 99.55
10 EO 4C S = 620 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A10 Claire Derieuw -Catherine de Moffarts 51,43 %
11 EO 5C S-1 -50 17.5 79.55
12 EO 1S E+3 -180 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 89,55 %
A.3 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 56,07 %
13 EO 5T E = -600 5.5 25.00
14 EO 2S N = 120 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A11 Anne Marchal -Claire Destin 56,98 %
15 EO 3K N = 110 8.8 40.00
16 EO 3S E-2 200 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx 44,34 %
17 EO 2P E = -110 11 50.00
18 EO 4T S+1 150 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A.5 Patrick Gilles -Serge Alard 56,94 %
21 EO 6K N = 1370 2 9.09
22 EO 4P E+1 -650 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 38,64 %
25 EO 5C E+2 -710 12 54.55
26 EO 3S E-1 100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.7 Giuseppe Napoli -Elena Valsesia 45,62 %
27 EO 5K S-2 -100 20.8 94.55
28 EO 3S E-1 50 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
Total : 236,8 / 528 = 44,85 %
PAIRE a.1 Sybille Gillet -Roselyne Delpon
A.1 Mercedes Oostens -Sophie Tilemans 53,06 %
1 EO 5K S+1 420 0.1 0.45
2 EO 2S E-1 50 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 10,45 %
A.9 Christine Defraigne -Michele Berrier 52,25 %
3 EO 3C E-2 200 3.4 15.45
4 EO 4C N-1 -100 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
A.2 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Marianne Borsu 51,45 %
5 EO 2S S-1 -100 15.4 70.00
6 EO 4P E+1 -650 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 67,50 %
A10 Claire Derieuw -Catherine de Moffarts 51,43 %
7 EO 3S N = 600 0.1 0.45
8 EO 4C N+1 450 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 5,45 %
A.3 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 56,07 %
9 EO 3P E-1 100 2.3 10.45
10 EO 3C S = 140 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A11 Anne Marchal -Claire Destin 56,98 %
11 EO 3S S+2 460 4.5 20.45
12 EO 1S E+1 -120 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx 44,34 %
13 EO 5T E = -600 5.5 25.00
14 EO 2S N-2 -100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
A12 Dominique Darmstaeter -Jean Chabotier 55,48 %
15 EO 2S S = 120 5.5 25.00
16 EO 3S E+1 -630 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.5 Patrick Gilles -Serge Alard 56,94 %
17 EO 2P E-1 50 0.1 0.45
18 EO 4CcE-1 100 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 38,64 %
19 EO 2P E = -110 17.5 79.55
20 EO 1S W+1 -120 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A.6 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 41,30 %
21 EO 6K N = 1370 2 9.09
22 EO 3S W+2 -660 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A.7 Giuseppe Napoli -Elena Valsesia 45,62 %
25 EO 5C E+2 -710 12 54.55
26 EO 4C W-1 100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 205,5 / 528 = 38,92 %
PAIRE a.2 Nicole Leclere -Francoise Turin
A.2 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Marianne Borsu 51,45 %
3 EO 2C E-1 100 11 50.00
4 EO 4C N-1 -100 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
A10 Claire Derieuw -Catherine de Moffarts 51,43 %
5 EO 2S S+1 150 1.2 5.45
6 EO 4P E = -620 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 7,95 %
A.3 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 56,07 %
7 EO 5P E-2 200 3.4 15.45
8 EO 3S N = 400 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
A11 Anne Marchal -Claire Destin 56,98 %
9 EO 3P E = -140 9.9 45.00
10 EO 4C S = 620 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx 44,34 %
11 EO 3S N+2 460 4.5 20.45
12 EO 2S E = -120 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A12 Dominique Darmstaeter -Jean Chabotier 55,48 %
13 EO 3S E+4 -720 20.8 94.55
14 EO 3S N-1 -50 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A.5 Patrick Gilles -Serge Alard 56,94 %
15 EO 3S S+1 630 0.1 0.45
16 EO 3S E+1 -630 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 38,64 %
17 EO 1P E+1 -110 11 50.00
18 EO 4T S+1 150 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A.6 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 41,30 %
19 EO 3T N = 110 4.5 20.45
20 EO 2P W = -110 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
A14 Noelle Fosse -Philippe van der Gracht 55,72 %
21 EO 6K N-1 -100 21 95.45
22 EO 5P E = -650 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.7 Giuseppe Napoli -Elena Valsesia 45,62 %
23 EO 1S E+1 -120 4.5 20.45
24 EO 4P N = 420 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 45,23 %
A.8 Brigitte Brusselmans -Maryse Gathy 41,92 %
27 EO 3S S+1 430 1.2 5.45
28 EO 4K E-2 100 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 10,45 %
Total : 196,1 / 528 = 37,14 %
PAIRE a.8 Veronique Englebienne -Virginie Van Damme
A.5 Patrick Gilles -Serge Alard 56,94 %
1 EO 5K S = 400 8.8 40.00
2 EO 4C W-1 50 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
A12 Dominique Darmstaeter -Jean Chabotier 55,48 %
3 EO 4PcW-3 800 0.1 0.45
4 EO 3P W-1 100 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 5,45 %
A.6 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 41,30 %
5 EO 2S S-1 -100 15.4 70.00
6 EO 4P E+1 -650 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 67,50 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 38,64 %
7 EO 4P E-2 200 3.4 15.45
8 EO 3S N-2 -100 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A14 Noelle Fosse -Philippe van der Gracht 55,72 %
11 EO 3S N+2 460 4.5 20.45
12 EO 2T W-2 100 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 15,45 %
A.8 Brigitte Brusselmans -Maryse Gathy 41,92 %
15 EO 3S S-3 -300 19.7 89.55
16 EO 5T W+1 -620 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A.2 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Marianne Borsu 51,45 %
17 EO 2P E+1 -140 20.8 94.55
18 EO 5T N = 600 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A.9 Christine Defraigne -Michele Berrier 52,25 %
19 EO 3P E-1 100 9.9 45.00
20 EO 2P E-1 100 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.3 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 56,07 %
21 EO 6K N = 1370 2 9.09
22 EO 4P E+1 -650 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
A10 Claire Derieuw -Catherine de Moffarts 51,43 %
23 EO 2C W+1 -140 12.1 55.00
24 EO 4P N+1 450 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx 44,34 %
25 EO 5C E+2 -710 12 54.55
26 EO 3S E-2 200 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A11 Anne Marchal -Claire Destin 56,98 %
27 EO 1S S+2 150 4.5 20.45
28 EO 5TcW-2 300 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 10,45 %
Total : 182,2 / 528 = 34,51 %
PAIRE a14 -
A.8 Brigitte Brusselmans -Maryse Gathy 41,92 %
1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.1 Mercedes Oostens -Sophie Tilemans 53,06 %
3 EO BYE 0 0.00
4 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.9 Christine Defraigne -Michele Berrier 52,25 %
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.2 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Marianne Borsu 51,45 %
7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A10 Claire Derieuw -Catherine de Moffarts 51,43 %
9 EO BYE 0 0.00
10 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.3 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 56,07 %
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A11 Anne Marchal -Claire Destin 56,98 %
13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx 44,34 %
15 EO BYE 0 0.00
16 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A12 Dominique Darmstaeter -Jean Chabotier 55,48 %
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.5 Patrick Gilles -Serge Alard 56,94 %
19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.6 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 41,30 %
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A14 Noelle Fosse -Philippe van der Gracht 55,72 %
27 EO BYE 0 0.00
28 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 616 = 0,00 %
|