B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 69,41 A.1 Chantal Barro -Jerome Claessens
--- 2 68,96 A.5 Michel Paquot -Jean Chabotier
--- 3 60,95 A12 Lydia Wildiers -Liliane Baptista
--- 4 58,54 A13 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
--- 5 58,26 A.7 Jean de Villenfagne -Marie Christine Remy
--- 6 53,47 A.9 Luc Cartuyvels -Daniel Couvreur
--- 7 45,04 A.4 Myriam de Timary -Eliane de Ceuninck
--- 8 41,19 A.6 Muriel de Ceuninck -Marina De Longree
--- 9 40,15 A.8 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten
--- 10 39,68 A10 Helene Christiaens -Grazia Neuenschwander
--- 11 39,36 A.3 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck
--- 12 37,88 A.2 Sophie Noach -Marie Claire Vienne
--- 13 37,14 A11 Colette Heerinckx -Luc Ramaeckers
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 55,91 a.1 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot
--- 2 55,40 a13 Antoinette Jourdain -Helene Schyns
--- 3 52,69 a10 Thierry Collart -Didier Collart
--- 4 51,65 a11 Simone Munsterhjelm -Chantal de Lichtervelde
--- 5 51,61 a.5 Dominique Darmstaeter -Marc Smeyers
--- 6 51,42 a.8 Diane Emsens -Nicolas de Neve
--- 7 51,31 a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Sandra Dallemagne
--- 8 51,12 a.3 Edith Close -Jan Sassen
--- 9 50,95 a.9 Patrick Gilles -Serge Alard
--- 10 48,84 a.2 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Veronique Englebienne
--- 11 45,49 a12 Christiane Huby -Jean van Caloen
--- 12 42,46 a.4 Annette Fobe -Ines Drory
--- 13 41,55 a.7 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman
PAIRE A.1 Chantal Barro -Jerome Claessens
a.1 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 55,91 %
1 NS 5K W = -400 22 100.00
2 NS 4P N+2 680 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 100,00 %
a13 Antoinette Jourdain -Helene Schyns 55,40 %
3 NS 3S E-1 100 14 63.64
4 NS 2S N = 120 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a12 Christiane Huby -Jean van Caloen 45,49 %
5 NS 3S E+1 -430 7 31.82
6 NS 3S S+2 460 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a11 Simone Munsterhjelm -Chantal de Lichtervelde 51,65 %
7 NS 2C N+1 140 16 72.73
8 NS 3PcE-2 300 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
a10 Thierry Collart -Didier Collart 52,69 %
9 NS 3P W+1 -170 8 36.36
10 NS 4P S+1 650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.9 Patrick Gilles -Serge Alard 50,95 %
11 NS 3S E-1 50 18 81.82
12 NS 3S N+1 630 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a.8 Diane Emsens -Nicolas de Neve 51,42 %
13 NS 3KcE-1 200 16.5 75.00
14 NS 2C E+1 -140 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
a.7 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman 41,55 %
15 NS 3P E+1 -170 21 95.45
16 NS 3K N = 110 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 93,18 %
a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Sandra Dallemagne 51,31 %
17 NS 2P N+1 140 18 81.82
18 NS 4P W-1 50 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a.5 Dominique Darmstaeter -Marc Smeyers 51,61 %
19 NS 3C N-3 -150 16 72.73
20 NS 2PcW-4 1100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
a.4 Annette Fobe -Ines Drory 42,46 %
21 NS 3C W-1 50 11 50.00
22 NS 3S N-2 -100 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a.3 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 51,12 %
23 NS 2T W-2 200 22 100.00
24 NS 4P E = -420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
Total : 366,5 / 528 = 69,41 %
PAIRE A.5 Michel Paquot -Jean Chabotier
a.9 Patrick Gilles -Serge Alard 50,95 %
1 NS 4S W+2 -490 17 77.27
2 NS 4P N+1 650 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a.8 Diane Emsens -Nicolas de Neve 51,42 %
3 NS 3T W = -110 4 18.18
4 NS 2C S+1 140 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.7 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman 41,55 %
5 NS 3S E = -400 16 72.73
6 NS 3S S+2 460 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a.5 Dominique Darmstaeter -Marc Smeyers 51,61 %
9 NS 2S E = -120 14 63.64
10 NS 4P S+2 680 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a.4 Annette Fobe -Ines Drory 42,46 %
11 NS 3S E-1 50 18 81.82
12 NS 3S N+1 630 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a.3 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 51,12 %
13 NS 3P N-2 -200 0.1 0.45
14 NS 3P N-1 -50 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 43,41 %
a.2 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Veronique Englebienne 48,84 %
15 NS 3P E+1 -170 21 95.45
16 NS 2K N = 90 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a.1 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 55,91 %
17 NS 1S S = 90 8 36.36
18 NS 2P W = -110 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a13 Antoinette Jourdain -Helene Schyns 55,40 %
19 NS 2K E+2 -130 21 95.45
20 NS 1S E-3 300 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
a12 Christiane Huby -Jean van Caloen 45,49 %
21 NS 4C E-2 100 19 86.36
22 NS 2KcE-1 200 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
a11 Simone Munsterhjelm -Chantal de Lichtervelde 51,65 %
23 NS 1S W-1 100 18 81.82
24 NS 4P E = -420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a10 Thierry Collart -Didier Collart 52,69 %
25 NS 2P S+2 170 18 81.82
26 NS 2P N+1 140 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
Total : 364,1 / 528 = 68,96 %
PAIRE A12 Lydia Wildiers -Liliane Baptista
a10 Thierry Collart -Didier Collart 52,69 %
1 NS 6K W = -920 8 36.36
2 NS 4P N = 620 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.9 Patrick Gilles -Serge Alard 50,95 %
3 NS 3K W+1 -130 1 4.55
4 NS 1S N+1 120 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a.8 Diane Emsens -Nicolas de Neve 51,42 %
5 NS 3S E+1 -430 7 31.82
6 NS 3S S+2 460 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a.7 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman 41,55 %
7 NS 2C S = 110 9 40.91
8 NS 2P E = -110 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Sandra Dallemagne 51,31 %
9 NS 2S E = -120 14 63.64
10 NS 4P S+2 680 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a.5 Dominique Darmstaeter -Marc Smeyers 51,61 %
11 NS 3S E = -400 11 50.00
12 NS 3S N+1 630 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.4 Annette Fobe -Ines Drory 42,46 %
13 NS 4C N+1 650 20.8 94.55
14 NS 3P S-1 -50 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 90,45 %
a.3 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 51,12 %
15 NS 4P E+1 -450 8 36.36
16 NS 2K N = 90 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.2 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Veronique Englebienne 48,84 %
17 NS 3T E-2 100 13 59.09
18 NS 3P W-2 100 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a.1 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 55,91 %
19 NS 2S E+1 -150 16 72.73
20 NS 1S N+3 180 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a12 Christiane Huby -Jean van Caloen 45,49 %
23 NS 3K W-1 100 18 81.82
24 NS 4P E = -420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a11 Simone Munsterhjelm -Chantal de Lichtervelde 51,65 %
25 NS 4P S = 420 22 100.00
26 NS 2P N = 110 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
Total : 321,8 / 528 = 60,95 %
PAIRE A13 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
a12 Christiane Huby -Jean van Caloen 45,49 %
1 NS 6S W+1 -1020 1 4.55
2 NS 4P N+1 650 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a11 Simone Munsterhjelm -Chantal de Lichtervelde 51,65 %
3 NS 3P N-1 -50 9 40.91
4 NS 2C S+1 140 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a10 Thierry Collart -Didier Collart 52,69 %
5 NS 5C W-2 100 22 100.00
6 NS 3S S+1 430 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.9 Patrick Gilles -Serge Alard 50,95 %
7 NS 1S W = -90 4 18.18
8 NS 3K S-1 -50 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.8 Diane Emsens -Nicolas de Neve 51,42 %
9 NS 4P W-1 100 20 90.91
10 NS 2TcW = -180 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.7 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman 41,55 %
11 NS 3S E-1 50 18 81.82
12 NS 3S N+1 630 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Sandra Dallemagne 51,31 %
13 NS 3C S = 140 12.1 55.00
14 NS 2P N = 110 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,50 %
a.5 Dominique Darmstaeter -Marc Smeyers 51,61 %
15 NS 3S W+2 -460 6 27.27
16 NS 2K N = 90 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.4 Annette Fobe -Ines Drory 42,46 %
17 NS 3C W-2 100 13 59.09
18 NS 3P W-1 50 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.3 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 51,12 %
19 NS 3T E+1 -130 21 95.45
20 NS 1S N+2 150 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a.2 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Veronique Englebienne 48,84 %
21 NS 3S W-2 100 19 86.36
22 NS 3P N = 140 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a13 Antoinette Jourdain -Helene Schyns 55,40 %
25 NS 1S S+1 120 8 36.36
26 NS 2C E-1 100 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
Total : 309,1 / 528 = 58,54 %
PAIRE A.7 Jean de Villenfagne -Marie Christine Remy
a13 Antoinette Jourdain -Helene Schyns 55,40 %
1 NS 6S E = -990 4 18.18
2 NS 3K S+2 150 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
a12 Christiane Huby -Jean van Caloen 45,49 %
3 NS 5K W-3 300 22 100.00
4 NS 2C S+1 140 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 95,45 %
a11 Simone Munsterhjelm -Chantal de Lichtervelde 51,65 %
5 NS 3S E = -400 16 72.73
6 NS 3S S+1 430 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a10 Thierry Collart -Didier Collart 52,69 %
7 NS 2C N = 110 9 40.91
8 NS 2P E+1 -140 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.9 Patrick Gilles -Serge Alard 50,95 %
9 NS 3S E-1 100 20 90.91
10 NS 4P S+2 680 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
a.7 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman 41,55 %
13 NS 4K E-1 100 6.6 30.00
14 NS 2C E+2 -170 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 24,09 %
a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Sandra Dallemagne 51,31 %
15 NS 4P E = -420 10 45.45
16 NS 1S N+1 120 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a.5 Dominique Darmstaeter -Marc Smeyers 51,61 %
17 NS 2P E-3 150 20 90.91
18 NS 2P W = -110 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a.4 Annette Fobe -Ines Drory 42,46 %
19 NS 2K E+3 -150 16 72.73
20 NS 1S S+2 150 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.3 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 51,12 %
21 NS 2C W+1 -140 3 13.64
22 NS 2C N+3 200 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.2 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Veronique Englebienne 48,84 %
23 NS 1S W-1 100 18 81.82
24 NS 4P E-1 50 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
a.1 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 55,91 %
25 NS 2P S+1 140 12 54.55
26 NS 2S W-1 100 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
Total : 307,6 / 528 = 58,26 %
PAIRE A.9 Luc Cartuyvels -Daniel Couvreur
a.4 Annette Fobe -Ines Drory 42,46 %
1 NS 6K W = -920 8 36.36
2 NS 4P N+1 650 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.3 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 51,12 %
3 NS 2P N+1 140 20 90.91
4 NS 1S N = 90 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a.2 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Veronique Englebienne 48,84 %
5 NS 3S E-1 50 20 90.91
6 NS 6T N-1 -50 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.1 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 55,91 %
7 NS 2C N+1 140 16 72.73
8 NS 2P E+1 -140 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a13 Antoinette Jourdain -Helene Schyns 55,40 %
9 NS 4P W+1 -650 0 0.00
10 NS 4P S+2 680 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a12 Christiane Huby -Jean van Caloen 45,49 %
11 NS 3S E = -400 11 50.00
12 NS 3S N+1 630 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a11 Simone Munsterhjelm -Chantal de Lichtervelde 51,65 %
13 NS 3K E = -110 2.3 10.45
14 NS 3C E+1 -170 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 14,32 %
a.9 Patrick Gilles -Serge Alard 50,95 %
17 NS 2PcN = 470 22 100.00
18 NS 2P W+1 -140 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.8 Diane Emsens -Nicolas de Neve 51,42 %
19 NS 5K E+1 -620 2 9.09
20 NS 3P W-2 200 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.7 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman 41,55 %
21 NS 3S W-3 150 22 100.00
22 NS 4C N = 420 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 100,00 %
a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Sandra Dallemagne 51,31 %
23 NS 2C E+1 -140 4 18.18
24 NS 4P E = -420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a.5 Dominique Darmstaeter -Marc Smeyers 51,61 %
25 NS 2P S+2 170 18 81.82
26 NS 3T E-3 300 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
Total : 282,3 / 528 = 53,47 %
PAIRE A.4 Myriam de Timary -Eliane de Ceuninck
a.7 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman 41,55 %
1 NS 3S E+3 -490 17 77.27
2 NS 4P N+1 650 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Sandra Dallemagne 51,31 %
3 NS 2P N = 110 18 81.82
4 NS 2C S = 110 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a.4 Annette Fobe -Ines Drory 42,46 %
7 NS 2S W-2 200 22 100.00
8 NS 3K S-2 -100 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
a.3 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 51,12 %
9 NS 3S E+1 -630 2 9.09
10 NS 4P S+2 680 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.2 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Veronique Englebienne 48,84 %
11 NS 4P W-1 50 18 81.82
12 NS 3S N = 600 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.1 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 55,91 %
13 NS 2P N = 110 8.8 40.00
14 NS 2C E+1 -140 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a13 Antoinette Jourdain -Helene Schyns 55,40 %
15 NS 4P E+2 -480 3 13.64
16 NS 2K N-1 -50 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
a12 Christiane Huby -Jean van Caloen 45,49 %
17 NS 2C W = -110 2 9.09
18 NS 3P W = -140 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
a11 Simone Munsterhjelm -Chantal de Lichtervelde 51,65 %
19 NS 3S E = -600 6 27.27
20 NS 3S E-2 200 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a10 Thierry Collart -Didier Collart 52,69 %
21 NS 3C W = -140 3 13.64
22 NS 2C S+2 170 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.9 Patrick Gilles -Serge Alard 50,95 %
23 NS 1S W = -90 13 59.09
24 NS 4P E = -420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.8 Diane Emsens -Nicolas de Neve 51,42 %
25 NS 4P S-1 -50 2 9.09
26 NS 2C E = -110 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
Total : 237,8 / 528 = 45,04 %
PAIRE A.6 Muriel de Ceuninck -Marina De Longree
a11 Simone Munsterhjelm -Chantal de Lichtervelde 51,65 %
1 NS 3S E+3 -490 17 77.27
2 NS 4C S-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a10 Thierry Collart -Didier Collart 52,69 %
3 NS 3P N-1 -50 9 40.91
4 NS 3C S-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
a.9 Patrick Gilles -Serge Alard 50,95 %
5 NS 3S E+1 -430 7 31.82
6 NS 3S N+1 430 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a.8 Diane Emsens -Nicolas de Neve 51,42 %
7 NS 2C S+1 140 16 72.73
8 NS 3P E-1 50 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Sandra Dallemagne 51,31 %
11 NS 3S E+1 -430 6 27.27
12 NS 3S N+1 630 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.5 Dominique Darmstaeter -Marc Smeyers 51,61 %
13 NS 4C S-1 -100 4.5 20.45
14 NS 2C W+3 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 10,23 %
a.4 Annette Fobe -Ines Drory 42,46 %
15 NS 3S W = -400 12 54.55
16 NS 2K N = 90 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a.3 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 51,12 %
17 NS 2S S-3 -150 0 0.00
18 NS 4P W-2 100 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.2 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Veronique Englebienne 48,84 %
19 NS 3C N-4 -200 10 45.45
20 NS 1S E = -90 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a.1 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 55,91 %
21 NS 3S W-1 50 11 50.00
22 NS 2S N-1 -50 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a13 Antoinette Jourdain -Helene Schyns 55,40 %
23 NS 2C E+1 -140 4 18.18
24 NS 4P E = -420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a12 Christiane Huby -Jean van Caloen 45,49 %
25 NS 2P N+2 170 18 81.82
26 NS 2C E-1 100 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
Total : 217,5 / 528 = 41,19 %
PAIRE A.8 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten
a.2 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Veronique Englebienne 48,84 %
1 NS 6S E+1 -1020 1 4.55
2 NS 4P N+1 650 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.1 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 55,91 %
3 NS 3K W-1 100 14 63.64
4 NS 1S N = 90 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a13 Antoinette Jourdain -Helene Schyns 55,40 %
5 NS 3S E+1 -430 7 31.82
6 NS 3S S+1 430 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a12 Christiane Huby -Jean van Caloen 45,49 %
7 NS 4C S-1 -100 1 4.55
8 NS 2P E+1 -140 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a11 Simone Munsterhjelm -Chantal de Lichtervelde 51,65 %
9 NS 1C E+2 -140 10 45.45
10 NS 3S S-3 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a10 Thierry Collart -Didier Collart 52,69 %
11 NS 3S E-1 50 18 81.82
12 NS 3S N+1 630 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a.8 Diane Emsens -Nicolas de Neve 51,42 %
15 NS 5P E+2 -480 3 13.64
16 NS 2K N = 90 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.7 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman 41,55 %
17 NS 3C W-2 100 13 59.09
18 NS 2P W+1 -140 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Sandra Dallemagne 51,31 %
19 NS 3S E = -600 6 27.27
20 NS 1S N+2 150 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a.5 Dominique Darmstaeter -Marc Smeyers 51,61 %
21 NS 3C W-1 50 11 50.00
22 NS 2P S+1 140 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.4 Annette Fobe -Ines Drory 42,46 %
23 NS 1S W = -90 13 59.09
24 NS 4P E-1 50 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a.3 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 51,12 %
25 NS 2P N = 110 6 27.27
26 NS 2P S-2 -200 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
Total : 212,0 / 528 = 40,15 %
PAIRE A10 Helene Christiaens -Grazia Neuenschwander
a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Sandra Dallemagne 51,31 %
1 NS 3S E+3 -490 17 77.27
2 NS 4P N+1 650 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a.5 Dominique Darmstaeter -Marc Smeyers 51,61 %
3 NS 3P N-2 -100 6 27.27
4 NS 2T W = -90 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.4 Annette Fobe -Ines Drory 42,46 %
5 NS 4PcN-2 -500 0 0.00
6 NS 3S S+2 460 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.3 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 51,12 %
7 NS 2C S-1 -100 1 4.55
8 NS 2P E+1 -140 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.2 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Veronique Englebienne 48,84 %
9 NS 2S E = -120 14 63.64
10 NS 4TcW-2 500 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.1 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 55,91 %
11 NS 3S E+3 -490 1 4.55
12 NS 3S N = 600 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 4,55 %
a13 Antoinette Jourdain -Helene Schyns 55,40 %
13 NS 3C S+2 200 16.5 75.00
14 NS 3P S-2 -100 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 73,86 %
a12 Christiane Huby -Jean van Caloen 45,49 %
15 NS 3P E+3 -230 14 63.64
16 NS 2K N-1 -50 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a10 Thierry Collart -Didier Collart 52,69 %
19 NS 4CcN-4 -800 0 0.00
20 NS 2S E-4 400 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.9 Patrick Gilles -Serge Alard 50,95 %
21 NS 3S W-1 50 11 50.00
22 NS 3S N-2 -100 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a.8 Diane Emsens -Nicolas de Neve 51,42 %
23 NS 1S W+1 -120 10 45.45
24 NS 4P E = -420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.7 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman 41,55 %
25 NS 2P S+1 140 12 54.55
26 NS 2C E+1 -140 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
Total : 209,5 / 528 = 39,68 %
PAIRE A.3 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck
a.5 Dominique Darmstaeter -Marc Smeyers 51,61 %
1 NS 3S E+4 -520 12 54.55
2 NS 2C S+1 140 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a.3 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 51,12 %
5 NS 3S E = -400 16 72.73
6 NS 3S S+2 460 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a.2 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Veronique Englebienne 48,84 %
7 NS 2C S+1 140 16 72.73
8 NS 2S N-3 -150 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.1 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 55,91 %
9 NS 4P W = -620 5 22.73
10 NS 2P S+5 260 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
a13 Antoinette Jourdain -Helene Schyns 55,40 %
11 NS 3S E+1 -430 6 27.27
12 NS 3S N+1 630 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a12 Christiane Huby -Jean van Caloen 45,49 %
13 NS 4C S+1 650 20.8 94.55
14 NS 2C E+2 -170 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 56,36 %
a11 Simone Munsterhjelm -Chantal de Lichtervelde 51,65 %
15 NS 3S W+4 -520 0 0.00
16 NS 1S N = 90 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a10 Thierry Collart -Didier Collart 52,69 %
17 NS 3P E-2 100 13 59.09
18 NS 3P W-1 50 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.9 Patrick Gilles -Serge Alard 50,95 %
19 NS 3K E+3 -170 12 54.55
20 NS 2P W = -110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a.8 Diane Emsens -Nicolas de Neve 51,42 %
21 NS 2C W-1 50 11 50.00
22 NS 3K E-1 100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.7 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman 41,55 %
23 NS 2C E+1 -140 4 18.18
24 NS 4P E = -420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Sandra Dallemagne 51,31 %
25 NS 2S S-1 -50 2 9.09
26 NS 2S S-4 -400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 4,55 %
Total : 207,8 / 528 = 39,36 %
PAIRE A.2 Sophie Noach -Marie Claire Vienne
a.2 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Veronique Englebienne 48,84 %
3 NS 3K W+1 -130 1 4.55
4 NS 3C S-1 -100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 6,82 %
a.1 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 55,91 %
5 NS 3S E+2 -460 2 9.09
6 NS 3S S+1 430 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a13 Antoinette Jourdain -Helene Schyns 55,40 %
7 NS 3C S = 140 16 72.73
8 NS 2PcE+1 -570 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a12 Christiane Huby -Jean van Caloen 45,49 %
9 NS 4P W-1 100 20 90.91
10 NS 4P S = 620 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a11 Simone Munsterhjelm -Chantal de Lichtervelde 51,65 %
11 NS 3S E+3 -490 1 4.55
12 NS 3S N+1 630 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a10 Thierry Collart -Didier Collart 52,69 %
13 NS 50%60% Ajust 11 50.00
14 NS 3C E = -140 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.9 Patrick Gilles -Serge Alard 50,95 %
15 NS 3P E+2 -200 17 77.27
16 NS 3S N-1 -50 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.8 Diane Emsens -Nicolas de Neve 51,42 %
17 NS 2P N-2 -100 4 18.18
18 NS 4PcW-2 300 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.7 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman 41,55 %
19 NS 5K E = -600 6 27.27
20 NS 2P W-2 200 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Sandra Dallemagne 51,31 %
21 NS 4TcW = -510 0 0.00
22 NS 1S N = 90 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
a.5 Dominique Darmstaeter -Marc Smeyers 51,61 %
23 NS 3C E = -140 4 18.18
24 NS 4P E = -420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a.4 Annette Fobe -Ines Drory 42,46 %
25 NS 2P S+1 140 12 54.55
26 NS 2C E = -110 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
Total : 200,0 / 528 = 37,88 %
PAIRE A11 Colette Heerinckx -Luc Ramaeckers
a.8 Diane Emsens -Nicolas de Neve 51,42 %
1 NS 6K W = -920 8 36.36
2 NS 3P N+2 200 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a.7 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman 41,55 %
3 NS 4K W-1 100 14 63.64
4 NS 1S N+1 120 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Sandra Dallemagne 51,31 %
5 NS 4C W = -420 12 54.55
6 NS 2C S-1 -50 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a.5 Dominique Darmstaeter -Marc Smeyers 51,61 %
7 NS 2S W-1 100 6 27.27
8 NS 3S N-3 -150 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
a.4 Annette Fobe -Ines Drory 42,46 %
9 NS 4P W = -620 5 22.73
10 NS 4P S+1 650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.3 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 51,12 %
11 NS 3S E+1 -430 6 27.27
12 NS 3S N+1 630 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.2 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Veronique Englebienne 48,84 %
13 NS 3C S = 140 12.1 55.00
14 NS 3C E = -140 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.1 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 55,91 %
15 NS 2P E+3 -200 17 77.27
16 NS 3P S-1 -50 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a13 Antoinette Jourdain -Helene Schyns 55,40 %
17 NS 3C E-1 50 6 27.27
18 NS 4P W-1 50 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a11 Simone Munsterhjelm -Chantal de Lichtervelde 51,65 %
21 NS 5T E-1 50 11 50.00
22 NS 2S N-1 -50 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a10 Thierry Collart -Didier Collart 52,69 %
23 NS 2C E+1 -140 4 18.18
24 NS 4P E+1 -450 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
a.9 Patrick Gilles -Serge Alard 50,95 %
25 NS 4P S-1 -50 2 9.09
26 NS 2C E-1 100 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
Total : 196,1 / 528 = 37,14 %
PAIRE a.1 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot
A.1 Chantal Barro -Jerome Claessens 69,41 %
1 EO 5K W = -400 0 0.00
2 EO 4P N+2 680 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.8 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten 40,15 %
3 EO 3K W-1 100 8 36.36
4 EO 1S N = 90 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.2 Sophie Noach -Marie Claire Vienne 37,88 %
5 EO 3S E+2 -460 20 90.91
6 EO 3S S+1 430 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.9 Luc Cartuyvels -Daniel Couvreur 53,47 %
7 EO 2C N+1 140 6 27.27
8 EO 2P E+1 -140 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A.3 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 39,36 %
9 EO 4P W = -620 17 77.27
10 EO 2P S+5 260 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
A10 Helene Christiaens -Grazia Neuenschwander 39,68 %
11 EO 3S E+3 -490 21 95.45
12 EO 3S N = 600 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 95,45 %
A.4 Myriam de Timary -Eliane de Ceuninck 45,04 %
13 EO 2P N = 110 13.2 60.00
14 EO 2C E+1 -140 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A11 Colette Heerinckx -Luc Ramaeckers 37,14 %
15 EO 2P E+3 -200 5 22.73
16 EO 3P S-1 -50 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.5 Michel Paquot -Jean Chabotier 68,96 %
17 EO 1S S = 90 14 63.64
18 EO 2P W = -110 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A12 Lydia Wildiers -Liliane Baptista 60,95 %
19 EO 2S E+1 -150 6 27.27
20 EO 1S N+3 180 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A.6 Muriel de Ceuninck -Marina De Longree 41,19 %
21 EO 3S W-1 50 11 50.00
22 EO 2S N-1 -50 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.7 Jean de Villenfagne -Marie Christine Remy 58,26 %
25 EO 2P S+1 140 10 45.45
26 EO 2S W-1 100 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
Total : 295,2 / 528 = 55,91 %
PAIRE a13 Antoinette Jourdain -Helene Schyns
A.7 Jean de Villenfagne -Marie Christine Remy 58,26 %
1 EO 6S E = -990 18 81.82
2 EO 3K S+2 150 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
A.1 Chantal Barro -Jerome Claessens 69,41 %
3 EO 3S E-1 100 8 36.36
4 EO 2S N = 120 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A.8 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten 40,15 %
5 EO 3S E+1 -430 15 68.18
6 EO 3S S+1 430 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A.2 Sophie Noach -Marie Claire Vienne 37,88 %
7 EO 3C S = 140 6 27.27
8 EO 2PcE+1 -570 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.9 Luc Cartuyvels -Daniel Couvreur 53,47 %
9 EO 4P W+1 -650 22 100.00
10 EO 4P S+2 680 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.3 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 39,36 %
11 EO 3S E+1 -430 16 72.73
12 EO 3S N+1 630 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A10 Helene Christiaens -Grazia Neuenschwander 39,68 %
13 EO 3C S+2 200 5.5 25.00
14 EO 3P S-2 -100 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 26,14 %
A.4 Myriam de Timary -Eliane de Ceuninck 45,04 %
15 EO 4P E+2 -480 19 86.36
16 EO 2K N-1 -50 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
A11 Colette Heerinckx -Luc Ramaeckers 37,14 %
17 EO 3C E-1 50 16 72.73
18 EO 4P W-1 50 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.5 Michel Paquot -Jean Chabotier 68,96 %
19 EO 2K E+2 -130 1 4.55
20 EO 1S E-3 300 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
A.6 Muriel de Ceuninck -Marina De Longree 41,19 %
23 EO 2C E+1 -140 18 81.82
24 EO 4P E = -420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A13 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 58,54 %
25 EO 1S S+1 120 14 63.64
26 EO 2C E-1 100 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
Total : 292,5 / 528 = 55,40 %
PAIRE a10 Thierry Collart -Didier Collart
A12 Lydia Wildiers -Liliane Baptista 60,95 %
1 EO 6K W = -920 14 63.64
2 EO 4P N = 620 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.6 Muriel de Ceuninck -Marina De Longree 41,19 %
3 EO 3P N-1 -50 13 59.09
4 EO 3C S-2 -200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
A13 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 58,54 %
5 EO 5C W-2 100 0 0.00
6 EO 3S S+1 430 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A.7 Jean de Villenfagne -Marie Christine Remy 58,26 %
7 EO 2C N = 110 13 59.09
8 EO 2P E+1 -140 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.1 Chantal Barro -Jerome Claessens 69,41 %
9 EO 3P W+1 -170 14 63.64
10 EO 4P S+1 650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.8 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten 40,15 %
11 EO 3S E-1 50 4 18.18
12 EO 3S N+1 630 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A.2 Sophie Noach -Marie Claire Vienne 37,88 %
13 EO 50%60% Ajust 13.2 60.00
14 EO 3C E = -140 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.3 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 39,36 %
17 EO 3P E-2 100 9 40.91
18 EO 3P W-1 50 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A10 Helene Christiaens -Grazia Neuenschwander 39,68 %
19 EO 4CcN-4 -800 22 100.00
20 EO 2S E-4 400 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.4 Myriam de Timary -Eliane de Ceuninck 45,04 %
21 EO 3C W = -140 19 86.36
22 EO 2C S+2 170 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A11 Colette Heerinckx -Luc Ramaeckers 37,14 %
23 EO 2C E+1 -140 18 81.82
24 EO 4P E+1 -450 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
A.5 Michel Paquot -Jean Chabotier 68,96 %
25 EO 2P S+2 170 4 18.18
26 EO 2P N+1 140 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
Total : 278,2 / 528 = 52,69 %
PAIRE a11 Simone Munsterhjelm -Chantal de Lichtervelde
A.6 Muriel de Ceuninck -Marina De Longree 41,19 %
1 EO 3S E+3 -490 5 22.73
2 EO 4C S-2 -200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A13 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 58,54 %
3 EO 3P N-1 -50 13 59.09
4 EO 2C S+1 140 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A.7 Jean de Villenfagne -Marie Christine Remy 58,26 %
5 EO 3S E = -400 6 27.27
6 EO 3S S+1 430 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.1 Chantal Barro -Jerome Claessens 69,41 %
7 EO 2C N+1 140 6 27.27
8 EO 3PcE-2 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
A.8 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten 40,15 %
9 EO 1C E+2 -140 12 54.55
10 EO 3S S-3 -300 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.2 Sophie Noach -Marie Claire Vienne 37,88 %
11 EO 3S E+3 -490 21 95.45
12 EO 3S N+1 630 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A.9 Luc Cartuyvels -Daniel Couvreur 53,47 %
13 EO 3K E = -110 19.7 89.55
14 EO 3C E+1 -170 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 85,68 %
A.3 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 39,36 %
15 EO 3S W+4 -520 22 100.00
16 EO 1S N = 90 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A.4 Myriam de Timary -Eliane de Ceuninck 45,04 %
19 EO 3S E = -600 16 72.73
20 EO 3S E-2 200 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A11 Colette Heerinckx -Luc Ramaeckers 37,14 %
21 EO 5T E-1 50 11 50.00
22 EO 2S N-1 -50 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.5 Michel Paquot -Jean Chabotier 68,96 %
23 EO 1S W-1 100 4 18.18
24 EO 4P E = -420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A12 Lydia Wildiers -Liliane Baptista 60,95 %
25 EO 4P S = 420 0 0.00
26 EO 2P N = 110 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
Total : 272,7 / 528 = 51,65 %
PAIRE a.5 Dominique Darmstaeter -Marc Smeyers
A.3 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 39,36 %
1 EO 3S E+4 -520 10 45.45
2 EO 2C S+1 140 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A10 Helene Christiaens -Grazia Neuenschwander 39,68 %
3 EO 3P N-2 -100 16 72.73
4 EO 2T W = -90 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A11 Colette Heerinckx -Luc Ramaeckers 37,14 %
7 EO 2S W-1 100 16 72.73
8 EO 3S N-3 -150 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
A.5 Michel Paquot -Jean Chabotier 68,96 %
9 EO 2S E = -120 8 36.36
10 EO 4P S+2 680 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A12 Lydia Wildiers -Liliane Baptista 60,95 %
11 EO 3S E = -400 11 50.00
12 EO 3S N+1 630 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.6 Muriel de Ceuninck -Marina De Longree 41,19 %
13 EO 4C S-1 -100 17.5 79.55
14 EO 2C W+3 -200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 89,77 %
A13 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 58,54 %
15 EO 3S W+2 -460 16 72.73
16 EO 2K N = 90 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.7 Jean de Villenfagne -Marie Christine Remy 58,26 %
17 EO 2P E-3 150 2 9.09
18 EO 2P W = -110 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.1 Chantal Barro -Jerome Claessens 69,41 %
19 EO 3C N-3 -150 6 27.27
20 EO 2PcW-4 1100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
A.8 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten 40,15 %
21 EO 3C W-1 50 11 50.00
22 EO 2P S+1 140 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.2 Sophie Noach -Marie Claire Vienne 37,88 %
23 EO 3C E = -140 18 81.82
24 EO 4P E = -420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A.9 Luc Cartuyvels -Daniel Couvreur 53,47 %
25 EO 2P S+2 170 4 18.18
26 EO 3T E-3 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
Total : 272,5 / 528 = 51,61 %
PAIRE a.8 Diane Emsens -Nicolas de Neve
A11 Colette Heerinckx -Luc Ramaeckers 37,14 %
1 EO 6K W = -920 14 63.64
2 EO 3P N+2 200 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A.5 Michel Paquot -Jean Chabotier 68,96 %
3 EO 3T W = -110 18 81.82
4 EO 2C S+1 140 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A12 Lydia Wildiers -Liliane Baptista 60,95 %
5 EO 3S E+1 -430 15 68.18
6 EO 3S S+2 460 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A.6 Muriel de Ceuninck -Marina De Longree 41,19 %
7 EO 2C S+1 140 6 27.27
8 EO 3P E-1 50 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
A13 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 58,54 %
9 EO 4P W-1 100 2 9.09
10 EO 2TcW = -180 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.1 Chantal Barro -Jerome Claessens 69,41 %
13 EO 3KcE-1 200 5.5 25.00
14 EO 2C E+1 -140 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
A.8 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten 40,15 %
15 EO 5P E+2 -480 19 86.36
16 EO 2K N = 90 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.2 Sophie Noach -Marie Claire Vienne 37,88 %
17 EO 2P N-2 -100 18 81.82
18 EO 4PcW-2 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A.9 Luc Cartuyvels -Daniel Couvreur 53,47 %
19 EO 5K E+1 -620 20 90.91
20 EO 3P W-2 200 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.3 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 39,36 %
21 EO 2C W-1 50 11 50.00
22 EO 3K E-1 100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A10 Helene Christiaens -Grazia Neuenschwander 39,68 %
23 EO 1S W+1 -120 12 54.55
24 EO 4P E = -420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.4 Myriam de Timary -Eliane de Ceuninck 45,04 %
25 EO 4P S-1 -50 20 90.91
26 EO 2C E = -110 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
Total : 271,5 / 528 = 51,42 %
PAIRE a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Sandra Dallemagne
A10 Helene Christiaens -Grazia Neuenschwander 39,68 %
1 EO 3S E+3 -490 5 22.73
2 EO 4P N+1 650 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A.4 Myriam de Timary -Eliane de Ceuninck 45,04 %
3 EO 2P N = 110 4 18.18
4 EO 2C S = 110 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A11 Colette Heerinckx -Luc Ramaeckers 37,14 %
5 EO 4C W = -420 10 45.45
6 EO 2C S-1 -50 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A12 Lydia Wildiers -Liliane Baptista 60,95 %
9 EO 2S E = -120 8 36.36
10 EO 4P S+2 680 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A.6 Muriel de Ceuninck -Marina De Longree 41,19 %
11 EO 3S E+1 -430 16 72.73
12 EO 3S N+1 630 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A13 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 58,54 %
13 EO 3C S = 140 9.9 45.00
14 EO 2P N = 110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,50 %
A.7 Jean de Villenfagne -Marie Christine Remy 58,26 %
15 EO 4P E = -420 12 54.55
16 EO 1S N+1 120 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A.1 Chantal Barro -Jerome Claessens 69,41 %
17 EO 2P N+1 140 4 18.18
18 EO 4P W-1 50 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A.8 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten 40,15 %
19 EO 3S E = -600 16 72.73
20 EO 1S N+2 150 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.2 Sophie Noach -Marie Claire Vienne 37,88 %
21 EO 4TcW = -510 22 100.00
22 EO 1S N = 90 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
A.9 Luc Cartuyvels -Daniel Couvreur 53,47 %
23 EO 2C E+1 -140 18 81.82
24 EO 4P E = -420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A.3 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 39,36 %
25 EO 2S S-1 -50 20 90.91
26 EO 2S S-4 -400 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 95,45 %
Total : 270,9 / 528 = 51,31 %
PAIRE a.3 Edith Close -Jan Sassen
A.9 Luc Cartuyvels -Daniel Couvreur 53,47 %
3 EO 2P N+1 140 2 9.09
4 EO 1S N = 90 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.3 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 39,36 %
5 EO 3S E = -400 6 27.27
6 EO 3S S+2 460 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A10 Helene Christiaens -Grazia Neuenschwander 39,68 %
7 EO 2C S-1 -100 21 95.45
8 EO 2P E+1 -140 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.4 Myriam de Timary -Eliane de Ceuninck 45,04 %
9 EO 3S E+1 -630 20 90.91
10 EO 4P S+2 680 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A11 Colette Heerinckx -Luc Ramaeckers 37,14 %
11 EO 3S E+1 -430 16 72.73
12 EO 3S N+1 630 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.5 Michel Paquot -Jean Chabotier 68,96 %
13 EO 3P N-2 -200 21.9 99.55
14 EO 3P N-1 -50 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 56,59 %
A12 Lydia Wildiers -Liliane Baptista 60,95 %
15 EO 4P E+1 -450 14 63.64
16 EO 2K N = 90 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.6 Muriel de Ceuninck -Marina De Longree 41,19 %
17 EO 2S S-3 -150 22 100.00
18 EO 4P W-2 100 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A13 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 58,54 %
19 EO 3T E+1 -130 1 4.55
20 EO 1S N+2 150 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.7 Jean de Villenfagne -Marie Christine Remy 58,26 %
21 EO 2C W+1 -140 19 86.36
22 EO 2C N+3 200 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.1 Chantal Barro -Jerome Claessens 69,41 %
23 EO 2T W-2 200 0 0.00
24 EO 4P E = -420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A.8 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten 40,15 %
25 EO 2P N = 110 16 72.73
26 EO 2P S-2 -200 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
Total : 269,9 / 528 = 51,12 %
PAIRE a.9 Patrick Gilles -Serge Alard
A.5 Michel Paquot -Jean Chabotier 68,96 %
1 EO 4S W+2 -490 5 22.73
2 EO 4P N+1 650 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A12 Lydia Wildiers -Liliane Baptista 60,95 %
3 EO 3K W+1 -130 21 95.45
4 EO 1S N+1 120 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A.6 Muriel de Ceuninck -Marina De Longree 41,19 %
5 EO 3S E+1 -430 15 68.18
6 EO 3S N+1 430 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A13 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 58,54 %
7 EO 1S W = -90 18 81.82
8 EO 3K S-1 -50 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.7 Jean de Villenfagne -Marie Christine Remy 58,26 %
9 EO 3S E-1 100 2 9.09
10 EO 4P S+2 680 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
A.1 Chantal Barro -Jerome Claessens 69,41 %
11 EO 3S E-1 50 4 18.18
12 EO 3S N+1 630 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A.2 Sophie Noach -Marie Claire Vienne 37,88 %
15 EO 3P E+2 -200 5 22.73
16 EO 3S N-1 -50 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.9 Luc Cartuyvels -Daniel Couvreur 53,47 %
17 EO 2PcN = 470 0 0.00
18 EO 2P W+1 -140 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.3 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 39,36 %
19 EO 3K E+3 -170 10 45.45
20 EO 2P W = -110 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A10 Helene Christiaens -Grazia Neuenschwander 39,68 %
21 EO 3S W-1 50 11 50.00
22 EO 3S N-2 -100 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.4 Myriam de Timary -Eliane de Ceuninck 45,04 %
23 EO 1S W = -90 9 40.91
24 EO 4P E = -420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A11 Colette Heerinckx -Luc Ramaeckers 37,14 %
25 EO 4P S-1 -50 20 90.91
26 EO 2C E-1 100 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
Total : 269,0 / 528 = 50,95 %
PAIRE a.2 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Veronique Englebienne
A.8 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten 40,15 %
1 EO 6S E+1 -1020 21 95.45
2 EO 4P N+1 650 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.2 Sophie Noach -Marie Claire Vienne 37,88 %
3 EO 3K W+1 -130 21 95.45
4 EO 3C S-1 -100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 93,18 %
A.9 Luc Cartuyvels -Daniel Couvreur 53,47 %
5 EO 3S E-1 50 2 9.09
6 EO 6T N-1 -50 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.3 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 39,36 %
7 EO 2C S+1 140 6 27.27
8 EO 2S N-3 -150 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A10 Helene Christiaens -Grazia Neuenschwander 39,68 %
9 EO 2S E = -120 8 36.36
10 EO 4TcW-2 500 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.4 Myriam de Timary -Eliane de Ceuninck 45,04 %
11 EO 4P W-1 50 4 18.18
12 EO 3S N = 600 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A11 Colette Heerinckx -Luc Ramaeckers 37,14 %
13 EO 3C S = 140 9.9 45.00
14 EO 3C E = -140 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.5 Michel Paquot -Jean Chabotier 68,96 %
15 EO 3P E+1 -170 1 4.55
16 EO 2K N = 90 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A12 Lydia Wildiers -Liliane Baptista 60,95 %
17 EO 3T E-2 100 9 40.91
18 EO 3P W-2 100 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A.6 Muriel de Ceuninck -Marina De Longree 41,19 %
19 EO 3C N-4 -200 12 54.55
20 EO 1S E = -90 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A13 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 58,54 %
21 EO 3S W-2 100 3 13.64
22 EO 3P N = 140 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A.7 Jean de Villenfagne -Marie Christine Remy 58,26 %
23 EO 1S W-1 100 4 18.18
24 EO 4P E-1 50 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
Total : 257,9 / 528 = 48,84 %
PAIRE a12 Christiane Huby -Jean van Caloen
A13 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 58,54 %
1 EO 6S W+1 -1020 21 95.45
2 EO 4P N+1 650 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.7 Jean de Villenfagne -Marie Christine Remy 58,26 %
3 EO 5K W-3 300 0 0.00
4 EO 2C S+1 140 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 4,55 %
A.1 Chantal Barro -Jerome Claessens 69,41 %
5 EO 3S E+1 -430 15 68.18
6 EO 3S S+2 460 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A.8 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten 40,15 %
7 EO 4C S-1 -100 21 95.45
8 EO 2P E+1 -140 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.2 Sophie Noach -Marie Claire Vienne 37,88 %
9 EO 4P W-1 100 2 9.09
10 EO 4P S = 620 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A.9 Luc Cartuyvels -Daniel Couvreur 53,47 %
11 EO 3S E = -400 11 50.00
12 EO 3S N+1 630 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.3 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 39,36 %
13 EO 4C S+1 650 1.2 5.45
14 EO 2C E+2 -170 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 43,64 %
A10 Helene Christiaens -Grazia Neuenschwander 39,68 %
15 EO 3P E+3 -230 8 36.36
16 EO 2K N-1 -50 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A.4 Myriam de Timary -Eliane de Ceuninck 45,04 %
17 EO 2C W = -110 20 90.91
18 EO 3P W = -140 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
A.5 Michel Paquot -Jean Chabotier 68,96 %
21 EO 4C E-2 100 3 13.64
22 EO 2KcE-1 200 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
A12 Lydia Wildiers -Liliane Baptista 60,95 %
23 EO 3K W-1 100 4 18.18
24 EO 4P E = -420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A.6 Muriel de Ceuninck -Marina De Longree 41,19 %
25 EO 2P N+2 170 4 18.18
26 EO 2C E-1 100 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
Total : 240,2 / 528 = 45,49 %
PAIRE a.4 Annette Fobe -Ines Drory
A.9 Luc Cartuyvels -Daniel Couvreur 53,47 %
1 EO 6K W = -920 14 63.64
2 EO 4P N+1 650 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A10 Helene Christiaens -Grazia Neuenschwander 39,68 %
5 EO 4PcN-2 -500 22 100.00
6 EO 3S S+2 460 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.4 Myriam de Timary -Eliane de Ceuninck 45,04 %
7 EO 2S W-2 200 0 0.00
8 EO 3K S-2 -100 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
A11 Colette Heerinckx -Luc Ramaeckers 37,14 %
9 EO 4P W = -620 17 77.27
10 EO 4P S+1 650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.5 Michel Paquot -Jean Chabotier 68,96 %
11 EO 3S E-1 50 4 18.18
12 EO 3S N+1 630 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A12 Lydia Wildiers -Liliane Baptista 60,95 %
13 EO 4C N+1 650 1.2 5.45
14 EO 3P S-1 -50 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 9,55 %
A.6 Muriel de Ceuninck -Marina De Longree 41,19 %
15 EO 3S W = -400 10 45.45
16 EO 2K N = 90 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A13 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 58,54 %
17 EO 3C W-2 100 9 40.91
18 EO 3P W-1 50 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A.7 Jean de Villenfagne -Marie Christine Remy 58,26 %
19 EO 2K E+3 -150 6 27.27
20 EO 1S S+2 150 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.1 Chantal Barro -Jerome Claessens 69,41 %
21 EO 3C W-1 50 11 50.00
22 EO 3S N-2 -100 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.8 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten 40,15 %
23 EO 1S W = -90 9 40.91
24 EO 4P E-1 50 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.2 Sophie Noach -Marie Claire Vienne 37,88 %
25 EO 2P S+1 140 10 45.45
26 EO 2C E = -110 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
Total : 224,2 / 528 = 42,46 %
PAIRE a.7 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman
A.4 Myriam de Timary -Eliane de Ceuninck 45,04 %
1 EO 3S E+3 -490 5 22.73
2 EO 4P N+1 650 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A11 Colette Heerinckx -Luc Ramaeckers 37,14 %
3 EO 4K W-1 100 8 36.36
4 EO 1S N+1 120 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A.5 Michel Paquot -Jean Chabotier 68,96 %
5 EO 3S E = -400 6 27.27
6 EO 3S S+2 460 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A12 Lydia Wildiers -Liliane Baptista 60,95 %
7 EO 2C S = 110 13 59.09
8 EO 2P E = -110 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A13 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 58,54 %
11 EO 3S E-1 50 4 18.18
12 EO 3S N+1 630 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A.7 Jean de Villenfagne -Marie Christine Remy 58,26 %
13 EO 4K E-1 100 15.4 70.00
14 EO 2C E+2 -170 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 75,91 %
A.1 Chantal Barro -Jerome Claessens 69,41 %
15 EO 3P E+1 -170 1 4.55
16 EO 3K N = 110 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 6,82 %
A.8 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten 40,15 %
17 EO 3C W-2 100 9 40.91
18 EO 2P W+1 -140 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A.2 Sophie Noach -Marie Claire Vienne 37,88 %
19 EO 5K E = -600 16 72.73
20 EO 2P W-2 200 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.9 Luc Cartuyvels -Daniel Couvreur 53,47 %
21 EO 3S W-3 150 0 0.00
22 EO 4C N = 420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.3 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 39,36 %
23 EO 2C E+1 -140 18 81.82
24 EO 4P E = -420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A10 Helene Christiaens -Grazia Neuenschwander 39,68 %
25 EO 2P S+1 140 10 45.45
26 EO 2C E+1 -140 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
Total : 219,4 / 528 = 41,55 %
|