B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 61,90 A.2 Thierry Bollansee -Pascale Ortegat
--- 2 57,74 A.4 Michele Berrier -Teresa Dekoster
--- 3 56,67 A.7 Philippe van der Gracht -Tina Katila
--- 4 56,25 A.6 Caroll Pucher -Grazia Neuenschwander
--- 5 55,24 A.5 Kathleen van Doren -Bernard Groetembril
--- 6 53,69 A10 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
--- 7 43,57 A.9 Myriam de Timary -Christiane Huby
--- 8 42,83 A.8 Juan del Marmol -Philippe d'Hoop
--- 9 42,68 A.1 Mercedes Oostens -Sophie Tilemans
--- 10 39,70 A11 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes
--- 11 39,29 A.3 Francoise Turin -Brigitte Velge
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 65,06 a.2 Annette Fobe -Dominique Sassen
--- 2 60,71 a.7 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige
--- 3 54,64 a.8 Veronique Englebienne -Ghislaine Deschuyteneer
--- 4 52,20 a.9 Lydia Wildiers -Antoinette Jourdain
--- 5 49,58 a10 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens
--- 6 48,51 a11 Laurence del Marmol -Benoit del Marmol
--- 7 47,20 a.6 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens
--- 8 47,05 a.4 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor
--- 9 46,13 a.5 Jan Sassen -Edith Close
--- 10 41,85 a.1 Catherine de Moffarts -Marie J. de Wagheneire
--- 11 37,50 a.3 Nadine Brabant -Sybille Gillet
PAIRE A.2 Thierry Bollansee -Pascale Ortegat
a.2 Annette Fobe -Dominique Sassen 65,06 %
4 NS 4C S-2 -200 3 21.43
5 NS 3S N-5 -500 2 14.29
6 NS 4P N-2 -100 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
a.1 Catherine de Moffarts -Marie J. de Wagheneire 41,85 %
7 NS 4C N+2 680 13 92.86
8 NS 2K N-2 -100 7 50.00
9 NS 4P W+1 -650 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
a11 Laurence del Marmol -Benoit del Marmol 48,51 %
10 NS 4K S-1 -100 6 42.86
11 NS 3P S = 140 11 78.57
12 NS 3T W+1 -130 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
a10 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 49,58 %
13 NS 3S N+4 720 9 64.29
14 NS 2T N-1 -50 14 100.00
15 NS 4P S-2 -200 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
a.9 Lydia Wildiers -Antoinette Jourdain 52,20 %
16 NS 2P S+1 140 10 71.43
17 NS 3P S = 140 10 71.43
18 NS 2C N = 110 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
a.8 Veronique Englebienne -Ghislaine Deschuyteneer 54,64 %
19 NS 3S E = -600 10 71.43
20 NS 4K E = -130 4 28.57
21 NS 3S N+4 720 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.7 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige 60,71 %
22 NS 4P W+1 -650 12 85.71
23 NS 3S S-1 -100 9 64.29
24 NS 5K N+1 420 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
a.6 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 47,20 %
25 NS 2P W = -110 6 42.86
26 NS 2P S = 110 8 57.14
27 NS 2P N = 110 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 208,0 / 336 = 61,90 %
PAIRE A.4 Michele Berrier -Teresa Dekoster
a.4 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 47,05 %
10 NS 3C W-1 100 10 71.43
11 NS 4P S-1 -50 5 35.71
12 NS 2S E+2 -180 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
a.3 Nadine Brabant -Sybille Gillet 37,50 %
13 NS 3S N+4 720 9 64.29
14 NS 1S W = -90 11 78.57
15 NS 1K N+1 90 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
a.2 Annette Fobe -Dominique Sassen 65,06 %
16 NS 4PcS-4 -800 1 7.14
17 NS 3P S = 140 10 71.43
18 NS 2C N = 110 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
a.1 Catherine de Moffarts -Marie J. de Wagheneire 41,85 %
19 NS 3S E = -600 10 71.43
20 NS 3K E = -110 7 50.00
21 NS 3S N+2 660 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
a11 Laurence del Marmol -Benoit del Marmol 48,51 %
22 NS 4P W+2 -680 5 35.71
23 NS 3C E+1 -170 4 28.57
24 NS 3P W-3 150 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
a10 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 49,58 %
25 NS 2T W = -90 8 57.14
26 NS 2P S = 110 8 57.14
27 NS 3T W+1 -130 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
a.9 Lydia Wildiers -Antoinette Jourdain 52,20 %
28 NS 3S W+4 -520 8 57.14
29 NS 5T N+1 620 9 64.29
30 NS 4P S+1 450 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
a.8 Veronique Englebienne -Ghislaine Deschuyteneer 54,64 %
31 NS 4P S+1 650 6 42.86
32 NS 3P E-1 100 10 71.43
33 NS 3T E-1 50 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
Total : 194,0 / 336 = 57,74 %
PAIRE A.7 Philippe van der Gracht -Tina Katila
a.2 Annette Fobe -Dominique Sassen 65,06 %
1 NS 6K E = -920 5 35.71
2 NS 3S N = 600 7 50.00
3 NS 3C S-1 -50 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
a.1 Catherine de Moffarts -Marie J. de Wagheneire 41,85 %
4 NS 4P E-1 100 14 100.00
5 NS 3P E-2 100 12 85.71
6 NS 3S S = 400 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 80,95 %
a11 Laurence del Marmol -Benoit del Marmol 48,51 %
7 NS 4C N+1 650 5 35.71
8 NS 1S S = 90 12 85.71
9 NS 4P W+1 -650 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
a.7 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige 60,71 %
19 NS 3S E+1 -630 3 21.43
20 NS 3K E = -110 7 50.00
21 NS 3S N = 600 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
a.6 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 47,20 %
22 NS 4P W+2 -680 5 35.71
23 NS 3S S-1 -100 9 64.29
24 NS 3C N = 140 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
a.5 Jan Sassen -Edith Close 46,13 %
25 NS 3C S-3 -150 2 14.29
26 NS 2P S = 110 8 57.14
27 NS 1S S-2 -100 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
a.4 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 47,05 %
28 NS 3S W+3 -490 12 85.71
29 NS 3S N+2 660 14 100.00
30 NS 4P S+1 450 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 80,95 %
a.3 Nadine Brabant -Sybille Gillet 37,50 %
31 NS 5P S+1 680 9 64.29
32 NS 2C N+1 140 12 85.71
33 NS 4C W+1 -450 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
Total : 190,4 / 336 = 56,67 %
PAIRE A.6 Caroll Pucher -Grazia Neuenschwander
a11 Laurence del Marmol -Benoit del Marmol 48,51 %
1 NS 6S W-1 50 13 92.86
2 NS 3S N-2 -200 2 14.29
3 NS 4C S-2 -100 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
a10 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 49,58 %
4 NS 4C S-2 -200 3 21.43
5 NS 2P E-1 50 10 71.43
6 NS 3S S+1 430 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
a.6 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 47,20 %
16 NS 2P S-1 -50 8 57.14
17 NS 3P S = 140 10 71.43
18 NS 2C N = 110 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
a.5 Jan Sassen -Edith Close 46,13 %
19 NS 3S E = -600 10 71.43
20 NS 3P S = 140 14 100.00
21 NS 3S N+2 660 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 78,57 %
a.4 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 47,05 %
22 NS 4P W+2 -680 5 35.71
23 NS 3S S-1 -100 9 64.29
24 NS 2S S-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.3 Nadine Brabant -Sybille Gillet 37,50 %
25 NS 3S E-3 300 14 100.00
26 NS 2P S = 110 8 57.14
27 NS 4T W = -130 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.2 Annette Fobe -Dominique Sassen 65,06 %
28 NS 3S W+4 -520 8 57.14
29 NS 5T N = 600 4 28.57
30 NS 5P S = 450 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
a.1 Catherine de Moffarts -Marie J. de Wagheneire 41,85 %
31 NS 5PcS+1 1050 13 92.86
32 NS 4C N-1 -50 6 42.86
33 NS 3S E+2 -460 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 189,0 / 336 = 56,25 %
PAIRE A.5 Kathleen van Doren -Bernard Groetembril
a.9 Lydia Wildiers -Antoinette Jourdain 52,20 %
1 NS 6S W-1 50 13 92.86
2 NS 3S N-3 -300 0 0.00
3 NS 40%60% Ajust 5.6 40.00 µ Tbl = 44,29 %
a.5 Jan Sassen -Edith Close 46,13 %
13 NS 3S N+4 720 9 64.29
14 NS 1S W = -90 11 78.57
15 NS 3S N-2 -200 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
a.4 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 47,05 %
16 NS 4C E-3 300 14 100.00
17 NS 4P S-1 -50 1 7.14
18 NS 2C N = 110 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
a.3 Nadine Brabant -Sybille Gillet 37,50 %
19 NS 3S E+1 -630 3 21.43
20 NS 3P S-1 -100 11 78.57
21 NS 3S N+2 660 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
a.2 Annette Fobe -Dominique Sassen 65,06 %
22 NS 4P W+2 -680 5 35.71
23 NS 5T S-2 -200 1 7.14
24 NS 2C N+2 170 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
a.1 Catherine de Moffarts -Marie J. de Wagheneire 41,85 %
25 NS 3S E-1 100 11 78.57
26 NS 2P S = 110 8 57.14
27 NS 3S E-1 50 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
a11 Laurence del Marmol -Benoit del Marmol 48,51 %
28 NS 6S E = -990 4 28.57
29 NS 5T N+1 620 9 64.29
30 NS 4P S+1 450 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a10 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 49,58 %
31 NS 5T S+1 620 4 28.57
32 NS 3C N+1 170 14 100.00
33 NS 3S W+1 -430 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
Total : 185,6 / 336 = 55,24 %
PAIRE A10 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
a.8 Veronique Englebienne -Ghislaine Deschuyteneer 54,64 %
1 NS 5K E = -400 9 64.29
2 NS 3S N = 600 7 50.00
3 NS 4T E = -130 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 43,81 %
a.7 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige 60,71 %
4 NS 2P E+2 -170 8 57.14
5 NS 2S W = -120 6 42.86
6 NS 3K S = 110 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
a.6 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 47,20 %
7 NS 4C N+1 650 5 35.71
8 NS 3T W-2 100 14 100.00
9 NS 3S E = -600 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 78,57 %
a.5 Jan Sassen -Edith Close 46,13 %
10 NS 1S N+3 180 12 85.71
11 NS 2P S+1 140 11 78.57
12 NS 3S E+1 -430 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
a.4 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 47,05 %
13 NS 3S N+1 630 2 14.29
14 NS 1S W+1 -120 7 50.00
15 NS 2P S = 110 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
a.3 Nadine Brabant -Sybille Gillet 37,50 %
16 NS 4C E-2 200 12 85.71
17 NS 3P S = 140 10 71.43
18 NS 3C N-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
a10 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 49,58 %
28 NS 6S W+1 -1020 0 0.00
29 NS 5T N+1 620 9 64.29
30 NS 4P S+1 450 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
a.9 Lydia Wildiers -Antoinette Jourdain 52,20 %
31 NS 5P S+1 680 9 64.29
32 NS 3T S-1 -50 6 42.86
33 NS 4C W+1 -450 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 180,4 / 336 = 53,69 %
PAIRE A.9 Myriam de Timary -Christiane Huby
a.6 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 47,20 %
1 NS 5K E = -400 9 64.29
2 NS 3S N+2 660 14 100.00
3 NS 3C S-1 -50 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 79,52 %
a.5 Jan Sassen -Edith Close 46,13 %
4 NS 4C S-2 -200 3 21.43
5 NS 3C S-1 -100 8 57.14
6 NS 3S S-3 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
a.4 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 47,05 %
7 NS 4C N+1 650 5 35.71
8 NS 1S W+1 -120 2 14.29
9 NS 4P E+1 -650 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
a.3 Nadine Brabant -Sybille Gillet 37,50 %
10 NS 3S N+2 660 14 100.00
11 NS 4P S-1 -50 5 35.71
12 NS 2S E+2 -180 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.2 Annette Fobe -Dominique Sassen 65,06 %
13 NS 3S N+4 720 9 64.29
14 NS 1S W+2 -150 1 7.14
15 NS 2S N-1 -100 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
a.9 Lydia Wildiers -Antoinette Jourdain 52,20 %
25 NS 3S E-1 100 11 78.57
26 NS 3P S-1 -100 2 14.29
27 NS 4T W = -130 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
a.8 Veronique Englebienne -Ghislaine Deschuyteneer 54,64 %
28 NS 6P W+1 -1010 2 14.29
29 NS 4T N+1 150 0 0.00
30 NS 4P S+1 450 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
a.7 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige 60,71 %
31 NS 5KcW-2 300 2 14.29
32 NS 3C N-1 -50 6 42.86
33 NS 4C E+1 -450 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 146,4 / 336 = 43,57 %
PAIRE A.8 Juan del Marmol -Philippe d'Hoop
a.4 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 47,05 %
1 NS 6T W = -920 5 35.71
2 NS 3S N = 600 7 50.00
3 NS 2C S+1 140 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 61,67 %
a.3 Nadine Brabant -Sybille Gillet 37,50 %
4 NS 4C S-2 -200 3 21.43
5 NS 4PcE-3 500 14 100.00
6 NS 4P N-1 -50 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.2 Annette Fobe -Dominique Sassen 65,06 %
7 NS 4C N+1 650 5 35.71
8 NS 1S S-4 -200 0 0.00
9 NS 4P E+1 -650 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
a.1 Catherine de Moffarts -Marie J. de Wagheneire 41,85 %
10 NS 4K N-2 -200 1 7.14
11 NS 4P S = 420 14 100.00
12 NS 2S E+1 -150 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
a.8 Veronique Englebienne -Ghislaine Deschuyteneer 54,64 %
22 NS 4P W+2 -680 5 35.71
23 NS 5T S-1 -100 9 64.29
24 NS 3C N = 140 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
a.7 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige 60,71 %
25 NS 4T W = -130 4 28.57
26 NS 3P S-2 -200 0 0.00
27 NS 4T W+1 -150 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 14,29 %
a.6 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 47,20 %
28 NS 3S W+2 -460 14 100.00
29 NS 5T N+1 620 9 64.29
30 NS 5C E = -450 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
a.5 Jan Sassen -Edith Close 46,13 %
31 NS 2P S+4 230 0 0.00
32 NS 3P E = -140 1 7.14
33 NS 3S W+1 -430 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
Total : 143,9 / 336 = 42,83 %
PAIRE A.1 Mercedes Oostens -Sophie Tilemans
a.1 Catherine de Moffarts -Marie J. de Wagheneire 41,85 %
1 NS 6S W = -990 2 14.29
2 NS 3S N+1 630 12 85.71
3 NS 4T E = -130 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 39,05 %
a11 Laurence del Marmol -Benoit del Marmol 48,51 %
4 NS 3P E = -140 11 78.57
5 NS 3ScN-3 -800 0 0.00
6 NS 4P N = 420 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a10 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 49,58 %
7 NS 4C N+1 650 5 35.71
8 NS 2T W-1 50 10 71.43
9 NS 4P E+1 -650 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
a.9 Lydia Wildiers -Antoinette Jourdain 52,20 %
10 NS 3S N-1 -100 6 42.86
11 NS 4P S-1 -50 5 35.71
12 NS 3S E+1 -430 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.8 Veronique Englebienne -Ghislaine Deschuyteneer 54,64 %
13 NS 3T S+4 190 0 0.00
14 NS 1S W+1 -120 7 50.00
15 NS 4P S-1 -100 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
a.7 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige 60,71 %
16 NS 2C E = -110 5 35.71
17 NS 4P S-1 -50 1 7.14
18 NS 2C N = 110 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
a.6 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 47,20 %
19 NS 3S E+1 -630 3 21.43
20 NS 2C N-2 -200 1 7.14
21 NS 2P N+2 170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 9,52 %
a.5 Jan Sassen -Edith Close 46,13 %
22 NS 3S E-1 100 14 100.00
23 NS 3S S = 600 14 100.00
24 NS 2C N+2 170 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 92,86 %
Total : 143,4 / 336 = 42,68 %
PAIRE A11 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes
a10 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 49,58 %
1 NS 4PcS-5 -1100 0 0.00
2 NS 3S N = 600 7 50.00
3 NS 4K W = -130 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 22,38 %
a.9 Lydia Wildiers -Antoinette Jourdain 52,20 %
4 NS 3P E = -140 11 78.57
5 NS 3C S-2 -200 4 28.57
6 NS 3S S+1 430 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.8 Veronique Englebienne -Ghislaine Deschuyteneer 54,64 %
7 NS 4C N+1 650 5 35.71
8 NS 3P N-2 -100 7 50.00
9 NS 4P W+1 -650 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
a.7 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige 60,71 %
10 NS 4K N-1 -100 6 42.86
11 NS 4P N-1 -50 5 35.71
12 NS 3S E+1 -430 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.6 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 47,20 %
13 NS 3S N+2 660 4 28.57
14 NS 2C E+1 -140 4 28.57
15 NS 4P S-2 -200 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
a.5 Jan Sassen -Edith Close 46,13 %
16 NS 2C E = -110 5 35.71
17 NS 1S S+1 120 4 28.57
18 NS 2C N = 110 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
a.4 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 47,05 %
19 NS 3S W+1 -630 3 21.43
20 NS 3C N-1 -100 11 78.57
21 NS 5S N = 660 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
a11 Laurence del Marmol -Benoit del Marmol 48,51 %
31 NS 5PcS+1 1050 13 92.86
32 NS 3P E = -140 1 7.14
33 NS 4C W+2 -480 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 133,4 / 336 = 39,70 %
PAIRE A.3 Francoise Turin -Brigitte Velge
a.3 Nadine Brabant -Sybille Gillet 37,50 %
7 NS 4C N+2 680 13 92.86
8 NS 2P E = -110 4 28.57
9 NS 3S E+1 -630 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
a.2 Annette Fobe -Dominique Sassen 65,06 %
10 NS 4K N-2 -200 1 7.14
11 NS 4P S-2 -100 0 0.00
12 NS 3S E+1 -430 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 9,52 %
a.1 Catherine de Moffarts -Marie J. de Wagheneire 41,85 %
13 NS 6K N = 1370 14 100.00
14 NS 1S W+2 -150 1 7.14
15 NS 4PcS-2 -500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
a11 Laurence del Marmol -Benoit del Marmol 48,51 %
16 NS 4PcS-4 -800 1 7.14
17 NS 3P S = 140 10 71.43
18 NS 2C N+1 140 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
a10 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 49,58 %
19 NS 5K W-1 100 14 100.00
20 NS 3P S-2 -200 1 7.14
21 NS 4P N+1 650 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
a.9 Lydia Wildiers -Antoinette Jourdain 52,20 %
22 NS 4P W+2 -680 5 35.71
23 NS 4P N-2 -200 1 7.14
24 NS 2P W-1 50 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 19,05 %
a.8 Veronique Englebienne -Ghislaine Deschuyteneer 54,64 %
25 NS 3S E = -600 0 0.00
26 NS 2P S+1 140 14 100.00
27 NS 2S E+3 -210 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.7 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige 60,71 %
28 NS 3S W+4 -520 8 57.14
29 NS 3T N+3 170 2 14.29
30 NS 4P S+1 450 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
Total : 132,0 / 336 = 39,29 %
PAIRE a.2 Annette Fobe -Dominique Sassen
A.7 Philippe van der Gracht -Tina Katila 56,67 %
1 EO 6K E = -920 9 64.29
2 EO 3S N = 600 7 50.00
3 EO 3C S-1 -50 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
A.2 Thierry Bollansee -Pascale Ortegat 61,90 %
4 EO 4C S-2 -200 11 78.57
5 EO 3S N-5 -500 12 85.71
6 EO 4P N-2 -100 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
A.8 Juan del Marmol -Philippe d'Hoop 42,83 %
7 EO 4C N+1 650 9 64.29
8 EO 1S S-4 -200 14 100.00
9 EO 4P E+1 -650 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
A.3 Francoise Turin -Brigitte Velge 39,29 %
10 EO 4K N-2 -200 13 92.86
11 EO 4P S-2 -100 14 100.00
12 EO 3S E+1 -430 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 90,48 %
A.9 Myriam de Timary -Christiane Huby 43,57 %
13 EO 3S N+4 720 5 35.71
14 EO 1S W+2 -150 13 92.86
15 EO 2S N-1 -100 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
A.4 Michele Berrier -Teresa Dekoster 57,74 %
16 EO 4PcS-4 -800 13 92.86
17 EO 3P S = 140 4 28.57
18 EO 2C N = 110 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
A.5 Kathleen van Doren -Bernard Groetembril 55,24 %
22 EO 4P W+2 -680 9 64.29
23 EO 5T S-2 -200 13 92.86
24 EO 2C N+2 170 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
A.6 Caroll Pucher -Grazia Neuenschwander 56,25 %
28 EO 3S W+4 -520 6 42.86
29 EO 5T N = 600 10 71.43
30 EO 5P S = 450 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
Total : 218,6 / 336 = 65,06 %
PAIRE a.7 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige
A10 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 53,69 %
4 EO 2P E+2 -170 6 42.86
5 EO 2S W = -120 8 57.14
6 EO 3K S = 110 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
A11 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes 39,70 %
10 EO 4K N-1 -100 8 57.14
11 EO 4P N-1 -50 9 64.29
12 EO 3S E+1 -430 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.1 Mercedes Oostens -Sophie Tilemans 42,68 %
16 EO 2C E = -110 9 64.29
17 EO 4P S-1 -50 13 92.86
18 EO 2C N = 110 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
A.7 Philippe van der Gracht -Tina Katila 56,67 %
19 EO 3S E+1 -630 11 78.57
20 EO 3K E = -110 7 50.00
21 EO 3S N = 600 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
A.2 Thierry Bollansee -Pascale Ortegat 61,90 %
22 EO 4P W+1 -650 2 14.29
23 EO 3S S-1 -100 5 35.71
24 EO 5K N+1 420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
A.8 Juan del Marmol -Philippe d'Hoop 42,83 %
25 EO 4T W = -130 10 71.43
26 EO 3P S-2 -200 14 100.00
27 EO 4T W+1 -150 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 85,71 %
A.3 Francoise Turin -Brigitte Velge 39,29 %
28 EO 3S W+4 -520 6 42.86
29 EO 3T N+3 170 12 85.71
30 EO 4P S+1 450 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
A.9 Myriam de Timary -Christiane Huby 43,57 %
31 EO 5KcW-2 300 12 85.71
32 EO 3C N-1 -50 8 57.14
33 EO 4C E+1 -450 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 204,0 / 336 = 60,71 %
PAIRE a.8 Veronique Englebienne -Ghislaine Deschuyteneer
A10 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 53,69 %
1 EO 5K E = -400 5 35.71
2 EO 3S N = 600 7 50.00
3 EO 4T E = -130 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 56,19 %
A11 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes 39,70 %
7 EO 4C N+1 650 9 64.29
8 EO 3P N-2 -100 7 50.00
9 EO 4P W+1 -650 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
A.1 Mercedes Oostens -Sophie Tilemans 42,68 %
13 EO 3T S+4 190 14 100.00
14 EO 1S W+1 -120 7 50.00
15 EO 4P S-1 -100 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
A.2 Thierry Bollansee -Pascale Ortegat 61,90 %
19 EO 3S E = -600 4 28.57
20 EO 4K E = -130 10 71.43
21 EO 3S N+4 720 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.8 Juan del Marmol -Philippe d'Hoop 42,83 %
22 EO 4P W+2 -680 9 64.29
23 EO 5T S-1 -100 5 35.71
24 EO 3C N = 140 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
A.3 Francoise Turin -Brigitte Velge 39,29 %
25 EO 3S E = -600 14 100.00
26 EO 2P S+1 140 0 0.00
27 EO 2S E+3 -210 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.9 Myriam de Timary -Christiane Huby 43,57 %
28 EO 6P W+1 -1010 12 85.71
29 EO 4T N+1 150 14 100.00
30 EO 4P S+1 450 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
A.4 Michele Berrier -Teresa Dekoster 57,74 %
31 EO 4P S+1 650 8 57.14
32 EO 3P E-1 100 4 28.57
33 EO 3T E-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
Total : 183,6 / 336 = 54,64 %
PAIRE a.9 Lydia Wildiers -Antoinette Jourdain
A.5 Kathleen van Doren -Bernard Groetembril 55,24 %
1 EO 6S W-1 50 1 7.14
2 EO 3S N-3 -300 14 100.00
3 EO 40%60% Ajust 8.4 60.00 µ Tbl = 55,71 %
A11 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes 39,70 %
4 EO 3P E = -140 3 21.43
5 EO 3C S-2 -200 10 71.43
6 EO 3S S+1 430 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.1 Mercedes Oostens -Sophie Tilemans 42,68 %
10 EO 3S N-1 -100 8 57.14
11 EO 4P S-1 -50 9 64.29
12 EO 3S E+1 -430 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.2 Thierry Bollansee -Pascale Ortegat 61,90 %
16 EO 2P S+1 140 4 28.57
17 EO 3P S = 140 4 28.57
18 EO 2C N = 110 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
A.3 Francoise Turin -Brigitte Velge 39,29 %
22 EO 4P W+2 -680 9 64.29
23 EO 4P N-2 -200 13 92.86
24 EO 2P W-1 50 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 80,95 %
A.9 Myriam de Timary -Christiane Huby 43,57 %
25 EO 3S E-1 100 3 21.43
26 EO 3P S-1 -100 12 85.71
27 EO 4T W = -130 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
A.4 Michele Berrier -Teresa Dekoster 57,74 %
28 EO 3S W+4 -520 6 42.86
29 EO 5T N+1 620 5 35.71
30 EO 4P S+1 450 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
A10 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 53,69 %
31 EO 5P S+1 680 5 35.71
32 EO 3T S-1 -50 8 57.14
33 EO 4C W+1 -450 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 175,4 / 336 = 52,20 %
PAIRE a10 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens
A11 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes 39,70 %
1 EO 4PcS-5 -1100 14 100.00
2 EO 3S N = 600 7 50.00
3 EO 4K W = -130 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 77,62 %
A.6 Caroll Pucher -Grazia Neuenschwander 56,25 %
4 EO 4C S-2 -200 11 78.57
5 EO 2P E-1 50 4 28.57
6 EO 3S S+1 430 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
A.1 Mercedes Oostens -Sophie Tilemans 42,68 %
7 EO 4C N+1 650 9 64.29
8 EO 2T W-1 50 4 28.57
9 EO 4P E+1 -650 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
A.2 Thierry Bollansee -Pascale Ortegat 61,90 %
13 EO 3S N+4 720 5 35.71
14 EO 2T N-1 -50 0 0.00
15 EO 4P S-2 -200 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
A.3 Francoise Turin -Brigitte Velge 39,29 %
19 EO 5K W-1 100 0 0.00
20 EO 3P S-2 -200 13 92.86
21 EO 4P N+1 650 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
A.4 Michele Berrier -Teresa Dekoster 57,74 %
25 EO 2T W = -90 6 42.86
26 EO 2P S = 110 6 42.86
27 EO 3T W+1 -130 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
A10 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 53,69 %
28 EO 6S W+1 -1020 14 100.00
29 EO 5T N+1 620 5 35.71
30 EO 4P S+1 450 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
A.5 Kathleen van Doren -Bernard Groetembril 55,24 %
31 EO 5T S+1 620 10 71.43
32 EO 3C N+1 170 0 0.00
33 EO 3S W+1 -430 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
Total : 166,6 / 336 = 49,58 %
PAIRE a11 Laurence del Marmol -Benoit del Marmol
A.6 Caroll Pucher -Grazia Neuenschwander 56,25 %
1 EO 6S W-1 50 1 7.14
2 EO 3S N-2 -200 12 85.71
3 EO 4C S-2 -100 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
A.1 Mercedes Oostens -Sophie Tilemans 42,68 %
4 EO 3P E = -140 3 21.43
5 EO 3ScN-3 -800 14 100.00
6 EO 4P N = 420 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.7 Philippe van der Gracht -Tina Katila 56,67 %
7 EO 4C N+1 650 9 64.29
8 EO 1S S = 90 2 14.29
9 EO 4P W+1 -650 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
A.2 Thierry Bollansee -Pascale Ortegat 61,90 %
10 EO 4K S-1 -100 8 57.14
11 EO 3P S = 140 3 21.43
12 EO 3T W+1 -130 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
A.3 Francoise Turin -Brigitte Velge 39,29 %
16 EO 4PcS-4 -800 13 92.86
17 EO 3P S = 140 4 28.57
18 EO 2C N+1 140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
A.4 Michele Berrier -Teresa Dekoster 57,74 %
22 EO 4P W+2 -680 9 64.29
23 EO 3C E+1 -170 10 71.43
24 EO 3P W-3 150 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
A.5 Kathleen van Doren -Bernard Groetembril 55,24 %
28 EO 6S E = -990 10 71.43
29 EO 5T N+1 620 5 35.71
30 EO 4P S+1 450 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A11 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes 39,70 %
31 EO 5PcS+1 1050 1 7.14
32 EO 3P E = -140 13 92.86
33 EO 4C W+2 -480 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 163,0 / 336 = 48,51 %
PAIRE a.6 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens
A.9 Myriam de Timary -Christiane Huby 43,57 %
1 EO 5K E = -400 5 35.71
2 EO 3S N+2 660 0 0.00
3 EO 3C S-1 -50 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 20,48 %
A10 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 53,69 %
7 EO 4C N+1 650 9 64.29
8 EO 3T W-2 100 0 0.00
9 EO 3S E = -600 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 21,43 %
A11 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes 39,70 %
13 EO 3S N+2 660 10 71.43
14 EO 2C E+1 -140 10 71.43
15 EO 4P S-2 -200 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
A.6 Caroll Pucher -Grazia Neuenschwander 56,25 %
16 EO 2P S-1 -50 6 42.86
17 EO 3P S = 140 4 28.57
18 EO 2C N = 110 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
A.1 Mercedes Oostens -Sophie Tilemans 42,68 %
19 EO 3S E+1 -630 11 78.57
20 EO 2C N-2 -200 13 92.86
21 EO 2P N+2 170 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 90,48 %
A.7 Philippe van der Gracht -Tina Katila 56,67 %
22 EO 4P W+2 -680 9 64.29
23 EO 3S S-1 -100 5 35.71
24 EO 3C N = 140 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
A.2 Thierry Bollansee -Pascale Ortegat 61,90 %
25 EO 2P W = -110 8 57.14
26 EO 2P S = 110 6 42.86
27 EO 2P N = 110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.8 Juan del Marmol -Philippe d'Hoop 42,83 %
28 EO 3S W+2 -460 0 0.00
29 EO 5T N+1 620 5 35.71
30 EO 5C E = -450 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
Total : 158,6 / 336 = 47,20 %
PAIRE a.4 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor
A.8 Juan del Marmol -Philippe d'Hoop 42,83 %
1 EO 6T W = -920 9 64.29
2 EO 3S N = 600 7 50.00
3 EO 2C S+1 140 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 38,33 %
A.9 Myriam de Timary -Christiane Huby 43,57 %
7 EO 4C N+1 650 9 64.29
8 EO 1S W+1 -120 12 85.71
9 EO 4P E+1 -650 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
A.4 Michele Berrier -Teresa Dekoster 57,74 %
10 EO 3C W-1 100 4 28.57
11 EO 4P S-1 -50 9 64.29
12 EO 2S E+2 -180 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
A10 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 53,69 %
13 EO 3S N+1 630 12 85.71
14 EO 1S W+1 -120 7 50.00
15 EO 2P S = 110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
A.5 Kathleen van Doren -Bernard Groetembril 55,24 %
16 EO 4C E-3 300 0 0.00
17 EO 4P S-1 -50 13 92.86
18 EO 2C N = 110 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
A11 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes 39,70 %
19 EO 3S W+1 -630 11 78.57
20 EO 3C N-1 -100 3 21.43
21 EO 5S N = 660 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
A.6 Caroll Pucher -Grazia Neuenschwander 56,25 %
22 EO 4P W+2 -680 9 64.29
23 EO 3S S-1 -100 5 35.71
24 EO 2S S-1 -50 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.7 Philippe van der Gracht -Tina Katila 56,67 %
28 EO 3S W+3 -490 2 14.29
29 EO 3S N+2 660 0 0.00
30 EO 4P S+1 450 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 19,05 %
Total : 158,1 / 336 = 47,05 %
PAIRE a.5 Jan Sassen -Edith Close
A.9 Myriam de Timary -Christiane Huby 43,57 %
4 EO 4C S-2 -200 11 78.57
5 EO 3C S-1 -100 6 42.86
6 EO 3S S-3 -150 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
A10 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 53,69 %
10 EO 1S N+3 180 2 14.29
11 EO 2P S+1 140 3 21.43
12 EO 3S E+1 -430 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
A.5 Kathleen van Doren -Bernard Groetembril 55,24 %
13 EO 3S N+4 720 5 35.71
14 EO 1S W = -90 3 21.43
15 EO 3S N-2 -200 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
A11 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes 39,70 %
16 EO 2C E = -110 9 64.29
17 EO 1S S+1 120 10 71.43
18 EO 2C N = 110 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
A.6 Caroll Pucher -Grazia Neuenschwander 56,25 %
19 EO 3S E = -600 4 28.57
20 EO 3P S = 140 0 0.00
21 EO 3S N+2 660 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 21,43 %
A.1 Mercedes Oostens -Sophie Tilemans 42,68 %
22 EO 3S E-1 100 0 0.00
23 EO 3S S = 600 0 0.00
24 EO 2C N+2 170 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 7,14 %
A.7 Philippe van der Gracht -Tina Katila 56,67 %
25 EO 3C S-3 -150 12 85.71
26 EO 2P S = 110 6 42.86
27 EO 1S S-2 -100 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
A.8 Juan del Marmol -Philippe d'Hoop 42,83 %
31 EO 2P S+4 230 14 100.00
32 EO 3P E = -140 13 92.86
33 EO 3S W+1 -430 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
Total : 155,0 / 336 = 46,13 %
PAIRE a.1 Catherine de Moffarts -Marie J. de Wagheneire
A.1 Mercedes Oostens -Sophie Tilemans 42,68 %
1 EO 6S W = -990 12 85.71
2 EO 3S N+1 630 2 14.29
3 EO 4T E = -130 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 60,95 %
A.7 Philippe van der Gracht -Tina Katila 56,67 %
4 EO 4P E-1 100 0 0.00
5 EO 3P E-2 100 2 14.29
6 EO 3S S = 400 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 19,05 %
A.2 Thierry Bollansee -Pascale Ortegat 61,90 %
7 EO 4C N+2 680 1 7.14
8 EO 2K N-2 -100 7 50.00
9 EO 4P W+1 -650 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
A.8 Juan del Marmol -Philippe d'Hoop 42,83 %
10 EO 4K N-2 -200 13 92.86
11 EO 4P S = 420 0 0.00
12 EO 2S E+1 -150 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
A.3 Francoise Turin -Brigitte Velge 39,29 %
13 EO 6K N = 1370 0 0.00
14 EO 1S W+2 -150 13 92.86
15 EO 4PcS-2 -500 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
A.4 Michele Berrier -Teresa Dekoster 57,74 %
19 EO 3S E = -600 4 28.57
20 EO 3K E = -110 7 50.00
21 EO 3S N+2 660 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
A.5 Kathleen van Doren -Bernard Groetembril 55,24 %
25 EO 3S E-1 100 3 21.43
26 EO 2P S = 110 6 42.86
27 EO 3S E-1 50 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
A.6 Caroll Pucher -Grazia Neuenschwander 56,25 %
31 EO 5PcS+1 1050 1 7.14
32 EO 4C N-1 -50 8 57.14
33 EO 3S E+2 -460 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 140,6 / 336 = 41,85 %
PAIRE a.3 Nadine Brabant -Sybille Gillet
A.8 Juan del Marmol -Philippe d'Hoop 42,83 %
4 EO 4C S-2 -200 11 78.57
5 EO 4PcE-3 500 0 0.00
6 EO 4P N-1 -50 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.3 Francoise Turin -Brigitte Velge 39,29 %
7 EO 4C N+2 680 1 7.14
8 EO 2P E = -110 10 71.43
9 EO 3S E+1 -630 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
A.9 Myriam de Timary -Christiane Huby 43,57 %
10 EO 3S N+2 660 0 0.00
11 EO 4P S-1 -50 9 64.29
12 EO 2S E+2 -180 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.4 Michele Berrier -Teresa Dekoster 57,74 %
13 EO 3S N+4 720 5 35.71
14 EO 1S W = -90 3 21.43
15 EO 1K N+1 90 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
A10 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 53,69 %
16 EO 4C E-2 200 2 14.29
17 EO 3P S = 140 4 28.57
18 EO 3C N-1 -100 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
A.5 Kathleen van Doren -Bernard Groetembril 55,24 %
19 EO 3S E+1 -630 11 78.57
20 EO 3P S-1 -100 3 21.43
21 EO 3S N+2 660 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
A.6 Caroll Pucher -Grazia Neuenschwander 56,25 %
25 EO 3S E-3 300 0 0.00
26 EO 2P S = 110 6 42.86
27 EO 4T W = -130 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.7 Philippe van der Gracht -Tina Katila 56,67 %
31 EO 5P S+1 680 5 35.71
32 EO 2C N+1 140 2 14.29
33 EO 4C W+1 -450 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
Total : 126,0 / 336 = 37,50 %
|