B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 62,33 A14 Patrick Gilles -Philippe van der Gracht
--- 2 57,31 A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois
--- 3 57,14 A10 Patricia Bardy -Didier Collart
--- 4 52,31 A.8 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed
--- 5 52,05 A13 Mado Miller -Hélène Lemberger
--- 6 51,89 A.1 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Sophie Tilemans
--- 7 51,29 A.9 Anne Tirtiaux -Christiane Vroninckx
--- 8 49,34 A.5 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen
--- 9 49,26 A.6 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens
--- 10 48,52 A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor
--- 11 48,20 A.3 Nicole Leclere -Grazia Neuenschwander
--- 12 47,65 A15 Sylviane Delbeke -Fabienne Smit
--- 13 42,42 A12 Colette Heerinckx -Annette Fobe
--- 14 41,65 A.7 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza
--- 15 38,54 A11 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm
--- 16 0,00 A16 -
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 61,38 a.4 Jeannine Thys -Christiane Huby
--- 2 56,63 a14 Lydia Wildiers -Liliane Baptista
--- 3 56,10 a.9 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru
--- 4 55,72 a10 Teresa Dekoster -Michel Lievens
--- 5 55,42 a.8 Alexandre Viot -Noelle Fosse
--- 6 54,87 a.1 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille
--- 7 53,41 a12 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain
--- 8 52,93 a.7 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten
--- 9 52,75 a.2 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee
--- 10 52,44 a.6 Helene Schyns -Michele Berrier
--- 11 51,80 a11 Brigitte de Fauconval -Florence Vital
--- 12 47,69 a.3 Edith Close -Jan Sassen
--- 13 45,33 a15 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger
--- 14 45,02 a16 Annick Peeters -Neslihan Buharali
--- 15 38,47 a.5 Marc Antoine de Halloy -Chantal de Locht
--- 16 19,17 a13 Chantal Huybrechts. -Micheline de Looz
PAIRE A14 Patrick Gilles -Philippe van der Gracht
a11 Brigitte de Fauconval -Florence Vital 51,80 %
1 NS 4K N-1 -50 9.9 45.00
2 NS 4C E-2 100 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a10 Teresa Dekoster -Michel Lievens 55,72 %
3 NS 3S W+2 -660 11 50.00
4 NS 3T S-1 -100 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.9 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 56,10 %
5 NS 2S S+2 180 15.4 70.00
6 NS 3S E-2 200 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
a.8 Alexandre Viot -Noelle Fosse 55,42 %
7 NS 3S N-1 -100 4.5 20.45
8 NS 3K E-1 50 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
a.7 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 52,93 %
9 NS 4P E = -620 6.6 30.00
10 NS 4P S = 620 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
a.5 Marc Antoine de Halloy -Chantal de Locht 38,47 %
11 NS 3S S+3 490 17.5 79.55
12 NS 3T S = 110 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 84,55 %
a.4 Jeannine Thys -Christiane Huby 61,38 %
13 NS 4P E = -620 11 50.00
14 NS 4P S+1 450 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.3 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 47,69 %
15 NS 4P W = -420 16.5 75.00
16 NS 3K N+1 130 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a.2 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 52,75 %
17 NS 3S N+2 460 12.1 55.00
18 NS 2S S+1 150 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a14 Lydia Wildiers -Liliane Baptista 56,63 %
27 NS 7C S-1 -50 6 27.27
28 NS 4P W+1 -450 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a13 Chantal Huybrechts. -Micheline de Looz 19,17 %
29 NS 4K S = 130 18 81.82
30 NS 2C N+1 140 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
a12 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 53,41 %
31 NS 4C E-3 150 21.9 99.55
32 NS 4P N = 420 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
Total : 329,1 / 528 = 62,33 %
PAIRE A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois
a.2 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 52,75 %
3 NS 3S W+2 -660 11 50.00
4 NS 3P W-1 100 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
a.1 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 54,87 %
5 NS 2K N+4 170 11 50.00
6 NS 3S W+2 -660 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a16 Annick Peeters -Neslihan Buharali 45,02 %
7 NS 3S N+1 630 20.8 94.55
8 NS 2C S+1 140 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 89,55 %
a15 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 45,33 %
9 NS 4P E = -620 6.6 30.00
10 NS 3S N+3 690 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a14 Lydia Wildiers -Liliane Baptista 56,63 %
11 NS 4C N+1 450 8.8 40.00
12 NS 3T S = 110 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a13 Chantal Huybrechts. -Micheline de Looz 19,17 %
13 NS 4P E-1 100 21.9 99.55
14 NS 4P S+1 450 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a12 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 53,41 %
15 NS 3P W+3 -230 20.8 94.55
16 NS 3T E-1 100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
a11 Brigitte de Fauconval -Florence Vital 51,80 %
17 NS 3S N+2 460 12.1 55.00
18 NS 4P S-2 -200 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a.9 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 56,10 %
19 NS 3S N-3 -150 2.3 10.45
20 NS 2P E+1 -140 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 15,45 %
a.8 Alexandre Viot -Noelle Fosse 55,42 %
21 NS 2C E = -110 5.5 25.00
22 NS 2C W-2 200 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.7 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 52,93 %
23 NS 2C N-1 -100 9 40.91
24 NS 2C W = -110 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a.6 Helene Schyns -Michele Berrier 52,44 %
25 NS 4C E-2 200 16 72.73
26 NS 3S W-2 200 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
Total : 302,6 / 528 = 57,31 %
PAIRE A10 Patricia Bardy -Didier Collart
a.3 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 47,69 %
1 NS 4C W-1 50 15.4 70.00
2 NS 4PcN-1 -200 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
a.1 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 54,87 %
3 NS 3S E+2 -660 11 50.00
4 NS 5TcS-3 -800 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a16 Annick Peeters -Neslihan Buharali 45,02 %
5 NS 1S N+3 180 15.4 70.00
6 NS 3S E = -600 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 67,50 %
a15 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 45,33 %
7 NS 2S N-1 -100 4.5 20.45
8 NS 2C S+1 140 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a14 Lydia Wildiers -Liliane Baptista 56,63 %
9 NS 4P E-1 100 18.6 84.55
10 NS 4P S = 620 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a10 Teresa Dekoster -Michel Lievens 55,72 %
19 NS 3C E+1 -170 0.1 0.45
20 NS 2P W+1 -140 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 10,45 %
a.9 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 56,10 %
21 NS 2C E-1 50 15.4 70.00
22 NS 2C W-2 200 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 67,50 %
a.8 Alexandre Viot -Noelle Fosse 55,42 %
23 NS 1S N = 90 16 72.73
24 NS 3T W = -110 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a.7 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 52,93 %
25 NS 4PcN-1 -100 0 0.00
26 NS 4C E-1 100 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.6 Helene Schyns -Michele Berrier 52,44 %
27 NS 6C S = 980 19 86.36
28 NS 4P E+1 -450 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a.5 Marc Antoine de Halloy -Chantal de Locht 38,47 %
29 NS 5K N = 600 22 100.00
30 NS 3P E-1 50 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
a.4 Jeannine Thys -Christiane Huby 61,38 %
31 NS 3C E-1 50 7.7 35.00
32 NS 4P N+1 450 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
Total : 301,7 / 528 = 57,14 %
PAIRE A.8 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed
a14 Lydia Wildiers -Liliane Baptista 56,63 %
1 NS 5C W = -450 0.1 0.45
2 NS 5T W = -400 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
a13 Chantal Huybrechts. -Micheline de Looz 19,17 %
3 NS 3S E+1 -630 19.7 89.55
4 NS 3P W-2 200 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 94,55 %
a12 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 53,41 %
5 NS 3C W-1 50 3.4 15.45
6 NS 3S W+1 -630 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.8 Alexandre Viot -Noelle Fosse 55,42 %
15 NS 3S E+1 -430 12.1 55.00
16 NS 4T E-2 200 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
a.7 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 52,93 %
17 NS 3S N+2 460 12.1 55.00
18 NS 3S S-1 -100 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a.6 Helene Schyns -Michele Berrier 52,44 %
19 NS 5TcS-1 -100 5.5 25.00
20 NS 2S E-2 200 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
a.5 Marc Antoine de Halloy -Chantal de Locht 38,47 %
21 NS 1S E-1 50 15.4 70.00
22 NS 2CcW-2 500 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
a.4 Jeannine Thys -Christiane Huby 61,38 %
23 NS 2C N-2 -200 2 9.09
24 NS 3T W+3 -170 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
a.3 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 47,69 %
25 NS 3P N = 140 10 45.45
26 NS Pass Passe 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.2 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 52,75 %
27 NS 6S N-1 -50 6 27.27
28 NS 4P E+1 -450 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.1 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 54,87 %
29 NS 5K S-1 -100 6 27.27
30 NS 4P E-2 100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a15 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 45,33 %
31 NS 3C E-2 100 15.4 70.00
32 NS 4P N+1 450 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
Total : 276,2 / 528 = 52,31 %
PAIRE A13 Mado Miller -Hélène Lemberger
a.9 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 56,10 %
1 NS 4C E-1 50 15.4 70.00
2 NS 4PcN-2 -500 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a.8 Alexandre Viot -Noelle Fosse 55,42 %
3 NS 3S E+2 -660 11 50.00
4 NS 4T S-1 -100 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.7 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 52,93 %
5 NS 1S E-4 200 19.7 89.55
6 NS 3C E+2 -200 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 89,55 %
a.6 Helene Schyns -Michele Berrier 52,44 %
7 NS 2S N+1 150 13.2 60.00
8 NS 2C S-2 -100 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a.4 Jeannine Thys -Christiane Huby 61,38 %
9 NS 4P E = -620 6.6 30.00
10 NS 4P N = 620 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
a.3 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 47,69 %
11 NS 4C N+1 450 8.8 40.00
12 NS 3K E-1 50 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a.2 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 52,75 %
13 NS 4P E = -620 11 50.00
14 NS 4P S+1 450 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.1 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 54,87 %
15 NS 4P W+1 -450 6.6 30.00
16 NS 4T E-2 200 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a13 Chantal Huybrechts. -Micheline de Looz 19,17 %
25 NS 4C E-2 200 16 72.73
26 NS 2P E = -110 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a12 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 53,41 %
27 NS 4S N+2 490 16 72.73
28 NS 4P E+1 -450 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a11 Brigitte de Fauconval -Florence Vital 51,80 %
29 NS 4K S-1 -100 6 27.27
30 NS 3P E-1 50 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a10 Teresa Dekoster -Michel Lievens 55,72 %
31 NS 4T W-1 50 7.7 35.00
32 NS 4P N = 420 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
Total : 274,8 / 528 = 52,05 %
PAIRE A.1 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Sophie Tilemans
a.1 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 54,87 %
1 NS 5KcN-2 -300 4.5 20.45
2 NS 5C E-2 100 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a16 Annick Peeters -Neslihan Buharali 45,02 %
3 NS 3S W+2 -660 11 50.00
4 NS 5T S-3 -300 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a15 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 45,33 %
5 NS 1S N+3 180 15.4 70.00
6 NS 3S E = -600 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 67,50 %
a14 Lydia Wildiers -Liliane Baptista 56,63 %
7 NS 1S S+2 150 13.2 60.00
8 NS 2C S-1 -50 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
a13 Chantal Huybrechts. -Micheline de Looz 19,17 %
9 NS 4P E = -620 6.6 30.00
10 NS 4P N+1 650 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
a12 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 53,41 %
11 NS 3S S+3 490 17.5 79.55
12 NS 2C E = -110 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a11 Brigitte de Fauconval -Florence Vital 51,80 %
13 NS 4P E = -620 11 50.00
14 NS 4P S+1 450 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a10 Teresa Dekoster -Michel Lievens 55,72 %
15 NS 3P W+3 -230 20.8 94.55
16 NS 3K N = 110 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
a.8 Alexandre Viot -Noelle Fosse 55,42 %
17 NS 3S N+2 460 12.1 55.00
18 NS 3P S = 140 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.7 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 52,93 %
19 NS 5T S = 400 21.9 99.55
20 NS 2P E = -110 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a.6 Helene Schyns -Michele Berrier 52,44 %
21 NS 2C E = -110 5.5 25.00
22 NS 2P S = 110 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
a.5 Marc Antoine de Halloy -Chantal de Locht 38,47 %
23 NS 2P S+1 140 20 90.91
24 NS 3S E = -400 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
Total : 274,0 / 528 = 51,89 %
PAIRE A.9 Anne Tirtiaux -Christiane Vroninckx
a16 Annick Peeters -Neslihan Buharali 45,02 %
1 NS 4C E = -420 2.3 10.45
2 NS 4PcN-1 -200 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a15 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 45,33 %
3 NS 3S E+2 -660 11 50.00
4 NS 4T S-1 -100 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a14 Lydia Wildiers -Liliane Baptista 56,63 %
5 NS 3K N+1 130 6.6 30.00
6 NS 3S W+1 -630 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
a13 Chantal Huybrechts. -Micheline de Looz 19,17 %
7 NS 3S N+1 630 20.8 94.55
8 NS 3S W-3 150 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 97,05 %
a.9 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 56,10 %
17 NS 6KcN-1 -100 1.2 5.45
18 NS 2P S+1 140 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.8 Alexandre Viot -Noelle Fosse 55,42 %
19 NS 5T S-1 -50 11 50.00
20 NS 3P W-1 100 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
a.7 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 52,93 %
21 NS 2C W = -110 5.5 25.00
22 NS 3T S+1 130 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 32,50 %
a.6 Helene Schyns -Michele Berrier 52,44 %
23 NS 2P S+1 140 20 90.91
24 NS 2T W+2 -130 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.5 Marc Antoine de Halloy -Chantal de Locht 38,47 %
25 NS 4C E-1 100 6 27.27
26 NS 4C E-2 200 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a.4 Jeannine Thys -Christiane Huby 61,38 %
27 NS 7C S-1 -50 6 27.27
28 NS 4P W+1 -450 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.3 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 47,69 %
29 NS 4K S = 130 18 81.82
30 NS 3C N-1 -50 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a.2 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 52,75 %
31 NS 3C E-1 50 7.7 35.00
32 NS 4P N = 420 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
Total : 270,8 / 528 = 51,29 %
PAIRE A.5 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen
a.5 Marc Antoine de Halloy -Chantal de Locht 38,47 %
9 NS 4P E-1 100 18.6 84.55
10 NS 4P S = 620 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a.4 Jeannine Thys -Christiane Huby 61,38 %
11 NS 2S S+4 240 0.1 0.45
12 NS 3K E-1 50 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.3 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 47,69 %
13 NS 4P E = -620 11 50.00
14 NS 4P S+1 450 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.2 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 52,75 %
15 NS 4P E+2 -480 1.2 5.45
16 NS 3K N = 110 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
a.1 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 54,87 %
17 NS 3S N+2 460 12.1 55.00
18 NS 4P S = 620 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
a16 Annick Peeters -Neslihan Buharali 45,02 %
19 NS 3T S+1 130 19.7 89.55
20 NS 4P E-1 100 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
a15 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 45,33 %
21 NS 2C W = -110 5.5 25.00
22 NS 3T S = 110 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
a14 Lydia Wildiers -Liliane Baptista 56,63 %
23 NS 1S N-1 -100 9 40.91
24 NS 2T W+3 -150 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a12 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 53,41 %
25 NS 5P E-2 200 16 72.73
26 NS 3P E = -140 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a11 Brigitte de Fauconval -Florence Vital 51,80 %
27 NS 6S N = 990 22 100.00
28 NS 4P W+1 -450 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
a10 Teresa Dekoster -Michel Lievens 55,72 %
29 NS 2K S = 90 12 54.55
30 NS 3P E+1 -170 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.9 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 56,10 %
31 NS 3C E-1 50 7.7 35.00
32 NS 4P N = 420 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
Total : 260,5 / 528 = 49,34 %
PAIRE A.6 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens
a10 Teresa Dekoster -Michel Lievens 55,72 %
1 NS 4K S+1 150 21.9 99.55
2 NS 4PcN-2 -500 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.6 Helene Schyns -Michele Berrier 52,44 %
11 NS 3S S+3 490 17.5 79.55
12 NS 3C E = -140 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a.5 Marc Antoine de Halloy -Chantal de Locht 38,47 %
13 NS 4P E = -620 11 50.00
14 NS 4P S+1 450 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.4 Jeannine Thys -Christiane Huby 61,38 %
15 NS 4P W+2 -480 1.2 5.45
16 NS 1S W = -90 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 2,95 %
a.3 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 47,69 %
17 NS 3S S+2 460 12.1 55.00
18 NS 3P S = 140 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.2 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 52,75 %
19 NS 5C E-1 100 16.5 75.00
20 NS 2P E = -110 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
a.1 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 54,87 %
21 NS 2C E = -110 5.5 25.00
22 NS 2C W-3 300 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a16 Annick Peeters -Neslihan Buharali 45,02 %
23 NS 2P S-1 -100 9 40.91
24 NS 3T W = -110 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a15 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 45,33 %
25 NS 4C E-2 200 16 72.73
26 NS 2C E+1 -140 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a13 Chantal Huybrechts. -Micheline de Looz 19,17 %
27 NS 3C S+3 230 14 63.64
28 NS 4P E-1 50 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
a12 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 53,41 %
29 NS 5K S-2 -200 0 0.00
30 NS 1S W+1 -120 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a11 Brigitte de Fauconval -Florence Vital 51,80 %
31 NS 3P N = 140 18.6 84.55
32 NS 4P N = 420 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
Total : 260,1 / 528 = 49,26 %
PAIRE A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor
a.4 Jeannine Thys -Christiane Huby 61,38 %
7 NS 3S N = 600 17.5 79.55
8 NS 3C S-2 -100 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a.3 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 47,69 %
9 NS 4P E-1 100 18.6 84.55
10 NS 4P S = 620 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a.2 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 52,75 %
11 NS 3S S+1 430 3.4 15.45
12 NS 3K E-1 50 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
a.1 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 54,87 %
13 NS 4P E = -620 11 50.00
14 NS 6P S-1 -50 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a16 Annick Peeters -Neslihan Buharali 45,02 %
15 NS 4P W = -420 16.5 75.00
16 NS 3C N-1 -50 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 45,23 %
a15 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 45,33 %
17 NS 6ScS-1 -100 1.2 5.45
18 NS 2P S+2 170 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a14 Lydia Wildiers -Liliane Baptista 56,63 %
19 NS 5C E-1 100 16.5 75.00
20 NS 4P E-2 200 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
a13 Chantal Huybrechts. -Micheline de Looz 19,17 %
21 NS 1S S+1 120 21.9 99.55
22 NS 3CcW-3 800 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 99,55 %
a11 Brigitte de Fauconval -Florence Vital 51,80 %
23 NS 3S S-3 -300 0 0.00
24 NS 5TcW-2 300 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a10 Teresa Dekoster -Michel Lievens 55,72 %
25 NS 4P S = 420 22 100.00
26 NS 5T N-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.9 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 56,10 %
27 NS 6S N-1 -50 6 27.27
28 NS 6P W = -980 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
a.8 Alexandre Viot -Noelle Fosse 55,42 %
29 NS 3K S = 110 14 63.64
30 NS 3S W = -400 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
Total : 256,2 / 528 = 48,52 %
PAIRE A.3 Nicole Leclere -Grazia Neuenschwander
a.3 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 47,69 %
5 NS 2P N-1 -100 0.1 0.45
6 NS 3S W = -600 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a.2 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 52,75 %
7 NS 2S N+1 150 13.2 60.00
8 NS 2P W-1 50 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.1 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 54,87 %
9 NS 4P E = -620 6.6 30.00
10 NS 5P S-1 -100 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
a16 Annick Peeters -Neslihan Buharali 45,02 %
11 NS 4C N+1 450 8.8 40.00
12 NS 3T S = 110 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a15 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 45,33 %
13 NS 4P E = -620 11 50.00
14 NS 4P S+1 450 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a14 Lydia Wildiers -Liliane Baptista 56,63 %
15 NS 4P W+1 -450 6.6 30.00
16 NS 1S W-1 100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
a13 Chantal Huybrechts. -Micheline de Looz 19,17 %
17 NS 3S N+3 490 21.9 99.55
18 NS 4P S = 620 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 92,05 %
a12 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 53,41 %
19 NS 5T S-1 -50 11 50.00
20 NS 2P E+1 -140 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
a10 Teresa Dekoster -Michel Lievens 55,72 %
21 NS 2C W-1 50 15.4 70.00
22 NS 2S N+2 180 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a.9 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 56,10 %
23 NS 1S N-1 -100 9 40.91
24 NS 2S E = -120 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.8 Alexandre Viot -Noelle Fosse 55,42 %
25 NS 4C E-1 100 6 27.27
26 NS 4P E-1 100 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.7 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 52,93 %
27 NS 6S N-1 -50 6 27.27
28 NS 4P W+1 -450 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
Total : 254,5 / 528 = 48,20 %
PAIRE A15 Sylviane Delbeke -Fabienne Smit
a13 Chantal Huybrechts. -Micheline de Looz 19,17 %
1 NS 5K N-1 -50 9.9 45.00
2 NS 3P N+1 170 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
a12 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 53,41 %
3 NS 3S W+3 -690 1.2 5.45
4 NS 4T S-2 -200 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
a11 Brigitte de Fauconval -Florence Vital 51,80 %
5 NS 1S N+4 210 21.9 99.55
6 NS 3S E+2 -660 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a10 Teresa Dekoster -Michel Lievens 55,72 %
7 NS 3S N-2 -200 0.1 0.45
8 NS 3P W-2 100 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a.9 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 56,10 %
9 NS 4P E-1 100 18.6 84.55
10 NS 4P S = 620 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a.8 Alexandre Viot -Noelle Fosse 55,42 %
11 NS 3S N+1 430 3.4 15.45
12 NS 4T S-1 -100 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 17,95 %
a.6 Helene Schyns -Michele Berrier 52,44 %
13 NS 4P E = -620 11 50.00
14 NS 4P S+1 450 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.5 Marc Antoine de Halloy -Chantal de Locht 38,47 %
15 NS 3S E+1 -430 12.1 55.00
16 NS 3T E-1 100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.4 Jeannine Thys -Christiane Huby 61,38 %
17 NS 3S N+2 460 12.1 55.00
18 NS 3S S+1 630 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a.3 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 47,69 %
19 NS 5T S-1 -50 11 50.00
20 NS 2P E+1 -140 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
a15 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 45,33 %
29 NS 4K S = 130 18 81.82
30 NS 3P E = -140 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a14 Lydia Wildiers -Liliane Baptista 56,63 %
31 NS 3C E-1 50 7.7 35.00
32 NS 4P N = 420 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
Total : 251,6 / 528 = 47,65 %
PAIRE A12 Colette Heerinckx -Annette Fobe
a.7 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 52,93 %
1 NS 4C W-1 50 15.4 70.00
2 NS 5T W = -400 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.6 Helene Schyns -Michele Berrier 52,44 %
3 NS 3S E+2 -660 11 50.00
4 NS 3T S-1 -100 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.5 Marc Antoine de Halloy -Chantal de Locht 38,47 %
5 NS 1S N+2 150 8.8 40.00
6 NS 3S W = -600 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.3 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 47,69 %
7 NS 3S N-1 -100 4.5 20.45
8 NS 1S W-1 50 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
a.2 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 52,75 %
9 NS 4P E = -620 6.6 30.00
10 NS 4P S = 620 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
a.1 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 54,87 %
11 NS 3S S+3 490 17.5 79.55
12 NS 3K E-2 100 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
a16 Annick Peeters -Neslihan Buharali 45,02 %
13 NS 4P E = -620 11 50.00
14 NS 4P S+1 450 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a12 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 53,41 %
23 NS 2P S+1 140 20 90.91
24 NS 3T W+2 -150 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a11 Brigitte de Fauconval -Florence Vital 51,80 %
25 NS 4P S-1 -50 2 9.09
26 NS 3C E = -140 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
a10 Teresa Dekoster -Michel Lievens 55,72 %
27 NS 6C S = 980 19 86.36
28 NS 6P W = -980 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.9 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 56,10 %
29 NS 4K S-1 -100 6 27.27
30 NS 4P E = -420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
a.8 Alexandre Viot -Noelle Fosse 55,42 %
31 NS 3P N-1 -100 0.1 0.45
32 NS 4P N = 420 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
Total : 224,0 / 528 = 42,42 %
PAIRE A.7 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza
a12 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 53,41 %
1 NS 5K S-2 -100 6.6 30.00
2 NS 4P N-1 -100 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a11 Brigitte de Fauconval -Florence Vital 51,80 %
3 NS 4K E+1 -150 21.9 99.55
4 NS 3T N-3 -300 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a.7 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 52,93 %
13 NS 5TcN-5 -1400 0.1 0.45
14 NS 5P S = 450 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a.6 Helene Schyns -Michele Berrier 52,44 %
15 NS 4P W+1 -450 6.6 30.00
16 NS 3P S-1 -50 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.5 Marc Antoine de Halloy -Chantal de Locht 38,47 %
17 NS 3S N+2 460 12.1 55.00
18 NS 2P S = 110 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a.4 Jeannine Thys -Christiane Huby 61,38 %
19 NS 5TcS-1 -100 5.5 25.00
20 NS 2P E+1 -140 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.3 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 47,69 %
21 NS 2K N+1 110 19.7 89.55
22 NS 2S N = 120 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
a.2 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 52,75 %
23 NS 2P S-1 -100 9 40.91
24 NS 3T W-1 50 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a.1 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 54,87 %
25 NS 4C E-1 100 6 27.27
26 NS 3C W = -140 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
a16 Annick Peeters -Neslihan Buharali 45,02 %
27 NS 6S N-1 -50 6 27.27
28 NS 4P W+1 -450 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a14 Lydia Wildiers -Liliane Baptista 56,63 %
29 NS 5K S-1 -100 6 27.27
30 NS 3P E+2 -200 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a13 Chantal Huybrechts. -Micheline de Looz 19,17 %
31 NS 2P N+1 140 18.6 84.55
32 NS 4P N = 420 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
Total : 219,9 / 528 = 41,65 %
PAIRE A11 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm
a.5 Marc Antoine de Halloy -Chantal de Locht 38,47 %
1 NS 2K S+2 130 19.7 89.55
2 NS 5T W = -400 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
a.4 Jeannine Thys -Christiane Huby 61,38 %
3 NS 3S E+3 -690 1.2 5.45
4 NS 3P W-1 100 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.2 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 52,75 %
5 NS 2C W-1 50 3.4 15.45
6 NS 3S E+1 -630 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.1 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 54,87 %
7 NS 2S N = 120 8.8 40.00
8 NS 3K E-2 100 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a16 Annick Peeters -Neslihan Buharali 45,02 %
9 NS 4P E = -620 6.6 30.00
10 NS 4P S = 620 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
a15 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 45,33 %
11 NS 3S S+3 490 17.5 79.55
12 NS 3C E-1 50 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a11 Brigitte de Fauconval -Florence Vital 51,80 %
21 NS 2C W = -110 5.5 25.00
22 NS 3K S-1 -50 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 12,73 %
a10 Teresa Dekoster -Michel Lievens 55,72 %
23 NS 2S N-1 -100 9 40.91
24 NS 5T W = -400 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.9 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 56,10 %
25 NS 4C E-2 200 16 72.73
26 NS 4P E-1 100 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a.8 Alexandre Viot -Noelle Fosse 55,42 %
27 NS 6C S-1 -50 6 27.27
28 NS 4P W+2 -480 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.7 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 52,93 %
29 NS 4K S-1 -100 6 27.27
30 NS 3P E = -140 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a.6 Helene Schyns -Michele Berrier 52,44 %
31 NS 3C E-1 50 7.7 35.00
32 NS 3P N = 140 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
Total : 203,5 / 528 = 38,54 %
PAIRE A16 -
a15 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 45,33 %
1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a14 Lydia Wildiers -Liliane Baptista 56,63 %
3 NS BYE 0 0.00
4 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a13 Chantal Huybrechts. -Micheline de Looz 19,17 %
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a12 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 53,41 %
7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a11 Brigitte de Fauconval -Florence Vital 51,80 %
9 NS BYE 0 0.00
10 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a10 Teresa Dekoster -Michel Lievens 55,72 %
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.9 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 56,10 %
13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.7 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 52,93 %
15 NS BYE 0 0.00
16 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.6 Helene Schyns -Michele Berrier 52,44 %
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.5 Marc Antoine de Halloy -Chantal de Locht 38,47 %
19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.4 Jeannine Thys -Christiane Huby 61,38 %
21 NS BYE 0 0.00
22 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a16 Annick Peeters -Neslihan Buharali 45,02 %
31 NS BYE 0 0.00
32 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 704 = 0,00 %
PAIRE a.4 Jeannine Thys -Christiane Huby
A11 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm 38,54 %
3 EO 3S E+3 -690 20.8 94.55
4 EO 3P W-1 100 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 48,52 %
7 EO 3S N = 600 4.5 20.45
8 EO 3C S-2 -100 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A13 Mado Miller -Hélène Lemberger 52,05 %
9 EO 4P E = -620 15.4 70.00
10 EO 4P N = 620 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
A.5 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen 49,34 %
11 EO 2S S+4 240 21.9 99.55
12 EO 3K E-1 50 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A14 Patrick Gilles -Philippe van der Gracht 62,33 %
13 EO 4P E = -620 11 50.00
14 EO 4P S+1 450 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.6 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 49,26 %
15 EO 4P W+2 -480 20.8 94.55
16 EO 1S W = -90 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 97,05 %
A15 Sylviane Delbeke -Fabienne Smit 47,65 %
17 EO 3S N+2 460 9.9 45.00
18 EO 3S S+1 630 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.7 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 41,65 %
19 EO 5TcS-1 -100 16.5 75.00
20 EO 2P E+1 -140 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A16 - 0,00 %
21 EO BYE 0 0.00
22 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.8 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 52,31 %
23 EO 2C N-2 -200 20 90.91
24 EO 3T W+3 -170 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
A.9 Anne Tirtiaux -Christiane Vroninckx 51,29 %
27 EO 7C S-1 -50 16 72.73
28 EO 4P W+1 -450 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A10 Patricia Bardy -Didier Collart 57,14 %
31 EO 3C E-1 50 14.3 65.00
32 EO 4P N+1 450 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
Total : 297,1 / 484 = 61,38 %
PAIRE a14 Lydia Wildiers -Liliane Baptista
A.8 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 52,31 %
1 EO 5C W = -450 21.9 99.55
2 EO 5T W = -400 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
A16 - 0,00 %
3 EO BYE 0 0.00
4 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.9 Anne Tirtiaux -Christiane Vroninckx 51,29 %
5 EO 3K N+1 130 15.4 70.00
6 EO 3S W+1 -630 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
A.1 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Sophie Tilemans 51,89 %
7 EO 1S S+2 150 8.8 40.00
8 EO 2C S-1 -50 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
A10 Patricia Bardy -Didier Collart 57,14 %
9 EO 4P E-1 100 3.4 15.45
10 EO 4P S = 620 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 57,31 %
11 EO 4C N+1 450 13.2 60.00
12 EO 3T S = 110 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A.3 Nicole Leclere -Grazia Neuenschwander 48,20 %
15 EO 4P W+1 -450 15.4 70.00
16 EO 1S W-1 100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 48,52 %
19 EO 5C E-1 100 5.5 25.00
20 EO 4P E-2 200 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
A.5 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen 49,34 %
23 EO 1S N-1 -100 13 59.09
24 EO 2T W+3 -150 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A14 Patrick Gilles -Philippe van der Gracht 62,33 %
27 EO 7C S-1 -50 16 72.73
28 EO 4P W+1 -450 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.7 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 41,65 %
29 EO 5K S-1 -100 16 72.73
30 EO 3P E+2 -200 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A15 Sylviane Delbeke -Fabienne Smit 47,65 %
31 EO 3C E-1 50 14.3 65.00
32 EO 4P N = 420 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
Total : 274,1 / 484 = 56,63 %
PAIRE a.9 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru
A13 Mado Miller -Hélène Lemberger 52,05 %
1 EO 4C E-1 50 6.6 30.00
2 EO 4PcN-2 -500 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A14 Patrick Gilles -Philippe van der Gracht 62,33 %
5 EO 2S S+2 180 6.6 30.00
6 EO 3S E-2 200 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
A15 Sylviane Delbeke -Fabienne Smit 47,65 %
9 EO 4P E-1 100 3.4 15.45
10 EO 4P S = 620 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A16 - 0,00 %
13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.9 Anne Tirtiaux -Christiane Vroninckx 51,29 %
17 EO 6KcN-1 -100 20.8 94.55
18 EO 2P S+1 140 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 57,31 %
19 EO 3S N-3 -150 19.7 89.55
20 EO 2P E+1 -140 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 84,55 %
A10 Patricia Bardy -Didier Collart 57,14 %
21 EO 2C E-1 50 6.6 30.00
22 EO 2C W-2 200 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 32,50 %
A.3 Nicole Leclere -Grazia Neuenschwander 48,20 %
23 EO 1S N-1 -100 13 59.09
24 EO 2S E = -120 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A11 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm 38,54 %
25 EO 4C E-2 200 6 27.27
26 EO 4P E-1 100 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 48,52 %
27 EO 6S N-1 -50 16 72.73
28 EO 6P W = -980 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
A12 Colette Heerinckx -Annette Fobe 42,42 %
29 EO 4K S-1 -100 16 72.73
30 EO 4P E = -420 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
A.5 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen 49,34 %
31 EO 3C E-1 50 14.3 65.00
32 EO 4P N = 420 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
Total : 271,5 / 484 = 56,10 %
PAIRE a10 Teresa Dekoster -Michel Lievens
A.6 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 49,26 %
1 EO 4K S+1 150 0.1 0.45
2 EO 4PcN-2 -500 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A14 Patrick Gilles -Philippe van der Gracht 62,33 %
3 EO 3S W+2 -660 11 50.00
4 EO 3T S-1 -100 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A15 Sylviane Delbeke -Fabienne Smit 47,65 %
7 EO 3S N-2 -200 21.9 99.55
8 EO 3P W-2 100 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A16 - 0,00 %
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.1 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Sophie Tilemans 51,89 %
15 EO 3P W+3 -230 1.2 5.45
16 EO 3K N = 110 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
A10 Patricia Bardy -Didier Collart 57,14 %
19 EO 3C E+1 -170 21.9 99.55
20 EO 2P W+1 -140 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 89,55 %
A.3 Nicole Leclere -Grazia Neuenschwander 48,20 %
21 EO 2C W-1 50 6.6 30.00
22 EO 2S N+2 180 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A11 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm 38,54 %
23 EO 2S N-1 -100 13 59.09
24 EO 5T W = -400 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 48,52 %
25 EO 4P S = 420 0 0.00
26 EO 5T N-2 -200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A12 Colette Heerinckx -Annette Fobe 42,42 %
27 EO 6C S = 980 3 13.64
28 EO 6P W = -980 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.5 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen 49,34 %
29 EO 2K S = 90 10 45.45
30 EO 3P E+1 -170 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A13 Mado Miller -Hélène Lemberger 52,05 %
31 EO 4T W-1 50 14.3 65.00
32 EO 4P N = 420 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
Total : 269,7 / 484 = 55,72 %
PAIRE a.8 Alexandre Viot -Noelle Fosse
A13 Mado Miller -Hélène Lemberger 52,05 %
3 EO 3S E+2 -660 11 50.00
4 EO 4T S-1 -100 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A14 Patrick Gilles -Philippe van der Gracht 62,33 %
7 EO 3S N-1 -100 17.5 79.55
8 EO 3K E-1 50 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A15 Sylviane Delbeke -Fabienne Smit 47,65 %
11 EO 3S N+1 430 18.6 84.55
12 EO 4T S-1 -100 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 82,05 %
A.8 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 52,31 %
15 EO 3S E+1 -430 9.9 45.00
16 EO 4T E-2 200 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
A.1 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Sophie Tilemans 51,89 %
17 EO 3S N+2 460 9.9 45.00
18 EO 3P S = 140 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A.9 Anne Tirtiaux -Christiane Vroninckx 51,29 %
19 EO 5T S-1 -50 11 50.00
20 EO 3P W-1 100 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 57,31 %
21 EO 2C E = -110 16.5 75.00
22 EO 2C W-2 200 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A10 Patricia Bardy -Didier Collart 57,14 %
23 EO 1S N = 90 6 27.27
24 EO 3T W = -110 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A.3 Nicole Leclere -Grazia Neuenschwander 48,20 %
25 EO 4C E-1 100 16 72.73
26 EO 4P E-1 100 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A11 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm 38,54 %
27 EO 6C S-1 -50 16 72.73
28 EO 4P W+2 -480 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 48,52 %
29 EO 3K S = 110 8 36.36
30 EO 3S W = -400 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A12 Colette Heerinckx -Annette Fobe 42,42 %
31 EO 3P N-1 -100 21.9 99.55
32 EO 4P N = 420 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
Total : 292,6 / 528 = 55,42 %
PAIRE a.1 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille
A.1 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Sophie Tilemans 51,89 %
1 EO 5KcN-2 -300 17.5 79.55
2 EO 5C E-2 100 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A10 Patricia Bardy -Didier Collart 57,14 %
3 EO 3S E+2 -660 11 50.00
4 EO 5TcS-3 -800 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 57,31 %
5 EO 2K N+4 170 11 50.00
6 EO 3S W+2 -660 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A11 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm 38,54 %
7 EO 2S N = 120 13.2 60.00
8 EO 3K E-2 100 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.3 Nicole Leclere -Grazia Neuenschwander 48,20 %
9 EO 4P E = -620 15.4 70.00
10 EO 5P S-1 -100 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
A12 Colette Heerinckx -Annette Fobe 42,42 %
11 EO 3S S+3 490 4.5 20.45
12 EO 3K E-2 100 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 48,52 %
13 EO 4P E = -620 11 50.00
14 EO 6P S-1 -50 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A13 Mado Miller -Hélène Lemberger 52,05 %
15 EO 4P W+1 -450 15.4 70.00
16 EO 4T E-2 200 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A.5 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen 49,34 %
17 EO 3S N+2 460 9.9 45.00
18 EO 4P S = 620 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
A.6 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 49,26 %
21 EO 2C E = -110 16.5 75.00
22 EO 2C W-3 300 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.7 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 41,65 %
25 EO 4C E-1 100 16 72.73
26 EO 3C W = -140 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
A.8 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 52,31 %
29 EO 5K S-1 -100 16 72.73
30 EO 4P E-2 100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
Total : 289,7 / 528 = 54,87 %
PAIRE a12 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain
A.7 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 41,65 %
1 EO 5K S-2 -100 15.4 70.00
2 EO 4P N-1 -100 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A15 Sylviane Delbeke -Fabienne Smit 47,65 %
3 EO 3S W+3 -690 20.8 94.55
4 EO 4T S-2 -200 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
A.8 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 52,31 %
5 EO 3C W-1 50 18.6 84.55
6 EO 3S W+1 -630 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A16 - 0,00 %
7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.1 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Sophie Tilemans 51,89 %
11 EO 3S S+3 490 4.5 20.45
12 EO 2C E = -110 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 57,31 %
15 EO 3P W+3 -230 1.2 5.45
16 EO 3T E-1 100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
A.3 Nicole Leclere -Grazia Neuenschwander 48,20 %
19 EO 5T S-1 -50 11 50.00
20 EO 2P E+1 -140 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
A12 Colette Heerinckx -Annette Fobe 42,42 %
23 EO 2P S+1 140 2 9.09
24 EO 3T W+2 -150 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.5 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen 49,34 %
25 EO 5P E-2 200 6 27.27
26 EO 3P E = -140 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A13 Mado Miller -Hélène Lemberger 52,05 %
27 EO 4S N+2 490 6 27.27
28 EO 4P E+1 -450 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A.6 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 49,26 %
29 EO 5K S-2 -200 22 100.00
30 EO 1S W+1 -120 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A14 Patrick Gilles -Philippe van der Gracht 62,33 %
31 EO 4C E-3 150 0.1 0.45
32 EO 4P N = 420 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
Total : 258,5 / 484 = 53,41 %
PAIRE a.7 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten
A12 Colette Heerinckx -Annette Fobe 42,42 %
1 EO 4C W-1 50 6.6 30.00
2 EO 5T W = -400 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A13 Mado Miller -Hélène Lemberger 52,05 %
5 EO 1S E-4 200 2.3 10.45
6 EO 3C E+2 -200 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 10,45 %
A14 Patrick Gilles -Philippe van der Gracht 62,33 %
9 EO 4P E = -620 15.4 70.00
10 EO 4P S = 620 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
A.7 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 41,65 %
13 EO 5TcN-5 -1400 21.9 99.55
14 EO 5P S = 450 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A16 - 0,00 %
15 EO BYE 0 0.00
16 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.8 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 52,31 %
17 EO 3S N+2 460 9.9 45.00
18 EO 3S S-1 -100 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A.1 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Sophie Tilemans 51,89 %
19 EO 5T S = 400 0.1 0.45
20 EO 2P E = -110 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.9 Anne Tirtiaux -Christiane Vroninckx 51,29 %
21 EO 2C W = -110 16.5 75.00
22 EO 3T S+1 130 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 67,50 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 57,31 %
23 EO 2C N-1 -100 13 59.09
24 EO 2C W = -110 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A10 Patricia Bardy -Didier Collart 57,14 %
25 EO 4PcN-1 -100 22 100.00
26 EO 4C E-1 100 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.3 Nicole Leclere -Grazia Neuenschwander 48,20 %
27 EO 6S N-1 -50 16 72.73
28 EO 4P W+1 -450 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A11 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm 38,54 %
29 EO 4K S-1 -100 16 72.73
30 EO 3P E = -140 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
Total : 256,2 / 484 = 52,93 %
PAIRE a.2 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 57,31 %
3 EO 3S W+2 -660 11 50.00
4 EO 3P W-1 100 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
A11 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm 38,54 %
5 EO 2C W-1 50 18.6 84.55
6 EO 3S E+1 -630 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.3 Nicole Leclere -Grazia Neuenschwander 48,20 %
7 EO 2S N+1 150 8.8 40.00
8 EO 2P W-1 50 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A12 Colette Heerinckx -Annette Fobe 42,42 %
9 EO 4P E = -620 15.4 70.00
10 EO 4P S = 620 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 48,52 %
11 EO 3S S+1 430 18.6 84.55
12 EO 3K E-1 50 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A13 Mado Miller -Hélène Lemberger 52,05 %
13 EO 4P E = -620 11 50.00
14 EO 4P S+1 450 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.5 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen 49,34 %
15 EO 4P E+2 -480 20.8 94.55
16 EO 3K N = 110 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
A14 Patrick Gilles -Philippe van der Gracht 62,33 %
17 EO 3S N+2 460 9.9 45.00
18 EO 2S S+1 150 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A.6 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 49,26 %
19 EO 5C E-1 100 5.5 25.00
20 EO 2P E = -110 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
A.7 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 41,65 %
23 EO 2P S-1 -100 13 59.09
24 EO 3T W-1 50 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A.8 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 52,31 %
27 EO 6S N-1 -50 16 72.73
28 EO 4P E+1 -450 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.9 Anne Tirtiaux -Christiane Vroninckx 51,29 %
31 EO 3C E-1 50 14.3 65.00
32 EO 4P N = 420 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
Total : 278,5 / 528 = 52,75 %
PAIRE a.6 Helene Schyns -Michele Berrier
A12 Colette Heerinckx -Annette Fobe 42,42 %
3 EO 3S E+2 -660 11 50.00
4 EO 3T S-1 -100 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A13 Mado Miller -Hélène Lemberger 52,05 %
7 EO 2S N+1 150 8.8 40.00
8 EO 2C S-2 -100 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A.6 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 49,26 %
11 EO 3S S+3 490 4.5 20.45
12 EO 3C E = -140 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A15 Sylviane Delbeke -Fabienne Smit 47,65 %
13 EO 4P E = -620 11 50.00
14 EO 4P S+1 450 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.7 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 41,65 %
15 EO 4P W+1 -450 15.4 70.00
16 EO 3P S-1 -50 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A16 - 0,00 %
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.8 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 52,31 %
19 EO 5TcS-1 -100 16.5 75.00
20 EO 2S E-2 200 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
A.1 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Sophie Tilemans 51,89 %
21 EO 2C E = -110 16.5 75.00
22 EO 2P S = 110 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
A.9 Anne Tirtiaux -Christiane Vroninckx 51,29 %
23 EO 2P S+1 140 2 9.09
24 EO 2T W+2 -130 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 57,31 %
25 EO 4C E-2 200 6 27.27
26 EO 3S W-2 200 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
A10 Patricia Bardy -Didier Collart 57,14 %
27 EO 6C S = 980 3 13.64
28 EO 4P E+1 -450 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A11 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm 38,54 %
31 EO 3C E-1 50 14.3 65.00
32 EO 3P N = 140 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
Total : 253,8 / 484 = 52,44 %
PAIRE a11 Brigitte de Fauconval -Florence Vital
A14 Patrick Gilles -Philippe van der Gracht 62,33 %
1 EO 4K N-1 -50 12.1 55.00
2 EO 4C E-2 100 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A.7 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 41,65 %
3 EO 4K E+1 -150 0.1 0.45
4 EO 3T N-3 -300 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A15 Sylviane Delbeke -Fabienne Smit 47,65 %
5 EO 1S N+4 210 0.1 0.45
6 EO 3S E+2 -660 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A16 - 0,00 %
9 EO BYE 0 0.00
10 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.1 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Sophie Tilemans 51,89 %
13 EO 4P E = -620 11 50.00
14 EO 4P S+1 450 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 57,31 %
17 EO 3S N+2 460 9.9 45.00
18 EO 4P S-2 -200 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A11 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm 38,54 %
21 EO 2C W = -110 16.5 75.00
22 EO 3K S-1 -50 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 87,27 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 48,52 %
23 EO 3S S-3 -300 22 100.00
24 EO 5TcW-2 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A12 Colette Heerinckx -Annette Fobe 42,42 %
25 EO 4P S-1 -50 20 90.91
26 EO 3C E = -140 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
A.5 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen 49,34 %
27 EO 6S N = 990 0 0.00
28 EO 4P W+1 -450 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
A13 Mado Miller -Hélène Lemberger 52,05 %
29 EO 4K S-1 -100 16 72.73
30 EO 3P E-1 50 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.6 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 49,26 %
31 EO 3P N = 140 3.4 15.45
32 EO 4P N = 420 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
Total : 250,7 / 484 = 51,80 %
PAIRE a.3 Edith Close -Jan Sassen
A10 Patricia Bardy -Didier Collart 57,14 %
1 EO 4C W-1 50 6.6 30.00
2 EO 4PcN-1 -200 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
A.3 Nicole Leclere -Grazia Neuenschwander 48,20 %
5 EO 2P N-1 -100 21.9 99.55
6 EO 3S W = -600 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A12 Colette Heerinckx -Annette Fobe 42,42 %
7 EO 3S N-1 -100 17.5 79.55
8 EO 1S W-1 50 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 48,52 %
9 EO 4P E-1 100 3.4 15.45
10 EO 4P S = 620 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A13 Mado Miller -Hélène Lemberger 52,05 %
11 EO 4C N+1 450 13.2 60.00
12 EO 3K E-1 50 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A.5 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen 49,34 %
13 EO 4P E = -620 11 50.00
14 EO 4P S+1 450 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A14 Patrick Gilles -Philippe van der Gracht 62,33 %
15 EO 4P W = -420 5.5 25.00
16 EO 3K N+1 130 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.6 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 49,26 %
17 EO 3S S+2 460 9.9 45.00
18 EO 3P S = 140 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A15 Sylviane Delbeke -Fabienne Smit 47,65 %
19 EO 5T S-1 -50 11 50.00
20 EO 2P E+1 -140 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
A.7 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 41,65 %
21 EO 2K N+1 110 2.3 10.45
22 EO 2S N = 120 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
A.8 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 52,31 %
25 EO 3P N = 140 12 54.55
26 EO Pass Passe 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.9 Anne Tirtiaux -Christiane Vroninckx 51,29 %
29 EO 4K S = 130 4 18.18
30 EO 3C N-1 -50 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
Total : 251,8 / 528 = 47,69 %
PAIRE a15 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger
A16 - 0,00 %
1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.9 Anne Tirtiaux -Christiane Vroninckx 51,29 %
3 EO 3S E+2 -660 11 50.00
4 EO 4T S-1 -100 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.1 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Sophie Tilemans 51,89 %
5 EO 1S N+3 180 6.6 30.00
6 EO 3S E = -600 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 32,50 %
A10 Patricia Bardy -Didier Collart 57,14 %
7 EO 2S N-1 -100 17.5 79.55
8 EO 2C S+1 140 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 57,31 %
9 EO 4P E = -620 15.4 70.00
10 EO 3S N+3 690 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A11 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm 38,54 %
11 EO 3S S+3 490 4.5 20.45
12 EO 3C E-1 50 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A.3 Nicole Leclere -Grazia Neuenschwander 48,20 %
13 EO 4P E = -620 11 50.00
14 EO 4P S+1 450 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 48,52 %
17 EO 6ScS-1 -100 20.8 94.55
18 EO 2P S+2 170 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A.5 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen 49,34 %
21 EO 2C W = -110 16.5 75.00
22 EO 3T S = 110 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
A.6 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 49,26 %
25 EO 4C E-2 200 6 27.27
26 EO 2C E+1 -140 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A15 Sylviane Delbeke -Fabienne Smit 47,65 %
29 EO 4K S = 130 4 18.18
30 EO 3P E = -140 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.8 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 52,31 %
31 EO 3C E-2 100 6.6 30.00
32 EO 4P N+1 450 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
Total : 219,4 / 484 = 45,33 %
PAIRE a16 Annick Peeters -Neslihan Buharali
A.9 Anne Tirtiaux -Christiane Vroninckx 51,29 %
1 EO 4C E = -420 19.7 89.55
2 EO 4PcN-1 -200 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A.1 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Sophie Tilemans 51,89 %
3 EO 3S W+2 -660 11 50.00
4 EO 5T S-3 -300 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A10 Patricia Bardy -Didier Collart 57,14 %
5 EO 1S N+3 180 6.6 30.00
6 EO 3S E = -600 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 32,50 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 57,31 %
7 EO 3S N+1 630 1.2 5.45
8 EO 2C S+1 140 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 10,45 %
A11 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm 38,54 %
9 EO 4P E = -620 15.4 70.00
10 EO 4P S = 620 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
A.3 Nicole Leclere -Grazia Neuenschwander 48,20 %
11 EO 4C N+1 450 13.2 60.00
12 EO 3T S = 110 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A12 Colette Heerinckx -Annette Fobe 42,42 %
13 EO 4P E = -620 11 50.00
14 EO 4P S+1 450 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 48,52 %
15 EO 4P W = -420 5.5 25.00
16 EO 3C N-1 -50 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 54,77 %
A.5 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen 49,34 %
19 EO 3T S+1 130 2.3 10.45
20 EO 4P E-1 100 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
A.6 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 49,26 %
23 EO 2P S-1 -100 13 59.09
24 EO 3T W = -110 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A.7 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 41,65 %
27 EO 6S N-1 -50 16 72.73
28 EO 4P W+1 -450 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A16 - 0,00 %
31 EO BYE 0 0.00
32 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 217,9 / 484 = 45,02 %
PAIRE a.5 Marc Antoine de Halloy -Chantal de Locht
A11 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm 38,54 %
1 EO 2K S+2 130 2.3 10.45
2 EO 5T W = -400 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
A12 Colette Heerinckx -Annette Fobe 42,42 %
5 EO 1S N+2 150 13.2 60.00
6 EO 3S W = -600 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.5 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen 49,34 %
9 EO 4P E-1 100 3.4 15.45
10 EO 4P S = 620 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A14 Patrick Gilles -Philippe van der Gracht 62,33 %
11 EO 3S S+3 490 4.5 20.45
12 EO 3T S = 110 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 15,45 %
A.6 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 49,26 %
13 EO 4P E = -620 11 50.00
14 EO 4P S+1 450 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A15 Sylviane Delbeke -Fabienne Smit 47,65 %
15 EO 3S E+1 -430 9.9 45.00
16 EO 3T E-1 100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A.7 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 41,65 %
17 EO 3S N+2 460 9.9 45.00
18 EO 2P S = 110 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A16 - 0,00 %
19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.8 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 52,31 %
21 EO 1S E-1 50 6.6 30.00
22 EO 2CcW-2 500 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
A.1 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Sophie Tilemans 51,89 %
23 EO 2P S+1 140 2 9.09
24 EO 3S E = -400 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.9 Anne Tirtiaux -Christiane Vroninckx 51,29 %
25 EO 4C E-1 100 16 72.73
26 EO 4C E-2 200 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A10 Patricia Bardy -Didier Collart 57,14 %
29 EO 5K N = 600 0 0.00
30 EO 3P E-1 50 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
Total : 186,2 / 484 = 38,47 %
PAIRE a13 Chantal Huybrechts. -Micheline de Looz
A15 Sylviane Delbeke -Fabienne Smit 47,65 %
1 EO 5K N-1 -50 12.1 55.00
2 EO 3P N+1 170 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
A.8 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 52,31 %
3 EO 3S E+1 -630 2.3 10.45
4 EO 3P W-2 200 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 5,45 %
A16 - 0,00 %
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.9 Anne Tirtiaux -Christiane Vroninckx 51,29 %
7 EO 3S N+1 630 1.2 5.45
8 EO 3S W-3 150 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 2,95 %
A.1 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Sophie Tilemans 51,89 %
9 EO 4P E = -620 15.4 70.00
10 EO 4P N+1 650 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 57,31 %
13 EO 4P E-1 100 0.1 0.45
14 EO 4P S+1 450 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.3 Nicole Leclere -Grazia Neuenschwander 48,20 %
17 EO 3S N+3 490 0.1 0.45
18 EO 4P S = 620 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 7,95 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 48,52 %
21 EO 1S S+1 120 0.1 0.45
22 EO 3CcW-3 800 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 0,45 %
A13 Mado Miller -Hélène Lemberger 52,05 %
25 EO 4C E-2 200 6 27.27
26 EO 2P E = -110 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A.6 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 49,26 %
27 EO 3C S+3 230 8 36.36
28 EO 4P E-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
A14 Patrick Gilles -Philippe van der Gracht 62,33 %
29 EO 4K S = 130 4 18.18
30 EO 2C N+1 140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
A.7 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 41,65 %
31 EO 2P N+1 140 3.4 15.45
32 EO 4P N = 420 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
Total : 92,8 / 484 = 19,17 %
|