B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 64,01 A.2 Giuseppe Napoli -Lydia Wildiers
--- 2 61,28 A.4 Bruno Chevalier -Michel Paquot
--- 3 60,17 A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh
--- 4 59,88 B.5 Helene Schyns -Michele Berrier
--- 5 58,78 B.9 Magda Moortgat -Philippe Gilles
--- 6 55,28 A.9 Claire Derieuw -Caroll Pucher
--- 7 52,93 B.8 Luc Cartuyvels -Daniel Couvreur
--- 8 52,68 B.6 Patricia Bardy -Jeanine Bontemps
--- 9 52,64 B.7 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski
--- 10 50,17 B.3 Patrick Gilles -Teresa Dekoster
--- 11 46,51 B.4 Yolande Waerseggers -Marguerite Verstraeten
--- 12 45,78 A.3 Anne Van den Berge -Andre Delacroix
--- 13 45,54 A.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Myriam de Timary
--- 14 45,46 A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
--- 15 44,61 B.1 Colette Heerinckx -Annette Fobe
--- 16 42,17 B.2 Grazia Neuenschwander -Nicole Leclere
--- 17 37,58 A.6 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger
--- 18 25,13 A.8 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck
--- 19 0,00 A10 -
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 60,19 a.9 Chantal Barro -Isabelle de Vanssay
--- 2 60,08 b.7 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren
--- 3 58,26 a.5 Michel Lievens -Helene Christiaens
--- 4 58,07 b.8 Benoit Ortegat -Jean de Villenfagne
--- 5 55,33 a.7 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru
--- 6 54,19 a.4 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige
--- 7 52,92 a.8 Marianne Borsu -Regis Lamy
--- 8 52,19 a.2 Dominique Sassen -Danielle Wybauw
--- 9 51,67 b.5 Jeannine Thys -Christiane Huby
--- 10 49,67 b.2 Catherine de Moffarts -Veronique Englebienne
--- 11 48,90 a.1 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille
--- 12 48,90 b.9 Olivier Paternostre -Cécile Drion de Chapois
--- 13 47,85 b.3 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Jacques Podevyn
--- 14 46,33 a10 Lydia Luyten -Prisca Tondreau
--- 15 43,89 a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger
--- 16 42,38 b.1 Nicolas de Neve -Regine de Viron
--- 17 40,64 b.4 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm
--- 18 40,39 b.6 Chris Oostens -Manuela Meeus
--- 19 38,89 a.6 Luc Rampaer -Bernard Brisbois
PAIRE A.2 Giuseppe Napoli -Lydia Wildiers
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Danielle Wybauw 52,19 %
4 NS 4P N-1 -100 8.6 28.67
5 NS 4P S-1 -100 6.5 21.67
6 NS 3S N+2 460 27.8 92.67 µ Tbl = 47,67 %
a.1 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 48,90 %
7 NS 3S W-1 100 28.9 96.33
8 NS 4PcW-3 500 25.7 85.67
9 NS 3C S = 140 27.8 92.67 µ Tbl = 91,56 %
a10 Lydia Luyten -Prisca Tondreau 46,33 %
10 NS 4P W+1 -650 10.7 35.67
11 NS 3S W = -400 29.9 99.67
12 NS 3S N+2 660 27.8 92.67 µ Tbl = 76,00 %
a.9 Chantal Barro -Isabelle de Vanssay 60,19 %
13 NS 2P N+2 170 19.3 64.33
14 NS 2K S-2 -100 4.3 14.33
15 NS 3P N+3 230 3.3 11.00 µ Tbl = 29,89 %
a.8 Marianne Borsu -Regis Lamy 52,92 %
16 NS 6P S+1 1010 17.1 57.00
17 NS 3S W-2 100 29.9 99.67
18 NS 5P S+1 680 25.7 85.67 µ Tbl = 80,78 %
a.6 Luc Rampaer -Bernard Brisbois 38,89 %
19 NS 4K N-1 -50 9.7 32.33
20 NS 3S W = -600 18.2 60.67
21 NS 3S S = 600 10.7 35.67 µ Tbl = 42,89 %
a.5 Michel Lievens -Helene Christiaens 58,26 %
22 NS 2P N+1 140 25 83.33
23 NS 1S E = -90 24 80.00
24 NS 4C E-3 150 30 100.00 µ Tbl = 87,78 %
a.4 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige 54,19 %
25 NS 2P N+3 200 15 50.00
26 NS 2C E-1 100 17 56.67
27 NS 4C E-2 Ajust 18 60.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 460,9 / 720 = 64,01 %
PAIRE A.4 Bruno Chevalier -Michel Paquot
a.6 Luc Rampaer -Bernard Brisbois 38,89 %
1 NS 2C E-2 100 27.8 92.67
2 NS 2C E-1 50 19.3 64.33
3 NS 2C W-1 100 12.9 43.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.4 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige 54,19 %
10 NS 4P W = -620 26.7 89.00
11 NS 3S E+1 -430 25.7 85.67
12 NS 3S N+1 630 20.3 67.67 µ Tbl = 80,78 %
a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 43,89 %
13 NS 3S S+1 630 29.9 99.67
14 NS 2K S = 90 24.6 82.00
15 NS 4P N+2 680 19.3 64.33 µ Tbl = 82,00 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Danielle Wybauw 52,19 %
16 NS 6P N+1 1010 17.1 57.00
17 NS 2P E+3 -200 9.7 32.33
18 NS 5P S+1 680 25.7 85.67 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
a.1 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 48,90 %
19 NS 4C E-2 200 22.5 75.00
20 NS 3S E+1 -630 7.5 25.00
21 NS 4PcW-2 300 6.5 21.67 µ Tbl = 40,56 %
a10 Lydia Luyten -Prisca Tondreau 46,33 %
22 NS 1P N+2 140 25 83.33
23 NS 1S E+1 -120 10 33.33
24 NS 3C E-1 50 18 60.00 µ Tbl = 58,89 %
a.8 Marianne Borsu -Regis Lamy 52,92 %
25 NS 4T W-1 100 5 16.67
26 NS 2T W+1 -110 6 20.00
27 NS 4C E-2 100 29.9 99.67 µ Tbl = 45,44 %
a.7 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 55,33 %
28 NS 3S S+2 660 28.7 95.67
29 NS 3S W+1 -630 15 50.00
30 NS 4C S = 420 8.1 27.00 µ Tbl = 57,56 %
Total : 441,2 / 720 = 61,28 %
PAIRE A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh
a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 43,89 %
1 NS 3P E+1 -170 6.5 21.67
2 NS 2C E-1 50 19.3 64.33
3 NS 3S N+1 430 29.9 99.67 µ Tbl = 61,89 %
a.1 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 48,90 %
4 NS 3P S-1 -100 8.6 28.67
5 NS 4P S = 620 23.5 78.33
6 NS 3S N+1 430 18.2 60.67 µ Tbl = 55,89 %
a10 Lydia Luyten -Prisca Tondreau 46,33 %
7 NS 3S W-1 100 28.9 96.33
8 NS 3S N = 400 19.3 64.33
9 NS 2C S = 110 18.2 60.67 µ Tbl = 73,78 %
a.9 Chantal Barro -Isabelle de Vanssay 60,19 %
10 NS 5P W = -650 10.7 35.67
11 NS 3S E+3 -490 4.3 14.33
12 NS 5K S+1 620 11.8 39.33 µ Tbl = 29,78 %
a.7 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 55,33 %
19 NS 3S S-3 -150 0.1 0.33
20 NS 5K E-1 100 26.7 89.00
21 NS 5K S+1 620 21.4 71.33 µ Tbl = 53,56 %
a.6 Luc Rampaer -Bernard Brisbois 38,89 %
22 NS 2S S = 120 18 60.00
23 NS 1S E = -90 24 80.00
24 NS 1S S+1 120 28 93.33 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
a.5 Michel Lievens -Helene Christiaens 58,26 %
25 NS 3P N+2 200 15 50.00
26 NS 2K W+1 -110 6 20.00
27 NS 3T E+2 -150 24.6 82.00 µ Tbl = 50,67 %
a.4 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige 54,19 %
28 NS 3S S = 600 19.6 65.33
29 NS 3S E = -600 21.9 73.00
30 NS 4PcE-4 800 28.7 95.67 µ Tbl = 78,00 %
Total : 433,2 / 720 = 60,17 %
PAIRE B.5 Helene Schyns -Michele Berrier
b.9 Olivier Paternostre -Cécile Drion de Chapois 48,90 %
1 NS 4KcS-2 -300 0.1 0.33
2 NS 2C E = -110 9.7 32.33
3 NS 3K S = 110 17.1 57.00 µ Tbl = 29,89 %
b.8 Benoit Ortegat -Jean de Villenfagne 58,07 %
4 NS 4P N-1 -100 8.6 28.67
5 NS 3S S+1 630 29.9 99.67
6 NS 3S N+1 430 18.2 60.67 µ Tbl = 63,00 %
b.7 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren 60,08 %
7 NS 3S W+1 -630 11.8 39.33
8 NS 4PcW-3 500 25.7 85.67
9 NS 3C S = 140 27.8 92.67 µ Tbl = 72,56 %
b.5 Jeannine Thys -Christiane Huby 51,67 %
13 NS 2P N = 110 11.8 39.33
14 NS 2K S-2 -100 4.3 14.33
15 NS 4P N+2 680 19.3 64.33 µ Tbl = 39,33 %
b.4 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm 40,64 %
16 NS 6P S = 980 9.7 32.33
17 NS 2S W = -120 15 50.00
18 NS 5PcS+1 1050 29.9 99.67 µ Tbl = 60,67 %
b.3 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Jacques Podevyn 47,85 %
19 NS 4K N = 130 16.1 53.67
20 NS 3K E = -110 23.5 78.33
21 NS 5K S+1 620 21.4 71.33 µ Tbl = 67,78 %
b.2 Catherine de Moffarts -Veronique Englebienne 49,67 %
22 NS 2P N+1 140 25 83.33
23 NS 1S E-1 100 29 96.67
24 NS 1C E+1 -110 4 13.33 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
b.1 Nicolas de Neve -Regine de Viron 42,38 %
25 NS 5TcW-2 500 29 96.67
26 NS 2K W-2 200 26 86.67
27 NS 3T E+3 -170 18.2 60.67 µ Tbl = 81,33 %
Total : 431,1 / 720 = 59,88 %
PAIRE B.9 Magda Moortgat -Philippe Gilles
b.8 Benoit Ortegat -Jean de Villenfagne 58,07 %
1 NS 3K S-2 -100 18.2 60.67
2 NS 2C E = -110 9.7 32.33
3 NS 2C E-1 100 12.9 43.00 µ Tbl = 45,33 %
b.7 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren 60,08 %
4 NS 4P N+2 680 26.7 89.00
5 NS 2P S+1 140 15 50.00
6 NS 3S N = 400 6.5 21.67 µ Tbl = 53,56 %
b.6 Chris Oostens -Manuela Meeus 40,39 %
7 NS 3S W = -600 23.5 78.33
8 NS 4PcW-2 300 17.1 57.00
9 NS 2C S = 110 18.2 60.67 µ Tbl = 65,33 %
b.5 Jeannine Thys -Christiane Huby 51,67 %
10 NS 4P W+1 -650 10.7 35.67
11 NS 3S E+1 -430 25.7 85.67
12 NS 2K N+4 170 5.4 18.00 µ Tbl = 46,44 %
b.4 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm 40,64 %
13 NS 3S S = 600 26.7 89.00
14 NS 2K S-1 -50 12.9 43.00
15 NS 4P N+2 680 19.3 64.33 µ Tbl = 65,44 %
b.3 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Jacques Podevyn 47,85 %
16 NS 7S S = 1520 29.9 99.67
17 NS 3S W-1 50 22.5 75.00
18 NS 5C E-1 50 9.7 32.33 µ Tbl = 69,00 %
b.2 Catherine de Moffarts -Veronique Englebienne 49,67 %
19 NS 4C E-3 300 28.9 96.33
20 NS 3S E+1 -630 7.5 25.00
21 NS 5K S+1 620 21.4 71.33 µ Tbl = 64,22 %
b.9 Olivier Paternostre -Cécile Drion de Chapois 48,90 %
25 NS 4T W = -130 1 3.33
26 NS 3S W-2 200 26 86.67
27 NS 3T E+1 -130 27.8 92.67 µ Tbl = 60,89 %
Total : 423,2 / 720 = 58,78 %
PAIRE A.9 Claire Derieuw -Caroll Pucher
a.7 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 55,33 %
1 NS 3K S-2 -100 18.2 60.67
2 NS 2C E = -110 9.7 32.33
3 NS 2S N+1 150 25.7 85.67 µ Tbl = 59,56 %
a.6 Luc Rampaer -Bernard Brisbois 38,89 %
4 NS 4P N-1 -100 8.6 28.67
5 NS 4P S = 620 23.5 78.33
6 NS 3S N+1 430 18.2 60.67 µ Tbl = 55,89 %
a.5 Michel Lievens -Helene Christiaens 58,26 %
7 NS 4P E = -620 21.4 71.33
8 NS 3S N-2 -100 5.4 18.00
9 NS 3C S-1 -50 8.6 28.67 µ Tbl = 39,33 %
a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 43,89 %
10 NS 4P W+1 -650 10.7 35.67
11 NS 3S E+1 -430 25.7 85.67
12 NS 3S N+1 630 20.3 67.67 µ Tbl = 63,00 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Danielle Wybauw 52,19 %
13 NS 4K S = 130 15 50.00
14 NS 2K S+1 110 29.9 99.67
15 NS 4P N+2 680 19.3 64.33 µ Tbl = 71,33 %
a.1 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 48,90 %
16 NS 6P N = 980 9.7 32.33
17 NS 3S W-1 50 22.5 75.00
18 NS 6CcE-2 300 20.3 67.67 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
a.9 Chantal Barro -Isabelle de Vanssay 60,19 %
25 NS 5K N+1 420 20 66.67
26 NS 1S W-1 100 17 56.67
27 NS 3S W+2 -460 3.3 11.00 µ Tbl = 44,78 %
a.8 Marianne Borsu -Regis Lamy 52,92 %
28 NS 3S S+1 630 24.1 80.33
29 NS 3S W+2 -660 1.3 4.33
30 NS 4PcE-3 500 19.6 65.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 398,0 / 720 = 55,28 %
PAIRE B.8 Luc Cartuyvels -Daniel Couvreur
b.6 Chris Oostens -Manuela Meeus 40,39 %
1 NS 3K S = 110 29.9 99.67
2 NS 2C E-1 50 19.3 64.33
3 NS 3S N-4 -200 0.1 0.33 µ Tbl = 54,78 %
b.5 Jeannine Thys -Christiane Huby 51,67 %
4 NS 4P N+2 680 26.7 89.00
5 NS 4P S = 620 23.5 78.33
6 NS 3S N = 400 6.5 21.67 µ Tbl = 63,00 %
b.4 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm 40,64 %
7 NS 3S W+1 -630 11.8 39.33
8 NS 3P W-2 100 15 50.00
9 NS 2C S+1 140 27.8 92.67 µ Tbl = 60,67 %
b.3 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Jacques Podevyn 47,85 %
10 NS 4P W = -620 26.7 89.00
11 NS 3S E+3 -490 4.3 14.33
12 NS 3S S+2 660 27.8 92.67 µ Tbl = 65,33 %
b.2 Catherine de Moffarts -Veronique Englebienne 49,67 %
13 NS 4P N-2 -200 1.1 3.67
14 NS 2K S-1 -50 12.9 43.00
15 NS 4P N+2 680 19.3 64.33 µ Tbl = 37,00 %
b.1 Nicolas de Neve -Regine de Viron 42,38 %
16 NS 7P N-1 -50 0.1 0.33
17 NS 3S W+1 -430 3.3 11.00
18 NS 5P S+1 680 25.7 85.67 µ Tbl = 32,33 %
b.8 Benoit Ortegat -Jean de Villenfagne 58,07 %
22 NS 1P N+1 110 12 40.00
23 NS 2P E = -110 17 56.67
24 NS 2P S-1 -50 12 40.00 µ Tbl = 45,56 %
b.7 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren 60,08 %
25 NS 5TcW-2 500 29 96.67
26 NS 4C E-2 200 26 86.67
27 NS 3S W+2 -460 3.3 11.00 µ Tbl = 64,78 %
Total : 381,1 / 720 = 52,93 %
PAIRE B.6 Patricia Bardy -Jeanine Bontemps
b.2 Catherine de Moffarts -Veronique Englebienne 49,67 %
1 NS 5K S-2 -100 18.2 60.67
2 NS 2C E = -110 9.7 32.33
3 NS 1S N = 90 8.6 28.67 µ Tbl = 40,56 %
b.1 Nicolas de Neve -Regine de Viron 42,38 %
4 NS 5P N+1 680 26.7 89.00
5 NS 4P S = 620 23.5 78.33
6 NS 3S N = 400 6.5 21.67 µ Tbl = 63,00 %
b.9 Olivier Paternostre -Cécile Drion de Chapois 48,90 %
7 NS 3S W+1 -630 11.8 39.33
8 NS 3S N-1 -50 10.7 35.67
9 NS 2C S = 110 18.2 60.67 µ Tbl = 45,22 %
b.8 Benoit Ortegat -Jean de Villenfagne 58,07 %
10 NS 5P W = -650 10.7 35.67
11 NS 3S E+2 -460 16.1 53.67
12 NS 5K S+1 620 11.8 39.33 µ Tbl = 42,89 %
b.6 Chris Oostens -Manuela Meeus 40,39 %
16 NS 6S N = 990 12.9 43.00
17 NS 3S W-1 50 22.5 75.00
18 NS 6CcE-2 300 20.3 67.67 µ Tbl = 61,89 %
b.5 Jeannine Thys -Christiane Huby 51,67 %
19 NS 5K N-2 -100 4.3 14.33
20 NS 3S W = -600 18.2 60.67
21 NS 5K S+1 620 21.4 71.33 µ Tbl = 48,78 %
b.4 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm 40,64 %
22 NS 2P N+1 140 25 83.33
23 NS 3T N-1 -100 20 66.67
24 NS 3T S-1 -50 12 40.00 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
b.3 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Jacques Podevyn 47,85 %
25 NS 3P N+2 200 15 50.00
26 NS 2K W-1 100 17 56.67
27 NS 4T E+2 -170 18.2 60.67 µ Tbl = 55,78 %
Total : 379,3 / 720 = 52,68 %
PAIRE B.7 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski
b.4 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm 40,64 %
1 NS 4K S-3 -150 9.7 32.33
2 NS 2S N+1 150 29.9 99.67
3 NS 3S N = 400 27.8 92.67 µ Tbl = 74,89 %
b.3 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Jacques Podevyn 47,85 %
4 NS 4P N = 620 18.2 60.67
5 NS 4P S-1 -100 6.5 21.67
6 NS 3S N+2 460 27.8 92.67 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
b.2 Catherine de Moffarts -Veronique Englebienne 49,67 %
7 NS 4CcS-4 -1100 0.1 0.33
8 NS 4C S-1 -50 10.7 35.67
9 NS 2C S = 110 18.2 60.67 µ Tbl = 32,22 %
b.1 Nicolas de Neve -Regine de Viron 42,38 %
10 NS 4P W+1 -650 10.7 35.67
11 NS 3S E+3 -490 4.3 14.33
12 NS 3S N+1 630 20.3 67.67 µ Tbl = 39,22 %
b.9 Olivier Paternostre -Cécile Drion de Chapois 48,90 %
13 NS 4K S-1 -100 6.5 21.67
14 NS 2K S = 90 24.6 82.00
15 NS 4P N+2 680 19.3 64.33 µ Tbl = 56,00 %
b.7 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren 60,08 %
19 NS 5K N-2 -100 4.3 14.33
20 NS 3S W+1 -630 7.5 25.00
21 NS 5K S+1 620 21.4 71.33 µ Tbl = 36,89 %
b.6 Chris Oostens -Manuela Meeus 40,39 %
22 NS 3P N-1 -50 4 13.33
23 NS 1S E-1 100 29 96.67
24 NS 4C E-2 100 24 80.00 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
b.5 Jeannine Thys -Christiane Huby 51,67 %
25 NS 4P N+1 450 24 80.00
26 NS 2K W = -90 12 40.00
27 NS 3C W+1 -170 18.2 60.67 µ Tbl = 60,22 %
Total : 379,0 / 720 = 52,64 %
PAIRE B.3 Patrick Gilles -Teresa Dekoster
b.5 Jeannine Thys -Christiane Huby 51,67 %
1 NS 3P E+3 -230 3.3 11.00
2 NS 3K S = 110 26.7 89.00
3 NS 2C W-1 100 12.9 43.00 µ Tbl = 47,67 %
b.3 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Jacques Podevyn 47,85 %
7 NS 3S W+2 -660 2.2 7.33
8 NS 4C S-2 -100 5.4 18.00
9 NS 2C S = 110 18.2 60.67 µ Tbl = 28,67 %
b.2 Catherine de Moffarts -Veronique Englebienne 49,67 %
10 NS 4P W = -620 26.7 89.00
11 NS 3S E+2 -460 16.1 53.67
12 NS 3S N+2 660 27.8 92.67 µ Tbl = 78,44 %
b.1 Nicolas de Neve -Regine de Viron 42,38 %
13 NS 3C E-3 300 22.5 75.00
14 NS 2K S = 90 24.6 82.00
15 NS 4P N+2 680 19.3 64.33 µ Tbl = 73,78 %
b.9 Olivier Paternostre -Cécile Drion de Chapois 48,90 %
16 NS 7P S = 1510 27.8 92.67
17 NS 3S W-1 50 22.5 75.00
18 NS 5C E = -450 3.3 11.00 µ Tbl = 59,56 %
b.8 Benoit Ortegat -Jean de Villenfagne 58,07 %
19 NS 3C E-2 200 22.5 75.00
20 NS 3S W+1 -630 7.5 25.00
21 NS 3S S = 600 10.7 35.67 µ Tbl = 45,22 %
b.7 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren 60,08 %
22 NS 3S S-2 -100 0 0.00
23 NS 1S E+1 -120 10 33.33
24 NS 2P S-1 -50 12 40.00 µ Tbl = 24,44 %
b.6 Chris Oostens -Manuela Meeus 40,39 %
25 NS 3P N+2 200 15 50.00
26 NS 2K W+1 -110 6 20.00
27 NS 4T E+2 -170 18.2 60.67 µ Tbl = 43,56 %
Total : 361,2 / 720 = 50,17 %
PAIRE B.4 Yolande Waerseggers -Marguerite Verstraeten
b.7 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren 60,08 %
1 NS 3P E = -140 12.9 43.00
2 NS 2C E+1 -140 2.2 7.33
3 NS 3S S-2 -100 2.2 7.33 µ Tbl = 19,22 %
b.6 Chris Oostens -Manuela Meeus 40,39 %
4 NS 4P N+2 680 26.7 89.00
5 NS 4P S-1 -100 6.5 21.67
6 NS 3S N+1 430 18.2 60.67 µ Tbl = 57,11 %
b.4 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm 40,64 %
10 NS 4P W = -620 26.7 89.00
11 NS 3S E+2 -460 16.1 53.67
12 NS 5K N+1 620 11.8 39.33 µ Tbl = 60,67 %
b.3 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Jacques Podevyn 47,85 %
13 NS 4K S-1 -100 6.5 21.67
14 NS 3S W-1 50 19.3 64.33
15 NS 3P N+3 230 3.3 11.00 µ Tbl = 32,33 %
b.2 Catherine de Moffarts -Veronique Englebienne 49,67 %
16 NS 6S N+1 1020 23.5 78.33
17 NS 3S W-1 50 22.5 75.00
18 NS 5C E+1 -480 0.1 0.33 µ Tbl = 51,22 %
b.1 Nicolas de Neve -Regine de Viron 42,38 %
19 NS 4C E-3 300 28.9 96.33
20 NS 3S E+1 -630 7.5 25.00
21 NS 3S S = 600 10.7 35.67 µ Tbl = 52,33 %
b.9 Olivier Paternostre -Cécile Drion de Chapois 48,90 %
22 NS 1P N+1 110 12 40.00
23 NS 1S E = -90 24 80.00
24 NS 3C E-2 100 24 80.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
b.8 Benoit Ortegat -Jean de Villenfagne 58,07 %
25 NS 3P N+1 170 9 30.00
26 NS 2S W-1 100 17 56.67
27 NS 3S W+2 -460 3.3 11.00 µ Tbl = 32,56 %
Total : 334,9 / 720 = 46,51 %
PAIRE A.3 Anne Van den Berge -Andre Delacroix
a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 43,89 %
7 NS 3S W+1 -630 11.8 39.33
8 NS 4PcW-3 500 25.7 85.67
9 NS 1S W = -90 4.3 14.33 µ Tbl = 46,44 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Danielle Wybauw 52,19 %
10 NS 4P W+1 -650 10.7 35.67
11 NS 3S E+2 -460 16.1 53.67
12 NS 3S N+1 630 20.3 67.67 µ Tbl = 52,33 %
a.1 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 48,90 %
13 NS 3P N = 140 17.1 57.00
14 NS 2S E+1 -150 0.1 0.33
15 NS 3P N+3 230 3.3 11.00 µ Tbl = 22,78 %
a10 Lydia Luyten -Prisca Tondreau 46,33 %
16 NS 6P S+1 1010 17.1 57.00
17 NS 3S W+1 -430 3.3 11.00
18 NS 6C E-2 100 16.1 53.67 µ Tbl = 40,56 %
a.9 Chantal Barro -Isabelle de Vanssay 60,19 %
19 NS 4K N-1 -50 9.7 32.33
20 NS 3K E+1 -130 21.4 71.33
21 NS 4C N+1 650 29.9 99.67 µ Tbl = 67,78 %
a.7 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 55,33 %
22 NS 2P N = 110 12 40.00
23 NS 1S E+1 -120 10 33.33
24 NS 2C E = -110 4 13.33 µ Tbl = 28,89 %
a.6 Luc Rampaer -Bernard Brisbois 38,89 %
25 NS 4P N+1 450 24 80.00
26 NS 5T W-2 200 26 86.67
27 NS 3T W+2 -150 24.6 82.00 µ Tbl = 82,89 %
a.5 Michel Lievens -Helene Christiaens 58,26 %
28 NS 2S S = 120 5.9 19.67
29 NS 5C E = -650 8.1 27.00
30 NS 4C S = 420 8.1 27.00 µ Tbl = 24,56 %
Total : 329,6 / 720 = 45,78 %
PAIRE A.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Myriam de Timary
a.8 Marianne Borsu -Regis Lamy 52,92 %
1 NS 4K S-2 -100 18.2 60.67
2 NS 2C E-2 100 23.5 78.33
3 NS 2S N-1 -50 5.4 18.00 µ Tbl = 52,33 %
a.7 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 55,33 %
4 NS 4P N-1 -100 8.6 28.67
5 NS 4P S = 620 23.5 78.33
6 NS 3S N = 400 6.5 21.67 µ Tbl = 42,89 %
a.5 Michel Lievens -Helene Christiaens 58,26 %
13 NS 3S S-1 -100 6.5 21.67
14 NS 2K S-1 -50 12.9 43.00
15 NS 4P N+2 680 19.3 64.33 µ Tbl = 43,00 %
a.4 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige 54,19 %
16 NS 6S S+1 1020 23.5 78.33
17 NS 3S W-1 50 22.5 75.00
18 NS 5C E = -450 3.3 11.00 µ Tbl = 54,78 %
a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 43,89 %
19 NS 3K N = 110 12.9 43.00
20 NS 3S W+1 -630 7.5 25.00
21 NS 5K S+1 620 21.4 71.33 µ Tbl = 46,44 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Danielle Wybauw 52,19 %
22 NS 1P N+1 110 12 40.00
23 NS 1S E+1 -120 10 33.33
24 NS 2C E-1 50 18 60.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a.1 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 48,90 %
25 NS 4P N+1 450 24 80.00
26 NS 2S W = -120 2 6.67
27 NS 5K E+1 -420 12.9 43.00 µ Tbl = 43,22 %
a.9 Chantal Barro -Isabelle de Vanssay 60,19 %
28 NS 3S N-1 -100 1.3 4.33
29 NS 4C E+1 -650 8.1 27.00
30 NS 4CcS = 590 24.1 80.33 µ Tbl = 37,22 %
Total : 327,9 / 720 = 45,54 %
PAIRE A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
a.1 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 48,90 %
1 NS 5K S-3 -150 9.7 32.33
2 NS 2P S = 110 26.7 89.00
3 NS 3K S+1 130 23.5 78.33 µ Tbl = 66,56 %
a10 Lydia Luyten -Prisca Tondreau 46,33 %
4 NS 4P N+1 650 21.4 71.33
5 NS 3S S = 600 17.1 57.00
6 NS 3S N = 400 6.5 21.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.9 Chantal Barro -Isabelle de Vanssay 60,19 %
7 NS 3S W+1 -630 11.8 39.33
8 NS 3S N-1 -50 10.7 35.67
9 NS 2C S-1 -50 8.6 28.67 µ Tbl = 34,56 %
a.8 Marianne Borsu -Regis Lamy 52,92 %
10 NS 4P W+1 -650 10.7 35.67
11 NS 3S E+3 -490 4.3 14.33
12 NS 5K S+1 620 11.8 39.33 µ Tbl = 29,78 %
a.7 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 55,33 %
13 NS 3S S = 600 26.7 89.00
14 NS 3K S-1 -50 12.9 43.00
15 NS 4P N+2 680 19.3 64.33 µ Tbl = 65,44 %
a.5 Michel Lievens -Helene Christiaens 58,26 %
16 NS 4P S+2 480 3.3 11.00
17 NS 2K E+4 -170 12.9 43.00
18 NS 6CcE-1 100 16.1 53.67 µ Tbl = 35,89 %
a.4 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige 54,19 %
19 NS 3C E-2 200 22.5 75.00
20 NS 3S W+1 -630 7.5 25.00
21 NS 5P W-3 150 4.3 14.33 µ Tbl = 38,11 %
a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 43,89 %
22 NS 1P N+1 110 12 40.00
23 NS 1S E+2 -150 3 10.00
24 NS 4C E-2 100 24 80.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
Total : 327,3 / 720 = 45,46 %
PAIRE B.1 Colette Heerinckx -Annette Fobe
b.1 Nicolas de Neve -Regine de Viron 42,38 %
1 NS 3K S-1 -50 23.5 78.33
2 NS 2C E = -110 9.7 32.33
3 NS 1S N+1 120 20.3 67.67 µ Tbl = 59,44 %
b.9 Olivier Paternostre -Cécile Drion de Chapois 48,90 %
4 NS 2P N+3 200 15 50.00
5 NS 4P S-1 -100 6.5 21.67
6 NS 3S N+2 460 27.8 92.67 µ Tbl = 54,78 %
b.8 Benoit Ortegat -Jean de Villenfagne 58,07 %
7 NS 3S W+1 -630 11.8 39.33
8 NS 4CxS-3 -1000 0.1 0.33
9 NS 2C S = 110 18.2 60.67 µ Tbl = 33,44 %
b.7 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren 60,08 %
10 NS 4P W+1 -650 10.7 35.67
11 NS 3S E+3 -490 4.3 14.33
12 NS 2P W-2 100 2.2 7.33 µ Tbl = 19,11 %
b.6 Chris Oostens -Manuela Meeus 40,39 %
13 NS 3C E-3 300 22.5 75.00
14 NS 2K S = 90 24.6 82.00
15 NS 4P N+2 680 19.3 64.33 µ Tbl = 73,78 %
b.5 Jeannine Thys -Christiane Huby 51,67 %
16 NS 4P S+2 480 3.3 11.00
17 NS 3S W+2 -460 0.1 0.33
18 NS 6C E-1 50 9.7 32.33 µ Tbl = 14,56 %
b.4 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm 40,64 %
19 NS 5K N-2 -100 4.3 14.33
20 NS 3K E-2 200 29.9 99.67
21 NS 5K S+1 620 21.4 71.33 µ Tbl = 61,78 %
b.3 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Jacques Podevyn 47,85 %
22 NS 2P N+1 140 25 83.33
23 NS 1S E+2 -150 3 10.00
24 NS 3P S-2 -100 8 26.67 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
Total : 321,2 / 720 = 44,61 %
PAIRE B.2 Grazia Neuenschwander -Nicole Leclere
b.2 Catherine de Moffarts -Veronique Englebienne 49,67 %
4 NS 4P S-2 -200 1.1 3.67
5 NS 4P S-1 -100 6.5 21.67
6 NS 4P S+1 450 23.5 78.33 µ Tbl = 34,56 %
b.1 Nicolas de Neve -Regine de Viron 42,38 %
7 NS 2C N-2 -200 25.7 85.67
8 NS 4PcW-3 500 25.7 85.67
9 NS 3C S-2 -100 2.2 7.33 µ Tbl = 59,56 %
b.9 Olivier Paternostre -Cécile Drion de Chapois 48,90 %
10 NS 4P W+1 -650 10.7 35.67
11 NS 3S E+2 -460 16.1 53.67
12 NS 4K S+2 170 5.4 18.00 µ Tbl = 35,78 %
b.8 Benoit Ortegat -Jean de Villenfagne 58,07 %
13 NS 3P N-2 -200 1.1 3.67
14 NS 3P S-2 -100 4.3 14.33
15 NS 4P N+2 680 19.3 64.33 µ Tbl = 27,44 %
b.7 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren 60,08 %
16 NS 3S N+3 490 6.5 21.67
17 NS 2P E+3 -200 9.7 32.33
18 NS 5C E-1 50 9.7 32.33 µ Tbl = 28,78 %
b.6 Chris Oostens -Manuela Meeus 40,39 %
19 NS 4C E-2 200 22.5 75.00
20 NS 5K E-1 100 26.7 89.00
21 NS 4P W-2 100 2.2 7.33 µ Tbl = 57,11 %
b.5 Jeannine Thys -Christiane Huby 51,67 %
22 NS 3P N = 140 25 83.33
23 NS 2P E = -110 17 56.67
24 NS 3C E-1 50 18 60.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
b.4 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm 40,64 %
25 NS 4T W-1 100 5 16.67
26 NS 2P N-1 -100 10 33.33
27 NS 3S W+1 -430 9.7 32.33 µ Tbl = 27,44 %
Total : 303,6 / 720 = 42,17 %
PAIRE A.6 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger
a10 Lydia Luyten -Prisca Tondreau 46,33 %
1 NS 2K S = 90 25.7 85.67
2 NS 2C E = -110 9.7 32.33
3 NS 3K S-1 -50 5.4 18.00 µ Tbl = 45,33 %
a.9 Chantal Barro -Isabelle de Vanssay 60,19 %
4 NS 4P N = 620 18.2 60.67
5 NS 4P S-1 -100 6.5 21.67
6 NS 3S N = 400 6.5 21.67 µ Tbl = 34,67 %
a.8 Marianne Borsu -Regis Lamy 52,92 %
7 NS 3S W+1 -630 11.8 39.33
8 NS 4PcW-3 500 25.7 85.67
9 NS 3C S-1 -50 8.6 28.67 µ Tbl = 51,22 %
a.6 Luc Rampaer -Bernard Brisbois 38,89 %
16 NS 6S N+1 1020 23.5 78.33
17 NS 2S W+3 -210 6.5 21.67
18 NS 5C E-1 50 9.7 32.33 µ Tbl = 44,11 %
a.5 Michel Lievens -Helene Christiaens 58,26 %
19 NS 4K N = 130 16.1 53.67
20 NS 3S W+1 -630 7.5 25.00
21 NS 6K S-1 -100 0.1 0.33 µ Tbl = 26,33 %
a.4 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige 54,19 %
22 NS 1S N-1 -50 4 13.33
23 NS 2PcE = -670 0 0.00
24 NS 3P S-3 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 4,44 %
a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 43,89 %
25 NS 3K N+3 170 9 30.00
26 NS 3S W-2 200 26 86.67
27 NS 3S W+1 -430 9.7 32.33 µ Tbl = 49,67 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Danielle Wybauw 52,19 %
28 NS 1S S+2 150 10.4 34.67
29 NS 3S E = -600 21.9 73.00
30 NS 4C S = 420 8.1 27.00 µ Tbl = 44,89 %
Total : 270,6 / 720 = 37,58 %
PAIRE A.8 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck
a.5 Michel Lievens -Helene Christiaens 58,26 %
1 NS 3P E+3 -230 3.3 11.00
2 NS 2P S-2 -200 0.1 0.33
3 NS 2S N = 120 20.3 67.67 µ Tbl = 26,33 %
a.4 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige 54,19 %
4 NS 4PcN-1 -200 1.1 3.67
5 NS 4P S-1 -100 6.5 21.67
6 NS 3S S = 400 6.5 21.67 µ Tbl = 15,67 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Danielle Wybauw 52,19 %
7 NS 3S W+1 -630 11.8 39.33
8 NS 4C S-3 -150 2.2 7.33
9 NS 3T E+1 -130 0.1 0.33 µ Tbl = 15,67 %
a.1 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 48,90 %
10 NS 4P W+1 -650 10.7 35.67
11 NS 3S E+2 -460 16.1 53.67
12 NS 2P W-1 50 0.1 0.33 µ Tbl = 29,89 %
a10 Lydia Luyten -Prisca Tondreau 46,33 %
13 NS 3K S = 110 11.8 39.33
14 NS 2K S-1 -50 12.9 43.00
15 NS 3P N+3 230 3.3 11.00 µ Tbl = 31,11 %
a.8 Marianne Borsu -Regis Lamy 52,92 %
22 NS 3P N-1 -50 4 13.33
23 NS 1S E+1 -120 10 33.33
24 NS 2C E = -110 4 13.33 µ Tbl = 20,00 %
a.7 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 55,33 %
25 NS 4T W = -130 1 3.33
26 NS 1S W+3 -180 0 0.00
27 NS 3S W+2 -460 3.3 11.00 µ Tbl = 4,78 %
a.6 Luc Rampaer -Bernard Brisbois 38,89 %
28 NS 1S S+5 240 15 50.00
29 NS 3S W-2 200 28.7 95.67
30 NS 4C S = 420 8.1 27.00 µ Tbl = 57,56 %
Total : 180,9 / 720 = 25,13 %
PAIRE A10 -
a.9 Chantal Barro -Isabelle de Vanssay 60,19 %
1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.8 Marianne Borsu -Regis Lamy 52,92 %
4 NS BYE 0 0.00
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.7 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 55,33 %
7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.6 Luc Rampaer -Bernard Brisbois 38,89 %
10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.4 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige 54,19 %
13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00
15 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 43,89 %
16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Danielle Wybauw 52,19 %
19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00
21 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a10 Lydia Luyten -Prisca Tondreau 46,33 %
28 NS BYE 0 0.00
29 NS BYE 0 0.00
30 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 900 = 0,00 %
PAIRE a.9 Chantal Barro -Isabelle de Vanssay
A10 - 0,00 %
1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.6 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 37,58 %
4 EO 4P N = 620 11.8 39.33
5 EO 4P S-1 -100 23.5 78.33
6 EO 3S N = 400 23.5 78.33 µ Tbl = 65,33 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 45,46 %
7 EO 3S W+1 -630 18.2 60.67
8 EO 3S N-1 -50 19.3 64.33
9 EO 2C S-1 -50 21.4 71.33 µ Tbl = 65,44 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 60,17 %
10 EO 5P W = -650 19.3 64.33
11 EO 3S E+3 -490 25.7 85.67
12 EO 5K S+1 620 18.2 60.67 µ Tbl = 70,22 %
A.2 Giuseppe Napoli -Lydia Wildiers 64,01 %
13 EO 2P N+2 170 10.7 35.67
14 EO 2K S-2 -100 25.7 85.67
15 EO 3P N+3 230 26.7 89.00 µ Tbl = 70,11 %
A.3 Anne Van den Berge -Andre Delacroix 45,78 %
19 EO 4K N-1 -50 20.3 67.67
20 EO 3K E+1 -130 8.6 28.67
21 EO 4C N+1 650 0.1 0.33 µ Tbl = 32,22 %
A.9 Claire Derieuw -Caroll Pucher 55,28 %
25 EO 5K N+1 420 10 33.33
26 EO 1S W-1 100 13 43.33
27 EO 3S W+2 -460 26.7 89.00 µ Tbl = 55,22 %
A.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Myriam de Timary 45,54 %
28 EO 3S N-1 -100 28.7 95.67
29 EO 4C E+1 -650 21.9 73.00
30 EO 4CcS = 590 5.9 19.67 µ Tbl = 62,78 %
Total : 379,2 / 630 = 60,19 %
PAIRE b.7 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren
B.4 Yolande Waerseggers -Marguerite Verstraeten 46,51 %
1 EO 3P E = -140 17.1 57.00
2 EO 2C E+1 -140 27.8 92.67
3 EO 3S S-2 -100 27.8 92.67 µ Tbl = 80,78 %
B.9 Magda Moortgat -Philippe Gilles 58,78 %
4 EO 4P N+2 680 3.3 11.00
5 EO 2P S+1 140 15 50.00
6 EO 3S N = 400 23.5 78.33 µ Tbl = 46,44 %
B.5 Helene Schyns -Michele Berrier 59,88 %
7 EO 3S W+1 -630 18.2 60.67
8 EO 4PcW-3 500 4.3 14.33
9 EO 3C S = 140 2.2 7.33 µ Tbl = 27,44 %
B.1 Colette Heerinckx -Annette Fobe 44,61 %
10 EO 4P W+1 -650 19.3 64.33
11 EO 3S E+3 -490 25.7 85.67
12 EO 2P W-2 100 27.8 92.67 µ Tbl = 80,89 %
B.2 Grazia Neuenschwander -Nicole Leclere 42,17 %
16 EO 3S N+3 490 23.5 78.33
17 EO 2P E+3 -200 20.3 67.67
18 EO 5C E-1 50 20.3 67.67 µ Tbl = 71,22 %
B.7 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 52,64 %
19 EO 5K N-2 -100 25.7 85.67
20 EO 3S W+1 -630 22.5 75.00
21 EO 5K S+1 620 8.6 28.67 µ Tbl = 63,11 %
B.3 Patrick Gilles -Teresa Dekoster 50,17 %
22 EO 3S S-2 -100 30 100.00
23 EO 1S E+1 -120 20 66.67
24 EO 2P S-1 -50 18 60.00 µ Tbl = 75,56 %
B.8 Luc Cartuyvels -Daniel Couvreur 52,93 %
25 EO 5TcW-2 500 1 3.33
26 EO 4C E-2 200 4 13.33
27 EO 3S W+2 -460 26.7 89.00 µ Tbl = 35,22 %
Total : 432,6 / 720 = 60,08 %
PAIRE a.5 Michel Lievens -Helene Christiaens
A.8 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 25,13 %
1 EO 3P E+3 -230 26.7 89.00
2 EO 2P S-2 -200 29.9 99.67
3 EO 2S N = 120 9.7 32.33 µ Tbl = 73,67 %
A.9 Claire Derieuw -Caroll Pucher 55,28 %
7 EO 4P E = -620 8.6 28.67
8 EO 3S N-2 -100 24.6 82.00
9 EO 3C S-1 -50 21.4 71.33 µ Tbl = 60,67 %
A.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Myriam de Timary 45,54 %
13 EO 3S S-1 -100 23.5 78.33
14 EO 2K S-1 -50 17.1 57.00
15 EO 4P N+2 680 10.7 35.67 µ Tbl = 57,00 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 45,46 %
16 EO 4P S+2 480 26.7 89.00
17 EO 2K E+4 -170 17.1 57.00
18 EO 6CcE-1 100 13.9 46.33 µ Tbl = 64,11 %
A.6 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 37,58 %
19 EO 4K N = 130 13.9 46.33
20 EO 3S W+1 -630 22.5 75.00
21 EO 6K S-1 -100 29.9 99.67 µ Tbl = 73,67 %
A.2 Giuseppe Napoli -Lydia Wildiers 64,01 %
22 EO 2P N+1 140 5 16.67
23 EO 1S E = -90 6 20.00
24 EO 4C E-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 12,22 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 60,17 %
25 EO 3P N+2 200 15 50.00
26 EO 2K W+1 -110 24 80.00
27 EO 3T E+2 -150 5.4 18.00 µ Tbl = 49,33 %
A.3 Anne Van den Berge -Andre Delacroix 45,78 %
28 EO 2S S = 120 24.1 80.33
29 EO 5C E = -650 21.9 73.00
30 EO 4C S = 420 21.9 73.00 µ Tbl = 75,44 %
Total : 419,5 / 720 = 58,26 %
PAIRE b.8 Benoit Ortegat -Jean de Villenfagne
B.9 Magda Moortgat -Philippe Gilles 58,78 %
1 EO 3K S-2 -100 11.8 39.33
2 EO 2C E = -110 20.3 67.67
3 EO 2C E-1 100 17.1 57.00 µ Tbl = 54,67 %
B.5 Helene Schyns -Michele Berrier 59,88 %
4 EO 4P N-1 -100 21.4 71.33
5 EO 3S S+1 630 0.1 0.33
6 EO 3S N+1 430 11.8 39.33 µ Tbl = 37,00 %
B.1 Colette Heerinckx -Annette Fobe 44,61 %
7 EO 3S W+1 -630 18.2 60.67
8 EO 4CxS-3 -1000 29.9 99.67
9 EO 2C S = 110 11.8 39.33 µ Tbl = 66,56 %
B.6 Patricia Bardy -Jeanine Bontemps 52,68 %
10 EO 5P W = -650 19.3 64.33
11 EO 3S E+2 -460 13.9 46.33
12 EO 5K S+1 620 18.2 60.67 µ Tbl = 57,11 %
B.2 Grazia Neuenschwander -Nicole Leclere 42,17 %
13 EO 3P N-2 -200 28.9 96.33
14 EO 3P S-2 -100 25.7 85.67
15 EO 4P N+2 680 10.7 35.67 µ Tbl = 72,56 %
B.3 Patrick Gilles -Teresa Dekoster 50,17 %
19 EO 3C E-2 200 7.5 25.00
20 EO 3S W+1 -630 22.5 75.00
21 EO 3S S = 600 19.3 64.33 µ Tbl = 54,78 %
B.8 Luc Cartuyvels -Daniel Couvreur 52,93 %
22 EO 1P N+1 110 18 60.00
23 EO 2P E = -110 13 43.33
24 EO 2P S-1 -50 18 60.00 µ Tbl = 54,44 %
B.4 Yolande Waerseggers -Marguerite Verstraeten 46,51 %
25 EO 3P N+1 170 21 70.00
26 EO 2S W-1 100 13 43.33
27 EO 3S W+2 -460 26.7 89.00 µ Tbl = 67,44 %
Total : 418,1 / 720 = 58,07 %
PAIRE a.7 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru
A.9 Claire Derieuw -Caroll Pucher 55,28 %
1 EO 3K S-2 -100 11.8 39.33
2 EO 2C E = -110 20.3 67.67
3 EO 2S N+1 150 4.3 14.33 µ Tbl = 40,44 %
A.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Myriam de Timary 45,54 %
4 EO 4P N-1 -100 21.4 71.33
5 EO 4P S = 620 6.5 21.67
6 EO 3S N = 400 23.5 78.33 µ Tbl = 57,11 %
A10 - 0,00 %
7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 45,46 %
13 EO 3S S = 600 3.3 11.00
14 EO 3K S-1 -50 17.1 57.00
15 EO 4P N+2 680 10.7 35.67 µ Tbl = 34,56 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 60,17 %
19 EO 3S S-3 -150 29.9 99.67
20 EO 5K E-1 100 3.3 11.00
21 EO 5K S+1 620 8.6 28.67 µ Tbl = 46,44 %
A.3 Anne Van den Berge -Andre Delacroix 45,78 %
22 EO 2P N = 110 18 60.00
23 EO 1S E+1 -120 20 66.67
24 EO 2C E = -110 26 86.67 µ Tbl = 71,11 %
A.8 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 25,13 %
25 EO 4T W = -130 29 96.67
26 EO 1S W+3 -180 30 100.00
27 EO 3S W+2 -460 26.7 89.00 µ Tbl = 95,22 %
A.4 Bruno Chevalier -Michel Paquot 61,28 %
28 EO 3S S+2 660 1.3 4.33
29 EO 3S W+1 -630 15 50.00
30 EO 4C S = 420 21.9 73.00 µ Tbl = 42,44 %
Total : 348,6 / 630 = 55,33 %
PAIRE a.4 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige
A.8 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 25,13 %
4 EO 4PcN-1 -200 28.9 96.33
5 EO 4P S-1 -100 23.5 78.33
6 EO 3S S = 400 23.5 78.33 µ Tbl = 84,33 %
A.4 Bruno Chevalier -Michel Paquot 61,28 %
10 EO 4P W = -620 3.3 11.00
11 EO 3S E+1 -430 4.3 14.33
12 EO 3S N+1 630 9.7 32.33 µ Tbl = 19,22 %
A10 - 0,00 %
13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00
15 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Myriam de Timary 45,54 %
16 EO 6S S+1 1020 6.5 21.67
17 EO 3S W-1 50 7.5 25.00
18 EO 5C E = -450 26.7 89.00 µ Tbl = 45,22 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 45,46 %
19 EO 3C E-2 200 7.5 25.00
20 EO 3S W+1 -630 22.5 75.00
21 EO 5P W-3 150 25.7 85.67 µ Tbl = 61,89 %
A.6 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 37,58 %
22 EO 1S N-1 -50 26 86.67
23 EO 2PcE = -670 30 100.00
24 EO 3P S-3 -150 30 100.00 µ Tbl = 95,56 %
A.2 Giuseppe Napoli -Lydia Wildiers 64,01 %
25 EO 2P N+3 200 15 50.00
26 EO 2C E-1 100 13 43.33
27 EO 4C E-2 Ajust 18 60.00 µ Tbl = 51,11 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 60,17 %
28 EO 3S S = 600 10.4 34.67
29 EO 3S E = -600 8.1 27.00
30 EO 4PcE-4 800 1.3 4.33 µ Tbl = 22,00 %
Total : 341,4 / 630 = 54,19 %
PAIRE a.8 Marianne Borsu -Regis Lamy
A.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Myriam de Timary 45,54 %
1 EO 4K S-2 -100 11.8 39.33
2 EO 2C E-2 100 6.5 21.67
3 EO 2S N-1 -50 24.6 82.00 µ Tbl = 47,67 %
A10 - 0,00 %
4 EO BYE 0 0.00
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.6 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 37,58 %
7 EO 3S W+1 -630 18.2 60.67
8 EO 4PcW-3 500 4.3 14.33
9 EO 3C S-1 -50 21.4 71.33 µ Tbl = 48,78 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 45,46 %
10 EO 4P W+1 -650 19.3 64.33
11 EO 3S E+3 -490 25.7 85.67
12 EO 5K S+1 620 18.2 60.67 µ Tbl = 70,22 %
A.2 Giuseppe Napoli -Lydia Wildiers 64,01 %
16 EO 6P S+1 1010 12.9 43.00
17 EO 3S W-2 100 0.1 0.33
18 EO 5P S+1 680 4.3 14.33 µ Tbl = 19,22 %
A.8 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 25,13 %
22 EO 3P N-1 -50 26 86.67
23 EO 1S E+1 -120 20 66.67
24 EO 2C E = -110 26 86.67 µ Tbl = 80,00 %
A.4 Bruno Chevalier -Michel Paquot 61,28 %
25 EO 4T W-1 100 25 83.33
26 EO 2T W+1 -110 24 80.00
27 EO 4C E-2 100 0.1 0.33 µ Tbl = 54,56 %
A.9 Claire Derieuw -Caroll Pucher 55,28 %
28 EO 3S S+1 630 5.9 19.67
29 EO 3S W+2 -660 28.7 95.67
30 EO 4PcE-3 500 10.4 34.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 333,4 / 630 = 52,92 %
PAIRE a.2 Dominique Sassen -Danielle Wybauw
A.2 Giuseppe Napoli -Lydia Wildiers 64,01 %
4 EO 4P N-1 -100 21.4 71.33
5 EO 4P S-1 -100 23.5 78.33
6 EO 3S N+2 460 2.2 7.33 µ Tbl = 52,33 %
A.8 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 25,13 %
7 EO 3S W+1 -630 18.2 60.67
8 EO 4C S-3 -150 27.8 92.67
9 EO 3T E+1 -130 29.9 99.67 µ Tbl = 84,33 %
A.3 Anne Van den Berge -Andre Delacroix 45,78 %
10 EO 4P W+1 -650 19.3 64.33
11 EO 3S E+2 -460 13.9 46.33
12 EO 3S N+1 630 9.7 32.33 µ Tbl = 47,67 %
A.9 Claire Derieuw -Caroll Pucher 55,28 %
13 EO 4K S = 130 15 50.00
14 EO 2K S+1 110 0.1 0.33
15 EO 4P N+2 680 10.7 35.67 µ Tbl = 28,67 %
A.4 Bruno Chevalier -Michel Paquot 61,28 %
16 EO 6P N+1 1010 12.9 43.00
17 EO 2P E+3 -200 20.3 67.67
18 EO 5P S+1 680 4.3 14.33 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
A10 - 0,00 %
19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00
21 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Myriam de Timary 45,54 %
22 EO 1P N+1 110 18 60.00
23 EO 1S E+1 -120 20 66.67
24 EO 2C E-1 50 12 40.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A.6 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 37,58 %
28 EO 1S S+2 150 19.6 65.33
29 EO 3S E = -600 8.1 27.00
30 EO 4C S = 420 21.9 73.00 µ Tbl = 55,11 %
Total : 328,8 / 630 = 52,19 %
PAIRE b.5 Jeannine Thys -Christiane Huby
B.3 Patrick Gilles -Teresa Dekoster 50,17 %
1 EO 3P E+3 -230 26.7 89.00
2 EO 3K S = 110 3.3 11.00
3 EO 2C W-1 100 17.1 57.00 µ Tbl = 52,33 %
B.8 Luc Cartuyvels -Daniel Couvreur 52,93 %
4 EO 4P N+2 680 3.3 11.00
5 EO 4P S = 620 6.5 21.67
6 EO 3S N = 400 23.5 78.33 µ Tbl = 37,00 %
B.9 Magda Moortgat -Philippe Gilles 58,78 %
10 EO 4P W+1 -650 19.3 64.33
11 EO 3S E+1 -430 4.3 14.33
12 EO 2K N+4 170 24.6 82.00 µ Tbl = 53,56 %
B.5 Helene Schyns -Michele Berrier 59,88 %
13 EO 2P N = 110 18.2 60.67
14 EO 2K S-2 -100 25.7 85.67
15 EO 4P N+2 680 10.7 35.67 µ Tbl = 60,67 %
B.1 Colette Heerinckx -Annette Fobe 44,61 %
16 EO 4P S+2 480 26.7 89.00
17 EO 3S W+2 -460 29.9 99.67
18 EO 6C E-1 50 20.3 67.67 µ Tbl = 85,44 %
B.6 Patricia Bardy -Jeanine Bontemps 52,68 %
19 EO 5K N-2 -100 25.7 85.67
20 EO 3S W = -600 11.8 39.33
21 EO 5K S+1 620 8.6 28.67 µ Tbl = 51,22 %
B.2 Grazia Neuenschwander -Nicole Leclere 42,17 %
22 EO 3P N = 140 5 16.67
23 EO 2P E = -110 13 43.33
24 EO 3C E-1 50 12 40.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
B.7 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 52,64 %
25 EO 4P N+1 450 6 20.00
26 EO 2K W = -90 18 60.00
27 EO 3C W+1 -170 11.8 39.33 µ Tbl = 39,78 %
Total : 372,0 / 720 = 51,67 %
PAIRE b.2 Catherine de Moffarts -Veronique Englebienne
B.6 Patricia Bardy -Jeanine Bontemps 52,68 %
1 EO 5K S-2 -100 11.8 39.33
2 EO 2C E = -110 20.3 67.67
3 EO 1S N = 90 21.4 71.33 µ Tbl = 59,44 %
B.2 Grazia Neuenschwander -Nicole Leclere 42,17 %
4 EO 4P S-2 -200 28.9 96.33
5 EO 4P S-1 -100 23.5 78.33
6 EO 4P S+1 450 6.5 21.67 µ Tbl = 65,44 %
B.7 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 52,64 %
7 EO 4CcS-4 -1100 29.9 99.67
8 EO 4C S-1 -50 19.3 64.33
9 EO 2C S = 110 11.8 39.33 µ Tbl = 67,78 %
B.3 Patrick Gilles -Teresa Dekoster 50,17 %
10 EO 4P W = -620 3.3 11.00
11 EO 3S E+2 -460 13.9 46.33
12 EO 3S N+2 660 2.2 7.33 µ Tbl = 21,56 %
B.8 Luc Cartuyvels -Daniel Couvreur 52,93 %
13 EO 4P N-2 -200 28.9 96.33
14 EO 2K S-1 -50 17.1 57.00
15 EO 4P N+2 680 10.7 35.67 µ Tbl = 63,00 %
B.4 Yolande Waerseggers -Marguerite Verstraeten 46,51 %
16 EO 6S N+1 1020 6.5 21.67
17 EO 3S W-1 50 7.5 25.00
18 EO 5C E+1 -480 29.9 99.67 µ Tbl = 48,78 %
B.9 Magda Moortgat -Philippe Gilles 58,78 %
19 EO 4C E-3 300 1.1 3.67
20 EO 3S E+1 -630 22.5 75.00
21 EO 5K S+1 620 8.6 28.67 µ Tbl = 35,78 %
B.5 Helene Schyns -Michele Berrier 59,88 %
22 EO 2P N+1 140 5 16.67
23 EO 1S E-1 100 1 3.33
24 EO 1C E+1 -110 26 86.67 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
Total : 357,6 / 720 = 49,67 %
PAIRE a.1 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 45,46 %
1 EO 5K S-3 -150 20.3 67.67
2 EO 2P S = 110 3.3 11.00
3 EO 3K S+1 130 6.5 21.67 µ Tbl = 33,44 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 60,17 %
4 EO 3P S-1 -100 21.4 71.33
5 EO 4P S = 620 6.5 21.67
6 EO 3S N+1 430 11.8 39.33 µ Tbl = 44,11 %
A.2 Giuseppe Napoli -Lydia Wildiers 64,01 %
7 EO 3S W-1 100 1.1 3.67
8 EO 4PcW-3 500 4.3 14.33
9 EO 3C S = 140 2.2 7.33 µ Tbl = 8,44 %
A.8 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 25,13 %
10 EO 4P W+1 -650 19.3 64.33
11 EO 3S E+2 -460 13.9 46.33
12 EO 2P W-1 50 29.9 99.67 µ Tbl = 70,11 %
A.3 Anne Van den Berge -Andre Delacroix 45,78 %
13 EO 3P N = 140 12.9 43.00
14 EO 2S E+1 -150 29.9 99.67
15 EO 3P N+3 230 26.7 89.00 µ Tbl = 77,22 %
A.9 Claire Derieuw -Caroll Pucher 55,28 %
16 EO 6P N = 980 20.3 67.67
17 EO 3S W-1 50 7.5 25.00
18 EO 6CcE-2 300 9.7 32.33 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
A.4 Bruno Chevalier -Michel Paquot 61,28 %
19 EO 4C E-2 200 7.5 25.00
20 EO 3S E+1 -630 22.5 75.00
21 EO 4PcW-2 300 23.5 78.33 µ Tbl = 59,44 %
A.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Myriam de Timary 45,54 %
25 EO 4P N+1 450 6 20.00
26 EO 2S W = -120 28 93.33
27 EO 5K E+1 -420 17.1 57.00 µ Tbl = 56,78 %
Total : 352,1 / 720 = 48,90 %
PAIRE b.9 Olivier Paternostre -Cécile Drion de Chapois
B.5 Helene Schyns -Michele Berrier 59,88 %
1 EO 4KcS-2 -300 29.9 99.67
2 EO 2C E = -110 20.3 67.67
3 EO 3K S = 110 12.9 43.00 µ Tbl = 70,11 %
B.1 Colette Heerinckx -Annette Fobe 44,61 %
4 EO 2P N+3 200 15 50.00
5 EO 4P S-1 -100 23.5 78.33
6 EO 3S N+2 460 2.2 7.33 µ Tbl = 45,22 %
B.6 Patricia Bardy -Jeanine Bontemps 52,68 %
7 EO 3S W+1 -630 18.2 60.67
8 EO 3S N-1 -50 19.3 64.33
9 EO 2C S = 110 11.8 39.33 µ Tbl = 54,78 %
B.2 Grazia Neuenschwander -Nicole Leclere 42,17 %
10 EO 4P W+1 -650 19.3 64.33
11 EO 3S E+2 -460 13.9 46.33
12 EO 4K S+2 170 24.6 82.00 µ Tbl = 64,22 %
B.7 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 52,64 %
13 EO 4K S-1 -100 23.5 78.33
14 EO 2K S = 90 5.4 18.00
15 EO 4P N+2 680 10.7 35.67 µ Tbl = 44,00 %
B.3 Patrick Gilles -Teresa Dekoster 50,17 %
16 EO 7P S = 1510 2.2 7.33
17 EO 3S W-1 50 7.5 25.00
18 EO 5C E = -450 26.7 89.00 µ Tbl = 40,44 %
B.4 Yolande Waerseggers -Marguerite Verstraeten 46,51 %
22 EO 1P N+1 110 18 60.00
23 EO 1S E = -90 6 20.00
24 EO 3C E-2 100 6 20.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
B.9 Magda Moortgat -Philippe Gilles 58,78 %
25 EO 4T W = -130 29 96.67
26 EO 3S W-2 200 4 13.33
27 EO 3T E+1 -130 2.2 7.33 µ Tbl = 39,11 %
Total : 352,1 / 720 = 48,90 %
PAIRE b.3 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Jacques Podevyn
B.7 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 52,64 %
4 EO 4P N = 620 11.8 39.33
5 EO 4P S-1 -100 23.5 78.33
6 EO 3S N+2 460 2.2 7.33 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
B.3 Patrick Gilles -Teresa Dekoster 50,17 %
7 EO 3S W+2 -660 27.8 92.67
8 EO 4C S-2 -100 24.6 82.00
9 EO 2C S = 110 11.8 39.33 µ Tbl = 71,33 %
B.8 Luc Cartuyvels -Daniel Couvreur 52,93 %
10 EO 4P W = -620 3.3 11.00
11 EO 3S E+3 -490 25.7 85.67
12 EO 3S S+2 660 2.2 7.33 µ Tbl = 34,67 %
B.4 Yolande Waerseggers -Marguerite Verstraeten 46,51 %
13 EO 4K S-1 -100 23.5 78.33
14 EO 3S W-1 50 10.7 35.67
15 EO 3P N+3 230 26.7 89.00 µ Tbl = 67,67 %
B.9 Magda Moortgat -Philippe Gilles 58,78 %
16 EO 7S S = 1520 0.1 0.33
17 EO 3S W-1 50 7.5 25.00
18 EO 5C E-1 50 20.3 67.67 µ Tbl = 31,00 %
B.5 Helene Schyns -Michele Berrier 59,88 %
19 EO 4K N = 130 13.9 46.33
20 EO 3K E = -110 6.5 21.67
21 EO 5K S+1 620 8.6 28.67 µ Tbl = 32,22 %
B.1 Colette Heerinckx -Annette Fobe 44,61 %
22 EO 2P N+1 140 5 16.67
23 EO 1S E+2 -150 27 90.00
24 EO 3P S-2 -100 22 73.33 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
B.6 Patricia Bardy -Jeanine Bontemps 52,68 %
25 EO 3P N+2 200 15 50.00
26 EO 2K W-1 100 13 43.33
27 EO 4T E+2 -170 11.8 39.33 µ Tbl = 44,22 %
Total : 344,5 / 720 = 47,85 %
PAIRE a10 Lydia Luyten -Prisca Tondreau
A.6 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 37,58 %
1 EO 2K S = 90 4.3 14.33
2 EO 2C E = -110 20.3 67.67
3 EO 3K S-1 -50 24.6 82.00 µ Tbl = 54,67 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 45,46 %
4 EO 4P N+1 650 8.6 28.67
5 EO 3S S = 600 12.9 43.00
6 EO 3S N = 400 23.5 78.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 60,17 %
7 EO 3S W-1 100 1.1 3.67
8 EO 3S N = 400 10.7 35.67
9 EO 2C S = 110 11.8 39.33 µ Tbl = 26,22 %
A.2 Giuseppe Napoli -Lydia Wildiers 64,01 %
10 EO 4P W+1 -650 19.3 64.33
11 EO 3S W = -400 0.1 0.33
12 EO 3S N+2 660 2.2 7.33 µ Tbl = 24,00 %
A.8 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 25,13 %
13 EO 3K S = 110 18.2 60.67
14 EO 2K S-1 -50 17.1 57.00
15 EO 3P N+3 230 26.7 89.00 µ Tbl = 68,89 %
A.3 Anne Van den Berge -Andre Delacroix 45,78 %
16 EO 6P S+1 1010 12.9 43.00
17 EO 3S W+1 -430 26.7 89.00
18 EO 6C E-2 100 13.9 46.33 µ Tbl = 59,44 %
A.4 Bruno Chevalier -Michel Paquot 61,28 %
22 EO 1P N+2 140 5 16.67
23 EO 1S E+1 -120 20 66.67
24 EO 3C E-1 50 12 40.00 µ Tbl = 41,11 %
A10 - 0,00 %
28 EO BYE 0 0.00
29 EO BYE 0 0.00
30 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 291,9 / 630 = 46,33 %
PAIRE a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 60,17 %
1 EO 3P E+1 -170 23.5 78.33
2 EO 2C E-1 50 10.7 35.67
3 EO 3S N+1 430 0.1 0.33 µ Tbl = 38,11 %
A.3 Anne Van den Berge -Andre Delacroix 45,78 %
7 EO 3S W+1 -630 18.2 60.67
8 EO 4PcW-3 500 4.3 14.33
9 EO 1S W = -90 25.7 85.67 µ Tbl = 53,56 %
A.9 Claire Derieuw -Caroll Pucher 55,28 %
10 EO 4P W+1 -650 19.3 64.33
11 EO 3S E+1 -430 4.3 14.33
12 EO 3S N+1 630 9.7 32.33 µ Tbl = 37,00 %
A.4 Bruno Chevalier -Michel Paquot 61,28 %
13 EO 3S S+1 630 0.1 0.33
14 EO 2K S = 90 5.4 18.00
15 EO 4P N+2 680 10.7 35.67 µ Tbl = 18,00 %
A10 - 0,00 %
16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Myriam de Timary 45,54 %
19 EO 3K N = 110 17.1 57.00
20 EO 3S W+1 -630 22.5 75.00
21 EO 5K S+1 620 8.6 28.67 µ Tbl = 53,56 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 45,46 %
22 EO 1P N+1 110 18 60.00
23 EO 1S E+2 -150 27 90.00
24 EO 4C E-2 100 6 20.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
A.6 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 37,58 %
25 EO 3K N+3 170 21 70.00
26 EO 3S W-2 200 4 13.33
27 EO 3S W+1 -430 20.3 67.67 µ Tbl = 50,33 %
Total : 276,5 / 630 = 43,89 %
PAIRE b.1 Nicolas de Neve -Regine de Viron
B.1 Colette Heerinckx -Annette Fobe 44,61 %
1 EO 3K S-1 -50 6.5 21.67
2 EO 2C E = -110 20.3 67.67
3 EO 1S N+1 120 9.7 32.33 µ Tbl = 40,56 %
B.6 Patricia Bardy -Jeanine Bontemps 52,68 %
4 EO 5P N+1 680 3.3 11.00
5 EO 4P S = 620 6.5 21.67
6 EO 3S N = 400 23.5 78.33 µ Tbl = 37,00 %
B.2 Grazia Neuenschwander -Nicole Leclere 42,17 %
7 EO 2C N-2 -200 4.3 14.33
8 EO 4PcW-3 500 4.3 14.33
9 EO 3C S-2 -100 27.8 92.67 µ Tbl = 40,44 %
B.7 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 52,64 %
10 EO 4P W+1 -650 19.3 64.33
11 EO 3S E+3 -490 25.7 85.67
12 EO 3S N+1 630 9.7 32.33 µ Tbl = 60,78 %
B.3 Patrick Gilles -Teresa Dekoster 50,17 %
13 EO 3C E-3 300 7.5 25.00
14 EO 2K S = 90 5.4 18.00
15 EO 4P N+2 680 10.7 35.67 µ Tbl = 26,22 %
B.8 Luc Cartuyvels -Daniel Couvreur 52,93 %
16 EO 7P N-1 -50 29.9 99.67
17 EO 3S W+1 -430 26.7 89.00
18 EO 5P S+1 680 4.3 14.33 µ Tbl = 67,67 %
B.4 Yolande Waerseggers -Marguerite Verstraeten 46,51 %
19 EO 4C E-3 300 1.1 3.67
20 EO 3S E+1 -630 22.5 75.00
21 EO 3S S = 600 19.3 64.33 µ Tbl = 47,67 %
B.5 Helene Schyns -Michele Berrier 59,88 %
25 EO 5TcW-2 500 1 3.33
26 EO 2K W-2 200 4 13.33
27 EO 3T E+3 -170 11.8 39.33 µ Tbl = 18,67 %
Total : 305,1 / 720 = 42,38 %
PAIRE b.4 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm
B.7 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 52,64 %
1 EO 4K S-3 -150 20.3 67.67
2 EO 2S N+1 150 0.1 0.33
3 EO 3S N = 400 2.2 7.33 µ Tbl = 25,11 %
B.8 Luc Cartuyvels -Daniel Couvreur 52,93 %
7 EO 3S W+1 -630 18.2 60.67
8 EO 3P W-2 100 15 50.00
9 EO 2C S+1 140 2.2 7.33 µ Tbl = 39,33 %
B.4 Yolande Waerseggers -Marguerite Verstraeten 46,51 %
10 EO 4P W = -620 3.3 11.00
11 EO 3S E+2 -460 13.9 46.33
12 EO 5K N+1 620 18.2 60.67 µ Tbl = 39,33 %
B.9 Magda Moortgat -Philippe Gilles 58,78 %
13 EO 3S S = 600 3.3 11.00
14 EO 2K S-1 -50 17.1 57.00
15 EO 4P N+2 680 10.7 35.67 µ Tbl = 34,56 %
B.5 Helene Schyns -Michele Berrier 59,88 %
16 EO 6P S = 980 20.3 67.67
17 EO 2S W = -120 15 50.00
18 EO 5PcS+1 1050 0.1 0.33 µ Tbl = 39,33 %
B.1 Colette Heerinckx -Annette Fobe 44,61 %
19 EO 5K N-2 -100 25.7 85.67
20 EO 3K E-2 200 0.1 0.33
21 EO 5K S+1 620 8.6 28.67 µ Tbl = 38,22 %
B.6 Patricia Bardy -Jeanine Bontemps 52,68 %
22 EO 2P N+1 140 5 16.67
23 EO 3T N-1 -100 10 33.33
24 EO 3T S-1 -50 18 60.00 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
B.2 Grazia Neuenschwander -Nicole Leclere 42,17 %
25 EO 4T W-1 100 25 83.33
26 EO 2P N-1 -100 20 66.67
27 EO 3S W+1 -430 20.3 67.67 µ Tbl = 72,56 %
Total : 292,6 / 720 = 40,64 %
PAIRE b.6 Chris Oostens -Manuela Meeus
B.8 Luc Cartuyvels -Daniel Couvreur 52,93 %
1 EO 3K S = 110 0.1 0.33
2 EO 2C E-1 50 10.7 35.67
3 EO 3S N-4 -200 29.9 99.67 µ Tbl = 45,22 %
B.4 Yolande Waerseggers -Marguerite Verstraeten 46,51 %
4 EO 4P N+2 680 3.3 11.00
5 EO 4P S-1 -100 23.5 78.33
6 EO 3S N+1 430 11.8 39.33 µ Tbl = 42,89 %
B.9 Magda Moortgat -Philippe Gilles 58,78 %
7 EO 3S W = -600 6.5 21.67
8 EO 4PcW-2 300 12.9 43.00
9 EO 2C S = 110 11.8 39.33 µ Tbl = 34,67 %
B.1 Colette Heerinckx -Annette Fobe 44,61 %
13 EO 3C E-3 300 7.5 25.00
14 EO 2K S = 90 5.4 18.00
15 EO 4P N+2 680 10.7 35.67 µ Tbl = 26,22 %
B.6 Patricia Bardy -Jeanine Bontemps 52,68 %
16 EO 6S N = 990 17.1 57.00
17 EO 3S W-1 50 7.5 25.00
18 EO 6CcE-2 300 9.7 32.33 µ Tbl = 38,11 %
B.2 Grazia Neuenschwander -Nicole Leclere 42,17 %
19 EO 4C E-2 200 7.5 25.00
20 EO 5K E-1 100 3.3 11.00
21 EO 4P W-2 100 27.8 92.67 µ Tbl = 42,89 %
B.7 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 52,64 %
22 EO 3P N-1 -50 26 86.67
23 EO 1S E-1 100 1 3.33
24 EO 4C E-2 100 6 20.00 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
B.3 Patrick Gilles -Teresa Dekoster 50,17 %
25 EO 3P N+2 200 15 50.00
26 EO 2K W+1 -110 24 80.00
27 EO 4T E+2 -170 11.8 39.33 µ Tbl = 56,44 %
Total : 290,8 / 720 = 40,39 %
PAIRE a.6 Luc Rampaer -Bernard Brisbois
A.4 Bruno Chevalier -Michel Paquot 61,28 %
1 EO 2C E-2 100 2.2 7.33
2 EO 2C E-1 50 10.7 35.67
3 EO 2C W-1 100 17.1 57.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.9 Claire Derieuw -Caroll Pucher 55,28 %
4 EO 4P N-1 -100 21.4 71.33
5 EO 4P S = 620 6.5 21.67
6 EO 3S N+1 430 11.8 39.33 µ Tbl = 44,11 %
A10 - 0,00 %
10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.6 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 37,58 %
16 EO 6S N+1 1020 6.5 21.67
17 EO 2S W+3 -210 23.5 78.33
18 EO 5C E-1 50 20.3 67.67 µ Tbl = 55,89 %
A.2 Giuseppe Napoli -Lydia Wildiers 64,01 %
19 EO 4K N-1 -50 20.3 67.67
20 EO 3S W = -600 11.8 39.33
21 EO 3S S = 600 19.3 64.33 µ Tbl = 57,11 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 60,17 %
22 EO 2S S = 120 12 40.00
23 EO 1S E = -90 6 20.00
24 EO 1S S+1 120 2 6.67 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
A.3 Anne Van den Berge -Andre Delacroix 45,78 %
25 EO 4P N+1 450 6 20.00
26 EO 5T W-2 200 4 13.33
27 EO 3T W+2 -150 5.4 18.00 µ Tbl = 17,11 %
A.8 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 25,13 %
28 EO 1S S+5 240 15 50.00
29 EO 3S W-2 200 1.3 4.33
30 EO 4C S = 420 21.9 73.00 µ Tbl = 42,44 %
Total : 245,0 / 630 = 38,89 %
|