B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 60,74 A10 Jean Marie Schmiliver -Patrick Gilles
--- 2 59,89 A.7 Thierry Bollansee -Benoit Ortegat
--- 3 59,05 A.4 Marie Claire Vienne -Sandra Dallemagne
--- 4 51,65 A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Antoinette Jourdain
--- 5 51,59 A.5 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens
--- 6 51,31 A11 Claire Derieuw -Catherine de Moffarts
--- 7 50,34 A12 Regine de Hemptinne -Michou van Wetter
--- 8 47,67 A.3 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart
--- 9 44,03 A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Mercedes Oostens
--- 10 42,88 A.8 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx
--- 11 40,98 A.6 Benedicte Lemaigre -Brigitte Velge
--- 12 40,42 A.9 Anne Marchal -Claire Destin
--- 13 0,00 A13 -
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 64,88 a.5 Stan Tabor -Michel Lievens
--- 2 58,24 a12 Christiane Verelst -Jean Verelst
--- 3 53,88 a.7 Hugo Baetens -Gaetan van de Werve
--- 4 52,62 a10 Luc Cartuyvels -Daniel Couvreur
--- 5 49,67 a.3 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant
--- 6 49,61 a.9 Myriam de Timary -Christiane Huby
--- 7 49,52 a.8 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere
--- 8 48,29 a.2 Dominique Sassen -Noelle Fosse
--- 9 47,40 a.6 Didier Collart -Marie J. de Wagheneire
--- 10 46,49 a11 Pascale Nobels -Anne Van den Berge
--- 11 44,00 a.1 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
--- 12 43,84 a13 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Annie Dirckx
--- 13 42,42 a.4 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Luyten
PAIRE A10 Jean Marie Schmiliver -Patrick Gilles
a.6 Didier Collart -Marie J. de Wagheneire 47,40 %
1 NS 3S W+1 -430 11 50.00
2 NS 2C S-2 -200 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a.5 Stan Tabor -Michel Lievens 64,88 %
3 NS 1S E-1 100 17.5 79.55
4 NS 3C S = 140 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.4 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Luyten 42,42 %
5 NS 3C N-1 -100 17.5 79.55
6 NS 4P N+1 450 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
a.3 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 49,67 %
7 NS 4P N-1 -100 5.5 25.00
8 NS 3C E-1 50 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 54,77 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Noelle Fosse 48,29 %
9 NS 2C N+1 140 9.9 45.00
10 NS 6C E-2 200 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a.1 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 44,00 %
11 NS 3S N+1 430 7.7 35.00
12 NS 2K E+2 -130 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a13 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Annie Dirckx 43,84 %
13 NS 1S W = -90 15.4 70.00
14 NS 1P N+3 170 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
a12 Christiane Verelst -Jean Verelst 58,24 %
15 NS 4C W-2 100 14.3 65.00
16 NS 4P W+1 -650 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a10 Luc Cartuyvels -Daniel Couvreur 52,62 %
19 NS 2P N = 110 16.5 75.00
20 NS 3S W-1 100 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a.9 Myriam de Timary -Christiane Huby 49,61 %
21 NS 4C E+1 -450 8.6 39.09
22 NS 5T W-3 300 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 69,32 %
a.8 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 49,52 %
23 NS 5CcW-2 500 13 59.09
24 NS 1S N = 90 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a.7 Hugo Baetens -Gaetan van de Werve 53,88 %
25 NS 4P N = 420 20.8 94.55
26 NS 4C N = 620 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 87,05 %
Total : 320,7 / 528 = 60,74 %
PAIRE A.7 Thierry Bollansee -Benoit Ortegat
a13 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Annie Dirckx 43,84 %
1 NS 3C E-1 50 21.9 99.55
2 NS 2S S+1 150 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 99,55 %
a12 Christiane Verelst -Jean Verelst 58,24 %
3 NS 1S E-1 100 17.5 79.55
4 NS 2S S+2 180 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 82,05 %
a11 Pascale Nobels -Anne Van den Berge 46,49 %
5 NS 2C N-1 -100 17.5 79.55
6 NS 5K N+1 420 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a10 Luc Cartuyvels -Daniel Couvreur 52,62 %
7 NS 4P N = 620 20.8 94.55
8 NS 4C E = -420 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.9 Myriam de Timary -Christiane Huby 49,61 %
9 NS 2C N+2 170 17.5 79.55
10 NS 6C E-1 100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
a.7 Hugo Baetens -Gaetan van de Werve 53,88 %
13 NS 3K N-2 -200 1.2 5.45
14 NS 1P N+2 140 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
a.6 Didier Collart -Marie J. de Wagheneire 47,40 %
15 NS 3P S = 140 19.7 89.55
16 NS 5K E-3 300 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 89,55 %
a.5 Stan Tabor -Michel Lievens 64,88 %
17 NS 3S S-5 -250 0.1 0.45
18 NS 3C W = -140 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 5,45 %
a.4 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Luyten 42,42 %
19 NS 2P N = 110 16.5 75.00
20 NS 4K W = -130 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a.3 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 49,67 %
21 NS 4C E = -420 17 77.27
22 NS 3S W = -600 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 48,86 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Noelle Fosse 48,29 %
23 NS 4P S+1 650 21 95.45
24 NS 2S N-1 -50 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a.1 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 44,00 %
25 NS 2P N+2 170 13.2 60.00
26 NS 4C N = 620 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
Total : 316,2 / 528 = 59,89 %
PAIRE A.4 Marie Claire Vienne -Sandra Dallemagne
a.7 Hugo Baetens -Gaetan van de Werve 53,88 %
1 NS 3S W+2 -460 3.4 15.45
2 NS 2P N-2 -200 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 15,45 %
a.6 Didier Collart -Marie J. de Wagheneire 47,40 %
3 NS 2C W-2 200 21.9 99.55
4 NS 3C S+1 170 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
a.4 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Luyten 42,42 %
7 NS 4P N = 620 20.8 94.55
8 NS 3K S+1 130 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 97,05 %
a.3 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 49,67 %
9 NS 5CcN-2 -300 0.1 0.45
10 NS 6C E-1 100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Noelle Fosse 48,29 %
11 NS 4C S+1 450 14.3 65.00
12 NS 4P W-1 50 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
a.1 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 44,00 %
13 NS 2C S = 110 21.9 99.55
14 NS 2P N+1 140 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
a13 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Annie Dirckx 43,84 %
15 NS 3K W-1 50 9.9 45.00
16 NS 4P W = -620 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a12 Christiane Verelst -Jean Verelst 58,24 %
17 NS 4C W-2 100 6.6 30.00
18 NS 2P S = 110 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a11 Pascale Nobels -Anne Van den Berge 46,49 %
19 NS 2P N+1 140 19.7 89.55
20 NS 4K W-1 100 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
a10 Luc Cartuyvels -Daniel Couvreur 52,62 %
21 NS 5C E = -450 8.6 39.09
22 NS 3T W+2 -150 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 42,05 %
a.9 Myriam de Timary -Christiane Huby 49,61 %
23 NS 4P S = 620 17 77.27
24 NS 2T N = 90 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
a.8 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 49,52 %
25 NS 3P N+1 170 13.2 60.00
26 NS 3C N+1 170 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
Total : 311,8 / 528 = 59,05 %
PAIRE A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Antoinette Jourdain
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Noelle Fosse 48,29 %
3 NS 1S E+2 -150 0.1 0.45
4 NS 2S S+1 150 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 10,45 %
a.1 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 44,00 %
5 NS 3C N-1 -100 17.5 79.55
6 NS 4P N+1 450 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
a13 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Annie Dirckx 43,84 %
7 NS 2P N+2 170 14.3 65.00
8 NS 1S E+1 -120 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a12 Christiane Verelst -Jean Verelst 58,24 %
9 NS 2C N+1 140 9.9 45.00
10 NS 3S W+1 -630 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a11 Pascale Nobels -Anne Van den Berge 46,49 %
11 NS 3S N+2 460 19.7 89.55
12 NS 4P W = -420 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a10 Luc Cartuyvels -Daniel Couvreur 52,62 %
13 NS 2S W = -120 6.6 30.00
14 NS 2S E-1 50 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
a.9 Myriam de Timary -Christiane Huby 49,61 %
15 NS 3P S-1 -100 3.4 15.45
16 NS 3P W = -140 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 17,95 %
a.8 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 49,52 %
17 NS 3T N+2 150 16.5 75.00
18 NS 3P S = 140 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
a.7 Hugo Baetens -Gaetan van de Werve 53,88 %
19 NS 2P S+2 170 21.9 99.55
20 NS 3PcS-2 -500 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.6 Didier Collart -Marie J. de Wagheneire 47,40 %
21 NS 4C E-1 50 20.6 93.64
22 NS 3C W+1 -170 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 61,82 %
a.5 Stan Tabor -Michel Lievens 64,88 %
23 NS 4P S+1 650 21 95.45
24 NS 2P W-1 50 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a.4 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Luyten 42,42 %
25 NS 3P N+1 170 13.2 60.00
26 NS 4C N+1 650 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
Total : 272,7 / 528 = 51,65 %
PAIRE A.5 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens
a.9 Myriam de Timary -Christiane Huby 49,61 %
1 NS 3S W = -400 17.5 79.55
2 NS 2P N-1 -100 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a.8 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 49,52 %
3 NS 1S E = -90 8.8 40.00
4 NS 3C S+1 170 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.7 Hugo Baetens -Gaetan van de Werve 53,88 %
5 NS 3P W+1 -170 11 50.00
6 NS 4P N+2 480 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
a.5 Stan Tabor -Michel Lievens 64,88 %
9 NS 2C N+2 170 17.5 79.55
10 NS 6S W = -1440 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a.4 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Luyten 42,42 %
11 NS 3S N+2 460 19.7 89.55
12 NS 4P W = -420 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.3 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 49,67 %
13 NS 2C S-1 -100 12.1 55.00
14 NS 2P N = 110 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Noelle Fosse 48,29 %
15 NS 3P S-1 -100 3.4 15.45
16 NS 4PcW-1 200 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
a.1 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 44,00 %
17 NS 3T N+2 150 16.5 75.00
18 NS 3P S+2 200 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 87,27 %
a13 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Annie Dirckx 43,84 %
19 NS 2C E = -110 4.5 20.45
20 NS 3K W = -110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
a12 Christiane Verelst -Jean Verelst 58,24 %
21 NS 5C E = -450 8.6 39.09
22 NS 5C W-1 100 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 57,05 %
a11 Pascale Nobels -Anne Van den Berge 46,49 %
23 NS 5CcW-2 500 13 59.09
24 NS 2P W-1 50 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a10 Luc Cartuyvels -Daniel Couvreur 52,62 %
25 NS 1S E = -90 4.5 20.45
26 NS 4C N-1 -100 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
Total : 272,4 / 528 = 51,59 %
PAIRE A11 Claire Derieuw -Catherine de Moffarts
a.8 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 49,52 %
1 NS 3S W+1 -430 11 50.00
2 NS 3P N-2 -200 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a.7 Hugo Baetens -Gaetan van de Werve 53,88 %
3 NS 1S E+1 -120 2.3 10.45
4 NS 3C S+1 170 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
a.6 Didier Collart -Marie J. de Wagheneire 47,40 %
5 NS 3C N+1 170 21.9 99.55
6 NS 4P N+1 450 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
a.5 Stan Tabor -Michel Lievens 64,88 %
7 NS 4P N-1 -100 5.5 25.00
8 NS 3C E+2 -200 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
a.4 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Luyten 42,42 %
9 NS 2C N+2 170 17.5 79.55
10 NS 6C E-2 200 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 82,05 %
a.3 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 49,67 %
11 NS 3S N+1 430 7.7 35.00
12 NS 4P W = -420 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Noelle Fosse 48,29 %
13 NS 3T W = -110 8.8 40.00
14 NS 3P N = 140 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.1 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 44,00 %
15 NS 3P S-1 -100 3.4 15.45
16 NS 5K E-2 200 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
a13 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Annie Dirckx 43,84 %
17 NS 4T N+1 150 16.5 75.00
18 NS 2P S = 110 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 67,50 %
a11 Pascale Nobels -Anne Van den Berge 46,49 %
21 NS 5C E-1 50 20.6 93.64
22 NS 4C W = -620 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 49,55 %
a10 Luc Cartuyvels -Daniel Couvreur 52,62 %
23 NS 4P S = 620 17 77.27
24 NS 2P W-1 50 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a.9 Myriam de Timary -Christiane Huby 49,61 %
25 NS 3P N+1 170 13.2 60.00
26 NS 4C N = 620 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
Total : 270,9 / 528 = 51,31 %
PAIRE A12 Regine de Hemptinne -Michou van Wetter
a10 Luc Cartuyvels -Daniel Couvreur 52,62 %
1 NS 3S W+2 -460 3.4 15.45
2 NS 2K E-2 100 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.9 Myriam de Timary -Christiane Huby 49,61 %
3 NS 1S E = -90 8.8 40.00
4 NS 3S S+1 630 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
a.8 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 49,52 %
5 NS 4T E+1 -150 13.2 60.00
6 NS 5P N = 450 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a.7 Hugo Baetens -Gaetan van de Werve 53,88 %
7 NS 3S N = 600 17.5 79.55
8 NS 4C E-1 50 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 82,05 %
a.6 Didier Collart -Marie J. de Wagheneire 47,40 %
9 NS 4P W-1 100 4.5 20.45
10 NS 4C E+1 -650 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
a.5 Stan Tabor -Michel Lievens 64,88 %
11 NS 5C S = 450 14.3 65.00
12 NS 2P W+2 -170 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.4 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Luyten 42,42 %
13 NS 3P E-1 100 18.6 84.55
14 NS 1P N = 80 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.3 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 49,67 %
15 NS 3K W-3 150 21.9 99.55
16 NS 3S W-4 400 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 99,55 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Noelle Fosse 48,29 %
17 NS 3T N+1 130 11 50.00
18 NS 2P S = 110 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.1 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 44,00 %
19 NS 1S N-1 -50 8.8 40.00
20 NS 3C E+1 -170 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
a12 Christiane Verelst -Jean Verelst 58,24 %
23 NS 4C W-1 100 3 13.64
24 NS 4C S-3 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 6,82 %
a11 Pascale Nobels -Anne Van den Berge 46,49 %
25 NS 2P N+2 170 13.2 60.00
26 NS 6C N-2 -200 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
Total : 265,8 / 528 = 50,34 %
PAIRE A.3 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart
a.5 Stan Tabor -Michel Lievens 64,88 %
1 NS 3S W+2 -460 3.4 15.45
2 NS 2S S-1 -100 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
a.3 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 49,67 %
5 NS 3C N-2 -200 6.6 30.00
6 NS 4P N+1 450 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Noelle Fosse 48,29 %
7 NS 2P N+1 170 14.3 65.00
8 NS 1S E+1 -120 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a.1 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 44,00 %
9 NS 2C N+1 140 9.9 45.00
10 NS 6C E-3 300 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
a13 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Annie Dirckx 43,84 %
11 NS 3S S+2 460 19.7 89.55
12 NS 2S E = -120 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
a12 Christiane Verelst -Jean Verelst 58,24 %
13 NS 2K N-1 -100 12.1 55.00
14 NS 2P N+1 140 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a11 Pascale Nobels -Anne Van den Berge 46,49 %
15 NS 3K W-1 50 9.9 45.00
16 NS 3C N-1 -50 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a10 Luc Cartuyvels -Daniel Couvreur 52,62 %
17 NS 3K E-3 150 16.5 75.00
18 NS 2P S = 110 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 67,50 %
a.9 Myriam de Timary -Christiane Huby 49,61 %
19 NS 2P S-1 -50 8.8 40.00
20 NS 3S W+1 -630 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
a.8 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 49,52 %
21 NS 5C E = -450 8.6 39.09
22 NS 2T W+3 -150 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 42,05 %
a.7 Hugo Baetens -Gaetan van de Werve 53,88 %
23 NS 5C W-2 200 9 40.91
24 NS 2P W = -110 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
a.6 Didier Collart -Marie J. de Wagheneire 47,40 %
25 NS 2P N+1 140 6.6 30.00
26 NS 3C N = 140 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
Total : 251,7 / 528 = 47,67 %
PAIRE A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Mercedes Oostens
a.1 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 44,00 %
1 NS 3S E = -400 17.5 79.55
2 NS 2P N-2 -200 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a13 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Annie Dirckx 43,84 %
3 NS 1S E = -90 8.8 40.00
4 NS 3C S+1 170 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a12 Christiane Verelst -Jean Verelst 58,24 %
5 NS 3C N-2 -200 6.6 30.00
6 NS 4P N = 420 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a11 Pascale Nobels -Anne Van den Berge 46,49 %
7 NS 2P N+1 140 11 50.00
8 NS 2S E = -120 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a10 Luc Cartuyvels -Daniel Couvreur 52,62 %
9 NS 2C N+1 140 9.9 45.00
10 NS 6C E-1 100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.9 Myriam de Timary -Christiane Huby 49,61 %
11 NS 3S N+1 430 7.7 35.00
12 NS 2S E = -120 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.8 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 49,52 %
13 NS 2C S-2 -200 1.2 5.45
14 NS 2P N = 110 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
a.7 Hugo Baetens -Gaetan van de Werve 53,88 %
15 NS 1S W-2 100 14.3 65.00
16 NS 5K E-1 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a.6 Didier Collart -Marie J. de Wagheneire 47,40 %
17 NS 3T N = 110 8.8 40.00
18 NS 2P S = 110 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.5 Stan Tabor -Michel Lievens 64,88 %
19 NS 3C E+1 -170 2.3 10.45
20 NS 3C E = -140 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
a.4 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Luyten 42,42 %
21 NS 60%60% Ajust 13.2 60.00
22 NS 2T W+1 -110 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a.3 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 49,67 %
23 NS 4C W-1 100 3 13.64
24 NS 1S N = 90 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
Total : 232,5 / 528 = 44,03 %
PAIRE A.8 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Noelle Fosse 48,29 %
1 NS 3S W = -400 17.5 79.55
2 NS 4K E-1 50 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
a.1 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 44,00 %
3 NS 1S E-1 100 17.5 79.55
4 NS 4C N-1 -100 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a13 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Annie Dirckx 43,84 %
5 NS 3C N-2 -200 6.6 30.00
6 NS 4P N+1 450 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a12 Christiane Verelst -Jean Verelst 58,24 %
7 NS 4P N-1 -100 5.5 25.00
8 NS 1S E+2 -150 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a11 Pascale Nobels -Anne Van den Berge 46,49 %
9 NS 4C N-2 -100 2.3 10.45
10 NS 4C E+1 -650 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 15,45 %
a10 Luc Cartuyvels -Daniel Couvreur 52,62 %
11 NS 3S N+1 430 7.7 35.00
12 NS 4P W = -420 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a.8 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 49,52 %
15 NS 2P S = 110 17.5 79.55
16 NS 5P W-2 200 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
a.7 Hugo Baetens -Gaetan van de Werve 53,88 %
17 NS 3C W-1 50 4.5 20.45
18 NS 3C W-1 50 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.6 Didier Collart -Marie J. de Wagheneire 47,40 %
19 NS 3P S-1 -50 8.8 40.00
20 NS 3S W-1 100 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a.5 Stan Tabor -Michel Lievens 64,88 %
21 NS 5C E = -450 8.6 39.09
22 NS 5T W-1 100 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 57,05 %
a.4 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Luyten 42,42 %
23 NS 5C W-2 200 9 40.91
24 NS 3C S-2 -100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a.3 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 49,67 %
25 NS 4P N = 420 20.8 94.55
26 NS 4C N-2 -200 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 226,4 / 528 = 42,88 %
PAIRE A.6 Benedicte Lemaigre -Brigitte Velge
a11 Pascale Nobels -Anne Van den Berge 46,49 %
1 NS 3S W+1 -430 11 50.00
2 NS 2C S = 110 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
a10 Luc Cartuyvels -Daniel Couvreur 52,62 %
3 NS 1S E = -90 8.8 40.00
4 NS 2S S+2 180 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a.9 Myriam de Timary -Christiane Huby 49,61 %
5 NS 5T E = -400 2.3 10.45
6 NS 5P N = 450 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
a.8 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 49,52 %
7 NS 4P N-2 -200 0.1 0.45
8 NS 1S E+1 -120 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a.6 Didier Collart -Marie J. de Wagheneire 47,40 %
11 NS 5K S = 400 0.1 0.45
12 NS 2P W+1 -140 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a.5 Stan Tabor -Michel Lievens 64,88 %
13 NS 1S W+3 -180 4.5 20.45
14 NS 3T E-2 100 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
a.4 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Luyten 42,42 %
15 NS 2P S-1 -100 3.4 15.45
16 NS 4C N-1 -50 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a.3 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 49,67 %
17 NS 5CcW-2 300 21.9 99.55
18 NS 3C W-1 50 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Noelle Fosse 48,29 %
19 NS 3C E-1 100 13.2 60.00
20 NS 3S W-1 100 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 67,50 %
a.1 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 44,00 %
21 NS 5CcE = -650 0.2 0.91
22 NS 5T W-2 200 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 45,23 %
a13 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Annie Dirckx 43,84 %
23 NS 4C W-1 100 3 13.64
24 NS 3S N-2 -100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
a12 Christiane Verelst -Jean Verelst 58,24 %
25 NS 1S E+1 -120 2.3 10.45
26 NS 3C N+2 200 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
Total : 216,4 / 528 = 40,98 %
PAIRE A.9 Anne Marchal -Claire Destin
a.4 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Luyten 42,42 %
1 NS 3S W+2 -460 3.4 15.45
2 NS 3T W-1 50 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
a.3 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 49,67 %
3 NS 1S E = -90 8.8 40.00
4 NS 3C S+1 170 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Noelle Fosse 48,29 %
5 NS 3CcN-2 -500 0.1 0.45
6 NS 5K N = 400 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 0,45 %
a.1 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 44,00 %
7 NS 4P N-1 -100 5.5 25.00
8 NS 1S E+1 -120 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
a13 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Annie Dirckx 43,84 %
9 NS 4C N+1 450 21.9 99.55
10 NS 4C E+1 -650 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a12 Christiane Verelst -Jean Verelst 58,24 %
11 NS 5K S+1 420 2.3 10.45
12 NS 4P W-1 50 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a11 Pascale Nobels -Anne Van den Berge 46,49 %
13 NS 3T W-1 100 18.6 84.55
14 NS 4C W-5 250 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 92,05 %
a.9 Myriam de Timary -Christiane Huby 49,61 %
17 NS 2S S-3 -150 2.3 10.45
18 NS 3C E+2 -200 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 5,45 %
a.8 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 49,52 %
19 NS 4PcN-2 -300 0.1 0.45
20 NS 3C E-2 200 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.7 Hugo Baetens -Gaetan van de Werve 53,88 %
21 NS 5C E = -450 8.6 39.09
22 NS 4C W = -620 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 22,27 %
a.6 Didier Collart -Marie J. de Wagheneire 47,40 %
23 NS 4C W-1 100 3 13.64
24 NS 2P W-2 100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a.5 Stan Tabor -Michel Lievens 64,88 %
25 NS 1S E+2 -150 0.1 0.45
26 NS 3C S+1 170 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
Total : 213,4 / 528 = 40,42 %
PAIRE A13 -
a12 Christiane Verelst -Jean Verelst 58,24 %
1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a11 Pascale Nobels -Anne Van den Berge 46,49 %
3 NS BYE 0 0.00
4 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a10 Luc Cartuyvels -Daniel Couvreur 52,62 %
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.9 Myriam de Timary -Christiane Huby 49,61 %
7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.8 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 49,52 %
9 NS BYE 0 0.00
10 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.7 Hugo Baetens -Gaetan van de Werve 53,88 %
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.6 Didier Collart -Marie J. de Wagheneire 47,40 %
13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.5 Stan Tabor -Michel Lievens 64,88 %
15 NS BYE 0 0.00
16 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.4 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Luyten 42,42 %
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.3 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 49,67 %
19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Noelle Fosse 48,29 %
21 NS BYE 0 0.00
22 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a13 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Annie Dirckx 43,84 %
25 NS BYE 0 0.00
26 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 572 = 0,00 %
PAIRE a.5 Stan Tabor -Michel Lievens
A.3 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 47,67 %
1 EO 3S W+2 -460 18.6 84.55
2 EO 2S S-1 -100 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A10 Jean Marie Schmiliver -Patrick Gilles 60,74 %
3 EO 1S E-1 100 4.5 20.45
4 EO 3C S = 140 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A11 Claire Derieuw -Catherine de Moffarts 51,31 %
7 EO 4P N-1 -100 16.5 75.00
8 EO 3C E+2 -200 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
A.5 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 51,59 %
9 EO 2C N+2 170 4.5 20.45
10 EO 6S W = -1440 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A12 Regine de Hemptinne -Michou van Wetter 50,34 %
11 EO 5C S = 450 7.7 35.00
12 EO 2P W+2 -170 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.6 Benedicte Lemaigre -Brigitte Velge 40,98 %
13 EO 1S W+3 -180 17.5 79.55
14 EO 3T E-2 100 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
A13 - 0,00 %
15 EO BYE 0 0.00
16 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.7 Thierry Bollansee -Benoit Ortegat 59,89 %
17 EO 3S S-5 -250 21.9 99.55
18 EO 3C W = -140 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 94,55 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Mercedes Oostens 44,03 %
19 EO 3C E+1 -170 19.7 89.55
20 EO 3C E = -140 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
A.8 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx 42,88 %
21 EO 5C E = -450 13.4 60.91
22 EO 5T W-1 100 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 42,95 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Antoinette Jourdain 51,65 %
23 EO 4P S+1 650 1 4.55
24 EO 2P W-1 50 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A.9 Anne Marchal -Claire Destin 40,42 %
25 EO 1S E+2 -150 21.9 99.55
26 EO 3C S+1 170 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
Total : 314,0 / 484 = 64,88 %
PAIRE a12 Christiane Verelst -Jean Verelst
A13 - 0,00 %
1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.7 Thierry Bollansee -Benoit Ortegat 59,89 %
3 EO 1S E-1 100 4.5 20.45
4 EO 2S S+2 180 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 17,95 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Mercedes Oostens 44,03 %
5 EO 3C N-2 -200 15.4 70.00
6 EO 4P N = 420 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.8 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx 42,88 %
7 EO 4P N-1 -100 16.5 75.00
8 EO 1S E+2 -150 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Antoinette Jourdain 51,65 %
9 EO 2C N+1 140 12.1 55.00
10 EO 3S W+1 -630 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A.9 Anne Marchal -Claire Destin 40,42 %
11 EO 5K S+1 420 19.7 89.55
12 EO 4P W-1 50 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.3 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 47,67 %
13 EO 2K N-1 -100 9.9 45.00
14 EO 2P N+1 140 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A10 Jean Marie Schmiliver -Patrick Gilles 60,74 %
15 EO 4C W-2 100 7.7 35.00
16 EO 4P W+1 -650 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A.4 Marie Claire Vienne -Sandra Dallemagne 59,05 %
17 EO 4C W-2 100 15.4 70.00
18 EO 2P S = 110 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.5 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 51,59 %
21 EO 5C E = -450 13.4 60.91
22 EO 5C W-1 100 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 42,95 %
A12 Regine de Hemptinne -Michou van Wetter 50,34 %
23 EO 4C W-1 100 19 86.36
24 EO 4C S-3 -150 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 93,18 %
A.6 Benedicte Lemaigre -Brigitte Velge 40,98 %
25 EO 1S E+1 -120 19.7 89.55
26 EO 3C N+2 200 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
Total : 281,9 / 484 = 58,24 %
PAIRE a.7 Hugo Baetens -Gaetan van de Werve
A.4 Marie Claire Vienne -Sandra Dallemagne 59,05 %
1 EO 3S W+2 -460 18.6 84.55
2 EO 2P N-2 -200 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 84,55 %
A11 Claire Derieuw -Catherine de Moffarts 51,31 %
3 EO 1S E+1 -120 19.7 89.55
4 EO 3C S+1 170 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A.5 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 51,59 %
5 EO 3P W+1 -170 11 50.00
6 EO 4P N+2 480 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
A12 Regine de Hemptinne -Michou van Wetter 50,34 %
7 EO 3S N = 600 4.5 20.45
8 EO 4C E-1 50 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 17,95 %
A13 - 0,00 %
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.7 Thierry Bollansee -Benoit Ortegat 59,89 %
13 EO 3K N-2 -200 20.8 94.55
14 EO 1P N+2 140 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Mercedes Oostens 44,03 %
15 EO 1S W-2 100 7.7 35.00
16 EO 5K E-1 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A.8 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx 42,88 %
17 EO 3C W-1 50 17.5 79.55
18 EO 3C W-1 50 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Antoinette Jourdain 51,65 %
19 EO 2P S+2 170 0.1 0.45
20 EO 3PcS-2 -500 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.9 Anne Marchal -Claire Destin 40,42 %
21 EO 5C E = -450 13.4 60.91
22 EO 4C W = -620 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 77,73 %
A.3 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 47,67 %
23 EO 5C W-2 200 13 59.09
24 EO 2P W = -110 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
A10 Jean Marie Schmiliver -Patrick Gilles 60,74 %
25 EO 4P N = 420 1.2 5.45
26 EO 4C N = 620 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 12,95 %
Total : 260,8 / 484 = 53,88 %
PAIRE a10 Luc Cartuyvels -Daniel Couvreur
A12 Regine de Hemptinne -Michou van Wetter 50,34 %
1 EO 3S W+2 -460 18.6 84.55
2 EO 2K E-2 100 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A.6 Benedicte Lemaigre -Brigitte Velge 40,98 %
3 EO 1S E = -90 13.2 60.00
4 EO 2S S+2 180 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A13 - 0,00 %
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.7 Thierry Bollansee -Benoit Ortegat 59,89 %
7 EO 4P N = 620 1.2 5.45
8 EO 4C E = -420 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Mercedes Oostens 44,03 %
9 EO 2C N+1 140 12.1 55.00
10 EO 6C E-1 100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.8 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx 42,88 %
11 EO 3S N+1 430 14.3 65.00
12 EO 4P W = -420 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Antoinette Jourdain 51,65 %
13 EO 2S W = -120 15.4 70.00
14 EO 2S E-1 50 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
A.3 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 47,67 %
17 EO 3K E-3 150 5.5 25.00
18 EO 2P S = 110 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 32,50 %
A10 Jean Marie Schmiliver -Patrick Gilles 60,74 %
19 EO 2P N = 110 5.5 25.00
20 EO 3S W-1 100 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A.4 Marie Claire Vienne -Sandra Dallemagne 59,05 %
21 EO 5C E = -450 13.4 60.91
22 EO 3T W+2 -150 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 57,95 %
A11 Claire Derieuw -Catherine de Moffarts 51,31 %
23 EO 4P S = 620 5 22.73
24 EO 2P W-1 50 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A.5 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 51,59 %
25 EO 1S E = -90 17.5 79.55
26 EO 4C N-1 -100 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
Total : 254,7 / 484 = 52,62 %
PAIRE a.3 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant
A.9 Anne Marchal -Claire Destin 40,42 %
3 EO 1S E = -90 13.2 60.00
4 EO 3C S+1 170 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.3 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 47,67 %
5 EO 3C N-2 -200 15.4 70.00
6 EO 4P N+1 450 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A10 Jean Marie Schmiliver -Patrick Gilles 60,74 %
7 EO 4P N-1 -100 16.5 75.00
8 EO 3C E-1 50 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 45,23 %
A.4 Marie Claire Vienne -Sandra Dallemagne 59,05 %
9 EO 5CcN-2 -300 21.9 99.55
10 EO 6C E-1 100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A11 Claire Derieuw -Catherine de Moffarts 51,31 %
11 EO 3S N+1 430 14.3 65.00
12 EO 4P W = -420 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A.5 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 51,59 %
13 EO 2C S-1 -100 9.9 45.00
14 EO 2P N = 110 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A12 Regine de Hemptinne -Michou van Wetter 50,34 %
15 EO 3K W-3 150 0.1 0.45
16 EO 3S W-4 400 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 0,45 %
A.6 Benedicte Lemaigre -Brigitte Velge 40,98 %
17 EO 5CcW-2 300 0.1 0.45
18 EO 3C W-1 50 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A13 - 0,00 %
19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.7 Thierry Bollansee -Benoit Ortegat 59,89 %
21 EO 4C E = -420 5 22.73
22 EO 3S W = -600 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 51,14 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Mercedes Oostens 44,03 %
23 EO 4C W-1 100 19 86.36
24 EO 1S N = 90 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.8 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx 42,88 %
25 EO 4P N = 420 1.2 5.45
26 EO 4C N-2 -200 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 240,4 / 484 = 49,67 %
PAIRE a.9 Myriam de Timary -Christiane Huby
A.5 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 51,59 %
1 EO 3S W = -400 4.5 20.45
2 EO 2P N-1 -100 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A12 Regine de Hemptinne -Michou van Wetter 50,34 %
3 EO 1S E = -90 13.2 60.00
4 EO 3S S+1 630 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
A.6 Benedicte Lemaigre -Brigitte Velge 40,98 %
5 EO 5T E = -400 19.7 89.55
6 EO 5P N = 450 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
A13 - 0,00 %
7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.7 Thierry Bollansee -Benoit Ortegat 59,89 %
9 EO 2C N+2 170 4.5 20.45
10 EO 6C E-1 100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Mercedes Oostens 44,03 %
11 EO 3S N+1 430 14.3 65.00
12 EO 2S E = -120 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Antoinette Jourdain 51,65 %
15 EO 3P S-1 -100 18.6 84.55
16 EO 3P W = -140 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 82,05 %
A.9 Anne Marchal -Claire Destin 40,42 %
17 EO 2S S-3 -150 19.7 89.55
18 EO 3C E+2 -200 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 94,55 %
A.3 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 47,67 %
19 EO 2P S-1 -50 13.2 60.00
20 EO 3S W+1 -630 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
A10 Jean Marie Schmiliver -Patrick Gilles 60,74 %
21 EO 4C E+1 -450 13.4 60.91
22 EO 5T W-3 300 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 30,68 %
A.4 Marie Claire Vienne -Sandra Dallemagne 59,05 %
23 EO 4P S = 620 5 22.73
24 EO 2T N = 90 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
A11 Claire Derieuw -Catherine de Moffarts 51,31 %
25 EO 3P N+1 170 8.8 40.00
26 EO 4C N = 620 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
Total : 240,1 / 484 = 49,61 %
PAIRE a.8 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere
A11 Claire Derieuw -Catherine de Moffarts 51,31 %
1 EO 3S W+1 -430 11 50.00
2 EO 3P N-2 -200 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A.5 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 51,59 %
3 EO 1S E = -90 13.2 60.00
4 EO 3C S+1 170 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A12 Regine de Hemptinne -Michou van Wetter 50,34 %
5 EO 4T E+1 -150 8.8 40.00
6 EO 5P N = 450 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A.6 Benedicte Lemaigre -Brigitte Velge 40,98 %
7 EO 4P N-2 -200 21.9 99.55
8 EO 1S E+1 -120 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A13 - 0,00 %
9 EO BYE 0 0.00
10 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Mercedes Oostens 44,03 %
13 EO 2C S-2 -200 20.8 94.55
14 EO 2P N = 110 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
A.8 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx 42,88 %
15 EO 2P S = 110 4.5 20.45
16 EO 5P W-2 200 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Antoinette Jourdain 51,65 %
17 EO 3T N+2 150 5.5 25.00
18 EO 3P S = 140 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
A.9 Anne Marchal -Claire Destin 40,42 %
19 EO 4PcN-2 -300 21.9 99.55
20 EO 3C E-2 200 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.3 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 47,67 %
21 EO 5C E = -450 13.4 60.91
22 EO 2T W+3 -150 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 57,95 %
A10 Jean Marie Schmiliver -Patrick Gilles 60,74 %
23 EO 5CcW-2 500 9 40.91
24 EO 1S N = 90 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A.4 Marie Claire Vienne -Sandra Dallemagne 59,05 %
25 EO 3P N+1 170 8.8 40.00
26 EO 3C N+1 170 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
Total : 239,7 / 484 = 49,52 %
PAIRE a.2 Dominique Sassen -Noelle Fosse
A.8 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx 42,88 %
1 EO 3S W = -400 4.5 20.45
2 EO 4K E-1 50 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Antoinette Jourdain 51,65 %
3 EO 1S E+2 -150 21.9 99.55
4 EO 2S S+1 150 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 89,55 %
A.9 Anne Marchal -Claire Destin 40,42 %
5 EO 3CcN-2 -500 21.9 99.55
6 EO 5K N = 400 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 99,55 %
A.3 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 47,67 %
7 EO 2P N+1 170 7.7 35.00
8 EO 1S E+1 -120 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A10 Jean Marie Schmiliver -Patrick Gilles 60,74 %
9 EO 2C N+1 140 12.1 55.00
10 EO 6C E-2 200 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A.4 Marie Claire Vienne -Sandra Dallemagne 59,05 %
11 EO 4C S+1 450 7.7 35.00
12 EO 4P W-1 50 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
A11 Claire Derieuw -Catherine de Moffarts 51,31 %
13 EO 3T W = -110 13.2 60.00
14 EO 3P N = 140 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.5 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 51,59 %
15 EO 3P S-1 -100 18.6 84.55
16 EO 4PcW-1 200 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
A12 Regine de Hemptinne -Michou van Wetter 50,34 %
17 EO 3T N+1 130 11 50.00
18 EO 2P S = 110 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.6 Benedicte Lemaigre -Brigitte Velge 40,98 %
19 EO 3C E-1 100 8.8 40.00
20 EO 3S W-1 100 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 32,50 %
A13 - 0,00 %
21 EO BYE 0 0.00
22 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.7 Thierry Bollansee -Benoit Ortegat 59,89 %
23 EO 4P S+1 650 1 4.55
24 EO 2S N-1 -50 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
Total : 233,7 / 484 = 48,29 %
PAIRE a.6 Didier Collart -Marie J. de Wagheneire
A10 Jean Marie Schmiliver -Patrick Gilles 60,74 %
1 EO 3S W+1 -430 11 50.00
2 EO 2C S-2 -200 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A.4 Marie Claire Vienne -Sandra Dallemagne 59,05 %
3 EO 2C W-2 200 0.1 0.45
4 EO 3C S+1 170 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
A11 Claire Derieuw -Catherine de Moffarts 51,31 %
5 EO 3C N+1 170 0.1 0.45
6 EO 4P N+1 450 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
A12 Regine de Hemptinne -Michou van Wetter 50,34 %
9 EO 4P W-1 100 17.5 79.55
10 EO 4C E+1 -650 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
A.6 Benedicte Lemaigre -Brigitte Velge 40,98 %
11 EO 5K S = 400 21.9 99.55
12 EO 2P W+1 -140 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A13 - 0,00 %
13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.7 Thierry Bollansee -Benoit Ortegat 59,89 %
15 EO 3P S = 140 2.3 10.45
16 EO 5K E-3 300 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 10,45 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Mercedes Oostens 44,03 %
17 EO 3T N = 110 13.2 60.00
18 EO 2P S = 110 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.8 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx 42,88 %
19 EO 3P S-1 -50 13.2 60.00
20 EO 3S W-1 100 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Antoinette Jourdain 51,65 %
21 EO 4C E-1 50 1.4 6.36
22 EO 3C W+1 -170 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 38,18 %
A.9 Anne Marchal -Claire Destin 40,42 %
23 EO 4C W-1 100 19 86.36
24 EO 2P W-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A.3 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 47,67 %
25 EO 2P N+1 140 15.4 70.00
26 EO 3C N = 140 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
Total : 229,4 / 484 = 47,40 %
PAIRE a11 Pascale Nobels -Anne Van den Berge
A.6 Benedicte Lemaigre -Brigitte Velge 40,98 %
1 EO 3S W+1 -430 11 50.00
2 EO 2C S = 110 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
A13 - 0,00 %
3 EO BYE 0 0.00
4 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.7 Thierry Bollansee -Benoit Ortegat 59,89 %
5 EO 2C N-1 -100 4.5 20.45
6 EO 5K N+1 420 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Mercedes Oostens 44,03 %
7 EO 2P N+1 140 11 50.00
8 EO 2S E = -120 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.8 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx 42,88 %
9 EO 4C N-2 -100 19.7 89.55
10 EO 4C E+1 -650 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 84,55 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Antoinette Jourdain 51,65 %
11 EO 3S N+2 460 2.3 10.45
12 EO 4P W = -420 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.9 Anne Marchal -Claire Destin 40,42 %
13 EO 3T W-1 100 3.4 15.45
14 EO 4C W-5 250 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 7,95 %
A.3 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 47,67 %
15 EO 3K W-1 50 12.1 55.00
16 EO 3C N-1 -50 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A.4 Marie Claire Vienne -Sandra Dallemagne 59,05 %
19 EO 2P N+1 140 2.3 10.45
20 EO 4K W-1 100 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
A11 Claire Derieuw -Catherine de Moffarts 51,31 %
21 EO 5C E-1 50 1.4 6.36
22 EO 4C W = -620 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 50,45 %
A.5 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 51,59 %
23 EO 5CcW-2 500 9 40.91
24 EO 2P W-1 50 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A12 Regine de Hemptinne -Michou van Wetter 50,34 %
25 EO 2P N+2 170 8.8 40.00
26 EO 6C N-2 -200 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
Total : 225,0 / 484 = 46,49 %
PAIRE a.1 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Mercedes Oostens 44,03 %
1 EO 3S E = -400 4.5 20.45
2 EO 2P N-2 -200 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A.8 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx 42,88 %
3 EO 1S E-1 100 4.5 20.45
4 EO 4C N-1 -100 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Antoinette Jourdain 51,65 %
5 EO 3C N-1 -100 4.5 20.45
6 EO 4P N+1 450 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
A.9 Anne Marchal -Claire Destin 40,42 %
7 EO 4P N-1 -100 16.5 75.00
8 EO 1S E+1 -120 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
A.3 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 47,67 %
9 EO 2C N+1 140 12.1 55.00
10 EO 6C E-3 300 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
A10 Jean Marie Schmiliver -Patrick Gilles 60,74 %
11 EO 3S N+1 430 14.3 65.00
12 EO 2K E+2 -130 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A.4 Marie Claire Vienne -Sandra Dallemagne 59,05 %
13 EO 2C S = 110 0.1 0.45
14 EO 2P N+1 140 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
A11 Claire Derieuw -Catherine de Moffarts 51,31 %
15 EO 3P S-1 -100 18.6 84.55
16 EO 5K E-2 200 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
A.5 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 51,59 %
17 EO 3T N+2 150 5.5 25.00
18 EO 3P S+2 200 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 12,73 %
A12 Regine de Hemptinne -Michou van Wetter 50,34 %
19 EO 1S N-1 -50 13.2 60.00
20 EO 3C E+1 -170 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A.6 Benedicte Lemaigre -Brigitte Velge 40,98 %
21 EO 5CcE = -650 21.8 99.09
22 EO 5T W-2 200 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 54,77 %
A.7 Thierry Bollansee -Benoit Ortegat 59,89 %
25 EO 2P N+2 170 8.8 40.00
26 EO 4C N = 620 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
Total : 232,3 / 528 = 44,00 %
PAIRE a13 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Annie Dirckx
A.7 Thierry Bollansee -Benoit Ortegat 59,89 %
1 EO 3C E-1 50 0.1 0.45
2 EO 2S S+1 150 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 0,45 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Mercedes Oostens 44,03 %
3 EO 1S E = -90 13.2 60.00
4 EO 3C S+1 170 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.8 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx 42,88 %
5 EO 3C N-2 -200 15.4 70.00
6 EO 4P N+1 450 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Antoinette Jourdain 51,65 %
7 EO 2P N+2 170 7.7 35.00
8 EO 1S E+1 -120 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A.9 Anne Marchal -Claire Destin 40,42 %
9 EO 4C N+1 450 0.1 0.45
10 EO 4C E+1 -650 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A.3 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 47,67 %
11 EO 3S S+2 460 2.3 10.45
12 EO 2S E = -120 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
A10 Jean Marie Schmiliver -Patrick Gilles 60,74 %
13 EO 1S W = -90 6.6 30.00
14 EO 1P N+3 170 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
A.4 Marie Claire Vienne -Sandra Dallemagne 59,05 %
15 EO 3K W-1 50 12.1 55.00
16 EO 4P W = -620 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A11 Claire Derieuw -Catherine de Moffarts 51,31 %
17 EO 4T N+1 150 5.5 25.00
18 EO 2P S = 110 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 32,50 %
A.5 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 51,59 %
19 EO 2C E = -110 17.5 79.55
20 EO 3K W = -110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
A.6 Benedicte Lemaigre -Brigitte Velge 40,98 %
23 EO 4C W-1 100 19 86.36
24 EO 3S N-2 -100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
A13 - 0,00 %
25 EO BYE 0 0.00
26 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 212,2 / 484 = 43,84 %
PAIRE a.4 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Luyten
A.9 Anne Marchal -Claire Destin 40,42 %
1 EO 3S W+2 -460 18.6 84.55
2 EO 3T W-1 50 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
A10 Jean Marie Schmiliver -Patrick Gilles 60,74 %
5 EO 3C N-1 -100 4.5 20.45
6 EO 4P N+1 450 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
A.4 Marie Claire Vienne -Sandra Dallemagne 59,05 %
7 EO 4P N = 620 1.2 5.45
8 EO 3K S+1 130 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 2,95 %
A11 Claire Derieuw -Catherine de Moffarts 51,31 %
9 EO 2C N+2 170 4.5 20.45
10 EO 6C E-2 200 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 17,95 %
A.5 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 51,59 %
11 EO 3S N+2 460 2.3 10.45
12 EO 4P W = -420 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A12 Regine de Hemptinne -Michou van Wetter 50,34 %
13 EO 3P E-1 100 3.4 15.45
14 EO 1P N = 80 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A.6 Benedicte Lemaigre -Brigitte Velge 40,98 %
15 EO 2P S-1 -100 18.6 84.55
16 EO 4C N-1 -50 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A13 - 0,00 %
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.7 Thierry Bollansee -Benoit Ortegat 59,89 %
19 EO 2P N = 110 5.5 25.00
20 EO 4K W = -130 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Mercedes Oostens 44,03 %
21 EO 60%60% Ajust 13.2 60.00
22 EO 2T W+1 -110 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.8 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx 42,88 %
23 EO 5C W-2 200 13 59.09
24 EO 3C S-2 -100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Antoinette Jourdain 51,65 %
25 EO 3P N+1 170 8.8 40.00
26 EO 4C N+1 650 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
Total : 205,3 / 484 = 42,42 %
|