B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 60,51 A.6 Myriam de Timary -Eliane de Ceuninck
--- 2 59,05 A.8 Jean Verelst -Christiane Verelst
--- 3 57,59 A.7 Luc Cartuyvels -Charlotte de Wasseige
--- 4 54,15 A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Liliane Baptista
--- 5 52,52 A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
--- 6 49,46 A.5 Patrick Gilles -Jean de Villenfagne
--- 7 49,32 A.9 Giuseppe Napoli -Elena Valsesia
--- 8 49,25 A.3 Francoise Turin -Brigitte Velge
--- 9 48,06 A11 Marie Claire Vienne -Sandra Dallemagne
--- 10 38,12 A10 Marguerite Verstraeten -Christian Martinot
--- 11 33,03 A.4 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 60,92 a.3 Serge Alard -Teresa Dekoster
--- 2 53,87 a.5 Benoit Ortegat -Gerard Cooreman
--- 3 53,10 a10 Michel Paquot -Catherine de Moffarts
--- 4 52,44 a.8 Chris Oostens -Jeanine Bontemps
--- 5 51,64 a.7 Alain Chif -Francoise Duren
--- 6 51,61 a.9 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain
--- 7 51,34 a.2 Michel Lievens -Stan Tabor
--- 8 45,51 a.6 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Colette Heerinckx
--- 9 40,80 a.1 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille
--- 10 38,30 a.4 Dilva Haym -Marie J. de Wagheneire
--- 11 0,00 a11 -
PAIRE A.6 Myriam de Timary -Eliane de Ceuninck
a11 - 0,00 %
1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a10 Michel Paquot -Catherine de Moffarts 53,10 %
4 NS 5PcN-7 -2000 0.1 0.71
5 NS 4P S+1 650 12.7 90.71
6 NS 3S W-2 200 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 63,57 %
a.6 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Colette Heerinckx 45,51 %
16 NS 2S N = 120 12.7 90.71
17 NS 4C W = -420 9.3 66.43
18 NS 4C N+2 680 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 74,52 %
a.5 Benoit Ortegat -Gerard Cooreman 53,87 %
19 NS 1S E+2 -150 2 14.29
20 NS 3S E+2 -660 0 0.00
21 NS 3S N-1 -100 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 19,05 %
a.4 Dilva Haym -Marie J. de Wagheneire 38,30 %
22 NS 2C N = 110 13.9 99.29
23 NS 6P E-1 100 13.9 99.29
24 NS 4C N+1 450 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 93,81 %
a.3 Serge Alard -Teresa Dekoster 60,92 %
25 NS 3S S = 400 13 92.86
26 NS 4P W+1 -650 4 28.57
27 NS 3C N-2 -100 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
a.2 Michel Lievens -Stan Tabor 51,34 %
28 NS 1C E+1 -110 5.9 42.14
29 NS 3S W+4 -720 5.9 42.14
30 NS 7S N = 1520 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 61,19 %
a.1 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 40,80 %
31 NS 4P S+1 650 11.6 82.86
32 NS 4C N-1 -50 5.9 42.14
33 NS 1S E = -90 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 63,81 %
Total : 177,9 / 294 = 60,51 %
PAIRE A.8 Jean Verelst -Christiane Verelst
a.4 Dilva Haym -Marie J. de Wagheneire 38,30 %
1 NS 6C N = 980 13.9 99.29
2 NS 4P E-1 50 9.3 66.43
3 NS 3S S+2 460 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 80,00 %
a.3 Serge Alard -Teresa Dekoster 60,92 %
4 NS 6S W-1 100 9.3 66.43
5 NS 4P S = 620 5.9 42.14
6 NS 3C S-1 -50 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,86 %
a.2 Michel Lievens -Stan Tabor 51,34 %
7 NS 3S N+1 630 5.9 42.14
8 NS 2C S-1 -50 0.1 0.71
9 NS 3S E+1 -630 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 28,33 %
a.1 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 40,80 %
10 NS 4C N+1 650 13.9 99.29
11 NS 3C E+1 -170 10.4 74.29
12 NS 2K N+3 150 1.3 9.29 µ Tbl = 60,95 %
a.8 Chris Oostens -Jeanine Bontemps 52,44 %
22 NS 2S W = -120 3.6 25.71
23 NS 4P W+1 -650 5.9 42.14
24 NS 4C N+1 450 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 50,24 %
a.7 Alain Chif -Francoise Duren 51,64 %
25 NS 3C E = -140 2 14.29
26 NS 4C E-1 100 12 85.71
27 NS 4PcE-1 100 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
a.6 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Colette Heerinckx 45,51 %
28 NS 3T E = -110 5.9 42.14
29 NS 3S W+3 -690 12.7 90.71
30 NS 7K N = 1440 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 71,90 %
a.5 Benoit Ortegat -Gerard Cooreman 53,87 %
31 NS 4P S = 620 7 50.00
32 NS 4C N-1 -50 5.9 42.14
33 NS 3T W-1 50 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 63,81 %
Total : 198,4 / 336 = 59,05 %
PAIRE A.7 Luc Cartuyvels -Charlotte de Wasseige
a.2 Michel Lievens -Stan Tabor 51,34 %
1 NS 4C N+2 480 7 50.00
2 NS 4P E-1 50 9.3 66.43
3 NS 4C N = 420 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,48 %
a.1 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 40,80 %
4 NS 6S W-1 100 9.3 66.43
5 NS 4P N = 620 5.9 42.14
6 NS 4K E-1 100 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 60,95 %
a11 - 0,00 %
7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.7 Alain Chif -Francoise Duren 51,64 %
19 NS 1S E+2 -150 2 14.29
20 NS 3S E-1 100 7 50.00
21 NS 2P N+1 140 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
a.6 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Colette Heerinckx 45,51 %
22 NS 2S W-1 100 11.6 82.86
23 NS 5P W = -650 5.9 42.14
24 NS 4C N+1 450 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 69,29 %
a.5 Benoit Ortegat -Gerard Cooreman 53,87 %
25 NS 2S S+1 150 10 71.43
26 NS 4C W-2 200 14 100.00
27 NS 4C E-1 50 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 78,57 %
a.4 Dilva Haym -Marie J. de Wagheneire 38,30 %
28 NS 2P W-1 50 11.6 82.86
29 NS 6S W = -1440 0.1 0.71
30 NS 6K N+1 940 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 33,57 %
a.3 Serge Alard -Teresa Dekoster 60,92 %
31 NS 4P S+1 650 11.6 82.86
32 NS 4C N-1 -50 5.9 42.14
33 NS 2C S-2 -100 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 52,86 %
Total : 169,3 / 294 = 57,59 %
PAIRE A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Liliane Baptista
a.2 Michel Lievens -Stan Tabor 51,34 %
4 NS 6S E-1 100 9.3 66.43
5 NS 5KcE-2 300 0.1 0.71
6 NS 2S E-1 100 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 47,14 %
a.1 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 40,80 %
7 NS 3S S+2 660 12.7 90.71
8 NS 2C S+2 170 12.7 90.71
9 NS 3S E = -600 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 85,24 %
a11 - 0,00 %
10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a10 Michel Paquot -Catherine de Moffarts 53,10 %
13 NS 4C E = -620 4 28.57
14 NS 3K S+2 150 5 35.71
15 NS 2T E = -90 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
a.9 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 51,61 %
16 NS 1S N+1 120 12.7 90.71
17 NS 4PcN-3 -500 2.4 17.14
18 NS 4C N+2 680 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 58,10 %
a.8 Chris Oostens -Jeanine Bontemps 52,44 %
19 NS 1S E+1 -120 7 50.00
20 NS 3S E-1 100 7 50.00
21 NS 4C S-1 -100 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
a.7 Alain Chif -Francoise Duren 51,64 %
22 NS 2S W = -120 3.6 25.71
23 NS 5P W = -650 5.9 42.14
24 NS 3C N+1 170 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 33,81 %
a.6 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Colette Heerinckx 45,51 %
25 NS 3S S = 400 13 92.86
26 NS 4P W = -620 8 57.14
27 NS 3P E-1 50 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
Total : 159,2 / 294 = 54,15 %
PAIRE A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
a.1 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 40,80 %
1 NS 5C N+1 480 7 50.00
2 NS 3P E = -140 2.4 17.14
3 NS 3S S = 400 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 33,57 %
a11 - 0,00 %
4 NS BYE 0 0.00
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a10 Michel Paquot -Catherine de Moffarts 53,10 %
7 NS 3S N+1 630 5.9 42.14
8 NS 3C S+1 170 12.7 90.71
9 NS 3S E+2 -660 1.3 9.29 µ Tbl = 47,38 %
a.9 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 51,61 %
10 NS 4C N = 620 9.3 66.43
11 NS 3C E+3 -230 7 50.00
12 NS 3S S+3 690 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 71,90 %
a.8 Chris Oostens -Jeanine Bontemps 52,44 %
13 NS 6C E-2 200 13 92.86
14 NS 2K S+3 150 5 35.71
15 NS 1S W-1 50 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.7 Alain Chif -Francoise Duren 51,64 %
16 NS 1P W = -80 7 50.00
17 NS 4C W = -420 9.3 66.43
18 NS 4C N = 620 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 44,52 %
a.6 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Colette Heerinckx 45,51 %
19 NS 2K E-1 100 14 100.00
20 NS 3S W-1 100 7 50.00
21 NS 6C S-1 -100 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
a.5 Benoit Ortegat -Gerard Cooreman 53,87 %
22 NS 2S W = -120 3.6 25.71
23 NS 5P W = -650 5.9 42.14
24 NS 4C N = 420 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 39,29 %
Total : 154,4 / 294 = 52,52 %
PAIRE A.5 Patrick Gilles -Jean de Villenfagne
a.9 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 51,61 %
1 NS 4C N+2 480 7 50.00
2 NS 4P E-1 50 9.3 66.43
3 NS 3S S+3 490 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 71,90 %
a.5 Benoit Ortegat -Gerard Cooreman 53,87 %
13 NS 4C E = -620 4 28.57
14 NS 3S S = 400 12 85.71
15 NS 3T E-1 50 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
a.4 Dilva Haym -Marie J. de Wagheneire 38,30 %
16 NS 3K S-2 -100 3.6 25.71
17 NS 4C E = -420 9.3 66.43
18 NS 4P S+3 710 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 63,81 %
a.3 Serge Alard -Teresa Dekoster 60,92 %
19 NS 2T N = 90 12 85.71
20 NS 3S W+1 -630 2 14.29
21 NS 4K N-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.2 Michel Lievens -Stan Tabor 51,34 %
22 NS 2S W = -120 3.6 25.71
23 NS 5P W = -650 5.9 42.14
24 NS 4C N-1 -50 1.3 9.29 µ Tbl = 25,71 %
a.1 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 40,80 %
25 NS 3S S-1 -50 6 42.86
26 NS 4C W = -620 8 57.14
27 NS 3C N-1 -50 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
a11 - 0,00 %
28 NS BYE 0 0.00
29 NS BYE 0 0.00
30 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a10 Michel Paquot -Catherine de Moffarts 53,10 %
31 NS 3T N+1 130 2.4 17.14
32 NS 4C N-1 -50 5.9 42.14
33 NS 1S E = -90 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 41,90 %
Total : 145,4 / 294 = 49,46 %
PAIRE A.9 Giuseppe Napoli -Elena Valsesia
a.6 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Colette Heerinckx 45,51 %
1 NS 5TcE-2 300 0.1 0.71
2 NS 4P E-1 50 9.3 66.43
3 NS 3T S+2 150 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 22,62 %
a.5 Benoit Ortegat -Gerard Cooreman 53,87 %
4 NS 6S W-1 100 9.3 66.43
5 NS 4P S = 620 5.9 42.14
6 NS 4C S-2 -100 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 44,76 %
a.4 Dilva Haym -Marie J. de Wagheneire 38,30 %
7 NS 3S N+1 630 5.9 42.14
8 NS 3C S = 140 7 50.00
9 NS 3S E+1 -630 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 44,76 %
a.3 Serge Alard -Teresa Dekoster 60,92 %
10 NS 5C N-1 -100 2.4 17.14
11 NS 3C E+1 -170 10.4 74.29
12 NS 4K S+1 150 1.3 9.29 µ Tbl = 33,57 %
a.2 Michel Lievens -Stan Tabor 51,34 %
13 NS 4C E = -620 4 28.57
14 NS 3S S = 400 12 85.71
15 NS 3S W-4 200 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
a.9 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 51,61 %
25 NS 3S S-1 -50 6 42.86
26 NS 4P W+3 -710 2 14.29
27 NS 4PcE-1 100 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.8 Chris Oostens -Jeanine Bontemps 52,44 %
28 NS 2C E = -110 5.9 42.14
29 NS 5S W+1 -690 12.7 90.71
30 NS 6S N+1 1020 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 66,43 %
a.7 Alain Chif -Francoise Duren 51,64 %
31 NS 3T N+1 130 2.4 17.14
32 NS 3C N = 140 13.9 99.29
33 NS 1S E = -90 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 60,95 %
Total : 165,7 / 336 = 49,32 %
PAIRE A.3 Francoise Turin -Brigitte Velge
a.3 Serge Alard -Teresa Dekoster 60,92 %
7 NS 3S S+1 630 5.9 42.14
8 NS 2C S+1 140 7 50.00
9 NS 3S E+2 -660 1.3 9.29 µ Tbl = 33,81 %
a.2 Michel Lievens -Stan Tabor 51,34 %
10 NS 4C N = 620 9.3 66.43
11 NS 3P N = 140 13.9 99.29
12 NS 5K S = 600 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 71,90 %
a.1 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 40,80 %
13 NS 6C E-2 200 13 92.86
14 NS 3S S = 400 12 85.71
15 NS 3T E = -110 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
a11 - 0,00 %
16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a10 Michel Paquot -Catherine de Moffarts 53,10 %
19 NS 1S E+1 -120 7 50.00
20 NS 3S W-2 200 13 92.86
21 NS 4C S-1 -100 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
a.9 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 51,61 %
22 NS 2C N-1 -50 9.3 66.43
23 NS 5P W = -650 5.9 42.14
24 NS 4C N-1 -50 1.3 9.29 µ Tbl = 39,29 %
a.8 Chris Oostens -Jeanine Bontemps 52,44 %
25 NS 3S S-1 -50 6 42.86
26 NS 5TcS-3 -800 0 0.00
27 NS 3C N-2 -100 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 21,43 %
a.7 Alain Chif -Francoise Duren 51,64 %
28 NS 1S N = 90 13.9 99.29
29 NS 3S W+4 -720 5.9 42.14
30 NS 3K N+4 190 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 47,38 %
Total : 144,8 / 294 = 49,25 %
PAIRE A11 Marie Claire Vienne -Sandra Dallemagne
a10 Michel Paquot -Catherine de Moffarts 53,10 %
1 NS 4C N+2 480 7 50.00
2 NS 4C E-1 50 9.3 66.43
3 NS 3S S+2 460 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 63,57 %
a.9 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 51,61 %
4 NS 6S W-1 100 9.3 66.43
5 NS 4P S = 620 5.9 42.14
6 NS 3C S-2 -100 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 44,76 %
a.8 Chris Oostens -Jeanine Bontemps 52,44 %
7 NS 3S N+2 660 12.7 90.71
8 NS 2C S = 110 2.4 17.14
9 NS 3S E = -600 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 60,71 %
a.7 Alain Chif -Francoise Duren 51,64 %
10 NS 4C N = 620 9.3 66.43
11 NS 4C E = -420 3.6 25.71
12 NS 3S S = 600 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,38 %
a.6 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Colette Heerinckx 45,51 %
13 NS 4C E = -620 4 28.57
14 NS 2K S+2 130 1 7.14
15 NS 2C S-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 11,90 %
a.5 Benoit Ortegat -Gerard Cooreman 53,87 %
16 NS 2K S-1 -50 9.3 66.43
17 NS 4PcN-3 -500 2.4 17.14
18 NS 4P S+1 650 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 39,05 %
a.4 Dilva Haym -Marie J. de Wagheneire 38,30 %
19 NS 2C W = -110 10 71.43
20 NS 3S E-2 200 13 92.86
21 NS 4C S-1 -100 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
a11 - 0,00 %
31 NS BYE 0 0.00
32 NS BYE 0 0.00
33 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 141,3 / 294 = 48,06 %
PAIRE A10 Marguerite Verstraeten -Christian Martinot
a.8 Chris Oostens -Jeanine Bontemps 52,44 %
1 NS 4C N+2 480 7 50.00
2 NS 4C E = -420 0.1 0.71
3 NS 2P W-2 200 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 22,62 %
a.7 Alain Chif -Francoise Duren 51,64 %
4 NS 4C W+1 -650 2.4 17.14
5 NS 4P S+1 650 12.7 90.71
6 NS 4K E = -130 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 36,19 %
a.6 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Colette Heerinckx 45,51 %
7 NS 3S N = 600 0.1 0.71
8 NS 3C S = 140 7 50.00
9 NS 3S E-1 100 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.5 Benoit Ortegat -Gerard Cooreman 53,87 %
10 NS 4C N-1 -100 2.4 17.14
11 NS 4C E+1 -450 0.1 0.71
12 NS 3S S = 600 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 22,62 %
a.4 Dilva Haym -Marie J. de Wagheneire 38,30 %
13 NS 4C E-1 100 10 71.43
14 NS 3K S+3 170 8 57.14
15 NS 3T E-1 50 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.3 Serge Alard -Teresa Dekoster 60,92 %
16 NS 3K S-2 -100 3.6 25.71
17 NS 4P N-3 -150 13.9 99.29
18 NS 3C N+3 230 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 41,90 %
a10 Michel Paquot -Catherine de Moffarts 53,10 %
28 NS 2C E = -110 5.9 42.14
29 NS 3S W+4 -720 5.9 42.14
30 NS 6P S+1 1010 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 42,14 %
a.9 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 51,61 %
31 NS 3T N+1 130 2.4 17.14
32 NS 4C N-1 -50 5.9 42.14
33 NS 1S E+1 -120 1.3 9.29 µ Tbl = 22,86 %
Total : 128,1 / 336 = 38,12 %
PAIRE A.4 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne
a.4 Dilva Haym -Marie J. de Wagheneire 38,30 %
10 NS 4C N-1 -100 2.4 17.14
11 NS 4C E = -420 3.6 25.71
12 NS 3S S+1 630 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 41,90 %
a.3 Serge Alard -Teresa Dekoster 60,92 %
13 NS 4C E = -620 4 28.57
14 NS 2K S+2 130 1 7.14
15 NS 1S W+2 -150 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
a.2 Michel Lievens -Stan Tabor 51,34 %
16 NS 1S N-3 -150 0.1 0.71
17 NS 4PcN-3 -500 2.4 17.14
18 NS 5C N+1 680 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 28,10 %
a.1 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 40,80 %
19 NS 1S E+2 -150 2 14.29
20 NS 3S E-1 100 7 50.00
21 NS 3C S = 140 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
a11 - 0,00 %
22 NS BYE 0 0.00
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a10 Michel Paquot -Catherine de Moffarts 53,10 %
25 NS 3S S-3 -150 0 0.00
26 NS 4P W = -620 8 57.14
27 NS 2P E+1 -140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 19,05 %
a.9 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 51,61 %
28 NS 2T E+2 -130 0.1 0.71
29 NS 3S W+4 -720 5.9 42.14
30 NS 6P S+1 1010 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 28,33 %
a.8 Chris Oostens -Jeanine Bontemps 52,44 %
31 NS 4P S+1 650 11.6 82.86
32 NS 4C N-1 -50 5.9 42.14
33 NS 1S E+1 -120 1.3 9.29 µ Tbl = 44,76 %
Total : 97,1 / 294 = 33,03 %
PAIRE a.3 Serge Alard -Teresa Dekoster
A.8 Jean Verelst -Christiane Verelst 59,05 %
4 EO 6S W-1 100 4.7 33.57
5 EO 4P S = 620 8.1 57.86
6 EO 3C S-1 -50 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,14 %
A.3 Francoise Turin -Brigitte Velge 49,25 %
7 EO 3S S+1 630 8.1 57.86
8 EO 2C S+1 140 7 50.00
9 EO 3S E+2 -660 12.7 90.71 µ Tbl = 66,19 %
A.9 Giuseppe Napoli -Elena Valsesia 49,32 %
10 EO 5C N-1 -100 11.6 82.86
11 EO 3C E+1 -170 3.6 25.71
12 EO 4K S+1 150 12.7 90.71 µ Tbl = 66,43 %
A.4 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne 33,03 %
13 EO 4C E = -620 10 71.43
14 EO 2K S+2 130 13 92.86
15 EO 1S W+2 -150 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
A10 Marguerite Verstraeten -Christian Martinot 38,12 %
16 EO 3K S-2 -100 10.4 74.29
17 EO 4P N-3 -150 0.1 0.71
18 EO 3C N+3 230 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 58,10 %
A.5 Patrick Gilles -Jean de Villenfagne 49,46 %
19 EO 2T N = 90 2 14.29
20 EO 3S W+1 -630 12 85.71
21 EO 4K N-2 -200 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.6 Myriam de Timary -Eliane de Ceuninck 60,51 %
25 EO 3S S = 400 1 7.14
26 EO 4P W+1 -650 10 71.43
27 EO 3C N-2 -100 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
A.7 Luc Cartuyvels -Charlotte de Wasseige 57,59 %
31 EO 4P S+1 650 2.4 17.14
32 EO 4C N-1 -50 8.1 57.86
33 EO 2C S-2 -100 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 47,14 %
Total : 204,7 / 336 = 60,92 %
PAIRE a.5 Benoit Ortegat -Gerard Cooreman
A.9 Giuseppe Napoli -Elena Valsesia 49,32 %
4 EO 6S W-1 100 4.7 33.57
5 EO 4P S = 620 8.1 57.86
6 EO 4C S-2 -100 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 55,24 %
A10 Marguerite Verstraeten -Christian Martinot 38,12 %
10 EO 4C N-1 -100 11.6 82.86
11 EO 4C E+1 -450 13.9 99.29
12 EO 3S S = 600 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 77,38 %
A.5 Patrick Gilles -Jean de Villenfagne 49,46 %
13 EO 4C E = -620 10 71.43
14 EO 3S S = 400 2 14.29
15 EO 3T E-1 50 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
A11 Marie Claire Vienne -Sandra Dallemagne 48,06 %
16 EO 2K S-1 -50 4.7 33.57
17 EO 4PcN-3 -500 11.6 82.86
18 EO 4P S+1 650 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 60,95 %
A.6 Myriam de Timary -Eliane de Ceuninck 60,51 %
19 EO 1S E+2 -150 12 85.71
20 EO 3S E+2 -660 14 100.00
21 EO 3S N-1 -100 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 80,95 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,52 %
22 EO 2S W = -120 10.4 74.29
23 EO 5P W = -650 8.1 57.86
24 EO 4C N = 420 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 60,71 %
A.7 Luc Cartuyvels -Charlotte de Wasseige 57,59 %
25 EO 2S S+1 150 4 28.57
26 EO 4C W-2 200 0 0.00
27 EO 4C E-1 50 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 21,43 %
A.8 Jean Verelst -Christiane Verelst 59,05 %
31 EO 4P S = 620 7 50.00
32 EO 4C N-1 -50 8.1 57.86
33 EO 3T W-1 50 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 36,19 %
Total : 181,0 / 336 = 53,87 %
PAIRE a10 Michel Paquot -Catherine de Moffarts
A11 Marie Claire Vienne -Sandra Dallemagne 48,06 %
1 EO 4C N+2 480 7 50.00
2 EO 4C E-1 50 4.7 33.57
3 EO 3S S+2 460 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 36,43 %
A.6 Myriam de Timary -Eliane de Ceuninck 60,51 %
4 EO 5PcN-7 -2000 13.9 99.29
5 EO 4P S+1 650 1.3 9.29
6 EO 3S W-2 200 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 36,43 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,52 %
7 EO 3S N+1 630 8.1 57.86
8 EO 3C S+1 170 1.3 9.29
9 EO 3S E+2 -660 12.7 90.71 µ Tbl = 52,62 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Liliane Baptista 54,15 %
13 EO 4C E = -620 10 71.43
14 EO 3K S+2 150 9 64.29
15 EO 2T E = -90 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
A.3 Francoise Turin -Brigitte Velge 49,25 %
19 EO 1S E+1 -120 7 50.00
20 EO 3S W-2 200 1 7.14
21 EO 4C S-1 -100 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
A.4 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne 33,03 %
25 EO 3S S-3 -150 14 100.00
26 EO 4P W = -620 6 42.86
27 EO 2P E+1 -140 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 80,95 %
A10 Marguerite Verstraeten -Christian Martinot 38,12 %
28 EO 2C E = -110 8.1 57.86
29 EO 3S W+4 -720 8.1 57.86
30 EO 6P S+1 1010 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 57,86 %
A.5 Patrick Gilles -Jean de Villenfagne 49,46 %
31 EO 3T N+1 130 11.6 82.86
32 EO 4C N-1 -50 8.1 57.86
33 EO 1S E = -90 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 58,10 %
Total : 178,4 / 336 = 53,10 %
PAIRE a.8 Chris Oostens -Jeanine Bontemps
A10 Marguerite Verstraeten -Christian Martinot 38,12 %
1 EO 4C N+2 480 7 50.00
2 EO 4C E = -420 13.9 99.29
3 EO 2P W-2 200 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 77,38 %
A11 Marie Claire Vienne -Sandra Dallemagne 48,06 %
7 EO 3S N+2 660 1.3 9.29
8 EO 2C S = 110 11.6 82.86
9 EO 3S E = -600 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 39,29 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,52 %
13 EO 6C E-2 200 1 7.14
14 EO 2K S+3 150 9 64.29
15 EO 1S W-1 50 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Liliane Baptista 54,15 %
19 EO 1S E+1 -120 7 50.00
20 EO 3S E-1 100 7 50.00
21 EO 4C S-1 -100 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
A.8 Jean Verelst -Christiane Verelst 59,05 %
22 EO 2S W = -120 10.4 74.29
23 EO 4P W+1 -650 8.1 57.86
24 EO 4C N+1 450 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 49,76 %
A.3 Francoise Turin -Brigitte Velge 49,25 %
25 EO 3S S-1 -50 8 57.14
26 EO 5TcS-3 -800 14 100.00
27 EO 3C N-2 -100 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 78,57 %
A.9 Giuseppe Napoli -Elena Valsesia 49,32 %
28 EO 2C E = -110 8.1 57.86
29 EO 5S W+1 -690 1.3 9.29
30 EO 6S N+1 1020 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 33,57 %
A.4 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne 33,03 %
31 EO 4P S+1 650 2.4 17.14
32 EO 4C N-1 -50 8.1 57.86
33 EO 1S E+1 -120 12.7 90.71 µ Tbl = 55,24 %
Total : 176,2 / 336 = 52,44 %
PAIRE a.7 Alain Chif -Francoise Duren
A10 Marguerite Verstraeten -Christian Martinot 38,12 %
4 EO 4C W+1 -650 11.6 82.86
5 EO 4P S+1 650 1.3 9.29
6 EO 4K E = -130 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 63,81 %
A11 Marie Claire Vienne -Sandra Dallemagne 48,06 %
10 EO 4C N = 620 4.7 33.57
11 EO 4C E = -420 10.4 74.29
12 EO 3S S = 600 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,62 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,52 %
16 EO 1P W = -80 7 50.00
17 EO 4C W = -420 4.7 33.57
18 EO 4C N = 620 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 55,48 %
A.7 Luc Cartuyvels -Charlotte de Wasseige 57,59 %
19 EO 1S E+2 -150 12 85.71
20 EO 3S E-1 100 7 50.00
21 EO 2P N+1 140 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Liliane Baptista 54,15 %
22 EO 2S W = -120 10.4 74.29
23 EO 5P W = -650 8.1 57.86
24 EO 3C N+1 170 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 66,19 %
A.8 Jean Verelst -Christiane Verelst 59,05 %
25 EO 3C E = -140 12 85.71
26 EO 4C E-1 100 2 14.29
27 EO 4PcE-1 100 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
A.3 Francoise Turin -Brigitte Velge 49,25 %
28 EO 1S N = 90 0.1 0.71
29 EO 3S W+4 -720 8.1 57.86
30 EO 3K N+4 190 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 52,62 %
A.9 Giuseppe Napoli -Elena Valsesia 49,32 %
31 EO 3T N+1 130 11.6 82.86
32 EO 3C N = 140 0.1 0.71
33 EO 1S E = -90 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 39,05 %
Total : 173,5 / 336 = 51,64 %
PAIRE a.9 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain
A.5 Patrick Gilles -Jean de Villenfagne 49,46 %
1 EO 4C N+2 480 7 50.00
2 EO 4P E-1 50 4.7 33.57
3 EO 3S S+3 490 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 28,10 %
A11 Marie Claire Vienne -Sandra Dallemagne 48,06 %
4 EO 6S W-1 100 4.7 33.57
5 EO 4P S = 620 8.1 57.86
6 EO 3C S-2 -100 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 55,24 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,52 %
10 EO 4C N = 620 4.7 33.57
11 EO 3C E+3 -230 7 50.00
12 EO 3S S+3 690 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 28,10 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Liliane Baptista 54,15 %
16 EO 1S N+1 120 1.3 9.29
17 EO 4PcN-3 -500 11.6 82.86
18 EO 4C N+2 680 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 41,90 %
A.3 Francoise Turin -Brigitte Velge 49,25 %
22 EO 2C N-1 -50 4.7 33.57
23 EO 5P W = -650 8.1 57.86
24 EO 4C N-1 -50 12.7 90.71 µ Tbl = 60,71 %
A.9 Giuseppe Napoli -Elena Valsesia 49,32 %
25 EO 3S S-1 -50 8 57.14
26 EO 4P W+3 -710 12 85.71
27 EO 4PcE-1 100 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.4 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne 33,03 %
28 EO 2T E+2 -130 13.9 99.29
29 EO 3S W+4 -720 8.1 57.86
30 EO 6P S+1 1010 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 71,67 %
A10 Marguerite Verstraeten -Christian Martinot 38,12 %
31 EO 3T N+1 130 11.6 82.86
32 EO 4C N-1 -50 8.1 57.86
33 EO 1S E+1 -120 12.7 90.71 µ Tbl = 77,14 %
Total : 173,4 / 336 = 51,61 %
PAIRE a.2 Michel Lievens -Stan Tabor
A.7 Luc Cartuyvels -Charlotte de Wasseige 57,59 %
1 EO 4C N+2 480 7 50.00
2 EO 4P E-1 50 4.7 33.57
3 EO 4C N = 420 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 44,52 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Liliane Baptista 54,15 %
4 EO 6S E-1 100 4.7 33.57
5 EO 5KcE-2 300 13.9 99.29
6 EO 2S E-1 100 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 52,86 %
A.8 Jean Verelst -Christiane Verelst 59,05 %
7 EO 3S N+1 630 8.1 57.86
8 EO 2C S-1 -50 13.9 99.29
9 EO 3S E+1 -630 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 71,67 %
A.3 Francoise Turin -Brigitte Velge 49,25 %
10 EO 4C N = 620 4.7 33.57
11 EO 3P N = 140 0.1 0.71
12 EO 5K S = 600 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 28,10 %
A.9 Giuseppe Napoli -Elena Valsesia 49,32 %
13 EO 4C E = -620 10 71.43
14 EO 3S S = 400 2 14.29
15 EO 3S W-4 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
A.4 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne 33,03 %
16 EO 1S N-3 -150 13.9 99.29
17 EO 4PcN-3 -500 11.6 82.86
18 EO 5C N+1 680 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 71,90 %
A.5 Patrick Gilles -Jean de Villenfagne 49,46 %
22 EO 2S W = -120 10.4 74.29
23 EO 5P W = -650 8.1 57.86
24 EO 4C N-1 -50 12.7 90.71 µ Tbl = 74,29 %
A.6 Myriam de Timary -Eliane de Ceuninck 60,51 %
28 EO 1C E+1 -110 8.1 57.86
29 EO 3S W+4 -720 8.1 57.86
30 EO 7S N = 1520 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 38,81 %
Total : 172,5 / 336 = 51,34 %
PAIRE a.6 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Colette Heerinckx
A.9 Giuseppe Napoli -Elena Valsesia 49,32 %
1 EO 5TcE-2 300 13.9 99.29
2 EO 4P E-1 50 4.7 33.57
3 EO 3T S+2 150 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 77,38 %
A10 Marguerite Verstraeten -Christian Martinot 38,12 %
7 EO 3S N = 600 13.9 99.29
8 EO 3C S = 140 7 50.00
9 EO 3S E-1 100 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A11 Marie Claire Vienne -Sandra Dallemagne 48,06 %
13 EO 4C E = -620 10 71.43
14 EO 2K S+2 130 13 92.86
15 EO 2C S-2 -200 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 88,10 %
A.6 Myriam de Timary -Eliane de Ceuninck 60,51 %
16 EO 2S N = 120 1.3 9.29
17 EO 4C W = -420 4.7 33.57
18 EO 4C N+2 680 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 25,48 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,52 %
19 EO 2K E-1 100 0 0.00
20 EO 3S W-1 100 7 50.00
21 EO 6C S-1 -100 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
A.7 Luc Cartuyvels -Charlotte de Wasseige 57,59 %
22 EO 2S W-1 100 2.4 17.14
23 EO 5P W = -650 8.1 57.86
24 EO 4C N+1 450 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 30,71 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Liliane Baptista 54,15 %
25 EO 3S S = 400 1 7.14
26 EO 4P W = -620 6 42.86
27 EO 3P E-1 50 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
A.8 Jean Verelst -Christiane Verelst 59,05 %
28 EO 3T E = -110 8.1 57.86
29 EO 3S W+3 -690 1.3 9.29
30 EO 7K N = 1440 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 28,10 %
Total : 152,9 / 336 = 45,51 %
PAIRE a.1 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,52 %
1 EO 5C N+1 480 7 50.00
2 EO 3P E = -140 11.6 82.86
3 EO 3S S = 400 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 66,43 %
A.7 Luc Cartuyvels -Charlotte de Wasseige 57,59 %
4 EO 6S W-1 100 4.7 33.57
5 EO 4P N = 620 8.1 57.86
6 EO 4K E-1 100 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 39,05 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Liliane Baptista 54,15 %
7 EO 3S S+2 660 1.3 9.29
8 EO 2C S+2 170 1.3 9.29
9 EO 3S E = -600 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 14,76 %
A.8 Jean Verelst -Christiane Verelst 59,05 %
10 EO 4C N+1 650 0.1 0.71
11 EO 3C E+1 -170 3.6 25.71
12 EO 2K N+3 150 12.7 90.71 µ Tbl = 39,05 %
A.3 Francoise Turin -Brigitte Velge 49,25 %
13 EO 6C E-2 200 1 7.14
14 EO 3S S = 400 2 14.29
15 EO 3T E = -110 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
A.4 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne 33,03 %
19 EO 1S E+2 -150 12 85.71
20 EO 3S E-1 100 7 50.00
21 EO 3C S = 140 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
A.5 Patrick Gilles -Jean de Villenfagne 49,46 %
25 EO 3S S-1 -50 8 57.14
26 EO 4C W = -620 6 42.86
27 EO 3C N-1 -50 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
A.6 Myriam de Timary -Eliane de Ceuninck 60,51 %
31 EO 4P S+1 650 2.4 17.14
32 EO 4C N-1 -50 8.1 57.86
33 EO 1S E = -90 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 36,19 %
Total : 137,1 / 336 = 40,80 %
PAIRE a.4 Dilva Haym -Marie J. de Wagheneire
A.8 Jean Verelst -Christiane Verelst 59,05 %
1 EO 6C N = 980 0.1 0.71
2 EO 4P E-1 50 4.7 33.57
3 EO 3S S+2 460 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 20,00 %
A.9 Giuseppe Napoli -Elena Valsesia 49,32 %
7 EO 3S N+1 630 8.1 57.86
8 EO 3C S = 140 7 50.00
9 EO 3S E+1 -630 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 55,24 %
A.4 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne 33,03 %
10 EO 4C N-1 -100 11.6 82.86
11 EO 4C E = -420 10.4 74.29
12 EO 3S S+1 630 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 58,10 %
A10 Marguerite Verstraeten -Christian Martinot 38,12 %
13 EO 4C E-1 100 4 28.57
14 EO 3K S+3 170 6 42.86
15 EO 3T E-1 50 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.5 Patrick Gilles -Jean de Villenfagne 49,46 %
16 EO 3K S-2 -100 10.4 74.29
17 EO 4C E = -420 4.7 33.57
18 EO 4P S+3 710 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 36,19 %
A11 Marie Claire Vienne -Sandra Dallemagne 48,06 %
19 EO 2C W = -110 4 28.57
20 EO 3S E-2 200 1 7.14
21 EO 4C S-1 -100 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
A.6 Myriam de Timary -Eliane de Ceuninck 60,51 %
22 EO 2C N = 110 0.1 0.71
23 EO 6P E-1 100 0.1 0.71
24 EO 4C N+1 450 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 6,19 %
A.7 Luc Cartuyvels -Charlotte de Wasseige 57,59 %
28 EO 2P W-1 50 2.4 17.14
29 EO 6S W = -1440 13.9 99.29
30 EO 6K N+1 940 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 66,43 %
Total : 128,7 / 336 = 38,30 %
PAIRE a11 -
A.6 Myriam de Timary -Eliane de Ceuninck 60,51 %
1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,52 %
4 EO BYE 0 0.00
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.7 Luc Cartuyvels -Charlotte de Wasseige 57,59 %
7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Liliane Baptista 54,15 %
10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.3 Francoise Turin -Brigitte Velge 49,25 %
16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.4 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne 33,03 %
22 EO BYE 0 0.00
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.5 Patrick Gilles -Jean de Villenfagne 49,46 %
28 EO BYE 0 0.00
29 EO BYE 0 0.00
30 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A11 Marie Claire Vienne -Sandra Dallemagne 48,06 %
31 EO BYE 0 0.00
32 EO BYE 0 0.00
33 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 462 = 0,00 %
|