B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 58,42 A.9 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles
--- 2 58,30 A.4 Alan Beckman -Hugo Baetens
--- 3 55,78 A.6 Myriam de Timary -Colette Heerinckx
--- 4 55,39 A.5 Michele Berrier -Teresa Dekoster
--- 5 52,65 A.2 Daniel Couvreur -Thomas Pascal
--- 6 50,58 A.1 Grazia Neuenschwander -Eliane de Ceuninck
--- 7 46,39 A.7 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
--- 8 46,05 A10 Brigitte Velge -Nicole Leclere
--- 9 40,27 A.3 Kathleen van Doren -Bernard Groetembril
--- 10 34,42 A.8 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Michele Verhulst
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 64,88 a.7 Dominique Sassen -Annette Fobe
--- 2 57,95 a.4 Christian Meert -Didier Collart
--- 3 53,13 a.8 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille
--- 4 50,63 a.9 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle
--- 5 49,55 a.6 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor
--- 6 48,75 a.3 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Chris Oostens
--- 7 45,57 a.2 Lydia Wildiers -Luc Cartuyvels
--- 8 42,35 a.1 Catherine de Moffarts -Gerard Cooreman
--- 9 36,99 a.5 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne
--- 10 0,00 a10 -
PAIRE A.9 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles
a.7 Dominique Sassen -Annette Fobe 64,88 %
1 NS 3S W = -400 4.7 33.57
2 NS 3C S-1 -100 1.3 9.29
3 NS 3C S-1 -50 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 39,05 %
a.6 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 49,55 %
4 NS 5C E-1 100 12.7 90.71
5 NS 2C E-1 50 9.3 66.43
6 NS 4P W-2 200 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 85,48 %
a.5 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne 36,99 %
7 NS 3S W-1 100 8.1 57.86
8 NS 3KcE-2 300 11.6 82.86
9 NS 2P N+1 140 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 71,67 %
a.3 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Chris Oostens 48,75 %
10 NS 4P S+2 680 7 50.00
11 NS 4C W+1 -450 9.3 66.43
12 NS 4P N+2 680 1.3 9.29 µ Tbl = 41,90 %
a.2 Lydia Wildiers -Luc Cartuyvels 45,57 %
13 NS 5T N = 600 9.3 66.43
14 NS 3S E = -400 0.1 0.71
15 NS 4PcW-1 100 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 55,48 %
a.1 Catherine de Moffarts -Gerard Cooreman 42,35 %
16 NS 3S S+1 430 9.3 66.43
17 NS 3C W+4 -260 13.9 99.29
18 NS 2S N = 120 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 74,52 %
a.9 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 50,63 %
25 NS 2P S-1 -50 5 35.71
26 NS 1S E+1 -120 5 35.71
27 NS 3S N+1 430 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
a.8 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 53,13 %
28 NS 4PcN-1 -200 1.3 9.29
29 NS 3T N+1 130 12.7 90.71
30 NS 5K S-2 -100 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 44,52 %
Total : 196,3 / 336 = 58,42 %
PAIRE A.4 Alan Beckman -Hugo Baetens
a.6 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 49,55 %
1 NS 3S W-1 50 11.6 82.86
2 NS 3C S-1 -100 1.3 9.29
3 NS 4TcW-1 200 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 63,81 %
a.4 Christian Meert -Didier Collart 57,95 %
10 NS 4P S+2 680 7 50.00
11 NS 2S E+4 -240 13.9 99.29
12 NS 6P N = 1430 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 74,52 %
a.3 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Chris Oostens 48,75 %
13 NS 5T N-1 -100 1.3 9.29
14 NS 3T E = -110 4.7 33.57
15 NS 2P W+2 -170 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 22,86 %
a.2 Lydia Wildiers -Luc Cartuyvels 45,57 %
16 NS 3S N+1 430 9.3 66.43
17 NS 5TcS-2 -300 11.6 82.86
18 NS 2S S+1 150 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 82,86 %
a.1 Catherine de Moffarts -Gerard Cooreman 42,35 %
19 NS 4P W = -620 6 42.86
20 NS 4P S-1 -100 4 28.57
21 NS 4P E-2 100 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
a10 - 0,00 %
22 NS BYE 0 0.00
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.8 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 53,13 %
25 NS 2P S-1 -50 5 35.71
26 NS 3T N-1 -100 10 71.43
27 NS 4CcE-2 300 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.7 Dominique Sassen -Annette Fobe 64,88 %
28 NS 4CcW-3 500 11.6 82.86
29 NS 2P S-1 -100 2.4 17.14
30 NS 3S N = 400 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 66,43 %
Total : 171,4 / 294 = 58,30 %
PAIRE A.6 Myriam de Timary -Colette Heerinckx
a10 - 0,00 %
1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.9 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 50,63 %
4 NS 4C E = -620 5.9 42.14
5 NS 2C E-1 50 9.3 66.43
6 NS 4K S+1 150 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 60,95 %
a.8 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 53,13 %
7 NS 1S W-1 100 8.1 57.86
8 NS 4TcW-3 500 13.9 99.29
9 NS 2P N+1 140 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 77,14 %
a.6 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 49,55 %
16 NS 4P N-2 -100 0.1 0.71
17 NS 4C W+3 -510 1.3 9.29
18 NS 3S S-1 -100 1.3 9.29 µ Tbl = 6,43 %
a.5 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne 36,99 %
19 NS 4P W = -620 6 42.86
20 NS 1S N+1 120 10 71.43
21 NS 3T N = 110 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
a.4 Christian Meert -Didier Collart 57,95 %
22 NS 3S N-2 -100 0.1 0.71
23 NS 4P N-1 -100 4.7 33.57
24 NS 3P W+1 -170 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 20,00 %
a.3 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Chris Oostens 48,75 %
25 NS 2C E-1 100 12 85.71
26 NS 1S E = -90 12 85.71
27 NS 3S N+1 430 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 88,10 %
a.2 Lydia Wildiers -Luc Cartuyvels 45,57 %
28 NS 4P N-1 -100 5.9 42.14
29 NS 3T N+1 130 12.7 90.71
30 NS 4K S-1 -50 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 66,43 %
Total : 164,0 / 294 = 55,78 %
PAIRE A.5 Michele Berrier -Teresa Dekoster
a.8 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 53,13 %
1 NS 3S W = -400 4.7 33.57
2 NS 3K W-1 50 4.7 33.57
3 NS 3K E = -110 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 36,43 %
a.7 Dominique Sassen -Annette Fobe 64,88 %
4 NS 4C E = -620 5.9 42.14
5 NS 2C E-1 50 9.3 66.43
6 NS 2P W+1 -140 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 36,43 %
a.5 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne 36,99 %
13 NS 3S N = 600 9.3 66.43
14 NS 5TcE-2 300 13.9 99.29
15 NS 4P W-1 50 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 80,00 %
a.4 Christian Meert -Didier Collart 57,95 %
16 NS 3S S+1 430 9.3 66.43
17 NS 4C W+2 -480 5.9 42.14
18 NS 2S S = 120 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 55,48 %
a.3 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Chris Oostens 48,75 %
19 NS 4P W = -620 6 42.86
20 NS 4P S-2 -200 1 7.14
21 NS 4P E-2 100 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
a.2 Lydia Wildiers -Luc Cartuyvels 45,57 %
22 NS 1S N+1 120 7 50.00
23 NS 2P N+1 140 11.6 82.86
24 NS 3P W-1 50 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
a.1 Catherine de Moffarts -Gerard Cooreman 42,35 %
25 NS 2C E-1 100 12 85.71
26 NS 2S E-1 100 14 100.00
27 NS 3S N-2 -100 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
a.9 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 50,63 %
28 NS 5CcW-5 1100 13.9 99.29
29 NS 3T N = 110 9.3 66.43
30 NS 5KcS-2 -300 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 60,95 %
Total : 186,1 / 336 = 55,39 %
PAIRE A.2 Daniel Couvreur -Thomas Pascal
a.2 Lydia Wildiers -Luc Cartuyvels 45,57 %
4 NS 4C E = -620 5.9 42.14
5 NS 2C E+1 -140 2.4 17.14
6 NS 4T S = 130 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
a.1 Catherine de Moffarts -Gerard Cooreman 42,35 %
7 NS 3S W-3 300 13.9 99.29
8 NS 4PcS-1 -100 5.9 42.14
9 NS 4P N-1 -50 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 52,86 %
a10 - 0,00 %
10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.9 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 50,63 %
13 NS 3S N = 600 9.3 66.43
14 NS 5T E-2 100 9.3 66.43
15 NS 3P W+1 -170 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 52,86 %
a.8 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 53,13 %
16 NS 3S S = 400 2.4 17.14
17 NS 4C W+1 -450 9.3 66.43
18 NS 2S N = 120 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 47,14 %
a.6 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 49,55 %
19 NS 4P W = -620 6 42.86
20 NS 2P S+1 140 13 92.86
21 NS 3P E-1 50 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
a.5 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne 36,99 %
22 NS 1S N+3 180 11.6 82.86
23 NS 3P N = 140 11.6 82.86
24 NS 3P W-1 50 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 80,00 %
a.4 Christian Meert -Didier Collart 57,95 %
25 NS 2P S-1 -50 5 35.71
26 NS 2S E = -120 5 35.71
27 NS 3S N = 400 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
Total : 154,8 / 294 = 52,65 %
PAIRE A.1 Grazia Neuenschwander -Eliane de Ceuninck
a.1 Catherine de Moffarts -Gerard Cooreman 42,35 %
1 NS 3S E = -400 4.7 33.57
2 NS 1C S = 80 8.1 57.86
3 NS 3P E+1 -170 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 30,71 %
a10 - 0,00 %
4 NS BYE 0 0.00
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.9 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 50,63 %
7 NS 3S W = -600 3.6 25.71
8 NS 4PcN-1 -100 5.9 42.14
9 NS 3P N = 140 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 47,38 %
a.8 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 53,13 %
10 NS 4P S+2 680 7 50.00
11 NS 6C W = -980 0.1 0.71
12 NS 6S N = 1440 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.7 Dominique Sassen -Annette Fobe 64,88 %
13 NS 4T N+1 150 4.7 33.57
14 NS 2S W+2 -180 2.4 17.14
15 NS 4P W = -420 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 17,14 %
a.5 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne 36,99 %
16 NS 3S N+1 430 9.3 66.43
17 NS 4C W+2 -480 5.9 42.14
18 NS 2S S = 120 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 55,48 %
a.4 Christian Meert -Didier Collart 57,95 %
19 NS 3P W+1 -170 14 100.00
20 NS 4P S-2 -200 1 7.14
21 NS 4P E-2 100 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
a.3 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Chris Oostens 48,75 %
22 NS 3S N+1 430 13.9 99.29
23 NS 2P N+1 140 11.6 82.86
24 NS 4PcW-1 100 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 93,81 %
Total : 148,7 / 294 = 50,58 %
PAIRE A.7 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
a.3 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Chris Oostens 48,75 %
1 NS 3S W-1 50 11.6 82.86
2 NS 1TxN = 230 13.9 99.29
3 NS 3C S-1 -50 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 85,48 %
a.1 Catherine de Moffarts -Gerard Cooreman 42,35 %
4 NS 4C E = -620 5.9 42.14
5 NS 4C E-2 100 13.9 99.29
6 NS 4T S = 130 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
a10 - 0,00 %
7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.9 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 50,63 %
10 NS 4P S+2 680 7 50.00
11 NS 4C W+2 -480 3.6 25.71
12 NS 3S N+3 690 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 39,29 %
a.7 Dominique Sassen -Annette Fobe 64,88 %
19 NS 3S S+2 -660 0 0.00
20 NS 2P S = 110 7 50.00
21 NS 3C E = -140 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
a.6 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 49,55 %
22 NS 2S N+1 150 9.3 66.43
23 NS 4P N-1 -100 4.7 33.57
24 NS 5T N-3 -150 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.5 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne 36,99 %
25 NS 3K S-1 -50 5 35.71
26 NS 2S E = -120 5 35.71
27 NS 3S N = 400 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
a.4 Christian Meert -Didier Collart 57,95 %
28 NS 3C W-2 100 9.3 66.43
29 NS 3C E = -140 0.1 0.71
30 NS 6KcS-3 -500 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 22,62 %
Total : 136,4 / 294 = 46,39 %
PAIRE A10 Brigitte Velge -Nicole Leclere
a.9 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 50,63 %
1 NS 3S E+1 -430 0.1 0.71
2 NS 1C S = 80 8.1 57.86
3 NS 3T W = -110 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 33,57 %
a.8 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 53,13 %
4 NS 3S E-1 100 12.7 90.71
5 NS 3C E = -140 2.4 17.14
6 NS 4K S+1 150 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 60,71 %
a.7 Dominique Sassen -Annette Fobe 64,88 %
7 NS 3S W-2 200 11.6 82.86
8 NS 4P N-1 -50 9.3 66.43
9 NS 4P N-1 -50 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 55,48 %
a.6 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 49,55 %
10 NS 4P N+2 680 7 50.00
11 NS 4C W+2 -480 3.6 25.71
12 NS 6P N = 1430 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.4 Christian Meert -Didier Collart 57,95 %
13 NS 7T N-1 -100 1.3 9.29
14 NS 5T E-2 100 9.3 66.43
15 NS 2P W+1 -140 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 41,90 %
a.3 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Chris Oostens 48,75 %
16 NS 3S N+1 430 9.3 66.43
17 NS 4C W+3 -510 1.3 9.29
18 NS 2S N-1 -100 1.3 9.29 µ Tbl = 28,33 %
a.2 Lydia Wildiers -Luc Cartuyvels 45,57 %
19 NS 3S W = -600 12 85.71
20 NS 2P S = 110 7 50.00
21 NS 3C E = -140 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
a10 - 0,00 %
28 NS BYE 0 0.00
29 NS BYE 0 0.00
30 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 135,4 / 294 = 46,05 %
PAIRE A.3 Kathleen van Doren -Bernard Groetembril
a.3 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Chris Oostens 48,75 %
7 NS 3S W+1 -630 0.1 0.71
8 NS 5PcN-2 -300 1.3 9.29
9 NS 4P N-1 -50 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 9,05 %
a.2 Lydia Wildiers -Luc Cartuyvels 45,57 %
10 NS 4P S+2 680 7 50.00
11 NS 4C E+1 -450 9.3 66.43
12 NS 4P N+2 680 1.3 9.29 µ Tbl = 41,90 %
a.1 Catherine de Moffarts -Gerard Cooreman 42,35 %
13 NS 5T N+1 620 13.9 99.29
14 NS 5T E-2 100 9.3 66.43
15 NS 3P W-1 50 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 80,00 %
a10 - 0,00 %
16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.9 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 50,63 %
19 NS 4P W = -620 6 42.86
20 NS 3P S = 140 13 92.86
21 NS 1P E+3 -170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
a.7 Dominique Sassen -Annette Fobe 64,88 %
22 NS 2T S-1 -50 3.6 25.71
23 NS 4P N-1 -100 4.7 33.57
24 NS 3P W+1 -170 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 28,33 %
a.6 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 49,55 %
25 NS 2C E-1 100 12 85.71
26 NS 2S W+1 -150 0 0.00
27 NS 3S N-1 -50 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
a.5 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne 36,99 %
28 NS 4PcN-1 -200 1.3 9.29
29 NS 2C E-1 100 5.9 42.14
30 NS 3K S-1 -50 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 39,29 %
Total : 118,4 / 294 = 40,27 %
PAIRE A.8 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Michele Verhulst
a.5 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne 36,99 %
1 NS 3S W-1 50 11.6 82.86
2 NS 2C E-3 150 11.6 82.86
3 NS 3P E = -140 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 60,95 %
a.4 Christian Meert -Didier Collart 57,95 %
4 NS 4C E+1 -650 0.1 0.71
5 NS 3C E = -140 2.4 17.14
6 NS 4T S = 130 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 17,14 %
a.2 Lydia Wildiers -Luc Cartuyvels 45,57 %
7 NS 3S W = -600 3.6 25.71
8 NS 4PcN-2 -300 1.3 9.29
9 NS 3P N = 140 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 36,43 %
a.1 Catherine de Moffarts -Gerard Cooreman 42,35 %
10 NS 4P S+2 680 7 50.00
11 NS 5C W = -450 9.3 66.43
12 NS 3S N+3 690 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 52,86 %
a10 - 0,00 %
13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00
15 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.8 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 53,13 %
22 NS 3S N-1 -50 3.6 25.71
23 NS 4PcN-1 -200 0.1 0.71
24 NS 4P W = -420 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 9,05 %
a.7 Dominique Sassen -Annette Fobe 64,88 %
25 NS 2C E = -110 0 0.00
26 NS 1S E+1 -120 5 35.71
27 NS 3S N-2 -100 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 14,29 %
a.6 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 49,55 %
28 NS 4P N-1 -100 5.9 42.14
29 NS 2C E-1 100 5.9 42.14
30 NS 4K S-1 -50 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 50,24 %
Total : 101,2 / 294 = 34,42 %
PAIRE a.7 Dominique Sassen -Annette Fobe
A.9 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 58,42 %
1 EO 3S W = -400 9.3 66.43
2 EO 3C S-1 -100 12.7 90.71
3 EO 3C S-1 -50 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 60,95 %
A.5 Michele Berrier -Teresa Dekoster 55,39 %
4 EO 4C E = -620 8.1 57.86
5 EO 2C E-1 50 4.7 33.57
6 EO 2P W+1 -140 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 63,57 %
A10 Brigitte Velge -Nicole Leclere 46,05 %
7 EO 3S W-2 200 2.4 17.14
8 EO 4P N-1 -50 4.7 33.57
9 EO 4P N-1 -50 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 44,52 %
A.1 Grazia Neuenschwander -Eliane de Ceuninck 50,58 %
13 EO 4T N+1 150 9.3 66.43
14 EO 2S W+2 -180 11.6 82.86
15 EO 4P W = -420 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 82,86 %
A.7 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 46,39 %
19 EO 3S S+2 -660 14 100.00
20 EO 2P S = 110 7 50.00
21 EO 3C E = -140 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
A.3 Kathleen van Doren -Bernard Groetembril 40,27 %
22 EO 2T S-1 -50 10.4 74.29
23 EO 4P N-1 -100 9.3 66.43
24 EO 3P W+1 -170 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 71,67 %
A.8 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Michele Verhulst 34,42 %
25 EO 2C E = -110 14 100.00
26 EO 1S E+1 -120 9 64.29
27 EO 3S N-2 -100 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 85,71 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Hugo Baetens 58,30 %
28 EO 4CcW-3 500 2.4 17.14
29 EO 2P S-1 -100 11.6 82.86
30 EO 3S N = 400 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 33,57 %
Total : 218,0 / 336 = 64,88 %
PAIRE a.4 Christian Meert -Didier Collart
A.8 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Michele Verhulst 34,42 %
4 EO 4C E+1 -650 13.9 99.29
5 EO 3C E = -140 11.6 82.86
6 EO 4T S = 130 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 82,86 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Hugo Baetens 58,30 %
10 EO 4P S+2 680 7 50.00
11 EO 2S E+4 -240 0.1 0.71
12 EO 6P N = 1430 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 25,48 %
A10 Brigitte Velge -Nicole Leclere 46,05 %
13 EO 7T N-1 -100 12.7 90.71
14 EO 5T E-2 100 4.7 33.57
15 EO 2P W+1 -140 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 58,10 %
A.5 Michele Berrier -Teresa Dekoster 55,39 %
16 EO 3S S+1 430 4.7 33.57
17 EO 4C W+2 -480 8.1 57.86
18 EO 2S S = 120 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 44,52 %
A.1 Grazia Neuenschwander -Eliane de Ceuninck 50,58 %
19 EO 3P W+1 -170 0 0.00
20 EO 4P S-2 -200 13 92.86
21 EO 4P E-2 100 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
A.6 Myriam de Timary -Colette Heerinckx 55,78 %
22 EO 3S N-2 -100 13.9 99.29
23 EO 4P N-1 -100 9.3 66.43
24 EO 3P W+1 -170 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 80,00 %
A.2 Daniel Couvreur -Thomas Pascal 52,65 %
25 EO 2P S-1 -50 9 64.29
26 EO 2S E = -120 9 64.29
27 EO 3S N = 400 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
A.7 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 46,39 %
28 EO 3C W-2 100 4.7 33.57
29 EO 3C E = -140 13.9 99.29
30 EO 6KcS-3 -500 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 77,38 %
Total : 194,7 / 336 = 57,95 %
PAIRE a.8 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille
A.5 Michele Berrier -Teresa Dekoster 55,39 %
1 EO 3S W = -400 9.3 66.43
2 EO 3K W-1 50 9.3 66.43
3 EO 3K E = -110 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 63,57 %
A10 Brigitte Velge -Nicole Leclere 46,05 %
4 EO 3S E-1 100 1.3 9.29
5 EO 3C E = -140 11.6 82.86
6 EO 4K S+1 150 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 39,29 %
A.6 Myriam de Timary -Colette Heerinckx 55,78 %
7 EO 1S W-1 100 5.9 42.14
8 EO 4TcW-3 500 0.1 0.71
9 EO 2P N+1 140 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 22,86 %
A.1 Grazia Neuenschwander -Eliane de Ceuninck 50,58 %
10 EO 4P S+2 680 7 50.00
11 EO 6C W = -980 13.9 99.29
12 EO 6S N = 1440 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.2 Daniel Couvreur -Thomas Pascal 52,65 %
16 EO 3S S = 400 11.6 82.86
17 EO 4C W+1 -450 4.7 33.57
18 EO 2S N = 120 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 52,86 %
A.8 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Michele Verhulst 34,42 %
22 EO 3S N-1 -50 10.4 74.29
23 EO 4PcN-1 -200 13.9 99.29
24 EO 4P W = -420 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 90,95 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Hugo Baetens 58,30 %
25 EO 2P S-1 -50 9 64.29
26 EO 3T N-1 -100 4 28.57
27 EO 4CcE-2 300 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.9 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 58,42 %
28 EO 4PcN-1 -200 12.7 90.71
29 EO 3T N+1 130 1.3 9.29
30 EO 5K S-2 -100 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 55,48 %
Total : 178,5 / 336 = 53,13 %
PAIRE a.9 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle
A10 Brigitte Velge -Nicole Leclere 46,05 %
1 EO 3S E+1 -430 13.9 99.29
2 EO 1C S = 80 5.9 42.14
3 EO 3T W = -110 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 66,43 %
A.6 Myriam de Timary -Colette Heerinckx 55,78 %
4 EO 4C E = -620 8.1 57.86
5 EO 2C E-1 50 4.7 33.57
6 EO 4K S+1 150 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 39,05 %
A.1 Grazia Neuenschwander -Eliane de Ceuninck 50,58 %
7 EO 3S W = -600 10.4 74.29
8 EO 4PcN-1 -100 8.1 57.86
9 EO 3P N = 140 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 52,62 %
A.7 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 46,39 %
10 EO 4P S+2 680 7 50.00
11 EO 4C W+2 -480 10.4 74.29
12 EO 3S N+3 690 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 60,71 %
A.2 Daniel Couvreur -Thomas Pascal 52,65 %
13 EO 3S N = 600 4.7 33.57
14 EO 5T E-2 100 4.7 33.57
15 EO 3P W+1 -170 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 47,14 %
A.3 Kathleen van Doren -Bernard Groetembril 40,27 %
19 EO 4P W = -620 8 57.14
20 EO 3P S = 140 1 7.14
21 EO 1P E+3 -170 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
A.9 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 58,42 %
25 EO 2P S-1 -50 9 64.29
26 EO 1S E+1 -120 9 64.29
27 EO 3S N+1 430 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
A.5 Michele Berrier -Teresa Dekoster 55,39 %
28 EO 5CcW-5 1100 0.1 0.71
29 EO 3T N = 110 4.7 33.57
30 EO 5KcS-2 -300 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 39,05 %
Total : 170,1 / 336 = 50,63 %
PAIRE a.6 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor
A.4 Alan Beckman -Hugo Baetens 58,30 %
1 EO 3S W-1 50 2.4 17.14
2 EO 3C S-1 -100 12.7 90.71
3 EO 4TcW-1 200 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 36,19 %
A.9 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 58,42 %
4 EO 5C E-1 100 1.3 9.29
5 EO 2C E-1 50 4.7 33.57
6 EO 4P W-2 200 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 14,52 %
A10 Brigitte Velge -Nicole Leclere 46,05 %
10 EO 4P N+2 680 7 50.00
11 EO 4C W+2 -480 10.4 74.29
12 EO 6P N = 1430 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.6 Myriam de Timary -Colette Heerinckx 55,78 %
16 EO 4P N-2 -100 13.9 99.29
17 EO 4C W+3 -510 12.7 90.71
18 EO 3S S-1 -100 12.7 90.71 µ Tbl = 93,57 %
A.2 Daniel Couvreur -Thomas Pascal 52,65 %
19 EO 4P W = -620 8 57.14
20 EO 2P S+1 140 1 7.14
21 EO 3P E-1 50 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
A.7 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 46,39 %
22 EO 2S N+1 150 4.7 33.57
23 EO 4P N-1 -100 9.3 66.43
24 EO 5T N-3 -150 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.3 Kathleen van Doren -Bernard Groetembril 40,27 %
25 EO 2C E-1 100 2 14.29
26 EO 2S W+1 -150 14 100.00
27 EO 3S N-1 -50 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
A.8 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Michele Verhulst 34,42 %
28 EO 4P N-1 -100 8.1 57.86
29 EO 2C E-1 100 8.1 57.86
30 EO 4K S-1 -50 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 49,76 %
Total : 166,5 / 336 = 49,55 %
PAIRE a.3 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Chris Oostens
A.7 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 46,39 %
1 EO 3S W-1 50 2.4 17.14
2 EO 1TxN = 230 0.1 0.71
3 EO 3C S-1 -50 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 14,52 %
A.3 Kathleen van Doren -Bernard Groetembril 40,27 %
7 EO 3S W+1 -630 13.9 99.29
8 EO 5PcN-2 -300 12.7 90.71
9 EO 4P N-1 -50 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 90,95 %
A.9 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 58,42 %
10 EO 4P S+2 680 7 50.00
11 EO 4C W+1 -450 4.7 33.57
12 EO 4P N+2 680 12.7 90.71 µ Tbl = 58,10 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Hugo Baetens 58,30 %
13 EO 5T N-1 -100 12.7 90.71
14 EO 3T E = -110 9.3 66.43
15 EO 2P W+2 -170 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 77,14 %
A10 Brigitte Velge -Nicole Leclere 46,05 %
16 EO 3S N+1 430 4.7 33.57
17 EO 4C W+3 -510 12.7 90.71
18 EO 2S N-1 -100 12.7 90.71 µ Tbl = 71,67 %
A.5 Michele Berrier -Teresa Dekoster 55,39 %
19 EO 4P W = -620 8 57.14
20 EO 4P S-2 -200 13 92.86
21 EO 4P E-2 100 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
A.1 Grazia Neuenschwander -Eliane de Ceuninck 50,58 %
22 EO 3S N+1 430 0.1 0.71
23 EO 2P N+1 140 2.4 17.14
24 EO 4PcW-1 100 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 6,19 %
A.6 Myriam de Timary -Colette Heerinckx 55,78 %
25 EO 2C E-1 100 2 14.29
26 EO 1S E = -90 2 14.29
27 EO 3S N+1 430 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 11,90 %
Total : 163,8 / 336 = 48,75 %
PAIRE a.2 Lydia Wildiers -Luc Cartuyvels
A.2 Daniel Couvreur -Thomas Pascal 52,65 %
4 EO 4C E = -620 8.1 57.86
5 EO 2C E+1 -140 11.6 82.86
6 EO 4T S = 130 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
A.8 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Michele Verhulst 34,42 %
7 EO 3S W = -600 10.4 74.29
8 EO 4PcN-2 -300 12.7 90.71
9 EO 3P N = 140 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 63,57 %
A.3 Kathleen van Doren -Bernard Groetembril 40,27 %
10 EO 4P S+2 680 7 50.00
11 EO 4C E+1 -450 4.7 33.57
12 EO 4P N+2 680 12.7 90.71 µ Tbl = 58,10 %
A.9 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 58,42 %
13 EO 5T N = 600 4.7 33.57
14 EO 3S E = -400 13.9 99.29
15 EO 4PcW-1 100 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 44,52 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Hugo Baetens 58,30 %
16 EO 3S N+1 430 4.7 33.57
17 EO 5TcS-2 -300 2.4 17.14
18 EO 2S S+1 150 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 17,14 %
A10 Brigitte Velge -Nicole Leclere 46,05 %
19 EO 3S W = -600 2 14.29
20 EO 2P S = 110 7 50.00
21 EO 3C E = -140 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
A.5 Michele Berrier -Teresa Dekoster 55,39 %
22 EO 1S N+1 120 7 50.00
23 EO 2P N+1 140 2.4 17.14
24 EO 3P W-1 50 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
A.6 Myriam de Timary -Colette Heerinckx 55,78 %
28 EO 4P N-1 -100 8.1 57.86
29 EO 3T N+1 130 1.3 9.29
30 EO 4K S-1 -50 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 33,57 %
Total : 153,1 / 336 = 45,57 %
PAIRE a.1 Catherine de Moffarts -Gerard Cooreman
A.1 Grazia Neuenschwander -Eliane de Ceuninck 50,58 %
1 EO 3S E = -400 9.3 66.43
2 EO 1C S = 80 5.9 42.14
3 EO 3P E+1 -170 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 69,29 %
A.7 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 46,39 %
4 EO 4C E = -620 8.1 57.86
5 EO 4C E-2 100 0.1 0.71
6 EO 4T S = 130 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
A.2 Daniel Couvreur -Thomas Pascal 52,65 %
7 EO 3S W-3 300 0.1 0.71
8 EO 4PcS-1 -100 8.1 57.86
9 EO 4P N-1 -50 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 47,14 %
A.8 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Michele Verhulst 34,42 %
10 EO 4P S+2 680 7 50.00
11 EO 5C W = -450 4.7 33.57
12 EO 3S N+3 690 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 47,14 %
A.3 Kathleen van Doren -Bernard Groetembril 40,27 %
13 EO 5T N+1 620 0.1 0.71
14 EO 5T E-2 100 4.7 33.57
15 EO 3P W-1 50 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 20,00 %
A.9 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 58,42 %
16 EO 3S S+1 430 4.7 33.57
17 EO 3C W+4 -260 0.1 0.71
18 EO 2S N = 120 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 25,48 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Hugo Baetens 58,30 %
19 EO 4P W = -620 8 57.14
20 EO 4P S-1 -100 10 71.43
21 EO 4P E-2 100 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
A.5 Michele Berrier -Teresa Dekoster 55,39 %
25 EO 2C E-1 100 2 14.29
26 EO 2S E-1 100 0 0.00
27 EO 3S N-2 -100 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
Total : 142,3 / 336 = 42,35 %
PAIRE a.5 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne
A.8 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Michele Verhulst 34,42 %
1 EO 3S W-1 50 2.4 17.14
2 EO 2C E-3 150 2.4 17.14
3 EO 3P E = -140 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 39,05 %
A.9 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 58,42 %
7 EO 3S W-1 100 5.9 42.14
8 EO 3KcE-2 300 2.4 17.14
9 EO 2P N+1 140 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 28,33 %
A.5 Michele Berrier -Teresa Dekoster 55,39 %
13 EO 3S N = 600 4.7 33.57
14 EO 5TcE-2 300 0.1 0.71
15 EO 4P W-1 50 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 20,00 %
A.1 Grazia Neuenschwander -Eliane de Ceuninck 50,58 %
16 EO 3S N+1 430 4.7 33.57
17 EO 4C W+2 -480 8.1 57.86
18 EO 2S S = 120 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 44,52 %
A.6 Myriam de Timary -Colette Heerinckx 55,78 %
19 EO 4P W = -620 8 57.14
20 EO 1S N+1 120 4 28.57
21 EO 3T N = 110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
A.2 Daniel Couvreur -Thomas Pascal 52,65 %
22 EO 1S N+3 180 2.4 17.14
23 EO 3P N = 140 2.4 17.14
24 EO 3P W-1 50 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 20,00 %
A.7 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 46,39 %
25 EO 3K S-1 -50 9 64.29
26 EO 2S E = -120 9 64.29
27 EO 3S N = 400 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
A.3 Kathleen van Doren -Bernard Groetembril 40,27 %
28 EO 4PcN-1 -200 12.7 90.71
29 EO 2C E-1 100 8.1 57.86
30 EO 3K S-1 -50 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 60,71 %
Total : 124,3 / 336 = 36,99 %
PAIRE a10 -
A.6 Myriam de Timary -Colette Heerinckx 55,78 %
1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.1 Grazia Neuenschwander -Eliane de Ceuninck 50,58 %
4 EO BYE 0 0.00
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.7 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 46,39 %
7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.2 Daniel Couvreur -Thomas Pascal 52,65 %
10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.8 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Michele Verhulst 34,42 %
13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00
15 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.3 Kathleen van Doren -Bernard Groetembril 40,27 %
16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Hugo Baetens 58,30 %
22 EO BYE 0 0.00
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A10 Brigitte Velge -Nicole Leclere 46,05 %
28 EO BYE 0 0.00
29 EO BYE 0 0.00
30 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 420 = 0,00 %
|