B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 64,58 A.4 Hugo Baetens -Alan Beckman
--- 2 58,63 A12 Annie Legrand -Laurence Mauboussin
--- 3 53,57 A.7 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza
--- 4 52,38 A.2 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier
--- 5 49,11 A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Catherine Tilemans
--- 6 48,51 A.8 Denise Testaert -Chantal Woitrin
--- 7 47,92 A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Nicole Leclere
--- 8 47,62 A.9 Myriam de Timary -Christiane Huby
--- 9 46,43 A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens
--- 10 45,83 A.6 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Chantal de Lichtervelde
--- ~ 45,83 A10 Barbara Kengen -Michele Verhulst
--- 12 39,58 A.5 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 61,31 a.4 Jean de Villenfagne -Colette Heerinckx
--- 2 57,74 a11 Jacques Podevyn -Michel Lievens
--- 3 57,14 a.3 Claire Derieuw -Marie J. de Wagheneire
--- 4 56,85 a.2 Patrick Gilles -Fabienne Smit
--- 5 53,57 a.7 Dominique Sassen -Michel Lahaut
--- 6 52,38 a.9 Jacqueline de Thier -Lydia Wildiers
--- 7 51,79 a.1 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen
--- 8 46,43 a.8 Pascale Graton -Roselyne Delpon
--- 9 46,43 a12 Sylviane Delbeke -Nora Akavi
--- 10 44,94 a.6 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens
--- ~ 37,50 a10 Virginie Van Damme -Veronique Englebienne
--- 12 33,93 a.5 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck
PAIRE A.4 Hugo Baetens -Alan Beckman
a.4 Jean de Villenfagne -Colette Heerinckx 61,31 %
10 NS 1S S+3 180 12 85.71
11 NS 6ScS-3 -500 0 0.00
12 NS 4TcN-2 -500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
a.3 Claire Derieuw -Marie J. de Wagheneire 57,14 %
13 NS 3S S+1 630 11 78.57
14 NS 4C S-1 -50 5 35.71
15 NS 3C N = 140 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
a.2 Patrick Gilles -Fabienne Smit 56,85 %
16 NS 1S W+1 -120 11 78.57
17 NS 4C E-1 50 13 92.86
18 NS 4P N = 620 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 78,57 %
a.1 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 51,79 %
19 NS 2C S+1 140 13 92.86
20 NS 3P N = 140 10 71.43
21 NS 3S E-1 50 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 85,71 %
a12 Sylviane Delbeke -Nora Akavi 46,43 %
22 NS 4P S+1 450 9 64.29
23 NS 3K W+1 -130 14 100.00
24 NS 3S S+1 430 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
a11 Jacques Podevyn -Michel Lievens 57,74 %
25 NS 2P N-1 -50 4 28.57
26 NS 1S S+2 150 4 28.57
27 NS 5T W = -400 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
a.9 Jacqueline de Thier -Lydia Wildiers 52,38 %
28 NS 4P N+1 650 11 78.57
29 NS 4C W = -620 10 71.43
30 NS 6K E-1 50 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
a.8 Pascale Graton -Roselyne Delpon 46,43 %
31 NS 3T S = 110 10 71.43
32 NS 3S S = 400 4 28.57
33 NS 1S W+2 -150 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
Total : 217,0 / 336 = 64,58 %
PAIRE A12 Annie Legrand -Laurence Mauboussin
a11 Jacques Podevyn -Michel Lievens 57,74 %
1 NS 4C N-2 -100 6 42.86
2 NS 4C E-1 50 7 50.00
3 NS 2C N-1 -50 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
a10 Virginie Van Damme -Veronique Englebienne 37,50 %
4 NS 4P N+1 650 11 78.57
5 NS 2P E+1 -140 7 50.00
6 NS 2S E-1 100 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
a.9 Jacqueline de Thier -Lydia Wildiers 52,38 %
7 NS 4P W = -620 7 50.00
8 NS 2T N+3 150 2 14.29
9 NS 3S W+1 -630 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 21,43 %
a.8 Pascale Graton -Roselyne Delpon 46,43 %
10 NS 1K S+3 130 10 71.43
11 NS 4P E-2 100 12 85.71
12 NS 4C W = -420 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
a.7 Dominique Sassen -Michel Lahaut 53,57 %
13 NS 3S N = 600 3 21.43
14 NS 2C S = 110 12 85.71
15 NS 3C N-1 -100 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
a.5 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 33,93 %
16 NS 2S W-1 100 14 100.00
17 NS 4C E-1 50 13 92.86
18 NS 4P N+1 650 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 97,62 %
a.4 Jean de Villenfagne -Colette Heerinckx 61,31 %
19 NS 1S S-1 -50 6 42.86
20 NS 3C N = 140 10 71.43
21 NS 3S E+1 -430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
a12 Sylviane Delbeke -Nora Akavi 46,43 %
34 NS 4C N+1 650 11 78.57
35 NS 3S S = 400 10 71.43
36 NS 1S S = 90 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 197,0 / 336 = 58,63 %
PAIRE A.7 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza
a12 Sylviane Delbeke -Nora Akavi 46,43 %
1 NS 4P E-1 50 14 100.00
2 NS 3S E-1 50 7 50.00
3 NS 3P S-2 -100 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
a11 Jacques Podevyn -Michel Lievens 57,74 %
4 NS 4P N+1 650 11 78.57
5 NS 3P E = -140 7 50.00
6 NS 3C E+2 -200 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
a.7 Dominique Sassen -Michel Lahaut 53,57 %
19 NS 1S S-2 -100 3 21.43
20 NS 4C W-2 200 14 100.00
21 NS 3S E = -400 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.6 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 44,94 %
22 NS 4P S+1 450 9 64.29
23 NS 2C N-3 -300 7 50.00
24 NS 3S N = 400 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
a.5 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 33,93 %
25 NS 1S E-1 100 10 71.43
26 NS 3S N = 600 11 78.57
27 NS 3S E-2 100 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
a.4 Jean de Villenfagne -Colette Heerinckx 61,31 %
28 NS 5PcN = 850 14 100.00
29 NS 4C W+1 -650 6 42.86
30 NS 3S E+3 -490 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
a.3 Claire Derieuw -Marie J. de Wagheneire 57,14 %
31 NS 3T S-1 -100 0 0.00
32 NS 4C S = 420 9 64.29
33 NS 3S W = -400 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
a.2 Patrick Gilles -Fabienne Smit 56,85 %
34 NS 3C N+1 170 3 21.43
35 NS 3S S = 400 10 71.43
36 NS 1C N-1 -100 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
Total : 180,0 / 336 = 53,57 %
PAIRE A.2 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier
a.2 Patrick Gilles -Fabienne Smit 56,85 %
4 NS 2P N+3 200 4 28.57
5 NS 2P E+1 -140 7 50.00
6 NS 3C E+2 -200 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
a.1 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 51,79 %
7 NS 4P W = -620 7 50.00
8 NS 3S N = 400 11 78.57
9 NS 3S W-1 100 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
a12 Sylviane Delbeke -Nora Akavi 46,43 %
10 NS 2S N = 120 7 50.00
11 NS 5CcS-1 -100 5 35.71
12 NS 2C W+2 -170 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
a11 Jacques Podevyn -Michel Lievens 57,74 %
13 NS 3S S = 600 3 21.43
14 NS 3K E-2 100 9 64.29
15 NS 3P W-2 100 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
a10 Virginie Van Damme -Veronique Englebienne 37,50 %
16 NS 2S W+1 -150 4 28.57
17 NS 4C E = -420 7 50.00
18 NS 4P N = 620 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
a.9 Jacqueline de Thier -Lydia Wildiers 52,38 %
19 NS 2T W+1 -110 0 0.00
20 NS 2P N+1 140 10 71.43
21 NS 3T E = -110 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
a.7 Dominique Sassen -Michel Lahaut 53,57 %
22 NS 4P S+1 450 9 64.29
23 NS 2K W+4 -170 12 85.71
24 NS 3S N = 400 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
a.6 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 44,94 %
25 NS 1S E-1 100 10 71.43
26 NS 3S S = 600 11 78.57
27 NS 3S W+2 -460 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
Total : 176,0 / 336 = 52,38 %
PAIRE A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Catherine Tilemans
a.1 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 51,79 %
1 NS 3P W = -140 4 28.57
2 NS 2S W+1 -150 2 14.29
3 NS 3T E+1 -130 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
a12 Sylviane Delbeke -Nora Akavi 46,43 %
4 NS 4P N+1 650 11 78.57
5 NS 1S S-4 -400 0 0.00
6 NS 3S E = -600 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
a11 Jacques Podevyn -Michel Lievens 57,74 %
7 NS 4P W = -620 7 50.00
8 NS 5T N = 400 11 78.57
9 NS 3S W = -600 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
a10 Virginie Van Damme -Veronique Englebienne 37,50 %
10 NS 2S E-4 400 14 100.00
11 NS 4C S = 420 14 100.00
12 NS 4C W = -420 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
a.9 Jacqueline de Thier -Lydia Wildiers 52,38 %
13 NS 3S S = 600 3 21.43
14 NS 2C S+1 140 14 100.00
15 NS 2C N-1 -100 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
a.8 Pascale Graton -Roselyne Delpon 46,43 %
16 NS 2S W = -120 11 78.57
17 NS 4C W+1 -450 1 7.14
18 NS 4P S = 620 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.6 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 44,94 %
19 NS 1P N = 80 8 57.14
20 NS 3C W-1 100 3 21.43
21 NS 3T E = -110 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
a.5 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 33,93 %
22 NS 4P S+1 450 9 64.29
23 NS 1P N-3 -300 7 50.00
24 NS 3S S+1 430 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
Total : 165,0 / 336 = 49,11 %
PAIRE A.8 Denise Testaert -Chantal Woitrin
a.3 Claire Derieuw -Marie J. de Wagheneire 57,14 %
1 NS 4C N-1 -50 10 71.43
2 NS 3S W-2 100 13 92.86
3 NS 3S W+1 -630 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
a.1 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 51,79 %
4 NS 3C N+2 200 4 28.57
5 NS 4K S-2 -200 2 14.29
6 NS 4C E = -620 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 19,05 %
a12 Sylviane Delbeke -Nora Akavi 46,43 %
7 NS 4P W = -620 7 50.00
8 NS 3T N+3 170 5 35.71
9 NS 3S W-1 100 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
a.8 Pascale Graton -Roselyne Delpon 46,43 %
22 NS 4P S = 420 1 7.14
23 NS 2S W+3 -210 10 71.43
24 NS 3S S+2 460 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
a.7 Dominique Sassen -Michel Lahaut 53,57 %
25 NS 1S E-1 100 10 71.43
26 NS 2T S+1 110 2 14.29
27 NS 3S W = -400 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
a.6 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 44,94 %
28 NS 3C E = -140 0 0.00
29 NS 3S E = -600 14 100.00
30 NS 3S E+2 -460 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
a.5 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 33,93 %
31 NS 2S N = 120 13 92.86
32 NS 4C S = 420 9 64.29
33 NS 1S W+2 -150 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
a.4 Jean de Villenfagne -Colette Heerinckx 61,31 %
34 NS 4PcE-2 300 6 42.86
35 NS 2C S-2 -100 2 14.29
36 NS 1S S-1 -100 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
Total : 163,0 / 336 = 48,51 %
PAIRE A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Nicole Leclere
a.9 Jacqueline de Thier -Lydia Wildiers 52,38 %
1 NS 4PcN-2 -300 0 0.00
2 NS 3S W-1 50 7 50.00
3 NS 3C N-2 -100 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
a.8 Pascale Graton -Roselyne Delpon 46,43 %
4 NS 3P N+1 170 0 0.00
5 NS 1ScS+1 380 14 100.00
6 NS 3C E+1 -170 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
a.7 Dominique Sassen -Michel Lahaut 53,57 %
7 NS 4P W = -620 7 50.00
8 NS 3S S-1 -50 0 0.00
9 NS 3S W-1 100 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
a.6 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 44,94 %
10 NS 2K S+1 110 2 14.29
11 NS 4P E-1 50 10 71.43
12 NS 3C W = -140 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
a.4 Jean de Villenfagne -Colette Heerinckx 61,31 %
13 NS 3S S+1 630 11 78.57
14 NS 2K E+1 -110 1 7.14
15 NS 2C N = 110 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
a.3 Claire Derieuw -Marie J. de Wagheneire 57,14 %
16 NS 2S W+1 -150 4 28.57
17 NS 4C E = -420 7 50.00
18 NS 3S N-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
a11 Jacques Podevyn -Michel Lievens 57,74 %
31 NS 2C E-1 50 3 21.43
32 NS 4C S = 420 9 64.29
33 NS 1S W+4 -210 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
a10 Virginie Van Damme -Veronique Englebienne 37,50 %
34 NS 4C N+1 650 11 78.57
35 NS 3S S-1 -50 4 28.57
36 NS 1S S+1 120 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
Total : 161,0 / 336 = 47,92 %
PAIRE A.9 Myriam de Timary -Christiane Huby
a.5 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 33,93 %
1 NS 3C N-1 -50 10 71.43
2 NS 1S W-1 50 7 50.00
3 NS 2T E+2 -130 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.4 Jean de Villenfagne -Colette Heerinckx 61,31 %
4 NS 4C S+1 650 11 78.57
5 NS 3P E = -140 7 50.00
6 NS 4C E+1 -650 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
a.2 Patrick Gilles -Fabienne Smit 56,85 %
7 NS 4P W = -620 7 50.00
8 NS 1S N+5 240 8 57.14
9 NS 3S W = -600 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
a.1 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 51,79 %
10 NS 2K S+1 110 2 14.29
11 NS 4C S-1 -50 8 57.14
12 NS 2S N-1 -100 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
a.9 Jacqueline de Thier -Lydia Wildiers 52,38 %
25 NS 1S E-1 100 10 71.43
26 NS 3S S = 600 11 78.57
27 NS 3S E+2 -460 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
a.8 Pascale Graton -Roselyne Delpon 46,43 %
28 NS 5CcE-2 300 4 28.57
29 NS 3S W+2 -660 2 14.29
30 NS 3S W+4 -520 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 14,29 %
a.7 Dominique Sassen -Michel Lahaut 53,57 %
31 NS 2P W-1 50 3 21.43
32 NS 3S S+1 430 14 100.00
33 NS 3S W = -400 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
a.6 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 44,94 %
34 NS 4C N+1 650 11 78.57
35 NS 3S S = 400 10 71.43
36 NS 1S S+1 120 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
Total : 160,0 / 336 = 47,62 %
PAIRE A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens
a.3 Claire Derieuw -Marie J. de Wagheneire 57,14 %
7 NS 6P W-3 300 14 100.00
8 NS 3T N+3 170 5 35.71
9 NS 3S W-1 100 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
a.2 Patrick Gilles -Fabienne Smit 56,85 %
10 NS 2S N = 120 7 50.00
11 NS 5CcS-2 -300 2 14.29
12 NS 3T S-2 -200 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
a.1 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 51,79 %
13 NS 3S S+1 630 11 78.57
14 NS 2K E+1 -110 1 7.14
15 NS 2C N-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
a12 Sylviane Delbeke -Nora Akavi 46,43 %
16 NS 2S W+1 -150 4 28.57
17 NS 4C W = -420 7 50.00
18 NS 2P N+1 140 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
a11 Jacques Podevyn -Michel Lievens 57,74 %
19 NS 1S S-2 -100 3 21.43
20 NS 3C W-1 100 3 21.43
21 NS 3S E = -400 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
a10 Virginie Van Damme -Veronique Englebienne 37,50 %
22 NS 4P S+1 450 9 64.29
23 NS 3S E = -600 4 28.57
24 NS 3S S+2 460 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
a.8 Pascale Graton -Roselyne Delpon 46,43 %
25 NS 1S E = -90 1 7.14
26 NS 3S S = 600 11 78.57
27 NS 3S W = -400 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
a.7 Dominique Sassen -Michel Lahaut 53,57 %
28 NS 4P N = 620 8 57.14
29 NS 4C W = -620 10 71.43
30 NS 3S E+2 -460 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
Total : 156,0 / 336 = 46,43 %
PAIRE A.6 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Chantal de Lichtervelde
a10 Virginie Van Damme -Veronique Englebienne 37,50 %
1 NS 4C N-1 -50 10 71.43
2 NS 4C W-2 100 13 92.86
3 NS 3T E = -110 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
a.6 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 44,94 %
16 NS 1S W+2 -150 4 28.57
17 NS 4C E = -420 7 50.00
18 NS 2P N+2 170 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
a.5 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 33,93 %
19 NS 2C S+1 140 13 92.86
20 NS 2P N = 110 6 42.86
21 NS 3S W-1 50 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
a.4 Jean de Villenfagne -Colette Heerinckx 61,31 %
22 NS 4P S = 420 1 7.14
23 NS 2CcS-3 -800 0 0.00
24 NS 3S N+2 460 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
a.3 Claire Derieuw -Marie J. de Wagheneire 57,14 %
25 NS 1S E-1 100 10 71.43
26 NS 3S S-2 -200 0 0.00
27 NS 3S E+1 -430 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
a.2 Patrick Gilles -Fabienne Smit 56,85 %
28 NS 5CcE-2 300 4 28.57
29 NS 3S W+2 -660 2 14.29
30 NS 3S W+2 -460 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
a.1 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 51,79 %
31 NS 1S N+1 120 13 92.86
32 NS 4C S = 420 9 64.29
33 NS 1S W+2 -150 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
a11 Jacques Podevyn -Michel Lievens 57,74 %
34 NS 2P E-2 100 0 0.00
35 NS 4CcN-3 -500 0 0.00
36 NS 1S S-1 -100 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 4,76 %
Total : 154,0 / 336 = 45,83 %
PAIRE A10 Barbara Kengen -Michele Verhulst
a.7 Dominique Sassen -Michel Lahaut 53,57 %
1 NS 5C N-3 -150 2 14.29
2 NS 3S W = -400 0 0.00
3 NS 2T E+2 -130 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 14,29 %
a.6 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 44,94 %
4 NS 3P N+2 200 4 28.57
5 NS 1S S+1 120 12 85.71
6 NS 3S E-3 300 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
a.5 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 33,93 %
7 NS 4P W+1 -650 0 0.00
8 NS 3S N+1 430 14 100.00
9 NS 3S W = -600 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
a.3 Claire Derieuw -Marie J. de Wagheneire 57,14 %
10 NS 2K S+1 110 2 14.29
11 NS 5CcS-1 -100 5 35.71
12 NS 4C W = -420 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
a.2 Patrick Gilles -Fabienne Smit 56,85 %
13 NS 3S S = 600 3 21.43
14 NS 3K E-2 100 9 64.29
15 NS 3C N-1 -100 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
a10 Virginie Van Damme -Veronique Englebienne 37,50 %
28 NS 5P N = 650 11 78.57
29 NS 3S W+2 -660 2 14.29
30 NS 3S E+2 -460 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
a.9 Jacqueline de Thier -Lydia Wildiers 52,38 %
31 NS 1S N = 90 6 42.86
32 NS 3S S-1 -50 0 0.00
33 NS 1S W+2 -150 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
a.8 Pascale Graton -Roselyne Delpon 46,43 %
34 NS 4C N+1 650 11 78.57
35 NS 3S S = 400 10 71.43
36 NS 2K W-2 200 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
Total : 154,0 / 336 = 45,83 %
PAIRE A.5 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren
a.5 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 33,93 %
13 NS 3S S+1 630 11 78.57
14 NS 4C S-1 -50 5 35.71
15 NS 2C N-1 -100 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.4 Jean de Villenfagne -Colette Heerinckx 61,31 %
16 NS 2S W+1 -150 4 28.57
17 NS 4C E+1 -450 1 7.14
18 NS 4P N = 620 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.3 Claire Derieuw -Marie J. de Wagheneire 57,14 %
19 NS 2C S = 110 10 71.43
20 NS 3T N-2 -200 0 0.00
21 NS 3S W = -400 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.2 Patrick Gilles -Fabienne Smit 56,85 %
22 NS 4P S+1 450 9 64.29
23 NS 3S E+2 -660 2 14.29
24 NS 3S S-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
a.1 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 51,79 %
25 NS 1S E = -90 1 7.14
26 NS 2K E-2 200 6 42.86
27 NS 3S W+1 -430 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
a12 Sylviane Delbeke -Nora Akavi 46,43 %
28 NS 5CcE-2 300 4 28.57
29 NS 4C W = -620 10 71.43
30 NS 3S E+3 -490 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
a10 Virginie Van Damme -Veronique Englebienne 37,50 %
31 NS 3C E-2 100 8 57.14
32 NS 3C N+2 200 2 14.29
33 NS 1S W-1 50 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
a.9 Jacqueline de Thier -Lydia Wildiers 52,38 %
34 NS 3C N+1 170 3 21.43
35 NS 3S S = 400 10 71.43
36 NS 1S S = 90 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
Total : 133,0 / 336 = 39,58 %
PAIRE a.4 Jean de Villenfagne -Colette Heerinckx
A.9 Myriam de Timary -Christiane Huby 47,62 %
4 EO 4C S+1 650 3 21.43
5 EO 3P E = -140 7 50.00
6 EO 4C E+1 -650 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
A.4 Hugo Baetens -Alan Beckman 64,58 %
10 EO 1S S+3 180 2 14.29
11 EO 6ScS-3 -500 14 100.00
12 EO 4TcN-2 -500 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Nicole Leclere 47,92 %
13 EO 3S S+1 630 3 21.43
14 EO 2K E+1 -110 13 92.86
15 EO 2C N = 110 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
A.5 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 39,58 %
16 EO 2S W+1 -150 10 71.43
17 EO 4C E+1 -450 13 92.86
18 EO 4P N = 620 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A12 Annie Legrand -Laurence Mauboussin 58,63 %
19 EO 1S S-1 -50 8 57.14
20 EO 3C N = 140 4 28.57
21 EO 3S E+1 -430 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
A.6 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Chantal de Lichtervelde 45,83 %
22 EO 4P S = 420 13 92.86
23 EO 2CcS-3 -800 14 100.00
24 EO 3S N+2 460 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
A.7 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 53,57 %
28 EO 5PcN = 850 0 0.00
29 EO 4C W+1 -650 8 57.14
30 EO 3S E+3 -490 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
A.8 Denise Testaert -Chantal Woitrin 48,51 %
34 EO 4PcE-2 300 8 57.14
35 EO 2C S-2 -100 12 85.71
36 EO 1S S-1 -100 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
Total : 206,0 / 336 = 61,31 %
PAIRE a11 Jacques Podevyn -Michel Lievens
A12 Annie Legrand -Laurence Mauboussin 58,63 %
1 EO 4C N-2 -100 8 57.14
2 EO 4C E-1 50 7 50.00
3 EO 2C N-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
A.7 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 53,57 %
4 EO 4P N+1 650 3 21.43
5 EO 3P E = -140 7 50.00
6 EO 3C E+2 -200 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Catherine Tilemans 49,11 %
7 EO 4P W = -620 7 50.00
8 EO 5T N = 400 3 21.43
9 EO 3S W = -600 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
A.2 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 52,38 %
13 EO 3S S = 600 11 78.57
14 EO 3K E-2 100 5 35.71
15 EO 3P W-2 100 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 46,43 %
19 EO 1S S-2 -100 11 78.57
20 EO 3C W-1 100 11 78.57
21 EO 3S E = -400 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
A.4 Hugo Baetens -Alan Beckman 64,58 %
25 EO 2P N-1 -50 10 71.43
26 EO 1S S+2 150 10 71.43
27 EO 5T W = -400 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Nicole Leclere 47,92 %
31 EO 2C E-1 50 11 78.57
32 EO 4C S = 420 5 35.71
33 EO 1S W+4 -210 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
A.6 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Chantal de Lichtervelde 45,83 %
34 EO 2P E-2 100 14 100.00
35 EO 4CcN-3 -500 14 100.00
36 EO 1S S-1 -100 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 95,24 %
Total : 194,0 / 336 = 57,74 %
PAIRE a.3 Claire Derieuw -Marie J. de Wagheneire
A.8 Denise Testaert -Chantal Woitrin 48,51 %
1 EO 4C N-1 -50 4 28.57
2 EO 3S W-2 100 1 7.14
3 EO 3S W+1 -630 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 46,43 %
7 EO 6P W-3 300 0 0.00
8 EO 3T N+3 170 9 64.29
9 EO 3S W-1 100 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
A10 Barbara Kengen -Michele Verhulst 45,83 %
10 EO 2K S+1 110 12 85.71
11 EO 5CcS-1 -100 9 64.29
12 EO 4C W = -420 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
A.4 Hugo Baetens -Alan Beckman 64,58 %
13 EO 3S S+1 630 3 21.43
14 EO 4C S-1 -50 9 64.29
15 EO 3C N = 140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Nicole Leclere 47,92 %
16 EO 2S W+1 -150 10 71.43
17 EO 4C E = -420 7 50.00
18 EO 3S N-2 -200 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
A.5 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 39,58 %
19 EO 2C S = 110 4 28.57
20 EO 3T N-2 -200 14 100.00
21 EO 3S W = -400 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.6 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Chantal de Lichtervelde 45,83 %
25 EO 1S E-1 100 4 28.57
26 EO 3S S-2 -200 14 100.00
27 EO 3S E+1 -430 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
A.7 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 53,57 %
31 EO 3T S-1 -100 14 100.00
32 EO 4C S = 420 5 35.71
33 EO 3S W = -400 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
Total : 192,0 / 336 = 57,14 %
PAIRE a.2 Patrick Gilles -Fabienne Smit
A.2 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 52,38 %
4 EO 2P N+3 200 10 71.43
5 EO 2P E+1 -140 7 50.00
6 EO 3C E+2 -200 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
A.9 Myriam de Timary -Christiane Huby 47,62 %
7 EO 4P W = -620 7 50.00
8 EO 1S N+5 240 6 42.86
9 EO 3S W = -600 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 46,43 %
10 EO 2S N = 120 7 50.00
11 EO 5CcS-2 -300 12 85.71
12 EO 3T S-2 -200 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
A10 Barbara Kengen -Michele Verhulst 45,83 %
13 EO 3S S = 600 11 78.57
14 EO 3K E-2 100 5 35.71
15 EO 3C N-1 -100 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
A.4 Hugo Baetens -Alan Beckman 64,58 %
16 EO 1S W+1 -120 3 21.43
17 EO 4C E-1 50 1 7.14
18 EO 4P N = 620 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 21,43 %
A.5 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 39,58 %
22 EO 4P S+1 450 5 35.71
23 EO 3S E+2 -660 12 85.71
24 EO 3S S-1 -50 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
A.6 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Chantal de Lichtervelde 45,83 %
28 EO 5CcE-2 300 10 71.43
29 EO 3S W+2 -660 12 85.71
30 EO 3S W+2 -460 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
A.7 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 53,57 %
34 EO 3C N+1 170 11 78.57
35 EO 3S S = 400 4 28.57
36 EO 1C N-1 -100 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
Total : 191,0 / 336 = 56,85 %
PAIRE a.7 Dominique Sassen -Michel Lahaut
A10 Barbara Kengen -Michele Verhulst 45,83 %
1 EO 5C N-3 -150 12 85.71
2 EO 3S W = -400 14 100.00
3 EO 2T E+2 -130 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 85,71 %
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Nicole Leclere 47,92 %
7 EO 4P W = -620 7 50.00
8 EO 3S S-1 -50 14 100.00
9 EO 3S W-1 100 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
A12 Annie Legrand -Laurence Mauboussin 58,63 %
13 EO 3S N = 600 11 78.57
14 EO 2C S = 110 2 14.29
15 EO 3C N-1 -100 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
A.7 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 53,57 %
19 EO 1S S-2 -100 11 78.57
20 EO 4C W-2 200 0 0.00
21 EO 3S E = -400 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.2 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 52,38 %
22 EO 4P S+1 450 5 35.71
23 EO 2K W+4 -170 2 14.29
24 EO 3S N = 400 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
A.8 Denise Testaert -Chantal Woitrin 48,51 %
25 EO 1S E-1 100 4 28.57
26 EO 2T S+1 110 12 85.71
27 EO 3S W = -400 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 46,43 %
28 EO 4P N = 620 6 42.86
29 EO 4C W = -620 4 28.57
30 EO 3S E+2 -460 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
A.9 Myriam de Timary -Christiane Huby 47,62 %
31 EO 2P W-1 50 11 78.57
32 EO 3S S+1 430 0 0.00
33 EO 3S W = -400 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
Total : 180,0 / 336 = 53,57 %
PAIRE a.9 Jacqueline de Thier -Lydia Wildiers
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Nicole Leclere 47,92 %
1 EO 4PcN-2 -300 14 100.00
2 EO 3S W-1 50 7 50.00
3 EO 3C N-2 -100 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
A12 Annie Legrand -Laurence Mauboussin 58,63 %
7 EO 4P W = -620 7 50.00
8 EO 2T N+3 150 12 85.71
9 EO 3S W+1 -630 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 78,57 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Catherine Tilemans 49,11 %
13 EO 3S S = 600 11 78.57
14 EO 2C S+1 140 0 0.00
15 EO 2C N-1 -100 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
A.2 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 52,38 %
19 EO 2T W+1 -110 14 100.00
20 EO 2P N+1 140 4 28.57
21 EO 3T E = -110 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
A.9 Myriam de Timary -Christiane Huby 47,62 %
25 EO 1S E-1 100 4 28.57
26 EO 3S S = 600 3 21.43
27 EO 3S E+2 -460 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
A.4 Hugo Baetens -Alan Beckman 64,58 %
28 EO 4P N+1 650 3 21.43
29 EO 4C W = -620 4 28.57
30 EO 6K E-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
A10 Barbara Kengen -Michele Verhulst 45,83 %
31 EO 1S N = 90 8 57.14
32 EO 3S S-1 -50 14 100.00
33 EO 1S W+2 -150 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
A.5 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 39,58 %
34 EO 3C N+1 170 11 78.57
35 EO 3S S = 400 4 28.57
36 EO 1S S = 90 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
Total : 176,0 / 336 = 52,38 %
PAIRE a.1 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Catherine Tilemans 49,11 %
1 EO 3P W = -140 10 71.43
2 EO 2S W+1 -150 12 85.71
3 EO 3T E+1 -130 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
A.8 Denise Testaert -Chantal Woitrin 48,51 %
4 EO 3C N+2 200 10 71.43
5 EO 4K S-2 -200 12 85.71
6 EO 4C E = -620 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 80,95 %
A.2 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 52,38 %
7 EO 4P W = -620 7 50.00
8 EO 3S N = 400 3 21.43
9 EO 3S W-1 100 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
A.9 Myriam de Timary -Christiane Huby 47,62 %
10 EO 2K S+1 110 12 85.71
11 EO 4C S-1 -50 6 42.86
12 EO 2S N-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 46,43 %
13 EO 3S S+1 630 3 21.43
14 EO 2K E+1 -110 13 92.86
15 EO 2C N-2 -200 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
A.4 Hugo Baetens -Alan Beckman 64,58 %
19 EO 2C S+1 140 1 7.14
20 EO 3P N = 140 4 28.57
21 EO 3S E-1 50 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 14,29 %
A.5 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 39,58 %
25 EO 1S E = -90 13 92.86
26 EO 2K E-2 200 8 57.14
27 EO 3S W+1 -430 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
A.6 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Chantal de Lichtervelde 45,83 %
31 EO 1S N+1 120 1 7.14
32 EO 4C S = 420 5 35.71
33 EO 1S W+2 -150 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
Total : 174,0 / 336 = 51,79 %
PAIRE a.8 Pascale Graton -Roselyne Delpon
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Nicole Leclere 47,92 %
4 EO 3P N+1 170 14 100.00
5 EO 1ScS+1 380 0 0.00
6 EO 3C E+1 -170 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
A12 Annie Legrand -Laurence Mauboussin 58,63 %
10 EO 1K S+3 130 4 28.57
11 EO 4P E-2 100 2 14.29
12 EO 4C W = -420 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Catherine Tilemans 49,11 %
16 EO 2S W = -120 3 21.43
17 EO 4C W+1 -450 13 92.86
18 EO 4P S = 620 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.8 Denise Testaert -Chantal Woitrin 48,51 %
22 EO 4P S = 420 13 92.86
23 EO 2S W+3 -210 4 28.57
24 EO 3S S+2 460 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 46,43 %
25 EO 1S E = -90 13 92.86
26 EO 3S S = 600 3 21.43
27 EO 3S W = -400 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
A.9 Myriam de Timary -Christiane Huby 47,62 %
28 EO 5CcE-2 300 10 71.43
29 EO 3S W+2 -660 12 85.71
30 EO 3S W+4 -520 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 85,71 %
A.4 Hugo Baetens -Alan Beckman 64,58 %
31 EO 3T S = 110 4 28.57
32 EO 3S S = 400 10 71.43
33 EO 1S W+2 -150 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
A10 Barbara Kengen -Michele Verhulst 45,83 %
34 EO 4C N+1 650 3 21.43
35 EO 3S S = 400 4 28.57
36 EO 2K W-2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
Total : 156,0 / 336 = 46,43 %
PAIRE a12 Sylviane Delbeke -Nora Akavi
A.7 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 53,57 %
1 EO 4P E-1 50 0 0.00
2 EO 3S E-1 50 7 50.00
3 EO 3P S-2 -100 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Catherine Tilemans 49,11 %
4 EO 4P N+1 650 3 21.43
5 EO 1S S-4 -400 14 100.00
6 EO 3S E = -600 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
A.8 Denise Testaert -Chantal Woitrin 48,51 %
7 EO 4P W = -620 7 50.00
8 EO 3T N+3 170 9 64.29
9 EO 3S W-1 100 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
A.2 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 52,38 %
10 EO 2S N = 120 7 50.00
11 EO 5CcS-1 -100 9 64.29
12 EO 2C W+2 -170 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 46,43 %
16 EO 2S W+1 -150 10 71.43
17 EO 4C W = -420 7 50.00
18 EO 2P N+1 140 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
A.4 Hugo Baetens -Alan Beckman 64,58 %
22 EO 4P S+1 450 5 35.71
23 EO 3K W+1 -130 0 0.00
24 EO 3S S+1 430 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
A.5 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 39,58 %
28 EO 5CcE-2 300 10 71.43
29 EO 4C W = -620 4 28.57
30 EO 3S E+3 -490 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
A12 Annie Legrand -Laurence Mauboussin 58,63 %
34 EO 4C N+1 650 3 21.43
35 EO 3S S = 400 4 28.57
36 EO 1S S = 90 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 156,0 / 336 = 46,43 %
PAIRE a.6 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens
A10 Barbara Kengen -Michele Verhulst 45,83 %
4 EO 3P N+2 200 10 71.43
5 EO 1S S+1 120 2 14.29
6 EO 3S E-3 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Nicole Leclere 47,92 %
10 EO 2K S+1 110 12 85.71
11 EO 4P E-1 50 4 28.57
12 EO 3C W = -140 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
A.6 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Chantal de Lichtervelde 45,83 %
16 EO 1S W+2 -150 10 71.43
17 EO 4C E = -420 7 50.00
18 EO 2P N+2 170 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Catherine Tilemans 49,11 %
19 EO 1P N = 80 6 42.86
20 EO 3C W-1 100 11 78.57
21 EO 3T E = -110 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
A.7 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 53,57 %
22 EO 4P S+1 450 5 35.71
23 EO 2C N-3 -300 7 50.00
24 EO 3S N = 400 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
A.2 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 52,38 %
25 EO 1S E-1 100 4 28.57
26 EO 3S S = 600 3 21.43
27 EO 3S W+2 -460 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
A.8 Denise Testaert -Chantal Woitrin 48,51 %
28 EO 3C E = -140 14 100.00
29 EO 3S E = -600 0 0.00
30 EO 3S E+2 -460 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
A.9 Myriam de Timary -Christiane Huby 47,62 %
34 EO 4C N+1 650 3 21.43
35 EO 3S S = 400 4 28.57
36 EO 1S S+1 120 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
Total : 151,0 / 336 = 44,94 %
PAIRE a10 Virginie Van Damme -Veronique Englebienne
A.6 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Chantal de Lichtervelde 45,83 %
1 EO 4C N-1 -50 4 28.57
2 EO 4C W-2 100 1 7.14
3 EO 3T E = -110 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
A12 Annie Legrand -Laurence Mauboussin 58,63 %
4 EO 4P N+1 650 3 21.43
5 EO 2P E+1 -140 7 50.00
6 EO 2S E-1 100 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Catherine Tilemans 49,11 %
10 EO 2S E-4 400 0 0.00
11 EO 4C S = 420 0 0.00
12 EO 4C W = -420 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
A.2 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 52,38 %
16 EO 2S W+1 -150 10 71.43
17 EO 4C E = -420 7 50.00
18 EO 4P N = 620 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 46,43 %
22 EO 4P S+1 450 5 35.71
23 EO 3S E = -600 10 71.43
24 EO 3S S+2 460 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
A10 Barbara Kengen -Michele Verhulst 45,83 %
28 EO 5P N = 650 3 21.43
29 EO 3S W+2 -660 12 85.71
30 EO 3S E+2 -460 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
A.5 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 39,58 %
31 EO 3C E-2 100 6 42.86
32 EO 3C N+2 200 12 85.71
33 EO 1S W-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Nicole Leclere 47,92 %
34 EO 4C N+1 650 3 21.43
35 EO 3S S-1 -50 10 71.43
36 EO 1S S+1 120 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
Total : 126,0 / 336 = 37,50 %
PAIRE a.5 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck
A.9 Myriam de Timary -Christiane Huby 47,62 %
1 EO 3C N-1 -50 4 28.57
2 EO 1S W-1 50 7 50.00
3 EO 2T E+2 -130 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A10 Barbara Kengen -Michele Verhulst 45,83 %
7 EO 4P W+1 -650 14 100.00
8 EO 3S N+1 430 0 0.00
9 EO 3S W = -600 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
A.5 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 39,58 %
13 EO 3S S+1 630 3 21.43
14 EO 4C S-1 -50 9 64.29
15 EO 2C N-1 -100 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A12 Annie Legrand -Laurence Mauboussin 58,63 %
16 EO 2S W-1 100 0 0.00
17 EO 4C E-1 50 1 7.14
18 EO 4P N+1 650 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 2,38 %
A.6 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Chantal de Lichtervelde 45,83 %
19 EO 2C S+1 140 1 7.14
20 EO 2P N = 110 8 57.14
21 EO 3S W-1 50 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Catherine Tilemans 49,11 %
22 EO 4P S+1 450 5 35.71
23 EO 1P N-3 -300 7 50.00
24 EO 3S S+1 430 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
A.7 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 53,57 %
25 EO 1S E-1 100 4 28.57
26 EO 3S N = 600 3 21.43
27 EO 3S E-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
A.8 Denise Testaert -Chantal Woitrin 48,51 %
31 EO 2S N = 120 1 7.14
32 EO 4C S = 420 5 35.71
33 EO 1S W+2 -150 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
Total : 114,0 / 336 = 33,93 %
|