B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 61,04 A.2 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles
--- 2 60,09 A.8 Dominique Sassen -Elisabeth Harmant
--- 3 50,60 A.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Jannick Bekaert
--- 4 48,45 A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor
--- 5 47,17 A.7 Francoise Turin -Myriam de Timary
--- 6 45,98 A.3 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Sophie Tilemans
--- 7 45,83 A.6 Gerard Cooreman -Grazia Neuenschwander
--- 8 40,86 A.5 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm
--- 9 0,00 A.9 -
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 62,38 a.2 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille
--- 2 57,89 a.4 Chris Oostens -Marie J. de Wagheneire
--- 3 50,92 a.8 Liliane Baptista -Dilva Haym
--- 4 50,61 a.9 Mado Miller -Hélène Lemberger
--- 5 49,29 a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Jeannine Wanderpepen
--- 6 46,58 a.1 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens
--- 7 45,17 a.5 Ghislaine Deschuyteneer -Neslihan Buharali
--- 8 43,91 a.3 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens
--- 9 43,71 a.7 Francine Belet -Jacques Podevyn
PAIRE A.2 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles
a.2 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 62,38 %
4 NS 3P W-1 100 8.1 57.86
5 NS 3C S = 140 9.3 66.43
6 NS 3S W+1 -630 1.3 9.29 µ Tbl = 44,52 %
a.1 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 46,58 %
7 NS 2C S+1 140 12.7 90.71
8 NS 3S W+1 -430 7 50.00
9 NS 3P E = -140 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 55,48 %
a.9 Mado Miller -Hélène Lemberger 50,61 %
10 NS 3C N = 140 12.7 90.71
11 NS 4P W+1 -450 4.7 33.57
12 NS 4P S = 620 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 60,71 %
a.8 Liliane Baptista -Dilva Haym 50,92 %
13 NS 4P W = -620 4.7 33.57
14 NS 4KcE-3 500 13.9 99.29
15 NS 3T W = -110 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 60,95 %
a.7 Francine Belet -Jacques Podevyn 43,71 %
16 NS 6P N = 980 13.9 99.29
17 NS 3P S = 140 13.9 99.29
18 NS 5P N+1 680 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 99,29 %
a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Jeannine Wanderpepen 49,29 %
19 NS 4C S = 420 10.4 74.29
20 NS 3S S = 600 9.3 66.43
21 NS 4C E+3 -510 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 60,95 %
a.5 Ghislaine Deschuyteneer -Neslihan Buharali 45,17 %
22 NS 2P N = 110 2 14.29
23 NS 2S E = -120 14 100.00
24 NS 3P E-1 50 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
a.4 Chris Oostens -Marie J. de Wagheneire 57,89 %
25 NS 4P N = 420 3.6 25.71
26 NS 3P W = -140 8.1 57.86
27 NS 4P S+1 450 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 44,52 %
Total : 205,1 / 336 = 61,04 %
PAIRE A.8 Dominique Sassen -Elisabeth Harmant
a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Jeannine Wanderpepen 49,29 %
1 NS 4C W-4 200 13.9 99.29
2 NS 4CcS-1 -200 0.1 0.71
3 NS 3P S = 140 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.5 Ghislaine Deschuyteneer -Neslihan Buharali 45,17 %
4 NS 2P W = -110 2.4 17.14
5 NS 3P W-3 150 11.6 82.86
6 NS 2S W+2 -180 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 58,10 %
a.4 Chris Oostens -Marie J. de Wagheneire 57,89 %
7 NS 2C S = 110 8.1 57.86
8 NS 3S W+1 -430 7 50.00
9 NS 2P E+1 -140 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 44,52 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens 43,91 %
10 NS 3C N = 140 12.7 90.71
11 NS 3P W = -140 11.6 82.86
12 NS 2S S+1 150 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 63,57 %
a.2 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 62,38 %
13 NS 2P W+4 -230 11.6 82.86
14 NS 4P N-1 -50 2.4 17.14
15 NS 3P S-2 -200 1.3 9.29 µ Tbl = 36,43 %
a.1 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 46,58 %
16 NS 5K S+1 420 9.3 66.43
17 NS 5K W-2 100 9.3 66.43
18 NS 4P N+1 650 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
a.8 Liliane Baptista -Dilva Haym 50,92 %
22 NS 5TcS = 550 14 100.00
23 NS 2S E+3 -210 8 57.14
24 NS 4P E-1 50 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
a.7 Francine Belet -Jacques Podevyn 43,71 %
25 NS 4P N+3 510 12.7 90.71
26 NS 4P W-1 100 12.7 90.71
27 NS 4P S+2 480 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 93,57 %
Total : 201,9 / 336 = 60,09 %
PAIRE A.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Jannick Bekaert
a.1 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 46,58 %
1 NS 2P N = 110 11.6 82.86
2 NS 4P E-1 50 10.4 74.29
3 NS 3P S = 140 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
a.9 Mado Miller -Hélène Lemberger 50,61 %
4 NS 4P W-3 300 13.9 99.29
5 NS 3C S+1 170 13.9 99.29
6 NS 1S W+3 -180 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 90,95 %
a.8 Liliane Baptista -Dilva Haym 50,92 %
7 NS 4P W-1 100 3.6 25.71
8 NS 3S W+1 -430 7 50.00
9 NS 3P E-1 100 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.7 Francine Belet -Jacques Podevyn 43,71 %
10 NS 2P W+2 -170 0.1 0.71
11 NS 4C E+1 -450 4.7 33.57
12 NS 3S S-1 -100 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 11,67 %
a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Jeannine Wanderpepen 49,29 %
13 NS 4P W = -620 4.7 33.57
14 NS 3K E-2 100 7 50.00
15 NS 3P S-2 -200 1.3 9.29 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
a.5 Ghislaine Deschuyteneer -Neslihan Buharali 45,17 %
16 NS 4P N+1 450 11.6 82.86
17 NS 4KcW-1 100 9.3 66.43
18 NS 4P N+1 650 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 63,81 %
a.4 Chris Oostens -Marie J. de Wagheneire 57,89 %
19 NS 3S S-2 -100 1.3 9.29
20 NS 2S S+1 150 2.4 17.14
21 NS 6C E = -980 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 14,52 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens 43,91 %
22 NS 4T S+1 150 6 42.86
23 NS 2S E+1 -150 11 78.57
24 NS 4C S = 420 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
Total : 170,0 / 336 = 50,60 %
PAIRE A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor
a.7 Francine Belet -Jacques Podevyn 43,71 %
1 NS 4P N-2 -100 1.3 9.29
2 NS 3P E+1 -170 2.4 17.14
3 NS 3P S+1 170 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 41,90 %
a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Jeannine Wanderpepen 49,29 %
4 NS 3P W-1 100 8.1 57.86
5 NS 3PcW-1 100 4.7 33.57
6 NS 2S W+1 -150 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 63,57 %
a.4 Chris Oostens -Marie J. de Wagheneire 57,89 %
10 NS 3S W-1 100 4.7 33.57
11 NS 4C E-1 50 13.9 99.29
12 NS 4P N = 620 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 63,57 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens 43,91 %
13 NS 3S E = -600 9.3 66.43
14 NS 4P N-1 -50 2.4 17.14
15 NS 4T W-2 100 12.7 90.71 µ Tbl = 58,10 %
a.2 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 62,38 %
16 NS 3T S+1 130 2.4 17.14
17 NS 3KcW = -470 0.1 0.71
18 NS 4P N+1 650 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 20,00 %
a.1 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 46,58 %
19 NS 3S N-2 -100 1.3 9.29
20 NS 4P S+1 650 13.9 99.29
21 NS 4P W+1 -450 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 60,95 %
a.9 Mado Miller -Hélène Lemberger 50,61 %
22 NS 3T S+2 150 6 42.86
23 NS 3S E = -600 5 35.71
24 NS 5T S-1 -50 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
a.8 Liliane Baptista -Dilva Haym 50,92 %
25 NS 4P N+1 450 9.3 66.43
26 NS 3S E+1 -630 0.1 0.71
27 NS 4P S+1 450 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 39,05 %
Total : 162,8 / 336 = 48,45 %
PAIRE A.7 Francoise Turin -Myriam de Timary
a.4 Chris Oostens -Marie J. de Wagheneire 57,89 %
1 NS 3P N-2 -100 1.3 9.29
2 NS 4P E-1 50 10.4 74.29
3 NS 3P S = 140 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 44,52 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens 43,91 %
4 NS 4P W-2 200 11.6 82.86
5 NS 3S N-3 -300 2.4 17.14
6 NS 2S W+4 -240 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 44,52 %
a.2 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 62,38 %
7 NS 4P W-1 100 3.6 25.71
8 NS 3S E = -400 13.9 99.29
9 NS 3P E = -140 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 50,24 %
a.1 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 46,58 %
10 NS 2C N = 110 9.3 66.43
11 NS 4C E+1 -450 4.7 33.57
12 NS 4P S = 620 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 52,62 %
a.9 Mado Miller -Hélène Lemberger 50,61 %
13 NS 3S E+1 -630 0.1 0.71
14 NS 4P N-1 -50 2.4 17.14
15 NS 4T E-2 100 12.7 90.71 µ Tbl = 36,19 %
a.7 Francine Belet -Jacques Podevyn 43,71 %
19 NS 3C S+1 170 7 50.00
20 NS 4P N-1 -100 0.1 0.71
21 NS 6P W-1 50 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Jeannine Wanderpepen 49,29 %
22 NS 5T S = 400 11 78.57
23 NS 2S E+1 -150 11 78.57
24 NS 4K N-3 -150 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
a.5 Ghislaine Deschuyteneer -Neslihan Buharali 45,17 %
25 NS 4P N = 420 3.6 25.71
26 NS 3P W = -140 8.1 57.86
27 NS 4P S+1 450 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 44,52 %
Total : 158,5 / 336 = 47,17 %
PAIRE A.3 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Sophie Tilemans
a.5 Ghislaine Deschuyteneer -Neslihan Buharali 45,17 %
1 NS 1P N = 80 7 50.00
2 NS 2P E+1 -140 5.9 42.14
3 NS 2P S+1 140 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,38 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens 43,91 %
7 NS 4P W+1 -650 0.1 0.71
8 NS 3S W+1 -430 7 50.00
9 NS 3P E-1 100 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
a.2 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 62,38 %
10 NS 4P W-1 100 4.7 33.57
11 NS 4P W+1 -450 4.7 33.57
12 NS 4P S = 620 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
a.1 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 46,58 %
13 NS 3S E-2 200 13.9 99.29
14 NS 4P N = 420 11.6 82.86
15 NS 2S W-1 50 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 82,86 %
a.9 Mado Miller -Hélène Lemberger 50,61 %
16 NS 6P N-1 -50 0.1 0.71
17 NS 1K W+1 -90 3.6 25.71
18 NS 4P N+1 650 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 22,86 %
a.8 Liliane Baptista -Dilva Haym 50,92 %
19 NS 3S N+1 430 13.9 99.29
20 NS 3P N+1 170 5.9 42.14
21 NS 6C E+1 -1010 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 47,38 %
a.7 Francine Belet -Jacques Podevyn 43,71 %
22 NS 4T S+1 150 6 42.86
23 NS 3S W+1 -630 2 14.29
24 NS 3P E = -140 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Jeannine Wanderpepen 49,29 %
25 NS 4P N = 420 3.6 25.71
26 NS 4P W-1 100 12.7 90.71
27 NS 4P S+1 450 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,48 %
Total : 154,5 / 336 = 45,98 %
PAIRE A.6 Gerard Cooreman -Grazia Neuenschwander
a.2 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 62,38 %
1 NS 2P N-1 -50 4.7 33.57
2 NS 3P E = -140 5.9 42.14
3 NS 3P S = 140 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 41,90 %
a.1 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 46,58 %
4 NS 1S W+1 -120 0.1 0.71
5 NS 3T N = 110 7 50.00
6 NS 2S W+3 -210 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,57 %
a.9 Mado Miller -Hélène Lemberger 50,61 %
7 NS 3C N = 140 12.7 90.71
8 NS 3S W+2 -460 0.1 0.71
9 NS 3P E = -140 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 39,05 %
a.8 Liliane Baptista -Dilva Haym 50,92 %
10 NS 4T E-1 100 4.7 33.57
11 NS 4C E+1 -450 4.7 33.57
12 NS 3S S+1 630 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 55,48 %
a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Jeannine Wanderpepen 49,29 %
16 NS 4K S+2 170 7 50.00
17 NS 1S W = -90 3.6 25.71
18 NS 4P N+1 650 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 39,29 %
a.5 Ghislaine Deschuyteneer -Neslihan Buharali 45,17 %
19 NS 3S N-1 -50 4.7 33.57
20 NS 4P N = 620 11.6 82.86
21 NS 4C E+1 -450 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 63,57 %
a.4 Chris Oostens -Marie J. de Wagheneire 57,89 %
22 NS 4PcN-2 -300 0 0.00
23 NS 3S E = -600 5 35.71
24 NS 3P E-1 50 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens 43,91 %
25 NS 4P N+3 510 12.7 90.71
26 NS 2P W+2 -170 4.7 33.57
27 NS 4P S+1 450 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 58,10 %
Total : 154,0 / 336 = 45,83 %
PAIRE A.5 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm
a.9 Mado Miller -Hélène Lemberger 50,61 %
1 NS 3C W-2 100 9.3 66.43
2 NS 4PcE-1 100 13.9 99.29
3 NS 4P S-1 -50 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 55,48 %
a.8 Liliane Baptista -Dilva Haym 50,92 %
4 NS 1S W = -90 4.7 33.57
5 NS 3S N-4 -400 0.1 0.71
6 NS 3S W+1 -630 1.3 9.29 µ Tbl = 14,52 %
a.7 Francine Belet -Jacques Podevyn 43,71 %
7 NS 2C S = 110 8.1 57.86
8 NS 3S W+1 -430 7 50.00
9 NS 4T S = 130 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
a.5 Ghislaine Deschuyteneer -Neslihan Buharali 45,17 %
13 NS 4P W = -620 4.7 33.57
14 NS 2S S+1 150 9.3 66.43
15 NS 4T W = -130 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 44,52 %
a.4 Chris Oostens -Marie J. de Wagheneire 57,89 %
16 NS 3K S+2 150 4.7 33.57
17 NS 5K W-2 100 9.3 66.43
18 NS 4P N+1 650 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 47,38 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens 43,91 %
19 NS 4C S = 420 10.4 74.29
20 NS 3P N+1 170 5.9 42.14
21 NS 5C E+2 -510 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 52,86 %
a.2 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 62,38 %
22 NS 5T S = 400 11 78.57
23 NS 3S E+3 -690 0 0.00
24 NS 3K N-3 -150 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
a.1 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 46,58 %
25 NS 4P N = 420 3.6 25.71
26 NS 2P W+3 -200 2.4 17.14
27 NS 3P S+2 200 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 14,52 %
Total : 137,3 / 336 = 40,86 %
PAIRE A.9 -
a.8 Liliane Baptista -Dilva Haym 50,92 %
1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.7 Francine Belet -Jacques Podevyn 43,71 %
4 NS BYE 0 0.00
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Jeannine Wanderpepen 49,29 %
7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.5 Ghislaine Deschuyteneer -Neslihan Buharali 45,17 %
10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.4 Chris Oostens -Marie J. de Wagheneire 57,89 %
13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00
15 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens 43,91 %
16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.2 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 62,38 %
19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00
21 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.9 Mado Miller -Hélène Lemberger 50,61 %
25 NS BYE 0 0.00
26 NS BYE 0 0.00
27 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 378 = 0,00 %
PAIRE a.2 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille
A.6 Gerard Cooreman -Grazia Neuenschwander 45,83 %
1 EO 2P N-1 -50 9.3 66.43
2 EO 3P E = -140 8.1 57.86
3 EO 3P S = 140 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 58,10 %
A.2 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 61,04 %
4 EO 3P W-1 100 5.9 42.14
5 EO 3C S = 140 4.7 33.57
6 EO 3S W+1 -630 12.7 90.71 µ Tbl = 55,48 %
A.7 Francoise Turin -Myriam de Timary 47,17 %
7 EO 4P W-1 100 10.4 74.29
8 EO 3S E = -400 0.1 0.71
9 EO 3P E = -140 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 49,76 %
A.3 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Sophie Tilemans 45,98 %
10 EO 4P W-1 100 9.3 66.43
11 EO 4P W+1 -450 9.3 66.43
12 EO 4P S = 620 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
A.8 Dominique Sassen -Elisabeth Harmant 60,09 %
13 EO 2P W+4 -230 2.4 17.14
14 EO 4P N-1 -50 11.6 82.86
15 EO 3P S-2 -200 12.7 90.71 µ Tbl = 63,57 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 48,45 %
16 EO 3T S+1 130 11.6 82.86
17 EO 3KcW = -470 13.9 99.29
18 EO 4P N+1 650 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 80,00 %
A.9 - 0,00 %
19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00
21 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.5 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm 40,86 %
22 EO 5T S = 400 3 21.43
23 EO 3S E+3 -690 14 100.00
24 EO 3K N-3 -150 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
Total : 183,4 / 294 = 62,38 %
PAIRE a.4 Chris Oostens -Marie J. de Wagheneire
A.7 Francoise Turin -Myriam de Timary 47,17 %
1 EO 3P N-2 -100 12.7 90.71
2 EO 4P E-1 50 3.6 25.71
3 EO 3P S = 140 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,48 %
A.8 Dominique Sassen -Elisabeth Harmant 60,09 %
7 EO 2C S = 110 5.9 42.14
8 EO 3S W+1 -430 7 50.00
9 EO 2P E+1 -140 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 55,48 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 48,45 %
10 EO 3S W-1 100 9.3 66.43
11 EO 4C E-1 50 0.1 0.71
12 EO 4P N = 620 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 36,43 %
A.9 - 0,00 %
13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00
15 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.5 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm 40,86 %
16 EO 3K S+2 150 9.3 66.43
17 EO 5K W-2 100 4.7 33.57
18 EO 4P N+1 650 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 52,62 %
A.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Jannick Bekaert 50,60 %
19 EO 3S S-2 -100 12.7 90.71
20 EO 2S S+1 150 11.6 82.86
21 EO 6C E = -980 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 85,48 %
A.6 Gerard Cooreman -Grazia Neuenschwander 45,83 %
22 EO 4PcN-2 -300 14 100.00
23 EO 3S E = -600 9 64.29
24 EO 3P E-1 50 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
A.2 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 61,04 %
25 EO 4P N = 420 10.4 74.29
26 EO 3P W = -140 5.9 42.14
27 EO 4P S+1 450 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,48 %
Total : 170,2 / 294 = 57,89 %
PAIRE a.8 Liliane Baptista -Dilva Haym
A.9 - 0,00 %
1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.5 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm 40,86 %
4 EO 1S W = -90 9.3 66.43
5 EO 3S N-4 -400 13.9 99.29
6 EO 3S W+1 -630 12.7 90.71 µ Tbl = 85,48 %
A.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Jannick Bekaert 50,60 %
7 EO 4P W-1 100 10.4 74.29
8 EO 3S W+1 -430 7 50.00
9 EO 3P E-1 100 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.6 Gerard Cooreman -Grazia Neuenschwander 45,83 %
10 EO 4T E-1 100 9.3 66.43
11 EO 4C E+1 -450 9.3 66.43
12 EO 3S S+1 630 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 44,52 %
A.2 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 61,04 %
13 EO 4P W = -620 9.3 66.43
14 EO 4KcE-3 500 0.1 0.71
15 EO 3T W = -110 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 39,05 %
A.3 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Sophie Tilemans 45,98 %
19 EO 3S N+1 430 0.1 0.71
20 EO 3P N+1 170 8.1 57.86
21 EO 6C E+1 -1010 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 52,62 %
A.8 Dominique Sassen -Elisabeth Harmant 60,09 %
22 EO 5TcS = 550 0 0.00
23 EO 2S E+3 -210 6 42.86
24 EO 4P E-1 50 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 48,45 %
25 EO 4P N+1 450 4.7 33.57
26 EO 3S E+1 -630 13.9 99.29
27 EO 4P S+1 450 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 60,95 %
Total : 149,7 / 294 = 50,92 %
PAIRE a.9 Mado Miller -Hélène Lemberger
A.5 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm 40,86 %
1 EO 3C W-2 100 4.7 33.57
2 EO 4PcE-1 100 0.1 0.71
3 EO 4P S-1 -50 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 44,52 %
A.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Jannick Bekaert 50,60 %
4 EO 4P W-3 300 0.1 0.71
5 EO 3C S+1 170 0.1 0.71
6 EO 1S W+3 -180 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 9,05 %
A.6 Gerard Cooreman -Grazia Neuenschwander 45,83 %
7 EO 3C N = 140 1.3 9.29
8 EO 3S W+2 -460 13.9 99.29
9 EO 3P E = -140 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 60,95 %
A.2 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 61,04 %
10 EO 3C N = 140 1.3 9.29
11 EO 4P W+1 -450 9.3 66.43
12 EO 4P S = 620 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 39,29 %
A.7 Francoise Turin -Myriam de Timary 47,17 %
13 EO 3S E+1 -630 13.9 99.29
14 EO 4P N-1 -50 11.6 82.86
15 EO 4T E-2 100 1.3 9.29 µ Tbl = 63,81 %
A.3 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Sophie Tilemans 45,98 %
16 EO 6P N-1 -50 13.9 99.29
17 EO 1K W+1 -90 10.4 74.29
18 EO 4P N+1 650 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 77,14 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 48,45 %
22 EO 3T S+2 150 8 57.14
23 EO 3S E = -600 9 64.29
24 EO 5T S-1 -50 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
A.9 - 0,00 %
25 EO BYE 0 0.00
26 EO BYE 0 0.00
27 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 148,8 / 294 = 50,61 %
PAIRE a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Jeannine Wanderpepen
A.8 Dominique Sassen -Elisabeth Harmant 60,09 %
1 EO 4C W-4 200 0.1 0.71
2 EO 4CcS-1 -200 13.9 99.29
3 EO 3P S = 140 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 48,45 %
4 EO 3P W-1 100 5.9 42.14
5 EO 3PcW-1 100 9.3 66.43
6 EO 2S W+1 -150 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 36,43 %
A.9 - 0,00 %
7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Jannick Bekaert 50,60 %
13 EO 4P W = -620 9.3 66.43
14 EO 3K E-2 100 7 50.00
15 EO 3P S-2 -200 12.7 90.71 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
A.6 Gerard Cooreman -Grazia Neuenschwander 45,83 %
16 EO 4K S+2 170 7 50.00
17 EO 1S W = -90 10.4 74.29
18 EO 4P N+1 650 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 60,71 %
A.2 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 61,04 %
19 EO 4C S = 420 3.6 25.71
20 EO 3S S = 600 4.7 33.57
21 EO 4C E+3 -510 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 39,05 %
A.7 Francoise Turin -Myriam de Timary 47,17 %
22 EO 5T S = 400 3 21.43
23 EO 2S E+1 -150 3 21.43
24 EO 4K N-3 -150 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
A.3 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Sophie Tilemans 45,98 %
25 EO 4P N = 420 10.4 74.29
26 EO 4P W-1 100 1.3 9.29
27 EO 4P S+1 450 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 44,52 %
Total : 144,9 / 294 = 49,29 %
PAIRE a.1 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens
A.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Jannick Bekaert 50,60 %
1 EO 2P N = 110 2.4 17.14
2 EO 4P E-1 50 3.6 25.71
3 EO 3P S = 140 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
A.6 Gerard Cooreman -Grazia Neuenschwander 45,83 %
4 EO 1S W+1 -120 13.9 99.29
5 EO 3T N = 110 7 50.00
6 EO 2S W+3 -210 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,43 %
A.2 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 61,04 %
7 EO 2C S+1 140 1.3 9.29
8 EO 3S W+1 -430 7 50.00
9 EO 3P E = -140 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 44,52 %
A.7 Francoise Turin -Myriam de Timary 47,17 %
10 EO 2C N = 110 4.7 33.57
11 EO 4C E+1 -450 9.3 66.43
12 EO 4P S = 620 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 47,38 %
A.3 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Sophie Tilemans 45,98 %
13 EO 3S E-2 200 0.1 0.71
14 EO 4P N = 420 2.4 17.14
15 EO 2S W-1 50 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 17,14 %
A.8 Dominique Sassen -Elisabeth Harmant 60,09 %
16 EO 5K S+1 420 4.7 33.57
17 EO 5K W-2 100 4.7 33.57
18 EO 4P N+1 650 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 48,45 %
19 EO 3S N-2 -100 12.7 90.71
20 EO 4P S+1 650 0.1 0.71
21 EO 4P W+1 -450 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 39,05 %
A.5 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm 40,86 %
25 EO 4P N = 420 10.4 74.29
26 EO 2P W+3 -200 11.6 82.86
27 EO 3P S+2 200 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 85,48 %
Total : 156,5 / 336 = 46,58 %
PAIRE a.5 Ghislaine Deschuyteneer -Neslihan Buharali
A.3 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Sophie Tilemans 45,98 %
1 EO 1P N = 80 7 50.00
2 EO 2P E+1 -140 8.1 57.86
3 EO 2P S+1 140 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,62 %
A.8 Dominique Sassen -Elisabeth Harmant 60,09 %
4 EO 2P W = -110 11.6 82.86
5 EO 3P W-3 150 2.4 17.14
6 EO 2S W+2 -180 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 41,90 %
A.9 - 0,00 %
10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.5 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm 40,86 %
13 EO 4P W = -620 9.3 66.43
14 EO 2S S+1 150 4.7 33.57
15 EO 4T W = -130 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 55,48 %
A.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Jannick Bekaert 50,60 %
16 EO 4P N+1 450 2.4 17.14
17 EO 4KcW-1 100 4.7 33.57
18 EO 4P N+1 650 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 36,19 %
A.6 Gerard Cooreman -Grazia Neuenschwander 45,83 %
19 EO 3S N-1 -50 9.3 66.43
20 EO 4P N = 620 2.4 17.14
21 EO 4C E+1 -450 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 36,43 %
A.2 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 61,04 %
22 EO 2P N = 110 12 85.71
23 EO 2S E = -120 0 0.00
24 EO 3P E-1 50 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
A.7 Francoise Turin -Myriam de Timary 47,17 %
25 EO 4P N = 420 10.4 74.29
26 EO 3P W = -140 5.9 42.14
27 EO 4P S+1 450 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,48 %
Total : 132,8 / 294 = 45,17 %
PAIRE a.3 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens
A.7 Francoise Turin -Myriam de Timary 47,17 %
4 EO 4P W-2 200 2.4 17.14
5 EO 3S N-3 -300 11.6 82.86
6 EO 2S W+4 -240 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 55,48 %
A.3 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Sophie Tilemans 45,98 %
7 EO 4P W+1 -650 13.9 99.29
8 EO 3S W+1 -430 7 50.00
9 EO 3P E-1 100 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
A.8 Dominique Sassen -Elisabeth Harmant 60,09 %
10 EO 3C N = 140 1.3 9.29
11 EO 3P W = -140 2.4 17.14
12 EO 2S S+1 150 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 36,43 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 48,45 %
13 EO 3S E = -600 4.7 33.57
14 EO 4P N-1 -50 11.6 82.86
15 EO 4T W-2 100 1.3 9.29 µ Tbl = 41,90 %
A.9 - 0,00 %
16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.5 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm 40,86 %
19 EO 4C S = 420 3.6 25.71
20 EO 3P N+1 170 8.1 57.86
21 EO 5C E+2 -510 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 47,14 %
A.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Jannick Bekaert 50,60 %
22 EO 4T S+1 150 8 57.14
23 EO 2S E+1 -150 3 21.43
24 EO 4C S = 420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
A.6 Gerard Cooreman -Grazia Neuenschwander 45,83 %
25 EO 4P N+3 510 1.3 9.29
26 EO 2P W+2 -170 9.3 66.43
27 EO 4P S+1 450 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 41,90 %
Total : 129,1 / 294 = 43,91 %
PAIRE a.7 Francine Belet -Jacques Podevyn
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 48,45 %
1 EO 4P N-2 -100 12.7 90.71
2 EO 3P E+1 -170 11.6 82.86
3 EO 3P S+1 170 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 58,10 %
A.9 - 0,00 %
4 EO BYE 0 0.00
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.5 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm 40,86 %
7 EO 2C S = 110 5.9 42.14
8 EO 3S W+1 -430 7 50.00
9 EO 4T S = 130 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
A.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Jannick Bekaert 50,60 %
10 EO 2P W+2 -170 13.9 99.29
11 EO 4C E+1 -450 9.3 66.43
12 EO 3S S-1 -100 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 88,33 %
A.2 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 61,04 %
16 EO 6P N = 980 0.1 0.71
17 EO 3P S = 140 0.1 0.71
18 EO 5P N+1 680 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 0,71 %
A.7 Francoise Turin -Myriam de Timary 47,17 %
19 EO 3C S+1 170 7 50.00
20 EO 4P N-1 -100 13.9 99.29
21 EO 6P W-1 50 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.3 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Sophie Tilemans 45,98 %
22 EO 4T S+1 150 8 57.14
23 EO 3S W+1 -630 12 85.71
24 EO 3P E = -140 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
A.8 Dominique Sassen -Elisabeth Harmant 60,09 %
25 EO 4P N+3 510 1.3 9.29
26 EO 4P W-1 100 1.3 9.29
27 EO 4P S+2 480 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 6,43 %
Total : 128,5 / 294 = 43,71 %
|