B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 63,06 A.7 Stan Tabor -Philippe van der Gracht
--- 2 61,94 B.6 Jean Verelst -Nicole Louette
--- 3 55,56 B.8 Chantal de Locht -Marc Antoine de Halloy
--- 4 55,00 A.4 Marie Claire Vienne -Sandra Dallemagne
--- 5 54,44 B.4 Noelle Fosse -Michel Paquot
--- 6 54,17 B.1 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois
--- 7 53,06 B.3 Daniel Kuczynski -Annie Zeimes
--- 8 50,97 A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette Jourdain
--- 9 49,72 A.5 Myriam de Timary -Eliane de Ceuninck
--- 10 48,61 B.2 Caroll Pucher -Annie Legrand
--- 11 46,25 A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Giuseppe Napoli
--- 12 45,69 A.8 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson
--- 13 44,58 A.3 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger
--- 14 44,44 B.7 Helene Schyns -Michele Berrier
--- ~ 44,44 A.6 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Colette Heerinckx
--- 16 44,17 B.5 Grazia Neuenschwander -Nicole Leclere
--- 17 33,89 A.9 Liliane Baptista -Ghislaine Deschuyteneer
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 59,86 b.1 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee
--- 2 58,89 b.5 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker
--- 3 57,50 a.3 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens
--- 4 56,81 a.5 Jean Marie Schmiliver -Patrick Gilles
--- 5 55,00 a.7 Jeannine Thys -Christiane Huby
--- 6 51,81 a.1 Lydia Luyten -Ghislain le Hardy de B.
--- 7 51,39 a.6 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm
--- 8 51,39 b.4 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne
--- 9 51,39 a.9 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille
--- 10 50,56 a.2 Dominique Sassen -Danielle Wybauw
--- 11 49,31 b.6 Benedicte Lemaigre -Nadine Blondeau
--- 12 48,33 a.4 Francine Dozin -Brigitte de Fauconval
--- 13 48,33 b.7 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren
--- 14 45,69 b.8 Marianne Borsu -Muriel de Ceuninck
--- ~ 43,61 a.8 Barbara Kengen -Andre Delacroix
--- 16 35,28 b.2 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck
--- 17 34,86 b.3 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Catherine de Moffarts
PAIRE A.7 Stan Tabor -Philippe van der Gracht
a.4 Francine Dozin -Brigitte de Fauconval 48,33 %
1 NS 3S E+2 -460 10 33.33
2 NS 4P E = -420 23 76.67
3 NS 4P S = 420 26 86.67 µ Tbl = 65,56 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 57,50 %
4 NS 3S N+1 630 11 36.67
5 NS 2S W-1 50 17 56.67
6 NS 4P S = 420 27 90.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Danielle Wybauw 50,56 %
7 NS 3S S+1 630 17 56.67
8 NS 5PcW-3 500 30 100.00
9 NS 3S E+1 -630 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
a.1 Lydia Luyten -Ghislain le Hardy de B. 51,81 %
10 NS 2C N-2 -200 1 3.33
11 NS 3S W+4 -520 22 73.33
12 NS 3S N+3 690 27 90.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.9 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 51,39 %
13 NS 4P E = -620 15 50.00
14 NS 6P S = 980 29 96.67
15 NS 3P S = 140 30 100.00 µ Tbl = 82,22 %
a.7 Jeannine Thys -Christiane Huby 55,00 %
19 NS 1P N = 80 16 53.33
20 NS 4P E+1 -650 14 46.67
21 NS 3P N = 140 28 93.33 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
a.6 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm 51,39 %
22 NS 2P N = 110 27 90.00
23 NS 3S S-2 -200 4 13.33
24 NS 4P E+1 -450 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 48,89 %
a.5 Jean Marie Schmiliver -Patrick Gilles 56,81 %
25 NS 4C N = 420 19 63.33
26 NS 3S N+1 630 9 30.00
27 NS 3P W-1 50 23 76.67 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
Total : 454,0 / 720 = 63,06 %
PAIRE B.6 Jean Verelst -Nicole Louette
b.4 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne 51,39 %
1 NS 3S E+2 -460 10 33.33
2 NS 4P E = -420 23 76.67
3 NS 4T E-3 300 22 73.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
b.3 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Catherine de Moffarts 34,86 %
4 NS 3S N+2 660 24 80.00
5 NS 3C E-2 100 25 83.33
6 NS 3P S = 140 23 76.67 µ Tbl = 80,00 %
b.2 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 35,28 %
7 NS 3S S+1 630 17 56.67
8 NS 3P W-2 100 24 80.00
9 NS 3S E+2 -660 6 20.00 µ Tbl = 52,22 %
b.1 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 59,86 %
10 NS 2C N-2 -200 1 3.33
11 NS 3S W+3 -490 27 90.00
12 NS 3S N+3 690 27 90.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
b.8 Marianne Borsu -Muriel de Ceuninck 45,69 %
13 NS 4P E = -620 15 50.00
14 NS 6P S = 980 29 96.67
15 NS 2P S = 110 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
b.7 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren 48,33 %
16 NS 4P S+2 480 26 86.67
17 NS 2S S+2 180 18 60.00
18 NS 3P W-2 100 27 90.00 µ Tbl = 78,89 %
b.6 Benedicte Lemaigre -Nadine Blondeau 49,31 %
19 NS 2P N-1 -50 12 40.00
20 NS 4P E+1 -650 14 46.67
21 NS 2P N+1 140 28 93.33 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
b.5 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 58,89 %
22 NS 2P N-1 -50 15 50.00
23 NS 3S S-2 -200 4 13.33
24 NS 4P E+1 -450 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
Total : 446,0 / 720 = 61,94 %
PAIRE B.8 Chantal de Locht -Marc Antoine de Halloy
b.8 Marianne Borsu -Muriel de Ceuninck 45,69 %
1 NS 3S W-1 50 25 83.33
2 NS 2S W+2 -180 30 100.00
3 NS 3K E-2 200 20 66.67 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
b.7 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren 48,33 %
4 NS 3S N+1 630 11 36.67
5 NS 4C E-2 100 25 83.33
6 NS 4P S-1 -50 12 40.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
b.6 Benedicte Lemaigre -Nadine Blondeau 49,31 %
7 NS 3S S+1 630 17 56.67
8 NS 5K S-1 -50 12 40.00
9 NS 4P W = -620 24 80.00 µ Tbl = 58,89 %
b.5 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 58,89 %
10 NS 3T S-1 -100 11 36.67
11 NS 6S W = -990 11 36.67
12 NS 3S N+2 660 11 36.67 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
b.4 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne 51,39 %
13 NS 4P W = -620 15 50.00
14 NS 4P N+2 480 5 16.67
15 NS 1S S+1 120 28 93.33 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
b.3 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Catherine de Moffarts 34,86 %
16 NS 4P S+1 450 12 40.00
17 NS 3S S+2 460 28 93.33
18 NS 3K W = -110 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 58,89 %
b.2 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 35,28 %
19 NS 2P N-1 -50 12 40.00
20 NS 4P E = -620 30 100.00
21 NS 2P N+1 140 28 93.33 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
b.1 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 59,86 %
22 NS 3P N-2 -100 4 13.33
23 NS 3K N = 110 10 33.33
24 NS 3S W+2 -460 6 20.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
Total : 400,0 / 720 = 55,56 %
PAIRE A.4 Marie Claire Vienne -Sandra Dallemagne
a.7 Jeannine Thys -Christiane Huby 55,00 %
1 NS 3S W+2 -460 10 33.33
2 NS 4C E = -420 23 76.67
3 NS 4P S-1 -50 3 10.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a.6 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm 51,39 %
4 NS 3S N+2 660 24 80.00
5 NS 2P S = 110 29 96.67
6 NS 4PcS = 590 30 100.00 µ Tbl = 92,22 %
a.4 Francine Dozin -Brigitte de Fauconval 48,33 %
10 NS 3K E-1 100 23 76.67
11 NS 6S W = -990 11 36.67
12 NS 3S N+2 660 11 36.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 57,50 %
13 NS 4P E+1 -650 2 6.67
14 NS 4P S+3 510 19 63.33
15 NS 2P S = 110 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 41,11 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Danielle Wybauw 50,56 %
16 NS 4P S+1 450 12 40.00
17 NS 2P N+2 170 16 53.33
18 NS 3K E = -110 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 45,56 %
a.1 Lydia Luyten -Ghislain le Hardy de B. 51,81 %
19 NS 1P N+1 110 25 83.33
20 NS 4P E+1 -650 14 46.67
21 NS 3K W = -110 11 36.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.9 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 51,39 %
22 NS 3P N-3 -150 0 0.00
23 NS 4K N = 130 18 60.00
24 NS 3S E+1 -430 19 63.33 µ Tbl = 41,11 %
a.8 Barbara Kengen -Andre Delacroix 43,61 %
25 NS 4C N = 420 19 63.33
26 NS 3S N+2 660 25 83.33
27 NS 2S E-1 50 23 76.67 µ Tbl = 74,44 %
Total : 396,0 / 720 = 55,00 %
PAIRE B.4 Noelle Fosse -Michel Paquot
b.7 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren 48,33 %
1 NS 3S E+2 -460 10 33.33
2 NS 4C E = -420 23 76.67
3 NS 2P S+2 170 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 52,22 %
b.6 Benedicte Lemaigre -Nadine Blondeau 49,31 %
4 NS 3S N = 600 1 3.33
5 NS 3S W = -400 0 0.00
6 NS 4P S-2 -100 2 6.67 µ Tbl = 3,33 %
b.5 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 58,89 %
7 NS 3S S+1 630 17 56.67
8 NS 4P W-1 50 20 66.67
9 NS 3S W-1 100 30 100.00 µ Tbl = 74,44 %
b.4 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne 51,39 %
10 NS 2C N+1 140 29 96.67
11 NS 3S W+4 -520 22 73.33
12 NS 3S N+2 660 11 36.67 µ Tbl = 68,89 %
b.3 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Catherine de Moffarts 34,86 %
13 NS 4P E = -620 15 50.00
14 NS 4P S+3 510 19 63.33
15 NS 3P S-1 -100 1 3.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
b.2 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 35,28 %
16 NS 4P S+1 450 12 40.00
17 NS 3CcE-4 800 30 100.00
18 NS 3K E = -110 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
b.1 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 59,86 %
19 NS 2K W-2 200 30 100.00
20 NS 4P E+1 -650 14 46.67
21 NS 3PcN-1 -200 6 20.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
b.8 Marianne Borsu -Muriel de Ceuninck 45,69 %
22 NS 1P N = 80 22 73.33
23 NS 4K N+2 170 26 86.67
24 NS 3S W = -400 25 83.33 µ Tbl = 81,11 %
Total : 392,0 / 720 = 54,44 %
PAIRE B.1 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois
b.1 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 59,86 %
1 NS 3S E-1 50 25 83.33
2 NS 3S W+3 -490 0 0.00
3 NS 3KcE-2 500 30 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
b.8 Marianne Borsu -Muriel de Ceuninck 45,69 %
4 NS 3S N+2 660 24 80.00
5 NS 2S W = -120 6 20.00
6 NS 4P S-1 -50 12 40.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
b.7 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren 48,33 %
7 NS 3S S+1 630 17 56.67
8 NS 4K S-1 -50 12 40.00
9 NS 3S W = -600 27 90.00 µ Tbl = 62,22 %
b.6 Benedicte Lemaigre -Nadine Blondeau 49,31 %
10 NS 2C N-1 -100 11 36.67
11 NS 6K W = -920 17 56.67
12 NS 3S N+2 660 11 36.67 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
b.5 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 58,89 %
13 NS 3P E+1 -170 27 90.00
14 NS 4P S+3 510 19 63.33
15 NS 2P S = 110 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 68,89 %
b.4 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne 51,39 %
16 NS 4P S+1 450 12 40.00
17 NS 3S S-1 -50 10 33.33
18 NS 3K W = -110 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
b.3 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Catherine de Moffarts 34,86 %
19 NS 2P N-1 -50 12 40.00
20 NS 4P E+1 -650 14 46.67
21 NS 2P N = 110 24 80.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
b.2 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 35,28 %
22 NS 2P N-1 -50 15 50.00
23 NS 3S S-1 -100 8 26.67
24 NS 3S E-1 50 28 93.33 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
Total : 390,0 / 720 = 54,17 %
PAIRE B.3 Daniel Kuczynski -Annie Zeimes
b.5 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 58,89 %
1 NS 3S E+2 -460 10 33.33
2 NS 4C E+1 -450 12 40.00
3 NS 4P N-1 -50 3 10.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
b.4 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne 51,39 %
4 NS 3S N+1 630 11 36.67
5 NS 3C E-1 50 17 56.67
6 NS 4P S-1 -50 12 40.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
b.3 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Catherine de Moffarts 34,86 %
7 NS 3S N+1 630 17 56.67
8 NS 4K S = 130 27 90.00
9 NS 3S E+1 -630 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
b.2 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 35,28 %
10 NS 1S N-1 -100 11 36.67
11 NS 3K W+2 -150 30 100.00
12 NS 3S N+3 690 27 90.00 µ Tbl = 75,56 %
b.1 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 59,86 %
13 NS 5K N-1 -100 30 100.00
14 NS 4P S+3 510 19 63.33
15 NS 1S W = -90 4 13.33 µ Tbl = 58,89 %
b.8 Marianne Borsu -Muriel de Ceuninck 45,69 %
16 NS 4P S+2 480 26 86.67
17 NS 2K S+2 130 14 46.67
18 NS 4TcN-2 -500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
b.7 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren 48,33 %
19 NS 2C N = 110 25 83.33
20 NS 4P E+1 -650 14 46.67
21 NS 4P N-3 -300 1 3.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
b.6 Benedicte Lemaigre -Nadine Blondeau 49,31 %
22 NS 1S W = -90 8 26.67
23 NS 3K N+1 130 18 60.00
24 NS 6P E-2 100 30 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,22 %
Total : 382,0 / 720 = 53,06 %
PAIRE A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette Jourdain
a.1 Lydia Luyten -Ghislain le Hardy de B. 51,81 %
1 NS 3S E+1 -430 19 63.33
2 NS 3S W+2 -460 5 16.67
3 NS 3P S+1 170 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 42,22 %
a.9 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 51,39 %
4 NS 3S N+1 630 11 36.67
5 NS 4C E-1 50 17 56.67
6 NS 4P S = 420 27 90.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a.8 Barbara Kengen -Andre Delacroix 43,61 %
7 NS 3S S+1 630 17 56.67
8 NS 4P W-1 50 20 66.67
9 NS 3S E+1 -630 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 58,89 %
a.7 Jeannine Thys -Christiane Huby 55,00 %
10 NS 3T S = 110 26 86.67
11 NS 6S E = -990 11 36.67
12 NS 3S N+2 660 11 36.67 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
a.6 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm 51,39 %
13 NS 4P E = -620 15 50.00
14 NS 4P S+2 480 5 16.67
15 NS 2P S = 110 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a.5 Jean Marie Schmiliver -Patrick Gilles 56,81 %
16 NS 4P S+1 450 12 40.00
17 NS 3S S-2 -100 4 13.33
18 NS 3P W-2 100 27 90.00 µ Tbl = 47,78 %
a.4 Francine Dozin -Brigitte de Fauconval 48,33 %
19 NS 2P N = 110 25 83.33
20 NS 4P E+1 -650 14 46.67
21 NS 2P N-1 -100 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 57,50 %
22 NS 1S S-1 -50 15 50.00
23 NS 3K N+1 130 18 60.00
24 NS 3S E+2 -460 6 20.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
Total : 367,0 / 720 = 50,97 %
PAIRE A.5 Myriam de Timary -Eliane de Ceuninck
a.9 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 51,39 %
1 NS 3S E+2 -460 10 33.33
2 NS 4C E+2 -480 2 6.67
3 NS 2P S+2 170 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 28,89 %
a.8 Barbara Kengen -Andre Delacroix 43,61 %
4 NS 3S S+1 630 11 36.67
5 NS 2P S = 110 29 96.67
6 NS 4P S-1 -50 12 40.00 µ Tbl = 57,78 %
a.7 Jeannine Thys -Christiane Huby 55,00 %
7 NS 3S S+1 630 17 56.67
8 NS 5K S-2 -100 4 13.33
9 NS 3S W = -600 27 90.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
a.5 Jean Marie Schmiliver -Patrick Gilles 56,81 %
13 NS 4P W = -620 15 50.00
14 NS 4P S+3 510 19 63.33
15 NS 2P S = 110 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.4 Francine Dozin -Brigitte de Fauconval 48,33 %
16 NS 4P S+1 450 12 40.00
17 NS 3S S+1 430 25 83.33
18 NS 2C W-3 150 30 100.00 µ Tbl = 74,44 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 57,50 %
19 NS 2T E+1 -110 2 6.67
20 NS 4P E+1 -650 14 46.67
21 NS 3K W = -110 11 36.67 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Danielle Wybauw 50,56 %
22 NS 2P N-2 -100 4 13.33
23 NS 4K N = 130 18 60.00
24 NS 4P E+1 -450 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.1 Lydia Luyten -Ghislain le Hardy de B. 51,81 %
25 NS 4C N = 420 19 63.33
26 NS 3S N+2 660 25 83.33
27 NS 1S S-1 -50 9 30.00 µ Tbl = 58,89 %
Total : 358,0 / 720 = 49,72 %
PAIRE B.2 Caroll Pucher -Annie Legrand
b.3 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Catherine de Moffarts 34,86 %
1 NS 3S W-2 100 29 96.67
2 NS 4P E = -420 23 76.67
3 NS 3P S+1 170 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 73,33 %
b.2 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 35,28 %
4 NS 3S N+3 690 30 100.00
5 NS 3C E-1 50 17 56.67
6 NS 3P S = 140 23 76.67 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
b.1 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 59,86 %
7 NS 4P N = 620 2 6.67
8 NS 4P W-1 50 20 66.67
9 NS 3S E+3 -690 1 3.33 µ Tbl = 25,56 %
b.8 Marianne Borsu -Muriel de Ceuninck 45,69 %
10 NS 3T S-1 -100 11 36.67
11 NS 6S W+1 -1020 3 10.00
12 NS 3S N+2 660 11 36.67 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
b.7 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren 48,33 %
13 NS 4P E = -620 15 50.00
14 NS 4P S+2 480 5 16.67
15 NS 2P S = 110 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
b.6 Benedicte Lemaigre -Nadine Blondeau 49,31 %
16 NS 4P S+2 480 26 86.67
17 NS 3S S+1 430 25 83.33
18 NS 3K E = -110 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 71,11 %
b.5 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 58,89 %
19 NS 2S S-4 -200 0 0.00
20 NS 4P E+1 -650 14 46.67
21 NS 2P N-2 -200 6 20.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
b.4 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne 51,39 %
22 NS 2P N = 110 27 90.00
23 NS 3K N+1 130 18 60.00
24 NS 4P E+2 -480 1 3.33 µ Tbl = 51,11 %
Total : 350,0 / 720 = 48,61 %
PAIRE A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Giuseppe Napoli
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Danielle Wybauw 50,56 %
4 NS 3S N+2 660 24 80.00
5 NS 3C E-1 50 17 56.67
6 NS 4P S-1 -50 12 40.00 µ Tbl = 58,89 %
a.1 Lydia Luyten -Ghislain le Hardy de B. 51,81 %
7 NS 3S S+1 630 17 56.67
8 NS 4K S-1 -50 12 40.00
9 NS 3S E+1 -630 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.9 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 51,39 %
10 NS 2C N-1 -100 11 36.67
11 NS 6S W = -990 11 36.67
12 NS 3S N+2 660 11 36.67 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
a.8 Barbara Kengen -Andre Delacroix 43,61 %
13 NS 3P E+1 -170 27 90.00
14 NS 4P S+2 480 5 16.67
15 NS 2P S = 110 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
a.7 Jeannine Thys -Christiane Huby 55,00 %
16 NS 4P S+1 450 12 40.00
17 NS 3S N-1 -50 10 33.33
18 NS 3K E = -110 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.6 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm 51,39 %
19 NS 2S S-2 -100 6 20.00
20 NS 4P E+1 -650 14 46.67
21 NS 2P N-1 -100 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a.5 Jean Marie Schmiliver -Patrick Gilles 56,81 %
22 NS 2P N-1 -50 15 50.00
23 NS 4K N = 130 18 60.00
24 NS 4P E+1 -450 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 51,11 %
a.4 Francine Dozin -Brigitte de Fauconval 48,33 %
25 NS 4C N = 420 19 63.33
26 NS 3S N+1 630 9 30.00
27 NS 3K S-1 -50 9 30.00 µ Tbl = 41,11 %
Total : 333,0 / 720 = 46,25 %
PAIRE A.8 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson
a.6 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm 51,39 %
1 NS 3S E+1 -430 19 63.33
2 NS 3S W+2 -460 5 16.67
3 NS 4P S-1 -50 3 10.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
a.5 Jean Marie Schmiliver -Patrick Gilles 56,81 %
4 NS 3S N+1 630 11 36.67
5 NS 3C E = -140 3 10.00
6 NS 4P S-1 -50 12 40.00 µ Tbl = 28,89 %
a.4 Francine Dozin -Brigitte de Fauconval 48,33 %
7 NS 3S S+1 630 17 56.67
8 NS 4K S = 130 27 90.00
9 NS 3S E+2 -660 6 20.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 57,50 %
10 NS 4T S-1 -100 11 36.67
11 NS 6S W+1 -1020 3 10.00
12 NS 3S N+3 690 27 90.00 µ Tbl = 45,56 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Danielle Wybauw 50,56 %
13 NS 4P E = -620 15 50.00
14 NS 4P S+3 510 19 63.33
15 NS 2P S = 110 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.1 Lydia Luyten -Ghislain le Hardy de B. 51,81 %
16 NS 4P S+1 450 12 40.00
17 NS 3S S-2 -100 4 13.33
18 NS 3K E = -110 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 32,22 %
a.8 Barbara Kengen -Andre Delacroix 43,61 %
22 NS 2S W-1 100 24 80.00
23 NS 4K N = 130 18 60.00
24 NS 3S E = -400 25 83.33 µ Tbl = 74,44 %
a.7 Jeannine Thys -Christiane Huby 55,00 %
25 NS 5KcW-3 800 29 96.67
26 NS 3S N+1 630 9 30.00
27 NS 3T W = -110 1 3.33 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
Total : 329,0 / 720 = 45,69 %
PAIRE A.3 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger
a.5 Jean Marie Schmiliver -Patrick Gilles 56,81 %
1 NS 3S E+2 -460 10 33.33
2 NS 4C E = -420 23 76.67
3 NS 4P S-1 -50 3 10.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 57,50 %
7 NS 3T S+2 150 0 0.00
8 NS 5K S-2 -100 4 13.33
9 NS 3S W+1 -630 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Danielle Wybauw 50,56 %
10 NS 2C N+1 140 29 96.67
11 NS 3S W+3 -490 27 90.00
12 NS 3S N+2 660 11 36.67 µ Tbl = 74,44 %
a.1 Lydia Luyten -Ghislain le Hardy de B. 51,81 %
13 NS 4P W+1 -650 2 6.67
14 NS 5P S+2 510 19 63.33
15 NS 2P N = 110 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 41,11 %
a.9 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 51,39 %
16 NS 6C S = 980 30 100.00
17 NS 2S S-1 -50 10 33.33
18 NS 3K W = -110 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 58,89 %
a.8 Barbara Kengen -Andre Delacroix 43,61 %
19 NS 1P N+1 110 25 83.33
20 NS 4P E+1 -650 14 46.67
21 NS 2P N-1 -100 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a.7 Jeannine Thys -Christiane Huby 55,00 %
22 NS 2P N-1 -50 15 50.00
23 NS 5K N-2 -200 4 13.33
24 NS 4P E+2 -480 1 3.33 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
a.6 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm 51,39 %
25 NS 4C N-3 -150 1 3.33
26 NS 3S N+1 630 9 30.00
27 NS 1S E-1 50 23 76.67 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
Total : 321,0 / 720 = 44,58 %
PAIRE B.7 Helene Schyns -Michele Berrier
b.6 Benedicte Lemaigre -Nadine Blondeau 49,31 %
1 NS 3P W = -140 22 73.33
2 NS 4P E+1 -450 12 40.00
3 NS 4P S = 420 26 86.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
b.5 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 58,89 %
4 NS 3S S+1 630 11 36.67
5 NS 2P S-1 -100 9 30.00
6 NS 4P S-1 -50 12 40.00 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
b.4 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne 51,39 %
7 NS 3S S+1 630 17 56.67
8 NS 5KcS-2 -300 0 0.00
9 NS 3S E+2 -660 6 20.00 µ Tbl = 25,56 %
b.3 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Catherine de Moffarts 34,86 %
10 NS 3K E-1 100 23 76.67
11 NS 6K W = -920 17 56.67
12 NS 3S N+2 660 11 36.67 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
b.2 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 35,28 %
13 NS 4P E = -620 15 50.00
14 NS 4P S+3 510 19 63.33
15 NS 2P S = 110 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
b.1 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 59,86 %
16 NS 4P S+1 450 12 40.00
17 NS 3S S-2 -100 4 13.33
18 NS 3K W = -110 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 32,22 %
b.8 Marianne Borsu -Muriel de Ceuninck 45,69 %
19 NS 1S S = 90 19 63.33
20 NS 4P E+1 -650 14 46.67
21 NS 4T E-2 100 21 70.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
b.7 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren 48,33 %
22 NS 2P N-1 -50 15 50.00
23 NS 3PcE = -730 0 0.00
24 NS 3S E+2 -460 6 20.00 µ Tbl = 23,33 %
Total : 320,0 / 720 = 44,44 %
PAIRE A.6 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Colette Heerinckx
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Danielle Wybauw 50,56 %
1 NS 3S E+3 -490 1 3.33
2 NS 4P E+1 -450 12 40.00
3 NS 2P S+1 140 8 26.67 µ Tbl = 23,33 %
a.1 Lydia Luyten -Ghislain le Hardy de B. 51,81 %
4 NS 3S N+2 660 24 80.00
5 NS 3P S-1 -100 9 30.00
6 NS 4P S-1 -50 12 40.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.9 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 51,39 %
7 NS 3S S+1 630 17 56.67
8 NS 4K S-1 -50 12 40.00
9 NS 3S E+1 -630 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.8 Barbara Kengen -Andre Delacroix 43,61 %
10 NS 1P S-1 -100 11 36.67
11 NS 6S W+1 -1020 3 10.00
12 NS 3S N+2 660 11 36.67 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
a.6 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm 51,39 %
16 NS 4P S+1 450 12 40.00
17 NS 3S S = 400 21 70.00
18 NS 3K E = -110 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 51,11 %
a.5 Jean Marie Schmiliver -Patrick Gilles 56,81 %
19 NS 1S S = 90 19 63.33
20 NS 4P E+1 -650 14 46.67
21 NS 4P N-3 -300 1 3.33 µ Tbl = 37,78 %
a.4 Francine Dozin -Brigitte de Fauconval 48,33 %
22 NS 2P N-2 -100 4 13.33
23 NS 3P E-3 300 28 93.33
24 NS 3S E+1 -430 19 63.33 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 57,50 %
25 NS 3C N+1 170 5 16.67
26 NS 3S N+2 660 25 83.33
27 NS 1S E-1 50 23 76.67 µ Tbl = 58,89 %
Total : 320,0 / 720 = 44,44 %
PAIRE B.5 Grazia Neuenschwander -Nicole Leclere
b.2 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 35,28 %
1 NS 3S E-2 100 29 96.67
2 NS 4C E+1 -450 12 40.00
3 NS 2P S+2 170 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
b.1 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 59,86 %
4 NS 3S N = 600 1 3.33
5 NS 3C E = -140 3 10.00
6 NS 5T W = -600 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 4,44 %
b.8 Marianne Borsu -Muriel de Ceuninck 45,69 %
7 NS 3S S+1 630 17 56.67
8 NS 5K S-2 -100 4 13.33
9 NS 3S E+3 -690 1 3.33 µ Tbl = 24,44 %
b.7 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren 48,33 %
10 NS 2T S = 90 20 66.67
11 NS 3S W+4 -520 22 73.33
12 NS 3S N+2 660 11 36.67 µ Tbl = 58,89 %
b.6 Benedicte Lemaigre -Nadine Blondeau 49,31 %
13 NS 4P E = -620 15 50.00
14 NS 4P S+2 480 5 16.67
15 NS 2P S = 110 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
b.5 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 58,89 %
16 NS 4P S+1 450 12 40.00
17 NS 5K S-3 -150 0 0.00
18 NS 3K W = -110 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
b.4 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne 51,39 %
19 NS 2S N-2 -100 6 20.00
20 NS 4P E+1 -650 14 46.67
21 NS 3S E-2 100 21 70.00 µ Tbl = 45,56 %
b.3 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Catherine de Moffarts 34,86 %
22 NS 3K E-2 200 30 100.00
23 NS 3S S+1 630 30 100.00
24 NS 4P E = -420 22 73.33 µ Tbl = 91,11 %
Total : 318,0 / 720 = 44,17 %
PAIRE A.9 Liliane Baptista -Ghislaine Deschuyteneer
a.8 Barbara Kengen -Andre Delacroix 43,61 %
1 NS 3S E+3 -490 1 3.33
2 NS 4C E+1 -450 12 40.00
3 NS 4P S = 420 26 86.67 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
a.7 Jeannine Thys -Christiane Huby 55,00 %
4 NS 3S S+1 630 11 36.67
5 NS 4C E-1 50 17 56.67
6 NS 4P S-1 -50 12 40.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a.6 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm 51,39 %
7 NS 3S S+1 630 17 56.67
8 NS 5K S-1 -50 12 40.00
9 NS 3S E+1 -630 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.5 Jean Marie Schmiliver -Patrick Gilles 56,81 %
10 NS 2C N-1 -100 11 36.67
11 NS 6S W+1 -1020 3 10.00
12 NS 3S N+2 660 11 36.67 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
a.4 Francine Dozin -Brigitte de Fauconval 48,33 %
13 NS 4P E+1 -650 2 6.67
14 NS 4P S+2 480 5 16.67
15 NS 2P N-1 -100 1 3.33 µ Tbl = 8,89 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 57,50 %
16 NS 4P S = 420 0 0.00
17 NS 3S S = 400 21 70.00
18 NS 3K E = -110 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 37,78 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Danielle Wybauw 50,56 %
19 NS 2P N-2 -100 6 20.00
20 NS 4P E+1 -650 14 46.67
21 NS 3P N-2 -200 6 20.00 µ Tbl = 28,89 %
a.9 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 51,39 %
25 NS 4K W-2 200 9 30.00
26 NS 3S N+1 630 9 30.00
27 NS 2K S-1 -50 9 30.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
Total : 244,0 / 720 = 33,89 %
PAIRE b.1 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee
B.1 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 54,17 %
1 EO 3S E-1 50 5 16.67
2 EO 3S W+3 -490 30 100.00
3 EO 3KcE-2 500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
B.5 Grazia Neuenschwander -Nicole Leclere 44,17 %
4 EO 3S N = 600 29 96.67
5 EO 3C E = -140 27 90.00
6 EO 5T W = -600 30 100.00 µ Tbl = 95,56 %
B.2 Caroll Pucher -Annie Legrand 48,61 %
7 EO 4P N = 620 28 93.33
8 EO 4P W-1 50 10 33.33
9 EO 3S E+3 -690 29 96.67 µ Tbl = 74,44 %
B.6 Jean Verelst -Nicole Louette 61,94 %
10 EO 2C N-2 -200 29 96.67
11 EO 3S W+3 -490 3 10.00
12 EO 3S N+3 690 3 10.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
B.3 Daniel Kuczynski -Annie Zeimes 53,06 %
13 EO 5K N-1 -100 0 0.00
14 EO 4P S+3 510 11 36.67
15 EO 1S W = -90 26 86.67 µ Tbl = 41,11 %
B.7 Helene Schyns -Michele Berrier 44,44 %
16 EO 4P S+1 450 18 60.00
17 EO 3S S-2 -100 26 86.67
18 EO 3K W = -110 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 67,78 %
B.4 Noelle Fosse -Michel Paquot 54,44 %
19 EO 2K W-2 200 0 0.00
20 EO 4P E+1 -650 16 53.33
21 EO 3PcN-1 -200 24 80.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
B.8 Chantal de Locht -Marc Antoine de Halloy 55,56 %
22 EO 3P N-2 -100 26 86.67
23 EO 3K N = 110 20 66.67
24 EO 3S W+2 -460 24 80.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
Total : 431,0 / 720 = 59,86 %
PAIRE b.5 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker
B.3 Daniel Kuczynski -Annie Zeimes 53,06 %
1 EO 3S E+2 -460 20 66.67
2 EO 4C E+1 -450 18 60.00
3 EO 4P N-1 -50 27 90.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
B.7 Helene Schyns -Michele Berrier 44,44 %
4 EO 3S S+1 630 19 63.33
5 EO 2P S-1 -100 21 70.00
6 EO 4P S-1 -50 18 60.00 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
B.4 Noelle Fosse -Michel Paquot 54,44 %
7 EO 3S S+1 630 13 43.33
8 EO 4P W-1 50 10 33.33
9 EO 3S W-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,56 %
B.8 Chantal de Locht -Marc Antoine de Halloy 55,56 %
10 EO 3T S-1 -100 19 63.33
11 EO 6S W = -990 19 63.33
12 EO 3S N+2 660 19 63.33 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
B.1 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 54,17 %
13 EO 3P E+1 -170 3 10.00
14 EO 4P S+3 510 11 36.67
15 EO 2P S = 110 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 31,11 %
B.5 Grazia Neuenschwander -Nicole Leclere 44,17 %
16 EO 4P S+1 450 18 60.00
17 EO 5K S-3 -150 30 100.00
18 EO 3K W = -110 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
B.2 Caroll Pucher -Annie Legrand 48,61 %
19 EO 2S S-4 -200 30 100.00
20 EO 4P E+1 -650 16 53.33
21 EO 2P N-2 -200 24 80.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
B.6 Jean Verelst -Nicole Louette 61,94 %
22 EO 2P N-1 -50 15 50.00
23 EO 3S S-2 -200 26 86.67
24 EO 4P E+1 -450 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
Total : 424,0 / 720 = 58,89 %
PAIRE a.3 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens
A.7 Stan Tabor -Philippe van der Gracht 63,06 %
4 EO 3S N+1 630 19 63.33
5 EO 2S W-1 50 13 43.33
6 EO 4P S = 420 3 10.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.3 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 44,58 %
7 EO 3T S+2 150 30 100.00
8 EO 5K S-2 -100 26 86.67
9 EO 3S W+1 -630 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
A.8 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 45,69 %
10 EO 4T S-1 -100 19 63.33
11 EO 6S W+1 -1020 27 90.00
12 EO 3S N+3 690 3 10.00 µ Tbl = 54,44 %
A.4 Marie Claire Vienne -Sandra Dallemagne 55,00 %
13 EO 4P E+1 -650 28 93.33
14 EO 4P S+3 510 11 36.67
15 EO 2P S = 110 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 58,89 %
A.9 Liliane Baptista -Ghislaine Deschuyteneer 33,89 %
16 EO 4P S = 420 30 100.00
17 EO 3S S = 400 9 30.00
18 EO 3K E = -110 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 62,22 %
A.5 Myriam de Timary -Eliane de Ceuninck 49,72 %
19 EO 2T E+1 -110 28 93.33
20 EO 4P E+1 -650 16 53.33
21 EO 3K W = -110 19 63.33 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette Jourdain 50,97 %
22 EO 1S S-1 -50 15 50.00
23 EO 3K N+1 130 12 40.00
24 EO 3S E+2 -460 24 80.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
A.6 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Colette Heerinckx 44,44 %
25 EO 3C N+1 170 25 83.33
26 EO 3S N+2 660 5 16.67
27 EO 1S E-1 50 7 23.33 µ Tbl = 41,11 %
Total : 414,0 / 720 = 57,50 %
PAIRE a.5 Jean Marie Schmiliver -Patrick Gilles
A.3 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 44,58 %
1 EO 3S E+2 -460 20 66.67
2 EO 4C E = -420 7 23.33
3 EO 4P S-1 -50 27 90.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A.8 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 45,69 %
4 EO 3S N+1 630 19 63.33
5 EO 3C E = -140 27 90.00
6 EO 4P S-1 -50 18 60.00 µ Tbl = 71,11 %
A.9 Liliane Baptista -Ghislaine Deschuyteneer 33,89 %
10 EO 2C N-1 -100 19 63.33
11 EO 6S W+1 -1020 27 90.00
12 EO 3S N+2 660 19 63.33 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
A.5 Myriam de Timary -Eliane de Ceuninck 49,72 %
13 EO 4P W = -620 15 50.00
14 EO 4P S+3 510 11 36.67
15 EO 2P S = 110 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette Jourdain 50,97 %
16 EO 4P S+1 450 18 60.00
17 EO 3S S-2 -100 26 86.67
18 EO 3P W-2 100 3 10.00 µ Tbl = 52,22 %
A.6 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Colette Heerinckx 44,44 %
19 EO 1S S = 90 11 36.67
20 EO 4P E+1 -650 16 53.33
21 EO 4P N-3 -300 29 96.67 µ Tbl = 62,22 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Giuseppe Napoli 46,25 %
22 EO 2P N-1 -50 15 50.00
23 EO 4K N = 130 12 40.00
24 EO 4P E+1 -450 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 48,89 %
A.7 Stan Tabor -Philippe van der Gracht 63,06 %
25 EO 4C N = 420 11 36.67
26 EO 3S N+1 630 21 70.00
27 EO 3P W-1 50 7 23.33 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
Total : 409,0 / 720 = 56,81 %
PAIRE a.7 Jeannine Thys -Christiane Huby
A.4 Marie Claire Vienne -Sandra Dallemagne 55,00 %
1 EO 3S W+2 -460 20 66.67
2 EO 4C E = -420 7 23.33
3 EO 4P S-1 -50 27 90.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A.9 Liliane Baptista -Ghislaine Deschuyteneer 33,89 %
4 EO 3S S+1 630 19 63.33
5 EO 4C E-1 50 13 43.33
6 EO 4P S-1 -50 18 60.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A.5 Myriam de Timary -Eliane de Ceuninck 49,72 %
7 EO 3S S+1 630 13 43.33
8 EO 5K S-2 -100 26 86.67
9 EO 3S W = -600 3 10.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette Jourdain 50,97 %
10 EO 3T S = 110 4 13.33
11 EO 6S E = -990 19 63.33
12 EO 3S N+2 660 19 63.33 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Giuseppe Napoli 46,25 %
16 EO 4P S+1 450 18 60.00
17 EO 3S N-1 -50 20 66.67
18 EO 3K E = -110 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.7 Stan Tabor -Philippe van der Gracht 63,06 %
19 EO 1P N = 80 14 46.67
20 EO 4P E+1 -650 16 53.33
21 EO 3P N = 140 2 6.67 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
A.3 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 44,58 %
22 EO 2P N-1 -50 15 50.00
23 EO 5K N-2 -200 26 86.67
24 EO 4P E+2 -480 29 96.67 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
A.8 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 45,69 %
25 EO 5KcW-3 800 1 3.33
26 EO 3S N+1 630 21 70.00
27 EO 3T W = -110 29 96.67 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
Total : 396,0 / 720 = 55,00 %
PAIRE a.1 Lydia Luyten -Ghislain le Hardy de B.
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette Jourdain 50,97 %
1 EO 3S E+1 -430 11 36.67
2 EO 3S W+2 -460 25 83.33
3 EO 3P S+1 170 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 57,78 %
A.6 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Colette Heerinckx 44,44 %
4 EO 3S N+2 660 6 20.00
5 EO 3P S-1 -100 21 70.00
6 EO 4P S-1 -50 18 60.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Giuseppe Napoli 46,25 %
7 EO 3S S+1 630 13 43.33
8 EO 4K S-1 -50 18 60.00
9 EO 3S E+1 -630 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.7 Stan Tabor -Philippe van der Gracht 63,06 %
10 EO 2C N-2 -200 29 96.67
11 EO 3S W+4 -520 8 26.67
12 EO 3S N+3 690 3 10.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.3 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 44,58 %
13 EO 4P W+1 -650 28 93.33
14 EO 5P S+2 510 11 36.67
15 EO 2P N = 110 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 58,89 %
A.8 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 45,69 %
16 EO 4P S+1 450 18 60.00
17 EO 3S S-2 -100 26 86.67
18 EO 3K E = -110 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 67,78 %
A.4 Marie Claire Vienne -Sandra Dallemagne 55,00 %
19 EO 1P N+1 110 5 16.67
20 EO 4P E+1 -650 16 53.33
21 EO 3K W = -110 19 63.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.5 Myriam de Timary -Eliane de Ceuninck 49,72 %
25 EO 4C N = 420 11 36.67
26 EO 3S N+2 660 5 16.67
27 EO 1S S-1 -50 21 70.00 µ Tbl = 41,11 %
Total : 373,0 / 720 = 51,81 %
PAIRE a.6 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm
A.8 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 45,69 %
1 EO 3S E+1 -430 11 36.67
2 EO 3S W+2 -460 25 83.33
3 EO 4P S-1 -50 27 90.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
A.4 Marie Claire Vienne -Sandra Dallemagne 55,00 %
4 EO 3S N+2 660 6 20.00
5 EO 2P S = 110 1 3.33
6 EO 4PcS = 590 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 7,78 %
A.9 Liliane Baptista -Ghislaine Deschuyteneer 33,89 %
7 EO 3S S+1 630 13 43.33
8 EO 5K S-1 -50 18 60.00
9 EO 3S E+1 -630 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette Jourdain 50,97 %
13 EO 4P E = -620 15 50.00
14 EO 4P S+2 480 25 83.33
15 EO 2P S = 110 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A.6 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Colette Heerinckx 44,44 %
16 EO 4P S+1 450 18 60.00
17 EO 3S S = 400 9 30.00
18 EO 3K E = -110 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 48,89 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Giuseppe Napoli 46,25 %
19 EO 2S S-2 -100 24 80.00
20 EO 4P E+1 -650 16 53.33
21 EO 2P N-1 -100 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A.7 Stan Tabor -Philippe van der Gracht 63,06 %
22 EO 2P N = 110 3 10.00
23 EO 3S S-2 -200 26 86.67
24 EO 4P E+1 -450 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 51,11 %
A.3 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 44,58 %
25 EO 4C N-3 -150 29 96.67
26 EO 3S N+1 630 21 70.00
27 EO 1S E-1 50 7 23.33 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
Total : 370,0 / 720 = 51,39 %
PAIRE b.4 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne
B.6 Jean Verelst -Nicole Louette 61,94 %
1 EO 3S E+2 -460 20 66.67
2 EO 4P E = -420 7 23.33
3 EO 4T E-3 300 8 26.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
B.3 Daniel Kuczynski -Annie Zeimes 53,06 %
4 EO 3S N+1 630 19 63.33
5 EO 3C E-1 50 13 43.33
6 EO 4P S-1 -50 18 60.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
B.7 Helene Schyns -Michele Berrier 44,44 %
7 EO 3S S+1 630 13 43.33
8 EO 5KcS-2 -300 30 100.00
9 EO 3S E+2 -660 24 80.00 µ Tbl = 74,44 %
B.4 Noelle Fosse -Michel Paquot 54,44 %
10 EO 2C N+1 140 1 3.33
11 EO 3S W+4 -520 8 26.67
12 EO 3S N+2 660 19 63.33 µ Tbl = 31,11 %
B.8 Chantal de Locht -Marc Antoine de Halloy 55,56 %
13 EO 4P W = -620 15 50.00
14 EO 4P N+2 480 25 83.33
15 EO 1S S+1 120 2 6.67 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
B.1 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 54,17 %
16 EO 4P S+1 450 18 60.00
17 EO 3S S-1 -50 20 66.67
18 EO 3K W = -110 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
B.5 Grazia Neuenschwander -Nicole Leclere 44,17 %
19 EO 2S N-2 -100 24 80.00
20 EO 4P E+1 -650 16 53.33
21 EO 3S E-2 100 9 30.00 µ Tbl = 54,44 %
B.2 Caroll Pucher -Annie Legrand 48,61 %
22 EO 2P N = 110 3 10.00
23 EO 3K N+1 130 12 40.00
24 EO 4P E+2 -480 29 96.67 µ Tbl = 48,89 %
Total : 370,0 / 720 = 51,39 %
PAIRE a.9 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille
A.5 Myriam de Timary -Eliane de Ceuninck 49,72 %
1 EO 3S E+2 -460 20 66.67
2 EO 4C E+2 -480 28 93.33
3 EO 2P S+2 170 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 71,11 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette Jourdain 50,97 %
4 EO 3S N+1 630 19 63.33
5 EO 4C E-1 50 13 43.33
6 EO 4P S = 420 3 10.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.6 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Colette Heerinckx 44,44 %
7 EO 3S S+1 630 13 43.33
8 EO 4K S-1 -50 18 60.00
9 EO 3S E+1 -630 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Giuseppe Napoli 46,25 %
10 EO 2C N-1 -100 19 63.33
11 EO 6S W = -990 19 63.33
12 EO 3S N+2 660 19 63.33 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
A.7 Stan Tabor -Philippe van der Gracht 63,06 %
13 EO 4P E = -620 15 50.00
14 EO 6P S = 980 1 3.33
15 EO 3P S = 140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 17,78 %
A.3 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 44,58 %
16 EO 6C S = 980 0 0.00
17 EO 2S S-1 -50 20 66.67
18 EO 3K W = -110 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 41,11 %
A.4 Marie Claire Vienne -Sandra Dallemagne 55,00 %
22 EO 3P N-3 -150 30 100.00
23 EO 4K N = 130 12 40.00
24 EO 3S E+1 -430 11 36.67 µ Tbl = 58,89 %
A.9 Liliane Baptista -Ghislaine Deschuyteneer 33,89 %
25 EO 4K W-2 200 21 70.00
26 EO 3S N+1 630 21 70.00
27 EO 2K S-1 -50 21 70.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
Total : 370,0 / 720 = 51,39 %
PAIRE a.2 Dominique Sassen -Danielle Wybauw
A.6 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Colette Heerinckx 44,44 %
1 EO 3S E+3 -490 29 96.67
2 EO 4P E+1 -450 18 60.00
3 EO 2P S+1 140 22 73.33 µ Tbl = 76,67 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Giuseppe Napoli 46,25 %
4 EO 3S N+2 660 6 20.00
5 EO 3C E-1 50 13 43.33
6 EO 4P S-1 -50 18 60.00 µ Tbl = 41,11 %
A.7 Stan Tabor -Philippe van der Gracht 63,06 %
7 EO 3S S+1 630 13 43.33
8 EO 5PcW-3 500 0 0.00
9 EO 3S E+1 -630 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
A.3 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 44,58 %
10 EO 2C N+1 140 1 3.33
11 EO 3S W+3 -490 3 10.00
12 EO 3S N+2 660 19 63.33 µ Tbl = 25,56 %
A.8 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 45,69 %
13 EO 4P E = -620 15 50.00
14 EO 4P S+3 510 11 36.67
15 EO 2P S = 110 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.4 Marie Claire Vienne -Sandra Dallemagne 55,00 %
16 EO 4P S+1 450 18 60.00
17 EO 2P N+2 170 14 46.67
18 EO 3K E = -110 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 54,44 %
A.9 Liliane Baptista -Ghislaine Deschuyteneer 33,89 %
19 EO 2P N-2 -100 24 80.00
20 EO 4P E+1 -650 16 53.33
21 EO 3P N-2 -200 24 80.00 µ Tbl = 71,11 %
A.5 Myriam de Timary -Eliane de Ceuninck 49,72 %
22 EO 2P N-2 -100 26 86.67
23 EO 4K N = 130 12 40.00
24 EO 4P E+1 -450 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 364,0 / 720 = 50,56 %
PAIRE b.6 Benedicte Lemaigre -Nadine Blondeau
B.7 Helene Schyns -Michele Berrier 44,44 %
1 EO 3P W = -140 8 26.67
2 EO 4P E+1 -450 18 60.00
3 EO 4P S = 420 4 13.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
B.4 Noelle Fosse -Michel Paquot 54,44 %
4 EO 3S N = 600 29 96.67
5 EO 3S W = -400 30 100.00
6 EO 4P S-2 -100 28 93.33 µ Tbl = 96,67 %
B.8 Chantal de Locht -Marc Antoine de Halloy 55,56 %
7 EO 3S S+1 630 13 43.33
8 EO 5K S-1 -50 18 60.00
9 EO 4P W = -620 6 20.00 µ Tbl = 41,11 %
B.1 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 54,17 %
10 EO 2C N-1 -100 19 63.33
11 EO 6K W = -920 13 43.33
12 EO 3S N+2 660 19 63.33 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
B.5 Grazia Neuenschwander -Nicole Leclere 44,17 %
13 EO 4P E = -620 15 50.00
14 EO 4P S+2 480 25 83.33
15 EO 2P S = 110 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
B.2 Caroll Pucher -Annie Legrand 48,61 %
16 EO 4P S+2 480 4 13.33
17 EO 3S S+1 430 5 16.67
18 EO 3K E = -110 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 28,89 %
B.6 Jean Verelst -Nicole Louette 61,94 %
19 EO 2P N-1 -50 18 60.00
20 EO 4P E+1 -650 16 53.33
21 EO 2P N+1 140 2 6.67 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
B.3 Daniel Kuczynski -Annie Zeimes 53,06 %
22 EO 1S W = -90 22 73.33
23 EO 3K N+1 130 12 40.00
24 EO 6P E-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,78 %
Total : 355,0 / 720 = 49,31 %
PAIRE a.4 Francine Dozin -Brigitte de Fauconval
A.7 Stan Tabor -Philippe van der Gracht 63,06 %
1 EO 3S E+2 -460 20 66.67
2 EO 4P E = -420 7 23.33
3 EO 4P S = 420 4 13.33 µ Tbl = 34,44 %
A.8 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 45,69 %
7 EO 3S S+1 630 13 43.33
8 EO 4K S = 130 3 10.00
9 EO 3S E+2 -660 24 80.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.4 Marie Claire Vienne -Sandra Dallemagne 55,00 %
10 EO 3K E-1 100 7 23.33
11 EO 6S W = -990 19 63.33
12 EO 3S N+2 660 19 63.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.9 Liliane Baptista -Ghislaine Deschuyteneer 33,89 %
13 EO 4P E+1 -650 28 93.33
14 EO 4P S+2 480 25 83.33
15 EO 2P N-1 -100 29 96.67 µ Tbl = 91,11 %
A.5 Myriam de Timary -Eliane de Ceuninck 49,72 %
16 EO 4P S+1 450 18 60.00
17 EO 3S S+1 430 5 16.67
18 EO 2C W-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,56 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette Jourdain 50,97 %
19 EO 2P N = 110 5 16.67
20 EO 4P E+1 -650 16 53.33
21 EO 2P N-1 -100 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.6 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Colette Heerinckx 44,44 %
22 EO 2P N-2 -100 26 86.67
23 EO 3P E-3 300 2 6.67
24 EO 3S E+1 -430 11 36.67 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Giuseppe Napoli 46,25 %
25 EO 4C N = 420 11 36.67
26 EO 3S N+1 630 21 70.00
27 EO 3K S-1 -50 21 70.00 µ Tbl = 58,89 %
Total : 348,0 / 720 = 48,33 %
PAIRE b.7 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren
B.4 Noelle Fosse -Michel Paquot 54,44 %
1 EO 3S E+2 -460 20 66.67
2 EO 4C E = -420 7 23.33
3 EO 2P S+2 170 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 47,78 %
B.8 Chantal de Locht -Marc Antoine de Halloy 55,56 %
4 EO 3S N+1 630 19 63.33
5 EO 4C E-2 100 5 16.67
6 EO 4P S-1 -50 18 60.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
B.1 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 54,17 %
7 EO 3S S+1 630 13 43.33
8 EO 4K S-1 -50 18 60.00
9 EO 3S W = -600 3 10.00 µ Tbl = 37,78 %
B.5 Grazia Neuenschwander -Nicole Leclere 44,17 %
10 EO 2T S = 90 10 33.33
11 EO 3S W+4 -520 8 26.67
12 EO 3S N+2 660 19 63.33 µ Tbl = 41,11 %
B.2 Caroll Pucher -Annie Legrand 48,61 %
13 EO 4P E = -620 15 50.00
14 EO 4P S+2 480 25 83.33
15 EO 2P S = 110 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
B.6 Jean Verelst -Nicole Louette 61,94 %
16 EO 4P S+2 480 4 13.33
17 EO 2S S+2 180 12 40.00
18 EO 3P W-2 100 3 10.00 µ Tbl = 21,11 %
B.3 Daniel Kuczynski -Annie Zeimes 53,06 %
19 EO 2C N = 110 5 16.67
20 EO 4P E+1 -650 16 53.33
21 EO 4P N-3 -300 29 96.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
B.7 Helene Schyns -Michele Berrier 44,44 %
22 EO 2P N-1 -50 15 50.00
23 EO 3PcE = -730 30 100.00
24 EO 3S E+2 -460 24 80.00 µ Tbl = 76,67 %
Total : 348,0 / 720 = 48,33 %
PAIRE b.8 Marianne Borsu -Muriel de Ceuninck
B.8 Chantal de Locht -Marc Antoine de Halloy 55,56 %
1 EO 3S W-1 50 5 16.67
2 EO 2S W+2 -180 0 0.00
3 EO 3K E-2 200 10 33.33 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
B.1 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 54,17 %
4 EO 3S N+2 660 6 20.00
5 EO 2S W = -120 24 80.00
6 EO 4P S-1 -50 18 60.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
B.5 Grazia Neuenschwander -Nicole Leclere 44,17 %
7 EO 3S S+1 630 13 43.33
8 EO 5K S-2 -100 26 86.67
9 EO 3S E+3 -690 29 96.67 µ Tbl = 75,56 %
B.2 Caroll Pucher -Annie Legrand 48,61 %
10 EO 3T S-1 -100 19 63.33
11 EO 6S W+1 -1020 27 90.00
12 EO 3S N+2 660 19 63.33 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
B.6 Jean Verelst -Nicole Louette 61,94 %
13 EO 4P E = -620 15 50.00
14 EO 6P S = 980 1 3.33
15 EO 2P S = 110 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
B.3 Daniel Kuczynski -Annie Zeimes 53,06 %
16 EO 4P S+2 480 4 13.33
17 EO 2K S+2 130 16 53.33
18 EO 4TcN-2 -500 30 100.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
B.7 Helene Schyns -Michele Berrier 44,44 %
19 EO 1S S = 90 11 36.67
20 EO 4P E+1 -650 16 53.33
21 EO 4T E-2 100 9 30.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
B.4 Noelle Fosse -Michel Paquot 54,44 %
22 EO 1P N = 80 8 26.67
23 EO 4K N+2 170 4 13.33
24 EO 3S W = -400 5 16.67 µ Tbl = 18,89 %
Total : 329,0 / 720 = 45,69 %
PAIRE a.8 Barbara Kengen -Andre Delacroix
A.9 Liliane Baptista -Ghislaine Deschuyteneer 33,89 %
1 EO 3S E+3 -490 29 96.67
2 EO 4C E+1 -450 18 60.00
3 EO 4P S = 420 4 13.33 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
A.5 Myriam de Timary -Eliane de Ceuninck 49,72 %
4 EO 3S S+1 630 19 63.33
5 EO 2P S = 110 1 3.33
6 EO 4P S-1 -50 18 60.00 µ Tbl = 42,22 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette Jourdain 50,97 %
7 EO 3S S+1 630 13 43.33
8 EO 4P W-1 50 10 33.33
9 EO 3S E+1 -630 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 41,11 %
A.6 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Colette Heerinckx 44,44 %
10 EO 1P S-1 -100 19 63.33
11 EO 6S W+1 -1020 27 90.00
12 EO 3S N+2 660 19 63.33 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Giuseppe Napoli 46,25 %
13 EO 3P E+1 -170 3 10.00
14 EO 4P S+2 480 25 83.33
15 EO 2P S = 110 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
A.3 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 44,58 %
19 EO 1P N+1 110 5 16.67
20 EO 4P E+1 -650 16 53.33
21 EO 2P N-1 -100 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.8 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 45,69 %
22 EO 2S W-1 100 6 20.00
23 EO 4K N = 130 12 40.00
24 EO 3S E = -400 5 16.67 µ Tbl = 25,56 %
A.4 Marie Claire Vienne -Sandra Dallemagne 55,00 %
25 EO 4C N = 420 11 36.67
26 EO 3S N+2 660 5 16.67
27 EO 2S E-1 50 7 23.33 µ Tbl = 25,56 %
Total : 314,0 / 720 = 43,61 %
PAIRE b.2 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck
B.5 Grazia Neuenschwander -Nicole Leclere 44,17 %
1 EO 3S E-2 100 1 3.33
2 EO 4C E+1 -450 18 60.00
3 EO 2P S+2 170 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
B.2 Caroll Pucher -Annie Legrand 48,61 %
4 EO 3S N+3 690 0 0.00
5 EO 3C E-1 50 13 43.33
6 EO 3P S = 140 7 23.33 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
B.6 Jean Verelst -Nicole Louette 61,94 %
7 EO 3S S+1 630 13 43.33
8 EO 3P W-2 100 6 20.00
9 EO 3S E+2 -660 24 80.00 µ Tbl = 47,78 %
B.3 Daniel Kuczynski -Annie Zeimes 53,06 %
10 EO 1S N-1 -100 19 63.33
11 EO 3K W+2 -150 0 0.00
12 EO 3S N+3 690 3 10.00 µ Tbl = 24,44 %
B.7 Helene Schyns -Michele Berrier 44,44 %
13 EO 4P E = -620 15 50.00
14 EO 4P S+3 510 11 36.67
15 EO 2P S = 110 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
B.4 Noelle Fosse -Michel Paquot 54,44 %
16 EO 4P S+1 450 18 60.00
17 EO 3CcE-4 800 0 0.00
18 EO 3K E = -110 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
B.8 Chantal de Locht -Marc Antoine de Halloy 55,56 %
19 EO 2P N-1 -50 18 60.00
20 EO 4P E = -620 0 0.00
21 EO 2P N+1 140 2 6.67 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
B.1 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 54,17 %
22 EO 2P N-1 -50 15 50.00
23 EO 3S S-1 -100 22 73.33
24 EO 3S E-1 50 2 6.67 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
Total : 254,0 / 720 = 35,28 %
PAIRE b.3 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Catherine de Moffarts
B.2 Caroll Pucher -Annie Legrand 48,61 %
1 EO 3S W-2 100 1 3.33
2 EO 4P E = -420 7 23.33
3 EO 3P S+1 170 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 26,67 %
B.6 Jean Verelst -Nicole Louette 61,94 %
4 EO 3S N+2 660 6 20.00
5 EO 3C E-2 100 5 16.67
6 EO 3P S = 140 7 23.33 µ Tbl = 20,00 %
B.3 Daniel Kuczynski -Annie Zeimes 53,06 %
7 EO 3S N+1 630 13 43.33
8 EO 4K S = 130 3 10.00
9 EO 3S E+1 -630 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
B.7 Helene Schyns -Michele Berrier 44,44 %
10 EO 3K E-1 100 7 23.33
11 EO 6K W = -920 13 43.33
12 EO 3S N+2 660 19 63.33 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
B.4 Noelle Fosse -Michel Paquot 54,44 %
13 EO 4P E = -620 15 50.00
14 EO 4P S+3 510 11 36.67
15 EO 3P S-1 -100 29 96.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
B.8 Chantal de Locht -Marc Antoine de Halloy 55,56 %
16 EO 4P S+1 450 18 60.00
17 EO 3S S+2 460 2 6.67
18 EO 3K W = -110 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 41,11 %
B.1 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 54,17 %
19 EO 2P N-1 -50 18 60.00
20 EO 4P E+1 -650 16 53.33
21 EO 2P N = 110 6 20.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
B.5 Grazia Neuenschwander -Nicole Leclere 44,17 %
22 EO 3K E-2 200 0 0.00
23 EO 3S S+1 630 0 0.00
24 EO 4P E = -420 8 26.67 µ Tbl = 8,89 %
Total : 251,0 / 720 = 34,86 %
|