B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 70,83 A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor
--- 2 63,07 A11 Mercedes Steed -Benoit Ortegat
--- 3 62,69 A.8 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten
--- 4 62,12 A13 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Jacqueline de Thier
--- 5 56,06 A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Nicole Leclere
--- 6 54,17 A12 Efthalia Bogaerts -Claire Rolin
--- 7 53,98 A.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Myriam de Timary
--- 8 53,79 A.2 Annette Fobe -Colette Heerinckx
--- 9 50,76 A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
--- 10 46,21 A.7 Pascale Ortegat -Teresa Dekoster
--- 11 45,27 A.9 Marianne Falla -Patrick Gilles
--- 12 44,70 A14 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Catherine de Moffarts
--- 13 32,95 A.3 Claire Derieuw -Caroll Pucher
--- 14 27,65 A15 Francine Belet -Jacques Podevyn
--- 15 25,76 A10 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 60,61 a.7 Jeannine Thys -Christiane Huby
--- 2 60,61 a15 Jean Chabotier -Michel Paquot
--- 3 58,52 a.6 Dilva Haym -Serge Alard
--- 4 57,01 a.1 Noelle Fosse -Jean Marie Schmiliver
--- 5 55,87 a.9 Lydia Luyten -Jean de Villenfagne
--- 6 51,33 a.2 Liliane Baptista -Lydia Wildiers
--- 7 49,24 a13 Michel Lievens -Didier Collart
--- 8 48,11 a.5 Danielle Wybauw -Dominique Sassen
--- 9 47,54 a14 Francoise Turin -Brigitte Velge
--- 10 47,35 a11 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne
--- 11 46,40 a.3 Helene Christiaens -Gerard Cooreman
--- 12 43,75 a.8 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille
--- 13 43,37 a.4 Aida Zumot -Marie J. de Wagheneire
--- 14 40,53 a10 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger
--- 15 39,77 a12 Jan Sassen -Edith Close
PAIRE A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor
a.4 Aida Zumot -Marie J. de Wagheneire 43,37 %
7 NS 4T W = -130 18 81.82
8 NS 2CcE-3 500 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
a.3 Helene Christiaens -Gerard Cooreman 46,40 %
9 NS 4P N+2 480 8 36.36
10 NS 3T N = 110 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.2 Liliane Baptista -Lydia Wildiers 51,33 %
11 NS 5P E-1 50 15 68.18
12 NS 3S S = 600 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a.1 Noelle Fosse -Jean Marie Schmiliver 57,01 %
13 NS 3S E+1 -630 11 50.00
14 NS 2K S = 90 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a15 Jean Chabotier -Michel Paquot 60,61 %
15 NS 3S E = -400 15 68.18
16 NS 5P N = 450 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a14 Francoise Turin -Brigitte Velge 47,54 %
17 NS 3T W+3 -170 12 54.55
18 NS 1S E = -90 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a13 Michel Lievens -Didier Collart 49,24 %
19 NS 3C N-1 -50 22 100.00
20 NS 3S W-2 200 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
a12 Jan Sassen -Edith Close 39,77 %
21 NS 3S N = 600 14 63.64
22 NS 3P E+1 -170 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a11 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne 47,35 %
23 NS 3S S+1 630 22 100.00
24 NS 4T N-2 -100 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
a10 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 40,53 %
25 NS 3S E-1 100 18 81.82
26 NS 3S S+2 660 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
a.9 Lydia Luyten -Jean de Villenfagne 55,87 %
27 NS 2P S = 110 17 77.27
28 NS 4K N-2 -200 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a.8 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 43,75 %
29 NS 1S S+3 180 19 86.36
30 NS 3P E = -140 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
Total : 374,0 / 528 = 70,83 %
PAIRE A11 Mercedes Steed -Benoit Ortegat
a.6 Dilva Haym -Serge Alard 58,52 %
1 NS 6S S+1 1020 20 90.91
2 NS 3S W-1 50 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
a.5 Danielle Wybauw -Dominique Sassen 48,11 %
3 NS 2C W-2 200 17 77.27
4 NS 1C N-1 -100 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.4 Aida Zumot -Marie J. de Wagheneire 43,37 %
5 NS 4P N-1 -100 5 22.73
6 NS 5K E-2 200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a.3 Helene Christiaens -Gerard Cooreman 46,40 %
7 NS 3S E+1 -630 7 31.82
8 NS 3S N = 400 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.2 Liliane Baptista -Lydia Wildiers 51,33 %
9 NS 4P S+2 480 8 36.36
10 NS 3T N = 110 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.1 Noelle Fosse -Jean Marie Schmiliver 57,01 %
11 NS 5C S = 450 19 86.36
12 NS 3S S = 600 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a15 Jean Chabotier -Michel Paquot 60,61 %
13 NS 3S E+1 -630 11 50.00
14 NS 3K S-2 -100 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a11 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne 47,35 %
21 NS 3S N+2 660 22 100.00
22 NS 4P E+2 -680 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a10 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 40,53 %
23 NS 4P N = 620 11 50.00
24 NS 3T N-1 -50 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a.9 Lydia Luyten -Jean de Villenfagne 55,87 %
25 NS 3S E-1 100 18 81.82
26 NS 3S N+2 660 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
a.8 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 43,75 %
27 NS 2P N+1 140 22 100.00
28 NS 4P E-1 50 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 95,45 %
a.7 Jeannine Thys -Christiane Huby 60,61 %
29 NS 1S S+2 150 11 50.00
30 NS 2P E+2 -170 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
Total : 333,0 / 528 = 63,07 %
PAIRE A.8 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten
a15 Jean Chabotier -Michel Paquot 60,61 %
1 NS 6S S = 990 14 63.64
2 NS 3S W = -400 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a14 Francoise Turin -Brigitte Velge 47,54 %
3 NS 2C W-2 200 17 77.27
4 NS 3S E-3 300 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
a13 Michel Lievens -Didier Collart 49,24 %
5 NS 3S S+3 690 22 100.00
6 NS 4C W = -620 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a12 Jan Sassen -Edith Close 39,77 %
7 NS 1S E+2 -150 14 63.64
8 NS 3P S = 140 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a.8 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 43,75 %
15 NS 3S W-1 50 22 100.00
16 NS 4P N = 420 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a.7 Jeannine Thys -Christiane Huby 60,61 %
17 NS 3T W+2 -150 17 77.27
18 NS 1S E+2 -150 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.6 Dilva Haym -Serge Alard 58,52 %
19 NS 3C N-2 -100 20 90.91
20 NS 3S W-2 200 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
a.5 Danielle Wybauw -Dominique Sassen 48,11 %
21 NS 3S N-1 -100 3 13.64
22 NS 4P E-1 100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.4 Aida Zumot -Marie J. de Wagheneire 43,37 %
23 NS 4P N = 620 11 50.00
24 NS 3K W-1 50 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a.3 Helene Christiaens -Gerard Cooreman 46,40 %
25 NS 3S E+1 -630 0 0.00
26 NS 3S N = 600 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a.2 Liliane Baptista -Lydia Wildiers 51,33 %
27 NS 2P S = 110 17 77.27
28 NS Pass Passe 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a.1 Noelle Fosse -Jean Marie Schmiliver 57,01 %
29 NS 1S S+3 180 19 86.36
30 NS 2P E+1 -140 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
Total : 331,0 / 528 = 62,69 %
PAIRE A13 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Jacqueline de Thier
a10 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 40,53 %
1 NS 3S S+4 520 9 40.91
2 NS 3S W-1 50 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a.9 Lydia Luyten -Jean de Villenfagne 55,87 %
3 NS 2C W-2 200 17 77.27
4 NS 3T W = -110 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.8 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 43,75 %
5 NS 4P N+1 650 20 90.91
6 NS 5K E-1 100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
a.7 Jeannine Thys -Christiane Huby 60,61 %
7 NS 4T W-1 100 22 100.00
8 NS 3S N = 400 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
a.6 Dilva Haym -Serge Alard 58,52 %
9 NS 5CcE-2 500 16 72.73
10 NS 2S S-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.5 Danielle Wybauw -Dominique Sassen 48,11 %
11 NS 5C S = 450 19 86.36
12 NS 3S N+1 630 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
a.4 Aida Zumot -Marie J. de Wagheneire 43,37 %
13 NS 3S E+1 -630 11 50.00
14 NS 3K S = 110 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a.3 Helene Christiaens -Gerard Cooreman 46,40 %
15 NS 3S E = -400 15 68.18
16 NS 6S S-1 -50 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.2 Liliane Baptista -Lydia Wildiers 51,33 %
17 NS 5T W+1 -420 5 22.73
18 NS 2P N-1 -100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a13 Michel Lievens -Didier Collart 49,24 %
25 NS 2K W+2 -130 12 54.55
26 NS 3S N = 600 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a12 Jan Sassen -Edith Close 39,77 %
27 NS 2P S-1 -50 4 18.18
28 NS 4P E-1 50 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a11 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne 47,35 %
29 NS 1S S+2 150 11 50.00
30 NS 3T N = 110 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
Total : 328,0 / 528 = 62,12 %
PAIRE A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Nicole Leclere
a11 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne 47,35 %
1 NS 3S S+4 520 9 40.91
2 NS 1S W+1 -120 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a10 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 40,53 %
3 NS 3S W-2 200 17 77.27
4 NS 3S E-1 100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a.6 Dilva Haym -Serge Alard 58,52 %
11 NS 5KcS+1 650 22 100.00
12 NS 3S S = 600 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
a.5 Danielle Wybauw -Dominique Sassen 48,11 %
13 NS 3S E = -600 20 90.91
14 NS 2K S-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a.4 Aida Zumot -Marie J. de Wagheneire 43,37 %
15 NS 3S E+1 -430 4 18.18
16 NS 5S S-1 -50 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
a.3 Helene Christiaens -Gerard Cooreman 46,40 %
17 NS 3T W+1 -130 22 100.00
18 NS 2P N = 110 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 97,73 %
a.2 Liliane Baptista -Lydia Wildiers 51,33 %
19 NS 3P E+1 -170 7 31.82
20 NS 3S W-2 200 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.1 Noelle Fosse -Jean Marie Schmiliver 57,01 %
21 NS 3S N-1 -100 3 13.64
22 NS 4P E = -620 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a15 Jean Chabotier -Michel Paquot 60,61 %
23 NS 4P N = 620 11 50.00
24 NS 4T N-3 -150 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a14 Francoise Turin -Brigitte Velge 47,54 %
25 NS 3S E = -600 5 22.73
26 NS 3S S+2 660 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a13 Michel Lievens -Didier Collart 49,24 %
27 NS 2P S-1 -50 4 18.18
28 NS 4P E = -420 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
a12 Jan Sassen -Edith Close 39,77 %
29 NS 1S S+3 180 19 86.36
30 NS 2P E = -110 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
Total : 296,0 / 528 = 56,06 %
PAIRE A12 Efthalia Bogaerts -Claire Rolin
a.8 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 43,75 %
1 NS 6P S = 980 12 54.55
2 NS 3S W-1 50 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a.7 Jeannine Thys -Christiane Huby 60,61 %
3 NS 2C W-1 100 5 22.73
4 NS 2S E-2 200 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a.6 Dilva Haym -Serge Alard 58,52 %
5 NS 4P N-1 -100 5 22.73
6 NS 4C W = -620 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a.5 Danielle Wybauw -Dominique Sassen 48,11 %
7 NS 2T E+2 -130 18 81.82
8 NS 3S N-1 -50 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a.4 Aida Zumot -Marie J. de Wagheneire 43,37 %
9 NS 4PcS+2 790 20 90.91
10 NS 3C W-2 200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 95,45 %
a.3 Helene Christiaens -Gerard Cooreman 46,40 %
11 NS 4P W = -420 6 27.27
12 NS 3S S+1 630 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a.2 Liliane Baptista -Lydia Wildiers 51,33 %
13 NS 3S E+2 -660 3 13.64
14 NS 2T S-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a.1 Noelle Fosse -Jean Marie Schmiliver 57,01 %
15 NS 3S E+1 -430 4 18.18
16 NS 4P N+1 450 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a12 Jan Sassen -Edith Close 39,77 %
23 NS 4P N = 620 11 50.00
24 NS 3T N-3 -150 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a11 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne 47,35 %
25 NS 3S E-1 100 18 81.82
26 NS 2S N+1 150 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a10 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 40,53 %
27 NS 2P S = 110 17 77.27
28 NS 4P E-1 50 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
a.9 Lydia Luyten -Jean de Villenfagne 55,87 %
29 NS 1S S+1 120 4 18.18
30 NS 2P E+1 -140 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
Total : 286,0 / 528 = 54,17 %
PAIRE A.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Myriam de Timary
a.9 Lydia Luyten -Jean de Villenfagne 55,87 %
1 NS 6P S+1 1010 16 72.73
2 NS 3S W = -400 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.5 Danielle Wybauw -Dominique Sassen 48,11 %
9 NS 4P S+2 480 8 36.36
10 NS 2C W-1 100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.4 Aida Zumot -Marie J. de Wagheneire 43,37 %
11 NS 5P W-1 50 15 68.18
12 NS 2S S = 120 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.3 Helene Christiaens -Gerard Cooreman 46,40 %
13 NS 3S E+1 -630 11 50.00
14 NS 1S W-1 50 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a.2 Liliane Baptista -Lydia Wildiers 51,33 %
15 NS 3S E = -400 15 68.18
16 NS 4P N+1 450 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a.1 Noelle Fosse -Jean Marie Schmiliver 57,01 %
17 NS 3T W+2 -150 17 77.27
18 NS 1S E+2 -150 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a15 Jean Chabotier -Michel Paquot 60,61 %
19 NS 2P E+2 -170 7 31.82
20 NS 3S W-2 200 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a14 Francoise Turin -Brigitte Velge 47,54 %
21 NS 3S N = 600 14 63.64
22 NS 4P E = -620 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a13 Michel Lievens -Didier Collart 49,24 %
23 NS 4P N = 620 11 50.00
24 NS 3C E-2 100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a12 Jan Sassen -Edith Close 39,77 %
25 NS 3S E-1 100 18 81.82
26 NS 3S N = 600 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a11 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne 47,35 %
27 NS 2P S-1 -50 4 18.18
28 NS 4P E+2 -480 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
a10 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 40,53 %
29 NS 1S S+3 180 19 86.36
30 NS 3P E = -140 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
Total : 285,0 / 528 = 53,98 %
PAIRE A.2 Annette Fobe -Colette Heerinckx
a.2 Liliane Baptista -Lydia Wildiers 51,33 %
3 NS 2C W-1 100 5 22.73
4 NS 2S E-1 100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.1 Noelle Fosse -Jean Marie Schmiliver 57,01 %
5 NS 2P N = 110 12 54.55
6 NS 3K E+1 -130 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a15 Jean Chabotier -Michel Paquot 60,61 %
7 NS 3S W = -600 12 54.55
8 NS 4P N-1 -50 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a14 Francoise Turin -Brigitte Velge 47,54 %
9 NS 5KcE-3 800 22 100.00
10 NS 3K S-1 -100 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a13 Michel Lievens -Didier Collart 49,24 %
11 NS 3P W+1 -170 12 54.55
12 NS 3S S-1 -100 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a12 Jan Sassen -Edith Close 39,77 %
13 NS 3S E = -600 20 90.91
14 NS 3P E-2 100 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
a11 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne 47,35 %
15 NS 3S E = -400 15 68.18
16 NS 4P N+2 480 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
a10 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 40,53 %
17 NS 5T W+1 -420 5 22.73
18 NS 1S E = -90 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.9 Lydia Luyten -Jean de Villenfagne 55,87 %
19 NS 3C N-3 -150 16 72.73
20 NS 3S W-1 100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.8 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 43,75 %
21 NS 3S N+1 630 20 90.91
22 NS 4P E+1 -650 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.7 Jeannine Thys -Christiane Huby 60,61 %
23 NS 4P N = 620 11 50.00
24 NS 4TcN-3 -500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
a.6 Dilva Haym -Serge Alard 58,52 %
25 NS 3S E-1 100 18 81.82
26 NS 2P S+1 140 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
Total : 284,0 / 528 = 53,79 %
PAIRE A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
a.1 Noelle Fosse -Jean Marie Schmiliver 57,01 %
1 NS 6P S-1 -50 1 4.55
2 NS 3S W = -400 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
a15 Jean Chabotier -Michel Paquot 60,61 %
3 NS 2P N = 110 11 50.00
4 NS 2C E = -110 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a14 Francoise Turin -Brigitte Velge 47,54 %
5 NS 4P N-1 -100 5 22.73
6 NS 4C W = -620 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a13 Michel Lievens -Didier Collart 49,24 %
7 NS 3S E+2 -660 1 4.55
8 NS 4P N-1 -50 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
a12 Jan Sassen -Edith Close 39,77 %
9 NS 5PcS+1 750 18 81.82
10 NS 1S N+2 150 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
a11 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne 47,35 %
11 NS 5P E = -450 0 0.00
12 NS 3S N+2 660 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a10 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 40,53 %
13 NS 3S E = -600 20 90.91
14 NS 1S W-2 100 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
a.9 Lydia Luyten -Jean de Villenfagne 55,87 %
15 NS 3S E = -400 15 68.18
16 NS 4P N+1 450 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a.8 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 43,75 %
17 NS 3T W+2 -150 17 77.27
18 NS 3S E-2 100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
a.7 Jeannine Thys -Christiane Huby 60,61 %
19 NS 2P E+2 -170 7 31.82
20 NS 3S W-2 200 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.6 Dilva Haym -Serge Alard 58,52 %
21 NS 3S N = 600 14 63.64
22 NS 4P E+1 -650 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.5 Danielle Wybauw -Dominique Sassen 48,11 %
23 NS 4P N = 620 11 50.00
24 NS 3K W+1 -130 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
Total : 268,0 / 528 = 50,76 %
PAIRE A.7 Pascale Ortegat -Teresa Dekoster
a13 Michel Lievens -Didier Collart 49,24 %
1 NS 6S S+1 1020 20 90.91
2 NS 3S W = -400 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a12 Jan Sassen -Edith Close 39,77 %
3 NS 2P N-1 -50 0 0.00
4 NS 1C N-1 -100 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
a11 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne 47,35 %
5 NS 3P N = 140 14 63.64
6 NS 4C W = -620 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.7 Jeannine Thys -Christiane Huby 60,61 %
13 NS 3S E+3 -690 0 0.00
14 NS 1PcE+1 -260 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.6 Dilva Haym -Serge Alard 58,52 %
15 NS 3S E+1 -430 4 18.18
16 NS 6S S-4 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
a.5 Danielle Wybauw -Dominique Sassen 48,11 %
17 NS 3T W+2 -150 17 77.27
18 NS 2P N = 110 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
a.4 Aida Zumot -Marie J. de Wagheneire 43,37 %
19 NS 3P E = -140 18 81.82
20 NS 3S W-2 200 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a.3 Helene Christiaens -Gerard Cooreman 46,40 %
21 NS 3S N = 600 14 63.64
22 NS 4P E-1 100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a.2 Liliane Baptista -Lydia Wildiers 51,33 %
23 NS 4P N = 620 11 50.00
24 NS 4T N-1 -50 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a.1 Noelle Fosse -Jean Marie Schmiliver 57,01 %
25 NS 3K E+2 -150 10 45.45
26 NS 3S N = 600 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a15 Jean Chabotier -Michel Paquot 60,61 %
27 NS 2P S-1 -50 4 18.18
28 NS 4K N-2 -200 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a14 Francoise Turin -Brigitte Velge 47,54 %
29 NS 1S S+1 120 4 18.18
30 NS 3P E = -140 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
Total : 244,0 / 528 = 46,21 %
PAIRE A.9 Marianne Falla -Patrick Gilles
a.2 Liliane Baptista -Lydia Wildiers 51,33 %
1 NS 3S S+3 490 6 27.27
2 NS 2P S-2 -200 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.1 Noelle Fosse -Jean Marie Schmiliver 57,01 %
3 NS 2K E-1 100 5 22.73
4 NS 1C N-3 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
a15 Jean Chabotier -Michel Paquot 60,61 %
5 NS 4P N = 620 18 81.82
6 NS 4C W = -620 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a14 Francoise Turin -Brigitte Velge 47,54 %
7 NS 3T E+1 -130 18 81.82
8 NS 3S N+1 430 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
a13 Michel Lievens -Didier Collart 49,24 %
9 NS 4P S+2 480 8 36.36
10 NS 3T N-1 -100 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a.9 Lydia Luyten -Jean de Villenfagne 55,87 %
17 NS 4P E+1 -450 2 9.09
18 NS 1S E+1 -120 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
a.8 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 43,75 %
19 NS 2P E+2 -170 7 31.82
20 NS 3S W+1 -630 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
a.7 Jeannine Thys -Christiane Huby 60,61 %
21 NS 3S N = 600 14 63.64
22 NS 4P E-1 100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a.6 Dilva Haym -Serge Alard 58,52 %
23 NS 4P N = 620 11 50.00
24 NS 2K W+1 -110 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.5 Danielle Wybauw -Dominique Sassen 48,11 %
25 NS 3S E = -600 5 22.73
26 NS 3S N = 600 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a.4 Aida Zumot -Marie J. de Wagheneire 43,37 %
27 NS 2P N = 110 17 77.27
28 NS 3C E+1 -170 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a.3 Helene Christiaens -Gerard Cooreman 46,40 %
29 NS 1S S+2 150 11 50.00
30 NS 2P E+1 -140 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 239,0 / 528 = 45,27 %
PAIRE A14 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Catherine de Moffarts
a12 Jan Sassen -Edith Close 39,77 %
1 NS 6S S+1 1020 20 90.91
2 NS 1S W+1 -120 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a11 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne 47,35 %
3 NS 2P N = 110 11 50.00
4 NS 1S E-1 100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a10 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 40,53 %
5 NS 3S S = 600 16 72.73
6 NS 4C W = -620 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.9 Lydia Luyten -Jean de Villenfagne 55,87 %
7 NS 3S E+1 -630 7 31.82
8 NS 3K S-1 -50 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a.8 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 43,75 %
9 NS 4P S+2 480 8 36.36
10 NS 3K S-1 -100 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a.7 Jeannine Thys -Christiane Huby 60,61 %
11 NS 4P W = -420 6 27.27
12 NS 3S N-1 -100 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
a.6 Dilva Haym -Serge Alard 58,52 %
13 NS 3S E+2 -660 3 13.64
14 NS 1S W+1 -120 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
a.5 Danielle Wybauw -Dominique Sassen 48,11 %
15 NS 3S E = -400 15 68.18
16 NS 3S S = 400 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.4 Aida Zumot -Marie J. de Wagheneire 43,37 %
17 NS 3S W = -400 9 40.91
18 NS 1S E = -90 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.3 Helene Christiaens -Gerard Cooreman 46,40 %
19 NS 2P E+2 -170 7 31.82
20 NS 3S W-2 200 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a14 Francoise Turin -Brigitte Velge 47,54 %
27 NS 1S N = 90 11 50.00
28 NS 4P E+2 -480 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a13 Michel Lievens -Didier Collart 49,24 %
29 NS 1S S+2 150 11 50.00
30 NS 2T N = 90 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
Total : 236,0 / 528 = 44,70 %
PAIRE A.3 Claire Derieuw -Caroll Pucher
a.3 Helene Christiaens -Gerard Cooreman 46,40 %
5 NS 4P N-1 -100 5 22.73
6 NS 4C W = -620 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a.2 Liliane Baptista -Lydia Wildiers 51,33 %
7 NS 3S E+1 -630 7 31.82
8 NS 4P N-1 -50 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a.1 Noelle Fosse -Jean Marie Schmiliver 57,01 %
9 NS 4P N+2 480 8 36.36
10 NS 3T N-1 -100 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a15 Jean Chabotier -Michel Paquot 60,61 %
11 NS 4P E = -420 6 27.27
12 NS 3S N-1 -100 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
a14 Francoise Turin -Brigitte Velge 47,54 %
13 NS 3S E+1 -630 11 50.00
14 NS 1S W+1 -120 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a13 Michel Lievens -Didier Collart 49,24 %
15 NS 3S E+1 -430 4 18.18
16 NS 4P N = 420 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a12 Jan Sassen -Edith Close 39,77 %
17 NS 5T W = -400 9 40.91
18 NS 1S E = -90 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a11 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne 47,35 %
19 NS 2P E+2 -170 7 31.82
20 NS 3S W-2 200 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a10 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 40,53 %
21 NS 3S N-1 -100 3 13.64
22 NS 4P E = -620 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a.9 Lydia Luyten -Jean de Villenfagne 55,87 %
23 NS 6P N-2 -200 0 0.00
24 NS 3C N-2 -100 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a.8 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 43,75 %
25 NS 3S E = -600 5 22.73
26 NS 2C S-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
a.7 Jeannine Thys -Christiane Huby 60,61 %
27 NS 1S N = 90 11 50.00
28 NS 4P E = -420 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
Total : 174,0 / 528 = 32,95 %
PAIRE A15 Francine Belet -Jacques Podevyn
a14 Francoise Turin -Brigitte Velge 47,54 %
1 NS 4P N+2 480 4 18.18
2 NS 3S W-1 50 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a13 Michel Lievens -Didier Collart 49,24 %
3 NS 3S W-3 300 22 100.00
4 NS 2P E = -110 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a12 Jan Sassen -Edith Close 39,77 %
5 NS 4P N-1 -100 5 22.73
6 NS 4C W = -620 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a11 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne 47,35 %
7 NS 3S E+2 -660 1 4.55
8 NS 3P N-1 -50 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
a10 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 40,53 %
9 NS 2P N+4 230 0 0.00
10 NS 3T N = 110 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.9 Lydia Luyten -Jean de Villenfagne 55,87 %
11 NS 4P E = -420 6 27.27
12 NS 3S N-1 -100 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
a.8 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 43,75 %
13 NS 3S E+1 -630 11 50.00
14 NS 1S W = -90 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.7 Jeannine Thys -Christiane Huby 60,61 %
15 NS 3S E+1 -430 4 18.18
16 NS 6P N-1 -50 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
a.6 Dilva Haym -Serge Alard 58,52 %
17 NS 3S W+2 -460 0 0.00
18 NS 1S E+2 -150 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 4,55 %
a.5 Danielle Wybauw -Dominique Sassen 48,11 %
19 NS 2P E+2 -170 7 31.82
20 NS 3S W-1 100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a.4 Aida Zumot -Marie J. de Wagheneire 43,37 %
21 NS 3S N-1 -100 3 13.64
22 NS 4P E+2 -680 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
a15 Jean Chabotier -Michel Paquot 60,61 %
29 NS 1S S+1 120 4 18.18
30 NS 3P E+1 -170 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
Total : 146,0 / 528 = 27,65 %
PAIRE A10 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger
a.4 Aida Zumot -Marie J. de Wagheneire 43,37 %
1 NS 6S S-1 -50 1 4.55
2 NS 3S W = -400 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
a.3 Helene Christiaens -Gerard Cooreman 46,40 %
3 NS 2C W-1 100 5 22.73
4 NS 4P E-1 100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.2 Liliane Baptista -Lydia Wildiers 51,33 %
5 NS 4P N-1 -100 5 22.73
6 NS 4C W = -620 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a.1 Noelle Fosse -Jean Marie Schmiliver 57,01 %
7 NS 3S E+1 -630 7 31.82
8 NS 4P N-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
a15 Jean Chabotier -Michel Paquot 60,61 %
9 NS 4P S+2 480 8 36.36
10 NS 3S S-1 -100 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a14 Francoise Turin -Brigitte Velge 47,54 %
11 NS 4P E = -420 6 27.27
12 NS 3S N = 600 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a10 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 40,53 %
19 NS 2P E+2 -170 7 31.82
20 NS 5K W = -600 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
a.9 Lydia Luyten -Jean de Villenfagne 55,87 %
21 NS 1S N+1 120 8 36.36
22 NS 4P E+1 -650 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a.8 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 43,75 %
23 NS 4P N = 620 11 50.00
24 NS 4T N-3 -150 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a.7 Jeannine Thys -Christiane Huby 60,61 %
25 NS 3S E = -600 5 22.73
26 NS 2S N+1 150 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.6 Dilva Haym -Serge Alard 58,52 %
27 NS 2P S-1 -50 4 18.18
28 NS 4P E+1 -450 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
a.5 Danielle Wybauw -Dominique Sassen 48,11 %
29 NS 1S S = 90 0 0.00
30 NS 2P E+2 -170 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 4,55 %
Total : 136,0 / 528 = 25,76 %
PAIRE a.7 Jeannine Thys -Christiane Huby
A12 Efthalia Bogaerts -Claire Rolin 54,17 %
3 EO 2C W-1 100 17 77.27
4 EO 2S E-2 200 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A13 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Jacqueline de Thier 62,12 %
7 EO 4T W-1 100 0 0.00
8 EO 3S N = 400 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
A14 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Catherine de Moffarts 44,70 %
11 EO 4P W = -420 16 72.73
12 EO 3S N-1 -100 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
A.7 Pascale Ortegat -Teresa Dekoster 46,21 %
13 EO 3S E+3 -690 22 100.00
14 EO 1PcE+1 -260 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 100,00 %
A15 Francine Belet -Jacques Podevyn 27,65 %
15 EO 3S E+1 -430 18 81.82
16 EO 6P N-1 -50 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
A.8 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 62,69 %
17 EO 3T W+2 -150 5 22.73
18 EO 1S E+2 -150 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 50,76 %
19 EO 2P E+2 -170 15 68.18
20 EO 3S W-2 200 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.9 Marianne Falla -Patrick Gilles 45,27 %
21 EO 3S N = 600 8 36.36
22 EO 4P E-1 100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.2 Annette Fobe -Colette Heerinckx 53,79 %
23 EO 4P N = 620 11 50.00
24 EO 4TcN-3 -500 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
A10 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 25,76 %
25 EO 3S E = -600 17 77.27
26 EO 2S N+1 150 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.3 Claire Derieuw -Caroll Pucher 32,95 %
27 EO 1S N = 90 11 50.00
28 EO 4P E = -420 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A11 Mercedes Steed -Benoit Ortegat 63,07 %
29 EO 1S S+2 150 11 50.00
30 EO 2P E+2 -170 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
Total : 320,0 / 528 = 60,61 %
PAIRE a15 Jean Chabotier -Michel Paquot
A.8 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 62,69 %
1 EO 6S S = 990 8 36.36
2 EO 3S W = -400 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 50,76 %
3 EO 2P N = 110 11 50.00
4 EO 2C E = -110 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A.9 Marianne Falla -Patrick Gilles 45,27 %
5 EO 4P N = 620 4 18.18
6 EO 4C W = -620 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A.2 Annette Fobe -Colette Heerinckx 53,79 %
7 EO 3S W = -600 10 45.45
8 EO 4P N-1 -50 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A10 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 25,76 %
9 EO 4P S+2 480 14 63.64
10 EO 3S S-1 -100 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A.3 Claire Derieuw -Caroll Pucher 32,95 %
11 EO 4P E = -420 16 72.73
12 EO 3S N-1 -100 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
A11 Mercedes Steed -Benoit Ortegat 63,07 %
13 EO 3S E+1 -630 11 50.00
14 EO 3K S-2 -100 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 70,83 %
15 EO 3S E = -400 7 31.82
16 EO 5P N = 450 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Myriam de Timary 53,98 %
19 EO 2P E+2 -170 15 68.18
20 EO 3S W-2 200 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Nicole Leclere 56,06 %
23 EO 4P N = 620 11 50.00
24 EO 4T N-3 -150 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A.7 Pascale Ortegat -Teresa Dekoster 46,21 %
27 EO 2P S-1 -50 18 81.82
28 EO 4K N-2 -200 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A15 Francine Belet -Jacques Podevyn 27,65 %
29 EO 1S S+1 120 18 81.82
30 EO 3P E+1 -170 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
Total : 320,0 / 528 = 60,61 %
PAIRE a.6 Dilva Haym -Serge Alard
A11 Mercedes Steed -Benoit Ortegat 63,07 %
1 EO 6S S+1 1020 2 9.09
2 EO 3S W-1 50 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
A12 Efthalia Bogaerts -Claire Rolin 54,17 %
5 EO 4P N-1 -100 17 77.27
6 EO 4C W = -620 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A13 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Jacqueline de Thier 62,12 %
9 EO 5CcE-2 500 6 27.27
10 EO 2S S-2 -200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Nicole Leclere 56,06 %
11 EO 5KcS+1 650 0 0.00
12 EO 3S S = 600 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
A14 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Catherine de Moffarts 44,70 %
13 EO 3S E+2 -660 19 86.36
14 EO 1S W+1 -120 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
A.7 Pascale Ortegat -Teresa Dekoster 46,21 %
15 EO 3S E+1 -430 18 81.82
16 EO 6S S-4 -200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
A15 Francine Belet -Jacques Podevyn 27,65 %
17 EO 3S W+2 -460 22 100.00
18 EO 1S E+2 -150 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 95,45 %
A.8 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 62,69 %
19 EO 3C N-2 -100 2 9.09
20 EO 3S W-2 200 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 50,76 %
21 EO 3S N = 600 8 36.36
22 EO 4P E+1 -650 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.9 Marianne Falla -Patrick Gilles 45,27 %
23 EO 4P N = 620 11 50.00
24 EO 2K W+1 -110 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.2 Annette Fobe -Colette Heerinckx 53,79 %
25 EO 3S E-1 100 4 18.18
26 EO 2P S+1 140 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A10 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 25,76 %
27 EO 2P S-1 -50 18 81.82
28 EO 4P E+1 -450 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
Total : 309,0 / 528 = 58,52 %
PAIRE a.1 Noelle Fosse -Jean Marie Schmiliver
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 50,76 %
1 EO 6P S-1 -50 21 95.45
2 EO 3S W = -400 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
A.9 Marianne Falla -Patrick Gilles 45,27 %
3 EO 2K E-1 100 17 77.27
4 EO 1C N-3 -300 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
A.2 Annette Fobe -Colette Heerinckx 53,79 %
5 EO 2P N = 110 10 45.45
6 EO 3K E+1 -130 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A10 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 25,76 %
7 EO 3S E+1 -630 15 68.18
8 EO 4P N-2 -100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
A.3 Claire Derieuw -Caroll Pucher 32,95 %
9 EO 4P N+2 480 14 63.64
10 EO 3T N-1 -100 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A11 Mercedes Steed -Benoit Ortegat 63,07 %
11 EO 5C S = 450 3 13.64
12 EO 3S S = 600 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 70,83 %
13 EO 3S E+1 -630 11 50.00
14 EO 2K S = 90 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A12 Efthalia Bogaerts -Claire Rolin 54,17 %
15 EO 3S E+1 -430 18 81.82
16 EO 4P N+1 450 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Myriam de Timary 53,98 %
17 EO 3T W+2 -150 5 22.73
18 EO 1S E+2 -150 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Nicole Leclere 56,06 %
21 EO 3S N-1 -100 19 86.36
22 EO 4P E = -620 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A.7 Pascale Ortegat -Teresa Dekoster 46,21 %
25 EO 3K E+2 -150 12 54.55
26 EO 3S N = 600 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.8 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 62,69 %
29 EO 1S S+3 180 3 13.64
30 EO 2P E+1 -140 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
Total : 301,0 / 528 = 57,01 %
PAIRE a.9 Lydia Luyten -Jean de Villenfagne
A.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Myriam de Timary 53,98 %
1 EO 6P S+1 1010 6 27.27
2 EO 3S W = -400 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A13 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Jacqueline de Thier 62,12 %
3 EO 2C W-2 200 5 22.73
4 EO 3T W = -110 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A14 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Catherine de Moffarts 44,70 %
7 EO 3S E+1 -630 15 68.18
8 EO 3K S-1 -50 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A15 Francine Belet -Jacques Podevyn 27,65 %
11 EO 4P E = -420 16 72.73
12 EO 3S N-1 -100 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 50,76 %
15 EO 3S E = -400 7 31.82
16 EO 4P N+1 450 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A.9 Marianne Falla -Patrick Gilles 45,27 %
17 EO 4P E+1 -450 20 90.91
18 EO 1S E+1 -120 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
A.2 Annette Fobe -Colette Heerinckx 53,79 %
19 EO 3C N-3 -150 6 27.27
20 EO 3S W-1 100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A10 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 25,76 %
21 EO 1S N+1 120 14 63.64
22 EO 4P E+1 -650 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A.3 Claire Derieuw -Caroll Pucher 32,95 %
23 EO 6P N-2 -200 22 100.00
24 EO 3C N-2 -100 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A11 Mercedes Steed -Benoit Ortegat 63,07 %
25 EO 3S E-1 100 4 18.18
26 EO 3S N+2 660 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 70,83 %
27 EO 2P S = 110 5 22.73
28 EO 4K N-2 -200 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A12 Efthalia Bogaerts -Claire Rolin 54,17 %
29 EO 1S S+1 120 18 81.82
30 EO 2P E+1 -140 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
Total : 295,0 / 528 = 55,87 %
PAIRE a.2 Liliane Baptista -Lydia Wildiers
A.9 Marianne Falla -Patrick Gilles 45,27 %
1 EO 3S S+3 490 16 72.73
2 EO 2P S-2 -200 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.2 Annette Fobe -Colette Heerinckx 53,79 %
3 EO 2C W-1 100 17 77.27
4 EO 2S E-1 100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A10 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 25,76 %
5 EO 4P N-1 -100 17 77.27
6 EO 4C W = -620 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A.3 Claire Derieuw -Caroll Pucher 32,95 %
7 EO 3S E+1 -630 15 68.18
8 EO 4P N-1 -50 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A11 Mercedes Steed -Benoit Ortegat 63,07 %
9 EO 4P S+2 480 14 63.64
10 EO 3T N = 110 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 70,83 %
11 EO 5P E-1 50 7 31.82
12 EO 3S S = 600 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A12 Efthalia Bogaerts -Claire Rolin 54,17 %
13 EO 3S E+2 -660 19 86.36
14 EO 2T S-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Myriam de Timary 53,98 %
15 EO 3S E = -400 7 31.82
16 EO 4P N+1 450 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A13 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Jacqueline de Thier 62,12 %
17 EO 5T W+1 -420 17 77.27
18 EO 2P N-1 -100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Nicole Leclere 56,06 %
19 EO 3P E+1 -170 15 68.18
20 EO 3S W-2 200 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.7 Pascale Ortegat -Teresa Dekoster 46,21 %
23 EO 4P N = 620 11 50.00
24 EO 4T N-1 -50 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A.8 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 62,69 %
27 EO 2P S = 110 5 22.73
28 EO Pass Passe 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
Total : 271,0 / 528 = 51,33 %
PAIRE a13 Michel Lievens -Didier Collart
A.7 Pascale Ortegat -Teresa Dekoster 46,21 %
1 EO 6S S+1 1020 2 9.09
2 EO 3S W = -400 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A15 Francine Belet -Jacques Podevyn 27,65 %
3 EO 3S W-3 300 0 0.00
4 EO 2P E = -110 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A.8 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 62,69 %
5 EO 3S S+3 690 0 0.00
6 EO 4C W = -620 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 50,76 %
7 EO 3S E+2 -660 21 95.45
8 EO 4P N-1 -50 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
A.9 Marianne Falla -Patrick Gilles 45,27 %
9 EO 4P S+2 480 14 63.64
10 EO 3T N-1 -100 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A.2 Annette Fobe -Colette Heerinckx 53,79 %
11 EO 3P W+1 -170 10 45.45
12 EO 3S S-1 -100 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A.3 Claire Derieuw -Caroll Pucher 32,95 %
15 EO 3S E+1 -430 18 81.82
16 EO 4P N = 420 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 70,83 %
19 EO 3C N-1 -50 0 0.00
20 EO 3S W-2 200 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
A.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Myriam de Timary 53,98 %
23 EO 4P N = 620 11 50.00
24 EO 3C E-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A13 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Jacqueline de Thier 62,12 %
25 EO 2K W+2 -130 10 45.45
26 EO 3S N = 600 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Nicole Leclere 56,06 %
27 EO 2P S-1 -50 18 81.82
28 EO 4P E = -420 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
A14 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Catherine de Moffarts 44,70 %
29 EO 1S S+2 150 11 50.00
30 EO 2T N = 90 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
Total : 260,0 / 528 = 49,24 %
PAIRE a.5 Danielle Wybauw -Dominique Sassen
A11 Mercedes Steed -Benoit Ortegat 63,07 %
3 EO 2C W-2 200 5 22.73
4 EO 1C N-1 -100 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A12 Efthalia Bogaerts -Claire Rolin 54,17 %
7 EO 2T E+2 -130 4 18.18
8 EO 3S N-1 -50 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Myriam de Timary 53,98 %
9 EO 4P S+2 480 14 63.64
10 EO 2C W-1 100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A13 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Jacqueline de Thier 62,12 %
11 EO 5C S = 450 3 13.64
12 EO 3S N+1 630 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Nicole Leclere 56,06 %
13 EO 3S E = -600 2 9.09
14 EO 2K S-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A14 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Catherine de Moffarts 44,70 %
15 EO 3S E = -400 7 31.82
16 EO 3S S = 400 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.7 Pascale Ortegat -Teresa Dekoster 46,21 %
17 EO 3T W+2 -150 5 22.73
18 EO 2P N = 110 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
A15 Francine Belet -Jacques Podevyn 27,65 %
19 EO 2P E+2 -170 15 68.18
20 EO 3S W-1 100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.8 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 62,69 %
21 EO 3S N-1 -100 19 86.36
22 EO 4P E-1 100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 50,76 %
23 EO 4P N = 620 11 50.00
24 EO 3K W+1 -130 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.9 Marianne Falla -Patrick Gilles 45,27 %
25 EO 3S E = -600 17 77.27
26 EO 3S N = 600 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A10 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 25,76 %
29 EO 1S S = 90 22 100.00
30 EO 2P E+2 -170 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 95,45 %
Total : 254,0 / 528 = 48,11 %
PAIRE a14 Francoise Turin -Brigitte Velge
A15 Francine Belet -Jacques Podevyn 27,65 %
1 EO 4P N+2 480 18 81.82
2 EO 3S W-1 50 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.8 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 62,69 %
3 EO 2C W-2 200 5 22.73
4 EO 3S E-3 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 50,76 %
5 EO 4P N-1 -100 17 77.27
6 EO 4C W = -620 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A.9 Marianne Falla -Patrick Gilles 45,27 %
7 EO 3T E+1 -130 4 18.18
8 EO 3S N+1 430 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
A.2 Annette Fobe -Colette Heerinckx 53,79 %
9 EO 5KcE-3 800 0 0.00
10 EO 3K S-1 -100 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A10 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 25,76 %
11 EO 4P E = -420 16 72.73
12 EO 3S N = 600 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.3 Claire Derieuw -Caroll Pucher 32,95 %
13 EO 3S E+1 -630 11 50.00
14 EO 1S W+1 -120 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 70,83 %
17 EO 3T W+3 -170 10 45.45
18 EO 1S E = -90 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Myriam de Timary 53,98 %
21 EO 3S N = 600 8 36.36
22 EO 4P E = -620 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Nicole Leclere 56,06 %
25 EO 3S E = -600 17 77.27
26 EO 3S S+2 660 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A14 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Catherine de Moffarts 44,70 %
27 EO 1S N = 90 11 50.00
28 EO 4P E+2 -480 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.7 Pascale Ortegat -Teresa Dekoster 46,21 %
29 EO 1S S+1 120 18 81.82
30 EO 3P E = -140 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
Total : 251,0 / 528 = 47,54 %
PAIRE a11 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne
A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Nicole Leclere 56,06 %
1 EO 3S S+4 520 13 59.09
2 EO 1S W+1 -120 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A14 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Catherine de Moffarts 44,70 %
3 EO 2P N = 110 11 50.00
4 EO 1S E-1 100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A.7 Pascale Ortegat -Teresa Dekoster 46,21 %
5 EO 3P N = 140 8 36.36
6 EO 4C W = -620 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A15 Francine Belet -Jacques Podevyn 27,65 %
7 EO 3S E+2 -660 21 95.45
8 EO 3P N-1 -50 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 50,76 %
11 EO 5P E = -450 22 100.00
12 EO 3S N+2 660 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.2 Annette Fobe -Colette Heerinckx 53,79 %
15 EO 3S E = -400 7 31.82
16 EO 4P N+2 480 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
A.3 Claire Derieuw -Caroll Pucher 32,95 %
19 EO 2P E+2 -170 15 68.18
20 EO 3S W-2 200 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A11 Mercedes Steed -Benoit Ortegat 63,07 %
21 EO 3S N+2 660 0 0.00
22 EO 4P E+2 -680 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 70,83 %
23 EO 3S S+1 630 0 0.00
24 EO 4T N-2 -100 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
A12 Efthalia Bogaerts -Claire Rolin 54,17 %
25 EO 3S E-1 100 4 18.18
26 EO 2S N+1 150 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Myriam de Timary 53,98 %
27 EO 2P S-1 -50 18 81.82
28 EO 4P E+2 -480 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
A13 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Jacqueline de Thier 62,12 %
29 EO 1S S+2 150 11 50.00
30 EO 3T N = 110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
Total : 250,0 / 528 = 47,35 %
PAIRE a.3 Helene Christiaens -Gerard Cooreman
A10 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 25,76 %
3 EO 2C W-1 100 17 77.27
4 EO 4P E-1 100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.3 Claire Derieuw -Caroll Pucher 32,95 %
5 EO 4P N-1 -100 17 77.27
6 EO 4C W = -620 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A11 Mercedes Steed -Benoit Ortegat 63,07 %
7 EO 3S E+1 -630 15 68.18
8 EO 3S N = 400 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 70,83 %
9 EO 4P N+2 480 14 63.64
10 EO 3T N = 110 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A12 Efthalia Bogaerts -Claire Rolin 54,17 %
11 EO 4P W = -420 16 72.73
12 EO 3S S+1 630 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Myriam de Timary 53,98 %
13 EO 3S E+1 -630 11 50.00
14 EO 1S W-1 50 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A13 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Jacqueline de Thier 62,12 %
15 EO 3S E = -400 7 31.82
16 EO 6S S-1 -50 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Nicole Leclere 56,06 %
17 EO 3T W+1 -130 0 0.00
18 EO 2P N = 110 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 2,27 %
A14 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Catherine de Moffarts 44,70 %
19 EO 2P E+2 -170 15 68.18
20 EO 3S W-2 200 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.7 Pascale Ortegat -Teresa Dekoster 46,21 %
21 EO 3S N = 600 8 36.36
22 EO 4P E-1 100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.8 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 62,69 %
25 EO 3S E+1 -630 22 100.00
26 EO 3S N = 600 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.9 Marianne Falla -Patrick Gilles 45,27 %
29 EO 1S S+2 150 11 50.00
30 EO 2P E+1 -140 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 245,0 / 528 = 46,40 %
PAIRE a.8 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille
A12 Efthalia Bogaerts -Claire Rolin 54,17 %
1 EO 6P S = 980 10 45.45
2 EO 3S W-1 50 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A13 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Jacqueline de Thier 62,12 %
5 EO 4P N+1 650 2 9.09
6 EO 5K E-1 100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
A14 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Catherine de Moffarts 44,70 %
9 EO 4P S+2 480 14 63.64
10 EO 3K S-1 -100 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A15 Francine Belet -Jacques Podevyn 27,65 %
13 EO 3S E+1 -630 11 50.00
14 EO 1S W = -90 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.8 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 62,69 %
15 EO 3S W-1 50 0 0.00
16 EO 4P N = 420 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 50,76 %
17 EO 3T W+2 -150 5 22.73
18 EO 3S E-2 100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
A.9 Marianne Falla -Patrick Gilles 45,27 %
19 EO 2P E+2 -170 15 68.18
20 EO 3S W+1 -630 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
A.2 Annette Fobe -Colette Heerinckx 53,79 %
21 EO 3S N+1 630 2 9.09
22 EO 4P E+1 -650 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A10 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 25,76 %
23 EO 4P N = 620 11 50.00
24 EO 4T N-3 -150 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A.3 Claire Derieuw -Caroll Pucher 32,95 %
25 EO 3S E = -600 17 77.27
26 EO 2C S-1 -100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
A11 Mercedes Steed -Benoit Ortegat 63,07 %
27 EO 2P N+1 140 0 0.00
28 EO 4P E-1 50 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 4,55 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 70,83 %
29 EO 1S S+3 180 3 13.64
30 EO 3P E = -140 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
Total : 231,0 / 528 = 43,75 %
PAIRE a.4 Aida Zumot -Marie J. de Wagheneire
A10 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 25,76 %
1 EO 6S S-1 -50 21 95.45
2 EO 3S W = -400 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
A11 Mercedes Steed -Benoit Ortegat 63,07 %
5 EO 4P N-1 -100 17 77.27
6 EO 5K E-2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 70,83 %
7 EO 4T W = -130 4 18.18
8 EO 2CcE-3 500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
A12 Efthalia Bogaerts -Claire Rolin 54,17 %
9 EO 4PcS+2 790 2 9.09
10 EO 3C W-2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 4,55 %
A.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Myriam de Timary 53,98 %
11 EO 5P W-1 50 7 31.82
12 EO 2S S = 120 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A13 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Jacqueline de Thier 62,12 %
13 EO 3S E+1 -630 11 50.00
14 EO 3K S = 110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Nicole Leclere 56,06 %
15 EO 3S E+1 -430 18 81.82
16 EO 5S S-1 -50 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
A14 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Catherine de Moffarts 44,70 %
17 EO 3S W = -400 13 59.09
18 EO 1S E = -90 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.7 Pascale Ortegat -Teresa Dekoster 46,21 %
19 EO 3P E = -140 4 18.18
20 EO 3S W-2 200 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A15 Francine Belet -Jacques Podevyn 27,65 %
21 EO 3S N-1 -100 19 86.36
22 EO 4P E+2 -680 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
A.8 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 62,69 %
23 EO 4P N = 620 11 50.00
24 EO 3K W-1 50 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A.9 Marianne Falla -Patrick Gilles 45,27 %
27 EO 2P N = 110 5 22.73
28 EO 3C E+1 -170 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
Total : 229,0 / 528 = 43,37 %
PAIRE a10 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger
A13 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Jacqueline de Thier 62,12 %
1 EO 3S S+4 520 13 59.09
2 EO 3S W-1 50 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Nicole Leclere 56,06 %
3 EO 3S W-2 200 5 22.73
4 EO 3S E-1 100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A14 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Catherine de Moffarts 44,70 %
5 EO 3S S = 600 6 27.27
6 EO 4C W = -620 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A15 Francine Belet -Jacques Podevyn 27,65 %
9 EO 2P N+4 230 22 100.00
10 EO 3T N = 110 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 50,76 %
13 EO 3S E = -600 2 9.09
14 EO 1S W-2 100 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
A.2 Annette Fobe -Colette Heerinckx 53,79 %
17 EO 5T W+1 -420 17 77.27
18 EO 1S E = -90 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A10 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 25,76 %
19 EO 2P E+2 -170 15 68.18
20 EO 5K W = -600 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
A.3 Claire Derieuw -Caroll Pucher 32,95 %
21 EO 3S N-1 -100 19 86.36
22 EO 4P E = -620 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A11 Mercedes Steed -Benoit Ortegat 63,07 %
23 EO 4P N = 620 11 50.00
24 EO 3T N-1 -50 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 70,83 %
25 EO 3S E-1 100 4 18.18
26 EO 3S S+2 660 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
A12 Efthalia Bogaerts -Claire Rolin 54,17 %
27 EO 2P S = 110 5 22.73
28 EO 4P E-1 50 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
A.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Myriam de Timary 53,98 %
29 EO 1S S+3 180 3 13.64
30 EO 3P E = -140 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
Total : 214,0 / 528 = 40,53 %
PAIRE a12 Jan Sassen -Edith Close
A14 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Catherine de Moffarts 44,70 %
1 EO 6S S+1 1020 2 9.09
2 EO 1S W+1 -120 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A.7 Pascale Ortegat -Teresa Dekoster 46,21 %
3 EO 2P N-1 -50 22 100.00
4 EO 1C N-1 -100 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
A15 Francine Belet -Jacques Podevyn 27,65 %
5 EO 4P N-1 -100 17 77.27
6 EO 4C W = -620 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A.8 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 62,69 %
7 EO 1S E+2 -150 8 36.36
8 EO 3P S = 140 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 50,76 %
9 EO 5PcS+1 750 4 18.18
10 EO 1S N+2 150 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
A.2 Annette Fobe -Colette Heerinckx 53,79 %
13 EO 3S E = -600 2 9.09
14 EO 3P E-2 100 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
A.3 Claire Derieuw -Caroll Pucher 32,95 %
17 EO 5T W = -400 13 59.09
18 EO 1S E = -90 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 70,83 %
21 EO 3S N = 600 8 36.36
22 EO 3P E+1 -170 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A12 Efthalia Bogaerts -Claire Rolin 54,17 %
23 EO 4P N = 620 11 50.00
24 EO 3T N-3 -150 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Myriam de Timary 53,98 %
25 EO 3S E-1 100 4 18.18
26 EO 3S N = 600 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A13 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Jacqueline de Thier 62,12 %
27 EO 2P S-1 -50 18 81.82
28 EO 4P E-1 50 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Nicole Leclere 56,06 %
29 EO 1S S+3 180 3 13.64
30 EO 2P E = -110 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
Total : 210,0 / 528 = 39,77 %
|