B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 60,80 A14 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski
--- 2 58,90 A.9 Annette Fobe -Colette Heerinckx
--- 3 58,14 A.6 Brigitte Velge -Francoise Turin
--- 4 53,60 A.2 Marie Christine Remy -Hugo Baetens
--- 5 52,27 A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
--- 6 51,89 A12 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger
--- 7 50,38 A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor
--- 8 49,62 A13 Anne France Raquez -Laurence del Marmol
--- 9 48,48 A11 Patrick Gilles -Teresa Dekoster
--- 10 48,11 A.5 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin
--- 11 46,02 A10 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson
--- 12 41,48 A.7 Eliane de Ceuninck -Myriam de Timary
--- 13 41,29 A.3 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Jannick Bekaert
--- 14 39,02 A.8 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 58,71 a.5 Danielle Wybauw -Dominique Sassen
--- 2 57,01 a.8 Lydia Luyten -Philippe Leemans
--- 3 55,87 a.7 Noelle Fosse -Nicole Blondeau
--- 4 55,68 a14 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens
--- 5 54,36 a12 Aida Zumot -Alexandra Zahorski
--- 6 53,22 a11 Vinciane de Borrekens -Charlotte de Wasseige
--- 7 50,95 a.4 Christiane Huby -Jeannine Thys
--- 8 49,81 a.2 Lydia Wildiers -Liliane Baptista
--- 9 47,35 a.9 Jean de Villenfagne -Gaetan van de Werve
--- 10 46,02 a13 Catherine de Moffarts -Marianne Borsu
--- 11 45,83 a.3 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens
--- 12 44,13 a.1 Olivier Paternostre -Cécile Drion de Chapois
--- 13 41,86 a10 Edith Close -Jan Sassen
--- 14 39,20 a.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Nicole Leclere
PAIRE A14 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski
a13 Catherine de Moffarts -Marianne Borsu 46,02 %
1 NS 5KcE-2 300 21 95.45
2 NS 4P E-2 100 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
a12 Aida Zumot -Alexandra Zahorski 54,36 %
3 NS 5T S = 400 11 50.00
4 NS 2K S+3 150 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a11 Vinciane de Borrekens -Charlotte de Wasseige 53,22 %
5 NS 4K E = -130 7 31.82
6 NS 3S S = 400 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a10 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 41,86 %
7 NS 3P W+1 -170 17 77.27
8 NS 4C E-2 100 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
a.9 Jean de Villenfagne -Gaetan van de Werve 47,35 %
9 NS 4P E+1 -650 14 63.64
10 NS 3C W-2 200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
a.8 Lydia Luyten -Philippe Leemans 57,01 %
11 NS 4C N-2 -100 10 45.45
12 NS 3S W = -400 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Nicole Leclere 39,20 %
13 NS 4P N+3 710 13 59.09
14 NS 3S E = -400 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a.5 Danielle Wybauw -Dominique Sassen 58,71 %
15 NS 4P W = -420 8 36.36
16 NS 1S S+1 120 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.4 Christiane Huby -Jeannine Thys 50,95 %
17 NS 1S W+2 -150 3 13.64
18 NS 4C N+1 650 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.3 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 45,83 %
19 NS 1S S-2 -100 11 50.00
20 NS 2T N+1 110 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a.2 Lydia Wildiers -Liliane Baptista 49,81 %
21 NS 2P W = -110 13 59.09
22 NS 4C N-1 -50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a14 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 55,68 %
27 NS 2P S-3 -150 5 22.73
28 NS 2P N+2 170 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
Total : 321,0 / 528 = 60,80 %
PAIRE A.9 Annette Fobe -Colette Heerinckx
a.3 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 45,83 %
1 NS 4C N-2 -100 3 13.64
2 NS 4P E = -420 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
a.1 Olivier Paternostre -Cécile Drion de Chapois 44,13 %
3 NS 4PcN+1 690 22 100.00
4 NS 3S N+2 660 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 97,73 %
a14 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 55,68 %
5 NS 3K E = -110 13 59.09
6 NS 4C S-1 -50 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a13 Catherine de Moffarts -Marianne Borsu 46,02 %
7 NS 3P W+1 -170 17 77.27
8 NS 4C E-1 50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a12 Aida Zumot -Alexandra Zahorski 54,36 %
9 NS 4P E+1 -650 14 63.64
10 NS 3P E+1 -170 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a11 Vinciane de Borrekens -Charlotte de Wasseige 53,22 %
11 NS 3S S-1 -50 17 77.27
12 NS 3S W+1 -430 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.9 Jean de Villenfagne -Gaetan van de Werve 47,35 %
17 NS 1S E+1 -120 8 36.36
18 NS 4C N+1 650 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.8 Lydia Luyten -Philippe Leemans 57,01 %
19 NS 1S S-1 -50 18 81.82
20 NS 2K N = 90 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a.7 Noelle Fosse -Nicole Blondeau 55,87 %
21 NS 1S N-1 -100 18 81.82
22 NS 2P E+2 -170 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Nicole Leclere 39,20 %
23 NS 3P W-2 200 21 95.45
24 NS 3S W-1 50 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
a.5 Danielle Wybauw -Dominique Sassen 58,71 %
25 NS 3S N-3 -150 2 9.09
26 NS 4P S+2 680 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a.4 Christiane Huby -Jeannine Thys 50,95 %
27 NS 2P E-1 50 20 90.91
28 NS 4P N = 620 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 93,18 %
Total : 311,0 / 528 = 58,90 %
PAIRE A.6 Brigitte Velge -Francoise Turin
a10 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 41,86 %
1 NS 5KcE-2 300 21 95.45
2 NS 2P E+1 -140 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a.9 Jean de Villenfagne -Gaetan van de Werve 47,35 %
3 NS 3S S+2 460 20 90.91
4 NS 3S N+1 630 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a.8 Lydia Luyten -Philippe Leemans 57,01 %
5 NS 3K E+1 -130 7 31.82
6 NS 3S S-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
a.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Nicole Leclere 39,20 %
11 NS 3ScS-1 -100 10 45.45
12 NS 3S E = -400 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.5 Danielle Wybauw -Dominique Sassen 58,71 %
13 NS 4P N+3 710 13 59.09
14 NS 3S E+1 -430 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.4 Christiane Huby -Jeannine Thys 50,95 %
15 NS 4P W-1 50 22 100.00
16 NS 3S S = 400 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
a.3 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 45,83 %
17 NS 1S W = -90 17 77.27
18 NS 4C N+1 650 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
a.2 Lydia Wildiers -Liliane Baptista 49,81 %
19 NS 1S S-2 -100 11 50.00
20 NS 2K N = 90 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a.1 Olivier Paternostre -Cécile Drion de Chapois 44,13 %
21 NS 3C E-1 50 22 100.00
22 NS 4CcN = 590 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 100,00 %
a14 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 55,68 %
23 NS 2T E+1 -110 4 18.18
24 NS 3S W+1 -430 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
a12 Aida Zumot -Alexandra Zahorski 54,36 %
25 NS 1S S-2 -100 7 31.82
26 NS 4P S+2 680 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a11 Vinciane de Borrekens -Charlotte de Wasseige 53,22 %
27 NS 2P E-1 50 20 90.91
28 NS 3P N+1 170 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
Total : 307,0 / 528 = 58,14 %
PAIRE A.2 Marie Christine Remy -Hugo Baetens
a.2 Lydia Wildiers -Liliane Baptista 49,81 %
3 NS 4P N = 420 15 68.18
4 NS 3S N+2 660 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
a.1 Olivier Paternostre -Cécile Drion de Chapois 44,13 %
5 NS 3K E+1 -130 7 31.82
6 NS 3S S = 400 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a14 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 55,68 %
7 NS 4P W = -620 6 27.27
8 NS 3C E+1 -170 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a13 Catherine de Moffarts -Marianne Borsu 46,02 %
9 NS 4P E+1 -650 14 63.64
10 NS 2S W+1 -150 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a12 Aida Zumot -Alexandra Zahorski 54,36 %
11 NS 3S N-3 -150 2 9.09
12 NS 3S W = -400 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a11 Vinciane de Borrekens -Charlotte de Wasseige 53,22 %
13 NS 4P N+3 710 13 59.09
14 NS 3S E+1 -430 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a10 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 41,86 %
15 NS 4P W = -420 8 36.36
16 NS 3S S+1 430 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a.8 Lydia Luyten -Philippe Leemans 57,01 %
17 NS 1S W = -90 17 77.27
18 NS 2C N+3 200 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.7 Noelle Fosse -Nicole Blondeau 55,87 %
19 NS 1S S-2 -100 11 50.00
20 NS 1C S = 80 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Nicole Leclere 39,20 %
21 NS 1S N-2 -200 4 18.18
22 NS 4C N = 420 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.5 Danielle Wybauw -Dominique Sassen 58,71 %
23 NS 2P W-1 100 13 59.09
24 NS 3S W = -400 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.4 Christiane Huby -Jeannine Thys 50,95 %
25 NS 1S S = 90 18 81.82
26 NS 4P S+2 680 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
Total : 283,0 / 528 = 53,60 %
PAIRE A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
a.1 Olivier Paternostre -Cécile Drion de Chapois 44,13 %
1 NS 4C N-1 -50 12 54.55
2 NS 4P E-2 100 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a14 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 55,68 %
3 NS 3P N = 140 4 18.18
4 NS 3S N+1 630 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a13 Catherine de Moffarts -Marianne Borsu 46,02 %
5 NS 4K E-1 50 18 81.82
6 NS 4C S-1 -50 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a12 Aida Zumot -Alexandra Zahorski 54,36 %
7 NS 4P W = -620 6 27.27
8 NS 4C E-2 100 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a11 Vinciane de Borrekens -Charlotte de Wasseige 53,22 %
9 NS 4P E+2 -680 5 22.73
10 NS 2S W-1 100 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a10 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 41,86 %
11 NS 3S S-3 -150 2 9.09
12 NS 3S W = -400 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.9 Jean de Villenfagne -Gaetan van de Werve 47,35 %
13 NS 3S N+4 720 21 95.45
14 NS 3S E = -400 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
a.7 Noelle Fosse -Nicole Blondeau 55,87 %
15 NS 4P W = -420 8 36.36
16 NS 3S S-2 -100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Nicole Leclere 39,20 %
17 NS 1S W = -90 17 77.27
18 NS 2C N+3 200 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.5 Danielle Wybauw -Dominique Sassen 58,71 %
19 NS 3C E = -140 5 22.73
20 NS 3K N-1 -100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.4 Christiane Huby -Jeannine Thys 50,95 %
21 NS 1S N-3 -300 0 0.00
22 NS 3C N = 140 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.3 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 45,83 %
23 NS 1S N+1 120 17 77.27
24 NS 3S W-1 50 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
Total : 276,0 / 528 = 52,27 %
PAIRE A12 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger
a.9 Jean de Villenfagne -Gaetan van de Werve 47,35 %
1 NS 2C N+1 140 18 81.82
2 NS 4P E-1 50 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a.8 Lydia Luyten -Philippe Leemans 57,01 %
3 NS 3T S+2 150 7 31.82
4 NS 3S N+1 630 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.7 Noelle Fosse -Nicole Blondeau 55,87 %
5 NS 3K E+1 -130 7 31.82
6 NS 4C S-1 -50 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Nicole Leclere 39,20 %
7 NS 3P W+1 -170 17 77.27
8 NS 4C E = -420 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.4 Christiane Huby -Jeannine Thys 50,95 %
9 NS 6P E = -1430 0 0.00
10 NS 2C W = -110 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a.3 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 45,83 %
11 NS 3S S-2 -100 10 45.45
12 NS 3S W = -400 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.2 Lydia Wildiers -Liliane Baptista 49,81 %
13 NS 4P N+3 710 13 59.09
14 NS 3S E = -400 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a.1 Olivier Paternostre -Cécile Drion de Chapois 44,13 %
15 NS 3P W+1 -170 20 90.91
16 NS 3S S-2 -100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a14 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 55,68 %
17 NS 1S W = -90 17 77.27
18 NS 4C N-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a12 Aida Zumot -Alexandra Zahorski 54,36 %
23 NS 2P W-1 100 13 59.09
24 NS 3S W-1 50 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a11 Vinciane de Borrekens -Charlotte de Wasseige 53,22 %
25 NS 2C N-1 -50 14 63.64
26 NS 4P S+2 680 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a10 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 41,86 %
27 NS 3K N-2 -100 14 63.64
28 NS 2P N+2 170 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
Total : 274,0 / 528 = 51,89 %
PAIRE A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor
a.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Nicole Leclere 39,20 %
1 NS 4C N-1 -50 12 54.55
2 NS 4P E-1 50 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.4 Christiane Huby -Jeannine Thys 50,95 %
7 NS 4C W = -620 6 27.27
8 NS 4C E-1 50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.3 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 45,83 %
9 NS 4P E+1 -650 14 63.64
10 NS 1S W+1 -120 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.2 Lydia Wildiers -Liliane Baptista 49,81 %
11 NS 4KcE-1 100 20 90.91
12 NS 3S W+1 -430 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.1 Olivier Paternostre -Cécile Drion de Chapois 44,13 %
13 NS 3S N+3 690 4 18.18
14 NS 3S E+2 -460 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
a14 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 55,68 %
15 NS 4P W = -420 8 36.36
16 NS 3S S+1 430 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a13 Catherine de Moffarts -Marianne Borsu 46,02 %
17 NS 1S W = -90 17 77.27
18 NS 3S N+3 690 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
a12 Aida Zumot -Alexandra Zahorski 54,36 %
19 NS 1S S-1 -50 18 81.82
20 NS 2T N = 90 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a10 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 41,86 %
21 NS 1S N-2 -200 4 18.18
22 NS 3P E = -140 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a.9 Jean de Villenfagne -Gaetan van de Werve 47,35 %
23 NS 2P W = -110 4 18.18
24 NS 3S W = -400 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a.8 Lydia Luyten -Philippe Leemans 57,01 %
25 NS 3S S-2 -100 7 31.82
26 NS 4P S+2 680 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.7 Noelle Fosse -Nicole Blondeau 55,87 %
27 NS 3K N-1 -50 16 72.73
28 NS 3P N+1 170 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
Total : 266,0 / 528 = 50,38 %
PAIRE A13 Anne France Raquez -Laurence del Marmol
a11 Vinciane de Borrekens -Charlotte de Wasseige 53,22 %
1 NS 4C N-1 -50 12 54.55
2 NS 4P E = -420 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a10 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 41,86 %
3 NS 4P N = 420 15 68.18
4 NS 2S N+4 240 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.9 Jean de Villenfagne -Gaetan van de Werve 47,35 %
5 NS 3S E = -400 0 0.00
6 NS 4C S-1 -50 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
a.8 Lydia Luyten -Philippe Leemans 57,01 %
7 NS 4P W = -620 6 27.27
8 NS 5KcN-3 -500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
a.7 Noelle Fosse -Nicole Blondeau 55,87 %
9 NS 6P E-1 100 22 100.00
10 NS 2P E-1 100 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 93,18 %
a.5 Danielle Wybauw -Dominique Sassen 58,71 %
11 NS 3S S-1 -50 17 77.27
12 NS 3S W = -400 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a.4 Christiane Huby -Jeannine Thys 50,95 %
13 NS 4P N+3 710 13 59.09
14 NS 4C E-1 50 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a.3 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 45,83 %
15 NS 4P W = -420 8 36.36
16 NS 2S S+2 180 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.2 Lydia Wildiers -Liliane Baptista 49,81 %
17 NS 1S W+1 -120 8 36.36
18 NS 4C N = 620 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.1 Olivier Paternostre -Cécile Drion de Chapois 44,13 %
19 NS 4P N-4 -200 0 0.00
20 NS 2T N+1 110 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a13 Catherine de Moffarts -Marianne Borsu 46,02 %
25 NS 2S S+1 150 22 100.00
26 NS 5P S+1 680 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a12 Aida Zumot -Alexandra Zahorski 54,36 %
27 NS 2S N-4 -200 2 9.09
28 NS 2P N+2 170 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
Total : 262,0 / 528 = 49,62 %
PAIRE A11 Patrick Gilles -Teresa Dekoster
a.7 Noelle Fosse -Nicole Blondeau 55,87 %
1 NS 4C N-2 -100 3 13.64
2 NS 4P E-1 50 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Nicole Leclere 39,20 %
3 NS 3S S = 400 11 50.00
4 NS 3S N+1 630 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.5 Danielle Wybauw -Dominique Sassen 58,71 %
5 NS 5K E-1 50 18 81.82
6 NS 2C N+1 140 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a.3 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 45,83 %
7 NS 3K N = 110 22 100.00
8 NS 4C E = -420 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a.2 Lydia Wildiers -Liliane Baptista 49,81 %
9 NS 4P E+1 -650 14 63.64
10 NS 2P E+2 -170 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a.1 Olivier Paternostre -Cécile Drion de Chapois 44,13 %
11 NS 3C N-2 -100 10 45.45
12 NS 3S W+1 -430 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a14 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 55,68 %
13 NS 3S N+4 720 21 95.45
14 NS 3S E+1 -430 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a13 Catherine de Moffarts -Marianne Borsu 46,02 %
15 NS 4P W = -420 8 36.36
16 NS 2S S+2 180 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a11 Vinciane de Borrekens -Charlotte de Wasseige 53,22 %
21 NS 1S N-1 -100 18 81.82
22 NS 4PcE = -790 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a10 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 41,86 %
23 NS 1S N = 90 10 45.45
24 NS 4P E-1 50 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a.9 Jean de Villenfagne -Gaetan van de Werve 47,35 %
25 NS 3S S-2 -100 7 31.82
26 NS 4P S+2 680 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.8 Lydia Luyten -Philippe Leemans 57,01 %
27 NS 2P S-3 -150 5 22.73
28 NS 2P N+2 170 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
Total : 256,0 / 528 = 48,48 %
PAIRE A.5 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin
a.8 Lydia Luyten -Philippe Leemans 57,01 %
1 NS 4C N-2 -100 3 13.64
2 NS 4P E-2 100 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.7 Noelle Fosse -Nicole Blondeau 55,87 %
3 NS 4P N-2 -100 0 0.00
4 NS 3S N+1 630 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a.5 Danielle Wybauw -Dominique Sassen 58,71 %
9 NS 4P E+1 -650 14 63.64
10 NS 2P E = -110 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a.4 Christiane Huby -Jeannine Thys 50,95 %
11 NS 4P N-3 -150 2 9.09
12 NS 3S W+1 -430 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
a.3 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 45,83 %
13 NS 4P N+2 680 0 0.00
14 NS 3S E-1 50 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.2 Lydia Wildiers -Liliane Baptista 49,81 %
15 NS 4P W = -420 8 36.36
16 NS 3S S+1 430 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a.1 Olivier Paternostre -Cécile Drion de Chapois 44,13 %
17 NS 1S W = -90 17 77.27
18 NS 4C N = 620 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a14 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 55,68 %
19 NS 1S S-1 -50 18 81.82
20 NS 2C S-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a13 Catherine de Moffarts -Marianne Borsu 46,02 %
21 NS 1S N-2 -200 4 18.18
22 NS 2P E = -110 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a11 Vinciane de Borrekens -Charlotte de Wasseige 53,22 %
23 NS 1S N-1 -100 8 36.36
24 NS 3S W = -400 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a10 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 41,86 %
25 NS 1S S-1 -50 14 63.64
26 NS 4P S+2 680 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a.9 Jean de Villenfagne -Gaetan van de Werve 47,35 %
27 NS 2P E = -110 10 45.45
28 NS 4P N = 620 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
Total : 254,0 / 528 = 48,11 %
PAIRE A10 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson
a.5 Danielle Wybauw -Dominique Sassen 58,71 %
1 NS 4C N-1 -50 12 54.55
2 NS 4P E-1 50 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.4 Christiane Huby -Jeannine Thys 50,95 %
3 NS 4P N-1 -50 2 9.09
4 NS 3K S+2 150 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
a.2 Lydia Wildiers -Liliane Baptista 49,81 %
5 NS 2K E+1 -110 13 59.09
6 NS 4C S-1 -50 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.1 Olivier Paternostre -Cécile Drion de Chapois 44,13 %
7 NS 4P W = -620 6 27.27
8 NS 4C E-1 50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a14 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 55,68 %
9 NS 4P E+3 -710 2 9.09
10 NS 1S W+2 -150 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
a13 Catherine de Moffarts -Marianne Borsu 46,02 %
11 NS 5KcE-2 300 22 100.00
12 NS 3S W+1 -430 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a12 Aida Zumot -Alexandra Zahorski 54,36 %
13 NS 3S N+3 690 4 18.18
14 NS 3S E+1 -430 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a10 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 41,86 %
19 NS 1S S = 90 22 100.00
20 NS 2T N-1 -100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a.9 Jean de Villenfagne -Gaetan van de Werve 47,35 %
21 NS 2P W+2 -170 8 36.36
22 NS 3CcN-1 -100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.8 Lydia Luyten -Philippe Leemans 57,01 %
23 NS 2C E-2 200 21 95.45
24 NS 3S W = -400 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a.7 Noelle Fosse -Nicole Blondeau 55,87 %
25 NS 1S S-2 -100 7 31.82
26 NS 4P S+2 680 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Nicole Leclere 39,20 %
27 NS 2P E-1 50 20 90.91
28 NS 3P N+1 170 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
Total : 243,0 / 528 = 46,02 %
PAIRE A.7 Eliane de Ceuninck -Myriam de Timary
a12 Aida Zumot -Alexandra Zahorski 54,36 %
1 NS 5C N-2 -100 3 13.64
2 NS 4P E-1 50 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a11 Vinciane de Borrekens -Charlotte de Wasseige 53,22 %
3 NS 4P N+1 450 18 81.82
4 NS 3S S+1 630 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a10 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 41,86 %
5 NS 4K E-1 50 18 81.82
6 NS 3S S+1 430 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
a.9 Jean de Villenfagne -Gaetan van de Werve 47,35 %
7 NS 4P W = -620 6 27.27
8 NS 4C E = -420 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a.7 Noelle Fosse -Nicole Blondeau 55,87 %
13 NS 4P N+3 710 13 59.09
14 NS 3S E+1 -430 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Nicole Leclere 39,20 %
15 NS 4P W = -420 8 36.36
16 NS 3S S = 400 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.5 Danielle Wybauw -Dominique Sassen 58,71 %
17 NS 1S E+3 -180 0 0.00
18 NS 2C N+1 140 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 6,82 %
a.4 Christiane Huby -Jeannine Thys 50,95 %
19 NS 2C E+1 -140 5 22.73
20 NS 2P E = -110 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
a.3 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 45,83 %
21 NS 1S N-1 -100 18 81.82
22 NS 2P E+2 -170 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.2 Lydia Wildiers -Liliane Baptista 49,81 %
23 NS 1S E+1 -120 0 0.00
24 NS 3S W+1 -430 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 2,27 %
a.1 Olivier Paternostre -Cécile Drion de Chapois 44,13 %
25 NS 1S S-1 -50 14 63.64
26 NS 4P S+2 680 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a13 Catherine de Moffarts -Marianne Borsu 46,02 %
27 NS 2P E = -110 10 45.45
28 NS 2P N+2 170 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
Total : 219,0 / 528 = 41,48 %
PAIRE A.3 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Jannick Bekaert
a.3 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 45,83 %
5 NS 1S S = 90 22 100.00
6 NS 4C S-1 -50 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a.2 Lydia Wildiers -Liliane Baptista 49,81 %
7 NS 3P W+1 -170 17 77.27
8 NS 4C E = -420 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.1 Olivier Paternostre -Cécile Drion de Chapois 44,13 %
9 NS 4P E+1 -650 14 63.64
10 NS 2S W+2 -180 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a14 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 55,68 %
11 NS 2C N-2 -100 10 45.45
12 NS 3S W = -400 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a13 Catherine de Moffarts -Marianne Borsu 46,02 %
13 NS 3S N+3 690 4 18.18
14 NS 3S E+2 -460 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
a12 Aida Zumot -Alexandra Zahorski 54,36 %
15 NS 1S W+4 -210 18 81.82
16 NS 3T S = 110 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a11 Vinciane de Borrekens -Charlotte de Wasseige 53,22 %
17 NS 1S W+1 -120 8 36.36
18 NS 2C N+1 140 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
a.9 Jean de Villenfagne -Gaetan van de Werve 47,35 %
19 NS 1S S-3 -150 2 9.09
20 NS 2K N = 90 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.8 Lydia Luyten -Philippe Leemans 57,01 %
21 NS 2P W = -110 13 59.09
22 NS 3P E+1 -170 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a.7 Noelle Fosse -Nicole Blondeau 55,87 %
23 NS 2P W = -110 4 18.18
24 NS 3S W-1 50 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Nicole Leclere 39,20 %
25 NS 2C N = 110 20 90.91
26 NS 4P S+2 680 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a.5 Danielle Wybauw -Dominique Sassen 58,71 %
27 NS 3S E = -400 0 0.00
28 NS 3P N-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 218,0 / 528 = 41,29 %
PAIRE A.8 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm
a14 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 55,68 %
1 NS 4C N-1 -50 12 54.55
2 NS 4P E-2 100 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a13 Catherine de Moffarts -Marianne Borsu 46,02 %
3 NS 3T S+2 150 7 31.82
4 NS 4P N-4 -400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
a12 Aida Zumot -Alexandra Zahorski 54,36 %
5 NS 1S E+2 -150 2 9.09
6 NS 4C S = 420 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a11 Vinciane de Borrekens -Charlotte de Wasseige 53,22 %
7 NS 4P W = -620 6 27.27
8 NS 4C E = -420 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a10 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 41,86 %
9 NS 4P E+2 -680 5 22.73
10 NS 2P E = -110 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.8 Lydia Luyten -Philippe Leemans 57,01 %
15 NS 4P W = -420 8 36.36
16 NS 3S S-2 -100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.7 Noelle Fosse -Nicole Blondeau 55,87 %
17 NS 1S W+2 -150 3 13.64
18 NS 2C N+4 230 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Nicole Leclere 39,20 %
19 NS 1S S-2 -100 11 50.00
20 NS 2K N = 90 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a.5 Danielle Wybauw -Dominique Sassen 58,71 %
21 NS 2P W+1 -140 10 45.45
22 NS 2P E+1 -140 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.4 Christiane Huby -Jeannine Thys 50,95 %
23 NS 1S N+1 120 17 77.27
24 NS 3S W = -400 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a.3 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 45,83 %
25 NS 3S N-4 -200 0 0.00
26 NS 4P S+2 680 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
a.2 Lydia Wildiers -Liliane Baptista 49,81 %
27 NS 2P E = -110 10 45.45
28 NS 2P N+1 140 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
Total : 206,0 / 528 = 39,02 %
PAIRE a.5 Danielle Wybauw -Dominique Sassen
A10 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 46,02 %
1 EO 4C N-1 -50 10 45.45
2 EO 4P E-1 50 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A11 Patrick Gilles -Teresa Dekoster 48,48 %
5 EO 5K E-1 50 4 18.18
6 EO 2C N+1 140 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A.5 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin 48,11 %
9 EO 4P E+1 -650 8 36.36
10 EO 2P E = -110 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A13 Anne France Raquez -Laurence del Marmol 49,62 %
11 EO 3S S-1 -50 5 22.73
12 EO 3S W = -400 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A.6 Brigitte Velge -Francoise Turin 58,14 %
13 EO 4P N+3 710 9 40.91
14 EO 3S E+1 -430 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A14 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 60,80 %
15 EO 4P W = -420 14 63.64
16 EO 1S S+1 120 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.7 Eliane de Ceuninck -Myriam de Timary 41,48 %
17 EO 1S E+3 -180 22 100.00
18 EO 2C N+1 140 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 93,18 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,27 %
19 EO 3C E = -140 17 77.27
20 EO 3K N-1 -100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.8 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm 39,02 %
21 EO 2P W+1 -140 12 54.55
22 EO 2P E+1 -140 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.2 Marie Christine Remy -Hugo Baetens 53,60 %
23 EO 2P W-1 100 9 40.91
24 EO 3S W = -400 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.9 Annette Fobe -Colette Heerinckx 58,90 %
25 EO 3S N-3 -150 20 90.91
26 EO 4P S+2 680 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A.3 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Jannick Bekaert 41,29 %
27 EO 3S E = -400 22 100.00
28 EO 3P N-1 -100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 100,00 %
Total : 310,0 / 528 = 58,71 %
PAIRE a.8 Lydia Luyten -Philippe Leemans
A.5 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin 48,11 %
1 EO 4C N-2 -100 19 86.36
2 EO 4P E-2 100 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A12 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 51,89 %
3 EO 3T S+2 150 15 68.18
4 EO 3S N+1 630 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.6 Brigitte Velge -Francoise Turin 58,14 %
5 EO 3K E+1 -130 15 68.18
6 EO 3S S-2 -100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
A13 Anne France Raquez -Laurence del Marmol 49,62 %
7 EO 4P W = -620 16 72.73
8 EO 5KcN-3 -500 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
A14 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 60,80 %
11 EO 4C N-2 -100 12 54.55
12 EO 3S W = -400 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A.8 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm 39,02 %
15 EO 4P W = -420 14 63.64
16 EO 3S S-2 -100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.2 Marie Christine Remy -Hugo Baetens 53,60 %
17 EO 1S W = -90 5 22.73
18 EO 2C N+3 200 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.9 Annette Fobe -Colette Heerinckx 58,90 %
19 EO 1S S-1 -50 4 18.18
20 EO 2K N = 90 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A.3 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Jannick Bekaert 41,29 %
21 EO 2P W = -110 9 40.91
22 EO 3P E+1 -170 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A10 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 46,02 %
23 EO 2C E-2 200 1 4.55
24 EO 3S W = -400 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 50,38 %
25 EO 3S S-2 -100 15 68.18
26 EO 4P S+2 680 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A11 Patrick Gilles -Teresa Dekoster 48,48 %
27 EO 2P S-3 -150 17 77.27
28 EO 2P N+2 170 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
Total : 301,0 / 528 = 57,01 %
PAIRE a.7 Noelle Fosse -Nicole Blondeau
A11 Patrick Gilles -Teresa Dekoster 48,48 %
1 EO 4C N-2 -100 19 86.36
2 EO 4P E-1 50 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A.5 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin 48,11 %
3 EO 4P N-2 -100 22 100.00
4 EO 3S N+1 630 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A12 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 51,89 %
5 EO 3K E+1 -130 15 68.18
6 EO 4C S-1 -50 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A13 Anne France Raquez -Laurence del Marmol 49,62 %
9 EO 6P E-1 100 0 0.00
10 EO 2P E-1 100 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 6,82 %
A.7 Eliane de Ceuninck -Myriam de Timary 41,48 %
13 EO 4P N+3 710 9 40.91
14 EO 3S E+1 -430 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,27 %
15 EO 4P W = -420 14 63.64
16 EO 3S S-2 -100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.8 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm 39,02 %
17 EO 1S W+2 -150 19 86.36
18 EO 2C N+4 230 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A.2 Marie Christine Remy -Hugo Baetens 53,60 %
19 EO 1S S-2 -100 11 50.00
20 EO 1C S = 80 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.9 Annette Fobe -Colette Heerinckx 58,90 %
21 EO 1S N-1 -100 4 18.18
22 EO 2P E+2 -170 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.3 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Jannick Bekaert 41,29 %
23 EO 2P W = -110 18 81.82
24 EO 3S W-1 50 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A10 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 46,02 %
25 EO 1S S-2 -100 15 68.18
26 EO 4P S+2 680 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 50,38 %
27 EO 3K N-1 -50 6 27.27
28 EO 3P N+1 170 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
Total : 295,0 / 528 = 55,87 %
PAIRE a14 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens
A.8 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm 39,02 %
1 EO 4C N-1 -50 10 45.45
2 EO 4P E-2 100 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,27 %
3 EO 3P N = 140 18 81.82
4 EO 3S N+1 630 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A.9 Annette Fobe -Colette Heerinckx 58,90 %
5 EO 3K E = -110 9 40.91
6 EO 4C S-1 -50 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.2 Marie Christine Remy -Hugo Baetens 53,60 %
7 EO 4P W = -620 16 72.73
8 EO 3C E+1 -170 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A10 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 46,02 %
9 EO 4P E+3 -710 20 90.91
10 EO 1S W+2 -150 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
A.3 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Jannick Bekaert 41,29 %
11 EO 2C N-2 -100 12 54.55
12 EO 3S W = -400 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A11 Patrick Gilles -Teresa Dekoster 48,48 %
13 EO 3S N+4 720 1 4.55
14 EO 3S E+1 -430 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 50,38 %
15 EO 4P W = -420 14 63.64
16 EO 3S S+1 430 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A12 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 51,89 %
17 EO 1S W = -90 5 22.73
18 EO 4C N-1 -100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A.5 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin 48,11 %
19 EO 1S S-1 -50 4 18.18
20 EO 2C S-2 -200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.6 Brigitte Velge -Francoise Turin 58,14 %
23 EO 2T E+1 -110 18 81.82
24 EO 3S W+1 -430 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
A14 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 60,80 %
27 EO 2P S-3 -150 17 77.27
28 EO 2P N+2 170 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
Total : 294,0 / 528 = 55,68 %
PAIRE a12 Aida Zumot -Alexandra Zahorski
A.7 Eliane de Ceuninck -Myriam de Timary 41,48 %
1 EO 5C N-2 -100 19 86.36
2 EO 4P E-1 50 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A14 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 60,80 %
3 EO 5T S = 400 11 50.00
4 EO 2K S+3 150 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A.8 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm 39,02 %
5 EO 1S E+2 -150 20 90.91
6 EO 4C S = 420 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,27 %
7 EO 4P W = -620 16 72.73
8 EO 4C E-2 100 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.9 Annette Fobe -Colette Heerinckx 58,90 %
9 EO 4P E+1 -650 8 36.36
10 EO 3P E+1 -170 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A.2 Marie Christine Remy -Hugo Baetens 53,60 %
11 EO 3S N-3 -150 20 90.91
12 EO 3S W = -400 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A10 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 46,02 %
13 EO 3S N+3 690 18 81.82
14 EO 3S E+1 -430 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.3 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Jannick Bekaert 41,29 %
15 EO 1S W+4 -210 4 18.18
16 EO 3T S = 110 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 50,38 %
19 EO 1S S-1 -50 4 18.18
20 EO 2T N = 90 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A12 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 51,89 %
23 EO 2P W-1 100 9 40.91
24 EO 3S W-1 50 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A.6 Brigitte Velge -Francoise Turin 58,14 %
25 EO 1S S-2 -100 15 68.18
26 EO 4P S+2 680 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A13 Anne France Raquez -Laurence del Marmol 49,62 %
27 EO 2S N-4 -200 20 90.91
28 EO 2P N+2 170 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
Total : 287,0 / 528 = 54,36 %
PAIRE a11 Vinciane de Borrekens -Charlotte de Wasseige
A13 Anne France Raquez -Laurence del Marmol 49,62 %
1 EO 4C N-1 -50 10 45.45
2 EO 4P E = -420 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A.7 Eliane de Ceuninck -Myriam de Timary 41,48 %
3 EO 4P N+1 450 4 18.18
4 EO 3S S+1 630 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A14 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 60,80 %
5 EO 4K E = -130 15 68.18
6 EO 3S S = 400 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.8 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm 39,02 %
7 EO 4P W = -620 16 72.73
8 EO 4C E = -420 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,27 %
9 EO 4P E+2 -680 17 77.27
10 EO 2S W-1 100 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.9 Annette Fobe -Colette Heerinckx 58,90 %
11 EO 3S S-1 -50 5 22.73
12 EO 3S W+1 -430 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.2 Marie Christine Remy -Hugo Baetens 53,60 %
13 EO 4P N+3 710 9 40.91
14 EO 3S E+1 -430 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.3 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Jannick Bekaert 41,29 %
17 EO 1S W+1 -120 14 63.64
18 EO 2C N+1 140 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
A11 Patrick Gilles -Teresa Dekoster 48,48 %
21 EO 1S N-1 -100 4 18.18
22 EO 4PcE = -790 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.5 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin 48,11 %
23 EO 1S N-1 -100 14 63.64
24 EO 3S W = -400 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A12 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 51,89 %
25 EO 2C N-1 -50 8 36.36
26 EO 4P S+2 680 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A.6 Brigitte Velge -Francoise Turin 58,14 %
27 EO 2P E-1 50 2 9.09
28 EO 3P N+1 170 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
Total : 281,0 / 528 = 53,22 %
PAIRE a.4 Christiane Huby -Jeannine Thys
A10 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 46,02 %
3 EO 4P N-1 -50 20 90.91
4 EO 3K S+2 150 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 50,38 %
7 EO 4C W = -620 16 72.73
8 EO 4C E-1 50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A12 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 51,89 %
9 EO 6P E = -1430 22 100.00
10 EO 2C W = -110 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A.5 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin 48,11 %
11 EO 4P N-3 -150 20 90.91
12 EO 3S W+1 -430 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
A13 Anne France Raquez -Laurence del Marmol 49,62 %
13 EO 4P N+3 710 9 40.91
14 EO 4C E-1 50 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.6 Brigitte Velge -Francoise Turin 58,14 %
15 EO 4P W-1 50 0 0.00
16 EO 3S S = 400 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
A14 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 60,80 %
17 EO 1S W+2 -150 19 86.36
18 EO 4C N+1 650 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.7 Eliane de Ceuninck -Myriam de Timary 41,48 %
19 EO 2C E+1 -140 17 77.27
20 EO 2P E = -110 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,27 %
21 EO 1S N-3 -300 22 100.00
22 EO 3C N = 140 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.8 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm 39,02 %
23 EO 1S N+1 120 5 22.73
24 EO 3S W = -400 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A.2 Marie Christine Remy -Hugo Baetens 53,60 %
25 EO 1S S = 90 4 18.18
26 EO 4P S+2 680 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A.9 Annette Fobe -Colette Heerinckx 58,90 %
27 EO 2P E-1 50 2 9.09
28 EO 4P N = 620 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 6,82 %
Total : 269,0 / 528 = 50,95 %
PAIRE a.2 Lydia Wildiers -Liliane Baptista
A.2 Marie Christine Remy -Hugo Baetens 53,60 %
3 EO 4P N = 420 7 31.82
4 EO 3S N+2 660 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
A10 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 46,02 %
5 EO 2K E+1 -110 9 40.91
6 EO 4C S-1 -50 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.3 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Jannick Bekaert 41,29 %
7 EO 3P W+1 -170 5 22.73
8 EO 4C E = -420 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A11 Patrick Gilles -Teresa Dekoster 48,48 %
9 EO 4P E+1 -650 8 36.36
10 EO 2P E+2 -170 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 50,38 %
11 EO 4KcE-1 100 2 9.09
12 EO 3S W+1 -430 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A12 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 51,89 %
13 EO 4P N+3 710 9 40.91
14 EO 3S E = -400 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A.5 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin 48,11 %
15 EO 4P W = -420 14 63.64
16 EO 3S S+1 430 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A13 Anne France Raquez -Laurence del Marmol 49,62 %
17 EO 1S W+1 -120 14 63.64
18 EO 4C N = 620 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.6 Brigitte Velge -Francoise Turin 58,14 %
19 EO 1S S-2 -100 11 50.00
20 EO 2K N = 90 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A14 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 60,80 %
21 EO 2P W = -110 9 40.91
22 EO 4C N-1 -50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A.7 Eliane de Ceuninck -Myriam de Timary 41,48 %
23 EO 1S E+1 -120 22 100.00
24 EO 3S W+1 -430 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 97,73 %
A.8 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm 39,02 %
27 EO 2P E = -110 12 54.55
28 EO 2P N+1 140 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
Total : 263,0 / 528 = 49,81 %
PAIRE a.9 Jean de Villenfagne -Gaetan van de Werve
A12 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 51,89 %
1 EO 2C N+1 140 4 18.18
2 EO 4P E-1 50 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A.6 Brigitte Velge -Francoise Turin 58,14 %
3 EO 3S S+2 460 2 9.09
4 EO 3S N+1 630 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A13 Anne France Raquez -Laurence del Marmol 49,62 %
5 EO 3S E = -400 22 100.00
6 EO 4C S-1 -50 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
A.7 Eliane de Ceuninck -Myriam de Timary 41,48 %
7 EO 4P W = -620 16 72.73
8 EO 4C E = -420 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A14 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 60,80 %
9 EO 4P E+1 -650 8 36.36
10 EO 3C W-2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,27 %
13 EO 3S N+4 720 1 4.55
14 EO 3S E = -400 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
A.9 Annette Fobe -Colette Heerinckx 58,90 %
17 EO 1S E+1 -120 14 63.64
18 EO 4C N+1 650 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A.3 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Jannick Bekaert 41,29 %
19 EO 1S S-3 -150 20 90.91
20 EO 2K N = 90 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A10 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 46,02 %
21 EO 2P W+2 -170 14 63.64
22 EO 3CcN-1 -100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 50,38 %
23 EO 2P W = -110 18 81.82
24 EO 3S W = -400 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A11 Patrick Gilles -Teresa Dekoster 48,48 %
25 EO 3S S-2 -100 15 68.18
26 EO 4P S+2 680 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.5 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin 48,11 %
27 EO 2P E = -110 12 54.55
28 EO 4P N = 620 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
Total : 250,0 / 528 = 47,35 %
PAIRE a13 Catherine de Moffarts -Marianne Borsu
A14 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 60,80 %
1 EO 5KcE-2 300 1 4.55
2 EO 4P E-2 100 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
A.8 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm 39,02 %
3 EO 3T S+2 150 15 68.18
4 EO 4P N-4 -400 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,27 %
5 EO 4K E-1 50 4 18.18
6 EO 4C S-1 -50 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A.9 Annette Fobe -Colette Heerinckx 58,90 %
7 EO 3P W+1 -170 5 22.73
8 EO 4C E-1 50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A.2 Marie Christine Remy -Hugo Baetens 53,60 %
9 EO 4P E+1 -650 8 36.36
10 EO 2S W+1 -150 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A10 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 46,02 %
11 EO 5KcE-2 300 0 0.00
12 EO 3S W+1 -430 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A.3 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Jannick Bekaert 41,29 %
13 EO 3S N+3 690 18 81.82
14 EO 3S E+2 -460 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
A11 Patrick Gilles -Teresa Dekoster 48,48 %
15 EO 4P W = -420 14 63.64
16 EO 2S S+2 180 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 50,38 %
17 EO 1S W = -90 5 22.73
18 EO 3S N+3 690 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
A.5 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin 48,11 %
21 EO 1S N-2 -200 18 81.82
22 EO 2P E = -110 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A13 Anne France Raquez -Laurence del Marmol 49,62 %
25 EO 2S S+1 150 0 0.00
26 EO 5P S+1 680 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A.7 Eliane de Ceuninck -Myriam de Timary 41,48 %
27 EO 2P E = -110 12 54.55
28 EO 2P N+2 170 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
Total : 243,0 / 528 = 46,02 %
PAIRE a.3 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens
A.9 Annette Fobe -Colette Heerinckx 58,90 %
1 EO 4C N-2 -100 19 86.36
2 EO 4P E = -420 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
A.3 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Jannick Bekaert 41,29 %
5 EO 1S S = 90 0 0.00
6 EO 4C S-1 -50 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A11 Patrick Gilles -Teresa Dekoster 48,48 %
7 EO 3K N = 110 0 0.00
8 EO 4C E = -420 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 50,38 %
9 EO 4P E+1 -650 8 36.36
10 EO 1S W+1 -120 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A12 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 51,89 %
11 EO 3S S-2 -100 12 54.55
12 EO 3S W = -400 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A.5 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin 48,11 %
13 EO 4P N+2 680 22 100.00
14 EO 3S E-1 50 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A13 Anne France Raquez -Laurence del Marmol 49,62 %
15 EO 4P W = -420 14 63.64
16 EO 2S S+2 180 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.6 Brigitte Velge -Francoise Turin 58,14 %
17 EO 1S W = -90 5 22.73
18 EO 4C N+1 650 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
A14 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 60,80 %
19 EO 1S S-2 -100 11 50.00
20 EO 2T N+1 110 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A.7 Eliane de Ceuninck -Myriam de Timary 41,48 %
21 EO 1S N-1 -100 4 18.18
22 EO 2P E+2 -170 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,27 %
23 EO 1S N+1 120 5 22.73
24 EO 3S W-1 50 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
A.8 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm 39,02 %
25 EO 3S N-4 -200 22 100.00
26 EO 4P S+2 680 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
Total : 242,0 / 528 = 45,83 %
PAIRE a.1 Olivier Paternostre -Cécile Drion de Chapois
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,27 %
1 EO 4C N-1 -50 10 45.45
2 EO 4P E-2 100 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A.9 Annette Fobe -Colette Heerinckx 58,90 %
3 EO 4PcN+1 690 0 0.00
4 EO 3S N+2 660 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 2,27 %
A.2 Marie Christine Remy -Hugo Baetens 53,60 %
5 EO 3K E+1 -130 15 68.18
6 EO 3S S = 400 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A10 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 46,02 %
7 EO 4P W = -620 16 72.73
8 EO 4C E-1 50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.3 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Jannick Bekaert 41,29 %
9 EO 4P E+1 -650 8 36.36
10 EO 2S W+2 -180 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A11 Patrick Gilles -Teresa Dekoster 48,48 %
11 EO 3C N-2 -100 12 54.55
12 EO 3S W+1 -430 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 50,38 %
13 EO 3S N+3 690 18 81.82
14 EO 3S E+2 -460 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
A12 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 51,89 %
15 EO 3P W+1 -170 2 9.09
16 EO 3S S-2 -100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.5 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin 48,11 %
17 EO 1S W = -90 5 22.73
18 EO 4C N = 620 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A13 Anne France Raquez -Laurence del Marmol 49,62 %
19 EO 4P N-4 -200 22 100.00
20 EO 2T N+1 110 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.6 Brigitte Velge -Francoise Turin 58,14 %
21 EO 3C E-1 50 0 0.00
22 EO 4CcN = 590 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.7 Eliane de Ceuninck -Myriam de Timary 41,48 %
25 EO 1S S-1 -50 8 36.36
26 EO 4P S+2 680 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
Total : 233,0 / 528 = 44,13 %
PAIRE a10 Edith Close -Jan Sassen
A.6 Brigitte Velge -Francoise Turin 58,14 %
1 EO 5KcE-2 300 1 4.55
2 EO 2P E+1 -140 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A13 Anne France Raquez -Laurence del Marmol 49,62 %
3 EO 4P N = 420 7 31.82
4 EO 2S N+4 240 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.7 Eliane de Ceuninck -Myriam de Timary 41,48 %
5 EO 4K E-1 50 4 18.18
6 EO 3S S+1 430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
A14 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 60,80 %
7 EO 3P W+1 -170 5 22.73
8 EO 4C E-2 100 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
A.8 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm 39,02 %
9 EO 4P E+2 -680 17 77.27
10 EO 2P E = -110 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,27 %
11 EO 3S S-3 -150 20 90.91
12 EO 3S W = -400 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.2 Marie Christine Remy -Hugo Baetens 53,60 %
15 EO 4P W = -420 14 63.64
16 EO 3S S+1 430 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A10 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 46,02 %
19 EO 1S S = 90 0 0.00
20 EO 2T N-1 -100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 50,38 %
21 EO 1S N-2 -200 18 81.82
22 EO 3P E = -140 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A11 Patrick Gilles -Teresa Dekoster 48,48 %
23 EO 1S N = 90 12 54.55
24 EO 4P E-1 50 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A.5 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin 48,11 %
25 EO 1S S-1 -50 8 36.36
26 EO 4P S+2 680 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A12 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 51,89 %
27 EO 3K N-2 -100 8 36.36
28 EO 2P N+2 170 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
Total : 221,0 / 528 = 41,86 %
PAIRE a.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Nicole Leclere
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 50,38 %
1 EO 4C N-1 -50 10 45.45
2 EO 4P E-1 50 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A11 Patrick Gilles -Teresa Dekoster 48,48 %
3 EO 3S S = 400 11 50.00
4 EO 3S N+1 630 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A12 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 51,89 %
7 EO 3P W+1 -170 5 22.73
8 EO 4C E = -420 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.6 Brigitte Velge -Francoise Turin 58,14 %
11 EO 3ScS-1 -100 12 54.55
12 EO 3S E = -400 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A14 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 60,80 %
13 EO 4P N+3 710 9 40.91
14 EO 3S E = -400 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A.7 Eliane de Ceuninck -Myriam de Timary 41,48 %
15 EO 4P W = -420 14 63.64
16 EO 3S S = 400 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,27 %
17 EO 1S W = -90 5 22.73
18 EO 2C N+3 200 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.8 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm 39,02 %
19 EO 1S S-2 -100 11 50.00
20 EO 2K N = 90 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A.2 Marie Christine Remy -Hugo Baetens 53,60 %
21 EO 1S N-2 -200 18 81.82
22 EO 4C N = 420 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.9 Annette Fobe -Colette Heerinckx 58,90 %
23 EO 3P W-2 200 1 4.55
24 EO 3S W-1 50 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
A.3 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Jannick Bekaert 41,29 %
25 EO 2C N = 110 2 9.09
26 EO 4P S+2 680 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A10 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 46,02 %
27 EO 2P E-1 50 2 9.09
28 EO 3P N+1 170 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
Total : 207,0 / 528 = 39,20 %
|