B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 67,56 A.9 Patrick Gilles -Philippe van der Gracht
--- 2 61,27 B10 Yolande Waerseggers -Regine de Hemptinne
--- 3 57,03 B.1 Myriam de Timary -Eliane de Ceuninck
--- 4 53,74 A.4 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker
--- 5 53,33 A.3 Lydia Luyten -Philippe Leemans
--- 6 52,63 B.3 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie
--- 7 51,02 B.2 Michel Paquot -Jean Chabotier
--- 8 50,86 A.5 Grazia Neuenschwander -Nicole Leclere
--- 9 49,43 A.7 Martine Zens -Elena Valsesia
--- 10 49,33 A.2 Annette Fobe -Colette Heerinckx
--- 11 48,10 A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
--- 12 47,54 B.5 Michele Berrier -Helene Schyns
--- 13 45,08 A.6 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Jannick Bekaert
--- 14 44,95 B.4 Helene Lemberger -Mado Miller
--- 15 44,67 A.8 Peter Masterson -Clarence Steininger
--- 16 44,37 B.8 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire
--- 17 44,30 B.7 Claire Destin -Ghislaine Schelfhout
--- 18 43,89 B.9 Anne Arsac -Sandra Dallemagne
--- 19 40,33 B.6 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 64,51 b.2 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed
--- 2 60,57 a.9 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren
--- 3 59,74 a.4 Danielle Wybauw -Dominique Sassen
--- 4 57,76 a.2 Lydia Wildiers -Liliane Baptista
--- 5 57,44 b.1 Christiane Huby -Jeannine Thys
--- 6 56,75 b.8 Luc Cartuyvels -Daniel Couvreur
--- 7 53,50 b.4 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens
--- 8 51,04 a.1 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot
--- 9 50,76 b.5 Francoise Turin -Brigitte Velge
--- 10 49,92 b.9 Muriel de Ceuninck -Andre Delacroix
--- 11 47,21 a.3 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille
--- 12 46,67 b.7 Miguel del Marmol -Gaetan Collinet
--- 13 42,07 a.8 Olivier Paternostre -Michel Poncelet
--- 14 41,94 a.7 Noelle Fosse -Nicole Blondeau
--- 15 41,82 b.6 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck
--- 16 40,78 b.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm
--- 17 39,10 a.6 Jan Sassen -Edith Close
--- 18 38,47 a.5 Catherine de Moffarts -Helene Christiaens
--- 19 0,00 b10 -
PAIRE A.9 Patrick Gilles -Philippe van der Gracht
a.8 Olivier Paternostre -Michel Poncelet 42,07 %
1 NS 2C S+1 140 17.1 57.00
2 NS 3ScW-2 300 29.9 99.67
3 NS 4P E = -620 15 50.00 µ Tbl = 68,89 %
a.7 Noelle Fosse -Nicole Blondeau 41,94 %
4 NS 1S S = 90 18.2 60.67
5 NS 3S W-2 100 27.8 92.67
6 NS 1S N+2 150 27.8 92.67 µ Tbl = 82,00 %
a.6 Jan Sassen -Edith Close 39,10 %
7 NS 4P E-1 100 29.9 99.67
8 NS 4C W+2 -480 16.1 53.67
9 NS 1S N+2 150 25.7 85.67 µ Tbl = 79,67 %
a.5 Catherine de Moffarts -Helene Christiaens 38,47 %
10 NS 4C W+2 -680 4.3 14.33
11 NS 3K S+1 130 27.8 92.67
12 NS 1S W = -90 23.5 78.33 µ Tbl = 61,78 %
a.4 Danielle Wybauw -Dominique Sassen 59,74 %
13 NS 3S N+2 660 28.9 96.33
14 NS 3S E = -400 18.2 60.67
15 NS 50%50% Ajust 15 50.00 µ Tbl = 69,00 %
a.3 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 47,21 %
16 NS 1S N+2 150 27.8 92.67
17 NS 3S S+1 430 29.9 99.67
18 NS 4P S-1 -100 7.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 72,44 %
a.2 Lydia Wildiers -Liliane Baptista 57,76 %
19 NS 3S E+2 -660 6 20.00
20 NS 2K W-2 200 20 66.67
21 NS 4P N+1 650 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
a.9 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren 60,57 %
25 NS 4P E-1 100 27 90.00
26 NS 2P S = 110 23 76.67
27 NS 5P S-1 -50 4 13.33 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
Total : 486,4 / 720 = 67,56 %
PAIRE B10 Yolande Waerseggers -Regine de Hemptinne
b.9 Muriel de Ceuninck -Andre Delacroix 49,92 %
1 NS 1S S+2 150 27.8 92.67
2 NS 4C W = -420 2.2 7.33
3 NS 4P E = -620 15 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
b.8 Luc Cartuyvels -Daniel Couvreur 56,75 %
4 NS 2S E-2 200 27.8 92.67
5 NS 3S E-1 50 22.5 75.00
6 NS 2C S = 110 23.5 78.33 µ Tbl = 82,00 %
b.7 Miguel del Marmol -Gaetan Collinet 46,67 %
7 NS 4P E = -620 5.4 18.00
8 NS 4C W+2 -480 16.1 53.67
9 NS 1S N+1 120 17.1 57.00 µ Tbl = 42,89 %
b.6 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 41,82 %
10 NS 4C W+1 -650 20.3 67.67
11 NS 3S S-1 -50 10.7 35.67
12 NS 1S W = -90 23.5 78.33 µ Tbl = 60,56 %
b.4 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens 53,50 %
13 NS Pass Passe 19.3 64.33
14 NS 2K E+2 -130 27.8 92.67
15 NS 4C N+2 680 20.8 69.33 µ Tbl = 75,44 %
b.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm 40,78 %
16 NS 1S N+2 150 27.8 92.67
17 NS 3S S-1 -50 10.7 35.67
18 NS 4P S = 620 25.7 85.67 µ Tbl = 71,33 %
b.2 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 64,51 %
19 NS 3S E+1 -630 21 70.00
20 NS 2K W+1 -110 5 16.67
21 NS 4P N+1 650 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
b10 - 0,00 %
28 NS BYE 0 0.00
29 NS BYE 0 0.00
30 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 386,0 / 630 = 61,27 %
PAIRE B.1 Myriam de Timary -Eliane de Ceuninck
b.1 Christiane Huby -Jeannine Thys 57,44 %
1 NS 1S S = 90 6.5 21.67
2 NS 4C W-1 50 15 50.00
3 NS 3S W = -600 22.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 48,89 %
b10 - 0,00 %
4 NS BYE 0 0.00
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
b.9 Muriel de Ceuninck -Andre Delacroix 49,92 %
7 NS 3P E+1 -170 20.3 67.67
8 NS 4C W+2 -480 16.1 53.67
9 NS 1S N+2 150 25.7 85.67 µ Tbl = 69,00 %
b.8 Luc Cartuyvels -Daniel Couvreur 56,75 %
10 NS 4C W+1 -650 20.3 67.67
11 NS 4K N-1 -50 10.7 35.67
12 NS 1S W+1 -120 11.8 39.33 µ Tbl = 47,56 %
b.7 Miguel del Marmol -Gaetan Collinet 46,67 %
13 NS 3S S+1 630 24.6 82.00
14 NS 3S W+2 -460 5.4 18.00
15 NS 5C N+1 680 20.8 69.33 µ Tbl = 56,44 %
b.5 Francoise Turin -Brigitte Velge 50,76 %
16 NS 1S N+1 120 11.8 39.33
17 NS 3S S-2 -100 3.3 11.00
18 NS 4P S-1 -100 7.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 25,11 %
b.4 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens 53,50 %
19 NS 3S E-1 100 30 100.00
20 NS 2K W-1 100 15 50.00
21 NS 4P N+1 650 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 67,78 %
b.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm 40,78 %
22 NS 3P S-1 -50 27.8 92.67
23 NS 1S S-1 -100 19.3 64.33
24 NS 3K N+1 130 28.9 96.33 µ Tbl = 84,44 %
Total : 359,3 / 630 = 57,03 %
PAIRE A.4 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker
a.7 Noelle Fosse -Nicole Blondeau 41,94 %
1 NS 2C S+1 140 17.1 57.00
2 NS 4C W-1 50 15 50.00
3 NS 3S E = -600 22.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 60,67 %
a.6 Jan Sassen -Edith Close 39,10 %
4 NS 1S S-1 -100 12.9 43.00
5 NS 1S E = -90 15 50.00
6 NS 2C S+3 200 29.9 99.67 µ Tbl = 64,22 %
a.4 Danielle Wybauw -Dominique Sassen 59,74 %
10 NS 4C W+2 -680 4.3 14.33
11 NS 3C E-1 50 19.3 64.33
12 NS 1S W+1 -120 11.8 39.33 µ Tbl = 39,33 %
a.3 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 47,21 %
13 NS 3S S+1 630 24.6 82.00
14 NS 3S E = -400 18.2 60.67
15 NS 5C N+1 680 20.8 69.33 µ Tbl = 70,67 %
a.2 Lydia Wildiers -Liliane Baptista 57,76 %
16 NS 1S N+1 120 11.8 39.33
17 NS 3S S-4 -200 0.1 0.33
18 NS 2P S+2 170 21.4 71.33 µ Tbl = 37,00 %
a.1 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 51,04 %
19 NS 3S E+1 -630 21 70.00
20 NS 3K W-4 400 27 90.00
21 NS 2K N-4 -400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
a.9 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren 60,57 %
22 NS 3P S-2 -100 12.9 43.00
23 NS 1S W+1 -120 11.8 39.33
24 NS 4T W = -130 7.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 35,78 %
a.8 Olivier Paternostre -Michel Poncelet 42,07 %
25 NS 3P E+1 -170 9 30.00
26 NS 2P S = 110 23 76.67
27 NS 5KcW-4 800 30 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,89 %
Total : 386,9 / 720 = 53,74 %
PAIRE A.3 Lydia Luyten -Philippe Leemans
a.5 Catherine de Moffarts -Helene Christiaens 38,47 %
1 NS 3C S = 140 17.1 57.00
2 NS 2P N = 110 25.7 85.67
3 NS 3S W = -600 22.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 72,56 %
a.3 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 47,21 %
7 NS 4P E+1 -650 0.1 0.33
8 NS 6C W-1 50 29.9 99.67
9 NS 2P W = -110 0.1 0.33 µ Tbl = 33,44 %
a.2 Lydia Wildiers -Liliane Baptista 57,76 %
10 NS 4C W+1 -650 20.3 67.67
11 NS 3S S-1 -50 10.7 35.67
12 NS 1S W+1 -120 11.8 39.33 µ Tbl = 47,56 %
a.1 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 51,04 %
13 NS 3S S-2 -200 8.6 28.67
14 NS 3K E+2 -150 25.7 85.67
15 NS 4C N+1 650 10.4 34.67 µ Tbl = 49,67 %
a.9 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren 60,57 %
16 NS 1S N+1 120 11.8 39.33
17 NS 3S S-2 -100 3.3 11.00
18 NS 2P S+1 140 18.2 60.67 µ Tbl = 37,00 %
a.8 Olivier Paternostre -Michel Poncelet 42,07 %
19 NS 3S E+2 -660 6 20.00
20 NS 3S W-4 400 27 90.00
21 NS 5KcW-4 800 30 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
a.7 Noelle Fosse -Nicole Blondeau 41,94 %
22 NS 2K E = -90 22.5 75.00
23 NS 1S S-2 -200 2.2 7.33
24 NS 3K N-1 -50 17.1 57.00 µ Tbl = 46,44 %
a.6 Jan Sassen -Edith Close 39,10 %
25 NS 2P E+1 -140 17 56.67
26 NS 2P S = 110 23 76.67
27 NS 4P S = 420 23 76.67 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
Total : 384,0 / 720 = 53,33 %
PAIRE B.3 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie
b.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm 40,78 %
7 NS 3P E+2 -200 11.8 39.33
8 NS 4C W+2 -480 16.1 53.67
9 NS 1S N+2 150 25.7 85.67 µ Tbl = 59,56 %
b.2 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 64,51 %
10 NS 4C W+1 -650 20.3 67.67
11 NS 4C E = -420 0.1 0.33
12 NS 2C W+1 -140 4.3 14.33 µ Tbl = 27,44 %
b.1 Christiane Huby -Jeannine Thys 57,44 %
13 NS 3S S-2 -200 8.6 28.67
14 NS 3S E+2 -460 5.4 18.00
15 NS 4C N+2 680 20.8 69.33 µ Tbl = 38,67 %
b10 - 0,00 %
16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
b.9 Muriel de Ceuninck -Andre Delacroix 49,92 %
19 NS 3S E+1 -630 21 70.00
20 NS 3S E+1 -630 0 0.00
21 NS 6P N-1 -100 2 6.67 µ Tbl = 25,56 %
b.7 Miguel del Marmol -Gaetan Collinet 46,67 %
22 NS 2S E-2 200 29.9 99.67
23 NS 3P E = -140 8.6 28.67
24 NS 3K N = 110 24.6 82.00 µ Tbl = 70,11 %
b.6 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 41,82 %
25 NS 4P E-2 200 30 100.00
26 NS 2P S = 110 23 76.67
27 NS 4P S = 420 23 76.67 µ Tbl = 84,44 %
b.5 Francoise Turin -Brigitte Velge 50,76 %
28 NS 4C E-1 50 28.7 95.67
29 NS 4C S+1 650 17.3 57.67
30 NS 4C N-2 -100 10.4 34.67 µ Tbl = 62,67 %
Total : 331,6 / 630 = 52,63 %
PAIRE B.2 Michel Paquot -Jean Chabotier
b.2 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 64,51 %
4 NS 1S S-2 -200 5.4 18.00
5 NS 1S W = -90 15 50.00
6 NS 3C S-1 -50 13.9 46.33 µ Tbl = 38,11 %
b.1 Christiane Huby -Jeannine Thys 57,44 %
7 NS 3P E+1 -170 20.3 67.67
8 NS 5C W+1 -480 16.1 53.67
9 NS 1S N-1 -50 3.3 11.00 µ Tbl = 44,11 %
b10 - 0,00 %
10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
b.9 Muriel de Ceuninck -Andre Delacroix 49,92 %
13 NS 3S S-2 -200 8.6 28.67
14 NS 3S E+1 -430 12.9 43.00
15 NS 4C N+1 650 10.4 34.67 µ Tbl = 35,44 %
b.8 Luc Cartuyvels -Daniel Couvreur 56,75 %
16 NS 1S N = 90 0.1 0.33
17 NS 3K N+1 130 17.1 57.00
18 NS 4PcS = 790 29.9 99.67 µ Tbl = 52,33 %
b.6 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 41,82 %
19 NS 3S E+1 -630 21 70.00
20 NS 2TcW-4 1100 30 100.00
21 NS 4P N+2 680 28 93.33 µ Tbl = 87,78 %
b.5 Francoise Turin -Brigitte Velge 50,76 %
22 NS 2K E = -90 22.5 75.00
23 NS 1S W-1 100 27.8 92.67
24 NS 3K N-1 -50 17.1 57.00 µ Tbl = 74,89 %
b.4 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens 53,50 %
25 NS 2P E+1 -140 17 56.67
26 NS 4P S-2 -200 1 3.33
27 NS 4P S-1 -50 4 13.33 µ Tbl = 24,44 %
Total : 321,4 / 630 = 51,02 %
PAIRE A.5 Grazia Neuenschwander -Nicole Leclere
a.9 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren 60,57 %
1 NS 2C S+1 140 17.1 57.00
2 NS 4C E = -420 2.2 7.33
3 NS 3S W+1 -630 5.4 18.00 µ Tbl = 27,44 %
a.8 Olivier Paternostre -Michel Poncelet 42,07 %
4 NS 2K N-1 -100 12.9 43.00
5 NS 3S E-2 100 27.8 92.67
6 NS 3T N+1 130 25.7 85.67 µ Tbl = 73,78 %
a.7 Noelle Fosse -Nicole Blondeau 41,94 %
7 NS 2P E+2 -170 20.3 67.67
8 NS 6C W = -980 5.4 18.00
9 NS 1S N = 90 9.7 32.33 µ Tbl = 39,33 %
a.5 Catherine de Moffarts -Helene Christiaens 38,47 %
13 NS 3S S-1 -100 17.1 57.00
14 NS 3C W+1 -170 23.5 78.33
15 NS 4C N+2 680 20.8 69.33 µ Tbl = 68,22 %
a.4 Danielle Wybauw -Dominique Sassen 59,74 %
16 NS 2P N+1 140 23.5 78.33
17 NS 2S S+1 150 19.3 64.33
18 NS 4P S-1 -100 7.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 55,89 %
a.3 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 47,21 %
19 NS 3S E+1 -630 21 70.00
20 NS 2K W = -90 11 36.67
21 NS 4P N+1 650 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
a.2 Lydia Wildiers -Liliane Baptista 57,76 %
22 NS 3P S-2 -100 12.9 43.00
23 NS 1S S-1 -100 19.3 64.33
24 NS 2P E = -110 11.8 39.33 µ Tbl = 48,89 %
a.1 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 51,04 %
25 NS 3P E+1 -170 9 30.00
26 NS 2P S = 110 23 76.67
27 NS 4P S-1 -50 4 13.33 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
Total : 366,2 / 720 = 50,86 %
PAIRE A.7 Martine Zens -Elena Valsesia
a.4 Danielle Wybauw -Dominique Sassen 59,74 %
1 NS 2C S+1 140 17.1 57.00
2 NS 3S W-2 100 22.5 75.00
3 NS 3S W+1 -630 5.4 18.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.3 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 47,21 %
4 NS 3T S+1 130 23.5 78.33
5 NS 2S E = -120 8.6 28.67
6 NS 3K E = -110 2.2 7.33 µ Tbl = 38,11 %
a.2 Lydia Wildiers -Liliane Baptista 57,76 %
7 NS 4P E = -620 5.4 18.00
8 NS 6C W = -980 5.4 18.00
9 NS 1S N+2 150 25.7 85.67 µ Tbl = 40,56 %
a.1 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 51,04 %
10 NS 4C W+1 -650 20.3 67.67
11 NS 2K S+2 130 27.8 92.67
12 NS 1S W+2 -150 1.1 3.67 µ Tbl = 54,67 %
a.9 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren 60,57 %
13 NS 3S S-2 -200 8.6 28.67
14 NS 3S E+3 -490 0.1 0.33
15 NS 4PcE-3 500 3.6 12.00 µ Tbl = 13,67 %
a.7 Noelle Fosse -Nicole Blondeau 41,94 %
19 NS 3S E+1 -630 21 70.00
20 NS 2K W-1 100 15 50.00
21 NS 4P N+1 650 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 57,78 %
a.6 Jan Sassen -Edith Close 39,10 %
22 NS 3T S-2 -100 12.9 43.00
23 NS 2S W = -120 11.8 39.33
24 NS 3K N+1 130 28.9 96.33 µ Tbl = 59,56 %
a.5 Catherine de Moffarts -Helene Christiaens 38,47 %
25 NS 3P E-1 100 27 90.00
26 NS 2P S = 110 23 76.67
27 NS 4P S = 420 23 76.67 µ Tbl = 81,11 %
Total : 355,9 / 720 = 49,43 %
PAIRE A.2 Annette Fobe -Colette Heerinckx
a.2 Lydia Wildiers -Liliane Baptista 57,76 %
4 NS 1S S-1 -100 12.9 43.00
5 NS 2S E+1 -150 3.3 11.00
6 NS 2C S-1 -50 13.9 46.33 µ Tbl = 33,44 %
a.1 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 51,04 %
7 NS 4P E = -620 5.4 18.00
8 NS 4C W+1 -450 26.7 89.00
9 NS 1S N+2 150 25.7 85.67 µ Tbl = 64,22 %
a.9 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren 60,57 %
10 NS 4C W+1 -650 20.3 67.67
11 NS 3S S-1 -50 10.7 35.67
12 NS 1S W+1 -120 11.8 39.33 µ Tbl = 47,56 %
a.8 Olivier Paternostre -Michel Poncelet 42,07 %
13 NS 3S S+2 660 28.9 96.33
14 NS 3S E+1 -430 12.9 43.00
15 NS 4C N+1 650 10.4 34.67 µ Tbl = 58,00 %
a.7 Noelle Fosse -Nicole Blondeau 41,94 %
16 NS 1S N+1 120 11.8 39.33
17 NS 2S S-1 -50 10.7 35.67
18 NS 4P S = 620 25.7 85.67 µ Tbl = 53,56 %
a.6 Jan Sassen -Edith Close 39,10 %
19 NS 3S E+2 -660 6 20.00
20 NS 3K W-3 300 24 80.00
21 NS 2P N+3 200 4 13.33 µ Tbl = 37,78 %
a.5 Catherine de Moffarts -Helene Christiaens 38,47 %
22 NS 2K E = -90 22.5 75.00
23 NS 2P E-1 100 27.8 92.67
24 NS 3T W = -110 11.8 39.33 µ Tbl = 69,00 %
a.4 Danielle Wybauw -Dominique Sassen 59,74 %
25 NS 3P W+1 -170 9 30.00
26 NS 3P S-1 -100 9 30.00
27 NS 5T E-1 50 10 33.33 µ Tbl = 31,11 %
Total : 355,2 / 720 = 49,33 %
PAIRE A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
a.1 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 51,04 %
1 NS 2S S-1 -50 2.2 7.33
2 NS 3C W+1 -170 6.5 21.67
3 NS 2S W+1 -150 29.9 99.67 µ Tbl = 42,89 %
a.9 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren 60,57 %
4 NS 3C W = -140 8.6 28.67
5 NS 2S E = -120 8.6 28.67
6 NS 2C S-1 -50 13.9 46.33 µ Tbl = 34,56 %
a.8 Olivier Paternostre -Michel Poncelet 42,07 %
7 NS 3P E = -140 27.8 92.67
8 NS 6S W = -990 1.1 3.67
9 NS 1S N = 90 9.7 32.33 µ Tbl = 42,89 %
a.7 Noelle Fosse -Nicole Blondeau 41,94 %
10 NS 4C W+1 -650 20.3 67.67
11 NS 5C W-2 100 21.4 71.33
12 NS 1S W = -90 23.5 78.33 µ Tbl = 72,44 %
a.6 Jan Sassen -Edith Close 39,10 %
13 NS 3S S-2 -200 8.6 28.67
14 NS 3S E+2 -460 5.4 18.00
15 NS 5PcE-4 800 28.8 96.00 µ Tbl = 47,56 %
a.5 Catherine de Moffarts -Helene Christiaens 38,47 %
16 NS 1S N+1 120 11.8 39.33
17 NS 4P N = 420 27.8 92.67
18 NS 1S S = 90 15 50.00 µ Tbl = 60,67 %
a.4 Danielle Wybauw -Dominique Sassen 59,74 %
19 NS 3S E+2 -660 6 20.00
20 NS 3C E = -140 2 6.67
21 NS 4P N+1 650 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 26,67 %
a.3 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 47,21 %
22 NS 3P S-3 -150 2.2 7.33
23 NS 2P E-1 100 27.8 92.67
24 NS 3P E-1 50 21.4 71.33 µ Tbl = 57,11 %
Total : 346,3 / 720 = 48,10 %
PAIRE B.5 Michele Berrier -Helene Schyns
b.8 Luc Cartuyvels -Daniel Couvreur 56,75 %
1 NS 2C S+1 140 17.1 57.00
2 NS 4C E = -420 2.2 7.33
3 NS 3S E+1 -630 5.4 18.00 µ Tbl = 27,44 %
b.7 Miguel del Marmol -Gaetan Collinet 46,67 %
4 NS 1ScS+2 580 29.9 99.67
5 NS 2S E = -120 8.6 28.67
6 NS 3K W-1 100 21.4 71.33 µ Tbl = 66,56 %
b.5 Francoise Turin -Brigitte Velge 50,76 %
13 NS 3S N = 600 21.4 71.33
14 NS 3S E+1 -430 12.9 43.00
15 NS 5C N = 650 10.4 34.67 µ Tbl = 49,67 %
b.4 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens 53,50 %
16 NS 1S N+1 120 11.8 39.33
17 NS 3S S = 400 24.6 82.00
18 NS 2P S+1 140 18.2 60.67 µ Tbl = 60,67 %
b.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm 40,78 %
19 NS 3S E+2 -660 6 20.00
20 NS 3K W = -110 5 16.67
21 NS 4P N+1 650 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
b.2 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 64,51 %
22 NS 2K E = -90 22.5 75.00
23 NS 1K S-2 -200 2.2 7.33
24 NS 3P E+1 -170 2.2 7.33 µ Tbl = 29,89 %
b.1 Christiane Huby -Jeannine Thys 57,44 %
25 NS 4C N-2 -100 23 76.67
26 NS 3P S-1 -100 9 30.00
27 NS 4P S = 420 23 76.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
b.9 Muriel de Ceuninck -Andre Delacroix 49,92 %
28 NS 2C W+1 -140 10.4 34.67
29 NS 4C S+2 680 28.7 95.67
30 NS 4C S-2 -100 10.4 34.67 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
Total : 342,3 / 720 = 47,54 %
PAIRE A.6 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Jannick Bekaert
a.2 Lydia Wildiers -Liliane Baptista 57,76 %
1 NS 2C S+1 140 17.1 57.00
2 NS 2P N+1 140 27.8 92.67
3 NS 3S E+1 -630 5.4 18.00 µ Tbl = 55,89 %
a.1 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 51,04 %
4 NS 1S S = 90 18.2 60.67
5 NS 3S W = -400 0.1 0.33
6 NS 2C S-1 -50 13.9 46.33 µ Tbl = 35,78 %
a.9 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren 60,57 %
7 NS 3P E+1 -170 20.3 67.67
8 NS 4C W+2 -480 16.1 53.67
9 NS 1S N+1 120 17.1 57.00 µ Tbl = 59,44 %
a.8 Olivier Paternostre -Michel Poncelet 42,07 %
10 NS 4C W+2 -680 4.3 14.33
11 NS 3S S-2 -100 2.2 7.33
12 NS 3S W-1 50 29.9 99.67 µ Tbl = 40,44 %
a.6 Jan Sassen -Edith Close 39,10 %
16 NS 1S N+1 120 11.8 39.33
17 NS 3S S = 400 24.6 82.00
18 NS 4P S = 620 25.7 85.67 µ Tbl = 69,00 %
a.5 Catherine de Moffarts -Helene Christiaens 38,47 %
19 NS 4S E+1 -660 6 20.00
20 NS 3C W-2 200 20 66.67
21 NS 4P N+1 650 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
a.4 Danielle Wybauw -Dominique Sassen 59,74 %
22 NS 2K E+1 -110 5.4 18.00
23 NS 1S S-2 -200 2.2 7.33
24 NS 4T W = -130 7.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 16,78 %
a.3 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 47,21 %
25 NS 4C N-3 -150 14 46.67
26 NS 3P S-1 -100 9 30.00
27 NS 5T E-1 50 10 33.33 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
Total : 324,6 / 720 = 45,08 %
PAIRE B.4 Helene Lemberger -Mado Miller
b.6 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 41,82 %
1 NS 3C S-1 -50 2.2 7.33
2 NS 4C E-2 100 22.5 75.00
3 NS 4P E = -620 15 50.00 µ Tbl = 44,11 %
b.4 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens 53,50 %
10 NS 4C W+2 -680 4.3 14.33
11 NS 5K S-1 -50 10.7 35.67
12 NS 1S W+2 -150 1.1 3.67 µ Tbl = 17,89 %
b.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm 40,78 %
13 NS 3S S-2 -200 8.6 28.67
14 NS 2C W = -110 29.9 99.67
15 NS 5PcE-4 800 28.8 96.00 µ Tbl = 74,78 %
b.2 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 64,51 %
16 NS 1S N+1 120 11.8 39.33
17 NS 3S S-1 -50 10.7 35.67
18 NS 4P S-1 -100 7.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
b.1 Christiane Huby -Jeannine Thys 57,44 %
19 NS 3S E+2 -660 6 20.00
20 NS 2P S-1 -100 8 26.67
21 NS 5P N = 650 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
b10 - 0,00 %
22 NS BYE 0 0.00
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
b.8 Luc Cartuyvels -Daniel Couvreur 56,75 %
25 NS 3C N-2 -100 23 76.67
26 NS 2P S = 110 23 76.67
27 NS 6P S-3 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 51,11 %
b.7 Miguel del Marmol -Gaetan Collinet 46,67 %
28 NS 2C E+1 -140 10.4 34.67
29 NS 4C S+1 650 17.3 57.67
30 NS 3C N-1 -50 26.4 88.00 µ Tbl = 60,11 %
Total : 283,2 / 630 = 44,95 %
PAIRE A.8 Peter Masterson -Clarence Steininger
a.6 Jan Sassen -Edith Close 39,10 %
1 NS 2C S+1 140 17.1 57.00
2 NS 3C W = -140 8.6 28.67
3 NS 1S W+3 -180 27.8 92.67 µ Tbl = 59,44 %
a.5 Catherine de Moffarts -Helene Christiaens 38,47 %
4 NS 3S N-3 -300 1.1 3.67
5 NS 2S E-1 50 22.5 75.00
6 NS 3C S-2 -100 5.4 18.00 µ Tbl = 32,22 %
a.4 Danielle Wybauw -Dominique Sassen 59,74 %
7 NS 3P E+2 -200 11.8 39.33
8 NS 6S W = -990 1.1 3.67
9 NS 1S N+1 120 17.1 57.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.3 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 47,21 %
10 NS 4C W+1 -650 20.3 67.67
11 NS 5K S-1 -50 10.7 35.67
12 NS 1S W = -90 23.5 78.33 µ Tbl = 60,56 %
a.2 Lydia Wildiers -Liliane Baptista 57,76 %
13 NS 3S N-3 -300 0.1 0.33
14 NS 1S E+4 -210 21.4 71.33
15 NS 4PcE-3 500 3.6 12.00 µ Tbl = 27,89 %
a.1 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 51,04 %
16 NS 1S N+2 150 27.8 92.67
17 NS 3S S-1 -50 10.7 35.67
18 NS 3S S-1 -100 7.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 51,11 %
a.8 Olivier Paternostre -Michel Poncelet 42,07 %
22 NS 3K E = -110 5.4 18.00
23 NS 1S W+3 -180 6.5 21.67
24 NS 3K N = 110 24.6 82.00 µ Tbl = 40,56 %
a.7 Noelle Fosse -Nicole Blondeau 41,94 %
25 NS 4P E = -620 1 3.33
26 NS 2P S = 110 23 76.67
27 NS 4P N = 420 23 76.67 µ Tbl = 52,22 %
Total : 321,6 / 720 = 44,67 %
PAIRE B.8 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire
b.5 Francoise Turin -Brigitte Velge 50,76 %
1 NS 2C S+2 170 29.9 99.67
2 NS 4C E-1 50 15 50.00
3 NS 3S E+1 -630 5.4 18.00 µ Tbl = 55,89 %
b.4 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens 53,50 %
4 NS 2K N-2 -200 5.4 18.00
5 NS 1C E = -80 19.3 64.33
6 NS 5T N-1 -50 13.9 46.33 µ Tbl = 42,89 %
b.2 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 64,51 %
7 NS 2P E+2 -170 20.3 67.67
8 NS 4C W+1 -450 26.7 89.00
9 NS 1S N = 90 9.7 32.33 µ Tbl = 63,00 %
b.1 Christiane Huby -Jeannine Thys 57,44 %
10 NS 4C W+2 -680 4.3 14.33
11 NS 4K S = 130 27.8 92.67
12 NS 1S W+1 -120 11.8 39.33 µ Tbl = 48,78 %
b10 - 0,00 %
13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00
15 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
b.8 Luc Cartuyvels -Daniel Couvreur 56,75 %
22 NS 3S E = -600 0.1 0.33
23 NS 2P E = -110 15 50.00
24 NS 4P E = -420 0.1 0.33 µ Tbl = 16,89 %
b.7 Miguel del Marmol -Gaetan Collinet 46,67 %
25 NS 3P E+2 -200 4 13.33
26 NS 3P S-1 -100 9 30.00
27 NS 5T E-1 50 10 33.33 µ Tbl = 25,56 %
b.6 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 41,82 %
28 NS 2S S-1 -100 24.1 80.33
29 NS 4C S+1 650 17.3 57.67
30 NS 4C S-2 -100 10.4 34.67 µ Tbl = 57,56 %
Total : 279,5 / 630 = 44,37 %
PAIRE B.7 Claire Destin -Ghislaine Schelfhout
b.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm 40,78 %
1 NS 3C S-1 -50 2.2 7.33
2 NS 4C E-1 50 15 50.00
3 NS 3S W = -600 22.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 44,11 %
b.1 Christiane Huby -Jeannine Thys 57,44 %
4 NS 3K N-3 -300 1.1 3.67
5 NS 2S E+1 -150 3.3 11.00
6 NS 2C S-1 -50 13.9 46.33 µ Tbl = 20,33 %
b10 - 0,00 %
7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
b.9 Muriel de Ceuninck -Andre Delacroix 49,92 %
10 NS 4C W+1 -650 20.3 67.67
11 NS 1S N-1 -50 10.7 35.67
12 NS 1S W = -90 23.5 78.33 µ Tbl = 60,56 %
b.7 Miguel del Marmol -Gaetan Collinet 46,67 %
19 NS 3S E+1 -630 21 70.00
20 NS 4C E-2 200 20 66.67
21 NS 4P N+1 650 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
b.6 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 41,82 %
22 NS 2P S-2 -100 12.9 43.00
23 NS 1S S = 90 23.5 78.33
24 NS 3K N-1 -50 17.1 57.00 µ Tbl = 59,44 %
b.5 Francoise Turin -Brigitte Velge 50,76 %
25 NS 4P E = -620 1 3.33
26 NS 4P S-2 -200 1 3.33
27 NS 6TcE-2 300 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 20,00 %
b.4 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens 53,50 %
28 NS 2C E+1 -140 10.4 34.67
29 NS 3S N = 600 1.3 4.33
30 NS 4C S-1 -50 26.4 88.00 µ Tbl = 42,33 %
Total : 279,1 / 630 = 44,30 %
PAIRE B.9 Anne Arsac -Sandra Dallemagne
b.7 Miguel del Marmol -Gaetan Collinet 46,67 %
1 NS 2C S+1 140 17.1 57.00
2 NS 4C E-1 50 15 50.00
3 NS 3S W+1 -630 5.4 18.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
b.6 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 41,82 %
4 NS 2S E-1 100 21.4 71.33
5 NS 1S W = -90 15 50.00
6 NS 2C S-2 -100 5.4 18.00 µ Tbl = 46,44 %
b.5 Francoise Turin -Brigitte Velge 50,76 %
7 NS 2P E+2 -170 20.3 67.67
8 NS 3S W+2 -460 23.5 78.33
9 NS 1S N-1 -50 3.3 11.00 µ Tbl = 52,33 %
b.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm 40,78 %
10 NS 4C W+1 -650 20.3 67.67
11 NS 2K S+1 110 23.5 78.33
12 NS 1S W+1 -120 11.8 39.33 µ Tbl = 61,78 %
b.2 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 64,51 %
13 NS 3S S-2 -200 8.6 28.67
14 NS 3S E+2 -460 5.4 18.00
15 NS 4P E-3 150 0.2 0.67 µ Tbl = 15,78 %
b.1 Christiane Huby -Jeannine Thys 57,44 %
16 NS 1S N+1 120 11.8 39.33
17 NS 2P N+2 170 21.4 71.33
18 NS 4P S-1 -100 7.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 45,22 %
b.9 Muriel de Ceuninck -Andre Delacroix 49,92 %
25 NS 2P E+2 -170 9 30.00
26 NS 3P S-1 -100 9 30.00
27 NS 4P S = 420 23 76.67 µ Tbl = 45,56 %
b.8 Luc Cartuyvels -Daniel Couvreur 56,75 %
28 NS 3C E = -140 10.4 34.67
29 NS 4C S+1 650 17.3 57.67
30 NS 3T S-2 -100 10.4 34.67 µ Tbl = 42,33 %
Total : 316,0 / 720 = 43,89 %
PAIRE B.6 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski
b10 - 0,00 %
1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
b.9 Muriel de Ceuninck -Andre Delacroix 49,92 %
4 NS 2S N+2 180 25.7 85.67
5 NS 2S W-2 100 27.8 92.67
6 NS 4C S-3 -150 0.1 0.33 µ Tbl = 59,56 %
b.8 Luc Cartuyvels -Daniel Couvreur 56,75 %
7 NS 4P E = -620 5.4 18.00
8 NS 6T W = -920 8.6 28.67
9 NS 1S N = 90 9.7 32.33 µ Tbl = 26,33 %
b.6 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 41,82 %
16 NS 1S N+1 120 11.8 39.33
17 NS 3S S-1 -50 10.7 35.67
18 NS 4P S-2 -200 0.1 0.33 µ Tbl = 25,11 %
b.5 Francoise Turin -Brigitte Velge 50,76 %
19 NS 3S E+1 -630 21 70.00
20 NS 2K W = -90 11 36.67
21 NS 4P N+1 650 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
b.4 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens 53,50 %
22 NS 2P S-2 -100 12.9 43.00
23 NS 1S S-1 -100 19.3 64.33
24 NS 3P E = -140 4.3 14.33 µ Tbl = 40,56 %
b.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm 40,78 %
25 NS 1S E+1 -120 20 66.67
26 NS 3P S-1 -100 9 30.00
27 NS 5TcE-1 100 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 47,78 %
b.2 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 64,51 %
28 NS 3C E = -140 10.4 34.67
29 NS 4C S = 620 5.9 19.67
30 NS 4C S-2 -100 10.4 34.67 µ Tbl = 29,67 %
Total : 254,1 / 630 = 40,33 %
PAIRE b.2 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed
B.2 Michel Paquot -Jean Chabotier 51,02 %
4 EO 1S S-2 -200 24.6 82.00
5 EO 1S W = -90 15 50.00
6 EO 3C S-1 -50 16.1 53.67 µ Tbl = 61,89 %
B.8 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 44,37 %
7 EO 2P E+2 -170 9.7 32.33
8 EO 4C W+1 -450 3.3 11.00
9 EO 1S N = 90 20.3 67.67 µ Tbl = 37,00 %
B.3 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie 52,63 %
10 EO 4C W+1 -650 9.7 32.33
11 EO 4C E = -420 29.9 99.67
12 EO 2C W+1 -140 25.7 85.67 µ Tbl = 72,56 %
B.9 Anne Arsac -Sandra Dallemagne 43,89 %
13 EO 3S S-2 -200 21.4 71.33
14 EO 3S E+2 -460 24.6 82.00
15 EO 4P E-3 150 29.8 99.33 µ Tbl = 84,22 %
B.4 Helene Lemberger -Mado Miller 44,95 %
16 EO 1S N+1 120 18.2 60.67
17 EO 3S S-1 -50 19.3 64.33
18 EO 4P S-1 -100 22.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
B10 Yolande Waerseggers -Regine de Hemptinne 61,27 %
19 EO 3S E+1 -630 9 30.00
20 EO 2K W+1 -110 25 83.33
21 EO 4P N+1 650 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
B.5 Michele Berrier -Helene Schyns 47,54 %
22 EO 2K E = -90 7.5 25.00
23 EO 1K S-2 -200 27.8 92.67
24 EO 3P E+1 -170 27.8 92.67 µ Tbl = 70,11 %
B.6 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 40,33 %
28 EO 3C E = -140 19.6 65.33
29 EO 4C S = 620 24.1 80.33
30 EO 4C S-2 -100 19.6 65.33 µ Tbl = 70,33 %
Total : 464,5 / 720 = 64,51 %
PAIRE a.9 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren
A.5 Grazia Neuenschwander -Nicole Leclere 50,86 %
1 EO 2C S+1 140 12.9 43.00
2 EO 4C E = -420 27.8 92.67
3 EO 3S W+1 -630 24.6 82.00 µ Tbl = 72,56 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 48,10 %
4 EO 3C W = -140 21.4 71.33
5 EO 2S E = -120 21.4 71.33
6 EO 2C S-1 -50 16.1 53.67 µ Tbl = 65,44 %
A.6 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Jannick Bekaert 45,08 %
7 EO 3P E+1 -170 9.7 32.33
8 EO 4C W+2 -480 13.9 46.33
9 EO 1S N+1 120 12.9 43.00 µ Tbl = 40,56 %
A.2 Annette Fobe -Colette Heerinckx 49,33 %
10 EO 4C W+1 -650 9.7 32.33
11 EO 3S S-1 -50 19.3 64.33
12 EO 1S W+1 -120 18.2 60.67 µ Tbl = 52,44 %
A.7 Martine Zens -Elena Valsesia 49,43 %
13 EO 3S S-2 -200 21.4 71.33
14 EO 3S E+3 -490 29.9 99.67
15 EO 4PcE-3 500 26.4 88.00 µ Tbl = 86,33 %
A.3 Lydia Luyten -Philippe Leemans 53,33 %
16 EO 1S N+1 120 18.2 60.67
17 EO 3S S-2 -100 26.7 89.00
18 EO 2P S+1 140 11.8 39.33 µ Tbl = 63,00 %
A.4 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 53,74 %
22 EO 3P S-2 -100 17.1 57.00
23 EO 1S W+1 -120 18.2 60.67
24 EO 4T W = -130 22.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 64,22 %
A.9 Patrick Gilles -Philippe van der Gracht 67,56 %
25 EO 4P E-1 100 3 10.00
26 EO 2P S = 110 7 23.33
27 EO 5P S-1 -50 26 86.67 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
Total : 436,1 / 720 = 60,57 %
PAIRE a.4 Danielle Wybauw -Dominique Sassen
A.7 Martine Zens -Elena Valsesia 49,43 %
1 EO 2C S+1 140 12.9 43.00
2 EO 3S W-2 100 7.5 25.00
3 EO 3S W+1 -630 24.6 82.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.8 Peter Masterson -Clarence Steininger 44,67 %
7 EO 3P E+2 -200 18.2 60.67
8 EO 6S W = -990 28.9 96.33
9 EO 1S N+1 120 12.9 43.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.4 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 53,74 %
10 EO 4C W+2 -680 25.7 85.67
11 EO 3C E-1 50 10.7 35.67
12 EO 1S W+1 -120 18.2 60.67 µ Tbl = 60,67 %
A.9 Patrick Gilles -Philippe van der Gracht 67,56 %
13 EO 3S N+2 660 1.1 3.67
14 EO 3S E = -400 11.8 39.33
15 EO 50%50% Ajust 15 50.00 µ Tbl = 31,00 %
A.5 Grazia Neuenschwander -Nicole Leclere 50,86 %
16 EO 2P N+1 140 6.5 21.67
17 EO 2S S+1 150 10.7 35.67
18 EO 4P S-1 -100 22.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 44,11 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 48,10 %
19 EO 3S E+2 -660 24 80.00
20 EO 3C E = -140 28 93.33
21 EO 4P N+1 650 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 73,33 %
A.6 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Jannick Bekaert 45,08 %
22 EO 2K E+1 -110 24.6 82.00
23 EO 1S S-2 -200 27.8 92.67
24 EO 4T W = -130 22.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 83,22 %
A.2 Annette Fobe -Colette Heerinckx 49,33 %
25 EO 3P W+1 -170 21 70.00
26 EO 3P S-1 -100 21 70.00
27 EO 5T E-1 50 20 66.67 µ Tbl = 68,89 %
Total : 430,1 / 720 = 59,74 %
PAIRE a.2 Lydia Wildiers -Liliane Baptista
A.6 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Jannick Bekaert 45,08 %
1 EO 2C S+1 140 12.9 43.00
2 EO 2P N+1 140 2.2 7.33
3 EO 3S E+1 -630 24.6 82.00 µ Tbl = 44,11 %
A.2 Annette Fobe -Colette Heerinckx 49,33 %
4 EO 1S S-1 -100 17.1 57.00
5 EO 2S E+1 -150 26.7 89.00
6 EO 2C S-1 -50 16.1 53.67 µ Tbl = 66,56 %
A.7 Martine Zens -Elena Valsesia 49,43 %
7 EO 4P E = -620 24.6 82.00
8 EO 6C W = -980 24.6 82.00
9 EO 1S N+2 150 4.3 14.33 µ Tbl = 59,44 %
A.3 Lydia Luyten -Philippe Leemans 53,33 %
10 EO 4C W+1 -650 9.7 32.33
11 EO 3S S-1 -50 19.3 64.33
12 EO 1S W+1 -120 18.2 60.67 µ Tbl = 52,44 %
A.8 Peter Masterson -Clarence Steininger 44,67 %
13 EO 3S N-3 -300 29.9 99.67
14 EO 1S E+4 -210 8.6 28.67
15 EO 4PcE-3 500 26.4 88.00 µ Tbl = 72,11 %
A.4 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 53,74 %
16 EO 1S N+1 120 18.2 60.67
17 EO 3S S-4 -200 29.9 99.67
18 EO 2P S+2 170 8.6 28.67 µ Tbl = 63,00 %
A.9 Patrick Gilles -Philippe van der Gracht 67,56 %
19 EO 3S E+2 -660 24 80.00
20 EO 2K W-2 200 10 33.33
21 EO 4P N+1 650 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
A.5 Grazia Neuenschwander -Nicole Leclere 50,86 %
22 EO 3P S-2 -100 17.1 57.00
23 EO 1S S-1 -100 10.7 35.67
24 EO 2P E = -110 18.2 60.67 µ Tbl = 51,11 %
Total : 415,9 / 720 = 57,76 %
PAIRE b.1 Christiane Huby -Jeannine Thys
B.1 Myriam de Timary -Eliane de Ceuninck 57,03 %
1 EO 1S S = 90 23.5 78.33
2 EO 4C W-1 50 15 50.00
3 EO 3S W = -600 7.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 51,11 %
B.7 Claire Destin -Ghislaine Schelfhout 44,30 %
4 EO 3K N-3 -300 28.9 96.33
5 EO 2S E+1 -150 26.7 89.00
6 EO 2C S-1 -50 16.1 53.67 µ Tbl = 79,67 %
B.2 Michel Paquot -Jean Chabotier 51,02 %
7 EO 3P E+1 -170 9.7 32.33
8 EO 5C W+1 -480 13.9 46.33
9 EO 1S N-1 -50 26.7 89.00 µ Tbl = 55,89 %
B.8 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 44,37 %
10 EO 4C W+2 -680 25.7 85.67
11 EO 4K S = 130 2.2 7.33
12 EO 1S W+1 -120 18.2 60.67 µ Tbl = 51,22 %
B.3 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie 52,63 %
13 EO 3S S-2 -200 21.4 71.33
14 EO 3S E+2 -460 24.6 82.00
15 EO 4C N+2 680 9.2 30.67 µ Tbl = 61,33 %
B.9 Anne Arsac -Sandra Dallemagne 43,89 %
16 EO 1S N+1 120 18.2 60.67
17 EO 2P N+2 170 8.6 28.67
18 EO 4P S-1 -100 22.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 54,78 %
B.4 Helene Lemberger -Mado Miller 44,95 %
19 EO 3S E+2 -660 24 80.00
20 EO 2P S-1 -100 22 73.33
21 EO 5P N = 650 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
B.5 Michele Berrier -Helene Schyns 47,54 %
25 EO 4C N-2 -100 7 23.33
26 EO 3P S-1 -100 21 70.00
27 EO 4P S = 420 7 23.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 413,6 / 720 = 57,44 %
PAIRE b.8 Luc Cartuyvels -Daniel Couvreur
B.5 Michele Berrier -Helene Schyns 47,54 %
1 EO 2C S+1 140 12.9 43.00
2 EO 4C E = -420 27.8 92.67
3 EO 3S E+1 -630 24.6 82.00 µ Tbl = 72,56 %
B10 Yolande Waerseggers -Regine de Hemptinne 61,27 %
4 EO 2S E-2 200 2.2 7.33
5 EO 3S E-1 50 7.5 25.00
6 EO 2C S = 110 6.5 21.67 µ Tbl = 18,00 %
B.6 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 40,33 %
7 EO 4P E = -620 24.6 82.00
8 EO 6T W = -920 21.4 71.33
9 EO 1S N = 90 20.3 67.67 µ Tbl = 73,67 %
B.1 Myriam de Timary -Eliane de Ceuninck 57,03 %
10 EO 4C W+1 -650 9.7 32.33
11 EO 4K N-1 -50 19.3 64.33
12 EO 1S W+1 -120 18.2 60.67 µ Tbl = 52,44 %
B.2 Michel Paquot -Jean Chabotier 51,02 %
16 EO 1S N = 90 29.9 99.67
17 EO 3K N+1 130 12.9 43.00
18 EO 4PcS = 790 0.1 0.33 µ Tbl = 47,67 %
B.8 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 44,37 %
22 EO 3S E = -600 29.9 99.67
23 EO 2P E = -110 15 50.00
24 EO 4P E = -420 29.9 99.67 µ Tbl = 83,11 %
B.4 Helene Lemberger -Mado Miller 44,95 %
25 EO 3C N-2 -100 7 23.33
26 EO 2P S = 110 7 23.33
27 EO 6P S-3 -150 30 100.00 µ Tbl = 48,89 %
B.9 Anne Arsac -Sandra Dallemagne 43,89 %
28 EO 3C E = -140 19.6 65.33
29 EO 4C S+1 650 12.7 42.33
30 EO 3T S-2 -100 19.6 65.33 µ Tbl = 57,67 %
Total : 408,6 / 720 = 56,75 %
PAIRE b.4 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens
B.8 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 44,37 %
4 EO 2K N-2 -200 24.6 82.00
5 EO 1C E = -80 10.7 35.67
6 EO 5T N-1 -50 16.1 53.67 µ Tbl = 57,11 %
B.4 Helene Lemberger -Mado Miller 44,95 %
10 EO 4C W+2 -680 25.7 85.67
11 EO 5K S-1 -50 19.3 64.33
12 EO 1S W+2 -150 28.9 96.33 µ Tbl = 82,11 %
B10 Yolande Waerseggers -Regine de Hemptinne 61,27 %
13 EO Pass Passe 10.7 35.67
14 EO 2K E+2 -130 2.2 7.33
15 EO 4C N+2 680 9.2 30.67 µ Tbl = 24,56 %
B.5 Michele Berrier -Helene Schyns 47,54 %
16 EO 1S N+1 120 18.2 60.67
17 EO 3S S = 400 5.4 18.00
18 EO 2P S+1 140 11.8 39.33 µ Tbl = 39,33 %
B.1 Myriam de Timary -Eliane de Ceuninck 57,03 %
19 EO 3S E-1 100 0 0.00
20 EO 2K W-1 100 15 50.00
21 EO 4P N+1 650 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 32,22 %
B.6 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 40,33 %
22 EO 2P S-2 -100 17.1 57.00
23 EO 1S S-1 -100 10.7 35.67
24 EO 3P E = -140 25.7 85.67 µ Tbl = 59,44 %
B.2 Michel Paquot -Jean Chabotier 51,02 %
25 EO 2P E+1 -140 13 43.33
26 EO 4P S-2 -200 29 96.67
27 EO 4P S-1 -50 26 86.67 µ Tbl = 75,56 %
B.7 Claire Destin -Ghislaine Schelfhout 44,30 %
28 EO 2C E+1 -140 19.6 65.33
29 EO 3S N = 600 28.7 95.67
30 EO 4C S-1 -50 3.6 12.00 µ Tbl = 57,67 %
Total : 385,2 / 720 = 53,50 %
PAIRE a.1 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 48,10 %
1 EO 2S S-1 -50 27.8 92.67
2 EO 3C W+1 -170 23.5 78.33
3 EO 2S W+1 -150 0.1 0.33 µ Tbl = 57,11 %
A.6 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Jannick Bekaert 45,08 %
4 EO 1S S = 90 11.8 39.33
5 EO 3S W = -400 29.9 99.67
6 EO 2C S-1 -50 16.1 53.67 µ Tbl = 64,22 %
A.2 Annette Fobe -Colette Heerinckx 49,33 %
7 EO 4P E = -620 24.6 82.00
8 EO 4C W+1 -450 3.3 11.00
9 EO 1S N+2 150 4.3 14.33 µ Tbl = 35,78 %
A.7 Martine Zens -Elena Valsesia 49,43 %
10 EO 4C W+1 -650 9.7 32.33
11 EO 2K S+2 130 2.2 7.33
12 EO 1S W+2 -150 28.9 96.33 µ Tbl = 45,33 %
A.3 Lydia Luyten -Philippe Leemans 53,33 %
13 EO 3S S-2 -200 21.4 71.33
14 EO 3K E+2 -150 4.3 14.33
15 EO 4C N+1 650 19.6 65.33 µ Tbl = 50,33 %
A.8 Peter Masterson -Clarence Steininger 44,67 %
16 EO 1S N+2 150 2.2 7.33
17 EO 3S S-1 -50 19.3 64.33
18 EO 3S S-1 -100 22.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 48,89 %
A.4 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 53,74 %
19 EO 3S E+1 -630 9 30.00
20 EO 3K W-4 400 3 10.00
21 EO 2K N-4 -400 30 100.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
A.5 Grazia Neuenschwander -Nicole Leclere 50,86 %
25 EO 3P E+1 -170 21 70.00
26 EO 2P S = 110 7 23.33
27 EO 4P S-1 -50 26 86.67 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
Total : 367,5 / 720 = 51,04 %
PAIRE b.5 Francoise Turin -Brigitte Velge
B.8 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 44,37 %
1 EO 2C S+2 170 0.1 0.33
2 EO 4C E-1 50 15 50.00
3 EO 3S E+1 -630 24.6 82.00 µ Tbl = 44,11 %
B.9 Anne Arsac -Sandra Dallemagne 43,89 %
7 EO 2P E+2 -170 9.7 32.33
8 EO 3S W+2 -460 6.5 21.67
9 EO 1S N-1 -50 26.7 89.00 µ Tbl = 47,67 %
B.5 Michele Berrier -Helene Schyns 47,54 %
13 EO 3S N = 600 8.6 28.67
14 EO 3S E+1 -430 17.1 57.00
15 EO 5C N = 650 19.6 65.33 µ Tbl = 50,33 %
B.1 Myriam de Timary -Eliane de Ceuninck 57,03 %
16 EO 1S N+1 120 18.2 60.67
17 EO 3S S-2 -100 26.7 89.00
18 EO 4P S-1 -100 22.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 74,89 %
B.6 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 40,33 %
19 EO 3S E+1 -630 9 30.00
20 EO 2K W = -90 19 63.33
21 EO 4P N+1 650 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
B.2 Michel Paquot -Jean Chabotier 51,02 %
22 EO 2K E = -90 7.5 25.00
23 EO 1S W-1 100 2.2 7.33
24 EO 3K N-1 -50 12.9 43.00 µ Tbl = 25,11 %
B.7 Claire Destin -Ghislaine Schelfhout 44,30 %
25 EO 4P E = -620 29 96.67
26 EO 4P S-2 -200 29 96.67
27 EO 6TcE-2 300 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 80,00 %
B.3 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie 52,63 %
28 EO 4C E-1 50 1.3 4.33
29 EO 4C S+1 650 12.7 42.33
30 EO 4C N-2 -100 19.6 65.33 µ Tbl = 37,33 %
Total : 365,5 / 720 = 50,76 %
PAIRE b.9 Muriel de Ceuninck -Andre Delacroix
B10 Yolande Waerseggers -Regine de Hemptinne 61,27 %
1 EO 1S S+2 150 2.2 7.33
2 EO 4C W = -420 27.8 92.67
3 EO 4P E = -620 15 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
B.6 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 40,33 %
4 EO 2S N+2 180 4.3 14.33
5 EO 2S W-2 100 2.2 7.33
6 EO 4C S-3 -150 29.9 99.67 µ Tbl = 40,44 %
B.1 Myriam de Timary -Eliane de Ceuninck 57,03 %
7 EO 3P E+1 -170 9.7 32.33
8 EO 4C W+2 -480 13.9 46.33
9 EO 1S N+2 150 4.3 14.33 µ Tbl = 31,00 %
B.7 Claire Destin -Ghislaine Schelfhout 44,30 %
10 EO 4C W+1 -650 9.7 32.33
11 EO 1S N-1 -50 19.3 64.33
12 EO 1S W = -90 6.5 21.67 µ Tbl = 39,44 %
B.2 Michel Paquot -Jean Chabotier 51,02 %
13 EO 3S S-2 -200 21.4 71.33
14 EO 3S E+1 -430 17.1 57.00
15 EO 4C N+1 650 19.6 65.33 µ Tbl = 64,56 %
B.3 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie 52,63 %
19 EO 3S E+1 -630 9 30.00
20 EO 3S E+1 -630 30 100.00
21 EO 6P N-1 -100 28 93.33 µ Tbl = 74,44 %
B.9 Anne Arsac -Sandra Dallemagne 43,89 %
25 EO 2P E+2 -170 21 70.00
26 EO 3P S-1 -100 21 70.00
27 EO 4P S = 420 7 23.33 µ Tbl = 54,44 %
B.5 Michele Berrier -Helene Schyns 47,54 %
28 EO 2C W+1 -140 19.6 65.33
29 EO 4C S+2 680 1.3 4.33
30 EO 4C S-2 -100 19.6 65.33 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
Total : 359,4 / 720 = 49,92 %
PAIRE a.3 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille
A.7 Martine Zens -Elena Valsesia 49,43 %
4 EO 3T S+1 130 6.5 21.67
5 EO 2S E = -120 21.4 71.33
6 EO 3K E = -110 27.8 92.67 µ Tbl = 61,89 %
A.3 Lydia Luyten -Philippe Leemans 53,33 %
7 EO 4P E+1 -650 29.9 99.67
8 EO 6C W-1 50 0.1 0.33
9 EO 2P W = -110 29.9 99.67 µ Tbl = 66,56 %
A.8 Peter Masterson -Clarence Steininger 44,67 %
10 EO 4C W+1 -650 9.7 32.33
11 EO 5K S-1 -50 19.3 64.33
12 EO 1S W = -90 6.5 21.67 µ Tbl = 39,44 %
A.4 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 53,74 %
13 EO 3S S+1 630 5.4 18.00
14 EO 3S E = -400 11.8 39.33
15 EO 5C N+1 680 9.2 30.67 µ Tbl = 29,33 %
A.9 Patrick Gilles -Philippe van der Gracht 67,56 %
16 EO 1S N+2 150 2.2 7.33
17 EO 3S S+1 430 0.1 0.33
18 EO 4P S-1 -100 22.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 27,56 %
A.5 Grazia Neuenschwander -Nicole Leclere 50,86 %
19 EO 3S E+1 -630 9 30.00
20 EO 2K W = -90 19 63.33
21 EO 4P N+1 650 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 48,10 %
22 EO 3P S-3 -150 27.8 92.67
23 EO 2P E-1 100 2.2 7.33
24 EO 3P E-1 50 8.6 28.67 µ Tbl = 42,89 %
A.6 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Jannick Bekaert 45,08 %
25 EO 4C N-3 -150 16 53.33
26 EO 3P S-1 -100 21 70.00
27 EO 5T E-1 50 20 66.67 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
Total : 339,9 / 720 = 47,21 %
PAIRE b.7 Miguel del Marmol -Gaetan Collinet
B.9 Anne Arsac -Sandra Dallemagne 43,89 %
1 EO 2C S+1 140 12.9 43.00
2 EO 4C E-1 50 15 50.00
3 EO 3S W+1 -630 24.6 82.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
B.5 Michele Berrier -Helene Schyns 47,54 %
4 EO 1ScS+2 580 0.1 0.33
5 EO 2S E = -120 21.4 71.33
6 EO 3K W-1 100 8.6 28.67 µ Tbl = 33,44 %
B10 Yolande Waerseggers -Regine de Hemptinne 61,27 %
7 EO 4P E = -620 24.6 82.00
8 EO 4C W+2 -480 13.9 46.33
9 EO 1S N+1 120 12.9 43.00 µ Tbl = 57,11 %
B.1 Myriam de Timary -Eliane de Ceuninck 57,03 %
13 EO 3S S+1 630 5.4 18.00
14 EO 3S W+2 -460 24.6 82.00
15 EO 5C N+1 680 9.2 30.67 µ Tbl = 43,56 %
B.7 Claire Destin -Ghislaine Schelfhout 44,30 %
19 EO 3S E+1 -630 9 30.00
20 EO 4C E-2 200 10 33.33
21 EO 4P N+1 650 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
B.3 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie 52,63 %
22 EO 2S E-2 200 0.1 0.33
23 EO 3P E = -140 21.4 71.33
24 EO 3K N = 110 5.4 18.00 µ Tbl = 29,89 %
B.8 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 44,37 %
25 EO 3P E+2 -200 26 86.67
26 EO 3P S-1 -100 21 70.00
27 EO 5T E-1 50 20 66.67 µ Tbl = 74,44 %
B.4 Helene Lemberger -Mado Miller 44,95 %
28 EO 2C E+1 -140 19.6 65.33
29 EO 4C S+1 650 12.7 42.33
30 EO 3C N-1 -50 3.6 12.00 µ Tbl = 39,89 %
Total : 336,0 / 720 = 46,67 %
PAIRE a.8 Olivier Paternostre -Michel Poncelet
A.9 Patrick Gilles -Philippe van der Gracht 67,56 %
1 EO 2C S+1 140 12.9 43.00
2 EO 3ScW-2 300 0.1 0.33
3 EO 4P E = -620 15 50.00 µ Tbl = 31,11 %
A.5 Grazia Neuenschwander -Nicole Leclere 50,86 %
4 EO 2K N-1 -100 17.1 57.00
5 EO 3S E-2 100 2.2 7.33
6 EO 3T N+1 130 4.3 14.33 µ Tbl = 26,22 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 48,10 %
7 EO 3P E = -140 2.2 7.33
8 EO 6S W = -990 28.9 96.33
9 EO 1S N = 90 20.3 67.67 µ Tbl = 57,11 %
A.6 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Jannick Bekaert 45,08 %
10 EO 4C W+2 -680 25.7 85.67
11 EO 3S S-2 -100 27.8 92.67
12 EO 3S W-1 50 0.1 0.33 µ Tbl = 59,56 %
A.2 Annette Fobe -Colette Heerinckx 49,33 %
13 EO 3S S+2 660 1.1 3.67
14 EO 3S E+1 -430 17.1 57.00
15 EO 4C N+1 650 19.6 65.33 µ Tbl = 42,00 %
A.3 Lydia Luyten -Philippe Leemans 53,33 %
19 EO 3S E+2 -660 24 80.00
20 EO 3S W-4 400 3 10.00
21 EO 5KcW-4 800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
A.8 Peter Masterson -Clarence Steininger 44,67 %
22 EO 3K E = -110 24.6 82.00
23 EO 1S W+3 -180 23.5 78.33
24 EO 3K N = 110 5.4 18.00 µ Tbl = 59,44 %
A.4 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 53,74 %
25 EO 3P E+1 -170 21 70.00
26 EO 2P S = 110 7 23.33
27 EO 5KcW-4 800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,11 %
Total : 302,9 / 720 = 42,07 %
PAIRE a.7 Noelle Fosse -Nicole Blondeau
A.4 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 53,74 %
1 EO 2C S+1 140 12.9 43.00
2 EO 4C W-1 50 15 50.00
3 EO 3S E = -600 7.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 39,33 %
A.9 Patrick Gilles -Philippe van der Gracht 67,56 %
4 EO 1S S = 90 11.8 39.33
5 EO 3S W-2 100 2.2 7.33
6 EO 1S N+2 150 2.2 7.33 µ Tbl = 18,00 %
A.5 Grazia Neuenschwander -Nicole Leclere 50,86 %
7 EO 2P E+2 -170 9.7 32.33
8 EO 6C W = -980 24.6 82.00
9 EO 1S N = 90 20.3 67.67 µ Tbl = 60,67 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 48,10 %
10 EO 4C W+1 -650 9.7 32.33
11 EO 5C W-2 100 8.6 28.67
12 EO 1S W = -90 6.5 21.67 µ Tbl = 27,56 %
A.2 Annette Fobe -Colette Heerinckx 49,33 %
16 EO 1S N+1 120 18.2 60.67
17 EO 2S S-1 -50 19.3 64.33
18 EO 4P S = 620 4.3 14.33 µ Tbl = 46,44 %
A.7 Martine Zens -Elena Valsesia 49,43 %
19 EO 3S E+1 -630 9 30.00
20 EO 2K W-1 100 15 50.00
21 EO 4P N+1 650 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 42,22 %
A.3 Lydia Luyten -Philippe Leemans 53,33 %
22 EO 2K E = -90 7.5 25.00
23 EO 1S S-2 -200 27.8 92.67
24 EO 3K N-1 -50 12.9 43.00 µ Tbl = 53,56 %
A.8 Peter Masterson -Clarence Steininger 44,67 %
25 EO 4P E = -620 29 96.67
26 EO 2P S = 110 7 23.33
27 EO 4P N = 420 7 23.33 µ Tbl = 47,78 %
Total : 302,0 / 720 = 41,94 %
PAIRE b.6 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck
B.4 Helene Lemberger -Mado Miller 44,95 %
1 EO 3C S-1 -50 27.8 92.67
2 EO 4C E-2 100 7.5 25.00
3 EO 4P E = -620 15 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,89 %
B.9 Anne Arsac -Sandra Dallemagne 43,89 %
4 EO 2S E-1 100 8.6 28.67
5 EO 1S W = -90 15 50.00
6 EO 2C S-2 -100 24.6 82.00 µ Tbl = 53,56 %
B10 Yolande Waerseggers -Regine de Hemptinne 61,27 %
10 EO 4C W+1 -650 9.7 32.33
11 EO 3S S-1 -50 19.3 64.33
12 EO 1S W = -90 6.5 21.67 µ Tbl = 39,44 %
B.6 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 40,33 %
16 EO 1S N+1 120 18.2 60.67
17 EO 3S S-1 -50 19.3 64.33
18 EO 4P S-2 -200 29.9 99.67 µ Tbl = 74,89 %
B.2 Michel Paquot -Jean Chabotier 51,02 %
19 EO 3S E+1 -630 9 30.00
20 EO 2TcW-4 1100 0 0.00
21 EO 4P N+2 680 2 6.67 µ Tbl = 12,22 %
B.7 Claire Destin -Ghislaine Schelfhout 44,30 %
22 EO 2P S-2 -100 17.1 57.00
23 EO 1S S = 90 6.5 21.67
24 EO 3K N-1 -50 12.9 43.00 µ Tbl = 40,56 %
B.3 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie 52,63 %
25 EO 4P E-2 200 0 0.00
26 EO 2P S = 110 7 23.33
27 EO 4P S = 420 7 23.33 µ Tbl = 15,56 %
B.8 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 44,37 %
28 EO 2S S-1 -100 5.9 19.67
29 EO 4C S+1 650 12.7 42.33
30 EO 4C S-2 -100 19.6 65.33 µ Tbl = 42,44 %
Total : 301,1 / 720 = 41,82 %
PAIRE b.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm
B.7 Claire Destin -Ghislaine Schelfhout 44,30 %
1 EO 3C S-1 -50 27.8 92.67
2 EO 4C E-1 50 15 50.00
3 EO 3S W = -600 7.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 55,89 %
B.3 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie 52,63 %
7 EO 3P E+2 -200 18.2 60.67
8 EO 4C W+2 -480 13.9 46.33
9 EO 1S N+2 150 4.3 14.33 µ Tbl = 40,44 %
B.9 Anne Arsac -Sandra Dallemagne 43,89 %
10 EO 4C W+1 -650 9.7 32.33
11 EO 2K S+1 110 6.5 21.67
12 EO 1S W+1 -120 18.2 60.67 µ Tbl = 38,22 %
B.4 Helene Lemberger -Mado Miller 44,95 %
13 EO 3S S-2 -200 21.4 71.33
14 EO 2C W = -110 0.1 0.33
15 EO 5PcE-4 800 1.2 4.00 µ Tbl = 25,22 %
B10 Yolande Waerseggers -Regine de Hemptinne 61,27 %
16 EO 1S N+2 150 2.2 7.33
17 EO 3S S-1 -50 19.3 64.33
18 EO 4P S = 620 4.3 14.33 µ Tbl = 28,67 %
B.5 Michele Berrier -Helene Schyns 47,54 %
19 EO 3S E+2 -660 24 80.00
20 EO 3K W = -110 25 83.33
21 EO 4P N+1 650 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
B.1 Myriam de Timary -Eliane de Ceuninck 57,03 %
22 EO 3P S-1 -50 2.2 7.33
23 EO 1S S-1 -100 10.7 35.67
24 EO 3K N+1 130 1.1 3.67 µ Tbl = 15,56 %
B.6 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 40,33 %
25 EO 1S E+1 -120 10 33.33
26 EO 3P S-1 -100 21 70.00
27 EO 5TcE-1 100 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 52,22 %
Total : 293,6 / 720 = 40,78 %
PAIRE a.6 Jan Sassen -Edith Close
A.8 Peter Masterson -Clarence Steininger 44,67 %
1 EO 2C S+1 140 12.9 43.00
2 EO 3C W = -140 21.4 71.33
3 EO 1S W+3 -180 2.2 7.33 µ Tbl = 40,56 %
A.4 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 53,74 %
4 EO 1S S-1 -100 17.1 57.00
5 EO 1S E = -90 15 50.00
6 EO 2C S+3 200 0.1 0.33 µ Tbl = 35,78 %
A.9 Patrick Gilles -Philippe van der Gracht 67,56 %
7 EO 4P E-1 100 0.1 0.33
8 EO 4C W+2 -480 13.9 46.33
9 EO 1S N+2 150 4.3 14.33 µ Tbl = 20,33 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 48,10 %
13 EO 3S S-2 -200 21.4 71.33
14 EO 3S E+2 -460 24.6 82.00
15 EO 5PcE-4 800 1.2 4.00 µ Tbl = 52,44 %
A.6 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Jannick Bekaert 45,08 %
16 EO 1S N+1 120 18.2 60.67
17 EO 3S S = 400 5.4 18.00
18 EO 4P S = 620 4.3 14.33 µ Tbl = 31,00 %
A.2 Annette Fobe -Colette Heerinckx 49,33 %
19 EO 3S E+2 -660 24 80.00
20 EO 3K W-3 300 6 20.00
21 EO 2P N+3 200 26 86.67 µ Tbl = 62,22 %
A.7 Martine Zens -Elena Valsesia 49,43 %
22 EO 3T S-2 -100 17.1 57.00
23 EO 2S W = -120 18.2 60.67
24 EO 3K N+1 130 1.1 3.67 µ Tbl = 40,44 %
A.3 Lydia Luyten -Philippe Leemans 53,33 %
25 EO 2P E+1 -140 13 43.33
26 EO 2P S = 110 7 23.33
27 EO 4P S = 420 7 23.33 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
Total : 281,5 / 720 = 39,10 %
PAIRE a.5 Catherine de Moffarts -Helene Christiaens
A.3 Lydia Luyten -Philippe Leemans 53,33 %
1 EO 3C S = 140 12.9 43.00
2 EO 2P N = 110 4.3 14.33
3 EO 3S W = -600 7.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 27,44 %
A.8 Peter Masterson -Clarence Steininger 44,67 %
4 EO 3S N-3 -300 28.9 96.33
5 EO 2S E-1 50 7.5 25.00
6 EO 3C S-2 -100 24.6 82.00 µ Tbl = 67,78 %
A.9 Patrick Gilles -Philippe van der Gracht 67,56 %
10 EO 4C W+2 -680 25.7 85.67
11 EO 3K S+1 130 2.2 7.33
12 EO 1S W = -90 6.5 21.67 µ Tbl = 38,22 %
A.5 Grazia Neuenschwander -Nicole Leclere 50,86 %
13 EO 3S S-1 -100 12.9 43.00
14 EO 3C W+1 -170 6.5 21.67
15 EO 4C N+2 680 9.2 30.67 µ Tbl = 31,78 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 48,10 %
16 EO 1S N+1 120 18.2 60.67
17 EO 4P N = 420 2.2 7.33
18 EO 1S S = 90 15 50.00 µ Tbl = 39,33 %
A.6 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Jannick Bekaert 45,08 %
19 EO 4S E+1 -660 24 80.00
20 EO 3C W-2 200 10 33.33
21 EO 4P N+1 650 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
A.2 Annette Fobe -Colette Heerinckx 49,33 %
22 EO 2K E = -90 7.5 25.00
23 EO 2P E-1 100 2.2 7.33
24 EO 3T W = -110 18.2 60.67 µ Tbl = 31,00 %
A.7 Martine Zens -Elena Valsesia 49,43 %
25 EO 3P E-1 100 3 10.00
26 EO 2P S = 110 7 23.33
27 EO 4P S = 420 7 23.33 µ Tbl = 18,89 %
Total : 277,0 / 720 = 38,47 %
PAIRE b10 -
B.6 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 40,33 %
1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
B.1 Myriam de Timary -Eliane de Ceuninck 57,03 %
4 EO BYE 0 0.00
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
B.7 Claire Destin -Ghislaine Schelfhout 44,30 %
7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
B.2 Michel Paquot -Jean Chabotier 51,02 %
10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
B.8 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 44,37 %
13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00
15 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
B.3 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie 52,63 %
16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
B.4 Helene Lemberger -Mado Miller 44,95 %
22 EO BYE 0 0.00
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
B10 Yolande Waerseggers -Regine de Hemptinne 61,27 %
28 EO BYE 0 0.00
29 EO BYE 0 0.00
30 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 900 = 0,00 %
|