B.C.O.B.
Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement
--- 1 66,16 A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claude Renier
--- 2 61,82 a.7 Luca Dona -Jinming He
--- 3 65,41 A10 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles
--- 4 57,61 a10 Liliane Baptista -Lydia Wildiers
--- 5 57,39 a12 Serge Alard -Michel Lievens
--- 6 55,45 a.8 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger
--- 7 54,98 a.9 Benedicte Lemaigre -Mercedes Steed
--- 8 52,71 A.5 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont
--- 9 52,56 A.1 Colette Heerinckx -Eliane de Ceuninck
--- 10 52,39 a.3 Catherine de Moffarts -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
--- 11 52,00 A.9 Jacqueline de Thier -Jeannine Wanderpepen
--- 12 50,81 A.8 Francoise Turin -Brigitte Velge
--- 13 48,60 a.5 Myriam de Timary -Gerard Cooreman
--- 14 48,37 A11 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm
--- 15 47,29 A.6 Nicole Leclere -Grazia Neuenschwander
--- 16 46,04 A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia
--- 17 45,13 a.1 Jean Pierre Oudaert -Marina Oudaert
--- 18 44,81 a.6 Fabienne Smit -Helene Schyns
--- 19 44,73 a11 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson
--- 20 44,48 A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor
--- 21 44,28 A12 Sophie Tilemans -Martine Zens
--- 22 44,09 a13 Paul Henricot -Francois Dehem
--- 23 43,86 A.3 Didier Collart -Patricia Bardy
--- 24 43,69 A13 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart
--- 25 43,04 A14 Jacques Podevyn -Francine Belet
--- 26 42,54 a.2 Gaetan van de Werve -Nicole Blondeau
--- 27 40,66 a.4 Anne Beyne -Marie J. de Wagheneire
--- 28 0,00 a14 -
PAIRE A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claude Renier
a.2 Gaetan van de Werve -Nicole Blondeau 42,54 %
3 NS 4P W-1 100 20.8 94.55
4 NS 3P S-1 -100 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
a.1 Jean Pierre Oudaert -Marina Oudaert 45,13 %
5 NS 4C E = -420 12.1 55.00
6 NS 4P S-1 -50 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
a14 - 0,00 %
7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a13 Paul Henricot -Francois Dehem 44,09 %
9 NS 3C N+1 170 19.7 89.55
10 NS 3C S-3 -300 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
a12 Serge Alard -Michel Lievens 57,39 %
11 NS 3S S = 400 7.7 35.00
12 NS 4C N+1 650 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a11 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 44,73 %
13 NS 3S N+4 720 19.7 89.55
14 NS 3S N+1 430 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 87,05 %
a10 Liliane Baptista -Lydia Wildiers 57,61 %
15 NS 3S W-3 150 21.9 99.55
16 NS 3S N+3 490 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 92,05 %
a.8 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 55,45 %
17 NS 3C N+2 200 6.6 30.00
18 NS 3S E-1 50 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a.7 Luca Dona -Jinming He 61,82 %
19 NS 3S W+1 -630 2.3 10.45
20 NS 2P N = 110 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a.6 Fabienne Smit -Helene Schyns 44,81 %
21 NS 4C E+2 -480 7 31.82
22 NS 4P E = -620 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.5 Myriam de Timary -Gerard Cooreman 48,60 %
23 NS 3K W-1 100 12.1 55.00
24 NS 2P E-1 50 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
a.4 Anne Beyne -Marie J. de Wagheneire 40,66 %
25 NS 4T E-1 100 18 81.82
26 NS 3S S = 600 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
Total : 320,2 / 484 = 66,16 %
PAIRE a.7 Luca Dona -Jinming He
A11 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm 48,37 %
1 EO 2P E-1 50 11 50.00
2 EO 6C E = -980 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A.5 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 52,71 %
3 EO 3S E = -600 15.4 70.00
4 EO 3C E = -140 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 67,50 %
A12 Sophie Tilemans -Martine Zens 44,28 %
5 EO 4C E+1 -450 20.8 94.55
6 EO 4C W+2 -680 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 87,05 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 43,69 %
9 EO 2K E+1 -110 19.7 89.55
10 EO 2T W+4 -170 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia 46,04 %
13 EO 3S S+1 630 20.8 94.55
14 EO 2S N+1 150 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
A.1 Colette Heerinckx -Eliane de Ceuninck 52,56 %
15 EO 4T E-2 100 3.4 15.45
16 EO 3S N+2 460 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
A.8 Francoise Turin -Brigitte Velge 50,81 %
17 EO 4PcE-1 100 19.7 89.55
18 EO 3S E = -400 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claude Renier 66,16 %
19 EO 3S W+1 -630 19.7 89.55
20 EO 2P N = 110 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A.9 Jacqueline de Thier -Jeannine Wanderpepen 52,00 %
21 EO 5C E = -450 9 40.91
22 EO 3S W+2 -660 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A.3 Didier Collart -Patricia Bardy 43,86 %
23 EO 3K W-1 100 9.9 45.00
24 EO 3KcN-2 -300 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A10 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 65,41 %
25 EO 3S W-5 500 0 0.00
26 EO 3S S = 600 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 6,82 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 44,48 %
27 EO 3S N = 400 12.1 55.00
28 EO 6C W-2 100 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
Total : 326,4 / 528 = 61,82 %
PAIRE A10 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles
a.5 Myriam de Timary -Gerard Cooreman 48,60 %
1 NS 2S W-1 50 11 50.00
2 NS 6C W-1 50 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
a.4 Anne Beyne -Marie J. de Wagheneire 40,66 %
3 NS 4P W-1 100 20.8 94.55
4 NS 3C E-1 100 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 87,05 %
a.2 Gaetan van de Werve -Nicole Blondeau 42,54 %
5 NS 4C E = -420 12.1 55.00
6 NS 4P W+1 -650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.1 Jean Pierre Oudaert -Marina Oudaert 45,13 %
7 NS 3S N = 600 12.1 55.00
8 NS 4P W+2 -480 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
a14 - 0,00 %
9 NS BYE 0 0.00
10 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a13 Paul Henricot -Francois Dehem 44,09 %
11 NS 3S S+1 430 18.6 84.55
12 NS 4C N+1 650 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
a12 Serge Alard -Michel Lievens 57,39 %
13 NS 3S N+1 630 1.2 5.45
14 NS 3S N+1 430 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a10 Liliane Baptista -Lydia Wildiers 57,61 %
19 NS 3S W-1 100 21.9 99.55
20 NS 2P N = 110 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
a.9 Benedicte Lemaigre -Mercedes Steed 54,98 %
21 NS 4C E+2 -480 7 31.82
22 NS 4P E = -620 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.8 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 55,45 %
23 NS 2P N-2 -200 0.1 0.45
24 NS 3C N = 140 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.7 Luca Dona -Jinming He 61,82 %
25 NS 3S W-5 500 22 100.00
26 NS 3S S = 600 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 93,18 %
a.6 Fabienne Smit -Helene Schyns 44,81 %
27 NS 3S S+1 430 17.5 79.55
28 NS 5C W-1 50 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
Total : 316,6 / 484 = 65,41 %
PAIRE a10 Liliane Baptista -Lydia Wildiers
A.6 Nicole Leclere -Grazia Neuenschwander 47,29 %
1 EO 3S E = -400 20.8 94.55
2 EO 6C E = -980 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 94,55 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 43,69 %
3 EO 2P E+1 -140 6.6 30.00
4 EO 3C E = -140 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia 46,04 %
5 EO 4C E = -420 9.9 45.00
6 EO 5P S-2 -100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A14 Jacques Podevyn -Francine Belet 43,04 %
7 EO 3S N = 600 9.9 45.00
8 EO 6P W+1 -1010 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A.8 Francoise Turin -Brigitte Velge 50,81 %
9 EO 2C N+1 140 6.6 30.00
10 EO 3S W+2 -660 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
A.1 Colette Heerinckx -Eliane de Ceuninck 52,56 %
11 EO 3S S = 400 14.3 65.00
12 EO 4C N-1 -100 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claude Renier 66,16 %
15 EO 3S W-3 150 0.1 0.45
16 EO 3S N+3 490 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 7,95 %
A10 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 65,41 %
19 EO 3S W-1 100 0.1 0.45
20 EO 2P N = 110 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 44,48 %
21 EO 6C E = -980 22 100.00
22 EO 4P E+1 -650 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
A11 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm 48,37 %
23 EO 1P N+1 110 3.4 15.45
24 EO 3K N-2 -100 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
A.5 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 52,71 %
25 EO 3C S-5 -250 15 68.18
26 EO 3K N+1 130 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A12 Sophie Tilemans -Martine Zens 44,28 %
27 EO 2S N+2 180 15.4 70.00
28 EO 4C W = -420 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
Total : 304,2 / 528 = 57,61 %
PAIRE a12 Serge Alard -Michel Lievens
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia 46,04 %
1 EO 3C N-1 -50 15.4 70.00
2 EO 4C W = -420 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A14 Jacques Podevyn -Francine Belet 43,04 %
3 EO 1S S-3 -150 11 50.00
4 EO 3C E = -140 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A.8 Francoise Turin -Brigitte Velge 50,81 %
5 EO 4C E = -420 9.9 45.00
6 EO 4C W+2 -680 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A.1 Colette Heerinckx -Eliane de Ceuninck 52,56 %
7 EO 3S N+1 630 3.4 15.45
8 EO 6P W = -980 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.9 Jacqueline de Thier -Jeannine Wanderpepen 52,00 %
9 EO 2C N+2 170 2.3 10.45
10 EO 2T W+2 -130 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 15,45 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claude Renier 66,16 %
11 EO 3S S = 400 14.3 65.00
12 EO 4C N+1 650 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A10 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 65,41 %
13 EO 3S N+1 630 20.8 94.55
14 EO 3S N+1 430 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.3 Didier Collart -Patricia Bardy 43,86 %
15 EO 3T E = -110 14.3 65.00
16 EO 3S N+2 460 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 44,48 %
19 EO 3S W+2 -660 21.9 99.55
20 EO 2P N-1 -100 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 92,05 %
A12 Sophie Tilemans -Martine Zens 44,28 %
23 EO 2K W-1 100 9.9 45.00
24 EO 2P E = -110 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A.6 Nicole Leclere -Grazia Neuenschwander 47,29 %
25 EO 3C S-5 -250 15 68.18
26 EO 3K N = 110 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 43,69 %
27 EO 2T S-1 -50 19.7 89.55
28 EO 5C W-1 50 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
Total : 303,0 / 528 = 57,39 %
PAIRE a.8 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger
A.5 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 52,71 %
1 EO 3C N = 140 0.1 0.45
2 EO 6C W-1 50 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 7,95 %
A12 Sophie Tilemans -Martine Zens 44,28 %
3 EO 3S E = -600 15.4 70.00
4 EO 2P S = 110 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
A.6 Nicole Leclere -Grazia Neuenschwander 47,29 %
5 EO 4C E+1 -450 20.8 94.55
6 EO 5C W+1 -680 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 87,05 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 43,69 %
7 EO 3S N-1 -100 20.8 94.55
8 EO 6P W = -980 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 87,05 %
A14 Jacques Podevyn -Francine Belet 43,04 %
11 EO 3S S+1 430 3.4 15.45
12 EO 4C N = 620 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 45,23 %
A.8 Francoise Turin -Brigitte Velge 50,81 %
15 EO 5T E-2 100 3.4 15.45
16 EO 3S N+2 460 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claude Renier 66,16 %
17 EO 3C N+2 200 15.4 70.00
18 EO 3S E-1 50 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A.9 Jacqueline de Thier -Jeannine Wanderpepen 52,00 %
19 EO 2K E+3 -150 13.2 60.00
20 EO 3T W = -110 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
A.3 Didier Collart -Patricia Bardy 43,86 %
21 EO 4C E+2 -480 15 68.18
22 EO 6P E-2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A10 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 65,41 %
23 EO 2P N-2 -200 21.9 99.55
24 EO 3C N = 140 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 44,48 %
25 EO 3S W = -600 20 90.91
26 EO 3S S-1 -100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
A11 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm 48,37 %
27 EO 3S N-1 -50 19.7 89.55
28 EO 5C W-1 50 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
Total : 292,8 / 528 = 55,45 %
PAIRE a.9 Benedicte Lemaigre -Mercedes Steed
A12 Sophie Tilemans -Martine Zens 44,28 %
1 EO 3S E = -400 20.8 94.55
2 EO 5C W = -450 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
A.6 Nicole Leclere -Grazia Neuenschwander 47,29 %
3 EO 3S E+1 -630 20.8 94.55
4 EO 2C E+1 -140 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 43,69 %
5 EO 4C E = -420 9.9 45.00
6 EO 4P N-1 -50 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia 46,04 %
7 EO 3S N-1 -100 20.8 94.55
8 EO 4P W+2 -480 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
A14 Jacques Podevyn -Francine Belet 43,04 %
9 EO 2C S+2 170 2.3 10.45
10 EO 3S W+2 -660 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.1 Colette Heerinckx -Eliane de Ceuninck 52,56 %
13 EO 3S N+3 690 9.9 45.00
14 EO 3K S+2 150 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.9 Jacqueline de Thier -Jeannine Wanderpepen 52,00 %
17 EO 3P E = -140 21.9 99.55
18 EO 3S E = -400 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.3 Didier Collart -Patricia Bardy 43,86 %
19 EO 2K E+1 -110 3.4 15.45
20 EO 2P N+1 140 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A10 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 65,41 %
21 EO 4C E+2 -480 15 68.18
22 EO 4P E = -620 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 44,48 %
23 EO 1S N = 90 15.4 70.00
24 EO 4CcN-3 -500 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
A11 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm 48,37 %
25 EO 3C S-4 -200 11 50.00
26 EO 2P S = 110 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.5 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 52,71 %
27 EO 3S N+1 430 4.5 20.45
28 EO 5PcS = 850 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 12,95 %
Total : 290,3 / 528 = 54,98 %
PAIRE A.5 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont
a.8 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 55,45 %
1 NS 3C N = 140 21.9 99.55
2 NS 6C W-1 50 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 92,05 %
a.7 Luca Dona -Jinming He 61,82 %
3 NS 3S E = -600 6.6 30.00
4 NS 3C E = -140 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 32,50 %
a.5 Myriam de Timary -Gerard Cooreman 48,60 %
9 NS 2K E+1 -110 2.3 10.45
10 NS 3S W+2 -660 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 10,45 %
a.4 Anne Beyne -Marie J. de Wagheneire 40,66 %
11 NS 3S N+1 430 18.6 84.55
12 NS 4C S+1 650 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
a.3 Catherine de Moffarts -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,39 %
13 NS 3S N+3 690 12.1 55.00
14 NS 3S N-1 -50 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
a.2 Gaetan van de Werve -Nicole Blondeau 42,54 %
15 NS 2T E = -90 15.4 70.00
16 NS 3S N+1 430 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
a.1 Jean Pierre Oudaert -Marina Oudaert 45,13 %
17 NS 4C N+1 450 16.5 75.00
18 NS 2S E+1 -150 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
a14 - 0,00 %
19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a13 Paul Henricot -Francois Dehem 44,09 %
21 NS 5C E+1 -480 7 31.82
22 NS 4P E = -620 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a11 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 44,73 %
23 NS 2P N-1 -100 2.3 10.45
24 NS 2C N-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
a10 Liliane Baptista -Lydia Wildiers 57,61 %
25 NS 3C S-5 -250 7 31.82
26 NS 3K N+1 130 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.9 Benedicte Lemaigre -Mercedes Steed 54,98 %
27 NS 3S N+1 430 17.5 79.55
28 NS 5PcS = 850 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 87,05 %
Total : 255,1 / 484 = 52,71 %
PAIRE A.1 Colette Heerinckx -Eliane de Ceuninck
a.1 Jean Pierre Oudaert -Marina Oudaert 45,13 %
1 NS 2P E-2 100 17.5 79.55
2 NS 4C W = -420 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
a14 - 0,00 %
3 NS BYE 0 0.00
4 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a13 Paul Henricot -Francois Dehem 44,09 %
5 NS 4C E = -420 12.1 55.00
6 NS 4P N = 420 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a12 Serge Alard -Michel Lievens 57,39 %
7 NS 3S N+1 630 18.6 84.55
8 NS 6P W = -980 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a11 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 44,73 %
9 NS 2K E = -90 7.7 35.00
10 NS 3T W+2 -150 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a10 Liliane Baptista -Lydia Wildiers 57,61 %
11 NS 3S S = 400 7.7 35.00
12 NS 4C N-1 -100 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
a.9 Benedicte Lemaigre -Mercedes Steed 54,98 %
13 NS 3S N+3 690 12.1 55.00
14 NS 3K S+2 150 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.7 Luca Dona -Jinming He 61,82 %
15 NS 4T E-2 100 18.6 84.55
16 NS 3S N+2 460 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
a.6 Fabienne Smit -Helene Schyns 44,81 %
17 NS 4CcN+1 690 21.9 99.55
18 NS 3S E = -400 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
a.5 Myriam de Timary -Gerard Cooreman 48,60 %
19 NS 2K E+2 -130 14.3 65.00
20 NS 2P N+2 170 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a.4 Anne Beyne -Marie J. de Wagheneire 40,66 %
21 NS 4PcS-2 -500 2 9.09
22 NS 4P E+2 -680 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
a.3 Catherine de Moffarts -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,39 %
23 NS 2K W-1 100 12.1 55.00
24 NS 2C N-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
Total : 254,4 / 484 = 52,56 %
PAIRE a.3 Catherine de Moffarts -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
A.9 Jacqueline de Thier -Jeannine Wanderpepen 52,00 %
1 EO 4T W-2 100 4.5 20.45
2 EO 4C W = -420 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
A.3 Didier Collart -Patricia Bardy 43,86 %
5 EO 4C E = -420 9.9 45.00
6 EO 4C W+2 -680 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A11 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm 48,37 %
7 EO 1S N+1 120 17.5 79.55
8 EO 6P W = -980 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 44,48 %
9 EO 3C S-1 -50 11 50.00
10 EO 2T W+3 -150 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A12 Sophie Tilemans -Martine Zens 44,28 %
11 EO 3S S+1 430 3.4 15.45
12 EO 5C S = 650 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
A.5 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 52,71 %
13 EO 3S N+3 690 9.9 45.00
14 EO 3S N-1 -50 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 43,69 %
15 EO 3T E = -110 14.3 65.00
16 EO 3S N+3 490 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
A.6 Nicole Leclere -Grazia Neuenschwander 47,29 %
17 EO 4C N = 420 9.9 45.00
18 EO 3S E = -400 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A14 Jacques Podevyn -Francine Belet 43,04 %
19 EO 2K E+3 -150 13.2 60.00
20 EO 2P N-1 -100 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia 46,04 %
21 EO 5C W-1 50 2 9.09
22 EO 4P E = -620 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.1 Colette Heerinckx -Eliane de Ceuninck 52,56 %
23 EO 2K W-1 100 9.9 45.00
24 EO 2C N-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.8 Francoise Turin -Brigitte Velge 50,81 %
25 EO 3S W = -600 20 90.91
26 EO 5K N-1 -100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
Total : 276,6 / 528 = 52,39 %
PAIRE A.9 Jacqueline de Thier -Jeannine Wanderpepen
a.3 Catherine de Moffarts -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,39 %
1 NS 4T W-2 100 17.5 79.55
2 NS 4C W = -420 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
a.1 Jean Pierre Oudaert -Marina Oudaert 45,13 %
3 NS 2P E+1 -140 15.4 70.00
4 NS 3P S-2 -200 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a14 - 0,00 %
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a13 Paul Henricot -Francois Dehem 44,09 %
7 NS 3S N+1 630 18.6 84.55
8 NS 4P W+2 -480 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
a12 Serge Alard -Michel Lievens 57,39 %
9 NS 2C N+2 170 19.7 89.55
10 NS 2T W+2 -130 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 84,55 %
a11 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 44,73 %
11 NS 3S S = 400 7.7 35.00
12 NS 4C N = 620 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
a.9 Benedicte Lemaigre -Mercedes Steed 54,98 %
17 NS 3P E = -140 0.1 0.45
18 NS 3S E = -400 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.8 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 55,45 %
19 NS 2K E+3 -150 8.8 40.00
20 NS 3T W = -110 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
a.7 Luca Dona -Jinming He 61,82 %
21 NS 5C E = -450 13 59.09
22 NS 3S W+2 -660 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a.6 Fabienne Smit -Helene Schyns 44,81 %
23 NS 2C S = 110 18.6 84.55
24 NS 2C N = 110 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 87,05 %
a.5 Myriam de Timary -Gerard Cooreman 48,60 %
25 NS 3C S-3 -150 14 63.64
26 NS 3K N = 110 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.4 Anne Beyne -Marie J. de Wagheneire 40,66 %
27 NS 3S N = 400 9.9 45.00
28 NS 5C W-1 50 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
Total : 251,7 / 484 = 52,00 %
PAIRE A.8 Francoise Turin -Brigitte Velge
a14 - 0,00 %
1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a13 Paul Henricot -Francois Dehem 44,09 %
3 NS 2P E+1 -140 15.4 70.00
4 NS 3P S+1 170 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
a12 Serge Alard -Michel Lievens 57,39 %
5 NS 4C E = -420 12.1 55.00
6 NS 4C W+2 -680 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a11 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 44,73 %
7 NS 3S N+1 630 18.6 84.55
8 NS 3S W+4 -520 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a10 Liliane Baptista -Lydia Wildiers 57,61 %
9 NS 2C N+1 140 15.4 70.00
10 NS 3S W+2 -660 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
a.8 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 55,45 %
15 NS 5T E-2 100 18.6 84.55
16 NS 3S N+2 460 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
a.7 Luca Dona -Jinming He 61,82 %
17 NS 4PcE-1 100 2.3 10.45
18 NS 3S E = -400 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a.6 Fabienne Smit -Helene Schyns 44,81 %
19 NS 2K E+1 -110 18.6 84.55
20 NS 2P N+1 140 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a.5 Myriam de Timary -Gerard Cooreman 48,60 %
21 NS 4C E+1 -450 13 59.09
22 NS 5P E = -650 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.4 Anne Beyne -Marie J. de Wagheneire 40,66 %
23 NS 1P N = 80 4.5 20.45
24 NS 2S E-1 50 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.3 Catherine de Moffarts -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,39 %
25 NS 3S W = -600 2 9.09
26 NS 5K N-1 -100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
a.2 Gaetan van de Werve -Nicole Blondeau 42,54 %
27 NS 3S N+1 430 17.5 79.55
28 NS 5C W-1 50 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
Total : 245,9 / 484 = 50,81 %
PAIRE a.5 Myriam de Timary -Gerard Cooreman
A10 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 65,41 %
1 EO 2S W-1 50 11 50.00
2 EO 6C W-1 50 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
A11 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm 48,37 %
5 EO 4C E = -420 9.9 45.00
6 EO 4P N-1 -50 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
A.5 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 52,71 %
9 EO 2K E+1 -110 19.7 89.55
10 EO 3S W+2 -660 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 89,55 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 43,69 %
11 EO 3S N = 400 14.3 65.00
12 EO 5C N = 650 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.6 Nicole Leclere -Grazia Neuenschwander 47,29 %
13 EO 3S N+3 690 9.9 45.00
14 EO 3S N+1 430 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
A14 Jacques Podevyn -Francine Belet 43,04 %
15 EO 2T E+1 -110 14.3 65.00
16 EO 3S N+2 460 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia 46,04 %
17 EO 5T W-4 200 15.4 70.00
18 EO 3S E = -400 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
A.1 Colette Heerinckx -Eliane de Ceuninck 52,56 %
19 EO 2K E+2 -130 7.7 35.00
20 EO 2P N+2 170 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.8 Francoise Turin -Brigitte Velge 50,81 %
21 EO 4C E+1 -450 9 40.91
22 EO 5P E = -650 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claude Renier 66,16 %
23 EO 3K W-1 100 9.9 45.00
24 EO 2P E-1 50 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
A.9 Jacqueline de Thier -Jeannine Wanderpepen 52,00 %
25 EO 3C S-3 -150 8 36.36
26 EO 3K N = 110 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A.3 Didier Collart -Patricia Bardy 43,86 %
27 EO 3S N-1 -50 19.7 89.55
28 EO 5C W-1 50 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
Total : 256,6 / 528 = 48,60 %
PAIRE A11 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm
a.7 Luca Dona -Jinming He 61,82 %
1 NS 2P E-1 50 11 50.00
2 NS 6C E = -980 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a.6 Fabienne Smit -Helene Schyns 44,81 %
3 NS 3S E = -600 6.6 30.00
4 NS 3P S-1 -100 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.5 Myriam de Timary -Gerard Cooreman 48,60 %
5 NS 4C E = -420 12.1 55.00
6 NS 4P N-1 -50 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
a.3 Catherine de Moffarts -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,39 %
7 NS 1S N+1 120 4.5 20.45
8 NS 6P W = -980 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
a.2 Gaetan van de Werve -Nicole Blondeau 42,54 %
9 NS 2K E = -90 7.7 35.00
10 NS 3S W-1 100 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a.1 Jean Pierre Oudaert -Marina Oudaert 45,13 %
11 NS 3S N = 400 7.7 35.00
12 NS 4C N = 620 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
a14 - 0,00 %
13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a13 Paul Henricot -Francois Dehem 44,09 %
15 NS 2C W = -110 7.7 35.00
16 NS 3S N+3 490 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
a11 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 44,73 %
21 NS 5C E-1 50 20 90.91
22 NS 4P E = -620 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a10 Liliane Baptista -Lydia Wildiers 57,61 %
23 NS 1P N+1 110 18.6 84.55
24 NS 3K N-2 -100 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
a.9 Benedicte Lemaigre -Mercedes Steed 54,98 %
25 NS 3C S-4 -200 11 50.00
26 NS 2P S = 110 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.8 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 55,45 %
27 NS 3S N-1 -50 2.3 10.45
28 NS 5C W-1 50 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
Total : 234,1 / 484 = 48,37 %
PAIRE A.6 Nicole Leclere -Grazia Neuenschwander
a10 Liliane Baptista -Lydia Wildiers 57,61 %
1 NS 3S E = -400 1.2 5.45
2 NS 6C E = -980 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 5,45 %
a.9 Benedicte Lemaigre -Mercedes Steed 54,98 %
3 NS 3S E+1 -630 1.2 5.45
4 NS 2C E+1 -140 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
a.8 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 55,45 %
5 NS 4C E+1 -450 1.2 5.45
6 NS 5C W+1 -680 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 12,95 %
a.6 Fabienne Smit -Helene Schyns 44,81 %
11 NS 3S S = 400 7.7 35.00
12 NS 4C N = 620 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
a.5 Myriam de Timary -Gerard Cooreman 48,60 %
13 NS 3S N+3 690 12.1 55.00
14 NS 3S N+1 430 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
a.4 Anne Beyne -Marie J. de Wagheneire 40,66 %
15 NS 2C W = -110 7.7 35.00
16 NS 3S N+3 490 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
a.3 Catherine de Moffarts -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,39 %
17 NS 4C N = 420 12.1 55.00
18 NS 3S E = -400 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.2 Gaetan van de Werve -Nicole Blondeau 42,54 %
19 NS 2K E+4 -170 4.5 20.45
20 NS 2PcN = 670 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a.1 Jean Pierre Oudaert -Marina Oudaert 45,13 %
21 NS 4C E = -420 16 72.73
22 NS 4P E-1 100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
a14 - 0,00 %
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a12 Serge Alard -Michel Lievens 57,39 %
25 NS 3C S-5 -250 7 31.82
26 NS 3K N = 110 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a11 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 44,73 %
27 NS 3S N+1 430 17.5 79.55
28 NS 5PcS = 850 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 87,05 %
Total : 228,9 / 484 = 47,29 %
PAIRE A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia
a12 Serge Alard -Michel Lievens 57,39 %
1 NS 3C N-1 -50 6.6 30.00
2 NS 4C W = -420 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a11 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 44,73 %
3 NS 3S E+1 -630 1.2 5.45
4 NS 3P S-2 -200 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 5,45 %
a10 Liliane Baptista -Lydia Wildiers 57,61 %
5 NS 4C E = -420 12.1 55.00
6 NS 5P S-2 -100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a.9 Benedicte Lemaigre -Mercedes Steed 54,98 %
7 NS 3S N-1 -100 1.2 5.45
8 NS 4P W+2 -480 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
a.7 Luca Dona -Jinming He 61,82 %
13 NS 3S S+1 630 1.2 5.45
14 NS 2S N+1 150 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
a.6 Fabienne Smit -Helene Schyns 44,81 %
15 NS 2C W = -110 7.7 35.00
16 NS 3S N+2 460 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
a.5 Myriam de Timary -Gerard Cooreman 48,60 %
17 NS 5T W-4 200 6.6 30.00
18 NS 3S E = -400 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
a.4 Anne Beyne -Marie J. de Wagheneire 40,66 %
19 NS 2K E+2 -130 14.3 65.00
20 NS 2P N+1 140 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 67,50 %
a.3 Catherine de Moffarts -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,39 %
21 NS 5C W-1 50 20 90.91
22 NS 4P E = -620 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a.2 Gaetan van de Werve -Nicole Blondeau 42,54 %
23 NS 1P N+2 140 21.9 99.55
24 NS 3T N-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
a.1 Jean Pierre Oudaert -Marina Oudaert 45,13 %
25 NS 4T E-2 200 20 90.91
26 NS 3S S-1 -100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a13 Paul Henricot -Francois Dehem 44,09 %
27 NS 3S S+1 430 17.5 79.55
28 NS 5C W = -450 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
Total : 243,1 / 528 = 46,04 %
PAIRE a.1 Jean Pierre Oudaert -Marina Oudaert
A.1 Colette Heerinckx -Eliane de Ceuninck 52,56 %
1 EO 2P E-2 100 4.5 20.45
2 EO 4C W = -420 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
A.9 Jacqueline de Thier -Jeannine Wanderpepen 52,00 %
3 EO 2P E+1 -140 6.6 30.00
4 EO 3P S-2 -200 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claude Renier 66,16 %
5 EO 4C E = -420 9.9 45.00
6 EO 4P S-1 -50 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
A10 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 65,41 %
7 EO 3S N = 600 9.9 45.00
8 EO 4P W+2 -480 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
A.3 Didier Collart -Patricia Bardy 43,86 %
9 EO 2K E+1 -110 19.7 89.55
10 EO 3S W-1 100 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A11 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm 48,37 %
11 EO 3S N = 400 14.3 65.00
12 EO 4C N = 620 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 44,48 %
13 EO 3S S+4 720 2.3 10.45
14 EO 3K S+2 150 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A12 Sophie Tilemans -Martine Zens 44,28 %
15 EO 3T E+1 -130 21.9 99.55
16 EO 3S N+2 460 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
A.5 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 52,71 %
17 EO 4C N+1 450 5.5 25.00
18 EO 2S E+1 -150 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 43,69 %
19 EO 3K E+2 -150 13.2 60.00
20 EO 2P N = 110 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A.6 Nicole Leclere -Grazia Neuenschwander 47,29 %
21 EO 4C E = -420 6 27.27
22 EO 4P E-1 100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia 46,04 %
25 EO 4T E-2 200 2 9.09
26 EO 3S S-1 -100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
Total : 238,3 / 528 = 45,13 %
PAIRE a.6 Fabienne Smit -Helene Schyns
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 44,48 %
1 EO 3P E-2 100 4.5 20.45
2 EO 6C E-2 100 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 10,45 %
A11 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm 48,37 %
3 EO 3S E = -600 15.4 70.00
4 EO 3P S-1 -100 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A12 Sophie Tilemans -Martine Zens 44,28 %
7 EO 2S N+1 150 14.3 65.00
8 EO 3S W+3 -490 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A.6 Nicole Leclere -Grazia Neuenschwander 47,29 %
11 EO 3S S = 400 14.3 65.00
12 EO 4C N = 620 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
A14 Jacques Podevyn -Francine Belet 43,04 %
13 EO 3S N+3 690 9.9 45.00
14 EO 5K S = 400 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia 46,04 %
15 EO 2C W = -110 14.3 65.00
16 EO 3S N+2 460 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
A.1 Colette Heerinckx -Eliane de Ceuninck 52,56 %
17 EO 4CcN+1 690 0.1 0.45
18 EO 3S E = -400 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
A.8 Francoise Turin -Brigitte Velge 50,81 %
19 EO 2K E+1 -110 3.4 15.45
20 EO 2P N+1 140 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claude Renier 66,16 %
21 EO 4C E+2 -480 15 68.18
22 EO 4P E = -620 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.9 Jacqueline de Thier -Jeannine Wanderpepen 52,00 %
23 EO 2C S = 110 3.4 15.45
24 EO 2C N = 110 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 12,95 %
A.3 Didier Collart -Patricia Bardy 43,86 %
25 EO 3S W = -600 20 90.91
26 EO 4K N-1 -100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
A10 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 65,41 %
27 EO 3S S+1 430 4.5 20.45
28 EO 5C W-1 50 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
Total : 236,6 / 528 = 44,81 %
PAIRE a11 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson
A13 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 43,69 %
1 EO 2P E-1 50 11 50.00
2 EO 4C W = -420 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia 46,04 %
3 EO 3S E+1 -630 20.8 94.55
4 EO 3P S-2 -200 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 94,55 %
A14 Jacques Podevyn -Francine Belet 43,04 %
5 EO 4C W-1 50 0.1 0.45
6 EO 4C W+2 -680 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A.8 Francoise Turin -Brigitte Velge 50,81 %
7 EO 3S N+1 630 3.4 15.45
8 EO 3S W+4 -520 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A.1 Colette Heerinckx -Eliane de Ceuninck 52,56 %
9 EO 2K E = -90 14.3 65.00
10 EO 3T W+2 -150 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A.9 Jacqueline de Thier -Jeannine Wanderpepen 52,00 %
11 EO 3S S = 400 14.3 65.00
12 EO 4C N = 620 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claude Renier 66,16 %
13 EO 3S N+4 720 2.3 10.45
14 EO 3S N+1 430 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 12,95 %
A.3 Didier Collart -Patricia Bardy 43,86 %
17 EO 3C N+2 200 15.4 70.00
18 EO 3S E = -400 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
A11 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm 48,37 %
21 EO 5C E-1 50 2 9.09
22 EO 4P E = -620 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.5 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 52,71 %
23 EO 2P N-1 -100 19.7 89.55
24 EO 2C N-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A12 Sophie Tilemans -Martine Zens 44,28 %
25 EO 3T E = -110 6 27.27
26 EO 3S S+1 630 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
A.6 Nicole Leclere -Grazia Neuenschwander 47,29 %
27 EO 3S N+1 430 4.5 20.45
28 EO 5PcS = 850 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 12,95 %
Total : 236,2 / 528 = 44,73 %
PAIRE A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor
a.6 Fabienne Smit -Helene Schyns 44,81 %
1 NS 3P E-2 100 17.5 79.55
2 NS 6C E-2 100 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 89,55 %
a.4 Anne Beyne -Marie J. de Wagheneire 40,66 %
7 NS 3S N+1 630 18.6 84.55
8 NS 7PcW-1 100 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 92,05 %
a.3 Catherine de Moffarts -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,39 %
9 NS 3C S-1 -50 11 50.00
10 NS 2T W+3 -150 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.2 Gaetan van de Werve -Nicole Blondeau 42,54 %
11 NS 3S S-1 -50 0.1 0.45
12 NS 4C S+1 650 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a.1 Jean Pierre Oudaert -Marina Oudaert 45,13 %
13 NS 3S S+4 720 19.7 89.55
14 NS 3K S+2 150 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a14 - 0,00 %
15 NS BYE 0 0.00
16 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a13 Paul Henricot -Francois Dehem 44,09 %
17 NS 4C N+1 450 16.5 75.00
18 NS 3S E+1 -430 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a12 Serge Alard -Michel Lievens 57,39 %
19 NS 3S W+2 -660 0.1 0.45
20 NS 2P N-1 -100 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 7,95 %
a10 Liliane Baptista -Lydia Wildiers 57,61 %
21 NS 6C E = -980 0 0.00
22 NS 4P E+1 -650 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
a.9 Benedicte Lemaigre -Mercedes Steed 54,98 %
23 NS 1S N = 90 6.6 30.00
24 NS 4CcN-3 -500 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
a.8 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 55,45 %
25 NS 3S W = -600 2 9.09
26 NS 3S S-1 -100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
a.7 Luca Dona -Jinming He 61,82 %
27 NS 3S N = 400 9.9 45.00
28 NS 6C W-2 100 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
Total : 215,3 / 484 = 44,48 %
PAIRE A12 Sophie Tilemans -Martine Zens
a.9 Benedicte Lemaigre -Mercedes Steed 54,98 %
1 NS 3S E = -400 1.2 5.45
2 NS 5C W = -450 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
a.8 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 55,45 %
3 NS 3S E = -600 6.6 30.00
4 NS 2P S = 110 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
a.7 Luca Dona -Jinming He 61,82 %
5 NS 4C E+1 -450 1.2 5.45
6 NS 4C W+2 -680 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 12,95 %
a.6 Fabienne Smit -Helene Schyns 44,81 %
7 NS 2S N+1 150 7.7 35.00
8 NS 3S W+3 -490 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a.4 Anne Beyne -Marie J. de Wagheneire 40,66 %
9 NS 3K E-1 100 13.2 60.00
10 NS 2T W+3 -150 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a.3 Catherine de Moffarts -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,39 %
11 NS 3S S+1 430 18.6 84.55
12 NS 5C S = 650 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
a.2 Gaetan van de Werve -Nicole Blondeau 42,54 %
13 NS 3S N+2 660 5.5 25.00
14 NS 3S N+1 430 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 54,77 %
a.1 Jean Pierre Oudaert -Marina Oudaert 45,13 %
15 NS 3T E+1 -130 0.1 0.45
16 NS 3S N+2 460 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
a14 - 0,00 %
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a12 Serge Alard -Michel Lievens 57,39 %
23 NS 2K W-1 100 12.1 55.00
24 NS 2P E = -110 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a11 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 44,73 %
25 NS 3T E = -110 16 72.73
26 NS 3S S+1 630 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
a10 Liliane Baptista -Lydia Wildiers 57,61 %
27 NS 2S N+2 180 6.6 30.00
28 NS 4C W = -420 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
Total : 214,3 / 484 = 44,28 %
PAIRE a13 Paul Henricot -Francois Dehem
A14 Jacques Podevyn -Francine Belet 43,04 %
1 EO 3T W = -110 17.5 79.55
2 EO 4C W+1 -450 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.8 Francoise Turin -Brigitte Velge 50,81 %
3 EO 2P E+1 -140 6.6 30.00
4 EO 3P S+1 170 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
A.1 Colette Heerinckx -Eliane de Ceuninck 52,56 %
5 EO 4C E = -420 9.9 45.00
6 EO 4P N = 420 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.9 Jacqueline de Thier -Jeannine Wanderpepen 52,00 %
7 EO 3S N+1 630 3.4 15.45
8 EO 4P W+2 -480 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claude Renier 66,16 %
9 EO 3C N+1 170 2.3 10.45
10 EO 3C S-3 -300 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
A10 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 65,41 %
11 EO 3S S+1 430 3.4 15.45
12 EO 4C N+1 650 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
A.3 Didier Collart -Patricia Bardy 43,86 %
13 EO 3S S+4 720 2.3 10.45
14 EO 2S N-1 -50 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A11 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm 48,37 %
15 EO 2C W = -110 14.3 65.00
16 EO 3S N+3 490 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 44,48 %
17 EO 4C N+1 450 5.5 25.00
18 EO 3S E+1 -430 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A.5 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 52,71 %
21 EO 5C E+1 -480 15 68.18
22 EO 4P E = -620 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 43,69 %
25 EO 3C S-4 -200 11 50.00
26 EO 4P S-1 -100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia 46,04 %
27 EO 3S S+1 430 4.5 20.45
28 EO 5C W = -450 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
Total : 232,8 / 528 = 44,09 %
PAIRE A.3 Didier Collart -Patricia Bardy
a.3 Catherine de Moffarts -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,39 %
5 NS 4C E = -420 12.1 55.00
6 NS 4C W+2 -680 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a.2 Gaetan van de Werve -Nicole Blondeau 42,54 %
7 NS 3T S+2 150 7.7 35.00
8 NS 4P W+2 -480 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.1 Jean Pierre Oudaert -Marina Oudaert 45,13 %
9 NS 2K E+1 -110 2.3 10.45
10 NS 3S W-1 100 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a14 - 0,00 %
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a13 Paul Henricot -Francois Dehem 44,09 %
13 NS 3S S+4 720 19.7 89.55
14 NS 2S N-1 -50 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a12 Serge Alard -Michel Lievens 57,39 %
15 NS 3T E = -110 7.7 35.00
16 NS 3S N+2 460 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
a11 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 44,73 %
17 NS 3C N+2 200 6.6 30.00
18 NS 3S E = -400 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
a.9 Benedicte Lemaigre -Mercedes Steed 54,98 %
19 NS 2K E+1 -110 18.6 84.55
20 NS 2P N+1 140 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a.8 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 55,45 %
21 NS 4C E+2 -480 7 31.82
22 NS 6P E-2 200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a.7 Luca Dona -Jinming He 61,82 %
23 NS 3K W-1 100 12.1 55.00
24 NS 3KcN-2 -300 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a.6 Fabienne Smit -Helene Schyns 44,81 %
25 NS 3S W = -600 2 9.09
26 NS 4K N-1 -100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
a.5 Myriam de Timary -Gerard Cooreman 48,60 %
27 NS 3S N-1 -50 2.3 10.45
28 NS 5C W-1 50 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
Total : 212,3 / 484 = 43,86 %
PAIRE A13 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart
a11 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 44,73 %
1 NS 2P E-1 50 11 50.00
2 NS 4C W = -420 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a10 Liliane Baptista -Lydia Wildiers 57,61 %
3 NS 2P E+1 -140 15.4 70.00
4 NS 3C E = -140 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.9 Benedicte Lemaigre -Mercedes Steed 54,98 %
5 NS 4C E = -420 12.1 55.00
6 NS 4P N-1 -50 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
a.8 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 55,45 %
7 NS 3S N-1 -100 1.2 5.45
8 NS 6P W = -980 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 12,95 %
a.7 Luca Dona -Jinming He 61,82 %
9 NS 2K E+1 -110 2.3 10.45
10 NS 2T W+4 -170 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a.5 Myriam de Timary -Gerard Cooreman 48,60 %
11 NS 3S N = 400 7.7 35.00
12 NS 5C N = 650 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.4 Anne Beyne -Marie J. de Wagheneire 40,66 %
13 NS 3S N+2 660 5.5 25.00
14 NS 2S N+1 150 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
a.3 Catherine de Moffarts -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,39 %
15 NS 3T E = -110 7.7 35.00
16 NS 3S N+3 490 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
a.2 Gaetan van de Werve -Nicole Blondeau 42,54 %
17 NS 5CcN = 650 19.7 89.55
18 NS 3S E = -400 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
a.1 Jean Pierre Oudaert -Marina Oudaert 45,13 %
19 NS 3K E+2 -150 8.8 40.00
20 NS 2P N = 110 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a13 Paul Henricot -Francois Dehem 44,09 %
25 NS 3C S-4 -200 11 50.00
26 NS 4P S-1 -100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a12 Serge Alard -Michel Lievens 57,39 %
27 NS 2T S-1 -50 2.3 10.45
28 NS 5C W-1 50 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
Total : 230,7 / 528 = 43,69 %
PAIRE A14 Jacques Podevyn -Francine Belet
a13 Paul Henricot -Francois Dehem 44,09 %
1 NS 3T W = -110 4.5 20.45
2 NS 4C W+1 -450 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a12 Serge Alard -Michel Lievens 57,39 %
3 NS 1S S-3 -150 11 50.00
4 NS 3C E = -140 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a11 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 44,73 %
5 NS 4C W-1 50 21.9 99.55
6 NS 4C W+2 -680 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a10 Liliane Baptista -Lydia Wildiers 57,61 %
7 NS 3S N = 600 12.1 55.00
8 NS 6P W+1 -1010 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a.9 Benedicte Lemaigre -Mercedes Steed 54,98 %
9 NS 2C S+2 170 19.7 89.55
10 NS 3S W+2 -660 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.8 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 55,45 %
11 NS 3S S+1 430 18.6 84.55
12 NS 4C N = 620 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 54,77 %
a.6 Fabienne Smit -Helene Schyns 44,81 %
13 NS 3S N+3 690 12.1 55.00
14 NS 5K S = 400 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a.5 Myriam de Timary -Gerard Cooreman 48,60 %
15 NS 2T E+1 -110 7.7 35.00
16 NS 3S N+2 460 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
a.4 Anne Beyne -Marie J. de Wagheneire 40,66 %
17 NS 4C N = 420 12.1 55.00
18 NS 3S E = -400 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.3 Catherine de Moffarts -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,39 %
19 NS 2K E+3 -150 8.8 40.00
20 NS 2P N-1 -100 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a.2 Gaetan van de Werve -Nicole Blondeau 42,54 %
21 NS 6C W-1 50 20 90.91
22 NS 6P E = -1430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a14 - 0,00 %
27 NS BYE 0 0.00
28 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 208,3 / 484 = 43,04 %
PAIRE a.2 Gaetan van de Werve -Nicole Blondeau
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claude Renier 66,16 %
3 EO 4P W-1 100 1.2 5.45
4 EO 3P S-1 -100 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
A10 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 65,41 %
5 EO 4C E = -420 9.9 45.00
6 EO 4P W+1 -650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.3 Didier Collart -Patricia Bardy 43,86 %
7 EO 3T S+2 150 14.3 65.00
8 EO 4P W+2 -480 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A11 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm 48,37 %
9 EO 2K E = -90 14.3 65.00
10 EO 3S W-1 100 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 44,48 %
11 EO 3S S-1 -50 21.9 99.55
12 EO 4C S+1 650 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A12 Sophie Tilemans -Martine Zens 44,28 %
13 EO 3S N+2 660 16.5 75.00
14 EO 3S N+1 430 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 45,23 %
A.5 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 52,71 %
15 EO 2T E = -90 6.6 30.00
16 EO 3S N+1 430 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 43,69 %
17 EO 5CcN = 650 2.3 10.45
18 EO 3S E = -400 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
A.6 Nicole Leclere -Grazia Neuenschwander 47,29 %
19 EO 2K E+4 -170 17.5 79.55
20 EO 2PcN = 670 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A14 Jacques Podevyn -Francine Belet 43,04 %
21 EO 6C W-1 50 2 9.09
22 EO 6P E = -1430 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia 46,04 %
23 EO 1P N+2 140 0.1 0.45
24 EO 3T N-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
A.8 Francoise Turin -Brigitte Velge 50,81 %
27 EO 3S N+1 430 4.5 20.45
28 EO 5C W-1 50 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
Total : 224,6 / 528 = 42,54 %
PAIRE a.4 Anne Beyne -Marie J. de Wagheneire
A10 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 65,41 %
3 EO 4P W-1 100 1.2 5.45
4 EO 3C E-1 100 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 12,95 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 44,48 %
7 EO 3S N+1 630 3.4 15.45
8 EO 7PcW-1 100 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 7,95 %
A12 Sophie Tilemans -Martine Zens 44,28 %
9 EO 3K E-1 100 8.8 40.00
10 EO 2T W+3 -150 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A.5 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 52,71 %
11 EO 3S N+1 430 3.4 15.45
12 EO 4C S+1 650 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 43,69 %
13 EO 3S N+2 660 16.5 75.00
14 EO 2S N+1 150 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
A.6 Nicole Leclere -Grazia Neuenschwander 47,29 %
15 EO 2C W = -110 14.3 65.00
16 EO 3S N+3 490 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
A14 Jacques Podevyn -Francine Belet 43,04 %
17 EO 4C N = 420 9.9 45.00
18 EO 3S E = -400 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia 46,04 %
19 EO 2K E+2 -130 7.7 35.00
20 EO 2P N+1 140 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 32,50 %
A.1 Colette Heerinckx -Eliane de Ceuninck 52,56 %
21 EO 4PcS-2 -500 20 90.91
22 EO 4P E+2 -680 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
A.8 Francoise Turin -Brigitte Velge 50,81 %
23 EO 1P N = 80 17.5 79.55
24 EO 2S E-1 50 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claude Renier 66,16 %
25 EO 4T E-1 100 4 18.18
26 EO 3S S = 600 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
A.9 Jacqueline de Thier -Jeannine Wanderpepen 52,00 %
27 EO 3S N = 400 12.1 55.00
28 EO 5C W-1 50 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
Total : 214,7 / 528 = 40,66 %
PAIRE a14 -
A.8 Francoise Turin -Brigitte Velge 50,81 %
1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.1 Colette Heerinckx -Eliane de Ceuninck 52,56 %
3 EO BYE 0 0.00
4 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.9 Jacqueline de Thier -Jeannine Wanderpepen 52,00 %
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claude Renier 66,16 %
7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A10 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 65,41 %
9 EO BYE 0 0.00
10 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.3 Didier Collart -Patricia Bardy 43,86 %
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A11 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Simone Munsterhjelm 48,37 %
13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 44,48 %
15 EO BYE 0 0.00
16 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A12 Sophie Tilemans -Martine Zens 44,28 %
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.5 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 52,71 %
19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.6 Nicole Leclere -Grazia Neuenschwander 47,29 %
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A14 Jacques Podevyn -Francine Belet 43,04 %
27 EO BYE 0 0.00
28 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 616 = 0,00 %
|