B.C.O.B.
Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 65,88 A.9 Alain Labaere -Grazia Neuenschwander
--- 2 58,74 A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens
--- 3 52,50 A.8 David Walker -Jacques Podevyn
--- 4 52,45 A.4 Hugo Baetens -Alan Beckman
--- 5 47,41 A.7 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
--- 6 46,84 A.2 Dominique Sassen -Annette Fobe
--- 7 45,61 A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Mercedes Oostens
--- 8 41,43 A.5 Kathleen van Doren -Bernard Groetembril
--- 9 39,05 A.6 Benedicte Lemaigre -Brigitte Velge
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 59,73 a.7 Myriam de Timary -Gerard Cooreman
--- 2 55,42 a.6 Dilva Haym -Michel Lievens
--- 3 54,49 a.2 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles
--- 4 51,25 a.8 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille
--- 5 47,53 a.1 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Catherine de Moffarts
--- 6 46,31 a.4 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor
--- 7 42,77 a.3 Didier Collart -Annie Zeimes
--- 8 42,26 a.5 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes
--- 9 0,00 a.9 -
PAIRE A.9 Alain Labaere -Grazia Neuenschwander
a.8 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 51,25 %
1 NS 4P E-1 50 13.9 99.29
2 NS 3C N-2 -200 0.1 0.71
3 NS 4P E = -620 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 60,95 %
a.7 Myriam de Timary -Gerard Cooreman 59,73 %
4 NS 3S S+2 660 11.6 82.86
5 NS 2K E = -90 8.1 57.86
6 NS 3T E-1 100 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 80,00 %
a.6 Dilva Haym -Michel Lievens 55,42 %
7 NS 3C W = -140 7 50.00
8 NS 4C S+1 450 13.9 99.29
9 NS 4C E = -620 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 60,95 %
a.5 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 42,26 %
10 NS 5K N = 600 10.4 74.29
11 NS 2C E-2 100 13.9 99.29
12 NS 5KcE-3 500 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 85,48 %
a.4 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 46,31 %
13 NS 2S N = 120 8.1 57.86
14 NS 3S W+2 -460 3.6 25.71
15 NS 1S E-2 100 12.7 90.71 µ Tbl = 58,10 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Annie Zeimes 42,77 %
16 NS 4C E-1 100 9.3 66.43
17 NS 2C N = 110 7 50.00
18 NS 3S W+1 -430 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 60,95 %
a.2 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 54,49 %
19 NS 3K E = -110 2 14.29
20 NS 2P N+2 170 10 71.43
21 NS 3P S+1 170 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
a.9 - 0,00 %
25 NS BYE 0 0.00
26 NS BYE 0 0.00
27 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 193,7 / 294 = 65,88 %
PAIRE A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens
a.5 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 42,26 %
1 NS 4P E = -420 1.3 9.29
2 NS 3C N = 140 11.6 82.86
3 NS 4P E = -620 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Annie Zeimes 42,77 %
7 NS 3C W = -140 7 50.00
8 NS 4C S-1 -50 0.1 0.71
9 NS 3C E-1 100 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
a.2 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 54,49 %
10 NS 5PcE = -850 0.1 0.71
11 NS 1S W-1 50 11.6 82.86
12 NS 5C W-1 50 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 44,52 %
a.1 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Catherine de Moffarts 47,53 %
13 NS 1S N+1 120 8.1 57.86
14 NS 3S W-1 50 11.6 82.86
15 NS 2K W-1 50 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
a.9 - 0,00 %
16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.8 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 51,25 %
19 NS 2C S = 110 10 71.43
20 NS 4P N = 620 13 92.86
21 NS 3P S+1 170 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 80,95 %
a.7 Myriam de Timary -Gerard Cooreman 59,73 %
22 NS 2P N = 110 11.6 82.86
23 NS 4C E+1 -650 5.9 42.14
24 NS 3S N-2 -100 1.3 9.29 µ Tbl = 44,76 %
a.6 Dilva Haym -Michel Lievens 55,42 %
25 NS 2C W+1 -140 4.7 33.57
26 NS 3S S = 600 13.9 99.29
27 NS 2K E-1 50 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 71,90 %
Total : 172,7 / 294 = 58,74 %
PAIRE A.8 David Walker -Jacques Podevyn
a.6 Dilva Haym -Michel Lievens 55,42 %
1 NS 2P W+2 -170 7 50.00
2 NS 1S W = -90 3.6 25.71
3 NS 4P E+1 -650 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 33,81 %
a.5 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 42,26 %
4 NS 5K S = 600 4.7 33.57
5 NS 2KcE-2 300 13.9 99.29
6 NS 2KcN-1 -100 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 66,43 %
a.4 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 46,31 %
7 NS 3C W = -140 7 50.00
8 NS 4C S = 420 7 50.00
9 NS 5TcN-4 -800 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 33,57 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Annie Zeimes 42,77 %
10 NS 5K N+1 620 13.9 99.29
11 NS 1S W = -90 9.3 66.43
12 NS 4C W = -420 1.3 9.29 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
a.2 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 54,49 %
13 NS 2S N+1 150 13.9 99.29
14 NS 3S W+1 -430 7 50.00
15 NS 1S E = -90 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 60,95 %
a.1 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Catherine de Moffarts 47,53 %
16 NS 4C W-2 200 13.9 99.29
17 NS 1P S+2 140 11.6 82.86
18 NS 4P E+1 -450 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 69,29 %
a.8 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 51,25 %
22 NS 2S S-2 -100 3.6 25.71
23 NS 4C E+1 -650 5.9 42.14
24 NS 3S N = 400 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 44,76 %
a.7 Myriam de Timary -Gerard Cooreman 59,73 %
25 NS 2C W+2 -170 1.3 9.29
26 NS 3C W-1 100 9.3 66.43
27 NS 2K E-1 50 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 52,86 %
Total : 176,4 / 336 = 52,50 %
PAIRE A.4 Hugo Baetens -Alan Beckman
a.7 Myriam de Timary -Gerard Cooreman 59,73 %
1 NS 4P W = -420 1.3 9.29
2 NS 2C N+1 140 11.6 82.86
3 NS 4P E+1 -650 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 39,29 %
a.6 Dilva Haym -Michel Lievens 55,42 %
4 NS 3S S+1 630 7 50.00
5 NS 2S W = -120 4.7 33.57
6 NS 1S E+1 -120 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 39,05 %
a.4 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 46,31 %
10 NS 5K N = 600 10.4 74.29
11 NS 2P S-2 -100 7 50.00
12 NS 4P S = 620 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 74,52 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Annie Zeimes 42,77 %
13 NS 2T N = 90 3.6 25.71
14 NS 3S W-1 50 11.6 82.86
15 NS 2T E-2 100 12.7 90.71 µ Tbl = 66,43 %
a.2 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 54,49 %
16 NS 3S E = -600 0.1 0.71
17 NS 3S N = 400 13.9 99.29
18 NS 4P E+1 -450 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 41,90 %
a.1 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Catherine de Moffarts 47,53 %
19 NS 4K E-1 100 6 42.86
20 NS 2P N+1 140 7 50.00
21 NS 4C N = 620 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
a.9 - 0,00 %
22 NS BYE 0 0.00
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.8 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 51,25 %
25 NS 3P S-1 -50 12.7 90.71
26 NS 3T N-2 -200 2.4 17.14
27 NS 2S S-2 -100 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
Total : 154,2 / 294 = 52,45 %
PAIRE A.7 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
a.4 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 46,31 %
1 NS 2P W+2 -170 7 50.00
2 NS 2C N+1 140 11.6 82.86
3 NS 4P E+1 -650 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 52,86 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Annie Zeimes 42,77 %
4 NS 3K N+1 130 0.1 0.71
5 NS 2S W-1 50 11.6 82.86
6 NS 2P N-2 -100 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.2 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 54,49 %
7 NS 3C W = -140 7 50.00
8 NS 4C S = 420 7 50.00
9 NS 4C E+1 -650 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 39,05 %
a.1 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Catherine de Moffarts 47,53 %
10 NS 4P E+1 -650 5.9 42.14
11 NS 1P S-3 -150 2.4 17.14
12 NS 4P S-1 -100 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
a.9 - 0,00 %
13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00
15 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.7 Myriam de Timary -Gerard Cooreman 59,73 %
19 NS 3K E = -110 2 14.29
20 NS 1S S+1 120 4 28.57
21 NS 3P S = 140 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
a.6 Dilva Haym -Michel Lievens 55,42 %
22 NS 2P N = 110 11.6 82.86
23 NS 4C E+1 -650 5.9 42.14
24 NS 3S N+1 430 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 74,76 %
a.5 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 42,26 %
25 NS 2C W = -110 8.1 57.86
26 NS 3T N = 110 11.6 82.86
27 NS 1S E = -90 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 58,10 %
Total : 139,4 / 294 = 47,41 %
PAIRE A.2 Dominique Sassen -Annette Fobe
a.2 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 54,49 %
4 NS 3S S+2 660 11.6 82.86
5 NS 2K E = -90 8.1 57.86
6 NS 3P N-2 -100 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
a.1 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Catherine de Moffarts 47,53 %
7 NS 3C W = -140 7 50.00
8 NS 4C N = 420 7 50.00
9 NS 3C E-1 100 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 58,10 %
a.9 - 0,00 %
10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.8 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 51,25 %
13 NS 3T S+1 130 11.6 82.86
14 NS 3ScW+2 -750 0.1 0.71
15 NS 1S E = -90 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 39,05 %
a.7 Myriam de Timary -Gerard Cooreman 59,73 %
16 NS 3C E = -140 2.4 17.14
17 NS 4C N-1 -50 1.3 9.29
18 NS 4P E+1 -450 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 17,38 %
a.6 Dilva Haym -Michel Lievens 55,42 %
19 NS 3K E = -110 2 14.29
20 NS 2P N+1 140 7 50.00
21 NS 2P S+1 140 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.5 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 42,26 %
22 NS 4P N-2 -100 3.6 25.71
23 NS 4C E = -620 12.7 90.71
24 NS 3S N-1 -50 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.4 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 46,31 %
25 NS 2C W = -110 8.1 57.86
26 NS 3T S-1 -100 5.9 42.14
27 NS 2K E-1 50 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 60,95 %
Total : 137,7 / 294 = 46,84 %
PAIRE A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Mercedes Oostens
a.1 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Catherine de Moffarts 47,53 %
1 NS 2P W+1 -140 11.6 82.86
2 NS 1S W = -90 3.6 25.71
3 NS 4P E = -620 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 63,81 %
a.9 - 0,00 %
4 NS BYE 0 0.00
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.8 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 51,25 %
7 NS 4C W-1 100 13.9 99.29
8 NS 3C N+1 170 2.4 17.14
9 NS 4C E-1 100 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 63,57 %
a.7 Myriam de Timary -Gerard Cooreman 59,73 %
10 NS 5C E+1 -680 2.4 17.14
11 NS 1KcN-2 -300 0.1 0.71
12 NS 4C W = -420 1.3 9.29 µ Tbl = 9,05 %
a.6 Dilva Haym -Michel Lievens 55,42 %
13 NS 2C E = -110 0.1 0.71
14 NS 3S W+2 -460 3.6 25.71
15 NS 1S E+1 -120 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 9,05 %
a.5 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 42,26 %
16 NS 3K S-1 -50 4.7 33.57
17 NS 2C N = 110 7 50.00
18 NS 4P E = -420 12.7 90.71 µ Tbl = 58,10 %
a.4 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 46,31 %
19 NS 3C S = 140 14 100.00
20 NS 4P N-1 -100 1 7.14
21 NS 4P S-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Annie Zeimes 42,77 %
22 NS 2P N = 110 11.6 82.86
23 NS 4C E = -620 12.7 90.71
24 NS 3S N = 400 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 80,00 %
Total : 134,1 / 294 = 45,61 %
PAIRE A.5 Kathleen van Doren -Bernard Groetembril
a.9 - 0,00 %
1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.8 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 51,25 %
4 NS 4K S+1 150 2.4 17.14
5 NS 2S W+1 -150 2.4 17.14
6 NS 3S E = -600 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 11,67 %
a.7 Myriam de Timary -Gerard Cooreman 59,73 %
7 NS 3P N-2 -200 0.1 0.71
8 NS 3S N+1 430 11.6 82.86
9 NS 3C E-1 100 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 52,62 %
a.5 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 42,26 %
13 NS 1S N = 90 3.6 25.71
14 NS 3S W-1 50 11.6 82.86
15 NS 1S E = -90 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 47,38 %
a.4 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 46,31 %
16 NS 4C W-1 100 9.3 66.43
17 NS 1C N+1 110 7 50.00
18 NS 4P E = -420 12.7 90.71 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Annie Zeimes 42,77 %
19 NS 2C S = 110 10 71.43
20 NS 4P N = 620 13 92.86
21 NS 3P S = 140 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.2 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 54,49 %
22 NS 4P N-2 -100 3.6 25.71
23 NS 4C E+2 -680 0.1 0.71
24 NS 3S N-2 -100 1.3 9.29 µ Tbl = 11,90 %
a.1 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Catherine de Moffarts 47,53 %
25 NS 3P S-1 -50 12.7 90.71
26 NS 4KcS-5 -1400 0.1 0.71
27 NS 1S E+1 -120 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 30,71 %
Total : 121,8 / 294 = 41,43 %
PAIRE A.6 Benedicte Lemaigre -Brigitte Velge
a.2 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 54,49 %
1 NS 2P W+2 -170 7 50.00
2 NS 2C N = 110 7 50.00
3 NS 4P E+1 -650 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 41,90 %
a.1 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Catherine de Moffarts 47,53 %
4 NS 3S S+2 660 11.6 82.86
5 NS 2T N-2 -200 0.1 0.71
6 NS 1S W+2 -150 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 33,57 %
a.9 - 0,00 %
7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.8 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 51,25 %
10 NS 5P E = -650 5.9 42.14
11 NS 2C E = -110 4.7 33.57
12 NS 4C W-2 100 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 47,38 %
a.6 Dilva Haym -Michel Lievens 55,42 %
16 NS 4C W-1 100 9.3 66.43
17 NS 3P S-1 -50 1.3 9.29
18 NS 4P E+1 -450 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 33,81 %
a.5 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 42,26 %
19 NS 2C S = 110 10 71.43
20 NS 4P N-1 -100 1 7.14
21 NS 3C N = 140 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
a.4 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 46,31 %
22 NS 4P N-2 -100 3.6 25.71
23 NS 4C E+1 -650 5.9 42.14
24 NS 3S N = 400 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 44,76 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Annie Zeimes 42,77 %
25 NS 2C W+2 -170 1.3 9.29
26 NS 3S S-1 -100 5.9 42.14
27 NS 1P W = -80 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,81 %
Total : 114,8 / 294 = 39,05 %
PAIRE a.7 Myriam de Timary -Gerard Cooreman
A.4 Hugo Baetens -Alan Beckman 52,45 %
1 EO 4P W = -420 12.7 90.71
2 EO 2C N+1 140 2.4 17.14
3 EO 4P E+1 -650 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 60,71 %
A.9 Alain Labaere -Grazia Neuenschwander 65,88 %
4 EO 3S S+2 660 2.4 17.14
5 EO 2K E = -90 5.9 42.14
6 EO 3T E-1 100 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 20,00 %
A.5 Kathleen van Doren -Bernard Groetembril 41,43 %
7 EO 3P N-2 -200 13.9 99.29
8 EO 3S N+1 430 2.4 17.14
9 EO 3C E-1 100 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 47,38 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Mercedes Oostens 45,61 %
10 EO 5C E+1 -680 11.6 82.86
11 EO 1KcN-2 -300 13.9 99.29
12 EO 4C W = -420 12.7 90.71 µ Tbl = 90,95 %
A.2 Dominique Sassen -Annette Fobe 46,84 %
16 EO 3C E = -140 11.6 82.86
17 EO 4C N-1 -50 12.7 90.71
18 EO 4P E+1 -450 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 82,62 %
A.7 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 47,41 %
19 EO 3K E = -110 12 85.71
20 EO 1S S+1 120 10 71.43
21 EO 3P S = 140 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 58,74 %
22 EO 2P N = 110 2.4 17.14
23 EO 4C E+1 -650 8.1 57.86
24 EO 3S N-2 -100 12.7 90.71 µ Tbl = 55,24 %
A.8 David Walker -Jacques Podevyn 52,50 %
25 EO 2C W+2 -170 12.7 90.71
26 EO 3C W-1 100 4.7 33.57
27 EO 2K E-1 50 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 47,14 %
Total : 200,7 / 336 = 59,73 %
PAIRE a.6 Dilva Haym -Michel Lievens
A.8 David Walker -Jacques Podevyn 52,50 %
1 EO 2P W+2 -170 7 50.00
2 EO 1S W = -90 10.4 74.29
3 EO 4P E+1 -650 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 66,19 %
A.4 Hugo Baetens -Alan Beckman 52,45 %
4 EO 3S S+1 630 7 50.00
5 EO 2S W = -120 9.3 66.43
6 EO 1S E+1 -120 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 60,95 %
A.9 Alain Labaere -Grazia Neuenschwander 65,88 %
7 EO 3C W = -140 7 50.00
8 EO 4C S+1 450 0.1 0.71
9 EO 4C E = -620 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 39,05 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Mercedes Oostens 45,61 %
13 EO 2C E = -110 13.9 99.29
14 EO 3S W+2 -460 10.4 74.29
15 EO 1S E+1 -120 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 90,95 %
A.6 Benedicte Lemaigre -Brigitte Velge 39,05 %
16 EO 4C W-1 100 4.7 33.57
17 EO 3P S-1 -50 12.7 90.71
18 EO 4P E+1 -450 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 66,19 %
A.2 Dominique Sassen -Annette Fobe 46,84 %
19 EO 3K E = -110 12 85.71
20 EO 2P N+1 140 7 50.00
21 EO 2P S+1 140 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.7 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 47,41 %
22 EO 2P N = 110 2.4 17.14
23 EO 4C E+1 -650 8.1 57.86
24 EO 3S N+1 430 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 25,24 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 58,74 %
25 EO 2C W+1 -140 9.3 66.43
26 EO 3S S = 600 0.1 0.71
27 EO 2K E-1 50 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 28,10 %
Total : 186,2 / 336 = 55,42 %
PAIRE a.2 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles
A.6 Benedicte Lemaigre -Brigitte Velge 39,05 %
1 EO 2P W+2 -170 7 50.00
2 EO 2C N = 110 7 50.00
3 EO 4P E+1 -650 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 58,10 %
A.2 Dominique Sassen -Annette Fobe 46,84 %
4 EO 3S S+2 660 2.4 17.14
5 EO 2K E = -90 5.9 42.14
6 EO 3P N-2 -100 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
A.7 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 47,41 %
7 EO 3C W = -140 7 50.00
8 EO 4C S = 420 7 50.00
9 EO 4C E+1 -650 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 60,95 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 58,74 %
10 EO 5PcE = -850 13.9 99.29
11 EO 1S W-1 50 2.4 17.14
12 EO 5C W-1 50 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,48 %
A.8 David Walker -Jacques Podevyn 52,50 %
13 EO 2S N+1 150 0.1 0.71
14 EO 3S W+1 -430 7 50.00
15 EO 1S E = -90 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 39,05 %
A.4 Hugo Baetens -Alan Beckman 52,45 %
16 EO 3S E = -600 13.9 99.29
17 EO 3S N = 400 0.1 0.71
18 EO 4P E+1 -450 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 58,10 %
A.9 Alain Labaere -Grazia Neuenschwander 65,88 %
19 EO 3K E = -110 12 85.71
20 EO 2P N+2 170 4 28.57
21 EO 3P S+1 170 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
A.5 Kathleen van Doren -Bernard Groetembril 41,43 %
22 EO 4P N-2 -100 10.4 74.29
23 EO 4C E+2 -680 13.9 99.29
24 EO 3S N-2 -100 12.7 90.71 µ Tbl = 88,10 %
Total : 183,1 / 336 = 54,49 %
PAIRE a.8 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille
A.9 Alain Labaere -Grazia Neuenschwander 65,88 %
1 EO 4P E-1 50 0.1 0.71
2 EO 3C N-2 -200 13.9 99.29
3 EO 4P E = -620 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 39,05 %
A.5 Kathleen van Doren -Bernard Groetembril 41,43 %
4 EO 4K S+1 150 11.6 82.86
5 EO 2S W+1 -150 11.6 82.86
6 EO 3S E = -600 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 88,33 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Mercedes Oostens 45,61 %
7 EO 4C W-1 100 0.1 0.71
8 EO 3C N+1 170 11.6 82.86
9 EO 4C E-1 100 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 36,43 %
A.6 Benedicte Lemaigre -Brigitte Velge 39,05 %
10 EO 5P E = -650 8.1 57.86
11 EO 2C E = -110 9.3 66.43
12 EO 4C W-2 100 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 52,62 %
A.2 Dominique Sassen -Annette Fobe 46,84 %
13 EO 3T S+1 130 2.4 17.14
14 EO 3ScW+2 -750 13.9 99.29
15 EO 1S E = -90 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 60,95 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 58,74 %
19 EO 2C S = 110 4 28.57
20 EO 4P N = 620 1 7.14
21 EO 3P S+1 170 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 19,05 %
A.8 David Walker -Jacques Podevyn 52,50 %
22 EO 2S S-2 -100 10.4 74.29
23 EO 4C E+1 -650 8.1 57.86
24 EO 3S N = 400 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 55,24 %
A.4 Hugo Baetens -Alan Beckman 52,45 %
25 EO 3P S-1 -50 1.3 9.29
26 EO 3T N-2 -200 11.6 82.86
27 EO 2S S-2 -100 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
Total : 172,2 / 336 = 51,25 %
PAIRE a.1 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Catherine de Moffarts
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Mercedes Oostens 45,61 %
1 EO 2P W+1 -140 2.4 17.14
2 EO 1S W = -90 10.4 74.29
3 EO 4P E = -620 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 36,19 %
A.6 Benedicte Lemaigre -Brigitte Velge 39,05 %
4 EO 3S S+2 660 2.4 17.14
5 EO 2T N-2 -200 13.9 99.29
6 EO 1S W+2 -150 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 66,43 %
A.2 Dominique Sassen -Annette Fobe 46,84 %
7 EO 3C W = -140 7 50.00
8 EO 4C N = 420 7 50.00
9 EO 3C E-1 100 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 41,90 %
A.7 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 47,41 %
10 EO 4P E+1 -650 8.1 57.86
11 EO 1P S-3 -150 11.6 82.86
12 EO 4P S-1 -100 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 58,74 %
13 EO 1S N+1 120 5.9 42.14
14 EO 3S W-1 50 2.4 17.14
15 EO 2K W-1 50 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
A.8 David Walker -Jacques Podevyn 52,50 %
16 EO 4C W-2 200 0.1 0.71
17 EO 1P S+2 140 2.4 17.14
18 EO 4P E+1 -450 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 30,71 %
A.4 Hugo Baetens -Alan Beckman 52,45 %
19 EO 4K E-1 100 8 57.14
20 EO 2P N+1 140 7 50.00
21 EO 4C N = 620 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
A.5 Kathleen van Doren -Bernard Groetembril 41,43 %
25 EO 3P S-1 -50 1.3 9.29
26 EO 4KcS-5 -1400 13.9 99.29
27 EO 1S E+1 -120 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 69,29 %
Total : 159,7 / 336 = 47,53 %
PAIRE a.4 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor
A.7 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 47,41 %
1 EO 2P W+2 -170 7 50.00
2 EO 2C N+1 140 2.4 17.14
3 EO 4P E+1 -650 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 47,14 %
A.8 David Walker -Jacques Podevyn 52,50 %
7 EO 3C W = -140 7 50.00
8 EO 4C S = 420 7 50.00
9 EO 5TcN-4 -800 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 66,43 %
A.4 Hugo Baetens -Alan Beckman 52,45 %
10 EO 5K N = 600 3.6 25.71
11 EO 2P S-2 -100 7 50.00
12 EO 4P S = 620 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 25,48 %
A.9 Alain Labaere -Grazia Neuenschwander 65,88 %
13 EO 2S N = 120 5.9 42.14
14 EO 3S W+2 -460 10.4 74.29
15 EO 1S E-2 100 1.3 9.29 µ Tbl = 41,90 %
A.5 Kathleen van Doren -Bernard Groetembril 41,43 %
16 EO 4C W-1 100 4.7 33.57
17 EO 1C N+1 110 7 50.00
18 EO 4P E = -420 1.3 9.29 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Mercedes Oostens 45,61 %
19 EO 3C S = 140 0 0.00
20 EO 4P N-1 -100 13 92.86
21 EO 4P S-1 -100 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
A.6 Benedicte Lemaigre -Brigitte Velge 39,05 %
22 EO 4P N-2 -100 10.4 74.29
23 EO 4C E+1 -650 8.1 57.86
24 EO 3S N = 400 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 55,24 %
A.2 Dominique Sassen -Annette Fobe 46,84 %
25 EO 2C W = -110 5.9 42.14
26 EO 3T S-1 -100 8.1 57.86
27 EO 2K E-1 50 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 39,05 %
Total : 155,6 / 336 = 46,31 %
PAIRE a.3 Didier Collart -Annie Zeimes
A.7 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 47,41 %
4 EO 3K N+1 130 13.9 99.29
5 EO 2S W-1 50 2.4 17.14
6 EO 2P N-2 -100 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 58,74 %
7 EO 3C W = -140 7 50.00
8 EO 4C S-1 -50 13.9 99.29
9 EO 3C E-1 100 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
A.8 David Walker -Jacques Podevyn 52,50 %
10 EO 5K N+1 620 0.1 0.71
11 EO 1S W = -90 4.7 33.57
12 EO 4C W = -420 12.7 90.71 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
A.4 Hugo Baetens -Alan Beckman 52,45 %
13 EO 2T N = 90 10.4 74.29
14 EO 3S W-1 50 2.4 17.14
15 EO 2T E-2 100 1.3 9.29 µ Tbl = 33,57 %
A.9 Alain Labaere -Grazia Neuenschwander 65,88 %
16 EO 4C E-1 100 4.7 33.57
17 EO 2C N = 110 7 50.00
18 EO 3S W+1 -430 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 39,05 %
A.5 Kathleen van Doren -Bernard Groetembril 41,43 %
19 EO 2C S = 110 4 28.57
20 EO 4P N = 620 1 7.14
21 EO 3P S = 140 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Mercedes Oostens 45,61 %
22 EO 2P N = 110 2.4 17.14
23 EO 4C E = -620 1.3 9.29
24 EO 3S N = 400 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 20,00 %
A.6 Benedicte Lemaigre -Brigitte Velge 39,05 %
25 EO 2C W+2 -170 12.7 90.71
26 EO 3S S-1 -100 8.1 57.86
27 EO 1P W = -80 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,19 %
Total : 143,7 / 336 = 42,77 %
PAIRE a.5 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 58,74 %
1 EO 4P E = -420 12.7 90.71
2 EO 3C N = 140 2.4 17.14
3 EO 4P E = -620 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
A.8 David Walker -Jacques Podevyn 52,50 %
4 EO 5K S = 600 9.3 66.43
5 EO 2KcE-2 300 0.1 0.71
6 EO 2KcN-1 -100 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 33,57 %
A.9 Alain Labaere -Grazia Neuenschwander 65,88 %
10 EO 5K N = 600 3.6 25.71
11 EO 2C E-2 100 0.1 0.71
12 EO 5KcE-3 500 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 14,52 %
A.5 Kathleen van Doren -Bernard Groetembril 41,43 %
13 EO 1S N = 90 10.4 74.29
14 EO 3S W-1 50 2.4 17.14
15 EO 1S E = -90 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 52,62 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Mercedes Oostens 45,61 %
16 EO 3K S-1 -50 9.3 66.43
17 EO 2C N = 110 7 50.00
18 EO 4P E = -420 1.3 9.29 µ Tbl = 41,90 %
A.6 Benedicte Lemaigre -Brigitte Velge 39,05 %
19 EO 2C S = 110 4 28.57
20 EO 4P N-1 -100 13 92.86
21 EO 3C N = 140 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
A.2 Dominique Sassen -Annette Fobe 46,84 %
22 EO 4P N-2 -100 10.4 74.29
23 EO 4C E = -620 1.3 9.29
24 EO 3S N-1 -50 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.7 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 47,41 %
25 EO 2C W = -110 5.9 42.14
26 EO 3T N = 110 2.4 17.14
27 EO 1S E = -90 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 41,90 %
Total : 142,0 / 336 = 42,26 %
PAIRE a.9 -
A.5 Kathleen van Doren -Bernard Groetembril 41,43 %
1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Mercedes Oostens 45,61 %
4 EO BYE 0 0.00
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.6 Benedicte Lemaigre -Brigitte Velge 39,05 %
7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.2 Dominique Sassen -Annette Fobe 46,84 %
10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.7 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 47,41 %
13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00
15 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 58,74 %
16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.4 Hugo Baetens -Alan Beckman 52,45 %
22 EO BYE 0 0.00
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.9 Alain Labaere -Grazia Neuenschwander 65,88 %
25 EO BYE 0 0.00
26 EO BYE 0 0.00
27 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 378 = 0,00 %
|