B.C.O.B.
Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 58,33 A.6 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed
--- 2 57,50 A.3 Ghislain le Hardy de B. -Benedicte Lemaigre
--- 3 51,25 A.2 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle
--- 4 50,00 A.4 Fabienne Smit -Anne Brans
--- 5 44,58 A.1 Fifi Englund -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
--- 6 38,33 A.5 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Marie Christine Remy
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 59,58 a.2 Patrick Gilles -Marianne Falla
--- 2 53,33 a.1 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx
--- 3 52,92 a.6 Evelyn Joos -Myriam de Timary
--- 4 48,75 a.5 Thierry Collart -Birgit Bacheberle
--- 5 47,08 a.3 Stan Tabor -Edith Bjorn
--- 6 38,33 a.4 Anne Arsac -Catherine de Moffarts
PAIRE A.6 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed
a.6 Evelyn Joos -Myriam de Timary 52,92 %
1 NS 1S W+2 -150 0 0.00
2 NS 3S E+1 -430 6 60.00
3 NS 6S N = 990 7 70.00
4 NS 4C E-3 300 10 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a.5 Thierry Collart -Birgit Bacheberle 48,75 %
5 NS 2P E-1 50 4 40.00
6 NS 6KcW-1 200 9 90.00
7 NS 3C N = 140 6 60.00
8 NS 4P S+1 450 7 70.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
a.4 Anne Arsac -Catherine de Moffarts 38,33 %
9 NS 2P N+2 170 10 100.00
10 NS 2C S+1 140 5 50.00
11 NS 2ScE-2 300 10 100.00
12 NS 4P E = -420 5 50.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a.3 Stan Tabor -Edith Bjorn 47,08 %
13 NS 3P W-2 200 8 80.00
14 NS 4C E-2 100 5 50.00
15 NS 5K E = -400 5 50.00
16 NS 3T S = 110 6 60.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a.2 Patrick Gilles -Marianne Falla 59,58 %
17 NS 3C W+1 -170 5 50.00
18 NS 3C S+1 170 3 30.00
19 NS 4CcN-1 -100 2 20.00
20 NS 2C E = -110 5 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
a.1 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx 53,33 %
21 NS 3K W-1 50 9 90.00
22 NS 2C S+1 140 5 50.00
23 NS 3S N+1 630 6 60.00
24 NS 3C W = -140 2 20.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
Total : 140,0 / 240 = 58,33 %
PAIRE A.3 Ghislain le Hardy de B. -Benedicte Lemaigre
a.5 Thierry Collart -Birgit Bacheberle 48,75 %
1 NS 2S E-2 100 8 80.00
2 NS 3S E+1 -430 6 60.00
3 NS 6S N = 990 7 70.00
4 NS 4C E-1 100 4 40.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
a.4 Anne Arsac -Catherine de Moffarts 38,33 %
5 NS 2S W-1 50 4 40.00
6 NS 7K E-2 200 9 90.00
7 NS 2C S+1 140 6 60.00
8 NS 4P S+1 450 7 70.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
a.3 Stan Tabor -Edith Bjorn 47,08 %
9 NS 3C W-1 100 4 40.00
10 NS 3C W-2 200 8 80.00
11 NS 2P S-2 -100 4 40.00
12 NS 5P W = -450 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a.2 Patrick Gilles -Marianne Falla 59,58 %
13 NS 2S N+1 150 5 50.00
14 NS 4C E-2 100 5 50.00
15 NS 3S W+1 -430 1 10.00
16 NS 3T S+1 130 9 90.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.1 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx 53,33 %
17 NS 2C W+2 -170 5 50.00
18 NS 4C S = 620 6 60.00
19 NS 3C N+1 170 6 60.00
20 NS 5CcW-3 800 10 100.00 µ Tbl = 67,50 %
a.6 Evelyn Joos -Myriam de Timary 52,92 %
21 NS 3S W-1 50 9 90.00
22 NS 4C S-1 -50 1 10.00
23 NS 3S N+1 630 6 60.00
24 NS 4C W-1 50 8 80.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
Total : 138,0 / 240 = 57,50 %
PAIRE A.2 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle
a.3 Stan Tabor -Edith Bjorn 47,08 %
1 NS 1S W = -90 3 30.00
2 NS 3S E+1 -430 6 60.00
3 NS 6S N+1 1020 10 100.00
4 NS 4C E-2 200 7 70.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
a.2 Patrick Gilles -Marianne Falla 59,58 %
5 NS 4P E-2 100 9 90.00
6 NS 6K W = -1370 2 20.00
7 NS 3C S = 140 6 60.00
8 NS 4P S = 420 2 20.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.1 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx 53,33 %
9 NS 2P N = 110 6 60.00
10 NS 1P S+2 140 5 50.00
11 NS 2S N-1 -50 7 70.00
12 NS 5P W-1 50 10 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
a.6 Evelyn Joos -Myriam de Timary 52,92 %
13 NS 3P W = -140 0 0.00
14 NS 3C E-2 100 5 50.00
15 NS 3S W-2 100 8 80.00
16 NS 2S S-1 -50 2 20.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
a.5 Thierry Collart -Birgit Bacheberle 48,75 %
17 NS 3C W+1 -170 5 50.00
18 NS 4C S+1 650 9 90.00
19 NS 4C N-1 -50 4 40.00
20 NS 3K E+1 -130 1 10.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.4 Anne Arsac -Catherine de Moffarts 38,33 %
21 NS 3K W = -110 5 50.00
22 NS 4C S = 420 9 90.00
23 NS 6S N-2 -200 0 0.00
24 NS 3C W = -140 2 20.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
Total : 123,0 / 240 = 51,25 %
PAIRE A.4 Fabienne Smit -Anne Brans
a.2 Patrick Gilles -Marianne Falla 59,58 %
1 NS 1C E-1 50 6 60.00
2 NS 3S E+1 -430 6 60.00
3 NS 3S N+4 520 0 0.00
4 NS 4C E = -620 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
a.1 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx 53,33 %
5 NS 1S W = -90 0 0.00
6 NS 5K W+1 -620 4 40.00
7 NS 3K E-1 100 0 0.00
8 NS 4P S+1 450 7 70.00 µ Tbl = 27,50 %
a.6 Evelyn Joos -Myriam de Timary 52,92 %
9 NS 4PcN-1 -100 0 0.00
10 NS 4P S = 620 10 100.00
11 NS 3P S-3 -150 1 10.00
12 NS 4P W = -420 5 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a.5 Thierry Collart -Birgit Bacheberle 48,75 %
13 NS 2S N+1 150 5 50.00
14 NS 3C E-2 100 5 50.00
15 NS 2P S = 110 10 100.00
16 NS 1S S = 90 4 40.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a.4 Anne Arsac -Catherine de Moffarts 38,33 %
17 NS 3T N = 110 10 100.00
18 NS 4C S+1 650 9 90.00
19 NS 4C N = 420 9 90.00
20 NS 3K E+1 -130 1 10.00 µ Tbl = 72,50 %
a.3 Stan Tabor -Edith Bjorn 47,08 %
21 NS 3K E = -110 5 50.00
22 NS 4C S = 420 9 90.00
23 NS 3S N+1 630 6 60.00
24 NS 4C W-1 50 8 80.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
Total : 120,0 / 240 = 50,00 %
PAIRE A.1 Fifi Englund -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
a.1 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx 53,33 %
1 NS 1S W = -90 3 30.00
2 NS 3S E+2 -460 0 0.00
3 NS 6K S = 920 2 20.00
4 NS 2P W+1 -140 2 20.00 µ Tbl = 17,50 %
a.6 Evelyn Joos -Myriam de Timary 52,92 %
5 NS 1S W-2 100 9 90.00
6 NS 6K W+1 -1390 0 0.00
7 NS 2C S+1 140 6 60.00
8 NS 4P S+1 450 7 70.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.5 Thierry Collart -Birgit Bacheberle 48,75 %
9 NS 2P N+1 140 8 80.00
10 NS 4P S-1 -100 0 0.00
11 NS 2S N-1 -50 7 70.00
12 NS 4P W = -420 5 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.4 Anne Arsac -Catherine de Moffarts 38,33 %
13 NS 4C E-3 300 10 100.00
14 NS 4C E-2 100 5 50.00
15 NS 3S W = -400 5 50.00
16 NS 3C W = -140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.3 Stan Tabor -Edith Bjorn 47,08 %
17 NS 4C W = -420 0 0.00
18 NS 3C S+1 170 3 30.00
19 NS 4C N = 420 9 90.00
20 NS 2C W = -110 5 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a.2 Patrick Gilles -Marianne Falla 59,58 %
21 NS 3S E = -400 2 20.00
22 NS 2C S+1 140 5 50.00
23 NS 3S N+1 630 6 60.00
24 NS 4C W-1 50 8 80.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
Total : 107,0 / 240 = 44,58 %
PAIRE A.5 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Marie Christine Remy
a.4 Anne Arsac -Catherine de Moffarts 38,33 %
1 NS 2S E-3 150 10 100.00
2 NS 3S E+1 -430 6 60.00
3 NS 6K S+1 940 4 40.00
4 NS 3S E-2 200 7 70.00 µ Tbl = 67,50 %
a.3 Stan Tabor -Edith Bjorn 47,08 %
5 NS 1S W-1 50 4 40.00
6 NS 5K W = -600 6 60.00
7 NS 3C S = 140 6 60.00
8 NS 3S S = 400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a.2 Patrick Gilles -Marianne Falla 59,58 %
9 NS 3P N-1 -50 2 20.00
10 NS 2P S = 110 2 20.00
11 NS 2S N-3 -150 1 10.00
12 NS 4P W = -420 5 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
a.1 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx 53,33 %
13 NS 1S N+1 120 2 20.00
14 NS 4C E-2 100 5 50.00
15 NS 3S W+1 -430 1 10.00
16 NS 3T S+1 130 9 90.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a.6 Evelyn Joos -Myriam de Timary 52,92 %
17 NS 3C W+1 -170 5 50.00
18 NS 5C S-2 -200 0 0.00
19 NS 4T W = -130 0 0.00
20 NS 3C W-1 100 8 80.00 µ Tbl = 32,50 %
a.5 Thierry Collart -Birgit Bacheberle 48,75 %
21 NS 3S W+1 -430 0 0.00
22 NS 4C S-1 -50 1 10.00
23 NS 3S N+1 630 6 60.00
24 NS 3C W = -140 2 20.00 µ Tbl = 22,50 %
Total : 92,0 / 240 = 38,33 %
PAIRE a.2 Patrick Gilles -Marianne Falla
A.4 Fabienne Smit -Anne Brans 50,00 %
1 EO 1C E-1 50 4 40.00
2 EO 3S E+1 -430 4 40.00
3 EO 3S N+4 520 10 100.00
4 EO 4C E = -620 10 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
A.2 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 51,25 %
5 EO 4P E-2 100 1 10.00
6 EO 6K W = -1370 8 80.00
7 EO 3C S = 140 4 40.00
8 EO 4P S = 420 8 80.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A.5 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Marie Christine Remy 38,33 %
9 EO 3P N-1 -50 8 80.00
10 EO 2P S = 110 8 80.00
11 EO 2S N-3 -150 9 90.00
12 EO 4P W = -420 5 50.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
A.3 Ghislain le Hardy de B. -Benedicte Lemaigre 57,50 %
13 EO 2S N+1 150 5 50.00
14 EO 4C E-2 100 5 50.00
15 EO 3S W+1 -430 9 90.00
16 EO 3T S+1 130 1 10.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.6 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 58,33 %
17 EO 3C W+1 -170 5 50.00
18 EO 3C S+1 170 7 70.00
19 EO 4CcN-1 -100 8 80.00
20 EO 2C E = -110 5 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
A.1 Fifi Englund -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 44,58 %
21 EO 3S E = -400 8 80.00
22 EO 2C S+1 140 5 50.00
23 EO 3S N+1 630 4 40.00
24 EO 4C W-1 50 2 20.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
Total : 143,0 / 240 = 59,58 %
PAIRE a.1 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx
A.1 Fifi Englund -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 44,58 %
1 EO 1S W = -90 7 70.00
2 EO 3S E+2 -460 10 100.00
3 EO 6K S = 920 8 80.00
4 EO 2P W+1 -140 8 80.00 µ Tbl = 82,50 %
A.4 Fabienne Smit -Anne Brans 50,00 %
5 EO 1S W = -90 10 100.00
6 EO 5K W+1 -620 6 60.00
7 EO 3K E-1 100 10 100.00
8 EO 4P S+1 450 3 30.00 µ Tbl = 72,50 %
A.2 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 51,25 %
9 EO 2P N = 110 4 40.00
10 EO 1P S+2 140 5 50.00
11 EO 2S N-1 -50 3 30.00
12 EO 5P W-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
A.5 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Marie Christine Remy 38,33 %
13 EO 1S N+1 120 8 80.00
14 EO 4C E-2 100 5 50.00
15 EO 3S W+1 -430 9 90.00
16 EO 3T S+1 130 1 10.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A.3 Ghislain le Hardy de B. -Benedicte Lemaigre 57,50 %
17 EO 2C W+2 -170 5 50.00
18 EO 4C S = 620 4 40.00
19 EO 3C N+1 170 4 40.00
20 EO 5CcW-3 800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 32,50 %
A.6 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 58,33 %
21 EO 3K W-1 50 1 10.00
22 EO 2C S+1 140 5 50.00
23 EO 3S N+1 630 4 40.00
24 EO 3C W = -140 8 80.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
Total : 128,0 / 240 = 53,33 %
PAIRE a.6 Evelyn Joos -Myriam de Timary
A.6 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 58,33 %
1 EO 1S W+2 -150 10 100.00
2 EO 3S E+1 -430 4 40.00
3 EO 6S N = 990 3 30.00
4 EO 4C E-3 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A.1 Fifi Englund -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 44,58 %
5 EO 1S W-2 100 1 10.00
6 EO 6K W+1 -1390 10 100.00
7 EO 2C S+1 140 4 40.00
8 EO 4P S+1 450 3 30.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.4 Fabienne Smit -Anne Brans 50,00 %
9 EO 4PcN-1 -100 10 100.00
10 EO 4P S = 620 0 0.00
11 EO 3P S-3 -150 9 90.00
12 EO 4P W = -420 5 50.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A.2 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 51,25 %
13 EO 3P W = -140 10 100.00
14 EO 3C E-2 100 5 50.00
15 EO 3S W-2 100 2 20.00
16 EO 2S S-1 -50 8 80.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
A.5 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Marie Christine Remy 38,33 %
17 EO 3C W+1 -170 5 50.00
18 EO 5C S-2 -200 10 100.00
19 EO 4T W = -130 10 100.00
20 EO 3C W-1 100 2 20.00 µ Tbl = 67,50 %
A.3 Ghislain le Hardy de B. -Benedicte Lemaigre 57,50 %
21 EO 3S W-1 50 1 10.00
22 EO 4C S-1 -50 9 90.00
23 EO 3S N+1 630 4 40.00
24 EO 4C W-1 50 2 20.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
Total : 127,0 / 240 = 52,92 %
PAIRE a.5 Thierry Collart -Birgit Bacheberle
A.3 Ghislain le Hardy de B. -Benedicte Lemaigre 57,50 %
1 EO 2S E-2 100 2 20.00
2 EO 3S E+1 -430 4 40.00
3 EO 6S N = 990 3 30.00
4 EO 4C E-1 100 6 60.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
A.6 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 58,33 %
5 EO 2P E-1 50 6 60.00
6 EO 6KcW-1 200 1 10.00
7 EO 3C N = 140 4 40.00
8 EO 4P S+1 450 3 30.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
A.1 Fifi Englund -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 44,58 %
9 EO 2P N+1 140 2 20.00
10 EO 4P S-1 -100 10 100.00
11 EO 2S N-1 -50 3 30.00
12 EO 4P W = -420 5 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.4 Fabienne Smit -Anne Brans 50,00 %
13 EO 2S N+1 150 5 50.00
14 EO 3C E-2 100 5 50.00
15 EO 2P S = 110 0 0.00
16 EO 1S S = 90 6 60.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A.2 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 51,25 %
17 EO 3C W+1 -170 5 50.00
18 EO 4C S+1 650 1 10.00
19 EO 4C N-1 -50 6 60.00
20 EO 3K E+1 -130 9 90.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A.5 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Marie Christine Remy 38,33 %
21 EO 3S W+1 -430 10 100.00
22 EO 4C S-1 -50 9 90.00
23 EO 3S N+1 630 4 40.00
24 EO 3C W = -140 8 80.00 µ Tbl = 77,50 %
Total : 117,0 / 240 = 48,75 %
PAIRE a.3 Stan Tabor -Edith Bjorn
A.2 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 51,25 %
1 EO 1S W = -90 7 70.00
2 EO 3S E+1 -430 4 40.00
3 EO 6S N+1 1020 0 0.00
4 EO 4C E-2 200 3 30.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
A.5 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Marie Christine Remy 38,33 %
5 EO 1S W-1 50 6 60.00
6 EO 5K W = -600 4 40.00
7 EO 3C S = 140 4 40.00
8 EO 3S S = 400 10 100.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A.3 Ghislain le Hardy de B. -Benedicte Lemaigre 57,50 %
9 EO 3C W-1 100 6 60.00
10 EO 3C W-2 200 2 20.00
11 EO 2P S-2 -100 6 60.00
12 EO 5P W = -450 10 100.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A.6 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 58,33 %
13 EO 3P W-2 200 2 20.00
14 EO 4C E-2 100 5 50.00
15 EO 5K E = -400 5 50.00
16 EO 3T S = 110 4 40.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A.1 Fifi Englund -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 44,58 %
17 EO 4C W = -420 10 100.00
18 EO 3C S+1 170 7 70.00
19 EO 4C N = 420 1 10.00
20 EO 2C W = -110 5 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A.4 Fabienne Smit -Anne Brans 50,00 %
21 EO 3K E = -110 5 50.00
22 EO 4C S = 420 1 10.00
23 EO 3S N+1 630 4 40.00
24 EO 4C W-1 50 2 20.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
Total : 113,0 / 240 = 47,08 %
PAIRE a.4 Anne Arsac -Catherine de Moffarts
A.5 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Marie Christine Remy 38,33 %
1 EO 2S E-3 150 0 0.00
2 EO 3S E+1 -430 4 40.00
3 EO 6K S+1 940 6 60.00
4 EO 3S E-2 200 3 30.00 µ Tbl = 32,50 %
A.3 Ghislain le Hardy de B. -Benedicte Lemaigre 57,50 %
5 EO 2S W-1 50 6 60.00
6 EO 7K E-2 200 1 10.00
7 EO 2C S+1 140 4 40.00
8 EO 4P S+1 450 3 30.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
A.6 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 58,33 %
9 EO 2P N+2 170 0 0.00
10 EO 2C S+1 140 5 50.00
11 EO 2ScE-2 300 0 0.00
12 EO 4P E = -420 5 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A.1 Fifi Englund -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 44,58 %
13 EO 4C E-3 300 0 0.00
14 EO 4C E-2 100 5 50.00
15 EO 3S W = -400 5 50.00
16 EO 3C W = -140 10 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.4 Fabienne Smit -Anne Brans 50,00 %
17 EO 3T N = 110 0 0.00
18 EO 4C S+1 650 1 10.00
19 EO 4C N = 420 1 10.00
20 EO 3K E+1 -130 9 90.00 µ Tbl = 27,50 %
A.2 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 51,25 %
21 EO 3K W = -110 5 50.00
22 EO 4C S = 420 1 10.00
23 EO 6S N-2 -200 10 100.00
24 EO 3C W = -140 8 80.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
Total : 92,0 / 240 = 38,33 %
|