B.C.O.B.
Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 58,33 A.2 Thierry Bollansee -Pascale Ortegat
--- 2 57,01 A.7 Giuseppe Napoli -Elena Valsesia
--- 3 55,68 A.5 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne
--- 4 53,79 A.6 Claire Derieuw -Monique Crouan
--- 5 52,27 A13 Hugo Baetens -Francis Rittweger
--- 6 50,76 A.8 Iris de Limbourg -Annie de Wasseige
--- 7 50,19 A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten
--- 8 49,43 A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck
--- 9 48,11 A10 Maryse Gathy -Brigitte Brusselmans
--- 10 46,97 A11 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne
--- ~ 46,97 A.9 Annie Legrand -Colette Heerinckx
--- 12 42,80 A.3 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart
--- 13 37,69 A12 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Simone Munsterhjelm
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 61,17 a.9 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman
--- 2 54,73 a12 Stan Tabor -Philippe van der Gracht
--- 3 53,79 a.6 Pascale Graton -Roselyne Delpon
--- 4 53,41 a.5 Nicole Leclere -Michel Lahaut
--- 5 52,65 a13 Serge Alard -Michel Lievens
--- 6 51,89 a.7 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne
--- 7 49,81 a.4 Nadine Brabant -Caroline Lallia
--- 8 49,62 a.8 Marianne Borsu -Beatrice Neys
--- 9 49,05 a10 Myriam de Timary -Caroll Pucher
--- 10 47,73 a.2 Gaetan van de Werve -Noelle Fosse
--- ~ 46,21 a.1 Francoise Turin -Christiane Huby
--- 12 44,13 a11 Brigitte Velge -Brigitte de Jamblinne
--- 13 35,80 a.3 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart
PAIRE A.2 Thierry Bollansee -Pascale Ortegat
a.2 Gaetan van de Werve -Noelle Fosse 47,73 %
3 NS 4P N-1 -50 2 9.09
4 NS 4P N+1 650 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
a.1 Francoise Turin -Christiane Huby 46,21 %
5 NS 3S S-1 -100 9 40.91
6 NS 3S E = -600 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a13 Serge Alard -Michel Lievens 52,65 %
7 NS 2S E = -120 8 36.36
8 NS 3K E-1 50 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a12 Stan Tabor -Philippe van der Gracht 54,73 %
9 NS 4C N-1 -50 20 90.91
10 NS 3K E = -110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a11 Brigitte Velge -Brigitte de Jamblinne 44,13 %
11 NS 1S N-1 -50 18 81.82
12 NS 3S S-1 -100 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a10 Myriam de Timary -Caroll Pucher 49,05 %
13 NS 3PcS = 730 22 100.00
14 NS 3S N = 400 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.9 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman 61,17 %
15 NS 3S E+1 -430 11 50.00
16 NS 6C N = 980 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a.8 Marianne Borsu -Beatrice Neys 49,62 %
17 NS 4K E-1 50 20 90.91
18 NS 5P S+1 680 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a.7 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 51,89 %
19 NS 5KcS-2 -300 18 81.82
20 NS 3S N+2 660 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
a.6 Pascale Graton -Roselyne Delpon 53,79 %
21 NS 2S E = -120 13 59.09
22 NS 2P S+1 140 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.5 Nicole Leclere -Michel Lahaut 53,41 %
23 NS 4C E+1 -650 3 13.64
24 NS 3S N-1 -50 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.4 Nadine Brabant -Caroline Lallia 49,81 %
25 NS 2C N-2 -100 18 81.82
26 NS 3C S = 140 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
Total : 308,0 / 528 = 58,33 %
PAIRE A.7 Giuseppe Napoli -Elena Valsesia
a13 Serge Alard -Michel Lievens 52,65 %
1 NS 3C S+2 200 5 22.73
2 NS 4P W+1 -450 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a12 Stan Tabor -Philippe van der Gracht 54,73 %
3 NS 4P N = 420 19 86.36
4 NS 4P N+2 680 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
a11 Brigitte Velge -Brigitte de Jamblinne 44,13 %
5 NS 5K N-1 -100 9 40.91
6 NS 2C W+2 -170 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a10 Myriam de Timary -Caroll Pucher 49,05 %
7 NS 2S E-1 100 19 86.36
8 NS 2P W+1 -140 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a.9 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman 61,17 %
9 NS 5CcN-2 -300 10 45.45
10 NS 3K E-1 100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a.7 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 51,89 %
13 NS 4C E = -620 16 72.73
14 NS 4P N+1 450 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.6 Pascale Graton -Roselyne Delpon 53,79 %
15 NS 3S E+1 -430 11 50.00
16 NS 5C N+1 480 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.5 Nicole Leclere -Michel Lahaut 53,41 %
17 NS 3S W+1 -430 4 18.18
18 NS 6P S = 1430 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.4 Nadine Brabant -Caroline Lallia 49,81 %
19 NS 4C E = -620 9 40.91
20 NS 3S S+1 630 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.3 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 35,80 %
21 NS 3S W-3 150 22 100.00
22 NS 3P S-1 -50 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a.2 Gaetan van de Werve -Noelle Fosse 47,73 %
23 NS 4C W-1 100 20 90.91
24 NS 3S N+2 460 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 95,45 %
a.1 Francoise Turin -Christiane Huby 46,21 %
25 NS 3T W+1 -130 10 45.45
26 NS 4C S-1 -100 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
Total : 301,0 / 528 = 57,01 %
PAIRE A.5 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne
a.9 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman 61,17 %
1 NS 3C S+2 200 5 22.73
2 NS 4P W+1 -450 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a.8 Marianne Borsu -Beatrice Neys 49,62 %
3 NS 4P N-1 -50 2 9.09
4 NS 4P N+2 680 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.7 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 51,89 %
5 NS 3S S-1 -100 9 40.91
6 NS 4C W+1 -650 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.5 Nicole Leclere -Michel Lahaut 53,41 %
9 NS 3P W+2 -200 12 54.55
10 NS 3S W-2 200 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a.4 Nadine Brabant -Caroline Lallia 49,81 %
11 NS 2K W+2 -130 4 18.18
12 NS 3S N-1 -100 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
a.3 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 35,80 %
13 NS 4C E+1 -650 7 31.82
14 NS 4P N+2 480 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.2 Gaetan van de Werve -Noelle Fosse 47,73 %
15 NS 3S E = -400 22 100.00
16 NS 4C N+2 480 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a.1 Francoise Turin -Christiane Huby 46,21 %
17 NS 3S W = -400 11 50.00
18 NS 6P S = 1430 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a13 Serge Alard -Michel Lievens 52,65 %
19 NS 4C E = -620 9 40.91
20 NS 3S N+1 630 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a12 Stan Tabor -Philippe van der Gracht 54,73 %
21 NS 3S E-2 100 20 90.91
22 NS 3P S = 140 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
a11 Brigitte Velge -Brigitte de Jamblinne 44,13 %
23 NS 3C E = -140 16 72.73
24 NS 2C S+1 140 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a10 Myriam de Timary -Caroll Pucher 49,05 %
25 NS 3K S-1 -50 22 100.00
26 NS 4T E-3 300 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 95,45 %
Total : 294,0 / 528 = 55,68 %
PAIRE A.6 Claire Derieuw -Monique Crouan
a11 Brigitte Velge -Brigitte de Jamblinne 44,13 %
1 NS 4C S+2 480 14 63.64
2 NS 6P W-2 100 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a10 Myriam de Timary -Caroll Pucher 49,05 %
3 NS 4P N = 420 19 86.36
4 NS 4C S+1 650 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a.9 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman 61,17 %
5 NS 3S S-1 -100 9 40.91
6 NS 4C W = -620 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.8 Marianne Borsu -Beatrice Neys 49,62 %
7 NS 2S E = -120 8 36.36
8 NS 3K E+1 -130 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.6 Pascale Graton -Roselyne Delpon 53,79 %
11 NS 1S W = -90 12 54.55
12 NS 3S N = 600 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a.5 Nicole Leclere -Michel Lahaut 53,41 %
13 NS 4C E+1 -650 7 31.82
14 NS 4P S+1 450 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a.4 Nadine Brabant -Caroline Lallia 49,81 %
15 NS 3S E+1 -430 11 50.00
16 NS 6C N = 980 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a.3 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 35,80 %
17 NS 4K E = -130 16 72.73
18 NS 4P S+2 680 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.2 Gaetan van de Werve -Noelle Fosse 47,73 %
19 NS 4C E = -620 9 40.91
20 NS 3S N+2 660 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a.1 Francoise Turin -Christiane Huby 46,21 %
21 NS 1S E+1 -120 13 59.09
22 NS 3P S = 140 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a13 Serge Alard -Michel Lievens 52,65 %
23 NS 4C E = -620 8 36.36
24 NS 4C S-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
a12 Stan Tabor -Philippe van der Gracht 54,73 %
25 NS 4T W = -130 10 45.45
26 NS 3C S = 140 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
Total : 284,0 / 528 = 53,79 %
PAIRE A13 Hugo Baetens -Francis Rittweger
a12 Stan Tabor -Philippe van der Gracht 54,73 %
1 NS 2P N+3 200 5 22.73
2 NS 4P W+2 -480 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
a11 Brigitte Velge -Brigitte de Jamblinne 44,13 %
3 NS 2P N+3 200 14 63.64
4 NS 4P N+1 650 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a10 Myriam de Timary -Caroll Pucher 49,05 %
5 NS 3S S-1 -100 9 40.91
6 NS 4C W = -620 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.9 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman 61,17 %
7 NS 1P W+1 -110 14 63.64
8 NS 4K E+1 -150 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.8 Marianne Borsu -Beatrice Neys 49,62 %
9 NS 3C N-1 -50 20 90.91
10 NS 3K E = -110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a.7 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 51,89 %
11 NS 3T N = 110 22 100.00
12 NS 3S S-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.6 Pascale Graton -Roselyne Delpon 53,79 %
13 NS 3P S-1 -100 18 81.82
14 NS 4P N+2 480 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
a.5 Nicole Leclere -Michel Lahaut 53,41 %
15 NS 3S E+1 -430 11 50.00
16 NS 6C N = 980 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a.4 Nadine Brabant -Caroline Lallia 49,81 %
17 NS 5K E-1 50 20 90.91
18 NS 4P S+1 650 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.3 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 35,80 %
19 NS 6CcE-2 500 22 100.00
20 NS 3S N+1 630 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a.2 Gaetan van de Werve -Noelle Fosse 47,73 %
21 NS 2C W = -110 18 81.82
22 NS 2P S+1 140 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
a13 Serge Alard -Michel Lievens 52,65 %
25 NS 3CcN-3 -500 0 0.00
26 NS 4C S-1 -100 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
Total : 276,0 / 528 = 52,27 %
PAIRE A.8 Iris de Limbourg -Annie de Wasseige
a.2 Gaetan van de Werve -Noelle Fosse 47,73 %
1 NS 4C S = 420 10 45.45
2 NS 3S E+3 -490 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.1 Francoise Turin -Christiane Huby 46,21 %
3 NS 4P N = 420 19 86.36
4 NS 4C S+1 650 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a13 Serge Alard -Michel Lievens 52,65 %
5 NS 3S S-1 -100 9 40.91
6 NS 4C W = -620 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a12 Stan Tabor -Philippe van der Gracht 54,73 %
7 NS 3S W-1 100 19 86.36
8 NS 3K E+1 -130 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a11 Brigitte Velge -Brigitte de Jamblinne 44,13 %
9 NS 4P W = -620 6 27.27
10 NS 5K E-2 200 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a10 Myriam de Timary -Caroll Pucher 49,05 %
11 NS 1S W = -90 12 54.55
12 NS 3K S+1 130 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.8 Marianne Borsu -Beatrice Neys 49,62 %
15 NS 3S E+1 -430 11 50.00
16 NS 4C N+1 450 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a.7 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 51,89 %
17 NS 4C N-3 -150 14 63.64
18 NS 6P S+1 1460 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
a.6 Pascale Graton -Roselyne Delpon 53,79 %
19 NS 4C E+2 -680 0 0.00
20 NS 5T S-1 -100 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 2,27 %
a.5 Nicole Leclere -Michel Lahaut 53,41 %
21 NS 1S E+1 -120 13 59.09
22 NS 2P S = 110 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.4 Nadine Brabant -Caroline Lallia 49,81 %
23 NS 3C E+2 -200 11 50.00
24 NS 3C S = 140 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a.3 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 35,80 %
25 NS 3C N-2 -100 18 81.82
26 NS 4PcW-2 500 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
Total : 268,0 / 528 = 50,76 %
PAIRE A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten
a.7 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 51,89 %
1 NS 4C S+2 480 14 63.64
2 NS 4P W+2 -480 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a.6 Pascale Graton -Roselyne Delpon 53,79 %
3 NS 2P N+2 170 9 40.91
4 NS 4P N+1 650 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a.4 Nadine Brabant -Caroline Lallia 49,81 %
7 NS 2K E+1 -110 14 63.64
8 NS 2K E+4 -170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a.3 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 35,80 %
9 NS 4C N-2 -100 15 68.18
10 NS 3C E-2 200 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
a.2 Gaetan van de Werve -Noelle Fosse 47,73 %
11 NS 1S N-1 -50 18 81.82
12 NS 3S N = 600 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a.1 Francoise Turin -Christiane Huby 46,21 %
13 NS 4C E+1 -650 7 31.82
14 NS 4P N+2 480 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a13 Serge Alard -Michel Lievens 52,65 %
15 NS 3S E+1 -430 11 50.00
16 NS 6C N = 980 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a12 Stan Tabor -Philippe van der Gracht 54,73 %
17 NS 3S W+1 -430 4 18.18
18 NS 4P S+2 680 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a11 Brigitte Velge -Brigitte de Jamblinne 44,13 %
19 NS 4C E = -620 9 40.91
20 NS 3S N+3 690 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a10 Myriam de Timary -Caroll Pucher 49,05 %
21 NS 3S W = -400 1 4.55
22 NS 3P S = 140 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.9 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman 61,17 %
23 NS 2S E+1 -150 14 63.64
24 NS 3C S-1 -50 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.8 Marianne Borsu -Beatrice Neys 49,62 %
25 NS 4T W+1 -150 4 18.18
26 NS 3P W-1 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
Total : 265,0 / 528 = 50,19 %
PAIRE A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck
a.1 Francoise Turin -Christiane Huby 46,21 %
1 NS 4C S+3 510 21 95.45
2 NS 6P W-2 100 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
a13 Serge Alard -Michel Lievens 52,65 %
3 NS 2P N+2 170 9 40.91
4 NS 4P N+2 680 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a12 Stan Tabor -Philippe van der Gracht 54,73 %
5 NS 5K N-1 -100 9 40.91
6 NS 4C W+1 -650 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a11 Brigitte Velge -Brigitte de Jamblinne 44,13 %
7 NS 2S E-2 200 22 100.00
8 NS 3K E+2 -150 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a10 Myriam de Timary -Caroll Pucher 49,05 %
9 NS 4P W = -620 6 27.27
10 NS 4P S-2 -200 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
a.9 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman 61,17 %
11 NS 2P W+2 -170 0 0.00
12 NS 3K S = 110 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
a.8 Marianne Borsu -Beatrice Neys 49,62 %
13 NS 4C E-1 100 20 90.91
14 NS 4P N+2 480 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
a.7 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 51,89 %
15 NS 3S E+1 -430 11 50.00
16 NS 5S N+1 490 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.6 Pascale Graton -Roselyne Delpon 53,79 %
17 NS 3S W = -400 11 50.00
18 NS 6P S+1 1460 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a.5 Nicole Leclere -Michel Lahaut 53,41 %
19 NS 4C E = -620 9 40.91
20 NS 3S S+1 630 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.4 Nadine Brabant -Caroline Lallia 49,81 %
21 NS 2C W+1 -140 8 36.36
22 NS 3P S-1 -50 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a.3 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 35,80 %
23 NS 4C E+1 -650 3 13.64
24 NS 3C S = 140 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
Total : 261,0 / 528 = 49,43 %
PAIRE A10 Maryse Gathy -Brigitte Brusselmans
a.6 Pascale Graton -Roselyne Delpon 53,79 %
1 NS 2P N+2 170 0 0.00
2 NS 6P W-3 150 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.5 Nicole Leclere -Michel Lahaut 53,41 %
3 NS 4P N = 420 19 86.36
4 NS 4P S+1 650 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a.4 Nadine Brabant -Caroline Lallia 49,81 %
5 NS 3S S+3 690 22 100.00
6 NS 4C W = -620 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a.3 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 35,80 %
7 NS 2K E+1 -110 14 63.64
8 NS 3P W-1 50 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a.2 Gaetan van de Werve -Noelle Fosse 47,73 %
9 NS 4P W = -620 6 27.27
10 NS 5K E-1 100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.1 Francoise Turin -Christiane Huby 46,21 %
11 NS 1S W+1 -120 6 27.27
12 NS 3S S = 600 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a13 Serge Alard -Michel Lievens 52,65 %
13 NS 4C E+1 -650 7 31.82
14 NS 4P N+2 480 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a12 Stan Tabor -Philippe van der Gracht 54,73 %
15 NS 3S E+1 -430 11 50.00
16 NS 2P S+4 230 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
a10 Myriam de Timary -Caroll Pucher 49,05 %
19 NS 4C E = -620 9 40.91
20 NS 3S S+1 630 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.9 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman 61,17 %
21 NS 1S E+2 -150 5 22.73
22 NS 3C E = -140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
a.8 Marianne Borsu -Beatrice Neys 49,62 %
23 NS 5C E-1 100 20 90.91
24 NS 4C S-1 -50 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a.7 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 51,89 %
25 NS 3C N-4 -200 2 9.09
26 NS 4P W-1 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
Total : 254,0 / 528 = 48,11 %
PAIRE A11 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne
a.8 Marianne Borsu -Beatrice Neys 49,62 %
1 NS 4C S+2 480 14 63.64
2 NS 6P W-1 50 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a.7 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 51,89 %
3 NS 2P N+2 170 9 40.91
4 NS 4P S+1 650 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a.6 Pascale Graton -Roselyne Delpon 53,79 %
5 NS 5K N-1 -100 9 40.91
6 NS 4PcN-3 -500 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a.5 Nicole Leclere -Michel Lahaut 53,41 %
7 NS 2S E+1 -150 2 9.09
8 NS 3P W-1 50 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.4 Nadine Brabant -Caroline Lallia 49,81 %
9 NS 4C N-1 -50 20 90.91
10 NS 3K E+1 -130 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a.3 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 35,80 %
11 NS 1S N-2 -100 8 36.36
12 NS 3S N+1 630 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.2 Gaetan van de Werve -Noelle Fosse 47,73 %
13 NS 4C E+1 -650 7 31.82
14 NS 4P S-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
a.1 Francoise Turin -Christiane Huby 46,21 %
15 NS 3S E+1 -430 11 50.00
16 NS 4C N+2 480 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a13 Serge Alard -Michel Lievens 52,65 %
17 NS 5K E-1 50 20 90.91
18 NS 5C N = 650 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a11 Brigitte Velge -Brigitte de Jamblinne 44,13 %
21 NS 2S E = -120 13 59.09
22 NS 4P S-2 -100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a10 Myriam de Timary -Caroll Pucher 49,05 %
23 NS 4C E+1 -650 3 13.64
24 NS 3S N-1 -50 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.9 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman 61,17 %
25 NS 3T W+1 -130 10 45.45
26 NS 3C S = 140 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
Total : 248,0 / 528 = 46,97 %
PAIRE A.9 Annie Legrand -Colette Heerinckx
a.4 Nadine Brabant -Caroline Lallia 49,81 %
1 NS 5TcE-3 500 18 81.82
2 NS 4P W+1 -450 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a.3 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 35,80 %
3 NS 2P N+2 170 9 40.91
4 NS 4P N+2 680 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a.2 Gaetan van de Werve -Noelle Fosse 47,73 %
5 NS 3S N = 600 18 81.82
6 NS 4C W = -620 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a.1 Francoise Turin -Christiane Huby 46,21 %
7 NS 3K E+1 -130 4 18.18
8 NS 2P W-1 50 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a13 Serge Alard -Michel Lievens 52,65 %
9 NS 4CcN-1 -100 15 68.18
10 NS 3K E+1 -130 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a12 Stan Tabor -Philippe van der Gracht 54,73 %
11 NS 3C E = -140 2 9.09
12 NS 3S S = 600 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a11 Brigitte Velge -Brigitte de Jamblinne 44,13 %
13 NS 4C E+1 -650 7 31.82
14 NS 4P N+2 480 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.9 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman 61,17 %
17 NS 3S W+1 -430 4 18.18
18 NS 4C N+2 680 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a.8 Marianne Borsu -Beatrice Neys 49,62 %
19 NS 4C E = -620 9 40.91
20 NS 3S S+1 630 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.7 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 51,89 %
21 NS 2S E+1 -150 5 22.73
22 NS 2P S = 110 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a.6 Pascale Graton -Roselyne Delpon 53,79 %
23 NS 3PcN-1 -200 11 50.00
24 NS 3S N-1 -50 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.5 Nicole Leclere -Michel Lahaut 53,41 %
25 NS 3T W+1 -130 10 45.45
26 NS 4C S-1 -100 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
Total : 248,0 / 528 = 46,97 %
PAIRE A.3 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart
a.5 Nicole Leclere -Michel Lahaut 53,41 %
1 NS 2P N+3 200 5 22.73
2 NS 4P W+1 -450 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a.3 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 35,80 %
5 NS 3S S+2 660 20 90.91
6 NS 4C W = -620 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.2 Gaetan van de Werve -Noelle Fosse 47,73 %
7 NS 2S E = -120 8 36.36
8 NS 2K E+1 -110 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.1 Francoise Turin -Christiane Huby 46,21 %
9 NS 4P W+1 -650 1 4.55
10 NS 3S W = -600 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 2,27 %
a13 Serge Alard -Michel Lievens 52,65 %
11 NS 3T N-1 -50 18 81.82
12 NS 3S N = 600 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a12 Stan Tabor -Philippe van der Gracht 54,73 %
13 NS 4C E+1 -650 7 31.82
14 NS 2P S+3 200 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
a11 Brigitte Velge -Brigitte de Jamblinne 44,13 %
15 NS 3S E+1 -430 11 50.00
16 NS 4C N+2 480 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a10 Myriam de Timary -Caroll Pucher 49,05 %
17 NS 3S W+1 -430 4 18.18
18 NS 4P S+3 710 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.9 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman 61,17 %
19 NS 4C E = -620 9 40.91
20 NS 6T S-1 -100 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.8 Marianne Borsu -Beatrice Neys 49,62 %
21 NS 3S E = -400 1 4.55
22 NS 2P S+1 140 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.7 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 51,89 %
23 NS 4C W-1 100 20 90.91
24 NS 3S N = 400 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
a.6 Pascale Graton -Roselyne Delpon 53,79 %
25 NS 4T W = -130 10 45.45
26 NS 3P W = -140 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
Total : 226,0 / 528 = 42,80 %
PAIRE A12 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Simone Munsterhjelm
a10 Myriam de Timary -Caroll Pucher 49,05 %
1 NS 4C S+3 510 21 95.45
2 NS 6P W-1 50 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
a.9 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman 61,17 %
3 NS 4P N-1 -50 2 9.09
4 NS 4P N+2 680 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.8 Marianne Borsu -Beatrice Neys 49,62 %
5 NS 3S S-2 -200 0 0.00
6 NS 4C W = -620 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.7 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 51,89 %
7 NS 3S E = -600 0 0.00
8 NS 3K E+2 -150 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
a.6 Pascale Graton -Roselyne Delpon 53,79 %
9 NS 4P W+1 -650 1 4.55
10 NS 3P S-2 -200 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
a.5 Nicole Leclere -Michel Lahaut 53,41 %
11 NS 1S W = -90 12 54.55
12 NS 3K N+2 150 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.4 Nadine Brabant -Caroline Lallia 49,81 %
13 NS 4C E+1 -650 7 31.82
14 NS 4P N+1 450 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a.3 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 35,80 %
15 NS 3S E+2 -460 0 0.00
16 NS 6C N = 980 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.2 Gaetan van de Werve -Noelle Fosse 47,73 %
17 NS 3S W+1 -430 4 18.18
18 NS 5P S+1 680 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a.1 Francoise Turin -Christiane Huby 46,21 %
19 NS 5C E-1 100 20 90.91
20 NS 3S S+1 630 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a12 Stan Tabor -Philippe van der Gracht 54,73 %
23 NS 4C E+1 -650 3 13.64
24 NS 3C S-1 -50 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a11 Brigitte Velge -Brigitte de Jamblinne 44,13 %
25 NS 2C N-2 -100 18 81.82
26 NS 4P W = -620 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
Total : 199,0 / 528 = 37,69 %
PAIRE a.9 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman
A.5 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne 55,68 %
1 EO 3C S+2 200 17 77.27
2 EO 4P W+1 -450 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A12 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Simone Munsterhjelm 37,69 %
3 EO 4P N-1 -50 20 90.91
4 EO 4P N+2 680 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.6 Claire Derieuw -Monique Crouan 53,79 %
5 EO 3S S-1 -100 13 59.09
6 EO 4C W = -620 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A13 Hugo Baetens -Francis Rittweger 52,27 %
7 EO 1P W+1 -110 8 36.36
8 EO 4K E+1 -150 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.7 Giuseppe Napoli -Elena Valsesia 57,01 %
9 EO 5CcN-2 -300 12 54.55
10 EO 3K E-1 100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck 49,43 %
11 EO 2P W+2 -170 22 100.00
12 EO 3K S = 110 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
A.2 Thierry Bollansee -Pascale Ortegat 58,33 %
15 EO 3S E+1 -430 11 50.00
16 EO 6C N = 980 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A.9 Annie Legrand -Colette Heerinckx 46,97 %
17 EO 3S W+1 -430 18 81.82
18 EO 4C N+2 680 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.3 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 42,80 %
19 EO 4C E = -620 13 59.09
20 EO 6T S-1 -100 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A10 Maryse Gathy -Brigitte Brusselmans 48,11 %
21 EO 1S E+2 -150 17 77.27
22 EO 3C E = -140 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 50,19 %
23 EO 2S E+1 -150 8 36.36
24 EO 3C S-1 -50 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A11 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 46,97 %
25 EO 3T W+1 -130 12 54.55
26 EO 3C S = 140 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
Total : 323,0 / 528 = 61,17 %
PAIRE a12 Stan Tabor -Philippe van der Gracht
A13 Hugo Baetens -Francis Rittweger 52,27 %
1 EO 2P N+3 200 17 77.27
2 EO 4P W+2 -480 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
A.7 Giuseppe Napoli -Elena Valsesia 57,01 %
3 EO 4P N = 420 3 13.64
4 EO 4P N+2 680 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck 49,43 %
5 EO 5K N-1 -100 13 59.09
6 EO 4C W+1 -650 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.8 Iris de Limbourg -Annie de Wasseige 50,76 %
7 EO 3S W-1 100 3 13.64
8 EO 3K E+1 -130 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A.2 Thierry Bollansee -Pascale Ortegat 58,33 %
9 EO 4C N-1 -50 2 9.09
10 EO 3K E = -110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A.9 Annie Legrand -Colette Heerinckx 46,97 %
11 EO 3C E = -140 20 90.91
12 EO 3S S = 600 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.3 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 42,80 %
13 EO 4C E+1 -650 15 68.18
14 EO 2P S+3 200 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
A10 Maryse Gathy -Brigitte Brusselmans 48,11 %
15 EO 3S E+1 -430 11 50.00
16 EO 2P S+4 230 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 50,19 %
17 EO 3S W+1 -430 18 81.82
18 EO 4P S+2 680 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.5 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne 55,68 %
21 EO 3S E-2 100 2 9.09
22 EO 3P S = 140 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
A12 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Simone Munsterhjelm 37,69 %
23 EO 4C E+1 -650 19 86.36
24 EO 3C S-1 -50 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.6 Claire Derieuw -Monique Crouan 53,79 %
25 EO 4T W = -130 12 54.55
26 EO 3C S = 140 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
Total : 289,0 / 528 = 54,73 %
PAIRE a.6 Pascale Graton -Roselyne Delpon
A10 Maryse Gathy -Brigitte Brusselmans 48,11 %
1 EO 2P N+2 170 22 100.00
2 EO 6P W-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 50,19 %
3 EO 2P N+2 170 13 59.09
4 EO 4P N+1 650 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A11 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 46,97 %
5 EO 5K N-1 -100 13 59.09
6 EO 4PcN-3 -500 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A12 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Simone Munsterhjelm 37,69 %
9 EO 4P W+1 -650 21 95.45
10 EO 3P S-2 -200 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
A.6 Claire Derieuw -Monique Crouan 53,79 %
11 EO 1S W = -90 10 45.45
12 EO 3S N = 600 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A13 Hugo Baetens -Francis Rittweger 52,27 %
13 EO 3P S-1 -100 4 18.18
14 EO 4P N+2 480 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
A.7 Giuseppe Napoli -Elena Valsesia 57,01 %
15 EO 3S E+1 -430 11 50.00
16 EO 5C N+1 480 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck 49,43 %
17 EO 3S W = -400 11 50.00
18 EO 6P S+1 1460 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A.8 Iris de Limbourg -Annie de Wasseige 50,76 %
19 EO 4C E+2 -680 22 100.00
20 EO 5T S-1 -100 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 97,73 %
A.2 Thierry Bollansee -Pascale Ortegat 58,33 %
21 EO 2S E = -120 9 40.91
22 EO 2P S+1 140 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A.9 Annie Legrand -Colette Heerinckx 46,97 %
23 EO 3PcN-1 -200 11 50.00
24 EO 3S N-1 -50 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.3 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 42,80 %
25 EO 4T W = -130 12 54.55
26 EO 3P W = -140 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
Total : 284,0 / 528 = 53,79 %
PAIRE a.5 Nicole Leclere -Michel Lahaut
A.3 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 42,80 %
1 EO 2P N+3 200 17 77.27
2 EO 4P W+1 -450 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A10 Maryse Gathy -Brigitte Brusselmans 48,11 %
3 EO 4P N = 420 3 13.64
4 EO 4P S+1 650 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A11 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 46,97 %
7 EO 2S E+1 -150 20 90.91
8 EO 3P W-1 50 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.5 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne 55,68 %
9 EO 3P W+2 -200 10 45.45
10 EO 3S W-2 200 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A12 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Simone Munsterhjelm 37,69 %
11 EO 1S W = -90 10 45.45
12 EO 3K N+2 150 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.6 Claire Derieuw -Monique Crouan 53,79 %
13 EO 4C E+1 -650 15 68.18
14 EO 4P S+1 450 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A13 Hugo Baetens -Francis Rittweger 52,27 %
15 EO 3S E+1 -430 11 50.00
16 EO 6C N = 980 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A.7 Giuseppe Napoli -Elena Valsesia 57,01 %
17 EO 3S W+1 -430 18 81.82
18 EO 6P S = 1430 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck 49,43 %
19 EO 4C E = -620 13 59.09
20 EO 3S S+1 630 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.8 Iris de Limbourg -Annie de Wasseige 50,76 %
21 EO 1S E+1 -120 9 40.91
22 EO 2P S = 110 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.2 Thierry Bollansee -Pascale Ortegat 58,33 %
23 EO 4C E+1 -650 19 86.36
24 EO 3S N-1 -50 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.9 Annie Legrand -Colette Heerinckx 46,97 %
25 EO 3T W+1 -130 12 54.55
26 EO 4C S-1 -100 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
Total : 282,0 / 528 = 53,41 %
PAIRE a13 Serge Alard -Michel Lievens
A.7 Giuseppe Napoli -Elena Valsesia 57,01 %
1 EO 3C S+2 200 17 77.27
2 EO 4P W+1 -450 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck 49,43 %
3 EO 2P N+2 170 13 59.09
4 EO 4P N+2 680 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.8 Iris de Limbourg -Annie de Wasseige 50,76 %
5 EO 3S S-1 -100 13 59.09
6 EO 4C W = -620 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.2 Thierry Bollansee -Pascale Ortegat 58,33 %
7 EO 2S E = -120 14 63.64
8 EO 3K E-1 50 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.9 Annie Legrand -Colette Heerinckx 46,97 %
9 EO 4CcN-1 -100 7 31.82
10 EO 3K E+1 -130 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.3 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 42,80 %
11 EO 3T N-1 -50 4 18.18
12 EO 3S N = 600 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A10 Maryse Gathy -Brigitte Brusselmans 48,11 %
13 EO 4C E+1 -650 15 68.18
14 EO 4P N+2 480 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 50,19 %
15 EO 3S E+1 -430 11 50.00
16 EO 6C N = 980 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A11 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 46,97 %
17 EO 5K E-1 50 2 9.09
18 EO 5C N = 650 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.5 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne 55,68 %
19 EO 4C E = -620 13 59.09
20 EO 3S N+1 630 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.6 Claire Derieuw -Monique Crouan 53,79 %
23 EO 4C E = -620 14 63.64
24 EO 4C S-2 -100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
A13 Hugo Baetens -Francis Rittweger 52,27 %
25 EO 3CcN-3 -500 22 100.00
26 EO 4C S-1 -100 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
Total : 278,0 / 528 = 52,65 %
PAIRE a.7 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne
A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 50,19 %
1 EO 4C S+2 480 8 36.36
2 EO 4P W+2 -480 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A11 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 46,97 %
3 EO 2P N+2 170 13 59.09
4 EO 4P S+1 650 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A.5 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne 55,68 %
5 EO 3S S-1 -100 13 59.09
6 EO 4C W+1 -650 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A12 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Simone Munsterhjelm 37,69 %
7 EO 3S E = -600 22 100.00
8 EO 3K E+2 -150 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
A13 Hugo Baetens -Francis Rittweger 52,27 %
11 EO 3T N = 110 0 0.00
12 EO 3S S-2 -200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.7 Giuseppe Napoli -Elena Valsesia 57,01 %
13 EO 4C E = -620 6 27.27
14 EO 4P N+1 450 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck 49,43 %
15 EO 3S E+1 -430 11 50.00
16 EO 5S N+1 490 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.8 Iris de Limbourg -Annie de Wasseige 50,76 %
17 EO 4C N-3 -150 8 36.36
18 EO 6P S+1 1460 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
A.2 Thierry Bollansee -Pascale Ortegat 58,33 %
19 EO 5KcS-2 -300 4 18.18
20 EO 3S N+2 660 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
A.9 Annie Legrand -Colette Heerinckx 46,97 %
21 EO 2S E+1 -150 17 77.27
22 EO 2P S = 110 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A.3 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 42,80 %
23 EO 4C W-1 100 2 9.09
24 EO 3S N = 400 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
A10 Maryse Gathy -Brigitte Brusselmans 48,11 %
25 EO 3C N-4 -200 20 90.91
26 EO 4P W-1 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
Total : 274,0 / 528 = 51,89 %
PAIRE a.4 Nadine Brabant -Caroline Lallia
A.9 Annie Legrand -Colette Heerinckx 46,97 %
1 EO 5TcE-3 500 4 18.18
2 EO 4P W+1 -450 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A10 Maryse Gathy -Brigitte Brusselmans 48,11 %
5 EO 3S S+3 690 0 0.00
6 EO 4C W = -620 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 50,19 %
7 EO 2K E+1 -110 8 36.36
8 EO 2K E+4 -170 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A11 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 46,97 %
9 EO 4C N-1 -50 2 9.09
10 EO 3K E+1 -130 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.5 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne 55,68 %
11 EO 2K W+2 -130 18 81.82
12 EO 3S N-1 -100 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
A12 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Simone Munsterhjelm 37,69 %
13 EO 4C E+1 -650 15 68.18
14 EO 4P N+1 450 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A.6 Claire Derieuw -Monique Crouan 53,79 %
15 EO 3S E+1 -430 11 50.00
16 EO 6C N = 980 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A13 Hugo Baetens -Francis Rittweger 52,27 %
17 EO 5K E-1 50 2 9.09
18 EO 4P S+1 650 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.7 Giuseppe Napoli -Elena Valsesia 57,01 %
19 EO 4C E = -620 13 59.09
20 EO 3S S+1 630 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck 49,43 %
21 EO 2C W+1 -140 14 63.64
22 EO 3P S-1 -50 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A.8 Iris de Limbourg -Annie de Wasseige 50,76 %
23 EO 3C E+2 -200 11 50.00
24 EO 3C S = 140 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.2 Thierry Bollansee -Pascale Ortegat 58,33 %
25 EO 2C N-2 -100 4 18.18
26 EO 3C S = 140 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
Total : 263,0 / 528 = 49,81 %
PAIRE a.8 Marianne Borsu -Beatrice Neys
A11 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 46,97 %
1 EO 4C S+2 480 8 36.36
2 EO 6P W-1 50 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A.5 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne 55,68 %
3 EO 4P N-1 -50 20 90.91
4 EO 4P N+2 680 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A12 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Simone Munsterhjelm 37,69 %
5 EO 3S S-2 -200 22 100.00
6 EO 4C W = -620 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.6 Claire Derieuw -Monique Crouan 53,79 %
7 EO 2S E = -120 14 63.64
8 EO 3K E+1 -130 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A13 Hugo Baetens -Francis Rittweger 52,27 %
9 EO 3C N-1 -50 2 9.09
10 EO 3K E = -110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck 49,43 %
13 EO 4C E-1 100 2 9.09
14 EO 4P N+2 480 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
A.8 Iris de Limbourg -Annie de Wasseige 50,76 %
15 EO 3S E+1 -430 11 50.00
16 EO 4C N+1 450 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A.2 Thierry Bollansee -Pascale Ortegat 58,33 %
17 EO 4K E-1 50 2 9.09
18 EO 5P S+1 680 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A.9 Annie Legrand -Colette Heerinckx 46,97 %
19 EO 4C E = -620 13 59.09
20 EO 3S S+1 630 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.3 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 42,80 %
21 EO 3S E = -400 21 95.45
22 EO 2P S+1 140 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A10 Maryse Gathy -Brigitte Brusselmans 48,11 %
23 EO 5C E-1 100 2 9.09
24 EO 4C S-1 -50 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 50,19 %
25 EO 4T W+1 -150 18 81.82
26 EO 3P W-1 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
Total : 262,0 / 528 = 49,62 %
PAIRE a10 Myriam de Timary -Caroll Pucher
A12 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Simone Munsterhjelm 37,69 %
1 EO 4C S+3 510 1 4.55
2 EO 6P W-1 50 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
A.6 Claire Derieuw -Monique Crouan 53,79 %
3 EO 4P N = 420 3 13.64
4 EO 4C S+1 650 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A13 Hugo Baetens -Francis Rittweger 52,27 %
5 EO 3S S-1 -100 13 59.09
6 EO 4C W = -620 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.7 Giuseppe Napoli -Elena Valsesia 57,01 %
7 EO 2S E-1 100 3 13.64
8 EO 2P W+1 -140 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck 49,43 %
9 EO 4P W = -620 16 72.73
10 EO 4P S-2 -200 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
A.8 Iris de Limbourg -Annie de Wasseige 50,76 %
11 EO 1S W = -90 10 45.45
12 EO 3K S+1 130 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.2 Thierry Bollansee -Pascale Ortegat 58,33 %
13 EO 3PcS = 730 0 0.00
14 EO 3S N = 400 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A.3 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 42,80 %
17 EO 3S W+1 -430 18 81.82
18 EO 4P S+3 710 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A10 Maryse Gathy -Brigitte Brusselmans 48,11 %
19 EO 4C E = -620 13 59.09
20 EO 3S S+1 630 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 50,19 %
21 EO 3S W = -400 21 95.45
22 EO 3P S = 140 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A11 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 46,97 %
23 EO 4C E+1 -650 19 86.36
24 EO 3S N-1 -50 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.5 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne 55,68 %
25 EO 3K S-1 -50 0 0.00
26 EO 4T E-3 300 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 4,55 %
Total : 259,0 / 528 = 49,05 %
PAIRE a.2 Gaetan van de Werve -Noelle Fosse
A.8 Iris de Limbourg -Annie de Wasseige 50,76 %
1 EO 4C S = 420 12 54.55
2 EO 3S E+3 -490 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.2 Thierry Bollansee -Pascale Ortegat 58,33 %
3 EO 4P N-1 -50 20 90.91
4 EO 4P N+1 650 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
A.9 Annie Legrand -Colette Heerinckx 46,97 %
5 EO 3S N = 600 4 18.18
6 EO 4C W = -620 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A.3 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 42,80 %
7 EO 2S E = -120 14 63.64
8 EO 2K E+1 -110 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A10 Maryse Gathy -Brigitte Brusselmans 48,11 %
9 EO 4P W = -620 16 72.73
10 EO 5K E-1 100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 50,19 %
11 EO 1S N-1 -50 4 18.18
12 EO 3S N = 600 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A11 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 46,97 %
13 EO 4C E+1 -650 15 68.18
14 EO 4P S-2 -100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
A.5 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne 55,68 %
15 EO 3S E = -400 0 0.00
16 EO 4C N+2 480 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A12 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Simone Munsterhjelm 37,69 %
17 EO 3S W+1 -430 18 81.82
18 EO 5P S+1 680 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.6 Claire Derieuw -Monique Crouan 53,79 %
19 EO 4C E = -620 13 59.09
20 EO 3S N+2 660 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A13 Hugo Baetens -Francis Rittweger 52,27 %
21 EO 2C W = -110 4 18.18
22 EO 2P S+1 140 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
A.7 Giuseppe Napoli -Elena Valsesia 57,01 %
23 EO 4C W-1 100 2 9.09
24 EO 3S N+2 460 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 4,55 %
Total : 252,0 / 528 = 47,73 %
PAIRE a.1 Francoise Turin -Christiane Huby
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck 49,43 %
1 EO 4C S+3 510 1 4.55
2 EO 6P W-2 100 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
A.8 Iris de Limbourg -Annie de Wasseige 50,76 %
3 EO 4P N = 420 3 13.64
4 EO 4C S+1 650 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A.2 Thierry Bollansee -Pascale Ortegat 58,33 %
5 EO 3S S-1 -100 13 59.09
6 EO 3S E = -600 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.9 Annie Legrand -Colette Heerinckx 46,97 %
7 EO 3K E+1 -130 18 81.82
8 EO 2P W-1 50 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.3 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 42,80 %
9 EO 4P W+1 -650 21 95.45
10 EO 3S W = -600 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 97,73 %
A10 Maryse Gathy -Brigitte Brusselmans 48,11 %
11 EO 1S W+1 -120 16 72.73
12 EO 3S S = 600 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 50,19 %
13 EO 4C E+1 -650 15 68.18
14 EO 4P N+2 480 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A11 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 46,97 %
15 EO 3S E+1 -430 11 50.00
16 EO 4C N+2 480 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.5 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne 55,68 %
17 EO 3S W = -400 11 50.00
18 EO 6P S = 1430 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A12 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Simone Munsterhjelm 37,69 %
19 EO 5C E-1 100 2 9.09
20 EO 3S S+1 630 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A.6 Claire Derieuw -Monique Crouan 53,79 %
21 EO 1S E+1 -120 9 40.91
22 EO 3P S = 140 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A.7 Giuseppe Napoli -Elena Valsesia 57,01 %
25 EO 3T W+1 -130 12 54.55
26 EO 4C S-1 -100 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
Total : 244,0 / 528 = 46,21 %
PAIRE a11 Brigitte Velge -Brigitte de Jamblinne
A.6 Claire Derieuw -Monique Crouan 53,79 %
1 EO 4C S+2 480 8 36.36
2 EO 6P W-2 100 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A13 Hugo Baetens -Francis Rittweger 52,27 %
3 EO 2P N+3 200 8 36.36
4 EO 4P N+1 650 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.7 Giuseppe Napoli -Elena Valsesia 57,01 %
5 EO 5K N-1 -100 13 59.09
6 EO 2C W+2 -170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck 49,43 %
7 EO 2S E-2 200 0 0.00
8 EO 3K E+2 -150 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A.8 Iris de Limbourg -Annie de Wasseige 50,76 %
9 EO 4P W = -620 16 72.73
10 EO 5K E-2 200 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A.2 Thierry Bollansee -Pascale Ortegat 58,33 %
11 EO 1S N-1 -50 4 18.18
12 EO 3S S-1 -100 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.9 Annie Legrand -Colette Heerinckx 46,97 %
13 EO 4C E+1 -650 15 68.18
14 EO 4P N+2 480 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.3 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 42,80 %
15 EO 3S E+1 -430 11 50.00
16 EO 4C N+2 480 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 50,19 %
19 EO 4C E = -620 13 59.09
20 EO 3S N+3 690 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A11 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 46,97 %
21 EO 2S E = -120 9 40.91
22 EO 4P S-2 -100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A.5 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne 55,68 %
23 EO 3C E = -140 6 27.27
24 EO 2C S+1 140 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A12 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Simone Munsterhjelm 37,69 %
25 EO 2C N-2 -100 4 18.18
26 EO 4P W = -620 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
Total : 233,0 / 528 = 44,13 %
PAIRE a.3 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart
A.9 Annie Legrand -Colette Heerinckx 46,97 %
3 EO 2P N+2 170 13 59.09
4 EO 4P N+2 680 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.3 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 42,80 %
5 EO 3S S+2 660 2 9.09
6 EO 4C W = -620 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A10 Maryse Gathy -Brigitte Brusselmans 48,11 %
7 EO 2K E+1 -110 8 36.36
8 EO 3P W-1 50 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 50,19 %
9 EO 4C N-2 -100 7 31.82
10 EO 3C E-2 200 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
A11 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 46,97 %
11 EO 1S N-2 -100 14 63.64
12 EO 3S N+1 630 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A.5 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne 55,68 %
13 EO 4C E+1 -650 15 68.18
14 EO 4P N+2 480 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A12 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Simone Munsterhjelm 37,69 %
15 EO 3S E+2 -460 22 100.00
16 EO 6C N = 980 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.6 Claire Derieuw -Monique Crouan 53,79 %
17 EO 4K E = -130 6 27.27
18 EO 4P S+2 680 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A13 Hugo Baetens -Francis Rittweger 52,27 %
19 EO 6CcE-2 500 0 0.00
20 EO 3S N+1 630 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A.7 Giuseppe Napoli -Elena Valsesia 57,01 %
21 EO 3S W-3 150 0 0.00
22 EO 3P S-1 -50 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck 49,43 %
23 EO 4C E+1 -650 19 86.36
24 EO 3C S = 140 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.8 Iris de Limbourg -Annie de Wasseige 50,76 %
25 EO 3C N-2 -100 4 18.18
26 EO 4PcW-2 500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
Total : 189,0 / 528 = 35,80 %
|