B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 66,19 A.1 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart
--- 2 59,20 A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne
--- 3 55,91 A.4 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne
--- 4 49,55 A.6 Claire Derieuw -Prisca Tondreau
--- 5 49,22 A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Chantal de Lichtervelde
--- 6 48,58 A12 Myriam de Timary -Caroll Pucher
--- 7 47,63 A13 Miguel del Marmol -Gaetan Collinet
--- 8 47,12 A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli
--- 9 45,97 A.3 Anne Van den Berge -Pascale Nobels
--- 10 44,77 A10 Philippe van der Gracht -Francoise Duren
--- 11 43,26 A.9 Pascale Graton -Roselyne Delpon
--- 12 42,84 A.8 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens
--- 13 0,00 A.5 -
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 62,93 a.3 Puce de Meulemeester -Christiane Melot
--- 2 55,43 a13 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart
--- 3 55,31 a.2 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman
--- 4 54,26 a10 Thierry Bollansee -Benoit Ortegat
--- 5 53,99 a.9 Nadine Brabant -Caroline Lallia
--- 6 50,60 a12 Christiane Huby -Francoise Turin
--- 7 48,80 a.7 Hugo Baetens -Michel Lahaut
--- 8 46,82 a.5 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille
--- 9 46,48 a.6 Chantal Woitrin -Catherine de Moffarts
--- 10 46,38 a.1 Nicole Leclere -Marie J. de Wagheneire
--- 11 44,75 a11 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck
--- 12 42,54 a.8 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen
--- 13 41,76 a.4 Claire Destin -Anne Marchal
PAIRE A.1 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart
a.1 Nicole Leclere -Marie J. de Wagheneire 46,38 %
1 NS 3S E-2 100 15.4 70.00
2 NS 2P S+1 140 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 72,50 %
a13 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 55,43 %
3 NS 4P S+1 450 16.5 75.00
4 NS 2P W+1 -140 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 72,50 %
a12 Christiane Huby -Francoise Turin 50,60 %
5 NS 3P E = -140 14.3 65.00
6 NS 4P N = 420 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
a11 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 44,75 %
7 NS 2P S-3 -300 18 81.82
8 NS 4C S+1 450 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a10 Thierry Bollansee -Benoit Ortegat 54,26 %
9 NS 3S E+1 -630 0.1 0.45
10 NS 3S E = -600 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
a.9 Nadine Brabant -Caroline Lallia 53,99 %
11 NS 3K E-3 150 21.9 99.55
12 NS 2S E = -120 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 94,55 %
a.8 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen 42,54 %
13 NS 1S E-2 200 20.8 94.55
14 NS 4C S+1 450 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
a.7 Hugo Baetens -Michel Lahaut 48,80 %
15 NS 1S W+2 -150 1.2 5.45
16 NS 6S S = 990 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.6 Chantal Woitrin -Catherine de Moffarts 46,48 %
17 NS 3S N+1 430 15.4 70.00
18 NS 3S E+1 -430 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
a.5 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 46,82 %
19 NS 5T W+1 -620 14.3 65.00
20 NS 4C E+1 -650 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.4 Claire Destin -Anne Marchal 41,76 %
21 NS 3K S+1 130 18.6 84.55
22 NS 4P N+1 450 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 92,05 %
a.3 Puce de Meulemeester -Christiane Melot 62,93 %
23 NS 4C S-1 -100 2.3 10.45
24 NS 3C W = -140 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
Total : 349,5 / 528 = 66,19 %
PAIRE A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman 55,31 %
3 NS 4P S = 420 5.5 25.00
4 NS 2P W+1 -140 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.1 Nicole Leclere -Marie J. de Wagheneire 46,38 %
5 NS 3P E = -140 14.3 65.00
6 NS 2P N+2 170 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a13 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 55,43 %
7 NS 6K E = -1370 0 0.00
8 NS 4C S+1 450 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a12 Christiane Huby -Francoise Turin 50,60 %
9 NS 2C W = -110 19.7 89.55
10 NS 3S E-2 200 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 92,05 %
a11 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 44,75 %
11 NS 1S S-1 -50 7.7 35.00
12 NS 4K W = -130 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a10 Thierry Bollansee -Benoit Ortegat 54,26 %
13 NS 2C E+1 -140 3.4 15.45
14 NS 3C S+2 200 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 15,45 %
a.9 Nadine Brabant -Caroline Lallia 53,99 %
15 NS 1S W-2 100 16.5 75.00
16 NS 3S N+3 490 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a.8 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen 42,54 %
17 NS 3S N+2 460 21.9 99.55
18 NS 3S E+2 -460 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
a.7 Hugo Baetens -Michel Lahaut 48,80 %
19 NS 5T W+1 -620 14.3 65.00
20 NS 2P E+5 -260 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
a.6 Chantal Woitrin -Catherine de Moffarts 46,48 %
21 NS 1S N+1 120 15.4 70.00
22 NS 4CcW-1 200 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a.5 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 46,82 %
23 NS 4C S = 620 6.6 30.00
24 NS 4C W-1 50 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a.4 Claire Destin -Anne Marchal 41,76 %
25 NS 1S E-2 200 17.5 79.55
26 NS 3T N = 110 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 82,05 %
Total : 312,6 / 528 = 59,20 %
PAIRE A.4 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne
a.7 Hugo Baetens -Michel Lahaut 48,80 %
1 NS 3S E-2 100 15.4 70.00
2 NS 2T W+1 -110 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
a.6 Chantal Woitrin -Catherine de Moffarts 46,48 %
3 NS 4P S = 420 5.5 25.00
4 NS 2P W+2 -170 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
a.4 Claire Destin -Anne Marchal 41,76 %
7 NS 2S W+5 -270 20 90.91
8 NS 4CcS = 590 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
a.3 Puce de Meulemeester -Christiane Melot 62,93 %
9 NS 2C W+2 -170 7.7 35.00
10 NS 2S E-1 100 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman 55,31 %
11 NS 1S S-1 -50 7.7 35.00
12 NS 5K W = -400 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
a.1 Nicole Leclere -Marie J. de Wagheneire 46,38 %
13 NS 1S E-1 100 15.4 70.00
14 NS 2C S+3 200 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
a13 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 55,43 %
15 NS 1S W-2 100 16.5 75.00
16 NS 3S N+3 490 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a12 Christiane Huby -Francoise Turin 50,60 %
17 NS 3S N+1 430 15.4 70.00
18 NS 3S E+2 -460 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a11 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 44,75 %
19 NS 5T W+1 -620 14.3 65.00
20 NS 2P E+4 -230 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
a10 Thierry Bollansee -Benoit Ortegat 54,26 %
21 NS 3P W-3 150 21.9 99.55
22 NS 4K S+1 150 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
a.9 Nadine Brabant -Caroline Lallia 53,99 %
23 NS 4C S+1 650 14.3 65.00
24 NS 4C W-1 50 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
a.8 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen 42,54 %
25 NS 2K S = 90 6.6 30.00
26 NS 2T N = 90 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 295,2 / 528 = 55,91 %
PAIRE A.6 Claire Derieuw -Prisca Tondreau
a11 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 44,75 %
1 NS 3K E = -110 4.5 20.45
2 NS 2P S+1 140 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a10 Thierry Bollansee -Benoit Ortegat 54,26 %
3 NS 5PcS = 650 21.9 99.55
4 NS 2P W+1 -140 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
a.9 Nadine Brabant -Caroline Lallia 53,99 %
5 NS 3P E-1 50 20.8 94.55
6 NS 2P N+1 140 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.8 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen 42,54 %
7 NS 3S W+4 -720 6 27.27
8 NS 4C S+2 480 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.6 Chantal Woitrin -Catherine de Moffarts 46,48 %
11 NS 1S S-1 -50 7.7 35.00
12 NS 3K W+1 -130 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.5 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 46,82 %
13 NS 1S E-1 100 15.4 70.00
14 NS 4C S+1 450 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 72,50 %
a.4 Claire Destin -Anne Marchal 41,76 %
15 NS 1S W+1 -120 5.5 25.00
16 NS 3S N+3 490 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 32,50 %
a.3 Puce de Meulemeester -Christiane Melot 62,93 %
17 NS 2S N+3 210 2.3 10.45
18 NS 3S E+2 -460 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman 55,31 %
19 NS 6S W-1 100 21.9 99.55
20 NS 2P E+5 -260 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 92,05 %
a.1 Nicole Leclere -Marie J. de Wagheneire 46,38 %
21 NS 3S N-1 -100 5.5 25.00
22 NS 4K S = 130 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
a13 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 55,43 %
23 NS 4C S = 620 6.6 30.00
24 NS 2C W+1 -140 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a12 Christiane Huby -Francoise Turin 50,60 %
25 NS 2C W+1 -140 0.1 0.45
26 NS 3S N-2 -200 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 12,73 %
Total : 261,6 / 528 = 49,55 %
PAIRE A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Chantal de Lichtervelde
a.8 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen 42,54 %
1 NS 3S E-2 100 15.4 70.00
2 NS 3P S = 140 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 72,50 %
a.7 Hugo Baetens -Michel Lahaut 48,80 %
3 NS 4P S = 420 5.5 25.00
4 NS 2P W+1 -140 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.6 Chantal Woitrin -Catherine de Moffarts 46,48 %
5 NS 4P E-1 50 20.8 94.55
6 NS 2P N+2 170 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a.5 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 46,82 %
7 NS 3S E+3 -690 14 63.64
8 NS 5P E-3 150 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.4 Claire Destin -Anne Marchal 41,76 %
9 NS 2C W+2 -170 7.7 35.00
10 NS 2S E+2 -180 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a.3 Puce de Meulemeester -Christiane Melot 62,93 %
11 NS 2K E = -90 1.2 5.45
12 NS 5K W = -400 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 5,45 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman 55,31 %
13 NS 2C E+1 -140 3.4 15.45
14 NS 4C S+1 450 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 45,23 %
a.1 Nicole Leclere -Marie J. de Wagheneire 46,38 %
15 NS 1S W-2 100 16.5 75.00
16 NS 4S N+3 520 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a13 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 55,43 %
17 NS 3S N+1 430 15.4 70.00
18 NS 3S E+2 -460 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a11 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 44,75 %
21 NS 2K S+1 110 12.1 55.00
22 NS 3K S+3 170 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a10 Thierry Bollansee -Benoit Ortegat 54,26 %
23 NS 5C S = 650 14.3 65.00
24 NS 3C W+1 -170 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
a.9 Nadine Brabant -Caroline Lallia 53,99 %
25 NS 3C W-1 100 11 50.00
26 NS 2S N-3 -300 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
Total : 259,9 / 528 = 49,22 %
PAIRE A12 Myriam de Timary -Caroll Pucher
a10 Thierry Bollansee -Benoit Ortegat 54,26 %
1 NS 3S E-2 100 15.4 70.00
2 NS 3T W-1 50 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.9 Nadine Brabant -Caroline Lallia 53,99 %
3 NS 4P S = 420 5.5 25.00
4 NS 2P W+2 -170 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
a.8 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen 42,54 %
5 NS 3P E = -140 14.3 65.00
6 NS 4P N+1 450 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
a.7 Hugo Baetens -Michel Lahaut 48,80 %
7 NS 1K E+5 -170 22 100.00
8 NS 4CcS+1 690 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 100,00 %
a.6 Chantal Woitrin -Catherine de Moffarts 46,48 %
9 NS 2C W+3 -200 2.3 10.45
10 NS 2S E+2 -180 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a.5 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 46,82 %
11 NS 1S S = 90 15.4 70.00
12 NS 5K W-1 50 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
a.4 Claire Destin -Anne Marchal 41,76 %
13 NS 1S E-1 100 15.4 70.00
14 NS 3C S+2 200 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
a.3 Puce de Meulemeester -Christiane Melot 62,93 %
15 NS 1S W+1 -120 5.5 25.00
16 NS 3S S+4 520 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman 55,31 %
17 NS 3S N = 400 6.6 30.00
18 NS 3S E+2 -460 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a.1 Nicole Leclere -Marie J. de Wagheneire 46,38 %
19 NS 3S E+4 -720 0.1 0.45
20 NS 4P E+1 -650 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
a12 Christiane Huby -Francoise Turin 50,60 %
23 NS 5C N = 650 14.3 65.00
24 NS 3C W+1 -170 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
a11 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 44,75 %
25 NS 2C W = -110 3.4 15.45
26 NS 3S S-2 -200 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
Total : 256,5 / 528 = 48,58 %
PAIRE A13 Miguel del Marmol -Gaetan Collinet
a12 Christiane Huby -Francoise Turin 50,60 %
1 NS 3S E-1 50 7.7 35.00
2 NS 2P S+1 140 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a11 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 44,75 %
3 NS 4P S = 420 5.5 25.00
4 NS 4P W-1 100 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a10 Thierry Bollansee -Benoit Ortegat 54,26 %
5 NS 4P E+1 -450 0.1 0.45
6 NS 3S S = 400 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a.9 Nadine Brabant -Caroline Lallia 53,99 %
7 NS 3S W+4 -720 6 27.27
8 NS 5C W = -450 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
a.8 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen 42,54 %
9 NS 2C W+1 -140 15.4 70.00
10 NS 5T E+1 -620 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
a.7 Hugo Baetens -Michel Lahaut 48,80 %
11 NS 1S S = 90 15.4 70.00
12 NS 3K W+1 -130 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
a.6 Chantal Woitrin -Catherine de Moffarts 46,48 %
13 NS 2T N = 90 11 50.00
14 NS 4C S+1 450 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
a.5 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 46,82 %
15 NS 1S W-2 100 16.5 75.00
16 NS 3S N+3 490 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a.4 Claire Destin -Anne Marchal 41,76 %
17 NS 3S N+1 430 15.4 70.00
18 NS 3S W+3 -490 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
a.3 Puce de Meulemeester -Christiane Melot 62,93 %
19 NS 3S E+3 -690 3.4 15.45
20 NS 4C E+2 -680 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 10,45 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman 55,31 %
21 NS 2K S+2 130 18.6 84.55
22 NS 3CcW-1 200 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 84,55 %
a13 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 55,43 %
25 NS 3K S = 110 15.4 70.00
26 NS 3S N-1 -100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
Total : 251,5 / 528 = 47,63 %
PAIRE A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli
a13 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 55,43 %
1 NS 3S E-1 50 7.7 35.00
2 NS 4P S-1 -100 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a12 Christiane Huby -Francoise Turin 50,60 %
3 NS 4P S+1 450 16.5 75.00
4 NS 2P W+1 -140 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 72,50 %
a11 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 44,75 %
5 NS 3P E = -140 14.3 65.00
6 NS 2P N+2 170 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a10 Thierry Bollansee -Benoit Ortegat 54,26 %
7 NS 3S W+4 -720 6 27.27
8 NS 4P W-2 100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
a.9 Nadine Brabant -Caroline Lallia 53,99 %
9 NS 1C W+2 -140 15.4 70.00
10 NS 5T E+1 -620 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
a.7 Hugo Baetens -Michel Lahaut 48,80 %
13 NS 2C E = -110 8.8 40.00
14 NS 4C S+1 450 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a.6 Chantal Woitrin -Catherine de Moffarts 46,48 %
15 NS 1S W-2 100 16.5 75.00
16 NS 3S S+3 490 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a.5 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 46,82 %
17 NS 3S N+1 430 15.4 70.00
18 NS 3S E+2 -460 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a.4 Claire Destin -Anne Marchal 41,76 %
19 NS 5T W+1 -620 14.3 65.00
20 NS 4C E+2 -680 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
a.3 Puce de Meulemeester -Christiane Melot 62,93 %
21 NS 5T N-3 -300 0.1 0.45
22 NS 4K S = 130 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 12,73 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman 55,31 %
23 NS 4C S = 620 6.6 30.00
24 NS 3C W = -140 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.1 Nicole Leclere -Marie J. de Wagheneire 46,38 %
25 NS 2T E-3 300 19.7 89.55
26 NS 3T N = 110 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 87,05 %
Total : 248,8 / 528 = 47,12 %
PAIRE A.3 Anne Van den Berge -Pascale Nobels
a.5 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 46,82 %
1 NS 3S E-3 150 21.9 99.55
2 NS 2C N = 110 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
a.3 Puce de Meulemeester -Christiane Melot 62,93 %
5 NS 4P E = -420 3.4 15.45
6 NS 4P N = 420 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 45,23 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman 55,31 %
7 NS 3S W+4 -720 6 27.27
8 NS 4C S = 420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.1 Nicole Leclere -Marie J. de Wagheneire 46,38 %
9 NS 4P E-1 100 21.9 99.55
10 NS 3S E-2 200 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 97,05 %
a13 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 55,43 %
11 NS 1S S-1 -50 7.7 35.00
12 NS 3K W+2 -150 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
a12 Christiane Huby -Francoise Turin 50,60 %
13 NS 2C E+1 -140 3.4 15.45
14 NS 4C S = 420 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a11 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 44,75 %
15 NS 1S W+2 -150 1.2 5.45
16 NS 3S S+2 460 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 7,95 %
a10 Thierry Bollansee -Benoit Ortegat 54,26 %
17 NS 3S S = 400 6.6 30.00
18 NS 3S E+2 -460 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a.9 Nadine Brabant -Caroline Lallia 53,99 %
19 NS 5T W+2 -640 6.6 30.00
20 NS 4P E = -620 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a.8 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen 42,54 %
21 NS 3K S = 110 12.1 55.00
22 NS 5K S-2 -100 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a.7 Hugo Baetens -Michel Lahaut 48,80 %
23 NS 4C S-2 -200 0.1 0.45
24 NS 2C W+1 -140 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
a.6 Chantal Woitrin -Catherine de Moffarts 46,48 %
25 NS 1S E-4 400 21.9 99.55
26 NS 2T N+2 130 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 99,55 %
Total : 242,7 / 528 = 45,97 %
PAIRE A10 Philippe van der Gracht -Francoise Duren
a.6 Chantal Woitrin -Catherine de Moffarts 46,48 %
1 NS 2K E+2 -130 2.3 10.45
2 NS 3P S-1 -100 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 12,95 %
a.5 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 46,82 %
3 NS 4P N+1 450 16.5 75.00
4 NS 2P W+3 -200 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a.4 Claire Destin -Anne Marchal 41,76 %
5 NS 3P E+1 -170 7.7 35.00
6 NS 4P N = 420 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.3 Puce de Meulemeester -Christiane Melot 62,93 %
7 NS 3S E+3 -690 14 63.64
8 NS 5C S = 450 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman 55,31 %
9 NS 3C W+1 -170 7.7 35.00
10 NS 5T E+1 -620 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.1 Nicole Leclere -Marie J. de Wagheneire 46,38 %
11 NS 1S S+1 120 19.7 89.55
12 NS 2S E+1 -150 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
a13 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 55,43 %
13 NS 2C E+1 -140 3.4 15.45
14 NS 2C S+3 200 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 15,45 %
a12 Christiane Huby -Francoise Turin 50,60 %
15 NS 1S W = -90 8.8 40.00
16 NS 3S N+4 520 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
a10 Thierry Bollansee -Benoit Ortegat 54,26 %
19 NS 5T W+1 -620 14.3 65.00
20 NS 3S W = -600 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
a.9 Nadine Brabant -Caroline Lallia 53,99 %
21 NS 2C E = -110 2.3 10.45
22 NS 4K S+2 170 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a.8 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen 42,54 %
23 NS 6C S = 1430 21.9 99.55
24 NS 3C W+1 -170 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a.7 Hugo Baetens -Michel Lahaut 48,80 %
25 NS 1S E-1 100 11 50.00
26 NS 3T N-1 -100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 236,4 / 528 = 44,77 %
PAIRE A.9 Pascale Graton -Roselyne Delpon
a.4 Claire Destin -Anne Marchal 41,76 %
1 NS 3S E-2 100 15.4 70.00
2 NS 2P S+1 140 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 72,50 %
a.3 Puce de Meulemeester -Christiane Melot 62,93 %
3 NS 4P S+1 450 16.5 75.00
4 NS 2P W+2 -170 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman 55,31 %
5 NS 3P E+1 -170 7.7 35.00
6 NS 2P N+1 140 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
a.1 Nicole Leclere -Marie J. de Wagheneire 46,38 %
7 NS 4S W+2 -690 14 63.64
8 NS 5P W-2 100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a13 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 55,43 %
9 NS 2C W+2 -170 7.7 35.00
10 NS 2T E+4 -170 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a12 Christiane Huby -Francoise Turin 50,60 %
11 NS 2K E = -90 1.2 5.45
12 NS 3K W+1 -130 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a11 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 44,75 %
13 NS 1S E-2 200 20.8 94.55
14 NS 4C S+1 450 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
a.9 Nadine Brabant -Caroline Lallia 53,99 %
17 NS 3S S = 400 6.6 30.00
18 NS 3S E+2 -460 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a.8 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen 42,54 %
19 NS 5T W+1 -620 14.3 65.00
20 NS 4P E+1 -650 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.7 Hugo Baetens -Michel Lahaut 48,80 %
21 NS 2P W-2 100 8.8 40.00
22 NS 5K S-1 -50 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a.6 Chantal Woitrin -Catherine de Moffarts 46,48 %
23 NS 4C S+2 680 19.7 89.55
24 NS 3CcW+1 -630 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.5 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 46,82 %
25 NS 2C W = -110 3.4 15.45
26 NS 3S N-3 -300 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 10,45 %
Total : 228,4 / 528 = 43,26 %
PAIRE A.8 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman 55,31 %
1 NS 2K E+3 -150 0.1 0.45
2 NS 2P S+1 140 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a.1 Nicole Leclere -Marie J. de Wagheneire 46,38 %
3 NS 4P S = 420 5.5 25.00
4 NS 3P W+1 -170 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
a13 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 55,43 %
5 NS 4P E = -420 3.4 15.45
6 NS 4P N = 420 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 45,23 %
a12 Christiane Huby -Francoise Turin 50,60 %
7 NS 3S W+4 -720 6 27.27
8 NS 5C S-1 -50 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
a11 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 44,75 %
9 NS 3C W = -140 15.4 70.00
10 NS 2C S = 110 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
a10 Thierry Bollansee -Benoit Ortegat 54,26 %
11 NS 1S S = 90 15.4 70.00
12 NS 3K W+1 -130 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
a.8 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen 42,54 %
15 NS 1S W-2 100 16.5 75.00
16 NS 2S S+5 270 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a.7 Hugo Baetens -Michel Lahaut 48,80 %
17 NS 3S S-1 -50 0.1 0.45
18 NS 3S E+2 -460 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a.6 Chantal Woitrin -Catherine de Moffarts 46,48 %
19 NS 3S E+3 -690 3.4 15.45
20 NS 3S W = -600 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
a.5 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 46,82 %
21 NS 3K S-1 -100 5.5 25.00
22 NS 3P S = 140 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 32,50 %
a.4 Claire Destin -Anne Marchal 41,76 %
23 NS 4C S+1 650 14.3 65.00
24 NS 3C W = -140 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
a.3 Puce de Meulemeester -Christiane Melot 62,93 %
25 NS 2C W-1 100 11 50.00
26 NS 3T N-1 -100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 226,2 / 528 = 42,84 %
PAIRE A.5 -
a.9 Nadine Brabant -Caroline Lallia 53,99 %
1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.8 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen 42,54 %
3 NS BYE 0 0.00
4 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.7 Hugo Baetens -Michel Lahaut 48,80 %
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.5 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 46,82 %
9 NS BYE 0 0.00
10 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.4 Claire Destin -Anne Marchal 41,76 %
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.3 Puce de Meulemeester -Christiane Melot 62,93 %
13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman 55,31 %
15 NS BYE 0 0.00
16 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.1 Nicole Leclere -Marie J. de Wagheneire 46,38 %
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a13 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 55,43 %
19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a12 Christiane Huby -Francoise Turin 50,60 %
21 NS BYE 0 0.00
22 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a11 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 44,75 %
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a10 Thierry Bollansee -Benoit Ortegat 54,26 %
25 NS BYE 0 0.00
26 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 572 = 0,00 %
PAIRE a.3 Puce de Meulemeester -Christiane Melot
A.9 Pascale Graton -Roselyne Delpon 43,26 %
3 EO 4P S+1 450 5.5 25.00
4 EO 2P W+2 -170 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.3 Anne Van den Berge -Pascale Nobels 45,97 %
5 EO 4P E = -420 18.6 84.55
6 EO 4P N = 420 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 54,77 %
A10 Philippe van der Gracht -Francoise Duren 44,77 %
7 EO 3S E+3 -690 8 36.36
8 EO 5C S = 450 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A.4 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne 55,91 %
9 EO 2C W+2 -170 14.3 65.00
10 EO 2S E-1 100 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Chantal de Lichtervelde 49,22 %
11 EO 2K E = -90 20.8 94.55
12 EO 5K W = -400 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 94,55 %
A.5 - 0,00 %
13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A12 Myriam de Timary -Caroll Pucher 48,58 %
15 EO 1S W+1 -120 16.5 75.00
16 EO 3S S+4 520 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.6 Claire Derieuw -Prisca Tondreau 49,55 %
17 EO 2S N+3 210 19.7 89.55
18 EO 3S E+2 -460 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A13 Miguel del Marmol -Gaetan Collinet 47,63 %
19 EO 3S E+3 -690 18.6 84.55
20 EO 4C E+2 -680 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 89,55 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 47,12 %
21 EO 5T N-3 -300 21.9 99.55
22 EO 4K S = 130 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 87,27 %
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 66,19 %
23 EO 4C S-1 -100 19.7 89.55
24 EO 3C W = -140 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
A.8 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 42,84 %
25 EO 2C W-1 100 11 50.00
26 EO 3T N-1 -100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 304,6 / 484 = 62,93 %
PAIRE a13 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 47,12 %
1 EO 3S E-1 50 14.3 65.00
2 EO 4P S-1 -100 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 66,19 %
3 EO 4P S+1 450 5.5 25.00
4 EO 2P W+1 -140 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 27,50 %
A.8 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 42,84 %
5 EO 4P E = -420 18.6 84.55
6 EO 4P N = 420 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 54,77 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 59,20 %
7 EO 6K E = -1370 22 100.00
8 EO 4C S+1 450 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A.9 Pascale Graton -Roselyne Delpon 43,26 %
9 EO 2C W+2 -170 14.3 65.00
10 EO 2T E+4 -170 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A.3 Anne Van den Berge -Pascale Nobels 45,97 %
11 EO 1S S-1 -50 14.3 65.00
12 EO 3K W+2 -150 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
A10 Philippe van der Gracht -Francoise Duren 44,77 %
13 EO 2C E+1 -140 18.6 84.55
14 EO 2C S+3 200 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 84,55 %
A.4 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne 55,91 %
15 EO 1S W-2 100 5.5 25.00
16 EO 3S N+3 490 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Chantal de Lichtervelde 49,22 %
17 EO 3S N+1 430 6.6 30.00
18 EO 3S E+2 -460 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A.5 - 0,00 %
19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.6 Claire Derieuw -Prisca Tondreau 49,55 %
23 EO 4C S = 620 15.4 70.00
24 EO 2C W+1 -140 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A13 Miguel del Marmol -Gaetan Collinet 47,63 %
25 EO 3K S = 110 6.6 30.00
26 EO 3S N-1 -100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
Total : 268,3 / 484 = 55,43 %
PAIRE a.2 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman
A.8 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 42,84 %
1 EO 2K E+3 -150 21.9 99.55
2 EO 2P S+1 140 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 59,20 %
3 EO 4P S = 420 16.5 75.00
4 EO 2P W+1 -140 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A.9 Pascale Graton -Roselyne Delpon 43,26 %
5 EO 3P E+1 -170 14.3 65.00
6 EO 2P N+1 140 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
A.3 Anne Van den Berge -Pascale Nobels 45,97 %
7 EO 3S W+4 -720 16 72.73
8 EO 4C S = 420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A10 Philippe van der Gracht -Francoise Duren 44,77 %
9 EO 3C W+1 -170 14.3 65.00
10 EO 5T E+1 -620 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.4 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne 55,91 %
11 EO 1S S-1 -50 14.3 65.00
12 EO 5K W = -400 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Chantal de Lichtervelde 49,22 %
13 EO 2C E+1 -140 18.6 84.55
14 EO 4C S+1 450 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 54,77 %
A.5 - 0,00 %
15 EO BYE 0 0.00
16 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A12 Myriam de Timary -Caroll Pucher 48,58 %
17 EO 3S N = 400 15.4 70.00
18 EO 3S E+2 -460 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A.6 Claire Derieuw -Prisca Tondreau 49,55 %
19 EO 6S W-1 100 0.1 0.45
20 EO 2P E+5 -260 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 7,95 %
A13 Miguel del Marmol -Gaetan Collinet 47,63 %
21 EO 2K S+2 130 3.4 15.45
22 EO 3CcW-1 200 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 15,45 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 47,12 %
23 EO 4C S = 620 15.4 70.00
24 EO 3C W = -140 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
Total : 267,7 / 484 = 55,31 %
PAIRE a10 Thierry Bollansee -Benoit Ortegat
A12 Myriam de Timary -Caroll Pucher 48,58 %
1 EO 3S E-2 100 6.6 30.00
2 EO 3T W-1 50 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.6 Claire Derieuw -Prisca Tondreau 49,55 %
3 EO 5PcS = 650 0.1 0.45
4 EO 2P W+1 -140 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
A13 Miguel del Marmol -Gaetan Collinet 47,63 %
5 EO 4P E+1 -450 21.9 99.55
6 EO 3S S = 400 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 47,12 %
7 EO 3S W+4 -720 16 72.73
8 EO 4P W-2 100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 66,19 %
9 EO 3S E+1 -630 21.9 99.55
10 EO 3S E = -600 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
A.8 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 42,84 %
11 EO 1S S = 90 6.6 30.00
12 EO 3K W+1 -130 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 59,20 %
13 EO 2C E+1 -140 18.6 84.55
14 EO 3C S+2 200 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 84,55 %
A.3 Anne Van den Berge -Pascale Nobels 45,97 %
17 EO 3S S = 400 15.4 70.00
18 EO 3S E+2 -460 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A10 Philippe van der Gracht -Francoise Duren 44,77 %
19 EO 5T W+1 -620 7.7 35.00
20 EO 3S W = -600 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
A.4 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne 55,91 %
21 EO 3P W-3 150 0.1 0.45
22 EO 4K S+1 150 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Chantal de Lichtervelde 49,22 %
23 EO 5C S = 650 7.7 35.00
24 EO 3C W+1 -170 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
A.5 - 0,00 %
25 EO BYE 0 0.00
26 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 262,6 / 484 = 54,26 %
PAIRE a.9 Nadine Brabant -Caroline Lallia
A.5 - 0,00 %
1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A12 Myriam de Timary -Caroll Pucher 48,58 %
3 EO 4P S = 420 16.5 75.00
4 EO 2P W+2 -170 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
A.6 Claire Derieuw -Prisca Tondreau 49,55 %
5 EO 3P E-1 50 1.2 5.45
6 EO 2P N+1 140 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A13 Miguel del Marmol -Gaetan Collinet 47,63 %
7 EO 3S W+4 -720 16 72.73
8 EO 5C W = -450 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 47,12 %
9 EO 1C W+2 -140 6.6 30.00
10 EO 5T E+1 -620 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 66,19 %
11 EO 3K E-3 150 0.1 0.45
12 EO 2S E = -120 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 5,45 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 59,20 %
15 EO 1S W-2 100 5.5 25.00
16 EO 3S N+3 490 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A.9 Pascale Graton -Roselyne Delpon 43,26 %
17 EO 3S S = 400 15.4 70.00
18 EO 3S E+2 -460 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A.3 Anne Van den Berge -Pascale Nobels 45,97 %
19 EO 5T W+2 -640 15.4 70.00
20 EO 4P E = -620 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A10 Philippe van der Gracht -Francoise Duren 44,77 %
21 EO 2C E = -110 19.7 89.55
22 EO 4K S+2 170 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A.4 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne 55,91 %
23 EO 4C S+1 650 7.7 35.00
24 EO 4C W-1 50 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Chantal de Lichtervelde 49,22 %
25 EO 3C W-1 100 11 50.00
26 EO 2S N-3 -300 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
Total : 261,3 / 484 = 53,99 %
PAIRE a12 Christiane Huby -Francoise Turin
A13 Miguel del Marmol -Gaetan Collinet 47,63 %
1 EO 3S E-1 50 14.3 65.00
2 EO 2P S+1 140 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 47,12 %
3 EO 4P S+1 450 5.5 25.00
4 EO 2P W+1 -140 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 27,50 %
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 66,19 %
5 EO 3P E = -140 7.7 35.00
6 EO 4P N = 420 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
A.8 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 42,84 %
7 EO 3S W+4 -720 16 72.73
8 EO 5C S-1 -50 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 59,20 %
9 EO 2C W = -110 2.3 10.45
10 EO 3S E-2 200 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 7,95 %
A.9 Pascale Graton -Roselyne Delpon 43,26 %
11 EO 2K E = -90 20.8 94.55
12 EO 3K W+1 -130 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A.3 Anne Van den Berge -Pascale Nobels 45,97 %
13 EO 2C E+1 -140 18.6 84.55
14 EO 4C S = 420 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A10 Philippe van der Gracht -Francoise Duren 44,77 %
15 EO 1S W = -90 13.2 60.00
16 EO 3S N+4 520 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
A.4 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne 55,91 %
17 EO 3S N+1 430 6.6 30.00
18 EO 3S E+2 -460 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A.5 - 0,00 %
21 EO BYE 0 0.00
22 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A12 Myriam de Timary -Caroll Pucher 48,58 %
23 EO 5C N = 650 7.7 35.00
24 EO 3C W+1 -170 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
A.6 Claire Derieuw -Prisca Tondreau 49,55 %
25 EO 2C W+1 -140 21.9 99.55
26 EO 3S N-2 -200 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 87,27 %
Total : 244,9 / 484 = 50,60 %
PAIRE a.7 Hugo Baetens -Michel Lahaut
A.4 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne 55,91 %
1 EO 3S E-2 100 6.6 30.00
2 EO 2T W+1 -110 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Chantal de Lichtervelde 49,22 %
3 EO 4P S = 420 16.5 75.00
4 EO 2P W+1 -140 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A.5 - 0,00 %
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A12 Myriam de Timary -Caroll Pucher 48,58 %
7 EO 1K E+5 -170 0 0.00
8 EO 4CcS+1 690 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A13 Miguel del Marmol -Gaetan Collinet 47,63 %
11 EO 1S S = 90 6.6 30.00
12 EO 3K W+1 -130 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 47,12 %
13 EO 2C E = -110 13.2 60.00
14 EO 4C S+1 450 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 66,19 %
15 EO 1S W+2 -150 20.8 94.55
16 EO 6S S = 990 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.8 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 42,84 %
17 EO 3S S-1 -50 21.9 99.55
18 EO 3S E+2 -460 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 59,20 %
19 EO 5T W+1 -620 7.7 35.00
20 EO 2P E+5 -260 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
A.9 Pascale Graton -Roselyne Delpon 43,26 %
21 EO 2P W-2 100 13.2 60.00
22 EO 5K S-1 -50 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A.3 Anne Van den Berge -Pascale Nobels 45,97 %
23 EO 4C S-2 -200 21.9 99.55
24 EO 2C W+1 -140 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A10 Philippe van der Gracht -Francoise Duren 44,77 %
25 EO 1S E-1 100 11 50.00
26 EO 3T N-1 -100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 236,2 / 484 = 48,80 %
PAIRE a.5 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille
A.3 Anne Van den Berge -Pascale Nobels 45,97 %
1 EO 3S E-3 150 0.1 0.45
2 EO 2C N = 110 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
A10 Philippe van der Gracht -Francoise Duren 44,77 %
3 EO 4P N+1 450 5.5 25.00
4 EO 2P W+3 -200 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Chantal de Lichtervelde 49,22 %
7 EO 3S E+3 -690 8 36.36
8 EO 5P E-3 150 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.5 - 0,00 %
9 EO BYE 0 0.00
10 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A12 Myriam de Timary -Caroll Pucher 48,58 %
11 EO 1S S = 90 6.6 30.00
12 EO 5K W-1 50 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
A.6 Claire Derieuw -Prisca Tondreau 49,55 %
13 EO 1S E-1 100 6.6 30.00
14 EO 4C S+1 450 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 27,50 %
A13 Miguel del Marmol -Gaetan Collinet 47,63 %
15 EO 1S W-2 100 5.5 25.00
16 EO 3S N+3 490 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 47,12 %
17 EO 3S N+1 430 6.6 30.00
18 EO 3S E+2 -460 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 66,19 %
19 EO 5T W+1 -620 7.7 35.00
20 EO 4C E+1 -650 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A.8 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 42,84 %
21 EO 3K S-1 -100 16.5 75.00
22 EO 3P S = 140 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 67,50 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 59,20 %
23 EO 4C S = 620 15.4 70.00
24 EO 4C W-1 50 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A.9 Pascale Graton -Roselyne Delpon 43,26 %
25 EO 2C W = -110 18.6 84.55
26 EO 3S N-3 -300 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 89,55 %
Total : 226,6 / 484 = 46,82 %
PAIRE a.6 Chantal Woitrin -Catherine de Moffarts
A10 Philippe van der Gracht -Francoise Duren 44,77 %
1 EO 2K E+2 -130 19.7 89.55
2 EO 3P S-1 -100 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 87,05 %
A.4 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne 55,91 %
3 EO 4P S = 420 16.5 75.00
4 EO 2P W+2 -170 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Chantal de Lichtervelde 49,22 %
5 EO 4P E-1 50 1.2 5.45
6 EO 2P N+2 170 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A12 Myriam de Timary -Caroll Pucher 48,58 %
9 EO 2C W+3 -200 19.7 89.55
10 EO 2S E+2 -180 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A.6 Claire Derieuw -Prisca Tondreau 49,55 %
11 EO 1S S-1 -50 14.3 65.00
12 EO 3K W+1 -130 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A13 Miguel del Marmol -Gaetan Collinet 47,63 %
13 EO 2T N = 90 11 50.00
14 EO 4C S+1 450 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 47,12 %
15 EO 1S W-2 100 5.5 25.00
16 EO 3S S+3 490 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 66,19 %
17 EO 3S N+1 430 6.6 30.00
18 EO 3S E+1 -430 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
A.8 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 42,84 %
19 EO 3S E+3 -690 18.6 84.55
20 EO 3S W = -600 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 59,20 %
21 EO 1S N+1 120 6.6 30.00
22 EO 4CcW-1 200 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.9 Pascale Graton -Roselyne Delpon 43,26 %
23 EO 4C S+2 680 2.3 10.45
24 EO 3CcW+1 -630 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.3 Anne Van den Berge -Pascale Nobels 45,97 %
25 EO 1S E-4 400 0.1 0.45
26 EO 2T N+2 130 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 0,45 %
Total : 245,4 / 528 = 46,48 %
PAIRE a.1 Nicole Leclere -Marie J. de Wagheneire
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 66,19 %
1 EO 3S E-2 100 6.6 30.00
2 EO 2P S+1 140 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 27,50 %
A.8 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 42,84 %
3 EO 4P S = 420 16.5 75.00
4 EO 3P W+1 -170 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 59,20 %
5 EO 3P E = -140 7.7 35.00
6 EO 2P N+2 170 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A.9 Pascale Graton -Roselyne Delpon 43,26 %
7 EO 4S W+2 -690 8 36.36
8 EO 5P W-2 100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.3 Anne Van den Berge -Pascale Nobels 45,97 %
9 EO 4P E-1 100 0.1 0.45
10 EO 3S E-2 200 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 2,95 %
A10 Philippe van der Gracht -Francoise Duren 44,77 %
11 EO 1S S+1 120 2.3 10.45
12 EO 2S E+1 -150 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
A.4 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne 55,91 %
13 EO 1S E-1 100 6.6 30.00
14 EO 2C S+3 200 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Chantal de Lichtervelde 49,22 %
15 EO 1S W-2 100 5.5 25.00
16 EO 4S N+3 520 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.5 - 0,00 %
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A12 Myriam de Timary -Caroll Pucher 48,58 %
19 EO 3S E+4 -720 21.9 99.55
20 EO 4P E+1 -650 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
A.6 Claire Derieuw -Prisca Tondreau 49,55 %
21 EO 3S N-1 -100 16.5 75.00
22 EO 4K S = 130 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 47,12 %
25 EO 2T E-3 300 2.3 10.45
26 EO 3T N = 110 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 12,95 %
Total : 224,5 / 484 = 46,38 %
PAIRE a11 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck
A.6 Claire Derieuw -Prisca Tondreau 49,55 %
1 EO 3K E = -110 17.5 79.55
2 EO 2P S+1 140 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A13 Miguel del Marmol -Gaetan Collinet 47,63 %
3 EO 4P S = 420 16.5 75.00
4 EO 4P W-1 100 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 47,12 %
5 EO 3P E = -140 7.7 35.00
6 EO 2P N+2 170 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 66,19 %
7 EO 2P S-3 -300 4 18.18
8 EO 4C S+1 450 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A.8 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 42,84 %
9 EO 3C W = -140 6.6 30.00
10 EO 2C S = 110 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 59,20 %
11 EO 1S S-1 -50 14.3 65.00
12 EO 4K W = -130 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A.9 Pascale Graton -Roselyne Delpon 43,26 %
13 EO 1S E-2 200 1.2 5.45
14 EO 4C S+1 450 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
A.3 Anne Van den Berge -Pascale Nobels 45,97 %
15 EO 1S W+2 -150 20.8 94.55
16 EO 3S S+2 460 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 92,05 %
A.4 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne 55,91 %
19 EO 5T W+1 -620 7.7 35.00
20 EO 2P E+4 -230 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Chantal de Lichtervelde 49,22 %
21 EO 2K S+1 110 9.9 45.00
22 EO 3K S+3 170 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A.5 - 0,00 %
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A12 Myriam de Timary -Caroll Pucher 48,58 %
25 EO 2C W = -110 18.6 84.55
26 EO 3S S-2 -200 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
Total : 216,6 / 484 = 44,75 %
PAIRE a.8 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Chantal de Lichtervelde 49,22 %
1 EO 3S E-2 100 6.6 30.00
2 EO 3P S = 140 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 27,50 %
A.5 - 0,00 %
3 EO BYE 0 0.00
4 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A12 Myriam de Timary -Caroll Pucher 48,58 %
5 EO 3P E = -140 7.7 35.00
6 EO 4P N+1 450 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
A.6 Claire Derieuw -Prisca Tondreau 49,55 %
7 EO 3S W+4 -720 16 72.73
8 EO 4C S+2 480 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A13 Miguel del Marmol -Gaetan Collinet 47,63 %
9 EO 2C W+1 -140 6.6 30.00
10 EO 5T E+1 -620 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 66,19 %
13 EO 1S E-2 200 1.2 5.45
14 EO 4C S+1 450 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
A.8 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 42,84 %
15 EO 1S W-2 100 5.5 25.00
16 EO 2S S+5 270 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 59,20 %
17 EO 3S N+2 460 0.1 0.45
18 EO 3S E+2 -460 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
A.9 Pascale Graton -Roselyne Delpon 43,26 %
19 EO 5T W+1 -620 7.7 35.00
20 EO 4P E+1 -650 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A.3 Anne Van den Berge -Pascale Nobels 45,97 %
21 EO 3K S = 110 9.9 45.00
22 EO 5K S-2 -100 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A10 Philippe van der Gracht -Francoise Duren 44,77 %
23 EO 6C S = 1430 0.1 0.45
24 EO 3C W+1 -170 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A.4 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne 55,91 %
25 EO 2K S = 90 15.4 70.00
26 EO 2T N = 90 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 205,9 / 484 = 42,54 %
PAIRE a.4 Claire Destin -Anne Marchal
A.9 Pascale Graton -Roselyne Delpon 43,26 %
1 EO 3S E-2 100 6.6 30.00
2 EO 2P S+1 140 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 27,50 %
A10 Philippe van der Gracht -Francoise Duren 44,77 %
5 EO 3P E+1 -170 14.3 65.00
6 EO 4P N = 420 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.4 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne 55,91 %
7 EO 2S W+5 -270 2 9.09
8 EO 4CcS = 590 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Chantal de Lichtervelde 49,22 %
9 EO 2C W+2 -170 14.3 65.00
10 EO 2S E+2 -180 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A.5 - 0,00 %
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A12 Myriam de Timary -Caroll Pucher 48,58 %
13 EO 1S E-1 100 6.6 30.00
14 EO 3C S+2 200 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
A.6 Claire Derieuw -Prisca Tondreau 49,55 %
15 EO 1S W+1 -120 16.5 75.00
16 EO 3S N+3 490 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 67,50 %
A13 Miguel del Marmol -Gaetan Collinet 47,63 %
17 EO 3S N+1 430 6.6 30.00
18 EO 3S W+3 -490 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 47,12 %
19 EO 5T W+1 -620 7.7 35.00
20 EO 4C E+2 -680 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 66,19 %
21 EO 3K S+1 130 3.4 15.45
22 EO 4P N+1 450 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 7,95 %
A.8 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 42,84 %
23 EO 4C S+1 650 7.7 35.00
24 EO 3C W = -140 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 59,20 %
25 EO 1S E-2 200 4.5 20.45
26 EO 3T N = 110 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 17,95 %
Total : 202,1 / 484 = 41,76 %
|