B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 65,14 B.8 Lydia Wildiers -Giuseppe Napoli
--- 2 64,63 B.3 Dominique Sassen -Philippe van der Gracht
--- 3 64,12 B.5 Marie Christine Remy -Jean de Villenfagne
--- 4 62,50 A.1 Chantal Barro -Jerome Claessens
--- 5 55,36 A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Noelle Fosse
--- 6 52,98 A.6 Claire Derieuw -Monique Crouan
--- 7 50,00 B.1 Aliona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire
--- 8 48,96 A.5 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand
--- 9 48,64 B.6 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry
--- 10 47,17 A.8 Marianne Borsu -Jeannine Wanderpepen
--- 11 47,11 B.4 Sandra Dallemagne -Marie Claire Vienne
--- 12 46,43 A.3 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten
--- 13 40,77 A.2 Annette Fobe -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
--- 14 40,33 A.4 Michele Verhulst -Andre Delacroix
--- 15 39,29 B.2 Annie Zeimes -Madeleine Gabriel
--- 16 27,38 B.7 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Sophie Tilemans
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 64,58 a.8 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere
--- 2 60,12 a.1 Francoise Duren -Benoit Ortegat
--- 3 55,65 b.5 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver
--- 4 53,72 a.5 Luc Cartuyvels -Daniel Couvreur
--- 5 53,42 b.4 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nicolas de Neve
--- 6 53,27 b.1 Gerard Cooreman -Myriam de Timary
--- 7 50,60 a.4 Fabiola de Liedekerke -Baudouin de Liedekerke
--- 8 50,30 a.6 Pierina Di Vito -Jeanine Bontemps
--- 9 50,30 b.8 Christiane Huby -Liliane Baptista
--- 10 50,00 a.7 Gaetan van de Werve -Stan Tabor
--- 11 47,17 b.7 Luc Rampaer -Bernard Brisbois
--- 12 42,86 b.3 Michele Berrier -Helene Schyns
--- 13 41,82 b.6 Michel Lievens -Helene Christiaens
--- 14 41,22 a.2 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot
--- 15 34,97 a.3 Didier Collart -Veronique Englebienne
--- 16 0,00 b.2 -
PAIRE B.8 Lydia Wildiers -Giuseppe Napoli
b.8 Christiane Huby -Liliane Baptista 50,30 %
1 NS 2C N = 110 24 85.71
2 NS 3S E-2 100 24 85.71
3 NS 3S N = 400 27 96.43 µ Tbl = 89,29 %
b.7 Luc Rampaer -Bernard Brisbois 47,17 %
4 NS 3P E-1 100 21 75.00
5 NS 3S S-1 -100 17 60.71
6 NS 2TcN-2 -300 2 7.14 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
b.6 Michel Lievens -Helene Christiaens 41,82 %
7 NS 2P S = 110 15 53.57
8 NS 3S N = 400 17 60.71
9 NS 4PcS = 590 26 92.86 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
b.5 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver 55,65 %
10 NS 4C W = -620 7 25.00
11 NS 2S W = -120 9 32.14
12 NS 3S S = 600 28 100.00 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
b.4 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nicolas de Neve 53,42 %
13 NS 2P N = 110 24 85.71
14 NS 3S S+2 460 17 60.71
15 NS 2S W-1 50 22 78.57 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
b.3 Michele Berrier -Helene Schyns 42,86 %
16 NS 3S N-1 -50 12 42.86
17 NS 4C W-2 100 28 100.00
18 NS 3T W+2 -150 19 67.86 µ Tbl = 70,24 %
b.2 - 0,00 %
19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00
21 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
b.1 Gerard Cooreman -Myriam de Timary 53,27 %
22 NS 4P S = 420 22 78.57
23 NS 2P W-1 100 17 60.71
24 NS 4PcW-2 300 5 17.86 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
Total : 383,0 / 588 = 65,14 %
PAIRE B.3 Dominique Sassen -Philippe van der Gracht
b.5 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver 55,65 %
1 NS 2C N = 110 24 85.71
2 NS 3S E-1 50 13 46.43
3 NS 3S N-1 -50 8 28.57 µ Tbl = 53,57 %
b.4 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nicolas de Neve 53,42 %
4 NS 3P E-1 100 21 75.00
5 NS 3S S-2 -200 2 7.14
6 NS 2P W = -110 14 50.00 µ Tbl = 44,05 %
b.3 Michele Berrier -Helene Schyns 42,86 %
7 NS 2P S = 110 15 53.57
8 NS 4K S+1 150 11 39.29
9 NS 4PcS = 590 26 92.86 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
b.2 - 0,00 %
10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
b.1 Gerard Cooreman -Myriam de Timary 53,27 %
13 NS 3K W-1 100 21 75.00
14 NS 3S S+3 490 21 75.00
15 NS 2S W-1 50 22 78.57 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
b.8 Christiane Huby -Liliane Baptista 50,30 %
16 NS 3S N = 400 24 85.71
17 NS 3C W+1 -170 22 78.57
18 NS 3S E = -400 8 28.57 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
b.7 Luc Rampaer -Bernard Brisbois 47,17 %
19 NS 4P N+1 450 24 85.71
20 NS 2T E = -90 28 100.00
21 NS 1S S+2 150 24 85.71 µ Tbl = 90,48 %
b.6 Michel Lievens -Helene Christiaens 41,82 %
22 NS 3S N = 400 12 42.86
23 NS 3S E-2 200 27 96.43
24 NS 4C N = 420 13 46.43 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
Total : 380,0 / 588 = 64,63 %
PAIRE B.5 Marie Christine Remy -Jean de Villenfagne
b.2 - 0,00 %
1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
b.1 Gerard Cooreman -Myriam de Timary 53,27 %
4 NS 3P E-1 100 21 75.00
5 NS 3S S-1 -100 17 60.71
6 NS 3P W-1 100 23 82.14 µ Tbl = 72,62 %
b.8 Christiane Huby -Liliane Baptista 50,30 %
7 NS 3C W = -140 1 3.57
8 NS 3S N+1 430 22 78.57
9 NS 4PcS = 590 26 92.86 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
b.7 Luc Rampaer -Bernard Brisbois 47,17 %
10 NS 4C W = -620 7 25.00
11 NS 3C E = -140 3 10.71
12 NS 1S S+3 180 24 85.71 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
b.6 Michel Lievens -Helene Christiaens 41,82 %
13 NS 2S W-3 300 28 100.00
14 NS 6T S+1 940 28 100.00
15 NS 2S W = -120 7 25.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
b.5 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver 55,65 %
16 NS 3S N-1 -50 12 42.86
17 NS 3C W+1 -170 22 78.57
18 NS 3K E+3 -170 14 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
b.4 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nicolas de Neve 53,42 %
19 NS 4P N+1 450 24 85.71
20 NS 2S E+1 -150 20 71.43
21 NS 2K N = 90 16 57.14 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
b.3 Michele Berrier -Helene Schyns 42,86 %
22 NS 4P N = 420 22 78.57
23 NS 3S E-1 100 17 60.71
24 NS 5C N = 450 23 82.14 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
Total : 377,0 / 588 = 64,12 %
PAIRE A.1 Chantal Barro -Jerome Claessens
a.1 Francoise Duren -Benoit Ortegat 60,12 %
1 NS 3T S-1 -50 14 50.00
2 NS 3S E-2 100 24 85.71
3 NS 4C S-1 -50 8 28.57 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
a.8 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 64,58 %
4 NS 3PcW = -730 0 0.00
5 NS 3S S-1 -100 17 60.71
6 NS 3K W+1 -130 6 21.43 µ Tbl = 27,38 %
a.7 Gaetan van de Werve -Stan Tabor 50,00 %
7 NS 2P S = 110 15 53.57
8 NS 4C N = 420 20 71.43
9 NS 5C W-1 100 11 39.29 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
a.6 Pierina Di Vito -Jeanine Bontemps 50,30 %
10 NS 3C W+1 -170 24 85.71
11 NS 2C E+1 -140 3 10.71
12 NS 1S S+2 150 18 64.29 µ Tbl = 53,57 %
a.5 Luc Cartuyvels -Daniel Couvreur 53,72 %
13 NS 2S W = -120 9 32.14
14 NS 6T S = 920 25 89.29
15 NS 2S W-1 50 22 78.57 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.4 Fabiola de Liedekerke -Baudouin de Liedekerke 50,60 %
16 NS 3S N+1 430 28 100.00
17 NS 4C W-1 50 26 92.86
18 NS 1S E+1 -120 25 89.29 µ Tbl = 94,05 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Veronique Englebienne 34,97 %
19 NS 4P N+1 450 24 85.71
20 NS 3P W = -140 23 82.14
21 NS 2P W-3 150 24 85.71 µ Tbl = 84,52 %
a.2 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 41,22 %
22 NS 4P S = 420 22 78.57
23 NS 3C S-1 -100 9 32.14
24 NS 4C N+1 450 23 82.14 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
Total : 420,0 / 672 = 62,50 %
PAIRE A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Noelle Fosse
a.6 Pierina Di Vito -Jeanine Bontemps 50,30 %
1 NS 2C N-1 -50 14 50.00
2 NS 3S E-2 100 24 85.71
3 NS 3T S = 110 14 50.00 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
a.5 Luc Cartuyvels -Daniel Couvreur 53,72 %
4 NS 3P E-1 100 21 75.00
5 NS 3S S-1 -100 17 60.71
6 NS 3K W = -110 14 50.00 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
a.4 Fabiola de Liedekerke -Baudouin de Liedekerke 50,60 %
7 NS 2P S+1 140 27 96.43
8 NS 3S N+2 460 26 92.86
9 NS 5PcS-1 -100 5 17.86 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Veronique Englebienne 34,97 %
10 NS 2C W+3 -200 16 57.14
11 NS 2P S-2 -100 12 42.86
12 NS 1S S+1 120 10 35.71 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
a.2 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 41,22 %
13 NS 1S W+1 -120 9 32.14
14 NS 3S N+2 460 17 60.71
15 NS 2S W-1 50 22 78.57 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
a.1 Francoise Duren -Benoit Ortegat 60,12 %
16 NS 2C W-4 400 24 85.71
17 NS 3C W+2 -200 14 50.00
18 NS 5K E+1 -420 2 7.14 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
a.8 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 64,58 %
19 NS 4P S = 420 10 35.71
20 NS 2P W+2 -170 16 57.14
21 NS 2P W-3 150 24 85.71 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
a.7 Gaetan van de Werve -Stan Tabor 50,00 %
22 NS 3S N = 400 12 42.86
23 NS 3C S-1 -100 9 32.14
24 NS 4C N = 420 13 46.43 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
Total : 372,0 / 672 = 55,36 %
PAIRE A.6 Claire Derieuw -Monique Crouan
a.4 Fabiola de Liedekerke -Baudouin de Liedekerke 50,60 %
1 NS 2S S-1 -50 14 50.00
2 NS 1K W+3 -130 4 14.29
3 NS 2S E-3 300 23 82.14 µ Tbl = 48,81 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Veronique Englebienne 34,97 %
4 NS 3P E = -140 7 25.00
5 NS 3S S-1 -100 17 60.71
6 NS 3S E-3 300 28 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
a.2 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 41,22 %
7 NS 1P S+2 140 27 96.43
8 NS 3S N+2 460 26 92.86
9 NS 5CcW-1 200 17 60.71 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
a.1 Francoise Duren -Benoit Ortegat 60,12 %
10 NS 4C W = -620 7 25.00
11 NS 2C E-1 50 19 67.86
12 NS 3S S-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
a.8 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 64,58 %
13 NS 2S W = -120 9 32.14
14 NS 5T S+2 440 13 46.43
15 NS 2S W = -120 7 25.00 µ Tbl = 34,52 %
a.7 Gaetan van de Werve -Stan Tabor 50,00 %
16 NS 3S N-1 -50 12 42.86
17 NS 4C W+1 -450 4 14.29
18 NS 2S W = -120 25 89.29 µ Tbl = 48,81 %
a.6 Pierina Di Vito -Jeanine Bontemps 50,30 %
19 NS 4P N+1 450 24 85.71
20 NS 3P W = -140 23 82.14
21 NS 2S S-2 -200 6 21.43 µ Tbl = 63,10 %
a.5 Luc Cartuyvels -Daniel Couvreur 53,72 %
22 NS 4P S = 420 22 78.57
23 NS 3C S = 140 22 78.57
24 NS 4C N-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
Total : 356,0 / 672 = 52,98 %
PAIRE B.1 Aliona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire
b.1 Gerard Cooreman -Myriam de Timary 53,27 %
1 NS 3C N-2 -100 3 10.71
2 NS 3S E-1 50 13 46.43
3 NS 2S N-3 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 19,05 %
b.8 Christiane Huby -Liliane Baptista 50,30 %
4 NS 2P E+1 -140 7 25.00
5 NS 3S S-1 -100 17 60.71
6 NS 4K W-1 100 23 82.14 µ Tbl = 55,95 %
b.7 Luc Rampaer -Bernard Brisbois 47,17 %
7 NS 2P S = 110 15 53.57
8 NS 3K S+1 130 5 17.86
9 NS 4P S = 420 21 75.00 µ Tbl = 48,81 %
b.6 Michel Lievens -Helene Christiaens 41,82 %
10 NS 2P N-2 -200 16 57.14
11 NS 2S W-1 50 19 67.86
12 NS 1S S+3 180 24 85.71 µ Tbl = 70,24 %
b.5 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver 55,65 %
13 NS 3T E-2 200 26 92.86
14 NS 6T S = 920 25 89.29
15 NS 2S W = -120 7 25.00 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
b.4 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nicolas de Neve 53,42 %
16 NS 2S N = 120 19 67.86
17 NS 2C W+3 -200 14 50.00
18 NS 4K E+2 -170 14 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,95 %
b.3 Michele Berrier -Helene Schyns 42,86 %
19 NS 3P N+1 170 0 0.00
20 NS 2P W = -110 26 92.86
21 NS 3TcW = -470 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
b.2 - 0,00 %
22 NS BYE 0 0.00
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 294,0 / 588 = 50,00 %
PAIRE A.5 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand
a.2 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 41,22 %
1 NS 2C N = 110 24 85.71
2 NS 1S W+2 -150 2 7.14
3 NS 2S S-1 -50 8 28.57 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
a.1 Francoise Duren -Benoit Ortegat 60,12 %
4 NS 3P E-1 100 21 75.00
5 NS 3S S-1 -100 17 60.71
6 NS 2K W+1 -110 14 50.00 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
a.8 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 64,58 %
7 NS 2P S = 110 15 53.57
8 NS 3K S = 110 2 7.14
9 NS 5C W-2 200 17 60.71 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
a.7 Gaetan van de Werve -Stan Tabor 50,00 %
10 NS 2C W+2 -170 24 85.71
11 NS 1S E = -90 14 50.00
12 NS 2K N+2 130 13 46.43 µ Tbl = 60,71 %
a.6 Pierina Di Vito -Jeanine Bontemps 50,30 %
13 NS 2S W = -120 9 32.14
14 NS 6S S-1 -50 0 0.00
15 NS 2S W-1 50 22 78.57 µ Tbl = 36,90 %
a.5 Luc Cartuyvels -Daniel Couvreur 53,72 %
16 NS 3S S-2 -100 5 17.86
17 NS 4C W+1 -450 4 14.29
18 NS 5T W+1 -420 2 7.14 µ Tbl = 13,10 %
a.4 Fabiola de Liedekerke -Baudouin de Liedekerke 50,60 %
19 NS 4P S = 420 10 35.71
20 NS 1S S-2 -200 11 39.29
21 NS 1S S-1 -100 12 42.86 µ Tbl = 39,29 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Veronique Englebienne 34,97 %
22 NS 3S N+1 430 28 100.00
23 NS 3P W-2 200 27 96.43
24 NS 4C N+2 480 28 100.00 µ Tbl = 98,81 %
Total : 329,0 / 672 = 48,96 %
PAIRE B.6 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry
b.4 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nicolas de Neve 53,42 %
1 NS 2C N-1 -50 14 50.00
2 NS 3S W+1 -430 0 0.00
3 NS 2S N-1 -50 8 28.57 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
b.3 Michele Berrier -Helene Schyns 42,86 %
4 NS 4P E-1 100 21 75.00
5 NS 3S S-1 -100 17 60.71
6 NS 3S E-1 100 23 82.14 µ Tbl = 72,62 %
b.2 - 0,00 %
7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
b.1 Gerard Cooreman -Myriam de Timary 53,27 %
10 NS 3C W+2 -200 16 57.14
11 NS 2P S+1 140 26 92.86
12 NS 1S W-1 50 2 7.14 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
b.8 Christiane Huby -Liliane Baptista 50,30 %
13 NS 2P N-2 -200 0 0.00
14 NS 5T S+1 420 8 28.57
15 NS 2S W = -120 7 25.00 µ Tbl = 17,86 %
b.7 Luc Rampaer -Bernard Brisbois 47,17 %
16 NS 2S N = 120 19 67.86
17 NS 2C W+2 -170 22 78.57
18 NS 3K E+3 -170 14 50.00 µ Tbl = 65,48 %
b.6 Michel Lievens -Helene Christiaens 41,82 %
19 NS 4P N = 420 10 35.71
20 NS 3P W+1 -170 16 57.14
21 NS 2P W-3 150 24 85.71 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
b.5 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver 55,65 %
22 NS 3S N = 400 12 42.86
23 NS 3C S = 140 22 78.57
24 NS 4PcW-2 300 5 17.86 µ Tbl = 46,43 %
Total : 286,0 / 588 = 48,64 %
PAIRE A.8 Marianne Borsu -Jeannine Wanderpepen
a.8 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 64,58 %
1 NS 3C N-2 -100 3 10.71
2 NS 3S E-1 50 13 46.43
3 NS 3S N = 400 27 96.43 µ Tbl = 51,19 %
a.7 Gaetan van de Werve -Stan Tabor 50,00 %
4 NS 2P W+1 -140 7 25.00
5 NS 3S S-1 -100 17 60.71
6 NS 3K W+1 -130 6 21.43 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
a.6 Pierina Di Vito -Jeanine Bontemps 50,30 %
7 NS 2P S = 110 15 53.57
8 NS 3C N+1 170 14 50.00
9 NS 3P S+1 170 14 50.00 µ Tbl = 51,19 %
a.5 Luc Cartuyvels -Daniel Couvreur 53,72 %
10 NS 4C W = -620 7 25.00
11 NS 2S W-1 50 19 67.86
12 NS 1S S+2 150 18 64.29 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
a.4 Fabiola de Liedekerke -Baudouin de Liedekerke 50,60 %
13 NS 1S W+1 -120 9 32.14
14 NS 5T S+2 440 13 46.43
15 NS 2S W = -120 7 25.00 µ Tbl = 34,52 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Veronique Englebienne 34,97 %
16 NS 3S N = 400 24 85.71
17 NS 5TcN-3 -500 0 0.00
18 NS 3C W = -140 22 78.57 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
a.2 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 41,22 %
19 NS 4P N = 420 10 35.71
20 NS 3P W+1 -170 16 57.14
21 NS 2P W-2 100 18 64.29 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
a.1 Francoise Duren -Benoit Ortegat 60,12 %
22 NS 2S N+1 150 6 21.43
23 NS 3C S-1 -100 9 32.14
24 NS 5C N = 450 23 82.14 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
Total : 317,0 / 672 = 47,17 %
PAIRE B.4 Sandra Dallemagne -Marie Claire Vienne
b.7 Luc Rampaer -Bernard Brisbois 47,17 %
1 NS 2C N-1 -50 14 50.00
2 NS 3C W-1 50 13 46.43
3 NS 3P W-3 300 23 82.14 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
b.6 Michel Lievens -Helene Christiaens 41,82 %
4 NS 2P E+1 -140 7 25.00
5 NS 3S S-1 -100 17 60.71
6 NS 3K W-1 100 23 82.14 µ Tbl = 55,95 %
b.5 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver 55,65 %
7 NS 2P S = 110 15 53.57
8 NS 2C N+1 140 8 28.57
9 NS 4PcS-1 -100 5 17.86 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
b.4 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nicolas de Neve 53,42 %
10 NS 4C W = -620 7 25.00
11 NS 3C E-1 50 19 67.86
12 NS 2S S+1 150 18 64.29 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
b.3 Michele Berrier -Helene Schyns 42,86 %
13 NS 1S W+1 -120 9 32.14
14 NS 5T S+1 420 8 28.57
15 NS 2S W = -120 7 25.00 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
b.2 - 0,00 %
16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
b.1 Gerard Cooreman -Myriam de Timary 53,27 %
19 NS 4P N = 420 10 35.71
20 NS 2T S-3 -300 8 28.57
21 NS 1S S-1 -100 12 42.86 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
b.8 Christiane Huby -Liliane Baptista 50,30 %
22 NS 4P S = 420 22 78.57
23 NS 4C S-1 -100 9 32.14
24 NS 4C N+1 450 23 82.14 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
Total : 277,0 / 588 = 47,11 %
PAIRE A.3 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten
a.5 Luc Cartuyvels -Daniel Couvreur 53,72 %
1 NS 3C N-2 -100 3 10.71
2 NS 3S E-2 100 24 85.71
3 NS 2S N = 120 16 57.14 µ Tbl = 51,19 %
a.4 Fabiola de Liedekerke -Baudouin de Liedekerke 50,60 %
4 NS 2P E-1 100 21 75.00
5 NS 3S S-2 -200 2 7.14
6 NS 2K W+2 -130 6 21.43 µ Tbl = 34,52 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Veronique Englebienne 34,97 %
7 NS 2P S = 110 15 53.57
8 NS 3S N+2 460 26 92.86
9 NS 4P S = 420 21 75.00 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
a.2 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 41,22 %
10 NS 2C W+2 -170 24 85.71
11 NS 4C E-3 150 28 100.00
12 NS 2K N+2 130 13 46.43 µ Tbl = 77,38 %
a.1 Francoise Duren -Benoit Ortegat 60,12 %
13 NS 3K W-1 100 21 75.00
14 NS 4T S+2 170 3 10.71
15 NS 2S W = -120 7 25.00 µ Tbl = 36,90 %
a.8 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 64,58 %
16 NS 3S N-5 -250 0 0.00
17 NS 2C W+4 -230 8 28.57
18 NS 3S E = -400 8 28.57 µ Tbl = 19,05 %
a.7 Gaetan van de Werve -Stan Tabor 50,00 %
19 NS 5P N = 450 24 85.71
20 NS 3S E = -600 5 17.86
21 NS 1S S-1 -100 12 42.86 µ Tbl = 48,81 %
a.6 Pierina Di Vito -Jeanine Bontemps 50,30 %
22 NS 3C N-1 -50 3 10.71
23 NS 3C S-1 -100 9 32.14
24 NS 4C N = 420 13 46.43 µ Tbl = 29,76 %
Total : 312,0 / 672 = 46,43 %
PAIRE A.2 Annette Fobe -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
a.3 Didier Collart -Veronique Englebienne 34,97 %
1 NS 2C N-1 -50 14 50.00
2 NS 1K W+1 -90 6 21.43
3 NS 3T S+1 130 19 67.86 µ Tbl = 46,43 %
a.2 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 41,22 %
4 NS 3P E-1 100 21 75.00
5 NS 3S S-1 -100 17 60.71
6 NS 2K W+1 -110 14 50.00 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
a.1 Francoise Duren -Benoit Ortegat 60,12 %
7 NS 3C W = -140 1 3.57
8 NS 3S N = 400 17 60.71
9 NS 5C W = -650 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 21,43 %
a.8 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 64,58 %
10 NS 4C W = -620 7 25.00
11 NS 2C E+1 -140 3 10.71
12 NS 2K N+1 110 6 21.43 µ Tbl = 19,05 %
a.7 Gaetan van de Werve -Stan Tabor 50,00 %
13 NS 2S W = -120 9 32.14
14 NS 5T S+1 420 8 28.57
15 NS 2S W-1 50 22 78.57 µ Tbl = 46,43 %
a.6 Pierina Di Vito -Jeanine Bontemps 50,30 %
16 NS 3S N-2 -100 5 17.86
17 NS 3C W+2 -200 14 50.00
18 NS 3S E-1 50 28 100.00 µ Tbl = 55,95 %
a.5 Luc Cartuyvels -Daniel Couvreur 53,72 %
19 NS 4P S = 420 10 35.71
20 NS 3S E = -600 5 17.86
21 NS 1S S+2 150 24 85.71 µ Tbl = 46,43 %
a.4 Fabiola de Liedekerke -Baudouin de Liedekerke 50,60 %
22 NS 3S N-2 -100 0 0.00
23 NS 3C S = 140 22 78.57
24 NS 4P W-2 100 2 7.14 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
Total : 274,0 / 672 = 40,77 %
PAIRE A.4 Michele Verhulst -Andre Delacroix
a.7 Gaetan van de Werve -Stan Tabor 50,00 %
1 NS 3S S = 400 28 100.00
2 NS 3S E-2 100 24 85.71
3 NS 3S N-2 -100 2 7.14 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
a.6 Pierina Di Vito -Jeanine Bontemps 50,30 %
4 NS 2P E+1 -140 7 25.00
5 NS 3S S-1 -100 17 60.71
6 NS 3K W = -110 14 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
a.5 Luc Cartuyvels -Daniel Couvreur 53,72 %
7 NS 2P S = 110 15 53.57
8 NS 4K S = 130 5 17.86
9 NS 5P S-2 -300 2 7.14 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
a.4 Fabiola de Liedekerke -Baudouin de Liedekerke 50,60 %
10 NS 2C W+2 -170 24 85.71
11 NS 2S W = -120 9 32.14
12 NS 2K N+1 110 6 21.43 µ Tbl = 46,43 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Veronique Englebienne 34,97 %
13 NS 1S E = -90 18 64.29
14 NS 3S S+3 490 21 75.00
15 NS 2S W = -120 7 25.00 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
a.2 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 41,22 %
16 NS 3S N-2 -100 5 17.86
17 NS 4C W+1 -450 4 14.29
18 NS 3T W+2 -150 19 67.86 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.1 Francoise Duren -Benoit Ortegat 60,12 %
19 NS 4P N = 420 10 35.71
20 NS 4P W = -620 1 3.57
21 NS 2S S-2 -200 6 21.43 µ Tbl = 20,24 %
a.8 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 64,58 %
22 NS 3S N = 400 12 42.86
23 NS 3S E = -600 2 7.14
24 NS 4C N = 420 13 46.43 µ Tbl = 32,14 %
Total : 271,0 / 672 = 40,33 %
PAIRE B.2 Annie Zeimes -Madeleine Gabriel
b.3 Michele Berrier -Helene Schyns 42,86 %
1 NS 3K N-1 -50 14 50.00
2 NS 3S E-1 50 13 46.43
3 NS 2T S+2 130 19 67.86 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
b.2 - 0,00 %
4 NS BYE 0 0.00
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
b.1 Gerard Cooreman -Myriam de Timary 53,27 %
7 NS 2P S = 110 15 53.57
8 NS 3K S+2 150 11 39.29
9 NS 4P S-1 -50 8 28.57 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
b.8 Christiane Huby -Liliane Baptista 50,30 %
10 NS 4C W+1 -650 0 0.00
11 NS 3C E = -140 3 10.71
12 NS 1S S+3 180 24 85.71 µ Tbl = 32,14 %
b.7 Luc Rampaer -Bernard Brisbois 47,17 %
13 NS 1S W+1 -120 9 32.14
14 NS 4K N+2 170 3 10.71
15 NS 2S W-1 50 22 78.57 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
b.6 Michel Lievens -Helene Christiaens 41,82 %
16 NS 3T N = 110 16 57.14
17 NS 2C W+3 -200 14 50.00
18 NS 5T W = -400 8 28.57 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
b.5 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver 55,65 %
19 NS 4P N = 420 10 35.71
20 NS 1S S-2 -200 11 39.29
21 NS 1S S-2 -200 6 21.43 µ Tbl = 32,14 %
b.4 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nicolas de Neve 53,42 %
22 NS 3S N = 400 12 42.86
23 NS 3S E+1 -630 0 0.00
24 NS 4C N = 420 13 46.43 µ Tbl = 29,76 %
Total : 231,0 / 588 = 39,29 %
PAIRE B.7 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Sophie Tilemans
b.6 Michel Lievens -Helene Christiaens 41,82 %
1 NS 2C N-2 -100 3 10.71
2 NS 3S E-1 50 13 46.43
3 NS 3S N-1 -50 8 28.57 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
b.5 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver 55,65 %
4 NS 3P E = -140 7 25.00
5 NS 3S S-2 -200 2 7.14
6 NS 3S E+1 -630 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 10,71 %
b.4 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nicolas de Neve 53,42 %
7 NS 2P S-1 -100 4 14.29
8 NS 2P E = -110 0 0.00
9 NS 5C W-1 100 11 39.29 µ Tbl = 17,86 %
b.3 Michele Berrier -Helene Schyns 42,86 %
10 NS 2C W+2 -170 24 85.71
11 NS 4C E-2 100 24 85.71
12 NS 2C S = 110 6 21.43 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
b.2 - 0,00 %
13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00
15 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
b.1 Gerard Cooreman -Myriam de Timary 53,27 %
16 NS 3S N-2 -100 5 17.86
17 NS 2C W+3 -200 14 50.00
18 NS 5K E+1 -420 2 7.14 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
b.8 Christiane Huby -Liliane Baptista 50,30 %
19 NS 4P S = 420 10 35.71
20 NS 4P W = -620 1 3.57
21 NS 2C S-3 -300 2 7.14 µ Tbl = 15,48 %
b.7 Luc Rampaer -Bernard Brisbois 47,17 %
22 NS 4P S-1 -50 3 10.71
23 NS 2C S-1 -100 9 32.14
24 NS 4C S = 420 13 46.43 µ Tbl = 29,76 %
Total : 161,0 / 588 = 27,38 %
PAIRE a.8 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere
A.8 Marianne Borsu -Jeannine Wanderpepen 47,17 %
1 EO 3C N-2 -100 25 89.29
2 EO 3S E-1 50 15 53.57
3 EO 3S N = 400 1 3.57 µ Tbl = 48,81 %
A.1 Chantal Barro -Jerome Claessens 62,50 %
4 EO 3PcW = -730 28 100.00
5 EO 3S S-1 -100 11 39.29
6 EO 3K W+1 -130 22 78.57 µ Tbl = 72,62 %
A.5 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 48,96 %
7 EO 2P S = 110 13 46.43
8 EO 3K S = 110 26 92.86
9 EO 5C W-2 200 11 39.29 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
A.2 Annette Fobe -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 40,77 %
10 EO 4C W = -620 21 75.00
11 EO 2C E+1 -140 25 89.29
12 EO 2K N+1 110 22 78.57 µ Tbl = 80,95 %
A.6 Claire Derieuw -Monique Crouan 52,98 %
13 EO 2S W = -120 19 67.86
14 EO 5T S+2 440 15 53.57
15 EO 2S W = -120 21 75.00 µ Tbl = 65,48 %
A.3 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 46,43 %
16 EO 3S N-5 -250 28 100.00
17 EO 2C W+4 -230 20 71.43
18 EO 3S E = -400 20 71.43 µ Tbl = 80,95 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Noelle Fosse 55,36 %
19 EO 4P S = 420 18 64.29
20 EO 2P W+2 -170 12 42.86
21 EO 2P W-3 150 4 14.29 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
A.4 Michele Verhulst -Andre Delacroix 40,33 %
22 EO 3S N = 400 16 57.14
23 EO 3S E = -600 26 92.86
24 EO 4C N = 420 15 53.57 µ Tbl = 67,86 %
Total : 434,0 / 672 = 64,58 %
PAIRE a.1 Francoise Duren -Benoit Ortegat
A.1 Chantal Barro -Jerome Claessens 62,50 %
1 EO 3T S-1 -50 14 50.00
2 EO 3S E-2 100 4 14.29
3 EO 4C S-1 -50 20 71.43 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
A.5 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 48,96 %
4 EO 3P E-1 100 7 25.00
5 EO 3S S-1 -100 11 39.29
6 EO 2K W+1 -110 14 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
A.2 Annette Fobe -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 40,77 %
7 EO 3C W = -140 27 96.43
8 EO 3S N = 400 11 39.29
9 EO 5C W = -650 28 100.00 µ Tbl = 78,57 %
A.6 Claire Derieuw -Monique Crouan 52,98 %
10 EO 4C W = -620 21 75.00
11 EO 2C E-1 50 9 32.14
12 EO 3S S-1 -100 28 100.00 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
A.3 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 46,43 %
13 EO 3K W-1 100 7 25.00
14 EO 4T S+2 170 25 89.29
15 EO 2S W = -120 21 75.00 µ Tbl = 63,10 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Noelle Fosse 55,36 %
16 EO 2C W-4 400 4 14.29
17 EO 3C W+2 -200 14 50.00
18 EO 5K E+1 -420 26 92.86 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
A.4 Michele Verhulst -Andre Delacroix 40,33 %
19 EO 4P N = 420 18 64.29
20 EO 4P W = -620 27 96.43
21 EO 2S S-2 -200 22 78.57 µ Tbl = 79,76 %
A.8 Marianne Borsu -Jeannine Wanderpepen 47,17 %
22 EO 2S N+1 150 22 78.57
23 EO 3C S-1 -100 19 67.86
24 EO 5C N = 450 5 17.86 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
Total : 404,0 / 672 = 60,12 %
PAIRE b.5 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver
B.3 Dominique Sassen -Philippe van der Gracht 64,63 %
1 EO 2C N = 110 4 14.29
2 EO 3S E-1 50 15 53.57
3 EO 3S N-1 -50 20 71.43 µ Tbl = 46,43 %
B.7 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Sophie Tilemans 27,38 %
4 EO 3P E = -140 21 75.00
5 EO 3S S-2 -200 26 92.86
6 EO 3S E+1 -630 28 100.00 µ Tbl = 89,29 %
B.4 Sandra Dallemagne -Marie Claire Vienne 47,11 %
7 EO 2P S = 110 13 46.43
8 EO 2C N+1 140 20 71.43
9 EO 4PcS-1 -100 23 82.14 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
B.8 Lydia Wildiers -Giuseppe Napoli 65,14 %
10 EO 4C W = -620 21 75.00
11 EO 2S W = -120 19 67.86
12 EO 3S S = 600 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
B.1 Aliona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 50,00 %
13 EO 3T E-2 200 2 7.14
14 EO 6T S = 920 3 10.71
15 EO 2S W = -120 21 75.00 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
B.5 Marie Christine Remy -Jean de Villenfagne 64,12 %
16 EO 3S N-1 -50 16 57.14
17 EO 3C W+1 -170 6 21.43
18 EO 3K E+3 -170 14 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
B.2 Annie Zeimes -Madeleine Gabriel 39,29 %
19 EO 4P N = 420 18 64.29
20 EO 1S S-2 -200 17 60.71
21 EO 1S S-2 -200 22 78.57 µ Tbl = 67,86 %
B.6 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry 48,64 %
22 EO 3S N = 400 16 57.14
23 EO 3C S = 140 6 21.43
24 EO 4PcW-2 300 23 82.14 µ Tbl = 53,57 %
Total : 374,0 / 672 = 55,65 %
PAIRE a.5 Luc Cartuyvels -Daniel Couvreur
A.3 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 46,43 %
1 EO 3C N-2 -100 25 89.29
2 EO 3S E-2 100 4 14.29
3 EO 2S N = 120 12 42.86 µ Tbl = 48,81 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Noelle Fosse 55,36 %
4 EO 3P E-1 100 7 25.00
5 EO 3S S-1 -100 11 39.29
6 EO 3K W = -110 14 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
A.4 Michele Verhulst -Andre Delacroix 40,33 %
7 EO 2P S = 110 13 46.43
8 EO 4K S = 130 23 82.14
9 EO 5P S-2 -300 26 92.86 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
A.8 Marianne Borsu -Jeannine Wanderpepen 47,17 %
10 EO 4C W = -620 21 75.00
11 EO 2S W-1 50 9 32.14
12 EO 1S S+2 150 10 35.71 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
A.1 Chantal Barro -Jerome Claessens 62,50 %
13 EO 2S W = -120 19 67.86
14 EO 6T S = 920 3 10.71
15 EO 2S W-1 50 6 21.43 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.5 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 48,96 %
16 EO 3S S-2 -100 23 82.14
17 EO 4C W+1 -450 24 85.71
18 EO 5T W+1 -420 26 92.86 µ Tbl = 86,90 %
A.2 Annette Fobe -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 40,77 %
19 EO 4P S = 420 18 64.29
20 EO 3S E = -600 23 82.14
21 EO 1S S+2 150 4 14.29 µ Tbl = 53,57 %
A.6 Claire Derieuw -Monique Crouan 52,98 %
22 EO 4P S = 420 6 21.43
23 EO 3C S = 140 6 21.43
24 EO 4C N-1 -50 28 100.00 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
Total : 361,0 / 672 = 53,72 %
PAIRE b.4 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nicolas de Neve
B.6 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry 48,64 %
1 EO 2C N-1 -50 14 50.00
2 EO 3S W+1 -430 28 100.00
3 EO 2S N-1 -50 20 71.43 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
B.3 Dominique Sassen -Philippe van der Gracht 64,63 %
4 EO 3P E-1 100 7 25.00
5 EO 3S S-2 -200 26 92.86
6 EO 2P W = -110 14 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,95 %
B.7 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Sophie Tilemans 27,38 %
7 EO 2P S-1 -100 24 85.71
8 EO 2P E = -110 28 100.00
9 EO 5C W-1 100 17 60.71 µ Tbl = 82,14 %
B.4 Sandra Dallemagne -Marie Claire Vienne 47,11 %
10 EO 4C W = -620 21 75.00
11 EO 3C E-1 50 9 32.14
12 EO 2S S+1 150 10 35.71 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
B.8 Lydia Wildiers -Giuseppe Napoli 65,14 %
13 EO 2P N = 110 4 14.29
14 EO 3S S+2 460 11 39.29
15 EO 2S W-1 50 6 21.43 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
B.1 Aliona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 50,00 %
16 EO 2S N = 120 9 32.14
17 EO 2C W+3 -200 14 50.00
18 EO 4K E+2 -170 14 50.00 µ Tbl = 44,05 %
B.5 Marie Christine Remy -Jean de Villenfagne 64,12 %
19 EO 4P N+1 450 4 14.29
20 EO 2S E+1 -150 8 28.57
21 EO 2K N = 90 12 42.86 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
B.2 Annie Zeimes -Madeleine Gabriel 39,29 %
22 EO 3S N = 400 16 57.14
23 EO 3S E+1 -630 28 100.00
24 EO 4C N = 420 15 53.57 µ Tbl = 70,24 %
Total : 359,0 / 672 = 53,42 %
PAIRE b.1 Gerard Cooreman -Myriam de Timary
B.1 Aliona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 50,00 %
1 EO 3C N-2 -100 25 89.29
2 EO 3S E-1 50 15 53.57
3 EO 2S N-3 -150 28 100.00 µ Tbl = 80,95 %
B.5 Marie Christine Remy -Jean de Villenfagne 64,12 %
4 EO 3P E-1 100 7 25.00
5 EO 3S S-1 -100 11 39.29
6 EO 3P W-1 100 5 17.86 µ Tbl = 27,38 %
B.2 Annie Zeimes -Madeleine Gabriel 39,29 %
7 EO 2P S = 110 13 46.43
8 EO 3K S+2 150 17 60.71
9 EO 4P S-1 -50 20 71.43 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
B.6 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry 48,64 %
10 EO 3C W+2 -200 12 42.86
11 EO 2P S+1 140 2 7.14
12 EO 1S W-1 50 26 92.86 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
B.3 Dominique Sassen -Philippe van der Gracht 64,63 %
13 EO 3K W-1 100 7 25.00
14 EO 3S S+3 490 7 25.00
15 EO 2S W-1 50 6 21.43 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
B.7 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Sophie Tilemans 27,38 %
16 EO 3S N-2 -100 23 82.14
17 EO 2C W+3 -200 14 50.00
18 EO 5K E+1 -420 26 92.86 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
B.4 Sandra Dallemagne -Marie Claire Vienne 47,11 %
19 EO 4P N = 420 18 64.29
20 EO 2T S-3 -300 20 71.43
21 EO 1S S-1 -100 16 57.14 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
B.8 Lydia Wildiers -Giuseppe Napoli 65,14 %
22 EO 4P S = 420 6 21.43
23 EO 2P W-1 100 11 39.29
24 EO 4PcW-2 300 23 82.14 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
Total : 358,0 / 672 = 53,27 %
PAIRE a.4 Fabiola de Liedekerke -Baudouin de Liedekerke
A.6 Claire Derieuw -Monique Crouan 52,98 %
1 EO 2S S-1 -50 14 50.00
2 EO 1K W+3 -130 24 85.71
3 EO 2S E-3 300 5 17.86 µ Tbl = 51,19 %
A.3 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 46,43 %
4 EO 2P E-1 100 7 25.00
5 EO 3S S-2 -200 26 92.86
6 EO 2K W+2 -130 22 78.57 µ Tbl = 65,48 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Noelle Fosse 55,36 %
7 EO 2P S+1 140 1 3.57
8 EO 3S N+2 460 2 7.14
9 EO 5PcS-1 -100 23 82.14 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
A.4 Michele Verhulst -Andre Delacroix 40,33 %
10 EO 2C W+2 -170 4 14.29
11 EO 2S W = -120 19 67.86
12 EO 2K N+1 110 22 78.57 µ Tbl = 53,57 %
A.8 Marianne Borsu -Jeannine Wanderpepen 47,17 %
13 EO 1S W+1 -120 19 67.86
14 EO 5T S+2 440 15 53.57
15 EO 2S W = -120 21 75.00 µ Tbl = 65,48 %
A.1 Chantal Barro -Jerome Claessens 62,50 %
16 EO 3S N+1 430 0 0.00
17 EO 4C W-1 50 2 7.14
18 EO 1S E+1 -120 3 10.71 µ Tbl = 5,95 %
A.5 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 48,96 %
19 EO 4P S = 420 18 64.29
20 EO 1S S-2 -200 17 60.71
21 EO 1S S-1 -100 16 57.14 µ Tbl = 60,71 %
A.2 Annette Fobe -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 40,77 %
22 EO 3S N-2 -100 28 100.00
23 EO 3C S = 140 6 21.43
24 EO 4P W-2 100 26 92.86 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
Total : 340,0 / 672 = 50,60 %
PAIRE a.6 Pierina Di Vito -Jeanine Bontemps
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Noelle Fosse 55,36 %
1 EO 2C N-1 -50 14 50.00
2 EO 3S E-2 100 4 14.29
3 EO 3T S = 110 14 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
A.4 Michele Verhulst -Andre Delacroix 40,33 %
4 EO 2P E+1 -140 21 75.00
5 EO 3S S-1 -100 11 39.29
6 EO 3K W = -110 14 50.00 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
A.8 Marianne Borsu -Jeannine Wanderpepen 47,17 %
7 EO 2P S = 110 13 46.43
8 EO 3C N+1 170 14 50.00
9 EO 3P S+1 170 14 50.00 µ Tbl = 48,81 %
A.1 Chantal Barro -Jerome Claessens 62,50 %
10 EO 3C W+1 -170 4 14.29
11 EO 2C E+1 -140 25 89.29
12 EO 1S S+2 150 10 35.71 µ Tbl = 46,43 %
A.5 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 48,96 %
13 EO 2S W = -120 19 67.86
14 EO 6S S-1 -50 28 100.00
15 EO 2S W-1 50 6 21.43 µ Tbl = 63,10 %
A.2 Annette Fobe -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 40,77 %
16 EO 3S N-2 -100 23 82.14
17 EO 3C W+2 -200 14 50.00
18 EO 3S E-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 44,05 %
A.6 Claire Derieuw -Monique Crouan 52,98 %
19 EO 4P N+1 450 4 14.29
20 EO 3P W = -140 5 17.86
21 EO 2S S-2 -200 22 78.57 µ Tbl = 36,90 %
A.3 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 46,43 %
22 EO 3C N-1 -50 25 89.29
23 EO 3C S-1 -100 19 67.86
24 EO 4C N = 420 15 53.57 µ Tbl = 70,24 %
Total : 338,0 / 672 = 50,30 %
PAIRE b.8 Christiane Huby -Liliane Baptista
B.8 Lydia Wildiers -Giuseppe Napoli 65,14 %
1 EO 2C N = 110 4 14.29
2 EO 3S E-2 100 4 14.29
3 EO 3S N = 400 1 3.57 µ Tbl = 10,71 %
B.1 Aliona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 50,00 %
4 EO 2P E+1 -140 21 75.00
5 EO 3S S-1 -100 11 39.29
6 EO 4K W-1 100 5 17.86 µ Tbl = 44,05 %
B.5 Marie Christine Remy -Jean de Villenfagne 64,12 %
7 EO 3C W = -140 27 96.43
8 EO 3S N+1 430 6 21.43
9 EO 4PcS = 590 2 7.14 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
B.2 Annie Zeimes -Madeleine Gabriel 39,29 %
10 EO 4C W+1 -650 28 100.00
11 EO 3C E = -140 25 89.29
12 EO 1S S+3 180 4 14.29 µ Tbl = 67,86 %
B.6 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry 48,64 %
13 EO 2P N-2 -200 28 100.00
14 EO 5T S+1 420 20 71.43
15 EO 2S W = -120 21 75.00 µ Tbl = 82,14 %
B.3 Dominique Sassen -Philippe van der Gracht 64,63 %
16 EO 3S N = 400 4 14.29
17 EO 3C W+1 -170 6 21.43
18 EO 3S E = -400 20 71.43 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
B.7 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Sophie Tilemans 27,38 %
19 EO 4P S = 420 18 64.29
20 EO 4P W = -620 27 96.43
21 EO 2C S-3 -300 26 92.86 µ Tbl = 84,52 %
B.4 Sandra Dallemagne -Marie Claire Vienne 47,11 %
22 EO 4P S = 420 6 21.43
23 EO 4C S-1 -100 19 67.86
24 EO 4C N+1 450 5 17.86 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
Total : 338,0 / 672 = 50,30 %
PAIRE a.7 Gaetan van de Werve -Stan Tabor
A.4 Michele Verhulst -Andre Delacroix 40,33 %
1 EO 3S S = 400 0 0.00
2 EO 3S E-2 100 4 14.29
3 EO 3S N-2 -100 26 92.86 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
A.8 Marianne Borsu -Jeannine Wanderpepen 47,17 %
4 EO 2P W+1 -140 21 75.00
5 EO 3S S-1 -100 11 39.29
6 EO 3K W+1 -130 22 78.57 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
A.1 Chantal Barro -Jerome Claessens 62,50 %
7 EO 2P S = 110 13 46.43
8 EO 4C N = 420 8 28.57
9 EO 5C W-1 100 17 60.71 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
A.5 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 48,96 %
10 EO 2C W+2 -170 4 14.29
11 EO 1S E = -90 14 50.00
12 EO 2K N+2 130 15 53.57 µ Tbl = 39,29 %
A.2 Annette Fobe -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 40,77 %
13 EO 2S W = -120 19 67.86
14 EO 5T S+1 420 20 71.43
15 EO 2S W-1 50 6 21.43 µ Tbl = 53,57 %
A.6 Claire Derieuw -Monique Crouan 52,98 %
16 EO 3S N-1 -50 16 57.14
17 EO 4C W+1 -450 24 85.71
18 EO 2S W = -120 3 10.71 µ Tbl = 51,19 %
A.3 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 46,43 %
19 EO 5P N = 450 4 14.29
20 EO 3S E = -600 23 82.14
21 EO 1S S-1 -100 16 57.14 µ Tbl = 51,19 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Noelle Fosse 55,36 %
22 EO 3S N = 400 16 57.14
23 EO 3C S-1 -100 19 67.86
24 EO 4C N = 420 15 53.57 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
Total : 336,0 / 672 = 50,00 %
PAIRE b.7 Luc Rampaer -Bernard Brisbois
B.4 Sandra Dallemagne -Marie Claire Vienne 47,11 %
1 EO 2C N-1 -50 14 50.00
2 EO 3C W-1 50 15 53.57
3 EO 3P W-3 300 5 17.86 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
B.8 Lydia Wildiers -Giuseppe Napoli 65,14 %
4 EO 3P E-1 100 7 25.00
5 EO 3S S-1 -100 11 39.29
6 EO 2TcN-2 -300 26 92.86 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
B.1 Aliona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 50,00 %
7 EO 2P S = 110 13 46.43
8 EO 3K S+1 130 23 82.14
9 EO 4P S = 420 7 25.00 µ Tbl = 51,19 %
B.5 Marie Christine Remy -Jean de Villenfagne 64,12 %
10 EO 4C W = -620 21 75.00
11 EO 3C E = -140 25 89.29
12 EO 1S S+3 180 4 14.29 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
B.2 Annie Zeimes -Madeleine Gabriel 39,29 %
13 EO 1S W+1 -120 19 67.86
14 EO 4K N+2 170 25 89.29
15 EO 2S W-1 50 6 21.43 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
B.6 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry 48,64 %
16 EO 2S N = 120 9 32.14
17 EO 2C W+2 -170 6 21.43
18 EO 3K E+3 -170 14 50.00 µ Tbl = 34,52 %
B.3 Dominique Sassen -Philippe van der Gracht 64,63 %
19 EO 4P N+1 450 4 14.29
20 EO 2T E = -90 0 0.00
21 EO 1S S+2 150 4 14.29 µ Tbl = 9,52 %
B.7 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Sophie Tilemans 27,38 %
22 EO 4P S-1 -50 25 89.29
23 EO 2C S-1 -100 19 67.86
24 EO 4C S = 420 15 53.57 µ Tbl = 70,24 %
Total : 317,0 / 672 = 47,17 %
PAIRE b.3 Michele Berrier -Helene Schyns
B.2 Annie Zeimes -Madeleine Gabriel 39,29 %
1 EO 3K N-1 -50 14 50.00
2 EO 3S E-1 50 15 53.57
3 EO 2T S+2 130 9 32.14 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
B.6 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry 48,64 %
4 EO 4P E-1 100 7 25.00
5 EO 3S S-1 -100 11 39.29
6 EO 3S E-1 100 5 17.86 µ Tbl = 27,38 %
B.3 Dominique Sassen -Philippe van der Gracht 64,63 %
7 EO 2P S = 110 13 46.43
8 EO 4K S+1 150 17 60.71
9 EO 4PcS = 590 2 7.14 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
B.7 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Sophie Tilemans 27,38 %
10 EO 2C W+2 -170 4 14.29
11 EO 4C E-2 100 4 14.29
12 EO 2C S = 110 22 78.57 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
B.4 Sandra Dallemagne -Marie Claire Vienne 47,11 %
13 EO 1S W+1 -120 19 67.86
14 EO 5T S+1 420 20 71.43
15 EO 2S W = -120 21 75.00 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
B.8 Lydia Wildiers -Giuseppe Napoli 65,14 %
16 EO 3S N-1 -50 16 57.14
17 EO 4C W-2 100 0 0.00
18 EO 3T W+2 -150 9 32.14 µ Tbl = 29,76 %
B.1 Aliona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 50,00 %
19 EO 3P N+1 170 28 100.00
20 EO 2P W = -110 2 7.14
21 EO 3TcW = -470 28 100.00 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
B.5 Marie Christine Remy -Jean de Villenfagne 64,12 %
22 EO 4P N = 420 6 21.43
23 EO 3S E-1 100 11 39.29
24 EO 5C N = 450 5 17.86 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
Total : 288,0 / 672 = 42,86 %
PAIRE b.6 Michel Lievens -Helene Christiaens
B.7 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Sophie Tilemans 27,38 %
1 EO 2C N-2 -100 25 89.29
2 EO 3S E-1 50 15 53.57
3 EO 3S N-1 -50 20 71.43 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
B.4 Sandra Dallemagne -Marie Claire Vienne 47,11 %
4 EO 2P E+1 -140 21 75.00
5 EO 3S S-1 -100 11 39.29
6 EO 3K W-1 100 5 17.86 µ Tbl = 44,05 %
B.8 Lydia Wildiers -Giuseppe Napoli 65,14 %
7 EO 2P S = 110 13 46.43
8 EO 3S N = 400 11 39.29
9 EO 4PcS = 590 2 7.14 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
B.1 Aliona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 50,00 %
10 EO 2P N-2 -200 12 42.86
11 EO 2S W-1 50 9 32.14
12 EO 1S S+3 180 4 14.29 µ Tbl = 29,76 %
B.5 Marie Christine Remy -Jean de Villenfagne 64,12 %
13 EO 2S W-3 300 0 0.00
14 EO 6T S+1 940 0 0.00
15 EO 2S W = -120 21 75.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
B.2 Annie Zeimes -Madeleine Gabriel 39,29 %
16 EO 3T N = 110 12 42.86
17 EO 2C W+3 -200 14 50.00
18 EO 5T W = -400 20 71.43 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
B.6 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry 48,64 %
19 EO 4P N = 420 18 64.29
20 EO 3P W+1 -170 12 42.86
21 EO 2P W-3 150 4 14.29 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
B.3 Dominique Sassen -Philippe van der Gracht 64,63 %
22 EO 3S N = 400 16 57.14
23 EO 3S E-2 200 1 3.57
24 EO 4C N = 420 15 53.57 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
Total : 281,0 / 672 = 41,82 %
PAIRE a.2 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot
A.5 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 48,96 %
1 EO 2C N = 110 4 14.29
2 EO 1S W+2 -150 26 92.86
3 EO 2S S-1 -50 20 71.43 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
A.2 Annette Fobe -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 40,77 %
4 EO 3P E-1 100 7 25.00
5 EO 3S S-1 -100 11 39.29
6 EO 2K W+1 -110 14 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
A.6 Claire Derieuw -Monique Crouan 52,98 %
7 EO 1P S+2 140 1 3.57
8 EO 3S N+2 460 2 7.14
9 EO 5CcW-1 200 11 39.29 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
A.3 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 46,43 %
10 EO 2C W+2 -170 4 14.29
11 EO 4C E-3 150 0 0.00
12 EO 2K N+2 130 15 53.57 µ Tbl = 22,62 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Noelle Fosse 55,36 %
13 EO 1S W+1 -120 19 67.86
14 EO 3S N+2 460 11 39.29
15 EO 2S W-1 50 6 21.43 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
A.4 Michele Verhulst -Andre Delacroix 40,33 %
16 EO 3S N-2 -100 23 82.14
17 EO 4C W+1 -450 24 85.71
18 EO 3T W+2 -150 9 32.14 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.8 Marianne Borsu -Jeannine Wanderpepen 47,17 %
19 EO 4P N = 420 18 64.29
20 EO 3P W+1 -170 12 42.86
21 EO 2P W-2 100 10 35.71 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
A.1 Chantal Barro -Jerome Claessens 62,50 %
22 EO 4P S = 420 6 21.43
23 EO 3C S-1 -100 19 67.86
24 EO 4C N+1 450 5 17.86 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
Total : 277,0 / 672 = 41,22 %
PAIRE a.3 Didier Collart -Veronique Englebienne
A.2 Annette Fobe -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 40,77 %
1 EO 2C N-1 -50 14 50.00
2 EO 1K W+1 -90 22 78.57
3 EO 3T S+1 130 9 32.14 µ Tbl = 53,57 %
A.6 Claire Derieuw -Monique Crouan 52,98 %
4 EO 3P E = -140 21 75.00
5 EO 3S S-1 -100 11 39.29
6 EO 3S E-3 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
A.3 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 46,43 %
7 EO 2P S = 110 13 46.43
8 EO 3S N+2 460 2 7.14
9 EO 4P S = 420 7 25.00 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Noelle Fosse 55,36 %
10 EO 2C W+3 -200 12 42.86
11 EO 2P S-2 -100 16 57.14
12 EO 1S S+1 120 18 64.29 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
A.4 Michele Verhulst -Andre Delacroix 40,33 %
13 EO 1S E = -90 10 35.71
14 EO 3S S+3 490 7 25.00
15 EO 2S W = -120 21 75.00 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
A.8 Marianne Borsu -Jeannine Wanderpepen 47,17 %
16 EO 3S N = 400 4 14.29
17 EO 5TcN-3 -500 28 100.00
18 EO 3C W = -140 6 21.43 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
A.1 Chantal Barro -Jerome Claessens 62,50 %
19 EO 4P N+1 450 4 14.29
20 EO 3P W = -140 5 17.86
21 EO 2P W-3 150 4 14.29 µ Tbl = 15,48 %
A.5 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 48,96 %
22 EO 3S N+1 430 0 0.00
23 EO 3P W-2 200 1 3.57
24 EO 4C N+2 480 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 1,19 %
Total : 235,0 / 672 = 34,97 %
PAIRE b.2 -
B.5 Marie Christine Remy -Jean de Villenfagne 64,12 %
1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
B.2 Annie Zeimes -Madeleine Gabriel 39,29 %
4 EO BYE 0 0.00
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
B.6 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry 48,64 %
7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
B.3 Dominique Sassen -Philippe van der Gracht 64,63 %
10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
B.7 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Sophie Tilemans 27,38 %
13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00
15 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
B.4 Sandra Dallemagne -Marie Claire Vienne 47,11 %
16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
B.8 Lydia Wildiers -Giuseppe Napoli 65,14 %
19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00
21 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
B.1 Aliona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 50,00 %
22 EO BYE 0 0.00
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 672 = 0,00 %
|