B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement
--- 1 60,47 a.5 Dominique Sassen -Michel Lahaut
--- 2 59,50 A.6 Dominique Bourgoignie -Claire Derieuw
--- 3 59,68 a.9 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne
--- 4 55,83 A11 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand
--- 5 55,35 A12 Grazia Neuenschwander -Patrick Gilles
--- 6 55,12 A.5 Philippe van der Gracht -Fabienne Smit
--- 7 54,60 a13 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker
--- 8 53,96 a.4 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens
--- 9 53,08 A13 Iris de Limbourg -Paul Henricot
--- 10 52,73 A.4 Michel Lievens -Alan Beckman
--- 11 52,05 a12 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor
--- 12 50,74 A.7 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart
--- 13 49,92 a11 Benedicte Lemaigre -Brigitte Velge
--- 14 49,28 A.9 Serge Alard -Alexandre Viot
--- 15 48,33 a.7 Christian Neve -Hugo Baetens
--- 16 47,61 a10 Pascale Graton -Sybille Gillet
--- 17 47,33 A10 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont
--- 18 46,67 a.1 Martine Zens -Elena Valsesia
--- 19 46,14 A.8 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Myriam de Timary
--- 20 45,31 A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck
--- 21 44,89 a.2 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen
--- 22 42,11 A.2 Annette Fobe -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
--- 23 41,42 a.3 Virginie Van Damme -Veronique Englebienne
--- 24 40,66 a.6 Jean Pierre Oudaert -Marina Oudaert
--- 25 37,58 A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chantal Woitrin
--- 26 0,00 a.8 -
PAIRE a.5 Dominique Sassen -Michel Lahaut
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chantal Woitrin 37,58 %
1 EO 3S S+2 460 20.8 94.55
2 EO 4P E+1 -450 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
A10 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 47,33 %
3 EO 6C N-1 -50 21.9 99.55
4 EO 4P E = -620 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 87,27 %
A11 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 55,83 %
7 EO 2S N = 120 8.8 40.00
8 EO 4P W-1 50 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
A.5 Philippe van der Gracht -Fabienne Smit 55,12 %
9 EO 4P N+1 450 17.5 79.55
10 EO 4P N = 620 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A12 Grazia Neuenschwander -Patrick Gilles 55,35 %
11 EO 4P N = 420 7 31.82
12 EO 4P W+1 -450 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.6 Dominique Bourgoignie -Claire Derieuw 59,50 %
13 EO 3S N+3 690 11 50.00
14 EO 3S W-2 100 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A13 Iris de Limbourg -Paul Henricot 53,08 %
15 EO 5K W-1 50 13.2 60.00
16 EO 4C E-1 100 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
A.7 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 50,74 %
17 EO 4P N+1 450 11 50.00
18 EO 3P S-3 -300 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck 45,31 %
19 EO 4K N+1 150 16.5 75.00
20 EO 4C W = -620 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
A.8 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Myriam de Timary 46,14 %
21 EO 3C N-4 -400 21.9 99.55
22 EO 3S N+1 430 15.8 71.82 µ Tbl = 85,68 %
A.2 Annette Fobe -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 42,11 %
23 EO 2P N-1 -100 19.7 89.55
24 EO 3S W-2 100 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
A.9 Serge Alard -Alexandre Viot 49,28 %
25 EO 6S E+1 -1470 12.1 55.00
26 EO 3P S-1 -100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
Total : 319,3 / 528 = 60,47 %
PAIRE A.6 Dominique Bourgoignie -Claire Derieuw
a11 Benedicte Lemaigre -Brigitte Velge 49,92 %
1 NS 4C N+3 510 16.5 75.00
2 NS 4P E+1 -450 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a10 Pascale Graton -Sybille Gillet 47,61 %
3 NS 4C N+2 480 16.5 75.00
4 NS 4P E-1 100 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 87,27 %
a.9 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 59,68 %
5 NS 2P N-1 -100 8.8 40.00
6 NS 4KcS = -100 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a.8 - 0,00 %
7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.6 Jean Pierre Oudaert -Marina Oudaert 40,66 %
11 NS 4P N = 420 15 68.18
12 NS 3P W+2 -200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
a.5 Dominique Sassen -Michel Lahaut 60,47 %
13 NS 3S N+3 690 11 50.00
14 NS 3S W-2 100 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a.4 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 53,96 %
15 NS 4P N+1 650 18.6 84.55
16 NS 4C E = -620 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
a.3 Virginie Van Damme -Veronique Englebienne 41,42 %
17 NS 5P N+1 480 16.5 75.00
18 NS 2C N+2 170 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
a.2 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 44,89 %
19 NS 3K N+3 170 11 50.00
20 NS 4C E = -620 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a.1 Martine Zens -Elena Valsesia 46,67 %
21 NS 3P S-1 -100 15.4 70.00
22 NS 3S N+2 460 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 73,64 %
a13 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 54,60 %
23 NS 2S E = -120 0.1 0.45
24 NS 3P N-1 -50 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a12 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 52,05 %
25 NS 6S E+1 -1470 9.9 45.00
26 NS 4P S-1 -100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
Total : 288,0 / 484 = 59,50 %
PAIRE a.9 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne
A.5 Philippe van der Gracht -Fabienne Smit 55,12 %
1 EO 4C N+3 510 5.5 25.00
2 EO 4P E+1 -450 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A12 Grazia Neuenschwander -Patrick Gilles 55,35 %
3 EO 3C N+2 200 19.7 89.55
4 EO 3S E+2 -660 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 94,55 %
A.6 Dominique Bourgoignie -Claire Derieuw 59,50 %
5 EO 2P N-1 -100 13.2 60.00
6 EO 4KcS = -100 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A13 Iris de Limbourg -Paul Henricot 53,08 %
7 EO 3S N-1 -100 16.5 75.00
8 EO 2P W+2 -170 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 87,27 %
A.7 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 50,74 %
9 EO 4C N+1 450 17.5 79.55
10 EO 2P N+2 170 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck 45,31 %
11 EO 5PcN-1 -100 21 95.45
12 EO 4P W+2 -480 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 97,73 %
A.2 Annette Fobe -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 42,11 %
15 EO 5P N-1 -100 17.5 79.55
16 EO 4C E = -620 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A.9 Serge Alard -Alexandre Viot 49,28 %
17 EO 6P N-2 -100 21.9 99.55
18 EO 4K W = -130 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chantal Woitrin 37,58 %
19 EO 5K N = 400 7.7 35.00
20 EO 2C E+1 -140 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A10 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 47,33 %
21 EO 2P S = 110 2.3 10.45
22 EO 3S N+2 460 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 16,59 %
A.4 Michel Lievens -Alan Beckman 52,73 %
23 EO 2P N = 110 7.7 35.00
24 EO 2C S+1 140 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A11 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 55,83 %
25 EO 6S E+1 -1470 12.1 55.00
26 EO 2P S = 110 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
Total : 315,1 / 528 = 59,68 %
PAIRE A11 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand
a.8 - 0,00 %
1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.7 Christian Neve -Hugo Baetens 48,33 %
3 NS 4C S+1 450 7.7 35.00
4 NS 2P E+2 -170 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.6 Jean Pierre Oudaert -Marina Oudaert 40,66 %
5 NS 2S S-1 -100 8.8 40.00
6 NS 3S E+2 -660 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
a.5 Dominique Sassen -Michel Lahaut 60,47 %
7 NS 2S N = 120 13.2 60.00
8 NS 4P W-1 50 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
a.4 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 53,96 %
9 NS 3S N+2 460 11 50.00
10 NS 2P N+3 200 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a.3 Virginie Van Damme -Veronique Englebienne 41,42 %
11 NS 4P N = 420 15 68.18
12 NS 4P W = -420 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a.2 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 44,89 %
13 NS 3S S+2 660 6.6 30.00
14 NS 3S W-3 150 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a.1 Martine Zens -Elena Valsesia 46,67 %
15 NS 5TcE-2 300 15.4 70.00
16 NS 4C E = -620 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a13 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 54,60 %
17 NS 6P N = 980 20.8 94.55
18 NS 3S W-1 50 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
a11 Benedicte Lemaigre -Brigitte Velge 49,92 %
21 NS 2S N-2 -200 7.7 35.00
22 NS 60%50% Ajust 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a10 Pascale Graton -Sybille Gillet 47,61 %
23 NS 2S E-1 100 9.9 45.00
24 NS 3P N-1 -50 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.9 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 59,68 %
25 NS 6S E+1 -1470 9.9 45.00
26 NS 2P S = 110 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
Total : 270,2 / 484 = 55,83 %
PAIRE A12 Grazia Neuenschwander -Patrick Gilles
a10 Pascale Graton -Sybille Gillet 47,61 %
1 NS 3S S+2 460 1.2 5.45
2 NS 6P E-1 50 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.9 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 59,68 %
3 NS 3C N+2 200 2.3 10.45
4 NS 3S E+2 -660 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 5,45 %
a.8 - 0,00 %
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.7 Christian Neve -Hugo Baetens 48,33 %
7 NS 3S N = 600 20.8 94.55
8 NS 4P W-1 50 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 87,05 %
a.6 Jean Pierre Oudaert -Marina Oudaert 40,66 %
9 NS 6C N = 980 21.9 99.55
10 NS 3S S = 600 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 94,55 %
a.5 Dominique Sassen -Michel Lahaut 60,47 %
11 NS 4P N = 420 15 68.18
12 NS 4P W+1 -450 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.4 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 53,96 %
13 NS 6K N-1 -100 0.1 0.45
14 NS 2S W-1 50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a.3 Virginie Van Damme -Veronique Englebienne 41,42 %
15 NS 5P N = 650 18.6 84.55
16 NS 3S E-1 100 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 82,05 %
a.2 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 44,89 %
17 NS 4P N+1 450 11 50.00
18 NS 4K E-2 100 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a.1 Martine Zens -Elena Valsesia 46,67 %
19 NS 5K N+1 420 19.7 89.55
20 NS 3T W+1 -130 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
a12 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 52,05 %
23 NS 2P N+2 170 21.9 99.55
24 NS 4P N-2 -100 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a11 Benedicte Lemaigre -Brigitte Velge 49,92 %
25 NS 6S E+1 -1470 9.9 45.00
26 NS 4P S-2 -200 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
Total : 267,9 / 484 = 55,35 %
PAIRE A.5 Philippe van der Gracht -Fabienne Smit
a.9 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 59,68 %
1 NS 4C N+3 510 16.5 75.00
2 NS 4P E+1 -450 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.8 - 0,00 %
3 NS BYE 0 0.00
4 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.7 Christian Neve -Hugo Baetens 48,33 %
5 NS 2C S+1 140 20.8 94.55
6 NS 5T W = -600 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a.5 Dominique Sassen -Michel Lahaut 60,47 %
9 NS 4P N+1 450 4.5 20.45
10 NS 4P N = 620 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a.4 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 53,96 %
11 NS 3P N+1 170 8 36.36
12 NS 4P W+1 -450 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a.3 Virginie Van Damme -Veronique Englebienne 41,42 %
13 NS 3S S+4 720 16.5 75.00
14 NS 3S W-2 100 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a.2 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 44,89 %
15 NS 5K W-1 50 8.8 40.00
16 NS 5C E-1 100 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
a.1 Martine Zens -Elena Valsesia 46,67 %
17 NS 6P N-1 -50 2.3 10.45
18 NS 3C S = 140 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a13 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 54,60 %
19 NS 5K N+1 420 19.7 89.55
20 NS 3PcS-2 -500 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
a12 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 52,05 %
21 NS 3S N-3 -300 2.3 10.45
22 NS 3S N+2 460 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 43,86 %
a11 Benedicte Lemaigre -Brigitte Velge 49,92 %
23 NS 2P N+1 140 18.6 84.55
24 NS 2P N-1 -50 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a10 Pascale Graton -Sybille Gillet 47,61 %
25 NS 6S E+1 -1470 9.9 45.00
26 NS 3P S-1 -100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
Total : 266,8 / 484 = 55,12 %
PAIRE a13 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker
A.7 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 50,74 %
1 EO 4C N+2 480 15.4 70.00
2 EO 3S E = -400 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck 45,31 %
3 EO 4C N+1 450 14.3 65.00
4 EO 4P E = -620 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
A.8 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Myriam de Timary 46,14 %
5 EO 4C S-1 -100 13.2 60.00
6 EO 5T W+1 -620 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A.2 Annette Fobe -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 42,11 %
7 EO 3S N-1 -100 16.5 75.00
8 EO 2P W+1 -140 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 72,50 %
A.9 Serge Alard -Alexandre Viot 49,28 %
9 EO 4C N+2 480 6.6 30.00
10 EO 2CcE-2 500 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chantal Woitrin 37,58 %
11 EO 5PcN-1 -100 21 95.45
12 EO 4P W+1 -450 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A10 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 47,33 %
13 EO 3S N = 600 19.7 89.55
14 EO 1S W+1 -120 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
A.4 Michel Lievens -Alan Beckman 52,73 %
15 EO 5K W-2 100 8.8 40.00
16 EO 4C E = -620 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A11 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 55,83 %
17 EO 6P N = 980 1.2 5.45
18 EO 3S W-1 50 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
A.5 Philippe van der Gracht -Fabienne Smit 55,12 %
19 EO 5K N+1 420 2.3 10.45
20 EO 3PcS-2 -500 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
A.6 Dominique Bourgoignie -Claire Derieuw 59,50 %
23 EO 2S E = -120 21.9 99.55
24 EO 3P N-1 -50 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A13 Iris de Limbourg -Paul Henricot 53,08 %
25 EO 6S E = -1440 0.1 0.45
26 EO 2P S+1 140 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 5,45 %
Total : 288,3 / 528 = 54,60 %
PAIRE a.4 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens
A.9 Serge Alard -Alexandre Viot 49,28 %
1 EO 3S S+3 490 11 50.00
2 EO 4P E = -420 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A10 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 47,33 %
5 EO 1S W-1 50 5.5 25.00
6 EO 5T W = -600 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.4 Michel Lievens -Alan Beckman 52,73 %
7 EO 4C S-3 -300 21.9 99.55
8 EO 4P W-1 50 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A11 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 55,83 %
9 EO 3S N+2 460 11 50.00
10 EO 2P N+3 200 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A.5 Philippe van der Gracht -Fabienne Smit 55,12 %
11 EO 3P N+1 170 14 63.64
12 EO 4P W+1 -450 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A12 Grazia Neuenschwander -Patrick Gilles 55,35 %
13 EO 6K N-1 -100 21.9 99.55
14 EO 2S W-1 50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A.6 Dominique Bourgoignie -Claire Derieuw 59,50 %
15 EO 4P N+1 650 3.4 15.45
16 EO 4C E = -620 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
A13 Iris de Limbourg -Paul Henricot 53,08 %
17 EO 4P N = 420 15.4 70.00
18 EO 2S W+1 -150 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.7 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 50,74 %
19 EO 3K N+1 130 21.9 99.55
20 EO 3T W-1 100 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck 45,31 %
21 EO 2S N-1 -100 6.6 30.00
22 EO 3S S+2 460 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 26,36 %
A.8 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Myriam de Timary 46,14 %
23 EO 1S S = 90 15.4 70.00
24 EO 3P N-1 -50 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
A.2 Annette Fobe -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 42,11 %
25 EO 6S E+1 -1470 12.1 55.00
26 EO 3P S-1 -100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
Total : 284,9 / 528 = 53,96 %
PAIRE A13 Iris de Limbourg -Paul Henricot
a12 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 52,05 %
1 NS 4C N+3 510 16.5 75.00
2 NS 6P E-2 100 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 87,27 %
a11 Benedicte Lemaigre -Brigitte Velge 49,92 %
3 NS 4C N+2 480 16.5 75.00
4 NS 1S E+2 -150 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a10 Pascale Graton -Sybille Gillet 47,61 %
5 NS 4P N-3 -300 1.2 5.45
6 NS 5T W = -600 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
a.9 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 59,68 %
7 NS 3S N-1 -100 5.5 25.00
8 NS 2P W+2 -170 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 12,73 %
a.8 - 0,00 %
9 NS BYE 0 0.00
10 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.7 Christian Neve -Hugo Baetens 48,33 %
11 NS 3P N+1 170 8 36.36
12 NS 4P W = -420 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a.6 Jean Pierre Oudaert -Marina Oudaert 40,66 %
13 NS 3S S+4 720 16.5 75.00
14 NS 2S E-1 50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
a.5 Dominique Sassen -Michel Lahaut 60,47 %
15 NS 5K W-1 50 8.8 40.00
16 NS 4C E-1 100 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
a.4 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 53,96 %
17 NS 4P N = 420 6.6 30.00
18 NS 2S W+1 -150 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.3 Virginie Van Damme -Veronique Englebienne 41,42 %
19 NS 4K N+1 150 5.5 25.00
20 NS 3T W = -110 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.2 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 44,89 %
21 NS 1S N-1 -100 15.4 70.00
22 NS 5C S-1 -50 0.2 0.91 µ Tbl = 35,45 %
a13 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 54,60 %
25 NS 6S E = -1440 21.9 99.55
26 NS 2P S+1 140 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 94,55 %
Total : 256,9 / 484 = 53,08 %
PAIRE A.4 Michel Lievens -Alan Beckman
a.7 Christian Neve -Hugo Baetens 48,33 %
1 NS 4C S+2 480 6.6 30.00
2 NS 4P E+1 -450 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 27,50 %
a.6 Jean Pierre Oudaert -Marina Oudaert 40,66 %
3 NS 4C N+1 450 7.7 35.00
4 NS 1S E+1 -120 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a.4 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 53,96 %
7 NS 4C S-3 -300 0.1 0.45
8 NS 4P W-1 50 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a.3 Virginie Van Damme -Veronique Englebienne 41,42 %
9 NS 4C S+1 450 4.5 20.45
10 NS 2C E-1 100 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.2 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 44,89 %
11 NS 4P N = 420 15 68.18
12 NS 4P W+1 -450 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.1 Martine Zens -Elena Valsesia 46,67 %
13 NS 6S N = 1440 19.7 89.55
14 NS 3S W-2 100 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 84,55 %
a13 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 54,60 %
15 NS 5K W-2 100 13.2 60.00
16 NS 4C E = -620 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a12 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 52,05 %
17 NS 3P N+3 230 4.5 20.45
18 NS 3CcN = 730 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a11 Benedicte Lemaigre -Brigitte Velge 49,92 %
19 NS 3K N+2 150 5.5 25.00
20 NS 2C E = -110 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a10 Pascale Graton -Sybille Gillet 47,61 %
21 NS 2S N-2 -200 7.7 35.00
22 NS 3S N+2 460 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 56,14 %
a.9 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 59,68 %
23 NS 2P N = 110 14.3 65.00
24 NS 2C S+1 140 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a.8 - 0,00 %
25 NS BYE 0 0.00
26 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 255,2 / 484 = 52,73 %
PAIRE a12 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor
A13 Iris de Limbourg -Paul Henricot 53,08 %
1 EO 4C N+3 510 5.5 25.00
2 EO 6P E-2 100 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 12,73 %
A.7 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 50,74 %
3 EO 4C N+2 480 5.5 25.00
4 EO 3P E+1 -170 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck 45,31 %
5 EO 1S W-1 50 5.5 25.00
6 EO 4T W+1 -150 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 27,50 %
A.8 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Myriam de Timary 46,14 %
7 EO 2C S-1 -100 16.5 75.00
8 EO 2P W+1 -140 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 72,50 %
A.2 Annette Fobe -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 42,11 %
9 EO 4P N+1 450 17.5 79.55
10 EO 2S S = 120 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A.9 Serge Alard -Alexandre Viot 49,28 %
11 EO 3P N+1 170 14 63.64
12 EO 4P W+1 -450 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chantal Woitrin 37,58 %
13 EO 3S S+3 690 11 50.00
14 EO 3S W = -400 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A10 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 47,33 %
15 EO 4K W = -130 19.7 89.55
16 EO 4C E = -620 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
A.4 Michel Lievens -Alan Beckman 52,73 %
17 EO 3P N+3 230 17.5 79.55
18 EO 3CcN = 730 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A.5 Philippe van der Gracht -Fabienne Smit 55,12 %
21 EO 3S N-3 -300 19.7 89.55
22 EO 3S N+2 460 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 56,14 %
A12 Grazia Neuenschwander -Patrick Gilles 55,35 %
23 EO 2P N+2 170 0.1 0.45
24 EO 4P N-2 -100 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A.6 Dominique Bourgoignie -Claire Derieuw 59,50 %
25 EO 6S E+1 -1470 12.1 55.00
26 EO 4P S-1 -100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
Total : 274,8 / 528 = 52,05 %
PAIRE A.7 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart
a13 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 54,60 %
1 NS 4C N+2 480 6.6 30.00
2 NS 3S E = -400 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a12 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 52,05 %
3 NS 4C N+2 480 16.5 75.00
4 NS 3P E+1 -170 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
a11 Benedicte Lemaigre -Brigitte Velge 49,92 %
5 NS 3P N-3 -300 1.2 5.45
6 NS 6T W-1 100 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a10 Pascale Graton -Sybille Gillet 47,61 %
7 NS 2S N+2 180 17.5 79.55
8 NS 2P W+1 -140 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 54,77 %
a.9 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 59,68 %
9 NS 4C N+1 450 4.5 20.45
10 NS 2P N+2 170 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
a.7 Christian Neve -Hugo Baetens 48,33 %
13 NS 3S N+1 630 4.5 20.45
14 NS 2S W = -120 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.6 Jean Pierre Oudaert -Marina Oudaert 40,66 %
15 NS 4PcN = 790 21.9 99.55
16 NS 4C E = -620 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a.5 Dominique Sassen -Michel Lahaut 60,47 %
17 NS 4P N+1 450 11 50.00
18 NS 3P S-3 -300 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a.4 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 53,96 %
19 NS 3K N+1 130 0.1 0.45
20 NS 3T W-1 100 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.3 Virginie Van Damme -Veronique Englebienne 41,42 %
21 NS 1S W-3 150 21.9 99.55
22 NS 3S N+1 430 6.2 28.18 µ Tbl = 63,86 %
a.2 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 44,89 %
23 NS 1K E = -70 4.5 20.45
24 NS 2C S+1 140 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.1 Martine Zens -Elena Valsesia 46,67 %
25 NS 6S E+1 -1470 9.9 45.00
26 NS 4P S = 620 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
Total : 267,9 / 528 = 50,74 %
PAIRE a11 Benedicte Lemaigre -Brigitte Velge
A.6 Dominique Bourgoignie -Claire Derieuw 59,50 %
1 EO 4C N+3 510 5.5 25.00
2 EO 4P E+1 -450 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A13 Iris de Limbourg -Paul Henricot 53,08 %
3 EO 4C N+2 480 5.5 25.00
4 EO 1S E+2 -150 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.7 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 50,74 %
5 EO 3P N-3 -300 20.8 94.55
6 EO 6T W-1 100 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck 45,31 %
7 EO 2T E = -90 11 50.00
8 EO 4P W-1 50 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A.8 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Myriam de Timary 46,14 %
9 EO 4C N+2 480 6.6 30.00
10 EO 3K S-1 -100 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
A.2 Annette Fobe -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 42,11 %
11 EO 5CcW-3 500 2 9.09
12 EO 4P W+1 -450 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A.9 Serge Alard -Alexandre Viot 49,28 %
13 EO 6S N+1 1470 0.1 0.45
14 EO 3S W = -400 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chantal Woitrin 37,58 %
15 EO 5PcN-2 -500 21.9 99.55
16 EO 4C W = -620 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
A.4 Michel Lievens -Alan Beckman 52,73 %
19 EO 3K N+2 150 16.5 75.00
20 EO 2C E = -110 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A11 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 55,83 %
21 EO 2S N-2 -200 14.3 65.00
22 EO 60%50% Ajust 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A.5 Philippe van der Gracht -Fabienne Smit 55,12 %
23 EO 2P N+1 140 3.4 15.45
24 EO 2P N-1 -50 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A12 Grazia Neuenschwander -Patrick Gilles 55,35 %
25 EO 6S E+1 -1470 12.1 55.00
26 EO 4P S-2 -200 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
Total : 263,6 / 528 = 49,92 %
PAIRE A.9 Serge Alard -Alexandre Viot
a.4 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 53,96 %
1 NS 3S S+3 490 11 50.00
2 NS 4P E = -420 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.3 Virginie Van Damme -Veronique Englebienne 41,42 %
3 NS 6C N = 980 21.9 99.55
4 NS 4P E+1 -650 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.2 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 44,89 %
5 NS 2P S-1 -100 8.8 40.00
6 NS 4KcS-1 -100 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a.1 Martine Zens -Elena Valsesia 46,67 %
7 NS 3S N-1 -100 5.5 25.00
8 NS 2P W+1 -140 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 27,50 %
a13 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 54,60 %
9 NS 4C N+2 480 15.4 70.00
10 NS 2CcE-2 500 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
a12 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 52,05 %
11 NS 3P N+1 170 8 36.36
12 NS 4P W+1 -450 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a11 Benedicte Lemaigre -Brigitte Velge 49,92 %
13 NS 6S N+1 1470 21.9 99.55
14 NS 3S W = -400 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.9 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 59,68 %
17 NS 6P N-2 -100 0.1 0.45
18 NS 4K W = -130 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
a.8 - 0,00 %
19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.7 Christian Neve -Hugo Baetens 48,33 %
21 NS 3K S-2 -200 7.7 35.00
22 NS 3S N+1 430 6.2 28.18 µ Tbl = 31,59 %
a.6 Jean Pierre Oudaert -Marina Oudaert 40,66 %
23 NS 2P N+1 140 18.6 84.55
24 NS 2C S+1 140 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 87,05 %
a.5 Dominique Sassen -Michel Lahaut 60,47 %
25 NS 6S E+1 -1470 9.9 45.00
26 NS 3P S-1 -100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
Total : 238,5 / 484 = 49,28 %
PAIRE a.7 Christian Neve -Hugo Baetens
A.4 Michel Lievens -Alan Beckman 52,73 %
1 EO 4C S+2 480 15.4 70.00
2 EO 4P E+1 -450 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 72,50 %
A11 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 55,83 %
3 EO 4C S+1 450 14.3 65.00
4 EO 2P E+2 -170 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.5 Philippe van der Gracht -Fabienne Smit 55,12 %
5 EO 2C S+1 140 1.2 5.45
6 EO 5T W = -600 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A12 Grazia Neuenschwander -Patrick Gilles 55,35 %
7 EO 3S N = 600 1.2 5.45
8 EO 4P W-1 50 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 12,95 %
A13 Iris de Limbourg -Paul Henricot 53,08 %
11 EO 3P N+1 170 14 63.64
12 EO 4P W = -420 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.7 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 50,74 %
13 EO 3S N+1 630 17.5 79.55
14 EO 2S W = -120 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck 45,31 %
15 EO 5K W-1 50 13.2 60.00
16 EO 4C W-2 200 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
A.8 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Myriam de Timary 46,14 %
17 EO 4P N+2 480 5.5 25.00
18 EO 2P W-1 50 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
A.2 Annette Fobe -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 42,11 %
19 EO 5K N+1 420 2.3 10.45
20 EO 3S W = -600 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.9 Serge Alard -Alexandre Viot 49,28 %
21 EO 3K S-2 -200 14.3 65.00
22 EO 3S N+1 430 15.8 71.82 µ Tbl = 68,41 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chantal Woitrin 37,58 %
23 EO 2P N = 110 7.7 35.00
24 EO 5PcN-3 -500 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A10 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 47,33 %
25 EO 6S E+1 -1470 12.1 55.00
26 EO 4C E-1 100 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
Total : 255,2 / 528 = 48,33 %
PAIRE a10 Pascale Graton -Sybille Gillet
A12 Grazia Neuenschwander -Patrick Gilles 55,35 %
1 EO 3S S+2 460 20.8 94.55
2 EO 6P E-1 50 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.6 Dominique Bourgoignie -Claire Derieuw 59,50 %
3 EO 4C N+2 480 5.5 25.00
4 EO 4P E-1 100 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 12,73 %
A13 Iris de Limbourg -Paul Henricot 53,08 %
5 EO 4P N-3 -300 20.8 94.55
6 EO 5T W = -600 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
A.7 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 50,74 %
7 EO 2S N+2 180 4.5 20.45
8 EO 2P W+1 -140 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 45,23 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck 45,31 %
9 EO 4C N+2 480 6.6 30.00
10 EO 2T E-1 100 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A.8 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Myriam de Timary 46,14 %
11 EO 4PcN = 590 0 0.00
12 EO 4P W+1 -450 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A.2 Annette Fobe -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 42,11 %
13 EO 3S S+3 690 11 50.00
14 EO 4T W-1 50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chantal Woitrin 37,58 %
17 EO 6P N = 980 1.2 5.45
18 EO 3C N-1 -100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
A10 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 47,33 %
19 EO 3K N+2 150 16.5 75.00
20 EO 2S W = -120 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A.4 Michel Lievens -Alan Beckman 52,73 %
21 EO 2S N-2 -200 14.3 65.00
22 EO 3S N+2 460 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 43,86 %
A11 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 55,83 %
23 EO 2S E-1 100 12.1 55.00
24 EO 3P N-1 -50 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.5 Philippe van der Gracht -Fabienne Smit 55,12 %
25 EO 6S E+1 -1470 12.1 55.00
26 EO 3P S-1 -100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
Total : 251,4 / 528 = 47,61 %
PAIRE A10 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont
a.6 Jean Pierre Oudaert -Marina Oudaert 40,66 %
1 NS 4C N+3 510 16.5 75.00
2 NS 4P E+1 -450 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.5 Dominique Sassen -Michel Lahaut 60,47 %
3 NS 6C N-1 -50 0.1 0.45
4 NS 4P E = -620 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 12,73 %
a.4 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 53,96 %
5 NS 1S W-1 50 16.5 75.00
6 NS 5T W = -600 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.3 Virginie Van Damme -Veronique Englebienne 41,42 %
7 NS 1S N+2 150 15.4 70.00
8 NS 4P W-1 50 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
a.2 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 44,89 %
9 NS 3S N+3 490 19.7 89.55
10 NS 2C E-2 200 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a.1 Martine Zens -Elena Valsesia 46,67 %
11 NS 3C W-1 50 4 18.18
12 NS 4P W+1 -450 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a13 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 54,60 %
13 NS 3S N = 600 2.3 10.45
14 NS 1S W+1 -120 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
a12 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 52,05 %
15 NS 4K W = -130 2.3 10.45
16 NS 4C E = -620 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
a10 Pascale Graton -Sybille Gillet 47,61 %
19 NS 3K N+2 150 5.5 25.00
20 NS 2S W = -120 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a.9 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 59,68 %
21 NS 2P S = 110 19.7 89.55
22 NS 3S N+2 460 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 83,41 %
a.8 - 0,00 %
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.7 Christian Neve -Hugo Baetens 48,33 %
25 NS 6S E+1 -1470 9.9 45.00
26 NS 4C E-1 100 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
Total : 229,1 / 484 = 47,33 %
PAIRE a.1 Martine Zens -Elena Valsesia
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck 45,31 %
1 EO 6S N+1 1020 0.1 0.45
2 EO 5P E = -450 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A.8 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Myriam de Timary 46,14 %
3 EO 4C N+2 480 5.5 25.00
4 EO 3P E+1 -170 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
A.2 Annette Fobe -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 42,11 %
5 EO 2P S-1 -100 13.2 60.00
6 EO 4PcN-3 -500 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.9 Serge Alard -Alexandre Viot 49,28 %
7 EO 3S N-1 -100 16.5 75.00
8 EO 2P W+1 -140 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 72,50 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chantal Woitrin 37,58 %
9 EO 5C S = 450 17.5 79.55
10 EO 3S S-2 -200 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 89,55 %
A10 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 47,33 %
11 EO 3C W-1 50 18 81.82
12 EO 4P W+1 -450 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A.4 Michel Lievens -Alan Beckman 52,73 %
13 EO 6S N = 1440 2.3 10.45
14 EO 3S W-2 100 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 15,45 %
A11 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 55,83 %
15 EO 5TcE-2 300 6.6 30.00
16 EO 4C E = -620 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.5 Philippe van der Gracht -Fabienne Smit 55,12 %
17 EO 6P N-1 -50 19.7 89.55
18 EO 3C S = 140 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A12 Grazia Neuenschwander -Patrick Gilles 55,35 %
19 EO 5K N+1 420 2.3 10.45
20 EO 3T W+1 -130 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
A.6 Dominique Bourgoignie -Claire Derieuw 59,50 %
21 EO 3P S-1 -100 6.6 30.00
22 EO 3S N+2 460 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 26,36 %
A.7 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 50,74 %
25 EO 6S E+1 -1470 12.1 55.00
26 EO 4P S = 620 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
Total : 246,4 / 528 = 46,67 %
PAIRE A.8 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Myriam de Timary
a.2 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 44,89 %
1 NS 4C N+2 480 6.6 30.00
2 NS 6P E-1 50 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
a.1 Martine Zens -Elena Valsesia 46,67 %
3 NS 4C N+2 480 16.5 75.00
4 NS 3P E+1 -170 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
a13 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 54,60 %
5 NS 4C S-1 -100 8.8 40.00
6 NS 5T W+1 -620 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a12 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 52,05 %
7 NS 2C S-1 -100 5.5 25.00
8 NS 2P W+1 -140 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 27,50 %
a11 Benedicte Lemaigre -Brigitte Velge 49,92 %
9 NS 4C N+2 480 15.4 70.00
10 NS 3K S-1 -100 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
a10 Pascale Graton -Sybille Gillet 47,61 %
11 NS 4PcN = 590 22 100.00
12 NS 4P W+1 -450 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a.8 - 0,00 %
15 NS BYE 0 0.00
16 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.7 Christian Neve -Hugo Baetens 48,33 %
17 NS 4P N+2 480 16.5 75.00
18 NS 2P W-1 50 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
a.6 Jean Pierre Oudaert -Marina Oudaert 40,66 %
19 NS 5K N = 400 14.3 65.00
20 NS 4C E-1 100 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
a.5 Dominique Sassen -Michel Lahaut 60,47 %
21 NS 3C N-4 -400 0.1 0.45
22 NS 3S N+1 430 6.2 28.18 µ Tbl = 14,32 %
a.4 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 53,96 %
23 NS 1S S = 90 6.6 30.00
24 NS 3P N-1 -50 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
a.3 Virginie Van Damme -Veronique Englebienne 41,42 %
25 NS 6S E+1 -1470 9.9 45.00
26 NS 4P S-2 -200 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
Total : 223,3 / 484 = 46,14 %
PAIRE A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck
a.1 Martine Zens -Elena Valsesia 46,67 %
1 NS 6S N+1 1020 21.9 99.55
2 NS 5P E = -450 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a13 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 54,60 %
3 NS 4C N+1 450 7.7 35.00
4 NS 4P E = -620 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
a12 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 52,05 %
5 NS 1S W-1 50 16.5 75.00
6 NS 4T W+1 -150 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 72,50 %
a11 Benedicte Lemaigre -Brigitte Velge 49,92 %
7 NS 2T E = -90 11 50.00
8 NS 4P W-1 50 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a10 Pascale Graton -Sybille Gillet 47,61 %
9 NS 4C N+2 480 15.4 70.00
10 NS 2T E-1 100 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.9 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 59,68 %
11 NS 5PcN-1 -100 1 4.55
12 NS 4P W+2 -480 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 2,27 %
a.8 - 0,00 %
13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.7 Christian Neve -Hugo Baetens 48,33 %
15 NS 5K W-1 50 8.8 40.00
16 NS 4C W-2 200 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
a.6 Jean Pierre Oudaert -Marina Oudaert 40,66 %
17 NS 4P N+1 450 11 50.00
18 NS 2S W+1 -150 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a.5 Dominique Sassen -Michel Lahaut 60,47 %
19 NS 4K N+1 150 5.5 25.00
20 NS 4C W = -620 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
a.4 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 53,96 %
21 NS 2S N-1 -100 15.4 70.00
22 NS 3S S+2 460 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 73,64 %
a.3 Virginie Van Damme -Veronique Englebienne 41,42 %
23 NS 2S E-1 100 9.9 45.00
24 NS 3T W = -110 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
Total : 219,3 / 484 = 45,31 %
PAIRE a.2 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen
A.8 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Myriam de Timary 46,14 %
1 EO 4C N+2 480 15.4 70.00
2 EO 6P E-1 50 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
A.2 Annette Fobe -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 42,11 %
3 EO 4C N+1 450 14.3 65.00
4 EO 3P E+1 -170 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.9 Serge Alard -Alexandre Viot 49,28 %
5 EO 2P S-1 -100 13.2 60.00
6 EO 4KcS-1 -100 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chantal Woitrin 37,58 %
7 EO 3S N = 600 1.2 5.45
8 EO 3P W = -140 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A10 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 47,33 %
9 EO 3S N+3 490 2.3 10.45
10 EO 2C E-2 200 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.4 Michel Lievens -Alan Beckman 52,73 %
11 EO 4P N = 420 7 31.82
12 EO 4P W+1 -450 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A11 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 55,83 %
13 EO 3S S+2 660 15.4 70.00
14 EO 3S W-3 150 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A.5 Philippe van der Gracht -Fabienne Smit 55,12 %
15 EO 5K W-1 50 13.2 60.00
16 EO 5C E-1 100 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
A12 Grazia Neuenschwander -Patrick Gilles 55,35 %
17 EO 4P N+1 450 11 50.00
18 EO 4K E-2 100 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A.6 Dominique Bourgoignie -Claire Derieuw 59,50 %
19 EO 3K N+3 170 11 50.00
20 EO 4C E = -620 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A13 Iris de Limbourg -Paul Henricot 53,08 %
21 EO 1S N-1 -100 6.6 30.00
22 EO 5C S-1 -50 21.8 99.09 µ Tbl = 64,55 %
A.7 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 50,74 %
23 EO 1K E = -70 17.5 79.55
24 EO 2C S+1 140 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
Total : 237,0 / 528 = 44,89 %
PAIRE A.2 Annette Fobe -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
a.2 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 44,89 %
3 NS 4C N+1 450 7.7 35.00
4 NS 3P E+1 -170 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.1 Martine Zens -Elena Valsesia 46,67 %
5 NS 2P S-1 -100 8.8 40.00
6 NS 4PcN-3 -500 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a13 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 54,60 %
7 NS 3S N-1 -100 5.5 25.00
8 NS 2P W+1 -140 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 27,50 %
a12 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 52,05 %
9 NS 4P N+1 450 4.5 20.45
10 NS 2S S = 120 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
a11 Benedicte Lemaigre -Brigitte Velge 49,92 %
11 NS 5CcW-3 500 20 90.91
12 NS 4P W+1 -450 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a10 Pascale Graton -Sybille Gillet 47,61 %
13 NS 3S S+3 690 11 50.00
14 NS 4T W-1 50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.9 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 59,68 %
15 NS 5P N-1 -100 4.5 20.45
16 NS 4C E = -620 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a.8 - 0,00 %
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.7 Christian Neve -Hugo Baetens 48,33 %
19 NS 5K N+1 420 19.7 89.55
20 NS 3S W = -600 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.6 Jean Pierre Oudaert -Marina Oudaert 40,66 %
21 NS 3C N-2 -200 7.7 35.00
22 NS 3S N+1 430 6.2 28.18 µ Tbl = 31,59 %
a.5 Dominique Sassen -Michel Lahaut 60,47 %
23 NS 2P N-1 -100 2.3 10.45
24 NS 3S W-2 100 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
a.4 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 53,96 %
25 NS 6S E+1 -1470 9.9 45.00
26 NS 3P S-1 -100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
Total : 203,8 / 484 = 42,11 %
PAIRE a.3 Virginie Van Damme -Veronique Englebienne
A.9 Serge Alard -Alexandre Viot 49,28 %
3 EO 6C N = 980 0.1 0.45
4 EO 4P E+1 -650 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chantal Woitrin 37,58 %
5 EO 2P S+1 140 1.2 5.45
6 EO 5T W = -600 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A10 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 47,33 %
7 EO 1S N+2 150 6.6 30.00
8 EO 4P W-1 50 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
A.4 Michel Lievens -Alan Beckman 52,73 %
9 EO 4C S+1 450 17.5 79.55
10 EO 2C E-1 100 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A11 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 55,83 %
11 EO 4P N = 420 7 31.82
12 EO 4P W = -420 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.5 Philippe van der Gracht -Fabienne Smit 55,12 %
13 EO 3S S+4 720 5.5 25.00
14 EO 3S W-2 100 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A12 Grazia Neuenschwander -Patrick Gilles 55,35 %
15 EO 5P N = 650 3.4 15.45
16 EO 3S E-1 100 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 17,95 %
A.6 Dominique Bourgoignie -Claire Derieuw 59,50 %
17 EO 5P N+1 480 5.5 25.00
18 EO 2C N+2 170 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
A13 Iris de Limbourg -Paul Henricot 53,08 %
19 EO 4K N+1 150 16.5 75.00
20 EO 3T W = -110 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.7 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 50,74 %
21 EO 1S W-3 150 0.1 0.45
22 EO 3S N+1 430 15.8 71.82 µ Tbl = 36,14 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck 45,31 %
23 EO 2S E-1 100 12.1 55.00
24 EO 3T W = -110 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A.8 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Myriam de Timary 46,14 %
25 EO 6S E+1 -1470 12.1 55.00
26 EO 4P S-2 -200 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
Total : 218,7 / 528 = 41,42 %
PAIRE a.6 Jean Pierre Oudaert -Marina Oudaert
A10 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 47,33 %
1 EO 4C N+3 510 5.5 25.00
2 EO 4P E+1 -450 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.4 Michel Lievens -Alan Beckman 52,73 %
3 EO 4C N+1 450 14.3 65.00
4 EO 1S E+1 -120 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A11 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 55,83 %
5 EO 2S S-1 -100 13.2 60.00
6 EO 3S E+2 -660 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
A12 Grazia Neuenschwander -Patrick Gilles 55,35 %
9 EO 6C N = 980 0.1 0.45
10 EO 3S S = 600 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 5,45 %
A.6 Dominique Bourgoignie -Claire Derieuw 59,50 %
11 EO 4P N = 420 7 31.82
12 EO 3P W+2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
A13 Iris de Limbourg -Paul Henricot 53,08 %
13 EO 3S S+4 720 5.5 25.00
14 EO 2S E-1 50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
A.7 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 50,74 %
15 EO 4PcN = 790 0.1 0.45
16 EO 4C E = -620 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck 45,31 %
17 EO 4P N+1 450 11 50.00
18 EO 2S W+1 -150 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A.8 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Myriam de Timary 46,14 %
19 EO 5K N = 400 7.7 35.00
20 EO 4C E-1 100 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
A.2 Annette Fobe -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 42,11 %
21 EO 3C N-2 -200 14.3 65.00
22 EO 3S N+1 430 15.8 71.82 µ Tbl = 68,41 %
A.9 Serge Alard -Alexandre Viot 49,28 %
23 EO 2P N+1 140 3.4 15.45
24 EO 2C S+1 140 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 12,95 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chantal Woitrin 37,58 %
25 EO 6S E+1 -1470 12.1 55.00
26 EO 3P S-1 -100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
Total : 214,7 / 528 = 40,66 %
PAIRE A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chantal Woitrin
a.5 Dominique Sassen -Michel Lahaut 60,47 %
1 NS 3S S+2 460 1.2 5.45
2 NS 4P E+1 -450 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
a.3 Virginie Van Damme -Veronique Englebienne 41,42 %
5 NS 2P S+1 140 20.8 94.55
6 NS 5T W = -600 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a.2 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 44,89 %
7 NS 3S N = 600 20.8 94.55
8 NS 3P W = -140 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a.1 Martine Zens -Elena Valsesia 46,67 %
9 NS 5C S = 450 4.5 20.45
10 NS 3S S-2 -200 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 10,45 %
a13 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 54,60 %
11 NS 5PcN-1 -100 1 4.55
12 NS 4P W+1 -450 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a12 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 52,05 %
13 NS 3S S+3 690 11 50.00
14 NS 3S W = -400 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a11 Benedicte Lemaigre -Brigitte Velge 49,92 %
15 NS 5PcN-2 -500 0.1 0.45
16 NS 4C W = -620 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
a10 Pascale Graton -Sybille Gillet 47,61 %
17 NS 6P N = 980 20.8 94.55
18 NS 3C N-1 -100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
a.9 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 59,68 %
19 NS 5K N = 400 14.3 65.00
20 NS 2C E+1 -140 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.8 - 0,00 %
21 NS BYE 0 0.00
22 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.7 Christian Neve -Hugo Baetens 48,33 %
23 NS 2P N = 110 14.3 65.00
24 NS 5PcN-3 -500 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a.6 Jean Pierre Oudaert -Marina Oudaert 40,66 %
25 NS 6S E+1 -1470 9.9 45.00
26 NS 3P S-1 -100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
Total : 181,9 / 484 = 37,58 %
PAIRE a.8 -
A11 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 55,83 %
1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.5 Philippe van der Gracht -Fabienne Smit 55,12 %
3 EO BYE 0 0.00
4 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A12 Grazia Neuenschwander -Patrick Gilles 55,35 %
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.6 Dominique Bourgoignie -Claire Derieuw 59,50 %
7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A13 Iris de Limbourg -Paul Henricot 53,08 %
9 EO BYE 0 0.00
10 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck 45,31 %
13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.8 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Myriam de Timary 46,14 %
15 EO BYE 0 0.00
16 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.2 Annette Fobe -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 42,11 %
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.9 Serge Alard -Alexandre Viot 49,28 %
19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chantal Woitrin 37,58 %
21 EO BYE 0 0.00
22 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A10 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 47,33 %
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.4 Michel Lievens -Alan Beckman 52,73 %
25 EO BYE 0 0.00
26 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 572 = 0,00 %
|