B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 57,95 A11 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier
--- 2 54,73 A.1 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie
--- 3 53,79 A.6 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander
--- 4 53,22 A10 Serge Alard -Michel Cornez
--- 5 51,52 A.2 Brigitte Velge -Teresa Dekoster
--- 6 50,95 A.7 Tina Katila -Philippe van der Gracht
--- ~ 50,95 A13 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck
--- 8 50,57 A.3 Patricia Vaccani -Chris Oostens
--- 9 48,48 A.8 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza
--- 10 47,73 A.4 Alan Beckman -Didier Collart
--- 11 45,45 A.9 Barbara Kengen -Michele Verhulst
--- 12 44,13 A12 Myriam de Timary -Caroll Pucher
--- 13 40,53 A.5 Iris de Limbourg -Nathalie de Laminne
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 62,50 a.2 Pascale Bodart -Nadine Brabant
--- 2 60,98 a12 Stan Tabor -Edith Bjorn
--- 3 56,82 a10 Francoise Turin -Christiane Huby
--- 4 55,11 a.5 Catherine de Moffarts -Anne Arsac
--- 5 51,14 a.6 Caroline Lallia -Pascale Graton
--- 6 50,57 a13 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand
--- ~ 50,19 a.7 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Wildiers
--- 8 48,86 a.3 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens
--- 9 46,59 a11 Suzanne Klausen -Agathe Housiaux
--- 10 45,27 a.8 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes
--- 11 42,23 a.4 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Simone Munsterhjelm
--- 12 42,05 a.9 Philippe d'Hoop -Francoise d'Hoop
--- 13 37,69 a.1 Veronique Englebienne -Ghislaine Deschuyteneer
PAIRE A11 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier
a.8 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 45,27 %
1 NS 2P N = 110 13 59.09
2 NS 1S E+1 -120 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.7 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Wildiers 50,19 %
3 NS 4P S+2 480 14 63.64
4 NS 3T W-1 100 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
a.6 Caroline Lallia -Pascale Graton 51,14 %
5 NS 3S E+1 -430 20 90.91
6 NS 2S S-1 -50 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a.5 Catherine de Moffarts -Anne Arsac 55,11 %
7 NS 3T W+1 -130 12 54.55
8 NS 4C N-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.4 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Simone Munsterhjelm 42,23 %
9 NS 4P E = -620 7 31.82
10 NS 5P S+1 680 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a.3 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 48,86 %
11 NS 4C W+2 -480 16 72.73
12 NS 4C E+2 -480 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.2 Pascale Bodart -Nadine Brabant 62,50 %
13 NS 3P S-1 -100 2 9.09
14 NS 3S S+1 430 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.1 Veronique Englebienne -Ghislaine Deschuyteneer 37,69 %
15 NS 3C W-2 100 19 86.36
16 NS 2P N-1 -50 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a13 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 50,57 %
17 NS 3S N+4 520 21 95.45
18 NS 3C N-1 -100 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a11 Suzanne Klausen -Agathe Housiaux 46,59 %
21 NS 3C E = -140 14 63.64
22 NS 4C E+2 -680 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a10 Francoise Turin -Christiane Huby 56,82 %
23 NS 4C W-1 100 21 95.45
24 NS 4C E = -420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a.9 Philippe d'Hoop -Francoise d'Hoop 42,05 %
25 NS 2P S+2 170 22 100.00
26 NS 3S S-2 -200 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
Total : 306,0 / 528 = 57,95 %
PAIRE A.1 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie
a.1 Veronique Englebienne -Ghislaine Deschuyteneer 37,69 %
1 NS 2P N+1 140 21 95.45
2 NS 1S E = -90 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
a13 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 50,57 %
3 NS 4P S+2 480 14 63.64
4 NS 1S W+1 -120 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a12 Stan Tabor -Edith Bjorn 60,98 %
5 NS 3S E+2 -460 2 9.09
6 NS 2S S-2 -100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
a11 Suzanne Klausen -Agathe Housiaux 46,59 %
7 NS 3T W+1 -130 12 54.55
8 NS 3C N = 140 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a10 Francoise Turin -Christiane Huby 56,82 %
9 NS 4P E = -620 7 31.82
10 NS 4P S+2 680 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a.9 Philippe d'Hoop -Francoise d'Hoop 42,05 %
11 NS 4C W+2 -480 16 72.73
12 NS 4C E+1 -450 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a.8 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 45,27 %
13 NS 2P S = 110 6 27.27
14 NS 3S S = 400 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.7 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Wildiers 50,19 %
15 NS 2C W-2 100 19 86.36
16 NS 4KcS-2 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.6 Caroline Lallia -Pascale Graton 51,14 %
17 NS 3S N+4 520 21 95.45
18 NS 3C N-1 -100 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.5 Catherine de Moffarts -Anne Arsac 55,11 %
19 NS 3C N+1 170 21 95.45
20 NS 3T N+3 170 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a.4 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Simone Munsterhjelm 42,23 %
21 NS 3S E-1 50 21 95.45
22 NS 4C E+3 -710 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a.3 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 48,86 %
23 NS 2P N-1 -100 18 81.82
24 NS 4C E = -420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
Total : 289,0 / 528 = 54,73 %
PAIRE A.6 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander
a11 Suzanne Klausen -Agathe Housiaux 46,59 %
1 NS 2P N = 110 13 59.09
2 NS 1S E+3 -180 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a10 Francoise Turin -Christiane Huby 56,82 %
3 NS 4P S+2 480 14 63.64
4 NS 1S W+1 -120 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.9 Philippe d'Hoop -Francoise d'Hoop 42,05 %
5 NS 4P W+1 -450 11 50.00
6 NS 2K S+2 130 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.8 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 45,27 %
7 NS 3S W-1 100 22 100.00
8 NS 3C N = 140 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 93,18 %
a.6 Caroline Lallia -Pascale Graton 51,14 %
11 NS 4C W+3 -510 6 27.27
12 NS 4C E+3 -510 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
a.5 Catherine de Moffarts -Anne Arsac 55,11 %
13 NS 2P S+1 140 15 68.18
14 NS 3S S+1 430 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a.4 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Simone Munsterhjelm 42,23 %
15 NS 1S S = 90 13 59.09
16 NS 3K S = 110 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.3 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 48,86 %
17 NS 3S N+2 460 10 45.45
18 NS 2C N = 110 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a.2 Pascale Bodart -Nadine Brabant 62,50 %
19 NS 3C N = 140 13 59.09
20 NS 3S S+2 660 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a.1 Veronique Englebienne -Ghislaine Deschuyteneer 37,69 %
21 NS 2S W = -120 16 72.73
22 NS 4C E+1 -650 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
a13 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 50,57 %
23 NS 2K W+1 -110 14 63.64
24 NS 4C E = -420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a12 Stan Tabor -Edith Bjorn 60,98 %
25 NS 2P S-1 -50 6 27.27
26 NS 4P N-3 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
Total : 284,0 / 528 = 53,79 %
PAIRE A10 Serge Alard -Michel Cornez
a.6 Caroline Lallia -Pascale Graton 51,14 %
1 NS 2C E+1 -140 0 0.00
2 NS 3S E-4 200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.5 Catherine de Moffarts -Anne Arsac 55,11 %
3 NS 4P S+2 480 14 63.64
4 NS 1S W = -90 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a.4 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Simone Munsterhjelm 42,23 %
5 NS 4P W+1 -450 11 50.00
6 NS 3K S+1 130 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.3 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 48,86 %
7 NS 4K S-1 -100 20 90.91
8 NS 4C N-2 -100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a.2 Pascale Bodart -Nadine Brabant 62,50 %
9 NS 4P E = -620 7 31.82
10 NS 4P N+3 710 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a.1 Veronique Englebienne -Ghislaine Deschuyteneer 37,69 %
11 NS 4C W+2 -480 16 72.73
12 NS 4C E+2 -480 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a13 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 50,57 %
13 NS 2P S+1 140 15 68.18
14 NS 3S S = 400 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a12 Stan Tabor -Edith Bjorn 60,98 %
15 NS 2C E-1 50 8 36.36
16 NS 2P N-1 -50 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a10 Francoise Turin -Christiane Huby 56,82 %
19 NS 2C N+1 140 13 59.09
20 NS 3T N+2 150 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.9 Philippe d'Hoop -Francoise d'Hoop 42,05 %
21 NS 4C E = -420 6 27.27
22 NS 4C E+2 -680 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.8 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 45,27 %
23 NS 3C E+1 -170 6 27.27
24 NS 4C E = -420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.7 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Wildiers 50,19 %
25 NS 2P S+2 140 20 90.91
26 NS 3S S-1 -100 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
Total : 281,0 / 528 = 53,22 %
PAIRE A.2 Brigitte Velge -Teresa Dekoster
a.2 Pascale Bodart -Nadine Brabant 62,50 %
3 NS 4P S+2 480 14 63.64
4 NS 1S W+2 -150 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.1 Veronique Englebienne -Ghislaine Deschuyteneer 37,69 %
5 NS 4P W = -420 22 100.00
6 NS 2S S-1 -50 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a13 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 50,57 %
7 NS 3T W+1 -130 12 54.55
8 NS 4P W = -420 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a12 Stan Tabor -Edith Bjorn 60,98 %
9 NS 4P E-1 100 21 95.45
10 NS 6S S-2 -200 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a11 Suzanne Klausen -Agathe Housiaux 46,59 %
11 NS 4C W+2 -480 16 72.73
12 NS 4C E+2 -480 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a10 Francoise Turin -Christiane Huby 56,82 %
13 NS 3P S = 140 15 68.18
14 NS 3S S = 400 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.9 Philippe d'Hoop -Francoise d'Hoop 42,05 %
15 NS 1S N = 90 13 59.09
16 NS 3C W-2 200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
a.8 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 45,27 %
17 NS 3S N+2 460 10 45.45
18 NS 2C N+2 170 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.7 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Wildiers 50,19 %
19 NS 3C N-2 -100 1 4.55
20 NS 3S N+2 660 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.6 Caroline Lallia -Pascale Graton 51,14 %
21 NS 1S W = -90 18 81.82
22 NS 6C E = -1430 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.5 Catherine de Moffarts -Anne Arsac 55,11 %
23 NS 3K W+1 -130 9 40.91
24 NS 4C E = -420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.4 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Simone Munsterhjelm 42,23 %
25 NS 2P S-1 -50 6 27.27
26 NS 3K S+1 130 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
Total : 272,0 / 528 = 51,52 %
PAIRE A.7 Tina Katila -Philippe van der Gracht
a13 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 50,57 %
1 NS 2P N = 110 13 59.09
2 NS 2C N+1 140 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a12 Stan Tabor -Edith Bjorn 60,98 %
3 NS 4P S+2 480 14 63.64
4 NS 3T W = -110 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a11 Suzanne Klausen -Agathe Housiaux 46,59 %
5 NS 4P W+1 -450 11 50.00
6 NS 2S S-1 -50 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a10 Francoise Turin -Christiane Huby 56,82 %
7 NS 4TcW = -710 0 0.00
8 NS 4C S-2 -100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
a.9 Philippe d'Hoop -Francoise d'Hoop 42,05 %
9 NS 4P E = -620 7 31.82
10 NS 4C N+1 650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.7 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Wildiers 50,19 %
13 NS 2P S+1 140 15 68.18
14 NS 3S S+1 430 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a.6 Caroline Lallia -Pascale Graton 51,14 %
15 NS 1S N-1 -100 5 22.73
16 NS 2P N+1 140 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.5 Catherine de Moffarts -Anne Arsac 55,11 %
17 NS 5K N+2 440 2 9.09
18 NS 2C N+1 140 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a.4 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Simone Munsterhjelm 42,23 %
19 NS 2S N+1 150 18 81.82
20 NS 6K S-1 -100 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.3 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 48,86 %
21 NS 4C W-1 50 21 95.45
22 NS 4C E+2 -680 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
a.2 Pascale Bodart -Nadine Brabant 62,50 %
23 NS 2K W+1 -110 14 63.64
24 NS 4C E+1 -450 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a.1 Veronique Englebienne -Ghislaine Deschuyteneer 37,69 %
25 NS 2P S-1 -50 6 27.27
26 NS 3S N = 600 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
Total : 269,0 / 528 = 50,95 %
PAIRE A13 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck
a12 Stan Tabor -Edith Bjorn 60,98 %
1 NS 2P N = 110 13 59.09
2 NS 1S E+2 -150 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a11 Suzanne Klausen -Agathe Housiaux 46,59 %
3 NS 4P S+2 480 14 63.64
4 NS 1S W = -90 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a10 Francoise Turin -Christiane Huby 56,82 %
5 NS 4P W+1 -450 11 50.00
6 NS 3S S-2 -100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a.9 Philippe d'Hoop -Francoise d'Hoop 42,05 %
7 NS 3T W+1 -130 12 54.55
8 NS 3C N+2 200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a.8 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 45,27 %
9 NS 3P E+1 -170 16 72.73
10 NS 6P N-1 -100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.7 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Wildiers 50,19 %
11 NS 4C W+2 -480 16 72.73
12 NS 4C E+2 -480 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.6 Caroline Lallia -Pascale Graton 51,14 %
13 NS 2P S+1 140 15 68.18
14 NS 3S S+2 460 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
a.5 Catherine de Moffarts -Anne Arsac 55,11 %
15 NS 1S S = 90 13 59.09
16 NS 3C W = -140 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a.4 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Simone Munsterhjelm 42,23 %
17 NS 3S N+3 490 18 81.82
18 NS 2C N+2 170 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
a.3 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 48,86 %
19 NS 2C N+2 170 21 95.45
20 NS 6T N-1 -100 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.2 Pascale Bodart -Nadine Brabant 62,50 %
21 NS 3S W+2 -460 0 0.00
22 NS 6C E = -1430 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 4,55 %
a13 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 50,57 %
25 NS 2P S-1 -50 6 27.27
26 NS 5K S-1 -100 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
Total : 269,0 / 528 = 50,95 %
PAIRE A.3 Patricia Vaccani -Chris Oostens
a.5 Catherine de Moffarts -Anne Arsac 55,11 %
1 NS 3C E-1 50 3 13.64
2 NS 1S E = -90 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.3 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 48,86 %
5 NS 4P W+1 -450 11 50.00
6 NS 2K S+1 110 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.2 Pascale Bodart -Nadine Brabant 62,50 %
7 NS 3T W+1 -130 12 54.55
8 NS 4P W = -420 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a.1 Veronique Englebienne -Ghislaine Deschuyteneer 37,69 %
9 NS 3P E+1 -170 16 72.73
10 NS 4P S+2 680 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a13 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 50,57 %
11 NS 4C W+3 -510 6 27.27
12 NS 4C E+2 -480 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a12 Stan Tabor -Edith Bjorn 60,98 %
13 NS 2P S+1 140 15 68.18
14 NS 3S S = 400 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a11 Suzanne Klausen -Agathe Housiaux 46,59 %
15 NS 1S N = 90 13 59.09
16 NS 2P N+1 140 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a10 Francoise Turin -Christiane Huby 56,82 %
17 NS 3S N+2 460 10 45.45
18 NS 3C N+1 170 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.9 Philippe d'Hoop -Francoise d'Hoop 42,05 %
19 NS 2S N-1 -50 4 18.18
20 NS 5K S = 600 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a.8 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 45,27 %
21 NS 1P E+3 -170 12 54.55
22 NS 6C E = -1430 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a.7 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Wildiers 50,19 %
23 NS 2K W+2 -130 9 40.91
24 NS 4C E = -420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.6 Caroline Lallia -Pascale Graton 51,14 %
25 NS 2P S = 110 15 68.18
26 NS 3K S+1 130 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
Total : 267,0 / 528 = 50,57 %
PAIRE A.8 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza
a.2 Pascale Bodart -Nadine Brabant 62,50 %
1 NS 2P N = 110 13 59.09
2 NS 3K W = -110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.1 Veronique Englebienne -Ghislaine Deschuyteneer 37,69 %
3 NS 5C S = 450 2 9.09
4 NS 2T W-1 100 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a13 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 50,57 %
5 NS 4P W+1 -450 11 50.00
6 NS 4P N-1 -50 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a12 Stan Tabor -Edith Bjorn 60,98 %
7 NS 3T W+1 -130 12 54.55
8 NS 3P W = -140 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a11 Suzanne Klausen -Agathe Housiaux 46,59 %
9 NS 4P E = -620 7 31.82
10 NS 6S N-2 -200 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
a10 Francoise Turin -Christiane Huby 56,82 %
11 NS 6C W+1 -1010 1 4.55
12 NS 4C E = -420 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.8 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 45,27 %
15 NS 2P N = 110 22 100.00
16 NS 2P N = 110 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
a.7 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Wildiers 50,19 %
17 NS 5K S = 400 0 0.00
18 NS 3C N = 140 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a.6 Caroline Lallia -Pascale Graton 51,14 %
19 NS 2C N = 110 7 31.82
20 NS 4T N+1 150 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a.5 Catherine de Moffarts -Anne Arsac 55,11 %
21 NS 4C E = -420 6 27.27
22 NS 4C E+2 -680 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.4 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Simone Munsterhjelm 42,23 %
23 NS 2K W+1 -110 14 63.64
24 NS 3C E+1 -170 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
a.3 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 48,86 %
25 NS 2P S = 110 15 68.18
26 NS 2C W-1 100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
Total : 256,0 / 528 = 48,48 %
PAIRE A.4 Alan Beckman -Didier Collart
a.7 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Wildiers 50,19 %
1 NS 2P N = 110 13 59.09
2 NS 2C S-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a.6 Caroline Lallia -Pascale Graton 51,14 %
3 NS 4P S+2 480 14 63.64
4 NS 1S W+1 -120 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.4 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Simone Munsterhjelm 42,23 %
7 NS 3T E+1 -130 12 54.55
8 NS 4C N-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.3 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 48,86 %
9 NS 2P E+2 -170 16 72.73
10 NS 3S S+1 630 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.2 Pascale Bodart -Nadine Brabant 62,50 %
11 NS 4C W+2 -480 16 72.73
12 NS 4C E+2 -480 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.1 Veronique Englebienne -Ghislaine Deschuyteneer 37,69 %
13 NS 3P S-1 -100 2 9.09
14 NS 3S S+1 430 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a13 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 50,57 %
15 NS 1S S-2 -200 0 0.00
16 NS 2P N+1 140 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a12 Stan Tabor -Edith Bjorn 60,98 %
17 NS 3S N+2 460 10 45.45
18 NS 2C N+1 140 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a11 Suzanne Klausen -Agathe Housiaux 46,59 %
19 NS 3S N-2 -100 1 4.55
20 NS 5T N = 600 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a10 Francoise Turin -Christiane Huby 56,82 %
21 NS 4C E = -420 6 27.27
22 NS 4C E+3 -710 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a.9 Philippe d'Hoop -Francoise d'Hoop 42,05 %
23 NS 4K W-1 100 21 95.45
24 NS 4C E = -420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a.8 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 45,27 %
25 NS 2P S = 110 15 68.18
26 NS 3K S+1 130 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
Total : 252,0 / 528 = 47,73 %
PAIRE A.9 Barbara Kengen -Michele Verhulst
a.4 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Simone Munsterhjelm 42,23 %
1 NS 4C E-2 100 6 27.27
2 NS 2K E+1 -110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a.3 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 48,86 %
3 NS 4P S+1 450 2 9.09
4 NS 1S W+1 -120 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
a.2 Pascale Bodart -Nadine Brabant 62,50 %
5 NS 4P W+2 -480 0 0.00
6 NS 3S S-2 -100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 4,55 %
a.1 Veronique Englebienne -Ghislaine Deschuyteneer 37,69 %
7 NS 1S W+2 -150 4 18.18
8 NS 4P W-1 50 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a13 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 50,57 %
9 NS 4P E-1 100 21 95.45
10 NS 4S S+1 660 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
a12 Stan Tabor -Edith Bjorn 60,98 %
11 NS 4C W+3 -510 6 27.27
12 NS 4C E+1 -450 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a11 Suzanne Klausen -Agathe Housiaux 46,59 %
13 NS 3P S = 140 15 68.18
14 NS 3S S+2 460 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
a.9 Philippe d'Hoop -Francoise d'Hoop 42,05 %
17 NS 3S N+2 460 10 45.45
18 NS 2C N+1 140 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.8 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 45,27 %
19 NS 2C N+1 140 13 59.09
20 NS 3S S+2 660 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a.7 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Wildiers 50,19 %
21 NS 4C E = -420 6 27.27
22 NS 4C E+2 -680 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.6 Caroline Lallia -Pascale Graton 51,14 %
23 NS 3C E+2 -200 4 18.18
24 NS 4C E = -420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a.5 Catherine de Moffarts -Anne Arsac 55,11 %
25 NS 4P S-3 -150 0 0.00
26 NS 3S S-1 -100 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
Total : 240,0 / 528 = 45,45 %
PAIRE A12 Myriam de Timary -Caroll Pucher
a10 Francoise Turin -Christiane Huby 56,82 %
1 NS 4C E-1 50 3 13.64
2 NS 2K W = -90 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.9 Philippe d'Hoop -Francoise d'Hoop 42,05 %
3 NS 5P S+1 480 14 63.64
4 NS 1S W+2 -150 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.8 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 45,27 %
5 NS 4P W+1 -450 11 50.00
6 NS 3C W-2 200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a.7 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Wildiers 50,19 %
7 NS 3S W+1 -630 2 9.09
8 NS 4P W-1 50 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a.6 Caroline Lallia -Pascale Graton 51,14 %
9 NS 4P E = -620 7 31.82
10 NS 4P N+1 650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.5 Catherine de Moffarts -Anne Arsac 55,11 %
11 NS 6C W+1 -1010 1 4.55
12 NS 3C E+2 -200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.4 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Simone Munsterhjelm 42,23 %
13 NS 4P S-1 -100 2 9.09
14 NS 3S S+1 430 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.3 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 48,86 %
15 NS 2C E = -110 2 9.09
16 NS 3K S-1 -50 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
a.2 Pascale Bodart -Nadine Brabant 62,50 %
17 NS 3S N+2 460 10 45.45
18 NS 2C N = 110 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a.1 Veronique Englebienne -Ghislaine Deschuyteneer 37,69 %
19 NS 2C N+1 140 13 59.09
20 NS 3S S+2 660 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a12 Stan Tabor -Edith Bjorn 60,98 %
23 NS 1S W+4 -210 2 9.09
24 NS 4C E = -420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a11 Suzanne Klausen -Agathe Housiaux 46,59 %
25 NS 2P S = 110 15 68.18
26 NS 5K S-1 -100 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
Total : 233,0 / 528 = 44,13 %
PAIRE A.5 Iris de Limbourg -Nathalie de Laminne
a.9 Philippe d'Hoop -Francoise d'Hoop 42,05 %
1 NS 2P N+1 140 21 95.45
2 NS 1S E+2 -150 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.8 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 45,27 %
3 NS 4P S+1 450 2 9.09
4 NS 1S W+2 -150 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
a.7 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Wildiers 50,19 %
5 NS 4P W+1 -450 11 50.00
6 NS 3K S = 110 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.5 Catherine de Moffarts -Anne Arsac 55,11 %
9 NS 4P E+1 -650 0 0.00
10 NS 6K S-1 -100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
a.4 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Simone Munsterhjelm 42,23 %
11 NS 4C W+2 -480 16 72.73
12 NS 4C E+2 -480 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.3 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 48,86 %
13 NS 2P S+1 140 15 68.18
14 NS 3S S = 400 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.2 Pascale Bodart -Nadine Brabant 62,50 %
15 NS 1S S-1 -100 5 22.73
16 NS 2P N-1 -50 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a.1 Veronique Englebienne -Ghislaine Deschuyteneer 37,69 %
17 NS 3S N+2 460 10 45.45
18 NS 2C N+1 140 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a13 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 50,57 %
19 NS 2C N = 110 7 31.82
20 NS 3S S+2 660 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a12 Stan Tabor -Edith Bjorn 60,98 %
21 NS 4C E = -420 6 27.27
22 NS 4C E+2 -680 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a11 Suzanne Klausen -Agathe Housiaux 46,59 %
23 NS 1S W+5 -240 0 0.00
24 NS 3C E+1 -170 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a10 Francoise Turin -Christiane Huby 56,82 %
25 NS 2P S-1 -50 6 27.27
26 NS 5K S-2 -200 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
Total : 214,0 / 528 = 40,53 %
PAIRE a.2 Pascale Bodart -Nadine Brabant
A.8 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 48,48 %
1 EO 2P N = 110 9 40.91
2 EO 3K W = -110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.2 Brigitte Velge -Teresa Dekoster 51,52 %
3 EO 4P S+2 480 8 36.36
4 EO 1S W+2 -150 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.9 Barbara Kengen -Michele Verhulst 45,45 %
5 EO 4P W+2 -480 22 100.00
6 EO 3S S-2 -100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 95,45 %
A.3 Patricia Vaccani -Chris Oostens 50,57 %
7 EO 3T W+1 -130 10 45.45
8 EO 4P W = -420 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A10 Serge Alard -Michel Cornez 53,22 %
9 EO 4P E = -620 15 68.18
10 EO 4P N+3 710 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Didier Collart 47,73 %
11 EO 4C W+2 -480 6 27.27
12 EO 4C E+2 -480 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A11 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier 57,95 %
13 EO 3P S-1 -100 20 90.91
14 EO 3S S+1 430 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.5 Iris de Limbourg -Nathalie de Laminne 40,53 %
15 EO 1S S-1 -100 17 77.27
16 EO 2P N-1 -50 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A12 Myriam de Timary -Caroll Pucher 44,13 %
17 EO 3S N+2 460 12 54.55
18 EO 2C N = 110 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A.6 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander 53,79 %
19 EO 3C N = 140 9 40.91
20 EO 3S S+2 660 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A13 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck 50,95 %
21 EO 3S W+2 -460 22 100.00
22 EO 6C E = -1430 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 95,45 %
A.7 Tina Katila -Philippe van der Gracht 50,95 %
23 EO 2K W+1 -110 8 36.36
24 EO 4C E+1 -450 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
Total : 330,0 / 528 = 62,50 %
PAIRE a12 Stan Tabor -Edith Bjorn
A13 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck 50,95 %
1 EO 2P N = 110 9 40.91
2 EO 1S E+2 -150 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.7 Tina Katila -Philippe van der Gracht 50,95 %
3 EO 4P S+2 480 8 36.36
4 EO 3T W = -110 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A.1 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie 54,73 %
5 EO 3S E+2 -460 20 90.91
6 EO 2S S-2 -100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
A.8 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 48,48 %
7 EO 3T W+1 -130 10 45.45
8 EO 3P W = -140 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.2 Brigitte Velge -Teresa Dekoster 51,52 %
9 EO 4P E-1 100 1 4.55
10 EO 6S S-2 -200 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.9 Barbara Kengen -Michele Verhulst 45,45 %
11 EO 4C W+3 -510 16 72.73
12 EO 4C E+1 -450 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.3 Patricia Vaccani -Chris Oostens 50,57 %
13 EO 2P S+1 140 7 31.82
14 EO 3S S = 400 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A10 Serge Alard -Michel Cornez 53,22 %
15 EO 2C E-1 50 14 63.64
16 EO 2P N-1 -50 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Didier Collart 47,73 %
17 EO 3S N+2 460 12 54.55
18 EO 2C N+1 140 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.5 Iris de Limbourg -Nathalie de Laminne 40,53 %
21 EO 4C E = -420 16 72.73
22 EO 4C E+2 -680 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A12 Myriam de Timary -Caroll Pucher 44,13 %
23 EO 1S W+4 -210 20 90.91
24 EO 4C E = -420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.6 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander 53,79 %
25 EO 2P S-1 -50 16 72.73
26 EO 4P N-3 -300 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
Total : 322,0 / 528 = 60,98 %
PAIRE a10 Francoise Turin -Christiane Huby
A12 Myriam de Timary -Caroll Pucher 44,13 %
1 EO 4C E-1 50 19 86.36
2 EO 2K W = -90 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.6 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander 53,79 %
3 EO 4P S+2 480 8 36.36
4 EO 1S W+1 -120 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A13 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck 50,95 %
5 EO 4P W+1 -450 11 50.00
6 EO 3S S-2 -100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A.7 Tina Katila -Philippe van der Gracht 50,95 %
7 EO 4TcW = -710 22 100.00
8 EO 4C S-2 -100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
A.1 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie 54,73 %
9 EO 4P E = -620 15 68.18
10 EO 4P S+2 680 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A.8 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 48,48 %
11 EO 6C W+1 -1010 21 95.45
12 EO 4C E = -420 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.2 Brigitte Velge -Teresa Dekoster 51,52 %
13 EO 3P S = 140 7 31.82
14 EO 3S S = 400 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.3 Patricia Vaccani -Chris Oostens 50,57 %
17 EO 3S N+2 460 12 54.55
18 EO 3C N+1 170 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A10 Serge Alard -Michel Cornez 53,22 %
19 EO 2C N+1 140 9 40.91
20 EO 3T N+2 150 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Didier Collart 47,73 %
21 EO 4C E = -420 16 72.73
22 EO 4C E+3 -710 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A11 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier 57,95 %
23 EO 4C W-1 100 1 4.55
24 EO 4C E = -420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A.5 Iris de Limbourg -Nathalie de Laminne 40,53 %
25 EO 2P S-1 -50 16 72.73
26 EO 5K S-2 -200 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
Total : 300,0 / 528 = 56,82 %
PAIRE a.5 Catherine de Moffarts -Anne Arsac
A.3 Patricia Vaccani -Chris Oostens 50,57 %
1 EO 3C E-1 50 19 86.36
2 EO 1S E = -90 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A10 Serge Alard -Michel Cornez 53,22 %
3 EO 4P S+2 480 8 36.36
4 EO 1S W = -90 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A11 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier 57,95 %
7 EO 3T W+1 -130 10 45.45
8 EO 4C N-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.5 Iris de Limbourg -Nathalie de Laminne 40,53 %
9 EO 4P E+1 -650 22 100.00
10 EO 6K S-1 -100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
A12 Myriam de Timary -Caroll Pucher 44,13 %
11 EO 6C W+1 -1010 21 95.45
12 EO 3C E+2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.6 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander 53,79 %
13 EO 2P S+1 140 7 31.82
14 EO 3S S+1 430 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A13 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck 50,95 %
15 EO 1S S = 90 9 40.91
16 EO 3C W = -140 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A.7 Tina Katila -Philippe van der Gracht 50,95 %
17 EO 5K N+2 440 20 90.91
18 EO 2C N+1 140 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A.1 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie 54,73 %
19 EO 3C N+1 170 1 4.55
20 EO 3T N+3 170 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A.8 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 48,48 %
21 EO 4C E = -420 16 72.73
22 EO 4C E+2 -680 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.2 Brigitte Velge -Teresa Dekoster 51,52 %
23 EO 3K W+1 -130 13 59.09
24 EO 4C E = -420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.9 Barbara Kengen -Michele Verhulst 45,45 %
25 EO 4P S-3 -150 22 100.00
26 EO 3S S-1 -100 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
Total : 291,0 / 528 = 55,11 %
PAIRE a.6 Caroline Lallia -Pascale Graton
A10 Serge Alard -Michel Cornez 53,22 %
1 EO 2C E+1 -140 22 100.00
2 EO 3S E-4 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Didier Collart 47,73 %
3 EO 4P S+2 480 8 36.36
4 EO 1S W+1 -120 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A11 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier 57,95 %
5 EO 3S E+1 -430 2 9.09
6 EO 2S S-1 -50 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A12 Myriam de Timary -Caroll Pucher 44,13 %
9 EO 4P E = -620 15 68.18
10 EO 4P N+1 650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.6 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander 53,79 %
11 EO 4C W+3 -510 16 72.73
12 EO 4C E+3 -510 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
A13 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck 50,95 %
13 EO 2P S+1 140 7 31.82
14 EO 3S S+2 460 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
A.7 Tina Katila -Philippe van der Gracht 50,95 %
15 EO 1S N-1 -100 17 77.27
16 EO 2P N+1 140 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.1 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie 54,73 %
17 EO 3S N+4 520 1 4.55
18 EO 3C N-1 -100 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.8 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 48,48 %
19 EO 2C N = 110 15 68.18
20 EO 4T N+1 150 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.2 Brigitte Velge -Teresa Dekoster 51,52 %
21 EO 1S W = -90 4 18.18
22 EO 6C E = -1430 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.9 Barbara Kengen -Michele Verhulst 45,45 %
23 EO 3C E+2 -200 18 81.82
24 EO 4C E = -420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A.3 Patricia Vaccani -Chris Oostens 50,57 %
25 EO 2P S = 110 7 31.82
26 EO 3K S+1 130 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
Total : 270,0 / 528 = 51,14 %
PAIRE a13 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand
A.7 Tina Katila -Philippe van der Gracht 50,95 %
1 EO 2P N = 110 9 40.91
2 EO 2C N+1 140 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A.1 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie 54,73 %
3 EO 4P S+2 480 8 36.36
4 EO 1S W+1 -120 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.8 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 48,48 %
5 EO 4P W+1 -450 11 50.00
6 EO 4P N-1 -50 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.2 Brigitte Velge -Teresa Dekoster 51,52 %
7 EO 3T W+1 -130 10 45.45
8 EO 4P W = -420 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A.9 Barbara Kengen -Michele Verhulst 45,45 %
9 EO 4P E-1 100 1 4.55
10 EO 4S S+1 660 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
A.3 Patricia Vaccani -Chris Oostens 50,57 %
11 EO 4C W+3 -510 16 72.73
12 EO 4C E+2 -480 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A10 Serge Alard -Michel Cornez 53,22 %
13 EO 2P S+1 140 7 31.82
14 EO 3S S = 400 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Didier Collart 47,73 %
15 EO 1S S-2 -200 22 100.00
16 EO 2P N+1 140 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A11 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier 57,95 %
17 EO 3S N+4 520 1 4.55
18 EO 3C N-1 -100 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.5 Iris de Limbourg -Nathalie de Laminne 40,53 %
19 EO 2C N = 110 15 68.18
20 EO 3S S+2 660 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A.6 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander 53,79 %
23 EO 2K W+1 -110 8 36.36
24 EO 4C E = -420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A13 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck 50,95 %
25 EO 2P S-1 -50 16 72.73
26 EO 5K S-1 -100 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
Total : 267,0 / 528 = 50,57 %
PAIRE a.7 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Wildiers
A.4 Alan Beckman -Didier Collart 47,73 %
1 EO 2P N = 110 9 40.91
2 EO 2C S-2 -200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A11 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier 57,95 %
3 EO 4P S+2 480 8 36.36
4 EO 3T W-1 100 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
A.5 Iris de Limbourg -Nathalie de Laminne 40,53 %
5 EO 4P W+1 -450 11 50.00
6 EO 3K S = 110 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A12 Myriam de Timary -Caroll Pucher 44,13 %
7 EO 3S W+1 -630 20 90.91
8 EO 4P W-1 50 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A13 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck 50,95 %
11 EO 4C W+2 -480 6 27.27
12 EO 4C E+2 -480 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.7 Tina Katila -Philippe van der Gracht 50,95 %
13 EO 2P S+1 140 7 31.82
14 EO 3S S+1 430 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A.1 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie 54,73 %
15 EO 2C W-2 100 3 13.64
16 EO 4KcS-2 -300 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.8 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 48,48 %
17 EO 5K S = 400 22 100.00
18 EO 3C N = 140 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.2 Brigitte Velge -Teresa Dekoster 51,52 %
19 EO 3C N-2 -100 21 95.45
20 EO 3S N+2 660 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.9 Barbara Kengen -Michele Verhulst 45,45 %
21 EO 4C E = -420 16 72.73
22 EO 4C E+2 -680 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.3 Patricia Vaccani -Chris Oostens 50,57 %
23 EO 2K W+2 -130 13 59.09
24 EO 4C E = -420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A10 Serge Alard -Michel Cornez 53,22 %
25 EO 2P S+2 140 2 9.09
26 EO 3S S-1 -100 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
Total : 265,0 / 528 = 50,19 %
PAIRE a.3 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens
A.9 Barbara Kengen -Michele Verhulst 45,45 %
3 EO 4P S+1 450 20 90.91
4 EO 1S W+1 -120 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
A.3 Patricia Vaccani -Chris Oostens 50,57 %
5 EO 4P W+1 -450 11 50.00
6 EO 2K S+1 110 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A10 Serge Alard -Michel Cornez 53,22 %
7 EO 4K S-1 -100 2 9.09
8 EO 4C N-2 -100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Didier Collart 47,73 %
9 EO 2P E+2 -170 6 27.27
10 EO 3S S+1 630 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A11 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier 57,95 %
11 EO 4C W+2 -480 6 27.27
12 EO 4C E+2 -480 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.5 Iris de Limbourg -Nathalie de Laminne 40,53 %
13 EO 2P S+1 140 7 31.82
14 EO 3S S = 400 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A12 Myriam de Timary -Caroll Pucher 44,13 %
15 EO 2C E = -110 20 90.91
16 EO 3K S-1 -50 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
A.6 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander 53,79 %
17 EO 3S N+2 460 12 54.55
18 EO 2C N = 110 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A13 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck 50,95 %
19 EO 2C N+2 170 1 4.55
20 EO 6T N-1 -100 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.7 Tina Katila -Philippe van der Gracht 50,95 %
21 EO 4C W-1 50 1 4.55
22 EO 4C E+2 -680 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
A.1 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie 54,73 %
23 EO 2P N-1 -100 4 18.18
24 EO 4C E = -420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A.8 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 48,48 %
25 EO 2P S = 110 7 31.82
26 EO 2C W-1 100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
Total : 258,0 / 528 = 48,86 %
PAIRE a11 Suzanne Klausen -Agathe Housiaux
A.6 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander 53,79 %
1 EO 2P N = 110 9 40.91
2 EO 1S E+3 -180 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A13 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck 50,95 %
3 EO 4P S+2 480 8 36.36
4 EO 1S W = -90 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A.7 Tina Katila -Philippe van der Gracht 50,95 %
5 EO 4P W+1 -450 11 50.00
6 EO 2S S-1 -50 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.1 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie 54,73 %
7 EO 3T W+1 -130 10 45.45
8 EO 3C N = 140 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A.8 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 48,48 %
9 EO 4P E = -620 15 68.18
10 EO 6S N-2 -200 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
A.2 Brigitte Velge -Teresa Dekoster 51,52 %
11 EO 4C W+2 -480 6 27.27
12 EO 4C E+2 -480 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.9 Barbara Kengen -Michele Verhulst 45,45 %
13 EO 3P S = 140 7 31.82
14 EO 3S S+2 460 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
A.3 Patricia Vaccani -Chris Oostens 50,57 %
15 EO 1S N = 90 9 40.91
16 EO 2P N+1 140 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Didier Collart 47,73 %
19 EO 3S N-2 -100 21 95.45
20 EO 5T N = 600 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A11 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier 57,95 %
21 EO 3C E = -140 8 36.36
22 EO 4C E+2 -680 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A.5 Iris de Limbourg -Nathalie de Laminne 40,53 %
23 EO 1S W+5 -240 22 100.00
24 EO 3C E+1 -170 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A12 Myriam de Timary -Caroll Pucher 44,13 %
25 EO 2P S = 110 7 31.82
26 EO 5K S-1 -100 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
Total : 246,0 / 528 = 46,59 %
PAIRE a.8 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes
A11 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier 57,95 %
1 EO 2P N = 110 9 40.91
2 EO 1S E+1 -120 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.5 Iris de Limbourg -Nathalie de Laminne 40,53 %
3 EO 4P S+1 450 20 90.91
4 EO 1S W+2 -150 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
A12 Myriam de Timary -Caroll Pucher 44,13 %
5 EO 4P W+1 -450 11 50.00
6 EO 3C W-2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A.6 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander 53,79 %
7 EO 3S W-1 100 0 0.00
8 EO 3C N = 140 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 6,82 %
A13 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck 50,95 %
9 EO 3P E+1 -170 6 27.27
10 EO 6P N-1 -100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.1 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie 54,73 %
13 EO 2P S = 110 16 72.73
14 EO 3S S = 400 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.8 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 48,48 %
15 EO 2P N = 110 0 0.00
16 EO 2P N = 110 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
A.2 Brigitte Velge -Teresa Dekoster 51,52 %
17 EO 3S N+2 460 12 54.55
18 EO 2C N+2 170 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A.9 Barbara Kengen -Michele Verhulst 45,45 %
19 EO 2C N+1 140 9 40.91
20 EO 3S S+2 660 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A.3 Patricia Vaccani -Chris Oostens 50,57 %
21 EO 1P E+3 -170 10 45.45
22 EO 6C E = -1430 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A10 Serge Alard -Michel Cornez 53,22 %
23 EO 3C E+1 -170 16 72.73
24 EO 4C E = -420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Didier Collart 47,73 %
25 EO 2P S = 110 7 31.82
26 EO 3K S+1 130 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
Total : 239,0 / 528 = 45,27 %
PAIRE a.4 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Simone Munsterhjelm
A.9 Barbara Kengen -Michele Verhulst 45,45 %
1 EO 4C E-2 100 16 72.73
2 EO 2K E+1 -110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A10 Serge Alard -Michel Cornez 53,22 %
5 EO 4P W+1 -450 11 50.00
6 EO 3K S+1 130 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Didier Collart 47,73 %
7 EO 3T E+1 -130 10 45.45
8 EO 4C N-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A11 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier 57,95 %
9 EO 4P E = -620 15 68.18
10 EO 5P S+1 680 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A.5 Iris de Limbourg -Nathalie de Laminne 40,53 %
11 EO 4C W+2 -480 6 27.27
12 EO 4C E+2 -480 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A12 Myriam de Timary -Caroll Pucher 44,13 %
13 EO 4P S-1 -100 20 90.91
14 EO 3S S+1 430 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.6 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander 53,79 %
15 EO 1S S = 90 9 40.91
16 EO 3K S = 110 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A13 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck 50,95 %
17 EO 3S N+3 490 4 18.18
18 EO 2C N+2 170 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
A.7 Tina Katila -Philippe van der Gracht 50,95 %
19 EO 2S N+1 150 4 18.18
20 EO 6K S-1 -100 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.1 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie 54,73 %
21 EO 3S E-1 50 1 4.55
22 EO 4C E+3 -710 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A.8 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 48,48 %
23 EO 2K W+1 -110 8 36.36
24 EO 3C E+1 -170 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
A.2 Brigitte Velge -Teresa Dekoster 51,52 %
25 EO 2P S-1 -50 16 72.73
26 EO 3K S+1 130 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
Total : 223,0 / 528 = 42,23 %
PAIRE a.9 Philippe d'Hoop -Francoise d'Hoop
A.5 Iris de Limbourg -Nathalie de Laminne 40,53 %
1 EO 2P N+1 140 1 4.55
2 EO 1S E+2 -150 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A12 Myriam de Timary -Caroll Pucher 44,13 %
3 EO 5P S+1 480 8 36.36
4 EO 1S W+2 -150 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.6 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander 53,79 %
5 EO 4P W+1 -450 11 50.00
6 EO 2K S+2 130 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A13 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck 50,95 %
7 EO 3T W+1 -130 10 45.45
8 EO 3C N+2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.7 Tina Katila -Philippe van der Gracht 50,95 %
9 EO 4P E = -620 15 68.18
10 EO 4C N+1 650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.1 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie 54,73 %
11 EO 4C W+2 -480 6 27.27
12 EO 4C E+1 -450 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A.2 Brigitte Velge -Teresa Dekoster 51,52 %
15 EO 1S N = 90 9 40.91
16 EO 3C W-2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
A.9 Barbara Kengen -Michele Verhulst 45,45 %
17 EO 3S N+2 460 12 54.55
18 EO 2C N+1 140 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.3 Patricia Vaccani -Chris Oostens 50,57 %
19 EO 2S N-1 -50 18 81.82
20 EO 5K S = 600 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A10 Serge Alard -Michel Cornez 53,22 %
21 EO 4C E = -420 16 72.73
22 EO 4C E+2 -680 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Didier Collart 47,73 %
23 EO 4K W-1 100 1 4.55
24 EO 4C E = -420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A11 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier 57,95 %
25 EO 2P S+2 170 0 0.00
26 EO 3S S-2 -200 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
Total : 222,0 / 528 = 42,05 %
PAIRE a.1 Veronique Englebienne -Ghislaine Deschuyteneer
A.1 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie 54,73 %
1 EO 2P N+1 140 1 4.55
2 EO 1S E = -90 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
A.8 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 48,48 %
3 EO 5C S = 450 20 90.91
4 EO 2T W-1 100 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.2 Brigitte Velge -Teresa Dekoster 51,52 %
5 EO 4P W = -420 0 0.00
6 EO 2S S-1 -50 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A.9 Barbara Kengen -Michele Verhulst 45,45 %
7 EO 1S W+2 -150 18 81.82
8 EO 4P W-1 50 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.3 Patricia Vaccani -Chris Oostens 50,57 %
9 EO 3P E+1 -170 6 27.27
10 EO 4P S+2 680 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A10 Serge Alard -Michel Cornez 53,22 %
11 EO 4C W+2 -480 6 27.27
12 EO 4C E+2 -480 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Didier Collart 47,73 %
13 EO 3P S-1 -100 20 90.91
14 EO 3S S+1 430 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A11 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier 57,95 %
15 EO 3C W-2 100 3 13.64
16 EO 2P N-1 -50 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A.5 Iris de Limbourg -Nathalie de Laminne 40,53 %
17 EO 3S N+2 460 12 54.55
18 EO 2C N+1 140 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A12 Myriam de Timary -Caroll Pucher 44,13 %
19 EO 2C N+1 140 9 40.91
20 EO 3S S+2 660 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A.6 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander 53,79 %
21 EO 2S W = -120 6 27.27
22 EO 4C E+1 -650 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
A.7 Tina Katila -Philippe van der Gracht 50,95 %
25 EO 2P S-1 -50 16 72.73
26 EO 3S N = 600 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
Total : 199,0 / 528 = 37,69 %
|