B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 64,29 A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claude Renier
--- 2 60,42 A10 Jean Verelst -Christiane Verelst
--- 3 59,82 A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia
--- 4 56,55 A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Chantal de Lichtervelde
--- 5 55,36 A.4 Dilva Haym -Michel Lievens
--- 6 51,79 A.6 Francine Dozin -Sylviane Delbeke
--- 7 46,73 A.5 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere
--- 8 45,83 A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Marguerite Verstraeten
--- 9 42,56 A.8 Eliane de Ceuninck -Andre Delacroix
--- ~ 42,56 A12 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski
--- 11 41,37 A.9 Marie Claire Vienne -Bernadette Regout
--- 12 32,74 A.3 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 61,31 a.4 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys
--- 2 59,23 a.2 Lydia Wildiers -Stan Tabor
--- 3 59,23 a.5 Patricia Bardy -Jeanine Bontemps
--- 4 57,14 a10 Benoit Ortegat -Patrick Gilles
--- 5 56,85 a.1 Myriam de Timary -Francoise Neve
--- 6 50,00 a.6 Teresa Dekoster -Jeannine Wanderpepen
--- 7 48,51 a.8 Simone Munsterhjelm -Catherine de Moffarts
--- 8 47,62 a.3 Luc Brisbois -Luc Rampaer
--- 9 46,43 a11 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart
--- ~ 44,64 a.9 Annette Fobe -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
--- 11 36,61 a12 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst
--- 12 32,44 a.7 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels
PAIRE A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claude Renier
a.2 Lydia Wildiers -Stan Tabor 59,23 %
4 NS 4P S+3 710 8 57.14
5 NS 4P S-2 -200 1 7.14
6 NS 4P E-1 100 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
a.1 Myriam de Timary -Francoise Neve 56,85 %
7 NS 4C S+1 650 6 42.86
8 NS 4K N-1 -50 6 42.86
9 NS 2S N = 120 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
a12 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst 36,61 %
10 NS 1S N+1 120 11 78.57
11 NS 4P N+1 450 14 100.00
12 NS 1S E = -90 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 80,95 %
a11 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 46,43 %
13 NS 2P S+1 140 12 85.71
14 NS 4P S+1 450 10 71.43
15 NS 3S E-1 50 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
a10 Benoit Ortegat -Patrick Gilles 57,14 %
16 NS 6K N = 920 11 78.57
17 NS 1S W = -90 8 57.14
18 NS 1S W = -90 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.9 Annette Fobe -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 44,64 %
19 NS 1S E = -90 7 50.00
20 NS 3K E = -110 6 42.86
21 NS 4C S+1 650 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
a.7 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 32,44 %
22 NS 2T S = 90 14 100.00
23 NS 5K W+2 -640 8 57.14
24 NS 3S N+1 430 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
a.6 Teresa Dekoster -Jeannine Wanderpepen 50,00 %
25 NS 6S E = -1440 7 50.00
26 NS 4C E-1 100 10 71.43
27 NS 2S N+1 150 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
Total : 216,0 / 336 = 64,29 %
PAIRE A10 Jean Verelst -Christiane Verelst
a.7 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 32,44 %
1 NS 1S N+1 120 10 71.43
2 NS 2P N+2 170 14 100.00
3 NS 4C N = 420 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 88,10 %
a.6 Teresa Dekoster -Jeannine Wanderpepen 50,00 %
4 NS 4C S+3 710 8 57.14
5 NS 2P S+1 140 9 64.29
6 NS 4P E-2 200 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
a.5 Patricia Bardy -Jeanine Bontemps 59,23 %
7 NS 4C S+2 680 12 85.71
8 NS 4P W+1 -450 0 0.00
9 NS 2K N-2 -100 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
a.3 Luc Brisbois -Luc Rampaer 47,62 %
10 NS 1S N+1 120 11 78.57
11 NS 4P N = 420 11 78.57
12 NS 1S E = -90 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
a.2 Lydia Wildiers -Stan Tabor 59,23 %
13 NS 3P S = 140 12 85.71
14 NS 3P S+1 170 2 14.29
15 NS 5K W = -400 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
a10 Benoit Ortegat -Patrick Gilles 57,14 %
28 NS 1S E-1 50 11 78.57
29 NS 4K W = -130 7 50.00
30 NS 4P N+1 450 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
a.9 Annette Fobe -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 44,64 %
31 NS 3S W+2 -460 2 14.29
32 NS 4PcE = -790 0 0.00
33 NS 2C N+2 170 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
a.8 Simone Munsterhjelm -Catherine de Moffarts 48,51 %
34 NS 3P E+2 -200 14 100.00
35 NS 3C E+1 -170 8 57.14
36 NS 2C S+1 140 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
Total : 203,0 / 336 = 60,42 %
PAIRE A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia
a12 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst 36,61 %
1 NS 1S N+2 150 14 100.00
2 NS 4P N-2 -200 2 14.29
3 NS 3C N+2 200 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
a11 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 46,43 %
4 NS 4C S+3 710 8 57.14
5 NS 2P S+2 170 13 92.86
6 NS 3K N-1 -50 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
a.7 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 32,44 %
19 NS 2S W-1 100 12 85.71
20 NS 2P N = 110 10 71.43
21 NS 4C S+1 650 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
a.6 Teresa Dekoster -Jeannine Wanderpepen 50,00 %
22 NS 2P W = -110 8 57.14
23 NS 3S E+3 -690 6 42.86
24 NS 5C S = 450 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
a.5 Patricia Bardy -Jeanine Bontemps 59,23 %
25 NS 6S E+1 -1470 2 14.29
26 NS 4C E-2 200 14 100.00
27 NS 2S N+1 150 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
a.4 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 61,31 %
28 NS 1S E = -90 8 57.14
29 NS 4P S-2 -200 2 14.29
30 NS 4P N+1 450 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
a.3 Luc Brisbois -Luc Rampaer 47,62 %
31 NS 4C E+1 -450 6 42.86
32 NS 5CcN = 650 11 78.57
33 NS 4C N = 420 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
a.2 Lydia Wildiers -Stan Tabor 59,23 %
34 NS 4P E+1 -450 2 14.29
35 NS 3C E+1 -170 8 57.14
36 NS 3C N = 140 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
Total : 201,0 / 336 = 59,82 %
PAIRE A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Chantal de Lichtervelde
a.9 Annette Fobe -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 44,64 %
1 NS 1S N+1 120 10 71.43
2 NS 2C N+1 140 12 85.71
3 NS 4P S = 420 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
a.8 Simone Munsterhjelm -Catherine de Moffarts 48,51 %
4 NS 4C S+3 710 8 57.14
5 NS 2P S+1 140 9 64.29
6 NS 3P E = -140 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
a.7 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 32,44 %
7 NS 4C S+2 680 12 85.71
8 NS 3S E-2 100 12 85.71
9 NS 2S N-1 -50 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 80,95 %
a.6 Teresa Dekoster -Jeannine Wanderpepen 50,00 %
10 NS 3T N-1 -100 0 0.00
11 NS 2T S+3 150 6 42.86
12 NS 1S E = -90 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
a.4 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 61,31 %
13 NS 2P S = 110 7 50.00
14 NS 4P S+1 450 10 71.43
15 NS 3K E+2 -150 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
a.3 Luc Brisbois -Luc Rampaer 47,62 %
16 NS 3S N+2 460 4 28.57
17 NS 1S W-1 50 12 85.71
18 NS 2P E-3 150 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a11 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 46,43 %
31 NS 4S W-1 50 13 92.86
32 NS 5C N = 450 5 35.71
33 NS 2C N+1 140 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
a10 Benoit Ortegat -Patrick Gilles 57,14 %
34 NS 4P E = -420 9 64.29
35 NS 3S W = -600 0 0.00
36 NS 2P E-1 100 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
Total : 190,0 / 336 = 56,55 %
PAIRE A.4 Dilva Haym -Michel Lievens
a.4 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 61,31 %
10 NS 1S N = 90 5 35.71
11 NS 3S N-1 -50 1 7.14
12 NS 1S E+1 -120 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 19,05 %
a.3 Luc Brisbois -Luc Rampaer 47,62 %
13 NS 4P S-2 -200 0 0.00
14 NS 4P S+1 450 10 71.43
15 NS 3K E+2 -150 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
a.2 Lydia Wildiers -Stan Tabor 59,23 %
16 NS 6S N = 990 14 100.00
17 NS 1S W+1 -120 2 14.29
18 NS 2C W+2 -170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
a.1 Myriam de Timary -Francoise Neve 56,85 %
19 NS 3C N-2 -100 4 28.57
20 NS 2P N+2 170 14 100.00
21 NS 4C S+1 650 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
a12 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst 36,61 %
22 NS 1P W+1 -110 8 57.14
23 NS 3K W+2 -150 14 100.00
24 NS 3S N+1 430 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
a11 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 46,43 %
25 NS 4K E+3 -190 14 100.00
26 NS 4C E = -620 3 21.43
27 NS 3S N = 400 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
a.9 Annette Fobe -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 44,64 %
28 NS 2K W-1 50 11 78.57
29 NS 5K W-1 100 13 92.86
30 NS 4P N+1 450 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 78,57 %
a.8 Simone Munsterhjelm -Catherine de Moffarts 48,51 %
31 NS 4C W = -420 8 57.14
32 NS 5CcN = 650 11 78.57
33 NS 2C N+2 170 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 186,0 / 336 = 55,36 %
PAIRE A.6 Francine Dozin -Sylviane Delbeke
a10 Benoit Ortegat -Patrick Gilles 57,14 %
1 NS 1S N = 90 2 14.29
2 NS 2T S+1 110 10 71.43
3 NS 4C N-1 -50 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.6 Teresa Dekoster -Jeannine Wanderpepen 50,00 %
16 NS 3S S+4 520 8 57.14
17 NS 1S W-3 150 14 100.00
18 NS 1S W+1 -120 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.5 Patricia Bardy -Jeanine Bontemps 59,23 %
19 NS 2S W-4 400 14 100.00
20 NS 3P N-1 -100 8 57.14
21 NS 4C S+1 650 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
a.4 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 61,31 %
22 NS 2P W = -110 8 57.14
23 NS 3S W+4 -720 2 14.29
24 NS 4C S+1 450 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
a.3 Luc Brisbois -Luc Rampaer 47,62 %
25 NS 4S E+2 -690 11 78.57
26 NS 4C W-1 100 10 71.43
27 NS 2S N+1 150 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
a.2 Lydia Wildiers -Stan Tabor 59,23 %
28 NS 1S E+2 -150 2 14.29
29 NS 3K W+1 -130 7 50.00
30 NS 4P N+1 450 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
a.1 Myriam de Timary -Francoise Neve 56,85 %
31 NS 3S E+2 -460 2 14.29
32 NS 5C N = 450 5 35.71
33 NS 2C N+2 170 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
a11 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 46,43 %
34 NS 4P E+1 -450 2 14.29
35 NS 2C E+2 -170 8 57.14
36 NS 2C N+1 140 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
Total : 174,0 / 336 = 51,79 %
PAIRE A.5 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere
a.5 Patricia Bardy -Jeanine Bontemps 59,23 %
13 NS 3P S-1 -100 4 28.57
14 NS 4P S = 420 4 28.57
15 NS 4K E+1 -150 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
a.4 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 61,31 %
16 NS 6K S = 920 11 78.57
17 NS 1S W = -90 8 57.14
18 NS 1S W+2 -150 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.3 Luc Brisbois -Luc Rampaer 47,62 %
19 NS 2S W = -120 2 14.29
20 NS 2S E = -120 4 28.57
21 NS 4C N+1 650 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
a.2 Lydia Wildiers -Stan Tabor 59,23 %
22 NS 3P W = -140 2 14.29
23 NS 5K E+1 -620 11 78.57
24 NS 5K S = 400 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
a.1 Myriam de Timary -Francoise Neve 56,85 %
25 NS 6S E+1 -1470 2 14.29
26 NS 4C W-1 100 10 71.43
27 NS 2S N+1 150 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
a12 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst 36,61 %
28 NS 1S E+1 -120 5 35.71
29 NS 5K W-1 100 13 92.86
30 NS 4P N+1 450 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
a10 Benoit Ortegat -Patrick Gilles 57,14 %
31 NS 3S E-1 50 13 92.86
32 NS 6CcN-1 -100 2 14.29
33 NS 4C N-1 -50 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
a.9 Annette Fobe -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 44,64 %
34 NS 4P E = -420 9 64.29
35 NS 3S W-1 100 14 100.00
36 NS 1C S+2 140 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
Total : 157,0 / 336 = 46,73 %
PAIRE A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Marguerite Verstraeten
a.1 Myriam de Timary -Francoise Neve 56,85 %
1 NS 2T W-2 100 6 42.86
2 NS 3S S-1 -100 6 42.86
3 NS 4C S-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
a12 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst 36,61 %
4 NS 4P N+3 710 8 57.14
5 NS 2P S+2 170 13 92.86
6 NS 3P W-1 100 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
a11 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 46,43 %
7 NS 4C S+1 650 6 42.86
8 NS 3T E+2 -150 4 28.57
9 NS 2C E = -110 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a10 Benoit Ortegat -Patrick Gilles 57,14 %
10 NS 1S N+3 180 14 100.00
11 NS 3P N = 140 4 28.57
12 NS 1T E-1 50 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
a.9 Annette Fobe -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 44,64 %
13 NS 3K E+1 -130 2 14.29
14 NS 5P S = 450 10 71.43
15 NS 5K W+1 -420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
a.8 Simone Munsterhjelm -Catherine de Moffarts 48,51 %
16 NS 3S N+2 460 4 28.57
17 NS 1S W = -90 8 57.14
18 NS 2P E-4 200 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
a.6 Teresa Dekoster -Jeannine Wanderpepen 50,00 %
19 NS 2K E = -90 7 50.00
20 NS 3S E = -600 0 0.00
21 NS 4C S+1 650 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.5 Patricia Bardy -Jeanine Bontemps 59,23 %
22 NS 2P W = -110 8 57.14
23 NS 3S E+4 -720 2 14.29
24 NS 5K S = 400 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
Total : 154,0 / 336 = 45,83 %
PAIRE A.8 Eliane de Ceuninck -Andre Delacroix
a.3 Luc Brisbois -Luc Rampaer 47,62 %
1 NS 1S N = 90 2 14.29
2 NS 3T S-1 -100 6 42.86
3 NS 3C N+2 200 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
a.1 Myriam de Timary -Francoise Neve 56,85 %
4 NS 4C S+3 710 8 57.14
5 NS 2P S = 110 6 42.86
6 NS 2P E+1 -140 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
a12 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst 36,61 %
7 NS 4C S+2 680 12 85.71
8 NS 3S W-3 150 14 100.00
9 NS 1S N-2 -100 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 78,57 %
a.8 Simone Munsterhjelm -Catherine de Moffarts 48,51 %
22 NS 2P W = -110 8 57.14
23 NS 5K W+1 -620 11 78.57
24 NS 3S S+1 430 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
a.7 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 32,44 %
25 NS 6S W = -1440 7 50.00
26 NS 4C E = -620 3 21.43
27 NS 1K N+2 110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
a.6 Teresa Dekoster -Jeannine Wanderpepen 50,00 %
28 NS 1S N-2 -200 0 0.00
29 NS 5K W = -600 0 0.00
30 NS 4P N+1 450 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 21,43 %
a.5 Patricia Bardy -Jeanine Bontemps 59,23 %
31 NS 3S E+2 -460 2 14.29
32 NS 5CcN = 650 11 78.57
33 NS 4C N-1 -50 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.4 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 61,31 %
34 NS 4P E+1 -450 2 14.29
35 NS 3C E+2 -200 3 21.43
36 NS 2C N+1 140 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 143,0 / 336 = 42,56 %
PAIRE A12 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski
a11 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 46,43 %
1 NS 1S N = 90 2 14.29
2 NS 4P N-1 -100 6 42.86
3 NS 2P S+2 170 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
a10 Benoit Ortegat -Patrick Gilles 57,14 %
4 NS 4C S+3 710 8 57.14
5 NS 4P S-1 -100 4 28.57
6 NS 4P E = -620 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
a.9 Annette Fobe -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 44,64 %
7 NS 4C S+1 650 6 42.86
8 NS 5T E-1 50 9 64.29
9 NS 3S N-4 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
a.8 Simone Munsterhjelm -Catherine de Moffarts 48,51 %
10 NS 1S N = 90 5 35.71
11 NS 2S N-1 -50 1 7.14
12 NS 1S E = -90 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
a.7 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 32,44 %
13 NS 3P S = 140 12 85.71
14 NS 4P S+1 450 10 71.43
15 NS 3S E-1 50 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
a.5 Patricia Bardy -Jeanine Bontemps 59,23 %
16 NS 5K S+1 420 0 0.00
17 NS 1S W+1 -120 2 14.29
18 NS 1S W = -90 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
a.4 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 61,31 %
19 NS 3CcN-2 -300 0 0.00
20 NS 2P N+1 140 12 85.71
21 NS 4C S+1 650 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
a12 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst 36,61 %
34 NS 4P W = -420 9 64.29
35 NS 2C E = -110 12 85.71
36 NS 3K E-1 100 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
Total : 143,0 / 336 = 42,56 %
PAIRE A.9 Marie Claire Vienne -Bernadette Regout
a.5 Patricia Bardy -Jeanine Bontemps 59,23 %
1 NS 1S N+1 120 10 71.43
2 NS 4C N-3 -300 0 0.00
3 NS 2P S+2 170 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
a.4 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 61,31 %
4 NS 6C S-1 -100 0 0.00
5 NS 4P S-2 -200 1 7.14
6 NS 4P E = -620 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 4,76 %
a.2 Lydia Wildiers -Stan Tabor 59,23 %
7 NS 3S S-1 -100 1 7.14
8 NS 4KcN-2 -300 2 14.29
9 NS 1S N = 90 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
a.1 Myriam de Timary -Francoise Neve 56,85 %
10 NS 1S N = 90 5 35.71
11 NS 3P N+1 170 8 57.14
12 NS 1S E+1 -120 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
a.9 Annette Fobe -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 44,64 %
25 NS 4S E+2 -690 11 78.57
26 NS 4C E = -620 3 21.43
27 NS 3S N+1 430 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.8 Simone Munsterhjelm -Catherine de Moffarts 48,51 %
28 NS 1S E+1 -120 5 35.71
29 NS 4K W = -130 7 50.00
30 NS 4P N-1 -50 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
a.7 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 32,44 %
31 NS 3S W = -400 10 71.43
32 NS 5CcS = 650 11 78.57
33 NS 3C N+1 170 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
a.6 Teresa Dekoster -Jeannine Wanderpepen 50,00 %
34 NS 4P E = -420 9 64.29
35 NS 3C E+2 -200 3 21.43
36 NS 1C N+2 140 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 139,0 / 336 = 41,37 %
PAIRE A.3 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck
a.3 Luc Brisbois -Luc Rampaer 47,62 %
7 NS 3S N-1 -100 1 7.14
8 NS 2C W-1 50 9 64.29
9 NS 2C E+1 -140 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
a.2 Lydia Wildiers -Stan Tabor 59,23 %
10 NS 1S N = 90 5 35.71
11 NS 4P N = 420 11 78.57
12 NS 1S E+1 -120 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
a.1 Myriam de Timary -Francoise Neve 56,85 %
13 NS 2P S = 110 7 50.00
14 NS 2S N-1 -50 0 0.00
15 NS 4K E+1 -150 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a12 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst 36,61 %
16 NS 3S N+2 460 4 28.57
17 NS 1S W+1 -120 2 14.29
18 NS 2C W+1 -140 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
a11 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 46,43 %
19 NS 1P E = -80 10 71.43
20 NS 3K E+1 -130 2 14.29
21 NS 4C S+1 650 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
a10 Benoit Ortegat -Patrick Gilles 57,14 %
22 NS 1P W+3 -170 0 0.00
23 NS 3S E+4 -720 2 14.29
24 NS 5K S = 400 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 9,52 %
a.8 Simone Munsterhjelm -Catherine de Moffarts 48,51 %
25 NS 6S E+1 -1470 2 14.29
26 NS 4C E = -620 3 21.43
27 NS 2S N+1 150 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
a.7 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 32,44 %
28 NS 1S E-2 100 14 100.00
29 NS 4K W = -130 7 50.00
30 NS 2S S-1 -50 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
Total : 110,0 / 336 = 32,74 %
PAIRE a.4 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys
A.9 Marie Claire Vienne -Bernadette Regout 41,37 %
4 EO 6C S-1 -100 14 100.00
5 EO 4P S-2 -200 13 92.86
6 EO 4P E = -620 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 95,24 %
A.4 Dilva Haym -Michel Lievens 55,36 %
10 EO 1S N = 90 9 64.29
11 EO 3S N-1 -50 13 92.86
12 EO 1S E+1 -120 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 80,95 %
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Chantal de Lichtervelde 56,55 %
13 EO 2P S = 110 7 50.00
14 EO 4P S+1 450 4 28.57
15 EO 3K E+2 -150 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
A.5 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 46,73 %
16 EO 6K S = 920 3 21.43
17 EO 1S W = -90 6 42.86
18 EO 1S W+2 -150 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A12 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 42,56 %
19 EO 3CcN-2 -300 14 100.00
20 EO 2P N+1 140 2 14.29
21 EO 4C S+1 650 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
A.6 Francine Dozin -Sylviane Delbeke 51,79 %
22 EO 2P W = -110 6 42.86
23 EO 3S W+4 -720 12 85.71
24 EO 4C S+1 450 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia 59,82 %
28 EO 1S E = -90 6 42.86
29 EO 4P S-2 -200 12 85.71
30 EO 4P N+1 450 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
A.8 Eliane de Ceuninck -Andre Delacroix 42,56 %
34 EO 4P E+1 -450 12 85.71
35 EO 3C E+2 -200 11 78.57
36 EO 2C N+1 140 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 206,0 / 336 = 61,31 %
PAIRE a.2 Lydia Wildiers -Stan Tabor
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claude Renier 64,29 %
4 EO 4P S+3 710 6 42.86
5 EO 4P S-2 -200 13 92.86
6 EO 4P E-1 100 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
A.9 Marie Claire Vienne -Bernadette Regout 41,37 %
7 EO 3S S-1 -100 13 92.86
8 EO 4KcN-2 -300 12 85.71
9 EO 1S N = 90 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
A.3 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 32,74 %
10 EO 1S N = 90 9 64.29
11 EO 4P N = 420 3 21.43
12 EO 1S E+1 -120 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
A10 Jean Verelst -Christiane Verelst 60,42 %
13 EO 3P S = 140 2 14.29
14 EO 3P S+1 170 12 85.71
15 EO 5K W = -400 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
A.4 Dilva Haym -Michel Lievens 55,36 %
16 EO 6S N = 990 0 0.00
17 EO 1S W+1 -120 12 85.71
18 EO 2C W+2 -170 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
A.5 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 46,73 %
22 EO 3P W = -140 12 85.71
23 EO 5K E+1 -620 3 21.43
24 EO 5K S = 400 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
A.6 Francine Dozin -Sylviane Delbeke 51,79 %
28 EO 1S E+2 -150 12 85.71
29 EO 3K W+1 -130 7 50.00
30 EO 4P N+1 450 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia 59,82 %
34 EO 4P E+1 -450 12 85.71
35 EO 3C E+1 -170 6 42.86
36 EO 3C N = 140 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
Total : 199,0 / 336 = 59,23 %
PAIRE a.5 Patricia Bardy -Jeanine Bontemps
A.9 Marie Claire Vienne -Bernadette Regout 41,37 %
1 EO 1S N+1 120 4 28.57
2 EO 4C N-3 -300 14 100.00
3 EO 2P S+2 170 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
A10 Jean Verelst -Christiane Verelst 60,42 %
7 EO 4C S+2 680 2 14.29
8 EO 4P W+1 -450 14 100.00
9 EO 2K N-2 -100 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
A.5 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 46,73 %
13 EO 3P S-1 -100 10 71.43
14 EO 4P S = 420 10 71.43
15 EO 4K E+1 -150 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
A12 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 42,56 %
16 EO 5K S+1 420 14 100.00
17 EO 1S W+1 -120 12 85.71
18 EO 1S W = -90 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
A.6 Francine Dozin -Sylviane Delbeke 51,79 %
19 EO 2S W-4 400 0 0.00
20 EO 3P N-1 -100 6 42.86
21 EO 4C S+1 650 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Marguerite Verstraeten 45,83 %
22 EO 2P W = -110 6 42.86
23 EO 3S E+4 -720 12 85.71
24 EO 5K S = 400 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia 59,82 %
25 EO 6S E+1 -1470 12 85.71
26 EO 4C E-2 200 0 0.00
27 EO 2S N+1 150 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
A.8 Eliane de Ceuninck -Andre Delacroix 42,56 %
31 EO 3S E+2 -460 12 85.71
32 EO 5CcN = 650 3 21.43
33 EO 4C N-1 -50 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 199,0 / 336 = 59,23 %
PAIRE a10 Benoit Ortegat -Patrick Gilles
A.6 Francine Dozin -Sylviane Delbeke 51,79 %
1 EO 1S N = 90 12 85.71
2 EO 2T S+1 110 4 28.57
3 EO 4C N-1 -50 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A12 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 42,56 %
4 EO 4C S+3 710 6 42.86
5 EO 4P S-1 -100 10 71.43
6 EO 4P E = -620 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Marguerite Verstraeten 45,83 %
10 EO 1S N+3 180 0 0.00
11 EO 3P N = 140 10 71.43
12 EO 1T E-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claude Renier 64,29 %
16 EO 6K N = 920 3 21.43
17 EO 1S W = -90 6 42.86
18 EO 1S W = -90 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.3 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 32,74 %
22 EO 1P W+3 -170 14 100.00
23 EO 3S E+4 -720 12 85.71
24 EO 5K S = 400 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 90,48 %
A10 Jean Verelst -Christiane Verelst 60,42 %
28 EO 1S E-1 50 3 21.43
29 EO 4K W = -130 7 50.00
30 EO 4P N+1 450 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
A.5 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 46,73 %
31 EO 3S E-1 50 1 7.14
32 EO 6CcN-1 -100 12 85.71
33 EO 4C N-1 -50 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Chantal de Lichtervelde 56,55 %
34 EO 4P E = -420 5 35.71
35 EO 3S W = -600 14 100.00
36 EO 2P E-1 100 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
Total : 192,0 / 336 = 57,14 %
PAIRE a.1 Myriam de Timary -Francoise Neve
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Marguerite Verstraeten 45,83 %
1 EO 2T W-2 100 8 57.14
2 EO 3S S-1 -100 8 57.14
3 EO 4C S-2 -100 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
A.8 Eliane de Ceuninck -Andre Delacroix 42,56 %
4 EO 4C S+3 710 6 42.86
5 EO 2P S = 110 8 57.14
6 EO 2P E+1 -140 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claude Renier 64,29 %
7 EO 4C S+1 650 8 57.14
8 EO 4K N-1 -50 8 57.14
9 EO 2S N = 120 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
A.9 Marie Claire Vienne -Bernadette Regout 41,37 %
10 EO 1S N = 90 9 64.29
11 EO 3P N+1 170 6 42.86
12 EO 1S E+1 -120 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
A.3 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 32,74 %
13 EO 2P S = 110 7 50.00
14 EO 2S N-1 -50 14 100.00
15 EO 4K E+1 -150 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.4 Dilva Haym -Michel Lievens 55,36 %
19 EO 3C N-2 -100 10 71.43
20 EO 2P N+2 170 0 0.00
21 EO 4C S+1 650 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
A.5 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 46,73 %
25 EO 6S E+1 -1470 12 85.71
26 EO 4C W-1 100 4 28.57
27 EO 2S N+1 150 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
A.6 Francine Dozin -Sylviane Delbeke 51,79 %
31 EO 3S E+2 -460 12 85.71
32 EO 5C N = 450 9 64.29
33 EO 2C N+2 170 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
Total : 191,0 / 336 = 56,85 %
PAIRE a.6 Teresa Dekoster -Jeannine Wanderpepen
A10 Jean Verelst -Christiane Verelst 60,42 %
4 EO 4C S+3 710 6 42.86
5 EO 2P S+1 140 5 35.71
6 EO 4P E-2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Chantal de Lichtervelde 56,55 %
10 EO 3T N-1 -100 14 100.00
11 EO 2T S+3 150 8 57.14
12 EO 1S E = -90 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
A.6 Francine Dozin -Sylviane Delbeke 51,79 %
16 EO 3S S+4 520 6 42.86
17 EO 1S W-3 150 0 0.00
18 EO 1S W+1 -120 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Marguerite Verstraeten 45,83 %
19 EO 2K E = -90 7 50.00
20 EO 3S E = -600 14 100.00
21 EO 4C S+1 650 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia 59,82 %
22 EO 2P W = -110 6 42.86
23 EO 3S E+3 -690 8 57.14
24 EO 5C S = 450 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claude Renier 64,29 %
25 EO 6S E = -1440 7 50.00
26 EO 4C E-1 100 4 28.57
27 EO 2S N+1 150 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
A.8 Eliane de Ceuninck -Andre Delacroix 42,56 %
28 EO 1S N-2 -200 14 100.00
29 EO 5K W = -600 14 100.00
30 EO 4P N+1 450 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 78,57 %
A.9 Marie Claire Vienne -Bernadette Regout 41,37 %
34 EO 4P E = -420 5 35.71
35 EO 3C E+2 -200 11 78.57
36 EO 1C N+2 140 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 168,0 / 336 = 50,00 %
PAIRE a.8 Simone Munsterhjelm -Catherine de Moffarts
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Chantal de Lichtervelde 56,55 %
4 EO 4C S+3 710 6 42.86
5 EO 2P S+1 140 5 35.71
6 EO 3P E = -140 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
A12 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 42,56 %
10 EO 1S N = 90 9 64.29
11 EO 2S N-1 -50 13 92.86
12 EO 1S E = -90 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Marguerite Verstraeten 45,83 %
16 EO 3S N+2 460 10 71.43
17 EO 1S W = -90 6 42.86
18 EO 2P E-4 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
A.8 Eliane de Ceuninck -Andre Delacroix 42,56 %
22 EO 2P W = -110 6 42.86
23 EO 5K W+1 -620 3 21.43
24 EO 3S S+1 430 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
A.3 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 32,74 %
25 EO 6S E+1 -1470 12 85.71
26 EO 4C E = -620 11 78.57
27 EO 2S N+1 150 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
A.9 Marie Claire Vienne -Bernadette Regout 41,37 %
28 EO 1S E+1 -120 9 64.29
29 EO 4K W = -130 7 50.00
30 EO 4P N-1 -50 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
A.4 Dilva Haym -Michel Lievens 55,36 %
31 EO 4C W = -420 6 42.86
32 EO 5CcN = 650 3 21.43
33 EO 2C N+2 170 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A10 Jean Verelst -Christiane Verelst 60,42 %
34 EO 3P E+2 -200 0 0.00
35 EO 3C E+1 -170 6 42.86
36 EO 2C S+1 140 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
Total : 163,0 / 336 = 48,51 %
PAIRE a.3 Luc Brisbois -Luc Rampaer
A.8 Eliane de Ceuninck -Andre Delacroix 42,56 %
1 EO 1S N = 90 12 85.71
2 EO 3T S-1 -100 8 57.14
3 EO 3C N+2 200 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
A.3 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 32,74 %
7 EO 3S N-1 -100 13 92.86
8 EO 2C W-1 50 5 35.71
9 EO 2C E+1 -140 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
A10 Jean Verelst -Christiane Verelst 60,42 %
10 EO 1S N+1 120 3 21.43
11 EO 4P N = 420 3 21.43
12 EO 1S E = -90 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
A.4 Dilva Haym -Michel Lievens 55,36 %
13 EO 4P S-2 -200 14 100.00
14 EO 4P S+1 450 4 28.57
15 EO 3K E+2 -150 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Chantal de Lichtervelde 56,55 %
16 EO 3S N+2 460 10 71.43
17 EO 1S W-1 50 2 14.29
18 EO 2P E-3 150 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.5 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 46,73 %
19 EO 2S W = -120 12 85.71
20 EO 2S E = -120 10 71.43
21 EO 4C N+1 650 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
A.6 Francine Dozin -Sylviane Delbeke 51,79 %
25 EO 4S E+2 -690 3 21.43
26 EO 4C W-1 100 4 28.57
27 EO 2S N+1 150 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia 59,82 %
31 EO 4C E+1 -450 8 57.14
32 EO 5CcN = 650 3 21.43
33 EO 4C N = 420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
Total : 160,0 / 336 = 47,62 %
PAIRE a11 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart
A12 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 42,56 %
1 EO 1S N = 90 12 85.71
2 EO 4P N-1 -100 8 57.14
3 EO 2P S+2 170 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia 59,82 %
4 EO 4C S+3 710 6 42.86
5 EO 2P S+2 170 1 7.14
6 EO 3K N-1 -50 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Marguerite Verstraeten 45,83 %
7 EO 4C S+1 650 8 57.14
8 EO 3T E+2 -150 10 71.43
9 EO 2C E = -110 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claude Renier 64,29 %
13 EO 2P S+1 140 2 14.29
14 EO 4P S+1 450 4 28.57
15 EO 3S E-1 50 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
A.3 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 32,74 %
19 EO 1P E = -80 4 28.57
20 EO 3K E+1 -130 12 85.71
21 EO 4C S+1 650 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
A.4 Dilva Haym -Michel Lievens 55,36 %
25 EO 4K E+3 -190 0 0.00
26 EO 4C E = -620 11 78.57
27 EO 3S N = 400 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Chantal de Lichtervelde 56,55 %
31 EO 4S W-1 50 1 7.14
32 EO 5C N = 450 9 64.29
33 EO 2C N+1 140 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
A.6 Francine Dozin -Sylviane Delbeke 51,79 %
34 EO 4P E+1 -450 12 85.71
35 EO 2C E+2 -170 6 42.86
36 EO 2C N+1 140 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
Total : 156,0 / 336 = 46,43 %
PAIRE a.9 Annette Fobe -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Chantal de Lichtervelde 56,55 %
1 EO 1S N+1 120 4 28.57
2 EO 2C N+1 140 2 14.29
3 EO 4P S = 420 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
A12 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 42,56 %
7 EO 4C S+1 650 8 57.14
8 EO 5T E-1 50 5 35.71
9 EO 3S N-4 -200 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Marguerite Verstraeten 45,83 %
13 EO 3K E+1 -130 12 85.71
14 EO 5P S = 450 4 28.57
15 EO 5K W+1 -420 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claude Renier 64,29 %
19 EO 1S E = -90 7 50.00
20 EO 3K E = -110 8 57.14
21 EO 4C S+1 650 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
A.9 Marie Claire Vienne -Bernadette Regout 41,37 %
25 EO 4S E+2 -690 3 21.43
26 EO 4C E = -620 11 78.57
27 EO 3S N+1 430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.4 Dilva Haym -Michel Lievens 55,36 %
28 EO 2K W-1 50 3 21.43
29 EO 5K W-1 100 1 7.14
30 EO 4P N+1 450 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 21,43 %
A10 Jean Verelst -Christiane Verelst 60,42 %
31 EO 3S W+2 -460 12 85.71
32 EO 4PcE = -790 14 100.00
33 EO 2C N+2 170 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
A.5 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 46,73 %
34 EO 4P E = -420 5 35.71
35 EO 3S W-1 100 0 0.00
36 EO 1C S+2 140 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
Total : 150,0 / 336 = 44,64 %
PAIRE a12 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia 59,82 %
1 EO 1S N+2 150 0 0.00
2 EO 4P N-2 -200 12 85.71
3 EO 3C N+2 200 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Marguerite Verstraeten 45,83 %
4 EO 4P N+3 710 6 42.86
5 EO 2P S+2 170 1 7.14
6 EO 3P W-1 100 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
A.8 Eliane de Ceuninck -Andre Delacroix 42,56 %
7 EO 4C S+2 680 2 14.29
8 EO 3S W-3 150 0 0.00
9 EO 1S N-2 -100 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 21,43 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claude Renier 64,29 %
10 EO 1S N+1 120 3 21.43
11 EO 4P N+1 450 0 0.00
12 EO 1S E = -90 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 19,05 %
A.3 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 32,74 %
16 EO 3S N+2 460 10 71.43
17 EO 1S W+1 -120 12 85.71
18 EO 2C W+1 -140 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
A.4 Dilva Haym -Michel Lievens 55,36 %
22 EO 1P W+1 -110 6 42.86
23 EO 3K W+2 -150 0 0.00
24 EO 3S N+1 430 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
A.5 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 46,73 %
28 EO 1S E+1 -120 9 64.29
29 EO 5K W-1 100 1 7.14
30 EO 4P N+1 450 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
A12 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 42,56 %
34 EO 4P W = -420 5 35.71
35 EO 2C E = -110 2 14.29
36 EO 3K E-1 100 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
Total : 123,0 / 336 = 36,61 %
PAIRE a.7 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels
A10 Jean Verelst -Christiane Verelst 60,42 %
1 EO 1S N+1 120 4 28.57
2 EO 2P N+2 170 0 0.00
3 EO 4C N = 420 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 11,90 %
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Chantal de Lichtervelde 56,55 %
7 EO 4C S+2 680 2 14.29
8 EO 3S E-2 100 2 14.29
9 EO 2S N-1 -50 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 19,05 %
A12 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 42,56 %
13 EO 3P S = 140 2 14.29
14 EO 4P S+1 450 4 28.57
15 EO 3S E-1 50 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia 59,82 %
19 EO 2S W-1 100 2 14.29
20 EO 2P N = 110 4 28.57
21 EO 4C S+1 650 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claude Renier 64,29 %
22 EO 2T S = 90 0 0.00
23 EO 5K W+2 -640 6 42.86
24 EO 3S N+1 430 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
A.8 Eliane de Ceuninck -Andre Delacroix 42,56 %
25 EO 6S W = -1440 7 50.00
26 EO 4C E = -620 11 78.57
27 EO 1K N+2 110 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
A.3 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 32,74 %
28 EO 1S E-2 100 0 0.00
29 EO 4K W = -130 7 50.00
30 EO 2S S-1 -50 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
A.9 Marie Claire Vienne -Bernadette Regout 41,37 %
31 EO 3S W = -400 4 28.57
32 EO 5CcS = 650 3 21.43
33 EO 3C N+1 170 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
Total : 109,0 / 336 = 32,44 %
|