B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 64,88 A.7 Martine Berben -Damien Calas
--- 2 62,68 A11 Pascale Ortegat -Christophe van den Hove
--- 3 55,86 A.9 Olga Pletser -Dominique Stuyck
--- 4 55,57 A.2 Jacques Podevyn -Grazia Neuenschwander
--- 5 53,33 A.1 Philippe Coenraets -Thierry Cooreman
--- 6 51,87 A10 Serge Alard -Jean Verelst
--- 7 49,85 A.3 Caroll Pucher -Alain Kaplan
--- 8 42,83 A.8 Catherine de Moffarts -Regine de Hemptinne
--- 9 37,80 A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren
--- 10 24,76 A.4 Chantal Woitrin -Dominique Woitrin
--- 11 0,00 A.5 -
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 67,45 a10 Michel Paquot -Jean Chabotier
--- 2 56,90 a.3 Dominique Sassen -Christiane Huby
--- 3 54,69 a.1 Jacques Stas -David Johnson
--- 4 53,98 a.5 Francoise Duren -Lydia Wildiers
--- 5 52,93 a.4 Nadine Blondeau -Claire de Quirini
--- 6 52,14 a11 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee
--- 7 50,31 a.2 Nicole Leclere -Marie J. de Wagheneire
--- 8 49,93 a.9 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne
--- 9 47,38 a.7 Daniel Dubois -Georges Keldermans
--- 10 39,91 a.8 Therese Roland -Veronique Englebienne
--- 11 29,73 a.6 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck
PAIRE A.7 Martine Berben -Damien Calas
a.2 Nicole Leclere -Marie J. de Wagheneire 50,31 %
1 NS 3S S+1 430 4.7 33.57
2 NS 6P E-1 50 12.7 90.71
3 NS 3P N+2 200 12.7 90.71 µ Tbl = 71,67 %
a.1 Jacques Stas -David Johnson 54,69 %
4 NS 6S N = 1440 11 78.57
5 NS 3PcS-1 -200 11 78.57
6 NS 7T S = 1440 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 85,71 %
a11 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 52,14 %
7 NS 2K N-2 -200 2 14.29
8 NS 2C E+1 -140 8 57.14
9 NS 4P N = 420 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
a.7 Daniel Dubois -Georges Keldermans 47,38 %
19 NS 5P W = -650 8.1 57.86
20 NS 2P N+1 140 10.4 74.29
21 NS 3C N+3 230 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 52,62 %
a.6 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 29,73 %
22 NS 5K S-4 -200 13.9 99.29
23 NS 4P S+1 650 11.6 82.86
24 NS 2P W+3 -200 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 93,81 %
a.5 Francoise Duren -Lydia Wildiers 53,98 %
25 NS 3S N+1 430 8.1 57.86
26 NS 3S E = -600 9.3 66.43
27 NS 1S W+3 -180 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 63,57 %
a.4 Nadine Blondeau -Claire de Quirini 52,93 %
28 NS 4C W+2 -480 4.7 33.57
29 NS 2S S+1 150 2.4 17.14
30 NS 3P S = 140 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 36,19 %
a.3 Dominique Sassen -Christiane Huby 56,90 %
31 NS 3P N+1 170 12.7 90.71
32 NS 4P E+1 -650 4.7 33.57
33 NS 2C N+2 170 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 60,71 %
Total : 218,0 / 336 = 64,88 %
PAIRE A11 Pascale Ortegat -Christophe van den Hove
a10 Michel Paquot -Jean Chabotier 67,45 %
1 NS 3S S+2 460 12.7 90.71
2 NS 4P E+2 -480 2.4 17.14
3 NS 3C W = -140 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 36,19 %
a.9 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne 49,93 %
4 NS 6S N = 1440 11 78.57
5 NS 5T E = -400 6 42.86
6 NS 4C N+1 450 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
a.8 Therese Roland -Veronique Englebienne 39,91 %
7 NS 2K N+1 110 12 85.71
8 NS 2C E+1 -140 8 57.14
9 NS 3P N+1 170 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
a.7 Daniel Dubois -Georges Keldermans 47,38 %
10 NS 4P S = 620 9 64.29
11 NS 4P N-1 -50 4 28.57
12 NS 4C W = -420 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.6 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 29,73 %
13 NS 4P N = 620 7 50.00
14 NS 3S W-4 200 13.9 99.29
15 NS 6S S = 1440 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,43 %
a.5 Francoise Duren -Lydia Wildiers 53,98 %
16 NS 4P W-3 300 13.9 99.29
17 NS 5T N = 400 11.6 82.86
18 NS 6P W+1 -1010 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 66,43 %
a.4 Nadine Blondeau -Claire de Quirini 52,93 %
19 NS 5P W = -650 8.1 57.86
20 NS 4C N = 620 13.9 99.29
21 NS 4C N+2 680 12.7 90.71 µ Tbl = 82,62 %
a11 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 52,14 %
31 NS 3P N = 140 8.1 57.86
32 NS 4P E = -620 12.7 90.71
33 NS 3C N+1 170 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 68,81 %
Total : 210,6 / 336 = 62,68 %
PAIRE A.9 Olga Pletser -Dominique Stuyck
a.6 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 29,73 %
1 NS 3S S+1 430 4.7 33.57
2 NS 4P E+2 -480 2.4 17.14
3 NS 4C W-2 200 12.7 90.71 µ Tbl = 47,14 %
a.5 Francoise Duren -Lydia Wildiers 53,98 %
4 NS 6S N-1 -100 1 7.14
5 NS 5T E = -400 6 42.86
6 NS 6T S+1 940 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
a.4 Nadine Blondeau -Claire de Quirini 52,93 %
7 NS 1K N+1 90 4 28.57
8 NS 3C E = -140 8 57.14
9 NS 3P N = 140 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
a.3 Dominique Sassen -Christiane Huby 56,90 %
10 NS 4P S = 620 9 64.29
11 NS 4P N = 420 14 100.00
12 NS 4C W = -420 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
a.2 Nicole Leclere -Marie J. de Wagheneire 50,31 %
13 NS 4P N = 620 7 50.00
14 NS 3S W-1 50 10.4 74.29
15 NS 6S S = 1440 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 58,10 %
a.9 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne 49,93 %
25 NS 3S N+1 430 8.1 57.86
26 NS 3S E+1 -630 2.4 17.14
27 NS 3S W+2 -460 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 33,57 %
a.8 Therese Roland -Veronique Englebienne 39,91 %
28 NS 4C E = -420 13.9 99.29
29 NS 3S N = 600 8.1 57.86
30 NS 3P S+1 170 12.7 90.71 µ Tbl = 82,62 %
a.7 Daniel Dubois -Georges Keldermans 47,38 %
31 NS 3P S = 140 8.1 57.86
32 NS 4P E+1 -650 4.7 33.57
33 NS 3C W-5 250 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 63,57 %
Total : 187,7 / 336 = 55,86 %
PAIRE A.2 Jacques Podevyn -Grazia Neuenschwander
a.2 Nicole Leclere -Marie J. de Wagheneire 50,31 %
4 NS 6S N = 1440 11 78.57
5 NS 2PcS = 670 14 100.00
6 NS 5T S+2 440 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
a.1 Jacques Stas -David Johnson 54,69 %
7 NS 2P E-1 100 7 50.00
8 NS 2C W+1 -140 8 57.14
9 NS 4P S-1 -50 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
a11 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 52,14 %
10 NS 4P S = 620 9 64.29
11 NS 3P N+1 170 12 85.71
12 NS 4C W+1 -450 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a10 Michel Paquot -Jean Chabotier 67,45 %
13 NS 4P N = 620 7 50.00
14 NS 3S W-1 50 10.4 74.29
15 NS 6S S = 1440 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 58,10 %
a.9 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne 49,93 %
16 NS 4P W-1 100 4.7 33.57
17 NS 5T N = 400 11.6 82.86
18 NS 6P W = -980 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 58,10 %
a.8 Therese Roland -Veronique Englebienne 39,91 %
19 NS 5P W = -650 8.1 57.86
20 NS 4C N-2 -200 2.4 17.14
21 NS 4C N+2 680 12.7 90.71 µ Tbl = 55,24 %
a.7 Daniel Dubois -Georges Keldermans 47,38 %
22 NS 4P E+1 -650 8.1 57.86
23 NS 4P S = 620 4.7 33.57
24 NS 4P W+1 -450 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 39,05 %
a.6 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 29,73 %
25 NS 3S N+1 430 8.1 57.86
26 NS 5K W = -600 9.3 66.43
27 NS 2T W+2 -130 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 74,52 %
Total : 186,7 / 336 = 55,57 %
PAIRE A.1 Philippe Coenraets -Thierry Cooreman
a.1 Jacques Stas -David Johnson 54,69 %
1 NS 3S N+1 430 4.7 33.57
2 NS 4P E+1 -450 8.1 57.86
3 NS 3P N+1 170 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,14 %
a11 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 52,14 %
4 NS 6S N = 1440 11 78.57
5 NS 4C W = -420 2 14.29
6 NS 4C N+1 450 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
a10 Michel Paquot -Jean Chabotier 67,45 %
7 NS 1C N+1 110 12 85.71
8 NS 2S S-4 -200 0 0.00
9 NS 3P N+1 170 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.9 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne 49,93 %
10 NS 4P S = 620 9 64.29
11 NS 4P N-1 -50 4 28.57
12 NS 4C W = -420 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.8 Therese Roland -Veronique Englebienne 39,91 %
13 NS 4P N = 620 7 50.00
14 NS 1C S-1 -50 7 50.00
15 NS 6S S+1 1470 12.7 90.71 µ Tbl = 63,57 %
a.7 Daniel Dubois -Georges Keldermans 47,38 %
16 NS 2C E = -110 0.1 0.71
17 NS 3T E-8 400 11.6 82.86
18 NS 6P W+1 -1010 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 33,57 %
a.6 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 29,73 %
19 NS 6CcN-3 -500 13.9 99.29
20 NS 2C S+1 140 10.4 74.29
21 NS 4C N = 620 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 74,52 %
a.5 Francoise Duren -Lydia Wildiers 53,98 %
22 NS 5P E = -650 8.1 57.86
23 NS 4P S+1 650 11.6 82.86
24 NS 4P W+1 -450 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 55,48 %
Total : 179,2 / 336 = 53,33 %
PAIRE A10 Serge Alard -Jean Verelst
a.8 Therese Roland -Veronique Englebienne 39,91 %
1 NS 3S S+2 460 12.7 90.71
2 NS 4P E+1 -450 8.1 57.86
3 NS 3P N+1 170 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,19 %
a.7 Daniel Dubois -Georges Keldermans 47,38 %
4 NS 3S N+2 660 4 28.57
5 NS 3PcS-1 -200 11 78.57
6 NS 3S N-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
a.6 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 29,73 %
7 NS 1K N+2 110 12 85.71
8 NS 3C E = -140 8 57.14
9 NS 4P N = 420 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 78,57 %
a.5 Francoise Duren -Lydia Wildiers 53,98 %
10 NS 3P S+1 170 1 7.14
11 NS 4PcN-2 -300 0 0.00
12 NS 4C W = -420 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 21,43 %
a.4 Nadine Blondeau -Claire de Quirini 52,93 %
13 NS 4P N = 620 7 50.00
14 NS 3S W+1 -430 1.3 9.29
15 NS 6S S+1 1470 12.7 90.71 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.3 Dominique Sassen -Christiane Huby 56,90 %
16 NS 4C E-2 200 10.4 74.29
17 NS 3T N+2 150 7 50.00
18 NS 6P W+1 -1010 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 47,14 %
a10 Michel Paquot -Jean Chabotier 67,45 %
28 NS 4C E+2 -480 4.7 33.57
29 NS 3S S = 600 8.1 57.86
30 NS 4P S-2 -100 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 36,19 %
a.9 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne 49,93 %
31 NS 3P S+1 170 12.7 90.71
32 NS 4P E = -620 12.7 90.71
33 NS 3C N+1 170 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 79,76 %
Total : 174,3 / 336 = 51,87 %
PAIRE A.3 Caroll Pucher -Alain Kaplan
a.3 Dominique Sassen -Christiane Huby 56,90 %
7 NS 1S W-1 100 7 50.00
8 NS 3C E = -140 8 57.14
9 NS 4P N-1 -50 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
a.2 Nicole Leclere -Marie J. de Wagheneire 50,31 %
10 NS 4P S = 620 9 64.29
11 NS 3P N-1 -50 4 28.57
12 NS 4C W = -420 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.1 Jacques Stas -David Johnson 54,69 %
13 NS 3S S+1 630 13.9 99.29
14 NS 3S E+1 -430 1.3 9.29
15 NS 4S S+3 720 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 41,90 %
a11 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 52,14 %
16 NS 4C E-1 100 4.7 33.57
17 NS 6T S-1 -50 3.6 25.71
18 NS 6P W = -980 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 39,05 %
a10 Michel Paquot -Jean Chabotier 67,45 %
19 NS 4P W+2 -680 1.3 9.29
20 NS 2S S-2 -200 2.4 17.14
21 NS 3C N+3 230 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 17,38 %
a.9 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne 49,93 %
22 NS 4P E+1 -650 8.1 57.86
23 NS 4P S+1 650 11.6 82.86
24 NS 4P W+1 -450 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 55,48 %
a.8 Therese Roland -Veronique Englebienne 39,91 %
25 NS 3S N+1 430 8.1 57.86
26 NS 3S E = -600 9.3 66.43
27 NS 1S E+2 -150 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
a.7 Daniel Dubois -Georges Keldermans 47,38 %
28 NS 4C W+1 -450 9.3 66.43
29 NS 2TcW-3 800 13.9 99.29
30 NS 2P S+2 170 12.7 90.71 µ Tbl = 85,48 %
Total : 167,5 / 336 = 49,85 %
PAIRE A.8 Catherine de Moffarts -Regine de Hemptinne
a.4 Nadine Blondeau -Claire de Quirini 52,93 %
1 NS 3S N+1 430 4.7 33.57
2 NS 4P E+2 -480 2.4 17.14
3 NS 3P N+1 170 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,57 %
a.3 Dominique Sassen -Christiane Huby 56,90 %
4 NS 6S N-1 -100 1 7.14
5 NS 5T E = -400 6 42.86
6 NS 5T S+2 440 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
a.2 Nicole Leclere -Marie J. de Wagheneire 50,31 %
7 NS 3K N-3 -300 0 0.00
8 NS 2C E+1 -140 8 57.14
9 NS 4P N-1 -50 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
a.1 Jacques Stas -David Johnson 54,69 %
10 NS 4P S = 620 9 64.29
11 NS 3K E-2 100 8 57.14
12 NS 4C W = -420 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
a.8 Therese Roland -Veronique Englebienne 39,91 %
22 NS 5P E = -650 8.1 57.86
23 NS 5C E-4 400 0.1 0.71
24 NS 4P W = -420 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 44,29 %
a.7 Daniel Dubois -Georges Keldermans 47,38 %
25 NS 3S N+1 430 8.1 57.86
26 NS 6K W-1 100 13.9 99.29
27 NS 3S W+2 -460 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 60,95 %
a.6 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 29,73 %
28 NS 3S E+1 -430 11.6 82.86
29 NS 3S S = 600 8.1 57.86
30 NS 3P S = 140 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 66,19 %
a.5 Francoise Duren -Lydia Wildiers 53,98 %
31 NS 3P N-1 -100 4.7 33.57
32 NS 4P E+1 -650 4.7 33.57
33 NS 2K E = -90 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 28,10 %
Total : 143,9 / 336 = 42,83 %
PAIRE A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren
a11 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 52,14 %
1 NS 3S N+1 430 4.7 33.57
2 NS 6P E-1 50 12.7 90.71
3 NS 4P N-1 -50 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 47,14 %
a10 Michel Paquot -Jean Chabotier 67,45 %
4 NS 6T N+1 1390 6 42.86
5 NS 4TcN-8 -2300 0 0.00
6 NS 5T S+2 440 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
a.6 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 29,73 %
16 NS 3C E-2 200 10.4 74.29
17 NS 6T N-1 -50 3.6 25.71
18 NS 4P E+3 -510 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 60,95 %
a.5 Francoise Duren -Lydia Wildiers 53,98 %
19 NS 5P W+1 -680 1.3 9.29
20 NS 1S S-1 -100 7 50.00
21 NS 5C N = 650 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 41,90 %
a.4 Nadine Blondeau -Claire de Quirini 52,93 %
22 NS 5P E+1 -680 1.3 9.29
23 NS 4P S = 620 4.7 33.57
24 NS 4P E = -420 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 39,05 %
a.3 Dominique Sassen -Christiane Huby 56,90 %
25 NS 3S N+1 430 8.1 57.86
26 NS 3S E+1 -630 2.4 17.14
27 NS 3S W = -400 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
a.2 Nicole Leclere -Marie J. de Wagheneire 50,31 %
28 NS 6CcW = -1210 0.1 0.71
29 NS 3S N = 600 8.1 57.86
30 NS 3P S-1 -50 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 30,71 %
a.1 Jacques Stas -David Johnson 54,69 %
31 NS 3C W+1 -170 2.4 17.14
32 NS 4P E+1 -650 4.7 33.57
33 NS 3P S-4 -200 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 17,14 %
Total : 127,0 / 336 = 37,80 %
PAIRE A.4 Chantal Woitrin -Dominique Woitrin
a.4 Nadine Blondeau -Claire de Quirini 52,93 %
10 NS 3P S+1 170 1 7.14
11 NS 2P N+1 140 10 71.43
12 NS 4C W = -420 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
a.3 Dominique Sassen -Christiane Huby 56,90 %
13 NS 4P N-1 -100 0.1 0.71
14 NS 3S W = -400 4.7 33.57
15 NS 6S S-1 -100 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 11,67 %
a.2 Nicole Leclere -Marie J. de Wagheneire 50,31 %
16 NS 3S W-1 100 4.7 33.57
17 NS 6TcN-2 -300 0.1 0.71
18 NS 4P W+2 -480 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 44,52 %
a.1 Jacques Stas -David Johnson 54,69 %
19 NS 4P W+1 -650 8.1 57.86
20 NS 3S N-2 -200 2.4 17.14
21 NS 3K W = -110 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 25,24 %
a11 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 52,14 %
22 NS 4P E+2 -680 1.3 9.29
23 NS 4P S = 620 4.7 33.57
24 NS 4P W+1 -450 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 22,86 %
a10 Michel Paquot -Jean Chabotier 67,45 %
25 NS 1S N+3 180 0.1 0.71
26 NS 3S E+1 -630 2.4 17.14
27 NS 2TcS-5 -1100 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 6,19 %
a.9 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne 49,93 %
28 NS 4C E+2 -480 4.7 33.57
29 NS 2C N+1 140 0.1 0.71
30 NS 3P S-3 -150 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 11,67 %
a.8 Therese Roland -Veronique Englebienne 39,91 %
31 NS 4P S-2 -200 0.1 0.71
32 NS 4P E+1 -650 4.7 33.57
33 NS 3C S+1 170 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 30,71 %
Total : 83,2 / 336 = 24,76 %
PAIRE A.5 -
a.9 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne 49,93 %
1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.5 Francoise Duren -Lydia Wildiers 53,98 %
13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00
15 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.4 Nadine Blondeau -Claire de Quirini 52,93 %
16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.3 Dominique Sassen -Christiane Huby 56,90 %
19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00
21 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.2 Nicole Leclere -Marie J. de Wagheneire 50,31 %
22 NS BYE 0 0.00
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.1 Jacques Stas -David Johnson 54,69 %
25 NS BYE 0 0.00
26 NS BYE 0 0.00
27 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a11 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 52,14 %
28 NS BYE 0 0.00
29 NS BYE 0 0.00
30 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a10 Michel Paquot -Jean Chabotier 67,45 %
31 NS BYE 0 0.00
32 NS BYE 0 0.00
33 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 462 = 0,00 %
PAIRE a10 Michel Paquot -Jean Chabotier
A11 Pascale Ortegat -Christophe van den Hove 62,68 %
1 EO 3S S+2 460 1.3 9.29
2 EO 4P E+2 -480 11.6 82.86
3 EO 3C W = -140 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 63,81 %
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 37,80 %
4 EO 6T N+1 1390 8 57.14
5 EO 4TcN-8 -2300 14 100.00
6 EO 5T S+2 440 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
A.1 Philippe Coenraets -Thierry Cooreman 53,33 %
7 EO 1C N+1 110 2 14.29
8 EO 2S S-4 -200 14 100.00
9 EO 3P N+1 170 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.2 Jacques Podevyn -Grazia Neuenschwander 55,57 %
13 EO 4P N = 620 7 50.00
14 EO 3S W-1 50 3.6 25.71
15 EO 6S S = 1440 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 41,90 %
A.3 Caroll Pucher -Alain Kaplan 49,85 %
19 EO 4P W+2 -680 12.7 90.71
20 EO 2S S-2 -200 11.6 82.86
21 EO 3C N+3 230 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 82,62 %
A.4 Chantal Woitrin -Dominique Woitrin 24,76 %
25 EO 1S N+3 180 13.9 99.29
26 EO 3S E+1 -630 11.6 82.86
27 EO 2TcS-5 -1100 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 93,81 %
A10 Serge Alard -Jean Verelst 51,87 %
28 EO 4C E+2 -480 9.3 66.43
29 EO 3S S = 600 5.9 42.14
30 EO 4P S-2 -100 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 63,81 %
A.5 - 0,00 %
31 EO BYE 0 0.00
32 EO BYE 0 0.00
33 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 198,3 / 294 = 67,45 %
PAIRE a.3 Dominique Sassen -Christiane Huby
A.8 Catherine de Moffarts -Regine de Hemptinne 42,83 %
4 EO 6S N-1 -100 13 92.86
5 EO 5T E = -400 8 57.14
6 EO 5T S+2 440 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
A.3 Caroll Pucher -Alain Kaplan 49,85 %
7 EO 1S W-1 100 7 50.00
8 EO 3C E = -140 6 42.86
9 EO 4P N-1 -50 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
A.9 Olga Pletser -Dominique Stuyck 55,86 %
10 EO 4P S = 620 5 35.71
11 EO 4P N = 420 0 0.00
12 EO 4C W = -420 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
A.4 Chantal Woitrin -Dominique Woitrin 24,76 %
13 EO 4P N-1 -100 13.9 99.29
14 EO 3S W = -400 9.3 66.43
15 EO 6S S-1 -100 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 88,33 %
A10 Serge Alard -Jean Verelst 51,87 %
16 EO 4C E-2 200 3.6 25.71
17 EO 3T N+2 150 7 50.00
18 EO 6P W+1 -1010 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 52,86 %
A.5 - 0,00 %
19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00
21 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 37,80 %
25 EO 3S N+1 430 5.9 42.14
26 EO 3S E+1 -630 11.6 82.86
27 EO 3S W = -400 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
A.7 Martine Berben -Damien Calas 64,88 %
31 EO 3P N+1 170 1.3 9.29
32 EO 4P E+1 -650 9.3 66.43
33 EO 2C N+2 170 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 39,29 %
Total : 167,3 / 294 = 56,90 %
PAIRE a.1 Jacques Stas -David Johnson
A.1 Philippe Coenraets -Thierry Cooreman 53,33 %
1 EO 3S N+1 430 9.3 66.43
2 EO 4P E+1 -450 5.9 42.14
3 EO 3P N+1 170 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,86 %
A.7 Martine Berben -Damien Calas 64,88 %
4 EO 6S N = 1440 3 21.43
5 EO 3PcS-1 -200 3 21.43
6 EO 7T S = 1440 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 14,29 %
A.2 Jacques Podevyn -Grazia Neuenschwander 55,57 %
7 EO 2P E-1 100 7 50.00
8 EO 2C W+1 -140 6 42.86
9 EO 4P S-1 -50 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
A.8 Catherine de Moffarts -Regine de Hemptinne 42,83 %
10 EO 4P S = 620 5 35.71
11 EO 3K E-2 100 6 42.86
12 EO 4C W = -420 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
A.3 Caroll Pucher -Alain Kaplan 49,85 %
13 EO 3S S+1 630 0.1 0.71
14 EO 3S E+1 -430 12.7 90.71
15 EO 4S S+3 720 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 58,10 %
A.4 Chantal Woitrin -Dominique Woitrin 24,76 %
19 EO 4P W+1 -650 5.9 42.14
20 EO 3S N-2 -200 11.6 82.86
21 EO 3K W = -110 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 74,76 %
A.5 - 0,00 %
25 EO BYE 0 0.00
26 EO BYE 0 0.00
27 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 37,80 %
31 EO 3C W+1 -170 11.6 82.86
32 EO 4P E+1 -650 9.3 66.43
33 EO 3P S-4 -200 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 82,86 %
Total : 160,8 / 294 = 54,69 %
PAIRE a.5 Francoise Duren -Lydia Wildiers
A.9 Olga Pletser -Dominique Stuyck 55,86 %
4 EO 6S N-1 -100 13 92.86
5 EO 5T E = -400 8 57.14
6 EO 6T S+1 940 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
A10 Serge Alard -Jean Verelst 51,87 %
10 EO 3P S+1 170 13 92.86
11 EO 4PcN-2 -300 14 100.00
12 EO 4C W = -420 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 78,57 %
A.5 - 0,00 %
13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00
15 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A11 Pascale Ortegat -Christophe van den Hove 62,68 %
16 EO 4P W-3 300 0.1 0.71
17 EO 5T N = 400 2.4 17.14
18 EO 6P W+1 -1010 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 33,57 %
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 37,80 %
19 EO 5P W+1 -680 12.7 90.71
20 EO 1S S-1 -100 7 50.00
21 EO 5C N = 650 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 58,10 %
A.1 Philippe Coenraets -Thierry Cooreman 53,33 %
22 EO 5P E = -650 5.9 42.14
23 EO 4P S+1 650 2.4 17.14
24 EO 4P W+1 -450 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 44,52 %
A.7 Martine Berben -Damien Calas 64,88 %
25 EO 3S N+1 430 5.9 42.14
26 EO 3S E = -600 4.7 33.57
27 EO 1S W+3 -180 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 36,43 %
A.8 Catherine de Moffarts -Regine de Hemptinne 42,83 %
31 EO 3P N-1 -100 9.3 66.43
32 EO 4P E+1 -650 9.3 66.43
33 EO 2K E = -90 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 71,90 %
Total : 158,7 / 294 = 53,98 %
PAIRE a.4 Nadine Blondeau -Claire de Quirini
A.8 Catherine de Moffarts -Regine de Hemptinne 42,83 %
1 EO 3S N+1 430 9.3 66.43
2 EO 4P E+2 -480 11.6 82.86
3 EO 3P N+1 170 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,43 %
A.9 Olga Pletser -Dominique Stuyck 55,86 %
7 EO 1K N+1 90 10 71.43
8 EO 3C E = -140 6 42.86
9 EO 3P N = 140 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
A.4 Chantal Woitrin -Dominique Woitrin 24,76 %
10 EO 3P S+1 170 13 92.86
11 EO 2P N+1 140 4 28.57
12 EO 4C W = -420 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
A10 Serge Alard -Jean Verelst 51,87 %
13 EO 4P N = 620 7 50.00
14 EO 3S W+1 -430 12.7 90.71
15 EO 6S S+1 1470 1.3 9.29 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.5 - 0,00 %
16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A11 Pascale Ortegat -Christophe van den Hove 62,68 %
19 EO 5P W = -650 5.9 42.14
20 EO 4C N = 620 0.1 0.71
21 EO 4C N+2 680 1.3 9.29 µ Tbl = 17,38 %
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 37,80 %
22 EO 5P E+1 -680 12.7 90.71
23 EO 4P S = 620 9.3 66.43
24 EO 4P E = -420 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 60,95 %
A.7 Martine Berben -Damien Calas 64,88 %
28 EO 4C W+2 -480 9.3 66.43
29 EO 2S S+1 150 11.6 82.86
30 EO 3P S = 140 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 63,81 %
Total : 155,6 / 294 = 52,93 %
PAIRE a11 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 37,80 %
1 EO 3S N+1 430 9.3 66.43
2 EO 6P E-1 50 1.3 9.29
3 EO 4P N-1 -50 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 52,86 %
A.1 Philippe Coenraets -Thierry Cooreman 53,33 %
4 EO 6S N = 1440 3 21.43
5 EO 4C W = -420 12 85.71
6 EO 4C N+1 450 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
A.7 Martine Berben -Damien Calas 64,88 %
7 EO 2K N-2 -200 12 85.71
8 EO 2C E+1 -140 6 42.86
9 EO 4P N = 420 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
A.2 Jacques Podevyn -Grazia Neuenschwander 55,57 %
10 EO 4P S = 620 5 35.71
11 EO 3P N+1 170 2 14.29
12 EO 4C W+1 -450 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.3 Caroll Pucher -Alain Kaplan 49,85 %
16 EO 4C E-1 100 9.3 66.43
17 EO 6T S-1 -50 10.4 74.29
18 EO 6P W = -980 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 60,95 %
A.4 Chantal Woitrin -Dominique Woitrin 24,76 %
22 EO 4P E+2 -680 12.7 90.71
23 EO 4P S = 620 9.3 66.43
24 EO 4P W+1 -450 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 77,14 %
A.5 - 0,00 %
28 EO BYE 0 0.00
29 EO BYE 0 0.00
30 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A11 Pascale Ortegat -Christophe van den Hove 62,68 %
31 EO 3P N = 140 5.9 42.14
32 EO 4P E = -620 1.3 9.29
33 EO 3C N+1 170 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 31,19 %
Total : 153,3 / 294 = 52,14 %
PAIRE a.2 Nicole Leclere -Marie J. de Wagheneire
A.7 Martine Berben -Damien Calas 64,88 %
1 EO 3S S+1 430 9.3 66.43
2 EO 6P E-1 50 1.3 9.29
3 EO 3P N+2 200 1.3 9.29 µ Tbl = 28,33 %
A.2 Jacques Podevyn -Grazia Neuenschwander 55,57 %
4 EO 6S N = 1440 3 21.43
5 EO 2PcS = 670 0 0.00
6 EO 5T S+2 440 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
A.8 Catherine de Moffarts -Regine de Hemptinne 42,83 %
7 EO 3K N-3 -300 14 100.00
8 EO 2C E+1 -140 6 42.86
9 EO 4P N-1 -50 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
A.3 Caroll Pucher -Alain Kaplan 49,85 %
10 EO 4P S = 620 5 35.71
11 EO 3P N-1 -50 10 71.43
12 EO 4C W = -420 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.9 Olga Pletser -Dominique Stuyck 55,86 %
13 EO 4P N = 620 7 50.00
14 EO 3S W-1 50 3.6 25.71
15 EO 6S S = 1440 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 41,90 %
A.4 Chantal Woitrin -Dominique Woitrin 24,76 %
16 EO 3S W-1 100 9.3 66.43
17 EO 6TcN-2 -300 13.9 99.29
18 EO 4P W+2 -480 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 55,48 %
A.5 - 0,00 %
22 EO BYE 0 0.00
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 37,80 %
28 EO 6CcW = -1210 13.9 99.29
29 EO 3S N = 600 5.9 42.14
30 EO 3P S-1 -50 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 69,29 %
Total : 147,9 / 294 = 50,31 %
PAIRE a.9 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne
A.5 - 0,00 %
1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A11 Pascale Ortegat -Christophe van den Hove 62,68 %
4 EO 6S N = 1440 3 21.43
5 EO 5T E = -400 8 57.14
6 EO 4C N+1 450 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
A.1 Philippe Coenraets -Thierry Cooreman 53,33 %
10 EO 4P S = 620 5 35.71
11 EO 4P N-1 -50 10 71.43
12 EO 4C W = -420 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.2 Jacques Podevyn -Grazia Neuenschwander 55,57 %
16 EO 4P W-1 100 9.3 66.43
17 EO 5T N = 400 2.4 17.14
18 EO 6P W = -980 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 41,90 %
A.3 Caroll Pucher -Alain Kaplan 49,85 %
22 EO 4P E+1 -650 5.9 42.14
23 EO 4P S+1 650 2.4 17.14
24 EO 4P W+1 -450 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 44,52 %
A.9 Olga Pletser -Dominique Stuyck 55,86 %
25 EO 3S N+1 430 5.9 42.14
26 EO 3S E+1 -630 11.6 82.86
27 EO 3S W+2 -460 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 66,43 %
A.4 Chantal Woitrin -Dominique Woitrin 24,76 %
28 EO 4C E+2 -480 9.3 66.43
29 EO 2C N+1 140 13.9 99.29
30 EO 3P S-3 -150 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 88,33 %
A10 Serge Alard -Jean Verelst 51,87 %
31 EO 3P S+1 170 1.3 9.29
32 EO 4P E = -620 1.3 9.29
33 EO 3C N+1 170 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 20,24 %
Total : 146,8 / 294 = 49,93 %
PAIRE a.7 Daniel Dubois -Georges Keldermans
A10 Serge Alard -Jean Verelst 51,87 %
4 EO 3S N+2 660 10 71.43
5 EO 3PcS-1 -200 3 21.43
6 EO 3S N-1 -50 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
A11 Pascale Ortegat -Christophe van den Hove 62,68 %
10 EO 4P S = 620 5 35.71
11 EO 4P N-1 -50 10 71.43
12 EO 4C W = -420 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.1 Philippe Coenraets -Thierry Cooreman 53,33 %
16 EO 2C E = -110 13.9 99.29
17 EO 3T E-8 400 2.4 17.14
18 EO 6P W+1 -1010 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 66,43 %
A.7 Martine Berben -Damien Calas 64,88 %
19 EO 5P W = -650 5.9 42.14
20 EO 2P N+1 140 3.6 25.71
21 EO 3C N+3 230 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 47,38 %
A.2 Jacques Podevyn -Grazia Neuenschwander 55,57 %
22 EO 4P E+1 -650 5.9 42.14
23 EO 4P S = 620 9.3 66.43
24 EO 4P W+1 -450 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 60,95 %
A.8 Catherine de Moffarts -Regine de Hemptinne 42,83 %
25 EO 3S N+1 430 5.9 42.14
26 EO 6K W-1 100 0.1 0.71
27 EO 3S W+2 -460 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 39,05 %
A.3 Caroll Pucher -Alain Kaplan 49,85 %
28 EO 4C W+1 -450 4.7 33.57
29 EO 2TcW-3 800 0.1 0.71
30 EO 2P S+2 170 1.3 9.29 µ Tbl = 14,52 %
A.9 Olga Pletser -Dominique Stuyck 55,86 %
31 EO 3P S = 140 5.9 42.14
32 EO 4P E+1 -650 9.3 66.43
33 EO 3C W-5 250 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 36,43 %
Total : 159,2 / 336 = 47,38 %
PAIRE a.8 Therese Roland -Veronique Englebienne
A10 Serge Alard -Jean Verelst 51,87 %
1 EO 3S S+2 460 1.3 9.29
2 EO 4P E+1 -450 5.9 42.14
3 EO 3P N+1 170 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,81 %
A11 Pascale Ortegat -Christophe van den Hove 62,68 %
7 EO 2K N+1 110 2 14.29
8 EO 2C E+1 -140 6 42.86
9 EO 3P N+1 170 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
A.1 Philippe Coenraets -Thierry Cooreman 53,33 %
13 EO 4P N = 620 7 50.00
14 EO 1C S-1 -50 7 50.00
15 EO 6S S+1 1470 1.3 9.29 µ Tbl = 36,43 %
A.2 Jacques Podevyn -Grazia Neuenschwander 55,57 %
19 EO 5P W = -650 5.9 42.14
20 EO 4C N-2 -200 11.6 82.86
21 EO 4C N+2 680 1.3 9.29 µ Tbl = 44,76 %
A.8 Catherine de Moffarts -Regine de Hemptinne 42,83 %
22 EO 5P E = -650 5.9 42.14
23 EO 5C E-4 400 13.9 99.29
24 EO 4P W = -420 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 55,71 %
A.3 Caroll Pucher -Alain Kaplan 49,85 %
25 EO 3S N+1 430 5.9 42.14
26 EO 3S E = -600 4.7 33.57
27 EO 1S E+2 -150 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
A.9 Olga Pletser -Dominique Stuyck 55,86 %
28 EO 4C E = -420 0.1 0.71
29 EO 3S N = 600 5.9 42.14
30 EO 3P S+1 170 1.3 9.29 µ Tbl = 17,38 %
A.4 Chantal Woitrin -Dominique Woitrin 24,76 %
31 EO 4P S-2 -200 13.9 99.29
32 EO 4P E+1 -650 9.3 66.43
33 EO 3C S+1 170 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 69,29 %
Total : 134,1 / 336 = 39,91 %
PAIRE a.6 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck
A.9 Olga Pletser -Dominique Stuyck 55,86 %
1 EO 3S S+1 430 9.3 66.43
2 EO 4P E+2 -480 11.6 82.86
3 EO 4C W-2 200 1.3 9.29 µ Tbl = 52,86 %
A10 Serge Alard -Jean Verelst 51,87 %
7 EO 1K N+2 110 2 14.29
8 EO 3C E = -140 6 42.86
9 EO 4P N = 420 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 21,43 %
A11 Pascale Ortegat -Christophe van den Hove 62,68 %
13 EO 4P N = 620 7 50.00
14 EO 3S W-4 200 0.1 0.71
15 EO 6S S = 1440 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,57 %
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 37,80 %
16 EO 3C E-2 200 3.6 25.71
17 EO 6T N-1 -50 10.4 74.29
18 EO 4P E+3 -510 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 39,05 %
A.1 Philippe Coenraets -Thierry Cooreman 53,33 %
19 EO 6CcN-3 -500 0.1 0.71
20 EO 2C S+1 140 3.6 25.71
21 EO 4C N = 620 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,48 %
A.7 Martine Berben -Damien Calas 64,88 %
22 EO 5K S-4 -200 0.1 0.71
23 EO 4P S+1 650 2.4 17.14
24 EO 2P W+3 -200 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 6,19 %
A.2 Jacques Podevyn -Grazia Neuenschwander 55,57 %
25 EO 3S N+1 430 5.9 42.14
26 EO 5K W = -600 4.7 33.57
27 EO 2T W+2 -130 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 25,48 %
A.8 Catherine de Moffarts -Regine de Hemptinne 42,83 %
28 EO 3S E+1 -430 2.4 17.14
29 EO 3S S = 600 5.9 42.14
30 EO 3P S = 140 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 33,81 %
Total : 99,9 / 336 = 29,73 %
|