B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 62,08 A.6 Diane Deslignes -Monique Crouan
--- 2 60,27 A.8 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten
--- 3 56,17 A.9 Michele Berrier -Jeannine Wanderpepen
--- 4 54,09 A13 Helene Christiaens -Marie J. de Wagheneire
--- 5 53,03 A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne
--- 6 51,27 A12 Jeanine Bontemps -Pierina Di Vito
--- 7 49,51 A10 Chris Oostens -Patricia Bardy
--- 8 48,60 A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans
--- 9 47,01 A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor
--- 10 46,14 A.5 Colette Heerinckx -Yolande Waerseggers
--- 11 42,33 A14 Regine de Hemptinne -Michou van Wetter
--- 12 41,55 A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli
--- 13 38,03 A11 Sylviane Delbeke -Caroll Pucher
--- 14 0,00 A.3 -
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 62,27 a10 Catherine de Moffarts -Chantal de Lichtervelde
--- 2 56,63 a12 Serge Alard -Teresa Dekoster
--- 3 56,55 a.7 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee
--- 4 55,06 a.3 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant
--- 5 53,74 a14 Iris de Limbourg -Anne de Wasseige
--- 6 50,95 a.4 Michel Lahaut -Myriam de Timary
--- 7 50,00 a11 Didier Collart -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
--- 8 49,32 a.2 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels
--- 9 47,83 a.9 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart
--- 10 47,27 a.6 Brigitte Brusselmans -Claire Derieuw
--- 11 45,76 a13 Francoise Turin -Michel Lievens
--- 12 44,81 a.1 Dominique Sassen -Nicole Leclere
--- 13 39,44 a.5 Brigitte Velge -Brigitte de Jamblinne
--- 14 39,07 a.8 Evelyn Sorel -Veronique Englebienne
PAIRE A.6 Diane Deslignes -Monique Crouan
a10 Catherine de Moffarts -Chantal de Lichtervelde 62,27 %
1 NS 4P S = 420 15 68.18
2 NS 6T E = -920 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a.9 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 47,83 %
3 NS 3S E-3 300 20 90.91
4 NS 4P W = -620 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
a.8 Evelyn Sorel -Veronique Englebienne 39,07 %
5 NS 4P N+1 650 5.5 25.00
6 NS 3S N = 400 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 54,77 %
a.6 Brigitte Brusselmans -Claire Derieuw 47,27 %
11 NS 6C W-2 100 20.8 94.55
12 NS 4P S+1 650 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
a.5 Brigitte Velge -Brigitte de Jamblinne 39,44 %
13 NS 4C E = -620 19.7 89.55
14 NS 3S N = 400 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 92,05 %
a.4 Michel Lahaut -Myriam de Timary 50,95 %
15 NS 2S N = 120 9.9 45.00
16 NS 3S S = 400 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.3 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 55,06 %
17 NS 3C S = 140 12.1 55.00
18 NS 1C S+2 140 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a.2 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 49,32 %
19 NS 3S W+1 -630 12.1 55.00
20 NS 3P W = -140 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a.1 Dominique Sassen -Nicole Leclere 44,81 %
21 NS 2S W+2 -180 15.4 70.00
22 NS 3S S+1 430 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 72,50 %
a14 Iris de Limbourg -Anne de Wasseige 53,74 %
23 NS 4P E+1 -650 3.4 15.45
24 NS 3S S+2 460 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
a12 Serge Alard -Teresa Dekoster 56,63 %
25 NS 2C E+2 -170 6.6 30.00
26 NS 1S W-2 200 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a11 Didier Collart -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 50,00 %
27 NS 1S N+1 120 14.3 65.00
28 NS 4C N = 620 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
Total : 327,8 / 528 = 62,08 %
PAIRE A.8 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten
a14 Iris de Limbourg -Anne de Wasseige 53,74 %
1 NS 4P S = 420 15 68.18
2 NS 6T E = -920 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a13 Francoise Turin -Michel Lievens 45,76 %
3 NS 2T W-2 200 18 81.82
4 NS 4P W = -620 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a12 Serge Alard -Teresa Dekoster 56,63 %
5 NS 5P N = 650 5.5 25.00
6 NS 4K S-1 -50 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
a11 Didier Collart -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 50,00 %
7 NS 2T W+1 -110 11 50.00
8 NS 4C S = 420 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
a10 Catherine de Moffarts -Chantal de Lichtervelde 62,27 %
9 NS 2K W-1 100 21.9 99.55
10 NS 5TcS+1 950 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 89,55 %
a.8 Evelyn Sorel -Veronique Englebienne 39,07 %
15 NS 2S N+3 210 17.5 79.55
16 NS 3K S+2 150 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
a.7 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 56,55 %
17 NS 3C S-1 -50 3.4 15.45
18 NS 2S S = 120 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 17,95 %
a.6 Brigitte Brusselmans -Claire Derieuw 47,27 %
19 NS 3S W+1 -630 12.1 55.00
20 NS 4P W-2 200 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
a.5 Brigitte Velge -Brigitte de Jamblinne 39,44 %
21 NS 2S W = -120 21.9 99.55
22 NS 3S N+1 430 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 87,27 %
a.4 Michel Lahaut -Myriam de Timary 50,95 %
23 NS 4P E = -620 11 50.00
24 NS 3S S+3 490 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
a.3 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 55,06 %
25 NS 2C E+1 -140 16.5 75.00
26 NS 2S N+1 150 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 67,50 %
a.2 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 49,32 %
27 NS 1S S+1 120 14.3 65.00
28 NS 4C N = 620 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
Total : 318,2 / 528 = 60,27 %
PAIRE A.9 Michele Berrier -Jeannine Wanderpepen
a.3 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 55,06 %
1 NS 4P S = 420 15 68.18
2 NS 6T E = -920 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a.1 Dominique Sassen -Nicole Leclere 44,81 %
3 NS 1S N+1 120 16 72.73
4 NS 4P W = -620 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a14 Iris de Limbourg -Anne de Wasseige 53,74 %
5 NS 3S N+2 660 16.5 75.00
6 NS 2P N-3 -150 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 45,23 %
a13 Francoise Turin -Michel Lievens 45,76 %
7 NS 2P N-2 -200 2.3 10.45
8 NS 4C S+1 450 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a12 Serge Alard -Teresa Dekoster 56,63 %
9 NS 4C W+1 -650 8.8 40.00
10 NS 6K N = 1370 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
a11 Didier Collart -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 50,00 %
11 NS 3S E+2 -460 3.4 15.45
12 NS 4P S+1 650 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
a.9 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 47,83 %
17 NS 2C S+1 140 12.1 55.00
18 NS 3C S = 140 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a.8 Evelyn Sorel -Veronique Englebienne 39,07 %
19 NS 3S E = -600 21.9 99.55
20 NS 4C N+1 650 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 99,55 %
a.7 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 56,55 %
21 NS 1T W+3 -130 19.7 89.55
22 NS 4C S = 420 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
a.6 Brigitte Brusselmans -Claire Derieuw 47,27 %
23 NS 4P E+1 -650 3.4 15.45
24 NS 3S S = 400 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 17,95 %
a.5 Brigitte Velge -Brigitte de Jamblinne 39,44 %
25 NS 2C E+2 -170 6.6 30.00
26 NS 1S W-1 100 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
a.4 Michel Lahaut -Myriam de Timary 50,95 %
27 NS 1S N+2 150 20.8 94.55
28 NS 4C N = 620 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
Total : 296,6 / 528 = 56,17 %
PAIRE A13 Helene Christiaens -Marie J. de Wagheneire
a11 Didier Collart -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 50,00 %
1 NS 4P S-1 -50 3 13.64
2 NS 6T E = -920 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a10 Catherine de Moffarts -Chantal de Lichtervelde 62,27 %
3 NS 3S N-1 -50 5 22.73
4 NS 4P W+1 -650 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
a.9 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 47,83 %
5 NS 3S N+2 660 16.5 75.00
6 NS 3C W-1 100 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
a.8 Evelyn Sorel -Veronique Englebienne 39,07 %
7 NS 2P N-1 -100 15.4 70.00
8 NS 3S N+2 460 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
a.7 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 56,55 %
9 NS 4C W+1 -650 8.8 40.00
10 NS 6K N = 1370 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
a.5 Brigitte Velge -Brigitte de Jamblinne 39,44 %
11 NS 4C W+1 -450 8.8 40.00
12 NS 3P S+2 200 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a.4 Michel Lahaut -Myriam de Timary 50,95 %
13 NS 4C W+1 -650 7.7 35.00
14 NS 2S N+1 150 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
a.3 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 55,06 %
15 NS 3S N-1 -100 2.3 10.45
16 NS 3S S+1 430 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.2 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 49,32 %
17 NS 2C S+1 140 12.1 55.00
18 NS 3C S = 140 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a.1 Dominique Sassen -Nicole Leclere 44,81 %
19 NS 3S E+2 -660 1.2 5.45
20 NS 4K N = 130 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a13 Francoise Turin -Michel Lievens 45,76 %
25 NS 2C E+1 -140 16.5 75.00
26 NS 3S N = 600 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 87,27 %
a12 Serge Alard -Teresa Dekoster 56,63 %
27 NS 1S S+1 120 14.3 65.00
28 NS 4C N = 620 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
Total : 285,6 / 528 = 54,09 %
PAIRE A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne
a.2 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 49,32 %
3 NS 2K S = 90 8 36.36
4 NS 4P W+1 -650 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
a.1 Dominique Sassen -Nicole Leclere 44,81 %
5 NS 4P N+1 650 5.5 25.00
6 NS 3C W-1 100 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a14 Iris de Limbourg -Anne de Wasseige 53,74 %
7 NS 1S W+1 -120 6.6 30.00
8 NS 3S S+1 430 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a13 Francoise Turin -Michel Lievens 45,76 %
9 NS 4C W+1 -650 8.8 40.00
10 NS 5T S+1 620 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a12 Serge Alard -Teresa Dekoster 56,63 %
11 NS 6C W-2 100 20.8 94.55
12 NS 5KcE-2 300 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a11 Didier Collart -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 50,00 %
13 NS 4C W = -620 19.7 89.55
14 NS 2P S = 110 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
a10 Catherine de Moffarts -Chantal de Lichtervelde 62,27 %
15 NS 3S S-1 -100 2.3 10.45
16 NS 3S S+1 430 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.8 Evelyn Sorel -Veronique Englebienne 39,07 %
17 NS 3C S+1 170 20.8 94.55
18 NS 3C S = 140 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
a.7 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 56,55 %
19 NS 3S W+1 -630 12.1 55.00
20 NS 3P W = -140 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a.6 Brigitte Brusselmans -Claire Derieuw 47,27 %
21 NS 3S W+1 -430 2.3 10.45
22 NS 3S N+2 460 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.5 Brigitte Velge -Brigitte de Jamblinne 39,44 %
23 NS 4P E-2 200 21.9 99.55
24 NS 3S S+2 460 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
a.4 Michel Lahaut -Myriam de Timary 50,95 %
25 NS 2C E+2 -170 6.6 30.00
26 NS 2S N+3 210 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 54,77 %
Total : 280,0 / 528 = 53,03 %
PAIRE A12 Jeanine Bontemps -Pierina Di Vito
a.9 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 47,83 %
1 NS 4P S+1 450 21 95.45
2 NS 6T E+1 -940 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.8 Evelyn Sorel -Veronique Englebienne 39,07 %
3 NS 3P W-1 100 12 54.55
4 NS 4P W = -620 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a.7 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 56,55 %
5 NS 4P N+1 650 5.5 25.00
6 NS 2C W = -110 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 27,50 %
a.6 Brigitte Brusselmans -Claire Derieuw 47,27 %
7 NS 4T W-2 200 21.9 99.55
8 NS 4C S+1 450 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 92,05 %
a.4 Michel Lahaut -Myriam de Timary 50,95 %
9 NS 4C W+1 -650 8.8 40.00
10 NS 5T S+1 620 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a.3 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 55,06 %
11 NS 4C W+1 -450 8.8 40.00
12 NS 3P S+2 200 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a.2 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 49,32 %
13 NS 4C W+1 -650 7.7 35.00
14 NS 1S N+1 120 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a.1 Dominique Sassen -Nicole Leclere 44,81 %
15 NS 3S N+2 660 21.9 99.55
16 NS 3S S-1 -50 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a14 Iris de Limbourg -Anne de Wasseige 53,74 %
17 NS 4CcS-1 -100 0.1 0.45
18 NS 2C S+1 140 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a12 Serge Alard -Teresa Dekoster 56,63 %
23 NS 5K E = -600 14.3 65.00
24 NS 3S S+1 430 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a11 Didier Collart -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 50,00 %
25 NS 2C E = -110 21.9 99.55
26 NS 1S W-3 300 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 94,55 %
a10 Catherine de Moffarts -Chantal de Lichtervelde 62,27 %
27 NS 2S N-1 -50 2.3 10.45
28 NS 4C N = 620 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
Total : 270,7 / 528 = 51,27 %
PAIRE A10 Chris Oostens -Patricia Bardy
a.5 Brigitte Velge -Brigitte de Jamblinne 39,44 %
1 NS 4P S = 420 15 68.18
2 NS 6K E-4 200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
a.4 Michel Lahaut -Myriam de Timary 50,95 %
3 NS 2P E+2 -170 0 0.00
4 NS 4P W = -620 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a.2 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 49,32 %
5 NS 3S N+2 660 16.5 75.00
6 NS 4KcS = 510 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 87,27 %
a.1 Dominique Sassen -Nicole Leclere 44,81 %
7 NS 2P N-2 -200 2.3 10.45
8 NS 4C S = 420 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 15,45 %
a14 Iris de Limbourg -Anne de Wasseige 53,74 %
9 NS 2C W+3 -200 16.5 75.00
10 NS 5K N+2 640 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
a13 Francoise Turin -Michel Lievens 45,76 %
11 NS 3S E+3 -490 0.1 0.45
12 NS 4P S+1 650 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
a12 Serge Alard -Teresa Dekoster 56,63 %
13 NS 4C W+1 -650 7.7 35.00
14 NS 2P S+1 140 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a10 Catherine de Moffarts -Chantal de Lichtervelde 62,27 %
19 NS 3S E+1 -630 12.1 55.00
20 NS 4C N-2 -200 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a.9 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 47,83 %
21 NS 3S W = -400 9.9 45.00
22 NS 4C S+1 450 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
a.8 Evelyn Sorel -Veronique Englebienne 39,07 %
23 NS 3S W = -600 14.3 65.00
24 NS 3S S-1 -50 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a.7 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 56,55 %
25 NS 3C E = -140 16.5 75.00
26 NS 2S N = 120 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.6 Brigitte Brusselmans -Claire Derieuw 47,27 %
27 NS 2T W-1 50 4.5 20.45
28 NS 4C N = 620 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
Total : 261,4 / 528 = 49,51 %
PAIRE A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans
a.1 Dominique Sassen -Nicole Leclere 44,81 %
1 NS 4P S+1 450 21 95.45
2 NS 5T E+2 -440 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 93,18 %
a14 Iris de Limbourg -Anne de Wasseige 53,74 %
3 NS 4T W-4 400 22 100.00
4 NS 4P W = -620 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
a13 Francoise Turin -Michel Lievens 45,76 %
5 NS 4P S+2 680 21.9 99.55
6 NS 3S N-4 -200 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a12 Serge Alard -Teresa Dekoster 56,63 %
7 NS 1S S-2 -200 2.3 10.45
8 NS 3S S+1 430 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a11 Didier Collart -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 50,00 %
9 NS 3T E+2 -150 19.7 89.55
10 NS 5T S+1 620 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a10 Catherine de Moffarts -Chantal de Lichtervelde 62,27 %
11 NS 3S E+2 -460 3.4 15.45
12 NS 5K E-2 100 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 7,95 %
a.9 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 47,83 %
13 NS 5C W = -650 7.7 35.00
14 NS 2P S = 110 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 32,50 %
a.7 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 56,55 %
15 NS 2S N+3 210 17.5 79.55
16 NS 3S S+1 430 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 84,55 %
a.6 Brigitte Brusselmans -Claire Derieuw 47,27 %
17 NS 2C S+1 140 12.1 55.00
18 NS 2K S+1 110 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a.5 Brigitte Velge -Brigitte de Jamblinne 39,44 %
19 NS 3S W+1 -630 12.1 55.00
20 NS 4P W-2 200 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
a.4 Michel Lahaut -Myriam de Timary 50,95 %
21 NS 3S W+1 -430 2.3 10.45
22 NS 2C N+2 170 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 12,95 %
a.3 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 55,06 %
23 NS 3S W+2 -660 0.1 0.45
24 NS 3S S+1 430 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
Total : 256,6 / 528 = 48,60 %
PAIRE A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor
a.6 Brigitte Brusselmans -Claire Derieuw 47,27 %
1 NS 4C N-1 -50 3 13.64
2 NS 6T E = -920 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.4 Michel Lahaut -Myriam de Timary 50,95 %
7 NS 2P N = 110 19.7 89.55
8 NS 3S N+1 430 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
a.3 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 55,06 %
9 NS 4C W+2 -680 0.1 0.45
10 NS 6S N-4 -400 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 0,45 %
a.2 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 49,32 %
11 NS 6C W-1 50 15.4 70.00
12 NS 4P S+1 650 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
a.1 Dominique Sassen -Nicole Leclere 44,81 %
13 NS 4C W = -620 19.7 89.55
14 NS 2P S+1 140 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a14 Iris de Limbourg -Anne de Wasseige 53,74 %
15 NS 2P W-2 100 6.6 30.00
16 NS 3S S = 400 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a13 Francoise Turin -Michel Lievens 45,76 %
17 NS 3C S+1 170 20.8 94.55
18 NS 3C S = 140 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
a12 Serge Alard -Teresa Dekoster 56,63 %
19 NS 3S W+1 -630 12.1 55.00
20 NS 3P W = -140 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a10 Catherine de Moffarts -Chantal de Lichtervelde 62,27 %
21 NS 3S W = -400 9.9 45.00
22 NS 4C S = 420 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.9 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 47,83 %
23 NS 2S W+1 -150 19.7 89.55
24 NS 3S S = 400 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.8 Evelyn Sorel -Veronique Englebienne 39,07 %
25 NS 4C E = -620 0.1 0.45
26 NS 2S N = 120 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
a.7 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 56,55 %
27 NS 3K N-3 -150 0.1 0.45
28 NS 4C N = 620 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
Total : 248,2 / 528 = 47,01 %
PAIRE A.5 Colette Heerinckx -Yolande Waerseggers
a.8 Evelyn Sorel -Veronique Englebienne 39,07 %
1 NS 3S N = 400 10 45.45
2 NS 6T E = -920 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.7 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 56,55 %
3 NS 3T E-1 100 12 54.55
4 NS 4P W = -620 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a.5 Brigitte Velge -Brigitte de Jamblinne 39,44 %
9 NS 4C W+1 -650 8.8 40.00
10 NS 5C N-3 -300 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a.4 Michel Lahaut -Myriam de Timary 50,95 %
11 NS 4C W+1 -450 8.8 40.00
12 NS 4P S+1 650 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.3 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 55,06 %
13 NS 4C W+1 -650 7.7 35.00
14 NS 2P S = 110 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 32,50 %
a.2 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 49,32 %
15 NS 2S N = 120 9.9 45.00
16 NS 3K S+1 130 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
a.1 Dominique Sassen -Nicole Leclere 44,81 %
17 NS 3C S-1 -50 3.4 15.45
18 NS 2C S+1 140 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
a14 Iris de Limbourg -Anne de Wasseige 53,74 %
19 NS 3S E+2 -660 1.2 5.45
20 NS 3S S-1 -100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a13 Francoise Turin -Michel Lievens 45,76 %
21 NS 2S W+1 -150 17.5 79.55
22 NS 4C S = 420 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a11 Didier Collart -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 50,00 %
23 NS 2P E+3 -200 17.5 79.55
24 NS 3S S+3 490 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 84,55 %
a10 Catherine de Moffarts -Chantal de Lichtervelde 62,27 %
25 NS 2C E+2 -170 6.6 30.00
26 NS 2S N = 120 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 32,50 %
a.9 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 47,83 %
27 NS 1ScW-1 100 8.8 40.00
28 NS 4C N = 620 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
Total : 243,6 / 528 = 46,14 %
PAIRE A14 Regine de Hemptinne -Michou van Wetter
a13 Francoise Turin -Michel Lievens 45,76 %
1 NS 1P S+2 140 8 36.36
2 NS 6T E+1 -940 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a12 Serge Alard -Teresa Dekoster 56,63 %
3 NS 3K S-1 -50 5 22.73
4 NS 4P W+1 -650 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
a11 Didier Collart -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 50,00 %
5 NS 5P N = 650 5.5 25.00
6 NS 3K S-1 -50 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
a10 Catherine de Moffarts -Chantal de Lichtervelde 62,27 %
7 NS 3T W-1 100 17.5 79.55
8 NS 4C S-1 -50 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a.9 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 47,83 %
9 NS 3S E+2 -660 2.3 10.45
10 NS 5K N+2 640 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a.8 Evelyn Sorel -Veronique Englebienne 39,07 %
11 NS 5C E-1 50 15.4 70.00
12 NS 4P S+1 650 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
a.6 Brigitte Brusselmans -Claire Derieuw 47,27 %
13 NS 4C W+1 -650 7.7 35.00
14 NS 3S N = 400 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a.5 Brigitte Velge -Brigitte de Jamblinne 39,44 %
15 NS 2S N+3 210 17.5 79.55
16 NS 5K S-1 -50 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a.4 Michel Lahaut -Myriam de Timary 50,95 %
17 NS 2C S+1 140 12.1 55.00
18 NS 4C N-1 -100 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a.3 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 55,06 %
19 NS 3S W+1 -630 12.1 55.00
20 NS 4PcW-2 500 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
a.2 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 49,32 %
21 NS 3S W = -400 9.9 45.00
22 NS 3C S+1 170 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
a14 Iris de Limbourg -Anne de Wasseige 53,74 %
27 NS 1S N = 90 6.6 30.00
28 NS 4C N = 620 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
Total : 223,5 / 528 = 42,33 %
PAIRE A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli
a12 Serge Alard -Teresa Dekoster 56,63 %
1 NS 4P S-1 -50 3 13.64
2 NS 6S W = -990 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
a11 Didier Collart -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 50,00 %
3 NS 2T W-1 100 12 54.55
4 NS 4P W+1 -650 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a10 Catherine de Moffarts -Chantal de Lichtervelde 62,27 %
5 NS 4P N+1 650 5.5 25.00
6 NS 3P S-3 -150 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
a.9 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 47,83 %
7 NS 2T W+1 -110 11 50.00
8 NS 4C S = 420 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
a.7 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 56,55 %
13 NS 4C W+1 -650 7.7 35.00
14 NS 3T E-2 100 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.6 Brigitte Brusselmans -Claire Derieuw 47,27 %
15 NS 3C S+1 170 13.2 60.00
16 NS 3S S = 400 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a.5 Brigitte Velge -Brigitte de Jamblinne 39,44 %
17 NS 3C S = 140 12.1 55.00
18 NS 3C N = 140 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a.4 Michel Lahaut -Myriam de Timary 50,95 %
19 NS 3S E+1 -630 12.1 55.00
20 NS 3P W = -140 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a.3 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 55,06 %
21 NS 3S W = -400 9.9 45.00
22 NS 4C S = 420 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.2 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 49,32 %
23 NS 3S W+1 -630 7.7 35.00
24 NS 3S S+3 490 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a.1 Dominique Sassen -Nicole Leclere 44,81 %
25 NS 2C E+1 -140 16.5 75.00
26 NS 2K S-1 -100 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a13 Francoise Turin -Michel Lievens 45,76 %
27 NS 1S N+2 150 20.8 94.55
28 NS 4C N = 620 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
Total : 219,4 / 528 = 41,55 %
PAIRE A11 Sylviane Delbeke -Caroll Pucher
a.7 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 56,55 %
1 NS 4P S-1 -50 3 13.64
2 NS 6S W = -990 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
a.6 Brigitte Brusselmans -Claire Derieuw 47,27 %
3 NS 4K S-3 -150 2 9.09
4 NS 4P W = -620 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a.5 Brigitte Velge -Brigitte de Jamblinne 39,44 %
5 NS 3S N+2 660 16.5 75.00
6 NS 3S N = 400 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
a.3 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 55,06 %
7 NS 2K E+1 -110 11 50.00
8 NS 3S S+1 430 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.2 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 49,32 %
9 NS 3C W+2 -200 16.5 75.00
10 NS 4PcW-2 500 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.1 Dominique Sassen -Nicole Leclere 44,81 %
11 NS 6C E-1 50 15.4 70.00
12 NS 4P S+1 650 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
a14 Iris de Limbourg -Anne de Wasseige 53,74 %
13 NS 4C W+1 -650 7.7 35.00
14 NS 5C N-4 -200 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
a13 Francoise Turin -Michel Lievens 45,76 %
15 NS 3S N-1 -100 2.3 10.45
16 NS 3K S+1 130 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
a11 Didier Collart -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 50,00 %
21 NS 3S W+1 -430 2.3 10.45
22 NS 3T N+1 130 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 5,45 %
a10 Catherine de Moffarts -Chantal de Lichtervelde 62,27 %
23 NS 3S W+1 -630 7.7 35.00
24 NS 3S S = 400 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a.9 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 47,83 %
25 NS 2C E+2 -170 6.6 30.00
26 NS 2S N = 120 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 32,50 %
a.8 Evelyn Sorel -Veronique Englebienne 39,07 %
27 NS 1S S+1 120 14.3 65.00
28 NS 4C N = 620 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
Total : 200,8 / 528 = 38,03 %
PAIRE A.3 -
a.3 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 55,06 %
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.2 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 49,32 %
7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.1 Dominique Sassen -Nicole Leclere 44,81 %
9 NS BYE 0 0.00
10 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a14 Iris de Limbourg -Anne de Wasseige 53,74 %
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a13 Francoise Turin -Michel Lievens 45,76 %
13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a12 Serge Alard -Teresa Dekoster 56,63 %
15 NS BYE 0 0.00
16 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a11 Didier Collart -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 50,00 %
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.9 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 47,83 %
19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.8 Evelyn Sorel -Veronique Englebienne 39,07 %
21 NS BYE 0 0.00
22 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.7 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 56,55 %
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.6 Brigitte Brusselmans -Claire Derieuw 47,27 %
25 NS BYE 0 0.00
26 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.5 Brigitte Velge -Brigitte de Jamblinne 39,44 %
27 NS BYE 0 0.00
28 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 616 = 0,00 %
PAIRE a10 Catherine de Moffarts -Chantal de Lichtervelde
A.6 Diane Deslignes -Monique Crouan 62,08 %
1 EO 4P S = 420 7 31.82
2 EO 6T E = -920 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A13 Helene Christiaens -Marie J. de Wagheneire 54,09 %
3 EO 3S N-1 -50 17 77.27
4 EO 4P W+1 -650 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 41,55 %
5 EO 4P N+1 650 16.5 75.00
6 EO 3P S-3 -150 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
A14 Regine de Hemptinne -Michou van Wetter 42,33 %
7 EO 3T W-1 100 4.5 20.45
8 EO 4C S-1 -50 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A.8 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 60,27 %
9 EO 2K W-1 100 0.1 0.45
10 EO 5TcS+1 950 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 10,45 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 48,60 %
11 EO 3S E+2 -460 18.6 84.55
12 EO 5K E-2 100 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 92,05 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 53,03 %
15 EO 3S S-1 -100 19.7 89.55
16 EO 3S S+1 430 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A10 Chris Oostens -Patricia Bardy 49,51 %
19 EO 3S E+1 -630 9.9 45.00
20 EO 4C N-2 -200 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 47,01 %
21 EO 3S W = -400 12.1 55.00
22 EO 4C S = 420 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A11 Sylviane Delbeke -Caroll Pucher 38,03 %
23 EO 3S W+1 -630 14.3 65.00
24 EO 3S S = 400 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A.5 Colette Heerinckx -Yolande Waerseggers 46,14 %
25 EO 2C E+2 -170 15.4 70.00
26 EO 2S N = 120 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 67,50 %
A12 Jeanine Bontemps -Pierina Di Vito 51,27 %
27 EO 2S N-1 -50 19.7 89.55
28 EO 4C N = 620 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
Total : 328,8 / 528 = 62,27 %
PAIRE a12 Serge Alard -Teresa Dekoster
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 41,55 %
1 EO 4P S-1 -50 19 86.36
2 EO 6S W = -990 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
A14 Regine de Hemptinne -Michou van Wetter 42,33 %
3 EO 3K S-1 -50 17 77.27
4 EO 4P W+1 -650 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
A.8 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 60,27 %
5 EO 5P N = 650 16.5 75.00
6 EO 4K S-1 -50 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 48,60 %
7 EO 1S S-2 -200 19.7 89.55
8 EO 3S S+1 430 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A.9 Michele Berrier -Jeannine Wanderpepen 56,17 %
9 EO 4C W+1 -650 13.2 60.00
10 EO 6K N = 1370 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 53,03 %
11 EO 6C W-2 100 1.2 5.45
12 EO 5KcE-2 300 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A10 Chris Oostens -Patricia Bardy 49,51 %
13 EO 4C W+1 -650 14.3 65.00
14 EO 2P S+1 140 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.3 - 0,00 %
15 EO BYE 0 0.00
16 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 47,01 %
19 EO 3S W+1 -630 9.9 45.00
20 EO 3P W = -140 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A12 Jeanine Bontemps -Pierina Di Vito 51,27 %
23 EO 5K E = -600 7.7 35.00
24 EO 3S S+1 430 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.6 Diane Deslignes -Monique Crouan 62,08 %
25 EO 2C E+2 -170 15.4 70.00
26 EO 1S W-2 200 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A13 Helene Christiaens -Marie J. de Wagheneire 54,09 %
27 EO 1S S+1 120 7.7 35.00
28 EO 4C N = 620 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
Total : 274,1 / 484 = 56,63 %
PAIRE a.7 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee
A11 Sylviane Delbeke -Caroll Pucher 38,03 %
1 EO 4P S-1 -50 19 86.36
2 EO 6S W = -990 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
A.5 Colette Heerinckx -Yolande Waerseggers 46,14 %
3 EO 3T E-1 100 10 45.45
4 EO 4P W = -620 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A12 Jeanine Bontemps -Pierina Di Vito 51,27 %
5 EO 4P N+1 650 16.5 75.00
6 EO 2C W = -110 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 72,50 %
A13 Helene Christiaens -Marie J. de Wagheneire 54,09 %
9 EO 4C W+1 -650 13.2 60.00
10 EO 6K N = 1370 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 41,55 %
13 EO 4C W+1 -650 14.3 65.00
14 EO 3T E-2 100 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 48,60 %
15 EO 2S N+3 210 4.5 20.45
16 EO 3S S+1 430 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 15,45 %
A.8 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 60,27 %
17 EO 3C S-1 -50 18.6 84.55
18 EO 2S S = 120 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 82,05 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 53,03 %
19 EO 3S W+1 -630 9.9 45.00
20 EO 3P W = -140 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A.9 Michele Berrier -Jeannine Wanderpepen 56,17 %
21 EO 1T W+3 -130 2.3 10.45
22 EO 4C S = 420 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
A.3 - 0,00 %
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A10 Chris Oostens -Patricia Bardy 49,51 %
25 EO 3C E = -140 5.5 25.00
26 EO 2S N = 120 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 47,01 %
27 EO 3K N-3 -150 21.9 99.55
28 EO 4C N = 620 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
Total : 273,7 / 484 = 56,55 %
PAIRE a.3 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant
A.9 Michele Berrier -Jeannine Wanderpepen 56,17 %
1 EO 4P S = 420 7 31.82
2 EO 6T E = -920 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A.3 - 0,00 %
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A11 Sylviane Delbeke -Caroll Pucher 38,03 %
7 EO 2K E+1 -110 11 50.00
8 EO 3S S+1 430 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 47,01 %
9 EO 4C W+2 -680 21.9 99.55
10 EO 6S N-4 -400 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 99,55 %
A12 Jeanine Bontemps -Pierina Di Vito 51,27 %
11 EO 4C W+1 -450 13.2 60.00
12 EO 3P S+2 200 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A.5 Colette Heerinckx -Yolande Waerseggers 46,14 %
13 EO 4C W+1 -650 14.3 65.00
14 EO 2P S = 110 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 67,50 %
A13 Helene Christiaens -Marie J. de Wagheneire 54,09 %
15 EO 3S N-1 -100 19.7 89.55
16 EO 3S S+1 430 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.6 Diane Deslignes -Monique Crouan 62,08 %
17 EO 3C S = 140 9.9 45.00
18 EO 1C S+2 140 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A14 Regine de Hemptinne -Michou van Wetter 42,33 %
19 EO 3S W+1 -630 9.9 45.00
20 EO 4PcW-2 500 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 41,55 %
21 EO 3S W = -400 12.1 55.00
22 EO 4C S = 420 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 48,60 %
23 EO 3S W+2 -660 21.9 99.55
24 EO 3S S+1 430 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.8 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 60,27 %
25 EO 2C E+1 -140 5.5 25.00
26 EO 2S N+1 150 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 32,50 %
Total : 266,5 / 484 = 55,06 %
PAIRE a14 Iris de Limbourg -Anne de Wasseige
A.8 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 60,27 %
1 EO 4P S = 420 7 31.82
2 EO 6T E = -920 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 48,60 %
3 EO 4T W-4 400 0 0.00
4 EO 4P W = -620 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
A.9 Michele Berrier -Jeannine Wanderpepen 56,17 %
5 EO 3S N+2 660 5.5 25.00
6 EO 2P N-3 -150 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 54,77 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 53,03 %
7 EO 1S W+1 -120 15.4 70.00
8 EO 3S S+1 430 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A10 Chris Oostens -Patricia Bardy 49,51 %
9 EO 2C W+3 -200 5.5 25.00
10 EO 5K N+2 640 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
A.3 - 0,00 %
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A11 Sylviane Delbeke -Caroll Pucher 38,03 %
13 EO 4C W+1 -650 14.3 65.00
14 EO 5C N-4 -200 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 47,01 %
15 EO 2P W-2 100 15.4 70.00
16 EO 3S S = 400 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A12 Jeanine Bontemps -Pierina Di Vito 51,27 %
17 EO 4CcS-1 -100 21.9 99.55
18 EO 2C S+1 140 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A.5 Colette Heerinckx -Yolande Waerseggers 46,14 %
19 EO 3S E+2 -660 20.8 94.55
20 EO 3S S-1 -100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A.6 Diane Deslignes -Monique Crouan 62,08 %
23 EO 4P E+1 -650 18.6 84.55
24 EO 3S S+2 460 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
A14 Regine de Hemptinne -Michou van Wetter 42,33 %
27 EO 1S N = 90 15.4 70.00
28 EO 4C N = 620 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
Total : 260,1 / 484 = 53,74 %
PAIRE a.4 Michel Lahaut -Myriam de Timary
A10 Chris Oostens -Patricia Bardy 49,51 %
3 EO 2P E+2 -170 22 100.00
4 EO 4P W = -620 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 47,01 %
7 EO 2P N = 110 2.3 10.45
8 EO 3S N+1 430 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
A12 Jeanine Bontemps -Pierina Di Vito 51,27 %
9 EO 4C W+1 -650 13.2 60.00
10 EO 5T S+1 620 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A.5 Colette Heerinckx -Yolande Waerseggers 46,14 %
11 EO 4C W+1 -450 13.2 60.00
12 EO 4P S+1 650 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A13 Helene Christiaens -Marie J. de Wagheneire 54,09 %
13 EO 4C W+1 -650 14.3 65.00
14 EO 2S N+1 150 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
A.6 Diane Deslignes -Monique Crouan 62,08 %
15 EO 2S N = 120 12.1 55.00
16 EO 3S S = 400 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A14 Regine de Hemptinne -Michou van Wetter 42,33 %
17 EO 2C S+1 140 9.9 45.00
18 EO 4C N-1 -100 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 41,55 %
19 EO 3S E+1 -630 9.9 45.00
20 EO 3P W = -140 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 48,60 %
21 EO 3S W+1 -430 19.7 89.55
22 EO 2C N+2 170 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 87,05 %
A.8 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 60,27 %
23 EO 4P E = -620 11 50.00
24 EO 3S S+3 490 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 53,03 %
25 EO 2C E+2 -170 15.4 70.00
26 EO 2S N+3 210 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 45,23 %
A.9 Michele Berrier -Jeannine Wanderpepen 56,17 %
27 EO 1S N+2 150 1.2 5.45
28 EO 4C N = 620 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
Total : 269,0 / 528 = 50,95 %
PAIRE a11 Didier Collart -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
A13 Helene Christiaens -Marie J. de Wagheneire 54,09 %
1 EO 4P S-1 -50 19 86.36
2 EO 6T E = -920 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 41,55 %
3 EO 2T W-1 100 10 45.45
4 EO 4P W+1 -650 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A14 Regine de Hemptinne -Michou van Wetter 42,33 %
5 EO 5P N = 650 16.5 75.00
6 EO 3K S-1 -50 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
A.8 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 60,27 %
7 EO 2T W+1 -110 11 50.00
8 EO 4C S = 420 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 48,60 %
9 EO 3T E+2 -150 2.3 10.45
10 EO 5T S+1 620 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A.9 Michele Berrier -Jeannine Wanderpepen 56,17 %
11 EO 3S E+2 -460 18.6 84.55
12 EO 4P S+1 650 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 53,03 %
13 EO 4C W = -620 2.3 10.45
14 EO 2P S = 110 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
A.3 - 0,00 %
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A11 Sylviane Delbeke -Caroll Pucher 38,03 %
21 EO 3S W+1 -430 19.7 89.55
22 EO 3T N+1 130 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 94,55 %
A.5 Colette Heerinckx -Yolande Waerseggers 46,14 %
23 EO 2P E+3 -200 4.5 20.45
24 EO 3S S+3 490 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 15,45 %
A12 Jeanine Bontemps -Pierina Di Vito 51,27 %
25 EO 2C E = -110 0.1 0.45
26 EO 1S W-3 300 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 5,45 %
A.6 Diane Deslignes -Monique Crouan 62,08 %
27 EO 1S N+1 120 7.7 35.00
28 EO 4C N = 620 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
Total : 242,0 / 484 = 50,00 %
PAIRE a.2 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 53,03 %
3 EO 2K S = 90 14 63.64
4 EO 4P W+1 -650 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
A10 Chris Oostens -Patricia Bardy 49,51 %
5 EO 3S N+2 660 5.5 25.00
6 EO 4KcS = 510 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 12,73 %
A.3 - 0,00 %
7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A11 Sylviane Delbeke -Caroll Pucher 38,03 %
9 EO 3C W+2 -200 5.5 25.00
10 EO 4PcW-2 500 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 47,01 %
11 EO 6C W-1 50 6.6 30.00
12 EO 4P S+1 650 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
A12 Jeanine Bontemps -Pierina Di Vito 51,27 %
13 EO 4C W+1 -650 14.3 65.00
14 EO 1S N+1 120 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A.5 Colette Heerinckx -Yolande Waerseggers 46,14 %
15 EO 2S N = 120 12.1 55.00
16 EO 3K S+1 130 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
A13 Helene Christiaens -Marie J. de Wagheneire 54,09 %
17 EO 2C S+1 140 9.9 45.00
18 EO 3C S = 140 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A.6 Diane Deslignes -Monique Crouan 62,08 %
19 EO 3S W+1 -630 9.9 45.00
20 EO 3P W = -140 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A14 Regine de Hemptinne -Michou van Wetter 42,33 %
21 EO 3S W = -400 12.1 55.00
22 EO 3C S+1 170 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 41,55 %
23 EO 3S W+1 -630 14.3 65.00
24 EO 3S S+3 490 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A.8 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 60,27 %
27 EO 1S S+1 120 7.7 35.00
28 EO 4C N = 620 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
Total : 238,7 / 484 = 49,32 %
PAIRE a.9 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart
A12 Jeanine Bontemps -Pierina Di Vito 51,27 %
1 EO 4P S+1 450 1 4.55
2 EO 6T E+1 -940 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A.6 Diane Deslignes -Monique Crouan 62,08 %
3 EO 3S E-3 300 2 9.09
4 EO 4P W = -620 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
A13 Helene Christiaens -Marie J. de Wagheneire 54,09 %
5 EO 3S N+2 660 5.5 25.00
6 EO 3C W-1 100 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 41,55 %
7 EO 2T W+1 -110 11 50.00
8 EO 4C S = 420 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
A14 Regine de Hemptinne -Michou van Wetter 42,33 %
9 EO 3S E+2 -660 19.7 89.55
10 EO 5K N+2 640 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 48,60 %
13 EO 5C W = -650 14.3 65.00
14 EO 2P S = 110 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 67,50 %
A.9 Michele Berrier -Jeannine Wanderpepen 56,17 %
17 EO 2C S+1 140 9.9 45.00
18 EO 3C S = 140 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A.3 - 0,00 %
19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A10 Chris Oostens -Patricia Bardy 49,51 %
21 EO 3S W = -400 12.1 55.00
22 EO 4C S+1 450 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 47,01 %
23 EO 2S W+1 -150 2.3 10.45
24 EO 3S S = 400 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A11 Sylviane Delbeke -Caroll Pucher 38,03 %
25 EO 2C E+2 -170 15.4 70.00
26 EO 2S N = 120 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 67,50 %
A.5 Colette Heerinckx -Yolande Waerseggers 46,14 %
27 EO 1ScW-1 100 13.2 60.00
28 EO 4C N = 620 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
Total : 231,5 / 484 = 47,83 %
PAIRE a.6 Brigitte Brusselmans -Claire Derieuw
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 47,01 %
1 EO 4C N-1 -50 19 86.36
2 EO 6T E = -920 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A11 Sylviane Delbeke -Caroll Pucher 38,03 %
3 EO 4K S-3 -150 20 90.91
4 EO 4P W = -620 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A12 Jeanine Bontemps -Pierina Di Vito 51,27 %
7 EO 4T W-2 200 0.1 0.45
8 EO 4C S+1 450 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 7,95 %
A.6 Diane Deslignes -Monique Crouan 62,08 %
11 EO 6C W-2 100 1.2 5.45
12 EO 4P S+1 650 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
A14 Regine de Hemptinne -Michou van Wetter 42,33 %
13 EO 4C W+1 -650 14.3 65.00
14 EO 3S N = 400 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 41,55 %
15 EO 3C S+1 170 8.8 40.00
16 EO 3S S = 400 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 48,60 %
17 EO 2C S+1 140 9.9 45.00
18 EO 2K S+1 110 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A.8 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 60,27 %
19 EO 3S W+1 -630 9.9 45.00
20 EO 4P W-2 200 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 53,03 %
21 EO 3S W+1 -430 19.7 89.55
22 EO 3S N+2 460 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.9 Michele Berrier -Jeannine Wanderpepen 56,17 %
23 EO 4P E+1 -650 18.6 84.55
24 EO 3S S = 400 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 82,05 %
A.3 - 0,00 %
25 EO BYE 0 0.00
26 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A10 Chris Oostens -Patricia Bardy 49,51 %
27 EO 2T W-1 50 17.5 79.55
28 EO 4C N = 620 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
Total : 228,8 / 484 = 47,27 %
PAIRE a13 Francoise Turin -Michel Lievens
A14 Regine de Hemptinne -Michou van Wetter 42,33 %
1 EO 1P S+2 140 14 63.64
2 EO 6T E+1 -940 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A.8 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 60,27 %
3 EO 2T W-2 200 4 18.18
4 EO 4P W = -620 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 48,60 %
5 EO 4P S+2 680 0.1 0.45
6 EO 3S N-4 -200 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.9 Michele Berrier -Jeannine Wanderpepen 56,17 %
7 EO 2P N-2 -200 19.7 89.55
8 EO 4C S+1 450 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 53,03 %
9 EO 4C W+1 -650 13.2 60.00
10 EO 5T S+1 620 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A10 Chris Oostens -Patricia Bardy 49,51 %
11 EO 3S E+3 -490 21.9 99.55
12 EO 4P S+1 650 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
A.3 - 0,00 %
13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A11 Sylviane Delbeke -Caroll Pucher 38,03 %
15 EO 3S N-1 -100 19.7 89.55
16 EO 3K S+1 130 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 47,01 %
17 EO 3C S+1 170 1.2 5.45
18 EO 3C S = 140 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
A.5 Colette Heerinckx -Yolande Waerseggers 46,14 %
21 EO 2S W+1 -150 4.5 20.45
22 EO 4C S = 420 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A13 Helene Christiaens -Marie J. de Wagheneire 54,09 %
25 EO 2C E+1 -140 5.5 25.00
26 EO 3S N = 600 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 12,73 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 41,55 %
27 EO 1S N+2 150 1.2 5.45
28 EO 4C N = 620 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
Total : 221,5 / 484 = 45,76 %
PAIRE a.1 Dominique Sassen -Nicole Leclere
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 48,60 %
1 EO 4P S+1 450 1 4.55
2 EO 5T E+2 -440 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 6,82 %
A.9 Michele Berrier -Jeannine Wanderpepen 56,17 %
3 EO 1S N+1 120 6 27.27
4 EO 4P W = -620 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 53,03 %
5 EO 4P N+1 650 16.5 75.00
6 EO 3C W-1 100 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A10 Chris Oostens -Patricia Bardy 49,51 %
7 EO 2P N-2 -200 19.7 89.55
8 EO 4C S = 420 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 84,55 %
A.3 - 0,00 %
9 EO BYE 0 0.00
10 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A11 Sylviane Delbeke -Caroll Pucher 38,03 %
11 EO 6C E-1 50 6.6 30.00
12 EO 4P S+1 650 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 47,01 %
13 EO 4C W = -620 2.3 10.45
14 EO 2P S+1 140 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A12 Jeanine Bontemps -Pierina Di Vito 51,27 %
15 EO 3S N+2 660 0.1 0.45
16 EO 3S S-1 -50 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.5 Colette Heerinckx -Yolande Waerseggers 46,14 %
17 EO 3C S-1 -50 18.6 84.55
18 EO 2C S+1 140 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
A13 Helene Christiaens -Marie J. de Wagheneire 54,09 %
19 EO 3S E+2 -660 20.8 94.55
20 EO 4K N = 130 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A.6 Diane Deslignes -Monique Crouan 62,08 %
21 EO 2S W+2 -180 6.6 30.00
22 EO 3S S+1 430 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 27,50 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 41,55 %
25 EO 2C E+1 -140 5.5 25.00
26 EO 2K S-1 -100 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
Total : 216,9 / 484 = 44,81 %
PAIRE a.5 Brigitte Velge -Brigitte de Jamblinne
A10 Chris Oostens -Patricia Bardy 49,51 %
1 EO 4P S = 420 7 31.82
2 EO 6K E-4 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
A11 Sylviane Delbeke -Caroll Pucher 38,03 %
5 EO 3S N+2 660 5.5 25.00
6 EO 3S N = 400 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
A.5 Colette Heerinckx -Yolande Waerseggers 46,14 %
9 EO 4C W+1 -650 13.2 60.00
10 EO 5C N-3 -300 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A13 Helene Christiaens -Marie J. de Wagheneire 54,09 %
11 EO 4C W+1 -450 13.2 60.00
12 EO 3P S+2 200 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A.6 Diane Deslignes -Monique Crouan 62,08 %
13 EO 4C E = -620 2.3 10.45
14 EO 3S N = 400 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 7,95 %
A14 Regine de Hemptinne -Michou van Wetter 42,33 %
15 EO 2S N+3 210 4.5 20.45
16 EO 5K S-1 -50 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 41,55 %
17 EO 3C S = 140 9.9 45.00
18 EO 3C N = 140 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 48,60 %
19 EO 3S W+1 -630 9.9 45.00
20 EO 4P W-2 200 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
A.8 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 60,27 %
21 EO 2S W = -120 0.1 0.45
22 EO 3S N+1 430 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 12,73 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 53,03 %
23 EO 4P E-2 200 0.1 0.45
24 EO 3S S+2 460 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
A.9 Michele Berrier -Jeannine Wanderpepen 56,17 %
25 EO 2C E+2 -170 15.4 70.00
26 EO 1S W-1 100 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
A.3 - 0,00 %
27 EO BYE 0 0.00
28 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 190,9 / 484 = 39,44 %
PAIRE a.8 Evelyn Sorel -Veronique Englebienne
A.5 Colette Heerinckx -Yolande Waerseggers 46,14 %
1 EO 3S N = 400 12 54.55
2 EO 6T E = -920 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A12 Jeanine Bontemps -Pierina Di Vito 51,27 %
3 EO 3P W-1 100 10 45.45
4 EO 4P W = -620 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.6 Diane Deslignes -Monique Crouan 62,08 %
5 EO 4P N+1 650 16.5 75.00
6 EO 3S N = 400 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 45,23 %
A13 Helene Christiaens -Marie J. de Wagheneire 54,09 %
7 EO 2P N-1 -100 6.6 30.00
8 EO 3S N+2 460 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
A14 Regine de Hemptinne -Michou van Wetter 42,33 %
11 EO 5C E-1 50 6.6 30.00
12 EO 4P S+1 650 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
A.8 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 60,27 %
15 EO 2S N+3 210 4.5 20.45
16 EO 3K S+2 150 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 53,03 %
17 EO 3C S+1 170 1.2 5.45
18 EO 3C S = 140 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
A.9 Michele Berrier -Jeannine Wanderpepen 56,17 %
19 EO 3S E = -600 0.1 0.45
20 EO 4C N+1 650 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 0,45 %
A.3 - 0,00 %
21 EO BYE 0 0.00
22 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A10 Chris Oostens -Patricia Bardy 49,51 %
23 EO 3S W = -600 7.7 35.00
24 EO 3S S-1 -50 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 47,01 %
25 EO 4C E = -620 21.9 99.55
26 EO 2S N = 120 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
A11 Sylviane Delbeke -Caroll Pucher 38,03 %
27 EO 1S S+1 120 7.7 35.00
28 EO 4C N = 620 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
Total : 189,1 / 484 = 39,07 %
|