B.C.O.B.
Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 59,64 A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois
--- 2 58,28 A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Myriam de Timary
--- 3 58,26 A12 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles
--- 4 57,58 A.4 Hugo Baetens -Alan Beckman
--- 5 51,36 A13 Serge Alard -Jean Chabotier
--- 6 51,14 A.7 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Liliane Baptista
--- 7 50,97 A.5 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier
--- 8 47,65 A.8 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Annette Fobe
--- 9 47,23 A10 Paul Henricot -Jean Henricot
--- 10 43,22 A.6 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont
--- 11 38,30 A11 Eliane de Ceuninck -Caroll Pucher
--- 12 36,72 A.3 Grazia Neuenschwander -Simone Munsterhjelm
--- 13 0,00 A.9 -
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 58,66 a.2 Fabienne Smit -Lydia Wildiers
--- 2 56,18 a.8 Catherine de Moffarts -Marie J. de Wagheneire
--- 3 54,30 a10 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand
--- 4 54,15 a.9 Annie Zeimes -Michel Lievens
--- 5 54,01 a.7 Nicole Leclere -Francoise Turin
--- 6 53,45 a.6 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart
--- 7 52,54 a11 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed
--- 8 51,59 a.4 Francoise Nibelle -Gaetan van de Werve
--- 9 50,19 a.1 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille
--- 10 45,10 a12 Hélène Lemberger -Mado Miller
--- 11 43,70 a.3 Brigitte de Fauconval -Laurence Mauboussin
--- 12 37,93 a13 Mimi Vanvinckenroye -Claudine van Zuylen
--- 13 37,44 a.5 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain
PAIRE A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois
a.2 Fabienne Smit -Lydia Wildiers 58,66 %
3 NS 3S E = -600 11 50.00
4 NS 4C S = 620 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.1 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 50,19 %
5 NS 2T S+1 110 16.5 75.00
6 NS 2P S-1 -50 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
a13 Mimi Vanvinckenroye -Claudine van Zuylen 37,93 %
7 NS 2C W+2 -170 20.8 94.55
8 NS 3S W = -400 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 92,05 %
a12 Hélène Lemberger -Mado Miller 45,10 %
9 NS 4P N = 420 14.3 65.00
10 NS 6S S-2 -200 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
a11 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 52,54 %
11 NS 4C W-1 50 7.7 35.00
12 NS 2C W-1 50 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a10 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 54,30 %
13 NS 3C W+1 -170 16.5 75.00
14 NS 4P E+1 -450 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a.9 Annie Zeimes -Michel Lievens 54,15 %
15 NS 6S S = 1440 21 95.45
16 NS 4T W = -130 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a.8 Catherine de Moffarts -Marie J. de Wagheneire 56,18 %
17 NS 4C S = 420 13.2 60.00
18 NS 4P E+2 -480 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
a.7 Nicole Leclere -Francoise Turin 54,01 %
19 NS 4C N+1 450 9.9 45.00
20 NS 2P N-1 -100 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a.6 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 53,45 %
21 NS 4P N+1 650 21.9 99.55
22 NS 3S E = -600 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
a.5 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 37,44 %
23 NS 3C W-2 200 14.3 65.00
24 NS 3C S = 140 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
a.4 Francoise Nibelle -Gaetan van de Werve 51,59 %
25 NS 5KcS-2 -300 18.6 84.55
26 NS 4C W-2 200 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 84,55 %
Total : 314,9 / 528 = 59,64 %
PAIRE A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Myriam de Timary
a.1 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 50,19 %
1 NS 3S S+1 430 15.4 70.00
2 NS 3S S = 600 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a13 Mimi Vanvinckenroye -Claudine van Zuylen 37,93 %
3 NS 3C W-1 100 19.7 89.55
4 NS 4C S = 620 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
a12 Hélène Lemberger -Mado Miller 45,10 %
5 NS 2P N = 110 16.5 75.00
6 NS 2P S = 110 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
a11 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 52,54 %
7 NS 3C W+2 -200 17.5 79.55
8 NS 4P W+1 -450 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a10 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 54,30 %
9 NS 4P S = 420 14.3 65.00
10 NS 3S N+2 660 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.9 Annie Zeimes -Michel Lievens 54,15 %
11 NS 4C W-1 50 7.7 35.00
12 NS 1S W-2 100 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
a.8 Catherine de Moffarts -Marie J. de Wagheneire 56,18 %
13 NS 4C W = -620 4.5 20.45
14 NS 4P E-1 50 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a.7 Nicole Leclere -Francoise Turin 54,01 %
15 NS 4S S+1 660 8 36.36
16 NS 5T W-1 100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.6 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 53,45 %
17 NS 4C N+1 450 20.8 94.55
18 NS 5P E = -450 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
a.5 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 37,44 %
19 NS 4C N+1 450 9.9 45.00
20 NS 2S S-1 -100 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a.4 Francoise Nibelle -Gaetan van de Werve 51,59 %
21 NS 4P N-2 -200 1.2 5.45
22 NS 4C E = -620 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
a.3 Brigitte de Fauconval -Laurence Mauboussin 43,70 %
23 NS 3K W-2 200 14.3 65.00
24 NS 3C S = 140 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
Total : 307,7 / 528 = 58,28 %
PAIRE A12 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles
a10 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 54,30 %
1 NS 3S S+1 430 15.4 70.00
2 NS 5K N = 600 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.9 Annie Zeimes -Michel Lievens 54,15 %
3 NS 2S E = -120 15.4 70.00
4 NS 4C S = 620 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a.8 Catherine de Moffarts -Marie J. de Wagheneire 56,18 %
5 NS 2C N+1 140 21.9 99.55
6 NS 2P S-1 -50 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.7 Nicole Leclere -Francoise Turin 54,01 %
7 NS 4C W = -620 7.7 35.00
8 NS 4P W = -420 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.6 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 53,45 %
9 NS 4P N = 420 14.3 65.00
10 NS 6S S-2 -200 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
a.5 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 37,44 %
11 NS 5C W-3 150 21.9 99.55
12 NS 1S W-1 50 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
a.4 Francoise Nibelle -Gaetan van de Werve 51,59 %
13 NS 3C W+1 -170 16.5 75.00
14 NS 4P E+1 -450 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a.3 Brigitte de Fauconval -Laurence Mauboussin 43,70 %
15 NS 4S S+2 690 15 68.18
16 NS 5TcW-1 200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
a.2 Fabienne Smit -Lydia Wildiers 58,66 %
17 NS 6C S-2 -100 1.2 5.45
18 NS 4P E+2 -480 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 12,95 %
a.1 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 50,19 %
19 NS 4C N+1 450 9.9 45.00
20 NS 3P N-1 -100 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a12 Hélène Lemberger -Mado Miller 45,10 %
23 NS 4C W-3 300 18.6 84.55
24 NS 3C S = 140 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
a11 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 52,54 %
25 NS 6KcS-3 -500 15.4 70.00
26 NS 4C W-2 200 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
Total : 307,6 / 528 = 58,26 %
PAIRE A.4 Hugo Baetens -Alan Beckman
a.7 Nicole Leclere -Francoise Turin 54,01 %
1 NS 3S S+1 430 15.4 70.00
2 NS 6K N = 1370 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
a.6 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 53,45 %
3 NS 3S E-1 100 19.7 89.55
4 NS 4C S = 620 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
a.4 Francoise Nibelle -Gaetan van de Werve 51,59 %
7 NS 4C W = -620 7.7 35.00
8 NS 3C E+1 -170 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
a.3 Brigitte de Fauconval -Laurence Mauboussin 43,70 %
9 NS 5P N = 450 21.9 99.55
10 NS 3S S+2 660 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
a.2 Fabienne Smit -Lydia Wildiers 58,66 %
11 NS 5C W-2 100 16.5 75.00
12 NS 1S W+1 -120 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
a.1 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 50,19 %
13 NS 4C W+1 -650 0.1 0.45
14 NS 4P E+1 -450 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
a13 Mimi Vanvinckenroye -Claudine van Zuylen 37,93 %
15 NS 6S S = 1440 21 95.45
16 NS 4T W = -130 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a12 Hélène Lemberger -Mado Miller 45,10 %
17 NS 4C S-1 -50 4.5 20.45
18 NS 4P E+1 -450 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a11 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 52,54 %
19 NS 5C N = 450 9.9 45.00
20 NS 2P N-1 -100 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a10 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 54,30 %
21 NS 4P N = 620 15.4 70.00
22 NS 4PcN-3 -500 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
a.9 Annie Zeimes -Michel Lievens 54,15 %
23 NS 4C W-3 300 18.6 84.55
24 NS 4K W-1 50 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.8 Catherine de Moffarts -Marie J. de Wagheneire 56,18 %
25 NS 4P W+1 -650 3.4 15.45
26 NS 3K E-2 200 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 304,0 / 528 = 57,58 %
PAIRE A13 Serge Alard -Jean Chabotier
a12 Hélène Lemberger -Mado Miller 45,10 %
1 NS 3S S+1 430 15.4 70.00
2 NS 5K N+1 620 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
a11 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 52,54 %
3 NS 3S E = -600 11 50.00
4 NS 4C S = 620 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a10 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 54,30 %
5 NS 2S W-1 50 4.5 20.45
6 NS 2P S = 110 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
a.9 Annie Zeimes -Michel Lievens 54,15 %
7 NS 4C W = -620 7.7 35.00
8 NS 4P W+2 -480 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
a.8 Catherine de Moffarts -Marie J. de Wagheneire 56,18 %
9 NS 5P S-1 -50 2.3 10.45
10 NS 4S S+2 690 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.7 Nicole Leclere -Francoise Turin 54,01 %
11 NS 4C W-2 100 16.5 75.00
12 NS 1S W-1 50 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
a.6 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 53,45 %
13 NS 3P S-2 -200 8.8 40.00
14 NS 4P W+2 -480 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
a.5 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 37,44 %
15 NS 3S S+3 690 15 68.18
16 NS 5T W-1 100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a.4 Francoise Nibelle -Gaetan van de Werve 51,59 %
17 NS 4C S = 420 13.2 60.00
18 NS 4P E+1 -450 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 67,50 %
a.3 Brigitte de Fauconval -Laurence Mauboussin 43,70 %
19 NS 4C N+1 450 9.9 45.00
20 NS 3K S-1 -100 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a.2 Fabienne Smit -Lydia Wildiers 58,66 %
21 NS 4P N = 620 15.4 70.00
22 NS 4C E = -620 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a13 Mimi Vanvinckenroye -Claudine van Zuylen 37,93 %
25 NS 5KcS-2 -300 18.6 84.55
26 NS 3P S = 140 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
Total : 271,2 / 528 = 51,36 %
PAIRE A.7 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Liliane Baptista
a13 Mimi Vanvinckenroye -Claudine van Zuylen 37,93 %
1 NS 3S S+1 430 15.4 70.00
2 NS 3S S = 600 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a12 Hélène Lemberger -Mado Miller 45,10 %
3 NS 3S E+1 -630 3.4 15.45
4 NS 4C S+1 650 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a11 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 52,54 %
5 NS 2T S = 90 8.8 40.00
6 NS 2P S = 110 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a10 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 54,30 %
7 NS 4C W = -620 7.7 35.00
8 NS 4P W+1 -450 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
a.9 Annie Zeimes -Michel Lievens 54,15 %
9 NS 4P N = 420 14.3 65.00
10 NS 3S N+2 660 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.7 Nicole Leclere -Francoise Turin 54,01 %
13 NS 4C W = -620 4.5 20.45
14 NS 4C E+1 -450 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
a.6 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 53,45 %
15 NS 6C S-1 -100 2 9.09
16 NS 5T W-1 100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.5 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 37,44 %
17 NS 4C S = 420 13.2 60.00
18 NS 4P E+1 -450 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 67,50 %
a.4 Francoise Nibelle -Gaetan van de Werve 51,59 %
19 NS 4C N+1 450 9.9 45.00
20 NS 2P N-2 -200 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
a.3 Brigitte de Fauconval -Laurence Mauboussin 43,70 %
21 NS 4P N = 620 15.4 70.00
22 NS 4C E = -620 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.2 Fabienne Smit -Lydia Wildiers 58,66 %
23 NS 3C W-1 100 2.3 10.45
24 NS 3C S+1 170 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.1 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 50,19 %
25 NS 4P W-1 100 21.9 99.55
26 NS 4C W-2 200 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 92,05 %
Total : 270,0 / 528 = 51,14 %
PAIRE A.5 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier
a.9 Annie Zeimes -Michel Lievens 54,15 %
1 NS 3S S = 400 3.4 15.45
2 NS 2K N+3 150 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 17,95 %
a.8 Catherine de Moffarts -Marie J. de Wagheneire 56,18 %
3 NS 3S E+1 -630 3.4 15.45
4 NS 4C S = 620 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a.7 Nicole Leclere -Francoise Turin 54,01 %
5 NS 2T S+1 110 16.5 75.00
6 NS 2P S = 110 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
a.5 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 37,44 %
9 NS 4P N = 420 14.3 65.00
10 NS 3S N+2 660 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.4 Francoise Nibelle -Gaetan van de Werve 51,59 %
11 NS 4C W = -420 1.2 5.45
12 NS 1S W = -90 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
a.3 Brigitte de Fauconval -Laurence Mauboussin 43,70 %
13 NS 2C W+2 -170 16.5 75.00
14 NS 4P E+1 -450 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a.2 Fabienne Smit -Lydia Wildiers 58,66 %
15 NS 4S S+2 690 15 68.18
16 NS 3S W+1 -630 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.1 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 50,19 %
17 NS 4C S = 420 13.2 60.00
18 NS 4P E+1 -450 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 67,50 %
a13 Mimi Vanvinckenroye -Claudine van Zuylen 37,93 %
19 NS 4C N+2 480 21.9 99.55
20 NS 3S N-2 -200 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a12 Hélène Lemberger -Mado Miller 45,10 %
21 NS 4P N = 620 15.4 70.00
22 NS 4C E-1 100 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a11 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 52,54 %
23 NS 3T N+1 130 7.7 35.00
24 NS 2C S+2 170 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a10 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 54,30 %
25 NS 4P E = -620 11 50.00
26 NS 2P S+1 140 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 269,1 / 528 = 50,97 %
PAIRE A.8 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Annette Fobe
a.2 Fabienne Smit -Lydia Wildiers 58,66 %
1 NS 3S S = 400 3.4 15.45
2 NS 3S S+2 660 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.1 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 50,19 %
3 NS 3S E-1 100 19.7 89.55
4 NS 5K W-1 100 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a13 Mimi Vanvinckenroye -Claudine van Zuylen 37,93 %
5 NS 2T S+1 110 16.5 75.00
6 NS 2P S = 110 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
a12 Hélène Lemberger -Mado Miller 45,10 %
7 NS 3C W+1 -170 20.8 94.55
8 NS 4P W+1 -450 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
a11 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 52,54 %
9 NS 5P N-1 -50 2.3 10.45
10 NS 3S S+2 660 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a10 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 54,30 %
11 NS 4C W = -420 1.2 5.45
12 NS 1S W-1 50 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
a.8 Catherine de Moffarts -Marie J. de Wagheneire 56,18 %
15 NS 6S S-1 -100 2 9.09
16 NS 5T W-1 100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.7 Nicole Leclere -Francoise Turin 54,01 %
17 NS 2C S = 110 6.6 30.00
18 NS 4P E+2 -480 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a.6 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 53,45 %
19 NS 4C N+1 450 9.9 45.00
20 NS 2T E-2 200 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
a.5 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 37,44 %
21 NS 4P N = 620 15.4 70.00
22 NS 3S E-2 200 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
a.4 Francoise Nibelle -Gaetan van de Werve 51,59 %
23 NS 3T N = 110 4.5 20.45
24 NS 2C S+1 140 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
a.3 Brigitte de Fauconval -Laurence Mauboussin 43,70 %
25 NS 4P E = -620 11 50.00
26 NS 3P S-2 -200 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
Total : 251,6 / 528 = 47,65 %
PAIRE A10 Paul Henricot -Jean Henricot
a.6 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 53,45 %
1 NS 3S S = 400 3.4 15.45
2 NS 3S S+1 630 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
a.5 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 37,44 %
3 NS 3S E = -600 11 50.00
4 NS 4C S = 620 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.4 Francoise Nibelle -Gaetan van de Werve 51,59 %
5 NS 1S E = -90 2.3 10.45
6 NS 2P S-1 -50 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 10,45 %
a.3 Brigitte de Fauconval -Laurence Mauboussin 43,70 %
7 NS 4C W = -620 7.7 35.00
8 NS 4P W = -420 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.2 Fabienne Smit -Lydia Wildiers 58,66 %
9 NS 6P N-1 -50 2.3 10.45
10 NS 6S S = 1440 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.1 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 50,19 %
11 NS 4C W-2 100 16.5 75.00
12 NS 1S W-1 50 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
a13 Mimi Vanvinckenroye -Claudine van Zuylen 37,93 %
13 NS 2C W+2 -170 16.5 75.00
14 NS 2P E+2 -170 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
a12 Hélène Lemberger -Mado Miller 45,10 %
15 NS 6S S-1 -100 2 9.09
16 NS 5T W-1 100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a10 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 54,30 %
19 NS 4C N+1 450 9.9 45.00
20 NS 2P N-2 -200 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
a.9 Annie Zeimes -Michel Lievens 54,15 %
21 NS 3P N = 140 8.8 40.00
22 NS 4C E-1 100 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a.8 Catherine de Moffarts -Marie J. de Wagheneire 56,18 %
23 NS 4C W-4 400 21.9 99.55
24 NS 2K W = -90 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.7 Nicole Leclere -Francoise Turin 54,01 %
25 NS 4P W+1 -650 3.4 15.45
26 NS 2C W-1 100 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
Total : 249,4 / 528 = 47,23 %
PAIRE A.6 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont
a11 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 52,54 %
1 NS 3S S+1 430 15.4 70.00
2 NS 3S S-1 -100 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a10 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 54,30 %
3 NS 3S W+1 -630 3.4 15.45
4 NS 4C S = 620 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a.9 Annie Zeimes -Michel Lievens 54,15 %
5 NS 2T S = 90 8.8 40.00
6 NS 2P S = 110 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.8 Catherine de Moffarts -Marie J. de Wagheneire 56,18 %
7 NS 4C W+1 -650 0.1 0.45
8 NS 4P W = -420 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a.6 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 53,45 %
11 NS 4C W-1 50 7.7 35.00
12 NS 2C W = -110 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a.5 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 37,44 %
13 NS 2C W+2 -170 16.5 75.00
14 NS 4P E+1 -450 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a.4 Francoise Nibelle -Gaetan van de Werve 51,59 %
15 NS 4S S+2 690 15 68.18
16 NS 4K S = 130 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
a.3 Brigitte de Fauconval -Laurence Mauboussin 43,70 %
17 NS 4C S = 420 13.2 60.00
18 NS 4P E+1 -450 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 67,50 %
a.2 Fabienne Smit -Lydia Wildiers 58,66 %
19 NS 4C N+1 450 9.9 45.00
20 NS 3S N-3 -300 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a.1 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 50,19 %
21 NS 4P N-2 -200 1.2 5.45
22 NS 4C E = -620 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
a13 Mimi Vanvinckenroye -Claudine van Zuylen 37,93 %
23 NS 4T N+1 150 11 50.00
24 NS 3C S = 140 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a12 Hélène Lemberger -Mado Miller 45,10 %
25 NS 4P W+1 -650 3.4 15.45
26 NS 3P S = 140 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
Total : 228,2 / 528 = 43,22 %
PAIRE A11 Eliane de Ceuninck -Caroll Pucher
a.8 Catherine de Moffarts -Marie J. de Wagheneire 56,18 %
1 NS 3S S = 400 3.4 15.45
2 NS 6K N = 1370 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.7 Nicole Leclere -Francoise Turin 54,01 %
3 NS 3S W+1 -630 3.4 15.45
4 NS 4C S = 620 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a.6 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 53,45 %
5 NS 2S N-1 -100 0.1 0.45
6 NS 2P S = 110 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a.5 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 37,44 %
7 NS 3S E = -600 15.4 70.00
8 NS 4P W = -420 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 67,50 %
a.4 Francoise Nibelle -Gaetan van de Werve 51,59 %
9 NS 4P N = 420 14.3 65.00
10 NS 3S S+2 660 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.3 Brigitte de Fauconval -Laurence Mauboussin 43,70 %
11 NS 4K E-2 100 16.5 75.00
12 NS 1S W+1 -120 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
a.2 Fabienne Smit -Lydia Wildiers 58,66 %
13 NS 2C W+2 -170 16.5 75.00
14 NS 4P E+1 -450 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a.1 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 50,19 %
15 NS 4S S+1 660 8 36.36
16 NS 3S W+1 -630 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
a13 Mimi Vanvinckenroye -Claudine van Zuylen 37,93 %
17 NS 4C S-2 -100 1.2 5.45
18 NS 4P E+2 -480 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 12,95 %
a11 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 52,54 %
21 NS 4P N-1 -100 5.5 25.00
22 NS 4C E = -620 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
a10 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 54,30 %
23 NS 3T N+1 130 7.7 35.00
24 NS 3P E-1 50 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a.9 Annie Zeimes -Michel Lievens 54,15 %
25 NS 4P W = -620 11 50.00
26 NS 2P S-1 -100 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
Total : 202,2 / 528 = 38,30 %
PAIRE A.3 Grazia Neuenschwander -Simone Munsterhjelm
a.5 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 37,44 %
1 NS 3S S+1 430 15.4 70.00
2 NS 6K N-1 -100 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a.3 Brigitte de Fauconval -Laurence Mauboussin 43,70 %
5 NS 2T S = 90 8.8 40.00
6 NS 2P S = 110 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.2 Fabienne Smit -Lydia Wildiers 58,66 %
7 NS 4C W = -620 7.7 35.00
8 NS 4P W+1 -450 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
a.1 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 50,19 %
9 NS 3P N+1 170 6.6 30.00
10 NS 6S S = 1440 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a13 Mimi Vanvinckenroye -Claudine van Zuylen 37,93 %
11 NS 4C W-1 50 7.7 35.00
12 NS 1S W-1 50 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a12 Hélène Lemberger -Mado Miller 45,10 %
13 NS 4C W = -620 4.5 20.45
14 NS 2P E+3 -200 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a11 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 52,54 %
15 NS 4S S+1 660 8 36.36
16 NS 5T W = -600 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a10 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 54,30 %
17 NS 4C S+1 450 20.8 94.55
18 NS 4P E+2 -480 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a.9 Annie Zeimes -Michel Lievens 54,15 %
19 NS 4C N+1 450 9.9 45.00
20 NS 4P N-5 -500 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.8 Catherine de Moffarts -Marie J. de Wagheneire 56,18 %
21 NS 4C N-1 -100 5.5 25.00
22 NS 4C E = -620 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
a.7 Nicole Leclere -Francoise Turin 54,01 %
23 NS 2C W+1 -140 0.1 0.45
24 NS 4P E-2 100 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
a.6 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 53,45 %
25 NS 4P E+1 -650 3.4 15.45
26 NS 2P S-2 -200 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 10,45 %
Total : 193,9 / 528 = 36,72 %
PAIRE A.9 -
a.4 Francoise Nibelle -Gaetan van de Werve 51,59 %
1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.3 Brigitte de Fauconval -Laurence Mauboussin 43,70 %
3 NS BYE 0 0.00
4 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.2 Fabienne Smit -Lydia Wildiers 58,66 %
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.1 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 50,19 %
7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a13 Mimi Vanvinckenroye -Claudine van Zuylen 37,93 %
9 NS BYE 0 0.00
10 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a12 Hélène Lemberger -Mado Miller 45,10 %
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a11 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 52,54 %
13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.9 Annie Zeimes -Michel Lievens 54,15 %
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.8 Catherine de Moffarts -Marie J. de Wagheneire 56,18 %
19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.7 Nicole Leclere -Francoise Turin 54,01 %
21 NS BYE 0 0.00
22 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.6 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 53,45 %
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.5 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 37,44 %
25 NS BYE 0 0.00
26 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 572 = 0,00 %
PAIRE a.2 Fabienne Smit -Lydia Wildiers
A.8 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Annette Fobe 47,65 %
1 EO 3S S = 400 18.6 84.55
2 EO 3S S+2 660 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 59,64 %
3 EO 3S E = -600 11 50.00
4 EO 4C S = 620 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.9 - 0,00 %
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.3 Grazia Neuenschwander -Simone Munsterhjelm 36,72 %
7 EO 4C W = -620 14.3 65.00
8 EO 4P W+1 -450 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
A10 Paul Henricot -Jean Henricot 47,23 %
9 EO 6P N-1 -50 19.7 89.55
10 EO 6S S = 1440 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.4 Hugo Baetens -Alan Beckman 57,58 %
11 EO 5C W-2 100 5.5 25.00
12 EO 1S W+1 -120 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
A11 Eliane de Ceuninck -Caroll Pucher 38,30 %
13 EO 2C W+2 -170 5.5 25.00
14 EO 4P E+1 -450 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A.5 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 50,97 %
15 EO 4S S+2 690 7 31.82
16 EO 3S W+1 -630 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A12 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 58,26 %
17 EO 6C S-2 -100 20.8 94.55
18 EO 4P E+2 -480 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 87,05 %
A.6 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 43,22 %
19 EO 4C N+1 450 12.1 55.00
20 EO 3S N-3 -300 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A13 Serge Alard -Jean Chabotier 51,36 %
21 EO 4P N = 620 6.6 30.00
22 EO 4C E = -620 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A.7 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Liliane Baptista 51,14 %
23 EO 3C W-1 100 19.7 89.55
24 EO 3C S+1 170 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
Total : 283,9 / 484 = 58,66 %
PAIRE a.8 Catherine de Moffarts -Marie J. de Wagheneire
A11 Eliane de Ceuninck -Caroll Pucher 38,30 %
1 EO 3S S = 400 18.6 84.55
2 EO 6K N = 1370 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.5 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 50,97 %
3 EO 3S E+1 -630 18.6 84.55
4 EO 4C S = 620 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A12 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 58,26 %
5 EO 2C N+1 140 0.1 0.45
6 EO 2P S-1 -50 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.6 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 43,22 %
7 EO 4C W+1 -650 21.9 99.55
8 EO 4P W = -420 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A13 Serge Alard -Jean Chabotier 51,36 %
9 EO 5P S-1 -50 19.7 89.55
10 EO 4S S+2 690 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Myriam de Timary 58,28 %
13 EO 4C W = -620 17.5 79.55
14 EO 4P E-1 50 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A.8 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Annette Fobe 47,65 %
15 EO 6S S-1 -100 20 90.91
16 EO 5T W-1 100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 59,64 %
17 EO 4C S = 420 8.8 40.00
18 EO 4P E+2 -480 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
A.9 - 0,00 %
19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.3 Grazia Neuenschwander -Simone Munsterhjelm 36,72 %
21 EO 4C N-1 -100 16.5 75.00
22 EO 4C E = -620 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
A10 Paul Henricot -Jean Henricot 47,23 %
23 EO 4C W-4 400 0.1 0.45
24 EO 2K W = -90 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.4 Hugo Baetens -Alan Beckman 57,58 %
25 EO 4P W+1 -650 18.6 84.55
26 EO 3K E-2 200 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 271,9 / 484 = 56,18 %
PAIRE a10 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand
A12 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 58,26 %
1 EO 3S S+1 430 6.6 30.00
2 EO 5K N = 600 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.6 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 43,22 %
3 EO 3S W+1 -630 18.6 84.55
4 EO 4C S = 620 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A13 Serge Alard -Jean Chabotier 51,36 %
5 EO 2S W-1 50 17.5 79.55
6 EO 2P S = 110 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
A.7 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Liliane Baptista 51,14 %
7 EO 4C W = -620 14.3 65.00
8 EO 4P W+1 -450 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Myriam de Timary 58,28 %
9 EO 4P S = 420 7.7 35.00
10 EO 3S N+2 660 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.8 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Annette Fobe 47,65 %
11 EO 4C W = -420 20.8 94.55
12 EO 1S W-1 50 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 59,64 %
13 EO 3C W+1 -170 5.5 25.00
14 EO 4P E+1 -450 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A.3 Grazia Neuenschwander -Simone Munsterhjelm 36,72 %
17 EO 4C S+1 450 1.2 5.45
18 EO 4P E+2 -480 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A10 Paul Henricot -Jean Henricot 47,23 %
19 EO 4C N+1 450 12.1 55.00
20 EO 2P N-2 -200 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
A.4 Hugo Baetens -Alan Beckman 57,58 %
21 EO 4P N = 620 6.6 30.00
22 EO 4PcN-3 -500 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
A11 Eliane de Ceuninck -Caroll Pucher 38,30 %
23 EO 3T N+1 130 14.3 65.00
24 EO 3P E-1 50 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A.5 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 50,97 %
25 EO 4P E = -620 11 50.00
26 EO 2P S+1 140 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 286,7 / 528 = 54,30 %
PAIRE a.9 Annie Zeimes -Michel Lievens
A.5 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 50,97 %
1 EO 3S S = 400 18.6 84.55
2 EO 2K N+3 150 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 82,05 %
A12 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 58,26 %
3 EO 2S E = -120 6.6 30.00
4 EO 4C S = 620 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A.6 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 43,22 %
5 EO 2T S = 90 13.2 60.00
6 EO 2P S = 110 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A13 Serge Alard -Jean Chabotier 51,36 %
7 EO 4C W = -620 14.3 65.00
8 EO 4P W+2 -480 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
A.7 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Liliane Baptista 51,14 %
9 EO 4P N = 420 7.7 35.00
10 EO 3S N+2 660 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Myriam de Timary 58,28 %
11 EO 4C W-1 50 14.3 65.00
12 EO 1S W-2 100 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 59,64 %
15 EO 6S S = 1440 1 4.55
16 EO 4T W = -130 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A.9 - 0,00 %
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.3 Grazia Neuenschwander -Simone Munsterhjelm 36,72 %
19 EO 4C N+1 450 12.1 55.00
20 EO 4P N-5 -500 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A10 Paul Henricot -Jean Henricot 47,23 %
21 EO 3P N = 140 13.2 60.00
22 EO 4C E-1 100 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A.4 Hugo Baetens -Alan Beckman 57,58 %
23 EO 4C W-3 300 3.4 15.45
24 EO 4K W-1 50 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A11 Eliane de Ceuninck -Caroll Pucher 38,30 %
25 EO 4P W = -620 11 50.00
26 EO 2P S-1 -100 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
Total : 262,1 / 484 = 54,15 %
PAIRE a.7 Nicole Leclere -Francoise Turin
A.4 Hugo Baetens -Alan Beckman 57,58 %
1 EO 3S S+1 430 6.6 30.00
2 EO 6K N = 1370 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
A11 Eliane de Ceuninck -Caroll Pucher 38,30 %
3 EO 3S W+1 -630 18.6 84.55
4 EO 4C S = 620 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A.5 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 50,97 %
5 EO 2T S+1 110 5.5 25.00
6 EO 2P S = 110 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
A12 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 58,26 %
7 EO 4C W = -620 14.3 65.00
8 EO 4P W = -420 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A13 Serge Alard -Jean Chabotier 51,36 %
11 EO 4C W-2 100 5.5 25.00
12 EO 1S W-1 50 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
A.7 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Liliane Baptista 51,14 %
13 EO 4C W = -620 17.5 79.55
14 EO 4C E+1 -450 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Myriam de Timary 58,28 %
15 EO 4S S+1 660 14 63.64
16 EO 5T W-1 100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.8 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Annette Fobe 47,65 %
17 EO 2C S = 110 15.4 70.00
18 EO 4P E+2 -480 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 59,64 %
19 EO 4C N+1 450 12.1 55.00
20 EO 2P N-1 -100 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A.9 - 0,00 %
21 EO BYE 0 0.00
22 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.3 Grazia Neuenschwander -Simone Munsterhjelm 36,72 %
23 EO 2C W+1 -140 21.9 99.55
24 EO 4P E-2 100 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
A10 Paul Henricot -Jean Henricot 47,23 %
25 EO 4P W+1 -650 18.6 84.55
26 EO 2C W-1 100 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
Total : 261,4 / 484 = 54,01 %
PAIRE a.6 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart
A10 Paul Henricot -Jean Henricot 47,23 %
1 EO 3S S = 400 18.6 84.55
2 EO 3S S+1 630 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
A.4 Hugo Baetens -Alan Beckman 57,58 %
3 EO 3S E-1 100 2.3 10.45
4 EO 4C S = 620 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
A11 Eliane de Ceuninck -Caroll Pucher 38,30 %
5 EO 2S N-1 -100 21.9 99.55
6 EO 2P S = 110 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A12 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 58,26 %
9 EO 4P N = 420 7.7 35.00
10 EO 6S S-2 -200 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
A.6 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 43,22 %
11 EO 4C W-1 50 14.3 65.00
12 EO 2C W = -110 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A13 Serge Alard -Jean Chabotier 51,36 %
13 EO 3P S-2 -200 13.2 60.00
14 EO 4P W+2 -480 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
A.7 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Liliane Baptista 51,14 %
15 EO 6C S-1 -100 20 90.91
16 EO 5T W-1 100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Myriam de Timary 58,28 %
17 EO 4C N+1 450 1.2 5.45
18 EO 5P E = -450 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
A.8 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Annette Fobe 47,65 %
19 EO 4C N+1 450 12.1 55.00
20 EO 2T E-2 200 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 59,64 %
21 EO 4P N+1 650 0.1 0.45
22 EO 3S E = -600 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
A.9 - 0,00 %
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.3 Grazia Neuenschwander -Simone Munsterhjelm 36,72 %
25 EO 4P E+1 -650 18.6 84.55
26 EO 2P S-2 -200 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 89,55 %
Total : 258,7 / 484 = 53,45 %
PAIRE a11 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed
A.6 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 43,22 %
1 EO 3S S+1 430 6.6 30.00
2 EO 3S S-1 -100 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A13 Serge Alard -Jean Chabotier 51,36 %
3 EO 3S E = -600 11 50.00
4 EO 4C S = 620 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.7 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Liliane Baptista 51,14 %
5 EO 2T S = 90 13.2 60.00
6 EO 2P S = 110 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Myriam de Timary 58,28 %
7 EO 3C W+2 -200 4.5 20.45
8 EO 4P W+1 -450 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.8 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Annette Fobe 47,65 %
9 EO 5P N-1 -50 19.7 89.55
10 EO 3S S+2 660 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 59,64 %
11 EO 4C W-1 50 14.3 65.00
12 EO 2C W-1 50 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.9 - 0,00 %
13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.3 Grazia Neuenschwander -Simone Munsterhjelm 36,72 %
15 EO 4S S+1 660 14 63.64
16 EO 5T W = -600 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.4 Hugo Baetens -Alan Beckman 57,58 %
19 EO 5C N = 450 12.1 55.00
20 EO 2P N-1 -100 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A11 Eliane de Ceuninck -Caroll Pucher 38,30 %
21 EO 4P N-1 -100 16.5 75.00
22 EO 4C E = -620 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
A.5 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 50,97 %
23 EO 3T N+1 130 14.3 65.00
24 EO 2C S+2 170 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A12 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 58,26 %
25 EO 6KcS-3 -500 6.6 30.00
26 EO 4C W-2 200 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
Total : 254,3 / 484 = 52,54 %
PAIRE a.4 Francoise Nibelle -Gaetan van de Werve
A.9 - 0,00 %
1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A10 Paul Henricot -Jean Henricot 47,23 %
5 EO 1S E = -90 19.7 89.55
6 EO 2P S-1 -50 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 89,55 %
A.4 Hugo Baetens -Alan Beckman 57,58 %
7 EO 4C W = -620 14.3 65.00
8 EO 3C E+1 -170 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
A11 Eliane de Ceuninck -Caroll Pucher 38,30 %
9 EO 4P N = 420 7.7 35.00
10 EO 3S S+2 660 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.5 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 50,97 %
11 EO 4C W = -420 20.8 94.55
12 EO 1S W = -90 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
A12 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 58,26 %
13 EO 3C W+1 -170 5.5 25.00
14 EO 4P E+1 -450 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A.6 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 43,22 %
15 EO 4S S+2 690 7 31.82
16 EO 4K S = 130 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
A13 Serge Alard -Jean Chabotier 51,36 %
17 EO 4C S = 420 8.8 40.00
18 EO 4P E+1 -450 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 32,50 %
A.7 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Liliane Baptista 51,14 %
19 EO 4C N+1 450 12.1 55.00
20 EO 2P N-2 -200 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Myriam de Timary 58,28 %
21 EO 4P N-2 -200 20.8 94.55
22 EO 4C E = -620 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
A.8 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Annette Fobe 47,65 %
23 EO 3T N = 110 17.5 79.55
24 EO 2C S+1 140 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 59,64 %
25 EO 5KcS-2 -300 3.4 15.45
26 EO 4C W-2 200 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 15,45 %
Total : 249,7 / 484 = 51,59 %
PAIRE a.1 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Myriam de Timary 58,28 %
1 EO 3S S+1 430 6.6 30.00
2 EO 3S S = 600 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.8 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Annette Fobe 47,65 %
3 EO 3S E-1 100 2.3 10.45
4 EO 5K W-1 100 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 59,64 %
5 EO 2T S+1 110 5.5 25.00
6 EO 2P S-1 -50 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
A.9 - 0,00 %
7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.3 Grazia Neuenschwander -Simone Munsterhjelm 36,72 %
9 EO 3P N+1 170 15.4 70.00
10 EO 6S S = 1440 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A10 Paul Henricot -Jean Henricot 47,23 %
11 EO 4C W-2 100 5.5 25.00
12 EO 1S W-1 50 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
A.4 Hugo Baetens -Alan Beckman 57,58 %
13 EO 4C W+1 -650 21.9 99.55
14 EO 4P E+1 -450 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
A11 Eliane de Ceuninck -Caroll Pucher 38,30 %
15 EO 4S S+1 660 14 63.64
16 EO 3S W+1 -630 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
A.5 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 50,97 %
17 EO 4C S = 420 8.8 40.00
18 EO 4P E+1 -450 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 32,50 %
A12 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 58,26 %
19 EO 4C N+1 450 12.1 55.00
20 EO 3P N-1 -100 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A.6 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 43,22 %
21 EO 4P N-2 -200 20.8 94.55
22 EO 4C E = -620 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
A.7 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Liliane Baptista 51,14 %
25 EO 4P W-1 100 0.1 0.45
26 EO 4C W-2 200 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 7,95 %
Total : 242,9 / 484 = 50,19 %
PAIRE a12 Hélène Lemberger -Mado Miller
A13 Serge Alard -Jean Chabotier 51,36 %
1 EO 3S S+1 430 6.6 30.00
2 EO 5K N+1 620 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
A.7 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Liliane Baptista 51,14 %
3 EO 3S E+1 -630 18.6 84.55
4 EO 4C S+1 650 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Myriam de Timary 58,28 %
5 EO 2P N = 110 5.5 25.00
6 EO 2P S = 110 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
A.8 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Annette Fobe 47,65 %
7 EO 3C W+1 -170 1.2 5.45
8 EO 4P W+1 -450 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 59,64 %
9 EO 4P N = 420 7.7 35.00
10 EO 6S S-2 -200 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
A.9 - 0,00 %
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.3 Grazia Neuenschwander -Simone Munsterhjelm 36,72 %
13 EO 4C W = -620 17.5 79.55
14 EO 2P E+3 -200 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A10 Paul Henricot -Jean Henricot 47,23 %
15 EO 6S S-1 -100 20 90.91
16 EO 5T W-1 100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.4 Hugo Baetens -Alan Beckman 57,58 %
17 EO 4C S-1 -50 17.5 79.55
18 EO 4P E+1 -450 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.5 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 50,97 %
21 EO 4P N = 620 6.6 30.00
22 EO 4C E-1 100 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A12 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 58,26 %
23 EO 4C W-3 300 3.4 15.45
24 EO 3C S = 140 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
A.6 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 43,22 %
25 EO 4P W+1 -650 18.6 84.55
26 EO 3P S = 140 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
Total : 218,3 / 484 = 45,10 %
PAIRE a.3 Brigitte de Fauconval -Laurence Mauboussin
A.9 - 0,00 %
3 EO BYE 0 0.00
4 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.3 Grazia Neuenschwander -Simone Munsterhjelm 36,72 %
5 EO 2T S = 90 13.2 60.00
6 EO 2P S = 110 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A10 Paul Henricot -Jean Henricot 47,23 %
7 EO 4C W = -620 14.3 65.00
8 EO 4P W = -420 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.4 Hugo Baetens -Alan Beckman 57,58 %
9 EO 5P N = 450 0.1 0.45
10 EO 3S S+2 660 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
A11 Eliane de Ceuninck -Caroll Pucher 38,30 %
11 EO 4K E-2 100 5.5 25.00
12 EO 1S W+1 -120 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
A.5 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 50,97 %
13 EO 2C W+2 -170 5.5 25.00
14 EO 4P E+1 -450 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A12 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 58,26 %
15 EO 4S S+2 690 7 31.82
16 EO 5TcW-1 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
A.6 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 43,22 %
17 EO 4C S = 420 8.8 40.00
18 EO 4P E+1 -450 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 32,50 %
A13 Serge Alard -Jean Chabotier 51,36 %
19 EO 4C N+1 450 12.1 55.00
20 EO 3K S-1 -100 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A.7 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Liliane Baptista 51,14 %
21 EO 4P N = 620 6.6 30.00
22 EO 4C E = -620 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Myriam de Timary 58,28 %
23 EO 3K W-2 200 7.7 35.00
24 EO 3C S = 140 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
A.8 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Annette Fobe 47,65 %
25 EO 4P E = -620 11 50.00
26 EO 3P S-2 -200 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
Total : 211,5 / 484 = 43,70 %
PAIRE a13 Mimi Vanvinckenroye -Claudine van Zuylen
A.7 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Liliane Baptista 51,14 %
1 EO 3S S+1 430 6.6 30.00
2 EO 3S S = 600 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Myriam de Timary 58,28 %
3 EO 3C W-1 100 2.3 10.45
4 EO 4C S = 620 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
A.8 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Annette Fobe 47,65 %
5 EO 2T S+1 110 5.5 25.00
6 EO 2P S = 110 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 59,64 %
7 EO 2C W+2 -170 1.2 5.45
8 EO 3S W = -400 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 7,95 %
A.9 - 0,00 %
9 EO BYE 0 0.00
10 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.3 Grazia Neuenschwander -Simone Munsterhjelm 36,72 %
11 EO 4C W-1 50 14.3 65.00
12 EO 1S W-1 50 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A10 Paul Henricot -Jean Henricot 47,23 %
13 EO 2C W+2 -170 5.5 25.00
14 EO 2P E+2 -170 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
A.4 Hugo Baetens -Alan Beckman 57,58 %
15 EO 6S S = 1440 1 4.55
16 EO 4T W = -130 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A11 Eliane de Ceuninck -Caroll Pucher 38,30 %
17 EO 4C S-2 -100 20.8 94.55
18 EO 4P E+2 -480 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 87,05 %
A.5 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 50,97 %
19 EO 4C N+2 480 0.1 0.45
20 EO 3S N-2 -200 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A.6 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 43,22 %
23 EO 4T N+1 150 11 50.00
24 EO 3C S = 140 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A13 Serge Alard -Jean Chabotier 51,36 %
25 EO 5KcS-2 -300 3.4 15.45
26 EO 3P S = 140 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
Total : 183,6 / 484 = 37,93 %
PAIRE a.5 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain
A.3 Grazia Neuenschwander -Simone Munsterhjelm 36,72 %
1 EO 3S S+1 430 6.6 30.00
2 EO 6K N-1 -100 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A10 Paul Henricot -Jean Henricot 47,23 %
3 EO 3S E = -600 11 50.00
4 EO 4C S = 620 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A11 Eliane de Ceuninck -Caroll Pucher 38,30 %
7 EO 3S E = -600 6.6 30.00
8 EO 4P W = -420 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 32,50 %
A.5 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 50,97 %
9 EO 4P N = 420 7.7 35.00
10 EO 3S N+2 660 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A12 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 58,26 %
11 EO 5C W-3 150 0.1 0.45
12 EO 1S W-1 50 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
A.6 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 43,22 %
13 EO 2C W+2 -170 5.5 25.00
14 EO 4P E+1 -450 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A13 Serge Alard -Jean Chabotier 51,36 %
15 EO 3S S+3 690 7 31.82
16 EO 5T W-1 100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A.7 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Liliane Baptista 51,14 %
17 EO 4C S = 420 8.8 40.00
18 EO 4P E+1 -450 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 32,50 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Myriam de Timary 58,28 %
19 EO 4C N+1 450 12.1 55.00
20 EO 2S S-1 -100 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A.8 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Annette Fobe 47,65 %
21 EO 4P N = 620 6.6 30.00
22 EO 3S E-2 200 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 59,64 %
23 EO 3C W-2 200 7.7 35.00
24 EO 3C S = 140 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
A.9 - 0,00 %
25 EO BYE 0 0.00
26 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 181,2 / 484 = 37,44 %
|