B.C.O.B.
Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 60,71 A.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Michele Berrier
--- 2 56,55 A10 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens
--- 3 55,36 A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans
--- 4 54,46 A.3 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren
--- 5 51,19 A.8 Iris de Limbourg -Paul Henricot
--- 6 49,11 A11 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander
--- 7 48,21 A.9 Daniel Couvreur -Anne Brans
--- 8 45,54 A.6 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie
--- 9 44,94 A.4 Alan Beckman -Mado Miller
--- 10 42,86 A.2 Nicole Leclere -Myriam de Timary
--- 11 41,07 A.7 Veronique Englebienne -Virginie Van Damme
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 56,55 a.6 Francoise Duren -Marc Bauherz
--- 2 55,95 a.1 Paul Henri Oosterlynck -Jean van Caloen
--- 3 54,76 a.3 Pascale Bodart -Nadine Brabant
--- 4 54,17 a.4 Didier Collart -Michel Lahaut
--- 5 50,89 a11 Teresa Dekoster -Helene Christiaens
--- 6 50,30 a.5 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne
--- 7 50,00 a.7 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor
--- 8 48,81 a.2 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain
--- 9 44,64 a10 Pascale Graton -Sybille Gillet
--- 10 43,45 a.8 Christiane Huby -Francoise Turin
--- 11 40,48 a.9 Benedicte Lemaigre -Mercedes Steed
PAIRE A.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Michele Berrier
a.9 Benedicte Lemaigre -Mercedes Steed 40,48 %
1 NS 3S E-1 50 13 92.86
2 NS 5CcS-1 -200 14 100.00
3 NS 6K S = 920 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 92,86 %
a.5 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 50,30 %
13 NS 3T W+2 -150 8 57.14
14 NS 1S W+1 -120 6 42.86
15 NS 3T N-2 -200 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
a.4 Didier Collart -Michel Lahaut 54,17 %
16 NS 5K S+2 440 7 50.00
17 NS 4P E+2 -480 12 85.71
18 NS 4P S = 620 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
a.3 Pascale Bodart -Nadine Brabant 54,76 %
19 NS 4P E-1 100 13 92.86
20 NS 4C S-1 -100 5 35.71
21 NS 3S E = -400 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 48,81 %
22 NS 2K W-1 100 8 57.14
23 NS 3P S = 140 7 50.00
24 NS 2T S+2 130 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
a.1 Paul Henri Oosterlynck -Jean van Caloen 55,95 %
25 NS 3S E-3 300 14 100.00
26 NS 2S N-1 -100 2 14.29
27 NS 3S N = 400 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
a11 Teresa Dekoster -Helene Christiaens 50,89 %
28 NS 3P N = 140 11 78.57
29 NS 4P S = 620 5 35.71
30 NS 2P S+1 140 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
a10 Pascale Graton -Sybille Gillet 44,64 %
31 NS 3P N = 140 11 78.57
32 NS 4T N+1 150 3 21.43
33 NS 3C E-2 100 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
Total : 204,0 / 336 = 60,71 %
PAIRE A10 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens
a.8 Christiane Huby -Francoise Turin 43,45 %
1 NS 3S E-1 50 13 92.86
2 NS 5T W+1 -420 6 42.86
3 NS 3S S+2 460 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
a.7 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 50,00 %
4 NS 3P S-1 -100 8 57.14
5 NS 3T W-1 50 11 78.57
6 NS 4K E = -130 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.6 Francoise Duren -Marc Bauherz 56,55 %
7 NS 3S N+2 660 12 85.71
8 NS 4PcN-1 -100 1 7.14
9 NS 5PcW-1 200 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
a.5 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 50,30 %
10 NS 2P S+1 140 12 85.71
11 NS 3S W-1 50 12 85.71
12 NS 5TcE-1 100 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
a.4 Didier Collart -Michel Lahaut 54,17 %
13 NS 1S W+1 -120 11 78.57
14 NS 2K S-1 -50 11 78.57
15 NS 3T N-1 -100 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.3 Pascale Bodart -Nadine Brabant 54,76 %
16 NS 6K S+1 940 14 100.00
17 NS 6P E = -980 3 21.43
18 NS 3P S = 140 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
a10 Pascale Graton -Sybille Gillet 44,64 %
28 NS 3P N = 140 11 78.57
29 NS 4P S = 620 5 35.71
30 NS 2PcS+2 670 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.9 Benedicte Lemaigre -Mercedes Steed 40,48 %
31 NS 4C S-2 -200 4 28.57
32 NS 4T N+1 150 3 21.43
33 NS 4C E-1 50 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 190,0 / 336 = 56,55 %
PAIRE A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans
a.1 Paul Henri Oosterlynck -Jean van Caloen 55,95 %
1 NS 3S E+1 -430 5 35.71
2 NS 4P W+2 -480 2 14.29
3 NS 6K S = 920 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
a11 Teresa Dekoster -Helene Christiaens 50,89 %
4 NS 3P S-1 -100 8 57.14
5 NS 2T W = -90 6 42.86
6 NS 5K E-1 100 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
a10 Pascale Graton -Sybille Gillet 44,64 %
7 NS 4P S+2 680 14 100.00
8 NS 3T N+2 150 14 100.00
9 NS 4P W = -620 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 88,10 %
a.9 Benedicte Lemaigre -Mercedes Steed 40,48 %
10 NS 3P S = 140 12 85.71
11 NS 4C E-1 50 12 85.71
12 NS 4C S+1 650 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 88,10 %
a.8 Christiane Huby -Francoise Turin 43,45 %
13 NS 4P E+1 -650 3 21.43
14 NS 1S W+2 -150 1 7.14
15 NS 4P W-2 100 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
a.7 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 50,00 %
16 NS 5K S+2 440 7 50.00
17 NS 6P E = -980 3 21.43
18 NS 2P S+2 170 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
a.6 Francoise Duren -Marc Bauherz 56,55 %
19 NS 4P E = -620 1 7.14
20 NS 3C S = 140 12 85.71
21 NS 3S E+1 -430 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.5 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 50,30 %
22 NS 2K W-1 100 8 57.14
23 NS 2P S+1 140 7 50.00
24 NS 2T S+2 130 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
Total : 186,0 / 336 = 55,36 %
PAIRE A.3 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren
a.3 Pascale Bodart -Nadine Brabant 54,76 %
7 NS 3S N = 600 5 35.71
8 NS 3T N+1 130 9 64.29
9 NS 5P W = -650 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 48,81 %
10 NS 2P S = 110 8 57.14
11 NS 4C E+1 -450 0 0.00
12 NS 4C S+1 650 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.1 Paul Henri Oosterlynck -Jean van Caloen 55,95 %
13 NS 4P E+1 -650 3 21.43
14 NS 3K S-1 -50 11 78.57
15 NS 2P W+1 -140 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
a11 Teresa Dekoster -Helene Christiaens 50,89 %
16 NS 5K S+2 440 7 50.00
17 NS 4P E+2 -480 12 85.71
18 NS 4P S+1 650 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
a10 Pascale Graton -Sybille Gillet 44,64 %
19 NS 4C N-4 -200 4 28.57
20 NS 3C S = 140 12 85.71
21 NS 4C W = -420 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.9 Benedicte Lemaigre -Mercedes Steed 40,48 %
22 NS 2P S+2 170 13 92.86
23 NS 4P S = 620 14 100.00
24 NS 3K W-1 50 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
a.8 Christiane Huby -Francoise Turin 43,45 %
25 NS 3S E-2 200 11 78.57
26 NS 2S N = 120 7 50.00
27 NS 3S N+2 460 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
a.7 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 50,00 %
28 NS 4P N-2 -200 1 7.14
29 NS 3S N+1 630 11 78.57
30 NS 2P S = 110 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 183,0 / 336 = 54,46 %
PAIRE A.8 Iris de Limbourg -Paul Henricot
a.4 Didier Collart -Michel Lahaut 54,17 %
1 NS 3S E = -400 10 71.43
2 NS 4P W+2 -480 2 14.29
3 NS 6K S = 920 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
a.3 Pascale Bodart -Nadine Brabant 54,76 %
4 NS 3P S-1 -100 8 57.14
5 NS 1S W = -90 6 42.86
6 NS 6KcE-2 500 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 48,81 %
7 NS 3S N+1 630 9 64.29
8 NS 3C W-2 100 6 42.86
9 NS 5P W = -650 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
a.1 Paul Henri Oosterlynck -Jean van Caloen 55,95 %
10 NS 3P S = 140 12 85.71
11 NS 2C E+1 -140 6 42.86
12 NS 3C S+2 200 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
a.8 Christiane Huby -Francoise Turin 43,45 %
22 NS 2K W-1 100 8 57.14
23 NS 3P S = 140 7 50.00
24 NS 3T S+1 130 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
a.7 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 50,00 %
25 NS 5T E-2 200 11 78.57
26 NS 2P S-1 -100 2 14.29
27 NS 3S N = 400 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
a.6 Francoise Duren -Marc Bauherz 56,55 %
28 NS 4T E-1 50 5 35.71
29 NS 4P S = 620 5 35.71
30 NS 3P S = 140 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
a.5 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 50,30 %
31 NS 5K E-1 50 8 57.14
32 NS 4T N+2 170 8 57.14
33 NS 3T N-3 -150 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
Total : 172,0 / 336 = 51,19 %
PAIRE A11 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander
a10 Pascale Graton -Sybille Gillet 44,64 %
1 NS 3S W+1 -430 5 35.71
2 NS 4P E+2 -480 2 14.29
3 NS 3S S+3 490 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.9 Benedicte Lemaigre -Mercedes Steed 40,48 %
4 NS 3K W = -110 3 21.43
5 NS 3T W-1 50 11 78.57
6 NS 5KcE-1 200 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
a.8 Christiane Huby -Francoise Turin 43,45 %
7 NS 3S N = 600 5 35.71
8 NS 4T N = 130 9 64.29
9 NS 5C S-3 -150 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
a.7 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 50,00 %
10 NS 2C W+1 -140 0 0.00
11 NS 2C E = -110 8 57.14
12 NS 5TcW-1 100 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
a.6 Francoise Duren -Marc Bauherz 56,55 %
13 NS 1S W = -90 14 100.00
14 NS 1S W+1 -120 6 42.86
15 NS 2K W = -90 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
a.5 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 50,30 %
16 NS 5K S+2 440 7 50.00
17 NS 6P W = -980 3 21.43
18 NS 4P S+1 650 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
a.4 Didier Collart -Michel Lahaut 54,17 %
19 NS 2P E+2 -170 6 42.86
20 NS 4C S-1 -100 5 35.71
21 NS 2C W+2 -170 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
a11 Teresa Dekoster -Helene Christiaens 50,89 %
31 NS 4C S-3 -300 2 14.29
32 NS 3T N+3 170 8 57.14
33 NS 2C E-1 50 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
Total : 165,0 / 336 = 49,11 %
PAIRE A.9 Daniel Couvreur -Anne Brans
a.6 Francoise Duren -Marc Bauherz 56,55 %
1 NS 3S E+2 -460 0 0.00
2 NS 5T W = -400 10 71.43
3 NS 5K S+1 420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
a.5 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 50,30 %
4 NS 4K W-1 100 12 85.71
5 NS 1S W = -90 6 42.86
6 NS 5KcE-1 200 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
a.4 Didier Collart -Michel Lahaut 54,17 %
7 NS 6CcS-2 -500 0 0.00
8 NS 4P S-2 -100 1 7.14
9 NS 4P W+1 -650 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 9,52 %
a.3 Pascale Bodart -Nadine Brabant 54,76 %
10 NS 2C E = -110 3 21.43
11 NS 2C E+2 -170 3 21.43
12 NS 4C S-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 14,29 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 48,81 %
13 NS 4P E+1 -650 3 21.43
14 NS 1S W+2 -150 1 7.14
15 NS 2T N = 90 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
a.9 Benedicte Lemaigre -Mercedes Steed 40,48 %
25 NS 4T E-1 100 7 50.00
26 NS 3S N = 600 14 100.00
27 NS 3S N+2 460 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 80,95 %
a.8 Christiane Huby -Francoise Turin 43,45 %
28 NS 3S W-1 50 5 35.71
29 NS 4P S+1 650 14 100.00
30 NS 1S E-3 150 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
a.7 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 50,00 %
31 NS 3P N+1 170 14 100.00
32 NS 5T N = 400 13 92.86
33 NS 1S S = 90 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 88,10 %
Total : 162,0 / 336 = 48,21 %
PAIRE A.6 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie
a11 Teresa Dekoster -Helene Christiaens 50,89 %
1 NS 3S E+1 -430 5 35.71
2 NS 5T W = -400 10 71.43
3 NS 3S N+2 460 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
a10 Pascale Graton -Sybille Gillet 44,64 %
4 NS 3C N = 140 14 100.00
5 NS 2T E+1 -110 0 0.00
6 NS 5KcE-1 200 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
a.6 Francoise Duren -Marc Bauherz 56,55 %
16 NS 5K S+2 440 7 50.00
17 NS 4S W+2 -490 8 57.14
18 NS 2K N+1 110 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
a.5 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 50,30 %
19 NS 2P E+1 -140 8 57.14
20 NS 4C S-1 -100 5 35.71
21 NS 4C W = -420 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
a.4 Didier Collart -Michel Lahaut 54,17 %
22 NS 3P S-2 -100 2 14.29
23 NS 3P S = 140 7 50.00
24 NS 1S N = 90 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
a.3 Pascale Bodart -Nadine Brabant 54,76 %
25 NS 3T E = -110 3 21.43
26 NS 3C E-3 300 11 78.57
27 NS 3S N = 400 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 48,81 %
28 NS 5T E-3 150 14 100.00
29 NS 3S N+1 630 11 78.57
30 NS 3T N-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
a.1 Paul Henri Oosterlynck -Jean van Caloen 55,95 %
31 NS 3C S-1 -100 6 42.86
32 NS 3T N+3 170 8 57.14
33 NS 1S N-1 -50 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
Total : 153,0 / 336 = 45,54 %
PAIRE A.4 Alan Beckman -Mado Miller
a.4 Didier Collart -Michel Lahaut 54,17 %
10 NS 1S W-1 100 6 42.86
11 NS 2C E+2 -170 3 21.43
12 NS 4C S = 620 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
a.3 Pascale Bodart -Nadine Brabant 54,76 %
13 NS 4P E+1 -650 3 21.43
14 NS 3C W-1 50 14 100.00
15 NS 4T N-2 -200 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 48,81 %
16 NS 5K N+2 440 7 50.00
17 NS 4P E+2 -480 12 85.71
18 NS 1S W-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
a.1 Paul Henri Oosterlynck -Jean van Caloen 55,95 %
19 NS 4P E = -620 1 7.14
20 NS 4C S-1 -100 5 35.71
21 NS 2C W+2 -170 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
a11 Teresa Dekoster -Helene Christiaens 50,89 %
22 NS 2P S+2 170 13 92.86
23 NS 3P S = 140 7 50.00
24 NS 3S S-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
a10 Pascale Graton -Sybille Gillet 44,64 %
25 NS 5T E = -600 0 0.00
26 NS 2S N-1 -100 2 14.29
27 NS 3S S+1 430 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
a.9 Benedicte Lemaigre -Mercedes Steed 40,48 %
28 NS 4P N-2 -200 1 7.14
29 NS 4P S = 620 5 35.71
30 NS 3TcW-4 800 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
a.8 Christiane Huby -Francoise Turin 43,45 %
31 NS 3P N = 140 11 78.57
32 NS 6T N-1 -50 0 0.00
33 NS 2P N = 110 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
Total : 151,0 / 336 = 44,94 %
PAIRE A.2 Nicole Leclere -Myriam de Timary
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 48,81 %
4 NS 4C S-2 -200 0 0.00
5 NS 1P N = 80 14 100.00
6 NS 5P S = 450 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
a.1 Paul Henri Oosterlynck -Jean van Caloen 55,95 %
7 NS 3S S-2 -200 2 14.29
8 NS 3P S = 140 12 85.71
9 NS 4P W = -620 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
a11 Teresa Dekoster -Helene Christiaens 50,89 %
10 NS 1C W+1 -110 3 21.43
11 NS 4C E-1 50 12 85.71
12 NS 3C S+2 200 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
a10 Pascale Graton -Sybille Gillet 44,64 %
13 NS 1S W+1 -120 11 78.57
14 NS 1S W+1 -120 6 42.86
15 NS 2K W = -90 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
a.9 Benedicte Lemaigre -Mercedes Steed 40,48 %
16 NS 4K S+3 190 0 0.00
17 NS 6P E = -980 3 21.43
18 NS 3C E-2 100 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 11,90 %
a.8 Christiane Huby -Francoise Turin 43,45 %
19 NS 4P E-1 100 13 92.86
20 NS 4C S-2 -200 0 0.00
21 NS 3S E+1 -430 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.7 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 50,00 %
22 NS 2K W = -90 4 28.57
23 NS 4P S-1 -100 0 0.00
24 NS 3T S+1 130 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.6 Francoise Duren -Marc Bauherz 56,55 %
25 NS 2P E = -110 3 21.43
26 NS 2C E-3 300 11 78.57
27 NS 4C S-3 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 144,0 / 336 = 42,86 %
PAIRE A.7 Veronique Englebienne -Virginie Van Damme
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 48,81 %
1 NS 3S E+1 -430 5 35.71
2 NS 5T W = -400 10 71.43
3 NS 3S S+3 490 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
a.1 Paul Henri Oosterlynck -Jean van Caloen 55,95 %
4 NS 3K W = -110 3 21.43
5 NS 2K N-1 -100 2 14.29
6 NS 5K W = -600 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 11,90 %
a11 Teresa Dekoster -Helene Christiaens 50,89 %
7 NS 3S N+1 630 9 64.29
8 NS 2K E-1 50 4 28.57
9 NS 4P W+1 -650 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
a.7 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 50,00 %
19 NS 4C S-1 -50 10 71.43
20 NS 2C S+1 140 12 85.71
21 NS 3C W+1 -170 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 80,95 %
a.6 Francoise Duren -Marc Bauherz 56,55 %
22 NS 1ScW = -180 0 0.00
23 NS 3P S = 140 7 50.00
24 NS 3T S+1 130 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
a.5 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 50,30 %
25 NS 3P W-1 100 7 50.00
26 NS 2S N = 120 7 50.00
27 NS 2S N+1 150 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
a.4 Didier Collart -Michel Lahaut 54,17 %
28 NS 4T E-2 100 8 57.14
29 NS 4P S-1 -100 0 0.00
30 NS 2P S+1 140 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.3 Pascale Bodart -Nadine Brabant 54,76 %
31 NS 5K E = -400 0 0.00
32 NS 5T N = 400 13 92.86
33 NS 3K N-3 -150 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 138,0 / 336 = 41,07 %
PAIRE a.6 Francoise Duren -Marc Bauherz
A.9 Daniel Couvreur -Anne Brans 48,21 %
1 EO 3S E+2 -460 14 100.00
2 EO 5T W = -400 4 28.57
3 EO 5K S+1 420 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
A10 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 56,55 %
7 EO 3S N+2 660 2 14.29
8 EO 4PcN-1 -100 13 92.86
9 EO 5PcW-1 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
A11 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander 49,11 %
13 EO 1S W = -90 0 0.00
14 EO 1S W+1 -120 8 57.14
15 EO 2K W = -90 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
A.6 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie 45,54 %
16 EO 5K S+2 440 7 50.00
17 EO 4S W+2 -490 6 42.86
18 EO 2K N+1 110 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 55,36 %
19 EO 4P E = -620 13 92.86
20 EO 3C S = 140 2 14.29
21 EO 3S E+1 -430 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.7 Veronique Englebienne -Virginie Van Damme 41,07 %
22 EO 1ScW = -180 14 100.00
23 EO 3P S = 140 7 50.00
24 EO 3T S+1 130 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
A.2 Nicole Leclere -Myriam de Timary 42,86 %
25 EO 2P E = -110 11 78.57
26 EO 2C E-3 300 3 21.43
27 EO 4C S-3 -150 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.8 Iris de Limbourg -Paul Henricot 51,19 %
28 EO 4T E-1 50 9 64.29
29 EO 4P S = 620 9 64.29
30 EO 3P S = 140 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
Total : 190,0 / 336 = 56,55 %
PAIRE a.1 Paul Henri Oosterlynck -Jean van Caloen
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 55,36 %
1 EO 3S E+1 -430 9 64.29
2 EO 4P W+2 -480 12 85.71
3 EO 6K S = 920 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
A.7 Veronique Englebienne -Virginie Van Damme 41,07 %
4 EO 3K W = -110 11 78.57
5 EO 2K N-1 -100 12 85.71
6 EO 5K W = -600 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 88,10 %
A.2 Nicole Leclere -Myriam de Timary 42,86 %
7 EO 3S S-2 -200 12 85.71
8 EO 3P S = 140 2 14.29
9 EO 4P W = -620 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
A.8 Iris de Limbourg -Paul Henricot 51,19 %
10 EO 3P S = 140 2 14.29
11 EO 2C E+1 -140 8 57.14
12 EO 3C S+2 200 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
A.3 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 54,46 %
13 EO 4P E+1 -650 11 78.57
14 EO 3K S-1 -50 3 21.43
15 EO 2P W+1 -140 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Mado Miller 44,94 %
19 EO 4P E = -620 13 92.86
20 EO 4C S-1 -100 9 64.29
21 EO 2C W+2 -170 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
A.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Michele Berrier 60,71 %
25 EO 3S E-3 300 0 0.00
26 EO 2S N-1 -100 12 85.71
27 EO 3S N = 400 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
A.6 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie 45,54 %
31 EO 3C S-1 -100 8 57.14
32 EO 3T N+3 170 6 42.86
33 EO 1S N-1 -50 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
Total : 188,0 / 336 = 55,95 %
PAIRE a.3 Pascale Bodart -Nadine Brabant
A.8 Iris de Limbourg -Paul Henricot 51,19 %
4 EO 3P S-1 -100 6 42.86
5 EO 1S W = -90 8 57.14
6 EO 6KcE-2 500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.3 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 54,46 %
7 EO 3S N = 600 9 64.29
8 EO 3T N+1 130 5 35.71
9 EO 5P W = -650 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
A.9 Daniel Couvreur -Anne Brans 48,21 %
10 EO 2C E = -110 11 78.57
11 EO 2C E+2 -170 11 78.57
12 EO 4C S-1 -100 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 85,71 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Mado Miller 44,94 %
13 EO 4P E+1 -650 11 78.57
14 EO 3C W-1 50 0 0.00
15 EO 4T N-2 -200 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
A10 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 56,55 %
16 EO 6K S+1 940 0 0.00
17 EO 6P E = -980 11 78.57
18 EO 3P S = 140 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
A.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Michele Berrier 60,71 %
19 EO 4P E-1 100 1 7.14
20 EO 4C S-1 -100 9 64.29
21 EO 3S E = -400 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
A.6 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie 45,54 %
25 EO 3T E = -110 11 78.57
26 EO 3C E-3 300 3 21.43
27 EO 3S N = 400 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
A.7 Veronique Englebienne -Virginie Van Damme 41,07 %
31 EO 5K E = -400 14 100.00
32 EO 5T N = 400 1 7.14
33 EO 3K N-3 -150 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 184,0 / 336 = 54,76 %
PAIRE a.4 Didier Collart -Michel Lahaut
A.8 Iris de Limbourg -Paul Henricot 51,19 %
1 EO 3S E = -400 4 28.57
2 EO 4P W+2 -480 12 85.71
3 EO 6K S = 920 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
A.9 Daniel Couvreur -Anne Brans 48,21 %
7 EO 6CcS-2 -500 14 100.00
8 EO 4P S-2 -100 13 92.86
9 EO 4P W+1 -650 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 90,48 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Mado Miller 44,94 %
10 EO 1S W-1 100 8 57.14
11 EO 2C E+2 -170 11 78.57
12 EO 4C S = 620 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
A10 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 56,55 %
13 EO 1S W+1 -120 3 21.43
14 EO 2K S-1 -50 3 21.43
15 EO 3T N-1 -100 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Michele Berrier 60,71 %
16 EO 5K S+2 440 7 50.00
17 EO 4P E+2 -480 2 14.29
18 EO 4P S = 620 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
A11 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander 49,11 %
19 EO 2P E+2 -170 8 57.14
20 EO 4C S-1 -100 9 64.29
21 EO 2C W+2 -170 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
A.6 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie 45,54 %
22 EO 3P S-2 -100 12 85.71
23 EO 3P S = 140 7 50.00
24 EO 1S N = 90 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
A.7 Veronique Englebienne -Virginie Van Damme 41,07 %
28 EO 4T E-2 100 6 42.86
29 EO 4P S-1 -100 14 100.00
30 EO 2P S+1 140 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 182,0 / 336 = 54,17 %
PAIRE a11 Teresa Dekoster -Helene Christiaens
A.6 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie 45,54 %
1 EO 3S E+1 -430 9 64.29
2 EO 5T W = -400 4 28.57
3 EO 3S N+2 460 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 55,36 %
4 EO 3P S-1 -100 6 42.86
5 EO 2T W = -90 8 57.14
6 EO 5K E-1 100 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
A.7 Veronique Englebienne -Virginie Van Damme 41,07 %
7 EO 3S N+1 630 5 35.71
8 EO 2K E-1 50 10 71.43
9 EO 4P W+1 -650 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
A.2 Nicole Leclere -Myriam de Timary 42,86 %
10 EO 1C W+1 -110 11 78.57
11 EO 4C E-1 50 2 14.29
12 EO 3C S+2 200 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
A.3 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 54,46 %
16 EO 5K S+2 440 7 50.00
17 EO 4P E+2 -480 2 14.29
18 EO 4P S+1 650 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Mado Miller 44,94 %
22 EO 2P S+2 170 1 7.14
23 EO 3P S = 140 7 50.00
24 EO 3S S-2 -100 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
A.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Michele Berrier 60,71 %
28 EO 3P N = 140 3 21.43
29 EO 4P S = 620 9 64.29
30 EO 2P S+1 140 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
A11 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander 49,11 %
31 EO 4C S-3 -300 12 85.71
32 EO 3T N+3 170 6 42.86
33 EO 2C E-1 50 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
Total : 171,0 / 336 = 50,89 %
PAIRE a.5 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne
A.9 Daniel Couvreur -Anne Brans 48,21 %
4 EO 4K W-1 100 2 14.29
5 EO 1S W = -90 8 57.14
6 EO 5KcE-1 200 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
A10 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 56,55 %
10 EO 2P S+1 140 2 14.29
11 EO 3S W-1 50 2 14.29
12 EO 5TcE-1 100 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
A.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Michele Berrier 60,71 %
13 EO 3T W+2 -150 6 42.86
14 EO 1S W+1 -120 8 57.14
15 EO 3T N-2 -200 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
A11 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander 49,11 %
16 EO 5K S+2 440 7 50.00
17 EO 6P W = -980 11 78.57
18 EO 4P S+1 650 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
A.6 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie 45,54 %
19 EO 2P E+1 -140 6 42.86
20 EO 4C S-1 -100 9 64.29
21 EO 4C W = -420 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 55,36 %
22 EO 2K W-1 100 6 42.86
23 EO 2P S+1 140 7 50.00
24 EO 2T S+2 130 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
A.7 Veronique Englebienne -Virginie Van Damme 41,07 %
25 EO 3P W-1 100 7 50.00
26 EO 2S N = 120 7 50.00
27 EO 2S N+1 150 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
A.8 Iris de Limbourg -Paul Henricot 51,19 %
31 EO 5K E-1 50 6 42.86
32 EO 4T N+2 170 6 42.86
33 EO 3T N-3 -150 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
Total : 169,0 / 336 = 50,30 %
PAIRE a.7 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor
A10 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 56,55 %
4 EO 3P S-1 -100 6 42.86
5 EO 3T W-1 50 3 21.43
6 EO 4K E = -130 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A11 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander 49,11 %
10 EO 2C W+1 -140 14 100.00
11 EO 2C E = -110 6 42.86
12 EO 5TcW-1 100 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 55,36 %
16 EO 5K S+2 440 7 50.00
17 EO 6P E = -980 11 78.57
18 EO 2P S+2 170 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
A.7 Veronique Englebienne -Virginie Van Damme 41,07 %
19 EO 4C S-1 -50 4 28.57
20 EO 2C S+1 140 2 14.29
21 EO 3C W+1 -170 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 19,05 %
A.2 Nicole Leclere -Myriam de Timary 42,86 %
22 EO 2K W = -90 10 71.43
23 EO 4P S-1 -100 14 100.00
24 EO 3T S+1 130 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.8 Iris de Limbourg -Paul Henricot 51,19 %
25 EO 5T E-2 200 3 21.43
26 EO 2P S-1 -100 12 85.71
27 EO 3S N = 400 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
A.3 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 54,46 %
28 EO 4P N-2 -200 13 92.86
29 EO 3S N+1 630 3 21.43
30 EO 2P S = 110 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.9 Daniel Couvreur -Anne Brans 48,21 %
31 EO 3P N+1 170 0 0.00
32 EO 5T N = 400 1 7.14
33 EO 1S S = 90 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 11,90 %
Total : 168,0 / 336 = 50,00 %
PAIRE a.2 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain
A.7 Veronique Englebienne -Virginie Van Damme 41,07 %
1 EO 3S E+1 -430 9 64.29
2 EO 5T W = -400 4 28.57
3 EO 3S S+3 490 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
A.2 Nicole Leclere -Myriam de Timary 42,86 %
4 EO 4C S-2 -200 14 100.00
5 EO 1P N = 80 0 0.00
6 EO 5P S = 450 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
A.8 Iris de Limbourg -Paul Henricot 51,19 %
7 EO 3S N+1 630 5 35.71
8 EO 3C W-2 100 8 57.14
9 EO 5P W = -650 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
A.3 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 54,46 %
10 EO 2P S = 110 6 42.86
11 EO 4C E+1 -450 14 100.00
12 EO 4C S+1 650 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.9 Daniel Couvreur -Anne Brans 48,21 %
13 EO 4P E+1 -650 11 78.57
14 EO 1S W+2 -150 13 92.86
15 EO 2T N = 90 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Mado Miller 44,94 %
16 EO 5K N+2 440 7 50.00
17 EO 4P E+2 -480 2 14.29
18 EO 1S W-1 50 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
A.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Michele Berrier 60,71 %
22 EO 2K W-1 100 6 42.86
23 EO 3P S = 140 7 50.00
24 EO 2T S+2 130 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
A.6 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie 45,54 %
28 EO 5T E-3 150 0 0.00
29 EO 3S N+1 630 3 21.43
30 EO 3T N-1 -50 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
Total : 164,0 / 336 = 48,81 %
PAIRE a10 Pascale Graton -Sybille Gillet
A11 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander 49,11 %
1 EO 3S W+1 -430 9 64.29
2 EO 4P E+2 -480 12 85.71
3 EO 3S S+3 490 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.6 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie 45,54 %
4 EO 3C N = 140 0 0.00
5 EO 2T E+1 -110 14 100.00
6 EO 5KcE-1 200 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 55,36 %
7 EO 4P S+2 680 0 0.00
8 EO 3T N+2 150 0 0.00
9 EO 4P W = -620 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 11,90 %
A.2 Nicole Leclere -Myriam de Timary 42,86 %
13 EO 1S W+1 -120 3 21.43
14 EO 1S W+1 -120 8 57.14
15 EO 2K W = -90 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
A.3 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 54,46 %
19 EO 4C N-4 -200 10 71.43
20 EO 3C S = 140 2 14.29
21 EO 4C W = -420 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Mado Miller 44,94 %
25 EO 5T E = -600 14 100.00
26 EO 2S N-1 -100 12 85.71
27 EO 3S S+1 430 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
A10 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 56,55 %
28 EO 3P N = 140 3 21.43
29 EO 4P S = 620 9 64.29
30 EO 2PcS+2 670 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Michele Berrier 60,71 %
31 EO 3P N = 140 3 21.43
32 EO 4T N+1 150 11 78.57
33 EO 3C E-2 100 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
Total : 150,0 / 336 = 44,64 %
PAIRE a.8 Christiane Huby -Francoise Turin
A10 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 56,55 %
1 EO 3S E-1 50 1 7.14
2 EO 5T W+1 -420 8 57.14
3 EO 3S S+2 460 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
A11 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander 49,11 %
7 EO 3S N = 600 9 64.29
8 EO 4T N = 130 5 35.71
9 EO 5C S-3 -150 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 55,36 %
13 EO 4P E+1 -650 11 78.57
14 EO 1S W+2 -150 13 92.86
15 EO 4P W-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
A.2 Nicole Leclere -Myriam de Timary 42,86 %
19 EO 4P E-1 100 1 7.14
20 EO 4C S-2 -200 14 100.00
21 EO 3S E+1 -430 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.8 Iris de Limbourg -Paul Henricot 51,19 %
22 EO 2K W-1 100 6 42.86
23 EO 3P S = 140 7 50.00
24 EO 3T S+1 130 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
A.3 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 54,46 %
25 EO 3S E-2 200 3 21.43
26 EO 2S N = 120 7 50.00
27 EO 3S N+2 460 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
A.9 Daniel Couvreur -Anne Brans 48,21 %
28 EO 3S W-1 50 9 64.29
29 EO 4P S+1 650 0 0.00
30 EO 1S E-3 150 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Mado Miller 44,94 %
31 EO 3P N = 140 3 21.43
32 EO 6T N-1 -50 14 100.00
33 EO 2P N = 110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
Total : 146,0 / 336 = 43,45 %
PAIRE a.9 Benedicte Lemaigre -Mercedes Steed
A.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Michele Berrier 60,71 %
1 EO 3S E-1 50 1 7.14
2 EO 5CcS-1 -200 0 0.00
3 EO 6K S = 920 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 7,14 %
A11 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander 49,11 %
4 EO 3K W = -110 11 78.57
5 EO 3T W-1 50 3 21.43
6 EO 5KcE-1 200 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 55,36 %
10 EO 3P S = 140 2 14.29
11 EO 4C E-1 50 2 14.29
12 EO 4C S+1 650 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 11,90 %
A.2 Nicole Leclere -Myriam de Timary 42,86 %
16 EO 4K S+3 190 14 100.00
17 EO 6P E = -980 11 78.57
18 EO 3C E-2 100 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 88,10 %
A.3 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 54,46 %
22 EO 2P S+2 170 1 7.14
23 EO 4P S = 620 0 0.00
24 EO 3K W-1 50 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
A.9 Daniel Couvreur -Anne Brans 48,21 %
25 EO 4T E-1 100 7 50.00
26 EO 3S N = 600 0 0.00
27 EO 3S N+2 460 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 19,05 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Mado Miller 44,94 %
28 EO 4P N-2 -200 13 92.86
29 EO 4P S = 620 9 64.29
30 EO 3TcW-4 800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
A10 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 56,55 %
31 EO 4C S-2 -200 10 71.43
32 EO 4T N+1 150 11 78.57
33 EO 4C E-1 50 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 136,0 / 336 = 40,48 %
|