B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 63,28 A.9 Liliane Baptista -Rose Marie Vaccarezza
--- 2 58,77 A.7 Lydia Wildiers -Yolande Davain
--- 3 56,21 A.4 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten
--- 4 55,85 A12 Nicole Leclere -Francoise Turin
--- 5 53,98 A.3 Patricia Bardy -Serge Allard
--- 6 51,04 A14 Michel Lievens -Annie Zeimes
--- 7 49,66 A.5 Giuseppe Napoli -Daniela Napoli
--- 8 49,30 A.6 Caroll Pucher -Eliane de Ceuninck
--- 9 49,28 A13 Grazia Neuenschwander -Michele Berrier
--- 10 49,09 A11 Myriam de Timary -Sophie Tilemans
--- 11 47,05 A.2 Annette Fobe -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
--- 12 43,39 A.1 Fifi Englund -Martine Zens
--- 13 39,94 A.8 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson
--- 14 32,82 A10 Claire Derieuw -Chantal de Lichtervelde
--- 15 0,00 A15 -
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 57,97 a.2 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain
--- 2 57,77 a.7 Elena Valsesia -Noelle Fosse
--- 3 56,34 a13 Fabienne Smit -Francoise Duren
--- 4 56,03 a12 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle
--- 5 55,33 a.4 Odile Franquet van Tilt -Anne France Raquez
--- 6 54,13 a.5 Thomas Brusselmans -Michel Léonard
--- 7 53,02 a14 Alexandre Viot -Philippe van der Gracht
--- 8 52,64 a15 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve
--- 9 51,65 a.8 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger
--- 10 50,89 a11 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed
--- 11 47,61 a.3 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru
--- 12 41,82 a.9 Christiane Huby -Danielle Wybauw
--- 13 40,23 a10 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart
--- 14 38,62 a.6 Miry Degret -Bernard Degret
--- 15 36,99 a.1 Aida Zumot -Claire de Quirini
PAIRE A.9 Liliane Baptista -Rose Marie Vaccarezza
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 57,97 %
1 NS 4P N+1 450 17.5 79.55
2 NS 2P S+2 170 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
a.1 Aida Zumot -Claire de Quirini 36,99 %
3 NS 6S S-2 -100 0.1 0.45
4 NS 3S W = -600 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a15 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 52,64 %
5 NS 4C S-1 -100 0.1 0.45
6 NS 1T E+4 -150 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 10,45 %
a14 Alexandre Viot -Philippe van der Gracht 53,02 %
7 NS 2T E-4 400 21.9 99.55
8 NS 3C E-1 50 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 87,27 %
a13 Fabienne Smit -Francoise Duren 56,34 %
9 NS 4P N = 420 20.8 94.55
10 NS 2P S = 110 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a.9 Christiane Huby -Danielle Wybauw 41,82 %
17 NS 4P N+2 480 16.5 75.00
18 NS 3C N-1 -100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 67,50 %
a.8 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 51,65 %
19 NS 3P N = 140 19.7 89.55
20 NS 3S S = 600 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 87,05 %
a.7 Elena Valsesia -Noelle Fosse 57,77 %
21 NS 6P W-1 50 21.9 99.55
22 NS 4C N-1 -50 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a.6 Miry Degret -Bernard Degret 38,62 %
23 NS 3C S-2 -200 10 45.45
24 NS 3S S = 400 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.5 Thomas Brusselmans -Michel Léonard 54,13 %
25 NS 3S W = -600 10 45.45
26 NS 3S N+1 630 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.4 Odile Franquet van Tilt -Anne France Raquez 55,33 %
27 NS 5C E-1 50 22 100.00
28 NS 4C E = -420 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
a.3 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 47,61 %
29 NS 1S E-1 100 8.8 40.00
30 NS 3S S = 400 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
Total : 334,1 / 528 = 63,28 %
PAIRE A.7 Lydia Wildiers -Yolande Davain
a13 Fabienne Smit -Francoise Duren 56,34 %
1 NS 5K S+1 420 9.9 45.00
2 NS 3P S+2 200 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a12 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 56,03 %
3 NS 5K S = 400 12.1 55.00
4 NS 3S E+2 -660 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a11 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 50,89 %
5 NS 4C N+2 680 19.7 89.55
6 NS 3S W-1 100 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
a.7 Elena Valsesia -Noelle Fosse 57,77 %
13 NS 4C E = -620 7.7 35.00
14 NS 4P S-1 -50 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
a.6 Miry Degret -Bernard Degret 38,62 %
15 NS 1S N+2 150 21.9 99.55
16 NS 3C N = 140 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 87,27 %
a.5 Thomas Brusselmans -Michel Léonard 54,13 %
17 NS 4P N+1 450 5.5 25.00
18 NS 2C N = 110 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 54,77 %
a.4 Odile Franquet van Tilt -Anne France Raquez 55,33 %
19 NS 3C W-1 100 9.9 45.00
20 NS 4C S = 620 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
a.3 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 47,61 %
21 NS 6K W+1 -940 14.3 65.00
22 NS 4C N = 420 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 57,97 %
23 NS 3P W+1 -170 14 63.64
24 NS 3S N = 400 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.1 Aida Zumot -Claire de Quirini 36,99 %
25 NS 2S W+1 -150 14 63.64
26 NS 3S S+2 660 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a15 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 52,64 %
27 NS 4P E+1 -450 5 22.73
28 NS 4C W = -420 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a14 Alexandre Viot -Philippe van der Gracht 53,02 %
29 NS 2C N = 110 14.3 65.00
30 NS 4K N-1 -50 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
Total : 310,3 / 528 = 58,77 %
PAIRE A.4 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten
a.4 Odile Franquet van Tilt -Anne France Raquez 55,33 %
7 NS 1S N+1 120 14.3 65.00
8 NS 4C E-1 50 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
a.3 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 47,61 %
9 NS 2P N+1 140 14.3 65.00
10 NS 2P S+1 140 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 57,97 %
11 NS 2P E+2 -170 13.2 60.00
12 NS 3S N+1 630 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.1 Aida Zumot -Claire de Quirini 36,99 %
13 NS 3C W+2 -200 16.5 75.00
14 NS 4P S = 420 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
a15 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 52,64 %
15 NS 3S N-1 -100 13.2 60.00
16 NS 3T W-1 100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a14 Alexandre Viot -Philippe van der Gracht 53,02 %
17 NS 5CcW-3 500 21.9 99.55
18 NS 3C N-1 -100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
a13 Fabienne Smit -Francoise Duren 56,34 %
19 NS 3P N-1 -50 5.5 25.00
20 NS 1C S+2 140 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
a12 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 56,03 %
21 NS 6S E+1 -1020 5.5 25.00
22 NS 4C N-1 -50 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 27,50 %
a11 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 50,89 %
23 NS 4P E = -620 4 18.18
24 NS 3P E-2 100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a10 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 40,23 %
25 NS 3S E = -600 10 45.45
26 NS 3S N+1 630 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.9 Christiane Huby -Danielle Wybauw 41,82 %
27 NS 4P W = -420 16 72.73
28 NS 4C E+1 -450 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.8 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 51,65 %
29 NS 2C N = 110 14.3 65.00
30 NS 4C W-3 150 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 67,50 %
Total : 296,8 / 528 = 56,21 %
PAIRE A12 Nicole Leclere -Francoise Turin
a.8 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 51,65 %
1 NS 5K N+1 420 9.9 45.00
2 NS 3P S+1 170 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a.7 Elena Valsesia -Noelle Fosse 57,77 %
3 NS 5K S = 400 12.1 55.00
4 NS 3S W+2 -660 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a.6 Miry Degret -Bernard Degret 38,62 %
5 NS 4C N+2 680 19.7 89.55
6 NS 3S E-1 100 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
a.5 Thomas Brusselmans -Michel Léonard 54,13 %
7 NS 1S S = 90 0.1 0.45
8 NS 1S E+1 -120 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a.4 Odile Franquet van Tilt -Anne France Raquez 55,33 %
9 NS 4P N-1 -50 5.5 25.00
10 NS 3S S-1 -100 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
a.3 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 47,61 %
11 NS 2P E+2 -170 13.2 60.00
12 NS 4P N+1 650 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 57,97 %
13 NS 4C E = -620 7.7 35.00
14 NS 4P S = 420 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a.1 Aida Zumot -Claire de Quirini 36,99 %
15 NS 3T N+1 130 19.7 89.55
16 NS 4C N-1 -50 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a12 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 56,03 %
23 NS 3P E+1 -170 14 63.64
24 NS 3S S = 400 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a11 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 50,89 %
25 NS 3S E+1 -630 3 13.64
26 NS 3S N+2 660 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a10 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 40,23 %
27 NS 4P W = -420 16 72.73
28 NS 4C E = -420 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.9 Christiane Huby -Danielle Wybauw 41,82 %
29 NS 2C N = 110 14.3 65.00
30 NS 3S S = 400 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
Total : 294,9 / 528 = 55,85 %
PAIRE A.3 Patricia Bardy -Serge Allard
a.3 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 47,61 %
5 NS 4C N = 620 13.2 60.00
6 NS 3S E-1 100 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 57,97 %
7 NS 1S S+1 120 14.3 65.00
8 NS 4C E = -420 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a.1 Aida Zumot -Claire de Quirini 36,99 %
9 NS 3P N = 140 14.3 65.00
10 NS 3P S = 140 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
a15 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 52,64 %
11 NS 2P E+1 -140 19.7 89.55
12 NS 4P N+1 650 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 84,55 %
a14 Alexandre Viot -Philippe van der Gracht 53,02 %
13 NS 4C E = -620 7.7 35.00
14 NS 3P S = 140 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a13 Fabienne Smit -Francoise Duren 56,34 %
15 NS 2P W+1 -140 9.9 45.00
16 NS 3C S-2 -100 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a12 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 56,03 %
17 NS 4P N+1 450 5.5 25.00
18 NS 2CcN-1 -200 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 27,50 %
a11 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 50,89 %
19 NS 2P N = 110 14.3 65.00
20 NS 2C S+2 170 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
a10 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 40,23 %
21 NS 6K E+1 -940 14.3 65.00
22 NS 4C N-1 -50 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.9 Christiane Huby -Danielle Wybauw 41,82 %
23 NS 2C S+1 140 22 100.00
24 NS 3S S = 400 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
a.8 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 51,65 %
25 NS 3S E-2 200 22 100.00
26 NS 3S S = 600 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.7 Elena Valsesia -Noelle Fosse 57,77 %
27 NS 4P W+1 -450 5 22.73
28 NS 4C E = -420 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
Total : 285,0 / 528 = 53,98 %
PAIRE A14 Michel Lievens -Annie Zeimes
a12 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 56,03 %
1 NS 5K N+1 420 9.9 45.00
2 NS 3P S+1 170 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a11 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 50,89 %
3 NS 5K S = 400 12.1 55.00
4 NS 3S W+2 -660 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a10 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 40,23 %
5 NS 4C N = 620 13.2 60.00
6 NS 4P W-4 400 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
a.9 Christiane Huby -Danielle Wybauw 41,82 %
7 NS 3T S = 110 8.8 40.00
8 NS 4C E-1 50 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a.8 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 51,65 %
9 NS 4P N-2 -100 0.1 0.45
10 NS 4P S-1 -100 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
a.7 Elena Valsesia -Noelle Fosse 57,77 %
11 NS 3S W = -400 4.5 20.45
12 NS 4P N+1 650 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.6 Miry Degret -Bernard Degret 38,62 %
13 NS 4C E = -620 7.7 35.00
14 NS 4P S = 420 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a.5 Thomas Brusselmans -Michel Léonard 54,13 %
15 NS 2T N = 90 17.5 79.55
16 NS 1S W-3 300 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 84,55 %
a.4 Odile Franquet van Tilt -Anne France Raquez 55,33 %
17 NS 5P N = 450 5.5 25.00
18 NS 2C N = 110 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 54,77 %
a.3 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 47,61 %
19 NS 3C W-1 100 9.9 45.00
20 NS 2C S+2 170 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a14 Alexandre Viot -Philippe van der Gracht 53,02 %
27 NS 4P W = -420 16 72.73
28 NS 4C E+1 -450 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a13 Fabienne Smit -Francoise Duren 56,34 %
29 NS 2C N-1 -100 5.5 25.00
30 NS 3K N = 110 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 27,50 %
Total : 269,5 / 528 = 51,04 %
PAIRE A.5 Giuseppe Napoli -Daniela Napoli
a.9 Christiane Huby -Danielle Wybauw 41,82 %
1 NS 5K N+1 420 9.9 45.00
2 NS 2P S+3 200 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a.5 Thomas Brusselmans -Michel Léonard 54,13 %
9 NS 2P N+1 140 14.3 65.00
10 NS 4P S-2 -200 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
a.4 Odile Franquet van Tilt -Anne France Raquez 55,33 %
11 NS 4P E = -420 1.2 5.45
12 NS 3S N+1 630 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a.3 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 47,61 %
13 NS 4C E-1 100 21.9 99.55
14 NS 5T E-3 150 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 57,97 %
15 NS 3C W = -140 9.9 45.00
16 NS 4CcN-2 -300 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.1 Aida Zumot -Claire de Quirini 36,99 %
17 NS 4P N+2 480 16.5 75.00
18 NS 4C N-1 -100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 67,50 %
a15 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 52,64 %
19 NS 2P N+1 140 19.7 89.55
20 NS 3S S = 600 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 87,05 %
a14 Alexandre Viot -Philippe van der Gracht 53,02 %
21 NS 7S W = -1520 1.2 5.45
22 NS 4C N-1 -50 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
a13 Fabienne Smit -Francoise Duren 56,34 %
23 NS 4P E = -620 4 18.18
24 NS 3S S = 400 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a12 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 56,03 %
25 NS 3S W+1 -630 3 13.64
26 NS 3S N+2 660 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a11 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 50,89 %
27 NS 4P W = -420 16 72.73
28 NS 4C E = -420 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a10 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 40,23 %
29 NS 2C N = 110 14.3 65.00
30 NS 3K N = 110 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
Total : 262,2 / 528 = 49,66 %
PAIRE A.6 Caroll Pucher -Eliane de Ceuninck
a11 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 50,89 %
1 NS 6P N = 980 21.9 99.55
2 NS 2P S+3 200 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 89,55 %
a10 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 40,23 %
3 NS 6K S-1 -50 2.3 10.45
4 NS 3S E+1 -630 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
a.6 Miry Degret -Bernard Degret 38,62 %
11 NS 1S S-4 -200 7.7 35.00
12 NS 4P N+1 650 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
a.5 Thomas Brusselmans -Michel Léonard 54,13 %
13 NS 4C E+1 -650 0.1 0.45
14 NS 2P S+2 170 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a.4 Odile Franquet van Tilt -Anne France Raquez 55,33 %
15 NS 3C W+1 -170 4.5 20.45
16 NS 3C N = 140 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.3 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 47,61 %
17 NS 5P N = 450 5.5 25.00
18 NS 3CcN-2 -500 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 12,73 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 57,97 %
19 NS 3P N-1 -50 5.5 25.00
20 NS 4C N-4 -400 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 12,73 %
a.1 Aida Zumot -Claire de Quirini 36,99 %
21 NS 5K E+2 -440 18.6 84.55
22 NS 4C N-1 -50 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
a15 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 52,64 %
23 NS 4P W = -620 4 18.18
24 NS 3S N = 400 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a14 Alexandre Viot -Philippe van der Gracht 53,02 %
25 NS 3T E+1 -130 17 77.27
26 NS 3S N+1 630 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a13 Fabienne Smit -Francoise Duren 56,34 %
27 NS 4P W = -420 16 72.73
28 NS 4C E = -420 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a12 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 56,03 %
29 NS 1S E-2 200 19.7 89.55
30 NS 2K N+1 110 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
Total : 260,3 / 528 = 49,30 %
PAIRE A13 Grazia Neuenschwander -Michele Berrier
a10 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 40,23 %
1 NS 5K N+1 420 9.9 45.00
2 NS 2P S+3 200 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a.9 Christiane Huby -Danielle Wybauw 41,82 %
3 NS 3S N+2 460 21.9 99.55
4 NS 3S W+2 -660 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a.8 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 51,65 %
5 NS 2C N+4 230 4.5 20.45
6 NS 4P W-2 200 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.7 Elena Valsesia -Noelle Fosse 57,77 %
7 NS 1S S+1 120 14.3 65.00
8 NS 3S E-2 100 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
a.6 Miry Degret -Bernard Degret 38,62 %
9 NS 4P N = 420 20.8 94.55
10 NS 4P S-1 -100 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a.5 Thomas Brusselmans -Michel Léonard 54,13 %
11 NS 3P E = -140 19.7 89.55
12 NS 4P N = 620 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
a.4 Odile Franquet van Tilt -Anne France Raquez 55,33 %
13 NS 4C E = -620 7.7 35.00
14 NS 3P S+1 170 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.3 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 47,61 %
15 NS 3T N-2 -200 0.1 0.45
16 NS 3C N-1 -50 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 57,97 %
17 NS 4P N+2 480 16.5 75.00
18 NS 4C N-2 -200 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a13 Fabienne Smit -Francoise Duren 56,34 %
25 NS 3S E+1 -630 3 13.64
26 NS 2P W-2 200 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
a12 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 56,03 %
27 NS 4P W+1 -450 5 22.73
28 NS 4C E = -420 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a11 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 50,89 %
29 NS 1S E+2 -150 2.3 10.45
30 NS 2K N+2 130 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
Total : 260,2 / 528 = 49,28 %
PAIRE A11 Myriam de Timary -Sophie Tilemans
a.6 Miry Degret -Bernard Degret 38,62 %
1 NS 6K N = 920 19.7 89.55
2 NS 3P S+1 170 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a.5 Thomas Brusselmans -Michel Léonard 54,13 %
3 NS 4K S+1 150 5.5 25.00
4 NS 3S W+1 -630 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.4 Odile Franquet van Tilt -Anne France Raquez 55,33 %
5 NS 4C N+2 680 19.7 89.55
6 NS 3S E+2 -660 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.3 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 47,61 %
7 NS 2C E-1 100 4.5 20.45
8 NS 2C E+1 -140 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 57,97 %
9 NS 3P N = 140 14.3 65.00
10 NS 2P S+1 140 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
a.1 Aida Zumot -Claire de Quirini 36,99 %
11 NS 3P E = -140 19.7 89.55
12 NS 1T N+5 170 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a15 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 52,64 %
13 NS 4C E = -620 7.7 35.00
14 NS 2P S+2 170 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a11 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 50,89 %
21 NS 7S W = -1520 1.2 5.45
22 NS 4C N = 420 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a10 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 40,23 %
23 NS 2P E+2 -170 14 63.64
24 NS 3P E-1 50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.9 Christiane Huby -Danielle Wybauw 41,82 %
25 NS 3S E = -600 10 45.45
26 NS 3S S = 600 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.8 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 51,65 %
27 NS 4P W+1 -450 5 22.73
28 NS 4C E = -420 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.7 Elena Valsesia -Noelle Fosse 57,77 %
29 NS 2C N-1 -100 5.5 25.00
30 NS 3S S = 400 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
Total : 259,2 / 528 = 49,09 %
PAIRE A.2 Annette Fobe -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 57,97 %
3 NS 3K S+2 150 5.5 25.00
4 NS 3S W+2 -660 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 27,50 %
a.1 Aida Zumot -Claire de Quirini 36,99 %
5 NS 4C N = 620 13.2 60.00
6 NS 3S E-1 100 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a15 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 52,64 %
7 NS 1S S+3 180 19.7 89.55
8 NS 4C E = -420 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a14 Alexandre Viot -Philippe van der Gracht 53,02 %
9 NS 3P N-1 -50 5.5 25.00
10 NS 3S S-2 -200 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
a13 Fabienne Smit -Francoise Duren 56,34 %
11 NS 2P E+2 -170 13.2 60.00
12 NS 4P N+1 650 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
a12 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 56,03 %
13 NS 3C E+2 -200 16.5 75.00
14 NS 4P S-1 -50 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
a11 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 50,89 %
15 NS 3C W+1 -170 4.5 20.45
16 NS 3C N-1 -50 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a10 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 40,23 %
17 NS 4P N+2 480 16.5 75.00
18 NS 2C N+1 140 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 87,27 %
a.9 Christiane Huby -Danielle Wybauw 41,82 %
19 NS 2P N = 110 14.3 65.00
20 NS 4C N-1 -100 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.8 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 51,65 %
21 NS 6P W = -980 9.9 45.00
22 NS 4C N-1 -50 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
a.7 Elena Valsesia -Noelle Fosse 57,77 %
23 NS 2C S = 110 20 90.91
24 NS 3K S-1 -50 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.6 Miry Degret -Bernard Degret 38,62 %
25 NS 1S E+1 -120 20 90.91
26 NS 2P W-3 300 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
Total : 248,4 / 528 = 47,05 %
PAIRE A.1 Fifi Englund -Martine Zens
a.1 Aida Zumot -Claire de Quirini 36,99 %
1 NS 3S N-1 -50 2.3 10.45
2 NS 2P S+3 200 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a15 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 52,64 %
3 NS 5K S = 400 12.1 55.00
4 NS 3S W+2 -660 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a14 Alexandre Viot -Philippe van der Gracht 53,02 %
5 NS 2C N+4 230 4.5 20.45
6 NS 3S E-1 100 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a13 Fabienne Smit -Francoise Duren 56,34 %
7 NS 2P E-1 100 4.5 20.45
8 NS 4C E = -420 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 15,45 %
a12 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 56,03 %
9 NS 4P N-1 -50 5.5 25.00
10 NS 2P S+1 140 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 54,77 %
a11 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 50,89 %
11 NS 2P E+3 -200 7.7 35.00
12 NS 4P E = -420 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
a10 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 40,23 %
13 NS 2S E+2 -180 19.7 89.55
14 NS 2P S+2 170 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
a.9 Christiane Huby -Danielle Wybauw 41,82 %
15 NS 2C E+2 -170 4.5 20.45
16 NS 3S E-4 400 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a.8 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 51,65 %
17 NS 4P N+1 450 5.5 25.00
18 NS 4C N-3 -300 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
a.7 Elena Valsesia -Noelle Fosse 57,77 %
19 NS 1C W+1 -110 2.3 10.45
20 NS 3S N-1 -100 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
a.6 Miry Degret -Bernard Degret 38,62 %
21 NS 5K W+2 -440 18.6 84.55
22 NS 4C N+1 450 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 92,05 %
a.5 Thomas Brusselmans -Michel Léonard 54,13 %
23 NS 2P E+1 -140 18 81.82
24 NS 3S S-1 -50 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
Total : 229,1 / 528 = 43,39 %
PAIRE A.8 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson
a15 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 52,64 %
1 NS 5K S+1 420 9.9 45.00
2 NS 3P S-1 -100 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a14 Alexandre Viot -Philippe van der Gracht 53,02 %
3 NS 3S S+1 430 19.7 89.55
4 NS 3S W = -600 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 92,05 %
a13 Fabienne Smit -Francoise Duren 56,34 %
5 NS 3C N+3 230 4.5 20.45
6 NS 3S E-1 100 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a12 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 56,03 %
7 NS 2C W-1 100 4.5 20.45
8 NS 3C E = -140 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a.8 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 51,65 %
15 NS 2C W-1 50 15.4 70.00
16 NS 3C N-1 -50 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.7 Elena Valsesia -Noelle Fosse 57,77 %
17 NS 4P N+1 450 5.5 25.00
18 NS 4C N-2 -200 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 27,50 %
a.6 Miry Degret -Bernard Degret 38,62 %
19 NS 3C W = -140 0.1 0.45
20 NS 1S S+1 120 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
a.5 Thomas Brusselmans -Michel Léonard 54,13 %
21 NS 6S W+1 -1020 5.5 25.00
22 NS 4C N = 420 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.4 Odile Franquet van Tilt -Anne France Raquez 55,33 %
23 NS 4P E = -620 4 18.18
24 NS 4K S-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
a.3 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 47,61 %
25 NS 3T E+1 -130 17 77.27
26 NS 3S N = 600 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 57,97 %
27 NS 4P W+1 -450 5 22.73
28 NS 4C E+1 -450 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
a.1 Aida Zumot -Claire de Quirini 36,99 %
29 NS 3K E-3 300 21.9 99.55
30 NS 3K N = 110 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
Total : 210,9 / 528 = 39,94 %
PAIRE A10 Claire Derieuw -Chantal de Lichtervelde
a.4 Odile Franquet van Tilt -Anne France Raquez 55,33 %
1 NS 6ScS-3 -500 0.1 0.45
2 NS 2P S = 110 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 5,45 %
a.3 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 47,61 %
3 NS 4P N = 420 17.5 79.55
4 NS 3S W+2 -660 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 54,77 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 57,97 %
5 NS 3S S = 600 8.8 40.00
6 NS 3S E+4 -720 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
a.1 Aida Zumot -Claire de Quirini 36,99 %
7 NS 1S S+1 120 14.3 65.00
8 NS 4C E-1 50 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
a15 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 52,64 %
9 NS 3P N-1 -50 5.5 25.00
10 NS 4P S-1 -100 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
a14 Alexandre Viot -Philippe van der Gracht 53,02 %
11 NS 4P E = -420 1.2 5.45
12 NS 4P S = 620 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
a10 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 40,23 %
19 NS 3P N = 140 19.7 89.55
20 NS 3S S-3 -300 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.9 Christiane Huby -Danielle Wybauw 41,82 %
21 NS 6P W = -980 9.9 45.00
22 NS 4C N-1 -50 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
a.8 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 51,65 %
23 NS 4P E = -620 4 18.18
24 NS 3S N = 400 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.7 Elena Valsesia -Noelle Fosse 57,77 %
25 NS 3S E+1 -630 3 13.64
26 NS 1S N+3 180 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 6,82 %
a.6 Miry Degret -Bernard Degret 38,62 %
27 NS 4P W+1 -450 5 22.73
28 NS 4C E = -420 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.5 Thomas Brusselmans -Michel Léonard 54,13 %
29 NS 3S E = -600 0.1 0.45
30 NS 3K N = 110 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
Total : 173,3 / 528 = 32,82 %
PAIRE A15 -
a14 Alexandre Viot -Philippe van der Gracht 53,02 %
1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a13 Fabienne Smit -Francoise Duren 56,34 %
3 NS BYE 0 0.00
4 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a12 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 56,03 %
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a11 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 50,89 %
7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a10 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 40,23 %
9 NS BYE 0 0.00
10 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.9 Christiane Huby -Danielle Wybauw 41,82 %
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.8 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 51,65 %
13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.7 Elena Valsesia -Noelle Fosse 57,77 %
15 NS BYE 0 0.00
16 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.6 Miry Degret -Bernard Degret 38,62 %
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.5 Thomas Brusselmans -Michel Léonard 54,13 %
19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.4 Odile Franquet van Tilt -Anne France Raquez 55,33 %
21 NS BYE 0 0.00
22 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a15 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 52,64 %
29 NS BYE 0 0.00
30 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 660 = 0,00 %
PAIRE a.2 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain
A.9 Liliane Baptista -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 63,28 %
1 EO 4P N+1 450 4.5 20.45
2 EO 2P S+2 170 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
A.2 Annette Fobe -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 47,05 %
3 EO 3K S+2 150 16.5 75.00
4 EO 3S W+2 -660 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 72,50 %
A10 Claire Derieuw -Chantal de Lichtervelde 32,82 %
5 EO 3S S = 600 13.2 60.00
6 EO 3S E+4 -720 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Serge Allard 53,98 %
7 EO 1S S+1 120 7.7 35.00
8 EO 4C E = -420 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A11 Myriam de Timary -Sophie Tilemans 49,09 %
9 EO 3P N = 140 7.7 35.00
10 EO 2P S+1 140 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
A.4 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 56,21 %
11 EO 2P E+2 -170 8.8 40.00
12 EO 3S N+1 630 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A12 Nicole Leclere -Francoise Turin 55,85 %
13 EO 4C E = -620 14.3 65.00
14 EO 4P S = 420 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A.5 Giuseppe Napoli -Daniela Napoli 49,66 %
15 EO 3C W = -140 12.1 55.00
16 EO 4CcN-2 -300 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A13 Grazia Neuenschwander -Michele Berrier 49,28 %
17 EO 4P N+2 480 5.5 25.00
18 EO 4C N-2 -200 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.6 Caroll Pucher -Eliane de Ceuninck 49,30 %
19 EO 3P N-1 -50 16.5 75.00
20 EO 4C N-4 -400 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 87,27 %
A.7 Lydia Wildiers -Yolande Davain 58,77 %
23 EO 3P W+1 -170 8 36.36
24 EO 3S N = 400 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A.8 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 39,94 %
27 EO 4P W+1 -450 17 77.27
28 EO 4C E+1 -450 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
Total : 306,1 / 528 = 57,97 %
PAIRE a.7 Elena Valsesia -Noelle Fosse
A12 Nicole Leclere -Francoise Turin 55,85 %
3 EO 5K S = 400 9.9 45.00
4 EO 3S W+2 -660 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A13 Grazia Neuenschwander -Michele Berrier 49,28 %
7 EO 1S S+1 120 7.7 35.00
8 EO 3S E-2 100 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
A14 Michel Lievens -Annie Zeimes 51,04 %
11 EO 3S W = -400 17.5 79.55
12 EO 4P N+1 650 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.7 Lydia Wildiers -Yolande Davain 58,77 %
13 EO 4C E = -620 14.3 65.00
14 EO 4P S-1 -50 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
A15 - 0,00 %
15 EO BYE 0 0.00
16 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.8 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 39,94 %
17 EO 4P N+1 450 16.5 75.00
18 EO 4C N-2 -200 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 72,50 %
A.1 Fifi Englund -Martine Zens 43,39 %
19 EO 1C W+1 -110 19.7 89.55
20 EO 3S N-1 -100 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
A.9 Liliane Baptista -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 63,28 %
21 EO 6P W-1 50 0.1 0.45
22 EO 4C N-1 -50 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A.2 Annette Fobe -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 47,05 %
23 EO 2C S = 110 2 9.09
24 EO 3K S-1 -50 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A10 Claire Derieuw -Chantal de Lichtervelde 32,82 %
25 EO 3S E+1 -630 19 86.36
26 EO 1S N+3 180 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 93,18 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Serge Allard 53,98 %
27 EO 4P W+1 -450 17 77.27
28 EO 4C E = -420 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A11 Myriam de Timary -Sophie Tilemans 49,09 %
29 EO 2C N-1 -100 16.5 75.00
30 EO 3S S = 400 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
Total : 279,6 / 484 = 57,77 %
PAIRE a13 Fabienne Smit -Francoise Duren
A.7 Lydia Wildiers -Yolande Davain 58,77 %
1 EO 5K S+1 420 12.1 55.00
2 EO 3P S+2 200 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A15 - 0,00 %
3 EO BYE 0 0.00
4 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.8 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 39,94 %
5 EO 3C N+3 230 17.5 79.55
6 EO 3S E-1 100 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A.1 Fifi Englund -Martine Zens 43,39 %
7 EO 2P E-1 100 17.5 79.55
8 EO 4C E = -420 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 84,55 %
A.9 Liliane Baptista -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 63,28 %
9 EO 4P N = 420 1.2 5.45
10 EO 2P S = 110 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.2 Annette Fobe -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 47,05 %
11 EO 2P E+2 -170 8.8 40.00
12 EO 4P N+1 650 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Serge Allard 53,98 %
15 EO 2P W+1 -140 12.1 55.00
16 EO 3C S-2 -100 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A.4 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 56,21 %
19 EO 3P N-1 -50 16.5 75.00
20 EO 1C S+2 140 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
A.5 Giuseppe Napoli -Daniela Napoli 49,66 %
23 EO 4P E = -620 18 81.82
24 EO 3S S = 400 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A13 Grazia Neuenschwander -Michele Berrier 49,28 %
25 EO 3S E+1 -630 19 86.36
26 EO 2P W-2 200 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
A.6 Caroll Pucher -Eliane de Ceuninck 49,30 %
27 EO 4P W = -420 6 27.27
28 EO 4C E = -420 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A14 Michel Lievens -Annie Zeimes 51,04 %
29 EO 2C N-1 -100 16.5 75.00
30 EO 3K N = 110 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 72,50 %
Total : 272,7 / 484 = 56,34 %
PAIRE a12 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle
A14 Michel Lievens -Annie Zeimes 51,04 %
1 EO 5K N+1 420 12.1 55.00
2 EO 3P S+1 170 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A.7 Lydia Wildiers -Yolande Davain 58,77 %
3 EO 5K S = 400 9.9 45.00
4 EO 3S E+2 -660 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A15 - 0,00 %
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.8 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 39,94 %
7 EO 2C W-1 100 17.5 79.55
8 EO 3C E = -140 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A.1 Fifi Englund -Martine Zens 43,39 %
9 EO 4P N-1 -50 16.5 75.00
10 EO 2P S+1 140 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 45,23 %
A.2 Annette Fobe -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 47,05 %
13 EO 3C E+2 -200 5.5 25.00
14 EO 4P S-1 -50 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Serge Allard 53,98 %
17 EO 4P N+1 450 16.5 75.00
18 EO 2CcN-1 -200 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 72,50 %
A.4 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 56,21 %
21 EO 6S E+1 -1020 16.5 75.00
22 EO 4C N-1 -50 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 72,50 %
A12 Nicole Leclere -Francoise Turin 55,85 %
23 EO 3P E+1 -170 8 36.36
24 EO 3S S = 400 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A.5 Giuseppe Napoli -Daniela Napoli 49,66 %
25 EO 3S W+1 -630 19 86.36
26 EO 3S N+2 660 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A13 Grazia Neuenschwander -Michele Berrier 49,28 %
27 EO 4P W+1 -450 17 77.27
28 EO 4C E = -420 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.6 Caroll Pucher -Eliane de Ceuninck 49,30 %
29 EO 1S E-2 200 2.3 10.45
30 EO 2K N+1 110 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
Total : 271,2 / 484 = 56,03 %
PAIRE a.4 Odile Franquet van Tilt -Anne France Raquez
A10 Claire Derieuw -Chantal de Lichtervelde 32,82 %
1 EO 6ScS-3 -500 21.9 99.55
2 EO 2P S = 110 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 94,55 %
A11 Myriam de Timary -Sophie Tilemans 49,09 %
5 EO 4C N+2 680 2.3 10.45
6 EO 3S E+2 -660 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.4 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 56,21 %
7 EO 1S N+1 120 7.7 35.00
8 EO 4C E-1 50 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
A12 Nicole Leclere -Francoise Turin 55,85 %
9 EO 4P N-1 -50 16.5 75.00
10 EO 3S S-1 -100 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
A.5 Giuseppe Napoli -Daniela Napoli 49,66 %
11 EO 4P E = -420 20.8 94.55
12 EO 3S N+1 630 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A13 Grazia Neuenschwander -Michele Berrier 49,28 %
13 EO 4C E = -620 14.3 65.00
14 EO 3P S+1 170 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.6 Caroll Pucher -Eliane de Ceuninck 49,30 %
15 EO 3C W+1 -170 17.5 79.55
16 EO 3C N = 140 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A14 Michel Lievens -Annie Zeimes 51,04 %
17 EO 5P N = 450 16.5 75.00
18 EO 2C N = 110 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 45,23 %
A.7 Lydia Wildiers -Yolande Davain 58,77 %
19 EO 3C W-1 100 12.1 55.00
20 EO 4C S = 620 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
A15 - 0,00 %
21 EO BYE 0 0.00
22 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.8 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 39,94 %
23 EO 4P E = -620 18 81.82
24 EO 4K S-2 -100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
A.9 Liliane Baptista -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 63,28 %
27 EO 5C E-1 50 0 0.00
28 EO 4C E = -420 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
Total : 267,8 / 484 = 55,33 %
PAIRE a.5 Thomas Brusselmans -Michel Léonard
A11 Myriam de Timary -Sophie Tilemans 49,09 %
3 EO 4K S+1 150 16.5 75.00
4 EO 3S W+1 -630 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A12 Nicole Leclere -Francoise Turin 55,85 %
7 EO 1S S = 90 21.9 99.55
8 EO 1S E+1 -120 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A.5 Giuseppe Napoli -Daniela Napoli 49,66 %
9 EO 2P N+1 140 7.7 35.00
10 EO 4P S-2 -200 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
A13 Grazia Neuenschwander -Michele Berrier 49,28 %
11 EO 3P E = -140 2.3 10.45
12 EO 4P N = 620 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
A.6 Caroll Pucher -Eliane de Ceuninck 49,30 %
13 EO 4C E+1 -650 21.9 99.55
14 EO 2P S+2 170 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A14 Michel Lievens -Annie Zeimes 51,04 %
15 EO 2T N = 90 4.5 20.45
16 EO 1S W-3 300 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 15,45 %
A.7 Lydia Wildiers -Yolande Davain 58,77 %
17 EO 4P N+1 450 16.5 75.00
18 EO 2C N = 110 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 45,23 %
A15 - 0,00 %
19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.8 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 39,94 %
21 EO 6S W+1 -1020 16.5 75.00
22 EO 4C N = 420 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.1 Fifi Englund -Martine Zens 43,39 %
23 EO 2P E+1 -140 4 18.18
24 EO 3S S-1 -50 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.9 Liliane Baptista -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 63,28 %
25 EO 3S W = -600 12 54.55
26 EO 3S N+1 630 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A10 Claire Derieuw -Chantal de Lichtervelde 32,82 %
29 EO 3S E = -600 21.9 99.55
30 EO 3K N = 110 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
Total : 262,0 / 484 = 54,13 %
PAIRE a14 Alexandre Viot -Philippe van der Gracht
A15 - 0,00 %
1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.8 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 39,94 %
3 EO 3S S+1 430 2.3 10.45
4 EO 3S W = -600 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 7,95 %
A.1 Fifi Englund -Martine Zens 43,39 %
5 EO 2C N+4 230 17.5 79.55
6 EO 3S E-1 100 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A.9 Liliane Baptista -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 63,28 %
7 EO 2T E-4 400 0.1 0.45
8 EO 3C E-1 50 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 12,73 %
A.2 Annette Fobe -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 47,05 %
9 EO 3P N-1 -50 16.5 75.00
10 EO 3S S-2 -200 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
A10 Claire Derieuw -Chantal de Lichtervelde 32,82 %
11 EO 4P E = -420 20.8 94.55
12 EO 4P S = 620 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Serge Allard 53,98 %
13 EO 4C E = -620 14.3 65.00
14 EO 3P S = 140 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A.4 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 56,21 %
17 EO 5CcW-3 500 0.1 0.45
18 EO 3C N-1 -100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
A.5 Giuseppe Napoli -Daniela Napoli 49,66 %
21 EO 7S W = -1520 20.8 94.55
22 EO 4C N-1 -50 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
A.6 Caroll Pucher -Eliane de Ceuninck 49,30 %
25 EO 3T E+1 -130 5 22.73
26 EO 3S N+1 630 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A14 Michel Lievens -Annie Zeimes 51,04 %
27 EO 4P W = -420 6 27.27
28 EO 4C E+1 -450 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.7 Lydia Wildiers -Yolande Davain 58,77 %
29 EO 2C N = 110 7.7 35.00
30 EO 4K N-1 -50 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
Total : 256,6 / 484 = 53,02 %
PAIRE a15 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve
A.8 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 39,94 %
1 EO 5K S+1 420 12.1 55.00
2 EO 3P S-1 -100 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.1 Fifi Englund -Martine Zens 43,39 %
3 EO 5K S = 400 9.9 45.00
4 EO 3S W+2 -660 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A.9 Liliane Baptista -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 63,28 %
5 EO 4C S-1 -100 21.9 99.55
6 EO 1T E+4 -150 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 89,55 %
A.2 Annette Fobe -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 47,05 %
7 EO 1S S+3 180 2.3 10.45
8 EO 4C E = -420 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A10 Claire Derieuw -Chantal de Lichtervelde 32,82 %
9 EO 3P N-1 -50 16.5 75.00
10 EO 4P S-1 -100 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Serge Allard 53,98 %
11 EO 2P E+1 -140 2.3 10.45
12 EO 4P N+1 650 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 15,45 %
A11 Myriam de Timary -Sophie Tilemans 49,09 %
13 EO 4C E = -620 14.3 65.00
14 EO 2P S+2 170 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.4 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 56,21 %
15 EO 3S N-1 -100 8.8 40.00
16 EO 3T W-1 100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A.5 Giuseppe Napoli -Daniela Napoli 49,66 %
19 EO 2P N+1 140 2.3 10.45
20 EO 3S S = 600 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 12,95 %
A.6 Caroll Pucher -Eliane de Ceuninck 49,30 %
23 EO 4P W = -620 18 81.82
24 EO 3S N = 400 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.7 Lydia Wildiers -Yolande Davain 58,77 %
27 EO 4P E+1 -450 17 77.27
28 EO 4C W = -420 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A15 - 0,00 %
29 EO BYE 0 0.00
30 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 254,8 / 484 = 52,64 %
PAIRE a.8 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger
A12 Nicole Leclere -Francoise Turin 55,85 %
1 EO 5K N+1 420 12.1 55.00
2 EO 3P S+1 170 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A13 Grazia Neuenschwander -Michele Berrier 49,28 %
5 EO 2C N+4 230 17.5 79.55
6 EO 4P W-2 200 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A14 Michel Lievens -Annie Zeimes 51,04 %
9 EO 4P N-2 -100 21.9 99.55
10 EO 4P S-1 -100 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
A15 - 0,00 %
13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.8 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 39,94 %
15 EO 2C W-1 50 6.6 30.00
16 EO 3C N-1 -50 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.1 Fifi Englund -Martine Zens 43,39 %
17 EO 4P N+1 450 16.5 75.00
18 EO 4C N-3 -300 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
A.9 Liliane Baptista -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 63,28 %
19 EO 3P N = 140 2.3 10.45
20 EO 3S S = 600 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 12,95 %
A.2 Annette Fobe -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 47,05 %
21 EO 6P W = -980 12.1 55.00
22 EO 4C N-1 -50 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
A10 Claire Derieuw -Chantal de Lichtervelde 32,82 %
23 EO 4P E = -620 18 81.82
24 EO 3S N = 400 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Serge Allard 53,98 %
25 EO 3S E-2 200 0 0.00
26 EO 3S S = 600 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A11 Myriam de Timary -Sophie Tilemans 49,09 %
27 EO 4P W+1 -450 17 77.27
28 EO 4C E = -420 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.4 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 56,21 %
29 EO 2C N = 110 7.7 35.00
30 EO 4C W-3 150 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 32,50 %
Total : 250,0 / 484 = 51,65 %
PAIRE a11 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed
A.6 Caroll Pucher -Eliane de Ceuninck 49,30 %
1 EO 6P N = 980 0.1 0.45
2 EO 2P S+3 200 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 10,45 %
A14 Michel Lievens -Annie Zeimes 51,04 %
3 EO 5K S = 400 9.9 45.00
4 EO 3S W+2 -660 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A.7 Lydia Wildiers -Yolande Davain 58,77 %
5 EO 4C N+2 680 2.3 10.45
6 EO 3S W-1 100 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
A15 - 0,00 %
7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.1 Fifi Englund -Martine Zens 43,39 %
11 EO 2P E+3 -200 14.3 65.00
12 EO 4P E = -420 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
A.2 Annette Fobe -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 47,05 %
15 EO 3C W+1 -170 17.5 79.55
16 EO 3C N-1 -50 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Serge Allard 53,98 %
19 EO 2P N = 110 7.7 35.00
20 EO 2C S+2 170 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
A11 Myriam de Timary -Sophie Tilemans 49,09 %
21 EO 7S W = -1520 20.8 94.55
22 EO 4C N = 420 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A.4 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 56,21 %
23 EO 4P E = -620 18 81.82
24 EO 3P E-2 100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A12 Nicole Leclere -Francoise Turin 55,85 %
25 EO 3S E+1 -630 19 86.36
26 EO 3S N+2 660 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.5 Giuseppe Napoli -Daniela Napoli 49,66 %
27 EO 4P W = -420 6 27.27
28 EO 4C E = -420 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A13 Grazia Neuenschwander -Michele Berrier 49,28 %
29 EO 1S E+2 -150 19.7 89.55
30 EO 2K N+2 130 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
Total : 246,3 / 484 = 50,89 %
PAIRE a.3 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru
A10 Claire Derieuw -Chantal de Lichtervelde 32,82 %
3 EO 4P N = 420 4.5 20.45
4 EO 3S W+2 -660 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 45,23 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Serge Allard 53,98 %
5 EO 4C N = 620 8.8 40.00
6 EO 3S E-1 100 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A11 Myriam de Timary -Sophie Tilemans 49,09 %
7 EO 2C E-1 100 17.5 79.55
8 EO 2C E+1 -140 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A.4 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 56,21 %
9 EO 2P N+1 140 7.7 35.00
10 EO 2P S+1 140 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
A12 Nicole Leclere -Francoise Turin 55,85 %
11 EO 2P E+2 -170 8.8 40.00
12 EO 4P N+1 650 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
A.5 Giuseppe Napoli -Daniela Napoli 49,66 %
13 EO 4C E-1 100 0.1 0.45
14 EO 5T E-3 150 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A13 Grazia Neuenschwander -Michele Berrier 49,28 %
15 EO 3T N-2 -200 21.9 99.55
16 EO 3C N-1 -50 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
A.6 Caroll Pucher -Eliane de Ceuninck 49,30 %
17 EO 5P N = 450 16.5 75.00
18 EO 3CcN-2 -500 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 87,27 %
A14 Michel Lievens -Annie Zeimes 51,04 %
19 EO 3C W-1 100 12.1 55.00
20 EO 2C S+2 170 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.7 Lydia Wildiers -Yolande Davain 58,77 %
21 EO 6K W+1 -940 7.7 35.00
22 EO 4C N = 420 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
A.8 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 39,94 %
25 EO 3T E+1 -130 5 22.73
26 EO 3S N = 600 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A.9 Liliane Baptista -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 63,28 %
29 EO 1S E-1 100 13.2 60.00
30 EO 3S S = 400 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
Total : 251,4 / 528 = 47,61 %
PAIRE a.9 Christiane Huby -Danielle Wybauw
A.5 Giuseppe Napoli -Daniela Napoli 49,66 %
1 EO 5K N+1 420 12.1 55.00
2 EO 2P S+3 200 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A13 Grazia Neuenschwander -Michele Berrier 49,28 %
3 EO 3S N+2 460 0.1 0.45
4 EO 3S W+2 -660 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A14 Michel Lievens -Annie Zeimes 51,04 %
7 EO 3T S = 110 13.2 60.00
8 EO 4C E-1 50 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A15 - 0,00 %
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.1 Fifi Englund -Martine Zens 43,39 %
15 EO 2C E+2 -170 17.5 79.55
16 EO 3S E-4 400 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A.9 Liliane Baptista -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 63,28 %
17 EO 4P N+2 480 5.5 25.00
18 EO 3C N-1 -100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 32,50 %
A.2 Annette Fobe -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 47,05 %
19 EO 2P N = 110 7.7 35.00
20 EO 4C N-1 -100 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A10 Claire Derieuw -Chantal de Lichtervelde 32,82 %
21 EO 6P W = -980 12.1 55.00
22 EO 4C N-1 -50 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Serge Allard 53,98 %
23 EO 2C S+1 140 0 0.00
24 EO 3S S = 400 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
A11 Myriam de Timary -Sophie Tilemans 49,09 %
25 EO 3S E = -600 12 54.55
26 EO 3S S = 600 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.4 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 56,21 %
27 EO 4P W = -420 6 27.27
28 EO 4C E+1 -450 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A12 Nicole Leclere -Francoise Turin 55,85 %
29 EO 2C N = 110 7.7 35.00
30 EO 3S S = 400 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
Total : 202,4 / 484 = 41,82 %
PAIRE a10 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart
A13 Grazia Neuenschwander -Michele Berrier 49,28 %
1 EO 5K N+1 420 12.1 55.00
2 EO 2P S+3 200 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A.6 Caroll Pucher -Eliane de Ceuninck 49,30 %
3 EO 6K S-1 -50 19.7 89.55
4 EO 3S E+1 -630 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
A14 Michel Lievens -Annie Zeimes 51,04 %
5 EO 4C N = 620 8.8 40.00
6 EO 4P W-4 400 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
A15 - 0,00 %
9 EO BYE 0 0.00
10 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.1 Fifi Englund -Martine Zens 43,39 %
13 EO 2S E+2 -180 2.3 10.45
14 EO 2P S+2 170 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
A.2 Annette Fobe -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 47,05 %
17 EO 4P N+2 480 5.5 25.00
18 EO 2C N+1 140 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 12,73 %
A10 Claire Derieuw -Chantal de Lichtervelde 32,82 %
19 EO 3P N = 140 2.3 10.45
20 EO 3S S-3 -300 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Serge Allard 53,98 %
21 EO 6K E+1 -940 7.7 35.00
22 EO 4C N-1 -50 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A11 Myriam de Timary -Sophie Tilemans 49,09 %
23 EO 2P E+2 -170 8 36.36
24 EO 3P E-1 50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.4 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 56,21 %
25 EO 3S E = -600 12 54.55
26 EO 3S N+1 630 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A12 Nicole Leclere -Francoise Turin 55,85 %
27 EO 4P W = -420 6 27.27
28 EO 4C E = -420 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A.5 Giuseppe Napoli -Daniela Napoli 49,66 %
29 EO 2C N = 110 7.7 35.00
30 EO 3K N = 110 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
Total : 194,7 / 484 = 40,23 %
PAIRE a.6 Miry Degret -Bernard Degret
A11 Myriam de Timary -Sophie Tilemans 49,09 %
1 EO 6K N = 920 2.3 10.45
2 EO 3P S+1 170 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A12 Nicole Leclere -Francoise Turin 55,85 %
5 EO 4C N+2 680 2.3 10.45
6 EO 3S E-1 100 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
A13 Grazia Neuenschwander -Michele Berrier 49,28 %
9 EO 4P N = 420 1.2 5.45
10 EO 4P S-1 -100 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A.6 Caroll Pucher -Eliane de Ceuninck 49,30 %
11 EO 1S S-4 -200 14.3 65.00
12 EO 4P N+1 650 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
A14 Michel Lievens -Annie Zeimes 51,04 %
13 EO 4C E = -620 14.3 65.00
14 EO 4P S = 420 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A.7 Lydia Wildiers -Yolande Davain 58,77 %
15 EO 1S N+2 150 0.1 0.45
16 EO 3C N = 140 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 12,73 %
A15 - 0,00 %
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.8 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 39,94 %
19 EO 3C W = -140 21.9 99.55
20 EO 1S S+1 120 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
A.1 Fifi Englund -Martine Zens 43,39 %
21 EO 5K W+2 -440 3.4 15.45
22 EO 4C N+1 450 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 7,95 %
A.9 Liliane Baptista -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 63,28 %
23 EO 3C S-2 -200 12 54.55
24 EO 3S S = 400 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A.2 Annette Fobe -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 47,05 %
25 EO 1S E+1 -120 2 9.09
26 EO 2P W-3 300 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A10 Claire Derieuw -Chantal de Lichtervelde 32,82 %
27 EO 4P W+1 -450 17 77.27
28 EO 4C E = -420 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
Total : 186,9 / 484 = 38,62 %
PAIRE a.1 Aida Zumot -Claire de Quirini
A.1 Fifi Englund -Martine Zens 43,39 %
1 EO 3S N-1 -50 19.7 89.55
2 EO 2P S+3 200 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.9 Liliane Baptista -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 63,28 %
3 EO 6S S-2 -100 21.9 99.55
4 EO 3S W = -600 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A.2 Annette Fobe -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 47,05 %
5 EO 4C N = 620 8.8 40.00
6 EO 3S E-1 100 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A10 Claire Derieuw -Chantal de Lichtervelde 32,82 %
7 EO 1S S+1 120 7.7 35.00
8 EO 4C E-1 50 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Serge Allard 53,98 %
9 EO 3P N = 140 7.7 35.00
10 EO 3P S = 140 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
A11 Myriam de Timary -Sophie Tilemans 49,09 %
11 EO 3P E = -140 2.3 10.45
12 EO 1T N+5 170 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.4 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 56,21 %
13 EO 3C W+2 -200 5.5 25.00
14 EO 4P S = 420 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
A12 Nicole Leclere -Francoise Turin 55,85 %
15 EO 3T N+1 130 2.3 10.45
16 EO 4C N-1 -50 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A.5 Giuseppe Napoli -Daniela Napoli 49,66 %
17 EO 4P N+2 480 5.5 25.00
18 EO 4C N-1 -100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 32,50 %
A.6 Caroll Pucher -Eliane de Ceuninck 49,30 %
21 EO 5K E+2 -440 3.4 15.45
22 EO 4C N-1 -50 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
A.7 Lydia Wildiers -Yolande Davain 58,77 %
25 EO 2S W+1 -150 8 36.36
26 EO 3S S+2 660 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.8 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 39,94 %
29 EO 3K E-3 300 0.1 0.45
30 EO 3K N = 110 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
Total : 195,3 / 528 = 36,99 %
|