B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 66,01 A.5 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie
--- 2 59,69 A10 Fabienne Smit -Jean de Villenfagne
--- 3 52,38 A.4 Alan Beckman -Myriam de Timary
--- 4 50,99 A.7 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles
--- 5 50,78 A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten
--- 6 47,24 A.8 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Danette Nuytens
--- 7 47,14 A.9 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand
--- 8 44,73 A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck
--- 9 43,61 A.2 Francoise Duren -Thierry Bollansee
--- 10 35,27 A.3 Barbara Kengen -Michele Verhulst
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 56,46 a.7 Antoinette Jourdain -Lydia Wildiers
--- 2 56,10 a.9 Michele Berrier -Christiane Huby
--- 3 53,45 a.3 Miguel Paredes -Manolo Hernandez
--- 4 50,09 a.6 Jacqueline de Thier -Catherine de Moffarts
--- 5 49,64 a.4 Pascale Graton -Caroline Lallia
--- 6 49,02 a.2 Gerard Cooreman -Dominique Sassen
--- 7 47,17 a.1 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens
--- 8 45,51 a.5 Annette Fobe -Chantal de Lichtervelde
--- 9 42,80 a.8 Sylviane Delbeke -Nathalie de Laminne
--- 10 0,00 a10 -
PAIRE A.5 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie
a.8 Sylviane Delbeke -Nathalie de Laminne 42,80 %
1 NS 3S S = 400 4.7 33.57
2 NS 3C E+1 -170 13.9 99.29
3 NS 2P N = 110 12.7 90.71 µ Tbl = 74,52 %
a.7 Antoinette Jourdain -Lydia Wildiers 56,46 %
4 NS 2K N+1 110 5.9 42.14
5 NS 3S S+1 630 4.7 33.57
6 NS 2P N+1 140 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 41,90 %
a.5 Annette Fobe -Chantal de Lichtervelde 45,51 %
13 NS 4C W-1 100 13.9 99.29
14 NS 3S N+1 430 12.7 90.71
15 NS 4P W-1 50 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 96,43 %
a.4 Pascale Graton -Caroline Lallia 49,64 %
16 NS 3S N+4 520 12.7 90.71
17 NS 5K E-2 100 13.9 99.29
18 NS 4P W = -420 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 80,00 %
a.3 Miguel Paredes -Manolo Hernandez 53,45 %
19 NS 4P N = 420 8 57.14
20 NS 6C W+1 -1460 7 50.00
21 NS 2P N+1 140 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
a.2 Gerard Cooreman -Dominique Sassen 49,02 %
22 NS 2P N+1 140 8.1 57.86
23 NS 6S W = -1440 1.3 9.29
24 NS 3S N+2 460 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 47,14 %
a.1 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 47,17 %
25 NS 3P S+1 170 12 85.71
26 NS 2P S+2 170 14 100.00
27 NS 2P E+1 -140 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 78,57 %
a.9 Michele Berrier -Christiane Huby 56,10 %
28 NS 3P S-1 -100 11.6 82.86
29 NS 4C N = 620 9.3 66.43
30 NS 2S W+1 -150 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
Total : 221,8 / 336 = 66,01 %
PAIRE A10 Fabienne Smit -Jean de Villenfagne
a.9 Michele Berrier -Christiane Huby 56,10 %
1 NS 3S S = 400 4.7 33.57
2 NS 4C E = -420 8.1 57.86
3 NS 3C E = -140 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 30,71 %
a.8 Sylviane Delbeke -Nathalie de Laminne 42,80 %
4 NS 2K N+2 130 11.6 82.86
5 NS 3S S+2 660 11.6 82.86
6 NS 2P N+1 140 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 71,90 %
a.7 Antoinette Jourdain -Lydia Wildiers 56,46 %
7 NS 3S N+4 720 8.1 57.86
8 NS 3S E+1 -430 4.7 33.57
9 NS 4T W+2 -170 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,14 %
a.6 Jacqueline de Thier -Catherine de Moffarts 50,09 %
10 NS 3S S-3 -300 1.3 9.29
11 NS 3P W-1 50 12.7 90.71
12 NS 4PcE-3 500 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 66,43 %
a.4 Pascale Graton -Caroline Lallia 49,64 %
13 NS 3S W = -600 5.9 42.14
14 NS 3S N+1 430 12.7 90.71
15 NS 2P W+3 -200 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
a.3 Miguel Paredes -Manolo Hernandez 53,45 %
16 NS 3S N+4 520 12.7 90.71
17 NS 3C N-1 -50 7 50.00
18 NS 4P W = -420 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 63,57 %
a.2 Gerard Cooreman -Dominique Sassen 49,02 %
19 NS 4P N+1 450 12 85.71
20 NS 6C W+1 -1460 7 50.00
21 NS 4P N = 620 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
a10 - 0,00 %
28 NS BYE 0 0.00
29 NS BYE 0 0.00
30 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 175,5 / 294 = 59,69 %
PAIRE A.4 Alan Beckman -Myriam de Timary
a.6 Jacqueline de Thier -Catherine de Moffarts 50,09 %
1 NS 3S S+1 430 12.7 90.71
2 NS 4C E = -420 8.1 57.86
3 NS 3P N-1 -50 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 68,81 %
a.4 Pascale Graton -Caroline Lallia 49,64 %
10 NS 3S S-3 -300 1.3 9.29
11 NS 4PcW = -590 0.1 0.71
12 NS 3K S+1 130 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 25,48 %
a.3 Miguel Paredes -Manolo Hernandez 53,45 %
13 NS 3C W+2 -200 11.6 82.86
14 NS 4P S = 420 8.1 57.86
15 NS 4P W+1 -450 1.3 9.29 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.2 Gerard Cooreman -Dominique Sassen 49,02 %
16 NS 3S N+2 460 9.3 66.43
17 NS 5K E-1 50 10.4 74.29
18 NS 4P W = -420 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 63,57 %
a.1 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 47,17 %
19 NS 3P N+2 200 4 28.57
20 NS 7C W = -2210 0 0.00
21 NS 4P N = 620 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a10 - 0,00 %
22 NS BYE 0 0.00
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.8 Sylviane Delbeke -Nathalie de Laminne 42,80 %
25 NS 2P S+1 140 4 28.57
26 NS 2S N+1 150 12 85.71
27 NS 2P E+2 -170 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
a.7 Antoinette Jourdain -Lydia Wildiers 56,46 %
28 NS 4C W-1 50 13.9 99.29
29 NS 3C N+2 200 5.9 42.14
30 NS 3T W = -110 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 80,24 %
Total : 154,0 / 294 = 52,38 %
PAIRE A.7 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles
a.3 Miguel Paredes -Manolo Hernandez 53,45 %
1 NS 3S S+1 430 12.7 90.71
2 NS 4C E+1 -450 1.3 9.29
3 NS 3P N-1 -50 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 52,62 %
a.1 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 47,17 %
4 NS 2K N+1 110 5.9 42.14
5 NS 3S S+2 660 11.6 82.86
6 NS 2P N+1 140 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
a10 - 0,00 %
7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.9 Michele Berrier -Christiane Huby 56,10 %
10 NS 4T N = 130 8.1 57.86
11 NS 3P W-1 50 12.7 90.71
12 NS 4P E-4 200 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 77,14 %
a.7 Antoinette Jourdain -Lydia Wildiers 56,46 %
19 NS 4P N = 420 8 57.14
20 NS 6C W+1 -1460 7 50.00
21 NS 3P N+2 200 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.6 Jacqueline de Thier -Catherine de Moffarts 50,09 %
22 NS 2S N = 120 2.4 17.14
23 NS 6C W = -1430 5.9 42.14
24 NS 3S S+2 460 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 44,52 %
a.5 Annette Fobe -Chantal de Lichtervelde 45,51 %
25 NS 2P S+1 140 4 28.57
26 NS 3T S = 110 9 64.29
27 NS 2P E+2 -170 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
a.4 Pascale Graton -Caroline Lallia 49,64 %
28 NS 4C W = -420 4.7 33.57
29 NS 2C N+2 170 2.4 17.14
30 NS 1S E+2 -150 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 36,19 %
Total : 149,9 / 294 = 50,99 %
PAIRE A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten
a10 - 0,00 %
1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.9 Michele Berrier -Christiane Huby 56,10 %
4 NS 1K N+1 90 0.1 0.71
5 NS 3S S = 600 0.1 0.71
6 NS 3P N+2 200 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 33,57 %
a.8 Sylviane Delbeke -Nathalie de Laminne 42,80 %
7 NS 4S S+3 720 8.1 57.86
8 NS 3K W+1 -130 13.9 99.29
9 NS 6T W = -1370 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 52,62 %
a.6 Jacqueline de Thier -Catherine de Moffarts 50,09 %
16 NS 3S N+1 430 4.7 33.57
17 NS 4K E = -130 1.3 9.29
18 NS 4P W = -420 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
a.5 Annette Fobe -Chantal de Lichtervelde 45,51 %
19 NS 4P N+2 480 14 100.00
20 NS 5C W+2 -710 14 100.00
21 NS 2P N+2 170 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
a.4 Pascale Graton -Caroline Lallia 49,64 %
22 NS 2P N+1 140 8.1 57.86
23 NS 4C W+2 -680 9.3 66.43
24 NS 3S N+1 430 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.3 Miguel Paredes -Manolo Hernandez 53,45 %
25 NS 2P S+2 170 12 85.71
26 NS 1CcE = -160 2 14.29
27 NS 2P E = -110 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
a.2 Gerard Cooreman -Dominique Sassen 49,02 %
28 NS 4C W = -420 4.7 33.57
29 NS 4C N+1 650 12.7 90.71
30 NS 2S W+2 -180 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 52,62 %
Total : 149,3 / 294 = 50,78 %
PAIRE A.8 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Danette Nuytens
a.5 Annette Fobe -Chantal de Lichtervelde 45,51 %
1 NS 3S S = 400 4.7 33.57
2 NS 4C E+1 -450 1.3 9.29
3 NS 2P N = 110 12.7 90.71 µ Tbl = 44,52 %
a.4 Pascale Graton -Caroline Lallia 49,64 %
4 NS 2KcN+1 380 13.9 99.29
5 NS 3S S+1 630 4.7 33.57
6 NS 2P S = 110 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 44,52 %
a.2 Gerard Cooreman -Dominique Sassen 49,02 %
7 NS 3S N+4 720 8.1 57.86
8 NS 3S E+1 -430 4.7 33.57
9 NS 3C N-1 -50 12.7 90.71 µ Tbl = 60,71 %
a.1 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 47,17 %
10 NS 3C E-3 300 11.6 82.86
11 NS 4K S-2 -100 5.9 42.14
12 NS 2K S+1 110 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 52,86 %
a10 - 0,00 %
13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00
15 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.8 Sylviane Delbeke -Nathalie de Laminne 42,80 %
22 NS 2P N+1 140 8.1 57.86
23 NS 3S W+2 -660 11.6 82.86
24 NS 3S N+2 460 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 71,67 %
a.7 Antoinette Jourdain -Lydia Wildiers 56,46 %
25 NS 2P S+1 140 4 28.57
26 NS 2P N = 110 9 64.29
27 NS 2P E+3 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
a.6 Jacqueline de Thier -Catherine de Moffarts 50,09 %
28 NS 4C W = -420 4.7 33.57
29 NS 3C N+2 200 5.9 42.14
30 NS 3S W+1 -430 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 25,48 %
Total : 138,9 / 294 = 47,24 %
PAIRE A.9 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand
a.7 Antoinette Jourdain -Lydia Wildiers 56,46 %
1 NS 3S S = 400 4.7 33.57
2 NS 4C E = -420 8.1 57.86
3 NS 3P N-2 -100 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
a.6 Jacqueline de Thier -Catherine de Moffarts 50,09 %
4 NS 2K N+1 110 5.9 42.14
5 NS 3S S+2 660 11.6 82.86
6 NS 2P N+1 140 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
a.5 Annette Fobe -Chantal de Lichtervelde 45,51 %
7 NS 3S N+4 720 8.1 57.86
8 NS 3S W = -400 11.6 82.86
9 NS 2P N-1 -50 12.7 90.71 µ Tbl = 77,14 %
a.3 Miguel Paredes -Manolo Hernandez 53,45 %
10 NS 3K S = 110 4.7 33.57
11 NS 3P W = -140 2.4 17.14
12 NS 3P E-2 100 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 17,14 %
a.2 Gerard Cooreman -Dominique Sassen 49,02 %
13 NS 4C W = -620 2.4 17.14
14 NS 4P S-1 -50 3.6 25.71
15 NS 4P W = -420 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 28,33 %
a.1 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 47,17 %
16 NS 3S N+1 430 4.7 33.57
17 NS 4K E-1 50 10.4 74.29
18 NS 4P W = -420 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,62 %
a.9 Michele Berrier -Christiane Huby 56,10 %
25 NS 2P S+1 140 4 28.57
26 NS 3T S-1 -100 5 35.71
27 NS 2S S-1 -50 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
a.8 Sylviane Delbeke -Nathalie de Laminne 42,80 %
28 NS 4C W = -420 4.7 33.57
29 NS 4C N+1 650 12.7 90.71
30 NS 3S W = -400 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 47,14 %
Total : 158,4 / 336 = 47,14 %
PAIRE A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck
a.1 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 47,17 %
1 NS 3S S = 400 4.7 33.57
2 NS 4C E = -420 8.1 57.86
3 NS 2C E = -110 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 36,19 %
a10 - 0,00 %
4 NS BYE 0 0.00
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.9 Michele Berrier -Christiane Huby 56,10 %
7 NS 3S N+4 720 8.1 57.86
8 NS 3S E+1 -430 4.7 33.57
9 NS 5T W+1 -620 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
a.8 Sylviane Delbeke -Nathalie de Laminne 42,80 %
10 NS 3S S+1 630 13.9 99.29
11 NS 4K S-1 -50 9.3 66.43
12 NS 2K S+1 110 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 66,43 %
a.7 Antoinette Jourdain -Lydia Wildiers 56,46 %
13 NS 3C W+3 -230 9.3 66.43
14 NS 4P S-2 -100 0.1 0.71
15 NS 4P W+1 -450 1.3 9.29 µ Tbl = 25,48 %
a.5 Annette Fobe -Chantal de Lichtervelde 45,51 %
16 NS 3S S+1 430 4.7 33.57
17 NS 3K E+1 -130 1.3 9.29
18 NS 4P W = -420 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
a.4 Pascale Graton -Caroline Lallia 49,64 %
19 NS 4P N-1 -50 0 0.00
20 NS 6C W+1 -1460 7 50.00
21 NS 4P N = 620 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
a.3 Miguel Paredes -Manolo Hernandez 53,45 %
22 NS 1S N+2 150 13.9 99.29
23 NS 6C W = -1430 5.9 42.14
24 NS 3S S+2 460 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 71,90 %
Total : 131,5 / 294 = 44,73 %
PAIRE A.2 Francoise Duren -Thierry Bollansee
a.2 Gerard Cooreman -Dominique Sassen 49,02 %
4 NS 3K N = 110 5.9 42.14
5 NS 3S S+1 630 4.7 33.57
6 NS 2P N+1 140 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 41,90 %
a.1 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 47,17 %
7 NS 3S N+4 720 8.1 57.86
8 NS 3S W+1 -430 4.7 33.57
9 NS 4C N-2 -100 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 52,62 %
a10 - 0,00 %
10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.9 Michele Berrier -Christiane Huby 56,10 %
13 NS 4C W+2 -680 0.1 0.71
14 NS 4P S-1 -50 3.6 25.71
15 NS 4P W = -420 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 22,86 %
a.8 Sylviane Delbeke -Nathalie de Laminne 42,80 %
16 NS 2S N+3 210 0.1 0.71
17 NS 4C N-2 -100 4.7 33.57
18 NS 4P E = -420 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 28,10 %
a.6 Jacqueline de Thier -Catherine de Moffarts 50,09 %
19 NS 4P N = 420 8 57.14
20 NS 6C W+1 -1460 7 50.00
21 NS 4P N+1 650 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
a.5 Annette Fobe -Chantal de Lichtervelde 45,51 %
22 NS 4P N-1 -50 0.1 0.71
23 NS 4P W-1 100 13.9 99.29
24 NS 6S N-3 -150 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 33,57 %
a.4 Pascale Graton -Caroline Lallia 49,64 %
25 NS 3P S+1 170 12 85.71
26 NS 3T S-1 -100 5 35.71
27 NS 3P E = -140 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
Total : 128,2 / 294 = 43,61 %
PAIRE A.3 Barbara Kengen -Michele Verhulst
a.3 Miguel Paredes -Manolo Hernandez 53,45 %
7 NS 3S N+2 660 0.1 0.71
8 NS 3S W+1 -430 4.7 33.57
9 NS 3S E+1 -630 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 17,14 %
a.2 Gerard Cooreman -Dominique Sassen 49,02 %
10 NS 4T N = 130 8.1 57.86
11 NS 4K S-2 -100 5.9 42.14
12 NS 3K S = 110 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 44,52 %
a.1 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 47,17 %
13 NS 3S W = -600 5.9 42.14
14 NS 4P S = 420 8.1 57.86
15 NS 2P W+3 -200 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 58,10 %
a10 - 0,00 %
16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.9 Michele Berrier -Christiane Huby 56,10 %
19 NS 3P N+1 170 2 14.29
20 NS 6C W+1 -1460 7 50.00
21 NS 4P N-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 21,43 %
a.7 Antoinette Jourdain -Lydia Wildiers 56,46 %
22 NS 2P N+1 140 8.1 57.86
23 NS 6S E = -1440 1.3 9.29
24 NS 3S N+1 430 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
a.6 Jacqueline de Thier -Catherine de Moffarts 50,09 %
25 NS 2P S+1 140 4 28.57
26 NS 2CcE = -670 0 0.00
27 NS 2P E = -110 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
a.5 Annette Fobe -Chantal de Lichtervelde 45,51 %
28 NS 4C W = -420 4.7 33.57
29 NS 4C N-1 -100 0.1 0.71
30 NS 2T W+2 -130 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 39,05 %
Total : 103,7 / 294 = 35,27 %
PAIRE a.7 Antoinette Jourdain -Lydia Wildiers
A.9 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 47,14 %
1 EO 3S S = 400 9.3 66.43
2 EO 4C E = -420 5.9 42.14
3 EO 3P N-2 -100 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
A.5 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie 66,01 %
4 EO 2K N+1 110 8.1 57.86
5 EO 3S S+1 630 9.3 66.43
6 EO 2P N+1 140 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 58,10 %
A10 Fabienne Smit -Jean de Villenfagne 59,69 %
7 EO 3S N+4 720 5.9 42.14
8 EO 3S E+1 -430 9.3 66.43
9 EO 4T W+2 -170 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,86 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck 44,73 %
13 EO 3C W+3 -230 4.7 33.57
14 EO 4P S-2 -100 13.9 99.29
15 EO 4P W+1 -450 12.7 90.71 µ Tbl = 74,52 %
A.7 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 50,99 %
19 EO 4P N = 420 6 42.86
20 EO 6C W+1 -1460 7 50.00
21 EO 3P N+2 200 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.3 Barbara Kengen -Michele Verhulst 35,27 %
22 EO 2P N+1 140 5.9 42.14
23 EO 6S E = -1440 12.7 90.71
24 EO 3S N+1 430 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
A.8 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Danette Nuytens 47,24 %
25 EO 2P S+1 140 10 71.43
26 EO 2P N = 110 5 35.71
27 EO 2P E+3 -200 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Myriam de Timary 52,38 %
28 EO 4C W-1 50 0.1 0.71
29 EO 3C N+2 200 8.1 57.86
30 EO 3T W = -110 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 19,76 %
Total : 189,7 / 336 = 56,46 %
PAIRE a.9 Michele Berrier -Christiane Huby
A10 Fabienne Smit -Jean de Villenfagne 59,69 %
1 EO 3S S = 400 9.3 66.43
2 EO 4C E = -420 5.9 42.14
3 EO 3C E = -140 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 69,29 %
A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 50,78 %
4 EO 1K N+1 90 13.9 99.29
5 EO 3S S = 600 13.9 99.29
6 EO 3P N+2 200 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 66,43 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck 44,73 %
7 EO 3S N+4 720 5.9 42.14
8 EO 3S E+1 -430 9.3 66.43
9 EO 5T W+1 -620 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
A.7 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 50,99 %
10 EO 4T N = 130 5.9 42.14
11 EO 3P W-1 50 1.3 9.29
12 EO 4P E-4 200 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 22,86 %
A.2 Francoise Duren -Thierry Bollansee 43,61 %
13 EO 4C W+2 -680 13.9 99.29
14 EO 4P S-1 -50 10.4 74.29
15 EO 4P W = -420 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 77,14 %
A.3 Barbara Kengen -Michele Verhulst 35,27 %
19 EO 3P N+1 170 12 85.71
20 EO 6C W+1 -1460 7 50.00
21 EO 4P N-1 -100 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 78,57 %
A.9 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 47,14 %
25 EO 2P S+1 140 10 71.43
26 EO 3T S-1 -100 9 64.29
27 EO 2S S-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
A.5 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie 66,01 %
28 EO 3P S-1 -100 2.4 17.14
29 EO 4C N = 620 4.7 33.57
30 EO 2S W+1 -150 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
Total : 188,5 / 336 = 56,10 %
PAIRE a.3 Miguel Paredes -Manolo Hernandez
A.7 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 50,99 %
1 EO 3S S+1 430 1.3 9.29
2 EO 4C E+1 -450 12.7 90.71
3 EO 3P N-1 -50 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 47,38 %
A.3 Barbara Kengen -Michele Verhulst 35,27 %
7 EO 3S N+2 660 13.9 99.29
8 EO 3S W+1 -430 9.3 66.43
9 EO 3S E+1 -630 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 82,86 %
A.9 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 47,14 %
10 EO 3K S = 110 9.3 66.43
11 EO 3P W = -140 11.6 82.86
12 EO 3P E-2 100 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 82,86 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Myriam de Timary 52,38 %
13 EO 3C W+2 -200 2.4 17.14
14 EO 4P S = 420 5.9 42.14
15 EO 4P W+1 -450 12.7 90.71 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A10 Fabienne Smit -Jean de Villenfagne 59,69 %
16 EO 3S N+4 520 1.3 9.29
17 EO 3C N-1 -50 7 50.00
18 EO 4P W = -420 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 36,43 %
A.5 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie 66,01 %
19 EO 4P N = 420 6 42.86
20 EO 6C W+1 -1460 7 50.00
21 EO 2P N+1 140 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck 44,73 %
22 EO 1S N+2 150 0.1 0.71
23 EO 6C W = -1430 8.1 57.86
24 EO 3S S+2 460 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 28,10 %
A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 50,78 %
25 EO 2P S+2 170 2 14.29
26 EO 1CcE = -160 12 85.71
27 EO 2P E = -110 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
Total : 179,6 / 336 = 53,45 %
PAIRE a.6 Jacqueline de Thier -Catherine de Moffarts
A.4 Alan Beckman -Myriam de Timary 52,38 %
1 EO 3S S+1 430 1.3 9.29
2 EO 4C E = -420 5.9 42.14
3 EO 3P N-1 -50 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 31,19 %
A.9 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 47,14 %
4 EO 2K N+1 110 8.1 57.86
5 EO 3S S+2 660 2.4 17.14
6 EO 2P N+1 140 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
A10 Fabienne Smit -Jean de Villenfagne 59,69 %
10 EO 3S S-3 -300 12.7 90.71
11 EO 3P W-1 50 1.3 9.29
12 EO 4PcE-3 500 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 33,57 %
A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 50,78 %
16 EO 3S N+1 430 9.3 66.43
17 EO 4K E = -130 12.7 90.71
18 EO 4P W = -420 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
A.2 Francoise Duren -Thierry Bollansee 43,61 %
19 EO 4P N = 420 6 42.86
20 EO 6C W+1 -1460 7 50.00
21 EO 4P N+1 650 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
A.7 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 50,99 %
22 EO 2S N = 120 11.6 82.86
23 EO 6C W = -1430 8.1 57.86
24 EO 3S S+2 460 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 55,48 %
A.3 Barbara Kengen -Michele Verhulst 35,27 %
25 EO 2P S+1 140 10 71.43
26 EO 2CcE = -670 14 100.00
27 EO 2P E = -110 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
A.8 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Danette Nuytens 47,24 %
28 EO 4C W = -420 9.3 66.43
29 EO 3C N+2 200 8.1 57.86
30 EO 3S W+1 -430 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 74,52 %
Total : 168,3 / 336 = 50,09 %
PAIRE a.4 Pascale Graton -Caroline Lallia
A.8 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Danette Nuytens 47,24 %
4 EO 2KcN+1 380 0.1 0.71
5 EO 3S S+1 630 9.3 66.43
6 EO 2P S = 110 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 55,48 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Myriam de Timary 52,38 %
10 EO 3S S-3 -300 12.7 90.71
11 EO 4PcW = -590 13.9 99.29
12 EO 3K S+1 130 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 74,52 %
A10 Fabienne Smit -Jean de Villenfagne 59,69 %
13 EO 3S W = -600 8.1 57.86
14 EO 3S N+1 430 1.3 9.29
15 EO 2P W+3 -200 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
A.5 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie 66,01 %
16 EO 3S N+4 520 1.3 9.29
17 EO 5K E-2 100 0.1 0.71
18 EO 4P W = -420 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 20,00 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck 44,73 %
19 EO 4P N-1 -50 14 100.00
20 EO 6C W+1 -1460 7 50.00
21 EO 4P N = 620 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 50,78 %
22 EO 2P N+1 140 5.9 42.14
23 EO 4C W+2 -680 4.7 33.57
24 EO 3S N+1 430 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.2 Francoise Duren -Thierry Bollansee 43,61 %
25 EO 3P S+1 170 2 14.29
26 EO 3T S-1 -100 9 64.29
27 EO 3P E = -140 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
A.7 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 50,99 %
28 EO 4C W = -420 9.3 66.43
29 EO 2C N+2 170 11.6 82.86
30 EO 1S E+2 -150 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 63,81 %
Total : 166,8 / 336 = 49,64 %
PAIRE a.2 Gerard Cooreman -Dominique Sassen
A.2 Francoise Duren -Thierry Bollansee 43,61 %
4 EO 3K N = 110 8.1 57.86
5 EO 3S S+1 630 9.3 66.43
6 EO 2P N+1 140 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 58,10 %
A.8 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Danette Nuytens 47,24 %
7 EO 3S N+4 720 5.9 42.14
8 EO 3S E+1 -430 9.3 66.43
9 EO 3C N-1 -50 1.3 9.29 µ Tbl = 39,29 %
A.3 Barbara Kengen -Michele Verhulst 35,27 %
10 EO 4T N = 130 5.9 42.14
11 EO 4K S-2 -100 8.1 57.86
12 EO 3K S = 110 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 55,48 %
A.9 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 47,14 %
13 EO 4C W = -620 11.6 82.86
14 EO 4P S-1 -50 10.4 74.29
15 EO 4P W = -420 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 71,67 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Myriam de Timary 52,38 %
16 EO 3S N+2 460 4.7 33.57
17 EO 5K E-1 50 3.6 25.71
18 EO 4P W = -420 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 36,43 %
A10 Fabienne Smit -Jean de Villenfagne 59,69 %
19 EO 4P N+1 450 2 14.29
20 EO 6C W+1 -1460 7 50.00
21 EO 4P N = 620 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
A.5 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie 66,01 %
22 EO 2P N+1 140 5.9 42.14
23 EO 6S W = -1440 12.7 90.71
24 EO 3S N+2 460 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 52,86 %
A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 50,78 %
28 EO 4C W = -420 9.3 66.43
29 EO 4C N+1 650 1.3 9.29
30 EO 2S W+2 -180 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 47,38 %
Total : 164,7 / 336 = 49,02 %
PAIRE a.1 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck 44,73 %
1 EO 3S S = 400 9.3 66.43
2 EO 4C E = -420 5.9 42.14
3 EO 2C E = -110 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 63,81 %
A.7 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 50,99 %
4 EO 2K N+1 110 8.1 57.86
5 EO 3S S+2 660 2.4 17.14
6 EO 2P N+1 140 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
A.2 Francoise Duren -Thierry Bollansee 43,61 %
7 EO 3S N+4 720 5.9 42.14
8 EO 3S W+1 -430 9.3 66.43
9 EO 4C N-2 -100 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 47,38 %
A.8 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Danette Nuytens 47,24 %
10 EO 3C E-3 300 2.4 17.14
11 EO 4K S-2 -100 8.1 57.86
12 EO 2K S+1 110 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 47,14 %
A.3 Barbara Kengen -Michele Verhulst 35,27 %
13 EO 3S W = -600 8.1 57.86
14 EO 4P S = 420 5.9 42.14
15 EO 2P W+3 -200 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 41,90 %
A.9 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 47,14 %
16 EO 3S N+1 430 9.3 66.43
17 EO 4K E-1 50 3.6 25.71
18 EO 4P W = -420 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,38 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Myriam de Timary 52,38 %
19 EO 3P N+2 200 10 71.43
20 EO 7C W = -2210 14 100.00
21 EO 4P N = 620 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.5 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie 66,01 %
25 EO 3P S+1 170 2 14.29
26 EO 2P S+2 170 0 0.00
27 EO 2P E+1 -140 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 21,43 %
Total : 158,5 / 336 = 47,17 %
PAIRE a.5 Annette Fobe -Chantal de Lichtervelde
A.8 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Danette Nuytens 47,24 %
1 EO 3S S = 400 9.3 66.43
2 EO 4C E+1 -450 12.7 90.71
3 EO 2P N = 110 1.3 9.29 µ Tbl = 55,48 %
A.9 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 47,14 %
7 EO 3S N+4 720 5.9 42.14
8 EO 3S W = -400 2.4 17.14
9 EO 2P N-1 -50 1.3 9.29 µ Tbl = 22,86 %
A.5 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie 66,01 %
13 EO 4C W-1 100 0.1 0.71
14 EO 3S N+1 430 1.3 9.29
15 EO 4P W-1 50 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 3,57 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck 44,73 %
16 EO 3S S+1 430 9.3 66.43
17 EO 3K E+1 -130 12.7 90.71
18 EO 4P W = -420 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 50,78 %
19 EO 4P N+2 480 0 0.00
20 EO 5C W+2 -710 0 0.00
21 EO 2P N+2 170 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
A.2 Francoise Duren -Thierry Bollansee 43,61 %
22 EO 4P N-1 -50 13.9 99.29
23 EO 4P W-1 100 0.1 0.71
24 EO 6S N-3 -150 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 66,43 %
A.7 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 50,99 %
25 EO 2P S+1 140 10 71.43
26 EO 3T S = 110 5 35.71
27 EO 2P E+2 -170 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
A.3 Barbara Kengen -Michele Verhulst 35,27 %
28 EO 4C W = -420 9.3 66.43
29 EO 4C N-1 -100 13.9 99.29
30 EO 2T W+2 -130 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 60,95 %
Total : 152,9 / 336 = 45,51 %
PAIRE a.8 Sylviane Delbeke -Nathalie de Laminne
A.5 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie 66,01 %
1 EO 3S S = 400 9.3 66.43
2 EO 3C E+1 -170 0.1 0.71
3 EO 2P N = 110 1.3 9.29 µ Tbl = 25,48 %
A10 Fabienne Smit -Jean de Villenfagne 59,69 %
4 EO 2K N+2 130 2.4 17.14
5 EO 3S S+2 660 2.4 17.14
6 EO 2P N+1 140 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 28,10 %
A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 50,78 %
7 EO 4S S+3 720 5.9 42.14
8 EO 3K W+1 -130 0.1 0.71
9 EO 6T W = -1370 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 47,38 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck 44,73 %
10 EO 3S S+1 630 0.1 0.71
11 EO 4K S-1 -50 4.7 33.57
12 EO 2K S+1 110 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 33,57 %
A.2 Francoise Duren -Thierry Bollansee 43,61 %
16 EO 2S N+3 210 13.9 99.29
17 EO 4C N-2 -100 9.3 66.43
18 EO 4P E = -420 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 71,90 %
A.8 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Danette Nuytens 47,24 %
22 EO 2P N+1 140 5.9 42.14
23 EO 3S W+2 -660 2.4 17.14
24 EO 3S N+2 460 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 28,33 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Myriam de Timary 52,38 %
25 EO 2P S+1 140 10 71.43
26 EO 2S N+1 150 2 14.29
27 EO 2P E+2 -170 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
A.9 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 47,14 %
28 EO 4C W = -420 9.3 66.43
29 EO 4C N+1 650 1.3 9.29
30 EO 3S W = -400 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 52,86 %
Total : 143,8 / 336 = 42,80 %
PAIRE a10 -
A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 50,78 %
1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck 44,73 %
4 EO BYE 0 0.00
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.7 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 50,99 %
7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.2 Francoise Duren -Thierry Bollansee 43,61 %
10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.8 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Danette Nuytens 47,24 %
13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00
15 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.3 Barbara Kengen -Michele Verhulst 35,27 %
16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Myriam de Timary 52,38 %
22 EO BYE 0 0.00
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A10 Fabienne Smit -Jean de Villenfagne 59,69 %
28 EO BYE 0 0.00
29 EO BYE 0 0.00
30 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 420 = 0,00 %
|