B.C.O.B.
Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 58,63 N.4 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Grazia Neuenschwander
--- 2 57,74 N10 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels
--- 3 57,14 N.7 Michele Berrier -Isabelle Vanssay
--- 4 54,76 N.1 Sophie Tilemans -Regine de Hemptinne
--- 5 53,87 N.6 Jeannine Vanderpepen -Nicole Louette
--- 6 53,57 N.8 Chantal de Locht -Marc Antoine de Halloy
--- 7 46,13 N.3 Serge Alard -Noelle Fosse
--- 8 41,67 N.5 Annie Zeimes -Teresa Dekoster
--- 9 40,77 N.2 Lydia Wildiers -Benoit Ortegat
--- 10 35,71 N.9 Christiane Verelst -Jean Verelst
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 58,33 e.3 Jeaninne Thys -Christiane Huby
--- 2 56,85 e.5 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw
--- 3 54,17 e.9 Barbara Kengen -Michele Verhulst
--- 4 52,08 e.4 Hugo Baetens -Dilva Haym
--- 5 51,49 e10 Jacques Podevyn -Michel Lievens
--- 6 50,89 e.8 Myriam de Timary -Gerard Cooreman
--- 7 46,73 e.2 Ivan Ruben -Liliane Baptista
--- 8 44,64 e.7 Marc Bauherz -Laurent Gross
--- 9 44,64 e.1 Nicole Leclere -Claire de Quirini
--- 10 40,18 e.6 Colette Heerinckx -Chantal de Lichtervelde
PAIRE N.4 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Grazia Neuenschwander
e.6 Colette Heerinckx -Chantal de Lichtervelde 40,18 %
1 NS 4P N-2 -100 4 28.57
2 NS 4C E-1 50 5 35.71
3 NS 3KcS = 470 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
e.4 Hugo Baetens -Dilva Haym 52,08 %
10 NS 4P E-2 200 14 100.00
11 NS 5P N = 450 8 57.14
12 NS 3P E+1 -170 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
e.3 Jeaninne Thys -Christiane Huby 58,33 %
13 NS 3S N+1 630 13 92.86
14 NS 3S W = -400 7 50.00
15 NS 3S W+4 -520 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
e.2 Ivan Ruben -Liliane Baptista 46,73 %
16 NS 3S N+1 430 12 85.71
17 NS 2K W+2 -130 11 78.57
18 NS 5P W+1 -480 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
e.1 Nicole Leclere -Claire de Quirini 44,64 %
19 NS 5C E-1 100 13 92.86
20 NS 2C N-2 -200 3 21.43
21 NS 4S E-1 50 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
e10 Jacques Podevyn -Michel Lievens 51,49 %
22 NS 4P N+1 450 11 78.57
23 NS 3S W+1 -630 0 0.00
24 NS 4C N = 420 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
e.8 Myriam de Timary -Gerard Cooreman 50,89 %
25 NS 4C E = -620 13 92.86
26 NS 2P N+3 200 7 50.00
27 NS 3K N+1 130 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
e.7 Marc Bauherz -Laurent Gross 44,64 %
28 NS 2S E = -120 2 14.29
29 NS 3K N = 110 12 85.71
30 NS 1S E+2 -150 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
Total : 197,0 / 336 = 58,63 %
PAIRE N10 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels
e.9 Barbara Kengen -Michele Verhulst 54,17 %
1 NS 3P N-1 -50 7 50.00
2 NS 3C E-1 50 5 35.71
3 NS 3C W+1 -170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
e.8 Myriam de Timary -Gerard Cooreman 50,89 %
4 NS 4C E+1 -650 5 35.71
5 NS 4P N+1 650 7 50.00
6 NS 3S W = -600 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
e.7 Marc Bauherz -Laurent Gross 44,64 %
7 NS 3CcW-3 800 14 100.00
8 NS 5K E+1 -420 11 78.57
9 NS 3S N+1 430 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 90,48 %
e.6 Colette Heerinckx -Chantal de Lichtervelde 40,18 %
10 NS 3P E-1 100 7 50.00
11 NS 5P S = 450 8 57.14
12 NS 3P E-1 50 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
e.4 Hugo Baetens -Dilva Haym 52,08 %
13 NS 3S N = 600 7 50.00
14 NS 3S W = -400 7 50.00
15 NS 6S E-1 50 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
e.3 Jeaninne Thys -Christiane Huby 58,33 %
16 NS 4P N = 420 9 64.29
17 NS 3S W-2 100 14 100.00
18 NS 5PcE = -650 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
e.2 Ivan Ruben -Liliane Baptista 46,73 %
19 NS 5P E-1 100 13 92.86
20 NS 3S S-1 -100 10 71.43
21 NS 2S E+1 -150 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
e10 Jacques Podevyn -Michel Lievens 51,49 %
28 NS 1S W+1 -120 2 14.29
29 NS 2P E-2 200 14 100.00
30 NS 1S E+1 -120 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
Total : 194,0 / 336 = 57,74 %
PAIRE N.7 Michele Berrier -Isabelle Vanssay
e.3 Jeaninne Thys -Christiane Huby 58,33 %
1 NS 3P N = 140 13 92.86
2 NS 4C E-2 100 12 85.71
3 NS 3KcS-1 -100 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
e.1 Nicole Leclere -Claire de Quirini 44,64 %
4 NS 4C W = -620 10 71.43
5 NS 4P N+1 650 7 50.00
6 NS 3S W-1 100 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
e10 Jacques Podevyn -Michel Lievens 51,49 %
7 NS 2P N+3 200 2 14.29
8 NS 4C W-1 50 14 100.00
9 NS 3S N = 400 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
e.9 Barbara Kengen -Michele Verhulst 54,17 %
10 NS 2P E+2 -170 3 21.43
11 NS 4P S+1 450 8 57.14
12 NS 4P E-1 50 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
e.7 Marc Bauherz -Laurent Gross 44,64 %
19 NS 4C E+1 -650 1 7.14
20 NS 2T S-1 -100 10 71.43
21 NS 2S E = -120 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
e.6 Colette Heerinckx -Chantal de Lichtervelde 40,18 %
22 NS 3P N+2 200 1 7.14
23 NS 2C N-1 -100 14 100.00
24 NS 4C N+1 450 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
e.5 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 56,85 %
25 NS 4C E = -620 13 92.86
26 NS 2P N+3 200 7 50.00
27 NS 2C W-1 50 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
e.4 Hugo Baetens -Dilva Haym 52,08 %
28 NS 1S W = -90 7 50.00
29 NS 1K N+1 90 9 64.29
30 NS 1S E+2 -150 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
Total : 192,0 / 336 = 57,14 %
PAIRE N.1 Sophie Tilemans -Regine de Hemptinne
e.1 Nicole Leclere -Claire de Quirini 44,64 %
1 NS 1K N = 70 10 71.43
2 NS 4C E-1 50 5 35.71
3 NS 4K S-1 -50 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
e10 Jacques Podevyn -Michel Lievens 51,49 %
4 NS 4C E+2 -680 0 0.00
5 NS 4P S+1 650 7 50.00
6 NS 3S W+1 -630 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
e.9 Barbara Kengen -Michele Verhulst 54,17 %
7 NS 4P N+1 650 11 78.57
8 NS 3S W+1 -430 8 57.14
9 NS 3S N+1 430 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
e.8 Myriam de Timary -Gerard Cooreman 50,89 %
10 NS 3T S = 110 11 78.57
11 NS 4P N+1 450 8 57.14
12 NS 4P E-1 50 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
e.7 Marc Bauherz -Laurent Gross 44,64 %
13 NS 3S N+1 630 13 92.86
14 NS 3S E+1 -430 1 7.14
15 NS 3S E+2 -460 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
e.5 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 56,85 %
16 NS 2T S+3 150 4 28.57
17 NS 3S W = -400 3 21.43
18 NS 4P E+1 -450 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
e.4 Hugo Baetens -Dilva Haym 52,08 %
19 NS 4C E = -620 5 35.71
20 NS 2C E-1 100 14 100.00
21 NS 3S E-1 50 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
e.3 Jeaninne Thys -Christiane Huby 58,33 %
22 NS 4C S = 420 5 35.71
23 NS 2P W = -110 10 71.43
24 NS 2C N+2 170 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
Total : 184,0 / 336 = 54,76 %
PAIRE N.6 Jeannine Vanderpepen -Nicole Louette
e10 Jacques Podevyn -Michel Lievens 51,49 %
1 NS 3P N = 140 13 92.86
2 NS 4C E-1 50 5 35.71
3 NS 4KcS-1 -100 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
e.9 Barbara Kengen -Michele Verhulst 54,17 %
4 NS 3C E+2 -200 13 92.86
5 NS 4P N+1 650 7 50.00
6 NS 3S W-1 100 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
e.8 Myriam de Timary -Gerard Cooreman 50,89 %
7 NS 4P N = 620 7 50.00
8 NS 5K E+1 -420 11 78.57
9 NS 3S N = 400 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
e.6 Colette Heerinckx -Chantal de Lichtervelde 40,18 %
16 NS 4P N = 420 9 64.29
17 NS 3S E = -400 3 21.43
18 NS 4P E = -420 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
e.5 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 56,85 %
19 NS 4PcN-2 -300 8 57.14
20 NS 2S S-1 -100 10 71.43
21 NS 1S E+2 -150 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
e.4 Hugo Baetens -Dilva Haym 52,08 %
22 NS 4P N+1 450 11 78.57
23 NS 2P W+1 -140 4 28.57
24 NS 3S S = 400 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
e.3 Jeaninne Thys -Christiane Huby 58,33 %
25 NS 4C E+1 -650 5 35.71
26 NS 2P N+2 170 1 7.14
27 NS 3C W-1 50 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 21,43 %
e.2 Ivan Ruben -Liliane Baptista 46,73 %
28 NS 1S W-1 50 11 78.57
29 NS 2K N-1 -100 4 28.57
30 NS 1S E = -90 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 181,0 / 336 = 53,87 %
PAIRE N.8 Chantal de Locht -Marc Antoine de Halloy
e.5 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 56,85 %
1 NS 1P N-1 -50 7 50.00
2 NS 4C E-2 100 12 85.71
3 NS 3K S-1 -50 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
e.4 Hugo Baetens -Dilva Haym 52,08 %
4 NS 4C E+1 -650 5 35.71
5 NS 4P S+1 650 7 50.00
6 NS 3S W = -600 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
e.2 Ivan Ruben -Liliane Baptista 46,73 %
7 NS 4P N = 620 7 50.00
8 NS 5K E+2 -440 5 35.71
9 NS 3S N = 400 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
e.1 Nicole Leclere -Claire de Quirini 44,64 %
10 NS 3P E+1 -170 3 21.43
11 NS 4C N+1 450 8 57.14
12 NS 3P E = -140 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
e10 Jacques Podevyn -Michel Lievens 51,49 %
13 NS 1S N+2 150 2 14.29
14 NS 3S W-1 50 13 92.86
15 NS 6S E-1 50 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
e.8 Myriam de Timary -Gerard Cooreman 50,89 %
22 NS 4P N = 420 5 35.71
23 NS 2P W = -110 10 71.43
24 NS 3S S = 400 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
e.7 Marc Bauherz -Laurent Gross 44,64 %
25 NS 4P W+1 -650 5 35.71
26 NS 3S N+1 630 13 92.86
27 NS 2C W-1 50 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
e.6 Colette Heerinckx -Chantal de Lichtervelde 40,18 %
28 NS 1C S = 80 14 100.00
29 NS 1K N+1 90 9 64.29
30 NS 1S E+1 -120 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
Total : 180,0 / 336 = 53,57 %
PAIRE N.3 Serge Alard -Noelle Fosse
e.3 Jeaninne Thys -Christiane Huby 58,33 %
7 NS 4P N+1 650 11 78.57
8 NS 3S W+4 -520 0 0.00
9 NS 3S N = 400 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
e.2 Ivan Ruben -Liliane Baptista 46,73 %
10 NS 3T S = 110 11 78.57
11 NS 5P S = 450 8 57.14
12 NS 3P E+1 -170 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
e.1 Nicole Leclere -Claire de Quirini 44,64 %
13 NS 3S N = 600 7 50.00
14 NS 3S W+1 -430 1 7.14
15 NS 3S E+3 -490 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
e10 Jacques Podevyn -Michel Lievens 51,49 %
16 NS 2T S+3 150 4 28.57
17 NS 2C E+2 -170 8 57.14
18 NS 5PcW+1 -750 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
e.9 Barbara Kengen -Michele Verhulst 54,17 %
19 NS 4C E = -620 5 35.71
20 NS 2C N-2 -200 3 21.43
21 NS 2S E+1 -150 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
e.7 Marc Bauherz -Laurent Gross 44,64 %
22 NS 4P N+1 450 11 78.57
23 NS 2P W = -110 10 71.43
24 NS 4C N = 420 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
e.6 Colette Heerinckx -Chantal de Lichtervelde 40,18 %
25 NS 4P E+1 -650 5 35.71
26 NS 2P N+4 230 10 71.43
27 NS 3C W-3 150 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
e.5 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 56,85 %
28 NS 1S E = -90 7 50.00
29 NS 1S W+2 -150 0 0.00
30 NS 1S E = -90 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
Total : 155,0 / 336 = 46,13 %
PAIRE N.5 Annie Zeimes -Teresa Dekoster
e.8 Myriam de Timary -Gerard Cooreman 50,89 %
1 NS 2C W+2 -170 2 14.29
2 NS 4C E-2 100 12 85.71
3 NS 1S N-2 -100 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
e.7 Marc Bauherz -Laurent Gross 44,64 %
4 NS 4C W+1 -650 5 35.71
5 NS 4P S+1 650 7 50.00
6 NS 3S W-1 100 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
e.5 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 56,85 %
13 NS 3S N = 600 7 50.00
14 NS 3S W = -400 7 50.00
15 NS 3S E+4 -520 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
e.4 Hugo Baetens -Dilva Haym 52,08 %
16 NS 2T S+3 150 4 28.57
17 NS 2PcN-4 -800 0 0.00
18 NS 4P E+2 -480 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
e.3 Jeaninne Thys -Christiane Huby 58,33 %
19 NS 4C E+1 -650 1 7.14
20 NS 3S N-2 -200 3 21.43
21 NS 2S E = -120 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
e.2 Ivan Ruben -Liliane Baptista 46,73 %
22 NS 3P N+2 200 1 7.14
23 NS 2P W+1 -140 4 28.57
24 NS 4C N-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 11,90 %
e.1 Nicole Leclere -Claire de Quirini 44,64 %
25 NS 4C E+1 -650 5 35.71
26 NS 3S N+1 630 13 92.86
27 NS 3K N+1 130 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
e.9 Barbara Kengen -Michele Verhulst 54,17 %
28 NS 1S E-1 50 11 78.57
29 NS 1K N = 70 6 42.86
30 NS 1S E+1 -120 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
Total : 140,0 / 336 = 41,67 %
PAIRE N.2 Lydia Wildiers -Benoit Ortegat
e.2 Ivan Ruben -Liliane Baptista 46,73 %
4 NS 2C W+3 -200 13 92.86
5 NS 4P N+1 650 7 50.00
6 NS 3S W = -600 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
e.1 Nicole Leclere -Claire de Quirini 44,64 %
7 NS 3S S = 600 4 28.57
8 NS 5K E+2 -440 5 35.71
9 NS 3S N = 400 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
e10 Jacques Podevyn -Michel Lievens 51,49 %
10 NS 3P E-1 100 7 50.00
11 NS 4P S+1 450 8 57.14
12 NS 4P E-1 50 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
e.9 Barbara Kengen -Michele Verhulst 54,17 %
13 NS 3S N-1 -100 0 0.00
14 NS 3S W = -400 7 50.00
15 NS 6S E = -990 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
e.8 Myriam de Timary -Gerard Cooreman 50,89 %
16 NS 4P N-1 -50 0 0.00
17 NS 4P S-4 -200 6 42.86
18 NS 5C N = 650 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
e.6 Colette Heerinckx -Chantal de Lichtervelde 40,18 %
19 NS 4P S-3 -150 10 71.43
20 NS 2C N-2 -200 3 21.43
21 NS 2S E+1 -150 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
e.5 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 56,85 %
22 NS 4P S+1 450 11 78.57
23 NS 2P W+1 -140 4 28.57
24 NS 2S N+1 150 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
e.4 Hugo Baetens -Dilva Haym 52,08 %
25 NS 4C E+1 -650 5 35.71
26 NS 1S S+3 180 4 28.57
27 NS 2C W-1 50 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
Total : 137,0 / 336 = 40,77 %
PAIRE N.9 Christiane Verelst -Jean Verelst
e.7 Marc Bauherz -Laurent Gross 44,64 %
1 NS 4P N-4 -200 0 0.00
2 NS 2C E = -110 0 0.00
3 NS 2K S = 90 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
e.6 Colette Heerinckx -Chantal de Lichtervelde 40,18 %
4 NS 4C E+1 -650 5 35.71
5 NS 5P S = 650 7 50.00
6 NS 3S W-1 100 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
e.5 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 56,85 %
7 NS 2P N+1 140 0 0.00
8 NS 3S W+2 -460 2 14.29
9 NS 2S N+1 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 4,76 %
e.3 Jeaninne Thys -Christiane Huby 58,33 %
10 NS 4C N-2 -200 0 0.00
11 NS 3S S = 400 0 0.00
12 NS 3P E = -140 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 11,90 %
e.2 Ivan Ruben -Liliane Baptista 46,73 %
13 NS 3S N = 600 7 50.00
14 NS 3S W-1 50 13 92.86
15 NS 3S E+2 -460 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
e.1 Nicole Leclere -Claire de Quirini 44,64 %
16 NS 4S N+1 460 14 100.00
17 NS 2K W+2 -130 11 78.57
18 NS 5P E+1 -480 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
e.9 Barbara Kengen -Michele Verhulst 54,17 %
25 NS 4C E+1 -650 5 35.71
26 NS 3P N+1 170 1 7.14
27 NS 2S S = 120 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
e.8 Myriam de Timary -Gerard Cooreman 50,89 %
28 NS 1S W+1 -120 2 14.29
29 NS 1S W+1 -120 2 14.29
30 NS 3S W = -400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 9,52 %
Total : 120,0 / 336 = 35,71 %
PAIRE e.3 Jeaninne Thys -Christiane Huby
N.7 Michele Berrier -Isabelle Vanssay 57,14 %
1 EO 3P N = 140 1 7.14
2 EO 4C E-2 100 2 14.29
3 EO 3KcS-1 -100 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
N.3 Serge Alard -Noelle Fosse 46,13 %
7 EO 4P N+1 650 3 21.43
8 EO 3S W+4 -520 14 100.00
9 EO 3S N = 400 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
N.9 Christiane Verelst -Jean Verelst 35,71 %
10 EO 4C N-2 -200 14 100.00
11 EO 3S S = 400 14 100.00
12 EO 3P E = -140 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 88,10 %
N.4 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Grazia Neuenschwander 58,63 %
13 EO 3S N+1 630 1 7.14
14 EO 3S W = -400 7 50.00
15 EO 3S W+4 -520 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
N10 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 57,74 %
16 EO 4P N = 420 5 35.71
17 EO 3S W-2 100 0 0.00
18 EO 5PcE = -650 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
N.5 Annie Zeimes -Teresa Dekoster 41,67 %
19 EO 4C E+1 -650 13 92.86
20 EO 3S N-2 -200 11 78.57
21 EO 2S E = -120 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
N.1 Sophie Tilemans -Regine de Hemptinne 54,76 %
22 EO 4C S = 420 9 64.29
23 EO 2P W = -110 4 28.57
24 EO 2C N+2 170 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
N.6 Jeannine Vanderpepen -Nicole Louette 53,87 %
25 EO 4C E+1 -650 9 64.29
26 EO 2P N+2 170 13 92.86
27 EO 3C W-1 50 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 78,57 %
Total : 196,0 / 336 = 58,33 %
PAIRE e.5 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw
N.8 Chantal de Locht -Marc Antoine de Halloy 53,57 %
1 EO 1P N-1 -50 7 50.00
2 EO 4C E-2 100 2 14.29
3 EO 3K S-1 -50 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
N.9 Christiane Verelst -Jean Verelst 35,71 %
7 EO 2P N+1 140 14 100.00
8 EO 3S W+2 -460 12 85.71
9 EO 2S N+1 150 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 95,24 %
N.5 Annie Zeimes -Teresa Dekoster 41,67 %
13 EO 3S N = 600 7 50.00
14 EO 3S W = -400 7 50.00
15 EO 3S E+4 -520 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
N.1 Sophie Tilemans -Regine de Hemptinne 54,76 %
16 EO 2T S+3 150 10 71.43
17 EO 3S W = -400 11 78.57
18 EO 4P E+1 -450 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
N.6 Jeannine Vanderpepen -Nicole Louette 53,87 %
19 EO 4PcN-2 -300 6 42.86
20 EO 2S S-1 -100 4 28.57
21 EO 1S E+2 -150 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
N.2 Lydia Wildiers -Benoit Ortegat 40,77 %
22 EO 4P S+1 450 3 21.43
23 EO 2P W+1 -140 10 71.43
24 EO 2S N+1 150 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
N.7 Michele Berrier -Isabelle Vanssay 57,14 %
25 EO 4C E = -620 1 7.14
26 EO 2P N+3 200 7 50.00
27 EO 2C W-1 50 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
N.3 Serge Alard -Noelle Fosse 46,13 %
28 EO 1S E = -90 7 50.00
29 EO 1S W+2 -150 14 100.00
30 EO 1S E = -90 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
Total : 191,0 / 336 = 56,85 %
PAIRE e.9 Barbara Kengen -Michele Verhulst
N10 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 57,74 %
1 EO 3P N-1 -50 7 50.00
2 EO 3C E-1 50 9 64.29
3 EO 3C W+1 -170 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
N.6 Jeannine Vanderpepen -Nicole Louette 53,87 %
4 EO 3C E+2 -200 1 7.14
5 EO 4P N+1 650 7 50.00
6 EO 3S W-1 100 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
N.1 Sophie Tilemans -Regine de Hemptinne 54,76 %
7 EO 4P N+1 650 3 21.43
8 EO 3S W+1 -430 6 42.86
9 EO 3S N+1 430 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
N.7 Michele Berrier -Isabelle Vanssay 57,14 %
10 EO 2P E+2 -170 11 78.57
11 EO 4P S+1 450 6 42.86
12 EO 4P E-1 50 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
N.2 Lydia Wildiers -Benoit Ortegat 40,77 %
13 EO 3S N-1 -100 14 100.00
14 EO 3S W = -400 7 50.00
15 EO 6S E = -990 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
N.3 Serge Alard -Noelle Fosse 46,13 %
19 EO 4C E = -620 9 64.29
20 EO 2C N-2 -200 11 78.57
21 EO 2S E+1 -150 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
N.9 Christiane Verelst -Jean Verelst 35,71 %
25 EO 4C E+1 -650 9 64.29
26 EO 3P N+1 170 13 92.86
27 EO 2S S = 120 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
N.5 Annie Zeimes -Teresa Dekoster 41,67 %
28 EO 1S E-1 50 3 21.43
29 EO 1K N = 70 8 57.14
30 EO 1S E+1 -120 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
Total : 182,0 / 336 = 54,17 %
PAIRE e.4 Hugo Baetens -Dilva Haym
N.8 Chantal de Locht -Marc Antoine de Halloy 53,57 %
4 EO 4C E+1 -650 9 64.29
5 EO 4P S+1 650 7 50.00
6 EO 3S W = -600 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
N.4 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Grazia Neuenschwander 58,63 %
10 EO 4P E-2 200 0 0.00
11 EO 5P N = 450 6 42.86
12 EO 3P E+1 -170 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
N10 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 57,74 %
13 EO 3S N = 600 7 50.00
14 EO 3S W = -400 7 50.00
15 EO 6S E-1 50 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
N.5 Annie Zeimes -Teresa Dekoster 41,67 %
16 EO 2T S+3 150 10 71.43
17 EO 2PcN-4 -800 14 100.00
18 EO 4P E+2 -480 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
N.1 Sophie Tilemans -Regine de Hemptinne 54,76 %
19 EO 4C E = -620 9 64.29
20 EO 2C E-1 100 0 0.00
21 EO 3S E-1 50 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
N.6 Jeannine Vanderpepen -Nicole Louette 53,87 %
22 EO 4P N+1 450 3 21.43
23 EO 2P W+1 -140 10 71.43
24 EO 3S S = 400 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
N.2 Lydia Wildiers -Benoit Ortegat 40,77 %
25 EO 4C E+1 -650 9 64.29
26 EO 1S S+3 180 10 71.43
27 EO 2C W-1 50 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
N.7 Michele Berrier -Isabelle Vanssay 57,14 %
28 EO 1S W = -90 7 50.00
29 EO 1K N+1 90 5 35.71
30 EO 1S E+2 -150 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
Total : 175,0 / 336 = 52,08 %
PAIRE e10 Jacques Podevyn -Michel Lievens
N.6 Jeannine Vanderpepen -Nicole Louette 53,87 %
1 EO 3P N = 140 1 7.14
2 EO 4C E-1 50 9 64.29
3 EO 4KcS-1 -100 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
N.1 Sophie Tilemans -Regine de Hemptinne 54,76 %
4 EO 4C E+2 -680 14 100.00
5 EO 4P S+1 650 7 50.00
6 EO 3S W+1 -630 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
N.7 Michele Berrier -Isabelle Vanssay 57,14 %
7 EO 2P N+3 200 12 85.71
8 EO 4C W-1 50 0 0.00
9 EO 3S N = 400 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
N.2 Lydia Wildiers -Benoit Ortegat 40,77 %
10 EO 3P E-1 100 7 50.00
11 EO 4P S+1 450 6 42.86
12 EO 4P E-1 50 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
N.8 Chantal de Locht -Marc Antoine de Halloy 53,57 %
13 EO 1S N+2 150 12 85.71
14 EO 3S W-1 50 1 7.14
15 EO 6S E-1 50 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
N.3 Serge Alard -Noelle Fosse 46,13 %
16 EO 2T S+3 150 10 71.43
17 EO 2C E+2 -170 6 42.86
18 EO 5PcW+1 -750 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
N.4 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Grazia Neuenschwander 58,63 %
22 EO 4P N+1 450 3 21.43
23 EO 3S W+1 -630 14 100.00
24 EO 4C N = 420 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
N10 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 57,74 %
28 EO 1S W+1 -120 12 85.71
29 EO 2P E-2 200 0 0.00
30 EO 1S E+1 -120 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
Total : 173,0 / 336 = 51,49 %
PAIRE e.8 Myriam de Timary -Gerard Cooreman
N.5 Annie Zeimes -Teresa Dekoster 41,67 %
1 EO 2C W+2 -170 12 85.71
2 EO 4C E-2 100 2 14.29
3 EO 1S N-2 -100 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
N10 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 57,74 %
4 EO 4C E+1 -650 9 64.29
5 EO 4P N+1 650 7 50.00
6 EO 3S W = -600 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
N.6 Jeannine Vanderpepen -Nicole Louette 53,87 %
7 EO 4P N = 620 7 50.00
8 EO 5K E+1 -420 3 21.43
9 EO 3S N = 400 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
N.1 Sophie Tilemans -Regine de Hemptinne 54,76 %
10 EO 3T S = 110 3 21.43
11 EO 4P N+1 450 6 42.86
12 EO 4P E-1 50 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
N.2 Lydia Wildiers -Benoit Ortegat 40,77 %
16 EO 4P N-1 -50 14 100.00
17 EO 4P S-4 -200 8 57.14
18 EO 5C N = 650 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
N.8 Chantal de Locht -Marc Antoine de Halloy 53,57 %
22 EO 4P N = 420 9 64.29
23 EO 2P W = -110 4 28.57
24 EO 3S S = 400 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
N.4 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Grazia Neuenschwander 58,63 %
25 EO 4C E = -620 1 7.14
26 EO 2P N+3 200 7 50.00
27 EO 3K N+1 130 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
N.9 Christiane Verelst -Jean Verelst 35,71 %
28 EO 1S W+1 -120 12 85.71
29 EO 1S W+1 -120 12 85.71
30 EO 3S W = -400 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 90,48 %
Total : 171,0 / 336 = 50,89 %
PAIRE e.2 Ivan Ruben -Liliane Baptista
N.2 Lydia Wildiers -Benoit Ortegat 40,77 %
4 EO 2C W+3 -200 1 7.14
5 EO 4P N+1 650 7 50.00
6 EO 3S W = -600 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
N.8 Chantal de Locht -Marc Antoine de Halloy 53,57 %
7 EO 4P N = 620 7 50.00
8 EO 5K E+2 -440 9 64.29
9 EO 3S N = 400 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
N.3 Serge Alard -Noelle Fosse 46,13 %
10 EO 3T S = 110 3 21.43
11 EO 5P S = 450 6 42.86
12 EO 3P E+1 -170 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
N.9 Christiane Verelst -Jean Verelst 35,71 %
13 EO 3S N = 600 7 50.00
14 EO 3S W-1 50 1 7.14
15 EO 3S E+2 -460 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
N.4 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Grazia Neuenschwander 58,63 %
16 EO 3S N+1 430 2 14.29
17 EO 2K W+2 -130 3 21.43
18 EO 5P W+1 -480 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
N10 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 57,74 %
19 EO 5P E-1 100 1 7.14
20 EO 3S S-1 -100 4 28.57
21 EO 2S E+1 -150 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
N.5 Annie Zeimes -Teresa Dekoster 41,67 %
22 EO 3P N+2 200 13 92.86
23 EO 2P W+1 -140 10 71.43
24 EO 4C N-1 -50 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 88,10 %
N.6 Jeannine Vanderpepen -Nicole Louette 53,87 %
28 EO 1S W-1 50 3 21.43
29 EO 2K N-1 -100 10 71.43
30 EO 1S E = -90 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 157,0 / 336 = 46,73 %
PAIRE e.7 Marc Bauherz -Laurent Gross
N.9 Christiane Verelst -Jean Verelst 35,71 %
1 EO 4P N-4 -200 14 100.00
2 EO 2C E = -110 14 100.00
3 EO 2K S = 90 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
N.5 Annie Zeimes -Teresa Dekoster 41,67 %
4 EO 4C W+1 -650 9 64.29
5 EO 4P S+1 650 7 50.00
6 EO 3S W-1 100 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
N10 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 57,74 %
7 EO 3CcW-3 800 0 0.00
8 EO 5K E+1 -420 3 21.43
9 EO 3S N+1 430 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 9,52 %
N.1 Sophie Tilemans -Regine de Hemptinne 54,76 %
13 EO 3S N+1 630 1 7.14
14 EO 3S E+1 -430 13 92.86
15 EO 3S E+2 -460 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
N.7 Michele Berrier -Isabelle Vanssay 57,14 %
19 EO 4C E+1 -650 13 92.86
20 EO 2T S-1 -100 4 28.57
21 EO 2S E = -120 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
N.3 Serge Alard -Noelle Fosse 46,13 %
22 EO 4P N+1 450 3 21.43
23 EO 2P W = -110 4 28.57
24 EO 4C N = 420 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
N.8 Chantal de Locht -Marc Antoine de Halloy 53,57 %
25 EO 4P W+1 -650 9 64.29
26 EO 3S N+1 630 1 7.14
27 EO 2C W-1 50 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
N.4 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Grazia Neuenschwander 58,63 %
28 EO 2S E = -120 12 85.71
29 EO 3K N = 110 2 14.29
30 EO 1S E+2 -150 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
Total : 150,0 / 336 = 44,64 %
PAIRE e.1 Nicole Leclere -Claire de Quirini
N.1 Sophie Tilemans -Regine de Hemptinne 54,76 %
1 EO 1K N = 70 4 28.57
2 EO 4C E-1 50 9 64.29
3 EO 4K S-1 -50 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
N.7 Michele Berrier -Isabelle Vanssay 57,14 %
4 EO 4C W = -620 4 28.57
5 EO 4P N+1 650 7 50.00
6 EO 3S W-1 100 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
N.2 Lydia Wildiers -Benoit Ortegat 40,77 %
7 EO 3S S = 600 10 71.43
8 EO 5K E+2 -440 9 64.29
9 EO 3S N = 400 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
N.8 Chantal de Locht -Marc Antoine de Halloy 53,57 %
10 EO 3P E+1 -170 11 78.57
11 EO 4C N+1 450 6 42.86
12 EO 3P E = -140 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
N.3 Serge Alard -Noelle Fosse 46,13 %
13 EO 3S N = 600 7 50.00
14 EO 3S W+1 -430 13 92.86
15 EO 3S E+3 -490 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
N.9 Christiane Verelst -Jean Verelst 35,71 %
16 EO 4S N+1 460 0 0.00
17 EO 2K W+2 -130 3 21.43
18 EO 5P E+1 -480 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
N.4 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Grazia Neuenschwander 58,63 %
19 EO 5C E-1 100 1 7.14
20 EO 2C N-2 -200 11 78.57
21 EO 4S E-1 50 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
N.5 Annie Zeimes -Teresa Dekoster 41,67 %
25 EO 4C E+1 -650 9 64.29
26 EO 3S N+1 630 1 7.14
27 EO 3K N+1 130 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
Total : 150,0 / 336 = 44,64 %
PAIRE e.6 Colette Heerinckx -Chantal de Lichtervelde
N.4 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Grazia Neuenschwander 58,63 %
1 EO 4P N-2 -100 10 71.43
2 EO 4C E-1 50 9 64.29
3 EO 3KcS = 470 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
N.9 Christiane Verelst -Jean Verelst 35,71 %
4 EO 4C E+1 -650 9 64.29
5 EO 5P S = 650 7 50.00
6 EO 3S W-1 100 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
N10 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 57,74 %
10 EO 3P E-1 100 7 50.00
11 EO 5P S = 450 6 42.86
12 EO 3P E-1 50 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
N.6 Jeannine Vanderpepen -Nicole Louette 53,87 %
16 EO 4P N = 420 5 35.71
17 EO 3S E = -400 11 78.57
18 EO 4P E = -420 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
N.2 Lydia Wildiers -Benoit Ortegat 40,77 %
19 EO 4P S-3 -150 4 28.57
20 EO 2C N-2 -200 11 78.57
21 EO 2S E+1 -150 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
N.7 Michele Berrier -Isabelle Vanssay 57,14 %
22 EO 3P N+2 200 13 92.86
23 EO 2C N-1 -100 0 0.00
24 EO 4C N+1 450 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
N.3 Serge Alard -Noelle Fosse 46,13 %
25 EO 4P E+1 -650 9 64.29
26 EO 2P N+4 230 4 28.57
27 EO 3C W-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
N.8 Chantal de Locht -Marc Antoine de Halloy 53,57 %
28 EO 1C S = 80 0 0.00
29 EO 1K N+1 90 5 35.71
30 EO 1S E+1 -120 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
Total : 135,0 / 336 = 40,18 %
|