B.C.O.B.
Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 62,31 A.9 Myriam de Timary -Gerard Cooreman
--- 2 57,95 A.7 Philippe van der Gracht -Lydia Wildiers
--- 3 57,58 A12 Nicole Leclere -Francoise Turin
--- 4 56,25 A.3 Michele Verhulst -Chris Oostens
--- 5 55,49 A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Caroll Pucher
--- 6 52,27 A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Patrick Gilles
--- 7 52,08 A.2 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand
--- 8 45,45 A.8 Jacques Podevyn -Francine Belet
--- 9 44,89 A11 Claire Rolin -Efthalia Bogaerts
--- 10 43,75 A13 Sophie Tilemans -Catherine Tilemans
--- 11 42,99 A.5 Michele Berrier -Helene Schyns
--- 12 42,23 A.4 Claire Destin -Elisabeth Harmant
--- 13 36,74 A10 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 57,01 a10 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys
--- 2 52,84 a.8 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski
--- 3 52,84 a13 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru
--- 4 51,89 a.4 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille
--- 5 51,52 a.1 Lydia Luyten -Prisca Tondreau
--- 6 50,57 a.6 Max Poupinel -Michel Lievens
--- 7 50,38 a12 Noelle Fosse -Marianne Falla
--- 8 50,19 a.7 Dilva Haym -Jean de Villenfagne
--- 9 48,30 a.2 Luc Cartuyvels -Charlotte de Wasseige
--- 10 48,11 a.5 Teresa Dekoster -Gaetan van de Werve
--- 11 47,73 a.9 Dominique Sassen -Danielle Wybauw
--- 12 45,27 a11 Aida Zumot -Claire de Quirini
--- 13 43,37 a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger
PAIRE A.9 Myriam de Timary -Gerard Cooreman
a.4 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 51,89 %
1 NS 3S W-1 50 13 59.09
2 NS 3S N+2 660 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 43,37 %
3 NS 4P E-2 200 20 90.91
4 NS 3P S+1 170 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
a.2 Luc Cartuyvels -Charlotte de Wasseige 48,30 %
5 NS 3S W = -400 14 63.64
6 NS 3C N+2 200 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a.1 Lydia Luyten -Prisca Tondreau 51,52 %
7 NS 4P W+2 -680 7 31.82
8 NS 2C N+2 170 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a13 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 52,84 %
9 NS 3S S-3 -150 1 4.55
10 NS 4P N+2 680 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a12 Noelle Fosse -Marianne Falla 50,38 %
11 NS 6S W-1 50 17 77.27
12 NS 4C W+2 -480 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a11 Aida Zumot -Claire de Quirini 45,27 %
13 NS 3C E-1 100 10 45.45
14 NS 2P N-1 -50 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.9 Dominique Sassen -Danielle Wybauw 47,73 %
17 NS 3S E+1 -430 12 54.55
18 NS 2S E = -120 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.8 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 52,84 %
19 NS 3C S = 140 16 72.73
20 NS 1P W+1 -110 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.7 Dilva Haym -Jean de Villenfagne 50,19 %
21 NS 3S N+2 660 22 100.00
22 NS 4P E+3 -710 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
a.6 Max Poupinel -Michel Lievens 50,57 %
23 NS 6C S+1 1460 16 72.73
24 NS 4C E+2 -480 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.5 Teresa Dekoster -Gaetan van de Werve 48,11 %
25 NS 4C N = 420 16 72.73
26 NS 6P E = -1430 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
Total : 329,0 / 528 = 62,31 %
PAIRE A.7 Philippe van der Gracht -Lydia Wildiers
a13 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 52,84 %
1 NS 3S E-1 50 13 59.09
2 NS 3S N+2 660 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a12 Noelle Fosse -Marianne Falla 50,38 %
3 NS 4P E-2 200 20 90.91
4 NS 4PcS-1 -200 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a11 Aida Zumot -Claire de Quirini 45,27 %
5 NS 3T W-1 50 22 100.00
6 NS 3S S+1 430 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 93,18 %
a10 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 57,01 %
7 NS 5T N-2 -200 19 86.36
8 NS 2C N = 110 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a.9 Dominique Sassen -Danielle Wybauw 47,73 %
9 NS 3K W-1 100 20 90.91
10 NS 4P N+1 650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a.7 Dilva Haym -Jean de Villenfagne 50,19 %
13 NS 4T N = 130 12 54.55
14 NS 2C E = -110 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.6 Max Poupinel -Michel Lievens 50,57 %
15 NS 3S W = -400 7 31.82
16 NS 3T E+1 -130 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a.5 Teresa Dekoster -Gaetan van de Werve 48,11 %
17 NS 3S W+1 -430 12 54.55
18 NS 3S W-2 100 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a.4 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 51,89 %
19 NS 4KcE = -710 0 0.00
20 NS 1S W = -90 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 43,37 %
21 NS 5T N = 600 15 68.18
22 NS 6P E+1 -1460 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.2 Luc Cartuyvels -Charlotte de Wasseige 48,30 %
23 NS 4C N+3 710 3 13.64
24 NS 5C E+1 -480 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a.1 Lydia Luyten -Prisca Tondreau 51,52 %
25 NS 6C N-1 -50 10 45.45
26 NS 4P W+1 -650 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
Total : 306,0 / 528 = 57,95 %
PAIRE A12 Nicole Leclere -Francoise Turin
a10 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 57,01 %
1 NS 3S W = -400 2 9.09
2 NS 3S N = 600 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a.9 Dominique Sassen -Danielle Wybauw 47,73 %
3 NS 4P E-1 100 12 54.55
4 NS 2P S = 110 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.8 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 52,84 %
5 NS 3S W = -400 14 63.64
6 NS 3C N-1 -50 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a.7 Dilva Haym -Jean de Villenfagne 50,19 %
7 NS 6P W = -1430 0 0.00
8 NS 2C N+1 140 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.6 Max Poupinel -Michel Lievens 50,57 %
9 NS 5T S-1 -50 15 68.18
10 NS 4P N+1 650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.5 Teresa Dekoster -Gaetan van de Werve 48,11 %
11 NS 3S W+3 -490 2 9.09
12 NS 5C W+1 -480 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a.4 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 51,89 %
13 NS 4CcE-2 500 18 81.82
14 NS 2P N-1 -50 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 43,37 %
15 NS 3S W-2 100 22 100.00
16 NS 5T E-3 300 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 100,00 %
a.2 Luc Cartuyvels -Charlotte de Wasseige 48,30 %
17 NS 3S E = -400 20 90.91
18 NS 2S W-2 100 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 93,18 %
a.1 Lydia Luyten -Prisca Tondreau 51,52 %
19 NS 3K E = -110 7 31.82
20 NS 1S N-1 -100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a12 Noelle Fosse -Marianne Falla 50,38 %
23 NS 6C S+1 1460 16 72.73
24 NS 4C W+3 -510 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a11 Aida Zumot -Claire de Quirini 45,27 %
25 NS 3S S+2 460 20 90.91
26 NS 4P W+1 -650 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
Total : 304,0 / 528 = 57,58 %
PAIRE A.3 Michele Verhulst -Chris Oostens
a.5 Teresa Dekoster -Gaetan van de Werve 48,11 %
1 NS 3S W-1 50 13 59.09
2 NS 2C N+2 170 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 43,37 %
5 NS 3S W+1 -430 6 27.27
6 NS 3S S+1 430 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a.2 Luc Cartuyvels -Charlotte de Wasseige 48,30 %
7 NS 4P W+2 -680 7 31.82
8 NS 2P W-1 50 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a.1 Lydia Luyten -Prisca Tondreau 51,52 %
9 NS 4T S-2 -100 10 45.45
10 NS 4P N = 620 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a13 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 52,84 %
11 NS 6S E-1 50 17 77.27
12 NS 4C W+2 -480 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a12 Noelle Fosse -Marianne Falla 50,38 %
13 NS 2S S+1 150 15 68.18
14 NS 1P N = 80 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
a11 Aida Zumot -Claire de Quirini 45,27 %
15 NS 3T W+1 -130 18 81.82
16 NS 3S E-1 100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
a10 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 57,01 %
17 NS 3S W+2 -460 2 9.09
18 NS 3S E-1 50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.9 Dominique Sassen -Danielle Wybauw 47,73 %
19 NS 4KcE-1 200 18 81.82
20 NS 1P W+2 -140 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.8 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 52,84 %
21 NS 3S S+1 630 19 86.36
22 NS 4P E+3 -710 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
a.7 Dilva Haym -Jean de Villenfagne 50,19 %
23 NS 6C S+1 1460 16 72.73
24 NS 4C W+3 -510 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.6 Max Poupinel -Michel Lievens 50,57 %
25 NS 5T S = 400 14 63.64
26 NS 3S E+2 -660 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
Total : 297,0 / 528 = 56,25 %
PAIRE A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Caroll Pucher
a.1 Lydia Luyten -Prisca Tondreau 51,52 %
1 NS 3S W+1 -430 0 0.00
2 NS 3S N-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a13 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 52,84 %
3 NS 4P E-1 100 12 54.55
4 NS 3P S+3 230 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a12 Noelle Fosse -Marianne Falla 50,38 %
5 NS 2S W+1 -150 18 81.82
6 NS 5K S = 400 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a11 Aida Zumot -Claire de Quirini 45,27 %
7 NS 5P W+1 -680 7 31.82
8 NS 2C N+1 140 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a10 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 57,01 %
9 NS 2K E-1 100 20 90.91
10 NS 4P N+1 650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a.9 Dominique Sassen -Danielle Wybauw 47,73 %
11 NS 4S W+2 -490 2 9.09
12 NS 4C W+1 -450 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.8 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 52,84 %
13 NS 3S S-1 -100 7 31.82
14 NS 3C E-1 50 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.7 Dilva Haym -Jean de Villenfagne 50,19 %
15 NS 2C E+1 -140 14 63.64
16 NS 2P W-1 100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a.6 Max Poupinel -Michel Lievens 50,57 %
17 NS 3S W+2 -460 2 9.09
18 NS 1S E = -90 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a.5 Teresa Dekoster -Gaetan van de Werve 48,11 %
19 NS 4P W-4 400 22 100.00
20 NS 2T N-2 -200 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.4 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 51,89 %
21 NS 5T N = 600 15 68.18
22 NS 6P E+1 -1460 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 43,37 %
23 NS 6C N+1 1460 16 72.73
24 NS 3K E+3 -170 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
Total : 293,0 / 528 = 55,49 %
PAIRE A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Patrick Gilles
a11 Aida Zumot -Claire de Quirini 45,27 %
1 NS 3S W-1 50 13 59.09
2 NS 3S N = 600 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a10 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 57,01 %
3 NS 4P E-1 100 12 54.55
4 NS 3P S-1 -100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.9 Dominique Sassen -Danielle Wybauw 47,73 %
5 NS 3S W+1 -430 6 27.27
6 NS 4C N+1 450 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a.8 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 52,84 %
7 NS 5P W+1 -680 7 31.82
8 NS 3T S-2 -100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
a.6 Max Poupinel -Michel Lievens 50,57 %
11 NS 6P W-3 150 22 100.00
12 NS 4C W+2 -480 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a.5 Teresa Dekoster -Gaetan van de Werve 48,11 %
13 NS 2C E = -110 3 13.64
14 NS 2C E = -110 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.4 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 51,89 %
15 NS 2C E+1 -140 14 63.64
16 NS 3K E-1 100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 43,37 %
17 NS 3S W+1 -430 12 54.55
18 NS 2S W = -120 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.2 Luc Cartuyvels -Charlotte de Wasseige 48,30 %
19 NS 2P W-3 300 20 90.91
20 NS 1S N = 90 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 95,45 %
a.1 Lydia Luyten -Prisca Tondreau 51,52 %
21 NS 4P S-2 -200 3 13.64
22 NS 4P E+3 -710 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a13 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 52,84 %
23 NS 4C S+3 710 3 13.64
24 NS 2S W+5 -270 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a12 Noelle Fosse -Marianne Falla 50,38 %
25 NS 3S N-2 -100 3 13.64
26 NS 3S W-1 100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
Total : 276,0 / 528 = 52,27 %
PAIRE A.2 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand
a.2 Luc Cartuyvels -Charlotte de Wasseige 48,30 %
3 NS 4P E-2 200 20 90.91
4 NS 2P S+3 200 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
a.1 Lydia Luyten -Prisca Tondreau 51,52 %
5 NS 3S W = -400 14 63.64
6 NS 3C N+1 170 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a13 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 52,84 %
7 NS 5T N-1 -100 22 100.00
8 NS 2P W-1 50 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a12 Noelle Fosse -Marianne Falla 50,38 %
9 NS 3K W = -110 6 27.27
10 NS 4P N+1 650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a11 Aida Zumot -Claire de Quirini 45,27 %
11 NS 5S W = -460 8 36.36
12 NS 4C W+2 -480 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a10 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 57,01 %
13 NS 2S S+1 150 15 68.18
14 NS 2P N-2 -100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a.9 Dominique Sassen -Danielle Wybauw 47,73 %
15 NS 3S W = -400 7 31.82
16 NS 2S E+1 -150 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
a.8 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 52,84 %
17 NS 3S W = -400 20 90.91
18 NS 3S W-1 50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
a.7 Dilva Haym -Jean de Villenfagne 50,19 %
19 NS 3K E = -110 7 31.82
20 NS 1P W+2 -140 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a.6 Max Poupinel -Michel Lievens 50,57 %
21 NS 3S N-1 -100 8 36.36
22 NS 6P E+1 -1460 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a.5 Teresa Dekoster -Gaetan van de Werve 48,11 %
23 NS 5C S+2 710 3 13.64
24 NS 3PcS-1 -100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a.4 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 51,89 %
25 NS 4C N-2 -100 3 13.64
26 NS 3S W-2 200 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
Total : 275,0 / 528 = 52,08 %
PAIRE A.8 Jacques Podevyn -Francine Belet
a.2 Luc Cartuyvels -Charlotte de Wasseige 48,30 %
1 NS 6P E-1 50 13 59.09
2 NS 3S N-1 -100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.1 Lydia Luyten -Prisca Tondreau 51,52 %
3 NS 4P E-1 100 12 54.55
4 NS 3P S+1 170 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a13 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 52,84 %
5 NS 3S W+1 -430 6 27.27
6 NS 3C N = 140 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a12 Noelle Fosse -Marianne Falla 50,38 %
7 NS 5P W+1 -680 7 31.82
8 NS 2S S+1 150 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a11 Aida Zumot -Claire de Quirini 45,27 %
9 NS 3K W = -110 6 27.27
10 NS 4P N = 620 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
a10 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 57,01 %
11 NS 6S W-1 50 17 77.27
12 NS 5C W+1 -480 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a.8 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 52,84 %
15 NS 1C E+2 -140 14 63.64
16 NS 2S E+1 -150 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.7 Dilva Haym -Jean de Villenfagne 50,19 %
17 NS 3S W = -400 20 90.91
18 NS 2S W+2 -180 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.6 Max Poupinel -Michel Lievens 50,57 %
19 NS 3P W-1 100 13 59.09
20 NS 1P W+2 -140 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.5 Teresa Dekoster -Gaetan van de Werve 48,11 %
21 NS 3S S-1 -100 8 36.36
22 NS 7P E = -2210 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
a.4 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 51,89 %
23 NS 6C S+1 1460 16 72.73
24 NS 4C W+2 -480 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 43,37 %
25 NS 6S S = 990 22 100.00
26 NS 6P W = -1430 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
Total : 240,0 / 528 = 45,45 %
PAIRE A11 Claire Rolin -Efthalia Bogaerts
a.8 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 52,84 %
1 NS 3S W-1 50 13 59.09
2 NS 3S N-1 -100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.7 Dilva Haym -Jean de Villenfagne 50,19 %
3 NS 3S E = -600 5 22.73
4 NS 3P S = 140 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a.6 Max Poupinel -Michel Lievens 50,57 %
5 NS 2S W = -120 20 90.91
6 NS 3C N+2 200 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a.5 Teresa Dekoster -Gaetan van de Werve 48,11 %
7 NS 5TcN-1 -200 19 86.36
8 NS 3C N = 140 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
a.4 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 51,89 %
9 NS 2K W+1 -110 6 27.27
10 NS 2P N+3 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 43,37 %
11 NS 4S W+1 -460 8 36.36
12 NS 4C W+2 -480 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.2 Luc Cartuyvels -Charlotte de Wasseige 48,30 %
13 NS 3C E = -140 0 0.00
14 NS 1S W+1 -120 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
a.1 Lydia Luyten -Prisca Tondreau 51,52 %
15 NS 3S W = -400 7 31.82
16 NS 1S E+1 -120 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a13 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 52,84 %
17 NS 3S E+2 -460 2 9.09
18 NS 2S E-1 50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a11 Aida Zumot -Claire de Quirini 45,27 %
21 NS 3S S-1 -100 8 36.36
22 NS 4P E+3 -710 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a10 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 57,01 %
23 NS 4C S+3 710 3 13.64
24 NS 2C W+3 -200 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.9 Dominique Sassen -Danielle Wybauw 47,73 %
25 NS 4C N-2 -100 3 13.64
26 NS 3S W-2 200 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
Total : 237,0 / 528 = 44,89 %
PAIRE A13 Sophie Tilemans -Catherine Tilemans
a12 Noelle Fosse -Marianne Falla 50,38 %
1 NS 3S W-1 50 13 59.09
2 NS 2C N+3 200 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a11 Aida Zumot -Claire de Quirini 45,27 %
3 NS 4P E-1 100 12 54.55
4 NS 4C E+1 -650 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a10 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 57,01 %
5 NS 2CcN-3 -800 0 0.00
6 NS 5K S-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.9 Dominique Sassen -Danielle Wybauw 47,73 %
7 NS 5P W = -650 14 63.64
8 NS 3K N = 110 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.8 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 52,84 %
9 NS 2K W-1 100 20 90.91
10 NS 4P N+1 650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a.7 Dilva Haym -Jean de Villenfagne 50,19 %
11 NS 4S W+2 -490 2 9.09
12 NS 4C W+2 -480 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a.6 Max Poupinel -Michel Lievens 50,57 %
13 NS 3S S = 600 21 95.45
14 NS 1TcW+2 -340 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.5 Teresa Dekoster -Gaetan van de Werve 48,11 %
15 NS 2S W = -120 20 90.91
16 NS 1S E = -90 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a.4 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 51,89 %
17 NS 3S W+1 -430 12 54.55
18 NS 1S W+2 -150 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 43,37 %
19 NS 3K E = -110 7 31.82
20 NS 1P W+2 -140 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a.2 Luc Cartuyvels -Charlotte de Wasseige 48,30 %
21 NS 2P S = 110 12 54.55
22 NS 6P E+1 -1460 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a13 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 52,84 %
25 NS 4C N+1 450 18 81.82
26 NS 6P W = -1430 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
Total : 231,0 / 528 = 43,75 %
PAIRE A.5 Michele Berrier -Helene Schyns
a.9 Dominique Sassen -Danielle Wybauw 47,73 %
1 NS 3S W-1 50 13 59.09
2 NS 3S N-1 -100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.8 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 52,84 %
3 NS 3S E+1 -630 0 0.00
4 NS 4C W-1 100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
a.7 Dilva Haym -Jean de Villenfagne 50,19 %
5 NS 3S W+1 -430 6 27.27
6 NS 4C N = 420 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.5 Teresa Dekoster -Gaetan van de Werve 48,11 %
9 NS 1S S-1 -50 15 68.18
10 NS 4P N+2 680 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
a.4 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 51,89 %
11 NS 4S E+1 -460 8 36.36
12 NS 6C W = -980 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 43,37 %
13 NS 4K N-1 -100 7 31.82
14 NS 2P N = 110 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a.2 Luc Cartuyvels -Charlotte de Wasseige 48,30 %
15 NS 3S E = -400 7 31.82
16 NS 2S E+1 -150 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
a.1 Lydia Luyten -Prisca Tondreau 51,52 %
17 NS 3S W+1 -430 12 54.55
18 NS 2S E = -120 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a13 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 52,84 %
19 NS 5K E-1 100 13 59.09
20 NS 2T N-2 -200 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a12 Noelle Fosse -Marianne Falla 50,38 %
21 NS 3S N+1 630 19 86.36
22 NS 6P E+1 -1460 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a11 Aida Zumot -Claire de Quirini 45,27 %
23 NS 6C S+1 1460 16 72.73
24 NS 4C W+3 -510 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a10 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 57,01 %
25 NS 4C N-1 -50 10 45.45
26 NS 4P W+2 -680 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
Total : 227,0 / 528 = 42,99 %
PAIRE A.4 Claire Destin -Elisabeth Harmant
a.7 Dilva Haym -Jean de Villenfagne 50,19 %
1 NS 3S W-1 50 13 59.09
2 NS 3S N+1 630 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a.6 Max Poupinel -Michel Lievens 50,57 %
3 NS 3S E = -600 5 22.73
4 NS 4C E-1 100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a.4 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 51,89 %
7 NS 5TcN-2 -500 16 72.73
8 NS 2C N = 110 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 43,37 %
9 NS 2K W = -90 12 54.55
10 NS 4P N+1 650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.2 Luc Cartuyvels -Charlotte de Wasseige 48,30 %
11 NS 6S W-1 50 17 77.27
12 NS 4C W+2 -480 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a.1 Lydia Luyten -Prisca Tondreau 51,52 %
13 NS 5T N = 600 21 95.45
14 NS 4PcN-3 -500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a13 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 52,84 %
15 NS 3S W+1 -430 1 4.55
16 NS 2S E+1 -150 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
a12 Noelle Fosse -Marianne Falla 50,38 %
17 NS 4C W+1 -450 6 27.27
18 NS 3S W = -400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
a11 Aida Zumot -Claire de Quirini 45,27 %
19 NS 4C S-3 -150 2 9.09
20 NS 1S N-1 -100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a10 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 57,01 %
21 NS 3S N-2 -200 3 13.64
22 NS 6P E+1 -1460 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.9 Dominique Sassen -Danielle Wybauw 47,73 %
23 NS 6C S+1 1460 16 72.73
24 NS 2P W+5 -260 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a.8 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 52,84 %
25 NS 4C N-2 -100 3 13.64
26 NS 4P W+2 -680 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
Total : 223,0 / 528 = 42,23 %
PAIRE A10 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger
a.6 Max Poupinel -Michel Lievens 50,57 %
1 NS 6K W-1 50 13 59.09
2 NS 3S N-1 -100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.5 Teresa Dekoster -Gaetan van de Werve 48,11 %
3 NS 4P E = -620 2 9.09
4 NS 2P S+2 170 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.4 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 51,89 %
5 NS 3S W+1 -430 6 27.27
6 NS 3C N-1 -50 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 43,37 %
7 NS 4P W+2 -680 7 31.82
8 NS 2P W = -110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
a.2 Luc Cartuyvels -Charlotte de Wasseige 48,30 %
9 NS 3S S-3 -150 1 4.55
10 NS 4P N+2 680 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.1 Lydia Luyten -Prisca Tondreau 51,52 %
11 NS 2S E+3 -210 12 54.55
12 NS 4S E-2 100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a13 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 52,84 %
13 NS 2C E = -110 3 13.64
14 NS 3C E-1 50 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a12 Noelle Fosse -Marianne Falla 50,38 %
15 NS 3S E+1 -430 1 4.55
16 NS 2S E+1 -150 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
a10 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 57,01 %
19 NS 3K E = -110 7 31.82
20 NS 1P W+2 -140 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a.9 Dominique Sassen -Danielle Wybauw 47,73 %
21 NS 2S S-3 -300 0 0.00
22 NS 4P E+3 -710 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.8 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 52,84 %
23 NS 4PcW-3 800 8 36.36
24 NS 5C W+2 -510 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
a.7 Dilva Haym -Jean de Villenfagne 50,19 %
25 NS 5T S-1 -50 10 45.45
26 NS 4P W+2 -680 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
Total : 194,0 / 528 = 36,74 %
PAIRE a10 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys
A12 Nicole Leclere -Francoise Turin 57,58 %
1 EO 3S W = -400 20 90.91
2 EO 3S N = 600 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Patrick Gilles 52,27 %
3 EO 4P E-1 100 10 45.45
4 EO 3P S-1 -100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A13 Sophie Tilemans -Catherine Tilemans 43,75 %
5 EO 2CcN-3 -800 22 100.00
6 EO 5K S-2 -100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 100,00 %
A.7 Philippe van der Gracht -Lydia Wildiers 57,95 %
7 EO 5T N-2 -200 3 13.64
8 EO 2C N = 110 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Caroll Pucher 55,49 %
9 EO 2K E-1 100 2 9.09
10 EO 4P N+1 650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A.8 Jacques Podevyn -Francine Belet 45,45 %
11 EO 6S W-1 50 5 22.73
12 EO 5C W+1 -480 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.2 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 52,08 %
13 EO 2S S+1 150 7 31.82
14 EO 2P N-2 -100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A.3 Michele Verhulst -Chris Oostens 56,25 %
17 EO 3S W+2 -460 20 90.91
18 EO 3S E-1 50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A10 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 36,74 %
19 EO 3K E = -110 15 68.18
20 EO 1P W+2 -140 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A.4 Claire Destin -Elisabeth Harmant 42,23 %
21 EO 3S N-2 -200 19 86.36
22 EO 6P E+1 -1460 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A11 Claire Rolin -Efthalia Bogaerts 44,89 %
23 EO 4C S+3 710 19 86.36
24 EO 2C W+3 -200 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.5 Michele Berrier -Helene Schyns 42,99 %
25 EO 4C N-1 -50 12 54.55
26 EO 4P W+2 -680 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
Total : 301,0 / 528 = 57,01 %
PAIRE a.8 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski
A11 Claire Rolin -Efthalia Bogaerts 44,89 %
1 EO 3S W-1 50 9 40.91
2 EO 3S N-1 -100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.5 Michele Berrier -Helene Schyns 42,99 %
3 EO 3S E+1 -630 22 100.00
4 EO 4C W-1 100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
A12 Nicole Leclere -Francoise Turin 57,58 %
5 EO 3S W = -400 8 36.36
6 EO 3C N-1 -50 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Patrick Gilles 52,27 %
7 EO 5P W+1 -680 15 68.18
8 EO 3T S-2 -100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
A13 Sophie Tilemans -Catherine Tilemans 43,75 %
9 EO 2K W-1 100 2 9.09
10 EO 4P N+1 650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Caroll Pucher 55,49 %
13 EO 3S S-1 -100 15 68.18
14 EO 3C E-1 50 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.8 Jacques Podevyn -Francine Belet 45,45 %
15 EO 1C E+2 -140 8 36.36
16 EO 2S E+1 -150 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.2 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 52,08 %
17 EO 3S W = -400 2 9.09
18 EO 3S W-1 50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
A.9 Myriam de Timary -Gerard Cooreman 62,31 %
19 EO 3C S = 140 6 27.27
20 EO 1P W+1 -110 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A.3 Michele Verhulst -Chris Oostens 56,25 %
21 EO 3S S+1 630 3 13.64
22 EO 4P E+3 -710 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
A10 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 36,74 %
23 EO 4PcW-3 800 14 63.64
24 EO 5C W+2 -510 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
A.4 Claire Destin -Elisabeth Harmant 42,23 %
25 EO 4C N-2 -100 19 86.36
26 EO 4P W+2 -680 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
Total : 279,0 / 528 = 52,84 %
PAIRE a13 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru
A.7 Philippe van der Gracht -Lydia Wildiers 57,95 %
1 EO 3S E-1 50 9 40.91
2 EO 3S N+2 660 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Caroll Pucher 55,49 %
3 EO 4P E-1 100 10 45.45
4 EO 3P S+3 230 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.8 Jacques Podevyn -Francine Belet 45,45 %
5 EO 3S W+1 -430 16 72.73
6 EO 3C N = 140 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.2 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 52,08 %
7 EO 5T N-1 -100 0 0.00
8 EO 2P W-1 50 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.9 Myriam de Timary -Gerard Cooreman 62,31 %
9 EO 3S S-3 -150 21 95.45
10 EO 4P N+2 680 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.3 Michele Verhulst -Chris Oostens 56,25 %
11 EO 6S E-1 50 5 22.73
12 EO 4C W+2 -480 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A10 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 36,74 %
13 EO 2C E = -110 19 86.36
14 EO 3C E-1 50 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.4 Claire Destin -Elisabeth Harmant 42,23 %
15 EO 3S W+1 -430 21 95.45
16 EO 2S E+1 -150 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
A11 Claire Rolin -Efthalia Bogaerts 44,89 %
17 EO 3S E+2 -460 20 90.91
18 EO 2S E-1 50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.5 Michele Berrier -Helene Schyns 42,99 %
19 EO 5K E-1 100 9 40.91
20 EO 2T N-2 -200 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Patrick Gilles 52,27 %
23 EO 4C S+3 710 19 86.36
24 EO 2S W+5 -270 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A13 Sophie Tilemans -Catherine Tilemans 43,75 %
25 EO 4C N+1 450 4 18.18
26 EO 6P W = -1430 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
Total : 279,0 / 528 = 52,84 %
PAIRE a.4 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille
A.9 Myriam de Timary -Gerard Cooreman 62,31 %
1 EO 3S W-1 50 9 40.91
2 EO 3S N+2 660 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A10 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 36,74 %
5 EO 3S W+1 -430 16 72.73
6 EO 3C N-1 -50 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
A.4 Claire Destin -Elisabeth Harmant 42,23 %
7 EO 5TcN-2 -500 6 27.27
8 EO 2C N = 110 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A11 Claire Rolin -Efthalia Bogaerts 44,89 %
9 EO 2K W+1 -110 16 72.73
10 EO 2P N+3 200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
A.5 Michele Berrier -Helene Schyns 42,99 %
11 EO 4S E+1 -460 14 63.64
12 EO 6C W = -980 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
A12 Nicole Leclere -Francoise Turin 57,58 %
13 EO 4CcE-2 500 4 18.18
14 EO 2P N-1 -50 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Patrick Gilles 52,27 %
15 EO 2C E+1 -140 8 36.36
16 EO 3K E-1 100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A13 Sophie Tilemans -Catherine Tilemans 43,75 %
17 EO 3S W+1 -430 10 45.45
18 EO 1S W+2 -150 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.7 Philippe van der Gracht -Lydia Wildiers 57,95 %
19 EO 4KcE = -710 22 100.00
20 EO 1S W = -90 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Caroll Pucher 55,49 %
21 EO 5T N = 600 7 31.82
22 EO 6P E+1 -1460 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.8 Jacques Podevyn -Francine Belet 45,45 %
23 EO 6C S+1 1460 6 27.27
24 EO 4C W+2 -480 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A.2 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 52,08 %
25 EO 4C N-2 -100 19 86.36
26 EO 3S W-2 200 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
Total : 274,0 / 528 = 51,89 %
PAIRE a.1 Lydia Luyten -Prisca Tondreau
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Caroll Pucher 55,49 %
1 EO 3S W+1 -430 22 100.00
2 EO 3S N-2 -200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 100,00 %
A.8 Jacques Podevyn -Francine Belet 45,45 %
3 EO 4P E-1 100 10 45.45
4 EO 3P S+1 170 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A.2 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 52,08 %
5 EO 3S W = -400 8 36.36
6 EO 3C N+1 170 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.9 Myriam de Timary -Gerard Cooreman 62,31 %
7 EO 4P W+2 -680 15 68.18
8 EO 2C N+2 170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A.3 Michele Verhulst -Chris Oostens 56,25 %
9 EO 4T S-2 -100 12 54.55
10 EO 4P N = 620 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A10 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 36,74 %
11 EO 2S E+3 -210 10 45.45
12 EO 4S E-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.4 Claire Destin -Elisabeth Harmant 42,23 %
13 EO 5T N = 600 1 4.55
14 EO 4PcN-3 -500 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A11 Claire Rolin -Efthalia Bogaerts 44,89 %
15 EO 3S W = -400 15 68.18
16 EO 1S E+1 -120 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.5 Michele Berrier -Helene Schyns 42,99 %
17 EO 3S W+1 -430 10 45.45
18 EO 2S E = -120 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A12 Nicole Leclere -Francoise Turin 57,58 %
19 EO 3K E = -110 15 68.18
20 EO 1S N-1 -100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Patrick Gilles 52,27 %
21 EO 4P S-2 -200 19 86.36
22 EO 4P E+3 -710 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.7 Philippe van der Gracht -Lydia Wildiers 57,95 %
25 EO 6C N-1 -50 12 54.55
26 EO 4P W+1 -650 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
Total : 272,0 / 528 = 51,52 %
PAIRE a.6 Max Poupinel -Michel Lievens
A10 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 36,74 %
1 EO 6K W-1 50 9 40.91
2 EO 3S N-1 -100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.4 Claire Destin -Elisabeth Harmant 42,23 %
3 EO 3S E = -600 17 77.27
4 EO 4C E-1 100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A11 Claire Rolin -Efthalia Bogaerts 44,89 %
5 EO 2S W = -120 2 9.09
6 EO 3C N+2 200 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A12 Nicole Leclere -Francoise Turin 57,58 %
9 EO 5T S-1 -50 7 31.82
10 EO 4P N+1 650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Patrick Gilles 52,27 %
11 EO 6P W-3 150 0 0.00
12 EO 4C W+2 -480 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A13 Sophie Tilemans -Catherine Tilemans 43,75 %
13 EO 3S S = 600 1 4.55
14 EO 1TcW+2 -340 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.7 Philippe van der Gracht -Lydia Wildiers 57,95 %
15 EO 3S W = -400 15 68.18
16 EO 3T E+1 -130 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Caroll Pucher 55,49 %
17 EO 3S W+2 -460 20 90.91
18 EO 1S E = -90 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A.8 Jacques Podevyn -Francine Belet 45,45 %
19 EO 3P W-1 100 9 40.91
20 EO 1P W+2 -140 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.2 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 52,08 %
21 EO 3S N-1 -100 14 63.64
22 EO 6P E+1 -1460 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A.9 Myriam de Timary -Gerard Cooreman 62,31 %
23 EO 6C S+1 1460 6 27.27
24 EO 4C E+2 -480 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A.3 Michele Verhulst -Chris Oostens 56,25 %
25 EO 5T S = 400 8 36.36
26 EO 3S E+2 -660 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
Total : 267,0 / 528 = 50,57 %
PAIRE a12 Noelle Fosse -Marianne Falla
A13 Sophie Tilemans -Catherine Tilemans 43,75 %
1 EO 3S W-1 50 9 40.91
2 EO 2C N+3 200 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A.7 Philippe van der Gracht -Lydia Wildiers 57,95 %
3 EO 4P E-2 200 2 9.09
4 EO 4PcS-1 -200 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Caroll Pucher 55,49 %
5 EO 2S W+1 -150 4 18.18
6 EO 5K S = 400 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A.8 Jacques Podevyn -Francine Belet 45,45 %
7 EO 5P W+1 -680 15 68.18
8 EO 2S S+1 150 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.2 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 52,08 %
9 EO 3K W = -110 16 72.73
10 EO 4P N+1 650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A.9 Myriam de Timary -Gerard Cooreman 62,31 %
11 EO 6S W-1 50 5 22.73
12 EO 4C W+2 -480 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.3 Michele Verhulst -Chris Oostens 56,25 %
13 EO 2S S+1 150 7 31.82
14 EO 1P N = 80 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
A10 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 36,74 %
15 EO 3S E+1 -430 21 95.45
16 EO 2S E+1 -150 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
A.4 Claire Destin -Elisabeth Harmant 42,23 %
17 EO 4C W+1 -450 16 72.73
18 EO 3S W = -400 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
A.5 Michele Berrier -Helene Schyns 42,99 %
21 EO 3S N+1 630 3 13.64
22 EO 6P E+1 -1460 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A12 Nicole Leclere -Francoise Turin 57,58 %
23 EO 6C S+1 1460 6 27.27
24 EO 4C W+3 -510 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Patrick Gilles 52,27 %
25 EO 3S N-2 -100 19 86.36
26 EO 3S W-1 100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
Total : 266,0 / 528 = 50,38 %
PAIRE a.7 Dilva Haym -Jean de Villenfagne
A.4 Claire Destin -Elisabeth Harmant 42,23 %
1 EO 3S W-1 50 9 40.91
2 EO 3S N+1 630 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A11 Claire Rolin -Efthalia Bogaerts 44,89 %
3 EO 3S E = -600 17 77.27
4 EO 3P S = 140 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A.5 Michele Berrier -Helene Schyns 42,99 %
5 EO 3S W+1 -430 16 72.73
6 EO 4C N = 420 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A12 Nicole Leclere -Francoise Turin 57,58 %
7 EO 6P W = -1430 22 100.00
8 EO 2C N+1 140 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A13 Sophie Tilemans -Catherine Tilemans 43,75 %
11 EO 4S W+2 -490 20 90.91
12 EO 4C W+2 -480 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.7 Philippe van der Gracht -Lydia Wildiers 57,95 %
13 EO 4T N = 130 10 45.45
14 EO 2C E = -110 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Caroll Pucher 55,49 %
15 EO 2C E+1 -140 8 36.36
16 EO 2P W-1 100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A.8 Jacques Podevyn -Francine Belet 45,45 %
17 EO 3S W = -400 2 9.09
18 EO 2S W+2 -180 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.2 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 52,08 %
19 EO 3K E = -110 15 68.18
20 EO 1P W+2 -140 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A.9 Myriam de Timary -Gerard Cooreman 62,31 %
21 EO 3S N+2 660 0 0.00
22 EO 4P E+3 -710 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
A.3 Michele Verhulst -Chris Oostens 56,25 %
23 EO 6C S+1 1460 6 27.27
24 EO 4C W+3 -510 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A10 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 36,74 %
25 EO 5T S-1 -50 12 54.55
26 EO 4P W+2 -680 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
Total : 265,0 / 528 = 50,19 %
PAIRE a.2 Luc Cartuyvels -Charlotte de Wasseige
A.8 Jacques Podevyn -Francine Belet 45,45 %
1 EO 6P E-1 50 9 40.91
2 EO 3S N-1 -100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.2 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 52,08 %
3 EO 4P E-2 200 2 9.09
4 EO 2P S+3 200 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
A.9 Myriam de Timary -Gerard Cooreman 62,31 %
5 EO 3S W = -400 8 36.36
6 EO 3C N+2 200 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A.3 Michele Verhulst -Chris Oostens 56,25 %
7 EO 4P W+2 -680 15 68.18
8 EO 2P W-1 50 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A10 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 36,74 %
9 EO 3S S-3 -150 21 95.45
10 EO 4P N+2 680 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.4 Claire Destin -Elisabeth Harmant 42,23 %
11 EO 6S W-1 50 5 22.73
12 EO 4C W+2 -480 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A11 Claire Rolin -Efthalia Bogaerts 44,89 %
13 EO 3C E = -140 22 100.00
14 EO 1S W+1 -120 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
A.5 Michele Berrier -Helene Schyns 42,99 %
15 EO 3S E = -400 15 68.18
16 EO 2S E+1 -150 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
A12 Nicole Leclere -Francoise Turin 57,58 %
17 EO 3S E = -400 2 9.09
18 EO 2S W-2 100 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 6,82 %
A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Patrick Gilles 52,27 %
19 EO 2P W-3 300 2 9.09
20 EO 1S N = 90 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 4,55 %
A13 Sophie Tilemans -Catherine Tilemans 43,75 %
21 EO 2P S = 110 10 45.45
22 EO 6P E+1 -1460 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.7 Philippe van der Gracht -Lydia Wildiers 57,95 %
23 EO 4C N+3 710 19 86.36
24 EO 5C E+1 -480 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
Total : 255,0 / 528 = 48,30 %
PAIRE a.5 Teresa Dekoster -Gaetan van de Werve
A.3 Michele Verhulst -Chris Oostens 56,25 %
1 EO 3S W-1 50 9 40.91
2 EO 2C N+2 170 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A10 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 36,74 %
3 EO 4P E = -620 20 90.91
4 EO 2P S+2 170 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A11 Claire Rolin -Efthalia Bogaerts 44,89 %
7 EO 5TcN-1 -200 3 13.64
8 EO 3C N = 140 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
A.5 Michele Berrier -Helene Schyns 42,99 %
9 EO 1S S-1 -50 7 31.82
10 EO 4P N+2 680 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
A12 Nicole Leclere -Francoise Turin 57,58 %
11 EO 3S W+3 -490 20 90.91
12 EO 5C W+1 -480 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Patrick Gilles 52,27 %
13 EO 2C E = -110 19 86.36
14 EO 2C E = -110 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A13 Sophie Tilemans -Catherine Tilemans 43,75 %
15 EO 2S W = -120 2 9.09
16 EO 1S E = -90 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.7 Philippe van der Gracht -Lydia Wildiers 57,95 %
17 EO 3S W+1 -430 10 45.45
18 EO 3S W-2 100 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Caroll Pucher 55,49 %
19 EO 4P W-4 400 0 0.00
20 EO 2T N-2 -200 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.8 Jacques Podevyn -Francine Belet 45,45 %
21 EO 3S S-1 -100 14 63.64
22 EO 7P E = -2210 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
A.2 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 52,08 %
23 EO 5C S+2 710 19 86.36
24 EO 3PcS-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A.9 Myriam de Timary -Gerard Cooreman 62,31 %
25 EO 4C N = 420 6 27.27
26 EO 6P E = -1430 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
Total : 254,0 / 528 = 48,11 %
PAIRE a.9 Dominique Sassen -Danielle Wybauw
A.5 Michele Berrier -Helene Schyns 42,99 %
1 EO 3S W-1 50 9 40.91
2 EO 3S N-1 -100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A12 Nicole Leclere -Francoise Turin 57,58 %
3 EO 4P E-1 100 10 45.45
4 EO 2P S = 110 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Patrick Gilles 52,27 %
5 EO 3S W+1 -430 16 72.73
6 EO 4C N+1 450 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A13 Sophie Tilemans -Catherine Tilemans 43,75 %
7 EO 5P W = -650 8 36.36
8 EO 3K N = 110 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.7 Philippe van der Gracht -Lydia Wildiers 57,95 %
9 EO 3K W-1 100 2 9.09
10 EO 4P N+1 650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Caroll Pucher 55,49 %
11 EO 4S W+2 -490 20 90.91
12 EO 4C W+1 -450 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.2 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 52,08 %
15 EO 3S W = -400 15 68.18
16 EO 2S E+1 -150 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
A.9 Myriam de Timary -Gerard Cooreman 62,31 %
17 EO 3S E+1 -430 10 45.45
18 EO 2S E = -120 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.3 Michele Verhulst -Chris Oostens 56,25 %
19 EO 4KcE-1 200 4 18.18
20 EO 1P W+2 -140 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A10 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 36,74 %
21 EO 2S S-3 -300 22 100.00
22 EO 4P E+3 -710 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.4 Claire Destin -Elisabeth Harmant 42,23 %
23 EO 6C S+1 1460 6 27.27
24 EO 2P W+5 -260 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A11 Claire Rolin -Efthalia Bogaerts 44,89 %
25 EO 4C N-2 -100 19 86.36
26 EO 3S W-2 200 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
Total : 252,0 / 528 = 47,73 %
PAIRE a11 Aida Zumot -Claire de Quirini
A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Patrick Gilles 52,27 %
1 EO 3S W-1 50 9 40.91
2 EO 3S N = 600 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A13 Sophie Tilemans -Catherine Tilemans 43,75 %
3 EO 4P E-1 100 10 45.45
4 EO 4C E+1 -650 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.7 Philippe van der Gracht -Lydia Wildiers 57,95 %
5 EO 3T W-1 50 0 0.00
6 EO 3S S+1 430 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 6,82 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Caroll Pucher 55,49 %
7 EO 5P W+1 -680 15 68.18
8 EO 2C N+1 140 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.8 Jacques Podevyn -Francine Belet 45,45 %
9 EO 3K W = -110 16 72.73
10 EO 4P N = 620 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
A.2 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 52,08 %
11 EO 5S W = -460 14 63.64
12 EO 4C W+2 -480 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.9 Myriam de Timary -Gerard Cooreman 62,31 %
13 EO 3C E-1 100 12 54.55
14 EO 2P N-1 -50 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.3 Michele Verhulst -Chris Oostens 56,25 %
15 EO 3T W+1 -130 4 18.18
16 EO 3S E-1 100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
A.4 Claire Destin -Elisabeth Harmant 42,23 %
19 EO 4C S-3 -150 20 90.91
20 EO 1S N-1 -100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A11 Claire Rolin -Efthalia Bogaerts 44,89 %
21 EO 3S S-1 -100 14 63.64
22 EO 4P E+3 -710 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A.5 Michele Berrier -Helene Schyns 42,99 %
23 EO 6C S+1 1460 6 27.27
24 EO 4C W+3 -510 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A12 Nicole Leclere -Francoise Turin 57,58 %
25 EO 3S S+2 460 2 9.09
26 EO 4P W+1 -650 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
Total : 239,0 / 528 = 45,27 %
PAIRE a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger
A.9 Myriam de Timary -Gerard Cooreman 62,31 %
3 EO 4P E-2 200 2 9.09
4 EO 3P S+1 170 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
A.3 Michele Verhulst -Chris Oostens 56,25 %
5 EO 3S W+1 -430 16 72.73
6 EO 3S S+1 430 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A10 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 36,74 %
7 EO 4P W+2 -680 15 68.18
8 EO 2P W = -110 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
A.4 Claire Destin -Elisabeth Harmant 42,23 %
9 EO 2K W = -90 10 45.45
10 EO 4P N+1 650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A11 Claire Rolin -Efthalia Bogaerts 44,89 %
11 EO 4S W+1 -460 14 63.64
12 EO 4C W+2 -480 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.5 Michele Berrier -Helene Schyns 42,99 %
13 EO 4K N-1 -100 15 68.18
14 EO 2P N = 110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A12 Nicole Leclere -Francoise Turin 57,58 %
15 EO 3S W-2 100 0 0.00
16 EO 5T E-3 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Patrick Gilles 52,27 %
17 EO 3S W+1 -430 10 45.45
18 EO 2S W = -120 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A13 Sophie Tilemans -Catherine Tilemans 43,75 %
19 EO 3K E = -110 15 68.18
20 EO 1P W+2 -140 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A.7 Philippe van der Gracht -Lydia Wildiers 57,95 %
21 EO 5T N = 600 7 31.82
22 EO 6P E+1 -1460 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Caroll Pucher 55,49 %
23 EO 6C N+1 1460 6 27.27
24 EO 3K E+3 -170 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
A.8 Jacques Podevyn -Francine Belet 45,45 %
25 EO 6S S = 990 0 0.00
26 EO 6P W = -1430 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
Total : 229,0 / 528 = 43,37 %
|