B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 64,81 A.6 Benoit del Marmol -Pascale Ortegat
--- 2 57,17 A.5 Giuseppe Napoli -Martine Zens
--- 3 56,87 A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Nicole Blondeau
--- 4 53,47 A.7 Hugo Baetens -Philippe van der Gracht
--- 5 52,44 B.5 Helene Schyns -Michele Berrier
--- 6 51,18 B.1 Marguerite Verstraeten -Christian Martinot
--- 7 51,15 A.8 Claire Derieuw -Monique Crouan
--- 8 48,97 A.9 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne
--- 9 48,25 B.8 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski
--- 10 47,98 B.3 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson
--- 11 47,96 A.3 Francoise Turin -Didier Collart
--- 12 46,44 B.4 Annette Fobe -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
--- 13 46,22 A.4 Anne Van den Berge -Andre Delacroix
--- 14 45,97 B.7 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru
--- 15 45,87 B.9 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger
--- 16 45,11 B.2 Grazia Neuenschwander -Patrick Gilles
--- 17 44,08 A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Caroll Pucher
--- 18 42,95 B.6 Yolande Waerseggers -Therese Dumont de Ch.
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 64,68 b.6 Jean Chabotier -Michel Paquot
--- 2 59,96 a.7 Noelle Fosse -Elena Valsesia
--- 3 57,11 a.3 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys
--- 4 55,83 b.9 Vinciane de Borrekens -Charlotte de Wasseige
--- 5 55,32 b.8 Serge Alard -Michel Lievens
--- 6 54,24 b.5 Danielle Wybauw -Christiane Huby
--- 7 53,51 b.4 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve
--- 8 52,60 b.1 Fabienne Smit -Dominique Bourgoignie
--- 9 52,22 a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Simone Munsterhjelm
--- 10 49,49 b.7 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger
--- 11 46,57 a.9 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels
--- 12 45,13 a.2 Dominique Sassen -Jacques Podevyn
--- 13 44,93 a.4 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Veronique Englebienne
--- 14 43,53 a.8 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot
--- 15 40,90 a.1 Chris Oostens -Helene Christiaens
--- 16 38,94 a.5 Gerard Cooreman -Myriam de Timary
--- 17 35,00 b.3 Muriel de Ceuninck -Marina De Longree
--- 18 0,00 b.2 -
PAIRE A.6 Benoit del Marmol -Pascale Ortegat
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Jacques Podevyn 45,13 %
1 NS 1ScS = 180 29.9 99.67
2 NS 3S E = -400 10.7 35.67
3 NS 4P S-1 -50 19.3 64.33 µ Tbl = 66,56 %
a.1 Chris Oostens -Helene Christiaens 40,90 %
4 NS 4P E = -620 21.4 71.33
5 NS 6C N = 1430 24.6 82.00
6 NS 4T W+1 -150 27.8 92.67 µ Tbl = 82,00 %
a.9 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 46,57 %
7 NS 3S N+1 630 27.8 92.67
8 NS 2S N+2 180 24.6 82.00
9 NS 3C E-1 100 10.7 35.67 µ Tbl = 70,11 %
a.8 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 43,53 %
10 NS 5CcW = -850 0.1 0.33
11 NS 6P S = 980 22.5 75.00
12 NS 4C W+1 -450 27.8 92.67 µ Tbl = 56,00 %
a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Simone Munsterhjelm 52,22 %
16 NS 2S E-1 100 22.5 75.00
17 NS 4P S+3 510 24.6 82.00
18 NS 3C S = 140 29.9 99.67 µ Tbl = 85,56 %
a.5 Gerard Cooreman -Myriam de Timary 38,94 %
19 NS 4C S+1 450 27.8 92.67
20 NS 2P E+3 -200 13.9 46.33
21 NS 2P S = 110 20.3 67.67 µ Tbl = 68,89 %
a.4 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Veronique Englebienne 44,93 %
22 NS 1S E = -90 10.7 35.67
23 NS 2T N+2 130 7.5 25.00
24 NS 3K S+1 130 2.2 7.33 µ Tbl = 22,67 %
a.3 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 57,11 %
25 NS 3K S-2 -100 28 93.33
26 NS 4T S-1 -100 16 53.33
27 NS 2S E-1 50 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 466,6 / 720 = 64,81 %
PAIRE A.5 Giuseppe Napoli -Martine Zens
a.9 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 46,57 %
1 NS 2P W-1 50 24.6 82.00
2 NS 6T W-2 100 22.5 75.00
3 NS 4PcS-1 -100 9.7 32.33 µ Tbl = 63,11 %
a.8 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 43,53 %
4 NS 3S W+1 -630 11.8 39.33
5 NS 5C N+1 680 9.7 32.33
6 NS 4T W+1 -150 27.8 92.67 µ Tbl = 54,78 %
a.7 Noelle Fosse -Elena Valsesia 59,96 %
7 NS 4P S = 620 25.7 85.67
8 NS 1S N+2 150 19.3 64.33
9 NS 2C E+1 -140 3.3 11.00 µ Tbl = 53,67 %
a.5 Gerard Cooreman -Myriam de Timary 38,94 %
13 NS 2C W+2 -170 17.1 57.00
14 NS 3S E-1 50 22.5 75.00
15 NS 2P S+3 200 22.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 69,00 %
a.4 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Veronique Englebienne 44,93 %
16 NS 2S E-1 100 22.5 75.00
17 NS 5KcW-2 300 4.3 14.33
18 NS 3S W+1 -430 2.2 7.33 µ Tbl = 32,22 %
a.3 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 57,11 %
19 NS 3K W-3 300 17.1 57.00
20 NS 2P E+3 -200 13.9 46.33
21 NS 2P S = 110 20.3 67.67 µ Tbl = 57,00 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Jacques Podevyn 45,13 %
22 NS 2C N-1 -50 17.1 57.00
23 NS 2T N+2 130 7.5 25.00
24 NS 5K S+1 420 18.2 60.67 µ Tbl = 47,56 %
a.1 Chris Oostens -Helene Christiaens 40,90 %
25 NS 4P W-1 100 30 100.00
26 NS 3P N-1 -100 16 53.33
27 NS 2S E-2 100 26 86.67 µ Tbl = 80,00 %
Total : 411,6 / 720 = 57,17 %
PAIRE A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Nicole Blondeau
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Jacques Podevyn 45,13 %
4 NS 4P E = -620 21.4 71.33
5 NS 6C N = 1430 24.6 82.00
6 NS 4C W+1 -650 12.9 43.00 µ Tbl = 65,44 %
a.1 Chris Oostens -Helene Christiaens 40,90 %
7 NS 3S N = 600 19.3 64.33
8 NS 1S N = 90 5.4 18.00
9 NS 3C E-1 100 10.7 35.67 µ Tbl = 39,33 %
a.9 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 46,57 %
10 NS 4K S+1 150 13.9 46.33
11 NS 6P S = 980 22.5 75.00
12 NS 4C W+2 -480 18.2 60.67 µ Tbl = 60,67 %
a.8 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 43,53 %
13 NS 2C W+1 -140 22.5 75.00
14 NS 3S E = -400 7.5 25.00
15 NS 3T N+1 130 10.7 35.67 µ Tbl = 45,22 %
a.7 Noelle Fosse -Elena Valsesia 59,96 %
16 NS 3K E+1 -130 7.5 25.00
17 NS 4P S+2 480 15 50.00
18 NS 5T W-1 50 24.6 82.00 µ Tbl = 52,33 %
a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Simone Munsterhjelm 52,22 %
19 NS 4C S = 420 23.5 78.33
20 NS 2P E+3 -200 13.9 46.33
21 NS 2C N-1 -100 6.5 21.67 µ Tbl = 48,78 %
a.5 Gerard Cooreman -Myriam de Timary 38,94 %
22 NS 2C N = 110 27.8 92.67
23 NS 3S S+1 630 28.9 96.33
24 NS 5K S+1 420 18.2 60.67 µ Tbl = 83,22 %
a.4 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Veronique Englebienne 44,93 %
25 NS 2P W+1 -140 22 73.33
26 NS 3P N-1 -100 16 53.33
27 NS 2S E-1 50 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
Total : 409,5 / 720 = 56,87 %
PAIRE A.7 Hugo Baetens -Philippe van der Gracht
a.4 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Veronique Englebienne 44,93 %
1 NS 2P N-1 -50 18.2 60.67
2 NS 5KcW-5 1100 29.9 99.67
3 NS 2P S+1 140 29.9 99.67 µ Tbl = 86,67 %
a.3 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 57,11 %
4 NS 3S W+2 -660 0.1 0.33
5 NS 6C N = 1430 24.6 82.00
6 NS 4C E+2 -680 3.3 11.00 µ Tbl = 31,11 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Jacques Podevyn 45,13 %
7 NS 3S N = 600 19.3 64.33
8 NS 1S N+3 180 24.6 82.00
9 NS 4C E-2 200 21.4 71.33 µ Tbl = 72,56 %
a.1 Chris Oostens -Helene Christiaens 40,90 %
10 NS 4C W-2 200 17.1 57.00
11 NS 5P S+1 480 6.5 21.67
12 NS 4C W+1 -450 27.8 92.67 µ Tbl = 57,11 %
a.9 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 46,57 %
13 NS 2C W+3 -200 8.6 28.67
14 NS 3S E-1 50 22.5 75.00
15 NS 3S N+4 720 29.9 99.67 µ Tbl = 67,78 %
a.7 Noelle Fosse -Elena Valsesia 59,96 %
19 NS 2S N+1 150 11.8 39.33
20 NS 2P E+4 -230 0.1 0.33
21 NS 2P S = 110 20.3 67.67 µ Tbl = 35,78 %
a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Simone Munsterhjelm 52,22 %
22 NS 2C N-1 -50 17.1 57.00
23 NS 3T N+1 130 7.5 25.00
24 NS 5K S = 400 7.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 35,67 %
a.5 Gerard Cooreman -Myriam de Timary 38,94 %
25 NS 4KcS-4 -800 0 0.00
26 NS 3P N-2 -200 7 23.33
27 NS 3T W-3 150 30 100.00 µ Tbl = 41,11 %
Total : 385,0 / 720 = 53,47 %
PAIRE B.5 Helene Schyns -Michele Berrier
b.9 Vinciane de Borrekens -Charlotte de Wasseige 55,83 %
1 NS 3C N-2 -100 11.8 39.33
2 NS 5T E-1 50 16.1 53.67
3 NS 2P S = 110 26.7 89.00 µ Tbl = 60,67 %
b.8 Serge Alard -Michel Lievens 55,32 %
4 NS 4P E+1 -650 5.4 18.00
5 NS 5C N+1 680 9.7 32.33
6 NS 4C W+1 -650 12.9 43.00 µ Tbl = 31,11 %
b.7 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 49,49 %
7 NS 5K N-4 -400 0.1 0.33
8 NS 1S S+4 210 29.9 99.67
9 NS 4C E-2 200 21.4 71.33 µ Tbl = 57,11 %
b.5 Danielle Wybauw -Christiane Huby 54,24 %
13 NS 4C E-1 100 26.7 89.00
14 NS 3S E-1 50 22.5 75.00
15 NS 3S N-1 -100 2.2 7.33 µ Tbl = 57,11 %
b.4 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 53,51 %
16 NS 3K E-1 100 22.5 75.00
17 NS 4P S+3 510 24.6 82.00
18 NS 3S W = -400 9.7 32.33 µ Tbl = 63,11 %
b.3 Muriel de Ceuninck -Marina De Longree 35,00 %
19 NS 2S W-1 100 8.6 28.67
20 NS 2P E+3 -200 13.9 46.33
21 NS 2P S+1 140 26.7 89.00 µ Tbl = 54,67 %
b.2 - 0,00 %
22 NS BYE 0 0.00
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
b.1 Fabienne Smit -Dominique Bourgoignie 52,60 %
25 NS 1P W+2 -140 22 73.33
26 NS 2P N-2 -200 7 23.33
27 NS 2P N-1 -50 10 33.33 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
Total : 330,4 / 630 = 52,44 %
PAIRE B.1 Marguerite Verstraeten -Christian Martinot
b.1 Fabienne Smit -Dominique Bourgoignie 52,60 %
1 NS 2P W = -110 7.5 25.00
2 NS 1S E+3 -180 12.9 43.00
3 NS 4P S-1 -50 19.3 64.33 µ Tbl = 44,11 %
b.9 Vinciane de Borrekens -Charlotte de Wasseige 55,83 %
4 NS 4P E = -620 21.4 71.33
5 NS 4C N+2 680 9.7 32.33
6 NS 4C W+1 -650 12.9 43.00 µ Tbl = 48,89 %
b.8 Serge Alard -Michel Lievens 55,32 %
7 NS 3S N = 600 19.3 64.33
8 NS 1S N+3 180 24.6 82.00
9 NS 4C E-2 200 21.4 71.33 µ Tbl = 72,56 %
b.7 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 49,49 %
10 NS 5KcS = 750 25.7 85.67
11 NS 3S S+3 490 11.8 39.33
12 NS 6C W = -980 5.4 18.00 µ Tbl = 47,67 %
b.6 Jean Chabotier -Michel Paquot 64,68 %
13 NS 4C W+1 -650 1.1 3.67
14 NS 3S E = -400 7.5 25.00
15 NS 4P S-1 -100 2.2 7.33 µ Tbl = 12,00 %
b.5 Danielle Wybauw -Christiane Huby 54,24 %
16 NS 3K E+1 -130 7.5 25.00
17 NS 4P S+2 480 15 50.00
18 NS 3S W = -400 9.7 32.33 µ Tbl = 35,78 %
b.4 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 53,51 %
19 NS 4C S = 420 23.5 78.33
20 NS 2P E+3 -200 13.9 46.33
21 NS 3KcE-2 300 29.9 99.67 µ Tbl = 74,78 %
b.3 Muriel de Ceuninck -Marina De Longree 35,00 %
22 NS 2P W-1 100 24.6 82.00
23 NS 2P N+3 200 23.5 78.33
24 NS 5K S+1 420 18.2 60.67 µ Tbl = 73,67 %
Total : 368,5 / 720 = 51,18 %
PAIRE A.8 Claire Derieuw -Monique Crouan
a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Simone Munsterhjelm 52,22 %
1 NS 2P W-2 100 27.8 92.67
2 NS 3S E+2 -460 4.3 14.33
3 NS 2S N-1 -50 19.3 64.33 µ Tbl = 57,11 %
a.5 Gerard Cooreman -Myriam de Timary 38,94 %
4 NS 4P E = -620 21.4 71.33
5 NS 6C N = 1430 24.6 82.00
6 NS 4C W+2 -680 3.3 11.00 µ Tbl = 54,78 %
a.4 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Veronique Englebienne 44,93 %
7 NS 3S N = 600 19.3 64.33
8 NS 2S S+2 180 24.6 82.00
9 NS 4C E-2 200 21.4 71.33 µ Tbl = 72,56 %
a.3 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 57,11 %
10 NS 5C W = -650 4.3 14.33
11 NS 6P S = 980 22.5 75.00
12 NS 4C W+2 -480 18.2 60.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Jacques Podevyn 45,13 %
13 NS 3C W+1 -170 17.1 57.00
14 NS 3S E = -400 7.5 25.00
15 NS 4P S-1 -100 2.2 7.33 µ Tbl = 29,78 %
a.1 Chris Oostens -Helene Christiaens 40,90 %
16 NS 2S E = -120 15 50.00
17 NS 4C N+2 480 15 50.00
18 NS 4T W = -130 19.3 64.33 µ Tbl = 54,78 %
a.8 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 43,53 %
22 NS 2C N-1 -50 17.1 57.00
23 NS 3S S+1 630 28.9 96.33
24 NS 5K S+1 420 18.2 60.67 µ Tbl = 71,33 %
a.7 Noelle Fosse -Elena Valsesia 59,96 %
25 NS 3S E = -600 12 40.00
26 NS 3P N-3 -300 1 3.33
27 NS 2S W = -120 4 13.33 µ Tbl = 18,89 %
Total : 368,3 / 720 = 51,15 %
PAIRE A.9 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne
a.8 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 43,53 %
1 NS 1S S-1 -50 18.2 60.67
2 NS 5T W-1 50 16.1 53.67
3 NS 2C E = -110 3.3 11.00 µ Tbl = 41,78 %
a.7 Noelle Fosse -Elena Valsesia 59,96 %
4 NS 4P E+1 -650 5.4 18.00
5 NS 5C N+1 680 9.7 32.33
6 NS 4PcS-3 -500 23.5 78.33 µ Tbl = 42,89 %
a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Simone Munsterhjelm 52,22 %
7 NS 3S N-1 -100 7.5 25.00
8 NS 2C E-2 100 10.7 35.67
9 NS 3C E-1 100 10.7 35.67 µ Tbl = 32,11 %
a.5 Gerard Cooreman -Myriam de Timary 38,94 %
10 NS 5K S = 600 19.3 64.33
11 NS 6P S = 980 22.5 75.00
12 NS 4C W+2 -480 18.2 60.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.4 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Veronique Englebienne 44,93 %
13 NS 4C W-1 100 26.7 89.00
14 NS 3S E = -400 7.5 25.00
15 NS 3S N+3 690 27.8 92.67 µ Tbl = 68,89 %
a.3 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 57,11 %
16 NS 3K E+1 -130 7.5 25.00
17 NS 4P S+2 480 15 50.00
18 NS 4T W = -130 19.3 64.33 µ Tbl = 46,44 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Jacques Podevyn 45,13 %
19 NS 3S N = 400 19.3 64.33
20 NS 2P E+3 -200 13.9 46.33
21 NS 2P S-1 -100 6.5 21.67 µ Tbl = 44,11 %
a.9 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 46,57 %
25 NS 3S E = -600 12 40.00
26 NS 3P N-1 -100 16 53.33
27 NS 2S E-1 50 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 48,89 %
Total : 352,6 / 720 = 48,97 %
PAIRE B.8 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski
b.6 Jean Chabotier -Michel Paquot 64,68 %
1 NS 2P E+1 -140 4.3 14.33
2 NS 5K E-4 200 27.8 92.67
3 NS 4PcS-1 -100 9.7 32.33 µ Tbl = 46,44 %
b.5 Danielle Wybauw -Christiane Huby 54,24 %
4 NS 4P E = -620 21.4 71.33
5 NS 5C N+1 680 9.7 32.33
6 NS 4C E+1 -650 12.9 43.00 µ Tbl = 48,89 %
b.4 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 53,51 %
7 NS 4P S-1 -100 7.5 25.00
8 NS 1S S+1 120 15 50.00
9 NS 3C E = -140 3.3 11.00 µ Tbl = 28,67 %
b.3 Muriel de Ceuninck -Marina De Longree 35,00 %
10 NS 4P W = -620 8.6 28.67
11 NS 6P S = 980 22.5 75.00
12 NS 4C W+1 -450 27.8 92.67 µ Tbl = 65,44 %
b.2 - 0,00 %
13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00
15 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
b.1 Fabienne Smit -Dominique Bourgoignie 52,60 %
16 NS 1S E+5 -240 2.2 7.33
17 NS 6P S = 980 28.9 96.33
18 NS 4T W = -130 19.3 64.33 µ Tbl = 56,00 %
b.8 Serge Alard -Michel Lievens 55,32 %
22 NS 2S S-2 -100 6.5 21.67
23 NS 2P N+2 170 21.4 71.33
24 NS 5K S+1 420 18.2 60.67 µ Tbl = 51,22 %
b.7 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 49,49 %
25 NS 3S E+1 -630 4 13.33
26 NS 5T S-2 -200 7 23.33
27 NS 3T W-2 100 26 86.67 µ Tbl = 41,11 %
Total : 304,0 / 630 = 48,25 %
PAIRE B.3 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson
b.5 Danielle Wybauw -Christiane Huby 54,24 %
1 NS 2P W = -110 7.5 25.00
2 NS 6K W-2 100 22.5 75.00
3 NS 4P S-1 -50 19.3 64.33 µ Tbl = 54,78 %
b.3 Muriel de Ceuninck -Marina De Longree 35,00 %
7 NS 3S N-1 -100 7.5 25.00
8 NS 1S N = 90 5.4 18.00
9 NS 4C E-1 100 10.7 35.67 µ Tbl = 26,22 %
b.2 - 0,00 %
10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
b.1 Fabienne Smit -Dominique Bourgoignie 52,60 %
13 NS 3C W+2 -200 8.6 28.67
14 NS 3S E-2 100 29.9 99.67
15 NS 2P S+1 140 16.1 53.67 µ Tbl = 60,67 %
b.9 Vinciane de Borrekens -Charlotte de Wasseige 55,83 %
16 NS 1S W+1 -120 15 50.00
17 NS 6P S = 980 28.9 96.33
18 NS 3S E = -400 9.7 32.33 µ Tbl = 59,56 %
b.8 Serge Alard -Michel Lievens 55,32 %
19 NS 4C S-1 -50 4.3 14.33
20 NS 2P E+2 -170 28.9 96.33
21 NS 1S S = 90 12.9 43.00 µ Tbl = 51,22 %
b.7 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 49,49 %
22 NS 2C N-2 -100 6.5 21.67
23 NS 2T N+3 150 17.1 57.00
24 NS 5K S = 400 7.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 34,56 %
b.6 Jean Chabotier -Michel Paquot 64,68 %
25 NS 3S E = -600 12 40.00
26 NS 4T S-1 -100 16 53.33
27 NS 2S E-1 50 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 48,89 %
Total : 302,3 / 630 = 47,98 %
PAIRE A.3 Francoise Turin -Didier Collart
a.5 Gerard Cooreman -Myriam de Timary 38,94 %
1 NS 2P W-1 50 24.6 82.00
2 NS 4CcN-3 -800 0.1 0.33
3 NS 1P S+1 110 26.7 89.00 µ Tbl = 57,11 %
a.3 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 57,11 %
7 NS 4P S-1 -100 7.5 25.00
8 NS 1S N+1 120 15 50.00
9 NS 4C E-1 100 10.7 35.67 µ Tbl = 36,89 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Jacques Podevyn 45,13 %
10 NS 4K S+1 150 13.9 46.33
11 NS 6P S = 980 22.5 75.00
12 NS 6C W = -980 5.4 18.00 µ Tbl = 46,44 %
a.1 Chris Oostens -Helene Christiaens 40,90 %
13 NS 2C W+1 -140 22.5 75.00
14 NS 3S E = -400 7.5 25.00
15 NS 2P S+1 140 16.1 53.67 µ Tbl = 51,22 %
a.9 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 46,57 %
16 NS 3K E+1 -130 7.5 25.00
17 NS 6C S-1 -50 0.1 0.33
18 NS 3S E = -400 9.7 32.33 µ Tbl = 19,22 %
a.8 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 43,53 %
19 NS 2S N+1 150 11.8 39.33
20 NS 3P E+1 -170 28.9 96.33
21 NS 1S S-1 -100 6.5 21.67 µ Tbl = 52,44 %
a.7 Noelle Fosse -Elena Valsesia 59,96 %
22 NS 2S E-1 100 24.6 82.00
23 NS 2T N+2 130 7.5 25.00
24 NS 4P N = 420 18.2 60.67 µ Tbl = 55,89 %
a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Simone Munsterhjelm 52,22 %
25 NS 1S E+2 -150 18 60.00
26 NS 4C E-1 100 24 80.00
27 NS 2S E-1 50 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
Total : 345,3 / 720 = 47,96 %
PAIRE B.4 Annette Fobe -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
b.7 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 49,49 %
1 NS 3C N-1 -50 18.2 60.67
2 NS 3S E-2 100 22.5 75.00
3 NS 4P S-1 -50 19.3 64.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
b.6 Jean Chabotier -Michel Paquot 64,68 %
4 NS 3S W+1 -630 11.8 39.33
5 NS 5C N+1 680 9.7 32.33
6 NS 4C E+2 -680 3.3 11.00 µ Tbl = 27,56 %
b.4 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 53,51 %
10 NS 5KcS = 750 25.7 85.67
11 NS 5P S+1 480 6.5 21.67
12 NS 4C W+2 -480 18.2 60.67 µ Tbl = 56,00 %
b.3 Muriel de Ceuninck -Marina De Longree 35,00 %
13 NS 3C W+1 -170 17.1 57.00
14 NS 3S E-1 50 22.5 75.00
15 NS 2P S+3 200 22.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 69,00 %
b.2 - 0,00 %
16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
b.1 Fabienne Smit -Dominique Bourgoignie 52,60 %
19 NS 4C S-1 -50 4.3 14.33
20 NS 2P E+3 -200 13.9 46.33
21 NS 1S S = 90 12.9 43.00 µ Tbl = 34,56 %
b.9 Vinciane de Borrekens -Charlotte de Wasseige 55,83 %
22 NS 2C N-2 -100 6.5 21.67
23 NS 2T N+2 130 7.5 25.00
24 NS 5K S+1 420 18.2 60.67 µ Tbl = 35,78 %
b.8 Serge Alard -Michel Lievens 55,32 %
25 NS 3S E+1 -630 4 13.33
26 NS 3K W-1 100 24 80.00
27 NS 2S E = -120 4 13.33 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
Total : 292,6 / 630 = 46,44 %
PAIRE A.4 Anne Van den Berge -Andre Delacroix
a.7 Noelle Fosse -Elena Valsesia 59,96 %
1 NS 4C N-3 -150 2.2 7.33
2 NS 3S E+2 -460 4.3 14.33
3 NS 2C E = -110 3.3 11.00 µ Tbl = 10,89 %
a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Simone Munsterhjelm 52,22 %
4 NS 4P E+1 -650 5.4 18.00
5 NS 5C N+1 680 9.7 32.33
6 NS 4C E+2 -680 3.3 11.00 µ Tbl = 20,44 %
a.4 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Veronique Englebienne 44,93 %
10 NS 5KcS = 750 25.7 85.67
11 NS 3S N+3 490 11.8 39.33
12 NS 6C W = -980 5.4 18.00 µ Tbl = 47,67 %
a.3 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 57,11 %
13 NS 2C W+3 -200 8.6 28.67
14 NS 3S E = -400 7.5 25.00
15 NS 2P S+1 140 16.1 53.67 µ Tbl = 35,78 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Jacques Podevyn 45,13 %
16 NS 2PcN = 470 29.9 99.67
17 NS 4P S+2 480 15 50.00
18 NS 4T W+1 -150 15 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,56 %
a.1 Chris Oostens -Helene Christiaens 40,90 %
19 NS 3KcW-2 500 29.9 99.67
20 NS 2P E+3 -200 13.9 46.33
21 NS 1S S = 90 12.9 43.00 µ Tbl = 63,00 %
a.9 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 46,57 %
22 NS 3K E-2 200 29.9 99.67
23 NS 3S S = 600 25.7 85.67
24 NS 4K S+2 170 4.3 14.33 µ Tbl = 66,56 %
a.8 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 43,53 %
25 NS 2T E+2 -130 26 86.67
26 NS 2P N-3 -300 1 3.33
27 NS 3S E-2 100 26 86.67 µ Tbl = 58,89 %
Total : 332,8 / 720 = 46,22 %
PAIRE B.7 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru
b.4 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 53,51 %
1 NS 2P N-4 -200 0.1 0.33
2 NS 3S E+1 -430 8.6 28.67
3 NS 4PcS-1 -100 9.7 32.33 µ Tbl = 20,44 %
b.3 Muriel de Ceuninck -Marina De Longree 35,00 %
4 NS 2P E+2 -170 29.9 99.67
5 NS 6C N = 1430 24.6 82.00
6 NS 4T W+1 -150 27.8 92.67 µ Tbl = 91,44 %
b.2 - 0,00 %
7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
b.1 Fabienne Smit -Dominique Bourgoignie 52,60 %
10 NS 6K S-1 -100 10.7 35.67
11 NS 6P S = 980 22.5 75.00
12 NS 6C W = -980 5.4 18.00 µ Tbl = 42,89 %
b.9 Vinciane de Borrekens -Charlotte de Wasseige 55,83 %
13 NS 2T W-2 200 29.9 99.67
14 NS 3S E = -400 7.5 25.00
15 NS 3T N = 110 7.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 49,89 %
b.7 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 49,49 %
19 NS 3C S+1 170 15 50.00
20 NS 3P E+2 -200 13.9 46.33
21 NS 3S S-2 -200 1.1 3.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
b.6 Jean Chabotier -Michel Paquot 64,68 %
22 NS 2C N-1 -50 17.1 57.00
23 NS 2T N+3 150 17.1 57.00
24 NS 5K S+1 420 18.2 60.67 µ Tbl = 58,22 %
b.5 Danielle Wybauw -Christiane Huby 54,24 %
25 NS 3S E = -600 12 40.00
26 NS 3P N-2 -200 7 23.33
27 NS 2S E = -120 4 13.33 µ Tbl = 25,56 %
Total : 289,6 / 630 = 45,97 %
PAIRE B.9 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger
b.8 Serge Alard -Michel Lievens 55,32 %
1 NS 2S S-2 -100 11.8 39.33
2 NS 3S E+2 -460 4.3 14.33
3 NS 4PcS-1 -100 9.7 32.33 µ Tbl = 28,67 %
b.7 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 49,49 %
4 NS 4P E = -620 21.4 71.33
5 NS 6C N = 1430 24.6 82.00
6 NS 4C E = -620 20.3 67.67 µ Tbl = 73,67 %
b.6 Jean Chabotier -Michel Paquot 64,68 %
7 NS 3S N-1 -100 7.5 25.00
8 NS 1S N+1 120 15 50.00
9 NS 3PcS-3 -500 0.1 0.33 µ Tbl = 25,11 %
b.5 Danielle Wybauw -Christiane Huby 54,24 %
10 NS 5KcS = 750 25.7 85.67
11 NS 5P S = 450 2.2 7.33
12 NS 4C W+2 -480 18.2 60.67 µ Tbl = 51,22 %
b.4 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 53,51 %
13 NS 3C W+2 -200 8.6 28.67
14 NS 3S E-1 50 22.5 75.00
15 NS 2P S = 110 7.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 42,89 %
b.3 Muriel de Ceuninck -Marina De Longree 35,00 %
16 NS 2S E-1 100 22.5 75.00
17 NS 5C N = 450 6.5 21.67
18 NS 5T W-1 50 24.6 82.00 µ Tbl = 59,56 %
b.2 - 0,00 %
19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00
21 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
b.9 Vinciane de Borrekens -Charlotte de Wasseige 55,83 %
25 NS 3S E = -600 12 40.00
26 NS 3C E-1 100 24 80.00
27 NS 2S E+1 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
Total : 289,0 / 630 = 45,87 %
PAIRE B.2 Grazia Neuenschwander -Patrick Gilles
b.2 - 0,00 %
4 NS BYE 0 0.00
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
b.1 Fabienne Smit -Dominique Bourgoignie 52,60 %
7 NS 3S N = 600 19.3 64.33
8 NS 1S N = 90 5.4 18.00
9 NS 4C E-2 200 21.4 71.33 µ Tbl = 51,22 %
b.9 Vinciane de Borrekens -Charlotte de Wasseige 55,83 %
10 NS 5C W = -650 4.3 14.33
11 NS 4P S+2 480 6.5 21.67
12 NS 6P W = -980 5.4 18.00 µ Tbl = 18,00 %
b.8 Serge Alard -Michel Lievens 55,32 %
13 NS 3C W+2 -200 8.6 28.67
14 NS 3S E-1 50 22.5 75.00
15 NS 2P S+1 140 16.1 53.67 µ Tbl = 52,44 %
b.7 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 49,49 %
16 NS 3C W-4 400 27.8 92.67
17 NS 4P S+2 480 15 50.00
18 NS 3S E+1 -430 2.2 7.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
b.6 Jean Chabotier -Michel Paquot 64,68 %
19 NS 4C S = 420 23.5 78.33
20 NS 3P E+2 -200 13.9 46.33
21 NS 2P N-2 -200 1.1 3.67 µ Tbl = 42,78 %
b.5 Danielle Wybauw -Christiane Huby 54,24 %
22 NS 4C N-3 -150 2.2 7.33
23 NS 2T N+3 150 17.1 57.00
24 NS 6P N = 980 29.9 99.67 µ Tbl = 54,67 %
b.4 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 53,51 %
25 NS 3S E+1 -630 4 13.33
26 NS 4CcE-2 500 30 100.00
27 NS 1S E = -90 8 26.67 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
Total : 284,2 / 630 = 45,11 %
PAIRE A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Caroll Pucher
a.1 Chris Oostens -Helene Christiaens 40,90 %
1 NS 3C S-1 -50 18.2 60.67
2 NS 5T W-2 100 22.5 75.00
3 NS 2C E+1 -140 0.1 0.33 µ Tbl = 45,33 %
a.9 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 46,57 %
4 NS 4P E+1 -650 5.4 18.00
5 NS 4C N+2 680 9.7 32.33
6 NS 4C E+1 -650 12.9 43.00 µ Tbl = 31,11 %
a.8 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 43,53 %
7 NS 3S N+2 660 29.9 99.67
8 NS 1S N = 90 5.4 18.00
9 NS 4C E-3 300 28.9 96.33 µ Tbl = 71,33 %
a.7 Noelle Fosse -Elena Valsesia 59,96 %
10 NS 4C W+1 -650 4.3 14.33
11 NS 6P S = 980 22.5 75.00
12 NS 4C W+2 -480 18.2 60.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Simone Munsterhjelm 52,22 %
13 NS 4C W+1 -650 1.1 3.67
14 NS 3S E = -400 7.5 25.00
15 NS 3S S = 600 25.7 85.67 µ Tbl = 38,11 %
a.5 Gerard Cooreman -Myriam de Timary 38,94 %
16 NS 1KxE+3 -1430 0.1 0.33
17 NS 4P S+2 480 15 50.00
18 NS 3S W-2 100 27.8 92.67 µ Tbl = 47,67 %
a.4 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Veronique Englebienne 44,93 %
19 NS 4C S-1 -50 4.3 14.33
20 NS 2P E+3 -200 13.9 46.33
21 NS 2P S+1 140 26.7 89.00 µ Tbl = 49,89 %
a.3 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 57,11 %
22 NS 2C N-1 -50 17.1 57.00
23 NS 2T N+1 110 0.1 0.33
24 NS 5K S-1 -50 0.1 0.33 µ Tbl = 19,22 %
Total : 317,4 / 720 = 44,08 %
PAIRE B.6 Yolande Waerseggers -Therese Dumont de Ch.
b.2 - 0,00 %
1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
b.1 Fabienne Smit -Dominique Bourgoignie 52,60 %
4 NS 4P E = -620 21.4 71.33
5 NS 4S S+1 660 0.1 0.33
6 NS 4C W = -620 20.3 67.67 µ Tbl = 46,44 %
b.9 Vinciane de Borrekens -Charlotte de Wasseige 55,83 %
7 NS 3S N-1 -100 7.5 25.00
8 NS 2C E-1 50 0.1 0.33
9 NS 4C E-3 300 28.9 96.33 µ Tbl = 40,56 %
b.8 Serge Alard -Michel Lievens 55,32 %
10 NS 5KcS = 750 25.7 85.67
11 NS 6P S-2 -100 0.1 0.33
12 NS 6C W = -980 5.4 18.00 µ Tbl = 34,67 %
b.6 Jean Chabotier -Michel Paquot 64,68 %
16 NS 2S E = -120 15 50.00
17 NS 2C N+4 230 2.2 7.33
18 NS 3S W+1 -430 2.2 7.33 µ Tbl = 21,56 %
b.5 Danielle Wybauw -Christiane Huby 54,24 %
19 NS 2K W+1 -110 0.1 0.33
20 NS 2P E+3 -200 13.9 46.33
21 NS 2P N = 110 20.3 67.67 µ Tbl = 38,11 %
b.4 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 53,51 %
22 NS 2S E+2 -180 0.1 0.33
23 NS 2T N+2 130 7.5 25.00
24 NS 4P N+2 480 27.8 92.67 µ Tbl = 39,33 %
b.3 Muriel de Ceuninck -Marina De Longree 35,00 %
25 NS 2P W+1 -140 22 73.33
26 NS 4T S = 130 28 93.33
27 NS 1S S = 90 22 73.33 µ Tbl = 80,00 %
Total : 270,6 / 630 = 42,95 %
PAIRE b.6 Jean Chabotier -Michel Paquot
B.8 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 48,25 %
1 EO 2P E+1 -140 25.7 85.67
2 EO 5K E-4 200 2.2 7.33
3 EO 4PcS-1 -100 20.3 67.67 µ Tbl = 53,56 %
B.4 Annette Fobe -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 46,44 %
4 EO 3S W+1 -630 18.2 60.67
5 EO 5C N+1 680 20.3 67.67
6 EO 4C E+2 -680 26.7 89.00 µ Tbl = 72,44 %
B.9 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 45,87 %
7 EO 3S N-1 -100 22.5 75.00
8 EO 1S N+1 120 15 50.00
9 EO 3PcS-3 -500 29.9 99.67 µ Tbl = 74,89 %
B.1 Marguerite Verstraeten -Christian Martinot 51,18 %
13 EO 4C W+1 -650 28.9 96.33
14 EO 3S E = -400 22.5 75.00
15 EO 4P S-1 -100 27.8 92.67 µ Tbl = 88,00 %
B.6 Yolande Waerseggers -Therese Dumont de Ch. 42,95 %
16 EO 2S E = -120 15 50.00
17 EO 2C N+4 230 27.8 92.67
18 EO 3S W+1 -430 27.8 92.67 µ Tbl = 78,44 %
B.2 Grazia Neuenschwander -Patrick Gilles 45,11 %
19 EO 4C S = 420 6.5 21.67
20 EO 3P E+2 -200 16.1 53.67
21 EO 2P N-2 -200 28.9 96.33 µ Tbl = 57,22 %
B.7 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 45,97 %
22 EO 2C N-1 -50 12.9 43.00
23 EO 2T N+3 150 12.9 43.00
24 EO 5K S+1 420 11.8 39.33 µ Tbl = 41,78 %
B.3 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 47,98 %
25 EO 3S E = -600 18 60.00
26 EO 4T S-1 -100 14 46.67
27 EO 2S E-1 50 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 51,11 %
Total : 465,7 / 720 = 64,68 %
PAIRE a.7 Noelle Fosse -Elena Valsesia
A.4 Anne Van den Berge -Andre Delacroix 46,22 %
1 EO 4C N-3 -150 27.8 92.67
2 EO 3S E+2 -460 25.7 85.67
3 EO 2C E = -110 26.7 89.00 µ Tbl = 89,11 %
A.9 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne 48,97 %
4 EO 4P E+1 -650 24.6 82.00
5 EO 5C N+1 680 20.3 67.67
6 EO 4PcS-3 -500 6.5 21.67 µ Tbl = 57,11 %
A.5 Giuseppe Napoli -Martine Zens 57,17 %
7 EO 4P S = 620 4.3 14.33
8 EO 1S N+2 150 10.7 35.67
9 EO 2C E+1 -140 26.7 89.00 µ Tbl = 46,33 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Caroll Pucher 44,08 %
10 EO 4C W+1 -650 25.7 85.67
11 EO 6P S = 980 7.5 25.00
12 EO 4C W+2 -480 11.8 39.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Nicole Blondeau 56,87 %
16 EO 3K E+1 -130 22.5 75.00
17 EO 4P S+2 480 15 50.00
18 EO 5T W-1 50 5.4 18.00 µ Tbl = 47,67 %
A.7 Hugo Baetens -Philippe van der Gracht 53,47 %
19 EO 2S N+1 150 18.2 60.67
20 EO 2P E+4 -230 29.9 99.67
21 EO 2P S = 110 9.7 32.33 µ Tbl = 64,22 %
A.3 Francoise Turin -Didier Collart 47,96 %
22 EO 2S E-1 100 5.4 18.00
23 EO 2T N+2 130 22.5 75.00
24 EO 4P N = 420 11.8 39.33 µ Tbl = 44,11 %
A.8 Claire Derieuw -Monique Crouan 51,15 %
25 EO 3S E = -600 18 60.00
26 EO 3P N-3 -300 29 96.67
27 EO 2S W = -120 26 86.67 µ Tbl = 81,11 %
Total : 431,7 / 720 = 59,96 %
PAIRE a.3 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys
A.7 Hugo Baetens -Philippe van der Gracht 53,47 %
4 EO 3S W+2 -660 29.9 99.67
5 EO 6C N = 1430 5.4 18.00
6 EO 4C E+2 -680 26.7 89.00 µ Tbl = 68,89 %
A.3 Francoise Turin -Didier Collart 47,96 %
7 EO 4P S-1 -100 22.5 75.00
8 EO 1S N+1 120 15 50.00
9 EO 4C E-1 100 19.3 64.33 µ Tbl = 63,11 %
A.8 Claire Derieuw -Monique Crouan 51,15 %
10 EO 5C W = -650 25.7 85.67
11 EO 6P S = 980 7.5 25.00
12 EO 4C W+2 -480 11.8 39.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.4 Anne Van den Berge -Andre Delacroix 46,22 %
13 EO 2C W+3 -200 21.4 71.33
14 EO 3S E = -400 22.5 75.00
15 EO 2P S+1 140 13.9 46.33 µ Tbl = 64,22 %
A.9 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne 48,97 %
16 EO 3K E+1 -130 22.5 75.00
17 EO 4P S+2 480 15 50.00
18 EO 4T W = -130 10.7 35.67 µ Tbl = 53,56 %
A.5 Giuseppe Napoli -Martine Zens 57,17 %
19 EO 3K W-3 300 12.9 43.00
20 EO 2P E+3 -200 16.1 53.67
21 EO 2P S = 110 9.7 32.33 µ Tbl = 43,00 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Caroll Pucher 44,08 %
22 EO 2C N-1 -50 12.9 43.00
23 EO 2T N+1 110 29.9 99.67
24 EO 5K S-1 -50 29.9 99.67 µ Tbl = 80,78 %
A.6 Benoit del Marmol -Pascale Ortegat 64,81 %
25 EO 3K S-2 -100 2 6.67
26 EO 4T S-1 -100 14 46.67
27 EO 2S E-1 50 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 411,2 / 720 = 57,11 %
PAIRE b.9 Vinciane de Borrekens -Charlotte de Wasseige
B.5 Helene Schyns -Michele Berrier 52,44 %
1 EO 3C N-2 -100 18.2 60.67
2 EO 5T E-1 50 13.9 46.33
3 EO 2P S = 110 3.3 11.00 µ Tbl = 39,33 %
B.1 Marguerite Verstraeten -Christian Martinot 51,18 %
4 EO 4P E = -620 8.6 28.67
5 EO 4C N+2 680 20.3 67.67
6 EO 4C W+1 -650 17.1 57.00 µ Tbl = 51,11 %
B.6 Yolande Waerseggers -Therese Dumont de Ch. 42,95 %
7 EO 3S N-1 -100 22.5 75.00
8 EO 2C E-1 50 29.9 99.67
9 EO 4C E-3 300 1.1 3.67 µ Tbl = 59,44 %
B.2 Grazia Neuenschwander -Patrick Gilles 45,11 %
10 EO 5C W = -650 25.7 85.67
11 EO 4P S+2 480 23.5 78.33
12 EO 6P W = -980 24.6 82.00 µ Tbl = 82,00 %
B.7 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 45,97 %
13 EO 2T W-2 200 0.1 0.33
14 EO 3S E = -400 22.5 75.00
15 EO 3T N = 110 22.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 50,11 %
B.3 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 47,98 %
16 EO 1S W+1 -120 15 50.00
17 EO 6P S = 980 1.1 3.67
18 EO 3S E = -400 20.3 67.67 µ Tbl = 40,44 %
B.4 Annette Fobe -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 46,44 %
22 EO 2C N-2 -100 23.5 78.33
23 EO 2T N+2 130 22.5 75.00
24 EO 5K S+1 420 11.8 39.33 µ Tbl = 64,22 %
B.9 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 45,87 %
25 EO 3S E = -600 18 60.00
26 EO 3C E-1 100 6 20.00
27 EO 2S E+1 -150 30 100.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
Total : 402,0 / 720 = 55,83 %
PAIRE b.8 Serge Alard -Michel Lievens
B.9 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 45,87 %
1 EO 2S S-2 -100 18.2 60.67
2 EO 3S E+2 -460 25.7 85.67
3 EO 4PcS-1 -100 20.3 67.67 µ Tbl = 71,33 %
B.5 Helene Schyns -Michele Berrier 52,44 %
4 EO 4P E+1 -650 24.6 82.00
5 EO 5C N+1 680 20.3 67.67
6 EO 4C W+1 -650 17.1 57.00 µ Tbl = 68,89 %
B.1 Marguerite Verstraeten -Christian Martinot 51,18 %
7 EO 3S N = 600 10.7 35.67
8 EO 1S N+3 180 5.4 18.00
9 EO 4C E-2 200 8.6 28.67 µ Tbl = 27,44 %
B.6 Yolande Waerseggers -Therese Dumont de Ch. 42,95 %
10 EO 5KcS = 750 4.3 14.33
11 EO 6P S-2 -100 29.9 99.67
12 EO 6C W = -980 24.6 82.00 µ Tbl = 65,33 %
B.2 Grazia Neuenschwander -Patrick Gilles 45,11 %
13 EO 3C W+2 -200 21.4 71.33
14 EO 3S E-1 50 7.5 25.00
15 EO 2P S+1 140 13.9 46.33 µ Tbl = 47,56 %
B.3 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 47,98 %
19 EO 4C S-1 -50 25.7 85.67
20 EO 2P E+2 -170 1.1 3.67
21 EO 1S S = 90 17.1 57.00 µ Tbl = 48,78 %
B.8 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 48,25 %
22 EO 2S S-2 -100 23.5 78.33
23 EO 2P N+2 170 8.6 28.67
24 EO 5K S+1 420 11.8 39.33 µ Tbl = 48,78 %
B.4 Annette Fobe -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 46,44 %
25 EO 3S E+1 -630 26 86.67
26 EO 3K W-1 100 6 20.00
27 EO 2S E = -120 26 86.67 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
Total : 398,3 / 720 = 55,32 %
PAIRE b.5 Danielle Wybauw -Christiane Huby
B.3 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 47,98 %
1 EO 2P W = -110 22.5 75.00
2 EO 6K W-2 100 7.5 25.00
3 EO 4P S-1 -50 10.7 35.67 µ Tbl = 45,22 %
B.8 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 48,25 %
4 EO 4P E = -620 8.6 28.67
5 EO 5C N+1 680 20.3 67.67
6 EO 4C E+1 -650 17.1 57.00 µ Tbl = 51,11 %
B.9 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 45,87 %
10 EO 5KcS = 750 4.3 14.33
11 EO 5P S = 450 27.8 92.67
12 EO 4C W+2 -480 11.8 39.33 µ Tbl = 48,78 %
B.5 Helene Schyns -Michele Berrier 52,44 %
13 EO 4C E-1 100 3.3 11.00
14 EO 3S E-1 50 7.5 25.00
15 EO 3S N-1 -100 27.8 92.67 µ Tbl = 42,89 %
B.1 Marguerite Verstraeten -Christian Martinot 51,18 %
16 EO 3K E+1 -130 22.5 75.00
17 EO 4P S+2 480 15 50.00
18 EO 3S W = -400 20.3 67.67 µ Tbl = 64,22 %
B.6 Yolande Waerseggers -Therese Dumont de Ch. 42,95 %
19 EO 2K W+1 -110 29.9 99.67
20 EO 2P E+3 -200 16.1 53.67
21 EO 2P N = 110 9.7 32.33 µ Tbl = 61,89 %
B.2 Grazia Neuenschwander -Patrick Gilles 45,11 %
22 EO 4C N-3 -150 27.8 92.67
23 EO 2T N+3 150 12.9 43.00
24 EO 6P N = 980 0.1 0.33 µ Tbl = 45,33 %
B.7 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 45,97 %
25 EO 3S E = -600 18 60.00
26 EO 3P N-2 -200 23 76.67
27 EO 2S E = -120 26 86.67 µ Tbl = 74,44 %
Total : 390,5 / 720 = 54,24 %
PAIRE b.4 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve
B.7 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 45,97 %
1 EO 2P N-4 -200 29.9 99.67
2 EO 3S E+1 -430 21.4 71.33
3 EO 4PcS-1 -100 20.3 67.67 µ Tbl = 79,56 %
B.8 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 48,25 %
7 EO 4P S-1 -100 22.5 75.00
8 EO 1S S+1 120 15 50.00
9 EO 3C E = -140 26.7 89.00 µ Tbl = 71,33 %
B.4 Annette Fobe -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 46,44 %
10 EO 5KcS = 750 4.3 14.33
11 EO 5P S+1 480 23.5 78.33
12 EO 4C W+2 -480 11.8 39.33 µ Tbl = 44,00 %
B.9 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 45,87 %
13 EO 3C W+2 -200 21.4 71.33
14 EO 3S E-1 50 7.5 25.00
15 EO 2P S = 110 22.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 57,11 %
B.5 Helene Schyns -Michele Berrier 52,44 %
16 EO 3K E-1 100 7.5 25.00
17 EO 4P S+3 510 5.4 18.00
18 EO 3S W = -400 20.3 67.67 µ Tbl = 36,89 %
B.1 Marguerite Verstraeten -Christian Martinot 51,18 %
19 EO 4C S = 420 6.5 21.67
20 EO 2P E+3 -200 16.1 53.67
21 EO 3KcE-2 300 0.1 0.33 µ Tbl = 25,22 %
B.6 Yolande Waerseggers -Therese Dumont de Ch. 42,95 %
22 EO 2S E+2 -180 29.9 99.67
23 EO 2T N+2 130 22.5 75.00
24 EO 4P N+2 480 2.2 7.33 µ Tbl = 60,67 %
B.2 Grazia Neuenschwander -Patrick Gilles 45,11 %
25 EO 3S E+1 -630 26 86.67
26 EO 4CcE-2 500 0 0.00
27 EO 1S E = -90 22 73.33 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
Total : 385,3 / 720 = 53,51 %
PAIRE b.1 Fabienne Smit -Dominique Bourgoignie
B.1 Marguerite Verstraeten -Christian Martinot 51,18 %
1 EO 2P W = -110 22.5 75.00
2 EO 1S E+3 -180 17.1 57.00
3 EO 4P S-1 -50 10.7 35.67 µ Tbl = 55,89 %
B.6 Yolande Waerseggers -Therese Dumont de Ch. 42,95 %
4 EO 4P E = -620 8.6 28.67
5 EO 4S S+1 660 29.9 99.67
6 EO 4C W = -620 9.7 32.33 µ Tbl = 53,56 %
B.2 Grazia Neuenschwander -Patrick Gilles 45,11 %
7 EO 3S N = 600 10.7 35.67
8 EO 1S N = 90 24.6 82.00
9 EO 4C E-2 200 8.6 28.67 µ Tbl = 48,78 %
B.7 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 45,97 %
10 EO 6K S-1 -100 19.3 64.33
11 EO 6P S = 980 7.5 25.00
12 EO 6C W = -980 24.6 82.00 µ Tbl = 57,11 %
B.3 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 47,98 %
13 EO 3C W+2 -200 21.4 71.33
14 EO 3S E-2 100 0.1 0.33
15 EO 2P S+1 140 13.9 46.33 µ Tbl = 39,33 %
B.8 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 48,25 %
16 EO 1S E+5 -240 27.8 92.67
17 EO 6P S = 980 1.1 3.67
18 EO 4T W = -130 10.7 35.67 µ Tbl = 44,00 %
B.4 Annette Fobe -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 46,44 %
19 EO 4C S-1 -50 25.7 85.67
20 EO 2P E+3 -200 16.1 53.67
21 EO 1S S = 90 17.1 57.00 µ Tbl = 65,44 %
B.5 Helene Schyns -Michele Berrier 52,44 %
25 EO 1P W+2 -140 8 26.67
26 EO 2P N-2 -200 23 76.67
27 EO 2P N-1 -50 20 66.67 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
Total : 378,7 / 720 = 52,60 %
PAIRE a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Simone Munsterhjelm
A.8 Claire Derieuw -Monique Crouan 51,15 %
1 EO 2P W-2 100 2.2 7.33
2 EO 3S E+2 -460 25.7 85.67
3 EO 2S N-1 -50 10.7 35.67 µ Tbl = 42,89 %
A.4 Anne Van den Berge -Andre Delacroix 46,22 %
4 EO 4P E+1 -650 24.6 82.00
5 EO 5C N+1 680 20.3 67.67
6 EO 4C E+2 -680 26.7 89.00 µ Tbl = 79,56 %
A.9 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne 48,97 %
7 EO 3S N-1 -100 22.5 75.00
8 EO 2C E-2 100 19.3 64.33
9 EO 3C E-1 100 19.3 64.33 µ Tbl = 67,89 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Caroll Pucher 44,08 %
13 EO 4C W+1 -650 28.9 96.33
14 EO 3S E = -400 22.5 75.00
15 EO 3S S = 600 4.3 14.33 µ Tbl = 61,89 %
A.6 Benoit del Marmol -Pascale Ortegat 64,81 %
16 EO 2S E-1 100 7.5 25.00
17 EO 4P S+3 510 5.4 18.00
18 EO 3C S = 140 0.1 0.33 µ Tbl = 14,44 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Nicole Blondeau 56,87 %
19 EO 4C S = 420 6.5 21.67
20 EO 2P E+3 -200 16.1 53.67
21 EO 2C N-1 -100 23.5 78.33 µ Tbl = 51,22 %
A.7 Hugo Baetens -Philippe van der Gracht 53,47 %
22 EO 2C N-1 -50 12.9 43.00
23 EO 3T N+1 130 22.5 75.00
24 EO 5K S = 400 22.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 64,33 %
A.3 Francoise Turin -Didier Collart 47,96 %
25 EO 1S E+2 -150 12 40.00
26 EO 4C E-1 100 6 20.00
27 EO 2S E-1 50 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
Total : 376,0 / 720 = 52,22 %
PAIRE b.7 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger
B.4 Annette Fobe -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 46,44 %
1 EO 3C N-1 -50 11.8 39.33
2 EO 3S E-2 100 7.5 25.00
3 EO 4P S-1 -50 10.7 35.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
B.9 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 45,87 %
4 EO 4P E = -620 8.6 28.67
5 EO 6C N = 1430 5.4 18.00
6 EO 4C E = -620 9.7 32.33 µ Tbl = 26,33 %
B.5 Helene Schyns -Michele Berrier 52,44 %
7 EO 5K N-4 -400 29.9 99.67
8 EO 1S S+4 210 0.1 0.33
9 EO 4C E-2 200 8.6 28.67 µ Tbl = 42,89 %
B.1 Marguerite Verstraeten -Christian Martinot 51,18 %
10 EO 5KcS = 750 4.3 14.33
11 EO 3S S+3 490 18.2 60.67
12 EO 6C W = -980 24.6 82.00 µ Tbl = 52,33 %
B.2 Grazia Neuenschwander -Patrick Gilles 45,11 %
16 EO 3C W-4 400 2.2 7.33
17 EO 4P S+2 480 15 50.00
18 EO 3S E+1 -430 27.8 92.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
B.7 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 45,97 %
19 EO 3C S+1 170 15 50.00
20 EO 3P E+2 -200 16.1 53.67
21 EO 3S S-2 -200 28.9 96.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
B.3 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 47,98 %
22 EO 2C N-2 -100 23.5 78.33
23 EO 2T N+3 150 12.9 43.00
24 EO 5K S = 400 22.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 65,44 %
B.8 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 48,25 %
25 EO 3S E+1 -630 26 86.67
26 EO 5T S-2 -200 23 76.67
27 EO 3T W-2 100 4 13.33 µ Tbl = 58,89 %
Total : 356,3 / 720 = 49,49 %
PAIRE a.9 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels
A.5 Giuseppe Napoli -Martine Zens 57,17 %
1 EO 2P W-1 50 5.4 18.00
2 EO 6T W-2 100 7.5 25.00
3 EO 4PcS-1 -100 20.3 67.67 µ Tbl = 36,89 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Caroll Pucher 44,08 %
4 EO 4P E+1 -650 24.6 82.00
5 EO 4C N+2 680 20.3 67.67
6 EO 4C E+1 -650 17.1 57.00 µ Tbl = 68,89 %
A.6 Benoit del Marmol -Pascale Ortegat 64,81 %
7 EO 3S N+1 630 2.2 7.33
8 EO 2S N+2 180 5.4 18.00
9 EO 3C E-1 100 19.3 64.33 µ Tbl = 29,89 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Nicole Blondeau 56,87 %
10 EO 4K S+1 150 16.1 53.67
11 EO 6P S = 980 7.5 25.00
12 EO 4C W+2 -480 11.8 39.33 µ Tbl = 39,33 %
A.7 Hugo Baetens -Philippe van der Gracht 53,47 %
13 EO 2C W+3 -200 21.4 71.33
14 EO 3S E-1 50 7.5 25.00
15 EO 3S N+4 720 0.1 0.33 µ Tbl = 32,22 %
A.3 Francoise Turin -Didier Collart 47,96 %
16 EO 3K E+1 -130 22.5 75.00
17 EO 6C S-1 -50 29.9 99.67
18 EO 3S E = -400 20.3 67.67 µ Tbl = 80,78 %
A.4 Anne Van den Berge -Andre Delacroix 46,22 %
22 EO 3K E-2 200 0.1 0.33
23 EO 3S S = 600 4.3 14.33
24 EO 4K S+2 170 25.7 85.67 µ Tbl = 33,44 %
A.9 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne 48,97 %
25 EO 3S E = -600 18 60.00
26 EO 3P N-1 -100 14 46.67
27 EO 2S E-1 50 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 51,11 %
Total : 335,3 / 720 = 46,57 %
PAIRE a.2 Dominique Sassen -Jacques Podevyn
A.6 Benoit del Marmol -Pascale Ortegat 64,81 %
1 EO 1ScS = 180 0.1 0.33
2 EO 3S E = -400 19.3 64.33
3 EO 4P S-1 -50 10.7 35.67 µ Tbl = 33,44 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Nicole Blondeau 56,87 %
4 EO 4P E = -620 8.6 28.67
5 EO 6C N = 1430 5.4 18.00
6 EO 4C W+1 -650 17.1 57.00 µ Tbl = 34,56 %
A.7 Hugo Baetens -Philippe van der Gracht 53,47 %
7 EO 3S N = 600 10.7 35.67
8 EO 1S N+3 180 5.4 18.00
9 EO 4C E-2 200 8.6 28.67 µ Tbl = 27,44 %
A.3 Francoise Turin -Didier Collart 47,96 %
10 EO 4K S+1 150 16.1 53.67
11 EO 6P S = 980 7.5 25.00
12 EO 6C W = -980 24.6 82.00 µ Tbl = 53,56 %
A.8 Claire Derieuw -Monique Crouan 51,15 %
13 EO 3C W+1 -170 12.9 43.00
14 EO 3S E = -400 22.5 75.00
15 EO 4P S-1 -100 27.8 92.67 µ Tbl = 70,22 %
A.4 Anne Van den Berge -Andre Delacroix 46,22 %
16 EO 2PcN = 470 0.1 0.33
17 EO 4P S+2 480 15 50.00
18 EO 4T W+1 -150 15 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,44 %
A.9 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne 48,97 %
19 EO 3S N = 400 10.7 35.67
20 EO 2P E+3 -200 16.1 53.67
21 EO 2P S-1 -100 23.5 78.33 µ Tbl = 55,89 %
A.5 Giuseppe Napoli -Martine Zens 57,17 %
22 EO 2C N-1 -50 12.9 43.00
23 EO 2T N+2 130 22.5 75.00
24 EO 5K S+1 420 11.8 39.33 µ Tbl = 52,44 %
Total : 324,9 / 720 = 45,13 %
PAIRE a.4 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Veronique Englebienne
A.7 Hugo Baetens -Philippe van der Gracht 53,47 %
1 EO 2P N-1 -50 11.8 39.33
2 EO 5KcW-5 1100 0.1 0.33
3 EO 2P S+1 140 0.1 0.33 µ Tbl = 13,33 %
A.8 Claire Derieuw -Monique Crouan 51,15 %
7 EO 3S N = 600 10.7 35.67
8 EO 2S S+2 180 5.4 18.00
9 EO 4C E-2 200 8.6 28.67 µ Tbl = 27,44 %
A.4 Anne Van den Berge -Andre Delacroix 46,22 %
10 EO 5KcS = 750 4.3 14.33
11 EO 3S N+3 490 18.2 60.67
12 EO 6C W = -980 24.6 82.00 µ Tbl = 52,33 %
A.9 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne 48,97 %
13 EO 4C W-1 100 3.3 11.00
14 EO 3S E = -400 22.5 75.00
15 EO 3S N+3 690 2.2 7.33 µ Tbl = 31,11 %
A.5 Giuseppe Napoli -Martine Zens 57,17 %
16 EO 2S E-1 100 7.5 25.00
17 EO 5KcW-2 300 25.7 85.67
18 EO 3S W+1 -430 27.8 92.67 µ Tbl = 67,78 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Caroll Pucher 44,08 %
19 EO 4C S-1 -50 25.7 85.67
20 EO 2P E+3 -200 16.1 53.67
21 EO 2P S+1 140 3.3 11.00 µ Tbl = 50,11 %
A.6 Benoit del Marmol -Pascale Ortegat 64,81 %
22 EO 1S E = -90 19.3 64.33
23 EO 2T N+2 130 22.5 75.00
24 EO 3K S+1 130 27.8 92.67 µ Tbl = 77,33 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Nicole Blondeau 56,87 %
25 EO 2P W+1 -140 8 26.67
26 EO 3P N-1 -100 14 46.67
27 EO 2S E-1 50 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
Total : 323,5 / 720 = 44,93 %
PAIRE a.8 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot
A.9 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne 48,97 %
1 EO 1S S-1 -50 11.8 39.33
2 EO 5T W-1 50 13.9 46.33
3 EO 2C E = -110 26.7 89.00 µ Tbl = 58,22 %
A.5 Giuseppe Napoli -Martine Zens 57,17 %
4 EO 3S W+1 -630 18.2 60.67
5 EO 5C N+1 680 20.3 67.67
6 EO 4T W+1 -150 2.2 7.33 µ Tbl = 45,22 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Caroll Pucher 44,08 %
7 EO 3S N+2 660 0.1 0.33
8 EO 1S N = 90 24.6 82.00
9 EO 4C E-3 300 1.1 3.67 µ Tbl = 28,67 %
A.6 Benoit del Marmol -Pascale Ortegat 64,81 %
10 EO 5CcW = -850 29.9 99.67
11 EO 6P S = 980 7.5 25.00
12 EO 4C W+1 -450 2.2 7.33 µ Tbl = 44,00 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Nicole Blondeau 56,87 %
13 EO 2C W+1 -140 7.5 25.00
14 EO 3S E = -400 22.5 75.00
15 EO 3T N+1 130 19.3 64.33 µ Tbl = 54,78 %
A.3 Francoise Turin -Didier Collart 47,96 %
19 EO 2S N+1 150 18.2 60.67
20 EO 3P E+1 -170 1.1 3.67
21 EO 1S S-1 -100 23.5 78.33 µ Tbl = 47,56 %
A.8 Claire Derieuw -Monique Crouan 51,15 %
22 EO 2C N-1 -50 12.9 43.00
23 EO 3S S+1 630 1.1 3.67
24 EO 5K S+1 420 11.8 39.33 µ Tbl = 28,67 %
A.4 Anne Van den Berge -Andre Delacroix 46,22 %
25 EO 2T E+2 -130 4 13.33
26 EO 2P N-3 -300 29 96.67
27 EO 3S E-2 100 4 13.33 µ Tbl = 41,11 %
Total : 313,4 / 720 = 43,53 %
PAIRE a.1 Chris Oostens -Helene Christiaens
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Caroll Pucher 44,08 %
1 EO 3C S-1 -50 11.8 39.33
2 EO 5T W-2 100 7.5 25.00
3 EO 2C E+1 -140 29.9 99.67 µ Tbl = 54,67 %
A.6 Benoit del Marmol -Pascale Ortegat 64,81 %
4 EO 4P E = -620 8.6 28.67
5 EO 6C N = 1430 5.4 18.00
6 EO 4T W+1 -150 2.2 7.33 µ Tbl = 18,00 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Nicole Blondeau 56,87 %
7 EO 3S N = 600 10.7 35.67
8 EO 1S N = 90 24.6 82.00
9 EO 3C E-1 100 19.3 64.33 µ Tbl = 60,67 %
A.7 Hugo Baetens -Philippe van der Gracht 53,47 %
10 EO 4C W-2 200 12.9 43.00
11 EO 5P S+1 480 23.5 78.33
12 EO 4C W+1 -450 2.2 7.33 µ Tbl = 42,89 %
A.3 Francoise Turin -Didier Collart 47,96 %
13 EO 2C W+1 -140 7.5 25.00
14 EO 3S E = -400 22.5 75.00
15 EO 2P S+1 140 13.9 46.33 µ Tbl = 48,78 %
A.8 Claire Derieuw -Monique Crouan 51,15 %
16 EO 2S E = -120 15 50.00
17 EO 4C N+2 480 15 50.00
18 EO 4T W = -130 10.7 35.67 µ Tbl = 45,22 %
A.4 Anne Van den Berge -Andre Delacroix 46,22 %
19 EO 3KcW-2 500 0.1 0.33
20 EO 2P E+3 -200 16.1 53.67
21 EO 1S S = 90 17.1 57.00 µ Tbl = 37,00 %
A.5 Giuseppe Napoli -Martine Zens 57,17 %
25 EO 4P W-1 100 0 0.00
26 EO 3P N-1 -100 14 46.67
27 EO 2S E-2 100 4 13.33 µ Tbl = 20,00 %
Total : 294,5 / 720 = 40,90 %
PAIRE a.5 Gerard Cooreman -Myriam de Timary
A.3 Francoise Turin -Didier Collart 47,96 %
1 EO 2P W-1 50 5.4 18.00
2 EO 4CcN-3 -800 29.9 99.67
3 EO 1P S+1 110 3.3 11.00 µ Tbl = 42,89 %
A.8 Claire Derieuw -Monique Crouan 51,15 %
4 EO 4P E = -620 8.6 28.67
5 EO 6C N = 1430 5.4 18.00
6 EO 4C W+2 -680 26.7 89.00 µ Tbl = 45,22 %
A.9 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne 48,97 %
10 EO 5K S = 600 10.7 35.67
11 EO 6P S = 980 7.5 25.00
12 EO 4C W+2 -480 11.8 39.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.5 Giuseppe Napoli -Martine Zens 57,17 %
13 EO 2C W+2 -170 12.9 43.00
14 EO 3S E-1 50 7.5 25.00
15 EO 2P S+3 200 7.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 31,00 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Caroll Pucher 44,08 %
16 EO 1KxE+3 -1430 29.9 99.67
17 EO 4P S+2 480 15 50.00
18 EO 3S W-2 100 2.2 7.33 µ Tbl = 52,33 %
A.6 Benoit del Marmol -Pascale Ortegat 64,81 %
19 EO 4C S+1 450 2.2 7.33
20 EO 2P E+3 -200 16.1 53.67
21 EO 2P S = 110 9.7 32.33 µ Tbl = 31,11 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Nicole Blondeau 56,87 %
22 EO 2C N = 110 2.2 7.33
23 EO 3S S+1 630 1.1 3.67
24 EO 5K S+1 420 11.8 39.33 µ Tbl = 16,78 %
A.7 Hugo Baetens -Philippe van der Gracht 53,47 %
25 EO 4KcS-4 -800 30 100.00
26 EO 3P N-2 -200 23 76.67
27 EO 3T W-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 58,89 %
Total : 280,4 / 720 = 38,94 %
PAIRE b.3 Muriel de Ceuninck -Marina De Longree
B.7 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 45,97 %
4 EO 2P E+2 -170 0.1 0.33
5 EO 6C N = 1430 5.4 18.00
6 EO 4T W+1 -150 2.2 7.33 µ Tbl = 8,56 %
B.3 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 47,98 %
7 EO 3S N-1 -100 22.5 75.00
8 EO 1S N = 90 24.6 82.00
9 EO 4C E-1 100 19.3 64.33 µ Tbl = 73,78 %
B.8 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 48,25 %
10 EO 4P W = -620 21.4 71.33
11 EO 6P S = 980 7.5 25.00
12 EO 4C W+1 -450 2.2 7.33 µ Tbl = 34,56 %
B.4 Annette Fobe -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 46,44 %
13 EO 3C W+1 -170 12.9 43.00
14 EO 3S E-1 50 7.5 25.00
15 EO 2P S+3 200 7.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 31,00 %
B.9 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 45,87 %
16 EO 2S E-1 100 7.5 25.00
17 EO 5C N = 450 23.5 78.33
18 EO 5T W-1 50 5.4 18.00 µ Tbl = 40,44 %
B.5 Helene Schyns -Michele Berrier 52,44 %
19 EO 2S W-1 100 21.4 71.33
20 EO 2P E+3 -200 16.1 53.67
21 EO 2P S+1 140 3.3 11.00 µ Tbl = 45,33 %
B.1 Marguerite Verstraeten -Christian Martinot 51,18 %
22 EO 2P W-1 100 5.4 18.00
23 EO 2P N+3 200 6.5 21.67
24 EO 5K S+1 420 11.8 39.33 µ Tbl = 26,33 %
B.6 Yolande Waerseggers -Therese Dumont de Ch. 42,95 %
25 EO 2P W+1 -140 8 26.67
26 EO 4T S = 130 2 6.67
27 EO 1S S = 90 8 26.67 µ Tbl = 20,00 %
Total : 252,0 / 720 = 35,00 %
PAIRE b.2 -
B.6 Yolande Waerseggers -Therese Dumont de Ch. 42,95 %
1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
B.2 Grazia Neuenschwander -Patrick Gilles 45,11 %
4 EO BYE 0 0.00
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
B.7 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 45,97 %
7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
B.3 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 47,98 %
10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
B.8 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 48,25 %
13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00
15 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
B.4 Annette Fobe -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 46,44 %
16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
B.9 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 45,87 %
19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00
21 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
B.5 Helene Schyns -Michele Berrier 52,44 %
22 EO BYE 0 0.00
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 810 = 0,00 %
|