B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 63,33 A.4 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Annette Fobe
--- 2 62,72 A.7 Bruno Chevalier -Michel Paquot
--- 3 56,11 A.5 Martine Zens -Giuseppe Napoli
--- 4 56,04 B.5 Michele Berrier -Helene Schyns
--- 5 53,47 A.8 Pascale Ortegat -Benoit del Marmol
--- 6 53,32 A.9 Catherine de Moffarts -Simone Munsterhjelm
--- 7 52,92 B.1 Patrick Gilles -Grazia Neuenschwander
--- 8 52,78 B.3 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire
--- 9 52,64 B.8 Stan Tabor -Philippe van der Gracht
--- 10 51,81 A.3 Claire Derieuw -Claire de Quirini
--- 11 51,33 A.6 Peter Masterson -Andre Delacroix
--- 12 46,25 B.7 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger
--- 13 46,01 B.6 Therese Dumont de Ch. -Yolande Waerseggers
--- 14 41,40 A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Nicole Blondeau
--- 15 40,18 A.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Sophie Tilemans
--- 16 37,89 B.4 Marie Christine Meeus -Laurence del Marmol
--- 17 32,22 B.2 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 64,79 b.8 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne
--- 2 60,56 b.7 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys
--- 3 58,94 a.2 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels
--- 4 56,81 b.3 Julia Carakehian -Gaetan Collinet
--- 5 56,10 a.1 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere
--- 6 55,42 b.1 Nicolas de Neve -Olivier Paternostre
--- 7 53,33 a.5 Elena Valsesia -Noelle Fosse
--- 8 52,60 b.2 Gerard Cooreman -Myriam de Timary
--- 9 49,89 b.5 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain
--- 10 49,54 a.8 Fabienne Smit -Francoise Duren
--- 11 48,75 a.7 Hugo Baetens -Gaetan van de Werve
--- 12 43,89 a.4 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Teresa Dekoster
--- 13 43,06 b.6 Didier Collart -Jacques Podevyn
--- 14 40,19 a.9 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens
--- 15 40,14 b.4 Anne Francoise Decoster -Sandra Dallemagne
--- 16 38,63 a.6 Dominique Bourgoignie -Marianne Borsu
--- 17 37,78 a.3 Marina De Longree -Muriel de Ceuninck
PAIRE A.4 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Annette Fobe
a.7 Hugo Baetens -Gaetan van de Werve 48,75 %
1 NS 3P N = 140 17 56.67
2 NS 3S E+1 -430 3 10.00
3 NS 4P S = 420 29 96.67 µ Tbl = 54,44 %
a.6 Dominique Bourgoignie -Marianne Borsu 38,63 %
4 NS 1S E-1 100 28 93.33
5 NS 3S S+1 630 28 93.33
6 NS 3C E-2 200 26 86.67 µ Tbl = 91,11 %
a.4 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Teresa Dekoster 43,89 %
10 NS 1S E-2 200 22 73.33
11 NS 3S S = 400 15 50.00
12 NS 4P W = -420 22 73.33 µ Tbl = 65,56 %
a.3 Marina De Longree -Muriel de Ceuninck 37,78 %
13 NS 2S E-3 300 30 100.00
14 NS 3S S+3 490 30 100.00
15 NS 4P W-1 50 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 82,22 %
a.2 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 58,94 %
16 NS 3S S+3 490 21 70.00
17 NS 3S W+1 -430 8 26.67
18 NS 3S S+1 630 19 63.33 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
a.1 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 56,10 %
19 NS 2C E+1 -140 8 26.67
20 NS 4P N+2 680 15 50.00
21 NS 2C N-1 -100 20 66.67 µ Tbl = 47,78 %
a.9 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 40,19 %
22 NS 3C S+1 170 14 46.67
23 NS 4C W+1 -650 17 56.67
24 NS 3S N+1 430 21 70.00 µ Tbl = 57,78 %
a.8 Fabienne Smit -Francoise Duren 49,54 %
25 NS 4C E+1 -650 5 16.67
26 NS 3C S+1 170 15 50.00
27 NS 6P W-3 150 29 96.67 µ Tbl = 54,44 %
Total : 456,0 / 720 = 63,33 %
PAIRE A.7 Bruno Chevalier -Michel Paquot
a.4 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Teresa Dekoster 43,89 %
1 NS 2P N+2 170 28 93.33
2 NS 3S E = -400 18 60.00
3 NS 2P S+2 170 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
a.3 Marina De Longree -Muriel de Ceuninck 37,78 %
4 NS 4K E-1 100 28 93.33
5 NS 3S S+1 630 28 93.33
6 NS 3T N+2 150 21 70.00 µ Tbl = 85,56 %
a.2 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 58,94 %
7 NS 2K E-1 100 24.6 82.00
8 NS 5K W+1 -420 12 40.00
9 NS 3S S = 400 9 30.00 µ Tbl = 50,67 %
a.1 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 56,10 %
10 NS 2T E-1 100 12 40.00
11 NS 2S S+1 150 9 30.00
12 NS 4P W = -420 22 73.33 µ Tbl = 47,78 %
a.9 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 40,19 %
13 NS 2C W-1 100 18 60.00
14 NS 3S S = 400 8 26.67
15 NS 4P W-1 50 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a.7 Hugo Baetens -Gaetan van de Werve 48,75 %
19 NS 1S S-1 -50 25 83.33
20 NS 6P N = 1430 26 86.67
21 NS 1S E = -90 25 83.33 µ Tbl = 84,44 %
a.6 Dominique Bourgoignie -Marianne Borsu 38,63 %
22 NS 2C S+1 140 4 13.33
23 NS 4C W+1 -650 17 56.67
24 NS 3S N+2 460 29 96.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.5 Elena Valsesia -Noelle Fosse 53,33 %
25 NS 3C E+2 -200 23 76.67
26 NS 2P W+1 -140 9 30.00
27 NS 7CcE-1 100 25 83.33 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
Total : 451,6 / 720 = 62,72 %
PAIRE A.5 Martine Zens -Giuseppe Napoli
a.9 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 40,19 %
1 NS 3P N = 140 17 56.67
2 NS 3S E = -400 18 60.00
3 NS 4P S = 420 29 96.67 µ Tbl = 71,11 %
a.8 Fabienne Smit -Francoise Duren 49,54 %
4 NS 4C S-1 -100 21 70.00
5 NS 5CcW-1 100 18 60.00
6 NS 4C E-2 200 26 86.67 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
a.7 Hugo Baetens -Gaetan van de Werve 48,75 %
7 NS 2P S-1 -100 15 50.00
8 NS 3S W+1 -430 5 16.67
9 NS 3S S = 400 9 30.00 µ Tbl = 32,22 %
a.5 Elena Valsesia -Noelle Fosse 53,33 %
13 NS 1K N+2 110 24 80.00
14 NS 3S S = 400 8 26.67
15 NS 4P W-1 50 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 51,11 %
a.4 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Teresa Dekoster 43,89 %
16 NS 3S S+3 490 21 70.00
17 NS 3S E-1 50 23 76.67
18 NS 3S N = 600 6 20.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.3 Marina De Longree -Muriel de Ceuninck 37,78 %
19 NS 3K W-3 300 30 100.00
20 NS 4P N+3 710 22 73.33
21 NS 1S E-1 50 28 93.33 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
a.2 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 58,94 %
22 NS 4C S = 420 25 83.33
23 NS 4C W-1 100 30 100.00
24 NS 3S N-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a.1 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 56,10 %
25 NS 5C E = -650 5 16.67
26 NS 3PcW = -730 3 10.00
27 NS 6C W = -980 7 23.33 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
Total : 404,0 / 720 = 56,11 %
PAIRE B.5 Michele Berrier -Helene Schyns
b.2 Gerard Cooreman -Myriam de Timary 52,60 %
1 NS 4P N-1 -50 3 10.00
2 NS 3S E = -400 18 60.00
3 NS 2P S+2 170 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 42,22 %
b.1 Nicolas de Neve -Olivier Paternostre 55,42 %
4 NS 4T W+2 -170 6 20.00
5 NS 5K S-1 -100 9 30.00
6 NS 5K E = -600 5 16.67 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
b.8 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne 64,79 %
7 NS 2K E+1 -110 6.5 21.67
8 NS 3S W = -400 23 76.67
9 NS 3S N = 400 9 30.00 µ Tbl = 42,78 %
b.7 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 60,56 %
10 NS 1S E-4 400 29 96.67
11 NS 3S N+1 430 23 76.67
12 NS 4C W+2 -480 3 10.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
b.6 Didier Collart -Jacques Podevyn 43,06 %
13 NS 2K N+1 110 24 80.00
14 NS 4P S+1 450 23 76.67
15 NS 3P W-1 50 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 67,78 %
b.5 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 49,89 %
16 NS 3S N+2 460 8 26.67
17 NS 3S W = -400 15 50.00
18 NS 3S S+2 660 29 96.67 µ Tbl = 57,78 %
b.4 Anne Francoise Decoster -Sandra Dallemagne 40,14 %
19 NS 1S S-1 -50 25 83.33
20 NS 6P N = 1430 26 86.67
21 NS 1S E = -90 25 83.33 µ Tbl = 84,44 %
b.3 Julia Carakehian -Gaetan Collinet 56,81 %
22 NS 4C S = 420 25 83.33
23 NS 4C W+1 -650 17 56.67
24 NS 3S N+1 430 21 70.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
Total : 403,5 / 720 = 56,04 %
PAIRE A.8 Pascale Ortegat -Benoit del Marmol
a.6 Dominique Bourgoignie -Marianne Borsu 38,63 %
1 NS 3P N-1 -50 3 10.00
2 NS 3S E = -400 18 60.00
3 NS 2P S+2 170 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 42,22 %
a.5 Elena Valsesia -Noelle Fosse 53,33 %
4 NS 4K E+2 -170 6 20.00
5 NS 5CcW-1 100 18 60.00
6 NS 5K W-1 100 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 45,56 %
a.4 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Teresa Dekoster 43,89 %
7 NS 60%60% Ajust 18 60.00
8 NS 5K W = -400 23 76.67
9 NS 3S S+2 460 29 96.67 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
a.3 Marina De Longree -Muriel de Ceuninck 37,78 %
10 NS 2C W-1 100 12 40.00
11 NS 4P N+1 450 28 93.33
12 NS 4P W = -420 22 73.33 µ Tbl = 68,89 %
a.2 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 58,94 %
13 NS 2K N-1 -100 4 13.33
14 NS 3S S = 400 8 26.67
15 NS 3P W-1 50 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 28,89 %
a.1 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 56,10 %
16 NS 3S N+3 490 21 70.00
17 NS 3S W = -400 15 50.00
18 NS 3S N+1 630 19 63.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a.8 Fabienne Smit -Francoise Duren 49,54 %
22 NS 2S S = 120 0 0.00
23 NS 4C W+1 -650 17 56.67
24 NS 3S N+2 460 29 96.67 µ Tbl = 51,11 %
a.7 Hugo Baetens -Gaetan van de Werve 48,75 %
25 NS 4C E+1 -650 5 16.67
26 NS 3PcW-1 200 21 70.00
27 NS 4C E+2 -480 21 70.00 µ Tbl = 52,22 %
Total : 385,0 / 720 = 53,47 %
PAIRE A.9 Catherine de Moffarts -Simone Munsterhjelm
a.8 Fabienne Smit -Francoise Duren 49,54 %
1 NS 4CcW-3 500 30 100.00
2 NS 3S E = -400 18 60.00
3 NS 2P S = 110 2 6.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.7 Hugo Baetens -Gaetan van de Werve 48,75 %
4 NS 4T W+2 -170 6 20.00
5 NS 5C W-1 50 14 46.67
6 NS 5K E-2 200 26 86.67 µ Tbl = 51,11 %
a.6 Dominique Bourgoignie -Marianne Borsu 38,63 %
7 NS 2TcS+1 380 29.9 99.67
8 NS 5K W+1 -420 12 40.00
9 NS 3S S = 400 9 30.00 µ Tbl = 56,56 %
a.5 Elena Valsesia -Noelle Fosse 53,33 %
10 NS 2T E-1 100 12 40.00
11 NS 3S S+2 460 30 100.00
12 NS 4P W = -420 22 73.33 µ Tbl = 71,11 %
a.4 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Teresa Dekoster 43,89 %
13 NS 2C W = -110 1 3.33
14 NS 4P S+1 450 23 76.67
15 NS 4P W-2 100 27 90.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
a.3 Marina De Longree -Muriel de Ceuninck 37,78 %
16 NS 5T N = 400 2 6.67
17 NS 3S E+1 -430 8 26.67
18 NS 3S S+1 630 19 63.33 µ Tbl = 32,22 %
a.2 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 58,94 %
19 NS 2C W+1 -140 8 26.67
20 NS 4P N+2 680 15 50.00
21 NS 2C N-2 -200 5 16.67 µ Tbl = 31,11 %
a.9 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 40,19 %
25 NS 4K S-2 -100 29 96.67
26 NS 4C S+1 650 29 96.67
27 NS 6C W = -980 7 23.33 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
Total : 383,9 / 720 = 53,32 %
PAIRE B.1 Patrick Gilles -Grazia Neuenschwander
b.1 Nicolas de Neve -Olivier Paternostre 55,42 %
1 NS 3P N = 140 17 56.67
2 NS 3S E+2 -460 0 0.00
3 NS 2P S+2 170 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 37,78 %
b.8 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne 64,79 %
4 NS 4C S-1 -100 21 70.00
5 NS 4K N = 130 23 76.67
6 NS 5K E = -600 5 16.67 µ Tbl = 54,44 %
b.7 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 60,56 %
7 NS 3T S-1 -100 15 50.00
8 NS 5K W+1 -420 12 40.00
9 NS 3S S = 400 9 30.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
b.6 Didier Collart -Jacques Podevyn 43,06 %
10 NS 1S E-3 300 26 86.67
11 NS 3S S+1 430 23 76.67
12 NS 4P W = -420 22 73.33 µ Tbl = 78,89 %
b.5 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 49,89 %
13 NS 1K N = 70 6 20.00
14 NS 4P S+1 450 23 76.67
15 NS 3P W = -140 2 6.67 µ Tbl = 34,44 %
b.4 Anne Francoise Decoster -Sandra Dallemagne 40,14 %
16 NS 3S S+3 490 21 70.00
17 NS 3S E-1 50 23 76.67
18 NS 3S S+1 630 19 63.33 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
b.3 Julia Carakehian -Gaetan Collinet 56,81 %
19 NS 3C W = -140 8 26.67
20 NS 4P N+1 650 7 23.33
21 NS 3K S = 110 30 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
b.2 Gerard Cooreman -Myriam de Timary 52,60 %
22 NS 2C S+2 170 14 46.67
23 NS 4C W+1 -650 17 56.67
24 NS 3S N+1 430 21 70.00 µ Tbl = 57,78 %
Total : 381,0 / 720 = 52,92 %
PAIRE B.3 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire
b.5 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 49,89 %
1 NS 2P N+1 140 17 56.67
2 NS 3S E = -400 18 60.00
3 NS 2P S+2 170 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 57,78 %
b.4 Anne Francoise Decoster -Sandra Dallemagne 40,14 %
4 NS 3T W+2 -150 14 46.67
5 NS 3S S+1 630 28 93.33
6 NS 5K E-3 300 30 100.00 µ Tbl = 80,00 %
b.3 Julia Carakehian -Gaetan Collinet 56,81 %
7 NS 2S N-1 -100 15 50.00
8 NS 3S W = -400 23 76.67
9 NS 3S S-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,22 %
b.2 Gerard Cooreman -Myriam de Timary 52,60 %
10 NS 2P S-1 -100 3 10.00
11 NS 3S N+1 430 23 76.67
12 NS 4P W+2 -480 3 10.00 µ Tbl = 32,22 %
b.1 Nicolas de Neve -Olivier Paternostre 55,42 %
13 NS 2K N+1 110 24 80.00
14 NS 3S S+1 430 16 53.33
15 NS 4P W-2 100 27 90.00 µ Tbl = 74,44 %
b.8 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne 64,79 %
16 NS 6T N-1 -50 0 0.00
17 NS 3S E = -400 15 50.00
18 NS 6S N-3 -300 2 6.67 µ Tbl = 18,89 %
b.7 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 60,56 %
19 NS 1S S-1 -50 25 83.33
20 NS 4P N+2 680 15 50.00
21 NS 1S E+1 -120 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
b.6 Didier Collart -Jacques Podevyn 43,06 %
22 NS 4C S = 420 25 83.33
23 NS 4C W+1 -650 17 56.67
24 NS 3S N = 400 9 30.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
Total : 380,0 / 720 = 52,78 %
PAIRE B.8 Stan Tabor -Philippe van der Gracht
b.8 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne 64,79 %
1 NS 3P N-1 -50 3 10.00
2 NS 3S E+1 -430 3 10.00
3 NS 3P S+1 170 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 25,56 %
b.7 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 60,56 %
4 NS 4K E+1 -150 14 46.67
5 NS 3S S-1 -100 9 30.00
6 NS 5K E = -600 5 16.67 µ Tbl = 31,11 %
b.6 Didier Collart -Jacques Podevyn 43,06 %
7 NS 2S N-1 -100 15 50.00
8 NS 5K W = -400 23 76.67
9 NS 3S S+2 460 29 96.67 µ Tbl = 74,44 %
b.5 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 49,89 %
10 NS 1S E-2 200 22 73.33
11 NS 3S S = 400 15 50.00
12 NS 4P W = -420 22 73.33 µ Tbl = 65,56 %
b.4 Anne Francoise Decoster -Sandra Dallemagne 40,14 %
13 NS 1K N+1 90 13 43.33
14 NS 4P S+1 450 23 76.67
15 NS 4P W-1 50 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
b.3 Julia Carakehian -Gaetan Collinet 56,81 %
16 NS 3S N+2 460 8 26.67
17 NS 3S E-1 50 23 76.67
18 NS 3S S+1 630 19 63.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
b.2 Gerard Cooreman -Myriam de Timary 52,60 %
19 NS 2C W = -110 15 50.00
20 NS 6P N+1 1460 30 100.00
21 NS 3K S-2 -200 5 16.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
b.1 Nicolas de Neve -Olivier Paternostre 55,42 %
22 NS 2C S+2 170 14 46.67
23 NS 4C W+1 -650 17 56.67
24 NS 3S N+1 430 21 70.00 µ Tbl = 57,78 %
Total : 379,0 / 720 = 52,64 %
PAIRE A.3 Claire Derieuw -Claire de Quirini
a.5 Elena Valsesia -Noelle Fosse 53,33 %
1 NS 3P N = 140 17 56.67
2 NS 3S E = -400 18 60.00
3 NS 2P S+2 170 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 57,78 %
a.3 Marina De Longree -Muriel de Ceuninck 37,78 %
7 NS 2P S-1 -100 15 50.00
8 NS 5K W+1 -420 12 40.00
9 NS 3S S = 400 9 30.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a.2 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 58,94 %
10 NS 2T E-1 100 12 40.00
11 NS 3S N = 400 15 50.00
12 NS 4P W = -420 22 73.33 µ Tbl = 54,44 %
a.1 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 56,10 %
13 NS 1P N = 80 8 26.67
14 NS 4P S+1 450 23 76.67
15 NS 4P W-1 50 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.9 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 40,19 %
16 NS 3S N+3 490 21 70.00
17 NS 3S E-2 100 28 93.33
18 NS 3S S+2 660 29 96.67 µ Tbl = 86,67 %
a.8 Fabienne Smit -Francoise Duren 49,54 %
19 NS 2C E+2 -170 1 3.33
20 NS 6P N-1 -100 3 10.00
21 NS 2C N-1 -100 20 66.67 µ Tbl = 26,67 %
a.7 Hugo Baetens -Gaetan van de Werve 48,75 %
22 NS 3C S+1 170 14 46.67
23 NS 4C W+1 -650 17 56.67
24 NS 3S N+1 430 21 70.00 µ Tbl = 57,78 %
a.6 Dominique Bourgoignie -Marianne Borsu 38,63 %
25 NS 4C E = -620 15 50.00
26 NS 3C S+1 170 15 50.00
27 NS 6C W = -980 7 23.33 µ Tbl = 41,11 %
Total : 373,0 / 720 = 51,81 %
PAIRE A.6 Peter Masterson -Andre Delacroix
a.2 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 58,94 %
1 NS 2P N+1 140 17 56.67
2 NS 3S E = -400 18 60.00
3 NS 4P S-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.1 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 56,10 %
4 NS 5K E-1 100 28 93.33
5 NS 5K S-1 -100 9 30.00
6 NS 5TcS-1 -100 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
a.9 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 40,19 %
7 NS 2K E-1 100 24.6 82.00
8 NS 3S W = -400 23 76.67
9 NS 3S S = 400 9 30.00 µ Tbl = 62,89 %
a.8 Fabienne Smit -Francoise Duren 49,54 %
10 NS 1S E-2 200 22 73.33
11 NS 3S S+1 430 23 76.67
12 NS 4P W+1 -450 10 33.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a.6 Dominique Bourgoignie -Marianne Borsu 38,63 %
16 NS 3S N+3 490 21 70.00
17 NS 4P W-1 50 23 76.67
18 NS 3S N+1 630 19 63.33 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
a.5 Elena Valsesia -Noelle Fosse 53,33 %
19 NS 2C E+2 -170 1 3.33
20 NS 6P N-2 -200 0 0.00
21 NS 1S E+2 -150 10 33.33 µ Tbl = 12,22 %
a.4 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Teresa Dekoster 43,89 %
22 NS 3S S+1 430 30 100.00
23 NS 4C W+2 -680 2 6.67
24 NS 3S N = 400 9 30.00 µ Tbl = 45,56 %
a.3 Marina De Longree -Muriel de Ceuninck 37,78 %
25 NS 4C E = -620 15 50.00
26 NS 4C S = 620 25 83.33
27 NS 4C E+3 -510 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
Total : 369,6 / 720 = 51,33 %
PAIRE B.7 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger
b.6 Didier Collart -Jacques Podevyn 43,06 %
1 NS 2P N+1 140 17 56.67
2 NS 3S E = -400 18 60.00
3 NS 2S S+2 180 26 86.67 µ Tbl = 67,78 %
b.5 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 49,89 %
4 NS 3C S-1 -100 21 70.00
5 NS 5C E-2 100 18 60.00
6 NS 4T S+1 150 21 70.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
b.4 Anne Francoise Decoster -Sandra Dallemagne 40,14 %
7 NS 2P S-1 -100 15 50.00
8 NS 3K W+3 -170 30 100.00
9 NS 3S S+1 430 22 73.33 µ Tbl = 74,44 %
b.3 Julia Carakehian -Gaetan Collinet 56,81 %
10 NS 2P S-1 -100 3 10.00
11 NS 4P N-1 -50 4 13.33
12 NS 4P W+1 -450 10 33.33 µ Tbl = 18,89 %
b.2 Gerard Cooreman -Myriam de Timary 52,60 %
13 NS 2K N = 90 13 43.33
14 NS 3S S = 400 8 26.67
15 NS 4P W-1 50 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
b.1 Nicolas de Neve -Olivier Paternostre 55,42 %
16 NS 3S S+3 490 21 70.00
17 NS 3S E = -400 15 50.00
18 NS 4C S = 620 9 30.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
b.8 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne 64,79 %
19 NS 2C E+1 -140 8 26.67
20 NS 4P N+2 680 15 50.00
21 NS 3CcN-3 -800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,56 %
b.7 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 60,56 %
22 NS 3C S+1 170 14 46.67
23 NS 4C W+2 -680 2 6.67
24 NS 3S N = 400 9 30.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
Total : 333,0 / 720 = 46,25 %
PAIRE B.6 Therese Dumont de Ch. -Yolande Waerseggers
b.4 Anne Francoise Decoster -Sandra Dallemagne 40,14 %
1 NS 2P N+1 140 17 56.67
2 NS 3S E = -400 18 60.00
3 NS 2P S+2 170 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 57,78 %
b.3 Julia Carakehian -Gaetan Collinet 56,81 %
4 NS 4K E+1 -150 14 46.67
5 NS 4K S = 130 23 76.67
6 NS 5K E = -600 5 16.67 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
b.2 Gerard Cooreman -Myriam de Timary 52,60 %
7 NS 3PcS-1 -200 3.3 11.00
8 NS 5K W = -400 23 76.67
9 NS 3S N+1 430 22 73.33 µ Tbl = 53,67 %
b.1 Nicolas de Neve -Olivier Paternostre 55,42 %
10 NS 3T E-1 100 12 40.00
11 NS 3S S-1 -50 4 13.33
12 NS 4P W = -420 22 73.33 µ Tbl = 42,22 %
b.8 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne 64,79 %
13 NS 2K N+1 110 24 80.00
14 NS 3S S = 400 8 26.67
15 NS 4P W-1 50 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 51,11 %
b.7 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 60,56 %
16 NS 3S N+3 490 21 70.00
17 NS 4P W+1 -450 2 6.67
18 NS 4C S = 620 9 30.00 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
b.6 Didier Collart -Jacques Podevyn 43,06 %
19 NS 1S S-2 -100 19 63.33
20 NS 4P N+2 680 15 50.00
21 NS 1S E+1 -120 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
b.5 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 49,89 %
22 NS 2C S+2 170 14 46.67
23 NS 4C W+2 -680 2 6.67
24 NS 3S N = 400 9 30.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
Total : 331,3 / 720 = 46,01 %
PAIRE A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Nicole Blondeau
a.2 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 58,94 %
4 NS 3CcS-1 -200 0 0.00
5 NS 3T W+2 -150 4 13.33
6 NS 5K E = -600 5 16.67 µ Tbl = 10,00 %
a.1 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 56,10 %
7 NS 5T S-3 -300 0.1 0.33
8 NS 6K W = -920 1 3.33
9 NS 3S S+1 430 22 73.33 µ Tbl = 25,67 %
a.9 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 40,19 %
10 NS 2P S = 110 18 60.00
11 NS 3T S+2 150 9 30.00
12 NS 4P W = -420 22 73.33 µ Tbl = 54,44 %
a.8 Fabienne Smit -Francoise Duren 49,54 %
13 NS 1K N+1 90 13 43.33
14 NS 4P S+1 450 23 76.67
15 NS 4P W-1 50 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.7 Hugo Baetens -Gaetan van de Werve 48,75 %
16 NS 3S S+3 490 21 70.00
17 NS 4P W+1 -450 2 6.67
18 NS 6S S-2 -200 4 13.33 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
a.6 Dominique Bourgoignie -Marianne Borsu 38,63 %
19 NS 1S S-1 -50 25 83.33
20 NS 6P N = 1430 26 86.67
21 NS 2S W = -120 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
a.5 Elena Valsesia -Noelle Fosse 53,33 %
22 NS 2C S+1 140 4 13.33
23 NS 4C W+1 -650 17 56.67
24 NS 3S N+1 430 21 70.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
a.4 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Teresa Dekoster 43,89 %
25 NS 3C E+2 -200 23 76.67
26 NS 3PcW = -730 3 10.00
27 NS 6C W = -980 7 23.33 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
Total : 298,1 / 720 = 41,40 %
PAIRE A.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Sophie Tilemans
a.1 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 56,10 %
1 NS 3P N = 140 17 56.67
2 NS 3S E = -400 18 60.00
3 NS 2P S+1 140 6 20.00 µ Tbl = 45,56 %
a.9 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 40,19 %
4 NS 4C S-1 -100 21 70.00
5 NS 4C W = -420 0 0.00
6 NS 5K E = -600 5 16.67 µ Tbl = 28,89 %
a.8 Fabienne Smit -Francoise Duren 49,54 %
7 NS 3P S-2 -200 3.3 11.00
8 NS 5K W+1 -420 12 40.00
9 NS 3S N = 400 9 30.00 µ Tbl = 27,00 %
a.7 Hugo Baetens -Gaetan van de Werve 48,75 %
10 NS 1S E-4 400 29 96.67
11 NS 3S S-1 -50 4 13.33
12 NS 4P W+1 -450 10 33.33 µ Tbl = 47,78 %
a.6 Dominique Bourgoignie -Marianne Borsu 38,63 %
13 NS 2P S = 110 24 80.00
14 NS 1S S+1 120 2 6.67
15 NS 4P W-3 150 30 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,22 %
a.5 Elena Valsesia -Noelle Fosse 53,33 %
16 NS 3S S+3 490 21 70.00
17 NS 4P W+1 -450 2 6.67
18 NS 6S S-4 -400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,56 %
a.4 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Teresa Dekoster 43,89 %
19 NS 3C E = -140 8 26.67
20 NS 4P N+2 680 15 50.00
21 NS 2C N-1 -100 20 66.67 µ Tbl = 47,78 %
a.3 Marina De Longree -Muriel de Ceuninck 37,78 %
22 NS 2C S+2 170 14 46.67
23 NS 4C W+1 -650 17 56.67
24 NS 2S N+1 150 2 6.67 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
Total : 289,3 / 720 = 40,18 %
PAIRE B.4 Marie Christine Meeus -Laurence del Marmol
b.7 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 60,56 %
1 NS 3P N-1 -50 3 10.00
2 NS 3S E = -400 18 60.00
3 NS 2P S+1 140 6 20.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
b.6 Didier Collart -Jacques Podevyn 43,06 %
4 NS 3K E+3 -170 6 20.00
5 NS 2C E+2 -170 2 6.67
6 NS 4K E = -130 12 40.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
b.5 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 49,89 %
7 NS 3T S+1 130 27.8 92.67
8 NS 3S W+1 -430 5 16.67
9 NS 3S S+1 430 22 73.33 µ Tbl = 60,89 %
b.4 Anne Francoise Decoster -Sandra Dallemagne 40,14 %
10 NS 2P S-1 -100 3 10.00
11 NS 3S N = 400 15 50.00
12 NS 4P W+2 -480 3 10.00 µ Tbl = 23,33 %
b.3 Julia Carakehian -Gaetan Collinet 56,81 %
13 NS 2C W = -110 1 3.33
14 NS 4P S = 420 14 46.67
15 NS 4P W = -420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
b.2 Gerard Cooreman -Myriam de Timary 52,60 %
16 NS 3S N+2 460 8 26.67
17 NS 3S E-3 150 30 100.00
18 NS 3S N+1 630 19 63.33 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
b.1 Nicolas de Neve -Olivier Paternostre 55,42 %
19 NS 1S S-2 -100 19 63.33
20 NS 6P N-1 -100 3 10.00
21 NS 2P S-2 -200 5 16.67 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
b.8 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne 64,79 %
22 NS 4C S = 420 25 83.33
23 NS 4C W+1 -650 17 56.67
24 NS 3S N = 400 9 30.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
Total : 272,8 / 720 = 37,89 %
PAIRE B.2 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten
b.3 Julia Carakehian -Gaetan Collinet 56,81 %
1 NS 3P N = 140 17 56.67
2 NS 3S E = -400 18 60.00
3 NS 2P S+1 140 6 20.00 µ Tbl = 45,56 %
b.2 Gerard Cooreman -Myriam de Timary 52,60 %
4 NS 3K E+3 -170 6 20.00
5 NS 5K S-1 -100 9 30.00
6 NS 5K E-1 100 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
b.1 Nicolas de Neve -Olivier Paternostre 55,42 %
7 NS 2P S-1 -100 15 50.00
8 NS 6K W = -920 1 3.33
9 NS 3S S+1 430 22 73.33 µ Tbl = 42,22 %
b.8 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne 64,79 %
10 NS 2P S-1 -100 3 10.00
11 NS 3S S-2 -100 0 0.00
12 NS 4P W+2 -480 3 10.00 µ Tbl = 6,67 %
b.7 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 60,56 %
13 NS 1K N+1 90 13 43.33
14 NS 3S S-1 -50 0 0.00
15 NS 4P W-1 50 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
b.6 Didier Collart -Jacques Podevyn 43,06 %
16 NS 3S S+1 430 4 13.33
17 NS 3S E+1 -430 8 26.67
18 NS 3S S+1 630 19 63.33 µ Tbl = 34,44 %
b.5 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 49,89 %
19 NS 2C E = -110 15 50.00
20 NS 4P N+1 650 7 23.33
21 NS 3C N-2 -200 5 16.67 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
b.4 Anne Francoise Decoster -Sandra Dallemagne 40,14 %
22 NS 2C S+1 140 4 13.33
23 NS 5C W = -650 17 56.67
24 NS 3S N = 400 9 30.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 232,0 / 720 = 32,22 %
PAIRE b.8 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne
B.8 Stan Tabor -Philippe van der Gracht 52,64 %
1 EO 3P N-1 -50 27 90.00
2 EO 3S E+1 -430 27 90.00
3 EO 3P S+1 170 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 74,44 %
B.1 Patrick Gilles -Grazia Neuenschwander 52,92 %
4 EO 4C S-1 -100 9 30.00
5 EO 4K N = 130 7 23.33
6 EO 5K E = -600 25 83.33 µ Tbl = 45,56 %
B.5 Michele Berrier -Helene Schyns 56,04 %
7 EO 2K E+1 -110 23.5 78.33
8 EO 3S W = -400 7 23.33
9 EO 3S N = 400 21 70.00 µ Tbl = 57,22 %
B.2 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten 32,22 %
10 EO 2P S-1 -100 27 90.00
11 EO 3S S-2 -100 30 100.00
12 EO 4P W+2 -480 27 90.00 µ Tbl = 93,33 %
B.6 Therese Dumont de Ch. -Yolande Waerseggers 46,01 %
13 EO 2K N+1 110 6 20.00
14 EO 3S S = 400 22 73.33
15 EO 4P W-1 50 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 48,89 %
B.3 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 52,78 %
16 EO 6T N-1 -50 30 100.00
17 EO 3S E = -400 15 50.00
18 EO 6S N-3 -300 28 93.33 µ Tbl = 81,11 %
B.7 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 46,25 %
19 EO 2C E+1 -140 22 73.33
20 EO 4P N+2 680 15 50.00
21 EO 3CcN-3 -800 30 100.00 µ Tbl = 74,44 %
B.4 Marie Christine Meeus -Laurence del Marmol 37,89 %
22 EO 4C S = 420 5 16.67
23 EO 4C W+1 -650 13 43.33
24 EO 3S N = 400 21 70.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
Total : 466,5 / 720 = 64,79 %
PAIRE b.7 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys
B.4 Marie Christine Meeus -Laurence del Marmol 37,89 %
1 EO 3P N-1 -50 27 90.00
2 EO 3S E = -400 12 40.00
3 EO 2P S+1 140 24 80.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
B.8 Stan Tabor -Philippe van der Gracht 52,64 %
4 EO 4K E+1 -150 16 53.33
5 EO 3S S-1 -100 21 70.00
6 EO 5K E = -600 25 83.33 µ Tbl = 68,89 %
B.1 Patrick Gilles -Grazia Neuenschwander 52,92 %
7 EO 3T S-1 -100 15 50.00
8 EO 5K W+1 -420 18 60.00
9 EO 3S S = 400 21 70.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
B.5 Michele Berrier -Helene Schyns 56,04 %
10 EO 1S E-4 400 1 3.33
11 EO 3S N+1 430 7 23.33
12 EO 4C W+2 -480 27 90.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
B.2 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten 32,22 %
13 EO 1K N+1 90 17 56.67
14 EO 3S S-1 -50 30 100.00
15 EO 4P W-1 50 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
B.6 Therese Dumont de Ch. -Yolande Waerseggers 46,01 %
16 EO 3S N+3 490 9 30.00
17 EO 4P W+1 -450 28 93.33
18 EO 4C S = 620 21 70.00 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
B.3 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 52,78 %
19 EO 1S S-1 -50 5 16.67
20 EO 4P N+2 680 15 50.00
21 EO 1S E+1 -120 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
B.7 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 46,25 %
22 EO 3C S+1 170 16 53.33
23 EO 4C W+2 -680 28 93.33
24 EO 3S N = 400 21 70.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
Total : 436,0 / 720 = 60,56 %
PAIRE a.2 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels
A.6 Peter Masterson -Andre Delacroix 51,33 %
1 EO 2P N+1 140 13 43.33
2 EO 3S E = -400 12 40.00
3 EO 4P S-1 -50 30 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Nicole Blondeau 41,40 %
4 EO 3CcS-1 -200 30 100.00
5 EO 3T W+2 -150 26 86.67
6 EO 5K E = -600 25 83.33 µ Tbl = 90,00 %
A.7 Bruno Chevalier -Michel Paquot 62,72 %
7 EO 2K E-1 100 5.4 18.00
8 EO 5K W+1 -420 18 60.00
9 EO 3S S = 400 21 70.00 µ Tbl = 49,33 %
A.3 Claire Derieuw -Claire de Quirini 51,81 %
10 EO 2T E-1 100 18 60.00
11 EO 3S N = 400 15 50.00
12 EO 4P W = -420 8 26.67 µ Tbl = 45,56 %
A.8 Pascale Ortegat -Benoit del Marmol 53,47 %
13 EO 2K N-1 -100 26 86.67
14 EO 3S S = 400 22 73.33
15 EO 3P W-1 50 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 71,11 %
A.4 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Annette Fobe 63,33 %
16 EO 3S S+3 490 9 30.00
17 EO 3S W+1 -430 22 73.33
18 EO 3S S+1 630 11 36.67 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
A.9 Catherine de Moffarts -Simone Munsterhjelm 53,32 %
19 EO 2C W+1 -140 22 73.33
20 EO 4P N+2 680 15 50.00
21 EO 2C N-2 -200 25 83.33 µ Tbl = 68,89 %
A.5 Martine Zens -Giuseppe Napoli 56,11 %
22 EO 4C S = 420 5 16.67
23 EO 4C W-1 100 0 0.00
24 EO 3S N-1 -50 30 100.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 424,4 / 720 = 58,94 %
PAIRE b.3 Julia Carakehian -Gaetan Collinet
B.2 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten 32,22 %
1 EO 3P N = 140 13 43.33
2 EO 3S E = -400 12 40.00
3 EO 2P S+1 140 24 80.00 µ Tbl = 54,44 %
B.6 Therese Dumont de Ch. -Yolande Waerseggers 46,01 %
4 EO 4K E+1 -150 16 53.33
5 EO 4K S = 130 7 23.33
6 EO 5K E = -600 25 83.33 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
B.3 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 52,78 %
7 EO 2S N-1 -100 15 50.00
8 EO 3S W = -400 7 23.33
9 EO 3S S-1 -50 30 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,78 %
B.7 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 46,25 %
10 EO 2P S-1 -100 27 90.00
11 EO 4P N-1 -50 26 86.67
12 EO 4P W+1 -450 20 66.67 µ Tbl = 81,11 %
B.4 Marie Christine Meeus -Laurence del Marmol 37,89 %
13 EO 2C W = -110 29 96.67
14 EO 4P S = 420 16 53.33
15 EO 4P W = -420 30 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
B.8 Stan Tabor -Philippe van der Gracht 52,64 %
16 EO 3S N+2 460 22 73.33
17 EO 3S E-1 50 7 23.33
18 EO 3S S+1 630 11 36.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
B.1 Patrick Gilles -Grazia Neuenschwander 52,92 %
19 EO 3C W = -140 22 73.33
20 EO 4P N+1 650 23 76.67
21 EO 3K S = 110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
B.5 Michele Berrier -Helene Schyns 56,04 %
22 EO 4C S = 420 5 16.67
23 EO 4C W+1 -650 13 43.33
24 EO 3S N+1 430 9 30.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
Total : 409,0 / 720 = 56,81 %
PAIRE a.1 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere
A.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Sophie Tilemans 40,18 %
1 EO 3P N = 140 13 43.33
2 EO 3S E = -400 12 40.00
3 EO 2P S+1 140 24 80.00 µ Tbl = 54,44 %
A.6 Peter Masterson -Andre Delacroix 51,33 %
4 EO 5K E-1 100 2 6.67
5 EO 5K S-1 -100 21 70.00
6 EO 5TcS-1 -100 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Nicole Blondeau 41,40 %
7 EO 5T S-3 -300 29.9 99.67
8 EO 6K W = -920 29 96.67
9 EO 3S S+1 430 8 26.67 µ Tbl = 74,33 %
A.7 Bruno Chevalier -Michel Paquot 62,72 %
10 EO 2T E-1 100 18 60.00
11 EO 2S S+1 150 21 70.00
12 EO 4P W = -420 8 26.67 µ Tbl = 52,22 %
A.3 Claire Derieuw -Claire de Quirini 51,81 %
13 EO 1P N = 80 22 73.33
14 EO 4P S+1 450 7 23.33
15 EO 4P W-1 50 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.8 Pascale Ortegat -Benoit del Marmol 53,47 %
16 EO 3S N+3 490 9 30.00
17 EO 3S W = -400 15 50.00
18 EO 3S N+1 630 11 36.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.4 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Annette Fobe 63,33 %
19 EO 2C E+1 -140 22 73.33
20 EO 4P N+2 680 15 50.00
21 EO 2C N-1 -100 10 33.33 µ Tbl = 52,22 %
A.5 Martine Zens -Giuseppe Napoli 56,11 %
25 EO 5C E = -650 25 83.33
26 EO 3PcW = -730 27 90.00
27 EO 6C W = -980 23 76.67 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
Total : 403,9 / 720 = 56,10 %
PAIRE b.1 Nicolas de Neve -Olivier Paternostre
B.1 Patrick Gilles -Grazia Neuenschwander 52,92 %
1 EO 3P N = 140 13 43.33
2 EO 3S E+2 -460 30 100.00
3 EO 2P S+2 170 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 62,22 %
B.5 Michele Berrier -Helene Schyns 56,04 %
4 EO 4T W+2 -170 24 80.00
5 EO 5K S-1 -100 21 70.00
6 EO 5K E = -600 25 83.33 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
B.2 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten 32,22 %
7 EO 2P S-1 -100 15 50.00
8 EO 6K W = -920 29 96.67
9 EO 3S S+1 430 8 26.67 µ Tbl = 57,78 %
B.6 Therese Dumont de Ch. -Yolande Waerseggers 46,01 %
10 EO 3T E-1 100 18 60.00
11 EO 3S S-1 -50 26 86.67
12 EO 4P W = -420 8 26.67 µ Tbl = 57,78 %
B.3 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 52,78 %
13 EO 2K N+1 110 6 20.00
14 EO 3S S+1 430 14 46.67
15 EO 4P W-2 100 3 10.00 µ Tbl = 25,56 %
B.7 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 46,25 %
16 EO 3S S+3 490 9 30.00
17 EO 3S E = -400 15 50.00
18 EO 4C S = 620 21 70.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
B.4 Marie Christine Meeus -Laurence del Marmol 37,89 %
19 EO 1S S-2 -100 11 36.67
20 EO 6P N-1 -100 27 90.00
21 EO 2P S-2 -200 25 83.33 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
B.8 Stan Tabor -Philippe van der Gracht 52,64 %
22 EO 2C S+2 170 16 53.33
23 EO 4C W+1 -650 13 43.33
24 EO 3S N+1 430 9 30.00 µ Tbl = 42,22 %
Total : 399,0 / 720 = 55,42 %
PAIRE a.5 Elena Valsesia -Noelle Fosse
A.3 Claire Derieuw -Claire de Quirini 51,81 %
1 EO 3P N = 140 13 43.33
2 EO 3S E = -400 12 40.00
3 EO 2P S+2 170 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 42,22 %
A.8 Pascale Ortegat -Benoit del Marmol 53,47 %
4 EO 4K E+2 -170 24 80.00
5 EO 5CcW-1 100 12 40.00
6 EO 5K W-1 100 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 54,44 %
A.9 Catherine de Moffarts -Simone Munsterhjelm 53,32 %
10 EO 2T E-1 100 18 60.00
11 EO 3S S+2 460 0 0.00
12 EO 4P W = -420 8 26.67 µ Tbl = 28,89 %
A.5 Martine Zens -Giuseppe Napoli 56,11 %
13 EO 1K N+2 110 6 20.00
14 EO 3S S = 400 22 73.33
15 EO 4P W-1 50 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 48,89 %
A.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Sophie Tilemans 40,18 %
16 EO 3S S+3 490 9 30.00
17 EO 4P W+1 -450 28 93.33
18 EO 6S S-4 -400 30 100.00 µ Tbl = 74,44 %
A.6 Peter Masterson -Andre Delacroix 51,33 %
19 EO 2C E+2 -170 29 96.67
20 EO 6P N-2 -200 30 100.00
21 EO 1S E+2 -150 20 66.67 µ Tbl = 87,78 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Nicole Blondeau 41,40 %
22 EO 2C S+1 140 26 86.67
23 EO 4C W+1 -650 13 43.33
24 EO 3S N+1 430 9 30.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
A.7 Bruno Chevalier -Michel Paquot 62,72 %
25 EO 3C E+2 -200 7 23.33
26 EO 2P W+1 -140 21 70.00
27 EO 7CcE-1 100 5 16.67 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
Total : 384,0 / 720 = 53,33 %
PAIRE b.2 Gerard Cooreman -Myriam de Timary
B.5 Michele Berrier -Helene Schyns 56,04 %
1 EO 4P N-1 -50 27 90.00
2 EO 3S E = -400 12 40.00
3 EO 2P S+2 170 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 57,78 %
B.2 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten 32,22 %
4 EO 3K E+3 -170 24 80.00
5 EO 5K S-1 -100 21 70.00
6 EO 5K E-1 100 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
B.6 Therese Dumont de Ch. -Yolande Waerseggers 46,01 %
7 EO 3PcS-1 -200 26.7 89.00
8 EO 5K W = -400 7 23.33
9 EO 3S N+1 430 8 26.67 µ Tbl = 46,33 %
B.3 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 52,78 %
10 EO 2P S-1 -100 27 90.00
11 EO 3S N+1 430 7 23.33
12 EO 4P W+2 -480 27 90.00 µ Tbl = 67,78 %
B.7 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 46,25 %
13 EO 2K N = 90 17 56.67
14 EO 3S S = 400 22 73.33
15 EO 4P W-1 50 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
B.4 Marie Christine Meeus -Laurence del Marmol 37,89 %
16 EO 3S N+2 460 22 73.33
17 EO 3S E-3 150 0 0.00
18 EO 3S N+1 630 11 36.67 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
B.8 Stan Tabor -Philippe van der Gracht 52,64 %
19 EO 2C W = -110 15 50.00
20 EO 6P N+1 1460 0 0.00
21 EO 3K S-2 -200 25 83.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
B.1 Patrick Gilles -Grazia Neuenschwander 52,92 %
22 EO 2C S+2 170 16 53.33
23 EO 4C W+1 -650 13 43.33
24 EO 3S N+1 430 9 30.00 µ Tbl = 42,22 %
Total : 378,7 / 720 = 52,60 %
PAIRE b.5 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain
B.3 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 52,78 %
1 EO 2P N+1 140 13 43.33
2 EO 3S E = -400 12 40.00
3 EO 2P S+2 170 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 42,22 %
B.7 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 46,25 %
4 EO 3C S-1 -100 9 30.00
5 EO 5C E-2 100 12 40.00
6 EO 4T S+1 150 9 30.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
B.4 Marie Christine Meeus -Laurence del Marmol 37,89 %
7 EO 3T S+1 130 2.2 7.33
8 EO 3S W+1 -430 25 83.33
9 EO 3S S+1 430 8 26.67 µ Tbl = 39,11 %
B.8 Stan Tabor -Philippe van der Gracht 52,64 %
10 EO 1S E-2 200 8 26.67
11 EO 3S S = 400 15 50.00
12 EO 4P W = -420 8 26.67 µ Tbl = 34,44 %
B.1 Patrick Gilles -Grazia Neuenschwander 52,92 %
13 EO 1K N = 70 24 80.00
14 EO 4P S+1 450 7 23.33
15 EO 3P W = -140 28 93.33 µ Tbl = 65,56 %
B.5 Michele Berrier -Helene Schyns 56,04 %
16 EO 3S N+2 460 22 73.33
17 EO 3S W = -400 15 50.00
18 EO 3S S+2 660 1 3.33 µ Tbl = 42,22 %
B.2 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten 32,22 %
19 EO 2C E = -110 15 50.00
20 EO 4P N+1 650 23 76.67
21 EO 3C N-2 -200 25 83.33 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
B.6 Therese Dumont de Ch. -Yolande Waerseggers 46,01 %
22 EO 2C S+2 170 16 53.33
23 EO 4C W+2 -680 28 93.33
24 EO 3S N = 400 21 70.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
Total : 359,2 / 720 = 49,89 %
PAIRE a.8 Fabienne Smit -Francoise Duren
A.9 Catherine de Moffarts -Simone Munsterhjelm 53,32 %
1 EO 4CcW-3 500 0 0.00
2 EO 3S E = -400 12 40.00
3 EO 2P S = 110 28 93.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.5 Martine Zens -Giuseppe Napoli 56,11 %
4 EO 4C S-1 -100 9 30.00
5 EO 5CcW-1 100 12 40.00
6 EO 4C E-2 200 4 13.33 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
A.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Sophie Tilemans 40,18 %
7 EO 3P S-2 -200 26.7 89.00
8 EO 5K W+1 -420 18 60.00
9 EO 3S N = 400 21 70.00 µ Tbl = 73,00 %
A.6 Peter Masterson -Andre Delacroix 51,33 %
10 EO 1S E-2 200 8 26.67
11 EO 3S S+1 430 7 23.33
12 EO 4P W+1 -450 20 66.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Nicole Blondeau 41,40 %
13 EO 1K N+1 90 17 56.67
14 EO 4P S+1 450 7 23.33
15 EO 4P W-1 50 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.3 Claire Derieuw -Claire de Quirini 51,81 %
19 EO 2C E+2 -170 29 96.67
20 EO 6P N-1 -100 27 90.00
21 EO 2C N-1 -100 10 33.33 µ Tbl = 73,33 %
A.8 Pascale Ortegat -Benoit del Marmol 53,47 %
22 EO 2S S = 120 30 100.00
23 EO 4C W+1 -650 13 43.33
24 EO 3S N+2 460 1 3.33 µ Tbl = 48,89 %
A.4 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Annette Fobe 63,33 %
25 EO 4C E+1 -650 25 83.33
26 EO 3C S+1 170 15 50.00
27 EO 6P W-3 150 1 3.33 µ Tbl = 45,56 %
Total : 356,7 / 720 = 49,54 %
PAIRE a.7 Hugo Baetens -Gaetan van de Werve
A.4 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Annette Fobe 63,33 %
1 EO 3P N = 140 13 43.33
2 EO 3S E+1 -430 27 90.00
3 EO 4P S = 420 1 3.33 µ Tbl = 45,56 %
A.9 Catherine de Moffarts -Simone Munsterhjelm 53,32 %
4 EO 4T W+2 -170 24 80.00
5 EO 5C W-1 50 16 53.33
6 EO 5K E-2 200 4 13.33 µ Tbl = 48,89 %
A.5 Martine Zens -Giuseppe Napoli 56,11 %
7 EO 2P S-1 -100 15 50.00
8 EO 3S W+1 -430 25 83.33
9 EO 3S S = 400 21 70.00 µ Tbl = 67,78 %
A.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Sophie Tilemans 40,18 %
10 EO 1S E-4 400 1 3.33
11 EO 3S S-1 -50 26 86.67
12 EO 4P W+1 -450 20 66.67 µ Tbl = 52,22 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Nicole Blondeau 41,40 %
16 EO 3S S+3 490 9 30.00
17 EO 4P W+1 -450 28 93.33
18 EO 6S S-2 -200 26 86.67 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
A.7 Bruno Chevalier -Michel Paquot 62,72 %
19 EO 1S S-1 -50 5 16.67
20 EO 6P N = 1430 4 13.33
21 EO 1S E = -90 5 16.67 µ Tbl = 15,56 %
A.3 Claire Derieuw -Claire de Quirini 51,81 %
22 EO 3C S+1 170 16 53.33
23 EO 4C W+1 -650 13 43.33
24 EO 3S N+1 430 9 30.00 µ Tbl = 42,22 %
A.8 Pascale Ortegat -Benoit del Marmol 53,47 %
25 EO 4C E+1 -650 25 83.33
26 EO 3PcW-1 200 9 30.00
27 EO 4C E+2 -480 9 30.00 µ Tbl = 47,78 %
Total : 351,0 / 720 = 48,75 %
PAIRE a.4 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Teresa Dekoster
A.7 Bruno Chevalier -Michel Paquot 62,72 %
1 EO 2P N+2 170 2 6.67
2 EO 3S E = -400 12 40.00
3 EO 2P S+2 170 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
A.8 Pascale Ortegat -Benoit del Marmol 53,47 %
7 EO 60%60% Ajust 18 60.00
8 EO 5K W = -400 7 23.33
9 EO 3S S+2 460 1 3.33 µ Tbl = 28,89 %
A.4 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Annette Fobe 63,33 %
10 EO 1S E-2 200 8 26.67
11 EO 3S S = 400 15 50.00
12 EO 4P W = -420 8 26.67 µ Tbl = 34,44 %
A.9 Catherine de Moffarts -Simone Munsterhjelm 53,32 %
13 EO 2C W = -110 29 96.67
14 EO 4P S+1 450 7 23.33
15 EO 4P W-2 100 3 10.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
A.5 Martine Zens -Giuseppe Napoli 56,11 %
16 EO 3S S+3 490 9 30.00
17 EO 3S E-1 50 7 23.33
18 EO 3S N = 600 24 80.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Sophie Tilemans 40,18 %
19 EO 3C E = -140 22 73.33
20 EO 4P N+2 680 15 50.00
21 EO 2C N-1 -100 10 33.33 µ Tbl = 52,22 %
A.6 Peter Masterson -Andre Delacroix 51,33 %
22 EO 3S S+1 430 0 0.00
23 EO 4C W+2 -680 28 93.33
24 EO 3S N = 400 21 70.00 µ Tbl = 54,44 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Nicole Blondeau 41,40 %
25 EO 3C E+2 -200 7 23.33
26 EO 3PcW = -730 27 90.00
27 EO 6C W = -980 23 76.67 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
Total : 316,0 / 720 = 43,89 %
PAIRE b.6 Didier Collart -Jacques Podevyn
B.7 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 46,25 %
1 EO 2P N+1 140 13 43.33
2 EO 3S E = -400 12 40.00
3 EO 2S S+2 180 4 13.33 µ Tbl = 32,22 %
B.4 Marie Christine Meeus -Laurence del Marmol 37,89 %
4 EO 3K E+3 -170 24 80.00
5 EO 2C E+2 -170 28 93.33
6 EO 4K E = -130 18 60.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
B.8 Stan Tabor -Philippe van der Gracht 52,64 %
7 EO 2S N-1 -100 15 50.00
8 EO 5K W = -400 7 23.33
9 EO 3S S+2 460 1 3.33 µ Tbl = 25,56 %
B.1 Patrick Gilles -Grazia Neuenschwander 52,92 %
10 EO 1S E-3 300 4 13.33
11 EO 3S S+1 430 7 23.33
12 EO 4P W = -420 8 26.67 µ Tbl = 21,11 %
B.5 Michele Berrier -Helene Schyns 56,04 %
13 EO 2K N+1 110 6 20.00
14 EO 4P S+1 450 7 23.33
15 EO 3P W-1 50 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 32,22 %
B.2 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten 32,22 %
16 EO 3S S+1 430 26 86.67
17 EO 3S E+1 -430 22 73.33
18 EO 3S S+1 630 11 36.67 µ Tbl = 65,56 %
B.6 Therese Dumont de Ch. -Yolande Waerseggers 46,01 %
19 EO 1S S-2 -100 11 36.67
20 EO 4P N+2 680 15 50.00
21 EO 1S E+1 -120 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
B.3 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 52,78 %
22 EO 4C S = 420 5 16.67
23 EO 4C W+1 -650 13 43.33
24 EO 3S N = 400 21 70.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
Total : 310,0 / 720 = 43,06 %
PAIRE a.9 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens
A.5 Martine Zens -Giuseppe Napoli 56,11 %
1 EO 3P N = 140 13 43.33
2 EO 3S E = -400 12 40.00
3 EO 4P S = 420 1 3.33 µ Tbl = 28,89 %
A.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Sophie Tilemans 40,18 %
4 EO 4C S-1 -100 9 30.00
5 EO 4C W = -420 30 100.00
6 EO 5K E = -600 25 83.33 µ Tbl = 71,11 %
A.6 Peter Masterson -Andre Delacroix 51,33 %
7 EO 2K E-1 100 5.4 18.00
8 EO 3S W = -400 7 23.33
9 EO 3S S = 400 21 70.00 µ Tbl = 37,11 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Nicole Blondeau 41,40 %
10 EO 2P S = 110 12 40.00
11 EO 3T S+2 150 21 70.00
12 EO 4P W = -420 8 26.67 µ Tbl = 45,56 %
A.7 Bruno Chevalier -Michel Paquot 62,72 %
13 EO 2C W-1 100 12 40.00
14 EO 3S S = 400 22 73.33
15 EO 4P W-1 50 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A.3 Claire Derieuw -Claire de Quirini 51,81 %
16 EO 3S N+3 490 9 30.00
17 EO 3S E-2 100 2 6.67
18 EO 3S S+2 660 1 3.33 µ Tbl = 13,33 %
A.4 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Annette Fobe 63,33 %
22 EO 3C S+1 170 16 53.33
23 EO 4C W+1 -650 13 43.33
24 EO 3S N+1 430 9 30.00 µ Tbl = 42,22 %
A.9 Catherine de Moffarts -Simone Munsterhjelm 53,32 %
25 EO 4K S-2 -100 1 3.33
26 EO 4C S+1 650 1 3.33
27 EO 6C W = -980 23 76.67 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
Total : 289,4 / 720 = 40,19 %
PAIRE b.4 Anne Francoise Decoster -Sandra Dallemagne
B.6 Therese Dumont de Ch. -Yolande Waerseggers 46,01 %
1 EO 2P N+1 140 13 43.33
2 EO 3S E = -400 12 40.00
3 EO 2P S+2 170 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 42,22 %
B.3 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 52,78 %
4 EO 3T W+2 -150 16 53.33
5 EO 3S S+1 630 2 6.67
6 EO 5K E-3 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 20,00 %
B.7 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 46,25 %
7 EO 2P S-1 -100 15 50.00
8 EO 3K W+3 -170 0 0.00
9 EO 3S S+1 430 8 26.67 µ Tbl = 25,56 %
B.4 Marie Christine Meeus -Laurence del Marmol 37,89 %
10 EO 2P S-1 -100 27 90.00
11 EO 3S N = 400 15 50.00
12 EO 4P W+2 -480 27 90.00 µ Tbl = 76,67 %
B.8 Stan Tabor -Philippe van der Gracht 52,64 %
13 EO 1K N+1 90 17 56.67
14 EO 4P S+1 450 7 23.33
15 EO 4P W-1 50 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
B.1 Patrick Gilles -Grazia Neuenschwander 52,92 %
16 EO 3S S+3 490 9 30.00
17 EO 3S E-1 50 7 23.33
18 EO 3S S+1 630 11 36.67 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
B.5 Michele Berrier -Helene Schyns 56,04 %
19 EO 1S S-1 -50 5 16.67
20 EO 6P N = 1430 4 13.33
21 EO 1S E = -90 5 16.67 µ Tbl = 15,56 %
B.2 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten 32,22 %
22 EO 2C S+1 140 26 86.67
23 EO 5C W = -650 13 43.33
24 EO 3S N = 400 21 70.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 289,0 / 720 = 40,14 %
PAIRE a.6 Dominique Bourgoignie -Marianne Borsu
A.8 Pascale Ortegat -Benoit del Marmol 53,47 %
1 EO 3P N-1 -50 27 90.00
2 EO 3S E = -400 12 40.00
3 EO 2P S+2 170 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 57,78 %
A.4 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Annette Fobe 63,33 %
4 EO 1S E-1 100 2 6.67
5 EO 3S S+1 630 2 6.67
6 EO 3C E-2 200 4 13.33 µ Tbl = 8,89 %
A.9 Catherine de Moffarts -Simone Munsterhjelm 53,32 %
7 EO 2TcS+1 380 0.1 0.33
8 EO 5K W+1 -420 18 60.00
9 EO 3S S = 400 21 70.00 µ Tbl = 43,44 %
A.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Sophie Tilemans 40,18 %
13 EO 2P S = 110 6 20.00
14 EO 1S S+1 120 28 93.33
15 EO 4P W-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,78 %
A.6 Peter Masterson -Andre Delacroix 51,33 %
16 EO 3S N+3 490 9 30.00
17 EO 4P W-1 50 7 23.33
18 EO 3S N+1 630 11 36.67 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Nicole Blondeau 41,40 %
19 EO 1S S-1 -50 5 16.67
20 EO 6P N = 1430 4 13.33
21 EO 2S W = -120 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
A.7 Bruno Chevalier -Michel Paquot 62,72 %
22 EO 2C S+1 140 26 86.67
23 EO 4C W+1 -650 13 43.33
24 EO 3S N+2 460 1 3.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.3 Claire Derieuw -Claire de Quirini 51,81 %
25 EO 4C E = -620 15 50.00
26 EO 3C S+1 170 15 50.00
27 EO 6C W = -980 23 76.67 µ Tbl = 58,89 %
Total : 278,1 / 720 = 38,63 %
PAIRE a.3 Marina De Longree -Muriel de Ceuninck
A.7 Bruno Chevalier -Michel Paquot 62,72 %
4 EO 4K E-1 100 2 6.67
5 EO 3S S+1 630 2 6.67
6 EO 3T N+2 150 9 30.00 µ Tbl = 14,44 %
A.3 Claire Derieuw -Claire de Quirini 51,81 %
7 EO 2P S-1 -100 15 50.00
8 EO 5K W+1 -420 18 60.00
9 EO 3S S = 400 21 70.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A.8 Pascale Ortegat -Benoit del Marmol 53,47 %
10 EO 2C W-1 100 18 60.00
11 EO 4P N+1 450 2 6.67
12 EO 4P W = -420 8 26.67 µ Tbl = 31,11 %
A.4 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Annette Fobe 63,33 %
13 EO 2S E-3 300 0 0.00
14 EO 3S S+3 490 0 0.00
15 EO 4P W-1 50 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 17,78 %
A.9 Catherine de Moffarts -Simone Munsterhjelm 53,32 %
16 EO 5T N = 400 28 93.33
17 EO 3S E+1 -430 22 73.33
18 EO 3S S+1 630 11 36.67 µ Tbl = 67,78 %
A.5 Martine Zens -Giuseppe Napoli 56,11 %
19 EO 3K W-3 300 0 0.00
20 EO 4P N+3 710 8 26.67
21 EO 1S E-1 50 2 6.67 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
A.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Sophie Tilemans 40,18 %
22 EO 2C S+2 170 16 53.33
23 EO 4C W+1 -650 13 43.33
24 EO 2S N+1 150 28 93.33 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
A.6 Peter Masterson -Andre Delacroix 51,33 %
25 EO 4C E = -620 15 50.00
26 EO 4C S = 620 5 16.67
27 EO 4C E+3 -510 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
Total : 272,0 / 720 = 37,78 %
|