B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 62,78 A.7 Grazia Neuenschwander -Philippe van der Gracht
--- 2 58,74 A11 Annie Legrand -Colette Heerinckx
--- 3 57,29 A.8 Sophie Noach -Michel Lahaut
--- 4 55,74 A.4 Alan Beckman -Mado Miller
--- 5 52,50 A14 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker
--- 6 51,69 A.3 Didier Collart -Thierry Collart
--- 7 50,72 A.6 Iris de Limbourg -Benedicte Lemaigre
--- 8 50,02 A.2 Jean de Villenfagne -Pascale Ortegat
--- 9 48,26 A.9 Teresa Dekoster -Michel Lievens
--- 10 47,36 A10 Myriam de Timary -Caroll Pucher
--- 11 44,36 A13 Nicole Leclere -Michele Berrier
--- 12 43,10 A12 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes
--- 13 42,05 A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans
--- 14 34,81 A.5 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 61,57 a.4 Daniel Couvreur -Anne Brans
--- 2 58,03 a13 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire
--- 3 57,12 a.3 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens
--- 4 51,76 a.7 Lydia Wildiers -Luc Cartuyvels
--- 5 50,83 a12 Chris Oostens -Jeanine Bontemps
--- 6 50,76 a11 Patrick Gilles -Fabienne Smit
--- 7 50,17 a.2 Annette Fobe -Dominique Sassen
--- 8 47,82 a10 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille
--- 9 46,88 a.8 Francoise Turin -Christiane Huby
--- 10 45,62 a.9 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes
--- 11 45,40 a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Simone Munsterhjelm
--- 12 43,01 a.1 Agathe Housiaux -Suzanne Klausen
--- 13 40,95 a.5 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck
--- 14 0,00 a14 -
PAIRE A.7 Grazia Neuenschwander -Philippe van der Gracht
a12 Chris Oostens -Jeanine Bontemps 50,83 %
1 NS 4CcE-1 100 18.6 84.55
2 NS 2C S+1 140 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 92,05 %
a11 Patrick Gilles -Fabienne Smit 50,76 %
3 NS 3T W-3 300 21.9 99.55
4 NS 2P N = 110 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
a10 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 47,82 %
5 NS 2S E-2 100 17.5 79.55
6 NS 4C S = 420 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
a.9 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 45,62 %
7 NS 2S W-2 200 19.7 89.55
8 NS 3S S = 400 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.7 Lydia Wildiers -Luc Cartuyvels 51,76 %
13 NS 5T E-1 100 8.8 40.00
14 NS 3P S+1 170 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Simone Munsterhjelm 45,40 %
15 NS 4P E = -420 6.6 30.00
16 NS 4P N+2 480 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
a.5 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 40,95 %
17 NS 3S E+1 -430 18.6 84.55
18 NS 3C N-2 -200 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.4 Daniel Couvreur -Anne Brans 61,57 %
19 NS 3P N = 140 14.3 65.00
20 NS 3C W+1 -170 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.3 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 57,12 %
21 NS 2S N-1 -100 6 27.27
22 NS 4C W = -620 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.2 Annette Fobe -Dominique Sassen 50,17 %
23 NS 2C S+1 140 8.8 40.00
24 NS 3P S-2 -100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.1 Agathe Housiaux -Suzanne Klausen 43,01 %
25 NS 3S N+1 430 21 95.45
26 NS 4P E = -620 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
a13 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 58,03 %
27 NS 3S N = 400 16.5 75.00
28 NS 2P S+2 170 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
Total : 331,5 / 528 = 62,78 %
PAIRE A11 Annie Legrand -Colette Heerinckx
a.7 Lydia Wildiers -Luc Cartuyvels 51,76 %
1 NS 4C E-1 50 12.1 55.00
2 NS 1S W = -90 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Simone Munsterhjelm 45,40 %
3 NS 1S S+1 120 8.8 40.00
4 NS 3T W-1 100 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.5 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 40,95 %
5 NS 2S W-1 50 11 50.00
6 NS 4C S = 420 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.3 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 57,12 %
7 NS 3C N = 140 12.1 55.00
8 NS 3S S+1 430 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.2 Annette Fobe -Dominique Sassen 50,17 %
9 NS 2P N-1 -50 20.8 94.55
10 NS 3P W = -140 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
a.1 Agathe Housiaux -Suzanne Klausen 43,01 %
11 NS 5K S-1 -50 8.8 40.00
12 NS 1S W-1 50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a14 - 0,00 %
13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a13 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 58,03 %
15 NS 4P E = -420 6.6 30.00
16 NS 4P N+1 450 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a11 Patrick Gilles -Fabienne Smit 50,76 %
21 NS 1S N+2 150 20 90.91
22 NS 3S W+1 -630 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a10 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 47,82 %
23 NS 2S N+1 150 13.2 60.00
24 NS 3S E-4 200 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
a.9 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 45,62 %
25 NS 3S N+1 430 21 95.45
26 NS 4P E = -620 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
a.8 Francoise Turin -Christiane Huby 46,88 %
27 NS 3S N = 400 16.5 75.00
28 NS 2P S+2 170 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
Total : 284,3 / 484 = 58,74 %
PAIRE A.8 Sophie Noach -Michel Lahaut
a14 - 0,00 %
1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a13 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 58,03 %
3 NS 1S S+1 120 8.8 40.00
4 NS 2T N-4 -400 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
a12 Chris Oostens -Jeanine Bontemps 50,83 %
5 NS 2S W+1 -150 4.5 20.45
6 NS 4C S = 420 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a11 Patrick Gilles -Fabienne Smit 50,76 %
7 NS 3C N-1 -100 0.1 0.45
8 NS 3S S+4 520 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a10 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 47,82 %
9 NS 3C E = -140 11 50.00
10 NS 3P W = -140 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.8 Francoise Turin -Christiane Huby 46,88 %
15 NS 5C W-4 200 21.9 99.55
16 NS 6P N = 980 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 99,55 %
a.7 Lydia Wildiers -Luc Cartuyvels 51,76 %
17 NS 4P W+1 -450 8.8 40.00
18 NS 2K E+2 -130 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Simone Munsterhjelm 45,40 %
19 NS 2P N = 110 11 50.00
20 NS 3P S-1 -100 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a.5 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 40,95 %
21 NS 2S S+2 180 22 100.00
22 NS 4C W = -620 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
a.4 Daniel Couvreur -Anne Brans 61,57 %
23 NS 2P E-2 200 19.7 89.55
24 NS 3T W+2 -150 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.3 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 57,12 %
25 NS 3T S+1 130 13 59.09
26 NS 5T E+1 -620 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a.2 Annette Fobe -Dominique Sassen 50,17 %
27 NS 3S N+1 430 20.8 94.55
28 NS 2P S+2 170 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
Total : 277,3 / 484 = 57,29 %
PAIRE A.4 Alan Beckman -Mado Miller
a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Simone Munsterhjelm 45,40 %
1 NS 4P N-1 -50 6.6 30.00
2 NS 3K N = 110 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
a.4 Daniel Couvreur -Anne Brans 61,57 %
7 NS 3C N = 140 12.1 55.00
8 NS 3S S+1 430 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.3 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 57,12 %
9 NS 4C E = -620 1.2 5.45
10 NS 3P W-1 100 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.2 Annette Fobe -Dominique Sassen 50,17 %
11 NS 5C N-2 -100 2.3 10.45
12 NS 4K W-1 50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
a.1 Agathe Housiaux -Suzanne Klausen 43,01 %
13 NS 6K E-4 400 20.8 94.55
14 NS 4P S = 420 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 97,05 %
a14 - 0,00 %
15 NS BYE 0 0.00
16 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a13 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 58,03 %
17 NS 4P W+1 -450 8.8 40.00
18 NS 3C N = 140 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
a12 Chris Oostens -Jeanine Bontemps 50,83 %
19 NS 2ScW-3 800 21.9 99.55
20 NS 4P S-2 -200 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a10 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 47,82 %
21 NS 2S N-1 -100 6 27.27
22 NS 4C W = -620 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.9 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 45,62 %
23 NS 2C S-1 -100 2.3 10.45
24 NS 3C E-3 150 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.8 Francoise Turin -Christiane Huby 46,88 %
25 NS 3S N-2 -100 1 4.55
26 NS 5T E+1 -620 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a.7 Lydia Wildiers -Luc Cartuyvels 51,76 %
27 NS 4C N-1 -50 5.5 25.00
28 NS 2P S+3 200 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
Total : 269,8 / 484 = 55,74 %
PAIRE A14 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker
a13 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 58,03 %
1 NS 4C E-1 50 12.1 55.00
2 NS 1S W = -90 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a12 Chris Oostens -Jeanine Bontemps 50,83 %
3 NS 1S S+2 150 18.6 84.55
4 NS 1S N = 90 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a11 Patrick Gilles -Fabienne Smit 50,76 %
5 NS 1S W-1 50 11 50.00
6 NS 3S S+1 430 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
a10 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 47,82 %
7 NS 3C N = 140 12.1 55.00
8 NS 3S S+1 430 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.9 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 45,62 %
9 NS 3P N-1 -50 20.8 94.55
10 NS 2P W = -110 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 92,05 %
a.8 Francoise Turin -Christiane Huby 46,88 %
11 NS 4K N-1 -50 8.8 40.00
12 NS 3K W+2 -150 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Simone Munsterhjelm 45,40 %
13 NS 4T E = -130 2.3 10.45
14 NS 2P S+2 170 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a.5 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 40,95 %
15 NS 3K S = 110 19.7 89.55
16 NS 6C N-1 -50 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.4 Daniel Couvreur -Anne Brans 61,57 %
17 NS 3S E+3 -490 0.1 0.45
18 NS 1S S = 90 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a.3 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 57,12 %
19 NS 2C W-1 100 7.7 35.00
20 NS 4C W-1 100 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a.2 Annette Fobe -Dominique Sassen 50,17 %
21 NS 2S N-1 -100 6 27.27
22 NS 4C W = -620 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a14 - 0,00 %
27 NS BYE 0 0.00
28 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 254,1 / 484 = 52,50 %
PAIRE A.3 Didier Collart -Thierry Collart
a.3 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 57,12 %
5 NS 2S W+2 -180 0.1 0.45
6 NS 4C S = 420 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a.2 Annette Fobe -Dominique Sassen 50,17 %
7 NS 2C N+1 140 12.1 55.00
8 NS 3S S+3 490 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
a.1 Agathe Housiaux -Suzanne Klausen 43,01 %
9 NS 3P N-2 -100 17.5 79.55
10 NS 3P W = -140 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
a14 - 0,00 %
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a13 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 58,03 %
13 NS 5T E-1 100 8.8 40.00
14 NS 2P S = 110 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
a12 Chris Oostens -Jeanine Bontemps 50,83 %
15 NS 3P E = -140 16.5 75.00
16 NS 6P N-1 -50 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
a11 Patrick Gilles -Fabienne Smit 50,76 %
17 NS 4P W+1 -450 8.8 40.00
18 NS 1S W = -90 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a.9 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 45,62 %
19 NS 3C E-2 200 18.6 84.55
20 NS 3C E = -140 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a.8 Francoise Turin -Christiane Huby 46,88 %
21 NS 3S N-2 -200 0 0.00
22 NS 4C W = -620 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a.7 Lydia Wildiers -Luc Cartuyvels 51,76 %
23 NS 1K W-3 300 21.9 99.55
24 NS 3P S-2 -100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Simone Munsterhjelm 45,40 %
25 NS 3S S-1 -50 7 31.82
26 NS 4P E = -620 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.5 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 40,95 %
27 NS 3S N+1 430 20.8 94.55
28 NS 2P S = 110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
Total : 250,2 / 484 = 51,69 %
PAIRE A.6 Iris de Limbourg -Benedicte Lemaigre
a10 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 47,82 %
1 NS 3P N = 140 21.9 99.55
2 NS 1S W-1 50 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
a.9 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 45,62 %
3 NS 3S S-4 -200 0.1 0.45
4 NS 2S W-1 100 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a.8 Francoise Turin -Christiane Huby 46,88 %
5 NS 2S W-2 100 17.5 79.55
6 NS 4C S = 420 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Simone Munsterhjelm 45,40 %
11 NS 4C N-1 -50 8.8 40.00
12 NS 1S W-1 50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.5 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 40,95 %
13 NS 3T E+2 -150 0.1 0.45
14 NS 2P S+2 170 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a.4 Daniel Couvreur -Anne Brans 61,57 %
15 NS 3P E+1 -170 13.2 60.00
16 NS 4P N+1 450 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a.3 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 57,12 %
17 NS 4P W+1 -450 8.8 40.00
18 NS 4C N-1 -100 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
a.2 Annette Fobe -Dominique Sassen 50,17 %
19 NS 2P N+1 140 14.3 65.00
20 NS 4P S-1 -100 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
a.1 Agathe Housiaux -Suzanne Klausen 43,01 %
21 NS 3S N-1 -100 6 27.27
22 NS 4C W = -620 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a14 - 0,00 %
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a12 Chris Oostens -Jeanine Bontemps 50,83 %
25 NS 4T S = 130 13 59.09
26 NS 4P E+2 -680 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a11 Patrick Gilles -Fabienne Smit 50,76 %
27 NS 3S N-1 -50 5.5 25.00
28 NS 2P S+2 170 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 245,5 / 484 = 50,72 %
PAIRE A.2 Jean de Villenfagne -Pascale Ortegat
a.2 Annette Fobe -Dominique Sassen 50,17 %
3 NS 2C E-1 100 4.5 20.45
4 NS 3S S-2 -200 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 15,45 %
a.1 Agathe Housiaux -Suzanne Klausen 43,01 %
5 NS 2S W+1 -150 4.5 20.45
6 NS 4C S+1 450 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a14 - 0,00 %
7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a13 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 58,03 %
9 NS 3C E+1 -170 4.5 20.45
10 NS 2P W+1 -140 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a12 Chris Oostens -Jeanine Bontemps 50,83 %
11 NS 5K S-1 -50 8.8 40.00
12 NS 3P N = 140 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
a11 Patrick Gilles -Fabienne Smit 50,76 %
13 NS 5T E-1 100 8.8 40.00
14 NS 3P S+1 170 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a10 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 47,82 %
15 NS 4P E = -420 6.6 30.00
16 NS 4P N+1 450 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a.8 Francoise Turin -Christiane Huby 46,88 %
17 NS 4P W+1 -450 8.8 40.00
18 NS 3C S-2 -200 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.7 Lydia Wildiers -Luc Cartuyvels 51,76 %
19 NS 2KcW-1 200 18.6 84.55
20 NS 3P S-1 -100 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Simone Munsterhjelm 45,40 %
21 NS 2S N = 120 15 68.18
22 NS 4C W = -620 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a.5 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 40,95 %
23 NS 3C S+1 170 16.5 75.00
24 NS 1P S+1 110 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a.4 Daniel Couvreur -Anne Brans 61,57 %
25 NS 4P S-1 -50 7 31.82
26 NS 4P E+2 -680 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
Total : 242,1 / 484 = 50,02 %
PAIRE A.9 Teresa Dekoster -Michel Lievens
a.3 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 57,12 %
1 NS 3C E = -140 1.2 5.45
2 NS 1S W = -90 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
a.1 Agathe Housiaux -Suzanne Klausen 43,01 %
3 NS 1S S+2 150 18.6 84.55
4 NS 2C W-2 200 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 89,55 %
a14 - 0,00 %
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a13 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 58,03 %
7 NS 2C S = 110 3.4 15.45
8 NS 3S S+1 430 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a12 Chris Oostens -Jeanine Bontemps 50,83 %
9 NS 3C E = -140 11 50.00
10 NS 3P W = -140 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a11 Patrick Gilles -Fabienne Smit 50,76 %
11 NS 3T N-7 -350 0.1 0.45
12 NS 3K E-1 50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a.9 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 45,62 %
17 NS 3S W+1 -430 18.6 84.55
18 NS 3K W-1 50 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
a.8 Francoise Turin -Christiane Huby 46,88 %
19 NS 2C W-1 100 7.7 35.00
20 NS 4P S-1 -100 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.7 Lydia Wildiers -Luc Cartuyvels 51,76 %
21 NS 1S N+1 120 15 68.18
22 NS 4C W = -620 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Simone Munsterhjelm 45,40 %
23 NS 2C S+1 140 8.8 40.00
24 NS 2P S = 110 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a.5 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 40,95 %
25 NS 4T S-2 -100 1 4.55
26 NS 4K W-2 200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.4 Daniel Couvreur -Anne Brans 61,57 %
27 NS 3C S-1 -50 5.5 25.00
28 NS 1S E+1 -120 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
Total : 233,6 / 484 = 48,26 %
PAIRE A10 Myriam de Timary -Caroll Pucher
a.5 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 40,95 %
1 NS 4C E-2 100 18.6 84.55
2 NS 1S S = 90 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 82,05 %
a.4 Daniel Couvreur -Anne Brans 61,57 %
3 NS 1S S = 90 2.3 10.45
4 NS 2S S-1 -100 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
a.2 Annette Fobe -Dominique Sassen 50,17 %
5 NS 2S W-2 100 17.5 79.55
6 NS 4C S = 420 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
a.1 Agathe Housiaux -Suzanne Klausen 43,01 %
7 NS 2C N+1 140 12.1 55.00
8 NS 3S S+4 520 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
a14 - 0,00 %
9 NS BYE 0 0.00
10 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a13 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 58,03 %
11 NS 5T W-1 50 16.5 75.00
12 NS 3P N-1 -100 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a12 Chris Oostens -Jeanine Bontemps 50,83 %
13 NS 3S E-3 300 17.5 79.55
14 NS 3P S+1 170 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
a10 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 47,82 %
19 NS 2C W = -110 2.3 10.45
20 NS 4P S-2 -200 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 10,45 %
a.9 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 45,62 %
21 NS 1S S+1 120 15 68.18
22 NS 3S W+1 -630 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a.8 Francoise Turin -Christiane Huby 46,88 %
23 NS 3C S+1 170 16.5 75.00
24 NS 3T W = -110 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.7 Lydia Wildiers -Luc Cartuyvels 51,76 %
25 NS 3P S-1 -50 7 31.82
26 NS 4P E+3 -710 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Simone Munsterhjelm 45,40 %
27 NS 3S N-1 -50 5.5 25.00
28 NS 1S E = -90 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
Total : 229,2 / 484 = 47,36 %
PAIRE A13 Nicole Leclere -Michele Berrier
a11 Patrick Gilles -Fabienne Smit 50,76 %
1 NS 4C E-1 50 12.1 55.00
2 NS 1S W = -90 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a10 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 47,82 %
3 NS 1S S+1 120 8.8 40.00
4 NS 2P S+2 170 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
a.9 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 45,62 %
5 NS 3S W-3 150 21.9 99.55
6 NS 5C S-1 -50 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.8 Francoise Turin -Christiane Huby 46,88 %
7 NS 2C N+1 140 12.1 55.00
8 NS 3S S+1 430 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.7 Lydia Wildiers -Luc Cartuyvels 51,76 %
9 NS 3C E = -140 11 50.00
10 NS 3K S-2 -200 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a.5 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 40,95 %
11 NS 4K S = 130 21.9 99.55
12 NS 2P N+1 140 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 97,05 %
a.4 Daniel Couvreur -Anne Brans 61,57 %
13 NS 5T E-1 100 8.8 40.00
14 NS 3P S+1 170 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.3 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 57,12 %
15 NS 4P E+1 -450 0.1 0.45
16 NS 4P N+1 450 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a.2 Annette Fobe -Dominique Sassen 50,17 %
17 NS 4P W+1 -450 8.8 40.00
18 NS 3K E-1 50 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.1 Agathe Housiaux -Suzanne Klausen 43,01 %
19 NS 2C W = -110 2.3 10.45
20 NS 3PcS-1 -200 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 10,45 %
a13 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 58,03 %
25 NS 3P N-1 -50 7 31.82
26 NS 3S E+3 -690 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a12 Chris Oostens -Jeanine Bontemps 50,83 %
27 NS 4K N-1 -50 5.5 25.00
28 NS 1S E = -90 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
Total : 234,2 / 528 = 44,36 %
PAIRE A12 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes
a.9 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 45,62 %
1 NS 4P S-2 -100 4.5 20.45
2 NS 1S W-1 50 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
a.8 Francoise Turin -Christiane Huby 46,88 %
3 NS 2P N+1 140 14.3 65.00
4 NS 2C W-2 200 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
a.7 Lydia Wildiers -Luc Cartuyvels 51,76 %
5 NS 2S W+1 -150 4.5 20.45
6 NS 5C S-1 -50 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 15,45 %
a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Simone Munsterhjelm 45,40 %
7 NS 3S W-3 300 21.9 99.55
8 NS 5S S-3 -150 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.4 Daniel Couvreur -Anne Brans 61,57 %
9 NS 3C E = -140 11 50.00
10 NS 3K S-2 -200 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a.3 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 57,12 %
11 NS 3K N = 110 19.7 89.55
12 NS 5K W-2 100 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 84,55 %
a.2 Annette Fobe -Dominique Sassen 50,17 %
13 NS 5T E-1 100 8.8 40.00
14 NS 2P N+1 140 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
a.1 Agathe Housiaux -Suzanne Klausen 43,01 %
15 NS 4P E = -420 6.6 30.00
16 NS 4P N+1 450 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a14 - 0,00 %
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a12 Chris Oostens -Jeanine Bontemps 50,83 %
23 NS 3C N = 140 8.8 40.00
24 NS 3S E = -400 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
a11 Patrick Gilles -Fabienne Smit 50,76 %
25 NS 1P S+3 170 16 72.73
26 NS 4CcN-3 -800 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a10 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 47,82 %
27 NS 2S N = 120 13.2 60.00
28 NS 2S E+1 -150 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
Total : 208,6 / 484 = 43,10 %
PAIRE A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans
a.1 Agathe Housiaux -Suzanne Klausen 43,01 %
1 NS 3C E = -140 1.2 5.45
2 NS 1S W+1 -120 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 2,95 %
a14 - 0,00 %
3 NS BYE 0 0.00
4 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a13 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 58,03 %
5 NS 2S W-1 50 11 50.00
6 NS 4C S-1 -50 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
a12 Chris Oostens -Jeanine Bontemps 50,83 %
7 NS 2C N = 110 3.4 15.45
8 NS 6ScS-3 -500 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 7,95 %
a11 Patrick Gilles -Fabienne Smit 50,76 %
9 NS 3C E = -140 11 50.00
10 NS 3P W = -140 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a10 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 47,82 %
11 NS 5T E-1 50 16.5 75.00
12 NS 4K E-1 50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
a.9 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 45,62 %
13 NS 4C W-4 400 20.8 94.55
14 NS 2C E-1 50 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.7 Lydia Wildiers -Luc Cartuyvels 51,76 %
15 NS 2C W+1 -140 16.5 75.00
16 NS 4P N+1 450 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Simone Munsterhjelm 45,40 %
17 NS 4P W = -420 21.9 99.55
18 NS 1T S+1 90 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 87,27 %
a.5 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 40,95 %
19 NS 2C W = -110 2.3 10.45
20 NS 3C E-2 200 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.4 Daniel Couvreur -Anne Brans 61,57 %
21 NS 2S N = 120 15 68.18
22 NS 3S W+1 -630 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a.3 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 57,12 %
23 NS 4C S-2 -200 0.1 0.45
24 NS 2S E+1 -150 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 7,95 %
Total : 203,5 / 484 = 42,05 %
PAIRE A.5 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren
a.8 Francoise Turin -Christiane Huby 46,88 %
1 NS 4C E-1 50 12.1 55.00
2 NS 1S W = -90 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a.7 Lydia Wildiers -Luc Cartuyvels 51,76 %
3 NS 3P N = 140 14.3 65.00
4 NS 2C W = -110 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
a.5 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 40,95 %
9 NS 4C W = -620 1.2 5.45
10 NS 2P W+2 -170 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 12,95 %
a.4 Daniel Couvreur -Anne Brans 61,57 %
11 NS 4K S-1 -50 8.8 40.00
12 NS 4C W = -420 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
a.3 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 57,12 %
13 NS 3P S+1 170 15.4 70.00
14 NS 4P S-1 -50 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
a.2 Annette Fobe -Dominique Sassen 50,17 %
15 NS 4P E = -420 6.6 30.00
16 NS 6P N-1 -50 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
a.1 Agathe Housiaux -Suzanne Klausen 43,01 %
17 NS 4P W+1 -450 8.8 40.00
18 NS 1P S+1 110 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a14 - 0,00 %
19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a13 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 58,03 %
21 NS 3S N-1 -100 6 27.27
22 NS 4C W = -620 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a11 Patrick Gilles -Fabienne Smit 50,76 %
23 NS 1S N+1 120 4.5 20.45
24 NS 3P S-2 -100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
a10 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 47,82 %
25 NS 3S N = 400 18 81.82
26 NS 6T E = -1370 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.9 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 45,62 %
27 NS 2S S-1 -50 5.5 25.00
28 NS 3T E = -110 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
Total : 168,5 / 484 = 34,81 %
PAIRE a.4 Daniel Couvreur -Anne Brans
A10 Myriam de Timary -Caroll Pucher 47,36 %
3 EO 1S S = 90 19.7 89.55
4 EO 2S S-1 -100 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Mado Miller 55,74 %
7 EO 3C N = 140 9.9 45.00
8 EO 3S S+1 430 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A12 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes 43,10 %
9 EO 3C E = -140 11 50.00
10 EO 3K S-2 -200 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A.5 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 34,81 %
11 EO 4K S-1 -50 13.2 60.00
12 EO 4C W = -420 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
A13 Nicole Leclere -Michele Berrier 44,36 %
13 EO 5T E-1 100 13.2 60.00
14 EO 3P S+1 170 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.6 Iris de Limbourg -Benedicte Lemaigre 50,72 %
15 EO 3P E+1 -170 8.8 40.00
16 EO 4P N+1 450 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A14 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 52,50 %
17 EO 3S E+3 -490 21.9 99.55
18 EO 1S S = 90 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A.7 Grazia Neuenschwander -Philippe van der Gracht 62,78 %
19 EO 3P N = 140 7.7 35.00
20 EO 3C W+1 -170 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 42,05 %
21 EO 2S N = 120 7 31.82
22 EO 3S W+1 -630 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A.8 Sophie Noach -Michel Lahaut 57,29 %
23 EO 2P E-2 200 2.3 10.45
24 EO 3T W+2 -150 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.2 Jean de Villenfagne -Pascale Ortegat 50,02 %
25 EO 4P S-1 -50 15 68.18
26 EO 4P E+2 -680 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.9 Teresa Dekoster -Michel Lievens 48,26 %
27 EO 3C S-1 -50 16.5 75.00
28 EO 1S E+1 -120 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
Total : 325,1 / 528 = 61,57 %
PAIRE a13 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire
A14 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 52,50 %
1 EO 4C E-1 50 9.9 45.00
2 EO 1S W = -90 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A.8 Sophie Noach -Michel Lahaut 57,29 %
3 EO 1S S+1 120 13.2 60.00
4 EO 2T N-4 -400 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 42,05 %
5 EO 2S W-1 50 11 50.00
6 EO 4C S-1 -50 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A.9 Teresa Dekoster -Michel Lievens 48,26 %
7 EO 2C S = 110 18.6 84.55
8 EO 3S S+1 430 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A.2 Jean de Villenfagne -Pascale Ortegat 50,02 %
9 EO 3C E+1 -170 17.5 79.55
10 EO 2P W+1 -140 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A10 Myriam de Timary -Caroll Pucher 47,36 %
11 EO 5T W-1 50 5.5 25.00
12 EO 3P N-1 -100 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.3 Didier Collart -Thierry Collart 51,69 %
13 EO 5T E-1 100 13.2 60.00
14 EO 2P S = 110 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A11 Annie Legrand -Colette Heerinckx 58,74 %
15 EO 4P E = -420 15.4 70.00
16 EO 4P N+1 450 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Mado Miller 55,74 %
17 EO 4P W+1 -450 13.2 60.00
18 EO 3C N = 140 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
A.5 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 34,81 %
21 EO 3S N-1 -100 16 72.73
22 EO 4C W = -620 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A13 Nicole Leclere -Michele Berrier 44,36 %
25 EO 3P N-1 -50 15 68.18
26 EO 3S E+3 -690 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A.7 Grazia Neuenschwander -Philippe van der Gracht 62,78 %
27 EO 3S N = 400 5.5 25.00
28 EO 2P S+2 170 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
Total : 306,4 / 528 = 58,03 %
PAIRE a.3 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens
A.9 Teresa Dekoster -Michel Lievens 48,26 %
1 EO 3C E = -140 20.8 94.55
2 EO 1S W = -90 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
A.3 Didier Collart -Thierry Collart 51,69 %
5 EO 2S W+2 -180 21.9 99.55
6 EO 4C S = 420 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A11 Annie Legrand -Colette Heerinckx 58,74 %
7 EO 3C N = 140 9.9 45.00
8 EO 3S S+1 430 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Mado Miller 55,74 %
9 EO 4C E = -620 20.8 94.55
10 EO 3P W-1 100 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A12 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes 43,10 %
11 EO 3K N = 110 2.3 10.45
12 EO 5K W-2 100 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 15,45 %
A.5 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 34,81 %
13 EO 3P S+1 170 6.6 30.00
14 EO 4P S-1 -50 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
A13 Nicole Leclere -Michele Berrier 44,36 %
15 EO 4P E+1 -450 21.9 99.55
16 EO 4P N+1 450 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A.6 Iris de Limbourg -Benedicte Lemaigre 50,72 %
17 EO 4P W+1 -450 13.2 60.00
18 EO 4C N-1 -100 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
A14 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 52,50 %
19 EO 2C W-1 100 14.3 65.00
20 EO 4C W-1 100 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A.7 Grazia Neuenschwander -Philippe van der Gracht 62,78 %
21 EO 2S N-1 -100 16 72.73
22 EO 4C W = -620 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 42,05 %
23 EO 4C S-2 -200 21.9 99.55
24 EO 2S E+1 -150 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 92,05 %
A.8 Sophie Noach -Michel Lahaut 57,29 %
25 EO 3T S+1 130 9 40.91
26 EO 5T E+1 -620 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
Total : 301,6 / 528 = 57,12 %
PAIRE a.7 Lydia Wildiers -Luc Cartuyvels
A11 Annie Legrand -Colette Heerinckx 58,74 %
1 EO 4C E-1 50 9.9 45.00
2 EO 1S W = -90 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A.5 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 34,81 %
3 EO 3P N = 140 7.7 35.00
4 EO 2C W = -110 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
A12 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes 43,10 %
5 EO 2S W+1 -150 17.5 79.55
6 EO 5C S-1 -50 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 84,55 %
A13 Nicole Leclere -Michele Berrier 44,36 %
9 EO 3C E = -140 11 50.00
10 EO 3K S-2 -200 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A.7 Grazia Neuenschwander -Philippe van der Gracht 62,78 %
13 EO 5T E-1 100 13.2 60.00
14 EO 3P S+1 170 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 42,05 %
15 EO 2C W+1 -140 5.5 25.00
16 EO 4P N+1 450 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
A.8 Sophie Noach -Michel Lahaut 57,29 %
17 EO 4P W+1 -450 13.2 60.00
18 EO 2K E+2 -130 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A.2 Jean de Villenfagne -Pascale Ortegat 50,02 %
19 EO 2KcW-1 200 3.4 15.45
20 EO 3P S-1 -100 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
A.9 Teresa Dekoster -Michel Lievens 48,26 %
21 EO 1S N+1 120 7 31.82
22 EO 4C W = -620 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A.3 Didier Collart -Thierry Collart 51,69 %
23 EO 1K W-3 300 0.1 0.45
24 EO 3P S-2 -100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
A10 Myriam de Timary -Caroll Pucher 47,36 %
25 EO 3P S-1 -50 15 68.18
26 EO 4P E+3 -710 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Mado Miller 55,74 %
27 EO 4C N-1 -50 16.5 75.00
28 EO 2P S+3 200 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
Total : 273,3 / 528 = 51,76 %
PAIRE a12 Chris Oostens -Jeanine Bontemps
A.7 Grazia Neuenschwander -Philippe van der Gracht 62,78 %
1 EO 4CcE-1 100 3.4 15.45
2 EO 2C S+1 140 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 7,95 %
A14 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 52,50 %
3 EO 1S S+2 150 3.4 15.45
4 EO 1S N = 90 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A.8 Sophie Noach -Michel Lahaut 57,29 %
5 EO 2S W+1 -150 17.5 79.55
6 EO 4C S = 420 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 42,05 %
7 EO 2C N = 110 18.6 84.55
8 EO 6ScS-3 -500 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 92,05 %
A.9 Teresa Dekoster -Michel Lievens 48,26 %
9 EO 3C E = -140 11 50.00
10 EO 3P W = -140 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.2 Jean de Villenfagne -Pascale Ortegat 50,02 %
11 EO 5K S-1 -50 13.2 60.00
12 EO 3P N = 140 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
A10 Myriam de Timary -Caroll Pucher 47,36 %
13 EO 3S E-3 300 4.5 20.45
14 EO 3P S+1 170 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
A.3 Didier Collart -Thierry Collart 51,69 %
15 EO 3P E = -140 5.5 25.00
16 EO 6P N-1 -50 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Mado Miller 55,74 %
19 EO 2ScW-3 800 0.1 0.45
20 EO 4P S-2 -200 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A12 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes 43,10 %
23 EO 3C N = 140 13.2 60.00
24 EO 3S E = -400 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
A.6 Iris de Limbourg -Benedicte Lemaigre 50,72 %
25 EO 4T S = 130 9 40.91
26 EO 4P E+2 -680 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A13 Nicole Leclere -Michele Berrier 44,36 %
27 EO 4K N-1 -50 16.5 75.00
28 EO 1S E = -90 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
Total : 268,4 / 528 = 50,83 %
PAIRE a11 Patrick Gilles -Fabienne Smit
A13 Nicole Leclere -Michele Berrier 44,36 %
1 EO 4C E-1 50 9.9 45.00
2 EO 1S W = -90 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A.7 Grazia Neuenschwander -Philippe van der Gracht 62,78 %
3 EO 3T W-3 300 0.1 0.45
4 EO 2P N = 110 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
A14 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 52,50 %
5 EO 1S W-1 50 11 50.00
6 EO 3S S+1 430 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
A.8 Sophie Noach -Michel Lahaut 57,29 %
7 EO 3C N-1 -100 21.9 99.55
8 EO 3S S+4 520 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 42,05 %
9 EO 3C E = -140 11 50.00
10 EO 3P W = -140 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.9 Teresa Dekoster -Michel Lievens 48,26 %
11 EO 3T N-7 -350 21.9 99.55
12 EO 3K E-1 50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A.2 Jean de Villenfagne -Pascale Ortegat 50,02 %
13 EO 5T E-1 100 13.2 60.00
14 EO 3P S+1 170 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.3 Didier Collart -Thierry Collart 51,69 %
17 EO 4P W+1 -450 13.2 60.00
18 EO 1S W = -90 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A11 Annie Legrand -Colette Heerinckx 58,74 %
21 EO 1S N+2 150 2 9.09
22 EO 3S W+1 -630 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.5 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 34,81 %
23 EO 1S N+1 120 17.5 79.55
24 EO 3P S-2 -100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
A12 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes 43,10 %
25 EO 1P S+3 170 6 27.27
26 EO 4CcN-3 -800 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.6 Iris de Limbourg -Benedicte Lemaigre 50,72 %
27 EO 3S N-1 -50 16.5 75.00
28 EO 2P S+2 170 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 268,0 / 528 = 50,76 %
PAIRE a.2 Annette Fobe -Dominique Sassen
A.2 Jean de Villenfagne -Pascale Ortegat 50,02 %
3 EO 2C E-1 100 17.5 79.55
4 EO 3S S-2 -200 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 84,55 %
A10 Myriam de Timary -Caroll Pucher 47,36 %
5 EO 2S W-2 100 4.5 20.45
6 EO 4C S = 420 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
A.3 Didier Collart -Thierry Collart 51,69 %
7 EO 2C N+1 140 9.9 45.00
8 EO 3S S+3 490 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
A11 Annie Legrand -Colette Heerinckx 58,74 %
9 EO 2P N-1 -50 1.2 5.45
10 EO 3P W = -140 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Mado Miller 55,74 %
11 EO 5C N-2 -100 19.7 89.55
12 EO 4K W-1 50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A12 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes 43,10 %
13 EO 5T E-1 100 13.2 60.00
14 EO 2P N+1 140 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
A.5 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 34,81 %
15 EO 4P E = -420 15.4 70.00
16 EO 6P N-1 -50 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
A13 Nicole Leclere -Michele Berrier 44,36 %
17 EO 4P W+1 -450 13.2 60.00
18 EO 3K E-1 50 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A.6 Iris de Limbourg -Benedicte Lemaigre 50,72 %
19 EO 2P N+1 140 7.7 35.00
20 EO 4P S-1 -100 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
A14 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 52,50 %
21 EO 2S N-1 -100 16 72.73
22 EO 4C W = -620 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.7 Grazia Neuenschwander -Philippe van der Gracht 62,78 %
23 EO 2C S+1 140 13.2 60.00
24 EO 3P S-2 -100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.8 Sophie Noach -Michel Lahaut 57,29 %
27 EO 3S N+1 430 1.2 5.45
28 EO 2P S+2 170 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
Total : 264,9 / 528 = 50,17 %
PAIRE a10 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille
A.6 Iris de Limbourg -Benedicte Lemaigre 50,72 %
1 EO 3P N = 140 0.1 0.45
2 EO 1S W-1 50 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
A13 Nicole Leclere -Michele Berrier 44,36 %
3 EO 1S S+1 120 13.2 60.00
4 EO 2P S+2 170 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
A.7 Grazia Neuenschwander -Philippe van der Gracht 62,78 %
5 EO 2S E-2 100 4.5 20.45
6 EO 4C S = 420 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
A14 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 52,50 %
7 EO 3C N = 140 9.9 45.00
8 EO 3S S+1 430 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.8 Sophie Noach -Michel Lahaut 57,29 %
9 EO 3C E = -140 11 50.00
10 EO 3P W = -140 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 42,05 %
11 EO 5T E-1 50 5.5 25.00
12 EO 4K E-1 50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
A.2 Jean de Villenfagne -Pascale Ortegat 50,02 %
15 EO 4P E = -420 15.4 70.00
16 EO 4P N+1 450 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A10 Myriam de Timary -Caroll Pucher 47,36 %
19 EO 2C W = -110 19.7 89.55
20 EO 4P S-2 -200 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 89,55 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Mado Miller 55,74 %
21 EO 2S N-1 -100 16 72.73
22 EO 4C W = -620 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A11 Annie Legrand -Colette Heerinckx 58,74 %
23 EO 2S N+1 150 8.8 40.00
24 EO 3S E-4 200 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
A.5 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 34,81 %
25 EO 3S N = 400 4 18.18
26 EO 6T E = -1370 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A12 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes 43,10 %
27 EO 2S N = 120 8.8 40.00
28 EO 2S E+1 -150 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
Total : 252,5 / 528 = 47,82 %
PAIRE a.8 Francoise Turin -Christiane Huby
A.5 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 34,81 %
1 EO 4C E-1 50 9.9 45.00
2 EO 1S W = -90 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A12 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes 43,10 %
3 EO 2P N+1 140 7.7 35.00
4 EO 2C W-2 200 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
A.6 Iris de Limbourg -Benedicte Lemaigre 50,72 %
5 EO 2S W-2 100 4.5 20.45
6 EO 4C S = 420 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
A13 Nicole Leclere -Michele Berrier 44,36 %
7 EO 2C N+1 140 9.9 45.00
8 EO 3S S+1 430 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A14 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 52,50 %
11 EO 4K N-1 -50 13.2 60.00
12 EO 3K W+2 -150 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A.8 Sophie Noach -Michel Lahaut 57,29 %
15 EO 5C W-4 200 0.1 0.45
16 EO 6P N = 980 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 0,45 %
A.2 Jean de Villenfagne -Pascale Ortegat 50,02 %
17 EO 4P W+1 -450 13.2 60.00
18 EO 3C S-2 -200 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.9 Teresa Dekoster -Michel Lievens 48,26 %
19 EO 2C W-1 100 14.3 65.00
20 EO 4P S-1 -100 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.3 Didier Collart -Thierry Collart 51,69 %
21 EO 3S N-2 -200 22 100.00
22 EO 4C W = -620 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A10 Myriam de Timary -Caroll Pucher 47,36 %
23 EO 3C S+1 170 5.5 25.00
24 EO 3T W = -110 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Mado Miller 55,74 %
25 EO 3S N-2 -100 21 95.45
26 EO 5T E+1 -620 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A11 Annie Legrand -Colette Heerinckx 58,74 %
27 EO 3S N = 400 5.5 25.00
28 EO 2P S+2 170 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
Total : 247,5 / 528 = 46,88 %
PAIRE a.9 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes
A12 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes 43,10 %
1 EO 4P S-2 -100 17.5 79.55
2 EO 1S W-1 50 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
A.6 Iris de Limbourg -Benedicte Lemaigre 50,72 %
3 EO 3S S-4 -200 21.9 99.55
4 EO 2S W-1 100 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A13 Nicole Leclere -Michele Berrier 44,36 %
5 EO 3S W-3 150 0.1 0.45
6 EO 5C S-1 -50 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.7 Grazia Neuenschwander -Philippe van der Gracht 62,78 %
7 EO 2S W-2 200 2.3 10.45
8 EO 3S S = 400 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A14 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 52,50 %
9 EO 3P N-1 -50 1.2 5.45
10 EO 2P W = -110 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 7,95 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 42,05 %
13 EO 4C W-4 400 1.2 5.45
14 EO 2C E-1 50 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.9 Teresa Dekoster -Michel Lievens 48,26 %
17 EO 3S W+1 -430 3.4 15.45
18 EO 3K W-1 50 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
A.3 Didier Collart -Thierry Collart 51,69 %
19 EO 3C E-2 200 3.4 15.45
20 EO 3C E = -140 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A10 Myriam de Timary -Caroll Pucher 47,36 %
21 EO 1S S+1 120 7 31.82
22 EO 3S W+1 -630 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Mado Miller 55,74 %
23 EO 2C S-1 -100 19.7 89.55
24 EO 3C E-3 150 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A11 Annie Legrand -Colette Heerinckx 58,74 %
25 EO 3S N+1 430 1 4.55
26 EO 4P E = -620 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
A.5 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 34,81 %
27 EO 2S S-1 -50 16.5 75.00
28 EO 3T E = -110 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
Total : 240,9 / 528 = 45,62 %
PAIRE a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Simone Munsterhjelm
A.4 Alan Beckman -Mado Miller 55,74 %
1 EO 4P N-1 -50 15.4 70.00
2 EO 3K N = 110 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
A11 Annie Legrand -Colette Heerinckx 58,74 %
3 EO 1S S+1 120 13.2 60.00
4 EO 3T W-1 100 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A12 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes 43,10 %
7 EO 3S W-3 300 0.1 0.45
8 EO 5S S-3 -150 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.6 Iris de Limbourg -Benedicte Lemaigre 50,72 %
11 EO 4C N-1 -50 13.2 60.00
12 EO 1S W-1 50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A14 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 52,50 %
13 EO 4T E = -130 19.7 89.55
14 EO 2P S+2 170 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A.7 Grazia Neuenschwander -Philippe van der Gracht 62,78 %
15 EO 4P E = -420 15.4 70.00
16 EO 4P N+2 480 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 42,05 %
17 EO 4P W = -420 0.1 0.45
18 EO 1T S+1 90 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 12,73 %
A.8 Sophie Noach -Michel Lahaut 57,29 %
19 EO 2P N = 110 11 50.00
20 EO 3P S-1 -100 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A.2 Jean de Villenfagne -Pascale Ortegat 50,02 %
21 EO 2S N = 120 7 31.82
22 EO 4C W = -620 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A.9 Teresa Dekoster -Michel Lievens 48,26 %
23 EO 2C S+1 140 13.2 60.00
24 EO 2P S = 110 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A.3 Didier Collart -Thierry Collart 51,69 %
25 EO 3S S-1 -50 15 68.18
26 EO 4P E = -620 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A10 Myriam de Timary -Caroll Pucher 47,36 %
27 EO 3S N-1 -50 16.5 75.00
28 EO 1S E = -90 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
Total : 239,7 / 528 = 45,40 %
PAIRE a.1 Agathe Housiaux -Suzanne Klausen
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 42,05 %
1 EO 3C E = -140 20.8 94.55
2 EO 1S W+1 -120 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 97,05 %
A.9 Teresa Dekoster -Michel Lievens 48,26 %
3 EO 1S S+2 150 3.4 15.45
4 EO 2C W-2 200 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 10,45 %
A.2 Jean de Villenfagne -Pascale Ortegat 50,02 %
5 EO 2S W+1 -150 17.5 79.55
6 EO 4C S+1 450 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A10 Myriam de Timary -Caroll Pucher 47,36 %
7 EO 2C N+1 140 9.9 45.00
8 EO 3S S+4 520 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
A.3 Didier Collart -Thierry Collart 51,69 %
9 EO 3P N-2 -100 4.5 20.45
10 EO 3P W = -140 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
A11 Annie Legrand -Colette Heerinckx 58,74 %
11 EO 5K S-1 -50 13.2 60.00
12 EO 1S W-1 50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Mado Miller 55,74 %
13 EO 6K E-4 400 1.2 5.45
14 EO 4P S = 420 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 2,95 %
A12 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes 43,10 %
15 EO 4P E = -420 15.4 70.00
16 EO 4P N+1 450 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A.5 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 34,81 %
17 EO 4P W+1 -450 13.2 60.00
18 EO 1P S+1 110 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A13 Nicole Leclere -Michele Berrier 44,36 %
19 EO 2C W = -110 19.7 89.55
20 EO 3PcS-1 -200 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 89,55 %
A.6 Iris de Limbourg -Benedicte Lemaigre 50,72 %
21 EO 3S N-1 -100 16 72.73
22 EO 4C W = -620 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.7 Grazia Neuenschwander -Philippe van der Gracht 62,78 %
25 EO 3S N+1 430 1 4.55
26 EO 4P E = -620 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
Total : 227,1 / 528 = 43,01 %
PAIRE a.5 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck
A10 Myriam de Timary -Caroll Pucher 47,36 %
1 EO 4C E-2 100 3.4 15.45
2 EO 1S S = 90 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 17,95 %
A11 Annie Legrand -Colette Heerinckx 58,74 %
5 EO 2S W-1 50 11 50.00
6 EO 4C S = 420 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.5 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 34,81 %
9 EO 4C W = -620 20.8 94.55
10 EO 2P W+2 -170 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 87,05 %
A13 Nicole Leclere -Michele Berrier 44,36 %
11 EO 4K S = 130 0.1 0.45
12 EO 2P N+1 140 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 2,95 %
A.6 Iris de Limbourg -Benedicte Lemaigre 50,72 %
13 EO 3T E+2 -150 21.9 99.55
14 EO 2P S+2 170 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A14 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 52,50 %
15 EO 3K S = 110 2.3 10.45
16 EO 6C N-1 -50 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.7 Grazia Neuenschwander -Philippe van der Gracht 62,78 %
17 EO 3S E+1 -430 3.4 15.45
18 EO 3C N-2 -200 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 42,05 %
19 EO 2C W = -110 19.7 89.55
20 EO 3C E-2 200 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.8 Sophie Noach -Michel Lahaut 57,29 %
21 EO 2S S+2 180 0 0.00
22 EO 4C W = -620 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
A.2 Jean de Villenfagne -Pascale Ortegat 50,02 %
23 EO 3C S+1 170 5.5 25.00
24 EO 1P S+1 110 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A.9 Teresa Dekoster -Michel Lievens 48,26 %
25 EO 4T S-2 -100 21 95.45
26 EO 4K W-2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.3 Didier Collart -Thierry Collart 51,69 %
27 EO 3S N+1 430 1.2 5.45
28 EO 2P S = 110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
Total : 216,2 / 528 = 40,95 %
PAIRE a14 -
A.8 Sophie Noach -Michel Lahaut 57,29 %
1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 42,05 %
3 EO BYE 0 0.00
4 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.9 Teresa Dekoster -Michel Lievens 48,26 %
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.2 Jean de Villenfagne -Pascale Ortegat 50,02 %
7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A10 Myriam de Timary -Caroll Pucher 47,36 %
9 EO BYE 0 0.00
10 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.3 Didier Collart -Thierry Collart 51,69 %
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A11 Annie Legrand -Colette Heerinckx 58,74 %
13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Mado Miller 55,74 %
15 EO BYE 0 0.00
16 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A12 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes 43,10 %
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.5 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 34,81 %
19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.6 Iris de Limbourg -Benedicte Lemaigre 50,72 %
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A14 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 52,50 %
27 EO BYE 0 0.00
28 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 616 = 0,00 %
|