B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 62,20 A.4 Anne Brans -Dominique Bourgoignie
--- 2 53,87 A.7 Grazia Neuenschwander -Patrick Gilles
--- 3 52,68 A.5 Hugo Baetens -Francis Rittweger
--- 4 51,79 A.8 Christian Meert -Didier Collart
--- 5 49,70 A.2 Pascale Ortegat -Philippe van der Gracht
--- 6 47,32 A.3 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere
--- 7 44,35 A.6 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Michele Verhulst
--- 8 38,10 A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 58,93 a.3 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor
--- 2 56,85 a.2 Lydia Wildiers -Gerard Cooreman
--- 3 52,68 a.1 Benedicte Lemaigre -Elie Behaghel
--- 4 52,68 a.5 Francoise Nibelle -Gaetan van de Werve
--- 5 49,11 a.7 Jacques Podevyn -Michel Lievens
--- 6 46,13 a.8 Dilva Haym -Catherine de Moffarts
--- 7 43,15 a.4 Teresa Dekoster -Ana Jara de Carvelho
--- 8 40,48 a.6 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
PAIRE A.4 Anne Brans -Dominique Bourgoignie
a.7 Jacques Podevyn -Michel Lievens 49,11 %
1 NS 4C W-2 100 12 85.71
2 NS 3C N = 140 8 57.14
3 NS 4P W+2 -680 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
a.6 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 40,48 %
4 NS 4P S+1 650 4 28.57
5 NS 2S W-1 50 14 100.00
6 NS 4P N = 420 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
a.5 Francoise Nibelle -Gaetan van de Werve 52,68 %
7 NS 3K S+1 130 5 35.71
8 NS 5C W-1 50 14 100.00
9 NS 3K N = 110 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
a.4 Teresa Dekoster -Ana Jara de Carvelho 43,15 %
10 NS 3S S+1 630 3 21.43
11 NS 3S E-1 50 13 92.86
12 NS 2C N+1 140 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
a.3 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 58,93 %
13 NS 2C W-1 100 10 71.43
14 NS 3K N+1 130 12 85.71
15 NS 1S S-1 -100 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
a.2 Lydia Wildiers -Gerard Cooreman 56,85 %
16 NS 3S W+1 -630 6 42.86
17 NS 1S E-1 50 6 42.86
18 NS 3S S+1 630 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.1 Benedicte Lemaigre -Elie Behaghel 52,68 %
19 NS 1S N-2 -100 1 7.14
20 NS 6T W = -1370 6 42.86
21 NS 2S S = 120 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.8 Dilva Haym -Catherine de Moffarts 46,13 %
22 NS 5KcN-1 -100 6 42.86
23 NS 3K N = 110 7 50.00
24 NS 3P E+1 -170 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
Total : 209,0 / 336 = 62,20 %
PAIRE A.7 Grazia Neuenschwander -Patrick Gilles
a.6 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 40,48 %
1 NS 3K E-2 100 12 85.71
2 NS 3C N+2 200 10 71.43
3 NS 4P W+2 -680 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
a.5 Francoise Nibelle -Gaetan van de Werve 52,68 %
4 NS 6P S-1 -100 2 14.29
5 NS 1S S-1 -100 9 64.29
6 NS 4P S-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
a.4 Teresa Dekoster -Ana Jara de Carvelho 43,15 %
7 NS 3K S+1 130 5 35.71
8 NS 4C W = -420 5 35.71
9 NS 3K N = 110 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
a.3 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 58,93 %
10 NS 3S S+2 660 8 57.14
11 NS 3K W-1 50 13 92.86
12 NS 2C S-1 -100 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
a.2 Lydia Wildiers -Gerard Cooreman 56,85 %
13 NS 2C W = -110 6 42.86
14 NS 6TcE-1 100 8 57.14
15 NS 1S S-2 -200 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
a.1 Benedicte Lemaigre -Elie Behaghel 52,68 %
16 NS 3S W+1 -630 6 42.86
17 NS 1S E-1 50 6 42.86
18 NS 3S N+2 660 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
a.8 Dilva Haym -Catherine de Moffarts 46,13 %
19 NS 1S N = 90 9 64.29
20 NS 4P E+2 -680 10 71.43
21 NS 3S S-3 -300 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.7 Jacques Podevyn -Michel Lievens 49,11 %
22 NS 5KcS = 550 14 100.00
23 NS 3K S = 110 7 50.00
24 NS 3P E+1 -170 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
Total : 181,0 / 336 = 53,87 %
PAIRE A.5 Hugo Baetens -Francis Rittweger
a.2 Lydia Wildiers -Gerard Cooreman 56,85 %
1 NS 3K E-1 50 5 35.71
2 NS 4C S = 620 14 100.00
3 NS 4P W+2 -680 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
a.1 Benedicte Lemaigre -Elie Behaghel 52,68 %
4 NS 3TcW-4 1100 8 57.14
5 NS 1P N-1 -100 9 64.29
6 NS 4P N = 420 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
a.8 Dilva Haym -Catherine de Moffarts 46,13 %
7 NS 2P S+2 170 10 71.43
8 NS 4C W = -420 5 35.71
9 NS 4K N-1 -50 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
a.7 Jacques Podevyn -Michel Lievens 49,11 %
10 NS 5S S = 660 8 57.14
11 NS 3P N-1 -50 10 71.43
12 NS 4C N-1 -100 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.6 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 40,48 %
13 NS 3CcW-2 500 14 100.00
14 NS 3PcE-2 300 14 100.00
15 NS 1S S-3 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.5 Francoise Nibelle -Gaetan van de Werve 52,68 %
16 NS 3S W+2 -660 1 7.14
17 NS 1S N+2 150 14 100.00
18 NS 3S S = 600 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
a.4 Teresa Dekoster -Ana Jara de Carvelho 43,15 %
19 NS 2C N-2 -100 1 7.14
20 NS 5T W-2 200 14 100.00
21 NS 2P N = 110 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
a.3 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 58,93 %
22 NS 4CcW+1 -990 0 0.00
23 NS 2PcN-2 -500 0 0.00
24 NS 2P E+2 -170 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
Total : 177,0 / 336 = 52,68 %
PAIRE A.8 Christian Meert -Didier Collart
a.8 Dilva Haym -Catherine de Moffarts 46,13 %
1 NS 2C W-1 50 5 35.71
2 NS 4PcE-3 500 12 85.71
3 NS 3S E+1 -630 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
a.7 Jacques Podevyn -Michel Lievens 49,11 %
4 NS 4P S+3 710 6 42.86
5 NS 2S W = -120 3 21.43
6 NS 4P N = 420 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
a.6 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 40,48 %
7 NS 4P N = 620 14 100.00
8 NS 4C W = -420 5 35.71
9 NS 5T E-1 100 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
a.5 Francoise Nibelle -Gaetan van de Werve 52,68 %
10 NS 3S S+3 690 13 92.86
11 NS 3S E = -400 5 35.71
12 NS 2C N = 110 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
a.4 Teresa Dekoster -Ana Jara de Carvelho 43,15 %
13 NS 1C W+1 -110 6 42.86
14 NS 1P E-1 50 4 28.57
15 NS 3C E = -140 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
a.3 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 58,93 %
16 NS 3S W+2 -660 1 7.14
17 NS 2C N-1 -50 2 14.29
18 NS 3S S+1 630 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
a.2 Lydia Wildiers -Gerard Cooreman 56,85 %
19 NS 1S N = 90 9 64.29
20 NS 4P E+2 -680 10 71.43
21 NS 3S S-1 -100 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
a.1 Benedicte Lemaigre -Elie Behaghel 52,68 %
22 NS 5CcW-1 200 12 85.71
23 NS 2K S = 90 2 14.29
24 NS 3S E+1 -430 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
Total : 174,0 / 336 = 51,79 %
PAIRE A.2 Pascale Ortegat -Philippe van der Gracht
a.3 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 58,93 %
1 NS 2C W+1 -140 0 0.00
2 NS 2S N = 120 6 42.86
3 NS 4P W+2 -680 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
a.2 Lydia Wildiers -Gerard Cooreman 56,85 %
4 NS 6P S = 1430 12 85.71
5 NS 1S E+1 -120 3 21.43
6 NS 2P N+1 140 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
a.1 Benedicte Lemaigre -Elie Behaghel 52,68 %
7 NS 3P N+1 170 10 71.43
8 NS 4C W = -420 5 35.71
9 NS 4K N-2 -100 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
a.8 Dilva Haym -Catherine de Moffarts 46,13 %
10 NS 3S S+2 660 8 57.14
11 NS 3S E+1 -430 1 7.14
12 NS 2C N+1 140 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
a.7 Jacques Podevyn -Michel Lievens 49,11 %
13 NS 1S S-2 -200 0 0.00
14 NS 5K N-1 -50 2 14.29
15 NS 1S S-1 -100 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
a.6 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 40,48 %
16 NS 3S W = -600 12 85.71
17 NS 1S E-1 50 6 42.86
18 NS 3S S+1 630 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
a.5 Francoise Nibelle -Gaetan van de Werve 52,68 %
19 NS 2ScE-1 200 14 100.00
20 NS 6P E = -1430 2 14.29
21 NS 3S N-2 -200 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
a.4 Teresa Dekoster -Ana Jara de Carvelho 43,15 %
22 NS 4K N = 130 10 71.43
23 NS 3C E-3 300 14 100.00
24 NS 4P W-1 50 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 90,48 %
Total : 167,0 / 336 = 49,70 %
PAIRE A.3 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere
a.5 Francoise Nibelle -Gaetan van de Werve 52,68 %
1 NS 3C W-1 50 5 35.71
2 NS 2P E-1 50 2 14.29
3 NS 4P W+2 -680 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.4 Teresa Dekoster -Ana Jara de Carvelho 43,15 %
4 NS 6P S = 1430 12 85.71
5 NS 1S S-1 -100 9 64.29
6 NS 4P N+1 450 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 80,95 %
a.3 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 58,93 %
7 NS 4P N-2 -200 0 0.00
8 NS 4C W = -420 5 35.71
9 NS 4K N-1 -50 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
a.2 Lydia Wildiers -Gerard Cooreman 56,85 %
10 NS 3S S+1 630 3 21.43
11 NS 2S E+1 -150 8 57.14
12 NS 2C N = 110 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
a.1 Benedicte Lemaigre -Elie Behaghel 52,68 %
13 NS 1C W+1 -110 6 42.86
14 NS 3T E = -110 0 0.00
15 NS 2P W-2 100 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
a.8 Dilva Haym -Catherine de Moffarts 46,13 %
16 NS 3S W = -600 12 85.71
17 NS 1S E-2 100 11 78.57
18 NS 2K N+2 130 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
a.7 Jacques Podevyn -Michel Lievens 49,11 %
19 NS 1S N = 90 9 64.29
20 NS 6P E = -1430 2 14.29
21 NS 3S N-3 -300 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
a.6 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 40,48 %
22 NS 4C W-1 100 8 57.14
23 NS 3K N+1 130 12 85.71
24 NS 4P E = -420 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
Total : 159,0 / 336 = 47,32 %
PAIRE A.6 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Michele Verhulst
a.4 Teresa Dekoster -Ana Jara de Carvelho 43,15 %
1 NS 3K E-2 100 12 85.71
2 NS 4C N-1 -100 0 0.00
3 NS 6P W = -1430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
a.3 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 58,93 %
4 NS 6P S-2 -200 0 0.00
5 NS 1S S-1 -100 9 64.29
6 NS 4P S+1 450 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
a.2 Lydia Wildiers -Gerard Cooreman 56,85 %
7 NS 3P N-1 -100 2 14.29
8 NS 4C W = -420 5 35.71
9 NS 4K N-2 -100 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 21,43 %
a.1 Benedicte Lemaigre -Elie Behaghel 52,68 %
10 NS 3S S+3 690 13 92.86
11 NS 3S W = -400 5 35.71
12 NS 4T W = -130 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
a.8 Dilva Haym -Catherine de Moffarts 46,13 %
13 NS 3K S = 110 12 85.71
14 NS 4P E-2 100 8 57.14
15 NS 3C E = -140 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
a.7 Jacques Podevyn -Michel Lievens 49,11 %
16 NS 3S W+1 -630 6 42.86
17 NS 1S E-2 100 11 78.57
18 NS 3S S+1 630 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
a.6 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 40,48 %
19 NS 1S N-1 -50 4 28.57
20 NS 4P E+2 -680 10 71.43
21 NS 2S N-2 -200 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.5 Francoise Nibelle -Gaetan van de Werve 52,68 %
22 NS 4C W = -620 4 28.57
23 NS 3K S = 110 7 50.00
24 NS 4P E = -420 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
Total : 149,0 / 336 = 44,35 %
PAIRE A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck
a.1 Benedicte Lemaigre -Elie Behaghel 52,68 %
1 NS 4C W-1 50 5 35.71
2 NS 3P E-2 100 4 28.57
3 NS 4P W+2 -680 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
a.8 Dilva Haym -Catherine de Moffarts 46,13 %
4 NS 6P S = 1430 12 85.71
5 NS 1S S-2 -200 0 0.00
6 NS 4C E-2 200 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
a.7 Jacques Podevyn -Michel Lievens 49,11 %
7 NS 3P N+1 170 10 71.43
8 NS Pass Passe 12 85.71
9 NS 3KcN-1 -100 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
a.6 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 40,48 %
10 NS 6S S-1 -100 0 0.00
11 NS 3S W+1 -430 1 7.14
12 NS 2CcN+1 870 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
a.5 Francoise Nibelle -Gaetan van de Werve 52,68 %
13 NS 2C W+1 -140 2 14.29
14 NS 5T E-2 100 8 57.14
15 NS 1S S-1 -100 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
a.4 Teresa Dekoster -Ana Jara de Carvelho 43,15 %
16 NS 3S W = -600 12 85.71
17 NS 1S E = -90 0 0.00
18 NS 3S S = 600 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
a.3 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 58,93 %
19 NS 1S N = 90 9 64.29
20 NS 6P E = -1430 2 14.29
21 NS 3S N-3 -300 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
a.2 Lydia Wildiers -Gerard Cooreman 56,85 %
22 NS 4C W+1 -650 2 14.29
23 NS 5C E = 110 7 50.00
24 NS 3K N = -650 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 21,43 %
Total : 128,0 / 336 = 38,10 %
PAIRE a.3 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor
A.2 Pascale Ortegat -Philippe van der Gracht 49,70 %
1 EO 2C W+1 -140 14 100.00
2 EO 2S N = 120 8 57.14
3 EO 4P W+2 -680 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
A.6 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Michele Verhulst 44,35 %
4 EO 6P S-2 -200 14 100.00
5 EO 1S S-1 -100 5 35.71
6 EO 4P S+1 450 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
A.3 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 47,32 %
7 EO 4P N-2 -200 14 100.00
8 EO 4C W = -420 9 64.29
9 EO 4K N-1 -50 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
A.7 Grazia Neuenschwander -Patrick Gilles 53,87 %
10 EO 3S S+2 660 6 42.86
11 EO 3K W-1 50 1 7.14
12 EO 2C S-1 -100 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
A.4 Anne Brans -Dominique Bourgoignie 62,20 %
13 EO 2C W-1 100 4 28.57
14 EO 3K N+1 130 2 14.29
15 EO 1S S-1 -100 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
A.8 Christian Meert -Didier Collart 51,79 %
16 EO 3S W+2 -660 13 92.86
17 EO 2C N-1 -50 12 85.71
18 EO 3S S+1 630 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck 38,10 %
19 EO 1S N = 90 5 35.71
20 EO 6P E = -1430 12 85.71
21 EO 3S N-3 -300 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
A.5 Hugo Baetens -Francis Rittweger 52,68 %
22 EO 4CcW+1 -990 14 100.00
23 EO 2PcN-2 -500 14 100.00
24 EO 2P E+2 -170 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
Total : 198,0 / 336 = 58,93 %
PAIRE a.2 Lydia Wildiers -Gerard Cooreman
A.5 Hugo Baetens -Francis Rittweger 52,68 %
1 EO 3K E-1 50 9 64.29
2 EO 4C S = 620 0 0.00
3 EO 4P W+2 -680 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
A.2 Pascale Ortegat -Philippe van der Gracht 49,70 %
4 EO 6P S = 1430 2 14.29
5 EO 1S E+1 -120 11 78.57
6 EO 2P N+1 140 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
A.6 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Michele Verhulst 44,35 %
7 EO 3P N-1 -100 12 85.71
8 EO 4C W = -420 9 64.29
9 EO 4K N-2 -100 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 78,57 %
A.3 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 47,32 %
10 EO 3S S+1 630 11 78.57
11 EO 2S E+1 -150 6 42.86
12 EO 2C N = 110 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
A.7 Grazia Neuenschwander -Patrick Gilles 53,87 %
13 EO 2C W = -110 8 57.14
14 EO 6TcE-1 100 6 42.86
15 EO 1S S-2 -200 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
A.4 Anne Brans -Dominique Bourgoignie 62,20 %
16 EO 3S W+1 -630 8 57.14
17 EO 1S E-1 50 8 57.14
18 EO 3S S+1 630 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.8 Christian Meert -Didier Collart 51,79 %
19 EO 1S N = 90 5 35.71
20 EO 4P E+2 -680 4 28.57
21 EO 3S S-1 -100 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck 38,10 %
22 EO 4C W+1 -650 12 85.71
23 EO 5C E = 110 7 50.00
24 EO 3K N = -650 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 78,57 %
Total : 191,0 / 336 = 56,85 %
PAIRE a.1 Benedicte Lemaigre -Elie Behaghel
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck 38,10 %
1 EO 4C W-1 50 9 64.29
2 EO 3P E-2 100 10 71.43
3 EO 4P W+2 -680 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
A.5 Hugo Baetens -Francis Rittweger 52,68 %
4 EO 3TcW-4 1100 6 42.86
5 EO 1P N-1 -100 5 35.71
6 EO 4P N = 420 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
A.2 Pascale Ortegat -Philippe van der Gracht 49,70 %
7 EO 3P N+1 170 4 28.57
8 EO 4C W = -420 9 64.29
9 EO 4K N-2 -100 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
A.6 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Michele Verhulst 44,35 %
10 EO 3S S+3 690 1 7.14
11 EO 3S W = -400 9 64.29
12 EO 4T W = -130 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
A.3 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 47,32 %
13 EO 1C W+1 -110 8 57.14
14 EO 3T E = -110 14 100.00
15 EO 2P W-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
A.7 Grazia Neuenschwander -Patrick Gilles 53,87 %
16 EO 3S W+1 -630 8 57.14
17 EO 1S E-1 50 8 57.14
18 EO 3S N+2 660 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
A.4 Anne Brans -Dominique Bourgoignie 62,20 %
19 EO 1S N-2 -100 13 92.86
20 EO 6T W = -1370 8 57.14
21 EO 2S S = 120 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.8 Christian Meert -Didier Collart 51,79 %
22 EO 5CcW-1 200 2 14.29
23 EO 2K S = 90 12 85.71
24 EO 3S E+1 -430 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
Total : 177,0 / 336 = 52,68 %
PAIRE a.5 Francoise Nibelle -Gaetan van de Werve
A.3 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 47,32 %
1 EO 3C W-1 50 9 64.29
2 EO 2P E-1 50 12 85.71
3 EO 4P W+2 -680 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.7 Grazia Neuenschwander -Patrick Gilles 53,87 %
4 EO 6P S-1 -100 12 85.71
5 EO 1S S-1 -100 5 35.71
6 EO 4P S-1 -50 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
A.4 Anne Brans -Dominique Bourgoignie 62,20 %
7 EO 3K S+1 130 9 64.29
8 EO 5C W-1 50 0 0.00
9 EO 3K N = 110 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
A.8 Christian Meert -Didier Collart 51,79 %
10 EO 3S S+3 690 1 7.14
11 EO 3S E = -400 9 64.29
12 EO 2C N = 110 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck 38,10 %
13 EO 2C W+1 -140 12 85.71
14 EO 5T E-2 100 6 42.86
15 EO 1S S-1 -100 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
A.5 Hugo Baetens -Francis Rittweger 52,68 %
16 EO 3S W+2 -660 13 92.86
17 EO 1S N+2 150 0 0.00
18 EO 3S S = 600 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
A.2 Pascale Ortegat -Philippe van der Gracht 49,70 %
19 EO 2ScE-1 200 0 0.00
20 EO 6P E = -1430 12 85.71
21 EO 3S N-2 -200 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
A.6 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Michele Verhulst 44,35 %
22 EO 4C W = -620 10 71.43
23 EO 3K S = 110 7 50.00
24 EO 4P E = -420 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
Total : 177,0 / 336 = 52,68 %
PAIRE a.7 Jacques Podevyn -Michel Lievens
A.4 Anne Brans -Dominique Bourgoignie 62,20 %
1 EO 4C W-2 100 2 14.29
2 EO 3C N = 140 6 42.86
3 EO 4P W+2 -680 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
A.8 Christian Meert -Didier Collart 51,79 %
4 EO 4P S+3 710 8 57.14
5 EO 2S W = -120 11 78.57
6 EO 4P N = 420 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck 38,10 %
7 EO 3P N+1 170 4 28.57
8 EO Pass Passe 2 14.29
9 EO 3KcN-1 -100 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
A.5 Hugo Baetens -Francis Rittweger 52,68 %
10 EO 5S S = 660 6 42.86
11 EO 3P N-1 -50 4 28.57
12 EO 4C N-1 -100 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.2 Pascale Ortegat -Philippe van der Gracht 49,70 %
13 EO 1S S-2 -200 14 100.00
14 EO 5K N-1 -50 12 85.71
15 EO 1S S-1 -100 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
A.6 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Michele Verhulst 44,35 %
16 EO 3S W+1 -630 8 57.14
17 EO 1S E-2 100 3 21.43
18 EO 3S S+1 630 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
A.3 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 47,32 %
19 EO 1S N = 90 5 35.71
20 EO 6P E = -1430 12 85.71
21 EO 3S N-3 -300 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
A.7 Grazia Neuenschwander -Patrick Gilles 53,87 %
22 EO 5KcS = 550 0 0.00
23 EO 3K S = 110 7 50.00
24 EO 3P E+1 -170 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
Total : 165,0 / 336 = 49,11 %
PAIRE a.8 Dilva Haym -Catherine de Moffarts
A.8 Christian Meert -Didier Collart 51,79 %
1 EO 2C W-1 50 9 64.29
2 EO 4PcE-3 500 2 14.29
3 EO 3S E+1 -630 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck 38,10 %
4 EO 6P S = 1430 2 14.29
5 EO 1S S-2 -200 14 100.00
6 EO 4C E-2 200 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
A.5 Hugo Baetens -Francis Rittweger 52,68 %
7 EO 2P S+2 170 4 28.57
8 EO 4C W = -420 9 64.29
9 EO 4K N-1 -50 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
A.2 Pascale Ortegat -Philippe van der Gracht 49,70 %
10 EO 3S S+2 660 6 42.86
11 EO 3S E+1 -430 13 92.86
12 EO 2C N+1 140 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
A.6 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Michele Verhulst 44,35 %
13 EO 3K S = 110 2 14.29
14 EO 4P E-2 100 6 42.86
15 EO 3C E = -140 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
A.3 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 47,32 %
16 EO 3S W = -600 2 14.29
17 EO 1S E-2 100 3 21.43
18 EO 2K N+2 130 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
A.7 Grazia Neuenschwander -Patrick Gilles 53,87 %
19 EO 1S N = 90 5 35.71
20 EO 4P E+2 -680 4 28.57
21 EO 3S S-3 -300 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.4 Anne Brans -Dominique Bourgoignie 62,20 %
22 EO 5KcN-1 -100 8 57.14
23 EO 3K N = 110 7 50.00
24 EO 3P E+1 -170 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
Total : 155,0 / 336 = 46,13 %
PAIRE a.4 Teresa Dekoster -Ana Jara de Carvelho
A.6 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Michele Verhulst 44,35 %
1 EO 3K E-2 100 2 14.29
2 EO 4C N-1 -100 14 100.00
3 EO 6P W = -1430 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
A.3 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 47,32 %
4 EO 6P S = 1430 2 14.29
5 EO 1S S-1 -100 5 35.71
6 EO 4P N+1 450 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 19,05 %
A.7 Grazia Neuenschwander -Patrick Gilles 53,87 %
7 EO 3K S+1 130 9 64.29
8 EO 4C W = -420 9 64.29
9 EO 3K N = 110 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
A.4 Anne Brans -Dominique Bourgoignie 62,20 %
10 EO 3S S+1 630 11 78.57
11 EO 3S E-1 50 1 7.14
12 EO 2C N+1 140 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
A.8 Christian Meert -Didier Collart 51,79 %
13 EO 1C W+1 -110 8 57.14
14 EO 1P E-1 50 10 71.43
15 EO 3C E = -140 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck 38,10 %
16 EO 3S W = -600 2 14.29
17 EO 1S E = -90 14 100.00
18 EO 3S S = 600 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
A.5 Hugo Baetens -Francis Rittweger 52,68 %
19 EO 2C N-2 -100 13 92.86
20 EO 5T W-2 200 0 0.00
21 EO 2P N = 110 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
A.2 Pascale Ortegat -Philippe van der Gracht 49,70 %
22 EO 4K N = 130 4 28.57
23 EO 3C E-3 300 0 0.00
24 EO 4P W-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 9,52 %
Total : 145,0 / 336 = 43,15 %
PAIRE a.6 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
A.7 Grazia Neuenschwander -Patrick Gilles 53,87 %
1 EO 3K E-2 100 2 14.29
2 EO 3C N+2 200 4 28.57
3 EO 4P W+2 -680 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
A.4 Anne Brans -Dominique Bourgoignie 62,20 %
4 EO 4P S+1 650 10 71.43
5 EO 2S W-1 50 0 0.00
6 EO 4P N = 420 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
A.8 Christian Meert -Didier Collart 51,79 %
7 EO 4P N = 620 0 0.00
8 EO 4C W = -420 9 64.29
9 EO 5T E-1 100 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck 38,10 %
10 EO 6S S-1 -100 14 100.00
11 EO 3S W+1 -430 13 92.86
12 EO 2CcN+1 870 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
A.5 Hugo Baetens -Francis Rittweger 52,68 %
13 EO 3CcW-2 500 0 0.00
14 EO 3PcE-2 300 0 0.00
15 EO 1S S-3 -300 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.2 Pascale Ortegat -Philippe van der Gracht 49,70 %
16 EO 3S W = -600 2 14.29
17 EO 1S E-1 50 8 57.14
18 EO 3S S+1 630 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
A.6 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Michele Verhulst 44,35 %
19 EO 1S N-1 -50 10 71.43
20 EO 4P E+2 -680 4 28.57
21 EO 2S N-2 -200 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.3 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 47,32 %
22 EO 4C W-1 100 6 42.86
23 EO 3K N+1 130 2 14.29
24 EO 4P E = -420 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
Total : 136,0 / 336 = 40,48 %
|