B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 63,03 A14 Christiane Verelst -Jean Verelst
--- 2 58,05 A.8 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen
--- 3 56,34 A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne
--- 4 54,73 A.3 Grazia Neuenschwander -Philippe Dekandelaer
--- 5 53,75 A.6 Sandra Dallemagne -Marie Claire Vienne
--- 6 53,28 A15 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Patricia Bardy
--- 7 49,15 A13 Iris de Limbourg -Nathalie de Laminne
--- 8 48,96 A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck
--- 9 48,39 A10 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne
--- 10 47,35 A.4 Michele Berrier -Ana Jara de Carvelho
--- 11 45,32 A.9 Francoise Neve -Colette Neve
--- 12 43,33 A.7 Marie Morimont -Catherine de Moffarts
--- 13 43,18 A12 Pascale Nobels -Anne Van den Berge
--- 14 43,05 A11 Patrick Gilles -Philippe van der Gracht
--- 15 42,05 A.5 Giuseppe Napoli -Martine Zens
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 58,43 a.2 Francoise Duren -Jean Marie Schmiliver
--- 2 58,33 a.7 Dominique Sassen -Annette Fobe
--- 3 56,63 a.4 Michel Lievens -Chantal de Lichtervelde
--- 4 54,87 a13 Serge Alard -Teresa Dekoster
--- 5 51,27 a.1 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart
--- 6 50,76 a.6 Francoise Turin -Christiane Huby
--- 7 49,91 a14 Christian Meert -Helene Christiaens
--- 8 48,71 a10 Pierina Di Vito -Jeanine Bontemps
--- 9 48,05 a.5 Nicole Leclere -Sylviane Delbeke
--- 10 47,63 a15 Simone Munsterhjelm -Jeannine Wanderpepen
--- 11 47,20 a11 Dilva Haym -Hugo Baetens
--- 12 46,69 a.9 Caroll Pucher -Myriam de Timary
--- 13 45,45 a.8 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck
--- 14 44,03 a.3 Luc Rampaer -Bernard Brisbois
--- 15 42,08 a12 Brigitte Brusselmans -Maryse Gathy
PAIRE A14 Christiane Verelst -Jean Verelst
a12 Brigitte Brusselmans -Maryse Gathy 42,08 %
1 NS 4C S+1 450 11 50.00
2 NS 4P W = -420 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a11 Dilva Haym -Hugo Baetens 47,20 %
3 NS 2S S-2 -100 8.8 40.00
4 NS 5K E = -600 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 40,45 %
a10 Pierina Di Vito -Jeanine Bontemps 48,71 %
5 NS 4P N+2 680 14 63.64
6 NS 3C E+4 -260 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
a.9 Caroll Pucher -Myriam de Timary 46,69 %
7 NS 1S S = 90 19 86.36
8 NS 3P W+1 -170 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
a.8 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 45,45 %
9 NS 4C S = 420 14 63.64
10 NS 4K E+2 -170 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a.7 Dominique Sassen -Annette Fobe 58,33 %
11 NS 3C S-2 -100 18 81.82
12 NS 3S E+2 -460 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.6 Francoise Turin -Christiane Huby 50,76 %
13 NS 4PcW-1 200 15 68.18
14 NS 3S N+1 430 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a.5 Nicole Leclere -Sylviane Delbeke 48,05 %
15 NS 4C S-2 -200 3 13.64
16 NS 3T E+1 -130 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.4 Michel Lievens -Chantal de Lichtervelde 56,63 %
17 NS 4C S-1 -50 10 45.45
18 NS 3S W+1 -430 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a.3 Luc Rampaer -Bernard Brisbois 44,03 %
19 NS 4PcN+1 690 22 100.00
20 NS 4C W-2 200 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 93,18 %
a14 Christian Meert -Helene Christiaens 49,91 %
27 NS 3P S-2 -100 4 18.18
28 NS 2P S+2 170 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a13 Serge Alard -Teresa Dekoster 54,87 %
29 NS 2S N = 120 20 90.91
30 NS 2C E+1 -140 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
Total : 332,8 / 528 = 63,03 %
PAIRE A.8 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen
a15 Simone Munsterhjelm -Jeannine Wanderpepen 47,63 %
1 NS 3S N+2 460 16 72.73
2 NS 4P W+2 -480 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a14 Christian Meert -Helene Christiaens 49,91 %
3 NS 2K S-1 -50 17.5 79.55
4 NS 3S E-2 200 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 80,68 %
a13 Serge Alard -Teresa Dekoster 54,87 %
5 NS 4P N+2 680 14 63.64
6 NS 6C E+1 -1460 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a12 Brigitte Brusselmans -Maryse Gathy 42,08 %
7 NS 1S S-1 -100 12 54.55
8 NS 4P W+1 -450 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.8 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 45,45 %
15 NS 2P E = -110 14 63.64
16 NS 3S E-1 100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
a.7 Dominique Sassen -Annette Fobe 58,33 %
17 NS 4C S-1 -50 10 45.45
18 NS 3S W+1 -430 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a.6 Francoise Turin -Christiane Huby 50,76 %
19 NS 4P N+1 450 14 63.64
20 NS 4C E-3 300 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
a.5 Nicole Leclere -Sylviane Delbeke 48,05 %
21 NS 3S S+1 630 19 86.36
22 NS 2S S-1 -50 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a.4 Michel Lievens -Chantal de Lichtervelde 56,63 %
23 NS 5P W = -650 10 45.45
24 NS 4T N-1 -50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.3 Luc Rampaer -Bernard Brisbois 44,03 %
25 NS 2P E-2 200 22 100.00
26 NS 4C E = -620 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 93,18 %
a.2 Francoise Duren -Jean Marie Schmiliver 58,43 %
27 NS 2T S-2 -100 4 18.18
28 NS 2P S+2 170 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.1 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 51,27 %
29 NS 1S S+1 120 20 90.91
30 NS 3S W+1 -430 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
Total : 306,5 / 528 = 58,05 %
PAIRE A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne
a.2 Francoise Duren -Jean Marie Schmiliver 58,43 %
3 NS 2S S-1 -50 17.5 79.55
4 NS 5K E+1 -620 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 51,14 %
a.1 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 51,27 %
5 NS 4P S+1 650 6 27.27
6 NS 6T W = -1370 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a15 Simone Munsterhjelm -Jeannine Wanderpepen 47,63 %
7 NS 1S S-1 -100 12 54.55
8 NS 4P W = -420 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a14 Christian Meert -Helene Christiaens 49,91 %
9 NS 4C S = 420 14 63.64
10 NS 4K E+2 -170 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a13 Serge Alard -Teresa Dekoster 54,87 %
11 NS 3T W+1 -130 8 36.36
12 NS 4P E = -420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a12 Brigitte Brusselmans -Maryse Gathy 42,08 %
13 NS 3PcW-3 800 22 100.00
14 NS 3S N+1 430 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
a11 Dilva Haym -Hugo Baetens 47,20 %
15 NS 4P E-1 50 17 77.27
16 NS 3S E = -600 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a10 Pierina Di Vito -Jeanine Bontemps 48,71 %
17 NS 4C S-1 -50 10 45.45
18 NS 3S W+1 -430 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a.9 Caroll Pucher -Myriam de Timary 46,69 %
19 NS 4P N+1 450 14 63.64
20 NS 4K W-1 100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.8 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 45,45 %
21 NS 3S S+2 660 22 100.00
22 NS 2P N+1 140 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 95,45 %
a.7 Dominique Sassen -Annette Fobe 58,33 %
23 NS 4P W+1 -650 10 45.45
24 NS 5K W-1 50 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.6 Francoise Turin -Christiane Huby 50,76 %
25 NS 2P E = -110 4 18.18
26 NS 4C E+1 -650 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
Total : 297,5 / 528 = 56,34 %
PAIRE A.3 Grazia Neuenschwander -Philippe Dekandelaer
a.3 Luc Rampaer -Bernard Brisbois 44,03 %
5 NS 4P N+2 680 14 63.64
6 NS 4S E+2 -690 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a.2 Francoise Duren -Jean Marie Schmiliver 58,43 %
7 NS 2C W+1 -140 4 18.18
8 NS 4P W+2 -480 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
a.1 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 51,27 %
9 NS 4C S = 420 14 63.64
10 NS 4K E+2 -170 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a15 Simone Munsterhjelm -Jeannine Wanderpepen 47,63 %
11 NS 3T W+1 -130 8 36.36
12 NS 4P E = -420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a14 Christian Meert -Helene Christiaens 49,91 %
13 NS 3K S-3 -300 0 0.00
14 NS 3S N+2 460 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a13 Serge Alard -Teresa Dekoster 54,87 %
15 NS 4P E = -420 0 0.00
16 NS 3T E+3 -170 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a12 Brigitte Brusselmans -Maryse Gathy 42,08 %
17 NS 4C S-1 -50 10 45.45
18 NS 3S W = -400 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a11 Dilva Haym -Hugo Baetens 47,20 %
19 NS 4P N+1 450 14 63.64
20 NS 4P E-1 100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a10 Pierina Di Vito -Jeanine Bontemps 48,71 %
21 NS 3S N = 600 13 59.09
22 NS 1S S+2 150 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
a.9 Caroll Pucher -Myriam de Timary 46,69 %
23 NS 4P W+1 -650 10 45.45
24 NS 4K E = -130 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
a.8 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 45,45 %
25 NS 3S S-1 -50 11 50.00
26 NS 4C W = -620 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.7 Dominique Sassen -Annette Fobe 58,33 %
27 NS 3K W-1 50 15 68.18
28 NS 2P S+2 170 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
Total : 289,0 / 528 = 54,73 %
PAIRE A.6 Sandra Dallemagne -Marie Claire Vienne
a11 Dilva Haym -Hugo Baetens 47,20 %
1 NS 4C S+2 480 20 90.91
2 NS 6P W-2 100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 95,45 %
a10 Pierina Di Vito -Jeanine Bontemps 48,71 %
3 NS 2S S-2 -100 8.8 40.00
4 NS 3K E+3 -170 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 47,27 %
a.6 Francoise Turin -Christiane Huby 50,76 %
11 NS 3CcS-1 -100 18 81.82
12 NS 5P E = -450 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.5 Nicole Leclere -Sylviane Delbeke 48,05 %
13 NS 3PcW-1 200 15 68.18
14 NS 3S S = 400 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a.4 Michel Lievens -Chantal de Lichtervelde 56,63 %
15 NS 3CcS-1 -200 3 13.64
16 NS 3S E+1 -630 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
a.3 Luc Rampaer -Bernard Brisbois 44,03 %
17 NS 2C S = 110 20 90.91
18 NS 3S W = -400 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
a.2 Francoise Duren -Jean Marie Schmiliver 58,43 %
19 NS 4P N+1 450 14 63.64
20 NS 3P E+1 -170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a.1 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 51,27 %
21 NS 2P N = 110 7 31.82
22 NS 2S S-1 -50 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a15 Simone Munsterhjelm -Jeannine Wanderpepen 47,63 %
23 NS 4P W+1 -650 10 45.45
24 NS 3K E = -110 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a14 Christian Meert -Helene Christiaens 49,91 %
25 NS 2K S = 90 14 63.64
26 NS 3C E+2 -200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
a13 Serge Alard -Teresa Dekoster 54,87 %
27 NS 1S E-1 50 15 68.18
28 NS 2P S+1 140 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a12 Brigitte Brusselmans -Maryse Gathy 42,08 %
29 NS 1S S-1 -100 12 54.55
30 NS 3T E = -110 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
Total : 283,8 / 528 = 53,75 %
PAIRE A15 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Patricia Bardy
a14 Christian Meert -Helene Christiaens 49,91 %
1 NS 3S N+1 430 7 31.82
2 NS 4P W+1 -450 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a13 Serge Alard -Teresa Dekoster 54,87 %
3 NS 2S S-3 -150 2.3 10.45
4 NS 4P W-3 300 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 55,23 %
a12 Brigitte Brusselmans -Maryse Gathy 42,08 %
5 NS 4C N+3 710 21 95.45
6 NS 5C E+2 -710 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
a11 Dilva Haym -Hugo Baetens 47,20 %
7 NS 2C W+2 -170 0 0.00
8 NS 6P W = -980 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a10 Pierina Di Vito -Jeanine Bontemps 48,71 %
9 NS 4C S = 420 14 63.64
10 NS 4K E+2 -170 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a.9 Caroll Pucher -Myriam de Timary 46,69 %
11 NS 3C S-2 -100 18 81.82
12 NS 4P E = -420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.8 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 45,45 %
13 NS 5K S = 600 20 90.91
14 NS 3S S-1 -50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.7 Dominique Sassen -Annette Fobe 58,33 %
15 NS 3P W = -140 9 40.91
16 NS 3S E = -600 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.6 Francoise Turin -Christiane Huby 50,76 %
17 NS 2T N-1 -50 10 45.45
18 NS 3S W = -400 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a.5 Nicole Leclere -Sylviane Delbeke 48,05 %
19 NS 5P N = 450 14 63.64
20 NS 4K W-1 100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.4 Michel Lievens -Chantal de Lichtervelde 56,63 %
21 NS 4P N-2 -200 1 4.55
22 NS 1S S-1 -50 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a15 Simone Munsterhjelm -Jeannine Wanderpepen 47,63 %
29 NS 1S S+1 120 20 90.91
30 NS 2C E = -110 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
Total : 281,3 / 528 = 53,28 %
PAIRE A13 Iris de Limbourg -Nathalie de Laminne
a10 Pierina Di Vito -Jeanine Bontemps 48,71 %
1 NS 3S N+3 490 22 100.00
2 NS 4P W+1 -450 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a.9 Caroll Pucher -Myriam de Timary 46,69 %
3 NS 3K S-1 -50 17.5 79.55
4 NS 5KcE = -750 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 39,77 %
a.8 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 45,45 %
5 NS 3S S+2 660 8 36.36
6 NS 6C E = -1430 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.7 Dominique Sassen -Annette Fobe 58,33 %
7 NS 1S S-1 -100 12 54.55
8 NS 3TcS-2 -300 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.6 Francoise Turin -Christiane Huby 50,76 %
9 NS 5C S-1 -50 3 13.64
10 NS 4K E+2 -170 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.5 Nicole Leclere -Sylviane Delbeke 48,05 %
11 NS 3T W+1 -130 8 36.36
12 NS 6P E-1 50 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a.4 Michel Lievens -Chantal de Lichtervelde 56,63 %
13 NS 4T N = 130 9 40.91
14 NS 3S S+1 430 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a.3 Luc Rampaer -Bernard Brisbois 44,03 %
15 NS 4P E-2 100 21 95.45
16 NS 3S E+1 -630 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.2 Francoise Duren -Jean Marie Schmiliver 58,43 %
17 NS 4CcS-2 -300 0 0.00
18 NS 1S W+3 -180 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a13 Serge Alard -Teresa Dekoster 54,87 %
25 NS 1P E = -80 8 36.36
26 NS 4C E+1 -650 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a12 Brigitte Brusselmans -Maryse Gathy 42,08 %
27 NS 1S E+2 -150 0 0.00
28 NS 2P S+2 170 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a11 Dilva Haym -Hugo Baetens 47,20 %
29 NS 3C N-1 -100 12 54.55
30 NS 3S W+1 -430 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
Total : 259,5 / 528 = 49,15 %
PAIRE A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck
a.1 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 51,27 %
1 NS 5T N = 400 2 9.09
2 NS 4P W+1 -450 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
a15 Simone Munsterhjelm -Jeannine Wanderpepen 47,63 %
3 NS 2C S-1 -50 17.5 79.55
4 NS 3S E-2 200 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 80,68 %
a14 Christian Meert -Helene Christiaens 49,91 %
5 NS 3S S-1 -100 0 0.00
6 NS 6T W = -1370 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a13 Serge Alard -Teresa Dekoster 54,87 %
7 NS 2C W = -110 8 36.36
8 NS 4P W+2 -480 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a12 Brigitte Brusselmans -Maryse Gathy 42,08 %
9 NS 4C S = 420 14 63.64
10 NS 3K E+2 -150 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
a11 Dilva Haym -Hugo Baetens 47,20 %
11 NS 3T W+1 -130 8 36.36
12 NS 6P E-1 50 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a10 Pierina Di Vito -Jeanine Bontemps 48,71 %
13 NS 4T N = 130 9 40.91
14 NS 1S N+3 180 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.9 Caroll Pucher -Myriam de Timary 46,69 %
15 NS 4P E-1 50 17 77.27
16 NS 3S E = -600 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a.8 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 45,45 %
17 NS 3C S-1 -50 10 45.45
18 NS 3S W+1 -430 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a.7 Dominique Sassen -Annette Fobe 58,33 %
19 NS 3P N+2 200 4 18.18
20 NS 5K W-1 100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.6 Francoise Turin -Christiane Huby 50,76 %
21 NS 3S S-1 -100 4 18.18
22 NS 2P N = 110 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.5 Nicole Leclere -Sylviane Delbeke 48,05 %
23 NS 4P W+1 -650 10 45.45
24 NS 3T N = 110 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 258,5 / 528 = 48,96 %
PAIRE A10 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne
a.4 Michel Lievens -Chantal de Lichtervelde 56,63 %
1 NS 5T N+1 420 4 18.18
2 NS 4P W-1 50 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.3 Luc Rampaer -Bernard Brisbois 44,03 %
3 NS 2S S-1 -50 17.5 79.55
4 NS 4C W+1 -650 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 44,32 %
a.2 Francoise Duren -Jean Marie Schmiliver 58,43 %
5 NS 3S N+1 630 4 18.18
6 NS 6S E+1 -1470 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
a.1 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 51,27 %
7 NS 1S S = 90 19 86.36
8 NS 4P W = -420 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a15 Simone Munsterhjelm -Jeannine Wanderpepen 47,63 %
9 NS 4C S = 420 14 63.64
10 NS 3S W+2 -660 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a14 Christian Meert -Helene Christiaens 49,91 %
11 NS 3T W+1 -130 8 36.36
12 NS 4P E = -420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a10 Pierina Di Vito -Jeanine Bontemps 48,71 %
19 NS 5P N = 450 14 63.64
20 NS 3P E = -140 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.9 Caroll Pucher -Myriam de Timary 46,69 %
21 NS 3S N = 600 13 59.09
22 NS 2P N = 110 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.8 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 45,45 %
23 NS 4P W+1 -650 10 45.45
24 NS 3T N = 110 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.7 Dominique Sassen -Annette Fobe 58,33 %
25 NS 2C N = 110 19 86.36
26 NS 4C E+1 -650 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a.6 Francoise Turin -Christiane Huby 50,76 %
27 NS 1S E-1 50 15 68.18
28 NS 3K N = 110 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a.5 Nicole Leclere -Sylviane Delbeke 48,05 %
29 NS 2S S-3 -300 0 0.00
30 NS 3T E = -110 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
Total : 255,5 / 528 = 48,39 %
PAIRE A.4 Michele Berrier -Ana Jara de Carvelho
a.4 Michel Lievens -Chantal de Lichtervelde 56,63 %
7 NS 1S S+1 120 22 100.00
8 NS 2P W+2 -170 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 97,73 %
a.3 Luc Rampaer -Bernard Brisbois 44,03 %
9 NS 4C S = 420 14 63.64
10 NS 6K E = -1370 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a.2 Francoise Duren -Jean Marie Schmiliver 58,43 %
11 NS 3T W+1 -130 8 36.36
12 NS 4P E = -420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.1 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 51,27 %
13 NS 4P W-3 300 18 81.82
14 NS 3S S-1 -50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a15 Simone Munsterhjelm -Jeannine Wanderpepen 47,63 %
15 NS 2S W-2 100 21 95.45
16 NS 1S E+3 -180 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
a14 Christian Meert -Helene Christiaens 49,91 %
17 NS 4C S-2 -100 2 9.09
18 NS 3S W = -400 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a13 Serge Alard -Teresa Dekoster 54,87 %
19 NS 3P N+2 200 4 18.18
20 NS 5K W-1 100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a12 Brigitte Brusselmans -Maryse Gathy 42,08 %
21 NS 2P N = 110 7 31.82
22 NS 2S S-2 -100 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
a11 Dilva Haym -Hugo Baetens 47,20 %
23 NS 4P W+1 -650 10 45.45
24 NS 3T N+1 130 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a10 Pierina Di Vito -Jeanine Bontemps 48,71 %
25 NS 2P E+1 -140 0 0.00
26 NS 4C E+1 -650 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
a.9 Caroll Pucher -Myriam de Timary 46,69 %
27 NS 2T S-1 -50 10 45.45
28 NS 2C W-3 150 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.8 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 45,45 %
29 NS 1S S-2 -200 4 18.18
30 NS 3S W = -400 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
Total : 250,0 / 528 = 47,35 %
PAIRE A.9 Francoise Neve -Colette Neve
a.2 Francoise Duren -Jean Marie Schmiliver 58,43 %
1 NS 4C S-1 -50 0 0.00
2 NS 4P W = -420 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.1 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 51,27 %
3 NS 2C S-3 -150 2.3 10.45
4 NS 3S E-2 200 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 46,14 %
a15 Simone Munsterhjelm -Jeannine Wanderpepen 47,63 %
5 NS 4P N+2 680 14 63.64
6 NS 6C E = -1430 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a14 Christian Meert -Helene Christiaens 49,91 %
7 NS 2C W+1 -140 4 18.18
8 NS 4P W = -420 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a13 Serge Alard -Teresa Dekoster 54,87 %
9 NS 4C N = 420 14 63.64
10 NS 3S W+4 -720 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.9 Caroll Pucher -Myriam de Timary 46,69 %
17 NS 3S N-1 -50 10 45.45
18 NS 3S W+1 -430 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a.8 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 45,45 %
19 NS 3P S = 140 0 0.00
20 NS 3P E = -140 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
a.7 Dominique Sassen -Annette Fobe 58,33 %
21 NS 4P N-2 -200 1 4.55
22 NS 2P S-1 -50 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.6 Francoise Turin -Christiane Huby 50,76 %
23 NS 4P W+1 -650 10 45.45
24 NS 4T N = 130 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.5 Nicole Leclere -Sylviane Delbeke 48,05 %
25 NS 2C N = 110 19 86.36
26 NS 4C E+1 -650 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a.4 Michel Lievens -Chantal de Lichtervelde 56,63 %
27 NS 2K E = -90 8 36.36
28 NS 3P S+3 230 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.3 Luc Rampaer -Bernard Brisbois 44,03 %
29 NS 1S S-1 -100 12 54.55
30 NS 2C E = -110 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
Total : 239,3 / 528 = 45,32 %
PAIRE A.7 Marie Morimont -Catherine de Moffarts
a13 Serge Alard -Teresa Dekoster 54,87 %
1 NS 3S N+1 430 7 31.82
2 NS 3S W+1 -430 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a12 Brigitte Brusselmans -Maryse Gathy 42,08 %
3 NS 2S S-2 -100 8.8 40.00
4 NS 3S E-1 100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 51,82 %
a11 Dilva Haym -Hugo Baetens 47,20 %
5 NS 4C N+3 710 21 95.45
6 NS 6S E = -1440 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a.7 Dominique Sassen -Annette Fobe 58,33 %
13 NS 3P W-1 100 6 27.27
14 NS 3S N-1 -50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a.6 Francoise Turin -Christiane Huby 50,76 %
15 NS 3P E = -140 9 40.91
16 NS 3S E = -600 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.5 Nicole Leclere -Sylviane Delbeke 48,05 %
17 NS 2C S+1 140 22 100.00
18 NS 3S W+1 -430 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a.4 Michel Lievens -Chantal de Lichtervelde 56,63 %
19 NS 3P N+2 200 4 18.18
20 NS 4C E-2 200 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.3 Luc Rampaer -Bernard Brisbois 44,03 %
21 NS 3S S = 600 13 59.09
22 NS 2S S-2 -100 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a.2 Francoise Duren -Jean Marie Schmiliver 58,43 %
23 NS 4P W = -620 22 100.00
24 NS 4K E = -130 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.1 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 51,27 %
25 NS 2P E = -110 4 18.18
26 NS 4C E+1 -650 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a15 Simone Munsterhjelm -Jeannine Wanderpepen 47,63 %
27 NS 1S E-1 50 15 68.18
28 NS 2P S+1 140 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a14 Christian Meert -Helene Christiaens 49,91 %
29 NS 2C N-1 -100 12 54.55
30 NS 3S W+2 -460 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
Total : 228,8 / 528 = 43,33 %
PAIRE A12 Pascale Nobels -Anne Van den Berge
a.8 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 45,45 %
1 NS 3S N+2 460 16 72.73
2 NS 3S W+3 -490 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.7 Dominique Sassen -Annette Fobe 58,33 %
3 NS 50%50% Ajust 11 50.00
4 NS 5K E+1 -620 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.6 Francoise Turin -Christiane Huby 50,76 %
5 NS 2C N+3 200 2 9.09
6 NS 6C E = -1430 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.5 Nicole Leclere -Sylviane Delbeke 48,05 %
7 NS 2T E = -90 16 72.73
8 NS 4P W+1 -450 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a.4 Michel Lievens -Chantal de Lichtervelde 56,63 %
9 NS 4CcS-2 -300 0 0.00
10 NS 4C W+2 -680 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
a.3 Luc Rampaer -Bernard Brisbois 44,03 %
11 NS 3C S-1 -50 22 100.00
12 NS 4P E = -420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a.2 Francoise Duren -Jean Marie Schmiliver 58,43 %
13 NS 4T N+1 150 12 54.55
14 NS 3T N+1 130 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.1 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 51,27 %
15 NS 3P E = -140 9 40.91
16 NS 3S E+1 -630 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
a12 Brigitte Brusselmans -Maryse Gathy 42,08 %
23 NS 4P W+1 -650 10 45.45
24 NS 3T N = 110 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a11 Dilva Haym -Hugo Baetens 47,20 %
25 NS 2P E-1 100 16 72.73
26 NS 4C E+1 -650 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a10 Pierina Di Vito -Jeanine Bontemps 48,71 %
27 NS 1PcW-1 100 20 90.91
28 NS 2P S-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.9 Caroll Pucher -Myriam de Timary 46,69 %
29 NS 3C N-1 -100 12 54.55
30 NS 3S W = -400 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
Total : 228,0 / 528 = 43,18 %
PAIRE A11 Patrick Gilles -Philippe van der Gracht
a.6 Francoise Turin -Christiane Huby 50,76 %
1 NS 4P N+1 450 11 50.00
2 NS 4P W+1 -450 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.5 Nicole Leclere -Sylviane Delbeke 48,05 %
3 NS 3S N-3 -150 2.3 10.45
4 NS 5K E = -600 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 25,68 %
a.4 Michel Lievens -Chantal de Lichtervelde 56,63 %
5 NS 4P N+2 680 14 63.64
6 NS 6T E = -1370 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a.3 Luc Rampaer -Bernard Brisbois 44,03 %
7 NS 2C W+1 -140 4 18.18
8 NS 5TcS-3 -500 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
a.2 Francoise Duren -Jean Marie Schmiliver 58,43 %
9 NS 4C S = 420 14 63.64
10 NS 4K E+2 -170 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a.1 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 51,27 %
11 NS 4T W = -130 8 36.36
12 NS 4P E = -420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a15 Simone Munsterhjelm -Jeannine Wanderpepen 47,63 %
13 NS 4K S-1 -100 4 18.18
14 NS 3S N-2 -100 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
a11 Dilva Haym -Hugo Baetens 47,20 %
21 NS 3S S = 600 13 59.09
22 NS 1S S-1 -50 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a10 Pierina Di Vito -Jeanine Bontemps 48,71 %
23 NS 4P W+1 -650 10 45.45
24 NS 3T N+1 130 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.9 Caroll Pucher -Myriam de Timary 46,69 %
25 NS 2P E = -110 4 18.18
26 NS 4C E+1 -650 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a.8 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 45,45 %
27 NS 1P N+2 140 22 100.00
28 NS 2P S+2 170 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
a.7 Dominique Sassen -Annette Fobe 58,33 %
29 NS 2S S-2 -200 4 18.18
30 NS 3S W+1 -430 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
Total : 227,3 / 528 = 43,05 %
PAIRE A.5 Giuseppe Napoli -Martine Zens
a.9 Caroll Pucher -Myriam de Timary 46,69 %
1 NS 3S N+2 460 16 72.73
2 NS 4P W = -420 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a.5 Nicole Leclere -Sylviane Delbeke 48,05 %
9 NS 5C S-1 -50 3 13.64
10 NS 4C W+2 -680 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
a.4 Michel Lievens -Chantal de Lichtervelde 56,63 %
11 NS 3C S-3 -150 0 0.00
12 NS 4P E+1 -450 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 6,82 %
a.3 Luc Rampaer -Bernard Brisbois 44,03 %
13 NS 3P W = -140 2 9.09
14 NS 3S S-2 -100 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 6,82 %
a.2 Francoise Duren -Jean Marie Schmiliver 58,43 %
15 NS 3P E = -140 9 40.91
16 NS 3S E = -600 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.1 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 51,27 %
17 NS 4KcW-1 100 18 81.82
18 NS 1S W+5 -240 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
a15 Simone Munsterhjelm -Jeannine Wanderpepen 47,63 %
19 NS 4P N+1 450 14 63.64
20 NS 2P E+1 -140 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a14 Christian Meert -Helene Christiaens 49,91 %
21 NS 3S S+1 630 19 86.36
22 NS 2S S-1 -50 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a13 Serge Alard -Teresa Dekoster 54,87 %
23 NS 4P W+1 -650 10 45.45
24 NS 2S S = 120 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a12 Brigitte Brusselmans -Maryse Gathy 42,08 %
25 NS 3C N-1 -50 11 50.00
26 NS 4C W+1 -650 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a11 Dilva Haym -Hugo Baetens 47,20 %
27 NS 2T S-2 -100 4 18.18
28 NS 3P S+1 170 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a10 Pierina Di Vito -Jeanine Bontemps 48,71 %
29 NS 1S S-2 -200 4 18.18
30 NS 3S W+1 -430 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
Total : 222,0 / 528 = 42,05 %
PAIRE a.2 Francoise Duren -Jean Marie Schmiliver
A.9 Francoise Neve -Colette Neve 45,32 %
1 EO 4C S-1 -50 22 100.00
2 EO 4P W = -420 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 56,34 %
3 EO 2S S-1 -50 4.5 20.45
4 EO 5K E+1 -620 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 48,86 %
A10 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 48,39 %
5 EO 3S N+1 630 18 81.82
6 EO 6S E+1 -1470 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
A.3 Grazia Neuenschwander -Philippe Dekandelaer 54,73 %
7 EO 2C W+1 -140 18 81.82
8 EO 4P W+2 -480 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
A11 Patrick Gilles -Philippe van der Gracht 43,05 %
9 EO 4C S = 420 8 36.36
10 EO 4K E+2 -170 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A.4 Michele Berrier -Ana Jara de Carvelho 47,35 %
11 EO 3T W+1 -130 14 63.64
12 EO 4P E = -420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A12 Pascale Nobels -Anne Van den Berge 43,18 %
13 EO 4T N+1 150 10 45.45
14 EO 3T N+1 130 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.5 Giuseppe Napoli -Martine Zens 42,05 %
15 EO 3P E = -140 13 59.09
16 EO 3S E = -600 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A13 Iris de Limbourg -Nathalie de Laminne 49,15 %
17 EO 4CcS-2 -300 22 100.00
18 EO 1S W+3 -180 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.6 Sandra Dallemagne -Marie Claire Vienne 53,75 %
19 EO 4P N+1 450 8 36.36
20 EO 3P E+1 -170 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A.7 Marie Morimont -Catherine de Moffarts 43,33 %
23 EO 4P W = -620 0 0.00
24 EO 4K E = -130 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.8 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen 58,05 %
27 EO 2T S-2 -100 18 81.82
28 EO 2P S+2 170 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
Total : 308,5 / 528 = 58,43 %
PAIRE a.7 Dominique Sassen -Annette Fobe
A12 Pascale Nobels -Anne Van den Berge 43,18 %
3 EO 50%50% Ajust 11 50.00
4 EO 5K E+1 -620 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A13 Iris de Limbourg -Nathalie de Laminne 49,15 %
7 EO 1S S-1 -100 10 45.45
8 EO 3TcS-2 -300 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A14 Christiane Verelst -Jean Verelst 63,03 %
11 EO 3C S-2 -100 4 18.18
12 EO 3S E+2 -460 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.7 Marie Morimont -Catherine de Moffarts 43,33 %
13 EO 3P W-1 100 16 72.73
14 EO 3S N-1 -50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A15 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Patricia Bardy 53,28 %
15 EO 3P W = -140 13 59.09
16 EO 3S E = -600 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.8 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen 58,05 %
17 EO 4C S-1 -50 12 54.55
18 EO 3S W+1 -430 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck 48,96 %
19 EO 3P N+2 200 18 81.82
20 EO 5K W-1 100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.9 Francoise Neve -Colette Neve 45,32 %
21 EO 4P N-2 -200 21 95.45
22 EO 2P S-1 -50 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 56,34 %
23 EO 4P W+1 -650 12 54.55
24 EO 5K W-1 50 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A10 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 48,39 %
25 EO 2C N = 110 3 13.64
26 EO 4C E+1 -650 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.3 Grazia Neuenschwander -Philippe Dekandelaer 54,73 %
27 EO 3K W-1 50 7 31.82
28 EO 2P S+2 170 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A11 Patrick Gilles -Philippe van der Gracht 43,05 %
29 EO 2S S-2 -200 18 81.82
30 EO 3S W+1 -430 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
Total : 308,0 / 528 = 58,33 %
PAIRE a.4 Michel Lievens -Chantal de Lichtervelde
A10 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 48,39 %
1 EO 5T N+1 420 18 81.82
2 EO 4P W-1 50 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A11 Patrick Gilles -Philippe van der Gracht 43,05 %
5 EO 4P N+2 680 8 36.36
6 EO 6T E = -1370 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A.4 Michele Berrier -Ana Jara de Carvelho 47,35 %
7 EO 1S S+1 120 0 0.00
8 EO 2P W+2 -170 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 2,27 %
A12 Pascale Nobels -Anne Van den Berge 43,18 %
9 EO 4CcS-2 -300 22 100.00
10 EO 4C W+2 -680 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
A.5 Giuseppe Napoli -Martine Zens 42,05 %
11 EO 3C S-3 -150 22 100.00
12 EO 4P E+1 -450 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 93,18 %
A13 Iris de Limbourg -Nathalie de Laminne 49,15 %
13 EO 4T N = 130 13 59.09
14 EO 3S S+1 430 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.6 Sandra Dallemagne -Marie Claire Vienne 53,75 %
15 EO 3CcS-1 -200 19 86.36
16 EO 3S E+1 -630 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
A14 Christiane Verelst -Jean Verelst 63,03 %
17 EO 4C S-1 -50 12 54.55
18 EO 3S W+1 -430 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A.7 Marie Morimont -Catherine de Moffarts 43,33 %
19 EO 3P N+2 200 18 81.82
20 EO 4C E-2 200 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A15 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Patricia Bardy 53,28 %
21 EO 4P N-2 -200 21 95.45
22 EO 1S S-1 -50 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.8 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen 58,05 %
23 EO 5P W = -650 12 54.55
24 EO 4T N-1 -50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.9 Francoise Neve -Colette Neve 45,32 %
27 EO 2K E = -90 14 63.64
28 EO 3P S+3 230 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
Total : 299,0 / 528 = 56,63 %
PAIRE a13 Serge Alard -Teresa Dekoster
A.7 Marie Morimont -Catherine de Moffarts 43,33 %
1 EO 3S N+1 430 15 68.18
2 EO 3S W+1 -430 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A15 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Patricia Bardy 53,28 %
3 EO 2S S-3 -150 19.7 89.55
4 EO 4P W-3 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 44,77 %
A.8 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen 58,05 %
5 EO 4P N+2 680 8 36.36
6 EO 6C E+1 -1460 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck 48,96 %
7 EO 2C W = -110 14 63.64
8 EO 4P W+2 -480 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A.9 Francoise Neve -Colette Neve 45,32 %
9 EO 4C N = 420 8 36.36
10 EO 3S W+4 -720 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 56,34 %
11 EO 3T W+1 -130 14 63.64
12 EO 4P E = -420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.3 Grazia Neuenschwander -Philippe Dekandelaer 54,73 %
15 EO 4P E = -420 22 100.00
16 EO 3T E+3 -170 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.4 Michele Berrier -Ana Jara de Carvelho 47,35 %
19 EO 3P N+2 200 18 81.82
20 EO 5K W-1 100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.5 Giuseppe Napoli -Martine Zens 42,05 %
23 EO 4P W+1 -650 12 54.55
24 EO 2S S = 120 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A13 Iris de Limbourg -Nathalie de Laminne 49,15 %
25 EO 1P E = -80 14 63.64
26 EO 4C E+1 -650 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.6 Sandra Dallemagne -Marie Claire Vienne 53,75 %
27 EO 1S E-1 50 7 31.82
28 EO 2P S+1 140 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A14 Christiane Verelst -Jean Verelst 63,03 %
29 EO 2S N = 120 2 9.09
30 EO 2C E+1 -140 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
Total : 289,7 / 528 = 54,87 %
PAIRE a.1 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck 48,96 %
1 EO 5T N = 400 20 90.91
2 EO 4P W+1 -450 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
A.9 Francoise Neve -Colette Neve 45,32 %
3 EO 2C S-3 -150 19.7 89.55
4 EO 3S E-2 200 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 53,86 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 56,34 %
5 EO 4P S+1 650 16 72.73
6 EO 6T W = -1370 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A10 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 48,39 %
7 EO 1S S = 90 3 13.64
8 EO 4P W = -420 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A.3 Grazia Neuenschwander -Philippe Dekandelaer 54,73 %
9 EO 4C S = 420 8 36.36
10 EO 4K E+2 -170 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A11 Patrick Gilles -Philippe van der Gracht 43,05 %
11 EO 4T W = -130 14 63.64
12 EO 4P E = -420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.4 Michele Berrier -Ana Jara de Carvelho 47,35 %
13 EO 4P W-3 300 4 18.18
14 EO 3S S-1 -50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A12 Pascale Nobels -Anne Van den Berge 43,18 %
15 EO 3P E = -140 13 59.09
16 EO 3S E+1 -630 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
A.5 Giuseppe Napoli -Martine Zens 42,05 %
17 EO 4KcW-1 100 4 18.18
18 EO 1S W+5 -240 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
A.6 Sandra Dallemagne -Marie Claire Vienne 53,75 %
21 EO 2P N = 110 15 68.18
22 EO 2S S-1 -50 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.7 Marie Morimont -Catherine de Moffarts 43,33 %
25 EO 2P E = -110 18 81.82
26 EO 4C E+1 -650 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.8 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen 58,05 %
29 EO 1S S+1 120 2 9.09
30 EO 3S W+1 -430 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
Total : 270,7 / 528 = 51,27 %
PAIRE a.6 Francoise Turin -Christiane Huby
A11 Patrick Gilles -Philippe van der Gracht 43,05 %
1 EO 4P N+1 450 11 50.00
2 EO 4P W+1 -450 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A12 Pascale Nobels -Anne Van den Berge 43,18 %
5 EO 2C N+3 200 20 90.91
6 EO 6C E = -1430 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A13 Iris de Limbourg -Nathalie de Laminne 49,15 %
9 EO 5C S-1 -50 19 86.36
10 EO 4K E+2 -170 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.6 Sandra Dallemagne -Marie Claire Vienne 53,75 %
11 EO 3CcS-1 -100 4 18.18
12 EO 5P E = -450 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A14 Christiane Verelst -Jean Verelst 63,03 %
13 EO 4PcW-1 200 7 31.82
14 EO 3S N+1 430 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A.7 Marie Morimont -Catherine de Moffarts 43,33 %
15 EO 3P E = -140 13 59.09
16 EO 3S E = -600 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A15 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Patricia Bardy 53,28 %
17 EO 2T N-1 -50 12 54.55
18 EO 3S W = -400 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A.8 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen 58,05 %
19 EO 4P N+1 450 8 36.36
20 EO 4C E-3 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck 48,96 %
21 EO 3S S-1 -100 18 81.82
22 EO 2P N = 110 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.9 Francoise Neve -Colette Neve 45,32 %
23 EO 4P W+1 -650 12 54.55
24 EO 4T N = 130 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 56,34 %
25 EO 2P E = -110 18 81.82
26 EO 4C E+1 -650 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A10 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 48,39 %
27 EO 1S E-1 50 7 31.82
28 EO 3K N = 110 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
Total : 268,0 / 528 = 50,76 %
PAIRE a14 Christian Meert -Helene Christiaens
A15 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Patricia Bardy 53,28 %
1 EO 3S N+1 430 15 68.18
2 EO 4P W+1 -450 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A.8 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen 58,05 %
3 EO 2K S-1 -50 4.5 20.45
4 EO 3S E-2 200 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 19,32 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck 48,96 %
5 EO 3S S-1 -100 22 100.00
6 EO 6T W = -1370 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A.9 Francoise Neve -Colette Neve 45,32 %
7 EO 2C W+1 -140 18 81.82
8 EO 4P W = -420 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 56,34 %
9 EO 4C S = 420 8 36.36
10 EO 4K E+2 -170 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A10 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 48,39 %
11 EO 3T W+1 -130 14 63.64
12 EO 4P E = -420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.3 Grazia Neuenschwander -Philippe Dekandelaer 54,73 %
13 EO 3K S-3 -300 22 100.00
14 EO 3S N+2 460 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.4 Michele Berrier -Ana Jara de Carvelho 47,35 %
17 EO 4C S-2 -100 20 90.91
18 EO 3S W = -400 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A.5 Giuseppe Napoli -Martine Zens 42,05 %
21 EO 3S S+1 630 3 13.64
22 EO 2S S-1 -50 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A.6 Sandra Dallemagne -Marie Claire Vienne 53,75 %
25 EO 2K S = 90 8 36.36
26 EO 3C E+2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
A14 Christiane Verelst -Jean Verelst 63,03 %
27 EO 3P S-2 -100 18 81.82
28 EO 2P S+2 170 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.7 Marie Morimont -Catherine de Moffarts 43,33 %
29 EO 2C N-1 -100 10 45.45
30 EO 3S W+2 -460 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
Total : 263,5 / 528 = 49,91 %
PAIRE a10 Pierina Di Vito -Jeanine Bontemps
A13 Iris de Limbourg -Nathalie de Laminne 49,15 %
1 EO 3S N+3 490 0 0.00
2 EO 4P W+1 -450 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A.6 Sandra Dallemagne -Marie Claire Vienne 53,75 %
3 EO 2S S-2 -100 13.2 60.00
4 EO 3K E+3 -170 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 52,73 %
A14 Christiane Verelst -Jean Verelst 63,03 %
5 EO 4P N+2 680 8 36.36
6 EO 3C E+4 -260 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
A15 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Patricia Bardy 53,28 %
9 EO 4C S = 420 8 36.36
10 EO 4K E+2 -170 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck 48,96 %
13 EO 4T N = 130 13 59.09
14 EO 1S N+3 180 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 56,34 %
17 EO 4C S-1 -50 12 54.55
18 EO 3S W+1 -430 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A10 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 48,39 %
19 EO 5P N = 450 8 36.36
20 EO 3P E = -140 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.3 Grazia Neuenschwander -Philippe Dekandelaer 54,73 %
21 EO 3S N = 600 9 40.91
22 EO 1S S+2 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
A11 Patrick Gilles -Philippe van der Gracht 43,05 %
23 EO 4P W+1 -650 12 54.55
24 EO 3T N+1 130 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A.4 Michele Berrier -Ana Jara de Carvelho 47,35 %
25 EO 2P E+1 -140 22 100.00
26 EO 4C E+1 -650 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
A12 Pascale Nobels -Anne Van den Berge 43,18 %
27 EO 1PcW-1 100 2 9.09
28 EO 2P S-1 -100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.5 Giuseppe Napoli -Martine Zens 42,05 %
29 EO 1S S-2 -200 18 81.82
30 EO 3S W+1 -430 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
Total : 257,2 / 528 = 48,71 %
PAIRE a.5 Nicole Leclere -Sylviane Delbeke
A11 Patrick Gilles -Philippe van der Gracht 43,05 %
3 EO 3S N-3 -150 19.7 89.55
4 EO 5K E = -600 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 74,32 %
A12 Pascale Nobels -Anne Van den Berge 43,18 %
7 EO 2T E = -90 6 27.27
8 EO 4P W+1 -450 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A.5 Giuseppe Napoli -Martine Zens 42,05 %
9 EO 5C S-1 -50 19 86.36
10 EO 4C W+2 -680 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
A13 Iris de Limbourg -Nathalie de Laminne 49,15 %
11 EO 3T W+1 -130 14 63.64
12 EO 6P E-1 50 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A.6 Sandra Dallemagne -Marie Claire Vienne 53,75 %
13 EO 3PcW-1 200 7 31.82
14 EO 3S S = 400 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A14 Christiane Verelst -Jean Verelst 63,03 %
15 EO 4C S-2 -200 19 86.36
16 EO 3T E+1 -130 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.7 Marie Morimont -Catherine de Moffarts 43,33 %
17 EO 2C S+1 140 0 0.00
18 EO 3S W+1 -430 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A15 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Patricia Bardy 53,28 %
19 EO 5P N = 450 8 36.36
20 EO 4K W-1 100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A.8 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen 58,05 %
21 EO 3S S+1 630 3 13.64
22 EO 2S S-1 -50 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck 48,96 %
23 EO 4P W+1 -650 12 54.55
24 EO 3T N = 110 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.9 Francoise Neve -Colette Neve 45,32 %
25 EO 2C N = 110 3 13.64
26 EO 4C E+1 -650 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A10 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 48,39 %
29 EO 2S S-3 -300 22 100.00
30 EO 3T E = -110 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
Total : 253,7 / 528 = 48,05 %
PAIRE a15 Simone Munsterhjelm -Jeannine Wanderpepen
A.8 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen 58,05 %
1 EO 3S N+2 460 6 27.27
2 EO 4P W+2 -480 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck 48,96 %
3 EO 2C S-1 -50 4.5 20.45
4 EO 3S E-2 200 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 19,32 %
A.9 Francoise Neve -Colette Neve 45,32 %
5 EO 4P N+2 680 8 36.36
6 EO 6C E = -1430 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 56,34 %
7 EO 1S S-1 -100 10 45.45
8 EO 4P W = -420 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A10 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 48,39 %
9 EO 4C S = 420 8 36.36
10 EO 3S W+2 -660 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.3 Grazia Neuenschwander -Philippe Dekandelaer 54,73 %
11 EO 3T W+1 -130 14 63.64
12 EO 4P E = -420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A11 Patrick Gilles -Philippe van der Gracht 43,05 %
13 EO 4K S-1 -100 18 81.82
14 EO 3S N-2 -100 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
A.4 Michele Berrier -Ana Jara de Carvelho 47,35 %
15 EO 2S W-2 100 1 4.55
16 EO 1S E+3 -180 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
A.5 Giuseppe Napoli -Martine Zens 42,05 %
19 EO 4P N+1 450 8 36.36
20 EO 2P E+1 -140 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.6 Sandra Dallemagne -Marie Claire Vienne 53,75 %
23 EO 4P W+1 -650 12 54.55
24 EO 3K E = -110 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A.7 Marie Morimont -Catherine de Moffarts 43,33 %
27 EO 1S E-1 50 7 31.82
28 EO 2P S+1 140 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A15 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Patricia Bardy 53,28 %
29 EO 1S S+1 120 2 9.09
30 EO 2C E = -110 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
Total : 251,5 / 528 = 47,63 %
PAIRE a11 Dilva Haym -Hugo Baetens
A.6 Sandra Dallemagne -Marie Claire Vienne 53,75 %
1 EO 4C S+2 480 2 9.09
2 EO 6P W-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 4,55 %
A14 Christiane Verelst -Jean Verelst 63,03 %
3 EO 2S S-2 -100 13.2 60.00
4 EO 5K E = -600 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 59,55 %
A.7 Marie Morimont -Catherine de Moffarts 43,33 %
5 EO 4C N+3 710 1 4.55
6 EO 6S E = -1440 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A15 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Patricia Bardy 53,28 %
7 EO 2C W+2 -170 22 100.00
8 EO 6P W = -980 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 100,00 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck 48,96 %
11 EO 3T W+1 -130 14 63.64
12 EO 6P E-1 50 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 56,34 %
15 EO 4P E-1 50 5 22.73
16 EO 3S E = -600 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.3 Grazia Neuenschwander -Philippe Dekandelaer 54,73 %
19 EO 4P N+1 450 8 36.36
20 EO 4P E-1 100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A11 Patrick Gilles -Philippe van der Gracht 43,05 %
21 EO 3S S = 600 9 40.91
22 EO 1S S-1 -50 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.4 Michele Berrier -Ana Jara de Carvelho 47,35 %
23 EO 4P W+1 -650 12 54.55
24 EO 3T N+1 130 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A12 Pascale Nobels -Anne Van den Berge 43,18 %
25 EO 2P E-1 100 6 27.27
26 EO 4C E+1 -650 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.5 Giuseppe Napoli -Martine Zens 42,05 %
27 EO 2T S-2 -100 18 81.82
28 EO 3P S+1 170 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A13 Iris de Limbourg -Nathalie de Laminne 49,15 %
29 EO 3C N-1 -100 10 45.45
30 EO 3S W+1 -430 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
Total : 249,2 / 528 = 47,20 %
PAIRE a.9 Caroll Pucher -Myriam de Timary
A.5 Giuseppe Napoli -Martine Zens 42,05 %
1 EO 3S N+2 460 6 27.27
2 EO 4P W = -420 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A13 Iris de Limbourg -Nathalie de Laminne 49,15 %
3 EO 3K S-1 -50 4.5 20.45
4 EO 5KcE = -750 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 60,23 %
A14 Christiane Verelst -Jean Verelst 63,03 %
7 EO 1S S = 90 3 13.64
8 EO 3P W+1 -170 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
A15 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Patricia Bardy 53,28 %
11 EO 3C S-2 -100 4 18.18
12 EO 4P E = -420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck 48,96 %
15 EO 4P E-1 50 5 22.73
16 EO 3S E = -600 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.9 Francoise Neve -Colette Neve 45,32 %
17 EO 3S N-1 -50 12 54.55
18 EO 3S W+1 -430 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 56,34 %
19 EO 4P N+1 450 8 36.36
20 EO 4K W-1 100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A10 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 48,39 %
21 EO 3S N = 600 9 40.91
22 EO 2P N = 110 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A.3 Grazia Neuenschwander -Philippe Dekandelaer 54,73 %
23 EO 4P W+1 -650 12 54.55
24 EO 4K E = -130 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
A11 Patrick Gilles -Philippe van der Gracht 43,05 %
25 EO 2P E = -110 18 81.82
26 EO 4C E+1 -650 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.4 Michele Berrier -Ana Jara de Carvelho 47,35 %
27 EO 2T S-1 -50 12 54.55
28 EO 2C W-3 150 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A12 Pascale Nobels -Anne Van den Berge 43,18 %
29 EO 3C N-1 -100 10 45.45
30 EO 3S W = -400 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
Total : 246,5 / 528 = 46,69 %
PAIRE a.8 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck
A12 Pascale Nobels -Anne Van den Berge 43,18 %
1 EO 3S N+2 460 6 27.27
2 EO 3S W+3 -490 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A13 Iris de Limbourg -Nathalie de Laminne 49,15 %
5 EO 3S S+2 660 14 63.64
6 EO 6C E = -1430 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A14 Christiane Verelst -Jean Verelst 63,03 %
9 EO 4C S = 420 8 36.36
10 EO 4K E+2 -170 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A15 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Patricia Bardy 53,28 %
13 EO 5K S = 600 2 9.09
14 EO 3S S-1 -50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A.8 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen 58,05 %
15 EO 2P E = -110 8 36.36
16 EO 3S E-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck 48,96 %
17 EO 3C S-1 -50 12 54.55
18 EO 3S W+1 -430 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A.9 Francoise Neve -Colette Neve 45,32 %
19 EO 3P S = 140 22 100.00
20 EO 3P E = -140 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 56,34 %
21 EO 3S S+2 660 0 0.00
22 EO 2P N+1 140 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 4,55 %
A10 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 48,39 %
23 EO 4P W+1 -650 12 54.55
24 EO 3T N = 110 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.3 Grazia Neuenschwander -Philippe Dekandelaer 54,73 %
25 EO 3S S-1 -50 11 50.00
26 EO 4C W = -620 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A11 Patrick Gilles -Philippe van der Gracht 43,05 %
27 EO 1P N+2 140 0 0.00
28 EO 2P S+2 170 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
A.4 Michele Berrier -Ana Jara de Carvelho 47,35 %
29 EO 1S S-2 -200 18 81.82
30 EO 3S W = -400 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
Total : 240,0 / 528 = 45,45 %
PAIRE a.3 Luc Rampaer -Bernard Brisbois
A10 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 48,39 %
3 EO 2S S-1 -50 4.5 20.45
4 EO 4C W+1 -650 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 55,68 %
A.3 Grazia Neuenschwander -Philippe Dekandelaer 54,73 %
5 EO 4P N+2 680 8 36.36
6 EO 4S E+2 -690 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A11 Patrick Gilles -Philippe van der Gracht 43,05 %
7 EO 2C W+1 -140 18 81.82
8 EO 5TcS-3 -500 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
A.4 Michele Berrier -Ana Jara de Carvelho 47,35 %
9 EO 4C S = 420 8 36.36
10 EO 6K E = -1370 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A12 Pascale Nobels -Anne Van den Berge 43,18 %
11 EO 3C S-1 -50 0 0.00
12 EO 4P E = -420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.5 Giuseppe Napoli -Martine Zens 42,05 %
13 EO 3P W = -140 20 90.91
14 EO 3S S-2 -100 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 93,18 %
A13 Iris de Limbourg -Nathalie de Laminne 49,15 %
15 EO 4P E-2 100 1 4.55
16 EO 3S E+1 -630 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.6 Sandra Dallemagne -Marie Claire Vienne 53,75 %
17 EO 2C S = 110 2 9.09
18 EO 3S W = -400 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
A14 Christiane Verelst -Jean Verelst 63,03 %
19 EO 4PcN+1 690 0 0.00
20 EO 4C W-2 200 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 6,82 %
A.7 Marie Morimont -Catherine de Moffarts 43,33 %
21 EO 3S S = 600 9 40.91
22 EO 2S S-2 -100 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A.8 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen 58,05 %
25 EO 2P E-2 200 0 0.00
26 EO 4C E = -620 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 6,82 %
A.9 Francoise Neve -Colette Neve 45,32 %
29 EO 1S S-1 -100 10 45.45
30 EO 2C E = -110 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
Total : 232,5 / 528 = 44,03 %
PAIRE a12 Brigitte Brusselmans -Maryse Gathy
A14 Christiane Verelst -Jean Verelst 63,03 %
1 EO 4C S+1 450 11 50.00
2 EO 4P W = -420 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.7 Marie Morimont -Catherine de Moffarts 43,33 %
3 EO 2S S-2 -100 13.2 60.00
4 EO 3S E-1 100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 48,18 %
A15 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Patricia Bardy 53,28 %
5 EO 4C N+3 710 1 4.55
6 EO 5C E+2 -710 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
A.8 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen 58,05 %
7 EO 1S S-1 -100 10 45.45
8 EO 4P W+1 -450 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Eliane de Ceuninck 48,96 %
9 EO 4C S = 420 8 36.36
10 EO 3K E+2 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 56,34 %
13 EO 3PcW-3 800 0 0.00
14 EO 3S N+1 430 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
A.3 Grazia Neuenschwander -Philippe Dekandelaer 54,73 %
17 EO 4C S-1 -50 12 54.55
18 EO 3S W = -400 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A.4 Michele Berrier -Ana Jara de Carvelho 47,35 %
21 EO 2P N = 110 15 68.18
22 EO 2S S-2 -100 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
A12 Pascale Nobels -Anne Van den Berge 43,18 %
23 EO 4P W+1 -650 12 54.55
24 EO 3T N = 110 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.5 Giuseppe Napoli -Martine Zens 42,05 %
25 EO 3C N-1 -50 11 50.00
26 EO 4C W+1 -650 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A13 Iris de Limbourg -Nathalie de Laminne 49,15 %
27 EO 1S E+2 -150 22 100.00
28 EO 2P S+2 170 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A.6 Sandra Dallemagne -Marie Claire Vienne 53,75 %
29 EO 1S S-1 -100 10 45.45
30 EO 3T E = -110 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
Total : 222,2 / 528 = 42,08 %
|