B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 62,27 A.2 Philippe van der Gracht -Fabienne Smit
--- 2 56,30 A.9 Serge Allard -Paul Gatel
--- 3 55,79 A10 Annie Legrand -Colette Heerinckx
--- 4 55,45 A.6 Laurence Mauboussin -Diane Deslignes
--- 5 54,43 A.1 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza
--- 6 52,93 A13 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker
--- 7 50,41 A.5 Francoise Nibelle -Daniela Napoli
--- 8 49,57 A.8 Claire Derieuw -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse
--- 9 48,82 A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens
--- 10 47,82 A.7 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere
--- 11 44,19 A.4 Caroll Pucher -Myriam de Timary
--- 12 43,80 A11 Christian Neve -Gerard Cooreman
--- 13 39,40 A14 Sylviane Delbeke -Marie J. de Wagheneire
--- 14 38,43 A12 Grazia Neuenschwander -Simone Munsterhjelm
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 58,05 a.7 John de Busschere -Dominique van de Werve
--- 2 56,21 a.9 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Wildiers
--- 3 55,15 a.4 Dilva Haym -Liliane Baptista
--- 4 53,13 a.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans
--- 5 52,90 a12 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne
--- 6 49,55 a11 Kjell Larsson -Tina Katila
--- 7 48,94 a.1 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant
--- 8 48,30 a.3 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart
--- 9 48,26 a14 Iris de Limbourg -Marie Eliane d'Udekem
--- 10 47,75 a.2 Francoise Duren -Antoinette Jourdain
--- 11 46,12 a13 Michel Lievens -Teresa Dekoster
--- 12 44,58 a10 Jacqueline de Thier -Jeannine Wanderpepen
--- 13 41,23 a.6 Anne Arsac -Catherine de Moffarts
--- 14 0,00 a.8 -
PAIRE A.2 Philippe van der Gracht -Fabienne Smit
a.2 Francoise Duren -Antoinette Jourdain 47,75 %
3 NS 3K S+1 130 16.5 75.00
4 NS 1S N-2 -200 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a.1 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 48,94 %
5 NS 3C S = 140 21.9 99.55
6 NS 2S E-3 300 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 99,55 %
a14 Iris de Limbourg -Marie Eliane d'Udekem 48,26 %
7 NS 2P W-2 200 19.7 89.55
8 NS 4C E = -420 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a13 Michel Lievens -Teresa Dekoster 46,12 %
9 NS 4C S+1 450 22 100.00
10 NS 3P S-1 -100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a12 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 52,90 %
11 NS 5P W = -450 14.3 65.00
12 NS 4P N-1 -100 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a11 Kjell Larsson -Tina Katila 49,55 %
13 NS 2P S+1 140 22 100.00
14 NS 3P E = -140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a10 Jacqueline de Thier -Jeannine Wanderpepen 44,58 %
15 NS 3S E-2 100 20.8 94.55
16 NS 6C W-2 200 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 97,05 %
a.8 - 0,00 %
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.7 John de Busschere -Dominique van de Werve 58,05 %
19 NS 5CcN-2 -300 12.1 55.00
20 NS 3K S = 110 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a.6 Anne Arsac -Catherine de Moffarts 41,23 %
21 NS 3S W-2 100 21.9 99.55
22 NS 4C N+1 450 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 97,05 %
a.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 53,13 %
23 NS 4C W = -620 0.1 0.45
24 NS 3T N+1 130 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
a.4 Dilva Haym -Liliane Baptista 55,15 %
25 NS 3S E+2 -660 1.2 5.45
26 NS 1P S = 80 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
Total : 301,4 / 484 = 62,27 %
PAIRE A.9 Serge Allard -Paul Gatel
a.3 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 48,30 %
1 NS 3K N = 110 16.5 75.00
2 NS 3S N+1 630 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
a.1 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 48,94 %
3 NS 3P E-1 100 3.4 15.45
4 NS 1S N-2 -200 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
a14 Iris de Limbourg -Marie Eliane d'Udekem 48,26 %
5 NS 4C S-2 -200 0.1 0.45
6 NS 3T N = 110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a13 Michel Lievens -Teresa Dekoster 46,12 %
7 NS 2P W-2 200 19.7 89.55
8 NS 4C E = -420 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a12 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 52,90 %
9 NS 3C S = 140 5 22.73
10 NS 2P S = 110 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a11 Kjell Larsson -Tina Katila 49,55 %
11 NS 6P W-1 50 21.9 99.55
12 NS 2S N+1 150 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
a.9 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Wildiers 56,21 %
17 NS 3S N+1 430 9.9 45.00
18 NS 4C N+2 680 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.8 - 0,00 %
19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.7 John de Busschere -Dominique van de Werve 58,05 %
21 NS 3S E+1 -430 11 50.00
22 NS 4C N = 420 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.6 Anne Arsac -Catherine de Moffarts 41,23 %
23 NS 4C W-2 200 15.4 70.00
24 NS 4T S = 130 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
a.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 53,13 %
25 NS 3K W+2 -150 15.4 70.00
26 NS 3K W-2 200 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
a.4 Dilva Haym -Liliane Baptista 55,15 %
27 NS 3S S = 400 21.9 99.55
28 NS 3S S-3 -300 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
Total : 272,5 / 484 = 56,30 %
PAIRE A10 Annie Legrand -Colette Heerinckx
a.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 53,13 %
1 NS 1S S = 90 7.7 35.00
2 NS 3S N+1 630 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a.4 Dilva Haym -Liliane Baptista 55,15 %
3 NS 3K S = 110 8.8 40.00
4 NS 1S N-2 -200 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a.2 Francoise Duren -Antoinette Jourdain 47,75 %
5 NS 3P W-1 50 6.6 30.00
6 NS 2C W-2 200 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
a.1 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 48,94 %
7 NS 1S S = 90 7.7 35.00
8 NS 4C E = -420 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
a14 Iris de Limbourg -Marie Eliane d'Udekem 48,26 %
9 NS 4C S = 420 18 81.82
10 NS 2P S = 110 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
a13 Michel Lievens -Teresa Dekoster 46,12 %
11 NS 5P W = -450 14.3 65.00
12 NS 1S N = 90 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a12 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 52,90 %
13 NS 1S W+1 -120 11 50.00
14 NS 5PcE-3 500 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a10 Jacqueline de Thier -Jeannine Wanderpepen 44,58 %
19 NS 5C N-4 -200 15.4 70.00
20 NS 2P W-2 200 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
a.9 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Wildiers 56,21 %
21 NS 3S E = -400 15.4 70.00
22 NS 4C N = 420 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a.8 - 0,00 %
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.7 John de Busschere -Dominique van de Werve 58,05 %
25 NS 3S E = -600 5.5 25.00
26 NS 3K W-2 200 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
a.6 Anne Arsac -Catherine de Moffarts 41,23 %
27 NS 4P N-3 -150 3.4 15.45
28 NS 3K E-2 100 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
Total : 270,0 / 484 = 55,79 %
PAIRE A.6 Laurence Mauboussin -Diane Deslignes
a10 Jacqueline de Thier -Jeannine Wanderpepen 44,58 %
1 NS 2K N+1 110 16.5 75.00
2 NS 3S S+3 690 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 87,27 %
a.9 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Wildiers 56,21 %
3 NS 3K S = 110 8.8 40.00
4 NS 1S N-2 -200 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a.8 - 0,00 %
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.6 Anne Arsac -Catherine de Moffarts 41,23 %
11 NS 5P W+1 -480 8.8 40.00
12 NS 4P N = 620 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
a.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 53,13 %
13 NS 1S W+2 -150 3 13.64
14 NS 5K S+1 420 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.4 Dilva Haym -Liliane Baptista 55,15 %
15 NS 2T E = -90 13.2 60.00
16 NS 4C W+1 -650 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.3 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 48,30 %
17 NS 3S S = 400 2.3 10.45
18 NS 5K N = 600 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 5,45 %
a.2 Francoise Duren -Antoinette Jourdain 47,75 %
19 NS 4P W-1 100 21.9 99.55
20 NS 1S S+2 150 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 89,55 %
a.1 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 48,94 %
21 NS 3S E+1 -430 11 50.00
22 NS 4C N+1 450 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
a14 Iris de Limbourg -Marie Eliane d'Udekem 48,26 %
23 NS 4P N-1 -100 3.4 15.45
24 NS 3T S = 110 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a12 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 52,90 %
25 NS 2C E+2 -170 11 50.00
26 NS 3T S = 110 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
a11 Kjell Larsson -Tina Katila 49,55 %
27 NS 3S S-2 -100 11 50.00
28 NS 5TcE-4 800 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
Total : 268,4 / 484 = 55,45 %
PAIRE A.1 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza
a.1 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 48,94 %
1 NS 3C W-2 100 11 50.00
2 NS 3S N+1 630 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a14 Iris de Limbourg -Marie Eliane d'Udekem 48,26 %
3 NS 2K S+2 130 16.5 75.00
4 NS 1S N-4 -400 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a13 Michel Lievens -Teresa Dekoster 46,12 %
5 NS 1C S = 80 9.9 45.00
6 NS 2T N+2 130 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a12 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 52,90 %
7 NS 2P W-2 200 19.7 89.55
8 NS 4C E = -420 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a11 Kjell Larsson -Tina Katila 49,55 %
9 NS 4C S-1 -50 1 4.55
10 NS 2C N-1 -100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
a10 Jacqueline de Thier -Jeannine Wanderpepen 44,58 %
11 NS 5PcW+1 -750 1.2 5.45
12 NS 3S N+1 630 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.9 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Wildiers 56,21 %
13 NS 2P S = 110 20 90.91
14 NS 4K S+2 170 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a.7 John de Busschere -Dominique van de Werve 58,05 %
15 NS 3T E = -110 11 50.00
16 NS 4C W+1 -650 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a.6 Anne Arsac -Catherine de Moffarts 41,23 %
17 NS 3S S+2 460 18.6 84.55
18 NS 6C N = 1430 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 89,55 %
a.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 53,13 %
19 NS 4K W = -130 17.5 79.55
20 NS 1S S-1 -100 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.4 Dilva Haym -Liliane Baptista 55,15 %
21 NS 2S E+2 -180 17.5 79.55
22 NS 4C N = 420 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a.3 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 48,30 %
23 NS 4C W-1 100 8.8 40.00
24 NS 3S N = 400 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
Total : 287,4 / 528 = 54,43 %
PAIRE A13 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker
a11 Kjell Larsson -Tina Katila 49,55 %
1 NS 2K N+1 110 16.5 75.00
2 NS 4C S+1 650 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a10 Jacqueline de Thier -Jeannine Wanderpepen 44,58 %
3 NS 2C N-1 -50 0.1 0.45
4 NS 1S N-2 -200 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.9 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Wildiers 56,21 %
5 NS 1C S+1 110 17.5 79.55
6 NS 2P E-1 100 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.8 - 0,00 %
7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.7 John de Busschere -Dominique van de Werve 58,05 %
9 NS 3PcW-1 200 13 59.09
10 NS 1S W = -90 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 53,13 %
11 NS 5C S-1 -50 19.7 89.55
12 NS 1S N = 90 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a.4 Dilva Haym -Liliane Baptista 55,15 %
13 NS 1S W+1 -120 11 50.00
14 NS 5K S+1 420 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a.3 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 48,30 %
15 NS 2S E-1 50 16.5 75.00
16 NS 4C W+1 -650 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.2 Francoise Duren -Antoinette Jourdain 47,75 %
17 NS 3S N+2 460 18.6 84.55
18 NS 4C N+2 680 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
a.1 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 48,94 %
19 NS 5P W+1 -680 0.1 0.45
20 NS 1S S+3 180 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a13 Michel Lievens -Teresa Dekoster 46,12 %
25 NS 2S N-5 -250 8.8 40.00
26 NS 1P S = 80 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
a12 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 52,90 %
27 NS 3S S-3 -150 3.4 15.45
28 NS 4P N = 620 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
Total : 256,2 / 484 = 52,93 %
PAIRE A.5 Francoise Nibelle -Daniela Napoli
a.8 - 0,00 %
1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.7 John de Busschere -Dominique van de Werve 58,05 %
3 NS 4K S = 130 16.5 75.00
4 NS 1S N-2 -200 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 53,13 %
9 NS 3C S = 140 5 22.73
10 NS 2C N-1 -100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a.4 Dilva Haym -Liliane Baptista 55,15 %
11 NS 5PcW+1 -750 1.2 5.45
12 NS 2P N+1 140 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
a.3 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 48,30 %
13 NS 1S W-1 100 18 81.82
14 NS 5K S+1 420 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a.2 Francoise Duren -Antoinette Jourdain 47,75 %
15 NS 2T E+3 -150 0.1 0.45
16 NS 4C W+1 -650 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
a.1 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 48,94 %
17 NS 3S N+2 460 18.6 84.55
18 NS 4C S+2 680 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
a14 Iris de Limbourg -Marie Eliane d'Udekem 48,26 %
19 NS 5C N-2 -100 19.7 89.55
20 NS 2C N = 110 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a13 Michel Lievens -Teresa Dekoster 46,12 %
21 NS 3S E+2 -460 3.4 15.45
22 NS 4C N = 420 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
a11 Kjell Larsson -Tina Katila 49,55 %
23 NS 4C W-1 100 8.8 40.00
24 NS 3T S = 110 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
a10 Jacqueline de Thier -Jeannine Wanderpepen 44,58 %
25 NS 3K W+2 -150 15.4 70.00
26 NS 1P S = 80 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.9 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Wildiers 56,21 %
27 NS 2T S-1 -50 16.5 75.00
28 NS 4P N = 620 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
Total : 244,0 / 484 = 50,41 %
PAIRE A.8 Claire Derieuw -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse
a14 Iris de Limbourg -Marie Eliane d'Udekem 48,26 %
1 NS 1ScS+1 280 21.9 99.55
2 NS 3S S+2 660 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 94,55 %
a13 Michel Lievens -Teresa Dekoster 46,12 %
3 NS 2S S+1 150 21.9 99.55
4 NS 1S N-2 -200 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
a12 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 52,90 %
5 NS 3C S-1 -100 4.5 20.45
6 NS 3T N = 110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
a11 Kjell Larsson -Tina Katila 49,55 %
7 NS 1S S-1 -100 3.4 15.45
8 NS 4C W = -420 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a10 Jacqueline de Thier -Jeannine Wanderpepen 44,58 %
9 NS 3C N-1 -50 1 4.55
10 NS 2C N-1 -100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
a.8 - 0,00 %
15 NS BYE 0 0.00
16 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.7 John de Busschere -Dominique van de Werve 58,05 %
17 NS 3S N+1 430 9.9 45.00
18 NS 4C N+2 680 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.6 Anne Arsac -Catherine de Moffarts 41,23 %
19 NS 4P W+1 -650 5.5 25.00
20 NS 1S S-1 -100 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
a.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 53,13 %
21 NS 3S W+1 -430 11 50.00
22 NS 4C N = 420 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.4 Dilva Haym -Liliane Baptista 55,15 %
23 NS 4C W-2 200 15.4 70.00
24 NS 3T S = 110 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.3 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 48,30 %
25 NS 3K W+1 -130 19.7 89.55
26 NS 1S S = 90 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
a.2 Francoise Duren -Antoinette Jourdain 47,75 %
27 NS 3S S-2 -100 11 50.00
28 NS 3C N+1 170 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
Total : 239,9 / 484 = 49,57 %
PAIRE A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens
a.3 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 48,30 %
5 NS 1C S = 80 9.9 45.00
6 NS 3T N = 110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.2 Francoise Duren -Antoinette Jourdain 47,75 %
7 NS 2S S-1 -100 3.4 15.45
8 NS 4C E-1 50 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.1 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 48,94 %
9 NS 3C S+2 200 13 59.09
10 NS 2C N = 110 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a14 Iris de Limbourg -Marie Eliane d'Udekem 48,26 %
11 NS 4PcW+1 -690 4.5 20.45
12 NS 4P N+1 650 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a13 Michel Lievens -Teresa Dekoster 46,12 %
13 NS 1S W+1 -120 11 50.00
14 NS 5K S+1 420 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a12 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 52,90 %
15 NS 3T E-1 50 16.5 75.00
16 NS 6C W-1 100 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
a11 Kjell Larsson -Tina Katila 49,55 %
17 NS 3S N = 400 2.3 10.45
18 NS 4C N+2 680 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
a.9 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Wildiers 56,21 %
19 NS 4P W+1 -650 5.5 25.00
20 NS 2C N-1 -100 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
a.8 - 0,00 %
21 NS BYE 0 0.00
22 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.7 John de Busschere -Dominique van de Werve 58,05 %
23 NS 4P N-1 -100 3.4 15.45
24 NS 4T S-1 -50 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 7,95 %
a.6 Anne Arsac -Catherine de Moffarts 41,23 %
25 NS 2P N-2 -100 21.9 99.55
26 NS 2S E = -120 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 53,13 %
27 NS 1S S-3 -150 3.4 15.45
28 NS 4P N = 620 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
Total : 236,3 / 484 = 48,82 %
PAIRE A.7 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere
a12 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 52,90 %
1 NS 2S W-1 50 4.5 20.45
2 NS 3S N = 600 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 17,95 %
a11 Kjell Larsson -Tina Katila 49,55 %
3 NS 3K S+1 130 16.5 75.00
4 NS 1S N-1 -100 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
a10 Jacqueline de Thier -Jeannine Wanderpepen 44,58 %
5 NS 3P E-2 100 13.2 60.00
6 NS 3T N = 110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.9 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Wildiers 56,21 %
7 NS 2P W-1 100 13.2 60.00
8 NS 4C E = -420 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.7 John de Busschere -Dominique van de Werve 58,05 %
13 NS 1S E+2 -150 3 13.64
14 NS 4K S+1 150 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
a.6 Anne Arsac -Catherine de Moffarts 41,23 %
15 NS 4P W-2 100 20.8 94.55
16 NS 4C W+1 -650 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 53,13 %
17 NS 3S N+1 430 9.9 45.00
18 NS 4C N+2 680 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.4 Dilva Haym -Liliane Baptista 55,15 %
19 NS 5CcN-2 -300 12.1 55.00
20 NS 1S S-3 -300 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a.3 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 48,30 %
21 NS 1S W+1 -120 19.7 89.55
22 NS 4C N = 420 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
a.2 Francoise Duren -Antoinette Jourdain 47,75 %
23 NS 5C W-3 300 20.8 94.55
24 NS 3S N = 400 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 94,55 %
a.1 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 48,94 %
25 NS 2K W+3 -150 15.4 70.00
26 NS 1S E+1 -120 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a13 Michel Lievens -Teresa Dekoster 46,12 %
27 NS 3S S-3 -150 3.4 15.45
28 NS 4C S-1 -100 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 17,95 %
Total : 252,5 / 528 = 47,82 %
PAIRE A.4 Caroll Pucher -Myriam de Timary
a.6 Anne Arsac -Catherine de Moffarts 41,23 %
1 NS 3K N-1 -50 2.3 10.45
2 NS 3S S+1 630 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
a.4 Dilva Haym -Liliane Baptista 55,15 %
7 NS 2P W-1 100 13.2 60.00
8 NS 4C E-1 50 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
a.3 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 48,30 %
9 NS 4C S = 420 18 81.82
10 NS 2C N-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.2 Francoise Duren -Antoinette Jourdain 47,75 %
11 NS 4P W+2 -480 8.8 40.00
12 NS 4P N-1 -100 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a.1 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 48,94 %
13 NS 1S W+1 -120 11 50.00
14 NS 5K S = 400 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a14 Iris de Limbourg -Marie Eliane d'Udekem 48,26 %
15 NS 2T E+2 -130 5.5 25.00
16 NS 4C W+1 -650 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
a13 Michel Lievens -Teresa Dekoster 46,12 %
17 NS 3S S+2 460 18.6 84.55
18 NS 6C N = 1430 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 89,55 %
a12 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 52,90 %
19 NS 4P W+1 -650 5.5 25.00
20 NS 1S S-1 -100 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
a10 Jacqueline de Thier -Jeannine Wanderpepen 44,58 %
21 NS 3S E+2 -460 3.4 15.45
22 NS 4C N = 420 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
a.9 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Wildiers 56,21 %
23 NS 5C W-3 300 20.8 94.55
24 NS 2T S+1 110 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a.8 - 0,00 %
25 NS BYE 0 0.00
26 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.7 John de Busschere -Dominique van de Werve 58,05 %
27 NS 3S S-2 -100 11 50.00
28 NS 3S S-3 -300 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
Total : 213,9 / 484 = 44,19 %
PAIRE A11 Christian Neve -Gerard Cooreman
a.7 John de Busschere -Dominique van de Werve 58,05 %
1 NS 2K N+1 110 16.5 75.00
2 NS 3S N = 600 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 45,23 %
a.6 Anne Arsac -Catherine de Moffarts 41,23 %
3 NS 3P E-1 100 3.4 15.45
4 NS 1S N = 90 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 53,13 %
5 NS 1C S+1 110 17.5 79.55
6 NS 2P E-1 100 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.3 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 48,30 %
7 NS 2P W = -110 0.1 0.45
8 NS 4C E = -420 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
a.2 Francoise Duren -Antoinette Jourdain 47,75 %
9 NS 4C S = 420 18 81.82
10 NS 2P S = 110 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
a.1 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 48,94 %
11 NS 5P W+1 -480 8.8 40.00
12 NS 4P N-1 -100 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a14 Iris de Limbourg -Marie Eliane d'Udekem 48,26 %
13 NS 1S W+1 -120 11 50.00
14 NS 4P E-3 150 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a13 Michel Lievens -Teresa Dekoster 46,12 %
15 NS 2T E+2 -130 5.5 25.00
16 NS 6C W-1 100 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 54,77 %
a11 Kjell Larsson -Tina Katila 49,55 %
21 NS 3S E+2 -460 3.4 15.45
22 NS 4C N = 420 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
a10 Jacqueline de Thier -Jeannine Wanderpepen 44,58 %
23 NS 4C W-2 200 15.4 70.00
24 NS 4T S = 130 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
a.9 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Wildiers 56,21 %
25 NS 3S E+2 -660 1.2 5.45
26 NS 1P S = 80 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
a.8 - 0,00 %
27 NS BYE 0 0.00
28 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 212,0 / 484 = 43,80 %
PAIRE A14 Sylviane Delbeke -Marie J. de Wagheneire
a13 Michel Lievens -Teresa Dekoster 46,12 %
1 NS 2K N = 90 7.7 35.00
2 NS 3S S+1 630 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a12 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 52,90 %
3 NS 3K S = 110 8.8 40.00
4 NS 1S N-2 -200 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a11 Kjell Larsson -Tina Katila 49,55 %
5 NS 1C S+1 110 17.5 79.55
6 NS 2C W-1 100 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a10 Jacqueline de Thier -Jeannine Wanderpepen 44,58 %
7 NS 1S S = 90 7.7 35.00
8 NS 4C E = -420 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
a.9 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Wildiers 56,21 %
9 NS 3C S+1 170 9 40.91
10 NS 2C N-1 -100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.8 - 0,00 %
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.6 Anne Arsac -Catherine de Moffarts 41,23 %
13 NS 1S W+1 -120 11 50.00
14 NS 5K S+1 420 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 53,13 %
15 NS 3T E+1 -130 5.5 25.00
16 NS 4C W+1 -650 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
a.4 Dilva Haym -Liliane Baptista 55,15 %
17 NS 3S N = 400 2.3 10.45
18 NS 5C N+1 680 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
a.3 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 48,30 %
19 NS 4P W+1 -650 5.5 25.00
20 NS 2S E-1 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
a.2 Francoise Duren -Antoinette Jourdain 47,75 %
21 NS 3S E+2 -460 3.4 15.45
22 NS 4C N-1 -50 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 7,95 %
a14 Iris de Limbourg -Marie Eliane d'Udekem 48,26 %
27 NS 3S S-1 -50 16.5 75.00
28 NS 2C N+2 170 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
Total : 190,7 / 484 = 39,40 %
PAIRE A12 Grazia Neuenschwander -Simone Munsterhjelm
a.9 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Wildiers 56,21 %
1 NS 1S W+1 -120 0.1 0.45
2 NS 3S N-1 -100 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 0,45 %
a.8 - 0,00 %
3 NS BYE 0 0.00
4 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.7 John de Busschere -Dominique van de Werve 58,05 %
5 NS 2P W = -110 2.3 10.45
6 NS 2T N+1 110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
a.6 Anne Arsac -Catherine de Moffarts 41,23 %
7 NS 1P W-1 100 13.2 60.00
8 NS 4C E-1 50 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
a.4 Dilva Haym -Liliane Baptista 55,15 %
9 NS 2C S+2 170 9 40.91
10 NS 2C N-1 -100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.3 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 48,30 %
11 NS 5CcS-1 -100 17.5 79.55
12 NS 3P N = 140 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
a.2 Francoise Duren -Antoinette Jourdain 47,75 %
13 NS 1S W+3 -180 0 0.00
14 NS 4K S+2 170 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
a.1 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 48,94 %
15 NS 2T E+2 -130 5.5 25.00
16 NS 4C W+1 -650 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
a14 Iris de Limbourg -Marie Eliane d'Udekem 48,26 %
17 NS 3S S+1 430 9.9 45.00
18 NS 4C N+1 650 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a12 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 52,90 %
23 NS 3C W-1 100 8.8 40.00
24 NS 3C E-2 100 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a11 Kjell Larsson -Tina Katila 49,55 %
25 NS 5K W = -600 5.5 25.00
26 NS 3T N = 110 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a10 Jacqueline de Thier -Jeannine Wanderpepen 44,58 %
27 NS 2T S = 90 19.7 89.55
28 NS 3P S = 140 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
Total : 186,0 / 484 = 38,43 %
PAIRE a.7 John de Busschere -Dominique van de Werve
A11 Christian Neve -Gerard Cooreman 43,80 %
1 EO 2K N+1 110 5.5 25.00
2 EO 3S N = 600 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 54,77 %
A.5 Francoise Nibelle -Daniela Napoli 50,41 %
3 EO 4K S = 130 5.5 25.00
4 EO 1S N-2 -200 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A12 Grazia Neuenschwander -Simone Munsterhjelm 38,43 %
5 EO 2P W = -110 19.7 89.55
6 EO 2T N+1 110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A13 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 52,93 %
9 EO 3PcW-1 200 9 40.91
10 EO 1S W = -90 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.7 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 47,82 %
13 EO 1S E+2 -150 19 86.36
14 EO 4K S+1 150 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 54,43 %
15 EO 3T E = -110 11 50.00
16 EO 4C W+1 -650 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A.8 Claire Derieuw -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 49,57 %
17 EO 3S N+1 430 12.1 55.00
18 EO 4C N+2 680 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A.2 Philippe van der Gracht -Fabienne Smit 62,27 %
19 EO 5CcN-2 -300 9.9 45.00
20 EO 3K S = 110 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A.9 Serge Allard -Paul Gatel 56,30 %
21 EO 3S E+1 -430 11 50.00
22 EO 4C N = 420 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 48,82 %
23 EO 4P N-1 -100 18.6 84.55
24 EO 4T S-1 -50 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 92,05 %
A10 Annie Legrand -Colette Heerinckx 55,79 %
25 EO 3S E = -600 16.5 75.00
26 EO 3K W-2 200 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
A.4 Caroll Pucher -Myriam de Timary 44,19 %
27 EO 3S S-2 -100 11 50.00
28 EO 3S S-3 -300 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
Total : 306,5 / 528 = 58,05 %
PAIRE a.9 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Wildiers
A12 Grazia Neuenschwander -Simone Munsterhjelm 38,43 %
1 EO 1S W+1 -120 21.9 99.55
2 EO 3S N-1 -100 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 99,55 %
A.6 Laurence Mauboussin -Diane Deslignes 55,45 %
3 EO 3K S = 110 13.2 60.00
4 EO 1S N-2 -200 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A13 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 52,93 %
5 EO 1C S+1 110 4.5 20.45
6 EO 2P E-1 100 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.7 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 47,82 %
7 EO 2P W-1 100 8.8 40.00
8 EO 4C E = -420 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A14 Sylviane Delbeke -Marie J. de Wagheneire 39,40 %
9 EO 3C S+1 170 13 59.09
10 EO 2C N-1 -100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 54,43 %
13 EO 2P S = 110 2 9.09
14 EO 4K S+2 170 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.9 Serge Allard -Paul Gatel 56,30 %
17 EO 3S N+1 430 12.1 55.00
18 EO 4C N+2 680 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 48,82 %
19 EO 4P W+1 -650 16.5 75.00
20 EO 2C N-1 -100 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
A10 Annie Legrand -Colette Heerinckx 55,79 %
21 EO 3S E = -400 6.6 30.00
22 EO 4C N = 420 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A.4 Caroll Pucher -Myriam de Timary 44,19 %
23 EO 5C W-3 300 1.2 5.45
24 EO 2T S+1 110 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A11 Christian Neve -Gerard Cooreman 43,80 %
25 EO 3S E+2 -660 20.8 94.55
26 EO 1P S = 80 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
A.5 Francoise Nibelle -Daniela Napoli 50,41 %
27 EO 2T S-1 -50 5.5 25.00
28 EO 4P N = 620 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
Total : 296,8 / 528 = 56,21 %
PAIRE a.4 Dilva Haym -Liliane Baptista
A10 Annie Legrand -Colette Heerinckx 55,79 %
3 EO 3K S = 110 13.2 60.00
4 EO 1S N-2 -200 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A.4 Caroll Pucher -Myriam de Timary 44,19 %
7 EO 2P W-1 100 8.8 40.00
8 EO 4C E-1 50 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
A12 Grazia Neuenschwander -Simone Munsterhjelm 38,43 %
9 EO 2C S+2 170 13 59.09
10 EO 2C N-1 -100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.5 Francoise Nibelle -Daniela Napoli 50,41 %
11 EO 5PcW+1 -750 20.8 94.55
12 EO 2P N+1 140 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A13 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 52,93 %
13 EO 1S W+1 -120 11 50.00
14 EO 5K S+1 420 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.6 Laurence Mauboussin -Diane Deslignes 55,45 %
15 EO 2T E = -90 8.8 40.00
16 EO 4C W+1 -650 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A14 Sylviane Delbeke -Marie J. de Wagheneire 39,40 %
17 EO 3S N = 400 19.7 89.55
18 EO 5C N+1 680 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A.7 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 47,82 %
19 EO 5CcN-2 -300 9.9 45.00
20 EO 1S S-3 -300 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 54,43 %
21 EO 2S E+2 -180 4.5 20.45
22 EO 4C N = 420 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A.8 Claire Derieuw -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 49,57 %
23 EO 4C W-2 200 6.6 30.00
24 EO 3T S = 110 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.2 Philippe van der Gracht -Fabienne Smit 62,27 %
25 EO 3S E+2 -660 20.8 94.55
26 EO 1P S = 80 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
A.9 Serge Allard -Paul Gatel 56,30 %
27 EO 3S S = 400 0.1 0.45
28 EO 3S S-3 -300 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
Total : 291,2 / 528 = 55,15 %
PAIRE a.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans
A10 Annie Legrand -Colette Heerinckx 55,79 %
1 EO 1S S = 90 14.3 65.00
2 EO 3S N+1 630 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A11 Christian Neve -Gerard Cooreman 43,80 %
5 EO 1C S+1 110 4.5 20.45
6 EO 2P E-1 100 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.5 Francoise Nibelle -Daniela Napoli 50,41 %
9 EO 3C S = 140 17 77.27
10 EO 2C N-1 -100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A13 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 52,93 %
11 EO 5C S-1 -50 2.3 10.45
12 EO 1S N = 90 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A.6 Laurence Mauboussin -Diane Deslignes 55,45 %
13 EO 1S W+2 -150 19 86.36
14 EO 5K S+1 420 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A14 Sylviane Delbeke -Marie J. de Wagheneire 39,40 %
15 EO 3T E+1 -130 16.5 75.00
16 EO 4C W+1 -650 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
A.7 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 47,82 %
17 EO 3S N+1 430 12.1 55.00
18 EO 4C N+2 680 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 54,43 %
19 EO 4K W = -130 4.5 20.45
20 EO 1S S-1 -100 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.8 Claire Derieuw -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 49,57 %
21 EO 3S W+1 -430 11 50.00
22 EO 4C N = 420 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A.2 Philippe van der Gracht -Fabienne Smit 62,27 %
23 EO 4C W = -620 21.9 99.55
24 EO 3T N+1 130 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
A.9 Serge Allard -Paul Gatel 56,30 %
25 EO 3K W+2 -150 6.6 30.00
26 EO 3K W-2 200 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 48,82 %
27 EO 1S S-3 -150 18.6 84.55
28 EO 4P N = 620 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
Total : 280,5 / 528 = 53,13 %
PAIRE a12 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne
A.7 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 47,82 %
1 EO 2S W-1 50 17.5 79.55
2 EO 3S N = 600 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 82,05 %
A14 Sylviane Delbeke -Marie J. de Wagheneire 39,40 %
3 EO 3K S = 110 13.2 60.00
4 EO 1S N-2 -200 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A.8 Claire Derieuw -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 49,57 %
5 EO 3C S-1 -100 17.5 79.55
6 EO 3T N = 110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 54,43 %
7 EO 2P W-2 200 2.3 10.45
8 EO 4C E = -420 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A.9 Serge Allard -Paul Gatel 56,30 %
9 EO 3C S = 140 17 77.27
10 EO 2P S = 110 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.2 Philippe van der Gracht -Fabienne Smit 62,27 %
11 EO 5P W = -450 7.7 35.00
12 EO 4P N-1 -100 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A10 Annie Legrand -Colette Heerinckx 55,79 %
13 EO 1S W+1 -120 11 50.00
14 EO 5PcE-3 500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 48,82 %
15 EO 3T E-1 50 5.5 25.00
16 EO 6C W-1 100 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
A.4 Caroll Pucher -Myriam de Timary 44,19 %
19 EO 4P W+1 -650 16.5 75.00
20 EO 1S S-1 -100 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
A12 Grazia Neuenschwander -Simone Munsterhjelm 38,43 %
23 EO 3C W-1 100 13.2 60.00
24 EO 3C E-2 100 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A.6 Laurence Mauboussin -Diane Deslignes 55,45 %
25 EO 2C E+2 -170 11 50.00
26 EO 3T S = 110 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
A13 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 52,93 %
27 EO 3S S-3 -150 18.6 84.55
28 EO 4P N = 620 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
Total : 279,3 / 528 = 52,90 %
PAIRE a11 Kjell Larsson -Tina Katila
A13 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 52,93 %
1 EO 2K N+1 110 5.5 25.00
2 EO 4C S+1 650 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.7 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 47,82 %
3 EO 3K S+1 130 5.5 25.00
4 EO 1S N-1 -100 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
A14 Sylviane Delbeke -Marie J. de Wagheneire 39,40 %
5 EO 1C S+1 110 4.5 20.45
6 EO 2C W-1 100 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.8 Claire Derieuw -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 49,57 %
7 EO 1S S-1 -100 18.6 84.55
8 EO 4C W = -420 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 54,43 %
9 EO 4C S-1 -50 21 95.45
10 EO 2C N-1 -100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
A.9 Serge Allard -Paul Gatel 56,30 %
11 EO 6P W-1 50 0.1 0.45
12 EO 2S N+1 150 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
A.2 Philippe van der Gracht -Fabienne Smit 62,27 %
13 EO 2P S+1 140 0 0.00
14 EO 3P E = -140 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 48,82 %
17 EO 3S N = 400 19.7 89.55
18 EO 4C N+2 680 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A11 Christian Neve -Gerard Cooreman 43,80 %
21 EO 3S E+2 -460 18.6 84.55
22 EO 4C N = 420 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A.5 Francoise Nibelle -Daniela Napoli 50,41 %
23 EO 4C W-1 100 13.2 60.00
24 EO 3T S = 110 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
A12 Grazia Neuenschwander -Simone Munsterhjelm 38,43 %
25 EO 5K W = -600 16.5 75.00
26 EO 3T N = 110 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.6 Laurence Mauboussin -Diane Deslignes 55,45 %
27 EO 3S S-2 -100 11 50.00
28 EO 5TcE-4 800 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
Total : 261,6 / 528 = 49,55 %
PAIRE a.1 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 54,43 %
1 EO 3C W-2 100 11 50.00
2 EO 3S N+1 630 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.9 Serge Allard -Paul Gatel 56,30 %
3 EO 3P E-1 100 18.6 84.55
4 EO 1S N-2 -200 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A.2 Philippe van der Gracht -Fabienne Smit 62,27 %
5 EO 3C S = 140 0.1 0.45
6 EO 2S E-3 300 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 0,45 %
A10 Annie Legrand -Colette Heerinckx 55,79 %
7 EO 1S S = 90 14.3 65.00
8 EO 4C E = -420 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 48,82 %
9 EO 3C S+2 200 9 40.91
10 EO 2C N = 110 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A11 Christian Neve -Gerard Cooreman 43,80 %
11 EO 5P W+1 -480 13.2 60.00
12 EO 4P N-1 -100 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A.4 Caroll Pucher -Myriam de Timary 44,19 %
13 EO 1S W+1 -120 11 50.00
14 EO 5K S = 400 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A12 Grazia Neuenschwander -Simone Munsterhjelm 38,43 %
15 EO 2T E+2 -130 16.5 75.00
16 EO 4C W+1 -650 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
A.5 Francoise Nibelle -Daniela Napoli 50,41 %
17 EO 3S N+2 460 3.4 15.45
18 EO 4C S+2 680 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
A13 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 52,93 %
19 EO 5P W+1 -680 21.9 99.55
20 EO 1S S+3 180 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.6 Laurence Mauboussin -Diane Deslignes 55,45 %
21 EO 3S E+1 -430 11 50.00
22 EO 4C N+1 450 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
A.7 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 47,82 %
25 EO 2K W+3 -150 6.6 30.00
26 EO 1S E+1 -120 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
Total : 258,4 / 528 = 48,94 %
PAIRE a.3 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart
A.9 Serge Allard -Paul Gatel 56,30 %
1 EO 3K N = 110 5.5 25.00
2 EO 3S N+1 630 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 48,82 %
5 EO 1C S = 80 12.1 55.00
6 EO 3T N = 110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A11 Christian Neve -Gerard Cooreman 43,80 %
7 EO 2P W = -110 21.9 99.55
8 EO 4C E = -420 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
A.4 Caroll Pucher -Myriam de Timary 44,19 %
9 EO 4C S = 420 4 18.18
10 EO 2C N-2 -200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A12 Grazia Neuenschwander -Simone Munsterhjelm 38,43 %
11 EO 5CcS-1 -100 4.5 20.45
12 EO 3P N = 140 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
A.5 Francoise Nibelle -Daniela Napoli 50,41 %
13 EO 1S W-1 100 4 18.18
14 EO 5K S+1 420 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A13 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 52,93 %
15 EO 2S E-1 50 5.5 25.00
16 EO 4C W+1 -650 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.6 Laurence Mauboussin -Diane Deslignes 55,45 %
17 EO 3S S = 400 19.7 89.55
18 EO 5K N = 600 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 94,55 %
A14 Sylviane Delbeke -Marie J. de Wagheneire 39,40 %
19 EO 4P W+1 -650 16.5 75.00
20 EO 2S E-1 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
A.7 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 47,82 %
21 EO 1S W+1 -120 2.3 10.45
22 EO 4C N = 420 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 54,43 %
23 EO 4C W-1 100 13.2 60.00
24 EO 3S N = 400 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
A.8 Claire Derieuw -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 49,57 %
25 EO 3K W+1 -130 2.3 10.45
26 EO 1S S = 90 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
Total : 255,0 / 528 = 48,30 %
PAIRE a14 Iris de Limbourg -Marie Eliane d'Udekem
A.8 Claire Derieuw -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 49,57 %
1 EO 1ScS+1 280 0.1 0.45
2 EO 3S S+2 660 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 5,45 %
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 54,43 %
3 EO 2K S+2 130 5.5 25.00
4 EO 1S N-4 -400 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A.9 Serge Allard -Paul Gatel 56,30 %
5 EO 4C S-2 -200 21.9 99.55
6 EO 3T N = 110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A.2 Philippe van der Gracht -Fabienne Smit 62,27 %
7 EO 2P W-2 200 2.3 10.45
8 EO 4C E = -420 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A10 Annie Legrand -Colette Heerinckx 55,79 %
9 EO 4C S = 420 4 18.18
10 EO 2P S = 110 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 48,82 %
11 EO 4PcW+1 -690 17.5 79.55
12 EO 4P N+1 650 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A11 Christian Neve -Gerard Cooreman 43,80 %
13 EO 1S W+1 -120 11 50.00
14 EO 4P E-3 150 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A.4 Caroll Pucher -Myriam de Timary 44,19 %
15 EO 2T E+2 -130 16.5 75.00
16 EO 4C W+1 -650 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
A12 Grazia Neuenschwander -Simone Munsterhjelm 38,43 %
17 EO 3S S+1 430 12.1 55.00
18 EO 4C N+1 650 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A.5 Francoise Nibelle -Daniela Napoli 50,41 %
19 EO 5C N-2 -100 2.3 10.45
20 EO 2C N = 110 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.6 Laurence Mauboussin -Diane Deslignes 55,45 %
23 EO 4P N-1 -100 18.6 84.55
24 EO 3T S = 110 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A14 Sylviane Delbeke -Marie J. de Wagheneire 39,40 %
27 EO 3S S-1 -50 5.5 25.00
28 EO 2C N+2 170 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
Total : 254,8 / 528 = 48,26 %
PAIRE a.2 Francoise Duren -Antoinette Jourdain
A.2 Philippe van der Gracht -Fabienne Smit 62,27 %
3 EO 3K S+1 130 5.5 25.00
4 EO 1S N-2 -200 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A10 Annie Legrand -Colette Heerinckx 55,79 %
5 EO 3P W-1 50 15.4 70.00
6 EO 2C W-2 200 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 48,82 %
7 EO 2S S-1 -100 18.6 84.55
8 EO 4C E-1 50 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A11 Christian Neve -Gerard Cooreman 43,80 %
9 EO 4C S = 420 4 18.18
10 EO 2P S = 110 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
A.4 Caroll Pucher -Myriam de Timary 44,19 %
11 EO 4P W+2 -480 13.2 60.00
12 EO 4P N-1 -100 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A12 Grazia Neuenschwander -Simone Munsterhjelm 38,43 %
13 EO 1S W+3 -180 22 100.00
14 EO 4K S+2 170 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
A.5 Francoise Nibelle -Daniela Napoli 50,41 %
15 EO 2T E+3 -150 21.9 99.55
16 EO 4C W+1 -650 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
A13 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 52,93 %
17 EO 3S N+2 460 3.4 15.45
18 EO 4C N+2 680 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
A.6 Laurence Mauboussin -Diane Deslignes 55,45 %
19 EO 4P W-1 100 0.1 0.45
20 EO 1S S+2 150 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 10,45 %
A14 Sylviane Delbeke -Marie J. de Wagheneire 39,40 %
21 EO 3S E+2 -460 18.6 84.55
22 EO 4C N-1 -50 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 92,05 %
A.7 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 47,82 %
23 EO 5C W-3 300 1.2 5.45
24 EO 3S N = 400 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 5,45 %
A.8 Claire Derieuw -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 49,57 %
27 EO 3S S-2 -100 11 50.00
28 EO 3C N+1 170 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
Total : 252,1 / 528 = 47,75 %
PAIRE a13 Michel Lievens -Teresa Dekoster
A14 Sylviane Delbeke -Marie J. de Wagheneire 39,40 %
1 EO 2K N = 90 14.3 65.00
2 EO 3S S+1 630 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A.8 Claire Derieuw -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 49,57 %
3 EO 2S S+1 150 0.1 0.45
4 EO 1S N-2 -200 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 54,43 %
5 EO 1C S = 80 12.1 55.00
6 EO 2T N+2 130 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A.9 Serge Allard -Paul Gatel 56,30 %
7 EO 2P W-2 200 2.3 10.45
8 EO 4C E = -420 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A.2 Philippe van der Gracht -Fabienne Smit 62,27 %
9 EO 4C S+1 450 0 0.00
10 EO 3P S-1 -100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A10 Annie Legrand -Colette Heerinckx 55,79 %
11 EO 5P W = -450 7.7 35.00
12 EO 1S N = 90 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 48,82 %
13 EO 1S W+1 -120 11 50.00
14 EO 5K S+1 420 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A11 Christian Neve -Gerard Cooreman 43,80 %
15 EO 2T E+2 -130 16.5 75.00
16 EO 6C W-1 100 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 45,23 %
A.4 Caroll Pucher -Myriam de Timary 44,19 %
17 EO 3S S+2 460 3.4 15.45
18 EO 6C N = 1430 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 10,45 %
A.5 Francoise Nibelle -Daniela Napoli 50,41 %
21 EO 3S E+2 -460 18.6 84.55
22 EO 4C N = 420 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A13 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 52,93 %
25 EO 2S N-5 -250 13.2 60.00
26 EO 1P S = 80 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
A.7 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 47,82 %
27 EO 3S S-3 -150 18.6 84.55
28 EO 4C S-1 -100 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 82,05 %
Total : 243,5 / 528 = 46,12 %
PAIRE a10 Jacqueline de Thier -Jeannine Wanderpepen
A.6 Laurence Mauboussin -Diane Deslignes 55,45 %
1 EO 2K N+1 110 5.5 25.00
2 EO 3S S+3 690 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 12,73 %
A13 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 52,93 %
3 EO 2C N-1 -50 21.9 99.55
4 EO 1S N-2 -200 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.7 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 47,82 %
5 EO 3P E-2 100 8.8 40.00
6 EO 3T N = 110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A14 Sylviane Delbeke -Marie J. de Wagheneire 39,40 %
7 EO 1S S = 90 14.3 65.00
8 EO 4C E = -420 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
A.8 Claire Derieuw -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 49,57 %
9 EO 3C N-1 -50 21 95.45
10 EO 2C N-1 -100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 54,43 %
11 EO 5PcW+1 -750 20.8 94.55
12 EO 3S N+1 630 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A.2 Philippe van der Gracht -Fabienne Smit 62,27 %
15 EO 3S E-2 100 1.2 5.45
16 EO 6C W-2 200 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 2,95 %
A10 Annie Legrand -Colette Heerinckx 55,79 %
19 EO 5C N-4 -200 6.6 30.00
20 EO 2P W-2 200 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
A.4 Caroll Pucher -Myriam de Timary 44,19 %
21 EO 3S E+2 -460 18.6 84.55
22 EO 4C N = 420 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A11 Christian Neve -Gerard Cooreman 43,80 %
23 EO 4C W-2 200 6.6 30.00
24 EO 4T S = 130 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
A.5 Francoise Nibelle -Daniela Napoli 50,41 %
25 EO 3K W+2 -150 6.6 30.00
26 EO 1P S = 80 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A12 Grazia Neuenschwander -Simone Munsterhjelm 38,43 %
27 EO 2T S = 90 2.3 10.45
28 EO 3P S = 140 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
Total : 235,4 / 528 = 44,58 %
PAIRE a.6 Anne Arsac -Catherine de Moffarts
A.4 Caroll Pucher -Myriam de Timary 44,19 %
1 EO 3K N-1 -50 19.7 89.55
2 EO 3S S+1 630 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A11 Christian Neve -Gerard Cooreman 43,80 %
3 EO 3P E-1 100 18.6 84.55
4 EO 1S N = 90 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A12 Grazia Neuenschwander -Simone Munsterhjelm 38,43 %
7 EO 1P W-1 100 8.8 40.00
8 EO 4C E-1 50 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
A.6 Laurence Mauboussin -Diane Deslignes 55,45 %
11 EO 5P W+1 -480 13.2 60.00
12 EO 4P N = 620 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
A14 Sylviane Delbeke -Marie J. de Wagheneire 39,40 %
13 EO 1S W+1 -120 11 50.00
14 EO 5K S+1 420 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.7 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 47,82 %
15 EO 4P W-2 100 1.2 5.45
16 EO 4C W+1 -650 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 54,43 %
17 EO 3S S+2 460 3.4 15.45
18 EO 6C N = 1430 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 10,45 %
A.8 Claire Derieuw -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 49,57 %
19 EO 4P W+1 -650 16.5 75.00
20 EO 1S S-1 -100 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
A.2 Philippe van der Gracht -Fabienne Smit 62,27 %
21 EO 3S W-2 100 0.1 0.45
22 EO 4C N+1 450 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 2,95 %
A.9 Serge Allard -Paul Gatel 56,30 %
23 EO 4C W-2 200 6.6 30.00
24 EO 4T S = 130 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 48,82 %
25 EO 2P N-2 -100 0.1 0.45
26 EO 2S E = -120 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A10 Annie Legrand -Colette Heerinckx 55,79 %
27 EO 4P N-3 -150 18.6 84.55
28 EO 3K E-2 100 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
Total : 217,7 / 528 = 41,23 %
PAIRE a.8 -
A.5 Francoise Nibelle -Daniela Napoli 50,41 %
1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A12 Grazia Neuenschwander -Simone Munsterhjelm 38,43 %
3 EO BYE 0 0.00
4 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.6 Laurence Mauboussin -Diane Deslignes 55,45 %
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A13 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 52,93 %
7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A14 Sylviane Delbeke -Marie J. de Wagheneire 39,40 %
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.8 Claire Derieuw -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 49,57 %
15 EO BYE 0 0.00
16 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.2 Philippe van der Gracht -Fabienne Smit 62,27 %
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.9 Serge Allard -Paul Gatel 56,30 %
19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 48,82 %
21 EO BYE 0 0.00
22 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A10 Annie Legrand -Colette Heerinckx 55,79 %
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.4 Caroll Pucher -Myriam de Timary 44,19 %
25 EO BYE 0 0.00
26 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A11 Christian Neve -Gerard Cooreman 43,80 %
27 EO BYE 0 0.00
28 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 616 = 0,00 %
|