B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 61,88 A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claude Renier
--- 2 61,36 A10 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere
--- 3 54,88 A11 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle
--- 4 53,74 A.7 Lydia Wildiers -Nicole Blondeau
--- 5 52,21 A.8 Michel Lievens -Annie Zeimes
--- 6 51,86 A12 Colette Heerinckx -Eliane de Ceuninck
--- 7 50,66 A.4 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson
--- 8 50,04 A14 Thomas Brusselmans -Christian Martinot
--- 9 49,57 A.5 Sophie Tilemans -Myriam de Timary
--- 10 49,26 A.1 Martine Zens -Fifi Englund
--- 11 46,03 A.9 Grazia Neuenschwander -Simone Munsterhjelm
--- 12 44,00 A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren
--- 13 40,19 A.3 Daniela Napoli -Giuseppe Napoli
--- 14 34,94 A13 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Christiane Vroninckx
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 67,92 a.2 Noelle Fosse -Patrick Gilles
--- 2 60,68 a.4 Anne France Raquez -Odile Franquet van Tilt
--- 3 59,49 a.5 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire
--- 4 52,56 a11 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed
--- 5 52,10 a.6 Patricia Bardy -Serge Allard
--- 6 51,65 a.3 Teresa Dekoster -Anne Beyne
--- 7 47,50 a.1 Dominique Sassen -Helene Schyns
--- 8 45,87 a10 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten
--- 9 44,96 a12 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart
--- 10 44,92 a.7 Alexandre Viot -Philippe van der Gracht
--- 11 44,77 a14 Benedicte Lemaigre -Chantal de Lichtervelde
--- 12 42,16 a.8 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Liliane Baptista
--- 13 35,21 a.9 Marina Oudaert -Jean Pierre Oudaert
--- 14 0,00 a13 -
PAIRE A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claude Renier
a.2 Noelle Fosse -Patrick Gilles 67,92 %
3 NS 4P N-1 -50 3.4 15.45
4 NS 2K N+1 110 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
a.1 Dominique Sassen -Helene Schyns 47,50 %
5 NS 6C N = 1430 15.4 70.00
6 NS 4P N = 420 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 72,50 %
a14 Benedicte Lemaigre -Chantal de Lichtervelde 44,77 %
7 NS 3S S+1 630 20.8 94.55
8 NS 4P W = -420 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a13 - 0,00 %
9 NS BYE 0 0.00
10 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a12 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 44,96 %
11 NS 1S S+1 120 15.4 70.00
12 NS 5P W-1 50 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
a11 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 52,56 %
13 NS 4T S = 130 13.2 60.00
14 NS 4K S-1 -50 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
a10 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 45,87 %
15 NS 4C E+2 -480 17.5 79.55
16 NS 4C W+1 -650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a.8 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Liliane Baptista 42,16 %
17 NS 2P S+2 170 16.5 75.00
18 NS 4C N+2 680 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a.7 Alexandre Viot -Philippe van der Gracht 44,92 %
19 NS 1C N+2 140 11 50.00
20 NS 3S W = -600 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.6 Patricia Bardy -Serge Allard 52,10 %
21 NS 2P S+1 140 20.8 94.55
22 NS 3K S+1 130 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
a.5 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 59,49 %
23 NS 4PcE-3 800 22 100.00
24 NS 3P S = 140 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
a.4 Anne France Raquez -Odile Franquet van Tilt 60,68 %
25 NS 4CcS-1 -100 6.6 30.00
26 NS 4P E+1 -650 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
Total : 299,5 / 484 = 61,88 %
PAIRE A10 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere
a.5 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 59,49 %
1 NS 4C N+1 450 20.8 94.55
2 NS 3K S = 110 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
a.4 Anne France Raquez -Odile Franquet van Tilt 60,68 %
3 NS 2P N+1 140 14.3 65.00
4 NS 2S E = -120 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a.2 Noelle Fosse -Patrick Gilles 67,92 %
5 NS 6C N = 1430 15.4 70.00
6 NS 4P N = 420 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 72,50 %
a.1 Dominique Sassen -Helene Schyns 47,50 %
7 NS 3S N = 600 11 50.00
8 NS 4P W-1 50 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
a14 Benedicte Lemaigre -Chantal de Lichtervelde 44,77 %
9 NS 3S E+2 -660 8.8 40.00
10 NS 3P S+1 170 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a13 - 0,00 %
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a12 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 44,96 %
13 NS 3S S = 600 21.9 99.55
14 NS 3K N-1 -50 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 94,55 %
a10 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 45,87 %
19 NS 1S E-2 200 18 81.82
20 NS 3S W+1 -630 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.9 Marina Oudaert -Jean Pierre Oudaert 35,21 %
21 NS 2P N+1 140 20.8 94.55
22 NS 3PcE-3 800 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 97,05 %
a.8 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Liliane Baptista 42,16 %
23 NS 2C S+1 140 15 68.18
24 NS 4P S-2 -100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.7 Alexandre Viot -Philippe van der Gracht 44,92 %
25 NS 4C S-2 -100 6.6 30.00
26 NS 4P W+1 -650 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
a.6 Patricia Bardy -Serge Allard 52,10 %
27 NS 2C W = -110 6.6 30.00
28 NS 4C S-2 -200 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
Total : 297,0 / 484 = 61,36 %
PAIRE A11 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle
a.7 Alexandre Viot -Philippe van der Gracht 44,92 %
1 NS 3C N+2 200 8.8 40.00
2 NS 2K S+2 130 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a.6 Patricia Bardy -Serge Allard 52,10 %
3 NS 4P N-1 -50 3.4 15.45
4 NS 4T E-1 100 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.5 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 59,49 %
5 NS 5S N+1 690 7.7 35.00
6 NS 3P N+1 170 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a.3 Teresa Dekoster -Anne Beyne 51,65 %
7 NS 3S S = 600 11 50.00
8 NS 2P W+3 -200 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a.2 Noelle Fosse -Patrick Gilles 67,92 %
9 NS 3S E+2 -660 8.8 40.00
10 NS 4P S-1 -100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a.1 Dominique Sassen -Helene Schyns 47,50 %
11 NS 3P E-3 150 19.7 89.55
12 NS 4P W-1 50 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
a14 Benedicte Lemaigre -Chantal de Lichtervelde 44,77 %
13 NS 4T S = 130 13.2 60.00
14 NS 3P W = -140 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a13 - 0,00 %
15 NS BYE 0 0.00
16 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a11 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 52,56 %
21 NS 1S E-1 50 11 50.00
22 NS 4K N = 130 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a10 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 45,87 %
23 NS 3C S = 140 15 68.18
24 NS 4P S = 420 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
a.9 Marina Oudaert -Jean Pierre Oudaert 35,21 %
25 NS 3P E-1 100 17.5 79.55
26 NS 2P E+3 -200 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 84,55 %
a.8 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Liliane Baptista 42,16 %
27 NS 2P N-1 -50 13.2 60.00
28 NS 2C S+1 140 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
Total : 265,6 / 484 = 54,88 %
PAIRE A.7 Lydia Wildiers -Nicole Blondeau
a12 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 44,96 %
1 NS 3C N+2 200 8.8 40.00
2 NS 2P W-2 100 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
a11 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 52,56 %
3 NS 3P N = 140 14.3 65.00
4 NS 2K N+2 130 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
a10 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 45,87 %
5 NS 6C N+1 1460 21.9 99.55
6 NS 3P N+1 170 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a.9 Marina Oudaert -Jean Pierre Oudaert 35,21 %
7 NS 3S N+1 630 20.8 94.55
8 NS 2P W+1 -140 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a.7 Alexandre Viot -Philippe van der Gracht 44,92 %
13 NS 3T W-5 500 19.7 89.55
14 NS 3K N-1 -50 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 89,55 %
a.6 Patricia Bardy -Serge Allard 52,10 %
15 NS 4P W+2 -480 17.5 79.55
16 NS 4C W+1 -650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a.5 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 59,49 %
17 NS 1P S+2 140 8.8 40.00
18 NS 4P N+1 650 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
a.4 Anne France Raquez -Odile Franquet van Tilt 60,68 %
19 NS 1S E-1 100 8 36.36
20 NS 2T W+2 -130 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a.3 Teresa Dekoster -Anne Beyne 51,65 %
21 NS 1S E = -90 3.4 15.45
22 NS 3K S+1 130 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a.2 Noelle Fosse -Patrick Gilles 67,92 %
23 NS 2P E = -110 7 31.82
24 NS 4C W+1 -450 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
a.1 Dominique Sassen -Helene Schyns 47,50 %
25 NS 4C S-1 -50 13.2 60.00
26 NS 4P W+1 -650 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a13 - 0,00 %
27 NS BYE 0 0.00
28 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 260,1 / 484 = 53,74 %
PAIRE A.8 Michel Lievens -Annie Zeimes
a14 Benedicte Lemaigre -Chantal de Lichtervelde 44,77 %
1 NS 3C N+2 200 8.8 40.00
2 NS 2C N+1 140 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a13 - 0,00 %
3 NS BYE 0 0.00
4 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a12 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 44,96 %
5 NS 7C N-1 -100 3.4 15.45
6 NS 4P N = 420 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 45,23 %
a11 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 52,56 %
7 NS 3S S = 600 11 50.00
8 NS 4P W+1 -450 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a10 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 45,87 %
9 NS 3K W = -110 19.7 89.55
10 NS 3P S = 140 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 84,55 %
a.8 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Liliane Baptista 42,16 %
15 NS 6P W = -980 9.9 45.00
16 NS 4P W+1 -650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.7 Alexandre Viot -Philippe van der Gracht 44,92 %
17 NS 1P S+3 170 16.5 75.00
18 NS 4C N+1 650 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.6 Patricia Bardy -Serge Allard 52,10 %
19 NS 1S E-4 400 22 100.00
20 NS 3S E = -600 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a.5 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 59,49 %
21 NS 1S E = -90 3.4 15.45
22 NS 4K N-1 -50 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 12,95 %
a.4 Anne France Raquez -Odile Franquet van Tilt 60,68 %
23 NS 3S W-4 400 20 90.91
24 NS 4C W = -420 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.3 Teresa Dekoster -Anne Beyne 51,65 %
25 NS 4C S = 420 21.9 99.55
26 NS 3S E = -600 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 89,55 %
a.2 Noelle Fosse -Patrick Gilles 67,92 %
27 NS 2C W = -110 6.6 30.00
28 NS 4C S-2 -200 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
Total : 252,7 / 484 = 52,21 %
PAIRE A12 Colette Heerinckx -Eliane de Ceuninck
a.9 Marina Oudaert -Jean Pierre Oudaert 35,21 %
1 NS 3C N+2 200 8.8 40.00
2 NS 3P E-3 150 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
a.8 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Liliane Baptista 42,16 %
3 NS 3P N = 140 14.3 65.00
4 NS 2P S+1 140 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
a.7 Alexandre Viot -Philippe van der Gracht 44,92 %
5 NS 6C N = 1430 15.4 70.00
6 NS 4P N = 420 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 72,50 %
a.6 Patricia Bardy -Serge Allard 52,10 %
7 NS 3S N = 600 11 50.00
8 NS 3P W = -140 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.4 Anne France Raquez -Odile Franquet van Tilt 60,68 %
9 NS 3S E+3 -690 1.2 5.45
10 NS 4P S-1 -100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.3 Teresa Dekoster -Anne Beyne 51,65 %
11 NS Pass Passe 4.5 20.45
12 NS 4P W-1 50 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a.2 Noelle Fosse -Patrick Gilles 67,92 %
13 NS 3P W+1 -170 3.4 15.45
14 NS 2P W+2 -170 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 12,95 %
a.1 Dominique Sassen -Helene Schyns 47,50 %
15 NS 4P W+2 -480 17.5 79.55
16 NS 4C W+1 -650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a14 Benedicte Lemaigre -Chantal de Lichtervelde 44,77 %
17 NS 2P S+3 200 21.9 99.55
18 NS 4C N+1 650 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a12 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 44,96 %
23 NS 2C W+2 -170 4 18.18
24 NS 3S W-4 200 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a11 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 52,56 %
25 NS 2P E = -110 2.3 10.45
26 NS 4P W+1 -650 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a10 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 45,87 %
27 NS 2C W-1 50 18.6 84.55
28 NS 2C S = 110 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
Total : 273,8 / 528 = 51,86 %
PAIRE A.4 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson
a.6 Patricia Bardy -Serge Allard 52,10 %
1 NS 3C N+2 200 8.8 40.00
2 NS 2K S+1 110 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.4 Anne France Raquez -Odile Franquet van Tilt 60,68 %
7 NS 2S N-1 -100 2.3 10.45
8 NS 4P W = -420 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 12,95 %
a.3 Teresa Dekoster -Anne Beyne 51,65 %
9 NS 3S E = -600 15.4 70.00
10 NS 3P S-1 -100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.2 Noelle Fosse -Patrick Gilles 67,92 %
11 NS 1S S = 90 7.7 35.00
12 NS 4P W-1 50 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.1 Dominique Sassen -Helene Schyns 47,50 %
13 NS 3P W+1 -170 3.4 15.45
14 NS 3P W = -140 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a14 Benedicte Lemaigre -Chantal de Lichtervelde 44,77 %
15 NS 6P W = -980 9.9 45.00
16 NS 4C W+1 -650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a13 - 0,00 %
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a12 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 44,96 %
19 NS 1C N+2 140 11 50.00
20 NS 3T W+2 -150 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a10 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 45,87 %
21 NS 1S E = -90 3.4 15.45
22 NS 3P E-3 300 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.9 Marina Oudaert -Jean Pierre Oudaert 35,21 %
23 NS 2P E = -110 7 31.82
24 NS 3C E+1 -170 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a.8 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Liliane Baptista 42,16 %
25 NS 3C S = 140 19.7 89.55
26 NS 3P W+1 -170 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 94,55 %
a.7 Alexandre Viot -Philippe van der Gracht 44,92 %
27 NS 3S W-1 50 18.6 84.55
28 NS 2C S = 110 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
Total : 245,2 / 484 = 50,66 %
PAIRE A14 Thomas Brusselmans -Christian Martinot
a13 - 0,00 %
1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a12 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 44,96 %
3 NS 3P N = 140 14.3 65.00
4 NS 2K N = 90 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
a11 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 52,56 %
5 NS 6C N = 1430 15.4 70.00
6 NS 4P N = 420 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 72,50 %
a10 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 45,87 %
7 NS 3S N = 600 11 50.00
8 NS 3P W = -140 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.9 Marina Oudaert -Jean Pierre Oudaert 35,21 %
9 NS 3S E+3 -690 1.2 5.45
10 NS 3K E-1 100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a.8 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Liliane Baptista 42,16 %
11 NS 3P E-3 150 19.7 89.55
12 NS 4P W = -420 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.6 Patricia Bardy -Serge Allard 52,10 %
13 NS 4P E-1 100 6.6 30.00
14 NS 4K N-2 -100 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.5 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 59,49 %
15 NS 6P W+1 -1010 4.5 20.45
16 NS 5C E = -650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
a.4 Anne France Raquez -Odile Franquet van Tilt 60,68 %
17 NS 1S N+1 120 4.5 20.45
18 NS 4C N+2 680 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.3 Teresa Dekoster -Anne Beyne 51,65 %
19 NS 2C N+2 170 14 63.64
20 NS 3S W = -600 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.2 Noelle Fosse -Patrick Gilles 67,92 %
21 NS 1S E-2 100 16.5 75.00
22 NS 5TcN-4 -800 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a14 Benedicte Lemaigre -Chantal de Lichtervelde 44,77 %
27 NS 2P N-1 -50 13.2 60.00
28 NS 1C S+2 140 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
Total : 242,2 / 484 = 50,04 %
PAIRE A.5 Sophie Tilemans -Myriam de Timary
a.8 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Liliane Baptista 42,16 %
1 NS 2P E-1 50 0.1 0.45
2 NS 1S S = 90 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 10,45 %
a.7 Alexandre Viot -Philippe van der Gracht 44,92 %
3 NS 4P N-1 -50 3.4 15.45
4 NS 5T E-2 200 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a.5 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 59,49 %
9 NS 3S E-2 200 21.9 99.55
10 NS 3C W+1 -170 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.4 Anne France Raquez -Odile Franquet van Tilt 60,68 %
11 NS 3P E-2 100 12.1 55.00
12 NS 6P W-2 100 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
a.3 Teresa Dekoster -Anne Beyne 51,65 %
13 NS 4T S = 130 13.2 60.00
14 NS 2P W+1 -140 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.2 Noelle Fosse -Patrick Gilles 67,92 %
15 NS 4P W+2 -480 17.5 79.55
16 NS 5P E = -650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a.1 Dominique Sassen -Helene Schyns 47,50 %
17 NS 2P S+1 140 8.8 40.00
18 NS 3C N+3 230 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a14 Benedicte Lemaigre -Chantal de Lichtervelde 44,77 %
19 NS 1S S-1 -50 5 22.73
20 NS 5T W-1 100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a13 - 0,00 %
21 NS BYE 0 0.00
22 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a11 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 52,56 %
23 NS 3C S-1 -100 10 45.45
24 NS 4C W = -420 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a10 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 45,87 %
25 NS 4C S-3 -150 0.1 0.45
26 NS 4P E+1 -650 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
a.9 Marina Oudaert -Jean Pierre Oudaert 35,21 %
27 NS 2C W-2 100 21.9 99.55
28 NS 2C S+1 140 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 94,55 %
Total : 239,9 / 484 = 49,57 %
PAIRE A.1 Martine Zens -Fifi Englund
a.1 Dominique Sassen -Helene Schyns 47,50 %
1 NS 3C N+2 200 8.8 40.00
2 NS 2P E-2 100 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
a14 Benedicte Lemaigre -Chantal de Lichtervelde 44,77 %
3 NS 2P N+1 140 14.3 65.00
4 NS 2P S = 110 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a13 - 0,00 %
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a12 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 44,96 %
7 NS 3S N = 600 11 50.00
8 NS 3S E-2 100 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
a11 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 52,56 %
9 NS 3S E+2 -660 8.8 40.00
10 NS 5C W-2 200 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
a10 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 45,87 %
11 NS 1S S-1 -50 2.3 10.45
12 NS 4P E = -420 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 10,45 %
a.9 Marina Oudaert -Jean Pierre Oudaert 35,21 %
13 NS 4T N = 130 13.2 60.00
14 NS 3P W = -140 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.7 Alexandre Viot -Philippe van der Gracht 44,92 %
15 NS 6P W+1 -1010 4.5 20.45
16 NS 5C W = -650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
a.6 Patricia Bardy -Serge Allard 52,10 %
17 NS 1P S+3 170 16.5 75.00
18 NS 4C N+2 680 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a.5 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 59,49 %
19 NS 2K W = -90 2 9.09
20 NS 3S E+1 -630 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
a.4 Anne France Raquez -Odile Franquet van Tilt 60,68 %
21 NS 1S E-2 100 16.5 75.00
22 NS 3K S = 110 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.3 Teresa Dekoster -Anne Beyne 51,65 %
23 NS 3P E-2 200 18 81.82
24 NS 4P S-2 -100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
Total : 238,4 / 484 = 49,26 %
PAIRE A.9 Grazia Neuenschwander -Simone Munsterhjelm
a.3 Teresa Dekoster -Anne Beyne 51,65 %
1 NS 4C S = 420 17.5 79.55
2 NS 1S S-1 -100 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a.1 Dominique Sassen -Helene Schyns 47,50 %
3 NS 2P N+1 140 14.3 65.00
4 NS 3P S = 140 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
a14 Benedicte Lemaigre -Chantal de Lichtervelde 44,77 %
5 NS 6C N = 1430 15.4 70.00
6 NS 3P N+1 170 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 45,23 %
a13 - 0,00 %
7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a12 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 44,96 %
9 NS 3T E+2 -150 17.5 79.55
10 NS 3C W = -140 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a11 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 52,56 %
11 NS 2P E = -110 0.1 0.45
12 NS 5P W-2 100 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.9 Marina Oudaert -Jean Pierre Oudaert 35,21 %
17 NS 2P S+2 170 16.5 75.00
18 NS 4C N+2 680 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a.8 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Liliane Baptista 42,16 %
19 NS 1S W-2 200 18 81.82
20 NS 3S E = -600 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a.7 Alexandre Viot -Philippe van der Gracht 44,92 %
21 NS 1S E = -90 3.4 15.45
22 NS 4P E-2 200 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 45,23 %
a.6 Patricia Bardy -Serge Allard 52,10 %
23 NS 2P S-3 -300 1 4.55
24 NS 4C W+1 -450 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 4,55 %
a.5 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 59,49 %
25 NS 4C S-1 -50 13.2 60.00
26 NS 4P W+1 -650 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.4 Anne France Raquez -Odile Franquet van Tilt 60,68 %
27 NS 1S W+2 -150 0.1 0.45
28 NS 4C S-1 -100 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
Total : 222,8 / 484 = 46,03 %
PAIRE A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren
a10 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 45,87 %
1 NS 4C N+1 450 20.8 94.55
2 NS 2K S+2 130 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
a.9 Marina Oudaert -Jean Pierre Oudaert 35,21 %
3 NS 4P N = 420 21.9 99.55
4 NS 3P S+1 170 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 94,55 %
a.8 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Liliane Baptista 42,16 %
5 NS 6P S-3 -300 0.1 0.45
6 NS 4P N = 420 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a.6 Patricia Bardy -Serge Allard 52,10 %
11 NS 2P E-2 100 12.1 55.00
12 NS 4P W-1 50 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.5 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 59,49 %
13 NS 4C N-3 -300 0.1 0.45
14 NS 2P W+1 -140 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
a.4 Anne France Raquez -Odile Franquet van Tilt 60,68 %
15 NS 6PcW = -1210 0.1 0.45
16 NS 4C W+1 -650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a.3 Teresa Dekoster -Anne Beyne 51,65 %
17 NS 3S N-1 -50 2.3 10.45
18 NS 4C N+2 680 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
a.2 Noelle Fosse -Patrick Gilles 67,92 %
19 NS 2P S-2 -100 0 0.00
20 NS 3S W = -600 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.1 Dominique Sassen -Helene Schyns 47,50 %
21 NS 1S E-1 50 11 50.00
22 NS 3P E-2 200 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
a14 Benedicte Lemaigre -Chantal de Lichtervelde 44,77 %
23 NS 3S N-3 -300 1 4.55
24 NS 5P N-3 -150 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a12 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 44,96 %
25 NS 3C N-1 -50 13.2 60.00
26 NS 3S E+3 -690 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
a11 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 52,56 %
27 NS 2C W+1 -140 2.3 10.45
28 NS 2C S-1 -100 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
Total : 232,3 / 528 = 44,00 %
PAIRE A.3 Daniela Napoli -Giuseppe Napoli
a.3 Teresa Dekoster -Anne Beyne 51,65 %
5 NS 3S N+3 690 7.7 35.00
6 NS 3P N+1 170 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a.2 Noelle Fosse -Patrick Gilles 67,92 %
7 NS 3S S-2 -200 0.1 0.45
8 NS 2P E+2 -170 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
a.1 Dominique Sassen -Helene Schyns 47,50 %
9 NS 3S E+2 -660 8.8 40.00
10 NS 2C W+1 -140 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a14 Benedicte Lemaigre -Chantal de Lichtervelde 44,77 %
11 NS 3P E-3 150 19.7 89.55
12 NS 4P W = -420 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a13 - 0,00 %
13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a12 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 44,96 %
15 NS 4C E+2 -480 17.5 79.55
16 NS 4C W+1 -650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a11 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 52,56 %
17 NS 2P S+1 140 8.8 40.00
18 NS 4C N+2 680 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a.9 Marina Oudaert -Jean Pierre Oudaert 35,21 %
19 NS 2S W-2 200 18 81.82
20 NS 3S W+1 -630 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.8 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Liliane Baptista 42,16 %
21 NS 1S E-1 50 11 50.00
22 NS 3K N = 110 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
a.7 Alexandre Viot -Philippe van der Gracht 44,92 %
23 NS 2P E-1 100 12 54.55
24 NS 4C E = -420 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.6 Patricia Bardy -Serge Allard 52,10 %
25 NS 4C S-2 -100 6.6 30.00
26 NS 4P W+1 -650 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
a.5 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 59,49 %
27 NS 2P N-1 -50 13.2 60.00
28 NS 4C N-2 -200 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
Total : 194,5 / 484 = 40,19 %
PAIRE A13 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Christiane Vroninckx
a11 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 52,56 %
1 NS 3C N+2 200 8.8 40.00
2 NS 2P W-1 50 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a10 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 45,87 %
3 NS 4P S-1 -50 3.4 15.45
4 NS 2K N = 90 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 15,45 %
a.9 Marina Oudaert -Jean Pierre Oudaert 35,21 %
5 NS 7C N-1 -100 3.4 15.45
6 NS 2P N+2 170 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 17,95 %
a.8 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Liliane Baptista 42,16 %
7 NS 3S N = 600 11 50.00
8 NS 3K E+1 -130 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a.7 Alexandre Viot -Philippe van der Gracht 44,92 %
9 NS 3S E+2 -660 8.8 40.00
10 NS 2P S = 110 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.5 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 59,49 %
11 NS 1S S = 90 7.7 35.00
12 NS 6P W-1 50 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.4 Anne France Raquez -Odile Franquet van Tilt 60,68 %
13 NS 3T S+1 130 13.2 60.00
14 NS 4P W = -420 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
a.3 Teresa Dekoster -Anne Beyne 51,65 %
15 NS 6P W+1 -1010 4.5 20.45
16 NS 4C W+1 -650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
a.2 Noelle Fosse -Patrick Gilles 67,92 %
17 NS 3P S-2 -100 0.1 0.45
18 NS 3P E-3 150 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 0,45 %
a.1 Dominique Sassen -Helene Schyns 47,50 %
19 NS 2C N-1 -50 5 22.73
20 NS 3T W+2 -150 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a13 - 0,00 %
25 NS BYE 0 0.00
26 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a12 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 44,96 %
27 NS 2C W = -110 6.6 30.00
28 NS 2C N = 110 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
Total : 169,1 / 484 = 34,94 %
PAIRE a.2 Noelle Fosse -Patrick Gilles
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claude Renier 61,88 %
3 EO 4P N-1 -50 18.6 84.55
4 EO 2K N+1 110 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A10 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 61,36 %
5 EO 6C N = 1430 6.6 30.00
6 EO 4P N = 420 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 27,50 %
A.3 Daniela Napoli -Giuseppe Napoli 40,19 %
7 EO 3S S-2 -200 21.9 99.55
8 EO 2P E+2 -170 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
A11 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 54,88 %
9 EO 3S E+2 -660 13.2 60.00
10 EO 4P S-1 -100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A.4 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 50,66 %
11 EO 1S S = 90 14.3 65.00
12 EO 4P W-1 50 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A12 Colette Heerinckx -Eliane de Ceuninck 51,86 %
13 EO 3P W+1 -170 18.6 84.55
14 EO 2P W+2 -170 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 87,05 %
A.5 Sophie Tilemans -Myriam de Timary 49,57 %
15 EO 4P W+2 -480 4.5 20.45
16 EO 5P E = -650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A13 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Christiane Vroninckx 34,94 %
17 EO 3P S-2 -100 21.9 99.55
18 EO 3P E-3 150 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 99,55 %
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 44,00 %
19 EO 2P S-2 -100 22 100.00
20 EO 3S W = -600 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A14 Thomas Brusselmans -Christian Martinot 50,04 %
21 EO 1S E-2 100 5.5 25.00
22 EO 5TcN-4 -800 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A.7 Lydia Wildiers -Nicole Blondeau 53,74 %
23 EO 2P E = -110 15 68.18
24 EO 4C W+1 -450 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
A.8 Michel Lievens -Annie Zeimes 52,21 %
27 EO 2C W = -110 15.4 70.00
28 EO 4C S-2 -200 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
Total : 358,6 / 528 = 67,92 %
PAIRE a.4 Anne France Raquez -Odile Franquet van Tilt
A10 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 61,36 %
3 EO 2P N+1 140 7.7 35.00
4 EO 2S E = -120 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A.4 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 50,66 %
7 EO 2S N-1 -100 19.7 89.55
8 EO 4P W = -420 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 87,05 %
A12 Colette Heerinckx -Eliane de Ceuninck 51,86 %
9 EO 3S E+3 -690 20.8 94.55
10 EO 4P S-1 -100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.5 Sophie Tilemans -Myriam de Timary 49,57 %
11 EO 3P E-2 100 9.9 45.00
12 EO 6P W-2 100 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
A13 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Christiane Vroninckx 34,94 %
13 EO 3T S+1 130 8.8 40.00
14 EO 4P W = -420 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 44,00 %
15 EO 6PcW = -1210 21.9 99.55
16 EO 4C W+1 -650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A14 Thomas Brusselmans -Christian Martinot 50,04 %
17 EO 1S N+1 120 17.5 79.55
18 EO 4C N+2 680 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.7 Lydia Wildiers -Nicole Blondeau 53,74 %
19 EO 1S E-1 100 14 63.64
20 EO 2T W+2 -130 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A.1 Martine Zens -Fifi Englund 49,26 %
21 EO 1S E-2 100 5.5 25.00
22 EO 3K S = 110 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.8 Michel Lievens -Annie Zeimes 52,21 %
23 EO 3S W-4 400 2 9.09
24 EO 4C W = -420 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claude Renier 61,88 %
25 EO 4CcS-1 -100 15.4 70.00
26 EO 4P E+1 -650 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
A.9 Grazia Neuenschwander -Simone Munsterhjelm 46,03 %
27 EO 1S W+2 -150 21.9 99.55
28 EO 4C S-1 -100 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
Total : 320,4 / 528 = 60,68 %
PAIRE a.5 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire
A10 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 61,36 %
1 EO 4C N+1 450 1.2 5.45
2 EO 3K S = 110 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
A11 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 54,88 %
5 EO 5S N+1 690 14.3 65.00
6 EO 3P N+1 170 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A.5 Sophie Tilemans -Myriam de Timary 49,57 %
9 EO 3S E-2 200 0.1 0.45
10 EO 3C W+1 -170 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A13 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Christiane Vroninckx 34,94 %
11 EO 1S S = 90 14.3 65.00
12 EO 6P W-1 50 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 44,00 %
13 EO 4C N-3 -300 21.9 99.55
14 EO 2P W+1 -140 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
A14 Thomas Brusselmans -Christian Martinot 50,04 %
15 EO 6P W+1 -1010 17.5 79.55
16 EO 5C E = -650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
A.7 Lydia Wildiers -Nicole Blondeau 53,74 %
17 EO 1P S+2 140 13.2 60.00
18 EO 4P N+1 650 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
A.1 Martine Zens -Fifi Englund 49,26 %
19 EO 2K W = -90 20 90.91
20 EO 3S E+1 -630 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
A.8 Michel Lievens -Annie Zeimes 52,21 %
21 EO 1S E = -90 18.6 84.55
22 EO 4K N-1 -50 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 87,05 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claude Renier 61,88 %
23 EO 4PcE-3 800 0 0.00
24 EO 3P S = 140 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
A.9 Grazia Neuenschwander -Simone Munsterhjelm 46,03 %
25 EO 4C S-1 -50 8.8 40.00
26 EO 4P W+1 -650 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.3 Daniela Napoli -Giuseppe Napoli 40,19 %
27 EO 2P N-1 -50 8.8 40.00
28 EO 4C N-2 -200 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
Total : 314,1 / 528 = 59,49 %
PAIRE a11 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed
A13 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Christiane Vroninckx 34,94 %
1 EO 3C N+2 200 13.2 60.00
2 EO 2P W-1 50 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A.7 Lydia Wildiers -Nicole Blondeau 53,74 %
3 EO 3P N = 140 7.7 35.00
4 EO 2K N+2 130 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
A14 Thomas Brusselmans -Christian Martinot 50,04 %
5 EO 6C N = 1430 6.6 30.00
6 EO 4P N = 420 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 27,50 %
A.8 Michel Lievens -Annie Zeimes 52,21 %
7 EO 3S S = 600 11 50.00
8 EO 4P W+1 -450 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A.1 Martine Zens -Fifi Englund 49,26 %
9 EO 3S E+2 -660 13.2 60.00
10 EO 5C W-2 200 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
A.9 Grazia Neuenschwander -Simone Munsterhjelm 46,03 %
11 EO 2P E = -110 21.9 99.55
12 EO 5P W-2 100 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claude Renier 61,88 %
13 EO 4T S = 130 8.8 40.00
14 EO 4K S-1 -50 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
A.3 Daniela Napoli -Giuseppe Napoli 40,19 %
17 EO 2P S+1 140 13.2 60.00
18 EO 4C N+2 680 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A11 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 54,88 %
21 EO 1S E-1 50 11 50.00
22 EO 4K N = 130 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.5 Sophie Tilemans -Myriam de Timary 49,57 %
23 EO 3C S-1 -100 12 54.55
24 EO 4C W = -420 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A12 Colette Heerinckx -Eliane de Ceuninck 51,86 %
25 EO 2P E = -110 19.7 89.55
26 EO 4P W+1 -650 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 44,00 %
27 EO 2C W+1 -140 19.7 89.55
28 EO 2C S-1 -100 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
Total : 277,5 / 528 = 52,56 %
PAIRE a.6 Patricia Bardy -Serge Allard
A.4 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 50,66 %
1 EO 3C N+2 200 13.2 60.00
2 EO 2K S+1 110 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A11 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 54,88 %
3 EO 4P N-1 -50 18.6 84.55
4 EO 4T E-1 100 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A12 Colette Heerinckx -Eliane de Ceuninck 51,86 %
7 EO 3S N = 600 11 50.00
8 EO 3P W = -140 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 44,00 %
11 EO 2P E-2 100 9.9 45.00
12 EO 4P W-1 50 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A14 Thomas Brusselmans -Christian Martinot 50,04 %
13 EO 4P E-1 100 15.4 70.00
14 EO 4K N-2 -100 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.7 Lydia Wildiers -Nicole Blondeau 53,74 %
15 EO 4P W+2 -480 4.5 20.45
16 EO 4C W+1 -650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A.1 Martine Zens -Fifi Englund 49,26 %
17 EO 1P S+3 170 5.5 25.00
18 EO 4C N+2 680 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A.8 Michel Lievens -Annie Zeimes 52,21 %
19 EO 1S E-4 400 0 0.00
20 EO 3S E = -600 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claude Renier 61,88 %
21 EO 2P S+1 140 1.2 5.45
22 EO 3K S+1 130 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
A.9 Grazia Neuenschwander -Simone Munsterhjelm 46,03 %
23 EO 2P S-3 -300 21 95.45
24 EO 4C W+1 -450 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 95,45 %
A.3 Daniela Napoli -Giuseppe Napoli 40,19 %
25 EO 4C S-2 -100 15.4 70.00
26 EO 4P W+1 -650 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
A10 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 61,36 %
27 EO 2C W = -110 15.4 70.00
28 EO 4C S-2 -200 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
Total : 275,1 / 528 = 52,10 %
PAIRE a.3 Teresa Dekoster -Anne Beyne
A.9 Grazia Neuenschwander -Simone Munsterhjelm 46,03 %
1 EO 4C S = 420 4.5 20.45
2 EO 1S S-1 -100 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A.3 Daniela Napoli -Giuseppe Napoli 40,19 %
5 EO 3S N+3 690 14.3 65.00
6 EO 3P N+1 170 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A11 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 54,88 %
7 EO 3S S = 600 11 50.00
8 EO 2P W+3 -200 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A.4 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 50,66 %
9 EO 3S E = -600 6.6 30.00
10 EO 3P S-1 -100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A12 Colette Heerinckx -Eliane de Ceuninck 51,86 %
11 EO Pass Passe 17.5 79.55
12 EO 4P W-1 50 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A.5 Sophie Tilemans -Myriam de Timary 49,57 %
13 EO 4T S = 130 8.8 40.00
14 EO 2P W+1 -140 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A13 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Christiane Vroninckx 34,94 %
15 EO 6P W+1 -1010 17.5 79.55
16 EO 4C W+1 -650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 44,00 %
17 EO 3S N-1 -50 19.7 89.55
18 EO 4C N+2 680 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
A14 Thomas Brusselmans -Christian Martinot 50,04 %
19 EO 2C N+2 170 8 36.36
20 EO 3S W = -600 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.7 Lydia Wildiers -Nicole Blondeau 53,74 %
21 EO 1S E = -90 18.6 84.55
22 EO 3K S+1 130 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A.1 Martine Zens -Fifi Englund 49,26 %
23 EO 3P E-2 200 4 18.18
24 EO 4P S-2 -100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A.8 Michel Lievens -Annie Zeimes 52,21 %
25 EO 4C S = 420 0.1 0.45
26 EO 3S E = -600 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 10,45 %
Total : 272,7 / 528 = 51,65 %
PAIRE a.1 Dominique Sassen -Helene Schyns
A.1 Martine Zens -Fifi Englund 49,26 %
1 EO 3C N+2 200 13.2 60.00
2 EO 2P E-2 100 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
A.9 Grazia Neuenschwander -Simone Munsterhjelm 46,03 %
3 EO 2P N+1 140 7.7 35.00
4 EO 3P S = 140 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claude Renier 61,88 %
5 EO 6C N = 1430 6.6 30.00
6 EO 4P N = 420 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 27,50 %
A10 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 61,36 %
7 EO 3S N = 600 11 50.00
8 EO 4P W-1 50 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
A.3 Daniela Napoli -Giuseppe Napoli 40,19 %
9 EO 3S E+2 -660 13.2 60.00
10 EO 2C W+1 -140 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A11 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 54,88 %
11 EO 3P E-3 150 2.3 10.45
12 EO 4P W-1 50 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
A.4 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 50,66 %
13 EO 3P W+1 -170 18.6 84.55
14 EO 3P W = -140 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A12 Colette Heerinckx -Eliane de Ceuninck 51,86 %
15 EO 4P W+2 -480 4.5 20.45
16 EO 4C W+1 -650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A.5 Sophie Tilemans -Myriam de Timary 49,57 %
17 EO 2P S+1 140 13.2 60.00
18 EO 3C N+3 230 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A13 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Christiane Vroninckx 34,94 %
19 EO 2C N-1 -50 17 77.27
20 EO 3T W+2 -150 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 44,00 %
21 EO 1S E-1 50 11 50.00
22 EO 3P E-2 200 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
A.7 Lydia Wildiers -Nicole Blondeau 53,74 %
25 EO 4C S-1 -50 8.8 40.00
26 EO 4P W+1 -650 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 250,8 / 528 = 47,50 %
PAIRE a10 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 44,00 %
1 EO 4C N+1 450 1.2 5.45
2 EO 2K S+2 130 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
A13 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Christiane Vroninckx 34,94 %
3 EO 4P S-1 -50 18.6 84.55
4 EO 2K N = 90 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 84,55 %
A.7 Lydia Wildiers -Nicole Blondeau 53,74 %
5 EO 6C N+1 1460 0.1 0.45
6 EO 3P N+1 170 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A14 Thomas Brusselmans -Christian Martinot 50,04 %
7 EO 3S N = 600 11 50.00
8 EO 3P W = -140 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.8 Michel Lievens -Annie Zeimes 52,21 %
9 EO 3K W = -110 2.3 10.45
10 EO 3P S = 140 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 15,45 %
A.1 Martine Zens -Fifi Englund 49,26 %
11 EO 1S S-1 -50 19.7 89.55
12 EO 4P E = -420 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 89,55 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claude Renier 61,88 %
15 EO 4C E+2 -480 4.5 20.45
16 EO 4C W+1 -650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A10 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 61,36 %
19 EO 1S E-2 200 4 18.18
20 EO 3S W+1 -630 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.4 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 50,66 %
21 EO 1S E = -90 18.6 84.55
22 EO 3P E-3 300 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A11 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 54,88 %
23 EO 3C S = 140 7 31.82
24 EO 4P S = 420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
A.5 Sophie Tilemans -Myriam de Timary 49,57 %
25 EO 4C S-3 -150 21.9 99.55
26 EO 4P E+1 -650 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
A12 Colette Heerinckx -Eliane de Ceuninck 51,86 %
27 EO 2C W-1 50 3.4 15.45
28 EO 2C S = 110 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
Total : 242,2 / 528 = 45,87 %
PAIRE a12 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart
A.7 Lydia Wildiers -Nicole Blondeau 53,74 %
1 EO 3C N+2 200 13.2 60.00
2 EO 2P W-2 100 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
A14 Thomas Brusselmans -Christian Martinot 50,04 %
3 EO 3P N = 140 7.7 35.00
4 EO 2K N = 90 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
A.8 Michel Lievens -Annie Zeimes 52,21 %
5 EO 7C N-1 -100 18.6 84.55
6 EO 4P N = 420 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 54,77 %
A.1 Martine Zens -Fifi Englund 49,26 %
7 EO 3S N = 600 11 50.00
8 EO 3S E-2 100 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
A.9 Grazia Neuenschwander -Simone Munsterhjelm 46,03 %
9 EO 3T E+2 -150 4.5 20.45
10 EO 3C W = -140 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claude Renier 61,88 %
11 EO 1S S+1 120 6.6 30.00
12 EO 5P W-1 50 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
A10 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 61,36 %
13 EO 3S S = 600 0.1 0.45
14 EO 3K N-1 -50 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 5,45 %
A.3 Daniela Napoli -Giuseppe Napoli 40,19 %
15 EO 4C E+2 -480 4.5 20.45
16 EO 4C W+1 -650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A.4 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 50,66 %
19 EO 1C N+2 140 11 50.00
20 EO 3T W+2 -150 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A12 Colette Heerinckx -Eliane de Ceuninck 51,86 %
23 EO 2C W+2 -170 18 81.82
24 EO 3S W-4 200 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 44,00 %
25 EO 3C N-1 -50 8.8 40.00
26 EO 3S E+3 -690 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A13 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Christiane Vroninckx 34,94 %
27 EO 2C W = -110 15.4 70.00
28 EO 2C N = 110 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
Total : 237,4 / 528 = 44,96 %
PAIRE a.7 Alexandre Viot -Philippe van der Gracht
A11 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 54,88 %
1 EO 3C N+2 200 13.2 60.00
2 EO 2K S+2 130 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A.5 Sophie Tilemans -Myriam de Timary 49,57 %
3 EO 4P N-1 -50 18.6 84.55
4 EO 5T E-2 200 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A12 Colette Heerinckx -Eliane de Ceuninck 51,86 %
5 EO 6C N = 1430 6.6 30.00
6 EO 4P N = 420 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 27,50 %
A13 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Christiane Vroninckx 34,94 %
9 EO 3S E+2 -660 13.2 60.00
10 EO 2P S = 110 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.7 Lydia Wildiers -Nicole Blondeau 53,74 %
13 EO 3T W-5 500 2.3 10.45
14 EO 3K N-1 -50 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 10,45 %
A.1 Martine Zens -Fifi Englund 49,26 %
15 EO 6P W+1 -1010 17.5 79.55
16 EO 5C W = -650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
A.8 Michel Lievens -Annie Zeimes 52,21 %
17 EO 1P S+3 170 5.5 25.00
18 EO 4C N+1 650 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claude Renier 61,88 %
19 EO 1C N+2 140 11 50.00
20 EO 3S W = -600 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.9 Grazia Neuenschwander -Simone Munsterhjelm 46,03 %
21 EO 1S E = -90 18.6 84.55
22 EO 4P E-2 200 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 54,77 %
A.3 Daniela Napoli -Giuseppe Napoli 40,19 %
23 EO 2P E-1 100 10 45.45
24 EO 4C E = -420 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A10 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 61,36 %
25 EO 4C S-2 -100 15.4 70.00
26 EO 4P W+1 -650 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
A.4 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 50,66 %
27 EO 3S W-1 50 3.4 15.45
28 EO 2C S = 110 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
Total : 237,2 / 528 = 44,92 %
PAIRE a14 Benedicte Lemaigre -Chantal de Lichtervelde
A.8 Michel Lievens -Annie Zeimes 52,21 %
1 EO 3C N+2 200 13.2 60.00
2 EO 2C N+1 140 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A.1 Martine Zens -Fifi Englund 49,26 %
3 EO 2P N+1 140 7.7 35.00
4 EO 2P S = 110 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.9 Grazia Neuenschwander -Simone Munsterhjelm 46,03 %
5 EO 6C N = 1430 6.6 30.00
6 EO 3P N+1 170 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 54,77 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claude Renier 61,88 %
7 EO 3S S+1 630 1.2 5.45
8 EO 4P W = -420 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A10 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 61,36 %
9 EO 3S E+2 -660 13.2 60.00
10 EO 3P S+1 170 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A.3 Daniela Napoli -Giuseppe Napoli 40,19 %
11 EO 3P E-3 150 2.3 10.45
12 EO 4P W = -420 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A11 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 54,88 %
13 EO 4T S = 130 8.8 40.00
14 EO 3P W = -140 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.4 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 50,66 %
15 EO 6P W = -980 12.1 55.00
16 EO 4C W+1 -650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A12 Colette Heerinckx -Eliane de Ceuninck 51,86 %
17 EO 2P S+3 200 0.1 0.45
18 EO 4C N+1 650 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A.5 Sophie Tilemans -Myriam de Timary 49,57 %
19 EO 1S S-1 -50 17 77.27
20 EO 5T W-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 44,00 %
23 EO 3S N-3 -300 21 95.45
24 EO 5P N-3 -150 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A14 Thomas Brusselmans -Christian Martinot 50,04 %
27 EO 2P N-1 -50 8.8 40.00
28 EO 1C S+2 140 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
Total : 236,4 / 528 = 44,77 %
PAIRE a.8 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Liliane Baptista
A.5 Sophie Tilemans -Myriam de Timary 49,57 %
1 EO 2P E-1 50 21.9 99.55
2 EO 1S S = 90 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 89,55 %
A12 Colette Heerinckx -Eliane de Ceuninck 51,86 %
3 EO 3P N = 140 7.7 35.00
4 EO 2P S+1 140 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 44,00 %
5 EO 6P S-3 -300 21.9 99.55
6 EO 4P N = 420 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A13 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Christiane Vroninckx 34,94 %
7 EO 3S N = 600 11 50.00
8 EO 3K E+1 -130 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A14 Thomas Brusselmans -Christian Martinot 50,04 %
11 EO 3P E-3 150 2.3 10.45
12 EO 4P W = -420 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.8 Michel Lievens -Annie Zeimes 52,21 %
15 EO 6P W = -980 12.1 55.00
16 EO 4P W+1 -650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claude Renier 61,88 %
17 EO 2P S+2 170 5.5 25.00
18 EO 4C N+2 680 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A.9 Grazia Neuenschwander -Simone Munsterhjelm 46,03 %
19 EO 1S W-2 200 4 18.18
20 EO 3S E = -600 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A.3 Daniela Napoli -Giuseppe Napoli 40,19 %
21 EO 1S E-1 50 11 50.00
22 EO 3K N = 110 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
A10 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 61,36 %
23 EO 2C S+1 140 7 31.82
24 EO 4P S-2 -100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A.4 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 50,66 %
25 EO 3C S = 140 2.3 10.45
26 EO 3P W+1 -170 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 5,45 %
A11 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 54,88 %
27 EO 2P N-1 -50 8.8 40.00
28 EO 2C S+1 140 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
Total : 222,6 / 528 = 42,16 %
PAIRE a.9 Marina Oudaert -Jean Pierre Oudaert
A12 Colette Heerinckx -Eliane de Ceuninck 51,86 %
1 EO 3C N+2 200 13.2 60.00
2 EO 3P E-3 150 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 44,00 %
3 EO 4P N = 420 0.1 0.45
4 EO 3P S+1 170 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 5,45 %
A13 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Christiane Vroninckx 34,94 %
5 EO 7C N-1 -100 18.6 84.55
6 EO 2P N+2 170 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 82,05 %
A.7 Lydia Wildiers -Nicole Blondeau 53,74 %
7 EO 3S N+1 630 1.2 5.45
8 EO 2P W+1 -140 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A14 Thomas Brusselmans -Christian Martinot 50,04 %
9 EO 3S E+3 -690 20.8 94.55
10 EO 3K E-1 100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A.1 Martine Zens -Fifi Englund 49,26 %
13 EO 4T N = 130 8.8 40.00
14 EO 3P W = -140 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.9 Grazia Neuenschwander -Simone Munsterhjelm 46,03 %
17 EO 2P S+2 170 5.5 25.00
18 EO 4C N+2 680 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A.3 Daniela Napoli -Giuseppe Napoli 40,19 %
19 EO 2S W-2 200 4 18.18
20 EO 3S W+1 -630 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A10 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 61,36 %
21 EO 2P N+1 140 1.2 5.45
22 EO 3PcE-3 800 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 2,95 %
A.4 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 50,66 %
23 EO 2P E = -110 15 68.18
24 EO 3C E+1 -170 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A11 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 54,88 %
25 EO 3P E-1 100 4.5 20.45
26 EO 2P E+3 -200 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 15,45 %
A.5 Sophie Tilemans -Myriam de Timary 49,57 %
27 EO 2C W-2 100 0.1 0.45
28 EO 2C S+1 140 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 5,45 %
Total : 185,9 / 528 = 35,21 %
PAIRE a13 -
A14 Thomas Brusselmans -Christian Martinot 50,04 %
1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.8 Michel Lievens -Annie Zeimes 52,21 %
3 EO BYE 0 0.00
4 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.1 Martine Zens -Fifi Englund 49,26 %
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.9 Grazia Neuenschwander -Simone Munsterhjelm 46,03 %
7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claude Renier 61,88 %
9 EO BYE 0 0.00
10 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A10 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 61,36 %
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.3 Daniela Napoli -Giuseppe Napoli 40,19 %
13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A11 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 54,88 %
15 EO BYE 0 0.00
16 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.4 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 50,66 %
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.5 Sophie Tilemans -Myriam de Timary 49,57 %
21 EO BYE 0 0.00
22 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A13 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Christiane Vroninckx 34,94 %
25 EO BYE 0 0.00
26 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.7 Lydia Wildiers -Nicole Blondeau 53,74 %
27 EO BYE 0 0.00
28 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 616 = 0,00 %
|