B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 59,24 B.7 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed
--- 2 57,72 A.2 Paul Henricot -Christian Martinot
--- 3 57,10 A.6 Simone Munsterhjelm -Grazia Neuenschwander
--- 4 56,10 B.5 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand
--- 5 53,24 A.7 Annie Zeimes -Michel Lievens
--- 6 52,93 B.1 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles
--- 7 52,81 A.8 Lydia Wildiers -Nicole Blondeau
--- 8 52,35 A.3 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst
--- 9 52,07 B.6 Sophie Tilemans -Myriam de Timary
--- 10 51,97 A.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Michele Berrier
--- 11 50,58 B.3 Patricia Bardy -Serge Alard
--- 12 44,15 B.4 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens
--- 13 44,00 A.4 Stan Tabor -Alan Beckman
--- 14 41,43 A.1 Caroll Pucher -Eliane de Ceuninck
--- 15 38,10 B.8 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse
--- 16 36,21 B.2 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie
--- 17 0,00 A.9 -
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 62,17 a.8 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille
--- 2 56,62 a.2 Francoise Nibelle -Gaetan van de Werve
--- 3 56,44 b.1 Marianne Falla -Noelle Fosse
--- 4 53,44 b.8 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve
--- 5 53,42 b.2 Fabienne Smit -Hervé van de Put
--- 6 52,96 b.6 Annette Fobe -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
--- 7 52,68 b.5 Thierry Goemaere -Michel Cornez
--- 8 50,89 b.4 Brigitte de Fauconval -Laurence Mauboussin
--- 9 50,43 b.3 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Sylviane Horekens
--- 10 50,06 a.3 Didier Collart -Patricia Vaccani
--- 11 49,73 a.7 Philippe d'Hoop -Catherine de Moffarts
--- 12 48,56 a.5 Helene Schyns -Dominique Sassen
--- 13 45,67 a.1 Suzanne Klausen -Anne de Maleingreau
--- 14 42,63 a.4 Liliane Baptista -Rose Marie Vaccarezza
--- 15 42,11 a.6 Aida Zumot -Claire de Quirini
--- 16 40,94 a.9 Mado Miller -Rosette Bagno
--- 17 40,36 b.7 Danielle Wybauw -Christiane Huby
PAIRE B.7 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed
b.6 Annette Fobe -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,96 %
1 NS 2P S-1 -50 12.9 43.00
2 NS 5C S = 650 24.6 82.00
3 NS 3K W-1 100 0.1 0.33 µ Tbl = 41,78 %
b.5 Thierry Goemaere -Michel Cornez 52,68 %
4 NS 3S W+1 -630 4.3 14.33
5 NS 5K E-1 50 20.3 67.67
6 NS 3K E-2 200 26.7 89.00 µ Tbl = 57,00 %
b.4 Brigitte de Fauconval -Laurence Mauboussin 50,89 %
7 NS 2S E-1 100 22.5 75.00
8 NS 3K N+2 150 25.7 85.67
9 NS 3C N = 140 24.6 82.00 µ Tbl = 80,89 %
b.3 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Sylviane Horekens 50,43 %
10 NS 3C S+2 200 10.7 35.67
11 NS 4C E-2 100 27.8 92.67
12 NS 2P W-2 100 16.1 53.67 µ Tbl = 60,67 %
b.2 Fabienne Smit -Hervé van de Put 53,42 %
13 NS 3C W-2 200 24.6 82.00
14 NS 5T N-2 -100 12.9 43.00
15 NS 4P W = -420 1.1 3.67 µ Tbl = 42,89 %
b.1 Marianne Falla -Noelle Fosse 56,44 %
16 NS 3T W-3 300 25.7 85.67
17 NS 4PcE-2 300 8.6 28.67
18 NS 1S E+1 -120 21.4 71.33 µ Tbl = 61,89 %
b.8 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 53,44 %
19 NS 3P W = -140 9.7 32.33
20 NS 2K W+1 -110 9.7 32.33
21 NS 3S N+2 660 23.5 78.33 µ Tbl = 47,67 %
b.7 Danielle Wybauw -Christiane Huby 40,36 %
22 NS 3S W-1 100 29 96.67
23 NS 4P N+1 650 30 100.00
24 NS 4P W = -420 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 81,11 %
Total : 426,5 / 720 = 59,24 %
PAIRE A.2 Paul Henricot -Christian Martinot
a.2 Francoise Nibelle -Gaetan van de Werve 56,62 %
4 NS 3S W-1 100 19.3 64.33
5 NS 5K E-1 50 20.3 67.67
6 NS 3S E = -600 0.1 0.33 µ Tbl = 44,11 %
a.1 Suzanne Klausen -Anne de Maleingreau 45,67 %
7 NS 1S E-2 200 27.8 92.67
8 NS 4T E-1 50 15 50.00
9 NS 4P W = -620 1.1 3.67 µ Tbl = 48,78 %
a.9 Mado Miller -Rosette Bagno 40,94 %
10 NS 4P N+1 650 24.6 82.00
11 NS 3S E-1 50 23.5 78.33
12 NS 1S S+1 120 21.4 71.33 µ Tbl = 77,22 %
a.8 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 62,17 %
13 NS 4C W-3 300 29.9 99.67
14 NS 4K S-3 -150 2.2 7.33
15 NS 4PcW-1 100 22.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 60,67 %
a.7 Philippe d'Hoop -Catherine de Moffarts 49,73 %
16 NS 3S W-1 100 15 50.00
17 NS 4C N+1 450 20.3 67.67
18 NS 1S E+1 -120 21.4 71.33 µ Tbl = 63,00 %
a.6 Aida Zumot -Claire de Quirini 42,11 %
19 NS 3P W = -140 9.7 32.33
20 NS 3T S-1 -100 19.3 64.33
21 NS 3S N+2 660 23.5 78.33 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
a.5 Helene Schyns -Dominique Sassen 48,56 %
22 NS 2S W+2 -180 20 66.67
23 NS 5P N-1 -100 7 23.33
24 NS 4P W-1 50 29 96.67 µ Tbl = 62,22 %
a.4 Liliane Baptista -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 42,63 %
25 NS 5K S+1 420 8.1 27.00
26 NS 3S W+2 -660 17.3 57.67
27 NS 3S S+2 460 17.3 57.67 µ Tbl = 47,44 %
Total : 415,6 / 720 = 57,72 %
PAIRE A.6 Simone Munsterhjelm -Grazia Neuenschwander
a.2 Francoise Nibelle -Gaetan van de Werve 56,62 %
1 NS 2K N-1 -50 12.9 43.00
2 NS 4C S = 620 9.7 32.33
3 NS 2C S+1 140 2.2 7.33 µ Tbl = 27,56 %
a.1 Suzanne Klausen -Anne de Maleingreau 45,67 %
4 NS 3S W-2 200 26.7 89.00
5 NS 5K E-1 50 20.3 67.67
6 NS 3K E-2 200 26.7 89.00 µ Tbl = 81,89 %
a.9 Mado Miller -Rosette Bagno 40,94 %
7 NS 3S E = -600 2.2 7.33
8 NS 3K N+2 150 25.7 85.67
9 NS 3C N+1 170 29.9 99.67 µ Tbl = 64,22 %
a.8 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 62,17 %
10 NS 3C S+2 200 10.7 35.67
11 NS 3S E+1 -430 7.5 25.00
12 NS 1S S = 90 7.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 28,56 %
a.6 Aida Zumot -Claire de Quirini 42,11 %
16 NS 3T W-3 300 25.7 85.67
17 NS 3C N+1 170 6.5 21.67
18 NS 1S E+2 -150 8.6 28.67 µ Tbl = 45,33 %
a.5 Helene Schyns -Dominique Sassen 48,56 %
19 NS 4K S = 130 26.7 89.00
20 NS 2C N-1 -100 19.3 64.33
21 NS 3S N+2 660 23.5 78.33 µ Tbl = 77,22 %
a.4 Liliane Baptista -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 42,63 %
22 NS 3S W = -600 12 40.00
23 NS 4P N = 620 19 63.33
24 NS 2P W+3 -200 20 66.67 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Patricia Vaccani 50,06 %
25 NS 6KcS = 1090 28.7 95.67
26 NS 2K W+5 -190 28.7 95.67
27 NS 4P N+1 450 10.4 34.67 µ Tbl = 75,33 %
Total : 411,1 / 720 = 57,10 %
PAIRE B.5 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand
b.2 Fabienne Smit -Hervé van de Put 53,42 %
1 NS 2K N-1 -50 12.9 43.00
2 NS 4C S = 620 9.7 32.33
3 NS 1S E-2 200 22.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 50,11 %
b.1 Marianne Falla -Noelle Fosse 56,44 %
4 NS 3S W+1 -630 4.3 14.33
5 NS 3S E-2 100 29.9 99.67
6 NS 3K E = -110 5.4 18.00 µ Tbl = 44,00 %
b.8 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 53,44 %
7 NS 3S W-2 200 27.8 92.67
8 NS 5TcE-1 100 21.4 71.33
9 NS 2C N = 110 19.3 64.33 µ Tbl = 76,11 %
b.7 Danielle Wybauw -Christiane Huby 40,36 %
10 NS 4P S+1 650 24.6 82.00
11 NS 3S E = -400 17.1 57.00
12 NS 1S S = 90 7.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 54,67 %
b.6 Annette Fobe -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,96 %
13 NS 4C W-2 200 24.6 82.00
14 NS 4C S-2 -100 12.9 43.00
15 NS 4C N = 620 27.8 92.67 µ Tbl = 72,56 %
b.5 Thierry Goemaere -Michel Cornez 52,68 %
16 NS 4CcN-1 -100 8.6 28.67
17 NS 4P E-2 100 2.2 7.33
18 NS 1S E = -90 28.9 96.33 µ Tbl = 44,11 %
b.4 Brigitte de Fauconval -Laurence Mauboussin 50,89 %
19 NS 3P W = -140 9.7 32.33
20 NS 1S S-1 -100 19.3 64.33
21 NS 3S N+1 630 7.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 40,56 %
b.3 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Sylviane Horekens 50,43 %
22 NS 3S W = -600 12 40.00
23 NS 4P N = 620 19 63.33
24 NS 4P W-1 50 29 96.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 403,9 / 720 = 56,10 %
PAIRE A.7 Annie Zeimes -Michel Lievens
a.4 Liliane Baptista -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 42,63 %
1 NS 2P S-1 -50 12.9 43.00
2 NS 4C S+2 680 29.9 99.67
3 NS 1S E-2 200 22.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 72,56 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Patricia Vaccani 50,06 %
4 NS 3S W-2 200 26.7 89.00
5 NS 4P S-2 -200 6.5 21.67
6 NS 4C S-4 -200 2.2 7.33 µ Tbl = 39,33 %
a.2 Francoise Nibelle -Gaetan van de Werve 56,62 %
7 NS 2S E+1 -150 7.5 25.00
8 NS 4T E-1 50 15 50.00
9 NS 4P W-1 100 17.1 57.00 µ Tbl = 44,00 %
a.1 Suzanne Klausen -Anne de Maleingreau 45,67 %
10 NS 3P N+1 170 1.1 3.67
11 NS 3C E-1 50 23.5 78.33
12 NS 1S S+1 120 21.4 71.33 µ Tbl = 51,11 %
a.9 Mado Miller -Rosette Bagno 40,94 %
13 NS 1S E+1 -120 3.3 11.00
14 NS 5T N-1 -50 18.2 60.67
15 NS 4C N+2 680 29.9 99.67 µ Tbl = 57,11 %
a.7 Philippe d'Hoop -Catherine de Moffarts 49,73 %
19 NS 2P W+1 -140 9.7 32.33
20 NS 2C N = 110 27.8 92.67
21 NS 3S N+2 660 23.5 78.33 µ Tbl = 67,78 %
a.6 Aida Zumot -Claire de Quirini 42,11 %
22 NS 2S W+1 -150 24 80.00
23 NS 4P N = 620 19 63.33
24 NS 2P W+2 -170 24 80.00 µ Tbl = 74,44 %
a.5 Helene Schyns -Dominique Sassen 48,56 %
25 NS 5K S+1 420 8.1 27.00
26 NS 3S W+4 -720 3.6 12.00
27 NS 4P N = 420 5.9 19.67 µ Tbl = 19,56 %
Total : 383,3 / 720 = 53,24 %
PAIRE B.1 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles
b.1 Marianne Falla -Noelle Fosse 56,44 %
1 NS 4PcS-2 -300 0.1 0.33
2 NS 4C S+1 650 24.6 82.00
3 NS 3C S+1 170 8.6 28.67 µ Tbl = 37,00 %
b.8 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 53,44 %
4 NS 3S W-1 100 19.3 64.33
5 NS 4C W = -420 1.1 3.67
6 NS 4T N = 130 18.2 60.67 µ Tbl = 42,89 %
b.7 Danielle Wybauw -Christiane Huby 40,36 %
7 NS 2S E+1 -150 7.5 25.00
8 NS 3C N+2 200 29.9 99.67
9 NS 4C N-2 -100 7.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 49,89 %
b.6 Annette Fobe -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,96 %
10 NS 4P N+1 650 24.6 82.00
11 NS 3S E = -400 17.1 57.00
12 NS 3K S+2 150 26.7 89.00 µ Tbl = 76,00 %
b.5 Thierry Goemaere -Michel Cornez 52,68 %
13 NS 3C W-2 200 24.6 82.00
14 NS 4P W-2 100 26.7 89.00
15 NS 3P W = -140 11.8 39.33 µ Tbl = 70,11 %
b.4 Brigitte de Fauconval -Laurence Mauboussin 50,89 %
16 NS 3T W = -110 6.5 21.67
17 NS 4P E-2 100 2.2 7.33
18 NS 1S E+2 -150 8.6 28.67 µ Tbl = 19,22 %
b.3 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Sylviane Horekens 50,43 %
19 NS 4T N = 130 26.7 89.00
20 NS 2C N-1 -100 19.3 64.33
21 NS 3S N+2 660 23.5 78.33 µ Tbl = 77,22 %
b.2 Fabienne Smit -Hervé van de Put 53,42 %
22 NS 3S W+1 -630 3 10.00
23 NS 4P N = 620 19 63.33
24 NS 2P W+2 -170 24 80.00 µ Tbl = 51,11 %
Total : 381,1 / 720 = 52,93 %
PAIRE A.8 Lydia Wildiers -Nicole Blondeau
a.6 Aida Zumot -Claire de Quirini 42,11 %
1 NS 2K N = 90 23.5 78.33
2 NS 4C S = 620 9.7 32.33
3 NS 1S E-2 200 22.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 61,89 %
a.5 Helene Schyns -Dominique Sassen 48,56 %
4 NS 3S W = -600 11.8 39.33
5 NS 5K E-1 50 20.3 67.67
6 NS 2K E = -90 8.6 28.67 µ Tbl = 45,22 %
a.4 Liliane Baptista -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 42,63 %
7 NS 3S E-1 100 22.5 75.00
8 NS 4T E-1 50 15 50.00
9 NS 3C N-1 -50 12.9 43.00 µ Tbl = 56,00 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Patricia Vaccani 50,06 %
10 NS 4C S+1 650 24.6 82.00
11 NS 3S E+1 -430 7.5 25.00
12 NS 1S S+1 120 21.4 71.33 µ Tbl = 59,44 %
a.2 Francoise Nibelle -Gaetan van de Werve 56,62 %
13 NS 3C W-1 100 12.9 43.00
14 NS 2P W+1 -140 7.5 25.00
15 NS 3P W = -140 11.8 39.33 µ Tbl = 35,78 %
a.1 Suzanne Klausen -Anne de Maleingreau 45,67 %
16 NS 3C S = 140 21.4 71.33
17 NS 4C N+1 450 20.3 67.67
18 NS 1S E = -90 28.9 96.33 µ Tbl = 78,44 %
a.8 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 62,17 %
22 NS 3S W = -600 12 40.00
23 NS 5P N-1 -100 7 23.33
24 NS 4P W+1 -450 4 13.33 µ Tbl = 25,56 %
a.7 Philippe d'Hoop -Catherine de Moffarts 49,73 %
25 NS 5K S+1 420 8.1 27.00
26 NS 3S E+2 -660 17.3 57.67
27 NS 6S S = 990 28.7 95.67 µ Tbl = 60,11 %
Total : 380,2 / 720 = 52,81 %
PAIRE A.3 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst
a.5 Helene Schyns -Dominique Sassen 48,56 %
1 NS 2P S = 110 27.8 92.67
2 NS 4C S+1 650 24.6 82.00
3 NS 1S E-2 200 22.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 83,22 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Patricia Vaccani 50,06 %
7 NS 3S E-2 200 27.8 92.67
8 NS 4T E = -130 5.4 18.00
9 NS 3C N-1 -50 12.9 43.00 µ Tbl = 51,22 %
a.2 Francoise Nibelle -Gaetan van de Werve 56,62 %
10 NS 2P S+2 170 1.1 3.67
11 NS 4C E-1 50 23.5 78.33
12 NS 3P W-2 100 16.1 53.67 µ Tbl = 45,22 %
a.1 Suzanne Klausen -Anne de Maleingreau 45,67 %
13 NS 3S E = -600 0.1 0.33
14 NS 4T N-1 -50 18.2 60.67
15 NS 3P W = -140 11.8 39.33 µ Tbl = 33,44 %
a.9 Mado Miller -Rosette Bagno 40,94 %
16 NS 1S W = -90 10.7 35.67
17 NS 5C N = 450 20.3 67.67
18 NS 1S E+1 -120 21.4 71.33 µ Tbl = 58,22 %
a.8 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 62,17 %
19 NS 3P W = -140 9.7 32.33
20 NS 1S W+2 -150 6.5 21.67
21 NS 4P S+1 650 15 50.00 µ Tbl = 34,67 %
a.7 Philippe d'Hoop -Catherine de Moffarts 49,73 %
22 NS 3S W = -600 12 40.00
23 NS 4P N = 620 19 63.33
24 NS 4P W = -420 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.6 Aida Zumot -Claire de Quirini 42,11 %
25 NS 6K S = 920 21.9 73.00
26 NS 3S E+2 -660 17.3 57.67
27 NS 3S S+2 460 17.3 57.67 µ Tbl = 62,78 %
Total : 376,9 / 720 = 52,35 %
PAIRE B.6 Sophie Tilemans -Myriam de Timary
b.4 Brigitte de Fauconval -Laurence Mauboussin 50,89 %
1 NS 3K N-1 -50 12.9 43.00
2 NS 4C S = 620 9.7 32.33
3 NS 1S E-2 200 22.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 50,11 %
b.3 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Sylviane Horekens 50,43 %
4 NS 3S W-1 100 19.3 64.33
5 NS 4P S-1 -100 10.7 35.67
6 NS 1C S = 80 12.9 43.00 µ Tbl = 47,67 %
b.2 Fabienne Smit -Hervé van de Put 53,42 %
7 NS 2S E = -120 16.1 53.67
8 NS 4T E = -130 5.4 18.00
9 NS 3C N = 140 24.6 82.00 µ Tbl = 51,22 %
b.1 Marianne Falla -Noelle Fosse 56,44 %
10 NS 3P N+2 200 10.7 35.67
11 NS 3S E = -400 17.1 57.00
12 NS 1S S = 90 7.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 39,22 %
b.8 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 53,44 %
13 NS 1S E+1 -120 3.3 11.00
14 NS 3P W-1 50 22.5 75.00
15 NS 3P W = -140 11.8 39.33 µ Tbl = 41,78 %
b.7 Danielle Wybauw -Christiane Huby 40,36 %
16 NS 2CcN+1 570 29.9 99.67
17 NS 5C N = 450 20.3 67.67
18 NS 1S E+2 -150 8.6 28.67 µ Tbl = 65,33 %
b.6 Annette Fobe -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,96 %
19 NS 4T S = 130 26.7 89.00
20 NS 2C S+1 140 29.9 99.67
21 NS 3S N+1 630 7.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 71,22 %
b.5 Thierry Goemaere -Michel Cornez 52,68 %
22 NS 3S W-1 100 29 96.67
23 NS 6PcN-2 -500 2 6.67
24 NS 4P W = -420 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 374,9 / 720 = 52,07 %
PAIRE A.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Michele Berrier
a.9 Mado Miller -Rosette Bagno 40,94 %
1 NS 2K N+1 110 27.8 92.67
2 NS 4C S = 620 9.7 32.33
3 NS 1S E-2 200 22.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.8 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 62,17 %
4 NS 3S W = -600 11.8 39.33
5 NS 4C W-1 50 20.3 67.67
6 NS 3K E-1 100 15 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,33 %
a.7 Philippe d'Hoop -Catherine de Moffarts 49,73 %
7 NS 3S E+1 -630 0.1 0.33
8 NS 3K N+2 150 25.7 85.67
9 NS 3C N = 140 24.6 82.00 µ Tbl = 56,00 %
a.5 Helene Schyns -Dominique Sassen 48,56 %
13 NS 4C W-2 200 24.6 82.00
14 NS 4C S-3 -150 2.2 7.33
15 NS 3P W+1 -170 5.4 18.00 µ Tbl = 35,78 %
a.4 Liliane Baptista -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 42,63 %
16 NS 3S W-3 300 25.7 85.67
17 NS 4C N+1 450 20.3 67.67
18 NS 1S E+1 -120 21.4 71.33 µ Tbl = 74,89 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Patricia Vaccani 50,06 %
19 NS 3P W = -140 9.7 32.33
20 NS 3C N-2 -200 3.3 11.00
21 NS 3S N+1 630 7.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 22,78 %
a.2 Francoise Nibelle -Gaetan van de Werve 56,62 %
22 NS 2S W+1 -150 24 80.00
23 NS 4P N = 620 19 63.33
24 NS 4P W+1 -450 4 13.33 µ Tbl = 52,22 %
a.1 Suzanne Klausen -Anne de Maleingreau 45,67 %
25 NS 6K S = 920 21.9 73.00
26 NS 3S W+4 -720 3.6 12.00
27 NS 6P N = 980 24.1 80.33 µ Tbl = 55,11 %
Total : 374,2 / 720 = 51,97 %
PAIRE B.3 Patricia Bardy -Serge Alard
b.5 Thierry Goemaere -Michel Cornez 52,68 %
1 NS 3K N = 110 27.8 92.67
2 NS 4C S = 620 9.7 32.33
3 NS 3C S+1 170 8.6 28.67 µ Tbl = 51,22 %
b.4 Brigitte de Fauconval -Laurence Mauboussin 50,89 %
4 NS 3S W = -600 11.8 39.33
5 NS 5K E-1 50 20.3 67.67
6 NS 2S N+2 180 21.4 71.33 µ Tbl = 59,44 %
b.3 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Sylviane Horekens 50,43 %
7 NS 3P W = -140 12.9 43.00
8 NS 4T E = -130 5.4 18.00
9 NS 3C N = 140 24.6 82.00 µ Tbl = 47,67 %
b.2 Fabienne Smit -Hervé van de Put 53,42 %
10 NS 4C S = 650 24.6 82.00
11 NS 3S E+1 -430 7.5 25.00
12 NS 1S S = 90 7.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 44,00 %
b.1 Marianne Falla -Noelle Fosse 56,44 %
13 NS 3S E-1 100 12.9 43.00
14 NS 4PcW-1 100 26.7 89.00
15 NS 3P W+1 -170 5.4 18.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
b.8 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 53,44 %
16 NS 3S W-1 100 15 50.00
17 NS 5C N = 450 20.3 67.67
18 NS 1S E+2 -150 8.6 28.67 µ Tbl = 48,78 %
b.7 Danielle Wybauw -Christiane Huby 40,36 %
19 NS 2S N-1 -50 21.4 71.33
20 NS 3C N-1 -100 19.3 64.33
21 NS 3S N+1 630 7.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 53,56 %
b.6 Annette Fobe -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,96 %
22 NS 3S W = -600 12 40.00
23 NS 4P N = 620 19 63.33
24 NS 4P W = -420 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 364,2 / 720 = 50,58 %
PAIRE B.4 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens
b.7 Danielle Wybauw -Christiane Huby 40,36 %
1 NS 2K N-1 -50 12.9 43.00
2 NS 4C S+1 650 24.6 82.00
3 NS 1S E-2 200 22.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
b.6 Annette Fobe -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,96 %
4 NS 3S W = -600 11.8 39.33
5 NS 4C W = -420 1.1 3.67
6 NS 2K E+1 -110 5.4 18.00 µ Tbl = 20,33 %
b.5 Thierry Goemaere -Michel Cornez 52,68 %
7 NS 2P W = -110 19.3 64.33
8 NS 5T W-1 50 15 50.00
9 NS 4P W = -620 1.1 3.67 µ Tbl = 39,33 %
b.4 Brigitte de Fauconval -Laurence Mauboussin 50,89 %
10 NS 2C S+3 200 10.7 35.67
11 NS 3S E+1 -430 7.5 25.00
12 NS 2C N+3 200 29.9 99.67 µ Tbl = 53,44 %
b.3 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Sylviane Horekens 50,43 %
13 NS 3S E-1 100 12.9 43.00
14 NS 2P W+1 -140 7.5 25.00
15 NS 4P W = -420 1.1 3.67 µ Tbl = 23,89 %
b.2 Fabienne Smit -Hervé van de Put 53,42 %
16 NS 2S W-1 100 15 50.00
17 NS 4C N = 420 10.7 35.67
18 NS 1S E+1 -120 21.4 71.33 µ Tbl = 52,33 %
b.1 Marianne Falla -Noelle Fosse 56,44 %
19 NS 3P W = -140 9.7 32.33
20 NS 2C N-1 -100 19.3 64.33
21 NS 3S N+2 660 23.5 78.33 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
b.8 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 53,44 %
22 NS 3S W = -600 12 40.00
23 NS 4P N = 620 19 63.33
24 NS 4P W+1 -450 4 13.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 317,9 / 720 = 44,15 %
PAIRE A.4 Stan Tabor -Alan Beckman
a.7 Philippe d'Hoop -Catherine de Moffarts 49,73 %
1 NS 2P S-1 -50 12.9 43.00
2 NS 4C S = 620 9.7 32.33
3 NS 2C S+2 170 8.6 28.67 µ Tbl = 34,67 %
a.6 Aida Zumot -Claire de Quirini 42,11 %
4 NS 3S W+2 -660 0.1 0.33
5 NS 5K E-1 50 20.3 67.67
6 NS 4T N-1 -50 10.7 35.67 µ Tbl = 34,56 %
a.4 Liliane Baptista -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 42,63 %
10 NS 2P S+3 200 10.7 35.67
11 NS 3S E-3 150 29.9 99.67
12 NS 1S S = 90 7.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 53,44 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Patricia Vaccani 50,06 %
13 NS 3S E-1 100 12.9 43.00
14 NS 4T N = 130 29.9 99.67
15 NS 4PcW-1 100 22.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 72,56 %
a.2 Francoise Nibelle -Gaetan van de Werve 56,62 %
16 NS 2C N = 110 19.3 64.33
17 NS 4PcE-3 500 29.9 99.67
18 NS 2P N-2 -200 0.1 0.33 µ Tbl = 54,78 %
a.1 Suzanne Klausen -Anne de Maleingreau 45,67 %
19 NS 4K S = 130 26.7 89.00
20 NS 3C N-1 -100 19.3 64.33
21 NS 6K N-1 -100 0.1 0.33 µ Tbl = 51,22 %
a.9 Mado Miller -Rosette Bagno 40,94 %
22 NS 3S W+1 -630 3 10.00
23 NS 6PcN-2 -500 2 6.67
24 NS 4P W = -420 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 21,11 %
a.8 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 62,17 %
25 NS 5K N+1 420 8.1 27.00
26 NS 3S E+2 -660 17.3 57.67
27 NS 6P N-2 -100 1.3 4.33 µ Tbl = 29,67 %
Total : 316,8 / 720 = 44,00 %
PAIRE A.1 Caroll Pucher -Eliane de Ceuninck
a.1 Suzanne Klausen -Anne de Maleingreau 45,67 %
1 NS 3K N-1 -50 12.9 43.00
2 NS 4C S = 620 9.7 32.33
3 NS 3C S+1 170 8.6 28.67 µ Tbl = 34,67 %
a.9 Mado Miller -Rosette Bagno 40,94 %
4 NS 4C E-2 200 26.7 89.00
5 NS 4K E = -130 8.6 28.67
6 NS 2K E-2 200 26.7 89.00 µ Tbl = 68,89 %
a.8 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 62,17 %
7 NS 2S E+1 -150 7.5 25.00
8 NS 4T E-1 50 15 50.00
9 NS 4C N-2 -100 7.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.7 Philippe d'Hoop -Catherine de Moffarts 49,73 %
10 NS 2C S+3 200 10.7 35.67
11 NS 3S W+1 -430 7.5 25.00
12 NS 2P W-1 50 0.1 0.33 µ Tbl = 20,33 %
a.6 Aida Zumot -Claire de Quirini 42,11 %
13 NS 3C W-1 100 12.9 43.00
14 NS 3P W-1 50 22.5 75.00
15 NS 3C N+3 230 25.7 85.67 µ Tbl = 67,89 %
a.5 Helene Schyns -Dominique Sassen 48,56 %
16 NS 2S W = -120 4.3 14.33
17 NS 4C N+1 450 20.3 67.67
18 NS 1S E+2 -150 8.6 28.67 µ Tbl = 36,89 %
a.4 Liliane Baptista -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 42,63 %
19 NS 2P W = -110 19.3 64.33
20 NS 2K W+1 -110 9.7 32.33
21 NS 3S N+1 630 7.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 40,56 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Patricia Vaccani 50,06 %
22 NS 3S W+2 -660 0 0.00
23 NS 6PcN-2 -500 2 6.67
24 NS 3P W+1 -170 24 80.00 µ Tbl = 28,89 %
Total : 298,3 / 720 = 41,43 %
PAIRE B.8 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse
b.8 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 53,44 %
1 NS 2P S-1 -50 12.9 43.00
2 NS 4C S = 620 9.7 32.33
3 NS 2C S+2 170 8.6 28.67 µ Tbl = 34,67 %
b.7 Danielle Wybauw -Christiane Huby 40,36 %
4 NS 3S W+1 -630 4.3 14.33
5 NS 4C W-1 50 20.3 67.67
6 NS 3K E-2 200 26.7 89.00 µ Tbl = 57,00 %
b.6 Annette Fobe -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,96 %
7 NS 2S W = -120 16.1 53.67
8 NS 4CcN-2 -300 0.1 0.33
9 NS 3C N-1 -50 12.9 43.00 µ Tbl = 32,33 %
b.5 Thierry Goemaere -Michel Cornez 52,68 %
10 NS 4P S+1 650 24.6 82.00
11 NS 3S E+1 -430 7.5 25.00
12 NS 1S S = 90 7.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 44,00 %
b.4 Brigitte de Fauconval -Laurence Mauboussin 50,89 %
13 NS 3S E-1 100 12.9 43.00
14 NS 4C S-3 -150 2.2 7.33
15 NS 4P W-1 50 18.2 60.67 µ Tbl = 37,00 %
b.3 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Sylviane Horekens 50,43 %
16 NS 3P S-3 -150 2.2 7.33
17 NS 5C N = 450 20.3 67.67
18 NS 1S E+2 -150 8.6 28.67 µ Tbl = 34,56 %
b.2 Fabienne Smit -Hervé van de Put 53,42 %
19 NS 3P W+1 -170 0.1 0.33
20 NS 4CcN-3 -800 0.1 0.33
21 NS 3S S+2 660 23.5 78.33 µ Tbl = 26,33 %
b.1 Marianne Falla -Noelle Fosse 56,44 %
22 NS 3S W = -600 12 40.00
23 NS 4P N = 620 19 63.33
24 NS 4P W+1 -450 4 13.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 274,3 / 720 = 38,10 %
PAIRE B.2 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie
b.3 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Sylviane Horekens 50,43 %
1 NS 4P S-2 -100 2.2 7.33
2 NS 4C S = 620 9.7 32.33
3 NS 1S E-2 200 22.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 38,22 %
b.2 Fabienne Smit -Hervé van de Put 53,42 %
4 NS 3S W-2 200 26.7 89.00
5 NS 5K E = -400 4.3 14.33
6 NS 4T N = 130 18.2 60.67 µ Tbl = 54,67 %
b.1 Marianne Falla -Noelle Fosse 56,44 %
7 NS 2S E+1 -150 7.5 25.00
8 NS 4T E = -130 5.4 18.00
9 NS 3P W+1 -170 4.3 14.33 µ Tbl = 19,11 %
b.8 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 53,44 %
10 NS 3C S+2 200 10.7 35.67
11 NS 3S W+2 -460 0.1 0.33
12 NS 1S S+2 150 26.7 89.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
b.7 Danielle Wybauw -Christiane Huby 40,36 %
13 NS 3S E-1 100 12.9 43.00
14 NS 4C S-2 -100 12.9 43.00
15 NS 4P W-1 50 18.2 60.67 µ Tbl = 48,89 %
b.6 Annette Fobe -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,96 %
16 NS 4KcS-3 -500 0.1 0.33
17 NS 4P E-2 100 2.2 7.33
18 NS 1S E+2 -150 8.6 28.67 µ Tbl = 12,11 %
b.5 Thierry Goemaere -Michel Cornez 52,68 %
19 NS 2P W+1 -140 9.7 32.33
20 NS 3C N-2 -200 3.3 11.00
21 NS 3S N+1 630 7.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 22,78 %
b.4 Brigitte de Fauconval -Laurence Mauboussin 50,89 %
22 NS 2S W+1 -150 24 80.00
23 NS 4P N = 620 19 63.33
24 NS 4P W+1 -450 4 13.33 µ Tbl = 52,22 %
Total : 260,7 / 720 = 36,21 %
PAIRE A.9 -
a.8 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 62,17 %
1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.7 Philippe d'Hoop -Catherine de Moffarts 49,73 %
4 NS BYE 0 0.00
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.6 Aida Zumot -Claire de Quirini 42,11 %
7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.5 Helene Schyns -Dominique Sassen 48,56 %
10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.4 Liliane Baptista -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 42,63 %
13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00
15 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Patricia Vaccani 50,06 %
16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.2 Francoise Nibelle -Gaetan van de Werve 56,62 %
19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00
21 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.9 Mado Miller -Rosette Bagno 40,94 %
25 NS BYE 0 0.00
26 NS BYE 0 0.00
27 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 810 = 0,00 %
PAIRE a.8 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille
A.9 - 0,00 %
1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Michele Berrier 51,97 %
4 EO 3S W = -600 18.2 60.67
5 EO 4C W-1 50 9.7 32.33
6 EO 3K E-1 100 15 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,67 %
A.1 Caroll Pucher -Eliane de Ceuninck 41,43 %
7 EO 2S E+1 -150 22.5 75.00
8 EO 4T E-1 50 15 50.00
9 EO 4C N-2 -100 22.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.6 Simone Munsterhjelm -Grazia Neuenschwander 57,10 %
10 EO 3C S+2 200 19.3 64.33
11 EO 3S E+1 -430 22.5 75.00
12 EO 1S S = 90 22.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 71,44 %
A.2 Paul Henricot -Christian Martinot 57,72 %
13 EO 4C W-3 300 0.1 0.33
14 EO 4K S-3 -150 27.8 92.67
15 EO 4PcW-1 100 7.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 39,33 %
A.3 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst 52,35 %
19 EO 3P W = -140 20.3 67.67
20 EO 1S W+2 -150 23.5 78.33
21 EO 4P S+1 650 15 50.00 µ Tbl = 65,33 %
A.8 Lydia Wildiers -Nicole Blondeau 52,81 %
22 EO 3S W = -600 18 60.00
23 EO 5P N-1 -100 23 76.67
24 EO 4P W+1 -450 26 86.67 µ Tbl = 74,44 %
A.4 Stan Tabor -Alan Beckman 44,00 %
25 EO 5K N+1 420 21.9 73.00
26 EO 3S E+2 -660 12.7 42.33
27 EO 6P N-2 -100 28.7 95.67 µ Tbl = 70,33 %
Total : 391,7 / 630 = 62,17 %
PAIRE a.2 Francoise Nibelle -Gaetan van de Werve
A.6 Simone Munsterhjelm -Grazia Neuenschwander 57,10 %
1 EO 2K N-1 -50 17.1 57.00
2 EO 4C S = 620 20.3 67.67
3 EO 2C S+1 140 27.8 92.67 µ Tbl = 72,44 %
A.2 Paul Henricot -Christian Martinot 57,72 %
4 EO 3S W-1 100 10.7 35.67
5 EO 5K E-1 50 9.7 32.33
6 EO 3S E = -600 29.9 99.67 µ Tbl = 55,89 %
A.7 Annie Zeimes -Michel Lievens 53,24 %
7 EO 2S E+1 -150 22.5 75.00
8 EO 4T E-1 50 15 50.00
9 EO 4P W-1 100 12.9 43.00 µ Tbl = 56,00 %
A.3 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst 52,35 %
10 EO 2P S+2 170 28.9 96.33
11 EO 4C E-1 50 6.5 21.67
12 EO 3P W-2 100 13.9 46.33 µ Tbl = 54,78 %
A.8 Lydia Wildiers -Nicole Blondeau 52,81 %
13 EO 3C W-1 100 17.1 57.00
14 EO 2P W+1 -140 22.5 75.00
15 EO 3P W = -140 18.2 60.67 µ Tbl = 64,22 %
A.4 Stan Tabor -Alan Beckman 44,00 %
16 EO 2C N = 110 10.7 35.67
17 EO 4PcE-3 500 0.1 0.33
18 EO 2P N-2 -200 29.9 99.67 µ Tbl = 45,22 %
A.9 - 0,00 %
19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00
21 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Michele Berrier 51,97 %
22 EO 2S W+1 -150 6 20.00
23 EO 4P N = 620 11 36.67
24 EO 4P W+1 -450 26 86.67 µ Tbl = 47,78 %
Total : 356,7 / 630 = 56,62 %
PAIRE b.1 Marianne Falla -Noelle Fosse
B.1 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 52,93 %
1 EO 4PcS-2 -300 29.9 99.67
2 EO 4C S+1 650 5.4 18.00
3 EO 3C S+1 170 21.4 71.33 µ Tbl = 63,00 %
B.5 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 56,10 %
4 EO 3S W+1 -630 25.7 85.67
5 EO 3S E-2 100 0.1 0.33
6 EO 3K E = -110 24.6 82.00 µ Tbl = 56,00 %
B.2 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie 36,21 %
7 EO 2S E+1 -150 22.5 75.00
8 EO 4T E = -130 24.6 82.00
9 EO 3P W+1 -170 25.7 85.67 µ Tbl = 80,89 %
B.6 Sophie Tilemans -Myriam de Timary 52,07 %
10 EO 3P N+2 200 19.3 64.33
11 EO 3S E = -400 12.9 43.00
12 EO 1S S = 90 22.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 60,78 %
B.3 Patricia Bardy -Serge Alard 50,58 %
13 EO 3S E-1 100 17.1 57.00
14 EO 4PcW-1 100 3.3 11.00
15 EO 3P W+1 -170 24.6 82.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
B.7 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 59,24 %
16 EO 3T W-3 300 4.3 14.33
17 EO 4PcE-2 300 21.4 71.33
18 EO 1S E+1 -120 8.6 28.67 µ Tbl = 38,11 %
B.4 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 44,15 %
19 EO 3P W = -140 20.3 67.67
20 EO 2C N-1 -100 10.7 35.67
21 EO 3S N+2 660 6.5 21.67 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
B.8 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 38,10 %
22 EO 3S W = -600 18 60.00
23 EO 4P N = 620 11 36.67
24 EO 4P W+1 -450 26 86.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 406,4 / 720 = 56,44 %
PAIRE b.8 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve
B.8 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 38,10 %
1 EO 2P S-1 -50 17.1 57.00
2 EO 4C S = 620 20.3 67.67
3 EO 2C S+2 170 21.4 71.33 µ Tbl = 65,33 %
B.1 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 52,93 %
4 EO 3S W-1 100 10.7 35.67
5 EO 4C W = -420 28.9 96.33
6 EO 4T N = 130 11.8 39.33 µ Tbl = 57,11 %
B.5 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 56,10 %
7 EO 3S W-2 200 2.2 7.33
8 EO 5TcE-1 100 8.6 28.67
9 EO 2C N = 110 10.7 35.67 µ Tbl = 23,89 %
B.2 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie 36,21 %
10 EO 3C S+2 200 19.3 64.33
11 EO 3S W+2 -460 29.9 99.67
12 EO 1S S+2 150 3.3 11.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
B.6 Sophie Tilemans -Myriam de Timary 52,07 %
13 EO 1S E+1 -120 26.7 89.00
14 EO 3P W-1 50 7.5 25.00
15 EO 3P W = -140 18.2 60.67 µ Tbl = 58,22 %
B.3 Patricia Bardy -Serge Alard 50,58 %
16 EO 3S W-1 100 15 50.00
17 EO 5C N = 450 9.7 32.33
18 EO 1S E+2 -150 21.4 71.33 µ Tbl = 51,22 %
B.7 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 59,24 %
19 EO 3P W = -140 20.3 67.67
20 EO 2K W+1 -110 20.3 67.67
21 EO 3S N+2 660 6.5 21.67 µ Tbl = 52,33 %
B.4 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 44,15 %
22 EO 3S W = -600 18 60.00
23 EO 4P N = 620 11 36.67
24 EO 4P W+1 -450 26 86.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 384,8 / 720 = 53,44 %
PAIRE b.2 Fabienne Smit -Hervé van de Put
B.5 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 56,10 %
1 EO 2K N-1 -50 17.1 57.00
2 EO 4C S = 620 20.3 67.67
3 EO 1S E-2 200 7.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 49,89 %
B.2 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie 36,21 %
4 EO 3S W-2 200 3.3 11.00
5 EO 5K E = -400 25.7 85.67
6 EO 4T N = 130 11.8 39.33 µ Tbl = 45,33 %
B.6 Sophie Tilemans -Myriam de Timary 52,07 %
7 EO 2S E = -120 13.9 46.33
8 EO 4T E = -130 24.6 82.00
9 EO 3C N = 140 5.4 18.00 µ Tbl = 48,78 %
B.3 Patricia Bardy -Serge Alard 50,58 %
10 EO 4C S = 650 5.4 18.00
11 EO 3S E+1 -430 22.5 75.00
12 EO 1S S = 90 22.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 56,00 %
B.7 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 59,24 %
13 EO 3C W-2 200 5.4 18.00
14 EO 5T N-2 -100 17.1 57.00
15 EO 4P W = -420 28.9 96.33 µ Tbl = 57,11 %
B.4 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 44,15 %
16 EO 2S W-1 100 15 50.00
17 EO 4C N = 420 19.3 64.33
18 EO 1S E+1 -120 8.6 28.67 µ Tbl = 47,67 %
B.8 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 38,10 %
19 EO 3P W+1 -170 29.9 99.67
20 EO 4CcN-3 -800 29.9 99.67
21 EO 3S S+2 660 6.5 21.67 µ Tbl = 73,67 %
B.1 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 52,93 %
22 EO 3S W+1 -630 27 90.00
23 EO 4P N = 620 11 36.67
24 EO 2P W+2 -170 6 20.00 µ Tbl = 48,89 %
Total : 384,6 / 720 = 53,42 %
PAIRE b.6 Annette Fobe -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
B.7 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 59,24 %
1 EO 2P S-1 -50 17.1 57.00
2 EO 5C S = 650 5.4 18.00
3 EO 3K W-1 100 29.9 99.67 µ Tbl = 58,22 %
B.4 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 44,15 %
4 EO 3S W = -600 18.2 60.67
5 EO 4C W = -420 28.9 96.33
6 EO 2K E+1 -110 24.6 82.00 µ Tbl = 79,67 %
B.8 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 38,10 %
7 EO 2S W = -120 13.9 46.33
8 EO 4CcN-2 -300 29.9 99.67
9 EO 3C N-1 -50 17.1 57.00 µ Tbl = 67,67 %
B.1 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 52,93 %
10 EO 4P N+1 650 5.4 18.00
11 EO 3S E = -400 12.9 43.00
12 EO 3K S+2 150 3.3 11.00 µ Tbl = 24,00 %
B.5 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 56,10 %
13 EO 4C W-2 200 5.4 18.00
14 EO 4C S-2 -100 17.1 57.00
15 EO 4C N = 620 2.2 7.33 µ Tbl = 27,44 %
B.2 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie 36,21 %
16 EO 4KcS-3 -500 29.9 99.67
17 EO 4P E-2 100 27.8 92.67
18 EO 1S E+2 -150 21.4 71.33 µ Tbl = 87,89 %
B.6 Sophie Tilemans -Myriam de Timary 52,07 %
19 EO 4T S = 130 3.3 11.00
20 EO 2C S+1 140 0.1 0.33
21 EO 3S N+1 630 22.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 28,78 %
B.3 Patricia Bardy -Serge Alard 50,58 %
22 EO 3S W = -600 18 60.00
23 EO 4P N = 620 11 36.67
24 EO 4P W = -420 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 381,3 / 720 = 52,96 %
PAIRE b.5 Thierry Goemaere -Michel Cornez
B.3 Patricia Bardy -Serge Alard 50,58 %
1 EO 3K N = 110 2.2 7.33
2 EO 4C S = 620 20.3 67.67
3 EO 3C S+1 170 21.4 71.33 µ Tbl = 48,78 %
B.7 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 59,24 %
4 EO 3S W+1 -630 25.7 85.67
5 EO 5K E-1 50 9.7 32.33
6 EO 3K E-2 200 3.3 11.00 µ Tbl = 43,00 %
B.4 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 44,15 %
7 EO 2P W = -110 10.7 35.67
8 EO 5T W-1 50 15 50.00
9 EO 4P W = -620 28.9 96.33 µ Tbl = 60,67 %
B.8 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 38,10 %
10 EO 4P S+1 650 5.4 18.00
11 EO 3S E+1 -430 22.5 75.00
12 EO 1S S = 90 22.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 56,00 %
B.1 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 52,93 %
13 EO 3C W-2 200 5.4 18.00
14 EO 4P W-2 100 3.3 11.00
15 EO 3P W = -140 18.2 60.67 µ Tbl = 29,89 %
B.5 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 56,10 %
16 EO 4CcN-1 -100 21.4 71.33
17 EO 4P E-2 100 27.8 92.67
18 EO 1S E = -90 1.1 3.67 µ Tbl = 55,89 %
B.2 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie 36,21 %
19 EO 2P W+1 -140 20.3 67.67
20 EO 3C N-2 -200 26.7 89.00
21 EO 3S N+1 630 22.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 77,22 %
B.6 Sophie Tilemans -Myriam de Timary 52,07 %
22 EO 3S W-1 100 1 3.33
23 EO 6PcN-2 -500 28 93.33
24 EO 4P W = -420 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 379,3 / 720 = 52,68 %
PAIRE b.4 Brigitte de Fauconval -Laurence Mauboussin
B.6 Sophie Tilemans -Myriam de Timary 52,07 %
1 EO 3K N-1 -50 17.1 57.00
2 EO 4C S = 620 20.3 67.67
3 EO 1S E-2 200 7.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 49,89 %
B.3 Patricia Bardy -Serge Alard 50,58 %
4 EO 3S W = -600 18.2 60.67
5 EO 5K E-1 50 9.7 32.33
6 EO 2S N+2 180 8.6 28.67 µ Tbl = 40,56 %
B.7 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 59,24 %
7 EO 2S E-1 100 7.5 25.00
8 EO 3K N+2 150 4.3 14.33
9 EO 3C N = 140 5.4 18.00 µ Tbl = 19,11 %
B.4 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 44,15 %
10 EO 2C S+3 200 19.3 64.33
11 EO 3S E+1 -430 22.5 75.00
12 EO 2C N+3 200 0.1 0.33 µ Tbl = 46,56 %
B.8 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 38,10 %
13 EO 3S E-1 100 17.1 57.00
14 EO 4C S-3 -150 27.8 92.67
15 EO 4P W-1 50 11.8 39.33 µ Tbl = 63,00 %
B.1 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 52,93 %
16 EO 3T W = -110 23.5 78.33
17 EO 4P E-2 100 27.8 92.67
18 EO 1S E+2 -150 21.4 71.33 µ Tbl = 80,78 %
B.5 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 56,10 %
19 EO 3P W = -140 20.3 67.67
20 EO 1S S-1 -100 10.7 35.67
21 EO 3S N+1 630 22.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 59,44 %
B.2 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie 36,21 %
22 EO 2S W+1 -150 6 20.00
23 EO 4P N = 620 11 36.67
24 EO 4P W+1 -450 26 86.67 µ Tbl = 47,78 %
Total : 366,4 / 720 = 50,89 %
PAIRE b.3 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Sylviane Horekens
B.2 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie 36,21 %
1 EO 4P S-2 -100 27.8 92.67
2 EO 4C S = 620 20.3 67.67
3 EO 1S E-2 200 7.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 61,78 %
B.6 Sophie Tilemans -Myriam de Timary 52,07 %
4 EO 3S W-1 100 10.7 35.67
5 EO 4P S-1 -100 19.3 64.33
6 EO 1C S = 80 17.1 57.00 µ Tbl = 52,33 %
B.3 Patricia Bardy -Serge Alard 50,58 %
7 EO 3P W = -140 17.1 57.00
8 EO 4T E = -130 24.6 82.00
9 EO 3C N = 140 5.4 18.00 µ Tbl = 52,33 %
B.7 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 59,24 %
10 EO 3C S+2 200 19.3 64.33
11 EO 4C E-2 100 2.2 7.33
12 EO 2P W-2 100 13.9 46.33 µ Tbl = 39,33 %
B.4 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 44,15 %
13 EO 3S E-1 100 17.1 57.00
14 EO 2P W+1 -140 22.5 75.00
15 EO 4P W = -420 28.9 96.33 µ Tbl = 76,11 %
B.8 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 38,10 %
16 EO 3P S-3 -150 27.8 92.67
17 EO 5C N = 450 9.7 32.33
18 EO 1S E+2 -150 21.4 71.33 µ Tbl = 65,44 %
B.1 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 52,93 %
19 EO 4T N = 130 3.3 11.00
20 EO 2C N-1 -100 10.7 35.67
21 EO 3S N+2 660 6.5 21.67 µ Tbl = 22,78 %
B.5 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 56,10 %
22 EO 3S W = -600 18 60.00
23 EO 4P N = 620 11 36.67
24 EO 4P W-1 50 1 3.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 363,1 / 720 = 50,43 %
PAIRE a.3 Didier Collart -Patricia Vaccani
A.7 Annie Zeimes -Michel Lievens 53,24 %
4 EO 3S W-2 200 3.3 11.00
5 EO 4P S-2 -200 23.5 78.33
6 EO 4C S-4 -200 27.8 92.67 µ Tbl = 60,67 %
A.3 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst 52,35 %
7 EO 3S E-2 200 2.2 7.33
8 EO 4T E = -130 24.6 82.00
9 EO 3C N-1 -50 17.1 57.00 µ Tbl = 48,78 %
A.8 Lydia Wildiers -Nicole Blondeau 52,81 %
10 EO 4C S+1 650 5.4 18.00
11 EO 3S E+1 -430 22.5 75.00
12 EO 1S S+1 120 8.6 28.67 µ Tbl = 40,56 %
A.4 Stan Tabor -Alan Beckman 44,00 %
13 EO 3S E-1 100 17.1 57.00
14 EO 4T N = 130 0.1 0.33
15 EO 4PcW-1 100 7.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 27,44 %
A.9 - 0,00 %
16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Michele Berrier 51,97 %
19 EO 3P W = -140 20.3 67.67
20 EO 3C N-2 -200 26.7 89.00
21 EO 3S N+1 630 22.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 77,22 %
A.1 Caroll Pucher -Eliane de Ceuninck 41,43 %
22 EO 3S W+2 -660 30 100.00
23 EO 6PcN-2 -500 28 93.33
24 EO 3P W+1 -170 6 20.00 µ Tbl = 71,11 %
A.6 Simone Munsterhjelm -Grazia Neuenschwander 57,10 %
25 EO 6KcS = 1090 1.3 4.33
26 EO 2K W+5 -190 1.3 4.33
27 EO 4P N+1 450 19.6 65.33 µ Tbl = 24,67 %
Total : 315,4 / 630 = 50,06 %
PAIRE a.7 Philippe d'Hoop -Catherine de Moffarts
A.4 Stan Tabor -Alan Beckman 44,00 %
1 EO 2P S-1 -50 17.1 57.00
2 EO 4C S = 620 20.3 67.67
3 EO 2C S+2 170 21.4 71.33 µ Tbl = 65,33 %
A.9 - 0,00 %
4 EO BYE 0 0.00
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Michele Berrier 51,97 %
7 EO 3S E+1 -630 29.9 99.67
8 EO 3K N+2 150 4.3 14.33
9 EO 3C N = 140 5.4 18.00 µ Tbl = 44,00 %
A.1 Caroll Pucher -Eliane de Ceuninck 41,43 %
10 EO 2C S+3 200 19.3 64.33
11 EO 3S W+1 -430 22.5 75.00
12 EO 2P W-1 50 29.9 99.67 µ Tbl = 79,67 %
A.2 Paul Henricot -Christian Martinot 57,72 %
16 EO 3S W-1 100 15 50.00
17 EO 4C N+1 450 9.7 32.33
18 EO 1S E+1 -120 8.6 28.67 µ Tbl = 37,00 %
A.7 Annie Zeimes -Michel Lievens 53,24 %
19 EO 2P W+1 -140 20.3 67.67
20 EO 2C N = 110 2.2 7.33
21 EO 3S N+2 660 6.5 21.67 µ Tbl = 32,22 %
A.3 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst 52,35 %
22 EO 3S W = -600 18 60.00
23 EO 4P N = 620 11 36.67
24 EO 4P W = -420 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.8 Lydia Wildiers -Nicole Blondeau 52,81 %
25 EO 5K S+1 420 21.9 73.00
26 EO 3S E+2 -660 12.7 42.33
27 EO 6S S = 990 1.3 4.33 µ Tbl = 39,89 %
Total : 313,3 / 630 = 49,73 %
PAIRE a.5 Helene Schyns -Dominique Sassen
A.3 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst 52,35 %
1 EO 2P S = 110 2.2 7.33
2 EO 4C S+1 650 5.4 18.00
3 EO 1S E-2 200 7.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 16,78 %
A.8 Lydia Wildiers -Nicole Blondeau 52,81 %
4 EO 3S W = -600 18.2 60.67
5 EO 5K E-1 50 9.7 32.33
6 EO 2K E = -90 21.4 71.33 µ Tbl = 54,78 %
A.9 - 0,00 %
10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Michele Berrier 51,97 %
13 EO 4C W-2 200 5.4 18.00
14 EO 4C S-3 -150 27.8 92.67
15 EO 3P W+1 -170 24.6 82.00 µ Tbl = 64,22 %
A.1 Caroll Pucher -Eliane de Ceuninck 41,43 %
16 EO 2S W = -120 25.7 85.67
17 EO 4C N+1 450 9.7 32.33
18 EO 1S E+2 -150 21.4 71.33 µ Tbl = 63,11 %
A.6 Simone Munsterhjelm -Grazia Neuenschwander 57,10 %
19 EO 4K S = 130 3.3 11.00
20 EO 2C N-1 -100 10.7 35.67
21 EO 3S N+2 660 6.5 21.67 µ Tbl = 22,78 %
A.2 Paul Henricot -Christian Martinot 57,72 %
22 EO 2S W+2 -180 10 33.33
23 EO 5P N-1 -100 23 76.67
24 EO 4P W-1 50 1 3.33 µ Tbl = 37,78 %
A.7 Annie Zeimes -Michel Lievens 53,24 %
25 EO 5K S+1 420 21.9 73.00
26 EO 3S W+4 -720 26.4 88.00
27 EO 4P N = 420 24.1 80.33 µ Tbl = 80,44 %
Total : 305,9 / 630 = 48,56 %
PAIRE a.1 Suzanne Klausen -Anne de Maleingreau
A.1 Caroll Pucher -Eliane de Ceuninck 41,43 %
1 EO 3K N-1 -50 17.1 57.00
2 EO 4C S = 620 20.3 67.67
3 EO 3C S+1 170 21.4 71.33 µ Tbl = 65,33 %
A.6 Simone Munsterhjelm -Grazia Neuenschwander 57,10 %
4 EO 3S W-2 200 3.3 11.00
5 EO 5K E-1 50 9.7 32.33
6 EO 3K E-2 200 3.3 11.00 µ Tbl = 18,11 %
A.2 Paul Henricot -Christian Martinot 57,72 %
7 EO 1S E-2 200 2.2 7.33
8 EO 4T E-1 50 15 50.00
9 EO 4P W = -620 28.9 96.33 µ Tbl = 51,22 %
A.7 Annie Zeimes -Michel Lievens 53,24 %
10 EO 3P N+1 170 28.9 96.33
11 EO 3C E-1 50 6.5 21.67
12 EO 1S S+1 120 8.6 28.67 µ Tbl = 48,89 %
A.3 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst 52,35 %
13 EO 3S E = -600 29.9 99.67
14 EO 4T N-1 -50 11.8 39.33
15 EO 3P W = -140 18.2 60.67 µ Tbl = 66,56 %
A.8 Lydia Wildiers -Nicole Blondeau 52,81 %
16 EO 3C S = 140 8.6 28.67
17 EO 4C N+1 450 9.7 32.33
18 EO 1S E = -90 1.1 3.67 µ Tbl = 21,56 %
A.4 Stan Tabor -Alan Beckman 44,00 %
19 EO 4K S = 130 3.3 11.00
20 EO 3C N-1 -100 10.7 35.67
21 EO 6K N-1 -100 29.9 99.67 µ Tbl = 48,78 %
A.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Michele Berrier 51,97 %
25 EO 6K S = 920 8.1 27.00
26 EO 3S W+4 -720 26.4 88.00
27 EO 6P N = 980 5.9 19.67 µ Tbl = 44,89 %
Total : 328,8 / 720 = 45,67 %
PAIRE a.4 Liliane Baptista -Rose Marie Vaccarezza
A.7 Annie Zeimes -Michel Lievens 53,24 %
1 EO 2P S-1 -50 17.1 57.00
2 EO 4C S+2 680 0.1 0.33
3 EO 1S E-2 200 7.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 27,44 %
A.8 Lydia Wildiers -Nicole Blondeau 52,81 %
7 EO 3S E-1 100 7.5 25.00
8 EO 4T E-1 50 15 50.00
9 EO 3C N-1 -50 17.1 57.00 µ Tbl = 44,00 %
A.4 Stan Tabor -Alan Beckman 44,00 %
10 EO 2P S+3 200 19.3 64.33
11 EO 3S E-3 150 0.1 0.33
12 EO 1S S = 90 22.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 46,56 %
A.9 - 0,00 %
13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00
15 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Michele Berrier 51,97 %
16 EO 3S W-3 300 4.3 14.33
17 EO 4C N+1 450 9.7 32.33
18 EO 1S E+1 -120 8.6 28.67 µ Tbl = 25,11 %
A.1 Caroll Pucher -Eliane de Ceuninck 41,43 %
19 EO 2P W = -110 10.7 35.67
20 EO 2K W+1 -110 20.3 67.67
21 EO 3S N+1 630 22.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 59,44 %
A.6 Simone Munsterhjelm -Grazia Neuenschwander 57,10 %
22 EO 3S W = -600 18 60.00
23 EO 4P N = 620 11 36.67
24 EO 2P W+3 -200 10 33.33 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
A.2 Paul Henricot -Christian Martinot 57,72 %
25 EO 5K S+1 420 21.9 73.00
26 EO 3S W+2 -660 12.7 42.33
27 EO 3S S+2 460 12.7 42.33 µ Tbl = 52,56 %
Total : 268,6 / 630 = 42,63 %
PAIRE a.6 Aida Zumot -Claire de Quirini
A.8 Lydia Wildiers -Nicole Blondeau 52,81 %
1 EO 2K N = 90 6.5 21.67
2 EO 4C S = 620 20.3 67.67
3 EO 1S E-2 200 7.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 38,11 %
A.4 Stan Tabor -Alan Beckman 44,00 %
4 EO 3S W+2 -660 29.9 99.67
5 EO 5K E-1 50 9.7 32.33
6 EO 4T N-1 -50 19.3 64.33 µ Tbl = 65,44 %
A.9 - 0,00 %
7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.1 Caroll Pucher -Eliane de Ceuninck 41,43 %
13 EO 3C W-1 100 17.1 57.00
14 EO 3P W-1 50 7.5 25.00
15 EO 3C N+3 230 4.3 14.33 µ Tbl = 32,11 %
A.6 Simone Munsterhjelm -Grazia Neuenschwander 57,10 %
16 EO 3T W-3 300 4.3 14.33
17 EO 3C N+1 170 23.5 78.33
18 EO 1S E+2 -150 21.4 71.33 µ Tbl = 54,67 %
A.2 Paul Henricot -Christian Martinot 57,72 %
19 EO 3P W = -140 20.3 67.67
20 EO 3T S-1 -100 10.7 35.67
21 EO 3S N+2 660 6.5 21.67 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
A.7 Annie Zeimes -Michel Lievens 53,24 %
22 EO 2S W+1 -150 6 20.00
23 EO 4P N = 620 11 36.67
24 EO 2P W+2 -170 6 20.00 µ Tbl = 25,56 %
A.3 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst 52,35 %
25 EO 6K S = 920 8.1 27.00
26 EO 3S E+2 -660 12.7 42.33
27 EO 3S S+2 460 12.7 42.33 µ Tbl = 37,22 %
Total : 265,3 / 630 = 42,11 %
PAIRE a.9 Mado Miller -Rosette Bagno
A.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Michele Berrier 51,97 %
1 EO 2K N+1 110 2.2 7.33
2 EO 4C S = 620 20.3 67.67
3 EO 1S E-2 200 7.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.1 Caroll Pucher -Eliane de Ceuninck 41,43 %
4 EO 4C E-2 200 3.3 11.00
5 EO 4K E = -130 21.4 71.33
6 EO 2K E-2 200 3.3 11.00 µ Tbl = 31,11 %
A.6 Simone Munsterhjelm -Grazia Neuenschwander 57,10 %
7 EO 3S E = -600 27.8 92.67
8 EO 3K N+2 150 4.3 14.33
9 EO 3C N+1 170 0.1 0.33 µ Tbl = 35,78 %
A.2 Paul Henricot -Christian Martinot 57,72 %
10 EO 4P N+1 650 5.4 18.00
11 EO 3S E-1 50 6.5 21.67
12 EO 1S S+1 120 8.6 28.67 µ Tbl = 22,78 %
A.7 Annie Zeimes -Michel Lievens 53,24 %
13 EO 1S E+1 -120 26.7 89.00
14 EO 5T N-1 -50 11.8 39.33
15 EO 4C N+2 680 0.1 0.33 µ Tbl = 42,89 %
A.3 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst 52,35 %
16 EO 1S W = -90 19.3 64.33
17 EO 5C N = 450 9.7 32.33
18 EO 1S E+1 -120 8.6 28.67 µ Tbl = 41,78 %
A.4 Stan Tabor -Alan Beckman 44,00 %
22 EO 3S W+1 -630 27 90.00
23 EO 6PcN-2 -500 28 93.33
24 EO 4P W = -420 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 78,89 %
A.9 - 0,00 %
25 EO BYE 0 0.00
26 EO BYE 0 0.00
27 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 257,9 / 630 = 40,94 %
PAIRE b.7 Danielle Wybauw -Christiane Huby
B.4 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 44,15 %
1 EO 2K N-1 -50 17.1 57.00
2 EO 4C S+1 650 5.4 18.00
3 EO 1S E-2 200 7.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
B.8 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 38,10 %
4 EO 3S W+1 -630 25.7 85.67
5 EO 4C W-1 50 9.7 32.33
6 EO 3K E-2 200 3.3 11.00 µ Tbl = 43,00 %
B.1 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 52,93 %
7 EO 2S E+1 -150 22.5 75.00
8 EO 3C N+2 200 0.1 0.33
9 EO 4C N-2 -100 22.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 50,11 %
B.5 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 56,10 %
10 EO 4P S+1 650 5.4 18.00
11 EO 3S E = -400 12.9 43.00
12 EO 1S S = 90 22.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 45,33 %
B.2 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie 36,21 %
13 EO 3S E-1 100 17.1 57.00
14 EO 4C S-2 -100 17.1 57.00
15 EO 4P W-1 50 11.8 39.33 µ Tbl = 51,11 %
B.6 Sophie Tilemans -Myriam de Timary 52,07 %
16 EO 2CcN+1 570 0.1 0.33
17 EO 5C N = 450 9.7 32.33
18 EO 1S E+2 -150 21.4 71.33 µ Tbl = 34,67 %
B.3 Patricia Bardy -Serge Alard 50,58 %
19 EO 2S N-1 -50 8.6 28.67
20 EO 3C N-1 -100 10.7 35.67
21 EO 3S N+1 630 22.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 46,44 %
B.7 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 59,24 %
22 EO 3S W-1 100 1 3.33
23 EO 4P N+1 650 0 0.00
24 EO 4P W = -420 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 18,89 %
Total : 290,6 / 720 = 40,36 %
|