B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 67,21 N.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans
--- 2 61,97 N.5 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia
--- 3 59,11 N10 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles
--- 4 56,85 N.6 Christiane Vroninckx -Anne Beyne
--- 5 53,69 N.9 Thierry Collart -Annie Zeimes
--- 6 46,60 N.8 Ghislaine Schelfhout -Claire Destin
--- 7 45,75 N.7 Grazia Neuenschwander -Gerard Cooreman
--- 8 45,31 N.3 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Marie Claire Vienne
--- 9 41,99 N11 Francoise Turin -Patricia Bardy
--- 10 41,60 N.2 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne
--- 11 40,58 N.4 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand
--- 12 37,52 N12 Regine de Hemptinne -Marguerite Verstraeten
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 57,08 e.7 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry
--- 2 55,54 e.4 Francoise Duren -Giuseppe Napoli
--- 3 55,12 e.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Simone Munsterhjelm
--- 4 54,82 e.2 Stan Tabor -Michel Lievens
--- 5 54,58 e.9 Jean Verelst -Christiane Verelst
--- 6 53,63 e11 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck
--- 7 46,64 e.8 Didier Collart -Christian Meert
--- 8 45,42 e.6 Myriam de Timary -Caroll Pucher
--- 9 45,33 e.1 Dominique van de Werve -Marie Laure Peterbroeck
--- 10 44,97 e.3 Lydia Luyten -Prisca Tondreau
--- 11 37,02 e10 Catherine de Moffarts -Sandra Dallemagne
--- 12 0,00 e12 -
PAIRE N.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans
e.1 Dominique van de Werve -Marie Laure Peterbroeck 45,33 %
1 NS 4P N+2 480 9.3 66.43
2 NS 2P S+1 140 8.1 57.86
3 NS 3S S = 400 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 74,52 %
e12 - 0,00 %
4 NS BYE 0 0.00
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
e11 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 53,63 %
7 NS 2C S+1 140 11.6 82.86
8 NS 2C N+1 140 4.7 33.57
9 NS 4P E-4 400 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 71,90 %
e10 Catherine de Moffarts -Sandra Dallemagne 37,02 %
10 NS 3S E = -600 9.3 66.43
11 NS 3S N+2 460 13.9 99.29
12 NS 4C W-2 100 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 82,86 %
e.9 Jean Verelst -Christiane Verelst 54,58 %
13 NS 4C W-1 100 13 92.86
14 NS 3C E-1 50 12 85.71
15 NS 6KcW-6 1400 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
e.8 Didier Collart -Christian Meert 46,64 %
16 NS 4C W+1 -650 3.6 25.71
17 NS 3S E-2 100 7 50.00
18 NS 4P E-1 50 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
e.6 Myriam de Timary -Caroll Pucher 45,42 %
19 NS 1S E+1 -120 8 57.14
20 NS 4P E+1 -650 11 78.57
21 NS 4P E-1 50 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
e.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Simone Munsterhjelm 55,12 %
22 NS 4C S = 420 2.4 17.14
23 NS 4C W-1 100 9.3 66.43
24 NS 4C N-5 -250 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 28,10 %
Total : 197,6 / 294 = 67,21 %
PAIRE N.5 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia
e.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Simone Munsterhjelm 55,12 %
13 NS 3C E = -140 5 35.71
14 NS 3P N-1 -50 5 35.71
15 NS 4C S+3 710 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
e.4 Francoise Duren -Giuseppe Napoli 55,54 %
16 NS 4PcN = 590 13.9 99.29
17 NS 6S E-2 100 7 50.00
18 NS 3S W = -400 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 71,90 %
e.3 Lydia Luyten -Prisca Tondreau 44,97 %
19 NS 2C S+2 170 14 100.00
20 NS 4P E+1 -650 11 78.57
21 NS 4P E-1 50 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 85,71 %
e.2 Stan Tabor -Michel Lievens 54,82 %
22 NS 4C S+2 480 11.6 82.86
23 NS 4C W = -620 2.4 17.14
24 NS 3C N-2 -100 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 52,62 %
e.1 Dominique van de Werve -Marie Laure Peterbroeck 45,33 %
25 NS 4P S+2 480 6 42.86
26 NS 2S N+1 150 11 78.57
27 NS 4P N-1 -50 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
e12 - 0,00 %
28 NS BYE 0 0.00
29 NS BYE 0 0.00
30 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
e10 Catherine de Moffarts -Sandra Dallemagne 37,02 %
31 NS 1S N = 90 11 78.57
32 NS 4K E-1 100 13 92.86
33 NS 3S S+1 430 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 85,71 %
e.9 Jean Verelst -Christiane Verelst 54,58 %
34 NS 4K S-2 -200 1.3 9.29
35 NS 1S S+2 150 7 50.00
36 NS 3S N = 600 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 47,38 %
Total : 182,2 / 294 = 61,97 %
PAIRE N10 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles
e.7 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry 57,08 %
1 NS 4K N+2 170 0.1 0.71
2 NS 1P S+1 110 0.1 0.71
3 NS 3P S = 140 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 28,10 %
e.6 Myriam de Timary -Caroll Pucher 45,42 %
4 NS 4P S+1 650 11.6 82.86
5 NS 1S E+2 -150 2.4 17.14
6 NS 2S E+2 -180 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 39,05 %
e.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Simone Munsterhjelm 55,12 %
7 NS 3P W-3 300 13.9 99.29
8 NS 2C N+1 140 4.7 33.57
9 NS 3S W-2 200 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
e.3 Lydia Luyten -Prisca Tondreau 44,97 %
10 NS 5P W-3 300 13.9 99.29
11 NS 3S S = 400 8.1 57.86
12 NS 3C W = -140 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 71,67 %
e.2 Stan Tabor -Michel Lievens 54,82 %
13 NS 1P W+2 -140 5 35.71
14 NS 3P N-1 -50 5 35.71
15 NS 6C N = 1430 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
e10 Catherine de Moffarts -Sandra Dallemagne 37,02 %
28 NS 4K E-1 50 12.7 90.71
29 NS 2K E+2 -130 10.4 74.29
30 NS 4C E-1 50 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 79,76 %
e.9 Jean Verelst -Christiane Verelst 54,58 %
31 NS 1S E = -90 2 14.29
32 NS 3S W-1 100 13 92.86
33 NS 4K N = 130 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
e.8 Didier Collart -Christian Meert 46,64 %
34 NS 3K S = 110 13.9 99.29
35 NS 1S N+3 180 13.9 99.29
36 NS 1S N+2 150 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 82,86 %
Total : 198,6 / 336 = 59,11 %
PAIRE N.6 Christiane Vroninckx -Anne Beyne
e10 Catherine de Moffarts -Sandra Dallemagne 37,02 %
1 NS 4P N+2 480 9.3 66.43
2 NS 2P S+1 140 8.1 57.86
3 NS 2P N = 110 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 63,57 %
e.6 Myriam de Timary -Caroll Pucher 45,42 %
16 NS 4C W = -620 8.1 57.86
17 NS 6S E-5 250 13.9 99.29
18 NS 2P W+1 -140 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 80,00 %
e.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Simone Munsterhjelm 55,12 %
19 NS 1S E = -90 10 71.43
20 NS 4P E+1 -650 11 78.57
21 NS 3P E+1 -170 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
e.4 Francoise Duren -Giuseppe Napoli 55,54 %
22 NS 4C S+1 450 7 50.00
23 NS 6C W-3 300 13.9 99.29
24 NS 2S N-2 -100 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
e.3 Lydia Luyten -Prisca Tondreau 44,97 %
25 NS 5P S+1 480 6 42.86
26 NS 2C E+1 -140 4 28.57
27 NS 4P N = 420 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
e.2 Stan Tabor -Michel Lievens 54,82 %
28 NS 5K E = -400 4.7 33.57
29 NS 3S W = -600 1.3 9.29
30 NS 5T E-1 50 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 39,05 %
e.1 Dominique van de Werve -Marie Laure Peterbroeck 45,33 %
31 NS 1C S+1 110 14 100.00
32 NS 3K E = -110 4 28.57
33 NS 3S S = 400 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
e11 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 53,63 %
34 NS 3P E+1 -170 5.9 42.14
35 NS 1S S+1 120 0.1 0.71
36 NS 2K N+1 110 1.3 9.29 µ Tbl = 17,38 %
Total : 191,0 / 336 = 56,85 %
PAIRE N.9 Thierry Collart -Annie Zeimes
e.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Simone Munsterhjelm 55,12 %
1 NS 6K S = 920 13.9 99.29
2 NS 3P S = 140 8.1 57.86
3 NS 4P N-1 -50 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 63,57 %
e.4 Francoise Duren -Giuseppe Napoli 55,54 %
4 NS 4P S = 620 7 50.00
5 NS 1S E+1 -120 9.3 66.43
6 NS 3S E-1 100 12.7 90.71 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
e.2 Stan Tabor -Michel Lievens 54,82 %
7 NS 3T S+1 130 7 50.00
8 NS 2C N = 110 0.1 0.71
9 NS 3S W-1 100 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
e.1 Dominique van de Werve -Marie Laure Peterbroeck 45,33 %
10 NS 3S E+1 -630 3.6 25.71
11 NS 2S N+2 180 4.7 33.57
12 NS 2C W+2 -170 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 25,48 %
e.9 Jean Verelst -Christiane Verelst 54,58 %
25 NS 6P S = 980 13 92.86
26 NS 2S N+1 150 11 78.57
27 NS 4P N-1 -50 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
e.8 Didier Collart -Christian Meert 46,64 %
28 NS 5K E-1 50 12.7 90.71
29 NS 1P S-1 -100 13.9 99.29
30 NS 4C E-1 50 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 88,10 %
e.7 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry 57,08 %
31 NS 2P E-1 50 7 50.00
32 NS 3C N-2 -100 9 64.29
33 NS 4K S = 130 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
e.6 Myriam de Timary -Caroll Pucher 45,42 %
34 NS 4T S-2 -200 1.3 9.29
35 NS 2S N+1 150 7 50.00
36 NS 2K N+2 130 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
Total : 180,4 / 336 = 53,69 %
PAIRE N.8 Ghislaine Schelfhout -Claire Destin
e.3 Lydia Luyten -Prisca Tondreau 44,97 %
1 NS 4P N = 420 2.4 17.14
2 NS 3P S = 140 8.1 57.86
3 NS 3S S-3 -150 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 25,24 %
e.1 Dominique van de Werve -Marie Laure Peterbroeck 45,33 %
4 NS 3P S+3 230 2.4 17.14
5 NS 4T W-2 100 13.9 99.29
6 NS 3PcN-4 -800 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 39,05 %
e12 - 0,00 %
7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
e.8 Didier Collart -Christian Meert 46,64 %
22 NS 4C S = 420 2.4 17.14
23 NS 4C W = -620 2.4 17.14
24 NS 3T N+1 130 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 44,52 %
e.7 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry 57,08 %
25 NS 4P S+2 480 6 42.86
26 NS 2K W-1 100 8 57.14
27 NS 4P S-1 -50 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
e.6 Myriam de Timary -Caroll Pucher 45,42 %
28 NS 3K E = -110 9.3 66.43
29 NS 2K E+2 -130 10.4 74.29
30 NS 5T E+1 -420 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 52,62 %
e.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Simone Munsterhjelm 55,12 %
31 NS 1S N = 90 11 78.57
32 NS 3C N-2 -100 9 64.29
33 NS 5K S-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
e.4 Francoise Duren -Giuseppe Napoli 55,54 %
34 NS 3P E = -140 9.3 66.43
35 NS 1S N+2 150 7 50.00
36 NS 3S N+1 630 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 71,90 %
Total : 137,0 / 294 = 46,60 %
PAIRE N.7 Grazia Neuenschwander -Gerard Cooreman
e12 - 0,00 %
1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
e11 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 53,63 %
4 NS 4P S+2 680 13.9 99.29
5 NS 1S E+1 -120 9.3 66.43
6 NS 2S E = -120 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 71,90 %
e.7 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry 57,08 %
19 NS 1S E+2 -150 4 28.57
20 NS 4P E+2 -680 3 21.43
21 NS 3P E+1 -170 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
e.6 Myriam de Timary -Caroll Pucher 45,42 %
22 NS 4C S+2 480 11.6 82.86
23 NS 4C W-1 100 9.3 66.43
24 NS 4C N-2 -100 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
e.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Simone Munsterhjelm 55,12 %
25 NS 5P S+1 480 6 42.86
26 NS 3T N-2 -200 0 0.00
27 NS 4P N-1 -50 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
e.4 Francoise Duren -Giuseppe Napoli 55,54 %
28 NS 3K E+1 -130 7 50.00
29 NS 2S W+2 -180 7 50.00
30 NS 5T E+1 -420 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 39,05 %
e.3 Lydia Luyten -Prisca Tondreau 44,97 %
31 NS 1S N-2 -200 0 0.00
32 NS 3S W = -600 0 0.00
33 NS 3S S+3 490 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
e.2 Stan Tabor -Michel Lievens 54,82 %
34 NS 4K S-1 -100 11.6 82.86
35 NS 1S S+2 150 7 50.00
36 NS 2K N+1 110 1.3 9.29 µ Tbl = 47,38 %
Total : 134,5 / 294 = 45,75 %
PAIRE N.3 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Marie Claire Vienne
e.3 Lydia Luyten -Prisca Tondreau 44,97 %
7 NS 3T S+1 130 7 50.00
8 NS 2C N+1 140 4.7 33.57
9 NS 3S W-2 200 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 52,62 %
e.2 Stan Tabor -Michel Lievens 54,82 %
10 NS 3S E+1 -630 3.6 25.71
11 NS 3S N = 400 8.1 57.86
12 NS 3S E-4 200 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 60,95 %
e.1 Dominique van de Werve -Marie Laure Peterbroeck 45,33 %
13 NS 2C W+1 -140 5 35.71
14 NS 2C E-1 50 12 85.71
15 NS 4C S+3 710 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
e12 - 0,00 %
16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
e11 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 53,63 %
19 NS 1S E+2 -150 4 28.57
20 NS 4P E+2 -680 3 21.43
21 NS 4P E+1 -450 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
e10 Catherine de Moffarts -Sandra Dallemagne 37,02 %
22 NS 4C S+2 480 11.6 82.86
23 NS 4C W = -620 2.4 17.14
24 NS 4C S-4 -200 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 39,05 %
e.8 Didier Collart -Christian Meert 46,64 %
25 NS 5P S+1 480 6 42.86
26 NS 3S N+1 630 14 100.00
27 NS 4P N-1 -50 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
e.7 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry 57,08 %
28 NS 3S E+1 -430 2.4 17.14
29 NS 3S W = -600 1.3 9.29
30 NS 5T E-1 50 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 33,57 %
Total : 133,2 / 294 = 45,31 %
PAIRE N11 Francoise Turin -Patricia Bardy
e.9 Jean Verelst -Christiane Verelst 54,58 %
1 NS 4P N+1 450 4.7 33.57
2 NS 2P S+1 140 8.1 57.86
3 NS 3P S-1 -50 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
e.8 Didier Collart -Christian Meert 46,64 %
4 NS 4P S-1 -100 0.1 0.71
5 NS 1S E+2 -150 2.4 17.14
6 NS 2S E = -120 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 22,62 %
e.7 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry 57,08 %
7 NS 3T S+1 130 7 50.00
8 NS 2C N+2 170 11.6 82.86
9 NS 2S W-1 100 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
e.6 Myriam de Timary -Caroll Pucher 45,42 %
10 NS 3S E = -600 9.3 66.43
11 NS 3S S+1 430 11.6 82.86
12 NS 3C W+1 -170 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 55,48 %
e.4 Francoise Duren -Giuseppe Napoli 55,54 %
13 NS 4C W = -620 0 0.00
14 NS 3P N-1 -50 5 35.71
15 NS 5T S+2 640 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 14,29 %
e.3 Lydia Luyten -Prisca Tondreau 44,97 %
16 NS 4C W+1 -650 3.6 25.71
17 NS 6P W-3 150 11.6 82.86
18 NS 4P E = -420 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 50,24 %
e11 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 53,63 %
31 NS 1S W-1 50 7 50.00
32 NS 3K E = -110 4 28.57
33 NS 2K S+2 130 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
e10 Catherine de Moffarts -Sandra Dallemagne 37,02 %
34 NS 3P E+1 -170 5.9 42.14
35 NS 1S S+2 150 7 50.00
36 NS 1S N+3 180 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 52,86 %
Total : 141,1 / 336 = 41,99 %
PAIRE N.2 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne
e.2 Stan Tabor -Michel Lievens 54,82 %
4 NS 4P S = 620 7 50.00
5 NS 1S E+1 -120 9.3 66.43
6 NS 2S E = -120 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,48 %
e.1 Dominique van de Werve -Marie Laure Peterbroeck 45,33 %
7 NS 3S N-1 -100 1.3 9.29
8 NS 2C S+2 170 11.6 82.86
9 NS 4CcS-2 -300 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 36,43 %
e12 - 0,00 %
10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
e11 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 53,63 %
13 NS 2C W+1 -140 5 35.71
14 NS 2C E-1 50 12 85.71
15 NS 5T S+2 640 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
e10 Catherine de Moffarts -Sandra Dallemagne 37,02 %
16 NS 2P N+1 140 11.6 82.86
17 NS 3S E+1 -430 2.4 17.14
18 NS 4P E = -420 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 47,38 %
e.9 Jean Verelst -Christiane Verelst 54,58 %
19 NS 2T N-3 -150 4 28.57
20 NS 4P E+2 -680 3 21.43
21 NS 4P E = -420 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
e.7 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry 57,08 %
22 NS 4C S = 420 2.4 17.14
23 NS 4C W-1 100 9.3 66.43
24 NS 4C S-2 -100 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 47,14 %
e.6 Myriam de Timary -Caroll Pucher 45,42 %
25 NS 4P S+1 450 0 0.00
26 NS 2C E+2 -170 2 14.29
27 NS 4P N+1 450 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
Total : 122,3 / 294 = 41,60 %
PAIRE N.4 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand
e.4 Francoise Duren -Giuseppe Napoli 55,54 %
10 NS 3S E+2 -660 0.1 0.71
11 NS 3ScN-1 -100 0.1 0.71
12 NS 3C W+1 -170 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 6,19 %
e.3 Lydia Luyten -Prisca Tondreau 44,97 %
13 NS 2C W = -110 10 71.43
14 NS 3P N-1 -50 5 35.71
15 NS 7C N = 2210 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
e.2 Stan Tabor -Michel Lievens 54,82 %
16 NS 4C W+2 -680 0.1 0.71
17 NS 6KcW-1 100 7 50.00
18 NS 4P W+1 -450 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 22,62 %
e.1 Dominique van de Werve -Marie Laure Peterbroeck 45,33 %
19 NS 3C N-1 -50 12 85.71
20 NS 4P E+1 -650 11 78.57
21 NS 3T N+1 130 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 88,10 %
e12 - 0,00 %
22 NS BYE 0 0.00
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
e11 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 53,63 %
25 NS 6P S = 980 13 92.86
26 NS 2T N = 90 6 42.86
27 NS 4P N-1 -50 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
e.9 Jean Verelst -Christiane Verelst 54,58 %
28 NS 3S W+2 -460 0.1 0.71
29 NS 2P S-2 -200 4.7 33.57
30 NS 5T E+1 -420 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 17,14 %
e.8 Didier Collart -Christian Meert 46,64 %
31 NS 1P E = -80 4 28.57
32 NS 3K E = -110 4 28.57
33 NS 3K S = 110 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
Total : 119,3 / 294 = 40,58 %
PAIRE N12 Regine de Hemptinne -Marguerite Verstraeten
e11 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 53,63 %
1 NS 4P N+2 480 9.3 66.43
2 NS 2P S+1 140 8.1 57.86
3 NS 4P N-1 -50 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 52,62 %
e10 Catherine de Moffarts -Sandra Dallemagne 37,02 %
4 NS 4P S = 620 7 50.00
5 NS 1S E+2 -150 2.4 17.14
6 NS 4C E-1 100 12.7 90.71 µ Tbl = 52,62 %
e.9 Jean Verelst -Christiane Verelst 54,58 %
7 NS 3T S-1 -100 1.3 9.29
8 NS 2C N+2 170 11.6 82.86
9 NS 3ScS-3 -500 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
e.8 Didier Collart -Christian Meert 46,64 %
10 NS 3S E = -600 9.3 66.43
11 NS 2S N = 120 2.4 17.14
12 NS 3C W = -140 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 47,14 %
e.7 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry 57,08 %
13 NS 4P W-1 100 13 92.86
14 NS 3PcN-1 -100 0 0.00
15 NS 4C S+3 710 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
e.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Simone Munsterhjelm 55,12 %
16 NS 4C W = -620 8.1 57.86
17 NS 3S E+2 -460 0.1 0.71
18 NS 3S W+2 -460 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 19,76 %
e.4 Francoise Duren -Giuseppe Napoli 55,54 %
19 NS 1S E+4 -210 0 0.00
20 NS 4P E+2 -680 3 21.43
21 NS 4P E = -420 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 14,29 %
e12 - 0,00 %
34 NS BYE 0 0.00
35 NS BYE 0 0.00
36 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 110,3 / 294 = 37,52 %
PAIRE e.7 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry
N10 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 59,11 %
1 EO 4K N+2 170 13.9 99.29
2 EO 1P S+1 110 13.9 99.29
3 EO 3P S = 140 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 71,90 %
N11 Francoise Turin -Patricia Bardy 41,99 %
7 EO 3T S+1 130 7 50.00
8 EO 2C N+2 170 2.4 17.14
9 EO 2S W-1 100 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
N12 Regine de Hemptinne -Marguerite Verstraeten 37,52 %
13 EO 4P W-1 100 1 7.14
14 EO 3PcN-1 -100 14 100.00
15 EO 4C S+3 710 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
N.7 Grazia Neuenschwander -Gerard Cooreman 45,75 %
19 EO 1S E+2 -150 10 71.43
20 EO 4P E+2 -680 11 78.57
21 EO 3P E+1 -170 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
N.2 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 41,60 %
22 EO 4C S = 420 11.6 82.86
23 EO 4C W-1 100 4.7 33.57
24 EO 4C S-2 -100 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 52,86 %
N.8 Ghislaine Schelfhout -Claire Destin 46,60 %
25 EO 4P S+2 480 8 57.14
26 EO 2K W-1 100 6 42.86
27 EO 4P S-1 -50 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
N.3 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Marie Claire Vienne 45,31 %
28 EO 3S E+1 -430 11.6 82.86
29 EO 3S W = -600 12.7 90.71
30 EO 5T E-1 50 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 66,43 %
N.9 Thierry Collart -Annie Zeimes 53,69 %
31 EO 2P E-1 50 7 50.00
32 EO 3C N-2 -100 5 35.71
33 EO 4K S = 130 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
Total : 191,8 / 336 = 57,08 %
PAIRE e.4 Francoise Duren -Giuseppe Napoli
N.9 Thierry Collart -Annie Zeimes 53,69 %
4 EO 4P S = 620 7 50.00
5 EO 1S E+1 -120 4.7 33.57
6 EO 3S E-1 100 1.3 9.29 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
N.4 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 40,58 %
10 EO 3S E+2 -660 13.9 99.29
11 EO 3ScN-1 -100 13.9 99.29
12 EO 3C W+1 -170 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 93,81 %
N11 Francoise Turin -Patricia Bardy 41,99 %
13 EO 4C W = -620 14 100.00
14 EO 3P N-1 -50 9 64.29
15 EO 5T S+2 640 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 85,71 %
N.5 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia 61,97 %
16 EO 4PcN = 590 0.1 0.71
17 EO 6S E-2 100 7 50.00
18 EO 3S W = -400 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 28,10 %
N12 Regine de Hemptinne -Marguerite Verstraeten 37,52 %
19 EO 1S E+4 -210 14 100.00
20 EO 4P E+2 -680 11 78.57
21 EO 4P E = -420 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 85,71 %
N.6 Christiane Vroninckx -Anne Beyne 56,85 %
22 EO 4C S+1 450 7 50.00
23 EO 6C W-3 300 0.1 0.71
24 EO 2S N-2 -100 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
N.7 Grazia Neuenschwander -Gerard Cooreman 45,75 %
28 EO 3K E+1 -130 7 50.00
29 EO 2S W+2 -180 7 50.00
30 EO 5T E+1 -420 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 60,95 %
N.8 Ghislaine Schelfhout -Claire Destin 46,60 %
34 EO 3P E = -140 4.7 33.57
35 EO 1S N+2 150 7 50.00
36 EO 3S N+1 630 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 28,10 %
Total : 186,6 / 336 = 55,54 %
PAIRE e.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Simone Munsterhjelm
N.9 Thierry Collart -Annie Zeimes 53,69 %
1 EO 6K S = 920 0.1 0.71
2 EO 3P S = 140 5.9 42.14
3 EO 4P N-1 -50 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 36,43 %
N10 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 59,11 %
7 EO 3P W-3 300 0.1 0.71
8 EO 2C N+1 140 9.3 66.43
9 EO 3S W-2 200 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
N.5 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia 61,97 %
13 EO 3C E = -140 9 64.29
14 EO 3P N-1 -50 9 64.29
15 EO 4C S+3 710 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
N12 Regine de Hemptinne -Marguerite Verstraeten 37,52 %
16 EO 4C W = -620 5.9 42.14
17 EO 3S E+2 -460 13.9 99.29
18 EO 3S W+2 -460 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 80,24 %
N.6 Christiane Vroninckx -Anne Beyne 56,85 %
19 EO 1S E = -90 4 28.57
20 EO 4P E+1 -650 3 21.43
21 EO 3P E+1 -170 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
N.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 67,21 %
22 EO 4C S = 420 11.6 82.86
23 EO 4C W-1 100 4.7 33.57
24 EO 4C N-5 -250 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 71,90 %
N.7 Grazia Neuenschwander -Gerard Cooreman 45,75 %
25 EO 5P S+1 480 8 57.14
26 EO 3T N-2 -200 14 100.00
27 EO 4P N-1 -50 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
N.8 Ghislaine Schelfhout -Claire Destin 46,60 %
31 EO 1S N = 90 3 21.43
32 EO 3C N-2 -100 5 35.71
33 EO 5K S-1 -50 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
Total : 185,2 / 336 = 55,12 %
PAIRE e.2 Stan Tabor -Michel Lievens
N.2 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 41,60 %
4 EO 4P S = 620 7 50.00
5 EO 1S E+1 -120 4.7 33.57
6 EO 2S E = -120 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 44,52 %
N.9 Thierry Collart -Annie Zeimes 53,69 %
7 EO 3T S+1 130 7 50.00
8 EO 2C N = 110 13.9 99.29
9 EO 3S W-1 100 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
N.3 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Marie Claire Vienne 45,31 %
10 EO 3S E+1 -630 10.4 74.29
11 EO 3S N = 400 5.9 42.14
12 EO 3S E-4 200 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 39,05 %
N10 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 59,11 %
13 EO 1P W+2 -140 9 64.29
14 EO 3P N-1 -50 9 64.29
15 EO 6C N = 1430 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
N.4 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 40,58 %
16 EO 4C W+2 -680 13.9 99.29
17 EO 6KcW-1 100 7 50.00
18 EO 4P W+1 -450 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 77,38 %
N.5 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia 61,97 %
22 EO 4C S+2 480 2.4 17.14
23 EO 4C W = -620 11.6 82.86
24 EO 3C N-2 -100 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 47,38 %
N.6 Christiane Vroninckx -Anne Beyne 56,85 %
28 EO 5K E = -400 9.3 66.43
29 EO 3S W = -600 12.7 90.71
30 EO 5T E-1 50 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 60,95 %
N.7 Grazia Neuenschwander -Gerard Cooreman 45,75 %
34 EO 4K S-1 -100 2.4 17.14
35 EO 1S S+2 150 7 50.00
36 EO 2K N+1 110 12.7 90.71 µ Tbl = 52,62 %
Total : 184,2 / 336 = 54,82 %
PAIRE e.9 Jean Verelst -Christiane Verelst
N11 Francoise Turin -Patricia Bardy 41,99 %
1 EO 4P N+1 450 9.3 66.43
2 EO 2P S+1 140 5.9 42.14
3 EO 3P S-1 -50 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
N12 Regine de Hemptinne -Marguerite Verstraeten 37,52 %
7 EO 3T S-1 -100 12.7 90.71
8 EO 2C N+2 170 2.4 17.14
9 EO 3ScS-3 -500 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
N.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 67,21 %
13 EO 4C W-1 100 1 7.14
14 EO 3C E-1 50 2 14.29
15 EO 6KcW-6 1400 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
N.2 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 41,60 %
19 EO 2T N-3 -150 10 71.43
20 EO 4P E+2 -680 11 78.57
21 EO 4P E = -420 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
N.9 Thierry Collart -Annie Zeimes 53,69 %
25 EO 6P S = 980 1 7.14
26 EO 2S N+1 150 3 21.43
27 EO 4P N-1 -50 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
N.4 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 40,58 %
28 EO 3S W+2 -460 13.9 99.29
29 EO 2P S-2 -200 9.3 66.43
30 EO 5T E+1 -420 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 82,86 %
N10 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 59,11 %
31 EO 1S E = -90 12 85.71
32 EO 3S W-1 100 1 7.14
33 EO 4K N = 130 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
N.5 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia 61,97 %
34 EO 4K S-2 -200 12.7 90.71
35 EO 1S S+2 150 7 50.00
36 EO 3S N = 600 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 52,62 %
Total : 183,4 / 336 = 54,58 %
PAIRE e11 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck
N12 Regine de Hemptinne -Marguerite Verstraeten 37,52 %
1 EO 4P N+2 480 4.7 33.57
2 EO 2P S+1 140 5.9 42.14
3 EO 4P N-1 -50 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 47,38 %
N.7 Grazia Neuenschwander -Gerard Cooreman 45,75 %
4 EO 4P S+2 680 0.1 0.71
5 EO 1S E+1 -120 4.7 33.57
6 EO 2S E = -120 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 28,10 %
N.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 67,21 %
7 EO 2C S+1 140 2.4 17.14
8 EO 2C N+1 140 9.3 66.43
9 EO 4P E-4 400 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 28,10 %
N.2 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 41,60 %
13 EO 2C W+1 -140 9 64.29
14 EO 2C E-1 50 2 14.29
15 EO 5T S+2 640 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
N.3 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Marie Claire Vienne 45,31 %
19 EO 1S E+2 -150 10 71.43
20 EO 4P E+2 -680 11 78.57
21 EO 4P E+1 -450 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
N.4 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 40,58 %
25 EO 6P S = 980 1 7.14
26 EO 2T N = 90 8 57.14
27 EO 4P N-1 -50 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
N11 Francoise Turin -Patricia Bardy 41,99 %
31 EO 1S W-1 50 7 50.00
32 EO 3K E = -110 10 71.43
33 EO 2K S+2 130 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
N.6 Christiane Vroninckx -Anne Beyne 56,85 %
34 EO 3P E+1 -170 8.1 57.86
35 EO 1S S+1 120 13.9 99.29
36 EO 2K N+1 110 12.7 90.71 µ Tbl = 82,62 %
Total : 180,2 / 336 = 53,63 %
PAIRE e.8 Didier Collart -Christian Meert
N11 Francoise Turin -Patricia Bardy 41,99 %
4 EO 4P S-1 -100 13.9 99.29
5 EO 1S E+2 -150 11.6 82.86
6 EO 2S E = -120 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 77,38 %
N12 Regine de Hemptinne -Marguerite Verstraeten 37,52 %
10 EO 3S E = -600 4.7 33.57
11 EO 2S N = 120 11.6 82.86
12 EO 3C W = -140 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 52,86 %
N.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 67,21 %
16 EO 4C W+1 -650 10.4 74.29
17 EO 3S E-2 100 7 50.00
18 EO 4P E-1 50 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
N.8 Ghislaine Schelfhout -Claire Destin 46,60 %
22 EO 4C S = 420 11.6 82.86
23 EO 4C W = -620 11.6 82.86
24 EO 3T N+1 130 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 55,48 %
N.3 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Marie Claire Vienne 45,31 %
25 EO 5P S+1 480 8 57.14
26 EO 3S N+1 630 0 0.00
27 EO 4P N-1 -50 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
N.9 Thierry Collart -Annie Zeimes 53,69 %
28 EO 5K E-1 50 1.3 9.29
29 EO 1P S-1 -100 0.1 0.71
30 EO 4C E-1 50 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 11,90 %
N.4 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 40,58 %
31 EO 1P E = -80 10 71.43
32 EO 3K E = -110 10 71.43
33 EO 3K S = 110 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
N10 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 59,11 %
34 EO 3K S = 110 0.1 0.71
35 EO 1S N+3 180 0.1 0.71
36 EO 1S N+2 150 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 17,14 %
Total : 156,7 / 336 = 46,64 %
PAIRE e.6 Myriam de Timary -Caroll Pucher
N10 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 59,11 %
4 EO 4P S+1 650 2.4 17.14
5 EO 1S E+2 -150 11.6 82.86
6 EO 2S E+2 -180 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 60,95 %
N11 Francoise Turin -Patricia Bardy 41,99 %
10 EO 3S E = -600 4.7 33.57
11 EO 3S S+1 430 2.4 17.14
12 EO 3C W+1 -170 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 44,52 %
N.6 Christiane Vroninckx -Anne Beyne 56,85 %
16 EO 4C W = -620 5.9 42.14
17 EO 6S E-5 250 0.1 0.71
18 EO 2P W+1 -140 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 20,00 %
N.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 67,21 %
19 EO 1S E+1 -120 6 42.86
20 EO 4P E+1 -650 3 21.43
21 EO 4P E-1 50 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
N.7 Grazia Neuenschwander -Gerard Cooreman 45,75 %
22 EO 4C S+2 480 2.4 17.14
23 EO 4C W-1 100 4.7 33.57
24 EO 4C N-2 -100 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
N.2 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 41,60 %
25 EO 4P S+1 450 14 100.00
26 EO 2C E+2 -170 12 85.71
27 EO 4P N+1 450 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
N.8 Ghislaine Schelfhout -Claire Destin 46,60 %
28 EO 3K E = -110 4.7 33.57
29 EO 2K E+2 -130 3.6 25.71
30 EO 5T E+1 -420 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 47,38 %
N.9 Thierry Collart -Annie Zeimes 53,69 %
34 EO 4T S-2 -200 12.7 90.71
35 EO 2S N+1 150 7 50.00
36 EO 2K N+2 130 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
Total : 152,6 / 336 = 45,42 %
PAIRE e.1 Dominique van de Werve -Marie Laure Peterbroeck
N.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 67,21 %
1 EO 4P N+2 480 4.7 33.57
2 EO 2P S+1 140 5.9 42.14
3 EO 3S S = 400 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 25,48 %
N.8 Ghislaine Schelfhout -Claire Destin 46,60 %
4 EO 3P S+3 230 11.6 82.86
5 EO 4T W-2 100 0.1 0.71
6 EO 3PcN-4 -800 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 60,95 %
N.2 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 41,60 %
7 EO 3S N-1 -100 12.7 90.71
8 EO 2C S+2 170 2.4 17.14
9 EO 4CcS-2 -300 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 63,57 %
N.9 Thierry Collart -Annie Zeimes 53,69 %
10 EO 3S E+1 -630 10.4 74.29
11 EO 2S N+2 180 9.3 66.43
12 EO 2C W+2 -170 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 74,52 %
N.3 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Marie Claire Vienne 45,31 %
13 EO 2C W+1 -140 9 64.29
14 EO 2C E-1 50 2 14.29
15 EO 4C S+3 710 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
N.4 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 40,58 %
19 EO 3C N-1 -50 2 14.29
20 EO 4P E+1 -650 3 21.43
21 EO 3T N+1 130 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 11,90 %
N.5 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia 61,97 %
25 EO 4P S+2 480 8 57.14
26 EO 2S N+1 150 3 21.43
27 EO 4P N-1 -50 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
N.6 Christiane Vroninckx -Anne Beyne 56,85 %
31 EO 1C S+1 110 0 0.00
32 EO 3K E = -110 10 71.43
33 EO 3S S = 400 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 152,3 / 336 = 45,33 %
PAIRE e.3 Lydia Luyten -Prisca Tondreau
N.8 Ghislaine Schelfhout -Claire Destin 46,60 %
1 EO 4P N = 420 11.6 82.86
2 EO 3P S = 140 5.9 42.14
3 EO 3S S-3 -150 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 74,76 %
N.3 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Marie Claire Vienne 45,31 %
7 EO 3T S+1 130 7 50.00
8 EO 2C N+1 140 9.3 66.43
9 EO 3S W-2 200 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 47,38 %
N10 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 59,11 %
10 EO 5P W-3 300 0.1 0.71
11 EO 3S S = 400 5.9 42.14
12 EO 3C W = -140 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 28,33 %
N.4 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 40,58 %
13 EO 2C W = -110 4 28.57
14 EO 3P N-1 -50 9 64.29
15 EO 7C N = 2210 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
N11 Francoise Turin -Patricia Bardy 41,99 %
16 EO 4C W+1 -650 10.4 74.29
17 EO 6P W-3 150 2.4 17.14
18 EO 4P E = -420 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 49,76 %
N.5 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia 61,97 %
19 EO 2C S+2 170 0 0.00
20 EO 4P E+1 -650 3 21.43
21 EO 4P E-1 50 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 14,29 %
N.6 Christiane Vroninckx -Anne Beyne 56,85 %
25 EO 5P S+1 480 8 57.14
26 EO 2C E+1 -140 10 71.43
27 EO 4P N = 420 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
N.7 Grazia Neuenschwander -Gerard Cooreman 45,75 %
31 EO 1S N-2 -200 14 100.00
32 EO 3S W = -600 14 100.00
33 EO 3S S+3 490 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 151,1 / 336 = 44,97 %
PAIRE e10 Catherine de Moffarts -Sandra Dallemagne
N.6 Christiane Vroninckx -Anne Beyne 56,85 %
1 EO 4P N+2 480 4.7 33.57
2 EO 2P S+1 140 5.9 42.14
3 EO 2P N = 110 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 36,43 %
N12 Regine de Hemptinne -Marguerite Verstraeten 37,52 %
4 EO 4P S = 620 7 50.00
5 EO 1S E+2 -150 11.6 82.86
6 EO 4C E-1 100 1.3 9.29 µ Tbl = 47,38 %
N.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 67,21 %
10 EO 3S E = -600 4.7 33.57
11 EO 3S N+2 460 0.1 0.71
12 EO 4C W-2 100 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 17,14 %
N.2 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 41,60 %
16 EO 2P N+1 140 2.4 17.14
17 EO 3S E+1 -430 11.6 82.86
18 EO 4P E = -420 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 52,62 %
N.3 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Marie Claire Vienne 45,31 %
22 EO 4C S+2 480 2.4 17.14
23 EO 4C W = -620 11.6 82.86
24 EO 4C S-4 -200 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 60,95 %
N10 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 59,11 %
28 EO 4K E-1 50 1.3 9.29
29 EO 2K E+2 -130 3.6 25.71
30 EO 4C E-1 50 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 20,24 %
N.5 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia 61,97 %
31 EO 1S N = 90 3 21.43
32 EO 4K E-1 100 1 7.14
33 EO 3S S+1 430 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 14,29 %
N11 Francoise Turin -Patricia Bardy 41,99 %
34 EO 3P E+1 -170 8.1 57.86
35 EO 1S S+2 150 7 50.00
36 EO 1S N+3 180 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 47,14 %
Total : 124,4 / 336 = 37,02 %
PAIRE e12 -
N.7 Grazia Neuenschwander -Gerard Cooreman 45,75 %
1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
N.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 67,21 %
4 EO BYE 0 0.00
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
N.8 Ghislaine Schelfhout -Claire Destin 46,60 %
7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
N.2 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 41,60 %
10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
N.3 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Marie Claire Vienne 45,31 %
16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
N.4 Colette Heerinckx -Annie Legrand 40,58 %
22 EO BYE 0 0.00
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
N.5 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia 61,97 %
28 EO BYE 0 0.00
29 EO BYE 0 0.00
30 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
N12 Regine de Hemptinne -Marguerite Verstraeten 37,52 %
34 EO BYE 0 0.00
35 EO BYE 0 0.00
36 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 504 = 0,00 %
|