B.C.O.B.
Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 57,99 A.4 Alan Beckman -Hugo Baetens
--- 2 53,74 A.3 Philippe van der Gracht -Dominique Sassen
--- 3 52,69 A11 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart
--- 4 51,94 A.5 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens
--- 5 50,60 A.9 Claire Destin -Elisabeth Harmant
--- 6 50,58 A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans
--- 7 49,05 A10 Marc Roobroeck -Philippe Leclercq
--- 8 47,11 A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Teresa Dekoster
--- 9 46,87 A.7 Annie Legrand -Colette Heerinckx
--- 10 45,51 A.8 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Claire Derieuw
--- 11 45,34 A.2 Dilva Haym -Michel Lievens
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 61,37 a.4 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne
--- 2 61,04 a.9 Pascale Graton -Victoria Romeu
--- 3 52,29 a.7 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille
--- 4 50,06 a.5 Paul Henri Oosterlynck -Jean van Caloen
--- 5 49,64 a.6 Benedicte Albani -Nathalie de Laminne
--- 6 49,40 a.1 Nadine Brabant -Caroline Lallia
--- 7 48,01 a10 Michele Verhulst -Marie J. de Wagheneire
--- 8 44,14 a.2 Didier Collart -Jacques Podevyn
--- 9 42,23 a.3 Caroll Pucher -Myriam de Timary
--- 10 41,61 a.8 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes
--- 11 0,00 a11 -
PAIRE A.4 Alan Beckman -Hugo Baetens
a.4 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 61,37 %
10 NS 3C S-1 -100 2.4 17.14
11 NS 6P W = -980 12.7 90.71
12 NS 3S S+1 630 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
a.3 Caroll Pucher -Myriam de Timary 42,23 %
13 NS 6S N+1 1470 11 78.57
14 NS 3K E-3 150 14 100.00
15 NS 3S N+2 660 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 90,48 %
a.2 Didier Collart -Jacques Podevyn 44,14 %
16 NS 1S E+2 -150 1.3 9.29
17 NS 4C W+2 -480 7 50.00
18 NS 4P E = -420 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 25,48 %
a.1 Nadine Brabant -Caroline Lallia 49,40 %
19 NS 4P W+2 -680 7 50.00
20 NS 4P N = 620 14 100.00
21 NS 4P W+2 -480 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
a11 - 0,00 %
22 NS BYE 0 0.00
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a10 Michele Verhulst -Marie J. de Wagheneire 48,01 %
25 NS 4P N = 420 10 71.43
26 NS 4C W = -620 2 14.29
27 NS 4P E = -420 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 42,62 %
a.9 Pascale Graton -Victoria Romeu 61,04 %
28 NS 4K S = 130 13.9 99.29
29 NS 3S S-3 -300 0.1 0.71
30 NS 1S W = -90 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.8 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 41,61 %
31 NS 1S E-1 50 10.4 74.29
32 NS 4P E-1 100 11.6 82.86
33 NS 3S S-1 -50 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 66,43 %
Total : 170,5 / 294 = 57,99 %
PAIRE A.3 Philippe van der Gracht -Dominique Sassen
a.3 Caroll Pucher -Myriam de Timary 42,23 %
7 NS 3S W = -600 1.3 9.29
8 NS 4K W-2 100 7 50.00
9 NS 1S N+4 210 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 52,86 %
a.2 Didier Collart -Jacques Podevyn 44,14 %
10 NS 3S W-3 300 13.9 99.29
11 NS 6P W+1 -1010 5.9 42.14
12 NS 1S S+1 120 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 47,38 %
a.1 Nadine Brabant -Caroline Lallia 49,40 %
13 NS 6S N+1 1470 11 78.57
14 NS 1S S = 90 7 50.00
15 NS 3S N = 600 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
a11 - 0,00 %
16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a10 Michele Verhulst -Marie J. de Wagheneire 48,01 %
19 NS 4P W+2 -680 7 50.00
20 NS 3C E-2 200 10 71.43
21 NS 4P W+1 -450 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
a.9 Pascale Graton -Victoria Romeu 61,04 %
22 NS 3S E-2 200 12.7 90.71
23 NS 4P W+1 -650 0.1 0.71
24 NS 3P W-1 50 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
a.8 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 41,61 %
25 NS 4P N = 420 10 71.43
26 NS 3P S+1 170 13 92.86
27 NS 4P E = -420 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 68,81 %
a.7 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 52,29 %
28 NS 3C W = -140 7 50.00
29 NS 4C S = 620 10.4 74.29
30 NS 1S W+1 -120 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
Total : 158,0 / 294 = 53,74 %
PAIRE A11 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart
a10 Michele Verhulst -Marie J. de Wagheneire 48,01 %
1 NS 3S W+2 -460 12.7 90.71
2 NS 3P E-2 100 13.9 99.29
3 NS 6P S-1 -50 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 74,52 %
a.9 Pascale Graton -Victoria Romeu 61,04 %
4 NS 1S W+5 -240 4.7 33.57
5 NS 3S E = -400 0.1 0.71
6 NS 2P N+4 230 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 17,14 %
a.8 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 41,61 %
7 NS 3S E-2 200 11.6 82.86
8 NS 4KcW-2 300 11.6 82.86
9 NS 1S N+2 150 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 77,38 %
a.7 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 52,29 %
10 NS 2T E = -90 8.1 57.86
11 NS 6P W+1 -1010 5.9 42.14
12 NS 2P S+1 140 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 39,05 %
a.6 Benedicte Albani -Nathalie de Laminne 49,64 %
13 NS 6S N = 1440 5 35.71
14 NS 2P S = 110 12 85.71
15 NS 2T S-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
a.5 Paul Henri Oosterlynck -Jean van Caloen 50,06 %
16 NS 1S E = -90 11.6 82.86
17 NS 6C W = -980 1.3 9.29
18 NS 3T N+3 170 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
a.4 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 61,37 %
19 NS 4P E+2 -680 7 50.00
20 NS 3T S+1 130 7 50.00
21 NS 3S W+1 -430 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
a11 - 0,00 %
31 NS BYE 0 0.00
32 NS BYE 0 0.00
33 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 154,9 / 294 = 52,69 %
PAIRE A.5 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens
a.9 Pascale Graton -Victoria Romeu 61,04 %
1 NS 6S E = -990 1.3 9.29
2 NS 4C W-1 50 10.4 74.29
3 NS 5P S+1 480 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 55,48 %
a.5 Paul Henri Oosterlynck -Jean van Caloen 50,06 %
13 NS 6S N = 1440 5 35.71
14 NS 3K N-4 -200 2 14.29
15 NS 2K S+2 130 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
a.4 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 61,37 %
16 NS 1S E+1 -120 7 50.00
17 NS 4C W+1 -450 12.7 90.71
18 NS 4K N+1 150 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 66,19 %
a.3 Caroll Pucher -Myriam de Timary 42,23 %
19 NS 4P W+2 -680 7 50.00
20 NS 2C E-1 100 3 21.43
21 NS 2P W+4 -230 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
a.2 Didier Collart -Jacques Podevyn 44,14 %
22 NS 4PcW+1 -990 0.1 0.71
23 NS 3P W+2 -200 11.6 82.86
24 NS 4K S+1 150 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 60,95 %
a.1 Nadine Brabant -Caroline Lallia 49,40 %
25 NS 4P N-2 -100 2 14.29
26 NS 3P S+1 170 13 92.86
27 NS 4P E = -420 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 49,76 %
a11 - 0,00 %
28 NS BYE 0 0.00
29 NS BYE 0 0.00
30 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a10 Michele Verhulst -Marie J. de Wagheneire 48,01 %
31 NS 2P W-2 100 13.9 99.29
32 NS 3S E+1 -630 1.3 9.29
33 NS 3C S-1 -50 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 50,24 %
Total : 152,7 / 294 = 51,94 %
PAIRE A.9 Claire Destin -Elisabeth Harmant
a.6 Benedicte Albani -Nathalie de Laminne 49,64 %
1 NS 3S W+4 -520 4.7 33.57
2 NS 2C W+1 -140 2.4 17.14
3 NS 6T N = 920 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.5 Paul Henri Oosterlynck -Jean van Caloen 50,06 %
4 NS 3S W+3 -690 1.3 9.29
5 NS 4C W-1 50 8.1 57.86
6 NS 3S S+2 460 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 36,43 %
a.4 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 61,37 %
7 NS 3S W = -600 1.3 9.29
8 NS 3K W = -110 0.1 0.71
9 NS 2K N = 90 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 14,52 %
a.3 Caroll Pucher -Myriam de Timary 42,23 %
10 NS 1S W = -90 8.1 57.86
11 NS 6P W = -980 12.7 90.71
12 NS 1S S+2 150 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 68,81 %
a.2 Didier Collart -Jacques Podevyn 44,14 %
13 NS 6S N+1 1470 11 78.57
14 NS 1S S = 90 7 50.00
15 NS 3S N+1 630 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.9 Pascale Graton -Victoria Romeu 61,04 %
25 NS 4P N = 420 10 71.43
26 NS 4C E-1 100 7 50.00
27 NS 4P E = -420 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 54,52 %
a.8 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 41,61 %
28 NS 3C W-1 50 11.6 82.86
29 NS 4C N+1 650 13.9 99.29
30 NS 1S W = -90 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 77,38 %
a.7 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 52,29 %
31 NS 2T E = -90 4.7 33.57
32 NS 4P E = -620 4.7 33.57
33 NS 3S S-1 -50 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 36,43 %
Total : 170,0 / 336 = 50,60 %
PAIRE A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans
a.1 Nadine Brabant -Caroline Lallia 49,40 %
1 NS 3S E+3 -490 8.1 57.86
2 NS 3T S-1 -100 7 50.00
3 NS 6T S-1 -50 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 47,14 %
a11 - 0,00 %
4 NS BYE 0 0.00
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a10 Michele Verhulst -Marie J. de Wagheneire 48,01 %
7 NS 1S E+1 -120 5.9 42.14
8 NS 3K W-1 50 3.6 25.71
9 NS 3C W = -140 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 22,86 %
a.9 Pascale Graton -Victoria Romeu 61,04 %
10 NS 3C S-1 -100 2.4 17.14
11 NS 6P W+1 -1010 5.9 42.14
12 NS 1S S+2 150 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 39,05 %
a.8 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 41,61 %
13 NS 3S N+4 720 2 14.29
14 NS 2C E+1 -140 4 28.57
15 NS 3S N+2 660 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
a.7 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 52,29 %
16 NS 1S E+1 -120 7 50.00
17 NS 4C W+2 -480 7 50.00
18 NS 5KcN = 750 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 66,43 %
a.6 Benedicte Albani -Nathalie de Laminne 49,64 %
19 NS 4P W+2 -680 7 50.00
20 NS 3T S+1 130 7 50.00
21 NS 4P W+2 -480 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
a.5 Paul Henri Oosterlynck -Jean van Caloen 50,06 %
22 NS 3S E-2 200 12.7 90.71
23 NS 4P W-1 100 13.9 99.29
24 NS 3K S+1 130 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 88,10 %
Total : 148,7 / 294 = 50,58 %
PAIRE A10 Marc Roobroeck -Philippe Leclercq
a.8 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 41,61 %
1 NS 4S E+1 -460 12.7 90.71
2 NS 2C W-1 50 10.4 74.29
3 NS 7PcS-1 -100 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 55,24 %
a.7 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 52,29 %
4 NS 2C E+2 -170 8.1 57.86
5 NS 5K E-2 100 12.7 90.71
6 NS 3S S+3 490 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 77,14 %
a.6 Benedicte Albani -Nathalie de Laminne 49,64 %
7 NS 3S W-2 200 11.6 82.86
8 NS 3K W-1 50 3.6 25.71
9 NS 1S N+3 180 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 63,81 %
a.5 Paul Henri Oosterlynck -Jean van Caloen 50,06 %
10 NS 2C S = 110 11.6 82.86
11 NS 7P W = -1510 0.1 0.71
12 NS 1S S+2 150 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 47,14 %
a.4 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 61,37 %
13 NS 3S N+3 690 0 0.00
14 NS 3ScS-6 -1400 0 0.00
15 NS 3K S+1 130 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 7,14 %
a.3 Caroll Pucher -Myriam de Timary 42,23 %
16 NS 1T N+1 90 13.9 99.29
17 NS 4C W+2 -480 7 50.00
18 NS 4P E = -420 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 55,48 %
a10 Michele Verhulst -Marie J. de Wagheneire 48,01 %
28 NS 3S S-5 -500 1.3 9.29
29 NS 4C N = 620 10.4 74.29
30 NS 1S W = -90 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 44,52 %
a.9 Pascale Graton -Victoria Romeu 61,04 %
31 NS 2S W = -120 0.1 0.71
32 NS 4P E-1 100 11.6 82.86
33 NS 3K N-1 -50 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 41,90 %
Total : 164,8 / 336 = 49,05 %
PAIRE A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Teresa Dekoster
a11 - 0,00 %
1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a10 Michele Verhulst -Marie J. de Wagheneire 48,01 %
4 NS 3T W+2 -150 11.6 82.86
5 NS 3K E = -110 3.6 25.71
6 NS 4S S+1 460 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 50,24 %
a.6 Benedicte Albani -Nathalie de Laminne 49,64 %
16 NS 1S E+1 -120 7 50.00
17 NS 4C W+1 -450 12.7 90.71
18 NS 4K N+1 150 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 66,19 %
a.5 Paul Henri Oosterlynck -Jean van Caloen 50,06 %
19 NS 4P W+2 -680 7 50.00
20 NS 3S S-1 -100 0 0.00
21 NS 4P W+2 -480 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
a.4 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 61,37 %
22 NS 4CcN-2 -300 9.3 66.43
23 NS 4P W = -620 5.9 42.14
24 NS 4K S-1 -50 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 41,90 %
a.3 Caroll Pucher -Myriam de Timary 42,23 %
25 NS 6P N-2 -100 2 14.29
26 NS 2P S+1 140 10 71.43
27 NS 4P E = -420 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 42,62 %
a.2 Didier Collart -Jacques Podevyn 44,14 %
28 NS 3S N-2 -200 4.7 33.57
29 NS 4C N-1 -100 3.6 25.71
30 NS 1S W-1 50 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 52,86 %
a.1 Nadine Brabant -Caroline Lallia 49,40 %
31 NS 1S E = -90 4.7 33.57
32 NS 3S E+1 -630 1.3 9.29
33 NS 2P N = 110 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 47,38 %
Total : 138,5 / 294 = 47,11 %
PAIRE A.7 Annie Legrand -Colette Heerinckx
a.2 Didier Collart -Jacques Podevyn 44,14 %
1 NS 3S W+3 -490 8.1 57.86
2 NS 2C W+1 -140 2.4 17.14
3 NS 4P S+1 450 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 47,14 %
a.1 Nadine Brabant -Caroline Lallia 49,40 %
4 NS 3S W+3 -690 1.3 9.29
5 NS 5K E-1 50 8.1 57.86
6 NS 4P N+2 480 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 44,52 %
a11 - 0,00 %
7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.7 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 52,29 %
19 NS 5P W+1 -680 7 50.00
20 NS 4C E-3 300 12 85.71
21 NS 4P W+2 -480 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
a.6 Benedicte Albani -Nathalie de Laminne 49,64 %
22 NS 3S E = -600 2.4 17.14
23 NS 4P W = -620 5.9 42.14
24 NS 3P W-2 100 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 36,43 %
a.5 Paul Henri Oosterlynck -Jean van Caloen 50,06 %
25 NS 4P N = 420 10 71.43
26 NS 4C E = -620 2 14.29
27 NS 2P E+2 -170 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 61,67 %
a.4 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 61,37 %
28 NS 3S N-5 -500 1.3 9.29
29 NS 4C N-1 -100 3.6 25.71
30 NS 1S W = -90 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 28,33 %
a.3 Caroll Pucher -Myriam de Timary 42,23 %
31 NS 1S E = -90 4.7 33.57
32 NS 4P E-1 100 11.6 82.86
33 NS 4C S-1 -50 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 52,86 %
Total : 137,8 / 294 = 46,87 %
PAIRE A.8 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Claire Derieuw
a.4 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 61,37 %
1 NS 6S W = -990 1.3 9.29
2 NS 3C W = -140 2.4 17.14
3 NS 4P S-1 -50 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 20,00 %
a.3 Caroll Pucher -Myriam de Timary 42,23 %
4 NS 1S W = -90 13.9 99.29
5 NS 3K E = -110 3.6 25.71
6 NS 6S S-1 -50 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 41,90 %
a.2 Didier Collart -Jacques Podevyn 44,14 %
7 NS 2S E = -120 5.9 42.14
8 NS 5KcW-3 500 13.9 99.29
9 NS 2K N+1 110 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 63,81 %
a.1 Nadine Brabant -Caroline Lallia 49,40 %
10 NS 3C S-1 -100 2.4 17.14
11 NS 6P W+1 -1010 5.9 42.14
12 NS 1S S+2 150 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 39,05 %
a.8 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 41,61 %
22 NS 4CcN-3 -500 5.9 42.14
23 NS 4P W = -620 5.9 42.14
24 NS 3K S+1 130 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 52,86 %
a.7 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 52,29 %
25 NS 5PcN-1 -100 2 14.29
26 NS 4C E-1 100 7 50.00
27 NS 4P E = -420 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 35,48 %
a.6 Benedicte Albani -Nathalie de Laminne 49,64 %
28 NS 3S N-1 -100 9.3 66.43
29 NS 3C N+2 200 7 50.00
30 NS 1S W = -90 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,48 %
a.5 Paul Henri Oosterlynck -Jean van Caloen 50,06 %
31 NS 2S E-1 50 10.4 74.29
32 NS 3S E = -600 7 50.00
33 NS 3S S-1 -50 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 55,48 %
Total : 152,9 / 336 = 45,51 %
PAIRE A.2 Dilva Haym -Michel Lievens
a.2 Didier Collart -Jacques Podevyn 44,14 %
4 NS 3C E+1 -170 8.1 57.86
5 NS 5K E-2 100 12.7 90.71
6 NS 6P N = 980 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 82,62 %
a.1 Nadine Brabant -Caroline Lallia 49,40 %
7 NS 3P W-2 200 11.6 82.86
8 NS 3P N+1 170 9.3 66.43
9 NS 2K N-1 -50 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 55,48 %
a11 - 0,00 %
10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a10 Michele Verhulst -Marie J. de Wagheneire 48,01 %
13 NS 6S N+1 1470 11 78.57
14 NS 3C E-2 100 10 71.43
15 NS 3S N = 600 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.9 Pascale Graton -Victoria Romeu 61,04 %
16 NS 1S S-3 -150 1.3 9.29
17 NS 6C W = -980 1.3 9.29
18 NS 4C W = -420 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 11,90 %
a.8 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 41,61 %
19 NS 4P E+2 -680 7 50.00
20 NS 3C E-1 100 3 21.43
21 NS 3S E+3 -490 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
a.7 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 52,29 %
22 NS 5CcN-3 -500 5.9 42.14
23 NS 4P W = -620 5.9 42.14
24 NS 3C N-2 -100 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 28,33 %
a.6 Benedicte Albani -Nathalie de Laminne 49,64 %
25 NS 4P N = 420 10 71.43
26 NS 4C E = -620 2 14.29
27 NS 60%50% Ajust 8.4 60.00 µ Tbl = 48,57 %
Total : 133,3 / 294 = 45,34 %
PAIRE a.4 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne
A.8 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Claire Derieuw 45,51 %
1 EO 6S W = -990 12.7 90.71
2 EO 3C W = -140 11.6 82.86
3 EO 4P S-1 -50 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 80,00 %
A.9 Claire Destin -Elisabeth Harmant 50,60 %
7 EO 3S W = -600 12.7 90.71
8 EO 3K W = -110 13.9 99.29
9 EO 2K N = 90 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 85,48 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Hugo Baetens 57,99 %
10 EO 3C S-1 -100 11.6 82.86
11 EO 6P W = -980 1.3 9.29
12 EO 3S S+1 630 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
A10 Marc Roobroeck -Philippe Leclercq 49,05 %
13 EO 3S N+3 690 14 100.00
14 EO 3ScS-6 -1400 14 100.00
15 EO 3K S+1 130 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 92,86 %
A.5 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 51,94 %
16 EO 1S E+1 -120 7 50.00
17 EO 4C W+1 -450 1.3 9.29
18 EO 4K N+1 150 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 33,81 %
A11 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 52,69 %
19 EO 4P E+2 -680 7 50.00
20 EO 3T S+1 130 7 50.00
21 EO 3S W+1 -430 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Teresa Dekoster 47,11 %
22 EO 4CcN-2 -300 4.7 33.57
23 EO 4P W = -620 8.1 57.86
24 EO 4K S-1 -50 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 58,10 %
A.7 Annie Legrand -Colette Heerinckx 46,87 %
28 EO 3S N-5 -500 12.7 90.71
29 EO 4C N-1 -100 10.4 74.29
30 EO 1S W = -90 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 71,67 %
Total : 206,2 / 336 = 61,37 %
PAIRE a.9 Pascale Graton -Victoria Romeu
A.5 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 51,94 %
1 EO 6S E = -990 12.7 90.71
2 EO 4C W-1 50 3.6 25.71
3 EO 5P S+1 480 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 44,52 %
A11 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 52,69 %
4 EO 1S W+5 -240 9.3 66.43
5 EO 3S E = -400 13.9 99.29
6 EO 2P N+4 230 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 82,86 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 50,58 %
10 EO 3C S-1 -100 11.6 82.86
11 EO 6P W+1 -1010 8.1 57.86
12 EO 1S S+2 150 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 60,95 %
A.2 Dilva Haym -Michel Lievens 45,34 %
16 EO 1S S-3 -150 12.7 90.71
17 EO 6C W = -980 12.7 90.71
18 EO 4C W = -420 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 88,10 %
A.3 Philippe van der Gracht -Dominique Sassen 53,74 %
22 EO 3S E-2 200 1.3 9.29
23 EO 4P W+1 -650 13.9 99.29
24 EO 3P W-1 50 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
A.9 Claire Destin -Elisabeth Harmant 50,60 %
25 EO 4P N = 420 4 28.57
26 EO 4C E-1 100 7 50.00
27 EO 4P E = -420 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 45,48 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Hugo Baetens 57,99 %
28 EO 4K S = 130 0.1 0.71
29 EO 3S S-3 -300 13.9 99.29
30 EO 1S W = -90 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A10 Marc Roobroeck -Philippe Leclercq 49,05 %
31 EO 2S W = -120 13.9 99.29
32 EO 4P E-1 100 2.4 17.14
33 EO 3K N-1 -50 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 58,10 %
Total : 205,1 / 336 = 61,04 %
PAIRE a.7 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille
A10 Marc Roobroeck -Philippe Leclercq 49,05 %
4 EO 2C E+2 -170 5.9 42.14
5 EO 5K E-2 100 1.3 9.29
6 EO 3S S+3 490 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 22,86 %
A11 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 52,69 %
10 EO 2T E = -90 5.9 42.14
11 EO 6P W+1 -1010 8.1 57.86
12 EO 2P S+1 140 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 60,95 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 50,58 %
16 EO 1S E+1 -120 7 50.00
17 EO 4C W+2 -480 7 50.00
18 EO 5KcN = 750 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 33,57 %
A.7 Annie Legrand -Colette Heerinckx 46,87 %
19 EO 5P W+1 -680 7 50.00
20 EO 4C E-3 300 2 14.29
21 EO 4P W+2 -480 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
A.2 Dilva Haym -Michel Lievens 45,34 %
22 EO 5CcN-3 -500 8.1 57.86
23 EO 4P W = -620 8.1 57.86
24 EO 3C N-2 -100 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 71,67 %
A.8 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Claire Derieuw 45,51 %
25 EO 5PcN-1 -100 12 85.71
26 EO 4C E-1 100 7 50.00
27 EO 4P E = -420 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 64,52 %
A.3 Philippe van der Gracht -Dominique Sassen 53,74 %
28 EO 3C W = -140 7 50.00
29 EO 4C S = 620 3.6 25.71
30 EO 1S W+1 -120 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
A.9 Claire Destin -Elisabeth Harmant 50,60 %
31 EO 2T E = -90 9.3 66.43
32 EO 4P E = -620 9.3 66.43
33 EO 3S S-1 -50 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 63,57 %
Total : 175,7 / 336 = 52,29 %
PAIRE a.5 Paul Henri Oosterlynck -Jean van Caloen
A.9 Claire Destin -Elisabeth Harmant 50,60 %
4 EO 3S W+3 -690 12.7 90.71
5 EO 4C W-1 50 5.9 42.14
6 EO 3S S+2 460 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 63,57 %
A10 Marc Roobroeck -Philippe Leclercq 49,05 %
10 EO 2C S = 110 2.4 17.14
11 EO 7P W = -1510 13.9 99.29
12 EO 1S S+2 150 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 52,86 %
A.5 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 51,94 %
13 EO 6S N = 1440 9 64.29
14 EO 3K N-4 -200 12 85.71
15 EO 2K S+2 130 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
A11 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 52,69 %
16 EO 1S E = -90 2.4 17.14
17 EO 6C W = -980 12.7 90.71
18 EO 3T N+3 170 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Teresa Dekoster 47,11 %
19 EO 4P W+2 -680 7 50.00
20 EO 3S S-1 -100 14 100.00
21 EO 4P W+2 -480 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 50,58 %
22 EO 3S E-2 200 1.3 9.29
23 EO 4P W-1 100 0.1 0.71
24 EO 3K S+1 130 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 11,90 %
A.7 Annie Legrand -Colette Heerinckx 46,87 %
25 EO 4P N = 420 4 28.57
26 EO 4C E = -620 12 85.71
27 EO 2P E+2 -170 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 38,33 %
A.8 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Claire Derieuw 45,51 %
31 EO 2S E-1 50 3.6 25.71
32 EO 3S E = -600 7 50.00
33 EO 3S S-1 -50 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 44,52 %
Total : 168,2 / 336 = 50,06 %
PAIRE a.6 Benedicte Albani -Nathalie de Laminne
A.9 Claire Destin -Elisabeth Harmant 50,60 %
1 EO 3S W+4 -520 9.3 66.43
2 EO 2C W+1 -140 11.6 82.86
3 EO 6T N = 920 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A10 Marc Roobroeck -Philippe Leclercq 49,05 %
7 EO 3S W-2 200 2.4 17.14
8 EO 3K W-1 50 10.4 74.29
9 EO 1S N+3 180 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 36,19 %
A11 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 52,69 %
13 EO 6S N = 1440 9 64.29
14 EO 2P S = 110 2 14.29
15 EO 2T S-1 -100 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Teresa Dekoster 47,11 %
16 EO 1S E+1 -120 7 50.00
17 EO 4C W+1 -450 1.3 9.29
18 EO 4K N+1 150 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 33,81 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 50,58 %
19 EO 4P W+2 -680 7 50.00
20 EO 3T S+1 130 7 50.00
21 EO 4P W+2 -480 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
A.7 Annie Legrand -Colette Heerinckx 46,87 %
22 EO 3S E = -600 11.6 82.86
23 EO 4P W = -620 8.1 57.86
24 EO 3P W-2 100 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 63,57 %
A.2 Dilva Haym -Michel Lievens 45,34 %
25 EO 4P N = 420 4 28.57
26 EO 4C E = -620 12 85.71
27 EO 60%50% Ajust 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
A.8 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Claire Derieuw 45,51 %
28 EO 3S N-1 -100 4.7 33.57
29 EO 3C N+2 200 7 50.00
30 EO 1S W = -90 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 44,52 %
Total : 166,8 / 336 = 49,64 %
PAIRE a.1 Nadine Brabant -Caroline Lallia
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 50,58 %
1 EO 3S E+3 -490 5.9 42.14
2 EO 3T S-1 -100 7 50.00
3 EO 6T S-1 -50 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 52,86 %
A.7 Annie Legrand -Colette Heerinckx 46,87 %
4 EO 3S W+3 -690 12.7 90.71
5 EO 5K E-1 50 5.9 42.14
6 EO 4P N+2 480 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 55,48 %
A.2 Dilva Haym -Michel Lievens 45,34 %
7 EO 3P W-2 200 2.4 17.14
8 EO 3P N+1 170 4.7 33.57
9 EO 2K N-1 -50 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 44,52 %
A.8 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Claire Derieuw 45,51 %
10 EO 3C S-1 -100 11.6 82.86
11 EO 6P W+1 -1010 8.1 57.86
12 EO 1S S+2 150 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 60,95 %
A.3 Philippe van der Gracht -Dominique Sassen 53,74 %
13 EO 6S N+1 1470 3 21.43
14 EO 1S S = 90 7 50.00
15 EO 3S N = 600 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Hugo Baetens 57,99 %
19 EO 4P W+2 -680 7 50.00
20 EO 4P N = 620 0 0.00
21 EO 4P W+2 -480 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
A.5 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 51,94 %
25 EO 4P N-2 -100 12 85.71
26 EO 3P S+1 170 1 7.14
27 EO 4P E = -420 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 50,24 %
A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Teresa Dekoster 47,11 %
31 EO 1S E = -90 9.3 66.43
32 EO 3S E+1 -630 12.7 90.71
33 EO 2P N = 110 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 52,62 %
Total : 166,0 / 336 = 49,40 %
PAIRE a10 Michele Verhulst -Marie J. de Wagheneire
A11 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 52,69 %
1 EO 3S W+2 -460 1.3 9.29
2 EO 3P E-2 100 0.1 0.71
3 EO 6P S-1 -50 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 25,48 %
A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Teresa Dekoster 47,11 %
4 EO 3T W+2 -150 2.4 17.14
5 EO 3K E = -110 10.4 74.29
6 EO 4S S+1 460 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 49,76 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 50,58 %
7 EO 1S E+1 -120 8.1 57.86
8 EO 3K W-1 50 10.4 74.29
9 EO 3C W = -140 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 77,14 %
A.2 Dilva Haym -Michel Lievens 45,34 %
13 EO 6S N+1 1470 3 21.43
14 EO 3C E-2 100 4 28.57
15 EO 3S N = 600 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.3 Philippe van der Gracht -Dominique Sassen 53,74 %
19 EO 4P W+2 -680 7 50.00
20 EO 3C E-2 200 4 28.57
21 EO 4P W+1 -450 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Hugo Baetens 57,99 %
25 EO 4P N = 420 4 28.57
26 EO 4C W = -620 12 85.71
27 EO 4P E = -420 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 57,38 %
A10 Marc Roobroeck -Philippe Leclercq 49,05 %
28 EO 3S S-5 -500 12.7 90.71
29 EO 4C N = 620 3.6 25.71
30 EO 1S W = -90 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,48 %
A.5 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 51,94 %
31 EO 2P W-2 100 0.1 0.71
32 EO 3S E+1 -630 12.7 90.71
33 EO 3C S-1 -50 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 49,76 %
Total : 161,3 / 336 = 48,01 %
PAIRE a.2 Didier Collart -Jacques Podevyn
A.7 Annie Legrand -Colette Heerinckx 46,87 %
1 EO 3S W+3 -490 5.9 42.14
2 EO 2C W+1 -140 11.6 82.86
3 EO 4P S+1 450 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 52,86 %
A.2 Dilva Haym -Michel Lievens 45,34 %
4 EO 3C E+1 -170 5.9 42.14
5 EO 5K E-2 100 1.3 9.29
6 EO 6P N = 980 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 17,38 %
A.8 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Claire Derieuw 45,51 %
7 EO 2S E = -120 8.1 57.86
8 EO 5KcW-3 500 0.1 0.71
9 EO 2K N+1 110 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 36,19 %
A.3 Philippe van der Gracht -Dominique Sassen 53,74 %
10 EO 3S W-3 300 0.1 0.71
11 EO 6P W+1 -1010 8.1 57.86
12 EO 1S S+1 120 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 52,62 %
A.9 Claire Destin -Elisabeth Harmant 50,60 %
13 EO 6S N+1 1470 3 21.43
14 EO 1S S = 90 7 50.00
15 EO 3S N+1 630 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Hugo Baetens 57,99 %
16 EO 1S E+2 -150 12.7 90.71
17 EO 4C W+2 -480 7 50.00
18 EO 4P E = -420 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 74,52 %
A.5 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 51,94 %
22 EO 4PcW+1 -990 13.9 99.29
23 EO 3P W+2 -200 2.4 17.14
24 EO 4K S+1 150 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 39,05 %
A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Teresa Dekoster 47,11 %
28 EO 3S N-2 -200 9.3 66.43
29 EO 4C N-1 -100 10.4 74.29
30 EO 1S W-1 50 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 47,14 %
Total : 148,3 / 336 = 44,14 %
PAIRE a.3 Caroll Pucher -Myriam de Timary
A.8 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Claire Derieuw 45,51 %
4 EO 1S W = -90 0.1 0.71
5 EO 3K E = -110 10.4 74.29
6 EO 6S S-1 -50 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 58,10 %
A.3 Philippe van der Gracht -Dominique Sassen 53,74 %
7 EO 3S W = -600 12.7 90.71
8 EO 4K W-2 100 7 50.00
9 EO 1S N+4 210 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 47,14 %
A.9 Claire Destin -Elisabeth Harmant 50,60 %
10 EO 1S W = -90 5.9 42.14
11 EO 6P W = -980 1.3 9.29
12 EO 1S S+2 150 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 31,19 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Hugo Baetens 57,99 %
13 EO 6S N+1 1470 3 21.43
14 EO 3K E-3 150 0 0.00
15 EO 3S N+2 660 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 9,52 %
A10 Marc Roobroeck -Philippe Leclercq 49,05 %
16 EO 1T N+1 90 0.1 0.71
17 EO 4C W+2 -480 7 50.00
18 EO 4P E = -420 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 44,52 %
A.5 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 51,94 %
19 EO 4P W+2 -680 7 50.00
20 EO 2C E-1 100 11 78.57
21 EO 2P W+4 -230 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Teresa Dekoster 47,11 %
25 EO 6P N-2 -100 12 85.71
26 EO 2P S+1 140 4 28.57
27 EO 4P E = -420 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 57,38 %
A.7 Annie Legrand -Colette Heerinckx 46,87 %
31 EO 1S E = -90 9.3 66.43
32 EO 4P E-1 100 2.4 17.14
33 EO 4C S-1 -50 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 47,14 %
Total : 141,9 / 336 = 42,23 %
PAIRE a.8 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes
A10 Marc Roobroeck -Philippe Leclercq 49,05 %
1 EO 4S E+1 -460 1.3 9.29
2 EO 2C W-1 50 3.6 25.71
3 EO 7PcS-1 -100 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 44,76 %
A11 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 52,69 %
7 EO 3S E-2 200 2.4 17.14
8 EO 4KcW-2 300 2.4 17.14
9 EO 1S N+2 150 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 22,62 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 50,58 %
13 EO 3S N+4 720 12 85.71
14 EO 2C E+1 -140 10 71.43
15 EO 3S N+2 660 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
A.2 Dilva Haym -Michel Lievens 45,34 %
19 EO 4P E+2 -680 7 50.00
20 EO 3C E-1 100 11 78.57
21 EO 3S E+3 -490 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
A.8 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Claire Derieuw 45,51 %
22 EO 4CcN-3 -500 8.1 57.86
23 EO 4P W = -620 8.1 57.86
24 EO 3K S+1 130 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 47,14 %
A.3 Philippe van der Gracht -Dominique Sassen 53,74 %
25 EO 4P N = 420 4 28.57
26 EO 3P S+1 170 1 7.14
27 EO 4P E = -420 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 31,19 %
A.9 Claire Destin -Elisabeth Harmant 50,60 %
28 EO 3C W-1 50 2.4 17.14
29 EO 4C N+1 650 0.1 0.71
30 EO 1S W = -90 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 22,62 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Hugo Baetens 57,99 %
31 EO 1S E-1 50 3.6 25.71
32 EO 4P E-1 100 2.4 17.14
33 EO 3S S-1 -50 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 33,57 %
Total : 139,8 / 336 = 41,61 %
PAIRE a11 -
A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Teresa Dekoster 47,11 %
1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 50,58 %
4 EO BYE 0 0.00
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.7 Annie Legrand -Colette Heerinckx 46,87 %
7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.2 Dilva Haym -Michel Lievens 45,34 %
10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.3 Philippe van der Gracht -Dominique Sassen 53,74 %
16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Hugo Baetens 57,99 %
22 EO BYE 0 0.00
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.5 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 51,94 %
28 EO BYE 0 0.00
29 EO BYE 0 0.00
30 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A11 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 52,69 %
31 EO BYE 0 0.00
32 EO BYE 0 0.00
33 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 462 = 0,00 %
|