B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 68,45 A.7 Alan Beckman -Hugo Baetens
--- 2 61,43 A.9 Alexandre Viot -Pascale Ortegat
--- 3 59,52 A.6 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli
--- 4 56,34 A.3 Annette Fobe -Ines Drory
--- 5 55,30 A11 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles
--- 6 49,29 A.8 Grazia Neuenschwander -Diane Deslignes
--- 7 46,96 A.1 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart
--- 8 44,82 A10 Claire Derieuw -Brigitte Brusselmans
--- 9 43,66 A.4 Pierina Di Vito -Claire Destin
--- 10 43,24 A.2 Michele Berrier -Helene Schyns
--- 11 39,52 A.5 Iris de Limbourg -Poupette de Ghellinck
--- 12 33,10 A12 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 61,13 a12 Caroll Pucher -Myriam de Timary
--- 2 60,33 a.9 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee
--- 3 53,27 a.6 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman
--- 4 52,95 a.3 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Wildiers
--- 5 52,08 a.8 Chantal Woitrin -Catherine de Moffarts
--- 6 51,10 a.1 Jannick Bekaert -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
--- 7 50,83 a.5 Colette Heerinckx -Chantal de Lichtervelde
--- 8 45,83 a10 Maryse Gathy -Beatrice Neys
--- 9 44,79 a11 Teresa Dekoster -Jeannine Wanderpepen
--- 10 43,90 a.7 Serge Alard -Michel Lievens
--- 11 42,44 a.4 Chris Oostens -Helene Christiaens
--- 12 41,37 a.2 Christiane Huby -Francoise Turin
PAIRE A.7 Alan Beckman -Hugo Baetens
a12 Caroll Pucher -Myriam de Timary 61,13 %
1 NS 3S S+1 430 10 71.43
2 NS 3P E+1 -170 2 14.29
3 NS 3S N+4 520 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
a11 Teresa Dekoster -Jeannine Wanderpepen 44,79 %
4 NS 2P N-1 -100 6 42.86
5 NS 6C S+1 1460 11 78.57
6 NS 2K N+1 110 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
a.7 Serge Alard -Michel Lievens 43,90 %
19 NS 6S N = 990 12 85.71
20 NS 4T S+1 150 8 57.14
21 NS 4TcW-3 500 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
a.6 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman 53,27 %
22 NS 5K S-3 -150 8 57.14
23 NS 3S N+1 630 13 92.86
24 NS 1S S+3 180 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
a.5 Colette Heerinckx -Chantal de Lichtervelde 50,83 %
25 NS 6T N+1 940 9 64.29
26 NS 2S W-2 200 14 100.00
27 NS 4T S = 130 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
a.4 Chris Oostens -Helene Christiaens 42,44 %
28 NS 4C E-2 100 14 100.00
29 NS 2C N-3 -300 5 35.71
30 NS 4C S+2 480 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
a.3 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Wildiers 52,95 %
31 NS 3P N-2 -200 7 50.00
32 NS 4P E-1 100 6 42.86
33 NS 5CcS-2 -300 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
a.2 Christiane Huby -Francoise Turin 41,37 %
34 NS 6C S = 1430 13 92.86
35 NS 4PcW-2 500 14 100.00
36 NS 1S E = -90 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 90,48 %
Total : 230,0 / 336 = 68,45 %
PAIRE A.9 Alexandre Viot -Pascale Ortegat
a.5 Colette Heerinckx -Chantal de Lichtervelde 50,83 %
1 NS 3S S+1 430 10 71.43
2 NS 2P E+1 -140 10 71.43
3 NS 3S N+4 520 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 78,57 %
a.4 Chris Oostens -Helene Christiaens 42,44 %
4 NS 2P N+1 140 13 92.86
5 NS 6C N+1 1460 11 78.57
6 NS 1S E+1 -120 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
a.2 Christiane Huby -Francoise Turin 41,37 %
7 NS 5C W+1 -680 6 42.86
8 NS 3S E+1 -430 11 78.57
9 NS 60%50% Ajust 8.4 60.00 µ Tbl = 60,48 %
a.1 Jannick Bekaert -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 51,10 %
10 NS 3S E-2 200 8 57.14
11 NS 5T S-1 -50 7 50.00
12 NS 3K N+2 150 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
a.9 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 60,33 %
25 NS 6T N+1 940 9 64.29
26 NS 3T E-1 100 12 85.71
27 NS 5K S = 400 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
a.8 Chantal Woitrin -Catherine de Moffarts 52,08 %
28 NS 4C E-1 50 12 85.71
29 NS 2C N-3 -300 5 35.71
30 NS 5C N+1 480 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
a.7 Serge Alard -Michel Lievens 43,90 %
31 NS 3P N-2 -200 7 50.00
32 NS 4P E-3 300 14 100.00
33 NS 4T E+1 -150 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
a.6 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman 53,27 %
34 NS 6T S-1 -100 0 0.00
35 NS 2T N-1 -50 7 50.00
36 NS 1P W+1 -110 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 206,4 / 336 = 61,43 %
PAIRE A.6 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli
a10 Maryse Gathy -Beatrice Neys 45,83 %
1 NS 3S S+1 430 10 71.43
2 NS 2P E+1 -140 10 71.43
3 NS 5K S+1 420 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.6 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman 53,27 %
16 NS 3T N-2 -100 4 28.57
17 NS 3S E+1 -430 10 71.43
18 NS 3P N-1 -100 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.5 Colette Heerinckx -Chantal de Lichtervelde 50,83 %
19 NS 3S N+2 460 4 28.57
20 NS 4T S = 130 4 28.57
21 NS 5TcW-4 800 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
a.4 Chris Oostens -Helene Christiaens 42,44 %
22 NS 4P W-1 100 12 85.71
23 NS 3S N+1 630 13 92.86
24 NS 1S S+1 120 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
a.3 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Wildiers 52,95 %
25 NS 5T N+2 440 1 7.14
26 NS 2T E+1 -110 2 14.29
27 NS 5K S = 400 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.2 Christiane Huby -Francoise Turin 41,37 %
28 NS 4C E+1 -450 5 35.71
29 NS 2S W = -120 9 64.29
30 NS 6C S = 980 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
a.1 Jannick Bekaert -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 51,10 %
31 NS 3C W = -140 13 92.86
32 NS 4P E-2 200 12 85.71
33 NS 4T E+1 -150 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 80,95 %
a11 Teresa Dekoster -Jeannine Wanderpepen 44,79 %
34 NS 3S N+2 660 4 28.57
35 NS 2T N = 90 10 71.43
36 NS 1S E = -90 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
Total : 200,0 / 336 = 59,52 %
PAIRE A.3 Annette Fobe -Ines Drory
a.3 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Wildiers 52,95 %
7 NS 4C W = -620 12 85.71
8 NS 3S E+2 -460 3 21.43
9 NS 3C S = 140 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 60,48 %
a.2 Christiane Huby -Francoise Turin 41,37 %
10 NS 3S E-2 200 8 57.14
11 NS 2T S+1 110 12 85.71
12 NS 3K N+2 150 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
a.1 Jannick Bekaert -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 51,10 %
13 NS 3S S-3 -300 3.6 25.71
14 NS 3S W = -400 12.7 90.71
15 NS 2C N-1 -100 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 47,38 %
a12 Caroll Pucher -Myriam de Timary 61,13 %
16 NS 3T N-1 -50 11 78.57
17 NS 3S W+2 -460 3 21.43
18 NS 4CcW-2 300 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a11 Teresa Dekoster -Jeannine Wanderpepen 44,79 %
19 NS 6K S = 920 9 64.29
20 NS 5T S = 600 12 85.71
21 NS 3P N = 140 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
a10 Maryse Gathy -Beatrice Neys 45,83 %
22 NS 4P W = -620 2 14.29
23 NS 5K S-2 -200 2 14.29
24 NS 1S S = 90 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 14,29 %
a.8 Chantal Woitrin -Catherine de Moffarts 52,08 %
25 NS 6S N+1 1020 14 100.00
26 NS 2T E = -90 8 57.14
27 NS 3C E+1 -170 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
a.7 Serge Alard -Michel Lievens 43,90 %
28 NS 4C E = -420 10 71.43
29 NS 3S W-2 200 14 100.00
30 NS 6C S = 980 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 80,95 %
Total : 189,3 / 336 = 56,34 %
PAIRE A11 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles
a.9 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 60,33 %
1 NS 3S N+1 430 10 71.43
2 NS 2P E+2 -170 2 14.29
3 NS 4P N-2 -100 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
a.8 Chantal Woitrin -Catherine de Moffarts 52,08 %
4 NS 2P N+1 140 13 92.86
5 NS 4C S+2 680 1 7.14
6 NS 2K N = 90 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
a.7 Serge Alard -Michel Lievens 43,90 %
7 NS 4C W+1 -650 10 71.43
8 NS 3S W+2 -460 3 21.43
9 NS 2C S+1 140 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 55,71 %
a.6 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman 53,27 %
10 NS 3S E-2 200 8 57.14
11 NS 4T S-1 -50 7 50.00
12 NS 2K N+3 150 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
a.4 Chris Oostens -Helene Christiaens 42,44 %
13 NS 3S S = 600 10.4 74.29
14 NS 3S W = -400 12.7 90.71
15 NS 2C N = 110 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 77,14 %
a.3 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Wildiers 52,95 %
16 NS 3P W+1 -170 0 0.00
17 NS 3S E+2 -460 3 21.43
18 NS 2P N-1 -100 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
a11 Teresa Dekoster -Jeannine Wanderpepen 44,79 %
31 NS 3C W+1 -170 10 71.43
32 NS 3S E-1 100 6 42.86
33 NS 5T E-1 50 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
a10 Maryse Gathy -Beatrice Neys 45,83 %
34 NS 6C S = 1430 13 92.86
35 NS 2P W-1 100 12 85.71
36 NS 1S E+1 -120 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 185,8 / 336 = 55,30 %
PAIRE A.8 Grazia Neuenschwander -Diane Deslignes
a.3 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Wildiers 52,95 %
1 NS 3S S+1 430 10 71.43
2 NS 2P E+1 -140 10 71.43
3 NS 4P N+1 450 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
a.1 Jannick Bekaert -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 51,10 %
4 NS 1S W = -90 10 71.43
5 NS 6C S+1 1460 11 78.57
6 NS 2S E+1 -150 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
a12 Caroll Pucher -Myriam de Timary 61,13 %
7 NS 5C W+1 -680 6 42.86
8 NS 4P W = -420 14 100.00
9 NS 2C S = 110 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 56,19 %
a.8 Chantal Woitrin -Catherine de Moffarts 52,08 %
22 NS 5KcS-3 -500 6 42.86
23 NS 5K S-2 -200 2 14.29
24 NS 1KcW-2 300 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
a.7 Serge Alard -Michel Lievens 43,90 %
25 NS 3S S+4 520 4 28.57
26 NS 2T E+1 -110 2 14.29
27 NS 5KcS = 550 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
a.6 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman 53,27 %
28 NS 4C E+1 -450 5 35.71
29 NS 3S W-1 100 12 85.71
30 NS 6C S = 980 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
a.5 Colette Heerinckx -Chantal de Lichtervelde 50,83 %
31 NS 4C W = -420 2 14.29
32 NS 2P E+2 -170 0 0.00
33 NS 5T E = -400 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 11,90 %
a.4 Chris Oostens -Helene Christiaens 42,44 %
34 NS 3S N+3 690 9 64.29
35 NS 3P W = -140 4 28.57
36 NS 1S E+1 -120 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
Total : 165,6 / 336 = 49,29 %
PAIRE A.1 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart
a.1 Jannick Bekaert -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 51,10 %
1 NS 2P S-1 -50 0 0.00
2 NS 2P E+1 -140 10 71.43
3 NS 4P N-2 -100 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
a12 Caroll Pucher -Myriam de Timary 61,13 %
4 NS 1S W+2 -150 1 7.14
5 NS 6C S+1 1460 11 78.57
6 NS 1S E+1 -120 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
a11 Teresa Dekoster -Jeannine Wanderpepen 44,79 %
7 NS 5K E-1 100 14 100.00
8 NS 4P W+1 -450 8 57.14
9 NS 2C S = 110 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 60,95 %
a10 Maryse Gathy -Beatrice Neys 45,83 %
10 NS 3S E-2 200 8 57.14
11 NS 5C E-1 50 10 71.43
12 NS 4C S = 620 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
a.9 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 60,33 %
13 NS 4C S-3 -300 3.6 25.71
14 NS 3S W+2 -460 4.7 33.57
15 NS 3K W-3 150 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 52,86 %
a.8 Chantal Woitrin -Catherine de Moffarts 52,08 %
16 NS 3S N-2 -100 4 28.57
17 NS 3S E = -400 14 100.00
18 NS 2P N-2 -200 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
a.6 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman 53,27 %
19 NS 3S N+1 430 2 14.29
20 NS 4T S+1 150 8 57.14
21 NS 5K E-3 150 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
a.5 Colette Heerinckx -Chantal de Lichtervelde 50,83 %
22 NS 4P W = -620 2 14.29
23 NS 2K S-2 -200 2 14.29
24 NS 1S S+1 120 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
Total : 157,8 / 336 = 46,96 %
PAIRE A10 Claire Derieuw -Brigitte Brusselmans
a.7 Serge Alard -Michel Lievens 43,90 %
1 NS 3S N = 400 3 21.43
2 NS 2P E+2 -170 2 14.29
3 NS 4P N-1 -50 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
a.6 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman 53,27 %
4 NS 1S W+2 -150 1 7.14
5 NS 6P N = 1430 5 35.71
6 NS 1S E+2 -150 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
a.5 Colette Heerinckx -Chantal de Lichtervelde 50,83 %
7 NS 4C W+2 -680 6 42.86
8 NS 3S W+1 -430 11 78.57
9 NS 3C S = 140 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 65,24 %
a.3 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Wildiers 52,95 %
10 NS 3S E-2 200 8 57.14
11 NS 3C E+1 -170 2 14.29
12 NS 5K N = 600 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
a.2 Christiane Huby -Francoise Turin 41,37 %
13 NS 60%50% Ajust 8.4 60.00
14 NS 60%50% Ajust 8.4 60.00
15 NS 60%50% Ajust 8.4 60.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a10 Maryse Gathy -Beatrice Neys 45,83 %
28 NS 4C E+1 -450 5 35.71
29 NS 4C N-4 -400 2 14.29
30 NS 6C S = 980 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
a.9 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 60,33 %
31 NS 4C W = -420 2 14.29
32 NS 3S E-1 100 6 42.86
33 NS 5T E = -400 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
a.8 Chantal Woitrin -Catherine de Moffarts 52,08 %
34 NS 3S N+3 690 9 64.29
35 NS 2T N-1 -50 7 50.00
36 NS 2P W-1 100 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
Total : 150,6 / 336 = 44,82 %
PAIRE A.4 Pierina Di Vito -Claire Destin
a.4 Chris Oostens -Helene Christiaens 42,44 %
10 NS 3S E-2 200 8 57.14
11 NS 4T S = 130 14 100.00
12 NS 4K N-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
a.3 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Wildiers 52,95 %
13 NS 3S S = 600 10.4 74.29
14 NS 3S W+2 -460 4.7 33.57
15 NS 2C N-1 -100 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 44,52 %
a.2 Christiane Huby -Francoise Turin 41,37 %
16 NS 2S N-1 -50 11 78.57
17 NS 3S E+2 -460 3 21.43
18 NS 2P N = 110 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
a.1 Jannick Bekaert -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 51,10 %
19 NS 3S S+4 520 6 42.86
20 NS 3C W-1 100 2 14.29
21 NS 3S W-5 250 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
a12 Caroll Pucher -Myriam de Timary 61,13 %
22 NS 4P W = -620 2 14.29
23 NS 2K S = 90 8 57.14
24 NS 1S S+3 180 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a11 Teresa Dekoster -Jeannine Wanderpepen 44,79 %
25 NS 5T N+2 440 1 7.14
26 NS 2T E+1 -110 2 14.29
27 NS 5C W-1 50 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 21,43 %
a.9 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 60,33 %
28 NS 4C E+1 -450 5 35.71
29 NS 1S W+1 -120 9 64.29
30 NS 6C S = 980 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
a.8 Chantal Woitrin -Catherine de Moffarts 52,08 %
31 NS 4C W = -420 2 14.29
32 NS 3K W-1 100 6 42.86
33 NS 5CcS-5 -1100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 19,05 %
Total : 146,7 / 336 = 43,66 %
PAIRE A.2 Michele Berrier -Helene Schyns
a.2 Christiane Huby -Francoise Turin 41,37 %
4 NS 2C S-1 -100 6 42.86
5 NS 6P N = 1430 5 35.71
6 NS 1S E+1 -120 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
a.1 Jannick Bekaert -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 51,10 %
7 NS 4C W+3 -710 1 7.14
8 NS 3S E+2 -460 3 21.43
9 NS 3C S = 140 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 34,29 %
a12 Caroll Pucher -Myriam de Timary 61,13 %
10 NS 3S E-1 100 0 0.00
11 NS 3C E+1 -170 2 14.29
12 NS 4P W-3 150 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 21,43 %
a11 Teresa Dekoster -Jeannine Wanderpepen 44,79 %
13 NS 3S S+3 690 13.9 99.29
14 NS 3S W+2 -460 4.7 33.57
15 NS 2C N = 110 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 66,43 %
a10 Maryse Gathy -Beatrice Neys 45,83 %
16 NS 3T N-1 -50 11 78.57
17 NS 3S E+1 -430 10 71.43
18 NS 3P N-2 -200 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
a.9 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 60,33 %
19 NS 7C N = 1510 14 100.00
20 NS 2CcW = -670 0 0.00
21 NS 3K E+1 -130 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.7 Serge Alard -Michel Lievens 43,90 %
22 NS 4P W-1 100 12 85.71
23 NS 3S N = 600 10 71.43
24 NS 1S S = 90 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
a.6 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman 53,27 %
25 NS 6T N+1 940 9 64.29
26 NS 2T E = -90 8 57.14
27 NS 3C W+2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
Total : 145,3 / 336 = 43,24 %
PAIRE A.5 Iris de Limbourg -Poupette de Ghellinck
a.5 Colette Heerinckx -Chantal de Lichtervelde 50,83 %
13 NS 3K N+2 150 7 50.00
14 NS 3S W+2 -460 4.7 33.57
15 NS 2C N-2 -200 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 28,10 %
a.4 Chris Oostens -Helene Christiaens 42,44 %
16 NS 3S N-1 -50 11 78.57
17 NS 3S W+2 -460 3 21.43
18 NS 3C W = -140 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
a.3 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Wildiers 52,95 %
19 NS 6T S = 920 9 64.29
20 NS 4T S+1 150 8 57.14
21 NS 4T W-1 50 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
a.2 Christiane Huby -Francoise Turin 41,37 %
22 NS 4P W-1 100 12 85.71
23 NS 3S N-1 -100 6 42.86
24 NS 1S S = 90 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
a.1 Jannick Bekaert -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 51,10 %
25 NS 6T N+1 940 9 64.29
26 NS 2T E = -90 8 57.14
27 NS 5K S-2 -100 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a12 Caroll Pucher -Myriam de Timary 61,13 %
28 NS 4C E+2 -480 0 0.00
29 NS 3S E = -600 0 0.00
30 NS 3S N+2 460 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a10 Maryse Gathy -Beatrice Neys 45,83 %
31 NS 3C W = -140 13 92.86
32 NS 4P E-1 100 6 42.86
33 NS 5T E-1 50 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
a.9 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 60,33 %
34 NS 3S N+2 660 4 28.57
35 NS 4P W = -620 0 0.00
36 NS 2P W = -110 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
Total : 132,8 / 336 = 39,52 %
PAIRE A12 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne
a11 Teresa Dekoster -Jeannine Wanderpepen 44,79 %
1 NS 3S N = 400 3 21.43
2 NS 2P E+1 -140 10 71.43
3 NS 6CcN-4 -800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
a10 Maryse Gathy -Beatrice Neys 45,83 %
4 NS 2C S-1 -100 6 42.86
5 NS 4C S+2 680 1 7.14
6 NS 1S E = -90 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
a.9 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 60,33 %
7 NS 4C W+3 -710 1 7.14
8 NS 3S W+2 -460 3 21.43
9 NS 3C S-1 -50 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 9,76 %
a.8 Chantal Woitrin -Catherine de Moffarts 52,08 %
10 NS 3S E-2 200 8 57.14
11 NS 3C E+1 -170 2 14.29
12 NS 3P W-2 100 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
a.7 Serge Alard -Michel Lievens 43,90 %
13 NS 2S S-4 -400 0.1 0.71
14 NS 3S W+2 -460 4.7 33.57
15 NS 2C N = 110 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 33,57 %
a.5 Colette Heerinckx -Chantal de Lichtervelde 50,83 %
16 NS 4T N-2 -100 4 28.57
17 NS 3S E+1 -430 10 71.43
18 NS 3K E-2 100 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
a.4 Chris Oostens -Helene Christiaens 42,44 %
19 NS 6S N-4 -200 0 0.00
20 NS 4TcS+1 910 14 100.00
21 NS 5T W-3 150 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a12 Caroll Pucher -Myriam de Timary 61,13 %
34 NS 3S N+2 660 4 28.57
35 NS 1P W+3 -170 2 14.29
36 NS 1S E+2 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 14,29 %
Total : 111,2 / 336 = 33,10 %
PAIRE a12 Caroll Pucher -Myriam de Timary
A.7 Alan Beckman -Hugo Baetens 68,45 %
1 EO 3S S+1 430 4 28.57
2 EO 3P E+1 -170 12 85.71
3 EO 3S N+4 520 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 46,96 %
4 EO 1S W+2 -150 13 92.86
5 EO 6C S+1 1460 3 21.43
6 EO 1S E+1 -120 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
A.8 Grazia Neuenschwander -Diane Deslignes 49,29 %
7 EO 5C W+1 -680 8 57.14
8 EO 4P W = -420 0 0.00
9 EO 2C S = 110 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 43,81 %
A.2 Michele Berrier -Helene Schyns 43,24 %
10 EO 3S E-1 100 14 100.00
11 EO 3C E+1 -170 12 85.71
12 EO 4P W-3 150 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 78,57 %
A.3 Annette Fobe -Ines Drory 56,34 %
16 EO 3T N-1 -50 3 21.43
17 EO 3S W+2 -460 11 78.57
18 EO 4CcW-2 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.4 Pierina Di Vito -Claire Destin 43,66 %
22 EO 4P W = -620 12 85.71
23 EO 2K S = 90 6 42.86
24 EO 1S S+3 180 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.5 Iris de Limbourg -Poupette de Ghellinck 39,52 %
28 EO 4C E+2 -480 14 100.00
29 EO 3S E = -600 14 100.00
30 EO 3S N+2 460 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 100,00 %
A12 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 33,10 %
34 EO 3S N+2 660 10 71.43
35 EO 1P W+3 -170 12 85.71
36 EO 1S E+2 -150 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 85,71 %
Total : 205,4 / 336 = 61,13 %
PAIRE a.9 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee
A11 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 55,30 %
1 EO 3S N+1 430 4 28.57
2 EO 2P E+2 -170 12 85.71
3 EO 4P N-2 -100 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
A12 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 33,10 %
7 EO 4C W+3 -710 13 92.86
8 EO 3S W+2 -460 11 78.57
9 EO 3C S-1 -50 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 90,24 %
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 46,96 %
13 EO 4C S-3 -300 10.4 74.29
14 EO 3S W+2 -460 9.3 66.43
15 EO 3K W-3 150 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 47,14 %
A.2 Michele Berrier -Helene Schyns 43,24 %
19 EO 7C N = 1510 0 0.00
20 EO 2CcW = -670 14 100.00
21 EO 3K E+1 -130 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.9 Alexandre Viot -Pascale Ortegat 61,43 %
25 EO 6T N+1 940 5 35.71
26 EO 3T E-1 100 2 14.29
27 EO 5K S = 400 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
A.4 Pierina Di Vito -Claire Destin 43,66 %
28 EO 4C E+1 -450 9 64.29
29 EO 1S W+1 -120 5 35.71
30 EO 6C S = 980 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
A10 Claire Derieuw -Brigitte Brusselmans 44,82 %
31 EO 4C W = -420 12 85.71
32 EO 3S E-1 100 8 57.14
33 EO 5T E = -400 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
A.5 Iris de Limbourg -Poupette de Ghellinck 39,52 %
34 EO 3S N+2 660 10 71.43
35 EO 4P W = -620 14 100.00
36 EO 2P W = -110 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
Total : 202,7 / 336 = 60,33 %
PAIRE a.6 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman
A10 Claire Derieuw -Brigitte Brusselmans 44,82 %
4 EO 1S W+2 -150 13 92.86
5 EO 6P N = 1430 9 64.29
6 EO 1S E+2 -150 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
A11 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 55,30 %
10 EO 3S E-2 200 6 42.86
11 EO 4T S-1 -50 7 50.00
12 EO 2K N+3 150 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
A.6 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 59,52 %
16 EO 3T N-2 -100 10 71.43
17 EO 3S E+1 -430 4 28.57
18 EO 3P N-1 -100 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 46,96 %
19 EO 3S N+1 430 12 85.71
20 EO 4T S+1 150 6 42.86
21 EO 5K E-3 150 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
A.7 Alan Beckman -Hugo Baetens 68,45 %
22 EO 5K S-3 -150 6 42.86
23 EO 3S N+1 630 1 7.14
24 EO 1S S+3 180 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
A.2 Michele Berrier -Helene Schyns 43,24 %
25 EO 6T N+1 940 5 35.71
26 EO 2T E = -90 6 42.86
27 EO 3C W+2 -200 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
A.8 Grazia Neuenschwander -Diane Deslignes 49,29 %
28 EO 4C E+1 -450 9 64.29
29 EO 3S W-1 100 2 14.29
30 EO 6C S = 980 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
A.9 Alexandre Viot -Pascale Ortegat 61,43 %
34 EO 6T S-1 -100 14 100.00
35 EO 2T N-1 -50 7 50.00
36 EO 1P W+1 -110 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 179,0 / 336 = 53,27 %
PAIRE a.3 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Wildiers
A.8 Grazia Neuenschwander -Diane Deslignes 49,29 %
1 EO 3S S+1 430 4 28.57
2 EO 2P E+1 -140 4 28.57
3 EO 4P N+1 450 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
A.3 Annette Fobe -Ines Drory 56,34 %
7 EO 4C W = -620 2 14.29
8 EO 3S E+2 -460 11 78.57
9 EO 3C S = 140 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 39,52 %
A10 Claire Derieuw -Brigitte Brusselmans 44,82 %
10 EO 3S E-2 200 6 42.86
11 EO 3C E+1 -170 12 85.71
12 EO 5K N = 600 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
A.4 Pierina Di Vito -Claire Destin 43,66 %
13 EO 3S S = 600 3.6 25.71
14 EO 3S W+2 -460 9.3 66.43
15 EO 2C N-1 -100 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 55,48 %
A11 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 55,30 %
16 EO 3P W+1 -170 14 100.00
17 EO 3S E+2 -460 11 78.57
18 EO 2P N-1 -100 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
A.5 Iris de Limbourg -Poupette de Ghellinck 39,52 %
19 EO 6T S = 920 5 35.71
20 EO 4T S+1 150 6 42.86
21 EO 4T W-1 50 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
A.6 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 59,52 %
25 EO 5T N+2 440 13 92.86
26 EO 2T E+1 -110 12 85.71
27 EO 5K S = 400 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.7 Alan Beckman -Hugo Baetens 68,45 %
31 EO 3P N-2 -200 7 50.00
32 EO 4P E-1 100 8 57.14
33 EO 5CcS-2 -300 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
Total : 177,9 / 336 = 52,95 %
PAIRE a.8 Chantal Woitrin -Catherine de Moffarts
A11 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 55,30 %
4 EO 2P N+1 140 1 7.14
5 EO 4C S+2 680 13 92.86
6 EO 2K N = 90 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
A12 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 33,10 %
10 EO 3S E-2 200 6 42.86
11 EO 3C E+1 -170 12 85.71
12 EO 3P W-2 100 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 46,96 %
16 EO 3S N-2 -100 10 71.43
17 EO 3S E = -400 0 0.00
18 EO 2P N-2 -200 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
A.8 Grazia Neuenschwander -Diane Deslignes 49,29 %
22 EO 5KcS-3 -500 8 57.14
23 EO 5K S-2 -200 12 85.71
24 EO 1KcW-2 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
A.3 Annette Fobe -Ines Drory 56,34 %
25 EO 6S N+1 1020 0 0.00
26 EO 2T E = -90 6 42.86
27 EO 3C E+1 -170 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
A.9 Alexandre Viot -Pascale Ortegat 61,43 %
28 EO 4C E-1 50 2 14.29
29 EO 2C N-3 -300 9 64.29
30 EO 5C N+1 480 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
A.4 Pierina Di Vito -Claire Destin 43,66 %
31 EO 4C W = -420 12 85.71
32 EO 3K W-1 100 8 57.14
33 EO 5CcS-5 -1100 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 80,95 %
A10 Claire Derieuw -Brigitte Brusselmans 44,82 %
34 EO 3S N+3 690 5 35.71
35 EO 2T N-1 -50 7 50.00
36 EO 2P W-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
Total : 175,0 / 336 = 52,08 %
PAIRE a.1 Jannick Bekaert -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 46,96 %
1 EO 2P S-1 -50 14 100.00
2 EO 2P E+1 -140 4 28.57
3 EO 4P N-2 -100 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
A.8 Grazia Neuenschwander -Diane Deslignes 49,29 %
4 EO 1S W = -90 4 28.57
5 EO 6C S+1 1460 3 21.43
6 EO 2S E+1 -150 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
A.2 Michele Berrier -Helene Schyns 43,24 %
7 EO 4C W+3 -710 13 92.86
8 EO 3S E+2 -460 11 78.57
9 EO 3C S = 140 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 65,71 %
A.9 Alexandre Viot -Pascale Ortegat 61,43 %
10 EO 3S E-2 200 6 42.86
11 EO 5T S-1 -50 7 50.00
12 EO 3K N+2 150 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
A.3 Annette Fobe -Ines Drory 56,34 %
13 EO 3S S-3 -300 10.4 74.29
14 EO 3S W = -400 1.3 9.29
15 EO 2C N-1 -100 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 52,62 %
A.4 Pierina Di Vito -Claire Destin 43,66 %
19 EO 3S S+4 520 8 57.14
20 EO 3C W-1 100 12 85.71
21 EO 3S W-5 250 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
A.5 Iris de Limbourg -Poupette de Ghellinck 39,52 %
25 EO 6T N+1 940 5 35.71
26 EO 2T E = -90 6 42.86
27 EO 5K S-2 -100 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.6 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 59,52 %
31 EO 3C W = -140 1 7.14
32 EO 4P E-2 200 2 14.29
33 EO 4T E+1 -150 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 19,05 %
Total : 171,7 / 336 = 51,10 %
PAIRE a.5 Colette Heerinckx -Chantal de Lichtervelde
A.9 Alexandre Viot -Pascale Ortegat 61,43 %
1 EO 3S S+1 430 4 28.57
2 EO 2P E+1 -140 4 28.57
3 EO 3S N+4 520 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 21,43 %
A10 Claire Derieuw -Brigitte Brusselmans 44,82 %
7 EO 4C W+2 -680 8 57.14
8 EO 3S W+1 -430 3 21.43
9 EO 3C S = 140 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 34,76 %
A.5 Iris de Limbourg -Poupette de Ghellinck 39,52 %
13 EO 3K N+2 150 7 50.00
14 EO 3S W+2 -460 9.3 66.43
15 EO 2C N-2 -200 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 71,90 %
A12 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 33,10 %
16 EO 4T N-2 -100 10 71.43
17 EO 3S E+1 -430 4 28.57
18 EO 3K E-2 100 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
A.6 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 59,52 %
19 EO 3S N+2 460 10 71.43
20 EO 4T S = 130 10 71.43
21 EO 5TcW-4 800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 46,96 %
22 EO 4P W = -620 12 85.71
23 EO 2K S-2 -200 12 85.71
24 EO 1S S+1 120 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
A.7 Alan Beckman -Hugo Baetens 68,45 %
25 EO 6T N+1 940 5 35.71
26 EO 2S W-2 200 0 0.00
27 EO 4T S = 130 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
A.8 Grazia Neuenschwander -Diane Deslignes 49,29 %
31 EO 4C W = -420 12 85.71
32 EO 2P E+2 -170 14 100.00
33 EO 5T E = -400 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 88,10 %
Total : 170,8 / 336 = 50,83 %
PAIRE a10 Maryse Gathy -Beatrice Neys
A.6 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 59,52 %
1 EO 3S S+1 430 4 28.57
2 EO 2P E+1 -140 4 28.57
3 EO 5K S+1 420 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A12 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 33,10 %
4 EO 2C S-1 -100 8 57.14
5 EO 4C S+2 680 13 92.86
6 EO 1S E = -90 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 46,96 %
10 EO 3S E-2 200 6 42.86
11 EO 5C E-1 50 4 28.57
12 EO 4C S = 620 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
A.2 Michele Berrier -Helene Schyns 43,24 %
16 EO 3T N-1 -50 3 21.43
17 EO 3S E+1 -430 4 28.57
18 EO 3P N-2 -200 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
A.3 Annette Fobe -Ines Drory 56,34 %
22 EO 4P W = -620 12 85.71
23 EO 5K S-2 -200 12 85.71
24 EO 1S S = 90 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 85,71 %
A10 Claire Derieuw -Brigitte Brusselmans 44,82 %
28 EO 4C E+1 -450 9 64.29
29 EO 4C N-4 -400 12 85.71
30 EO 6C S = 980 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
A.5 Iris de Limbourg -Poupette de Ghellinck 39,52 %
31 EO 3C W = -140 1 7.14
32 EO 4P E-1 100 8 57.14
33 EO 5T E-1 50 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
A11 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 55,30 %
34 EO 6C S = 1430 1 7.14
35 EO 2P W-1 100 2 14.29
36 EO 1S E+1 -120 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 154,0 / 336 = 45,83 %
PAIRE a11 Teresa Dekoster -Jeannine Wanderpepen
A12 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 33,10 %
1 EO 3S N = 400 11 78.57
2 EO 2P E+1 -140 4 28.57
3 EO 6CcN-4 -800 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
A.7 Alan Beckman -Hugo Baetens 68,45 %
4 EO 2P N-1 -100 8 57.14
5 EO 6C S+1 1460 3 21.43
6 EO 2K N+1 110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 46,96 %
7 EO 5K E-1 100 0 0.00
8 EO 4P W+1 -450 6 42.86
9 EO 2C S = 110 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 39,05 %
A.2 Michele Berrier -Helene Schyns 43,24 %
13 EO 3S S+3 690 0.1 0.71
14 EO 3S W+2 -460 9.3 66.43
15 EO 2C N = 110 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 33,57 %
A.3 Annette Fobe -Ines Drory 56,34 %
19 EO 6K S = 920 5 35.71
20 EO 5T S = 600 2 14.29
21 EO 3P N = 140 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
A.4 Pierina Di Vito -Claire Destin 43,66 %
25 EO 5T N+2 440 13 92.86
26 EO 2T E+1 -110 12 85.71
27 EO 5C W-1 50 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 78,57 %
A11 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 55,30 %
31 EO 3C W+1 -170 4 28.57
32 EO 3S E-1 100 8 57.14
33 EO 5T E-1 50 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
A.6 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 59,52 %
34 EO 3S N+2 660 10 71.43
35 EO 2T N = 90 4 28.57
36 EO 1S E = -90 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
Total : 150,5 / 336 = 44,79 %
PAIRE a.7 Serge Alard -Michel Lievens
A10 Claire Derieuw -Brigitte Brusselmans 44,82 %
1 EO 3S N = 400 11 78.57
2 EO 2P E+2 -170 12 85.71
3 EO 4P N-1 -50 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
A11 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 55,30 %
7 EO 4C W+1 -650 4 28.57
8 EO 3S W+2 -460 11 78.57
9 EO 2C S+1 140 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 44,29 %
A12 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 33,10 %
13 EO 2S S-4 -400 13.9 99.29
14 EO 3S W+2 -460 9.3 66.43
15 EO 2C N = 110 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 66,43 %
A.7 Alan Beckman -Hugo Baetens 68,45 %
19 EO 6S N = 990 2 14.29
20 EO 4T S+1 150 6 42.86
21 EO 4TcW-3 500 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
A.2 Michele Berrier -Helene Schyns 43,24 %
22 EO 4P W-1 100 2 14.29
23 EO 3S N = 600 4 28.57
24 EO 1S S = 90 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
A.8 Grazia Neuenschwander -Diane Deslignes 49,29 %
25 EO 3S S+4 520 10 71.43
26 EO 2T E+1 -110 12 85.71
27 EO 5KcS = 550 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
A.3 Annette Fobe -Ines Drory 56,34 %
28 EO 4C E = -420 4 28.57
29 EO 3S W-2 200 0 0.00
30 EO 6C S = 980 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 19,05 %
A.9 Alexandre Viot -Pascale Ortegat 61,43 %
31 EO 3P N-2 -200 7 50.00
32 EO 4P E-3 300 0 0.00
33 EO 4T E+1 -150 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
Total : 147,5 / 336 = 43,90 %
PAIRE a.4 Chris Oostens -Helene Christiaens
A.9 Alexandre Viot -Pascale Ortegat 61,43 %
4 EO 2P N+1 140 1 7.14
5 EO 6C N+1 1460 3 21.43
6 EO 1S E+1 -120 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
A.4 Pierina Di Vito -Claire Destin 43,66 %
10 EO 3S E-2 200 6 42.86
11 EO 4T S = 130 0 0.00
12 EO 4K N-1 -100 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
A11 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 55,30 %
13 EO 3S S = 600 3.6 25.71
14 EO 3S W = -400 1.3 9.29
15 EO 2C N = 110 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 22,86 %
A.5 Iris de Limbourg -Poupette de Ghellinck 39,52 %
16 EO 3S N-1 -50 3 21.43
17 EO 3S W+2 -460 11 78.57
18 EO 3C W = -140 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
A12 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 33,10 %
19 EO 6S N-4 -200 14 100.00
20 EO 4TcS+1 910 0 0.00
21 EO 5T W-3 150 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.6 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 59,52 %
22 EO 4P W-1 100 2 14.29
23 EO 3S N+1 630 1 7.14
24 EO 1S S+1 120 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
A.7 Alan Beckman -Hugo Baetens 68,45 %
28 EO 4C E-2 100 0 0.00
29 EO 2C N-3 -300 9 64.29
30 EO 4C S+2 480 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
A.8 Grazia Neuenschwander -Diane Deslignes 49,29 %
34 EO 3S N+3 690 5 35.71
35 EO 3P W = -140 10 71.43
36 EO 1S E+1 -120 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
Total : 142,6 / 336 = 42,44 %
PAIRE a.2 Christiane Huby -Francoise Turin
A.2 Michele Berrier -Helene Schyns 43,24 %
4 EO 2C S-1 -100 8 57.14
5 EO 6P N = 1430 9 64.29
6 EO 1S E+1 -120 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
A.9 Alexandre Viot -Pascale Ortegat 61,43 %
7 EO 5C W+1 -680 8 57.14
8 EO 3S E+1 -430 3 21.43
9 EO 60%50% Ajust 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
A.3 Annette Fobe -Ines Drory 56,34 %
10 EO 3S E-2 200 6 42.86
11 EO 2T S+1 110 2 14.29
12 EO 3K N+2 150 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
A10 Claire Derieuw -Brigitte Brusselmans 44,82 %
13 EO 60%50% Ajust 7 50.00
14 EO 60%50% Ajust 7 50.00
15 EO 60%50% Ajust 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.4 Pierina Di Vito -Claire Destin 43,66 %
16 EO 2S N-1 -50 3 21.43
17 EO 3S E+2 -460 11 78.57
18 EO 2P N = 110 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
A.5 Iris de Limbourg -Poupette de Ghellinck 39,52 %
22 EO 4P W-1 100 2 14.29
23 EO 3S N-1 -100 8 57.14
24 EO 1S S = 90 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
A.6 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 59,52 %
28 EO 4C E+1 -450 9 64.29
29 EO 2S W = -120 5 35.71
30 EO 6C S = 980 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
A.7 Alan Beckman -Hugo Baetens 68,45 %
34 EO 6C S = 1430 1 7.14
35 EO 4PcW-2 500 0 0.00
36 EO 1S E = -90 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 9,52 %
Total : 139,0 / 336 = 41,37 %
|