B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 60,23 A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Fabienne Smit
--- 2 58,31 A.9 Annie Legrand -Eliane de Ceuninck
--- 3 55,58 A10 Claire Derieuw -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse
--- 4 54,03 A14 Sophie Noach -Marie Claire Vienne
--- 5 53,10 A.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Jacqueline de Thier
--- 6 51,88 A.8 Giuseppe Napoli -Elena Valsesia
--- 7 51,61 A12 Isabelle de Vanssay -Michele Berrier
--- 8 51,47 A.1 Francoise Turin -Sophie Tilemans
--- 9 51,34 A.2 Patrick Gilles -Lydia Wildiers
--- 10 51,10 A15 Thierry Collart -Annie Zeimes
--- 11 49,28 A.3 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne
--- 12 48,70 A.7 Stan Tabor -Philippe van der Gracht
--- 13 46,61 A11 Thierry Bollansee -Pierina Di Vito
--- 14 38,86 A.6 Anne Van den Berge -Pascale Nobels
--- 15 29,19 A13 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 60,36 a.7 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren
--- 2 56,17 a.2 Serge Alard -Myriam de Timary
--- 3 56,08 a11 Miguel del Marmol -Gaetan Collinet
--- 4 55,02 a.5 Dominique van de Werve -John de Busschere
--- 5 52,58 a14 Claire Destin -Elisabeth Harmant
--- 6 51,04 a.6 Roselyne Delpon -Caroline Lallia
--- 7 50,85 a.9 Lydia Luyten -Dominique Sassen
--- 8 49,83 a13 Michel Lievens -Chantal de Lichtervelde
--- 9 48,86 a.8 Pascale Graton -Pascale Bodart
--- 10 48,45 a.1 Brigitte Velge -Claire de Quirini
--- 11 45,23 a.3 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens
--- 12 44,66 a.4 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck
--- 13 41,06 a10 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen
--- 14 39,91 a12 Christiane Huby -Gerard Cooreman
--- 15 0,00 a15 -
PAIRE A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Fabienne Smit
a.4 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 44,66 %
7 NS 4C W = -620 13.2 60.00
8 NS 2C S = 110 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 45,23 %
9 NS 3K S-1 -50 17.5 79.55
10 NS 3T N+3 170 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
a.2 Serge Alard -Myriam de Timary 56,17 %
11 NS 3P S = 140 18.6 84.55
12 NS 6S N-3 -300 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a.1 Brigitte Velge -Claire de Quirini 48,45 %
13 NS 1S W = -90 11 50.00
14 NS 3S N = 400 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a15 - 0,00 %
15 NS BYE 0 0.00
16 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a14 Claire Destin -Elisabeth Harmant 52,58 %
17 NS 3C W+1 -170 5 22.73
18 NS 3S N+2 660 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a13 Michel Lievens -Chantal de Lichtervelde 49,83 %
19 NS 3K N-2 -100 17.5 79.55
20 NS 4P N+2 680 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 89,55 %
a12 Christiane Huby -Gerard Cooreman 39,91 %
21 NS 4C W+2 -480 0 0.00
22 NS 6C N = 980 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a11 Miguel del Marmol -Gaetan Collinet 56,08 %
23 NS 4C E = -620 8.8 40.00
24 NS 3C S-1 -50 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a10 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen 41,06 %
25 NS 2C W+2 -170 2 9.09
26 NS 4C W-1 100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a.9 Lydia Luyten -Dominique Sassen 50,85 %
27 NS 4P S+1 450 15.4 70.00
28 NS 5P N-1 -100 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
a.8 Pascale Graton -Pascale Bodart 48,86 %
29 NS 4P N+1 650 21.9 99.55
30 NS 4PcW-3 500 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 99,55 %
Total : 291,5 / 484 = 60,23 %
PAIRE A.9 Annie Legrand -Eliane de Ceuninck
a.2 Serge Alard -Myriam de Timary 56,17 %
1 NS 3P W-3 150 21.9 99.55
2 NS 2P W+4 -230 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
a.1 Brigitte Velge -Claire de Quirini 48,45 %
3 NS 2P S+1 140 11 50.00
4 NS 4P N = 620 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a15 - 0,00 %
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a14 Claire Destin -Elisabeth Harmant 52,58 %
7 NS 4C W+1 -650 5.5 25.00
8 NS 3P W = -140 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
a13 Michel Lievens -Chantal de Lichtervelde 49,83 %
9 NS 2C E = -110 12.1 55.00
10 NS 3K N+3 170 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.9 Lydia Luyten -Dominique Sassen 50,85 %
17 NS 4C W-1 50 20 90.91
18 NS 3S N+2 660 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
a.8 Pascale Graton -Pascale Bodart 48,86 %
19 NS 4K N-1 -50 19.7 89.55
20 NS 2P N+4 230 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
a.7 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren 60,36 %
21 NS 4C W+1 -450 11 50.00
22 NS 4C N+1 450 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a.6 Roselyne Delpon -Caroline Lallia 51,04 %
23 NS 4C E = -620 8.8 40.00
24 NS 2P S-2 -100 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
a.5 Dominique van de Werve -John de Busschere 55,02 %
25 NS 2C W+1 -140 8 36.36
26 NS 4C W-2 200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.4 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 44,66 %
27 NS 4P S+1 450 15.4 70.00
28 NS 4P N = 620 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 45,23 %
29 NS 2P N = 110 13.2 60.00
30 NS 2T S-1 -50 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
Total : 282,2 / 484 = 58,31 %
PAIRE A10 Claire Derieuw -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse
a.4 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 44,66 %
1 NS 2C N+1 140 17.5 79.55
2 NS 4P E+2 -480 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 45,23 %
3 NS 4C N-1 -50 1.2 5.45
4 NS 4P N = 620 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a.2 Serge Alard -Myriam de Timary 56,17 %
5 NS 4C E = -420 4.5 20.45
6 NS 3P E-1 100 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.1 Brigitte Velge -Claire de Quirini 48,45 %
7 NS 4C W+1 -650 5.5 25.00
8 NS 2C S = 110 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
a15 - 0,00 %
9 NS BYE 0 0.00
10 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a14 Claire Destin -Elisabeth Harmant 52,58 %
11 NS 3S E-3 150 21.9 99.55
12 NS 6T S = 1370 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 97,05 %
a10 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen 41,06 %
19 NS 4K N-3 -150 3.4 15.45
20 NS 4P N+1 650 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.9 Lydia Luyten -Dominique Sassen 50,85 %
21 NS 4C W+1 -450 11 50.00
22 NS 4C N+2 480 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.8 Pascale Graton -Pascale Bodart 48,86 %
23 NS 4P N = 620 21.9 99.55
24 NS 2P S-1 -50 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
a.7 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren 60,36 %
25 NS 1S N-4 -200 0 0.00
26 NS 3S E+1 -630 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.6 Roselyne Delpon -Caroline Lallia 51,04 %
27 NS 4P S+2 480 21.9 99.55
28 NS 6T W-2 100 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
a.5 Dominique van de Werve -John de Busschere 55,02 %
29 NS 3S N-1 -100 7.7 35.00
30 NS 3C W-2 100 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
Total : 269,0 / 484 = 55,58 %
PAIRE A14 Sophie Noach -Marie Claire Vienne
a12 Christiane Huby -Gerard Cooreman 39,91 %
1 NS 4C N-1 -50 5.5 25.00
2 NS 3S E+1 -430 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 32,50 %
a11 Miguel del Marmol -Gaetan Collinet 56,08 %
3 NS 2P S+1 140 11 50.00
4 NS 4P N = 620 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a10 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen 41,06 %
5 NS 5C E-1 50 16.5 75.00
6 NS 3C N+1 170 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 87,27 %
a.9 Lydia Luyten -Dominique Sassen 50,85 %
7 NS 5T N-1 -100 20.8 94.55
8 NS 4C S-2 -100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
a.8 Pascale Graton -Pascale Bodart 48,86 %
9 NS 3C E+1 -170 0.1 0.45
10 NS 4T N+1 150 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 10,45 %
a.7 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren 60,36 %
11 NS 4T W = -130 3.4 15.45
12 NS 3S N+3 690 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
a.6 Roselyne Delpon -Caroline Lallia 51,04 %
13 NS 3C N-1 -100 7.7 35.00
14 NS 3S N = 400 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.5 Dominique van de Werve -John de Busschere 55,02 %
15 NS 4P S-1 -100 5.5 25.00
16 NS 3S N = 400 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
a.4 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 44,66 %
17 NS 4C W-1 50 20 90.91
18 NS 3S N+2 660 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 45,23 %
19 NS 3P W = -140 9.9 45.00
20 NS 4P N+1 650 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a14 Claire Destin -Elisabeth Harmant 52,58 %
27 NS 4P S = 420 5.5 25.00
28 NS 3P N+1 170 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a13 Michel Lievens -Chantal de Lichtervelde 49,83 %
29 NS 3S S = 600 17.5 79.55
30 NS 3T S-3 -150 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
Total : 285,3 / 528 = 54,03 %
PAIRE A.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Jacqueline de Thier
a.9 Lydia Luyten -Dominique Sassen 50,85 %
1 NS 3P W-1 50 11 50.00
2 NS 2K E+2 -130 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
a.5 Dominique van de Werve -John de Busschere 55,02 %
9 NS 1C E+2 -140 6.6 30.00
10 NS 3T N+3 170 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a.4 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 44,66 %
11 NS 3P S-2 -100 8.8 40.00
12 NS 3S N+3 690 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 45,23 %
13 NS 2C S = 110 16.5 75.00
14 NS 4P N-1 -50 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.2 Serge Alard -Myriam de Timary 56,17 %
15 NS 4T W = -130 2.3 10.45
16 NS 3P S+2 200 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a.1 Brigitte Velge -Claire de Quirini 48,45 %
17 NS 2C W+2 -170 5 22.73
18 NS 3S N+1 630 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a15 - 0,00 %
19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a14 Claire Destin -Elisabeth Harmant 52,58 %
21 NS 4C W+1 -450 11 50.00
22 NS 6C N = 980 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a13 Michel Lievens -Chantal de Lichtervelde 49,83 %
23 NS 4C E = -620 8.8 40.00
24 NS 2P S-1 -50 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a12 Christiane Huby -Gerard Cooreman 39,91 %
25 NS 2C W+1 -140 8 36.36
26 NS 4C W-1 100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a11 Miguel del Marmol -Gaetan Collinet 56,08 %
27 NS 4P S+1 450 15.4 70.00
28 NS 5T W-1 50 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a10 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen 41,06 %
29 NS 4P N = 620 19.7 89.55
30 NS 2K S = 90 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 84,55 %
Total : 257,0 / 484 = 53,10 %
PAIRE A.8 Giuseppe Napoli -Elena Valsesia
a15 - 0,00 %
1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a14 Claire Destin -Elisabeth Harmant 52,58 %
3 NS 2P S+1 140 11 50.00
4 NS 4P N = 620 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a13 Michel Lievens -Chantal de Lichtervelde 49,83 %
5 NS 5C E-1 50 16.5 75.00
6 NS 3P E = -140 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
a12 Christiane Huby -Gerard Cooreman 39,91 %
7 NS 5T N-1 -100 20.8 94.55
8 NS 3P W-1 50 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 87,05 %
a.8 Pascale Graton -Pascale Bodart 48,86 %
15 NS 4P S-2 -200 0.1 0.45
16 NS 2P S+3 200 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a.7 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren 60,36 %
17 NS 2C W+1 -140 12 54.55
18 NS 3S N+1 630 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.6 Roselyne Delpon -Caroline Lallia 51,04 %
19 NS 2K N+1 110 21.9 99.55
20 NS 2P N+4 230 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
a.5 Dominique van de Werve -John de Busschere 55,02 %
21 NS 4C W+1 -450 11 50.00
22 NS 4C N+3 510 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a.4 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 44,66 %
23 NS 4C W = -620 8.8 40.00
24 NS 2P S-2 -100 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 45,23 %
25 NS 2C W-1 100 21 95.45
26 NS 4C W-1 100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
a.2 Serge Alard -Myriam de Timary 56,17 %
27 NS 4P S = 420 5.5 25.00
28 NS 5T W-1 50 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
a.1 Brigitte Velge -Claire de Quirini 48,45 %
29 NS 3S N-1 -100 7.7 35.00
30 NS 3K S-2 -100 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
Total : 251,1 / 484 = 51,88 %
PAIRE A12 Isabelle de Vanssay -Michele Berrier
a.8 Pascale Graton -Pascale Bodart 48,86 %
1 NS 4P W+1 -450 0.1 0.45
2 NS 4P W+2 -480 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 7,95 %
a.7 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren 60,36 %
3 NS 2P S+1 140 11 50.00
4 NS 4P N-1 -100 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a.6 Roselyne Delpon -Caroline Lallia 51,04 %
5 NS 5C E-1 50 16.5 75.00
6 NS 3C N-1 -50 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
a.5 Dominique van de Werve -John de Busschere 55,02 %
7 NS 4C W+1 -650 5.5 25.00
8 NS 3C S-1 -50 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a.4 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 44,66 %
9 NS 1S N = 90 20.8 94.55
10 NS 2K N+4 170 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 45,23 %
11 NS 2P N = 110 15.4 70.00
12 NS 6T S = 1370 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
a.2 Serge Alard -Myriam de Timary 56,17 %
13 NS 3S W-2 200 20.8 94.55
14 NS 4P N-1 -50 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
a.1 Brigitte Velge -Claire de Quirini 48,45 %
15 NS 3P S = 140 16.5 75.00
16 NS 2P S+3 200 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
a12 Christiane Huby -Gerard Cooreman 39,91 %
23 NS 4C E = -620 8.8 40.00
24 NS 2P S-1 -50 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a11 Miguel del Marmol -Gaetan Collinet 56,08 %
25 NS 2C W+1 -140 8 36.36
26 NS 2S E+2 -180 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a10 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen 41,06 %
27 NS 4P S+1 450 15.4 70.00
28 NS 4P N+1 650 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
a.9 Lydia Luyten -Dominique Sassen 50,85 %
29 NS 4P N-2 -200 1.2 5.45
30 NS 4K S-2 -100 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 12,95 %
Total : 272,5 / 528 = 51,61 %
PAIRE A.1 Francoise Turin -Sophie Tilemans
a.1 Brigitte Velge -Claire de Quirini 48,45 %
1 NS 2C N+1 140 17.5 79.55
2 NS 2P E+4 -230 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
a15 - 0,00 %
3 NS BYE 0 0.00
4 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a14 Claire Destin -Elisabeth Harmant 52,58 %
5 NS 4C E = -420 4.5 20.45
6 NS 3K S-1 -50 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a13 Michel Lievens -Chantal de Lichtervelde 49,83 %
7 NS 3C W+2 -200 15.4 70.00
8 NS 2P W = -110 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a12 Christiane Huby -Gerard Cooreman 39,91 %
9 NS 1S E = -90 15.4 70.00
10 NS 3S S+1 630 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
a11 Miguel del Marmol -Gaetan Collinet 56,08 %
11 NS 3T W = -110 6.6 30.00
12 NS 5T S+1 620 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
a10 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen 41,06 %
13 NS 3S W-2 200 20.8 94.55
14 NS 3S N+1 430 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 87,05 %
a.9 Lydia Luyten -Dominique Sassen 50,85 %
15 NS 4P S-1 -100 5.5 25.00
16 NS 2P S+3 200 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a.8 Pascale Graton -Pascale Bodart 48,86 %
17 NS 4C W-1 50 20 90.91
18 NS 3S S+1 630 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a.7 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren 60,36 %
19 NS 2P W+1 -140 9.9 45.00
20 NS 3K S+2 150 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a.6 Roselyne Delpon -Caroline Lallia 51,04 %
21 NS 5C W = -450 11 50.00
22 NS 4C N+2 480 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.5 Dominique van de Werve -John de Busschere 55,02 %
23 NS 4C E = -620 8.8 40.00
24 NS 2P S-2 -100 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
Total : 249,1 / 484 = 51,47 %
PAIRE A.2 Patrick Gilles -Lydia Wildiers
a.2 Serge Alard -Myriam de Timary 56,17 %
3 NS 2P S+1 140 11 50.00
4 NS 4P N-1 -100 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a.1 Brigitte Velge -Claire de Quirini 48,45 %
5 NS 5C E-1 50 16.5 75.00
6 NS 3K S-1 -50 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
a15 - 0,00 %
7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a14 Claire Destin -Elisabeth Harmant 52,58 %
9 NS 2C E = -110 12.1 55.00
10 NS 3T N+2 150 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a13 Michel Lievens -Chantal de Lichtervelde 49,83 %
11 NS 3P S = 140 18.6 84.55
12 NS 5T S+1 620 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
a12 Christiane Huby -Gerard Cooreman 39,91 %
13 NS 2C N = 110 16.5 75.00
14 NS 2CcE-3 500 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 87,27 %
a11 Miguel del Marmol -Gaetan Collinet 56,08 %
15 NS 5T W-1 50 11 50.00
16 NS 2P S+2 170 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
a10 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen 41,06 %
17 NS 3C W = -140 12 54.55
18 NS 4C S-4 -400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a.9 Lydia Luyten -Dominique Sassen 50,85 %
19 NS 3P W = -140 9.9 45.00
20 NS 4P N-1 -100 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.8 Pascale Graton -Pascale Bodart 48,86 %
21 NS 3C W+3 -230 22 100.00
22 NS 4P N+2 480 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a.7 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren 60,36 %
23 NS 4C E = -620 8.8 40.00
24 NS 2P S+1 140 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
a.6 Roselyne Delpon -Caroline Lallia 51,04 %
25 NS 2C W = -110 15 68.18
26 NS 3C W = -140 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
Total : 248,5 / 484 = 51,34 %
PAIRE A15 Thierry Collart -Annie Zeimes
a14 Claire Destin -Elisabeth Harmant 52,58 %
1 NS 3P W-1 50 11 50.00
2 NS 4P E+2 -480 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a13 Michel Lievens -Chantal de Lichtervelde 49,83 %
3 NS 4C N-1 -50 1.2 5.45
4 NS 4P N-1 -100 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
a12 Christiane Huby -Gerard Cooreman 39,91 %
5 NS 5C E-1 50 16.5 75.00
6 NS 4K S-1 -50 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
a11 Miguel del Marmol -Gaetan Collinet 56,08 %
7 NS 4C W+1 -650 5.5 25.00
8 NS 2C S-1 -50 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a10 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen 41,06 %
9 NS 2K S = 90 20.8 94.55
10 NS 3C E-3 300 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 87,05 %
a.9 Lydia Luyten -Dominique Sassen 50,85 %
11 NS 4P S-1 -50 12.1 55.00
12 NS 3S N+3 690 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a.8 Pascale Graton -Pascale Bodart 48,86 %
13 NS 2S W-1 100 13.2 60.00
14 NS 4P N-1 -50 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a.7 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren 60,36 %
15 NS 5T W-1 50 11 50.00
16 NS 4P S+1 450 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
a.6 Roselyne Delpon -Caroline Lallia 51,04 %
17 NS 2C W = -110 16 72.73
18 NS 3S S+1 630 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.5 Dominique van de Werve -John de Busschere 55,02 %
19 NS 3P W = -140 9.9 45.00
20 NS 3P N+2 200 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
a.4 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 44,66 %
21 NS 4C W+1 -450 11 50.00
22 NS 4C N+2 480 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a15 - 0,00 %
29 NS BYE 0 0.00
30 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 247,3 / 484 = 51,10 %
PAIRE A.3 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne
a.3 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 45,23 %
5 NS 3C E+1 -170 8.8 40.00
6 NS 4K S-2 -100 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 32,50 %
a.2 Serge Alard -Myriam de Timary 56,17 %
7 NS 4C W+1 -650 5.5 25.00
8 NS 3C N-1 -50 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a.1 Brigitte Velge -Claire de Quirini 48,45 %
9 NS 1S E+2 -150 2.3 10.45
10 NS 3S S+2 660 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a15 - 0,00 %
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a14 Claire Destin -Elisabeth Harmant 52,58 %
13 NS 3T E+1 -130 0.1 0.45
14 NS 2P S+1 140 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a13 Michel Lievens -Chantal de Lichtervelde 49,83 %
15 NS 5TcW-2 300 19.7 89.55
16 NS 3P S+2 200 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
a12 Christiane Huby -Gerard Cooreman 39,91 %
17 NS 3C W+1 -170 5 22.73
18 NS 3S S+2 660 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a11 Miguel del Marmol -Gaetan Collinet 56,08 %
19 NS 2P W = -110 15.4 70.00
20 NS 3P N+2 200 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a10 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen 41,06 %
21 NS 4C W+1 -450 11 50.00
22 NS 5C N+1 480 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.9 Lydia Luyten -Dominique Sassen 50,85 %
23 NS 4C E = -620 8.8 40.00
24 NS 2C S-1 -50 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.8 Pascale Graton -Pascale Bodart 48,86 %
25 NS 3S E-1 100 21 95.45
26 NS 4C W-1 100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
a.7 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren 60,36 %
27 NS 4P S+1 450 15.4 70.00
28 NS 6PcN-2 -500 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
Total : 238,5 / 484 = 49,28 %
PAIRE A.7 Stan Tabor -Philippe van der Gracht
a13 Michel Lievens -Chantal de Lichtervelde 49,83 %
1 NS 3C N = 140 17.5 79.55
2 NS 2P E+4 -230 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
a12 Christiane Huby -Gerard Cooreman 39,91 %
3 NS 3C N+2 200 21.9 99.55
4 NS 4P N-1 -100 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
a11 Miguel del Marmol -Gaetan Collinet 56,08 %
5 NS 4C E = -420 4.5 20.45
6 NS 3K S-2 -100 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.7 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren 60,36 %
13 NS 2K W+1 -110 3.4 15.45
14 NS 3S N+2 460 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.6 Roselyne Delpon -Caroline Lallia 51,04 %
15 NS 4P S = 620 21.9 99.55
16 NS 2P S+2 170 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.5 Dominique van de Werve -John de Busschere 55,02 %
17 NS 3C W = -140 12 54.55
18 NS 3S S+1 630 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.4 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 44,66 %
19 NS 4K N-3 -150 3.4 15.45
20 NS 4P N = 620 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 45,23 %
21 NS 5C W = -450 11 50.00
22 NS 4C N+2 480 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.2 Serge Alard -Myriam de Timary 56,17 %
23 NS 4C E = -620 8.8 40.00
24 NS 2S W-1 50 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a.1 Brigitte Velge -Claire de Quirini 48,45 %
25 NS 2C W+1 -140 8 36.36
26 NS 4C W-1 100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a15 - 0,00 %
27 NS BYE 0 0.00
28 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a14 Claire Destin -Elisabeth Harmant 52,58 %
29 NS 4P N-2 -200 1.2 5.45
30 NS 3K S-2 -100 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 12,95 %
Total : 235,7 / 484 = 48,70 %
PAIRE A11 Thierry Bollansee -Pierina Di Vito
a.6 Roselyne Delpon -Caroline Lallia 51,04 %
1 NS 4C N-1 -50 5.5 25.00
2 NS 4P W+2 -480 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
a.5 Dominique van de Werve -John de Busschere 55,02 %
3 NS 2P S+1 140 11 50.00
4 NS 4P N = 620 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a.4 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 44,66 %
5 NS 5C E-1 50 16.5 75.00
6 NS 3P E-1 100 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 45,23 %
7 NS 3C W = -140 17.5 79.55
8 NS 2P W+1 -140 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.2 Serge Alard -Myriam de Timary 56,17 %
9 NS 2C E+1 -140 6.6 30.00
10 NS 4K N = 130 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
a.1 Brigitte Velge -Claire de Quirini 48,45 %
11 NS 3P S-1 -50 12.1 55.00
12 NS 5T S+1 620 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a15 - 0,00 %
13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a11 Miguel del Marmol -Gaetan Collinet 56,08 %
21 NS 4C W+1 -450 11 50.00
22 NS 4C N+2 480 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a10 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen 41,06 %
23 NS 4P N-1 -100 19.7 89.55
24 NS 3S N-3 -150 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.9 Lydia Luyten -Dominique Sassen 50,85 %
25 NS 1S N-1 -50 18 81.82
26 NS 3S E = -600 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.8 Pascale Graton -Pascale Bodart 48,86 %
27 NS 4P S = 420 5.5 25.00
28 NS 4P N = 620 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 54,77 %
a.7 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren 60,36 %
29 NS 4P N-1 -100 7.7 35.00
30 NS 3K S-1 -50 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
Total : 225,6 / 484 = 46,61 %
PAIRE A.6 Anne Van den Berge -Pascale Nobels
a11 Miguel del Marmol -Gaetan Collinet 56,08 %
1 NS 4P W-1 50 11 50.00
2 NS 3S E-1 50 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
a10 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen 41,06 %
3 NS 2P S+1 140 11 50.00
4 NS 4P N-2 -200 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
a.6 Roselyne Delpon -Caroline Lallia 51,04 %
11 NS 4T W = -130 3.4 15.45
12 NS 3S S+3 690 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
a.5 Dominique van de Werve -John de Busschere 55,02 %
13 NS 3T W = -110 3.4 15.45
14 NS 3S N-1 -50 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
a.4 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 44,66 %
15 NS 5T W-1 50 11 50.00
16 NS 2P S+2 170 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 45,23 %
17 NS 2C W+2 -170 5 22.73
18 NS 3T N-1 -100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
a.2 Serge Alard -Myriam de Timary 56,17 %
19 NS 4P W+1 -650 0.1 0.45
20 NS 3P N+3 230 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a.1 Brigitte Velge -Claire de Quirini 48,45 %
21 NS 4C W+1 -450 11 50.00
22 NS 4C N+1 450 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a15 - 0,00 %
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a14 Claire Destin -Elisabeth Harmant 52,58 %
25 NS 2C W = -110 15 68.18
26 NS 5C W-1 100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a13 Michel Lievens -Chantal de Lichtervelde 49,83 %
27 NS 4P S-1 -50 0.1 0.45
28 NS 3P N = 140 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
a12 Christiane Huby -Gerard Cooreman 39,91 %
29 NS 2P N+1 140 15.4 70.00
30 NS 1S N-1 -50 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
Total : 188,1 / 484 = 38,86 %
PAIRE A13 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert
a10 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen 41,06 %
1 NS 2P W = -110 2.3 10.45
2 NS 3P W+3 -230 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a.9 Lydia Luyten -Dominique Sassen 50,85 %
3 NS 3C S+1 170 19.7 89.55
4 NS 4P N-3 -300 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.8 Pascale Graton -Pascale Bodart 48,86 %
5 NS 4C E+1 -450 0.1 0.45
6 NS 2P E+1 -140 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 2,95 %
a.7 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren 60,36 %
7 NS 4C W+1 -650 5.5 25.00
8 NS 3P W+1 -170 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 12,73 %
a.6 Roselyne Delpon -Caroline Lallia 51,04 %
9 NS 2C E+1 -140 6.6 30.00
10 NS 3K N+2 150 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a.5 Dominique van de Werve -John de Busschere 55,02 %
11 NS 4P S-3 -150 0.1 0.45
12 NS 4T S+2 170 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 5,45 %
a.4 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 44,66 %
13 NS 2P S-1 -100 7.7 35.00
14 NS 4P N-2 -100 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 45,23 %
15 NS 3P S = 140 16.5 75.00
16 NS 2P S+3 200 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
a.2 Serge Alard -Myriam de Timary 56,17 %
17 NS 3S E+2 -460 0 0.00
18 NS 3S N+2 660 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a13 Michel Lievens -Chantal de Lichtervelde 49,83 %
25 NS 2P E+1 -140 8 36.36
26 NS 3S E = -600 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
a12 Christiane Huby -Gerard Cooreman 39,91 %
27 NS 4P S = 420 5.5 25.00
28 NS 5T W-2 100 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
a11 Miguel del Marmol -Gaetan Collinet 56,08 %
29 NS 3S S-1 -100 7.7 35.00
30 NS 1S E = -90 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
Total : 154,1 / 528 = 29,19 %
PAIRE a.7 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren
A12 Isabelle de Vanssay -Michele Berrier 51,61 %
3 EO 2P S+1 140 11 50.00
4 EO 4P N-1 -100 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A13 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 29,19 %
7 EO 4C W+1 -650 16.5 75.00
8 EO 3P W+1 -170 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 87,27 %
A14 Sophie Noach -Marie Claire Vienne 54,03 %
11 EO 4T W = -130 18.6 84.55
12 EO 3S N+3 690 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
A.7 Stan Tabor -Philippe van der Gracht 48,70 %
13 EO 2K W+1 -110 18.6 84.55
14 EO 3S N+2 460 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A15 Thierry Collart -Annie Zeimes 51,10 %
15 EO 5T W-1 50 11 50.00
16 EO 4P S+1 450 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
A.8 Giuseppe Napoli -Elena Valsesia 51,88 %
17 EO 2C W+1 -140 10 45.45
18 EO 3S N+1 630 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.1 Francoise Turin -Sophie Tilemans 51,47 %
19 EO 2P W+1 -140 12.1 55.00
20 EO 3K S+2 150 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A.9 Annie Legrand -Eliane de Ceuninck 58,31 %
21 EO 4C W+1 -450 11 50.00
22 EO 4C N+1 450 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.2 Patrick Gilles -Lydia Wildiers 51,34 %
23 EO 4C E = -620 13.2 60.00
24 EO 2P S+1 140 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
A10 Claire Derieuw -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 55,58 %
25 EO 1S N-4 -200 22 100.00
26 EO 3S E+1 -630 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 100,00 %
A.3 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 49,28 %
27 EO 4P S+1 450 6.6 30.00
28 EO 6PcN-2 -500 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
A11 Thierry Bollansee -Pierina Di Vito 46,61 %
29 EO 4P N-1 -100 14.3 65.00
30 EO 3K S-1 -50 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
Total : 318,7 / 528 = 60,36 %
PAIRE a.2 Serge Alard -Myriam de Timary
A.9 Annie Legrand -Eliane de Ceuninck 58,31 %
1 EO 3P W-3 150 0.1 0.45
2 EO 2P W+4 -230 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
A.2 Patrick Gilles -Lydia Wildiers 51,34 %
3 EO 2P S+1 140 11 50.00
4 EO 4P N-1 -100 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A10 Claire Derieuw -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 55,58 %
5 EO 4C E = -420 17.5 79.55
6 EO 3P E-1 100 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.3 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 49,28 %
7 EO 4C W+1 -650 16.5 75.00
8 EO 3C N-1 -50 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A11 Thierry Bollansee -Pierina Di Vito 46,61 %
9 EO 2C E+1 -140 15.4 70.00
10 EO 4K N = 130 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Fabienne Smit 60,23 %
11 EO 3P S = 140 3.4 15.45
12 EO 6S N-3 -300 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A12 Isabelle de Vanssay -Michele Berrier 51,61 %
13 EO 3S W-2 200 1.2 5.45
14 EO 4P N-1 -50 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
A.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Jacqueline de Thier 53,10 %
15 EO 4T W = -130 19.7 89.55
16 EO 3P S+2 200 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A13 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 29,19 %
17 EO 3S E+2 -460 22 100.00
18 EO 3S N+2 660 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.6 Anne Van den Berge -Pascale Nobels 38,86 %
19 EO 4P W+1 -650 21.9 99.55
20 EO 3P N+3 230 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A.7 Stan Tabor -Philippe van der Gracht 48,70 %
23 EO 4C E = -620 13.2 60.00
24 EO 2S W-1 50 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A.8 Giuseppe Napoli -Elena Valsesia 51,88 %
27 EO 4P S = 420 16.5 75.00
28 EO 5T W-1 50 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
Total : 296,6 / 528 = 56,17 %
PAIRE a11 Miguel del Marmol -Gaetan Collinet
A.6 Anne Van den Berge -Pascale Nobels 38,86 %
1 EO 4P W-1 50 11 50.00
2 EO 3S E-1 50 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
A14 Sophie Noach -Marie Claire Vienne 54,03 %
3 EO 2P S+1 140 11 50.00
4 EO 4P N = 620 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A.7 Stan Tabor -Philippe van der Gracht 48,70 %
5 EO 4C E = -420 17.5 79.55
6 EO 3K S-2 -100 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A15 Thierry Collart -Annie Zeimes 51,10 %
7 EO 4C W+1 -650 16.5 75.00
8 EO 2C S-1 -50 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A.1 Francoise Turin -Sophie Tilemans 51,47 %
11 EO 3T W = -110 15.4 70.00
12 EO 5T S+1 620 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
A.2 Patrick Gilles -Lydia Wildiers 51,34 %
15 EO 5T W-1 50 11 50.00
16 EO 2P S+2 170 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A.3 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 49,28 %
19 EO 2P W = -110 6.6 30.00
20 EO 3P N+2 200 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A11 Thierry Bollansee -Pierina Di Vito 46,61 %
21 EO 4C W+1 -450 11 50.00
22 EO 4C N+2 480 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Fabienne Smit 60,23 %
23 EO 4C E = -620 13.2 60.00
24 EO 3C S-1 -50 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A12 Isabelle de Vanssay -Michele Berrier 51,61 %
25 EO 2C W+1 -140 14 63.64
26 EO 2S E+2 -180 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Jacqueline de Thier 53,10 %
27 EO 4P S+1 450 6.6 30.00
28 EO 5T W-1 50 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A13 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 29,19 %
29 EO 3S S-1 -100 14.3 65.00
30 EO 1S E = -90 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
Total : 296,1 / 528 = 56,08 %
PAIRE a.5 Dominique van de Werve -John de Busschere
A11 Thierry Bollansee -Pierina Di Vito 46,61 %
3 EO 2P S+1 140 11 50.00
4 EO 4P N = 620 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A12 Isabelle de Vanssay -Michele Berrier 51,61 %
7 EO 4C W+1 -650 16.5 75.00
8 EO 3C S-1 -50 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Jacqueline de Thier 53,10 %
9 EO 1C E+2 -140 15.4 70.00
10 EO 3T N+3 170 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A13 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 29,19 %
11 EO 4P S-3 -150 21.9 99.55
12 EO 4T S+2 170 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 94,55 %
A.6 Anne Van den Berge -Pascale Nobels 38,86 %
13 EO 3T W = -110 18.6 84.55
14 EO 3S N-1 -50 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
A14 Sophie Noach -Marie Claire Vienne 54,03 %
15 EO 4P S-1 -100 16.5 75.00
16 EO 3S N = 400 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
A.7 Stan Tabor -Philippe van der Gracht 48,70 %
17 EO 3C W = -140 10 45.45
18 EO 3S S+1 630 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A15 Thierry Collart -Annie Zeimes 51,10 %
19 EO 3P W = -140 12.1 55.00
20 EO 3P N+2 200 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
A.8 Giuseppe Napoli -Elena Valsesia 51,88 %
21 EO 4C W+1 -450 11 50.00
22 EO 4C N+3 510 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A.1 Francoise Turin -Sophie Tilemans 51,47 %
23 EO 4C E = -620 13.2 60.00
24 EO 2P S-2 -100 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A.9 Annie Legrand -Eliane de Ceuninck 58,31 %
25 EO 2C W+1 -140 14 63.64
26 EO 4C W-2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A10 Claire Derieuw -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 55,58 %
29 EO 3S N-1 -100 14.3 65.00
30 EO 3C W-2 100 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
Total : 290,5 / 528 = 55,02 %
PAIRE a14 Claire Destin -Elisabeth Harmant
A15 Thierry Collart -Annie Zeimes 51,10 %
1 EO 3P W-1 50 11 50.00
2 EO 4P E+2 -480 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A.8 Giuseppe Napoli -Elena Valsesia 51,88 %
3 EO 2P S+1 140 11 50.00
4 EO 4P N = 620 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A.1 Francoise Turin -Sophie Tilemans 51,47 %
5 EO 4C E = -420 17.5 79.55
6 EO 3K S-1 -50 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A.9 Annie Legrand -Eliane de Ceuninck 58,31 %
7 EO 4C W+1 -650 16.5 75.00
8 EO 3P W = -140 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
A.2 Patrick Gilles -Lydia Wildiers 51,34 %
9 EO 2C E = -110 9.9 45.00
10 EO 3T N+2 150 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A10 Claire Derieuw -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 55,58 %
11 EO 3S E-3 150 0.1 0.45
12 EO 6T S = 1370 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 2,95 %
A.3 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 49,28 %
13 EO 3T E+1 -130 21.9 99.55
14 EO 2P S+1 140 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Fabienne Smit 60,23 %
17 EO 3C W+1 -170 17 77.27
18 EO 3S N+2 660 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Jacqueline de Thier 53,10 %
21 EO 4C W+1 -450 11 50.00
22 EO 6C N = 980 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A.6 Anne Van den Berge -Pascale Nobels 38,86 %
25 EO 2C W = -110 7 31.82
26 EO 5C W-1 100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A14 Sophie Noach -Marie Claire Vienne 54,03 %
27 EO 4P S = 420 16.5 75.00
28 EO 3P N+1 170 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A.7 Stan Tabor -Philippe van der Gracht 48,70 %
29 EO 4P N-2 -200 20.8 94.55
30 EO 3K S-2 -100 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 87,05 %
Total : 277,6 / 528 = 52,58 %
PAIRE a.6 Roselyne Delpon -Caroline Lallia
A11 Thierry Bollansee -Pierina Di Vito 46,61 %
1 EO 4C N-1 -50 16.5 75.00
2 EO 4P W+2 -480 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
A12 Isabelle de Vanssay -Michele Berrier 51,61 %
5 EO 5C E-1 50 5.5 25.00
6 EO 3C N-1 -50 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
A13 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 29,19 %
9 EO 2C E+1 -140 15.4 70.00
10 EO 3K N+2 150 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A.6 Anne Van den Berge -Pascale Nobels 38,86 %
11 EO 4T W = -130 18.6 84.55
12 EO 3S S+3 690 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
A14 Sophie Noach -Marie Claire Vienne 54,03 %
13 EO 3C N-1 -100 14.3 65.00
14 EO 3S N = 400 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.7 Stan Tabor -Philippe van der Gracht 48,70 %
15 EO 4P S = 620 0.1 0.45
16 EO 2P S+2 170 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A15 Thierry Collart -Annie Zeimes 51,10 %
17 EO 2C W = -110 6 27.27
18 EO 3S S+1 630 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.8 Giuseppe Napoli -Elena Valsesia 51,88 %
19 EO 2K N+1 110 0.1 0.45
20 EO 2P N+4 230 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
A.1 Francoise Turin -Sophie Tilemans 51,47 %
21 EO 5C W = -450 11 50.00
22 EO 4C N+2 480 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.9 Annie Legrand -Eliane de Ceuninck 58,31 %
23 EO 4C E = -620 13.2 60.00
24 EO 2P S-2 -100 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A.2 Patrick Gilles -Lydia Wildiers 51,34 %
25 EO 2C W = -110 7 31.82
26 EO 3C W = -140 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A10 Claire Derieuw -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 55,58 %
27 EO 4P S+2 480 0.1 0.45
28 EO 6T W-2 100 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
Total : 269,5 / 528 = 51,04 %
PAIRE a.9 Lydia Luyten -Dominique Sassen
A.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Jacqueline de Thier 53,10 %
1 EO 3P W-1 50 11 50.00
2 EO 2K E+2 -130 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
A13 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 29,19 %
3 EO 3C S+1 170 2.3 10.45
4 EO 4P N-3 -300 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A14 Sophie Noach -Marie Claire Vienne 54,03 %
7 EO 5T N-1 -100 1.2 5.45
8 EO 4C S-2 -100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
A15 Thierry Collart -Annie Zeimes 51,10 %
11 EO 4P S-1 -50 9.9 45.00
12 EO 3S N+3 690 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A.1 Francoise Turin -Sophie Tilemans 51,47 %
15 EO 4P S-1 -100 16.5 75.00
16 EO 2P S+3 200 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A.9 Annie Legrand -Eliane de Ceuninck 58,31 %
17 EO 4C W-1 50 2 9.09
18 EO 3S N+2 660 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
A.2 Patrick Gilles -Lydia Wildiers 51,34 %
19 EO 3P W = -140 12.1 55.00
20 EO 4P N-1 -100 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A10 Claire Derieuw -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 55,58 %
21 EO 4C W+1 -450 11 50.00
22 EO 4C N+2 480 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.3 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 49,28 %
23 EO 4C E = -620 13.2 60.00
24 EO 2C S-1 -50 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A11 Thierry Bollansee -Pierina Di Vito 46,61 %
25 EO 1S N-1 -50 4 18.18
26 EO 3S E = -600 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Fabienne Smit 60,23 %
27 EO 4P S+1 450 6.6 30.00
28 EO 5P N-1 -100 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
A12 Isabelle de Vanssay -Michele Berrier 51,61 %
29 EO 4P N-2 -200 20.8 94.55
30 EO 4K S-2 -100 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 87,05 %
Total : 268,5 / 528 = 50,85 %
PAIRE a13 Michel Lievens -Chantal de Lichtervelde
A.7 Stan Tabor -Philippe van der Gracht 48,70 %
1 EO 3C N = 140 4.5 20.45
2 EO 2P E+4 -230 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
A15 Thierry Collart -Annie Zeimes 51,10 %
3 EO 4C N-1 -50 20.8 94.55
4 EO 4P N-1 -100 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
A.8 Giuseppe Napoli -Elena Valsesia 51,88 %
5 EO 5C E-1 50 5.5 25.00
6 EO 3P E = -140 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
A.1 Francoise Turin -Sophie Tilemans 51,47 %
7 EO 3C W+2 -200 6.6 30.00
8 EO 2P W = -110 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.9 Annie Legrand -Eliane de Ceuninck 58,31 %
9 EO 2C E = -110 9.9 45.00
10 EO 3K N+3 170 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.2 Patrick Gilles -Lydia Wildiers 51,34 %
11 EO 3P S = 140 3.4 15.45
12 EO 5T S+1 620 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
A.3 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 49,28 %
15 EO 5TcW-2 300 2.3 10.45
16 EO 3P S+2 200 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Fabienne Smit 60,23 %
19 EO 3K N-2 -100 4.5 20.45
20 EO 4P N+2 680 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 10,45 %
A.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Jacqueline de Thier 53,10 %
23 EO 4C E = -620 13.2 60.00
24 EO 2P S-1 -50 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A13 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 29,19 %
25 EO 2P E+1 -140 14 63.64
26 EO 3S E = -600 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
A.6 Anne Van den Berge -Pascale Nobels 38,86 %
27 EO 4P S-1 -50 21.9 99.55
28 EO 3P N = 140 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A14 Sophie Noach -Marie Claire Vienne 54,03 %
29 EO 3S S = 600 4.5 20.45
30 EO 3T S-3 -150 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
Total : 263,1 / 528 = 49,83 %
PAIRE a.8 Pascale Graton -Pascale Bodart
A12 Isabelle de Vanssay -Michele Berrier 51,61 %
1 EO 4P W+1 -450 21.9 99.55
2 EO 4P W+2 -480 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 92,05 %
A13 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 29,19 %
5 EO 4C E+1 -450 21.9 99.55
6 EO 2P E+1 -140 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 97,05 %
A14 Sophie Noach -Marie Claire Vienne 54,03 %
9 EO 3C E+1 -170 21.9 99.55
10 EO 4T N+1 150 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 89,55 %
A15 Thierry Collart -Annie Zeimes 51,10 %
13 EO 2S W-1 100 8.8 40.00
14 EO 4P N-1 -50 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A.8 Giuseppe Napoli -Elena Valsesia 51,88 %
15 EO 4P S-2 -200 21.9 99.55
16 EO 2P S+3 200 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A.1 Francoise Turin -Sophie Tilemans 51,47 %
17 EO 4C W-1 50 2 9.09
18 EO 3S S+1 630 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A.9 Annie Legrand -Eliane de Ceuninck 58,31 %
19 EO 4K N-1 -50 2.3 10.45
20 EO 2P N+4 230 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
A.2 Patrick Gilles -Lydia Wildiers 51,34 %
21 EO 3C W+3 -230 0 0.00
22 EO 4P N+2 480 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A10 Claire Derieuw -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 55,58 %
23 EO 4P N = 620 0.1 0.45
24 EO 2P S-1 -50 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
A.3 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 49,28 %
25 EO 3S E-1 100 1 4.55
26 EO 4C W-1 100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
A11 Thierry Bollansee -Pierina Di Vito 46,61 %
27 EO 4P S = 420 16.5 75.00
28 EO 4P N = 620 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 45,23 %
A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Fabienne Smit 60,23 %
29 EO 4P N+1 650 0.1 0.45
30 EO 4PcW-3 500 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 0,45 %
Total : 258,0 / 528 = 48,86 %
PAIRE a.1 Brigitte Velge -Claire de Quirini
A.1 Francoise Turin -Sophie Tilemans 51,47 %
1 EO 2C N+1 140 4.5 20.45
2 EO 2P E+4 -230 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
A.9 Annie Legrand -Eliane de Ceuninck 58,31 %
3 EO 2P S+1 140 11 50.00
4 EO 4P N = 620 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A.2 Patrick Gilles -Lydia Wildiers 51,34 %
5 EO 5C E-1 50 5.5 25.00
6 EO 3K S-1 -50 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
A10 Claire Derieuw -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 55,58 %
7 EO 4C W+1 -650 16.5 75.00
8 EO 2C S = 110 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
A.3 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 49,28 %
9 EO 1S E+2 -150 19.7 89.55
10 EO 3S S+2 660 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A11 Thierry Bollansee -Pierina Di Vito 46,61 %
11 EO 3P S-1 -50 9.9 45.00
12 EO 5T S+1 620 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Fabienne Smit 60,23 %
13 EO 1S W = -90 11 50.00
14 EO 3S N = 400 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A12 Isabelle de Vanssay -Michele Berrier 51,61 %
15 EO 3P S = 140 5.5 25.00
16 EO 2P S+3 200 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
A.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Jacqueline de Thier 53,10 %
17 EO 2C W+2 -170 17 77.27
18 EO 3S N+1 630 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A.6 Anne Van den Berge -Pascale Nobels 38,86 %
21 EO 4C W+1 -450 11 50.00
22 EO 4C N+1 450 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.7 Stan Tabor -Philippe van der Gracht 48,70 %
25 EO 2C W+1 -140 14 63.64
26 EO 4C W-1 100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.8 Giuseppe Napoli -Elena Valsesia 51,88 %
29 EO 3S N-1 -100 14.3 65.00
30 EO 3K S-2 -100 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
Total : 255,8 / 528 = 48,45 %
PAIRE a.3 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens
A10 Claire Derieuw -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 55,58 %
3 EO 4C N-1 -50 20.8 94.55
4 EO 4P N = 620 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A.3 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 49,28 %
5 EO 3C E+1 -170 13.2 60.00
6 EO 4K S-2 -100 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 67,50 %
A11 Thierry Bollansee -Pierina Di Vito 46,61 %
7 EO 3C W = -140 4.5 20.45
8 EO 2P W+1 -140 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Fabienne Smit 60,23 %
9 EO 3K S-1 -50 4.5 20.45
10 EO 3T N+3 170 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
A12 Isabelle de Vanssay -Michele Berrier 51,61 %
11 EO 2P N = 110 6.6 30.00
12 EO 6T S = 1370 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
A.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Jacqueline de Thier 53,10 %
13 EO 2C S = 110 5.5 25.00
14 EO 4P N-1 -50 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A13 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 29,19 %
15 EO 3P S = 140 5.5 25.00
16 EO 2P S+3 200 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
A.6 Anne Van den Berge -Pascale Nobels 38,86 %
17 EO 2C W+2 -170 17 77.27
18 EO 3T N-1 -100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
A14 Sophie Noach -Marie Claire Vienne 54,03 %
19 EO 3P W = -140 12.1 55.00
20 EO 4P N+1 650 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A.7 Stan Tabor -Philippe van der Gracht 48,70 %
21 EO 5C W = -450 11 50.00
22 EO 4C N+2 480 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.8 Giuseppe Napoli -Elena Valsesia 51,88 %
25 EO 2C W-1 100 1 4.55
26 EO 4C W-1 100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
A.9 Annie Legrand -Eliane de Ceuninck 58,31 %
29 EO 2P N = 110 8.8 40.00
30 EO 2T S-1 -50 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
Total : 238,8 / 528 = 45,23 %
PAIRE a.4 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck
A10 Claire Derieuw -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 55,58 %
1 EO 2C N+1 140 4.5 20.45
2 EO 4P E+2 -480 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A11 Thierry Bollansee -Pierina Di Vito 46,61 %
5 EO 5C E-1 50 5.5 25.00
6 EO 3P E-1 100 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Fabienne Smit 60,23 %
7 EO 4C W = -620 8.8 40.00
8 EO 2C S = 110 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A12 Isabelle de Vanssay -Michele Berrier 51,61 %
9 EO 1S N = 90 1.2 5.45
10 EO 2K N+4 170 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
A.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Jacqueline de Thier 53,10 %
11 EO 3P S-2 -100 13.2 60.00
12 EO 3S N+3 690 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A13 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 29,19 %
13 EO 2P S-1 -100 14.3 65.00
14 EO 4P N-2 -100 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
A.6 Anne Van den Berge -Pascale Nobels 38,86 %
15 EO 5T W-1 50 11 50.00
16 EO 2P S+2 170 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A14 Sophie Noach -Marie Claire Vienne 54,03 %
17 EO 4C W-1 50 2 9.09
18 EO 3S N+2 660 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
A.7 Stan Tabor -Philippe van der Gracht 48,70 %
19 EO 4K N-3 -150 18.6 84.55
20 EO 4P N = 620 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
A15 Thierry Collart -Annie Zeimes 51,10 %
21 EO 4C W+1 -450 11 50.00
22 EO 4C N+2 480 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.8 Giuseppe Napoli -Elena Valsesia 51,88 %
23 EO 4C W = -620 13.2 60.00
24 EO 2P S-2 -100 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A.9 Annie Legrand -Eliane de Ceuninck 58,31 %
27 EO 4P S+1 450 6.6 30.00
28 EO 4P N = 620 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
Total : 235,8 / 528 = 44,66 %
PAIRE a10 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen
A13 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 29,19 %
1 EO 2P W = -110 19.7 89.55
2 EO 3P W+3 -230 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A.6 Anne Van den Berge -Pascale Nobels 38,86 %
3 EO 2P S+1 140 11 50.00
4 EO 4P N-2 -200 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A14 Sophie Noach -Marie Claire Vienne 54,03 %
5 EO 5C E-1 50 5.5 25.00
6 EO 3C N+1 170 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 12,73 %
A15 Thierry Collart -Annie Zeimes 51,10 %
9 EO 2K S = 90 1.2 5.45
10 EO 3C E-3 300 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 12,95 %
A.1 Francoise Turin -Sophie Tilemans 51,47 %
13 EO 3S W-2 200 1.2 5.45
14 EO 3S N+1 430 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 12,95 %
A.2 Patrick Gilles -Lydia Wildiers 51,34 %
17 EO 3C W = -140 10 45.45
18 EO 4C S-4 -400 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A10 Claire Derieuw -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 55,58 %
19 EO 4K N-3 -150 18.6 84.55
20 EO 4P N+1 650 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.3 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 49,28 %
21 EO 4C W+1 -450 11 50.00
22 EO 5C N+1 480 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A11 Thierry Bollansee -Pierina Di Vito 46,61 %
23 EO 4P N-1 -100 2.3 10.45
24 EO 3S N-3 -150 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Fabienne Smit 60,23 %
25 EO 2C W+2 -170 20 90.91
26 EO 4C W-1 100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A12 Isabelle de Vanssay -Michele Berrier 51,61 %
27 EO 4P S+1 450 6.6 30.00
28 EO 4P N+1 650 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
A.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Jacqueline de Thier 53,10 %
29 EO 4P N = 620 2.3 10.45
30 EO 2K S = 90 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 15,45 %
Total : 216,8 / 528 = 41,06 %
PAIRE a12 Christiane Huby -Gerard Cooreman
A14 Sophie Noach -Marie Claire Vienne 54,03 %
1 EO 4C N-1 -50 16.5 75.00
2 EO 3S E+1 -430 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 67,50 %
A.7 Stan Tabor -Philippe van der Gracht 48,70 %
3 EO 3C N+2 200 0.1 0.45
4 EO 4P N-1 -100 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
A15 Thierry Collart -Annie Zeimes 51,10 %
5 EO 5C E-1 50 5.5 25.00
6 EO 4K S-1 -50 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
A.8 Giuseppe Napoli -Elena Valsesia 51,88 %
7 EO 5T N-1 -100 1.2 5.45
8 EO 3P W-1 50 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 12,95 %
A.1 Francoise Turin -Sophie Tilemans 51,47 %
9 EO 1S E = -90 6.6 30.00
10 EO 3S S+1 630 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
A.2 Patrick Gilles -Lydia Wildiers 51,34 %
13 EO 2C N = 110 5.5 25.00
14 EO 2CcE-3 500 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 12,73 %
A.3 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 49,28 %
17 EO 3C W+1 -170 17 77.27
18 EO 3S S+2 660 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Fabienne Smit 60,23 %
21 EO 4C W+2 -480 22 100.00
22 EO 6C N = 980 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A12 Isabelle de Vanssay -Michele Berrier 51,61 %
23 EO 4C E = -620 13.2 60.00
24 EO 2P S-1 -50 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Jacqueline de Thier 53,10 %
25 EO 2C W+1 -140 14 63.64
26 EO 4C W-1 100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A13 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 29,19 %
27 EO 4P S = 420 16.5 75.00
28 EO 5T W-2 100 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
A.6 Anne Van den Berge -Pascale Nobels 38,86 %
29 EO 2P N+1 140 6.6 30.00
30 EO 1S N-1 -50 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
Total : 210,7 / 528 = 39,91 %
PAIRE a15 -
A.8 Giuseppe Napoli -Elena Valsesia 51,88 %
1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.1 Francoise Turin -Sophie Tilemans 51,47 %
3 EO BYE 0 0.00
4 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.9 Annie Legrand -Eliane de Ceuninck 58,31 %
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.2 Patrick Gilles -Lydia Wildiers 51,34 %
7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A10 Claire Derieuw -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 55,58 %
9 EO BYE 0 0.00
10 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.3 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 49,28 %
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A11 Thierry Bollansee -Pierina Di Vito 46,61 %
13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Fabienne Smit 60,23 %
15 EO BYE 0 0.00
16 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Jacqueline de Thier 53,10 %
19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.6 Anne Van den Berge -Pascale Nobels 38,86 %
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.7 Stan Tabor -Philippe van der Gracht 48,70 %
27 EO BYE 0 0.00
28 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A15 Thierry Collart -Annie Zeimes 51,10 %
29 EO BYE 0 0.00
30 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 660 = 0,00 %
|