B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 64,46 A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles
--- 2 59,77 A10 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart
--- 3 56,94 A12 Grazia Neuenschwander -Diane Deslignes
--- 4 56,84 A.4 Michele Berrier -Teresa Dekoster
--- 5 52,82 A.6 Brigitte Brusselmans -Claire Derieuw
--- 6 51,76 A11 Pascale Ortegat -Benoit Ortegat
--- 7 50,32 A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli
--- 8 49,81 A.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Annie Legrand
--- 9 47,93 A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Annette Fobe
--- 10 47,77 A.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne
--- 11 46,16 A15 Sandra Dallemagne -Catherine de Moffarts
--- 12 45,17 A14 Sylviane Delbeke -Virginie Van Damme
--- 13 44,48 A13 Iris de Limbourg -Marguerite Verstraeten
--- 14 41,50 A.8 Patricia Bardy -Patrizia Vaccani
--- 15 34,73 A.9 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 60,80 a.5 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Marie Claire Vienne
--- 2 58,66 a.4 Roselyne Delpon -Sybille Gillet
--- 3 57,65 a.6 Elisabeth Harmant -Claire Destin
--- 4 57,03 a.8 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens
--- 5 52,95 a11 Antoinette Jourdain -Francoise Duren
--- 6 52,67 a15 Dominique Sassen -Jeannine Wanderpepen
--- 7 52,44 a13 Michel Lievens -Marie J. de Wagheneire
--- 8 49,32 a14 Therese Roland -Chantal Woitrin
--- 9 47,59 a.3 Michele de Kerchove -Puce de Meulemeester
--- 10 45,87 a10 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere
--- 11 45,09 a.1 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant
--- 12 44,66 a.7 Myriam de Timary -Stan Tabor
--- 13 42,77 a.2 Noelle Fosse -Gaetan van de Werve
--- 14 32,52 a12 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck
--- 15 0,00 a.9 -
PAIRE A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles
a.2 Noelle Fosse -Gaetan van de Werve 42,77 %
3 NS 3S S+1 430 17.5 79.55
4 NS 3K N+1 130 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a.1 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 45,09 %
5 NS 3S W+1 -430 11 50.00
6 NS 3S S+1 430 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a15 Dominique Sassen -Jeannine Wanderpepen 52,67 %
7 NS 3P N-2 -200 5.5 25.00
8 NS 2P S+1 140 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a14 Therese Roland -Chantal Woitrin 49,32 %
9 NS 2P E = -110 12 54.55
10 NS 3S E-1 100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a13 Michel Lievens -Marie J. de Wagheneire 52,44 %
11 NS 2C W = -110 6.6 30.00
12 NS 2S E-2 100 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
a12 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 32,52 %
13 NS 3S S+1 630 19 86.36
14 NS 2S W-2 100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
a11 Antoinette Jourdain -Francoise Duren 52,95 %
15 NS 2P W-1 50 21.9 99.55
16 NS 3P W = -170 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a10 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 45,87 %
17 NS 2C N = 110 12.1 55.00
18 NS 2P W+1 -140 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
a.9 - 0,00 %
19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.8 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 57,03 %
21 NS 2S S = 120 21.9 99.55
22 NS 4P E+1 -650 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a.7 Myriam de Timary -Stan Tabor 44,66 %
23 NS 1S N+1 120 19.7 89.55
24 NS 2S S+1 150 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
a.6 Elisabeth Harmant -Claire Destin 57,65 %
25 NS 2C W+3 -200 18.6 84.55
26 NS 3P N-1 -100 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
Total : 312,0 / 484 = 64,46 %
PAIRE A10 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart
a.4 Roselyne Delpon -Sybille Gillet 58,66 %
1 NS 5PcS-2 -300 18.6 84.55
2 NS 2P S = 110 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
a.3 Michele de Kerchove -Puce de Meulemeester 47,59 %
3 NS 3S N-1 -50 3.4 15.45
4 NS 3T W-3 300 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.2 Noelle Fosse -Gaetan van de Werve 42,77 %
5 NS 3S W+3 -490 1 4.55
6 NS 3S S+2 460 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.1 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 45,09 %
7 NS 4PcN-2 -500 2.3 10.45
8 NS 3P S+1 170 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a15 Dominique Sassen -Jeannine Wanderpepen 52,67 %
9 NS 3K E+1 -130 9 40.91
10 NS 3T E = -110 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a14 Therese Roland -Chantal Woitrin 49,32 %
11 NS 2S E-2 100 18.6 84.55
12 NS 2C E-1 50 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
a10 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 45,87 %
19 NS 3P S-1 -50 15.4 70.00
20 NS 2C N+1 140 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
a.9 - 0,00 %
21 NS BYE 0 0.00
22 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.8 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 57,03 %
23 NS 2K N = 90 7.7 35.00
24 NS 1S E-3 150 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a.7 Myriam de Timary -Stan Tabor 44,66 %
25 NS 4C W = -620 13.2 60.00
26 NS 4C E-2 200 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
a.6 Elisabeth Harmant -Claire Destin 57,65 %
27 NS 3T W+1 -130 16.5 75.00
28 NS 5C N = 650 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
a.5 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Marie Claire Vienne 60,80 %
29 NS 4P S-1 -100 0.1 0.45
30 NS 3P S = 140 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
Total : 289,3 / 484 = 59,77 %
PAIRE A12 Grazia Neuenschwander -Diane Deslignes
a.8 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 57,03 %
1 NS 5PcS-2 -300 18.6 84.55
2 NS 2P S = 110 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
a.7 Myriam de Timary -Stan Tabor 44,66 %
3 NS 3S S+1 430 17.5 79.55
4 NS 1S E-2 200 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
a.6 Elisabeth Harmant -Claire Destin 57,65 %
5 NS 3S W+3 -490 1 4.55
6 NS 4P N+1 450 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a.5 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Marie Claire Vienne 60,80 %
7 NS 3P N+1 170 17.5 79.55
8 NS 4P S-1 -50 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.4 Roselyne Delpon -Sybille Gillet 58,66 %
9 NS 3P E = -140 4 18.18
10 NS 3S E-1 100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.3 Michele de Kerchove -Puce de Meulemeester 47,59 %
11 NS 4C W-2 100 18.6 84.55
12 NS 1S E = -90 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
a.2 Noelle Fosse -Gaetan van de Werve 42,77 %
13 NS 3S S = 600 11 50.00
14 NS 1S W-2 100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a.1 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 45,09 %
15 NS 3P W = -140 11 50.00
16 NS 4P E-1 100 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
a12 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 32,52 %
23 NS 2P E-1 100 13.2 60.00
24 NS 1S E-5 250 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
a11 Antoinette Jourdain -Francoise Duren 52,95 %
25 NS 4C W = -620 13.2 60.00
26 NS 3C E = -140 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a10 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 45,87 %
27 NS 3S W = -400 8.8 40.00
28 NS 6C N-1 -100 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
a.9 - 0,00 %
29 NS BYE 0 0.00
30 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 275,6 / 484 = 56,94 %
PAIRE A.4 Michele Berrier -Teresa Dekoster
a.4 Roselyne Delpon -Sybille Gillet 58,66 %
7 NS 3P N-2 -200 5.5 25.00
8 NS 2P S+1 140 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a.3 Michele de Kerchove -Puce de Meulemeester 47,59 %
9 NS 2S E-1 100 16 72.73
10 NS 3S E-1 100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a.2 Noelle Fosse -Gaetan van de Werve 42,77 %
11 NS 2S E-2 100 18.6 84.55
12 NS 1S E-2 100 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 87,05 %
a.1 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 45,09 %
13 NS 3S S = 600 11 50.00
14 NS 3P E-2 100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a15 Dominique Sassen -Jeannine Wanderpepen 52,67 %
15 NS 2P W+1 -140 11 50.00
16 NS 2P E+2 -170 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a14 Therese Roland -Chantal Woitrin 49,32 %
17 NS 2C N+1 140 17.5 79.55
18 NS 3S E = -400 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a13 Michel Lievens -Marie J. de Wagheneire 52,44 %
19 NS 2K E = -90 9.9 45.00
20 NS 4C N-1 -100 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a12 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 32,52 %
21 NS 3K S = 110 17.5 79.55
22 NS 4P E-1 100 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 84,55 %
a11 Antoinette Jourdain -Francoise Duren 52,95 %
23 NS 2T N+1 110 17.5 79.55
24 NS 3S S-1 -50 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a10 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 45,87 %
25 NS 4C W+1 -650 5.5 25.00
26 NS 2P N = 110 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
a.9 - 0,00 %
27 NS BYE 0 0.00
28 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.8 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 57,03 %
29 NS 3P S = 140 8.8 40.00
30 NS 3P S-1 -50 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
Total : 275,1 / 484 = 56,84 %
PAIRE A.6 Brigitte Brusselmans -Claire Derieuw
a11 Antoinette Jourdain -Francoise Duren 52,95 %
1 NS 5T E = -400 8.8 40.00
2 NS 2P S = 110 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a10 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 45,87 %
3 NS 3S S = 400 9.9 45.00
4 NS 2S N+1 150 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.6 Elisabeth Harmant -Claire Destin 57,65 %
11 NS 3C E-2 100 18.6 84.55
12 NS 1S E = -90 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
a.5 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Marie Claire Vienne 60,80 %
13 NS 3S N = 600 11 50.00
14 NS 4C N-3 -150 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a.4 Roselyne Delpon -Sybille Gillet 58,66 %
15 NS 3C N-1 -100 19.7 89.55
16 NS 3P E = -140 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 89,55 %
a.3 Michele de Kerchove -Puce de Meulemeester 47,59 %
17 NS 3S S-2 -100 2.3 10.45
18 NS 2S E+1 -150 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.2 Noelle Fosse -Gaetan van de Werve 42,77 %
19 NS 1S N-1 -50 15.4 70.00
20 NS 4C N-2 -200 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 45,23 %
a.1 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 45,09 %
21 NS 2C E = -110 9.9 45.00
22 NS 4P E-1 100 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
a15 Dominique Sassen -Jeannine Wanderpepen 52,67 %
23 NS 1S N = 90 7.7 35.00
24 NS 3S N = 400 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a14 Therese Roland -Chantal Woitrin 49,32 %
25 NS 4C W+1 -650 5.5 25.00
26 NS 3C E = -140 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 27,50 %
a13 Michel Lievens -Marie J. de Wagheneire 52,44 %
27 NS 3T W+1 -130 16.5 75.00
28 NS 5C N = 650 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
a12 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 32,52 %
29 NS 3P S = 140 8.8 40.00
30 NS 3P S = 140 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
Total : 278,9 / 528 = 52,82 %
PAIRE A11 Pascale Ortegat -Benoit Ortegat
a.6 Elisabeth Harmant -Claire Destin 57,65 %
1 NS 5T E = -400 8.8 40.00
2 NS 2P S-2 -200 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
a.5 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Marie Claire Vienne 60,80 %
3 NS 3S N+1 430 17.5 79.55
4 NS 2K N = 90 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.4 Roselyne Delpon -Sybille Gillet 58,66 %
5 NS 4C W+1 -450 4 18.18
6 NS 4P N = 420 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
a.3 Michele de Kerchove -Puce de Meulemeester 47,59 %
7 NS 4T E = -130 8.8 40.00
8 NS 2P S+1 140 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.2 Noelle Fosse -Gaetan van de Werve 42,77 %
9 NS 3S E-2 200 20 90.91
10 NS 3K W = -110 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a.1 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 45,09 %
11 NS 2K N-1 -50 9.9 45.00
12 NS 1S E-1 50 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a15 Dominique Sassen -Jeannine Wanderpepen 52,67 %
13 NS 3S S+2 660 22 100.00
14 NS 2P E = -110 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a11 Antoinette Jourdain -Francoise Duren 52,95 %
21 NS 3K N = 110 17.5 79.55
22 NS 4P E = -620 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
a10 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 45,87 %
23 NS 2P W = -110 1.2 5.45
24 NS 3S S+1 430 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.9 - 0,00 %
25 NS BYE 0 0.00
26 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.8 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 57,03 %
27 NS 3S W = -400 8.8 40.00
28 NS 6C N = 1430 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
a.7 Myriam de Timary -Stan Tabor 44,66 %
29 NS 3P S = 140 8.8 40.00
30 NS 2P S+1 140 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
Total : 250,5 / 484 = 51,76 %
PAIRE A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli
a13 Michel Lievens -Marie J. de Wagheneire 52,44 %
1 NS 5T E = -400 8.8 40.00
2 NS 2P S = 110 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a12 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 32,52 %
3 NS 3S N+1 430 17.5 79.55
4 NS 2C S = 110 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
a11 Antoinette Jourdain -Francoise Duren 52,95 %
5 NS 3S W+1 -430 11 50.00
6 NS 4P N+1 450 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a.7 Myriam de Timary -Stan Tabor 44,66 %
13 NS 3S S-1 -100 3 13.64
14 NS 2P E = -110 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.6 Elisabeth Harmant -Claire Destin 57,65 %
15 NS 3C N-2 -200 2.3 10.45
16 NS 3P E+1 -170 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a.5 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Marie Claire Vienne 60,80 %
17 NS 4C N-2 -100 2.3 10.45
18 NS 3S W = -400 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 10,45 %
a.4 Roselyne Delpon -Sybille Gillet 58,66 %
19 NS 3C E-1 100 20.8 94.55
20 NS 3C N = 140 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 92,05 %
a.3 Michele de Kerchove -Puce de Meulemeester 47,59 %
21 NS 4C E-2 100 13.2 60.00
22 NS 3P E+2 -200 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
a.2 Noelle Fosse -Gaetan van de Werve 42,77 %
23 NS 2P W-1 100 13.2 60.00
24 NS 1S S+2 150 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.1 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 45,09 %
25 NS 4C W+1 -650 5.5 25.00
26 NS 3C E = -140 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 27,50 %
a15 Dominique Sassen -Jeannine Wanderpepen 52,67 %
27 NS 3S W-2 100 21.9 99.55
28 NS 5C N-1 -100 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a14 Therese Roland -Chantal Woitrin 49,32 %
29 NS 4P S = 620 20.8 94.55
30 NS 2P S = 110 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
Total : 265,7 / 528 = 50,32 %
PAIRE A.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Annie Legrand
a.9 - 0,00 %
1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.5 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Marie Claire Vienne 60,80 %
9 NS 4P E-2 200 20 90.91
10 NS 3T E-1 100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
a.4 Roselyne Delpon -Sybille Gillet 58,66 %
11 NS 2S E = -120 4.5 20.45
12 NS 2C E+1 -140 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 10,45 %
a.3 Michele de Kerchove -Puce de Meulemeester 47,59 %
13 NS 4P N-3 -300 0 0.00
14 NS 1S W-2 100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a.2 Noelle Fosse -Gaetan van de Werve 42,77 %
15 NS 2P W+1 -140 11 50.00
16 NS 4P E = -620 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
a.1 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 45,09 %
17 NS 3C N = 140 17.5 79.55
18 NS 2P W+1 -140 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
a15 Dominique Sassen -Jeannine Wanderpepen 52,67 %
19 NS 2P S-2 -100 6.6 30.00
20 NS 4C N-3 -300 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
a14 Therese Roland -Chantal Woitrin 49,32 %
21 NS 3K N = 110 17.5 79.55
22 NS 4P E = -620 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
a13 Michel Lievens -Marie J. de Wagheneire 52,44 %
23 NS 2P W-1 100 13.2 60.00
24 NS 1S S+3 180 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
a12 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 32,52 %
25 NS 4C W-1 100 21.9 99.55
26 NS 3C E-1 100 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 89,55 %
a11 Antoinette Jourdain -Francoise Duren 52,95 %
27 NS 3S W = -400 8.8 40.00
28 NS 6C N-1 -100 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
a10 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 45,87 %
29 NS 3P S = 140 8.8 40.00
30 NS 2P S = 110 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
Total : 241,1 / 484 = 49,81 %
PAIRE A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Annette Fobe
a.1 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 45,09 %
1 NS 5T E = -400 8.8 40.00
2 NS 2P S = 110 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a15 Dominique Sassen -Jeannine Wanderpepen 52,67 %
3 NS 3S S+1 430 17.5 79.55
4 NS 2K N = 90 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a14 Therese Roland -Chantal Woitrin 49,32 %
5 NS 3S W+1 -430 11 50.00
6 NS 4P N = 420 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a13 Michel Lievens -Marie J. de Wagheneire 52,44 %
7 NS 4PcN-3 -800 0.1 0.45
8 NS 2P S+1 140 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a12 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 32,52 %
9 NS 2C N-1 -50 14 63.64
10 NS 2T E+1 -110 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a11 Antoinette Jourdain -Francoise Duren 52,95 %
11 NS 2S E-1 50 13.2 60.00
12 NS 1S E+1 -120 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
a10 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 45,87 %
13 NS 3S S = 600 11 50.00
14 NS 3T W = -110 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.9 - 0,00 %
15 NS BYE 0 0.00
16 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.8 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 57,03 %
17 NS 2C N = 110 12.1 55.00
18 NS 2P W+1 -140 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
a.7 Myriam de Timary -Stan Tabor 44,66 %
19 NS 3S W-1 100 20.8 94.55
20 NS 3C N = 140 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 92,05 %
a.6 Elisabeth Harmant -Claire Destin 57,65 %
21 NS 3C E = -140 3.4 15.45
22 NS 4P E+1 -650 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 17,95 %
a.5 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Marie Claire Vienne 60,80 %
23 NS 2S E-3 300 21.9 99.55
24 NS 2K S+2 130 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
Total : 232,0 / 484 = 47,93 %
PAIRE A.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne
a.3 Michele de Kerchove -Puce de Meulemeester 47,59 %
5 NS 2S W+2 -180 20 90.91
6 NS 3S S = 400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.2 Noelle Fosse -Gaetan van de Werve 42,77 %
7 NS 4T E-3 300 21.9 99.55
8 NS 3P S-1 -50 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a.1 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 45,09 %
9 NS 4P W-2 200 20 90.91
10 NS 5K E-2 200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 95,45 %
a15 Dominique Sassen -Jeannine Wanderpepen 52,67 %
11 NS 3K N-1 -50 9.9 45.00
12 NS 1S E = -90 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
a14 Therese Roland -Chantal Woitrin 49,32 %
13 NS 3S S = 600 11 50.00
14 NS 2S W-2 100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a13 Michel Lievens -Marie J. de Wagheneire 52,44 %
15 NS 2P W+1 -140 11 50.00
16 NS 2P E+2 -170 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a12 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 32,52 %
17 NS 4C N-1 -50 7.7 35.00
18 NS 2C W+1 -140 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a11 Antoinette Jourdain -Francoise Duren 52,95 %
19 NS 1S E+2 -150 2.3 10.45
20 NS 4C N-2 -200 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 15,45 %
a10 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 45,87 %
21 NS 3C E = -140 3.4 15.45
22 NS 4P E-1 100 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.9 - 0,00 %
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.8 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 57,03 %
25 NS 4C W+2 -680 0.1 0.45
26 NS 2C E+2 -170 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 0,45 %
a.7 Myriam de Timary -Stan Tabor 44,66 %
27 NS 3S W = -400 8.8 40.00
28 NS 4C N+1 650 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
Total : 231,2 / 484 = 47,77 %
PAIRE A15 Sandra Dallemagne -Catherine de Moffarts
a14 Therese Roland -Chantal Woitrin 49,32 %
1 NS 4C E = -420 0.1 0.45
2 NS 2P S = 110 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
a13 Michel Lievens -Marie J. de Wagheneire 52,44 %
3 NS 3S S = 400 9.9 45.00
4 NS 1C S+3 170 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a12 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 32,52 %
5 NS 4C W-2 100 22 100.00
6 NS 3S S+1 430 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a11 Antoinette Jourdain -Francoise Duren 52,95 %
7 NS 5T E-1 100 13.2 60.00
8 NS 3P S = 140 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a10 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 45,87 %
9 NS 4K E = -130 9 40.91
10 NS 3T E+1 -130 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
a.9 - 0,00 %
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.8 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 57,03 %
13 NS 3S S+1 630 19 86.36
14 NS 2P E = -110 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.7 Myriam de Timary -Stan Tabor 44,66 %
15 NS 2P W+1 -140 11 50.00
16 NS 4P E = -620 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
a.6 Elisabeth Harmant -Claire Destin 57,65 %
17 NS 3C N = 140 17.5 79.55
18 NS 2S E+1 -150 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
a.5 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Marie Claire Vienne 60,80 %
19 NS 3P W = -140 4.5 20.45
20 NS 4C N-2 -200 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
a.4 Roselyne Delpon -Sybille Gillet 58,66 %
21 NS 2P W+1 -140 3.4 15.45
22 NS 4P E+1 -650 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 17,95 %
a15 Dominique Sassen -Jeannine Wanderpepen 52,67 %
29 NS 4C E-2 200 17.5 79.55
30 NS 3P S = 140 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 82,05 %
Total : 223,4 / 484 = 46,16 %
PAIRE A14 Sylviane Delbeke -Virginie Van Damme
a12 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 32,52 %
1 NS 5T E = -400 8.8 40.00
2 NS 2P S = 110 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a11 Antoinette Jourdain -Francoise Duren 52,95 %
3 NS 3S N-1 -50 3.4 15.45
4 NS 2S E-3 300 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a10 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 45,87 %
5 NS 4C W = -420 18 81.82
6 NS 3S S+2 460 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
a.9 - 0,00 %
7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.8 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 57,03 %
9 NS 2P E+1 -140 4 18.18
10 NS 3T E = -110 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a.7 Myriam de Timary -Stan Tabor 44,66 %
11 NS 2S E+1 -150 0.1 0.45
12 NS 2S W-2 100 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.6 Elisabeth Harmant -Claire Destin 57,65 %
13 NS 3S S-1 -100 3 13.64
14 NS 1S W-2 100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.5 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Marie Claire Vienne 60,80 %
15 NS 4C N-3 -300 0.1 0.45
16 NS 2P E+2 -170 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a.4 Roselyne Delpon -Sybille Gillet 58,66 %
17 NS 3S S-2 -100 2.3 10.45
18 NS 3S E = -400 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 10,45 %
a.3 Michele de Kerchove -Puce de Meulemeester 47,59 %
19 NS 1S E = -90 9.9 45.00
20 NS 4C N-1 -100 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a14 Therese Roland -Chantal Woitrin 49,32 %
27 NS 3S W+1 -430 2.3 10.45
28 NS 6C N = 1430 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a13 Michel Lievens -Marie J. de Wagheneire 52,44 %
29 NS 2P S+1 140 8.8 40.00
30 NS 2P S = 110 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
Total : 218,6 / 484 = 45,17 %
PAIRE A13 Iris de Limbourg -Marguerite Verstraeten
a10 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 45,87 %
1 NS 5T E = -400 8.8 40.00
2 NS 2P S+1 140 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
a.9 - 0,00 %
3 NS BYE 0 0.00
4 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.8 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 57,03 %
5 NS 3S W+1 -430 11 50.00
6 NS 4P N = 420 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.7 Myriam de Timary -Stan Tabor 44,66 %
7 NS 4CcW-1 200 19.7 89.55
8 NS 4P S-2 -100 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.6 Elisabeth Harmant -Claire Destin 57,65 %
9 NS 3P E = -140 4 18.18
10 NS 2S E = -120 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
a.5 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Marie Claire Vienne 60,80 %
11 NS 2C W+1 -140 2.3 10.45
12 NS 3K W-1 50 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
a.4 Roselyne Delpon -Sybille Gillet 58,66 %
13 NS 3S S = 600 11 50.00
14 NS 3S S-3 -150 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a.3 Michele de Kerchove -Puce de Meulemeester 47,59 %
15 NS 3P W = -140 11 50.00
16 NS 3P E+1 -170 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.2 Noelle Fosse -Gaetan van de Werve 42,77 %
17 NS 2C N+2 170 21.9 99.55
18 NS 3S E-2 100 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 99,55 %
a13 Michel Lievens -Marie J. de Wagheneire 52,44 %
25 NS 4C W+1 -650 5.5 25.00
26 NS 3C E = -140 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 27,50 %
a12 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 32,52 %
27 NS 3S W = -400 8.8 40.00
28 NS 5C N = 650 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a11 Antoinette Jourdain -Francoise Duren 52,95 %
29 NS 2P S+1 140 8.8 40.00
30 NS 3P S-1 -50 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
Total : 215,3 / 484 = 44,48 %
PAIRE A.8 Patricia Bardy -Patrizia Vaccani
a15 Dominique Sassen -Jeannine Wanderpepen 52,67 %
1 NS 5T E = -400 8.8 40.00
2 NS 2P S-1 -100 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a14 Therese Roland -Chantal Woitrin 49,32 %
3 NS 3S N-1 -50 3.4 15.45
4 NS 2C S = 110 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a13 Michel Lievens -Marie J. de Wagheneire 52,44 %
5 NS 3S W+1 -430 11 50.00
6 NS 4P N+1 450 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a12 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 32,52 %
7 NS 2P N+1 140 15.4 70.00
8 NS 2P S+2 170 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
a.8 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 57,03 %
15 NS 3P W = -140 11 50.00
16 NS 4P E = -620 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
a.7 Myriam de Timary -Stan Tabor 44,66 %
17 NS 4C N-1 -50 7.7 35.00
18 NS 2C W+1 -140 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.6 Elisabeth Harmant -Claire Destin 57,65 %
19 NS 2P S-1 -50 15.4 70.00
20 NS 4C N-1 -100 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
a.5 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Marie Claire Vienne 60,80 %
21 NS 2C E+1 -140 3.4 15.45
22 NS 4P E+1 -650 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 17,95 %
a.4 Roselyne Delpon -Sybille Gillet 58,66 %
23 NS 1S N-1 -100 4.5 20.45
24 NS 3S N-1 -50 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 12,95 %
a.3 Michele de Kerchove -Puce de Meulemeester 47,59 %
25 NS 3C W+2 -200 18.6 84.55
26 NS 2C E = -110 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
a.2 Noelle Fosse -Gaetan van de Werve 42,77 %
27 NS 1KxS-3 -1000 0.1 0.45
28 NS 6C N-1 -100 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 10,45 %
a.1 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 45,09 %
29 NS 3P S = 140 8.8 40.00
30 NS 1P S+1 110 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
Total : 219,1 / 528 = 41,50 %
PAIRE A.9 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne
a.2 Noelle Fosse -Gaetan van de Werve 42,77 %
1 NS 3S E-4 200 21.9 99.55
2 NS 3P N-1 -100 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a.1 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 45,09 %
3 NS 3S N-1 -50 3.4 15.45
4 NS 4C S-3 -300 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 7,95 %
a15 Dominique Sassen -Jeannine Wanderpepen 52,67 %
5 NS 3S W+1 -430 11 50.00
6 NS 4P S = 420 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a14 Therese Roland -Chantal Woitrin 49,32 %
7 NS 3P N-1 -100 11 50.00
8 NS 3P S = 140 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a13 Michel Lievens -Marie J. de Wagheneire 52,44 %
9 NS 3S E = -600 0 0.00
10 NS 2S W = -120 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 6,82 %
a.9 - 0,00 %
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.8 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 57,03 %
19 NS 3S W+1 -630 0.1 0.45
20 NS 4C N-1 -100 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a.7 Myriam de Timary -Stan Tabor 44,66 %
21 NS 3T E = -110 9.9 45.00
22 NS 4P E+1 -650 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a.6 Elisabeth Harmant -Claire Destin 57,65 %
23 NS 2P E = -110 1.2 5.45
24 NS 1S S+1 120 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 12,95 %
a.5 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Marie Claire Vienne 60,80 %
25 NS 4C W = -620 13.2 60.00
26 NS 2C E+1 -140 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.4 Roselyne Delpon -Sybille Gillet 58,66 %
27 NS 3C S-2 -100 19.7 89.55
28 NS 6C N-1 -100 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.3 Michele de Kerchove -Puce de Meulemeester 47,59 %
29 NS 4P S = 620 20.8 94.55
30 NS 3P S-2 -100 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
Total : 168,1 / 484 = 34,73 %
PAIRE a.5 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Marie Claire Vienne
A11 Pascale Ortegat -Benoit Ortegat 51,76 %
3 EO 3S N+1 430 4.5 20.45
4 EO 2K N = 90 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A12 Grazia Neuenschwander -Diane Deslignes 56,94 %
7 EO 3P N+1 170 4.5 20.45
8 EO 4P S-1 -50 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Annie Legrand 49,81 %
9 EO 4P E-2 200 2 9.09
10 EO 3T E-1 100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
A13 Iris de Limbourg -Marguerite Verstraeten 44,48 %
11 EO 2C W+1 -140 19.7 89.55
12 EO 3K W-1 50 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
A.6 Brigitte Brusselmans -Claire Derieuw 52,82 %
13 EO 3S N = 600 11 50.00
14 EO 4C N-3 -150 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A14 Sylviane Delbeke -Virginie Van Damme 45,17 %
15 EO 4C N-3 -300 21.9 99.55
16 EO 2P E+2 -170 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 50,32 %
17 EO 4C N-2 -100 19.7 89.55
18 EO 3S W = -400 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 89,55 %
A15 Sandra Dallemagne -Catherine de Moffarts 46,16 %
19 EO 3P W = -140 17.5 79.55
20 EO 4C N-2 -200 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
A.8 Patricia Bardy -Patrizia Vaccani 41,50 %
21 EO 2C E+1 -140 18.6 84.55
22 EO 4P E+1 -650 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 82,05 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Annette Fobe 47,93 %
23 EO 2S E-3 300 0.1 0.45
24 EO 2K S+2 130 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A.9 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 34,73 %
25 EO 4C W = -620 8.8 40.00
26 EO 2C E+1 -140 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A10 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 59,77 %
29 EO 4P S-1 -100 21.9 99.55
30 EO 3P S = 140 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
Total : 321,0 / 528 = 60,80 %
PAIRE a.4 Roselyne Delpon -Sybille Gillet
A10 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 59,77 %
1 EO 5PcS-2 -300 3.4 15.45
2 EO 2P S = 110 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
A11 Pascale Ortegat -Benoit Ortegat 51,76 %
5 EO 4C W+1 -450 18 81.82
6 EO 4P N = 420 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
A.4 Michele Berrier -Teresa Dekoster 56,84 %
7 EO 3P N-2 -200 16.5 75.00
8 EO 2P S+1 140 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A12 Grazia Neuenschwander -Diane Deslignes 56,94 %
9 EO 3P E = -140 18 81.82
10 EO 3S E-1 100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Annie Legrand 49,81 %
11 EO 2S E = -120 17.5 79.55
12 EO 2C E+1 -140 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 89,55 %
A13 Iris de Limbourg -Marguerite Verstraeten 44,48 %
13 EO 3S S = 600 11 50.00
14 EO 3S S-3 -150 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.6 Brigitte Brusselmans -Claire Derieuw 52,82 %
15 EO 3C N-1 -100 2.3 10.45
16 EO 3P E = -140 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 10,45 %
A14 Sylviane Delbeke -Virginie Van Damme 45,17 %
17 EO 3S S-2 -100 19.7 89.55
18 EO 3S E = -400 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 89,55 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 50,32 %
19 EO 3C E-1 100 1.2 5.45
20 EO 3C N = 140 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 7,95 %
A15 Sandra Dallemagne -Catherine de Moffarts 46,16 %
21 EO 2P W+1 -140 18.6 84.55
22 EO 4P E+1 -650 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 82,05 %
A.8 Patricia Bardy -Patrizia Vaccani 41,50 %
23 EO 1S N-1 -100 17.5 79.55
24 EO 3S N-1 -50 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 87,05 %
A.9 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 34,73 %
27 EO 3C S-2 -100 2.3 10.45
28 EO 6C N-1 -100 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
Total : 309,7 / 528 = 58,66 %
PAIRE a.6 Elisabeth Harmant -Claire Destin
A11 Pascale Ortegat -Benoit Ortegat 51,76 %
1 EO 5T E = -400 13.2 60.00
2 EO 2P S-2 -200 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
A12 Grazia Neuenschwander -Diane Deslignes 56,94 %
5 EO 3S W+3 -490 21 95.45
6 EO 4P N+1 450 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A13 Iris de Limbourg -Marguerite Verstraeten 44,48 %
9 EO 3P E = -140 18 81.82
10 EO 2S E = -120 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
A.6 Brigitte Brusselmans -Claire Derieuw 52,82 %
11 EO 3C E-2 100 3.4 15.45
12 EO 1S E = -90 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
A14 Sylviane Delbeke -Virginie Van Damme 45,17 %
13 EO 3S S-1 -100 19 86.36
14 EO 1S W-2 100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 50,32 %
15 EO 3C N-2 -200 19.7 89.55
16 EO 3P E+1 -170 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A15 Sandra Dallemagne -Catherine de Moffarts 46,16 %
17 EO 3C N = 140 4.5 20.45
18 EO 2S E+1 -150 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
A.8 Patricia Bardy -Patrizia Vaccani 41,50 %
19 EO 2P S-1 -50 6.6 30.00
20 EO 4C N-1 -100 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Annette Fobe 47,93 %
21 EO 3C E = -140 18.6 84.55
22 EO 4P E+1 -650 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 82,05 %
A.9 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 34,73 %
23 EO 2P E = -110 20.8 94.55
24 EO 1S S+1 120 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 87,05 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles 64,46 %
25 EO 2C W+3 -200 3.4 15.45
26 EO 3P N-1 -100 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A10 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 59,77 %
27 EO 3T W+1 -130 5.5 25.00
28 EO 5C N = 650 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
Total : 304,4 / 528 = 57,65 %
PAIRE a.8 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens
A12 Grazia Neuenschwander -Diane Deslignes 56,94 %
1 EO 5PcS-2 -300 3.4 15.45
2 EO 2P S = 110 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
A13 Iris de Limbourg -Marguerite Verstraeten 44,48 %
5 EO 3S W+1 -430 11 50.00
6 EO 4P N = 420 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A14 Sylviane Delbeke -Virginie Van Damme 45,17 %
9 EO 2P E+1 -140 18 81.82
10 EO 3T E = -110 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A15 Sandra Dallemagne -Catherine de Moffarts 46,16 %
13 EO 3S S+1 630 3 13.64
14 EO 2P E = -110 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A.8 Patricia Bardy -Patrizia Vaccani 41,50 %
15 EO 3P W = -140 11 50.00
16 EO 4P E = -620 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Annette Fobe 47,93 %
17 EO 2C N = 110 9.9 45.00
18 EO 2P W+1 -140 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
A.9 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 34,73 %
19 EO 3S W+1 -630 21.9 99.55
20 EO 4C N-1 -100 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles 64,46 %
21 EO 2S S = 120 0.1 0.45
22 EO 4P E+1 -650 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A10 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 59,77 %
23 EO 2K N = 90 14.3 65.00
24 EO 1S E-3 150 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 47,77 %
25 EO 4C W+2 -680 21.9 99.55
26 EO 2C E+2 -170 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 99,55 %
A11 Pascale Ortegat -Benoit Ortegat 51,76 %
27 EO 3S W = -400 13.2 60.00
28 EO 6C N = 1430 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
A.4 Michele Berrier -Teresa Dekoster 56,84 %
29 EO 3P S = 140 13.2 60.00
30 EO 3P S-1 -50 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
Total : 301,1 / 528 = 57,03 %
PAIRE a11 Antoinette Jourdain -Francoise Duren
A.6 Brigitte Brusselmans -Claire Derieuw 52,82 %
1 EO 5T E = -400 13.2 60.00
2 EO 2P S = 110 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A14 Sylviane Delbeke -Virginie Van Damme 45,17 %
3 EO 3S N-1 -50 18.6 84.55
4 EO 2S E-3 300 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 50,32 %
5 EO 3S W+1 -430 11 50.00
6 EO 4P N+1 450 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A15 Sandra Dallemagne -Catherine de Moffarts 46,16 %
7 EO 5T E-1 100 8.8 40.00
8 EO 3P S = 140 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Annette Fobe 47,93 %
11 EO 2S E-1 50 8.8 40.00
12 EO 1S E+1 -120 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles 64,46 %
15 EO 2P W-1 50 0.1 0.45
16 EO 3P W = -170 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 47,77 %
19 EO 1S E+2 -150 19.7 89.55
20 EO 4C N-2 -200 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 84,55 %
A11 Pascale Ortegat -Benoit Ortegat 51,76 %
21 EO 3K N = 110 4.5 20.45
22 EO 4P E = -620 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
A.4 Michele Berrier -Teresa Dekoster 56,84 %
23 EO 2T N+1 110 4.5 20.45
24 EO 3S S-1 -50 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A12 Grazia Neuenschwander -Diane Deslignes 56,94 %
25 EO 4C W = -620 8.8 40.00
26 EO 3C E = -140 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Annie Legrand 49,81 %
27 EO 3S W = -400 13.2 60.00
28 EO 6C N-1 -100 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A13 Iris de Limbourg -Marguerite Verstraeten 44,48 %
29 EO 2P S+1 140 13.2 60.00
30 EO 3P S-1 -50 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
Total : 279,6 / 528 = 52,95 %
PAIRE a15 Dominique Sassen -Jeannine Wanderpepen
A.8 Patricia Bardy -Patrizia Vaccani 41,50 %
1 EO 5T E = -400 13.2 60.00
2 EO 2P S-1 -100 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Annette Fobe 47,93 %
3 EO 3S S+1 430 4.5 20.45
4 EO 2K N = 90 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A.9 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 34,73 %
5 EO 3S W+1 -430 11 50.00
6 EO 4P S = 420 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles 64,46 %
7 EO 3P N-2 -200 16.5 75.00
8 EO 2P S+1 140 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A10 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 59,77 %
9 EO 3K E+1 -130 13 59.09
10 EO 3T E = -110 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 47,77 %
11 EO 3K N-1 -50 12.1 55.00
12 EO 1S E = -90 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
A11 Pascale Ortegat -Benoit Ortegat 51,76 %
13 EO 3S S+2 660 0 0.00
14 EO 2P E = -110 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A.4 Michele Berrier -Teresa Dekoster 56,84 %
15 EO 2P W+1 -140 11 50.00
16 EO 2P E+2 -170 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Annie Legrand 49,81 %
19 EO 2P S-2 -100 15.4 70.00
20 EO 4C N-3 -300 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
A.6 Brigitte Brusselmans -Claire Derieuw 52,82 %
23 EO 1S N = 90 14.3 65.00
24 EO 3S N = 400 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 50,32 %
27 EO 3S W-2 100 0.1 0.45
28 EO 5C N-1 -100 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A15 Sandra Dallemagne -Catherine de Moffarts 46,16 %
29 EO 4C E-2 200 4.5 20.45
30 EO 3P S = 140 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 17,95 %
Total : 278,1 / 528 = 52,67 %
PAIRE a13 Michel Lievens -Marie J. de Wagheneire
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 50,32 %
1 EO 5T E = -400 13.2 60.00
2 EO 2P S = 110 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A15 Sandra Dallemagne -Catherine de Moffarts 46,16 %
3 EO 3S S = 400 12.1 55.00
4 EO 1C S+3 170 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A.8 Patricia Bardy -Patrizia Vaccani 41,50 %
5 EO 3S W+1 -430 11 50.00
6 EO 4P N+1 450 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Annette Fobe 47,93 %
7 EO 4PcN-3 -800 21.9 99.55
8 EO 2P S+1 140 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A.9 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 34,73 %
9 EO 3S E = -600 22 100.00
10 EO 2S W = -120 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 93,18 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles 64,46 %
11 EO 2C W = -110 15.4 70.00
12 EO 2S E-2 100 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
A.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 47,77 %
15 EO 2P W+1 -140 11 50.00
16 EO 2P E+2 -170 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.4 Michele Berrier -Teresa Dekoster 56,84 %
19 EO 2K E = -90 12.1 55.00
20 EO 4C N-1 -100 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Annie Legrand 49,81 %
23 EO 2P W-1 100 8.8 40.00
24 EO 1S S+3 180 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
A13 Iris de Limbourg -Marguerite Verstraeten 44,48 %
25 EO 4C W+1 -650 16.5 75.00
26 EO 3C E = -140 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 72,50 %
A.6 Brigitte Brusselmans -Claire Derieuw 52,82 %
27 EO 3T W+1 -130 5.5 25.00
28 EO 5C N = 650 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
A14 Sylviane Delbeke -Virginie Van Damme 45,17 %
29 EO 2P S+1 140 13.2 60.00
30 EO 2P S = 110 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
Total : 276,9 / 528 = 52,44 %
PAIRE a14 Therese Roland -Chantal Woitrin
A15 Sandra Dallemagne -Catherine de Moffarts 46,16 %
1 EO 4C E = -420 21.9 99.55
2 EO 2P S = 110 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A.8 Patricia Bardy -Patrizia Vaccani 41,50 %
3 EO 3S N-1 -50 18.6 84.55
4 EO 2C S = 110 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Annette Fobe 47,93 %
5 EO 3S W+1 -430 11 50.00
6 EO 4P N = 420 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.9 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 34,73 %
7 EO 3P N-1 -100 11 50.00
8 EO 3P S = 140 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles 64,46 %
9 EO 2P E = -110 10 45.45
10 EO 3S E-1 100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A10 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 59,77 %
11 EO 2S E-2 100 3.4 15.45
12 EO 2C E-1 50 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
A.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 47,77 %
13 EO 3S S = 600 11 50.00
14 EO 2S W-2 100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A.4 Michele Berrier -Teresa Dekoster 56,84 %
17 EO 2C N+1 140 4.5 20.45
18 EO 3S E = -400 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Annie Legrand 49,81 %
21 EO 3K N = 110 4.5 20.45
22 EO 4P E = -620 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
A.6 Brigitte Brusselmans -Claire Derieuw 52,82 %
25 EO 4C W+1 -650 16.5 75.00
26 EO 3C E = -140 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 72,50 %
A14 Sylviane Delbeke -Virginie Van Damme 45,17 %
27 EO 3S W+1 -430 19.7 89.55
28 EO 6C N = 1430 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 50,32 %
29 EO 4P S = 620 1.2 5.45
30 EO 2P S = 110 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
Total : 260,4 / 528 = 49,32 %
PAIRE a.3 Michele de Kerchove -Puce de Meulemeester
A10 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 59,77 %
3 EO 3S N-1 -50 18.6 84.55
4 EO 3T W-3 300 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 47,77 %
5 EO 2S W+2 -180 2 9.09
6 EO 3S S = 400 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A11 Pascale Ortegat -Benoit Ortegat 51,76 %
7 EO 4T E = -130 13.2 60.00
8 EO 2P S+1 140 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A.4 Michele Berrier -Teresa Dekoster 56,84 %
9 EO 2S E-1 100 6 27.27
10 EO 3S E-1 100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A12 Grazia Neuenschwander -Diane Deslignes 56,94 %
11 EO 4C W-2 100 3.4 15.45
12 EO 1S E = -90 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
A.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Annie Legrand 49,81 %
13 EO 4P N-3 -300 22 100.00
14 EO 1S W-2 100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A13 Iris de Limbourg -Marguerite Verstraeten 44,48 %
15 EO 3P W = -140 11 50.00
16 EO 3P E+1 -170 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.6 Brigitte Brusselmans -Claire Derieuw 52,82 %
17 EO 3S S-2 -100 19.7 89.55
18 EO 2S E+1 -150 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A14 Sylviane Delbeke -Virginie Van Damme 45,17 %
19 EO 1S E = -90 12.1 55.00
20 EO 4C N-1 -100 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 50,32 %
21 EO 4C E-2 100 8.8 40.00
22 EO 3P E+2 -200 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
A.8 Patricia Bardy -Patrizia Vaccani 41,50 %
25 EO 3C W+2 -200 3.4 15.45
26 EO 2C E = -110 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
A.9 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 34,73 %
29 EO 4P S = 620 1.2 5.45
30 EO 3P S-2 -100 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
Total : 251,3 / 528 = 47,59 %
PAIRE a10 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere
A13 Iris de Limbourg -Marguerite Verstraeten 44,48 %
1 EO 5T E = -400 13.2 60.00
2 EO 2P S+1 140 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
A.6 Brigitte Brusselmans -Claire Derieuw 52,82 %
3 EO 3S S = 400 12.1 55.00
4 EO 2S N+1 150 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A14 Sylviane Delbeke -Virginie Van Damme 45,17 %
5 EO 4C W = -420 4 18.18
6 EO 3S S+2 460 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
A15 Sandra Dallemagne -Catherine de Moffarts 46,16 %
9 EO 4K E = -130 13 59.09
10 EO 3T E+1 -130 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Annette Fobe 47,93 %
13 EO 3S S = 600 11 50.00
14 EO 3T W = -110 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles 64,46 %
17 EO 2C N = 110 9.9 45.00
18 EO 2P W+1 -140 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
A10 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 59,77 %
19 EO 3P S-1 -50 6.6 30.00
20 EO 2C N+1 140 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
A.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 47,77 %
21 EO 3C E = -140 18.6 84.55
22 EO 4P E-1 100 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A11 Pascale Ortegat -Benoit Ortegat 51,76 %
23 EO 2P W = -110 20.8 94.55
24 EO 3S S+1 430 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.4 Michele Berrier -Teresa Dekoster 56,84 %
25 EO 4C W+1 -650 16.5 75.00
26 EO 2P N = 110 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
A12 Grazia Neuenschwander -Diane Deslignes 56,94 %
27 EO 3S W = -400 13.2 60.00
28 EO 6C N-1 -100 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Annie Legrand 49,81 %
29 EO 3P S = 140 13.2 60.00
30 EO 2P S = 110 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
Total : 242,2 / 528 = 45,87 %
PAIRE a.1 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Annette Fobe 47,93 %
1 EO 5T E = -400 13.2 60.00
2 EO 2P S = 110 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.9 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 34,73 %
3 EO 3S N-1 -50 18.6 84.55
4 EO 4C S-3 -300 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 92,05 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles 64,46 %
5 EO 3S W+1 -430 11 50.00
6 EO 3S S+1 430 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A10 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 59,77 %
7 EO 4PcN-2 -500 19.7 89.55
8 EO 3P S+1 170 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 47,77 %
9 EO 4P W-2 200 2 9.09
10 EO 5K E-2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 4,55 %
A11 Pascale Ortegat -Benoit Ortegat 51,76 %
11 EO 2K N-1 -50 12.1 55.00
12 EO 1S E-1 50 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.4 Michele Berrier -Teresa Dekoster 56,84 %
13 EO 3S S = 600 11 50.00
14 EO 3P E-2 100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A12 Grazia Neuenschwander -Diane Deslignes 56,94 %
15 EO 3P W = -140 11 50.00
16 EO 4P E-1 100 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
A.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Annie Legrand 49,81 %
17 EO 3C N = 140 4.5 20.45
18 EO 2P W+1 -140 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
A.6 Brigitte Brusselmans -Claire Derieuw 52,82 %
21 EO 2C E = -110 12.1 55.00
22 EO 4P E-1 100 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 50,32 %
25 EO 4C W+1 -650 16.5 75.00
26 EO 3C E = -140 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 72,50 %
A.8 Patricia Bardy -Patrizia Vaccani 41,50 %
29 EO 3P S = 140 13.2 60.00
30 EO 1P S+1 110 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
Total : 238,1 / 528 = 45,09 %
PAIRE a.7 Myriam de Timary -Stan Tabor
A12 Grazia Neuenschwander -Diane Deslignes 56,94 %
3 EO 3S S+1 430 4.5 20.45
4 EO 1S E-2 200 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
A13 Iris de Limbourg -Marguerite Verstraeten 44,48 %
7 EO 4CcW-1 200 2.3 10.45
8 EO 4P S-2 -100 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A14 Sylviane Delbeke -Virginie Van Damme 45,17 %
11 EO 2S E+1 -150 21.9 99.55
12 EO 2S W-2 100 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 50,32 %
13 EO 3S S-1 -100 19 86.36
14 EO 2P E = -110 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A15 Sandra Dallemagne -Catherine de Moffarts 46,16 %
15 EO 2P W+1 -140 11 50.00
16 EO 4P E = -620 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A.8 Patricia Bardy -Patrizia Vaccani 41,50 %
17 EO 4C N-1 -50 14.3 65.00
18 EO 2C W+1 -140 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Annette Fobe 47,93 %
19 EO 3S W-1 100 1.2 5.45
20 EO 3C N = 140 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 7,95 %
A.9 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 34,73 %
21 EO 3T E = -110 12.1 55.00
22 EO 4P E+1 -650 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles 64,46 %
23 EO 1S N+1 120 2.3 10.45
24 EO 2S S+1 150 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
A10 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 59,77 %
25 EO 4C W = -620 8.8 40.00
26 EO 4C E-2 200 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
A.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 47,77 %
27 EO 3S W = -400 13.2 60.00
28 EO 4C N+1 650 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A11 Pascale Ortegat -Benoit Ortegat 51,76 %
29 EO 3P S = 140 13.2 60.00
30 EO 2P S+1 140 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
Total : 235,8 / 528 = 44,66 %
PAIRE a.2 Noelle Fosse -Gaetan van de Werve
A.9 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 34,73 %
1 EO 3S E-4 200 0.1 0.45
2 EO 3P N-1 -100 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles 64,46 %
3 EO 3S S+1 430 4.5 20.45
4 EO 3K N+1 130 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A10 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 59,77 %
5 EO 3S W+3 -490 21 95.45
6 EO 3S S+2 460 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 47,77 %
7 EO 4T E-3 300 0.1 0.45
8 EO 3P S-1 -50 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A11 Pascale Ortegat -Benoit Ortegat 51,76 %
9 EO 3S E-2 200 2 9.09
10 EO 3K W = -110 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A.4 Michele Berrier -Teresa Dekoster 56,84 %
11 EO 2S E-2 100 3.4 15.45
12 EO 1S E-2 100 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 12,95 %
A12 Grazia Neuenschwander -Diane Deslignes 56,94 %
13 EO 3S S = 600 11 50.00
14 EO 1S W-2 100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Annie Legrand 49,81 %
15 EO 2P W+1 -140 11 50.00
16 EO 4P E = -620 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A13 Iris de Limbourg -Marguerite Verstraeten 44,48 %
17 EO 2C N+2 170 0.1 0.45
18 EO 3S E-2 100 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 0,45 %
A.6 Brigitte Brusselmans -Claire Derieuw 52,82 %
19 EO 1S N-1 -50 6.6 30.00
20 EO 4C N-2 -200 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 54,77 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 50,32 %
23 EO 2P W-1 100 8.8 40.00
24 EO 1S S+2 150 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.8 Patricia Bardy -Patrizia Vaccani 41,50 %
27 EO 1KxS-3 -1000 21.9 99.55
28 EO 6C N-1 -100 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 89,55 %
Total : 225,8 / 528 = 42,77 %
PAIRE a12 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck
A14 Sylviane Delbeke -Virginie Van Damme 45,17 %
1 EO 5T E = -400 13.2 60.00
2 EO 2P S = 110 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 50,32 %
3 EO 3S N+1 430 4.5 20.45
4 EO 2C S = 110 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
A15 Sandra Dallemagne -Catherine de Moffarts 46,16 %
5 EO 4C W-2 100 0 0.00
6 EO 3S S+1 430 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A.8 Patricia Bardy -Patrizia Vaccani 41,50 %
7 EO 2P N+1 140 6.6 30.00
8 EO 2P S+2 170 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Annette Fobe 47,93 %
9 EO 2C N-1 -50 8 36.36
10 EO 2T E+1 -110 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles 64,46 %
13 EO 3S S+1 630 3 13.64
14 EO 2S W-2 100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
A.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 47,77 %
17 EO 4C N-1 -50 14.3 65.00
18 EO 2C W+1 -140 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.4 Michele Berrier -Teresa Dekoster 56,84 %
21 EO 3K S = 110 4.5 20.45
22 EO 4P E-1 100 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 15,45 %
A12 Grazia Neuenschwander -Diane Deslignes 56,94 %
23 EO 2P E-1 100 8.8 40.00
24 EO 1S E-5 250 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
A.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Annie Legrand 49,81 %
25 EO 4C W-1 100 0.1 0.45
26 EO 3C E-1 100 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 10,45 %
A13 Iris de Limbourg -Marguerite Verstraeten 44,48 %
27 EO 3S W = -400 13.2 60.00
28 EO 5C N = 650 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.6 Brigitte Brusselmans -Claire Derieuw 52,82 %
29 EO 3P S = 140 13.2 60.00
30 EO 3P S = 140 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
Total : 171,7 / 528 = 32,52 %
PAIRE a.9 -
A.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Annie Legrand 49,81 %
1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A13 Iris de Limbourg -Marguerite Verstraeten 44,48 %
3 EO BYE 0 0.00
4 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A14 Sylviane Delbeke -Virginie Van Damme 45,17 %
7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A15 Sandra Dallemagne -Catherine de Moffarts 46,16 %
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Annette Fobe 47,93 %
15 EO BYE 0 0.00
16 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.9 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 34,73 %
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles 64,46 %
19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A10 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 59,77 %
21 EO BYE 0 0.00
22 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 47,77 %
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A11 Pascale Ortegat -Benoit Ortegat 51,76 %
25 EO BYE 0 0.00
26 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.4 Michele Berrier -Teresa Dekoster 56,84 %
27 EO BYE 0 0.00
28 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A12 Grazia Neuenschwander -Diane Deslignes 56,94 %
29 EO BYE 0 0.00
30 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 660 = 0,00 %
|