B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 59,64 A13 David Walker -Jacques Podevyn
--- 2 55,70 A12 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Claire Derieuw
--- 3 54,09 A.1 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza
--- 4 53,81 A.8 Sylviane Delbeke -Marie J. de Wagheneire
--- 5 53,30 A11 Jacqueline de Thier -Janine Wanderpepen
--- 6 53,07 A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois
--- 7 50,11 A.7 Lydia Wildiers -Nicole Blondeau
--- 8 47,73 A.3 Michele Berrier -Teresa Dekoster
--- 9 47,46 A.5 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx
--- 10 45,57 A.4 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren
--- 11 44,43 A10 Michele Verhulst -Patricia Bardy
--- 12 43,41 A.6 Thomas Brusselmans -Brigitte Brusselmans
--- 13 42,08 A.9 Sophie Tilemans -Catherine Tilemans
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 58,30 a10 Jan Sassen -Edith Close
--- 2 55,76 a.8 Gerard Cooreman -Dominique Sassen
--- 3 52,77 a.7 Philippe van der Gracht -Fabienne Smit
--- 4 52,06 a.1 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor
--- 5 51,31 a.9 Benedicte Lemaigre -Simone Munsterhjelm
--- 6 50,64 a.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Mercedes Oostens
--- 7 50,38 a.2 Christiane Huby -Myriam de Timary
--- 8 49,05 a.4 Jeannine Thys -Liliane Baptista
--- 9 48,37 a.6 Jean van Caloen -Paul Henri Oosterlynck
--- 10 47,80 a13 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes
--- 11 46,67 a12 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens
--- 12 45,80 a.3 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert
--- 13 41,12 a11 Robert De Witt -Philippe Marchandise
PAIRE A13 David Walker -Jacques Podevyn
a12 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 46,67 %
1 NS 4P S-1 -50 4 18.18
2 NS 2P N+1 140 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a11 Robert De Witt -Philippe Marchandise 41,12 %
3 NS 4PcS = 590 21.9 99.55
4 NS 2P N+2 170 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 95,23 %
a10 Jan Sassen -Edith Close 58,30 %
5 NS 4C W-1 50 10 45.45
6 NS 1S N+1 120 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a.9 Benedicte Lemaigre -Simone Munsterhjelm 51,31 %
7 NS 4C N = 620 14 63.64
8 NS 4C E-4 200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
a.8 Gerard Cooreman -Dominique Sassen 55,76 %
9 NS 3P N-2 -100 14 63.64
10 NS 5K N+1 620 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
a.7 Philippe van der Gracht -Fabienne Smit 52,77 %
11 NS 4P W+1 -450 9 40.91
12 NS 4C N+3 710 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.6 Jean van Caloen -Paul Henri Oosterlynck 48,37 %
13 NS 3P W = -140 10 45.45
14 NS 6C N+1 1010 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Mercedes Oostens 50,64 %
15 NS 2T W+3 -150 12 54.55
16 NS 4P S = 420 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.4 Jeannine Thys -Liliane Baptista 49,05 %
17 NS 4C E-1 50 18 81.82
18 NS 4P N-1 -100 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.3 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 45,80 %
19 NS 4C S-2 -100 0 0.00
20 NS 4C E-1 100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a.2 Christiane Huby -Myriam de Timary 50,38 %
21 NS 6C S = 1430 15 68.18
22 NS 3C E = -140 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a13 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 47,80 %
25 NS 2S N+1 150 10 45.45
26 NS 3S W+1 -630 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
Total : 314,9 / 528 = 59,64 %
PAIRE A12 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Claire Derieuw
a10 Jan Sassen -Edith Close 58,30 %
1 NS 5C W-2 100 9 40.91
2 NS 2K N = 90 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a.9 Benedicte Lemaigre -Simone Munsterhjelm 51,31 %
3 NS 3K N = 110 12.1 55.00
4 NS 2C N+2 170 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 72,95 %
a.8 Gerard Cooreman -Dominique Sassen 55,76 %
5 NS 3P N+1 170 20 90.91
6 NS 1S N-1 -50 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a.7 Philippe van der Gracht -Fabienne Smit 52,77 %
7 NS 5C N-1 -100 0 0.00
8 NS 4C W-2 100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a.6 Jean van Caloen -Paul Henri Oosterlynck 48,37 %
9 NS 3K W = -110 7 31.82
10 NS 4C S-1 -100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
a.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Mercedes Oostens 50,64 %
11 NS 4P W+1 -450 9 40.91
12 NS 6C N+1 1460 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a.4 Jeannine Thys -Liliane Baptista 49,05 %
13 NS 2P W+1 -140 10 45.45
14 NS 6C S+1 1010 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.3 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 45,80 %
15 NS 2T W+3 -150 12 54.55
16 NS 4P S-1 -50 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.2 Christiane Huby -Myriam de Timary 50,38 %
17 NS 4C E-1 50 18 81.82
18 NS 4P N = 620 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
a.1 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 52,06 %
19 NS 4C S = 420 13 59.09
20 NS 4C W+1 -650 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a12 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 46,67 %
23 NS 2K W-1 100 17 77.27
24 NS 3P E+2 -200 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
a11 Robert De Witt -Philippe Marchandise 41,12 %
25 NS 3S N-1 -50 7 31.82
26 NS 2S W+1 -150 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
Total : 294,1 / 528 = 55,70 %
PAIRE A.1 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza
a.1 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 52,06 %
1 NS 4P S = 420 19 86.36
2 NS 1S N = 90 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a13 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 47,80 %
3 NS 4P N = 420 18.6 84.55
4 NS 2C N+1 140 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 69,55 %
a12 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 46,67 %
5 NS 3C W+2 -200 6 27.27
6 NS 2P S-1 -50 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a11 Robert De Witt -Philippe Marchandise 41,12 %
7 NS 4C S = 620 14 63.64
8 NS 2P S-1 -50 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a10 Jan Sassen -Edith Close 58,30 %
9 NS 3K W = -110 7 31.82
10 NS 5K N = 600 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.9 Benedicte Lemaigre -Simone Munsterhjelm 51,31 %
11 NS 4P W+1 -450 9 40.91
12 NS 4C N+3 710 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.8 Gerard Cooreman -Dominique Sassen 55,76 %
13 NS 3P W = -140 10 45.45
14 NS 6C S+1 1010 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.7 Philippe van der Gracht -Fabienne Smit 52,77 %
15 NS 2T W+3 -150 12 54.55
16 NS 4P S-1 -50 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.6 Jean van Caloen -Paul Henri Oosterlynck 48,37 %
17 NS 4C E = -420 5 22.73
18 NS 4P N = 620 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Mercedes Oostens 50,64 %
19 NS 4C S+1 450 21 95.45
20 NS 4C W-1 100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
a.4 Jeannine Thys -Liliane Baptista 49,05 %
21 NS 6C S = 1430 15 68.18
22 NS 2C E+1 -140 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.3 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 45,80 %
23 NS 2C S+1 140 20 90.91
24 NS 4P E+1 -450 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
Total : 285,6 / 528 = 54,09 %
PAIRE A.8 Sylviane Delbeke -Marie J. de Wagheneire
a.2 Christiane Huby -Myriam de Timary 50,38 %
1 NS 4P S-1 -50 4 18.18
2 NS 2P N = 110 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a.1 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 52,06 %
3 NS 3K N = 110 12.1 55.00
4 NS 2C N+1 140 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 54,77 %
a13 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 47,80 %
5 NS 3P S = 140 15 68.18
6 NS 4T N-2 -100 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a12 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 46,67 %
7 NS 4C S = 620 14 63.64
8 NS 2C W = -110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a11 Robert De Witt -Philippe Marchandise 41,12 %
9 NS 4C S-1 -50 16 72.73
10 NS 5K N = 600 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a10 Jan Sassen -Edith Close 58,30 %
11 NS 4P W+1 -450 9 40.91
12 NS 4C N+3 710 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.8 Gerard Cooreman -Dominique Sassen 55,76 %
15 NS 2S E = -120 22 100.00
16 NS 4P S-1 -50 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a.7 Philippe van der Gracht -Fabienne Smit 52,77 %
17 NS 4C E-1 50 18 81.82
18 NS 5CcW-2 300 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a.6 Jean van Caloen -Paul Henri Oosterlynck 48,37 %
19 NS 4C S+1 450 21 95.45
20 NS 4C W = -620 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Mercedes Oostens 50,64 %
21 NS 6C S = 1430 15 68.18
22 NS 2C W = -110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.4 Jeannine Thys -Liliane Baptista 49,05 %
23 NS 4K W-4 400 22 100.00
24 NS 4P E+1 -450 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a.3 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 45,80 %
25 NS 3S S-2 -100 4 18.18
26 NS 2S W+2 -180 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 284,1 / 528 = 53,81 %
PAIRE A11 Jacqueline de Thier -Janine Wanderpepen
a.8 Gerard Cooreman -Dominique Sassen 55,76 %
1 NS 4P S = 420 19 86.36
2 NS 4P N-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.7 Philippe van der Gracht -Fabienne Smit 52,77 %
3 NS 4T E-3 300 15.4 70.00
4 NS 3C N = 140 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a.6 Jean van Caloen -Paul Henri Oosterlynck 48,37 %
5 NS 3P N+1 170 20 90.91
6 NS 1S N-1 -50 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Mercedes Oostens 50,64 %
7 NS 4C S = 620 14 63.64
8 NS 4C W-2 100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a.4 Jeannine Thys -Liliane Baptista 49,05 %
9 NS 3K W = -110 7 31.82
10 NS 5K N = 600 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.3 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 45,80 %
11 NS 4P W+1 -450 9 40.91
12 NS 4C S+3 710 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.2 Christiane Huby -Myriam de Timary 50,38 %
13 NS 3P W = -140 10 45.45
14 NS 6C S+1 1010 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.1 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 52,06 %
15 NS 2T W+3 -150 12 54.55
16 NS 4P S-1 -50 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a13 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 47,80 %
17 NS 4C E = -420 5 22.73
18 NS 3P N+1 170 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a11 Robert De Witt -Philippe Marchandise 41,12 %
21 NS 6C S = 1430 15 68.18
22 NS 3C E-1 100 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a10 Jan Sassen -Edith Close 58,30 %
23 NS 3T E+1 -130 6 27.27
24 NS 4P E+1 -450 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a.9 Benedicte Lemaigre -Simone Munsterhjelm 51,31 %
25 NS 3S S = 400 17 77.27
26 NS 3S W+1 -630 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
Total : 281,4 / 528 = 53,30 %
PAIRE A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois
a.2 Christiane Huby -Myriam de Timary 50,38 %
3 NS 60%50% Ajust 13.2 60.00
4 NS 2C N+2 170 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 75,45 %
a.1 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 52,06 %
5 NS 4C W+1 -450 2 9.09
6 NS 1S N-1 -50 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a13 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 47,80 %
7 NS 4C S = 620 14 63.64
8 NS 3C W-1 50 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a12 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 46,67 %
9 NS 3P N = 140 20 90.91
10 NS 5K S = 600 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
a11 Robert De Witt -Philippe Marchandise 41,12 %
11 NS 4P W+1 -450 9 40.91
12 NS 4C S+1 650 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
a10 Jan Sassen -Edith Close 58,30 %
13 NS 2P W+1 -140 10 45.45
14 NS 4C S+3 510 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a.9 Benedicte Lemaigre -Simone Munsterhjelm 51,31 %
15 NS 5T W = -400 2 9.09
16 NS 4P S = 420 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.8 Gerard Cooreman -Dominique Sassen 55,76 %
17 NS 4C E = -420 5 22.73
18 NS 3T S-1 -100 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
a.7 Philippe van der Gracht -Fabienne Smit 52,77 %
19 NS 4C S = 420 13 59.09
20 NS 4C W-1 100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.6 Jean van Caloen -Paul Henri Oosterlynck 48,37 %
21 NS 6C S = 1430 15 68.18
22 NS 4C E-2 200 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
a.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Mercedes Oostens 50,64 %
23 NS 4T W = -130 6 27.27
24 NS 4P E = -420 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.4 Jeannine Thys -Liliane Baptista 49,05 %
25 NS 3S S = 400 17 77.27
26 NS 2S W+2 -180 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
Total : 280,2 / 528 = 53,07 %
PAIRE A.7 Lydia Wildiers -Nicole Blondeau
a13 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 47,80 %
1 NS 5CcW-3 500 22 100.00
2 NS 2P N+1 140 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
a12 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 46,67 %
3 NS 4P S = 420 18.6 84.55
4 NS 2C N = 110 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 53,64 %
a11 Robert De Witt -Philippe Marchandise 41,12 %
5 NS 4C W-1 50 10 45.45
6 NS 1S N-1 -50 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a10 Jan Sassen -Edith Close 58,30 %
7 NS 4P W-2 200 4 18.18
8 NS 3P S-2 -100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
a.9 Benedicte Lemaigre -Simone Munsterhjelm 51,31 %
9 NS 3C S = 140 20 90.91
10 NS 4C S-1 -100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.7 Philippe van der Gracht -Fabienne Smit 52,77 %
13 NS 3P W = -140 10 45.45
14 NS 6C S+1 1010 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.6 Jean van Caloen -Paul Henri Oosterlynck 48,37 %
15 NS 5T W = -400 2 9.09
16 NS 4P S = 420 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Mercedes Oostens 50,64 %
17 NS 4C E = -420 5 22.73
18 NS 4C W-1 50 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a.4 Jeannine Thys -Liliane Baptista 49,05 %
19 NS 4C S = 420 13 59.09
20 NS 4C W = -620 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.3 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 45,80 %
21 NS 6C S = 1430 15 68.18
22 NS 3P N = 140 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a.2 Christiane Huby -Myriam de Timary 50,38 %
23 NS 3S E = -600 0 0.00
24 NS 4P E+1 -450 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
a.1 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 52,06 %
25 NS 3S S = 400 17 77.27
26 NS 2S W+2 -180 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
Total : 264,6 / 528 = 50,11 %
PAIRE A.3 Michele Berrier -Teresa Dekoster
a.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Mercedes Oostens 50,64 %
1 NS 3P S = 140 13 59.09
2 NS 4P N-1 -100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a.3 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 45,80 %
5 NS 4C W-1 50 10 45.45
6 NS 1S N-1 -50 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.2 Christiane Huby -Myriam de Timary 50,38 %
7 NS 4C S = 620 14 63.64
8 NS 3C W-1 50 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.1 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 52,06 %
9 NS 3K W = -110 7 31.82
10 NS 4K N+1 150 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a13 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 47,80 %
11 NS 4P W+1 -450 9 40.91
12 NS 4C N+3 710 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a12 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 46,67 %
13 NS 3C S-1 -100 22 100.00
14 NS 4C S+3 510 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a11 Robert De Witt -Philippe Marchandise 41,12 %
15 NS 3T W+2 -150 12 54.55
16 NS 4P S+1 450 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a10 Jan Sassen -Edith Close 58,30 %
17 NS 4C E = -420 5 22.73
18 NS 3P N+1 170 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.9 Benedicte Lemaigre -Simone Munsterhjelm 51,31 %
19 NS 4C S-1 -50 4 18.18
20 NS 4C W-1 100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.8 Gerard Cooreman -Dominique Sassen 55,76 %
21 NS 6C S = 1430 15 68.18
22 NS 3P N-1 -50 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a.7 Philippe van der Gracht -Fabienne Smit 52,77 %
23 NS 3T E = -110 12 54.55
24 NS 4P E+2 -480 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a.6 Jean van Caloen -Paul Henri Oosterlynck 48,37 %
25 NS 3S S = 400 17 77.27
26 NS 3S W+2 -660 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
Total : 252,0 / 528 = 47,73 %
PAIRE A.5 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx
a.9 Benedicte Lemaigre -Simone Munsterhjelm 51,31 %
1 NS 5CcW = -650 0 0.00
2 NS 3P N = 140 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.8 Gerard Cooreman -Dominique Sassen 55,76 %
3 NS 4P S-1 -50 6.6 30.00
4 NS 4C S-2 -200 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 17,27 %
a.7 Philippe van der Gracht -Fabienne Smit 52,77 %
5 NS 3P N+1 170 20 90.91
6 NS 1S S-2 -100 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Mercedes Oostens 50,64 %
9 NS 3KcW = -670 0 0.00
10 NS 3K N+2 150 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
a.4 Jeannine Thys -Liliane Baptista 49,05 %
11 NS 4P W+1 -450 9 40.91
12 NS 4C N+3 710 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.3 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 45,80 %
13 NS 2P W+1 -140 10 45.45
14 NS 6C S+1 1010 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.2 Christiane Huby -Myriam de Timary 50,38 %
15 NS 2T W+3 -150 12 54.55
16 NS 4P S-1 -50 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.1 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 52,06 %
17 NS 3C E+2 -200 12 54.55
18 NS 4P N+1 650 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a13 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 47,80 %
19 NS 2C S+3 200 8 36.36
20 NS 4C W-1 100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a12 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 46,67 %
21 NS 6C S-1 -100 0 0.00
22 NS 4C E-2 200 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a11 Robert De Witt -Philippe Marchandise 41,12 %
23 NS 1S E+2 -150 2 9.09
24 NS 3S W-1 50 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a10 Jan Sassen -Edith Close 58,30 %
25 NS 3S S = 400 17 77.27
26 NS 2S W+3 -210 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
Total : 250,6 / 528 = 47,46 %
PAIRE A.4 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren
a.7 Philippe van der Gracht -Fabienne Smit 52,77 %
1 NS 4P S-1 -50 4 18.18
2 NS 1S N+1 120 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a.6 Jean van Caloen -Paul Henri Oosterlynck 48,37 %
3 NS 4P S-1 -50 6.6 30.00
4 NS 4C N-2 -200 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 17,27 %
a.4 Jeannine Thys -Liliane Baptista 49,05 %
7 NS 4C N = 620 14 63.64
8 NS 3T E-1 50 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.3 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 45,80 %
9 NS 3P N = 140 20 90.91
10 NS 5K N = 600 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
a.2 Christiane Huby -Myriam de Timary 50,38 %
11 NS 4P W+1 -450 9 40.91
12 NS 5C N+2 710 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.1 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 52,06 %
13 NS 3P W = -140 10 45.45
14 NS 4C S+3 510 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a13 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 47,80 %
15 NS 4T W = -130 20 90.91
16 NS 3P S+1 170 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a12 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 46,67 %
17 NS 4C E-1 50 18 81.82
18 NS 4P N = 620 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
a11 Robert De Witt -Philippe Marchandise 41,12 %
19 NS 3S N-1 -50 4 18.18
20 NS 4C E = -620 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
a10 Jan Sassen -Edith Close 58,30 %
21 NS 5C S = 650 4 18.18
22 NS 2C E = -110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a.9 Benedicte Lemaigre -Simone Munsterhjelm 51,31 %
23 NS 2K W-1 100 17 77.27
24 NS 4P E+1 -450 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.8 Gerard Cooreman -Dominique Sassen 55,76 %
25 NS 3S S-1 -50 7 31.82
26 NS 3S W+2 -660 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
Total : 240,6 / 528 = 45,57 %
PAIRE A10 Michele Verhulst -Patricia Bardy
a.6 Jean van Caloen -Paul Henri Oosterlynck 48,37 %
1 NS 5C W-2 100 9 40.91
2 NS 4P N = 620 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Mercedes Oostens 50,64 %
3 NS 3K N-1 -50 6.6 30.00
4 NS 2C N = 110 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 26,36 %
a.4 Jeannine Thys -Liliane Baptista 49,05 %
5 NS 4C W+1 -450 2 9.09
6 NS 1S N-1 -50 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a.3 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 45,80 %
7 NS 4C S = 620 14 63.64
8 NS 4C W-2 100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a.2 Christiane Huby -Myriam de Timary 50,38 %
9 NS 3K W = -110 7 31.82
10 NS 4C S-3 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
a.1 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 52,06 %
11 NS 4P W+1 -450 9 40.91
12 NS 4C N+3 710 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a13 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 47,80 %
13 NS 2P W+1 -140 10 45.45
14 NS 6C S+1 1010 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a12 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 46,67 %
15 NS 2T W+3 -150 12 54.55
16 NS 4C S-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a10 Jan Sassen -Edith Close 58,30 %
19 NS 4C S = 420 13 59.09
20 NS 3S W = -600 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.9 Benedicte Lemaigre -Simone Munsterhjelm 51,31 %
21 NS 6C S = 1430 15 68.18
22 NS 4PcS-2 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a.8 Gerard Cooreman -Dominique Sassen 55,76 %
23 NS 3T W+1 -130 6 27.27
24 NS 3S W+1 -430 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.7 Philippe van der Gracht -Fabienne Smit 52,77 %
25 NS 3S S = 400 17 77.27
26 NS 3S W+1 -630 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
Total : 234,6 / 528 = 44,43 %
PAIRE A.6 Thomas Brusselmans -Brigitte Brusselmans
a11 Robert De Witt -Philippe Marchandise 41,12 %
1 NS 3P S = 140 13 59.09
2 NS 2P N+1 140 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a10 Jan Sassen -Edith Close 58,30 %
3 NS 4K N-2 -100 1.2 5.45
4 NS 2C N+1 140 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
a.9 Benedicte Lemaigre -Simone Munsterhjelm 51,31 %
5 NS 4C W+1 -450 2 9.09
6 NS 1S N-1 -50 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a.8 Gerard Cooreman -Dominique Sassen 55,76 %
7 NS 3C S+1 170 2 9.09
8 NS 3C W-1 50 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
a.6 Jean van Caloen -Paul Henri Oosterlynck 48,37 %
11 NS 3P W+2 -200 22 100.00
12 NS 4C N+3 710 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Mercedes Oostens 50,64 %
13 NS 2P W+1 -140 10 45.45
14 NS 6C S+1 1010 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.4 Jeannine Thys -Liliane Baptista 49,05 %
15 NS 5T W = -400 2 9.09
16 NS 4P S-1 -50 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
a.3 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 45,80 %
17 NS 4C E-1 50 18 81.82
18 NS 4P N-1 -100 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.2 Christiane Huby -Myriam de Timary 50,38 %
19 NS 3S N+1 430 18 81.82
20 NS 4C W-1 100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
a.1 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 52,06 %
21 NS 4C S+2 680 6 27.27
22 NS 3C E = -140 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
a13 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 47,80 %
23 NS 3T E = -110 12 54.55
24 NS 4P E+1 -450 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a12 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 46,67 %
25 NS 3S S-3 -150 1 4.55
26 NS 3S W+1 -630 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
Total : 229,2 / 528 = 43,41 %
PAIRE A.9 Sophie Tilemans -Catherine Tilemans
a.4 Jeannine Thys -Liliane Baptista 49,05 %
1 NS 5C E-3 150 16 72.73
2 NS 2P N+1 140 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a.3 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 45,80 %
3 NS 3K N-2 -100 1.2 5.45
4 NS 2C N+1 140 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
a.2 Christiane Huby -Myriam de Timary 50,38 %
5 NS 3P N = 140 15 68.18
6 NS 1S N-1 -50 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a.1 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 52,06 %
7 NS 4C S = 620 14 63.64
8 NS 4C W-2 100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a13 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 47,80 %
9 NS 3K W = -110 7 31.82
10 NS 4S S-1 -100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
a12 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 46,67 %
11 NS 4P W = -420 20 90.91
12 NS 4C N+3 710 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a11 Robert De Witt -Philippe Marchandise 41,12 %
13 NS 3P W = -140 10 45.45
14 NS 6S S+1 1020 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a.9 Benedicte Lemaigre -Simone Munsterhjelm 51,31 %
17 NS 4C E = -420 5 22.73
18 NS 4P N-1 -100 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
a.8 Gerard Cooreman -Dominique Sassen 55,76 %
19 NS 4C S-1 -50 4 18.18
20 NS 4C E = -620 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
a.7 Philippe van der Gracht -Fabienne Smit 52,77 %
21 NS 2C S+4 230 2 9.09
22 NS 3C E = -140 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
a.6 Jean van Caloen -Paul Henri Oosterlynck 48,37 %
23 NS 3T E = -110 12 54.55
24 NS 4P E+3 -510 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Mercedes Oostens 50,64 %
25 NS 3S S-3 -150 1 4.55
26 NS 3S W+1 -630 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
Total : 222,2 / 528 = 42,08 %
PAIRE a10 Jan Sassen -Edith Close
A12 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Claire Derieuw 55,70 %
1 EO 5C W-2 100 13 59.09
2 EO 2K N = 90 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A.6 Thomas Brusselmans -Brigitte Brusselmans 43,41 %
3 EO 4K N-2 -100 20.8 94.55
4 EO 2C N+1 140 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
A13 David Walker -Jacques Podevyn 59,64 %
5 EO 4C W-1 50 12 54.55
6 EO 1S N+1 120 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A.7 Lydia Wildiers -Nicole Blondeau 50,11 %
7 EO 4P W-2 200 18 81.82
8 EO 3P S-2 -100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 54,09 %
9 EO 3K W = -110 15 68.18
10 EO 5K N = 600 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.8 Sylviane Delbeke -Marie J. de Wagheneire 53,81 %
11 EO 4P W+1 -450 13 59.09
12 EO 4C N+3 710 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 53,07 %
13 EO 2P W+1 -140 12 54.55
14 EO 4C S+3 510 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.3 Michele Berrier -Teresa Dekoster 47,73 %
17 EO 4C E = -420 17 77.27
18 EO 3P N+1 170 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A10 Michele Verhulst -Patricia Bardy 44,43 %
19 EO 4C S = 420 9 40.91
20 EO 3S W = -600 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.4 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 45,57 %
21 EO 5C S = 650 18 81.82
22 EO 2C E = -110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A11 Jacqueline de Thier -Janine Wanderpepen 53,30 %
23 EO 3T E+1 -130 16 72.73
24 EO 4P E+1 -450 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A.5 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx 47,46 %
25 EO 3S S = 400 5 22.73
26 EO 2S W+3 -210 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
Total : 307,8 / 528 = 58,30 %
PAIRE a.8 Gerard Cooreman -Dominique Sassen
A11 Jacqueline de Thier -Janine Wanderpepen 53,30 %
1 EO 4P S = 420 3 13.64
2 EO 4P N-2 -200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.5 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx 47,46 %
3 EO 4P S-1 -50 15.4 70.00
4 EO 4C S-2 -200 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 82,73 %
A12 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Claire Derieuw 55,70 %
5 EO 3P N+1 170 2 9.09
6 EO 1S N-1 -50 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A.6 Thomas Brusselmans -Brigitte Brusselmans 43,41 %
7 EO 3C S+1 170 20 90.91
8 EO 3C W-1 50 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
A13 David Walker -Jacques Podevyn 59,64 %
9 EO 3P N-2 -100 8 36.36
10 EO 5K N+1 620 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 54,09 %
13 EO 3P W = -140 12 54.55
14 EO 6C S+1 1010 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.8 Sylviane Delbeke -Marie J. de Wagheneire 53,81 %
15 EO 2S E = -120 0 0.00
16 EO 4P S-1 -50 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 53,07 %
17 EO 4C E = -420 17 77.27
18 EO 3T S-1 -100 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
A.9 Sophie Tilemans -Catherine Tilemans 42,08 %
19 EO 4C S-1 -50 18 81.82
20 EO 4C E = -620 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
A.3 Michele Berrier -Teresa Dekoster 47,73 %
21 EO 6C S = 1430 7 31.82
22 EO 3P N-1 -50 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A10 Michele Verhulst -Patricia Bardy 44,43 %
23 EO 3T W+1 -130 16 72.73
24 EO 3S W+1 -430 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.4 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 45,57 %
25 EO 3S S-1 -50 15 68.18
26 EO 3S W+2 -660 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
Total : 294,4 / 528 = 55,76 %
PAIRE a.7 Philippe van der Gracht -Fabienne Smit
A.4 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 45,57 %
1 EO 4P S-1 -50 18 81.82
2 EO 1S N+1 120 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A11 Jacqueline de Thier -Janine Wanderpepen 53,30 %
3 EO 4T E-3 300 6.6 30.00
4 EO 3C N = 140 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A.5 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx 47,46 %
5 EO 3P N+1 170 2 9.09
6 EO 1S S-2 -100 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A12 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Claire Derieuw 55,70 %
7 EO 5C N-1 -100 22 100.00
8 EO 4C W-2 100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A13 David Walker -Jacques Podevyn 59,64 %
11 EO 4P W+1 -450 13 59.09
12 EO 4C N+3 710 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.7 Lydia Wildiers -Nicole Blondeau 50,11 %
13 EO 3P W = -140 12 54.55
14 EO 6C S+1 1010 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 54,09 %
15 EO 2T W+3 -150 10 45.45
16 EO 4P S-1 -50 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.8 Sylviane Delbeke -Marie J. de Wagheneire 53,81 %
17 EO 4C E-1 50 4 18.18
18 EO 5CcW-2 300 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 53,07 %
19 EO 4C S = 420 9 40.91
20 EO 4C W-1 100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A.9 Sophie Tilemans -Catherine Tilemans 42,08 %
21 EO 2C S+4 230 20 90.91
22 EO 3C E = -140 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
A.3 Michele Berrier -Teresa Dekoster 47,73 %
23 EO 3T E = -110 10 45.45
24 EO 4P E+2 -480 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A10 Michele Verhulst -Patricia Bardy 44,43 %
25 EO 3S S = 400 5 22.73
26 EO 3S W+1 -630 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
Total : 278,6 / 528 = 52,77 %
PAIRE a.1 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 54,09 %
1 EO 4P S = 420 3 13.64
2 EO 1S N = 90 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.8 Sylviane Delbeke -Marie J. de Wagheneire 53,81 %
3 EO 3K N = 110 9.9 45.00
4 EO 2C N+1 140 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 45,23 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 53,07 %
5 EO 4C W+1 -450 20 90.91
6 EO 1S N-1 -50 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A.9 Sophie Tilemans -Catherine Tilemans 42,08 %
7 EO 4C S = 620 8 36.36
8 EO 4C W-2 100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A.3 Michele Berrier -Teresa Dekoster 47,73 %
9 EO 3K W = -110 15 68.18
10 EO 4K N+1 150 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A10 Michele Verhulst -Patricia Bardy 44,43 %
11 EO 4P W+1 -450 13 59.09
12 EO 4C N+3 710 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.4 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 45,57 %
13 EO 3P W = -140 12 54.55
14 EO 4C S+3 510 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A11 Jacqueline de Thier -Janine Wanderpepen 53,30 %
15 EO 2T W+3 -150 10 45.45
16 EO 4P S-1 -50 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.5 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx 47,46 %
17 EO 3C E+2 -200 10 45.45
18 EO 4P N+1 650 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A12 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Claire Derieuw 55,70 %
19 EO 4C S = 420 9 40.91
20 EO 4C W+1 -650 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A.6 Thomas Brusselmans -Brigitte Brusselmans 43,41 %
21 EO 4C S+2 680 16 72.73
22 EO 3C E = -140 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
A.7 Lydia Wildiers -Nicole Blondeau 50,11 %
25 EO 3S S = 400 5 22.73
26 EO 2S W+2 -180 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
Total : 274,9 / 528 = 52,06 %
PAIRE a.9 Benedicte Lemaigre -Simone Munsterhjelm
A.5 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx 47,46 %
1 EO 5CcW = -650 22 100.00
2 EO 3P N = 140 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A12 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Claire Derieuw 55,70 %
3 EO 3K N = 110 9.9 45.00
4 EO 2C N+2 170 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 27,05 %
A.6 Thomas Brusselmans -Brigitte Brusselmans 43,41 %
5 EO 4C W+1 -450 20 90.91
6 EO 1S N-1 -50 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A13 David Walker -Jacques Podevyn 59,64 %
7 EO 4C N = 620 8 36.36
8 EO 4C E-4 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
A.7 Lydia Wildiers -Nicole Blondeau 50,11 %
9 EO 3C S = 140 2 9.09
10 EO 4C S-1 -100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 54,09 %
11 EO 4P W+1 -450 13 59.09
12 EO 4C N+3 710 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 53,07 %
15 EO 5T W = -400 20 90.91
16 EO 4P S = 420 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.9 Sophie Tilemans -Catherine Tilemans 42,08 %
17 EO 4C E = -420 17 77.27
18 EO 4P N-1 -100 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
A.3 Michele Berrier -Teresa Dekoster 47,73 %
19 EO 4C S-1 -50 18 81.82
20 EO 4C W-1 100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A10 Michele Verhulst -Patricia Bardy 44,43 %
21 EO 6C S = 1430 7 31.82
22 EO 4PcS-2 -300 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A.4 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 45,57 %
23 EO 2K W-1 100 5 22.73
24 EO 4P E+1 -450 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A11 Jacqueline de Thier -Janine Wanderpepen 53,30 %
25 EO 3S S = 400 5 22.73
26 EO 3S W+1 -630 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
Total : 270,9 / 528 = 51,31 %
PAIRE a.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Mercedes Oostens
A.3 Michele Berrier -Teresa Dekoster 47,73 %
1 EO 3P S = 140 9 40.91
2 EO 4P N-1 -100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A10 Michele Verhulst -Patricia Bardy 44,43 %
3 EO 3K N-1 -50 15.4 70.00
4 EO 2C N = 110 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 73,64 %
A11 Jacqueline de Thier -Janine Wanderpepen 53,30 %
7 EO 4C S = 620 8 36.36
8 EO 4C W-2 100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A.5 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx 47,46 %
9 EO 3KcW = -670 22 100.00
10 EO 3K N+2 150 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
A12 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Claire Derieuw 55,70 %
11 EO 4P W+1 -450 13 59.09
12 EO 6C N+1 1460 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A.6 Thomas Brusselmans -Brigitte Brusselmans 43,41 %
13 EO 2P W+1 -140 12 54.55
14 EO 6C S+1 1010 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A13 David Walker -Jacques Podevyn 59,64 %
15 EO 2T W+3 -150 10 45.45
16 EO 4P S = 420 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A.7 Lydia Wildiers -Nicole Blondeau 50,11 %
17 EO 4C E = -420 17 77.27
18 EO 4C W-1 50 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 54,09 %
19 EO 4C S+1 450 1 4.55
20 EO 4C W-1 100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
A.8 Sylviane Delbeke -Marie J. de Wagheneire 53,81 %
21 EO 6C S = 1430 7 31.82
22 EO 2C W = -110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 53,07 %
23 EO 4T W = -130 16 72.73
24 EO 4P E = -420 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.9 Sophie Tilemans -Catherine Tilemans 42,08 %
25 EO 3S S-3 -150 21 95.45
26 EO 3S W+1 -630 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
Total : 267,4 / 528 = 50,64 %
PAIRE a.2 Christiane Huby -Myriam de Timary
A.8 Sylviane Delbeke -Marie J. de Wagheneire 53,81 %
1 EO 4P S-1 -50 18 81.82
2 EO 2P N = 110 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 53,07 %
3 EO 60%50% Ajust 11 50.00
4 EO 2C N+2 170 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A.9 Sophie Tilemans -Catherine Tilemans 42,08 %
5 EO 3P N = 140 7 31.82
6 EO 1S N-1 -50 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.3 Michele Berrier -Teresa Dekoster 47,73 %
7 EO 4C S = 620 8 36.36
8 EO 3C W-1 50 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A10 Michele Verhulst -Patricia Bardy 44,43 %
9 EO 3K W = -110 15 68.18
10 EO 4C S-3 -300 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
A.4 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 45,57 %
11 EO 4P W+1 -450 13 59.09
12 EO 5C N+2 710 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A11 Jacqueline de Thier -Janine Wanderpepen 53,30 %
13 EO 3P W = -140 12 54.55
14 EO 6C S+1 1010 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.5 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx 47,46 %
15 EO 2T W+3 -150 10 45.45
16 EO 4P S-1 -50 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A12 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Claire Derieuw 55,70 %
17 EO 4C E-1 50 4 18.18
18 EO 4P N = 620 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
A.6 Thomas Brusselmans -Brigitte Brusselmans 43,41 %
19 EO 3S N+1 430 4 18.18
20 EO 4C W-1 100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
A13 David Walker -Jacques Podevyn 59,64 %
21 EO 6C S = 1430 7 31.82
22 EO 3C E = -140 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.7 Lydia Wildiers -Nicole Blondeau 50,11 %
23 EO 3S E = -600 22 100.00
24 EO 4P E+1 -450 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
Total : 266,0 / 528 = 50,38 %
PAIRE a.4 Jeannine Thys -Liliane Baptista
A.9 Sophie Tilemans -Catherine Tilemans 42,08 %
1 EO 5C E-3 150 6 27.27
2 EO 2P N+1 140 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A10 Michele Verhulst -Patricia Bardy 44,43 %
5 EO 4C W+1 -450 20 90.91
6 EO 1S N-1 -50 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A.4 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 45,57 %
7 EO 4C N = 620 8 36.36
8 EO 3T E-1 50 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A11 Jacqueline de Thier -Janine Wanderpepen 53,30 %
9 EO 3K W = -110 15 68.18
10 EO 5K N = 600 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.5 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx 47,46 %
11 EO 4P W+1 -450 13 59.09
12 EO 4C N+3 710 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A12 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Claire Derieuw 55,70 %
13 EO 2P W+1 -140 12 54.55
14 EO 6C S+1 1010 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.6 Thomas Brusselmans -Brigitte Brusselmans 43,41 %
15 EO 5T W = -400 20 90.91
16 EO 4P S-1 -50 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
A13 David Walker -Jacques Podevyn 59,64 %
17 EO 4C E-1 50 4 18.18
18 EO 4P N-1 -100 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.7 Lydia Wildiers -Nicole Blondeau 50,11 %
19 EO 4C S = 420 9 40.91
20 EO 4C W = -620 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 54,09 %
21 EO 6C S = 1430 7 31.82
22 EO 2C E+1 -140 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.8 Sylviane Delbeke -Marie J. de Wagheneire 53,81 %
23 EO 4K W-4 400 0 0.00
24 EO 4P E+1 -450 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 53,07 %
25 EO 3S S = 400 5 22.73
26 EO 2S W+2 -180 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
Total : 259,0 / 528 = 49,05 %
PAIRE a.6 Jean van Caloen -Paul Henri Oosterlynck
A10 Michele Verhulst -Patricia Bardy 44,43 %
1 EO 5C W-2 100 13 59.09
2 EO 4P N = 620 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A.4 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 45,57 %
3 EO 4P S-1 -50 15.4 70.00
4 EO 4C N-2 -200 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 82,73 %
A11 Jacqueline de Thier -Janine Wanderpepen 53,30 %
5 EO 3P N+1 170 2 9.09
6 EO 1S N-1 -50 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A12 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Claire Derieuw 55,70 %
9 EO 3K W = -110 15 68.18
10 EO 4C S-1 -100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
A.6 Thomas Brusselmans -Brigitte Brusselmans 43,41 %
11 EO 3P W+2 -200 0 0.00
12 EO 4C N+3 710 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A13 David Walker -Jacques Podevyn 59,64 %
13 EO 3P W = -140 12 54.55
14 EO 6C N+1 1010 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.7 Lydia Wildiers -Nicole Blondeau 50,11 %
15 EO 5T W = -400 20 90.91
16 EO 4P S = 420 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 54,09 %
17 EO 4C E = -420 17 77.27
18 EO 4P N = 620 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.8 Sylviane Delbeke -Marie J. de Wagheneire 53,81 %
19 EO 4C S+1 450 1 4.55
20 EO 4C W = -620 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 53,07 %
21 EO 6C S = 1430 7 31.82
22 EO 4C E-2 200 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
A.9 Sophie Tilemans -Catherine Tilemans 42,08 %
23 EO 3T E = -110 10 45.45
24 EO 4P E+3 -510 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.3 Michele Berrier -Teresa Dekoster 47,73 %
25 EO 3S S = 400 5 22.73
26 EO 3S W+2 -660 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
Total : 255,4 / 528 = 48,37 %
PAIRE a13 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes
A.7 Lydia Wildiers -Nicole Blondeau 50,11 %
1 EO 5CcW-3 500 0 0.00
2 EO 2P N+1 140 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 54,09 %
3 EO 4P N = 420 3.4 15.45
4 EO 2C N+1 140 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 30,45 %
A.8 Sylviane Delbeke -Marie J. de Wagheneire 53,81 %
5 EO 3P S = 140 7 31.82
6 EO 4T N-2 -100 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 53,07 %
7 EO 4C S = 620 8 36.36
8 EO 3C W-1 50 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.9 Sophie Tilemans -Catherine Tilemans 42,08 %
9 EO 3K W = -110 15 68.18
10 EO 4S S-1 -100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
A.3 Michele Berrier -Teresa Dekoster 47,73 %
11 EO 4P W+1 -450 13 59.09
12 EO 4C N+3 710 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A10 Michele Verhulst -Patricia Bardy 44,43 %
13 EO 2P W+1 -140 12 54.55
14 EO 6C S+1 1010 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.4 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 45,57 %
15 EO 4T W = -130 2 9.09
16 EO 3P S+1 170 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A11 Jacqueline de Thier -Janine Wanderpepen 53,30 %
17 EO 4C E = -420 17 77.27
18 EO 3P N+1 170 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.5 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx 47,46 %
19 EO 2C S+3 200 14 63.64
20 EO 4C W-1 100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A.6 Thomas Brusselmans -Brigitte Brusselmans 43,41 %
23 EO 3T E = -110 10 45.45
24 EO 4P E+1 -450 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A13 David Walker -Jacques Podevyn 59,64 %
25 EO 2S N+1 150 12 54.55
26 EO 3S W+1 -630 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
Total : 252,4 / 528 = 47,80 %
PAIRE a12 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens
A13 David Walker -Jacques Podevyn 59,64 %
1 EO 4P S-1 -50 18 81.82
2 EO 2P N+1 140 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.7 Lydia Wildiers -Nicole Blondeau 50,11 %
3 EO 4P S = 420 3.4 15.45
4 EO 2C N = 110 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 46,36 %
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 54,09 %
5 EO 3C W+2 -200 16 72.73
6 EO 2P S-1 -50 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.8 Sylviane Delbeke -Marie J. de Wagheneire 53,81 %
7 EO 4C S = 620 8 36.36
8 EO 2C W = -110 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 53,07 %
9 EO 3P N = 140 2 9.09
10 EO 5K S = 600 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
A.9 Sophie Tilemans -Catherine Tilemans 42,08 %
11 EO 4P W = -420 2 9.09
12 EO 4C N+3 710 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A.3 Michele Berrier -Teresa Dekoster 47,73 %
13 EO 3C S-1 -100 0 0.00
14 EO 4C S+3 510 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A10 Michele Verhulst -Patricia Bardy 44,43 %
15 EO 2T W+3 -150 10 45.45
16 EO 4C S-2 -100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.4 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 45,57 %
17 EO 4C E-1 50 4 18.18
18 EO 4P N = 620 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
A.5 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx 47,46 %
21 EO 6C S-1 -100 22 100.00
22 EO 4C E-2 200 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A12 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Claire Derieuw 55,70 %
23 EO 2K W-1 100 5 22.73
24 EO 3P E+2 -200 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
A.6 Thomas Brusselmans -Brigitte Brusselmans 43,41 %
25 EO 3S S-3 -150 21 95.45
26 EO 3S W+1 -630 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
Total : 246,4 / 528 = 46,67 %
PAIRE a.3 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert
A.9 Sophie Tilemans -Catherine Tilemans 42,08 %
3 EO 3K N-2 -100 20.8 94.55
4 EO 2C N+1 140 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
A.3 Michele Berrier -Teresa Dekoster 47,73 %
5 EO 4C W-1 50 12 54.55
6 EO 1S N-1 -50 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A10 Michele Verhulst -Patricia Bardy 44,43 %
7 EO 4C S = 620 8 36.36
8 EO 4C W-2 100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A.4 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 45,57 %
9 EO 3P N = 140 2 9.09
10 EO 5K N = 600 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
A11 Jacqueline de Thier -Janine Wanderpepen 53,30 %
11 EO 4P W+1 -450 13 59.09
12 EO 4C S+3 710 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.5 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx 47,46 %
13 EO 2P W+1 -140 12 54.55
14 EO 6C S+1 1010 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A12 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Claire Derieuw 55,70 %
15 EO 2T W+3 -150 10 45.45
16 EO 4P S-1 -50 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.6 Thomas Brusselmans -Brigitte Brusselmans 43,41 %
17 EO 4C E-1 50 4 18.18
18 EO 4P N-1 -100 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A13 David Walker -Jacques Podevyn 59,64 %
19 EO 4C S-2 -100 22 100.00
20 EO 4C E-1 100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A.7 Lydia Wildiers -Nicole Blondeau 50,11 %
21 EO 6C S = 1430 7 31.82
22 EO 3P N = 140 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 54,09 %
23 EO 2C S+1 140 2 9.09
24 EO 4P E+1 -450 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A.8 Sylviane Delbeke -Marie J. de Wagheneire 53,81 %
25 EO 3S S-2 -100 18 81.82
26 EO 2S W+2 -180 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 241,8 / 528 = 45,80 %
PAIRE a11 Robert De Witt -Philippe Marchandise
A.6 Thomas Brusselmans -Brigitte Brusselmans 43,41 %
1 EO 3P S = 140 9 40.91
2 EO 2P N+1 140 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A13 David Walker -Jacques Podevyn 59,64 %
3 EO 4PcS = 590 0.1 0.45
4 EO 2P N+2 170 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 4,77 %
A.7 Lydia Wildiers -Nicole Blondeau 50,11 %
5 EO 4C W-1 50 12 54.55
6 EO 1S N-1 -50 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 54,09 %
7 EO 4C S = 620 8 36.36
8 EO 2P S-1 -50 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.8 Sylviane Delbeke -Marie J. de Wagheneire 53,81 %
9 EO 4C S-1 -50 6 27.27
10 EO 5K N = 600 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 53,07 %
11 EO 4P W+1 -450 13 59.09
12 EO 4C S+1 650 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
A.9 Sophie Tilemans -Catherine Tilemans 42,08 %
13 EO 3P W = -140 12 54.55
14 EO 6S S+1 1020 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A.3 Michele Berrier -Teresa Dekoster 47,73 %
15 EO 3T W+2 -150 10 45.45
16 EO 4P S+1 450 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.4 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 45,57 %
19 EO 3S N-1 -50 18 81.82
20 EO 4C E = -620 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
A11 Jacqueline de Thier -Janine Wanderpepen 53,30 %
21 EO 6C S = 1430 7 31.82
22 EO 3C E-1 100 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A.5 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx 47,46 %
23 EO 1S E+2 -150 20 90.91
24 EO 3S W-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A12 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Claire Derieuw 55,70 %
25 EO 3S N-1 -50 15 68.18
26 EO 2S W+1 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
Total : 217,1 / 528 = 41,12 %
|