B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 59,53 A12 Annette Fobe -Sophie Tilemans
--- 2 57,95 A13 Sylviane Delbeke -Jacqueline Vandenhaute
--- 3 55,95 A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren
--- 4 54,19 A.7 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza
--- 5 50,97 A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Michele Berrier
--- 6 50,85 A.1 Annie Legrand -Eliane de Ceuninck
--- 7 49,13 A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois
--- 8 48,53 A.9 Pascale Ortegat -Fabienne Smit
--- 9 47,73 A10 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne
--- 10 47,62 A.8 Dominique Bourgoignie -Anne Brans
--- 11 46,38 A.5 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen
--- 12 45,56 A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens
--- 13 34,63 A11 Denise Testaert -Chantal Woitrin
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 66,31 a.6 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne
--- 2 59,89 a.2 Francoise Duren -Lydia Wildiers
--- 3 54,73 a.9 Stan Tabor -Edith Bjorn
--- 4 54,62 a.5 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant
--- 5 49,64 a.7 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen
--- 6 47,94 a12 Brigitte Velge -Nicole Leclere
--- 7 47,78 a.3 Didier Collart -Gerard Cooreman
--- 8 46,31 a.4 Michel Lievens -Helene Christiaens
--- 9 45,09 a11 Caroll Pucher -Marie J. de Wagheneire
--- 10 44,19 a.1 Antoinette Jourdain -Diane della Faille
--- 11 43,54 a.8 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert
--- 12 40,06 a10 Simone Munsterhjelm -Myriam de Timary
--- 13 0,00 a13 -
PAIRE A12 Annette Fobe -Sophie Tilemans
a10 Simone Munsterhjelm -Myriam de Timary 40,06 %
1 NS 3S N+3 490 21.9 99.55
2 NS 2T E = -90 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 94,55 %
a.9 Stan Tabor -Edith Bjorn 54,73 %
3 NS 3S N+1 430 15.4 70.00
4 NS 3S E+1 -630 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
a.8 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 43,54 %
5 NS 4P N-2 -200 1.2 5.45
6 NS 4C S = 420 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
a.7 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 49,64 %
7 NS 5C W-5 500 21.9 99.55
8 NS 5CcN-1 -100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
a.6 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne 66,31 %
9 NS 3S N-2 -100 2.3 10.45
10 NS 2C S+1 140 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a.5 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 54,62 %
11 NS 3S W+3 -490 2.3 10.45
12 NS 3S W+1 -430 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a.4 Michel Lievens -Helene Christiaens 46,31 %
13 NS 2P N+3 200 16.5 75.00
14 NS 3S N+2 460 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Gerard Cooreman 47,78 %
15 NS 3P W = -140 14.3 65.00
16 NS 2C W = -110 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.2 Francoise Duren -Lydia Wildiers 59,89 %
17 NS 2C N-1 -50 3.4 15.45
18 NS 4C E-2 100 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.1 Antoinette Jourdain -Diane della Faille 44,19 %
19 NS 2P S+3 200 15.4 70.00
20 NS 3S S+2 660 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
a12 Brigitte Velge -Nicole Leclere 47,94 %
23 NS 6S N+1 1470 19.7 89.55
24 NS 3P W-2 100 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
a11 Caroll Pucher -Marie J. de Wagheneire 45,09 %
25 NS 1S E+2 -150 4.5 20.45
26 NS 6C E-2 200 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
Total : 314,3 / 528 = 59,53 %
PAIRE A13 Sylviane Delbeke -Jacqueline Vandenhaute
a12 Brigitte Velge -Nicole Leclere 47,94 %
1 NS 3S N = 400 14.3 65.00
2 NS 4P W = -420 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a11 Caroll Pucher -Marie J. de Wagheneire 45,09 %
3 NS 3S N+2 460 19.7 89.55
4 NS 3S E+2 -660 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a10 Simone Munsterhjelm -Myriam de Timary 40,06 %
5 NS 4P N = 620 20.8 94.55
6 NS 4C S+1 450 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 97,05 %
a.9 Stan Tabor -Edith Bjorn 54,73 %
7 NS 4C W-2 200 18.6 84.55
8 NS 3C S = 140 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 82,05 %
a.8 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 43,54 %
9 NS 2K N+1 110 13.2 60.00
10 NS 3S S = 600 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a.7 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 49,64 %
11 NS 3S W+1 -430 14.3 65.00
12 NS 3S W+1 -430 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.6 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne 66,31 %
13 NS 5T E-1 100 4.5 20.45
14 NS 3S N = 400 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a.5 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 54,62 %
15 NS 3P W = -140 14.3 65.00
16 NS 2C W+1 -140 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a.4 Michel Lievens -Helene Christiaens 46,31 %
17 NS 2C N = 110 16.5 75.00
18 NS 2P N-2 -200 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Gerard Cooreman 47,78 %
19 NS 3P S+1 170 7.7 35.00
20 NS 3S S+1 630 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.2 Francoise Duren -Lydia Wildiers 59,89 %
21 NS 4T N-1 -100 13 59.09
22 NS 2S E-1 100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a13 - 0,00 %
25 NS BYE 0 0.00
26 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 280,5 / 484 = 57,95 %
PAIRE A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren
a11 Caroll Pucher -Marie J. de Wagheneire 45,09 %
1 NS 3S N = 400 14.3 65.00
2 NS 4P W-1 50 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
a10 Simone Munsterhjelm -Myriam de Timary 40,06 %
3 NS 5K N = 400 12.1 55.00
4 NS 3S E+1 -630 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
a.9 Stan Tabor -Edith Bjorn 54,73 %
5 NS 4P N-1 -100 5.5 25.00
6 NS 3P N = 140 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 12,73 %
a.8 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 43,54 %
7 NS 5K N-3 -300 0.1 0.45
8 NS 5P S-1 -50 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
a.6 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne 66,31 %
11 NS 3S E+3 -490 2.3 10.45
12 NS 3S W+1 -430 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a.5 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 54,62 %
13 NS 2P N+3 200 16.5 75.00
14 NS 1P W-3 150 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a.4 Michel Lievens -Helene Christiaens 46,31 %
15 NS 4P W-2 100 21.9 99.55
16 NS 3C W-1 100 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 92,05 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Gerard Cooreman 47,78 %
17 NS 2C N = 110 16.5 75.00
18 NS 3C E-1 50 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 67,50 %
a.2 Francoise Duren -Lydia Wildiers 59,89 %
19 NS 3P S+1 170 7.7 35.00
20 NS 3S S+1 630 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.1 Antoinette Jourdain -Diane della Faille 44,19 %
21 NS 5T N-1 -100 13 59.09
22 NS 2S E-1 100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a13 - 0,00 %
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a12 Brigitte Velge -Nicole Leclere 47,94 %
25 NS 1S E = -90 19.7 89.55
26 NS 3S W+1 -630 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
Total : 270,8 / 484 = 55,95 %
PAIRE A.7 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza
a13 - 0,00 %
1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a12 Brigitte Velge -Nicole Leclere 47,94 %
3 NS 3S N-1 -50 2.3 10.45
4 NS 3S E+1 -630 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
a11 Caroll Pucher -Marie J. de Wagheneire 45,09 %
5 NS 3P N+1 170 15.4 70.00
6 NS 4C S = 420 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
a10 Simone Munsterhjelm -Myriam de Timary 40,06 %
7 NS 3C W-2 200 18.6 84.55
8 NS 5CcS-1 -100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a.9 Stan Tabor -Edith Bjorn 54,73 %
9 NS 2C S = 110 13.2 60.00
10 NS 2S S+1 150 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a.7 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 49,64 %
13 NS 2P N+1 140 7.7 35.00
14 NS 3S N+2 460 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
a.6 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne 66,31 %
15 NS 3T N-2 -200 7.7 35.00
16 NS 3C W-1 100 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
a.5 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 54,62 %
17 NS 2P S-1 -50 3.4 15.45
18 NS 3C E-1 50 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a.4 Michel Lievens -Helene Christiaens 46,31 %
19 NS 4P S = 420 19.7 89.55
20 NS 3S S = 600 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Gerard Cooreman 47,78 %
21 NS 4P E-1 50 20 90.91
22 NS 2S E-1 100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
a.2 Francoise Duren -Lydia Wildiers 59,89 %
23 NS 3S N+3 690 2.3 10.45
24 NS 3P E = -140 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 5,45 %
a.1 Antoinette Jourdain -Diane della Faille 44,19 %
25 NS 1S E = -90 19.7 89.55
26 NS 4C E+1 -650 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
Total : 262,3 / 484 = 54,19 %
PAIRE A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Michele Berrier
a.7 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 49,64 %
1 NS 3S N+2 460 18.6 84.55
2 NS 4P W = -420 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a.6 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne 66,31 %
3 NS 5K N = 400 12.1 55.00
4 NS 3S E+2 -660 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
a.4 Michel Lievens -Helene Christiaens 46,31 %
7 NS 3K N-1 -100 7.7 35.00
8 NS 5TcE+1 -650 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Gerard Cooreman 47,78 %
9 NS 3K N-1 -50 4.5 20.45
10 NS 2C W-2 200 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 45,23 %
a.2 Francoise Duren -Lydia Wildiers 59,89 %
11 NS 3S E+1 -430 14.3 65.00
12 NS 3S W+1 -430 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.1 Antoinette Jourdain -Diane della Faille 44,19 %
13 NS 4C N = 620 19.7 89.55
14 NS 3S N = 400 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
a13 - 0,00 %
15 NS BYE 0 0.00
16 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a12 Brigitte Velge -Nicole Leclere 47,94 %
17 NS 2C N = 110 16.5 75.00
18 NS 3C E = -140 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a11 Caroll Pucher -Marie J. de Wagheneire 45,09 %
19 NS 2P S+2 170 7.7 35.00
20 NS 3S S = 600 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
a10 Simone Munsterhjelm -Myriam de Timary 40,06 %
21 NS 3T N-1 -100 13 59.09
22 NS 2S E-1 100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a.9 Stan Tabor -Edith Bjorn 54,73 %
23 NS 6S S+1 1470 19.7 89.55
24 NS 4K N = 130 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
a.8 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 43,54 %
25 NS 1S E+2 -150 4.5 20.45
26 NS 5C E-1 100 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
Total : 246,7 / 484 = 50,97 %
PAIRE A.1 Annie Legrand -Eliane de Ceuninck
a.1 Antoinette Jourdain -Diane della Faille 44,19 %
1 NS 3S N+2 460 18.6 84.55
2 NS 4P W = -420 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a13 - 0,00 %
3 NS BYE 0 0.00
4 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a12 Brigitte Velge -Nicole Leclere 47,94 %
5 NS 3P N = 140 13.2 60.00
6 NS 4C S = 420 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a11 Caroll Pucher -Marie J. de Wagheneire 45,09 %
7 NS 5K N-2 -200 2.3 10.45
8 NS 3T S-8 -400 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 10,45 %
a10 Simone Munsterhjelm -Myriam de Timary 40,06 %
9 NS 2K N+2 130 17.5 79.55
10 NS 2C S+1 140 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a.9 Stan Tabor -Edith Bjorn 54,73 %
11 NS 3S W+2 -460 7.7 35.00
12 NS 3S W+1 -430 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
a.8 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 43,54 %
13 NS 2P N+2 170 12.1 55.00
14 NS 3S N+2 460 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
a.7 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 49,64 %
15 NS 4P W = -420 1.2 5.45
16 NS 2C W-1 100 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.6 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne 66,31 %
17 NS 3C N = 140 21.9 99.55
18 NS 2C E = -110 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
a.5 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 54,62 %
19 NS 2P S+2 170 7.7 35.00
20 NS 3S S = 600 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
a.4 Michel Lievens -Helene Christiaens 46,31 %
21 NS 4P E+1 -450 4 18.18
22 NS 2S E-1 100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Gerard Cooreman 47,78 %
23 NS 6S S+1 1470 19.7 89.55
24 NS 3P E-1 50 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
Total : 246,1 / 484 = 50,85 %
PAIRE A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois
a.2 Francoise Duren -Lydia Wildiers 59,89 %
3 NS 3S N-4 -200 0.1 0.45
4 NS 3S E+1 -630 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
a.1 Antoinette Jourdain -Diane della Faille 44,19 %
5 NS 5T W-4 200 17.5 79.55
6 NS 4C S = 420 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
a13 - 0,00 %
7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a12 Brigitte Velge -Nicole Leclere 47,94 %
9 NS 2K N = 90 7.7 35.00
10 NS 1S S-1 -100 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
a11 Caroll Pucher -Marie J. de Wagheneire 45,09 %
11 NS 3S E+3 -490 2.3 10.45
12 NS 3S W = -400 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a10 Simone Munsterhjelm -Myriam de Timary 40,06 %
13 NS 4P N-1 -100 2.3 10.45
14 NS 3S N = 400 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
a.9 Stan Tabor -Edith Bjorn 54,73 %
15 NS 2P W+1 -140 14.3 65.00
16 NS 2C W = -110 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.8 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 43,54 %
17 NS 2C N = 110 16.5 75.00
18 NS 4C E-2 100 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
a.7 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 49,64 %
19 NS 2P S+2 170 7.7 35.00
20 NS 3S S+1 630 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.6 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne 66,31 %
21 NS 3P E+1 -170 6 27.27
22 NS 2K S-4 -200 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
a.5 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 54,62 %
23 NS 6T S+1 1390 14.3 65.00
24 NS 4P E-3 150 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a.4 Michel Lievens -Helene Christiaens 46,31 %
25 NS 1S W+1 -120 13.2 60.00
26 NS 4C E = -620 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
Total : 237,8 / 484 = 49,13 %
PAIRE A.9 Pascale Ortegat -Fabienne Smit
a.4 Michel Lievens -Helene Christiaens 46,31 %
1 NS 3S N-1 -50 5.5 25.00
2 NS 4P W = -420 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Gerard Cooreman 47,78 %
3 NS 3K N+2 150 5.5 25.00
4 NS 3S E+2 -660 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
a.2 Francoise Duren -Lydia Wildiers 59,89 %
5 NS 3T W-1 50 8.8 40.00
6 NS 4C S = 420 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.1 Antoinette Jourdain -Diane della Faille 44,19 %
7 NS 5K N-1 -100 7.7 35.00
8 NS 5CcN-1 -100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
a13 - 0,00 %
9 NS BYE 0 0.00
10 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a12 Brigitte Velge -Nicole Leclere 47,94 %
11 NS 3S E+2 -460 7.7 35.00
12 NS 3S W = -400 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a11 Caroll Pucher -Marie J. de Wagheneire 45,09 %
13 NS 4P N+1 650 21.9 99.55
14 NS 3S N+2 460 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 89,55 %
a.9 Stan Tabor -Edith Bjorn 54,73 %
17 NS 2C N-1 -50 3.4 15.45
18 NS 2P N = 110 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a.8 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 43,54 %
19 NS 4P S = 420 19.7 89.55
20 NS 3S N+2 660 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 92,05 %
a.7 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 49,64 %
21 NS 4T N-1 -100 13 59.09
22 NS 3S E = -600 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a.6 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne 66,31 %
23 NS 2T S+5 190 0.1 0.45
24 NS 4CcN-1 -100 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 12,73 %
a.5 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 54,62 %
25 NS 1S E = -90 19.7 89.55
26 NS 3S W+3 -690 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 234,9 / 484 = 48,53 %
PAIRE A10 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne
a.6 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne 66,31 %
1 NS 3S N-1 -50 5.5 25.00
2 NS 3S E+2 -460 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 12,73 %
a.5 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 54,62 %
3 NS 3K N+2 150 5.5 25.00
4 NS 3S E+1 -630 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.4 Michel Lievens -Helene Christiaens 46,31 %
5 NS 4C W-2 100 11 50.00
6 NS 4C N = 420 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Gerard Cooreman 47,78 %
7 NS 3K N = 110 13.2 60.00
8 NS 4P S = 420 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a.2 Francoise Duren -Lydia Wildiers 59,89 %
9 NS 1S N = 90 7.7 35.00
10 NS 2S S = 120 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
a.1 Antoinette Jourdain -Diane della Faille 44,19 %
11 NS 3S W+1 -430 14.3 65.00
12 NS 3S W+1 -430 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a13 - 0,00 %
13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a12 Brigitte Velge -Nicole Leclere 47,94 %
15 NS 3P W = -140 14.3 65.00
16 NS 2C W-1 100 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
a10 Simone Munsterhjelm -Myriam de Timary 40,06 %
19 NS 4P S = 420 19.7 89.55
20 NS 3S S+1 630 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a.9 Stan Tabor -Edith Bjorn 54,73 %
21 NS 5TcN-2 -500 1 4.55
22 NS 2S E = -120 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.8 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 43,54 %
23 NS 3S S+4 720 7.7 35.00
24 NS 3P E-2 100 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.7 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 49,64 %
25 NS 1S W+2 -150 4.5 20.45
26 NS 4C E+1 -650 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
Total : 231,0 / 484 = 47,73 %
PAIRE A.8 Dominique Bourgoignie -Anne Brans
a.2 Francoise Duren -Lydia Wildiers 59,89 %
1 NS 5K S-1 -50 5.5 25.00
2 NS 4P W = -420 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
a.1 Antoinette Jourdain -Diane della Faille 44,19 %
3 NS 3S N+2 460 19.7 89.55
4 NS 3S E+2 -660 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a13 - 0,00 %
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a12 Brigitte Velge -Nicole Leclere 47,94 %
7 NS 4K N-1 -100 7.7 35.00
8 NS 4P N-2 -100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
a11 Caroll Pucher -Marie J. de Wagheneire 45,09 %
9 NS 2S S+1 150 19.7 89.55
10 NS 3S N = 600 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 92,05 %
a10 Simone Munsterhjelm -Myriam de Timary 40,06 %
11 NS 3S W+1 -430 14.3 65.00
12 NS 3S W+1 -430 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.8 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 43,54 %
15 NS 4T N-2 -200 7.7 35.00
16 NS 2C W = -110 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a.7 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 49,64 %
17 NS 2S W-2 100 11 50.00
18 NS 2C W+1 -140 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
a.6 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne 66,31 %
19 NS 3P S+1 170 7.7 35.00
20 NS 3S S = 600 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
a.5 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 54,62 %
21 NS 4T N = 130 22 100.00
22 NS 2S E+1 -150 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a.4 Michel Lievens -Helene Christiaens 46,31 %
23 NS 3S S+4 720 7.7 35.00
24 NS 4K N = 130 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Gerard Cooreman 47,78 %
25 NS 1S W+2 -150 4.5 20.45
26 NS 4C E+1 -650 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
Total : 230,5 / 484 = 47,62 %
PAIRE A.5 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen
a.9 Stan Tabor -Edith Bjorn 54,73 %
1 NS 3K S = 110 11 50.00
2 NS 4P W = -420 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.8 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 43,54 %
3 NS 3S N+2 460 19.7 89.55
4 NS 3S E+1 -630 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
a.7 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 49,64 %
5 NS 4P N-2 -200 1.2 5.45
6 NS 4C S = 420 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
a.5 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 54,62 %
9 NS 2C E-2 200 21.9 99.55
10 NS 1S S+1 120 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a.4 Michel Lievens -Helene Christiaens 46,31 %
11 NS 4P E-2 100 21.9 99.55
12 NS 3S W = -400 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 94,55 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Gerard Cooreman 47,78 %
13 NS 2P N+2 170 12.1 55.00
14 NS 5K S = 400 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a.2 Francoise Duren -Lydia Wildiers 59,89 %
15 NS 4P W = -420 1.2 5.45
16 NS 2C W = -110 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a.1 Antoinette Jourdain -Diane della Faille 44,19 %
17 NS 2P W-1 50 8.8 40.00
18 NS 2C E+1 -140 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
a13 - 0,00 %
19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a12 Brigitte Velge -Nicole Leclere 47,94 %
21 NS 5TcN-2 -500 1 4.55
22 NS 2S E = -120 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a11 Caroll Pucher -Marie J. de Wagheneire 45,09 %
23 NS 3S S+4 720 7.7 35.00
24 NS 2P E = -110 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a10 Simone Munsterhjelm -Myriam de Timary 40,06 %
25 NS 1S W+1 -120 13.2 60.00
26 NS 4C E+1 -650 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
Total : 224,5 / 484 = 46,38 %
PAIRE A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens
a.5 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 54,62 %
1 NS 3S N-4 -200 0.1 0.45
2 NS 4P W = -420 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Gerard Cooreman 47,78 %
5 NS 4P N-1 -100 5.5 25.00
6 NS 4C N = 420 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a.2 Francoise Duren -Lydia Wildiers 59,89 %
7 NS 4K N-1 -100 7.7 35.00
8 NS 4P S = 420 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a.1 Antoinette Jourdain -Diane della Faille 44,19 %
9 NS 2K N+1 110 13.2 60.00
10 NS 2P W-3 300 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
a13 - 0,00 %
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a12 Brigitte Velge -Nicole Leclere 47,94 %
13 NS 3P N = 140 7.7 35.00
14 NS 3S N+2 460 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
a11 Caroll Pucher -Marie J. de Wagheneire 45,09 %
15 NS 3T N-1 -100 19.7 89.55
16 NS 2C W+1 -140 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a10 Simone Munsterhjelm -Myriam de Timary 40,06 %
17 NS 2C N-1 -50 3.4 15.45
18 NS 3C E-1 50 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a.9 Stan Tabor -Edith Bjorn 54,73 %
19 NS 4P S-1 -50 0.1 0.45
20 NS 3S S-1 -100 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 0,45 %
a.8 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 43,54 %
21 NS 4T N-1 -100 13 59.09
22 NS 2S E+1 -150 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.7 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 49,64 %
23 NS 6T S+1 1390 14.3 65.00
24 NS 4PcE-3 500 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
a.6 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne 66,31 %
25 NS 1S W+1 -120 13.2 60.00
26 NS 3S W+3 -690 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
Total : 220,5 / 484 = 45,56 %
PAIRE A11 Denise Testaert -Chantal Woitrin
a.8 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 43,54 %
1 NS 3S N-1 -50 5.5 25.00
2 NS 4P W = -420 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
a.7 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 49,64 %
3 NS 2C N+3 200 8.8 40.00
4 NS 3S E+1 -630 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.6 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne 66,31 %
5 NS 4P N = 620 20.8 94.55
6 NS 3S S = 400 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.5 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 54,62 %
7 NS 4K N = 130 15.4 70.00
8 NS 5PcS-1 -100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.4 Michel Lievens -Helene Christiaens 46,31 %
9 NS 3S N-3 -150 0.1 0.45
10 NS 2C S = 110 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 5,45 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Gerard Cooreman 47,78 %
11 NS 2S E+1 -150 19.7 89.55
12 NS 3S W+2 -460 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.2 Francoise Duren -Lydia Wildiers 59,89 %
13 NS 3S S-2 -200 0.1 0.45
14 NS 3S N = 400 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
a.1 Antoinette Jourdain -Diane della Faille 44,19 %
15 NS 3S S-4 -400 4.5 20.45
16 NS 2C W+1 -140 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 15,45 %
a13 - 0,00 %
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a11 Caroll Pucher -Marie J. de Wagheneire 45,09 %
21 NS 5T N-1 -100 13 59.09
22 NS 1S E = -90 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a10 Simone Munsterhjelm -Myriam de Timary 40,06 %
23 NS 3S S+4 720 7.7 35.00
24 NS 4CcN-1 -100 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
a.9 Stan Tabor -Edith Bjorn 54,73 %
25 NS 1S W+2 -150 4.5 20.45
26 NS 3S W+3 -690 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 15,45 %
Total : 167,6 / 484 = 34,63 %
PAIRE a.6 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne
A10 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 47,73 %
1 EO 3S N-1 -50 16.5 75.00
2 EO 3S E+2 -460 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 87,27 %
A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Michele Berrier 50,97 %
3 EO 5K N = 400 9.9 45.00
4 EO 3S E+2 -660 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
A11 Denise Testaert -Chantal Woitrin 34,63 %
5 EO 4P N = 620 1.2 5.45
6 EO 3S S = 400 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A12 Annette Fobe -Sophie Tilemans 59,53 %
9 EO 3S N-2 -100 19.7 89.55
10 EO 2C S+1 140 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 55,95 %
11 EO 3S E+3 -490 19.7 89.55
12 EO 3S W+1 -430 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A13 Sylviane Delbeke -Jacqueline Vandenhaute 57,95 %
13 EO 5T E-1 100 17.5 79.55
14 EO 3S N = 400 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A.7 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 54,19 %
15 EO 3T N-2 -200 14.3 65.00
16 EO 3C W-1 100 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
A.1 Annie Legrand -Eliane de Ceuninck 50,85 %
17 EO 3C N = 140 0.1 0.45
18 EO 2C E = -110 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
A.8 Dominique Bourgoignie -Anne Brans 47,62 %
19 EO 3P S+1 170 14.3 65.00
20 EO 3S S = 600 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 49,13 %
21 EO 3P E+1 -170 16 72.73
22 EO 2K S-4 -200 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
A.9 Pascale Ortegat -Fabienne Smit 48,53 %
23 EO 2T S+5 190 21.9 99.55
24 EO 4CcN-1 -100 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 87,27 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 45,56 %
25 EO 1S W+1 -120 8.8 40.00
26 EO 3S W+3 -690 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
Total : 350,1 / 528 = 66,31 %
PAIRE a.2 Francoise Duren -Lydia Wildiers
A.8 Dominique Bourgoignie -Anne Brans 47,62 %
1 EO 5K S-1 -50 16.5 75.00
2 EO 4P W = -420 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 49,13 %
3 EO 3S N-4 -200 21.9 99.55
4 EO 3S E+1 -630 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
A.9 Pascale Ortegat -Fabienne Smit 48,53 %
5 EO 3T W-1 50 13.2 60.00
6 EO 4C S = 420 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 45,56 %
7 EO 4K N-1 -100 14.3 65.00
8 EO 4P S = 420 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A10 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 47,73 %
9 EO 1S N = 90 14.3 65.00
10 EO 2S S = 120 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Michele Berrier 50,97 %
11 EO 3S E+1 -430 7.7 35.00
12 EO 3S W+1 -430 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A11 Denise Testaert -Chantal Woitrin 34,63 %
13 EO 3S S-2 -200 21.9 99.55
14 EO 3S N = 400 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
A.5 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen 46,38 %
15 EO 4P W = -420 20.8 94.55
16 EO 2C W = -110 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A12 Annette Fobe -Sophie Tilemans 59,53 %
17 EO 2C N-1 -50 18.6 84.55
18 EO 4C E-2 100 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 55,95 %
19 EO 3P S+1 170 14.3 65.00
20 EO 3S S+1 630 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A13 Sylviane Delbeke -Jacqueline Vandenhaute 57,95 %
21 EO 4T N-1 -100 9 40.91
22 EO 2S E-1 100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A.7 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 54,19 %
23 EO 3S N+3 690 19.7 89.55
24 EO 3P E = -140 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 94,55 %
Total : 316,2 / 528 = 59,89 %
PAIRE a.9 Stan Tabor -Edith Bjorn
A.5 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen 46,38 %
1 EO 3K S = 110 11 50.00
2 EO 4P W = -420 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A12 Annette Fobe -Sophie Tilemans 59,53 %
3 EO 3S N+1 430 6.6 30.00
4 EO 3S E+1 -630 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 55,95 %
5 EO 4P N-1 -100 16.5 75.00
6 EO 3P N = 140 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 87,27 %
A13 Sylviane Delbeke -Jacqueline Vandenhaute 57,95 %
7 EO 4C W-2 200 3.4 15.45
8 EO 3C S = 140 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 17,95 %
A.7 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 54,19 %
9 EO 2C S = 110 8.8 40.00
10 EO 2S S+1 150 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A.1 Annie Legrand -Eliane de Ceuninck 50,85 %
11 EO 3S W+2 -460 14.3 65.00
12 EO 3S W+1 -430 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 49,13 %
15 EO 2P W+1 -140 7.7 35.00
16 EO 2C W = -110 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.9 Pascale Ortegat -Fabienne Smit 48,53 %
17 EO 2C N-1 -50 18.6 84.55
18 EO 2P N = 110 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 45,56 %
19 EO 4P S-1 -50 21.9 99.55
20 EO 3S S-1 -100 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 99,55 %
A10 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 47,73 %
21 EO 5TcN-2 -500 21 95.45
22 EO 2S E = -120 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Michele Berrier 50,97 %
23 EO 6S S+1 1470 2.3 10.45
24 EO 4K N = 130 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
A11 Denise Testaert -Chantal Woitrin 34,63 %
25 EO 1S W+2 -150 17.5 79.55
26 EO 3S W+3 -690 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 84,55 %
Total : 289,0 / 528 = 54,73 %
PAIRE a.5 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 45,56 %
1 EO 3S N-4 -200 21.9 99.55
2 EO 4P W = -420 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A10 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 47,73 %
3 EO 3K N+2 150 16.5 75.00
4 EO 3S E+1 -630 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A11 Denise Testaert -Chantal Woitrin 34,63 %
7 EO 4K N = 130 6.6 30.00
8 EO 5PcS-1 -100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.5 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen 46,38 %
9 EO 2C E-2 200 0.1 0.45
10 EO 1S S+1 120 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A12 Annette Fobe -Sophie Tilemans 59,53 %
11 EO 3S W+3 -490 19.7 89.55
12 EO 3S W+1 -430 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 55,95 %
13 EO 2P N+3 200 5.5 25.00
14 EO 1P W-3 150 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A13 Sylviane Delbeke -Jacqueline Vandenhaute 57,95 %
15 EO 3P W = -140 7.7 35.00
16 EO 2C W+1 -140 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A.7 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 54,19 %
17 EO 2P S-1 -50 18.6 84.55
18 EO 3C E-1 50 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A.1 Annie Legrand -Eliane de Ceuninck 50,85 %
19 EO 2P S+2 170 14.3 65.00
20 EO 3S S = 600 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
A.8 Dominique Bourgoignie -Anne Brans 47,62 %
21 EO 4T N = 130 0 0.00
22 EO 2S E+1 -150 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 49,13 %
23 EO 6T S+1 1390 7.7 35.00
24 EO 4P E-3 150 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.9 Pascale Ortegat -Fabienne Smit 48,53 %
25 EO 1S E = -90 2.3 10.45
26 EO 3S W+3 -690 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 288,4 / 528 = 54,62 %
PAIRE a.7 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen
A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Michele Berrier 50,97 %
1 EO 3S N+2 460 3.4 15.45
2 EO 4P W = -420 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A11 Denise Testaert -Chantal Woitrin 34,63 %
3 EO 2C N+3 200 13.2 60.00
4 EO 3S E+1 -630 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.5 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen 46,38 %
5 EO 4P N-2 -200 20.8 94.55
6 EO 4C S = 420 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A12 Annette Fobe -Sophie Tilemans 59,53 %
7 EO 5C W-5 500 0.1 0.45
8 EO 5CcN-1 -100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
A13 Sylviane Delbeke -Jacqueline Vandenhaute 57,95 %
11 EO 3S W+1 -430 7.7 35.00
12 EO 3S W+1 -430 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.7 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 54,19 %
13 EO 2P N+1 140 14.3 65.00
14 EO 3S N+2 460 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
A.1 Annie Legrand -Eliane de Ceuninck 50,85 %
15 EO 4P W = -420 20.8 94.55
16 EO 2C W-1 100 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.8 Dominique Bourgoignie -Anne Brans 47,62 %
17 EO 2S W-2 100 11 50.00
18 EO 2C W+1 -140 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 49,13 %
19 EO 2P S+2 170 14.3 65.00
20 EO 3S S+1 630 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.9 Pascale Ortegat -Fabienne Smit 48,53 %
21 EO 4T N-1 -100 9 40.91
22 EO 3S E = -600 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 45,56 %
23 EO 6T S+1 1390 7.7 35.00
24 EO 4PcE-3 500 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
A10 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 47,73 %
25 EO 1S W+2 -150 17.5 79.55
26 EO 4C E+1 -650 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
Total : 262,1 / 528 = 49,64 %
PAIRE a12 Brigitte Velge -Nicole Leclere
A13 Sylviane Delbeke -Jacqueline Vandenhaute 57,95 %
1 EO 3S N = 400 7.7 35.00
2 EO 4P W = -420 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.7 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 54,19 %
3 EO 3S N-1 -50 19.7 89.55
4 EO 3S E+1 -630 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
A.1 Annie Legrand -Eliane de Ceuninck 50,85 %
5 EO 3P N = 140 8.8 40.00
6 EO 4C S = 420 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A.8 Dominique Bourgoignie -Anne Brans 47,62 %
7 EO 4K N-1 -100 14.3 65.00
8 EO 4P N-2 -100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 49,13 %
9 EO 2K N = 90 14.3 65.00
10 EO 1S S-1 -100 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
A.9 Pascale Ortegat -Fabienne Smit 48,53 %
11 EO 3S E+2 -460 14.3 65.00
12 EO 3S W = -400 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 45,56 %
13 EO 3P N = 140 14.3 65.00
14 EO 3S N+2 460 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
A10 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 47,73 %
15 EO 3P W = -140 7.7 35.00
16 EO 2C W-1 100 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Michele Berrier 50,97 %
17 EO 2C N = 110 5.5 25.00
18 EO 3C E = -140 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.5 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen 46,38 %
21 EO 5TcN-2 -500 21 95.45
22 EO 2S E = -120 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A12 Annette Fobe -Sophie Tilemans 59,53 %
23 EO 6S N+1 1470 2.3 10.45
24 EO 3P W-2 100 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 55,95 %
25 EO 1S E = -90 2.3 10.45
26 EO 3S W+1 -630 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
Total : 253,1 / 528 = 47,94 %
PAIRE a.3 Didier Collart -Gerard Cooreman
A.9 Pascale Ortegat -Fabienne Smit 48,53 %
3 EO 3K N+2 150 16.5 75.00
4 EO 3S E+2 -660 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 45,56 %
5 EO 4P N-1 -100 16.5 75.00
6 EO 4C N = 420 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A10 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 47,73 %
7 EO 3K N = 110 8.8 40.00
8 EO 4P S = 420 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Michele Berrier 50,97 %
9 EO 3K N-1 -50 17.5 79.55
10 EO 2C W-2 200 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 54,77 %
A11 Denise Testaert -Chantal Woitrin 34,63 %
11 EO 2S E+1 -150 2.3 10.45
12 EO 3S W+2 -460 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.5 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen 46,38 %
13 EO 2P N+2 170 9.9 45.00
14 EO 5K S = 400 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A12 Annette Fobe -Sophie Tilemans 59,53 %
15 EO 3P W = -140 7.7 35.00
16 EO 2C W = -110 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 55,95 %
17 EO 2C N = 110 5.5 25.00
18 EO 3C E-1 50 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 32,50 %
A13 Sylviane Delbeke -Jacqueline Vandenhaute 57,95 %
19 EO 3P S+1 170 14.3 65.00
20 EO 3S S+1 630 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.7 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 54,19 %
21 EO 4P E-1 50 2 9.09
22 EO 2S E-1 100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
A.1 Annie Legrand -Eliane de Ceuninck 50,85 %
23 EO 6S S+1 1470 2.3 10.45
24 EO 3P E-1 50 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A.8 Dominique Bourgoignie -Anne Brans 47,62 %
25 EO 1S W+2 -150 17.5 79.55
26 EO 4C E+1 -650 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
Total : 252,3 / 528 = 47,78 %
PAIRE a.4 Michel Lievens -Helene Christiaens
A.9 Pascale Ortegat -Fabienne Smit 48,53 %
1 EO 3S N-1 -50 16.5 75.00
2 EO 4P W = -420 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
A10 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 47,73 %
5 EO 4C W-2 100 11 50.00
6 EO 4C N = 420 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Michele Berrier 50,97 %
7 EO 3K N-1 -100 14.3 65.00
8 EO 5TcE+1 -650 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
A11 Denise Testaert -Chantal Woitrin 34,63 %
9 EO 3S N-3 -150 21.9 99.55
10 EO 2C S = 110 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 94,55 %
A.5 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen 46,38 %
11 EO 4P E-2 100 0.1 0.45
12 EO 3S W = -400 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 5,45 %
A12 Annette Fobe -Sophie Tilemans 59,53 %
13 EO 2P N+3 200 5.5 25.00
14 EO 3S N+2 460 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 55,95 %
15 EO 4P W-2 100 0.1 0.45
16 EO 3C W-1 100 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 7,95 %
A13 Sylviane Delbeke -Jacqueline Vandenhaute 57,95 %
17 EO 2C N = 110 5.5 25.00
18 EO 2P N-2 -200 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A.7 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 54,19 %
19 EO 4P S = 420 2.3 10.45
20 EO 3S S = 600 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
A.1 Annie Legrand -Eliane de Ceuninck 50,85 %
21 EO 4P E+1 -450 18 81.82
22 EO 2S E-1 100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.8 Dominique Bourgoignie -Anne Brans 47,62 %
23 EO 3S S+4 720 14.3 65.00
24 EO 4K N = 130 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 49,13 %
25 EO 1S W+1 -120 8.8 40.00
26 EO 4C E = -620 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
Total : 244,5 / 528 = 46,31 %
PAIRE a11 Caroll Pucher -Marie J. de Wagheneire
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 55,95 %
1 EO 3S N = 400 7.7 35.00
2 EO 4P W-1 50 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
A13 Sylviane Delbeke -Jacqueline Vandenhaute 57,95 %
3 EO 3S N+2 460 2.3 10.45
4 EO 3S E+2 -660 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.7 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 54,19 %
5 EO 3P N+1 170 6.6 30.00
6 EO 4C S = 420 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
A.1 Annie Legrand -Eliane de Ceuninck 50,85 %
7 EO 5K N-2 -200 19.7 89.55
8 EO 3T S-8 -400 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 89,55 %
A.8 Dominique Bourgoignie -Anne Brans 47,62 %
9 EO 2S S+1 150 2.3 10.45
10 EO 3S N = 600 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 7,95 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 49,13 %
11 EO 3S E+3 -490 19.7 89.55
12 EO 3S W = -400 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.9 Pascale Ortegat -Fabienne Smit 48,53 %
13 EO 4P N+1 650 0.1 0.45
14 EO 3S N+2 460 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 10,45 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 45,56 %
15 EO 3T N-1 -100 2.3 10.45
16 EO 2C W+1 -140 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Michele Berrier 50,97 %
19 EO 2P S+2 170 14.3 65.00
20 EO 3S S = 600 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
A11 Denise Testaert -Chantal Woitrin 34,63 %
21 EO 5T N-1 -100 9 40.91
22 EO 1S E = -90 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A.5 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen 46,38 %
23 EO 3S S+4 720 14.3 65.00
24 EO 2P E = -110 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A12 Annette Fobe -Sophie Tilemans 59,53 %
25 EO 1S E+2 -150 17.5 79.55
26 EO 6C E-2 200 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
Total : 238,1 / 528 = 45,09 %
PAIRE a.1 Antoinette Jourdain -Diane della Faille
A.1 Annie Legrand -Eliane de Ceuninck 50,85 %
1 EO 3S N+2 460 3.4 15.45
2 EO 4P W = -420 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A.8 Dominique Bourgoignie -Anne Brans 47,62 %
3 EO 3S N+2 460 2.3 10.45
4 EO 3S E+2 -660 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 49,13 %
5 EO 5T W-4 200 4.5 20.45
6 EO 4C S = 420 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
A.9 Pascale Ortegat -Fabienne Smit 48,53 %
7 EO 5K N-1 -100 14.3 65.00
8 EO 5CcN-1 -100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 45,56 %
9 EO 2K N+1 110 8.8 40.00
10 EO 2P W-3 300 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
A10 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 47,73 %
11 EO 3S W+1 -430 7.7 35.00
12 EO 3S W+1 -430 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Michele Berrier 50,97 %
13 EO 4C N = 620 2.3 10.45
14 EO 3S N = 400 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
A11 Denise Testaert -Chantal Woitrin 34,63 %
15 EO 3S S-4 -400 17.5 79.55
16 EO 2C W+1 -140 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 84,55 %
A.5 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen 46,38 %
17 EO 2P W-1 50 13.2 60.00
18 EO 2C E+1 -140 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A12 Annette Fobe -Sophie Tilemans 59,53 %
19 EO 2P S+3 200 6.6 30.00
20 EO 3S S+2 660 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 55,95 %
21 EO 5T N-1 -100 9 40.91
22 EO 2S E-1 100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A.7 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 54,19 %
25 EO 1S E = -90 2.3 10.45
26 EO 4C E+1 -650 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
Total : 233,3 / 528 = 44,19 %
PAIRE a.8 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert
A11 Denise Testaert -Chantal Woitrin 34,63 %
1 EO 3S N-1 -50 16.5 75.00
2 EO 4P W = -420 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
A.5 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen 46,38 %
3 EO 3S N+2 460 2.3 10.45
4 EO 3S E+1 -630 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
A12 Annette Fobe -Sophie Tilemans 59,53 %
5 EO 4P N-2 -200 20.8 94.55
6 EO 4C S = 420 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 55,95 %
7 EO 5K N-3 -300 21.9 99.55
8 EO 5P S-1 -50 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
A13 Sylviane Delbeke -Jacqueline Vandenhaute 57,95 %
9 EO 2K N+1 110 8.8 40.00
10 EO 3S S = 600 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.1 Annie Legrand -Eliane de Ceuninck 50,85 %
13 EO 2P N+2 170 9.9 45.00
14 EO 3S N+2 460 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
A.8 Dominique Bourgoignie -Anne Brans 47,62 %
15 EO 4T N-2 -200 14.3 65.00
16 EO 2C W = -110 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 49,13 %
17 EO 2C N = 110 5.5 25.00
18 EO 4C E-2 100 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
A.9 Pascale Ortegat -Fabienne Smit 48,53 %
19 EO 4P S = 420 2.3 10.45
20 EO 3S N+2 660 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 7,95 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 45,56 %
21 EO 4T N-1 -100 9 40.91
22 EO 2S E+1 -150 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A10 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 47,73 %
23 EO 3S S+4 720 14.3 65.00
24 EO 3P E-2 100 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Michele Berrier 50,97 %
25 EO 1S E+2 -150 17.5 79.55
26 EO 5C E-1 100 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
Total : 229,9 / 528 = 43,54 %
PAIRE a10 Simone Munsterhjelm -Myriam de Timary
A12 Annette Fobe -Sophie Tilemans 59,53 %
1 EO 3S N+3 490 0.1 0.45
2 EO 2T E = -90 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 5,45 %
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 55,95 %
3 EO 5K N = 400 9.9 45.00
4 EO 3S E+1 -630 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
A13 Sylviane Delbeke -Jacqueline Vandenhaute 57,95 %
5 EO 4P N = 620 1.2 5.45
6 EO 4C S+1 450 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 2,95 %
A.7 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 54,19 %
7 EO 3C W-2 200 3.4 15.45
8 EO 5CcS-1 -100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A.1 Annie Legrand -Eliane de Ceuninck 50,85 %
9 EO 2K N+2 130 4.5 20.45
10 EO 2C S+1 140 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A.8 Dominique Bourgoignie -Anne Brans 47,62 %
11 EO 3S W+1 -430 7.7 35.00
12 EO 3S W+1 -430 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 49,13 %
13 EO 4P N-1 -100 19.7 89.55
14 EO 3S N = 400 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 45,56 %
17 EO 2C N-1 -50 18.6 84.55
18 EO 3C E-1 50 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A10 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 47,73 %
19 EO 4P S = 420 2.3 10.45
20 EO 3S S+1 630 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Michele Berrier 50,97 %
21 EO 3T N-1 -100 9 40.91
22 EO 2S E-1 100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A11 Denise Testaert -Chantal Woitrin 34,63 %
23 EO 3S S+4 720 14.3 65.00
24 EO 4CcN-1 -100 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
A.5 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen 46,38 %
25 EO 1S W+1 -120 8.8 40.00
26 EO 4C E+1 -650 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
Total : 211,5 / 528 = 40,06 %
PAIRE a13 -
A.7 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 54,19 %
1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.1 Annie Legrand -Eliane de Ceuninck 50,85 %
3 EO BYE 0 0.00
4 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.8 Dominique Bourgoignie -Anne Brans 47,62 %
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 49,13 %
7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.9 Pascale Ortegat -Fabienne Smit 48,53 %
9 EO BYE 0 0.00
10 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 45,56 %
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A10 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 47,73 %
13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Michele Berrier 50,97 %
15 EO BYE 0 0.00
16 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A11 Denise Testaert -Chantal Woitrin 34,63 %
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.5 Michele Verhulst -Barbara Kengen 46,38 %
19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 55,95 %
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A13 Sylviane Delbeke -Jacqueline Vandenhaute 57,95 %
25 EO BYE 0 0.00
26 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 572 = 0,00 %
|