B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement
--- 1 59,38 8 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten
--- 2 56,77 2 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Wildiers
--- 3 55,21 7 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Lydia Luyten
--- 4 51,04 1 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille
--- ~ 51,04 3 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart
--- 6 47,92 4 Alain Labaere -Marilene Walton
--- 7 46,35 5 Evelyn Joos -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
--- 8 45,31 6 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren
--- 9 43,75 10 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx
--- 10 43,23 9 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes
PAIRE 8 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten
7 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Lydia Luyten 55,21 %
1 EO 4C W+1 -450 8 100.00
2 EO 4C W+1 -450 5 62.50
3 EO 4CcN-2 -300 6 75.00 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
1 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 51,04 %
4 NS 4P E-1 100 3 37.50
5 NS 4P E = -420 3 37.50
6 NS 3T E+3 -170 6 75.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
5 Evelyn Joos -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 46,35 %
7 EO 3S W+2 -660 8 100.00
8 EO 4C N+2 480 0 0.00
9 EO 3S W+1 -630 5 62.50 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
9 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes 43,23 %
10 EO 2S S-1 -100 6 75.00
11 EO 3K E+1 -130 4 50.00
12 EO 3S N-4 -400 8 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
6 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren 45,31 %
13 EO 1S E+1 -120 7 87.50
14 EO 4C N-1 -50 7 87.50
15 EO 3K E = -110 8 100.00 µ Tbl = 91,67 %
3 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 51,04 %
16 NS 1S E = -90 1 12.50
17 NS 4C E-1 50 0 0.00
18 NS 3T N+2 150 3 37.50 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
2 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Wildiers 56,77 %
19 NS 2T E = -90 6 75.00
20 NS 1S E = -90 4 50.00
21 NS 2C E = -110 4 50.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
10 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx 43,75 %
22 EO 3S S = 400 7 87.50
23 EO 5C N-3 -300 3 37.50
24 EO 2K E+3 -150 2 25.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 114,0 / 192 = 59,38 %
PAIRE 2 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Wildiers
4 Alain Labaere -Marilene Walton 47,92 %
1 NS 3T E = -110 6 75.00
2 NS 3C W+1 -170 8 100.00
3 NS 3C N = 140 8 100.00 µ Tbl = 91,67 %
10 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx 43,75 %
4 EO 4P W-1 100 5 62.50
5 EO 2P W+2 -170 0 0.00
6 EO 3S W+2 -660 8 100.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
1 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 51,04 %
7 EO 3S E+1 -630 5 62.50
8 EO 4C N+1 450 4 50.00
9 EO 3S E+2 -660 8 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
3 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 51,04 %
10 NS 3S S+1 630 7 87.50
11 NS 3P W+1 -170 2 25.00
12 NS 2S N = 120 7 87.50 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
7 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Lydia Luyten 55,21 %
13 EO 2C E-1 100 2 25.00
14 EO 2C N+1 140 1 12.50
15 EO 2C N+1 140 3 37.50 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
9 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes 43,23 %
16 NS 2K S = 90 8 100.00
17 NS 3C W-2 100 3 37.50
18 NS 3T S+2 150 3 37.50 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
8 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 59,38 %
19 EO 2T E = -90 2 25.00
20 EO 1S E = -90 4 50.00
21 EO 2C E = -110 4 50.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
5 Evelyn Joos -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 46,35 %
22 NS 3S S+1 430 6 75.00
23 NS 5C E = -650 2 25.00
24 NS 3S W = -400 3 37.50 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
Total : 109,0 / 192 = 56,77 %
PAIRE 7 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Lydia Luyten
8 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 59,38 %
1 NS 4C W+1 -450 0 0.00
2 NS 4C W+1 -450 3 37.50
3 NS 4CcN-2 -300 2 25.00 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
4 Alain Labaere -Marilene Walton 47,92 %
4 EO 4P W-2 200 0 0.00
5 EO 4P W = -420 5 62.50
6 EO 3S E = -600 5 62.50 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
9 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes 43,23 %
7 EO 3S W = -600 2 25.00
8 EO 2C N+3 200 8 100.00
9 EO 3S W+1 -630 5 62.50 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
5 Evelyn Joos -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 46,35 %
10 EO 3S S-1 -100 6 75.00
11 EO 5K E-1 50 1 12.50
12 EO 3S N-2 -200 6 75.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
2 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Wildiers 56,77 %
13 NS 2C E-1 100 6 75.00
14 NS 2C N+1 140 7 87.50
15 NS 2C N+1 140 5 62.50 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
1 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 51,04 %
16 NS 2C N-1 -50 5 62.50
17 NS 5C W-3 150 6 75.00
18 NS 3S N+2 660 6 75.00 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
10 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx 43,75 %
19 EO 2P W = -110 6 75.00
20 EO 1S E = -90 4 50.00
21 EO 1S W+1 -120 8 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
6 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren 45,31 %
22 EO 3S S+1 430 2 25.00
23 EO 6K W+1 -1390 8 100.00
24 EO 2P S-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
Total : 106,0 / 192 = 55,21 %
PAIRE 1 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille
10 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx 43,75 %
1 EO 1S N-3 -150 6 75.00
2 EO 4C W+2 -480 8 100.00
3 EO 3C N-1 -50 2 25.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
8 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 59,38 %
4 EO 4P E-1 100 5 62.50
5 EO 4P E = -420 5 62.50
6 EO 3T E+3 -170 2 25.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
2 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Wildiers 56,77 %
7 NS 3S E+1 -630 3 37.50
8 NS 4C N+1 450 4 50.00
9 NS 3S E+2 -660 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
6 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren 45,31 %
10 EO 3S S+1 630 1 12.50
11 EO 5K E-1 50 1 12.50
12 EO 3S N-1 -100 4 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
9 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes 43,23 %
13 NS 2C E-2 200 8 100.00
14 NS 3T N-1 -50 1 12.50
15 NS 3C N = 140 5 62.50 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
7 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Lydia Luyten 55,21 %
16 EO 2C N-1 -50 3 37.50
17 EO 5C W-3 150 2 25.00
18 EO 3S N+2 660 2 25.00 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
4 Alain Labaere -Marilene Walton 47,92 %
19 NS 1S N-1 -50 8 100.00
20 NS 2C N = 110 8 100.00
21 NS 1S N = 90 8 100.00 µ Tbl = 100,00 %
3 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 51,04 %
22 NS 3S N = 400 1 12.50
23 NS 4P N-2 -200 8 100.00
24 NS 3S E = -400 3 37.50 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 98,0 / 192 = 51,04 %
PAIRE 3 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart
6 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren 45,31 %
1 NS 2P S-1 -50 8 100.00
2 NS 4C W = -420 6 75.00
3 NS 3C N-3 -150 4 50.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
5 Evelyn Joos -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 46,35 %
4 NS 4P W-1 100 3 37.50
5 NS 4P W+1 -450 0 0.00
6 NS 2P E+1 -140 8 100.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
10 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx 43,75 %
7 EO 3S W+1 -630 5 62.50
8 EO 4C N+1 450 4 50.00
9 EO 3S W = -600 2 25.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
2 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Wildiers 56,77 %
10 EO 3S S+1 630 1 12.50
11 EO 3P W+1 -170 6 75.00
12 EO 2S N = 120 1 12.50 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
4 Alain Labaere -Marilene Walton 47,92 %
13 NS 1S E+1 -120 1 12.50
14 NS 3K E-1 50 4 50.00
15 NS 3P S = 140 5 62.50 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
8 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 59,38 %
16 EO 1S E = -90 7 87.50
17 EO 4C E-1 50 8 100.00
18 EO 3T N+2 150 5 62.50 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
9 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes 43,23 %
19 NS 2P W+1 -140 0 0.00
20 NS 1S E = -90 4 50.00
21 NS 2C W = -110 4 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
1 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 51,04 %
22 EO 3S N = 400 7 87.50
23 EO 4P N-2 -200 0 0.00
24 EO 3S E = -400 5 62.50 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 98,0 / 192 = 51,04 %
PAIRE 4 Alain Labaere -Marilene Walton
2 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Wildiers 56,77 %
1 EO 3T E = -110 2 25.00
2 EO 3C W+1 -170 0 0.00
3 EO 3C N = 140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 8,33 %
7 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Lydia Luyten 55,21 %
4 NS 4P W-2 200 8 100.00
5 NS 4P W = -420 3 37.50
6 NS 3S E = -600 3 37.50 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
6 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren 45,31 %
7 NS 6S W-1 100 8 100.00
8 NS 4C N+1 450 4 50.00
9 NS 6S W-2 200 8 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
10 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx 43,75 %
10 EO 3S S-1 -100 6 75.00
11 EO 5K E = -400 8 100.00
12 EO 2S N = 120 1 12.50 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
3 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 51,04 %
13 EO 1S E+1 -120 7 87.50
14 EO 3K E-1 50 4 50.00
15 EO 3P S = 140 3 37.50 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
5 Evelyn Joos -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 46,35 %
16 NS 2K S-1 -50 5 62.50
17 NS 4C W-2 100 3 37.50
18 NS 3S N+3 690 8 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
1 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 51,04 %
19 EO 1S N-1 -50 0 0.00
20 EO 2C N = 110 0 0.00
21 EO 1S N = 90 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
9 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes 43,23 %
22 NS 3S S+1 430 6 75.00
23 NS 6P S-3 -300 5 62.50
24 NS 3S W+3 -490 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
Total : 92,0 / 192 = 47,92 %
PAIRE 5 Evelyn Joos -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
9 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes 43,23 %
1 EO 2S E = -120 4 50.00
2 EO 4C W+1 -450 5 62.50
3 EO 4CcN-3 -500 8 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
3 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 51,04 %
4 EO 4P W-1 100 5 62.50
5 EO 4P W+1 -450 8 100.00
6 EO 2P E+1 -140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
8 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 59,38 %
7 NS 3S W+2 -660 0 0.00
8 NS 4C N+2 480 8 100.00
9 NS 3S W+1 -630 3 37.50 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
7 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Lydia Luyten 55,21 %
10 NS 3S S-1 -100 2 25.00
11 NS 5K E-1 50 7 87.50
12 NS 3S N-2 -200 2 25.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
10 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx 43,75 %
13 EO 2C E = -110 4 50.00
14 EO 3C N = 140 1 12.50
15 EO 3C S = 140 3 37.50 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
4 Alain Labaere -Marilene Walton 47,92 %
16 EO 2K S-1 -50 3 37.50
17 EO 4C W-2 100 5 62.50
18 EO 3S N+3 690 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
6 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren 45,31 %
19 NS 2S N-2 -100 4 50.00
20 NS 1S E+1 -120 0 0.00
21 NS 2C W = -110 4 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
2 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Wildiers 56,77 %
22 EO 3S S+1 430 2 25.00
23 EO 5C E = -650 6 75.00
24 EO 3S W = -400 5 62.50 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
Total : 89,0 / 192 = 46,35 %
PAIRE 6 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren
3 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 51,04 %
1 EO 2P S-1 -50 0 0.00
2 EO 4C W = -420 2 25.00
3 EO 3C N-3 -150 4 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
9 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes 43,23 %
4 EO 4P W-1 100 5 62.50
5 EO 2P W+3 -200 2 25.00
6 EO 3S E = -600 5 62.50 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
4 Alain Labaere -Marilene Walton 47,92 %
7 EO 6S W-1 100 0 0.00
8 EO 4C N+1 450 4 50.00
9 EO 6S W-2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
1 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 51,04 %
10 NS 3S S+1 630 7 87.50
11 NS 5K E-1 50 7 87.50
12 NS 3S N-1 -100 4 50.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
8 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 59,38 %
13 NS 1S E+1 -120 1 12.50
14 NS 4C N-1 -50 1 12.50
15 NS 3K E = -110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 8,33 %
10 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx 43,75 %
16 EO 1S W = -90 7 87.50
17 EO 5KcE-2 300 0 0.00
18 EO 3C W-2 100 8 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
5 Evelyn Joos -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 46,35 %
19 EO 2S N-2 -100 4 50.00
20 EO 1S E+1 -120 8 100.00
21 EO 2C W = -110 4 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
7 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Lydia Luyten 55,21 %
22 NS 3S S+1 430 6 75.00
23 NS 6K W+1 -1390 0 0.00
24 NS 2P S-2 -100 8 100.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
Total : 87,0 / 192 = 45,31 %
PAIRE 10 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx
1 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 51,04 %
1 NS 1S N-3 -150 2 25.00
2 NS 4C W+2 -480 0 0.00
3 NS 3C N-1 -50 6 75.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
2 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Wildiers 56,77 %
4 NS 4P W-1 100 3 37.50
5 NS 2P W+2 -170 8 100.00
6 NS 3S W+2 -660 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
3 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 51,04 %
7 NS 3S W+1 -630 3 37.50
8 NS 4C N+1 450 4 50.00
9 NS 3S W = -600 6 75.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
4 Alain Labaere -Marilene Walton 47,92 %
10 NS 3S S-1 -100 2 25.00
11 NS 5K E = -400 0 0.00
12 NS 2S N = 120 7 87.50 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
5 Evelyn Joos -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 46,35 %
13 NS 2C E = -110 4 50.00
14 NS 3C N = 140 7 87.50
15 NS 3C S = 140 5 62.50 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
6 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren 45,31 %
16 NS 1S W = -90 1 12.50
17 NS 5KcE-2 300 8 100.00
18 NS 3C W-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
7 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Lydia Luyten 55,21 %
19 NS 2P W = -110 2 25.00
20 NS 1S E = -90 4 50.00
21 NS 1S W+1 -120 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
8 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 59,38 %
22 NS 3S S = 400 1 12.50
23 NS 5C N-3 -300 5 62.50
24 NS 2K E+3 -150 6 75.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 84,0 / 192 = 43,75 %
PAIRE 9 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes
5 Evelyn Joos -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 46,35 %
1 NS 2S E = -120 4 50.00
2 NS 4C W+1 -450 3 37.50
3 NS 4CcN-3 -500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
6 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren 45,31 %
4 NS 4P W-1 100 3 37.50
5 NS 2P W+3 -200 6 75.00
6 NS 3S E = -600 3 37.50 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
7 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Lydia Luyten 55,21 %
7 NS 3S W = -600 6 75.00
8 NS 2C N+3 200 0 0.00
9 NS 3S W+1 -630 3 37.50 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
8 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 59,38 %
10 NS 2S S-1 -100 2 25.00
11 NS 3K E+1 -130 4 50.00
12 NS 3S N-4 -400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
1 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 51,04 %
13 EO 2C E-2 200 0 0.00
14 EO 3T N-1 -50 7 87.50
15 EO 3C N = 140 3 37.50 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
2 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Wildiers 56,77 %
16 EO 2K S = 90 0 0.00
17 EO 3C W-2 100 5 62.50
18 EO 3T S+2 150 5 62.50 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
3 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 51,04 %
19 EO 2P W+1 -140 8 100.00
20 EO 1S E = -90 4 50.00
21 EO 2C W = -110 4 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
4 Alain Labaere -Marilene Walton 47,92 %
22 EO 3S S+1 430 2 25.00
23 EO 6P S-3 -300 3 37.50
24 EO 3S W+3 -490 8 100.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
Total : 83,0 / 192 = 43,23 %
|