B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 63,54 A.4 Magda Moortgat -Michele Berrier
--- 2 60,86 B.5 Philippe Dekandelaer -Patrick Gilles
--- 3 55,51 B.1 Pascale Ortegat -Serge Alard
--- 4 52,83 B.7 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski
--- 5 52,68 A.5 Liliane Baptista -Thierry Bontinck
--- 6 51,49 A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Lydia Wildiers
--- 7 49,85 B.4 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten
--- 8 49,55 A.6 Anne Van den Berge -Andre Delacroix
--- 9 49,26 A.8 Myriam de Timary -Annette Fobe
--- 10 48,36 B.2 Grazia Neuenschwander -Teresa Dekoster
--- 11 47,02 A.3 Patrizia Vaccani -Didier Collart
--- 12 46,43 A.7 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Jeannine Wanderpepen
--- 13 42,26 A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Jannick Bekaert
--- 14 41,96 B.6 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger
--- 15 38,39 B.3 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse
--- 16 0,00 B.8 -
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 64,46 b.3 Dilva Haym -Michel Lievens
--- 2 58,48 a.8 Noelle Fosse -Chantal Barro
--- 3 55,27 b.5 Gaetan Collinet -Anne France Raquez
--- 4 53,57 b.1 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne
--- 5 53,42 a.2 Luc Cartuyvels -Charlotte de Wasseige
--- 6 52,23 a.4 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Simone Munsterhjelm
--- 7 52,21 b.2 Luc Rampaer -Bernard Brisbois
--- 8 51,34 a.5 Francoise Duren -Gaetan van de Werve
--- 9 51,34 a.1 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru
--- 10 51,02 b.7 Christiane Huby -Jeannine Thys
--- 11 48,81 b.6 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck
--- 12 48,81 a.7 Suzanne Klausen -Michele Verhulst
--- 13 43,01 a.3 Veronique Cosyns -Anne Ceulemans
--- 14 39,97 b.4 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw
--- 15 39,14 a.6 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger
--- 16 37,24 b.8 Philippe Leemans -Lydia Luyten
PAIRE A.4 Magda Moortgat -Michele Berrier
a.7 Suzanne Klausen -Michele Verhulst 48,81 %
1 NS 4P E = -420 19 67.86
2 NS 2P N = 110 27 96.43
3 NS 3S N+2 460 24 85.71 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
a.6 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 39,14 %
4 NS 3S W = -600 13 46.43
5 NS 4P E-1 50 23 82.14
6 NS 4P N = 420 23 82.14 µ Tbl = 70,24 %
a.5 Francoise Duren -Gaetan van de Werve 51,34 %
7 NS 2C W = -110 19 67.86
8 NS 5KcN = 550 28 100.00
9 NS 4P E-1 100 22 78.57 µ Tbl = 82,14 %
a.4 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Simone Munsterhjelm 52,23 %
10 NS 4P S-1 -100 1 3.57
11 NS 3S E+2 -460 6 21.43
12 NS 3S S = 600 17 60.71 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
a.3 Veronique Cosyns -Anne Ceulemans 43,01 %
13 NS 4P E-2 200 23 82.14
14 NS 4P W-1 50 28 100.00
15 NS 3S E+1 -430 5 17.86 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.2 Luc Cartuyvels -Charlotte de Wasseige 53,42 %
16 NS 3S S+4 520 17 60.71
17 NS 4C W+2 -480 2 7.14
18 NS 5CcE-4 800 28 100.00 µ Tbl = 55,95 %
a.1 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 51,34 %
19 NS 4C E = -620 22 78.57
20 NS 3S S+1 630 7 25.00
21 NS 2C E+1 -140 12 42.86 µ Tbl = 48,81 %
a.8 Noelle Fosse -Chantal Barro 58,48 %
22 NS 1C E+3 -170 12 42.86
23 NS 1S S = 90 22 78.57
24 NS 4PcN = 590 27 96.43 µ Tbl = 72,62 %
Total : 427,0 / 672 = 63,54 %
PAIRE B.5 Philippe Dekandelaer -Patrick Gilles
b.2 Luc Rampaer -Bernard Brisbois 52,21 %
1 NS 4P E+1 -450 9 32.14
2 NS 4C W-2 100 24 85.71
3 NS 3S N+1 430 12 42.86 µ Tbl = 53,57 %
b.1 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne 53,57 %
4 NS 3S W = -600 13 46.43
5 NS 2S W-1 50 23 82.14
6 NS 4P N+1 450 27 96.43 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
b.8 Philippe Leemans -Lydia Luyten 37,24 %
7 NS 2C W = -110 19 67.86
8 NS 1K N+4 150 10 35.71
9 NS 6T W-3 300 28 100.00 µ Tbl = 67,86 %
b.7 Christiane Huby -Jeannine Thys 51,02 %
10 NS 4P N = 620 17 60.71
11 NS 3S E+1 -430 16 57.14
12 NS 3S S = 600 17 60.71 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
b.6 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 48,81 %
13 NS 4P E-2 200 23 82.14
14 NS 2P W+1 -140 24 85.71
15 NS 3S E = -400 18 64.29 µ Tbl = 77,38 %
b.5 Gaetan Collinet -Anne France Raquez 55,27 %
16 NS 4S S+2 490 8 28.57
17 NS 4C E+1 -450 14 50.00
18 NS 5T S-1 -100 14 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
b.4 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 39,97 %
19 NS 5C E = -650 9 32.14
20 NS 3S S+3 690 25 89.29
21 NS 3S W-2 100 28 100.00 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
b.3 Dilva Haym -Michel Lievens 64,46 %
22 NS 4C E = -620 3 10.71
23 NS 1S S-1 -100 12 42.86
24 NS 6K W-2 100 16 57.14 µ Tbl = 36,90 %
Total : 409,0 / 672 = 60,86 %
PAIRE B.1 Pascale Ortegat -Serge Alard
b.1 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne 53,57 %
1 NS 5P E = -450 9 32.14
2 NS 3C W = -140 14 50.00
3 NS 3S N+1 430 12 42.86 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
b.8 Philippe Leemans -Lydia Luyten 37,24 %
4 NS 3S W+1 -630 4 14.29
5 NS 2P E+2 -170 10 35.71
6 NS 4P N+1 450 27 96.43 µ Tbl = 48,81 %
b.7 Christiane Huby -Jeannine Thys 51,02 %
7 NS 3CcW = -730 0 0.00
8 NS 3S N+2 460 25 89.29
9 NS 3S E-1 100 22 78.57 µ Tbl = 55,95 %
b.6 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 48,81 %
10 NS 4P N = 620 17 60.71
11 NS 3S E+2 -460 6 21.43
12 NS 3S S = 600 17 60.71 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
b.5 Gaetan Collinet -Anne France Raquez 55,27 %
13 NS 5P E-3 300 28 100.00
14 NS 3P W+1 -170 14 50.00
15 NS 3S W+1 -430 5 17.86 µ Tbl = 55,95 %
b.4 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 39,97 %
16 NS 6S N+1 1020 27 96.43
17 NS 6C E-1 50 27 96.43
18 NS 5T S-1 -100 14 50.00 µ Tbl = 80,95 %
b.3 Dilva Haym -Michel Lievens 64,46 %
19 NS 4P E = -620 22 78.57
20 NS 3S N+2 660 16 57.14
21 NS 4C W-1 50 20 71.43 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
b.2 Luc Rampaer -Bernard Brisbois 52,21 %
22 NS 2P S = 110 27 96.43
23 NS 1S S-2 -200 4 14.29
24 NS 5PcN-1 -100 6 21.43 µ Tbl = 44,05 %
Total : 373,0 / 672 = 55,51 %
PAIRE B.7 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski
b.6 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 48,81 %
1 NS 4P E+1 -450 9 32.14
2 NS 3P N-1 -100 19 67.86
3 NS 3S N-1 -50 2 7.14 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
b.5 Gaetan Collinet -Anne France Raquez 55,27 %
4 NS 3S W = -600 13 46.43
5 NS 3S W-2 100 28 100.00
6 NS 3P N = 140 1 3.57 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
b.4 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 39,97 %
7 NS 2C W+1 -140 12 42.86
8 NS 5K N = 400 22 78.57
9 NS 4K E+1 -150 12 42.86 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
b.3 Dilva Haym -Michel Lievens 64,46 %
10 NS 4P N = 620 17 60.71
11 NS 3S E+1 -430 16 57.14
12 NS 3S N-1 -100 2 7.14 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
b.2 Luc Rampaer -Bernard Brisbois 52,21 %
13 NS 4P E-1 100 12 42.86
14 NS 3P W = -140 24 85.71
15 NS 2S E+1 -150 26 92.86 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
b.1 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne 53,57 %
16 NS 6S S = 990 22 78.57
17 NS 4C W+1 -450 14 50.00
18 NS 5T S-1 -100 14 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
b.8 Philippe Leemans -Lydia Luyten 37,24 %
19 NS 4PcN-1 -100 26 92.86
20 NS 3S S+2 660 16 57.14
21 NS 4C W-1 50 20 71.43 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
b.7 Christiane Huby -Jeannine Thys 51,02 %
22 NS 4C E = -620 3 10.71
23 NS 2P S-2 -200 4 14.29
24 NS 4P N = 420 21 75.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 355,0 / 672 = 52,83 %
PAIRE A.5 Liliane Baptista -Thierry Bontinck
a.2 Luc Cartuyvels -Charlotte de Wasseige 53,42 %
1 NS 5KcN-3 -500 0 0.00
2 NS 2P N = 110 27 96.43
3 NS 3S S+2 460 24 85.71 µ Tbl = 60,71 %
a.1 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 51,34 %
4 NS 5T E-1 100 26 92.86
5 NS 3P E+1 -170 10 35.71
6 NS 2P N+3 200 18 64.29 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
a.8 Noelle Fosse -Chantal Barro 58,48 %
7 NS 2S E+2 -180 3 10.71
8 NS 3K N+2 150 10 35.71
9 NS 5K W-1 100 22 78.57 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
a.7 Suzanne Klausen -Michele Verhulst 48,81 %
10 NS 4P N = 620 17 60.71
11 NS 3S E+2 -460 6 21.43
12 NS 3S N = 600 17 60.71 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
a.6 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 39,14 %
13 NS 4P E-2 200 23 82.14
14 NS 3P W+1 -170 14 50.00
15 NS 3S E+1 -430 5 17.86 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.5 Francoise Duren -Gaetan van de Werve 51,34 %
16 NS 4S S+2 490 8 28.57
17 NS 4C W+2 -480 2 7.14
18 NS 4K N-2 -200 2 7.14 µ Tbl = 14,29 %
a.4 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Simone Munsterhjelm 52,23 %
19 NS 4C W+1 -650 9 32.14
20 NS 3S S+3 690 25 89.29
21 NS 3S W-1 50 20 71.43 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
a.3 Veronique Cosyns -Anne Ceulemans 43,01 %
22 NS 2P S-1 -50 23 82.14
23 NS 1S S = 90 22 78.57
24 NS 4P N = 420 21 75.00 µ Tbl = 78,57 %
Total : 354,0 / 672 = 52,68 %
PAIRE A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Lydia Wildiers
a.3 Veronique Cosyns -Anne Ceulemans 43,01 %
1 NS 3P E+2 -200 25 89.29
2 NS 3C E+1 -170 9 32.14
3 NS 3S N+2 460 24 85.71 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
a.2 Luc Cartuyvels -Charlotte de Wasseige 53,42 %
4 NS 3T W+1 -130 22 78.57
5 NS 4P E-1 50 23 82.14
6 NS 3P N = 140 1 3.57 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
a.1 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 51,34 %
7 NS 2S E+1 -150 7 25.00
8 NS 3P E-2 100 0 0.00
9 NS 4P E = -620 6 21.43 µ Tbl = 15,48 %
a.8 Noelle Fosse -Chantal Barro 58,48 %
10 NS 4P N = 620 17 60.71
11 NS 3T W = -110 28 100.00
12 NS 1PcE-2 300 4 14.29 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
a.7 Suzanne Klausen -Michele Verhulst 48,81 %
13 NS 4P E-1 100 12 42.86
14 NS 3P W = -140 24 85.71
15 NS 3S E = -400 18 64.29 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
a.6 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 39,14 %
16 NS 3S S+3 490 8 28.57
17 NS 4C W+1 -450 14 50.00
18 NS 3S N-1 -100 14 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
a.5 Francoise Duren -Gaetan van de Werve 51,34 %
19 NS 4C E+1 -650 9 32.14
20 NS 3S N+2 660 16 57.14
21 NS 3C E+1 -170 10 35.71 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
a.4 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Simone Munsterhjelm 52,23 %
22 NS 3C E+1 -170 12 42.86
23 NS 1S S = 90 22 78.57
24 NS 4P N = 420 21 75.00 µ Tbl = 65,48 %
Total : 346,0 / 672 = 51,49 %
PAIRE B.4 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten
b.7 Christiane Huby -Jeannine Thys 51,02 %
1 NS 5KcN-2 -300 22 78.57
2 NS 3C E+2 -200 5 17.86
3 NS 3S N+2 460 24 85.71 µ Tbl = 60,71 %
b.6 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 48,81 %
4 NS 3T W+1 -130 22 78.57
5 NS 2P E+1 -140 16 57.14
6 NS 2P N+3 200 18 64.29 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
b.5 Gaetan Collinet -Anne France Raquez 55,27 %
7 NS 3P E = -140 12 42.86
8 NS 1K N+4 150 10 35.71
9 NS 4P E-1 100 22 78.57 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
b.4 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 39,97 %
10 NS 3P N+1 170 4 14.29
11 NS 3S E = -400 20 71.43
12 NS 3S S = 600 17 60.71 µ Tbl = 48,81 %
b.3 Dilva Haym -Michel Lievens 64,46 %
13 NS 5K S-1 -100 4 14.29
14 NS 4P W = -420 3 10.71
15 NS 3S E+1 -430 5 17.86 µ Tbl = 14,29 %
b.2 Luc Rampaer -Bernard Brisbois 52,21 %
16 NS 3S S+3 490 8 28.57
17 NS 4C W+1 -450 14 50.00
18 NS 3K N = 110 26 92.86 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
b.1 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne 53,57 %
19 NS 4P E+1 -650 9 32.14
20 NS 3S S+1 630 7 25.00
21 NS 4C W = -420 4 14.29 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
b.8 Philippe Leemans -Lydia Luyten 37,24 %
22 NS 3C E = -140 20 71.43
23 NS 1S S = 90 22 78.57
24 NS 4P N = 420 21 75.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
Total : 335,0 / 672 = 49,85 %
PAIRE A.6 Anne Van den Berge -Andre Delacroix
a.4 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Simone Munsterhjelm 52,23 %
1 NS 4P E+1 -450 9 32.14
2 NS 3C W = -140 14 50.00
3 NS 3S N+1 430 12 42.86 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
a.3 Veronique Cosyns -Anne Ceulemans 43,01 %
4 NS 5T W-2 200 28 100.00
5 NS 3S W = -400 3 10.71
6 NS 3P N+1 170 9 32.14 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
a.2 Luc Cartuyvels -Charlotte de Wasseige 53,42 %
7 NS 2C W-1 100 24 85.71
8 NS 3K N+2 150 10 35.71
9 NS 3K E+2 -150 12 42.86 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
a.1 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 51,34 %
10 NS 4P N = 620 17 60.71
11 NS 3S E+1 -430 16 57.14
12 NS 3S N = 600 17 60.71 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
a.8 Noelle Fosse -Chantal Barro 58,48 %
13 NS 4P E-1 100 12 42.86
14 NS 4P W = -420 3 10.71
15 NS 3S E+1 -430 5 17.86 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
a.7 Suzanne Klausen -Michele Verhulst 48,81 %
16 NS 6S S+1 1020 27 96.43
17 NS 4C E+1 -450 14 50.00
18 NS 5T S-1 -100 14 50.00 µ Tbl = 65,48 %
a.6 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 39,14 %
19 NS 6C E-1 100 28 100.00
20 NS 3S N+3 690 25 89.29
21 NS 4C W = -420 4 14.29 µ Tbl = 67,86 %
a.5 Francoise Duren -Gaetan van de Werve 51,34 %
22 NS 1C E+3 -170 12 42.86
23 NS 1S S-1 -100 12 42.86
24 NS 5PcN-1 -100 6 21.43 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
Total : 333,0 / 672 = 49,55 %
PAIRE A.8 Myriam de Timary -Annette Fobe
a.8 Noelle Fosse -Chantal Barro 58,48 %
1 NS 4P E+1 -450 9 32.14
2 NS 3P N-1 -100 19 67.86
3 NS 3S N+1 430 12 42.86 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
a.7 Suzanne Klausen -Michele Verhulst 48,81 %
4 NS 3S W = -600 13 46.43
5 NS 3P E+1 -170 10 35.71
6 NS 2P N+2 170 9 32.14 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
a.6 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 39,14 %
7 NS 2C W-2 200 28 100.00
8 NS 3K N+2 150 10 35.71
9 NS 4P E = -620 6 21.43 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
a.5 Francoise Duren -Gaetan van de Werve 51,34 %
10 NS 4P N = 620 17 60.71
11 NS 2S E+3 -210 23 82.14
12 NS 3S S = 600 17 60.71 µ Tbl = 67,86 %
a.4 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Simone Munsterhjelm 52,23 %
13 NS 3P E = -140 2 7.14
14 NS 2P W+2 -170 14 50.00
15 NS 3S E = -400 18 64.29 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
a.3 Veronique Cosyns -Anne Ceulemans 43,01 %
16 NS 6S S = 990 22 78.57
17 NS 4C W+1 -450 14 50.00
18 NS 5T S-1 -100 14 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
a.2 Luc Cartuyvels -Charlotte de Wasseige 53,42 %
19 NS 4C E+1 -650 9 32.14
20 NS 3S N+2 660 16 57.14
21 NS 4C W = -420 4 14.29 µ Tbl = 34,52 %
a.1 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 51,34 %
22 NS 2P S = 110 27 96.43
23 NS 1S S-2 -200 4 14.29
24 NS 5P N-1 -50 14 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,57 %
Total : 331,0 / 672 = 49,26 %
PAIRE B.2 Grazia Neuenschwander -Teresa Dekoster
b.3 Dilva Haym -Michel Lievens 64,46 %
1 NS 4P E+1 -450 9 32.14
2 NS 3C E+1 -170 9 32.14
3 NS 4P S-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 21,43 %
b.2 Luc Rampaer -Bernard Brisbois 52,21 %
4 NS 3S E+1 -630 4 14.29
5 NS 2S W+2 -180 6 21.43
6 NS 3P N+1 170 9 32.14 µ Tbl = 22,62 %
b.1 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne 53,57 %
7 NS 2C W-1 100 24 85.71
8 NS 2S N+4 240 20 71.43
9 NS 4P E+1 -650 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
b.8 Philippe Leemans -Lydia Luyten 37,24 %
10 NS 4P N = 620 17 60.71
11 NS 2S E+3 -210 23 82.14
12 NS 3S S = 600 17 60.71 µ Tbl = 67,86 %
b.7 Christiane Huby -Jeannine Thys 51,02 %
13 NS 3P E-1 100 12 42.86
14 NS 3P W+1 -170 14 50.00
15 NS 3S E+1 -430 5 17.86 µ Tbl = 36,90 %
b.6 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 48,81 %
16 NS 3S S+4 520 17 60.71
17 NS 4C W+1 -450 14 50.00
18 NS 5T S-1 -100 14 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,57 %
b.5 Gaetan Collinet -Anne France Raquez 55,27 %
19 NS 4C E+1 -650 9 32.14
20 NS 3S S+3 690 25 89.29
21 NS 4C W-1 50 20 71.43 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
b.4 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 39,97 %
22 NS 3P S-3 -150 18 64.29
23 NS 1S S-1 -100 12 42.86
24 NS 4PcN = 590 27 96.43 µ Tbl = 67,86 %
Total : 325,0 / 672 = 48,36 %
PAIRE A.3 Patrizia Vaccani -Didier Collart
a.5 Francoise Duren -Gaetan van de Werve 51,34 %
1 NS 4P E = -420 19 67.86
2 NS 2C W+3 -200 5 17.86
3 NS 3S N+1 430 12 42.86 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
a.4 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Simone Munsterhjelm 52,23 %
4 NS 3T W+1 -130 22 78.57
5 NS 3P E = -140 16 57.14
6 NS 3P N+1 170 9 32.14 µ Tbl = 55,95 %
a.3 Veronique Cosyns -Anne Ceulemans 43,01 %
7 NS 3S E-1 100 24 85.71
8 NS 3K N+2 150 10 35.71
9 NS 5K W-1 100 22 78.57 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.2 Luc Cartuyvels -Charlotte de Wasseige 53,42 %
10 NS 4P N = 620 17 60.71
11 NS 3S E+2 -460 6 21.43
12 NS 3S S = 600 17 60.71 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
a.1 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 51,34 %
13 NS 4P E-1 100 12 42.86
14 NS 3P W+1 -170 14 50.00
15 NS 3S E-1 50 28 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
a.8 Noelle Fosse -Chantal Barro 58,48 %
16 NS 3S S+2 460 0 0.00
17 NS 4C W+1 -450 14 50.00
18 NS 3S N-2 -200 2 7.14 µ Tbl = 19,05 %
a.7 Suzanne Klausen -Michele Verhulst 48,81 %
19 NS 4C E+1 -650 9 32.14
20 NS 4P N = 620 1 3.57
21 NS 4C W-1 50 20 71.43 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
a.6 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 39,14 %
22 NS 4C W = -620 3 10.71
23 NS 3T E-1 100 28 100.00
24 NS 5PcN-1 -100 6 21.43 µ Tbl = 44,05 %
Total : 316,0 / 672 = 47,02 %
PAIRE A.7 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Jeannine Wanderpepen
a.6 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 39,14 %
1 NS 2P E+2 -170 28 100.00
2 NS 4C E-1 50 22 78.57
3 NS 3S N+2 460 24 85.71 µ Tbl = 88,10 %
a.5 Francoise Duren -Gaetan van de Werve 51,34 %
4 NS 2S E+2 -180 18 64.29
5 NS 3S W = -400 3 10.71
6 NS 4P N = 420 23 82.14 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
a.4 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Simone Munsterhjelm 52,23 %
7 NS 2S E+2 -180 3 10.71
8 NS 3K N+3 170 18 64.29
9 NS 4S E = -630 2 7.14 µ Tbl = 27,38 %
a.3 Veronique Cosyns -Anne Ceulemans 43,01 %
10 NS 4P S-1 -100 1 3.57
11 NS 3S E+2 -460 6 21.43
12 NS 3S S = 600 17 60.71 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
a.2 Luc Cartuyvels -Charlotte de Wasseige 53,42 %
13 NS 4P E-1 100 12 42.86
14 NS 4P W = -420 3 10.71
15 NS 3S E = -400 18 64.29 µ Tbl = 39,29 %
a.1 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 51,34 %
16 NS 6S S = 990 22 78.57
17 NS 4C W = -420 24 85.71
18 NS 3S N-2 -200 2 7.14 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
a.8 Noelle Fosse -Chantal Barro 58,48 %
19 NS 4C E+1 -650 9 32.14
20 NS 3S S+1 630 7 25.00
21 NS 4C W-1 50 20 71.43 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
a.7 Suzanne Klausen -Michele Verhulst 48,81 %
22 NS 3C E+1 -170 12 42.86
23 NS 1S S-1 -100 12 42.86
24 NS 5PcN-1 -100 6 21.43 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
Total : 312,0 / 672 = 46,43 %
PAIRE A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Jannick Bekaert
a.1 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 51,34 %
1 NS 4P E+1 -450 9 32.14
2 NS 4C E = -420 1 3.57
3 NS 3S N+1 430 12 42.86 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
a.8 Noelle Fosse -Chantal Barro 58,48 %
4 NS 3S W+1 -630 4 14.29
5 NS 4P E = -420 0 0.00
6 NS 3P N+2 200 18 64.29 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
a.7 Suzanne Klausen -Michele Verhulst 48,81 %
7 NS 2S E+1 -150 7 25.00
8 NS 3K N+2 150 10 35.71
9 NS 1S E = -90 16 57.14 µ Tbl = 39,29 %
a.6 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 39,14 %
10 NS 4P N = 620 17 60.71
11 NS 2T W+2 -130 26 92.86
12 NS 3S N = 600 17 60.71 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
a.5 Francoise Duren -Gaetan van de Werve 51,34 %
13 NS 4P E-1 100 12 42.86
14 NS 3P W+1 -170 14 50.00
15 NS 3S E = -400 18 64.29 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
a.4 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Simone Munsterhjelm 52,23 %
16 NS 3S S+3 490 8 28.57
17 NS 6S E-1 50 27 96.43
18 NS 5T S-1 -100 14 50.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
a.3 Veronique Cosyns -Anne Ceulemans 43,01 %
19 NS 4C E = -620 22 78.57
20 NS 3S N+1 630 7 25.00
21 NS 4C W = -420 4 14.29 µ Tbl = 39,29 %
a.2 Luc Cartuyvels -Charlotte de Wasseige 53,42 %
22 NS 4C E = -620 3 10.71
23 NS 1S S-1 -100 12 42.86
24 NS 5PcN-1 -100 6 21.43 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
Total : 284,0 / 672 = 42,26 %
PAIRE B.6 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger
b.4 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 39,97 %
1 NS 3P E+2 -200 25 89.29
2 NS 3C E = -140 14 50.00
3 NS 3S N = 400 4 14.29 µ Tbl = 51,19 %
b.3 Dilva Haym -Michel Lievens 64,46 %
4 NS 3S W+1 -630 4 14.29
5 NS 3P W = -140 16 57.14
6 NS 3P N+1 170 9 32.14 µ Tbl = 34,52 %
b.2 Luc Rampaer -Bernard Brisbois 52,21 %
7 NS 2S E = -120 16 57.14
8 NS 3S S+2 460 25 89.29
9 NS 4P W = -620 6 21.43 µ Tbl = 55,95 %
b.1 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne 53,57 %
10 NS 4P N = 620 17 60.71
11 NS 3S E+2 -460 6 21.43
12 NS 3S N = 600 17 60.71 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
b.8 Philippe Leemans -Lydia Luyten 37,24 %
13 NS 4P E-2 200 23 82.14
14 NS 3P W+1 -170 14 50.00
15 NS 3S E = -400 18 64.29 µ Tbl = 65,48 %
b.7 Christiane Huby -Jeannine Thys 51,02 %
16 NS 3S S+3 490 8 28.57
17 NS 4C W+1 -450 14 50.00
18 NS 5T S-1 -100 14 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
b.6 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 48,81 %
19 NS 4C E+1 -650 9 32.14
20 NS 4P N = 620 1 3.57
21 NS 4C E = -420 4 14.29 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
b.5 Gaetan Collinet -Anne France Raquez 55,27 %
22 NS 2C E+2 -170 12 42.86
23 NS 1S S-3 -300 0 0.00
24 NS 5PcN-1 -100 6 21.43 µ Tbl = 21,43 %
Total : 282,0 / 672 = 41,96 %
PAIRE B.3 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse
b.5 Gaetan Collinet -Anne France Raquez 55,27 %
1 NS 4P E+1 -450 9 32.14
2 NS 4C E = -420 1 3.57
3 NS 3S N+1 430 12 42.86 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
b.4 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 39,97 %
4 NS 3S E+1 -630 4 14.29
5 NS 4P E-1 50 23 82.14
6 NS 3P N+1 170 9 32.14 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
b.3 Dilva Haym -Michel Lievens 64,46 %
7 NS 2C W+1 -140 12 42.86
8 NS 3K N+1 130 2 7.14
9 NS 3K E+2 -150 12 42.86 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
b.2 Luc Rampaer -Bernard Brisbois 52,21 %
10 NS 4P N = 620 17 60.71
11 NS 3S E+2 -460 6 21.43
12 NS 3S S-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,38 %
b.1 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne 53,57 %
13 NS 4P E = -620 0 0.00
14 NS 4P W = -420 3 10.71
15 NS 3S E = -400 18 64.29 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
b.8 Philippe Leemans -Lydia Luyten 37,24 %
16 NS 3S S+3 490 8 28.57
17 NS 4C W+2 -480 2 7.14
18 NS 2K N = 90 24 85.71 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
b.7 Christiane Huby -Jeannine Thys 51,02 %
19 NS 4C E+1 -650 9 32.14
20 NS 3S S+2 660 16 57.14
21 NS 4C W-1 50 20 71.43 µ Tbl = 53,57 %
b.6 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 48,81 %
22 NS 3P S-1 -50 23 82.14
23 NS 1S S = 90 22 78.57
24 NS 5PcN-1 -100 6 21.43 µ Tbl = 60,71 %
Total : 258,0 / 672 = 38,39 %
PAIRE B.8 -
b.8 Philippe Leemans -Lydia Luyten 37,24 %
1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
b.7 Christiane Huby -Jeannine Thys 51,02 %
4 NS BYE 0 0.00
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
b.6 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 48,81 %
7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
b.5 Gaetan Collinet -Anne France Raquez 55,27 %
10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
b.4 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 39,97 %
13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00
15 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
b.3 Dilva Haym -Michel Lievens 64,46 %
16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
b.2 Luc Rampaer -Bernard Brisbois 52,21 %
19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00
21 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
b.1 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne 53,57 %
22 NS BYE 0 0.00
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 672 = 0,00 %
PAIRE b.3 Dilva Haym -Michel Lievens
B.2 Grazia Neuenschwander -Teresa Dekoster 48,36 %
1 EO 4P E+1 -450 19 67.86
2 EO 3C E+1 -170 19 67.86
3 EO 4P S-2 -100 28 100.00 µ Tbl = 78,57 %
B.6 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 41,96 %
4 EO 3S W+1 -630 24 85.71
5 EO 3P W = -140 12 42.86
6 EO 3P N+1 170 19 67.86 µ Tbl = 65,48 %
B.3 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 38,39 %
7 EO 2C W+1 -140 16 57.14
8 EO 3K N+1 130 26 92.86
9 EO 3K E+2 -150 16 57.14 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
B.7 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 52,83 %
10 EO 4P N = 620 11 39.29
11 EO 3S E+1 -430 12 42.86
12 EO 3S N-1 -100 26 92.86 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
B.4 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten 49,85 %
13 EO 5K S-1 -100 24 85.71
14 EO 4P W = -420 25 89.29
15 EO 3S E+1 -430 23 82.14 µ Tbl = 85,71 %
B.8 - 0,00 %
16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
B.1 Pascale Ortegat -Serge Alard 55,51 %
19 EO 4P E = -620 6 21.43
20 EO 3S N+2 660 12 42.86
21 EO 4C W-1 50 8 28.57 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
B.5 Philippe Dekandelaer -Patrick Gilles 60,86 %
22 EO 4C E = -620 25 89.29
23 EO 1S S-1 -100 16 57.14
24 EO 6K W-2 100 12 42.86 µ Tbl = 63,10 %
Total : 379,0 / 588 = 64,46 %
PAIRE a.8 Noelle Fosse -Chantal Barro
A.8 Myriam de Timary -Annette Fobe 49,26 %
1 EO 4P E+1 -450 19 67.86
2 EO 3P N-1 -100 9 32.14
3 EO 3S N+1 430 16 57.14 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Jannick Bekaert 42,26 %
4 EO 3S W+1 -630 24 85.71
5 EO 4P E = -420 28 100.00
6 EO 3P N+2 200 10 35.71 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
A.5 Liliane Baptista -Thierry Bontinck 52,68 %
7 EO 2S E+2 -180 25 89.29
8 EO 3K N+2 150 18 64.29
9 EO 5K W-1 100 6 21.43 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Lydia Wildiers 51,49 %
10 EO 4P N = 620 11 39.29
11 EO 3T W = -110 0 0.00
12 EO 1PcE-2 300 24 85.71 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
A.6 Anne Van den Berge -Andre Delacroix 49,55 %
13 EO 4P E-1 100 16 57.14
14 EO 4P W = -420 25 89.29
15 EO 3S E+1 -430 23 82.14 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
A.3 Patrizia Vaccani -Didier Collart 47,02 %
16 EO 3S S+2 460 28 100.00
17 EO 4C W+1 -450 14 50.00
18 EO 3S N-2 -200 26 92.86 µ Tbl = 80,95 %
A.7 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Jeannine Wanderpepen 46,43 %
19 EO 4C E+1 -650 19 67.86
20 EO 3S S+1 630 21 75.00
21 EO 4C W-1 50 8 28.57 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
A.4 Magda Moortgat -Michele Berrier 63,54 %
22 EO 1C E+3 -170 16 57.14
23 EO 1S S = 90 6 21.43
24 EO 4PcN = 590 1 3.57 µ Tbl = 27,38 %
Total : 393,0 / 672 = 58,48 %
PAIRE b.5 Gaetan Collinet -Anne France Raquez
B.3 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 38,39 %
1 EO 4P E+1 -450 19 67.86
2 EO 4C E = -420 27 96.43
3 EO 3S N+1 430 16 57.14 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
B.7 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 52,83 %
4 EO 3S W = -600 15 53.57
5 EO 3S W-2 100 0 0.00
6 EO 3P N = 140 27 96.43 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
B.4 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten 49,85 %
7 EO 3P E = -140 16 57.14
8 EO 1K N+4 150 18 64.29
9 EO 4P E-1 100 6 21.43 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
B.8 - 0,00 %
10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
B.1 Pascale Ortegat -Serge Alard 55,51 %
13 EO 5P E-3 300 0 0.00
14 EO 3P W+1 -170 14 50.00
15 EO 3S W+1 -430 23 82.14 µ Tbl = 44,05 %
B.5 Philippe Dekandelaer -Patrick Gilles 60,86 %
16 EO 4S S+2 490 20 71.43
17 EO 4C E+1 -450 14 50.00
18 EO 5T S-1 -100 14 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
B.2 Grazia Neuenschwander -Teresa Dekoster 48,36 %
19 EO 4C E+1 -650 19 67.86
20 EO 3S S+3 690 3 10.71
21 EO 4C W-1 50 8 28.57 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
B.6 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 41,96 %
22 EO 2C E+2 -170 16 57.14
23 EO 1S S-3 -300 28 100.00
24 EO 5PcN-1 -100 22 78.57 µ Tbl = 78,57 %
Total : 325,0 / 588 = 55,27 %
PAIRE b.1 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne
B.1 Pascale Ortegat -Serge Alard 55,51 %
1 EO 5P E = -450 19 67.86
2 EO 3C W = -140 14 50.00
3 EO 3S N+1 430 16 57.14 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
B.5 Philippe Dekandelaer -Patrick Gilles 60,86 %
4 EO 3S W = -600 15 53.57
5 EO 2S W-1 50 5 17.86
6 EO 4P N+1 450 1 3.57 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
B.2 Grazia Neuenschwander -Teresa Dekoster 48,36 %
7 EO 2C W-1 100 4 14.29
8 EO 2S N+4 240 8 28.57
9 EO 4P E+1 -650 28 100.00 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
B.6 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 41,96 %
10 EO 4P N = 620 11 39.29
11 EO 3S E+2 -460 22 78.57
12 EO 3S N = 600 11 39.29 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
B.3 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 38,39 %
13 EO 4P E = -620 28 100.00
14 EO 4P W = -420 25 89.29
15 EO 3S E = -400 10 35.71 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
B.7 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 52,83 %
16 EO 6S S = 990 6 21.43
17 EO 4C W+1 -450 14 50.00
18 EO 5T S-1 -100 14 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
B.4 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten 49,85 %
19 EO 4P E+1 -650 19 67.86
20 EO 3S S+1 630 21 75.00
21 EO 4C W = -420 24 85.71 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
B.8 - 0,00 %
22 EO BYE 0 0.00
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 315,0 / 588 = 53,57 %
PAIRE a.2 Luc Cartuyvels -Charlotte de Wasseige
A.5 Liliane Baptista -Thierry Bontinck 52,68 %
1 EO 5KcN-3 -500 28 100.00
2 EO 2P N = 110 1 3.57
3 EO 3S S+2 460 4 14.29 µ Tbl = 39,29 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Lydia Wildiers 51,49 %
4 EO 3T W+1 -130 6 21.43
5 EO 4P E-1 50 5 17.86
6 EO 3P N = 140 27 96.43 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
A.6 Anne Van den Berge -Andre Delacroix 49,55 %
7 EO 2C W-1 100 4 14.29
8 EO 3K N+2 150 18 64.29
9 EO 3K E+2 -150 16 57.14 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
A.3 Patrizia Vaccani -Didier Collart 47,02 %
10 EO 4P N = 620 11 39.29
11 EO 3S E+2 -460 22 78.57
12 EO 3S S = 600 11 39.29 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
A.7 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Jeannine Wanderpepen 46,43 %
13 EO 4P E-1 100 16 57.14
14 EO 4P W = -420 25 89.29
15 EO 3S E = -400 10 35.71 µ Tbl = 60,71 %
A.4 Magda Moortgat -Michele Berrier 63,54 %
16 EO 3S S+4 520 11 39.29
17 EO 4C W+2 -480 26 92.86
18 EO 5CcE-4 800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 44,05 %
A.8 Myriam de Timary -Annette Fobe 49,26 %
19 EO 4C E+1 -650 19 67.86
20 EO 3S N+2 660 12 42.86
21 EO 4C W = -420 24 85.71 µ Tbl = 65,48 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Jannick Bekaert 42,26 %
22 EO 4C E = -620 25 89.29
23 EO 1S S-1 -100 16 57.14
24 EO 5PcN-1 -100 22 78.57 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
Total : 359,0 / 672 = 53,42 %
PAIRE a.4 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Simone Munsterhjelm
A.6 Anne Van den Berge -Andre Delacroix 49,55 %
1 EO 4P E+1 -450 19 67.86
2 EO 3C W = -140 14 50.00
3 EO 3S N+1 430 16 57.14 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
A.3 Patrizia Vaccani -Didier Collart 47,02 %
4 EO 3T W+1 -130 6 21.43
5 EO 3P E = -140 12 42.86
6 EO 3P N+1 170 19 67.86 µ Tbl = 44,05 %
A.7 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Jeannine Wanderpepen 46,43 %
7 EO 2S E+2 -180 25 89.29
8 EO 3K N+3 170 10 35.71
9 EO 4S E = -630 26 92.86 µ Tbl = 72,62 %
A.4 Magda Moortgat -Michele Berrier 63,54 %
10 EO 4P S-1 -100 27 96.43
11 EO 3S E+2 -460 22 78.57
12 EO 3S S = 600 11 39.29 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
A.8 Myriam de Timary -Annette Fobe 49,26 %
13 EO 3P E = -140 26 92.86
14 EO 2P W+2 -170 14 50.00
15 EO 3S E = -400 10 35.71 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Jannick Bekaert 42,26 %
16 EO 3S S+3 490 20 71.43
17 EO 6S E-1 50 1 3.57
18 EO 5T S-1 -100 14 50.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
A.5 Liliane Baptista -Thierry Bontinck 52,68 %
19 EO 4C W+1 -650 19 67.86
20 EO 3S S+3 690 3 10.71
21 EO 3S W-1 50 8 28.57 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Lydia Wildiers 51,49 %
22 EO 3C E+1 -170 16 57.14
23 EO 1S S = 90 6 21.43
24 EO 4P N = 420 7 25.00 µ Tbl = 34,52 %
Total : 351,0 / 672 = 52,23 %
PAIRE b.2 Luc Rampaer -Bernard Brisbois
B.5 Philippe Dekandelaer -Patrick Gilles 60,86 %
1 EO 4P E+1 -450 19 67.86
2 EO 4C W-2 100 4 14.29
3 EO 3S N+1 430 16 57.14 µ Tbl = 46,43 %
B.2 Grazia Neuenschwander -Teresa Dekoster 48,36 %
4 EO 3S E+1 -630 24 85.71
5 EO 2S W+2 -180 22 78.57
6 EO 3P N+1 170 19 67.86 µ Tbl = 77,38 %
B.6 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 41,96 %
7 EO 2S E = -120 12 42.86
8 EO 3S S+2 460 3 10.71
9 EO 4P W = -620 22 78.57 µ Tbl = 44,05 %
B.3 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 38,39 %
10 EO 4P N = 620 11 39.29
11 EO 3S E+2 -460 22 78.57
12 EO 3S S-2 -200 28 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,62 %
B.7 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 52,83 %
13 EO 4P E-1 100 16 57.14
14 EO 3P W = -140 4 14.29
15 EO 2S E+1 -150 2 7.14 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
B.4 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten 49,85 %
16 EO 3S S+3 490 20 71.43
17 EO 4C W+1 -450 14 50.00
18 EO 3K N = 110 2 7.14 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
B.8 - 0,00 %
19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00
21 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
B.1 Pascale Ortegat -Serge Alard 55,51 %
22 EO 2P S = 110 1 3.57
23 EO 1S S-2 -200 24 85.71
24 EO 5PcN-1 -100 22 78.57 µ Tbl = 55,95 %
Total : 307,0 / 588 = 52,21 %
PAIRE a.5 Francoise Duren -Gaetan van de Werve
A.3 Patrizia Vaccani -Didier Collart 47,02 %
1 EO 4P E = -420 9 32.14
2 EO 2C W+3 -200 23 82.14
3 EO 3S N+1 430 16 57.14 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
A.7 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Jeannine Wanderpepen 46,43 %
4 EO 2S E+2 -180 10 35.71
5 EO 3S W = -400 25 89.29
6 EO 4P N = 420 5 17.86 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
A.4 Magda Moortgat -Michele Berrier 63,54 %
7 EO 2C W = -110 9 32.14
8 EO 5KcN = 550 0 0.00
9 EO 4P E-1 100 6 21.43 µ Tbl = 17,86 %
A.8 Myriam de Timary -Annette Fobe 49,26 %
10 EO 4P N = 620 11 39.29
11 EO 2S E+3 -210 5 17.86
12 EO 3S S = 600 11 39.29 µ Tbl = 32,14 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Jannick Bekaert 42,26 %
13 EO 4P E-1 100 16 57.14
14 EO 3P W+1 -170 14 50.00
15 EO 3S E = -400 10 35.71 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
A.5 Liliane Baptista -Thierry Bontinck 52,68 %
16 EO 4S S+2 490 20 71.43
17 EO 4C W+2 -480 26 92.86
18 EO 4K N-2 -200 26 92.86 µ Tbl = 85,71 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Lydia Wildiers 51,49 %
19 EO 4C E+1 -650 19 67.86
20 EO 3S N+2 660 12 42.86
21 EO 3C E+1 -170 18 64.29 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
A.6 Anne Van den Berge -Andre Delacroix 49,55 %
22 EO 1C E+3 -170 16 57.14
23 EO 1S S-1 -100 16 57.14
24 EO 5PcN-1 -100 22 78.57 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
Total : 345,0 / 672 = 51,34 %
PAIRE a.1 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Jannick Bekaert 42,26 %
1 EO 4P E+1 -450 19 67.86
2 EO 4C E = -420 27 96.43
3 EO 3S N+1 430 16 57.14 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
A.5 Liliane Baptista -Thierry Bontinck 52,68 %
4 EO 5T E-1 100 2 7.14
5 EO 3P E+1 -170 18 64.29
6 EO 2P N+3 200 10 35.71 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Lydia Wildiers 51,49 %
7 EO 2S E+1 -150 21 75.00
8 EO 3P E-2 100 28 100.00
9 EO 4P E = -620 22 78.57 µ Tbl = 84,52 %
A.6 Anne Van den Berge -Andre Delacroix 49,55 %
10 EO 4P N = 620 11 39.29
11 EO 3S E+1 -430 12 42.86
12 EO 3S N = 600 11 39.29 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
A.3 Patrizia Vaccani -Didier Collart 47,02 %
13 EO 4P E-1 100 16 57.14
14 EO 3P W+1 -170 14 50.00
15 EO 3S E-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
A.7 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Jeannine Wanderpepen 46,43 %
16 EO 6S S = 990 6 21.43
17 EO 4C W = -420 4 14.29
18 EO 3S N-2 -200 26 92.86 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
A.4 Magda Moortgat -Michele Berrier 63,54 %
19 EO 4C E = -620 6 21.43
20 EO 3S S+1 630 21 75.00
21 EO 2C E+1 -140 16 57.14 µ Tbl = 51,19 %
A.8 Myriam de Timary -Annette Fobe 49,26 %
22 EO 2P S = 110 1 3.57
23 EO 1S S-2 -200 24 85.71
24 EO 5P N-1 -50 14 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,43 %
Total : 345,0 / 672 = 51,34 %
PAIRE b.7 Christiane Huby -Jeannine Thys
B.4 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten 49,85 %
1 EO 5KcN-2 -300 6 21.43
2 EO 3C E+2 -200 23 82.14
3 EO 3S N+2 460 4 14.29 µ Tbl = 39,29 %
B.8 - 0,00 %
4 EO BYE 0 0.00
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
B.1 Pascale Ortegat -Serge Alard 55,51 %
7 EO 3CcW = -730 28 100.00
8 EO 3S N+2 460 3 10.71
9 EO 3S E-1 100 6 21.43 µ Tbl = 44,05 %
B.5 Philippe Dekandelaer -Patrick Gilles 60,86 %
10 EO 4P N = 620 11 39.29
11 EO 3S E+1 -430 12 42.86
12 EO 3S S = 600 11 39.29 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
B.2 Grazia Neuenschwander -Teresa Dekoster 48,36 %
13 EO 3P E-1 100 16 57.14
14 EO 3P W+1 -170 14 50.00
15 EO 3S E+1 -430 23 82.14 µ Tbl = 63,10 %
B.6 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 41,96 %
16 EO 3S S+3 490 20 71.43
17 EO 4C W+1 -450 14 50.00
18 EO 5T S-1 -100 14 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
B.3 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 38,39 %
19 EO 4C E+1 -650 19 67.86
20 EO 3S S+2 660 12 42.86
21 EO 4C W-1 50 8 28.57 µ Tbl = 46,43 %
B.7 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 52,83 %
22 EO 4C E = -620 25 89.29
23 EO 2P S-2 -200 24 85.71
24 EO 4P N = 420 7 25.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 300,0 / 588 = 51,02 %
PAIRE b.6 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck
B.7 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 52,83 %
1 EO 4P E+1 -450 19 67.86
2 EO 3P N-1 -100 9 32.14
3 EO 3S N-1 -50 26 92.86 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
B.4 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten 49,85 %
4 EO 3T W+1 -130 6 21.43
5 EO 2P E+1 -140 12 42.86
6 EO 2P N+3 200 10 35.71 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
B.8 - 0,00 %
7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
B.1 Pascale Ortegat -Serge Alard 55,51 %
10 EO 4P N = 620 11 39.29
11 EO 3S E+2 -460 22 78.57
12 EO 3S S = 600 11 39.29 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
B.5 Philippe Dekandelaer -Patrick Gilles 60,86 %
13 EO 4P E-2 200 5 17.86
14 EO 2P W+1 -140 4 14.29
15 EO 3S E = -400 10 35.71 µ Tbl = 22,62 %
B.2 Grazia Neuenschwander -Teresa Dekoster 48,36 %
16 EO 3S S+4 520 11 39.29
17 EO 4C W+1 -450 14 50.00
18 EO 5T S-1 -100 14 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,43 %
B.6 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 41,96 %
19 EO 4C E+1 -650 19 67.86
20 EO 4P N = 620 27 96.43
21 EO 4C E = -420 24 85.71 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
B.3 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 38,39 %
22 EO 3P S-1 -50 5 17.86
23 EO 1S S = 90 6 21.43
24 EO 5PcN-1 -100 22 78.57 µ Tbl = 39,29 %
Total : 287,0 / 588 = 48,81 %
PAIRE a.7 Suzanne Klausen -Michele Verhulst
A.4 Magda Moortgat -Michele Berrier 63,54 %
1 EO 4P E = -420 9 32.14
2 EO 2P N = 110 1 3.57
3 EO 3S N+2 460 4 14.29 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
A.8 Myriam de Timary -Annette Fobe 49,26 %
4 EO 3S W = -600 15 53.57
5 EO 3P E+1 -170 18 64.29
6 EO 2P N+2 170 19 67.86 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Jannick Bekaert 42,26 %
7 EO 2S E+1 -150 21 75.00
8 EO 3K N+2 150 18 64.29
9 EO 1S E = -90 12 42.86 µ Tbl = 60,71 %
A.5 Liliane Baptista -Thierry Bontinck 52,68 %
10 EO 4P N = 620 11 39.29
11 EO 3S E+2 -460 22 78.57
12 EO 3S N = 600 11 39.29 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Lydia Wildiers 51,49 %
13 EO 4P E-1 100 16 57.14
14 EO 3P W = -140 4 14.29
15 EO 3S E = -400 10 35.71 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
A.6 Anne Van den Berge -Andre Delacroix 49,55 %
16 EO 6S S+1 1020 1 3.57
17 EO 4C E+1 -450 14 50.00
18 EO 5T S-1 -100 14 50.00 µ Tbl = 34,52 %
A.3 Patrizia Vaccani -Didier Collart 47,02 %
19 EO 4C E+1 -650 19 67.86
20 EO 4P N = 620 27 96.43
21 EO 4C W-1 50 8 28.57 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
A.7 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Jeannine Wanderpepen 46,43 %
22 EO 3C E+1 -170 16 57.14
23 EO 1S S-1 -100 16 57.14
24 EO 5PcN-1 -100 22 78.57 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
Total : 328,0 / 672 = 48,81 %
PAIRE a.3 Veronique Cosyns -Anne Ceulemans
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Lydia Wildiers 51,49 %
1 EO 3P E+2 -200 3 10.71
2 EO 3C E+1 -170 19 67.86
3 EO 3S N+2 460 4 14.29 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
A.6 Anne Van den Berge -Andre Delacroix 49,55 %
4 EO 5T W-2 200 0 0.00
5 EO 3S W = -400 25 89.29
6 EO 3P N+1 170 19 67.86 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
A.3 Patrizia Vaccani -Didier Collart 47,02 %
7 EO 3S E-1 100 4 14.29
8 EO 3K N+2 150 18 64.29
9 EO 5K W-1 100 6 21.43 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.7 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Jeannine Wanderpepen 46,43 %
10 EO 4P S-1 -100 27 96.43
11 EO 3S E+2 -460 22 78.57
12 EO 3S S = 600 11 39.29 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
A.4 Magda Moortgat -Michele Berrier 63,54 %
13 EO 4P E-2 200 5 17.86
14 EO 4P W-1 50 0 0.00
15 EO 3S E+1 -430 23 82.14 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.8 Myriam de Timary -Annette Fobe 49,26 %
16 EO 6S S = 990 6 21.43
17 EO 4C W+1 -450 14 50.00
18 EO 5T S-1 -100 14 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Jannick Bekaert 42,26 %
19 EO 4C E = -620 6 21.43
20 EO 3S N+1 630 21 75.00
21 EO 4C W = -420 24 85.71 µ Tbl = 60,71 %
A.5 Liliane Baptista -Thierry Bontinck 52,68 %
22 EO 2P S-1 -50 5 17.86
23 EO 1S S = 90 6 21.43
24 EO 4P N = 420 7 25.00 µ Tbl = 21,43 %
Total : 289,0 / 672 = 43,01 %
PAIRE b.4 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw
B.6 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 41,96 %
1 EO 3P E+2 -200 3 10.71
2 EO 3C E = -140 14 50.00
3 EO 3S N = 400 24 85.71 µ Tbl = 48,81 %
B.3 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 38,39 %
4 EO 3S E+1 -630 24 85.71
5 EO 4P E-1 50 5 17.86
6 EO 3P N+1 170 19 67.86 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
B.7 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 52,83 %
7 EO 2C W+1 -140 16 57.14
8 EO 5K N = 400 6 21.43
9 EO 4K E+1 -150 16 57.14 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
B.4 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten 49,85 %
10 EO 3P N+1 170 24 85.71
11 EO 3S E = -400 8 28.57
12 EO 3S S = 600 11 39.29 µ Tbl = 51,19 %
B.8 - 0,00 %
13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00
15 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
B.1 Pascale Ortegat -Serge Alard 55,51 %
16 EO 6S N+1 1020 1 3.57
17 EO 6C E-1 50 1 3.57
18 EO 5T S-1 -100 14 50.00 µ Tbl = 19,05 %
B.5 Philippe Dekandelaer -Patrick Gilles 60,86 %
19 EO 5C E = -650 19 67.86
20 EO 3S S+3 690 3 10.71
21 EO 3S W-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
B.2 Grazia Neuenschwander -Teresa Dekoster 48,36 %
22 EO 3P S-3 -150 10 35.71
23 EO 1S S-1 -100 16 57.14
24 EO 4PcN = 590 1 3.57 µ Tbl = 32,14 %
Total : 235,0 / 588 = 39,97 %
PAIRE a.6 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger
A.7 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Jeannine Wanderpepen 46,43 %
1 EO 2P E+2 -170 0 0.00
2 EO 4C E-1 50 6 21.43
3 EO 3S N+2 460 4 14.29 µ Tbl = 11,90 %
A.4 Magda Moortgat -Michele Berrier 63,54 %
4 EO 3S W = -600 15 53.57
5 EO 4P E-1 50 5 17.86
6 EO 4P N = 420 5 17.86 µ Tbl = 29,76 %
A.8 Myriam de Timary -Annette Fobe 49,26 %
7 EO 2C W-2 200 0 0.00
8 EO 3K N+2 150 18 64.29
9 EO 4P E = -620 22 78.57 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Jannick Bekaert 42,26 %
10 EO 4P N = 620 11 39.29
11 EO 2T W+2 -130 2 7.14
12 EO 3S N = 600 11 39.29 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
A.5 Liliane Baptista -Thierry Bontinck 52,68 %
13 EO 4P E-2 200 5 17.86
14 EO 3P W+1 -170 14 50.00
15 EO 3S E+1 -430 23 82.14 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Lydia Wildiers 51,49 %
16 EO 3S S+3 490 20 71.43
17 EO 4C W+1 -450 14 50.00
18 EO 3S N-1 -100 14 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
A.6 Anne Van den Berge -Andre Delacroix 49,55 %
19 EO 6C E-1 100 0 0.00
20 EO 3S N+3 690 3 10.71
21 EO 4C W = -420 24 85.71 µ Tbl = 32,14 %
A.3 Patrizia Vaccani -Didier Collart 47,02 %
22 EO 4C W = -620 25 89.29
23 EO 3T E-1 100 0 0.00
24 EO 5PcN-1 -100 22 78.57 µ Tbl = 55,95 %
Total : 263,0 / 672 = 39,14 %
PAIRE b.8 Philippe Leemans -Lydia Luyten
B.8 - 0,00 %
1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
B.1 Pascale Ortegat -Serge Alard 55,51 %
4 EO 3S W+1 -630 24 85.71
5 EO 2P E+2 -170 18 64.29
6 EO 4P N+1 450 1 3.57 µ Tbl = 51,19 %
B.5 Philippe Dekandelaer -Patrick Gilles 60,86 %
7 EO 2C W = -110 9 32.14
8 EO 1K N+4 150 18 64.29
9 EO 6T W-3 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 32,14 %
B.2 Grazia Neuenschwander -Teresa Dekoster 48,36 %
10 EO 4P N = 620 11 39.29
11 EO 2S E+3 -210 5 17.86
12 EO 3S S = 600 11 39.29 µ Tbl = 32,14 %
B.6 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 41,96 %
13 EO 4P E-2 200 5 17.86
14 EO 3P W+1 -170 14 50.00
15 EO 3S E = -400 10 35.71 µ Tbl = 34,52 %
B.3 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 38,39 %
16 EO 3S S+3 490 20 71.43
17 EO 4C W+2 -480 26 92.86
18 EO 2K N = 90 4 14.29 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
B.7 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 52,83 %
19 EO 4PcN-1 -100 2 7.14
20 EO 3S S+2 660 12 42.86
21 EO 4C W-1 50 8 28.57 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
B.4 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten 49,85 %
22 EO 3C E = -140 8 28.57
23 EO 1S S = 90 6 21.43
24 EO 4P N = 420 7 25.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
Total : 219,0 / 588 = 37,24 %
|