B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 60,03 A.7 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne
--- 2 57,14 A.4 Alan Beckman -Myriam de Timary
--- 3 55,27 A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Annette Fobe
--- 4 54,40 A.9 Lydia Wildiers -Philippe van der Gracht
--- 5 53,64 A.8 Eliane de Ceuninck -Annie Legrand
--- 6 50,37 A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Gerard Cooreman
--- 7 47,18 A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois
--- 8 46,64 A.5 Daniel Couvreur -Thomas Pascal
--- 9 43,78 A.3 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren
--- 10 31,36 A10 Thierry Collart -Annie Zeimes
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 66,49 a.9 Christiane Huby -Patrick Gilles
--- 2 56,90 a.5 Colette Heerinckx -Dilva Haym
--- 3 54,94 a.6 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Benedicte Lemaigre
--- 4 51,93 a.2 Hugo Baetens -Marie Christine Remy
--- 5 46,34 a.1 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten
--- 6 46,16 a.7 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor
--- 7 46,01 a.4 Teresa Dekoster -Jeannine Wanderpepen
--- 8 41,31 a.8 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens
--- 9 39,94 a.3 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes
--- 10 0,00 a10 -
PAIRE A.7 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne
a.3 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 39,94 %
1 NS 2C W-2 100 11.6 82.86
2 NS 5C S = 650 9.3 66.43
3 NS 3S N+3 490 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 77,38 %
a.1 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 46,34 %
4 NS 2P E = -110 11.6 82.86
5 NS 2P N-4 -400 4.7 33.57
6 NS 4C N-1 -50 1.3 9.29 µ Tbl = 41,90 %
a10 - 0,00 %
7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.9 Christiane Huby -Patrick Gilles 66,49 %
10 NS 4C W = -620 7 50.00
11 NS 1S W-1 50 9.3 66.43
12 NS 3S W+1 -430 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 58,10 %
a.7 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 46,16 %
19 NS 4P S = 420 11 78.57
20 NS 3K E-2 200 14 100.00
21 NS 4C N+1 650 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
a.6 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Benedicte Lemaigre 54,94 %
22 NS 4C S-1 -50 9.3 66.43
23 NS 3S W = -600 12.7 90.71
24 NS 3T E-1 50 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
a.5 Colette Heerinckx -Dilva Haym 56,90 %
25 NS 2C N+5 260 2 14.29
26 NS 3P S+1 170 12 85.71
27 NS 3S W = -400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.4 Teresa Dekoster -Jeannine Wanderpepen 46,01 %
28 NS 4P W-1 50 9.3 66.43
29 NS 4S N+1 660 8.1 57.86
30 NS 4K W-1 50 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
Total : 176,5 / 294 = 60,03 %
PAIRE A.4 Alan Beckman -Myriam de Timary
a.6 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Benedicte Lemaigre 54,94 %
1 NS 2P S = 110 13.9 99.29
2 NS 4C S = 620 2.4 17.14
3 NS 5P S-1 -50 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 39,05 %
a.4 Teresa Dekoster -Jeannine Wanderpepen 46,01 %
10 NS 5KcS-2 -500 9.3 66.43
11 NS 2C S-1 -50 4.7 33.57
12 NS 3S W+1 -430 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 52,62 %
a.3 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 39,94 %
13 NS 4P S+3 710 9.3 66.43
14 NS 3S E = -400 12.7 90.71
15 NS 4C N-1 -100 12.7 90.71 µ Tbl = 82,62 %
a.2 Hugo Baetens -Marie Christine Remy 51,93 %
16 NS 3S S+1 430 9.3 66.43
17 NS 3S S-1 -50 3.6 25.71
18 NS 2S W+1 -150 12.7 90.71 µ Tbl = 60,95 %
a.1 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 46,34 %
19 NS 3P N+1 170 5 35.71
20 NS 3C N = 140 12 85.71
21 NS 4C N+2 680 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
a10 - 0,00 %
22 NS BYE 0 0.00
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.8 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 41,31 %
25 NS 4C N+2 480 10 71.43
26 NS 3P S = 140 7 50.00
27 NS 2S W-1 50 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
a.7 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 46,16 %
28 NS 3P W = -140 2.4 17.14
29 NS 3S N+2 660 8.1 57.86
30 NS 4P S-2 -100 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 36,19 %
Total : 168,0 / 294 = 57,14 %
PAIRE A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Annette Fobe
a.1 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 46,34 %
1 NS 3T E = -110 3.6 25.71
2 NS 4C S+1 650 9.3 66.43
3 NS 3S N+3 490 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
a10 - 0,00 %
4 NS BYE 0 0.00
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.9 Christiane Huby -Patrick Gilles 66,49 %
7 NS 3P S+1 170 7 50.00
8 NS 3P W+1 -170 2.4 17.14
9 NS 4C S = 420 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 39,05 %
a.8 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 41,31 %
10 NS 3C W+2 -200 12.7 90.71
11 NS 1S W-1 50 9.3 66.43
12 NS 3S W+2 -460 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 52,62 %
a.7 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 46,16 %
13 NS 4P N+3 710 9.3 66.43
14 NS 3S E = -400 12.7 90.71
15 NS 5C N-2 -200 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 74,52 %
a.5 Colette Heerinckx -Dilva Haym 56,90 %
16 NS 3S S+2 460 13.9 99.29
17 NS 5T N-1 -50 3.6 25.71
18 NS 3S W = -400 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 52,86 %
a.4 Teresa Dekoster -Jeannine Wanderpepen 46,01 %
19 NS 4T W-2 200 8 57.14
20 NS 2C N = 110 9 64.29
21 NS 4C N = 620 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
a.3 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 39,94 %
22 NS 3K W = -110 4.7 33.57
23 NS 3S W = -600 12.7 90.71
24 NS 3T E-2 100 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
Total : 162,5 / 294 = 55,27 %
PAIRE A.9 Lydia Wildiers -Philippe van der Gracht
a.7 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 46,16 %
1 NS 2C W = -110 3.6 25.71
2 NS 4C S+2 680 13.9 99.29
3 NS 3S N+2 460 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 55,71 %
a.6 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Benedicte Lemaigre 54,94 %
4 NS 2P E+2 -170 2.4 17.14
5 NS 4T W = -130 9.3 66.43
6 NS 4P N = 420 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 47,14 %
a.5 Colette Heerinckx -Dilva Haym 56,90 %
7 NS 3P S+1 170 7 50.00
8 NS 4P W-1 50 10.4 74.29
9 NS 4C S = 420 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 58,10 %
a.3 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 39,94 %
10 NS 4C W+1 -650 2.4 17.14
11 NS 1S W-2 100 13.9 99.29
12 NS 3S W+1 -430 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 58,10 %
a.2 Hugo Baetens -Marie Christine Remy 51,93 %
13 NS 5TcE-2 500 2.4 17.14
14 NS 3S E+1 -430 5.9 42.14
15 NS 5C N-1 -100 12.7 90.71 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.1 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 46,34 %
16 NS 3S N+1 430 9.3 66.43
17 NS 3S S+2 460 10.4 74.29
18 NS 3S W = -400 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 58,10 %
a.9 Christiane Huby -Patrick Gilles 66,49 %
25 NS 4C N+2 480 10 71.43
26 NS 4T E-1 100 3 21.43
27 NS 3S W-1 50 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.8 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 41,31 %
28 NS 4P W-1 50 9.3 66.43
29 NS 3S N+2 660 8.1 57.86
30 NS 4P S-1 -50 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 58,10 %
Total : 182,8 / 336 = 54,40 %
PAIRE A.8 Eliane de Ceuninck -Annie Legrand
a.5 Colette Heerinckx -Dilva Haym 56,90 %
1 NS 2C W-1 50 9.3 66.43
2 NS 3S N-1 -100 0.1 0.71
3 NS 3S N+2 460 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 36,43 %
a.4 Teresa Dekoster -Jeannine Wanderpepen 46,01 %
4 NS 2P E+1 -140 7 50.00
5 NS 3P N-1 -100 13.9 99.29
6 NS 4P N+1 450 12.7 90.71 µ Tbl = 80,00 %
a.2 Hugo Baetens -Marie Christine Remy 51,93 %
7 NS 3P S+1 170 7 50.00
8 NS 2P W = -110 5.9 42.14
9 NS 4C S = 420 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,38 %
a.1 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 46,34 %
10 NS 4C W+1 -650 2.4 17.14
11 NS 1S W-1 50 9.3 66.43
12 NS 3S W+1 -430 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 47,14 %
a10 - 0,00 %
13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00
15 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.8 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 41,31 %
22 NS 5K W-2 200 12.7 90.71
23 NS 4P E = -620 9.3 66.43
24 NS 1K N = 70 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 74,52 %
a.7 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 46,16 %
25 NS 4C N+2 480 10 71.43
26 NS 3T E = -110 0 0.00
27 NS 3S W-1 50 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
a.6 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Benedicte Lemaigre 54,94 %
28 NS 4P W-1 50 9.3 66.43
29 NS 4S N+1 660 8.1 57.86
30 NS 4K W = -130 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 47,14 %
Total : 157,7 / 294 = 53,64 %
PAIRE A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Gerard Cooreman
a10 - 0,00 %
1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.9 Christiane Huby -Patrick Gilles 66,49 %
4 NS 2P E+2 -170 2.4 17.14
5 NS 3PcN-2 -500 1.3 9.29
6 NS 4P N = 420 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 28,10 %
a.8 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 41,31 %
7 NS 1S E-3 300 13.9 99.29
8 NS 4P W-2 100 13.9 99.29
9 NS 4C S+1 450 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 99,29 %
a.6 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Benedicte Lemaigre 54,94 %
16 NS 6S N-2 -100 1.3 9.29
17 NS 3S S-1 -50 3.6 25.71
18 NS 3S W = -400 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 22,86 %
a.5 Colette Heerinckx -Dilva Haym 56,90 %
19 NS 3P N+1 170 5 35.71
20 NS 1S E-1 100 5 35.71
21 NS 4C N+1 650 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
a.4 Teresa Dekoster -Jeannine Wanderpepen 46,01 %
22 NS 4P E-2 200 12.7 90.71
23 NS 3S W+1 -630 5.9 42.14
24 NS 3T E+1 -130 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.3 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 39,94 %
25 NS 3C N+3 230 0 0.00
26 NS 3P S+1 170 12 85.71
27 NS 3S E-1 50 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
a.2 Hugo Baetens -Marie Christine Remy 51,93 %
28 NS 4P W-1 50 9.3 66.43
29 NS 3S N+2 660 8.1 57.86
30 NS 4K W-1 50 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
Total : 148,1 / 294 = 50,37 %
PAIRE A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois
a.2 Hugo Baetens -Marie Christine Remy 51,93 %
4 NS 2P E = -110 11.6 82.86
5 NS 4PcN-2 -500 1.3 9.29
6 NS 3C N+2 200 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 41,90 %
a.1 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 46,34 %
7 NS 1S E-2 200 11.6 82.86
8 NS 2P W = -110 5.9 42.14
9 NS 4C S = 420 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
a10 - 0,00 %
10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.9 Christiane Huby -Patrick Gilles 66,49 %
13 NS 6P N+1 1460 13.9 99.29
14 NS 3S W+2 -460 0.1 0.71
15 NS 5K E+1 -420 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 47,38 %
a.8 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 41,31 %
16 NS 6S N-2 -100 1.3 9.29
17 NS 3S S+2 460 10.4 74.29
18 NS 3S W = -400 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 39,05 %
a.6 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Benedicte Lemaigre 54,94 %
19 NS 4P N+1 450 14 100.00
20 NS 2C N-1 -100 0 0.00
21 NS 4C N+2 680 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
a.5 Colette Heerinckx -Dilva Haym 56,90 %
22 NS 3K W+1 -130 1.3 9.29
23 NS 3S W+1 -630 5.9 42.14
24 NS 3S W = -400 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 17,38 %
a.4 Teresa Dekoster -Jeannine Wanderpepen 46,01 %
25 NS 4C S+2 480 10 71.43
26 NS 2C E-1 100 3 21.43
27 NS 3S W-2 100 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
Total : 138,7 / 294 = 47,18 %
PAIRE A.5 Daniel Couvreur -Thomas Pascal
a.8 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 41,31 %
1 NS 3K S-1 -50 7 50.00
2 NS 3S N+1 630 4.7 33.57
3 NS 3S N+3 490 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 55,48 %
a.7 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 46,16 %
4 NS 2P E = -110 11.6 82.86
5 NS 3T W+1 -130 9.3 66.43
6 NS 4C N+1 450 12.7 90.71 µ Tbl = 80,00 %
a.5 Colette Heerinckx -Dilva Haym 56,90 %
13 NS 5P N+2 710 9.3 66.43
14 NS 3S E+1 -430 5.9 42.14
15 NS 5CcN-2 -500 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 41,90 %
a.4 Teresa Dekoster -Jeannine Wanderpepen 46,01 %
16 NS 3S S+1 430 9.3 66.43
17 NS 3S S-1 -50 3.6 25.71
18 NS 2S W+1 -150 12.7 90.71 µ Tbl = 60,95 %
a.3 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 39,94 %
19 NS 4P S = 420 11 78.57
20 NS 2C N = 110 9 64.29
21 NS 4C N+1 650 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
a.2 Hugo Baetens -Marie Christine Remy 51,93 %
22 NS 3K W+1 -130 1.3 9.29
23 NS 3S W+2 -660 1.3 9.29
24 NS 3T E = -110 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 17,38 %
a.1 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 46,34 %
25 NS 5C N+1 480 10 71.43
26 NS 2P S+2 170 12 85.71
27 NS 2S W = -120 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
a.9 Christiane Huby -Patrick Gilles 66,49 %
28 NS 3S E+1 -430 0.1 0.71
29 NS 6S N-1 -100 0.1 0.71
30 NS 4PcS-2 -300 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 0,71 %
Total : 156,7 / 336 = 46,64 %
PAIRE A.3 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren
a.3 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 39,94 %
7 NS 2K W = -90 2.4 17.14
8 NS 4P W-1 50 10.4 74.29
9 NS 6C S-2 -100 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 30,71 %
a.2 Hugo Baetens -Marie Christine Remy 51,93 %
10 NS 3C W+2 -200 12.7 90.71
11 NS 1S W+1 -120 1.3 9.29
12 NS 3S W+1 -430 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 52,62 %
a.1 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 46,34 %
13 NS 5P S+1 680 4.7 33.57
14 NS 3S E+1 -430 5.9 42.14
15 NS 5K E+1 -420 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 39,29 %
a10 - 0,00 %
16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.9 Christiane Huby -Patrick Gilles 66,49 %
19 NS 3T W-1 100 0 0.00
20 NS 1S E = -90 2 14.29
21 NS 4C N+1 650 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
a.7 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 46,16 %
22 NS 3CcS-1 -100 7 50.00
23 NS 3S W+2 -660 1.3 9.29
24 NS 3CcW-2 300 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 52,86 %
a.6 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Benedicte Lemaigre 54,94 %
25 NS 4C N+1 450 4 28.57
26 NS 3P S = 140 7 50.00
27 NS 3S W-1 50 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
a.5 Colette Heerinckx -Dilva Haym 56,90 %
28 NS 4P W-1 50 9.3 66.43
29 NS 3S N+2 660 8.1 57.86
30 NS 5C E-1 50 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
Total : 128,7 / 294 = 43,78 %
PAIRE A10 Thierry Collart -Annie Zeimes
a.9 Christiane Huby -Patrick Gilles 66,49 %
1 NS 2P N-3 -150 0.1 0.71
2 NS 4C S+1 650 9.3 66.43
3 NS 3S N+1 430 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 28,10 %
a.8 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 41,31 %
4 NS 2P E+2 -170 2.4 17.14
5 NS 4T W = -130 9.3 66.43
6 NS 4C S-1 -50 1.3 9.29 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
a.7 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 46,16 %
7 NS 2K S-2 -200 0.1 0.71
8 NS 4P W = -420 0.1 0.71
9 NS 4C S = 420 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 17,14 %
a.6 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Benedicte Lemaigre 54,94 %
10 NS 4C W+1 -650 2.4 17.14
11 NS 1S W+1 -120 1.3 9.29
12 NS 3S W+1 -430 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 28,10 %
a.4 Teresa Dekoster -Jeannine Wanderpepen 46,01 %
13 NS 4C S-2 -200 0.1 0.71
14 NS 3S E+1 -430 5.9 42.14
15 NS 6KcE = -1090 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 14,52 %
a.3 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 39,94 %
16 NS 3S S = 400 4.7 33.57
17 NS 3S S+3 490 13.9 99.29
18 NS 3S W = -400 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 55,48 %
a.2 Hugo Baetens -Marie Christine Remy 51,93 %
19 NS 2P N+1 140 2 14.29
20 NS 1S E-1 100 5 35.71
21 NS 4C N+2 680 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
a10 - 0,00 %
28 NS BYE 0 0.00
29 NS BYE 0 0.00
30 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 92,2 / 294 = 31,36 %
PAIRE a.9 Christiane Huby -Patrick Gilles
A10 Thierry Collart -Annie Zeimes 31,36 %
1 EO 2P N-3 -150 13.9 99.29
2 EO 4C S+1 650 4.7 33.57
3 EO 3S N+1 430 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 71,90 %
A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Gerard Cooreman 50,37 %
4 EO 2P E+2 -170 11.6 82.86
5 EO 3PcN-2 -500 12.7 90.71
6 EO 4P N = 420 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 71,90 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Annette Fobe 55,27 %
7 EO 3P S+1 170 7 50.00
8 EO 3P W+1 -170 11.6 82.86
9 EO 4C S = 420 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 60,95 %
A.7 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne 60,03 %
10 EO 4C W = -620 7 50.00
11 EO 1S W-1 50 4.7 33.57
12 EO 3S W+1 -430 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 41,90 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 47,18 %
13 EO 6P N+1 1460 0.1 0.71
14 EO 3S W+2 -460 13.9 99.29
15 EO 5K E+1 -420 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 52,62 %
A.3 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 43,78 %
19 EO 3T W-1 100 14 100.00
20 EO 1S E = -90 12 85.71
21 EO 4C N+1 650 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
A.9 Lydia Wildiers -Philippe van der Gracht 54,40 %
25 EO 4C N+2 480 4 28.57
26 EO 4T E-1 100 11 78.57
27 EO 3S W-1 50 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.5 Daniel Couvreur -Thomas Pascal 46,64 %
28 EO 3S E+1 -430 13.9 99.29
29 EO 6S N-1 -100 13.9 99.29
30 EO 4PcS-2 -300 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 99,29 %
Total : 223,4 / 336 = 66,49 %
PAIRE a.5 Colette Heerinckx -Dilva Haym
A.8 Eliane de Ceuninck -Annie Legrand 53,64 %
1 EO 2C W-1 50 4.7 33.57
2 EO 3S N-1 -100 13.9 99.29
3 EO 3S N+2 460 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 63,57 %
A.9 Lydia Wildiers -Philippe van der Gracht 54,40 %
7 EO 3P S+1 170 7 50.00
8 EO 4P W-1 50 3.6 25.71
9 EO 4C S = 420 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 41,90 %
A.5 Daniel Couvreur -Thomas Pascal 46,64 %
13 EO 5P N+2 710 4.7 33.57
14 EO 3S E+1 -430 8.1 57.86
15 EO 5CcN-2 -500 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 58,10 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Annette Fobe 55,27 %
16 EO 3S S+2 460 0.1 0.71
17 EO 5T N-1 -50 10.4 74.29
18 EO 3S W = -400 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 47,14 %
A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Gerard Cooreman 50,37 %
19 EO 3P N+1 170 9 64.29
20 EO 1S E-1 100 9 64.29
21 EO 4C N+1 650 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 47,18 %
22 EO 3K W+1 -130 12.7 90.71
23 EO 3S W+1 -630 8.1 57.86
24 EO 3S W = -400 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 82,62 %
A.7 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne 60,03 %
25 EO 2C N+5 260 12 85.71
26 EO 3P S+1 170 2 14.29
27 EO 3S W = -400 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.3 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 43,78 %
28 EO 4P W-1 50 4.7 33.57
29 EO 3S N+2 660 5.9 42.14
30 EO 5C E-1 50 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
Total : 191,2 / 336 = 56,90 %
PAIRE a.6 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Benedicte Lemaigre
A.4 Alan Beckman -Myriam de Timary 57,14 %
1 EO 2P S = 110 0.1 0.71
2 EO 4C S = 620 11.6 82.86
3 EO 5P S-1 -50 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 60,95 %
A.9 Lydia Wildiers -Philippe van der Gracht 54,40 %
4 EO 2P E+2 -170 11.6 82.86
5 EO 4T W = -130 4.7 33.57
6 EO 4P N = 420 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 52,86 %
A10 Thierry Collart -Annie Zeimes 31,36 %
10 EO 4C W+1 -650 11.6 82.86
11 EO 1S W+1 -120 12.7 90.71
12 EO 3S W+1 -430 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 71,90 %
A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Gerard Cooreman 50,37 %
16 EO 6S N-2 -100 12.7 90.71
17 EO 3S S-1 -50 10.4 74.29
18 EO 3S W = -400 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 77,14 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 47,18 %
19 EO 4P N+1 450 0 0.00
20 EO 2C N-1 -100 14 100.00
21 EO 4C N+2 680 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
A.7 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne 60,03 %
22 EO 4C S-1 -50 4.7 33.57
23 EO 3S W = -600 1.3 9.29
24 EO 3T E-1 50 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
A.3 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 43,78 %
25 EO 4C N+1 450 10 71.43
26 EO 3P S = 140 7 50.00
27 EO 3S W-1 50 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
A.8 Eliane de Ceuninck -Annie Legrand 53,64 %
28 EO 4P W-1 50 4.7 33.57
29 EO 4S N+1 660 5.9 42.14
30 EO 4K W = -130 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 52,86 %
Total : 184,6 / 336 = 54,94 %
PAIRE a.2 Hugo Baetens -Marie Christine Remy
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 47,18 %
4 EO 2P E = -110 2.4 17.14
5 EO 4PcN-2 -500 12.7 90.71
6 EO 3C N+2 200 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 58,10 %
A.8 Eliane de Ceuninck -Annie Legrand 53,64 %
7 EO 3P S+1 170 7 50.00
8 EO 2P W = -110 8.1 57.86
9 EO 4C S = 420 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,62 %
A.3 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 43,78 %
10 EO 3C W+2 -200 1.3 9.29
11 EO 1S W+1 -120 12.7 90.71
12 EO 3S W+1 -430 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 47,38 %
A.9 Lydia Wildiers -Philippe van der Gracht 54,40 %
13 EO 5TcE-2 500 11.6 82.86
14 EO 3S E+1 -430 8.1 57.86
15 EO 5C N-1 -100 1.3 9.29 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Myriam de Timary 57,14 %
16 EO 3S S+1 430 4.7 33.57
17 EO 3S S-1 -50 10.4 74.29
18 EO 2S W+1 -150 1.3 9.29 µ Tbl = 39,05 %
A10 Thierry Collart -Annie Zeimes 31,36 %
19 EO 2P N+1 140 12 85.71
20 EO 1S E-1 100 9 64.29
21 EO 4C N+2 680 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
A.5 Daniel Couvreur -Thomas Pascal 46,64 %
22 EO 3K W+1 -130 12.7 90.71
23 EO 3S W+2 -660 12.7 90.71
24 EO 3T E = -110 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 82,62 %
A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Gerard Cooreman 50,37 %
28 EO 4P W-1 50 4.7 33.57
29 EO 3S N+2 660 5.9 42.14
30 EO 4K W-1 50 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
Total : 174,5 / 336 = 51,93 %
PAIRE a.1 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Annette Fobe 55,27 %
1 EO 3T E = -110 10.4 74.29
2 EO 4C S+1 650 4.7 33.57
3 EO 3S N+3 490 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
A.7 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne 60,03 %
4 EO 2P E = -110 2.4 17.14
5 EO 2P N-4 -400 9.3 66.43
6 EO 4C N-1 -50 12.7 90.71 µ Tbl = 58,10 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 47,18 %
7 EO 1S E-2 200 2.4 17.14
8 EO 2P W = -110 8.1 57.86
9 EO 4C S = 420 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
A.8 Eliane de Ceuninck -Annie Legrand 53,64 %
10 EO 4C W+1 -650 11.6 82.86
11 EO 1S W-1 50 4.7 33.57
12 EO 3S W+1 -430 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 52,86 %
A.3 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 43,78 %
13 EO 5P S+1 680 9.3 66.43
14 EO 3S E+1 -430 8.1 57.86
15 EO 5K E+1 -420 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 60,71 %
A.9 Lydia Wildiers -Philippe van der Gracht 54,40 %
16 EO 3S N+1 430 4.7 33.57
17 EO 3S S+2 460 3.6 25.71
18 EO 3S W = -400 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 41,90 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Myriam de Timary 57,14 %
19 EO 3P N+1 170 9 64.29
20 EO 3C N = 140 2 14.29
21 EO 4C N+2 680 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
A.5 Daniel Couvreur -Thomas Pascal 46,64 %
25 EO 5C N+1 480 4 28.57
26 EO 2P S+2 170 2 14.29
27 EO 2S W = -120 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
Total : 155,7 / 336 = 46,34 %
PAIRE a.7 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor
A.9 Lydia Wildiers -Philippe van der Gracht 54,40 %
1 EO 2C W = -110 10.4 74.29
2 EO 4C S+2 680 0.1 0.71
3 EO 3S N+2 460 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 44,29 %
A.5 Daniel Couvreur -Thomas Pascal 46,64 %
4 EO 2P E = -110 2.4 17.14
5 EO 3T W+1 -130 4.7 33.57
6 EO 4C N+1 450 1.3 9.29 µ Tbl = 20,00 %
A10 Thierry Collart -Annie Zeimes 31,36 %
7 EO 2K S-2 -200 13.9 99.29
8 EO 4P W = -420 13.9 99.29
9 EO 4C S = 420 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 82,86 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Annette Fobe 55,27 %
13 EO 4P N+3 710 4.7 33.57
14 EO 3S E = -400 1.3 9.29
15 EO 5C N-2 -200 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 25,48 %
A.7 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne 60,03 %
19 EO 4P S = 420 3 21.43
20 EO 3K E-2 200 0 0.00
21 EO 4C N+1 650 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
A.3 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 43,78 %
22 EO 3CcS-1 -100 7 50.00
23 EO 3S W+2 -660 12.7 90.71
24 EO 3CcW-2 300 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 47,14 %
A.8 Eliane de Ceuninck -Annie Legrand 53,64 %
25 EO 4C N+2 480 4 28.57
26 EO 3T E = -110 14 100.00
27 EO 3S W-1 50 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Myriam de Timary 57,14 %
28 EO 3P W = -140 11.6 82.86
29 EO 3S N+2 660 5.9 42.14
30 EO 4P S-2 -100 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 63,81 %
Total : 155,1 / 336 = 46,16 %
PAIRE a.4 Teresa Dekoster -Jeannine Wanderpepen
A.8 Eliane de Ceuninck -Annie Legrand 53,64 %
4 EO 2P E+1 -140 7 50.00
5 EO 3P N-1 -100 0.1 0.71
6 EO 4P N+1 450 1.3 9.29 µ Tbl = 20,00 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Myriam de Timary 57,14 %
10 EO 5KcS-2 -500 4.7 33.57
11 EO 2C S-1 -50 9.3 66.43
12 EO 3S W+1 -430 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 47,38 %
A10 Thierry Collart -Annie Zeimes 31,36 %
13 EO 4C S-2 -200 13.9 99.29
14 EO 3S E+1 -430 8.1 57.86
15 EO 6KcE = -1090 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 85,48 %
A.5 Daniel Couvreur -Thomas Pascal 46,64 %
16 EO 3S S+1 430 4.7 33.57
17 EO 3S S-1 -50 10.4 74.29
18 EO 2S W+1 -150 1.3 9.29 µ Tbl = 39,05 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Annette Fobe 55,27 %
19 EO 4T W-2 200 6 42.86
20 EO 2C N = 110 5 35.71
21 EO 4C N = 620 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Gerard Cooreman 50,37 %
22 EO 4P E-2 200 1.3 9.29
23 EO 3S W+1 -630 8.1 57.86
24 EO 3T E+1 -130 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 47,18 %
25 EO 4C S+2 480 4 28.57
26 EO 2C E-1 100 11 78.57
27 EO 3S W-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
A.7 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne 60,03 %
28 EO 4P W-1 50 4.7 33.57
29 EO 4S N+1 660 5.9 42.14
30 EO 4K W-1 50 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
Total : 154,6 / 336 = 46,01 %
PAIRE a.8 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens
A.5 Daniel Couvreur -Thomas Pascal 46,64 %
1 EO 3K S-1 -50 7 50.00
2 EO 3S N+1 630 9.3 66.43
3 EO 3S N+3 490 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 44,52 %
A10 Thierry Collart -Annie Zeimes 31,36 %
4 EO 2P E+2 -170 11.6 82.86
5 EO 4T W = -130 4.7 33.57
6 EO 4C S-1 -50 12.7 90.71 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Gerard Cooreman 50,37 %
7 EO 1S E-3 300 0.1 0.71
8 EO 4P W-2 100 0.1 0.71
9 EO 4C S+1 450 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 0,71 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Annette Fobe 55,27 %
10 EO 3C W+2 -200 1.3 9.29
11 EO 1S W-1 50 4.7 33.57
12 EO 3S W+2 -460 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 47,38 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 47,18 %
16 EO 6S N-2 -100 12.7 90.71
17 EO 3S S+2 460 3.6 25.71
18 EO 3S W = -400 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 60,95 %
A.8 Eliane de Ceuninck -Annie Legrand 53,64 %
22 EO 5K W-2 200 1.3 9.29
23 EO 4P E = -620 4.7 33.57
24 EO 1K N = 70 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 25,48 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Myriam de Timary 57,14 %
25 EO 4C N+2 480 4 28.57
26 EO 3P S = 140 7 50.00
27 EO 2S W-1 50 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
A.9 Lydia Wildiers -Philippe van der Gracht 54,40 %
28 EO 4P W-1 50 4.7 33.57
29 EO 3S N+2 660 5.9 42.14
30 EO 4P S-1 -50 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 41,90 %
Total : 138,8 / 336 = 41,31 %
PAIRE a.3 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes
A.7 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne 60,03 %
1 EO 2C W-2 100 2.4 17.14
2 EO 5C S = 650 4.7 33.57
3 EO 3S N+3 490 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 22,62 %
A.3 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 43,78 %
7 EO 2K W = -90 11.6 82.86
8 EO 4P W-1 50 3.6 25.71
9 EO 6C S-2 -100 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 69,29 %
A.9 Lydia Wildiers -Philippe van der Gracht 54,40 %
10 EO 4C W+1 -650 11.6 82.86
11 EO 1S W-2 100 0.1 0.71
12 EO 3S W+1 -430 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 41,90 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Myriam de Timary 57,14 %
13 EO 4P S+3 710 4.7 33.57
14 EO 3S E = -400 1.3 9.29
15 EO 4C N-1 -100 1.3 9.29 µ Tbl = 17,38 %
A10 Thierry Collart -Annie Zeimes 31,36 %
16 EO 3S S = 400 9.3 66.43
17 EO 3S S+3 490 0.1 0.71
18 EO 3S W = -400 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 44,52 %
A.5 Daniel Couvreur -Thomas Pascal 46,64 %
19 EO 4P S = 420 3 21.43
20 EO 2C N = 110 5 35.71
21 EO 4C N+1 650 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Annette Fobe 55,27 %
22 EO 3K W = -110 9.3 66.43
23 EO 3S W = -600 1.3 9.29
24 EO 3T E-2 100 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Gerard Cooreman 50,37 %
25 EO 3C N+3 230 14 100.00
26 EO 3P S+1 170 2 14.29
27 EO 3S E-1 50 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
Total : 134,2 / 336 = 39,94 %
PAIRE a10 -
A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Gerard Cooreman 50,37 %
1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Annette Fobe 55,27 %
4 EO BYE 0 0.00
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.7 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne 60,03 %
7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 47,18 %
10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.8 Eliane de Ceuninck -Annie Legrand 53,64 %
13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00
15 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.3 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 43,78 %
16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Myriam de Timary 57,14 %
22 EO BYE 0 0.00
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A10 Thierry Collart -Annie Zeimes 31,36 %
28 EO BYE 0 0.00
29 EO BYE 0 0.00
30 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 420 = 0,00 %
|