B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 67,64 A.5 Grazia Neuenschwander -Jacques Podevyn
--- 2 58,61 B.1 Jerome Claessens -Chantal Barro
--- 3 55,42 A.2 Michel Paquot -Lydia Wildiers
--- 4 54,72 B.5 Nicole Blondeau -Elena Valsesia
--- 5 52,92 B.2 Patrick Gilles -Philippe van der Gracht
--- 6 52,22 A.4 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Myriam de Timary
--- 7 50,97 B.8 Stan Tabor -Annie Zeimes
--- 8 47,92 A.7 Giuseppe Napoli -Sylvette Kahaleh
--- 9 47,08 A.8 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten
--- 10 46,94 A.3 Eliane de Ceuninck -Colette Heerinckx
--- 11 46,81 B.4 Liliane Baptista -Michele Berrier
--- 12 46,25 B.7 Jean Verelst -Christiane Verelst
--- ~ 46,25 A.6 Dilva Haym -Jeannine Wanderpepen
--- 14 43,47 B.6 Marie Claire Vienne -Bernadette Regout
--- 15 43,06 A.1 Nicole Leclere -Sophie Tilemans
--- 16 39,72 B.3 Sandra Dallemagne -Andre Delacroix
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 60,00 a.5 Annie Legrand -Prisca Tondreau
--- 2 56,25 b.2 Diane de Meeus -Ghislain le Hardy de B.
--- 3 56,11 b.8 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille
--- 4 52,92 b.4 Jeannine Thys -Christiane Huby
--- 5 51,53 b.7 Francoise Duren -Gaetan van de Werve
--- 6 51,25 a.7 Jean Chabotier -Marc Bauherz
--- 7 51,11 b.6 Pierina Di Vito -Helene Christiaens
--- 8 50,97 a.2 Dominique Sassen -Christian Neve
--- 9 49,86 b.1 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru
--- 10 49,17 a.1 Marianne Borsu -Muriel de Ceuninck
--- 11 48,89 a.4 Francine Dozin -Nancy De Brabandere
--- 12 48,75 a.6 Teresa Dekoster -Serge Alard
--- ~ 47,92 a.3 Danielle Wybauw -Helene Schyns
--- 14 44,86 b.3 Aida Zumot -Claire de Quirini
--- 15 43,89 b.5 Veronique Englebienne -Therese Roland
--- 16 36,53 a.8 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck
PAIRE A.5 Grazia Neuenschwander -Jacques Podevyn
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Christian Neve 50,97 %
1 NS 2P N+2 170 27 90.00
2 NS 2K S+1 110 15 50.00
3 NS 3T W+1 -130 3 10.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.1 Marianne Borsu -Muriel de Ceuninck 49,17 %
4 NS 3P N+1 170 30 100.00
5 NS 3P W-1 50 20 66.67
6 NS 3PcS = 530 30 100.00 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
a.8 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 36,53 %
7 NS 4C N+2 680 29 96.67
8 NS 4P W-1 50 22 73.33
9 NS 2P N+3 200 29 96.67 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
a.7 Jean Chabotier -Marc Bauherz 51,25 %
10 NS 4P S+1 650 26 86.67
11 NS 4P W+1 -450 13 43.33
12 NS 1C N+4 200 30 100.00 µ Tbl = 76,67 %
a.6 Teresa Dekoster -Serge Alard 48,75 %
13 NS 5C E = -650 14 46.67
14 NS 4K S+2 170 23 76.67
15 NS 2P S+1 140 28 93.33 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
a.5 Annie Legrand -Prisca Tondreau 60,00 %
16 NS 4S N = 430 14 46.67
17 NS 4KcW+1 -610 0 0.00
18 NS 2K S-2 -200 10 33.33 µ Tbl = 26,67 %
a.4 Francine Dozin -Nancy De Brabandere 48,89 %
19 NS 3S W-3 300 28 93.33
20 NS 1P N+1 110 22 73.33
21 NS 3S N-2 -200 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 74,44 %
a.3 Danielle Wybauw -Helene Schyns 47,92 %
22 NS 4C E+3 -710 21 70.00
23 NS 2K S+1 110 16 53.33
24 NS 4P E-1 50 20 66.67 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
Total : 487,0 / 720 = 67,64 %
PAIRE B.1 Jerome Claessens -Chantal Barro
b.1 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 49,86 %
1 NS 2P N+3 200 30 100.00
2 NS 5T W-3 150 25 83.33
3 NS 3P N = 140 28 93.33 µ Tbl = 92,22 %
b.8 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 56,11 %
4 NS 5C E+1 -680 12 40.00
5 NS 3P W-1 50 20 66.67
6 NS 4P S-2 -100 10 33.33 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
b.7 Francoise Duren -Gaetan van de Werve 51,53 %
7 NS 4C S+1 650 23 76.67
8 NS 4P W = -420 14 46.67
9 NS 3P N+1 170 20 66.67 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
b.6 Pierina Di Vito -Helene Christiaens 51,11 %
10 NS 3P S+2 200 13 43.33
11 NS 4P W+1 -450 13 43.33
12 NS 3K N = 110 18 60.00 µ Tbl = 48,89 %
b.5 Veronique Englebienne -Therese Roland 43,89 %
13 NS 4C E+1 -650 14 46.67
14 NS 5K S+1 420 28 93.33
15 NS 4P N-1 -100 8 26.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
b.4 Jeannine Thys -Christiane Huby 52,92 %
16 NS 4S N = 430 14 46.67
17 NS 3T S = 110 24 80.00
18 NS 3T W-3 150 28 93.33 µ Tbl = 73,33 %
b.3 Aida Zumot -Claire de Quirini 44,86 %
19 NS 3T W-1 100 21 70.00
20 NS 1S S+1 120 24 80.00
21 NS 3S N-2 -200 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 68,89 %
b.2 Diane de Meeus -Ghislain le Hardy de B. 56,25 %
22 NS 6C E+1 -1460 6 20.00
23 NS 2K S = 90 4 13.33
24 NS 5K N-2 -100 8 26.67 µ Tbl = 20,00 %
Total : 422,0 / 720 = 58,61 %
PAIRE A.2 Michel Paquot -Lydia Wildiers
a.3 Danielle Wybauw -Helene Schyns 47,92 %
1 NS 2K W-3 150 21 70.00
2 NS 3K S+2 150 25 83.33
3 NS 4T E = -130 3 10.00 µ Tbl = 54,44 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Christian Neve 50,97 %
4 NS 5PcN-4 -1100 1 3.33
5 NS 2P E = -110 9 30.00
6 NS 3C W = -140 8 26.67 µ Tbl = 20,00 %
a.1 Marianne Borsu -Muriel de Ceuninck 49,17 %
7 NS 4C S+1 650 23 76.67
8 NS 4P W+1 -450 8 26.67
9 NS 3P N+2 200 29 96.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.8 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 36,53 %
10 NS 4P S+1 650 26 86.67
11 NS 4P W+1 -450 13 43.33
12 NS 4P S-1 -100 7 23.33 µ Tbl = 51,11 %
a.7 Jean Chabotier -Marc Bauherz 51,25 %
13 NS 4C E+1 -650 14 46.67
14 NS 4TcE-3 500 30 100.00
15 NS 1S W-1 50 18 60.00 µ Tbl = 68,89 %
a.6 Teresa Dekoster -Serge Alard 48,75 %
16 NS 6S N-2 -100 3 10.00
17 NS 4T S = 130 29 96.67
18 NS 2KcS+1 380 30 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,89 %
a.5 Annie Legrand -Prisca Tondreau 60,00 %
19 NS 3C N-3 -150 3 10.00
20 NS 1S W = -90 13 43.33
21 NS 3S N-2 -200 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
a.4 Francine Dozin -Nancy De Brabandere 48,89 %
22 NS 4C W+3 -710 21 70.00
23 NS 2K S+2 130 28 93.33
24 NS 4P W-1 50 20 66.67 µ Tbl = 76,67 %
Total : 399,0 / 720 = 55,42 %
PAIRE B.5 Nicole Blondeau -Elena Valsesia
b.2 Diane de Meeus -Ghislain le Hardy de B. 56,25 %
1 NS 1S E-3 150 21 70.00
2 NS 3K N = 110 15 50.00
3 NS 2P S = 110 21 70.00 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
b.1 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 49,86 %
4 NS 5C E+1 -680 12 40.00
5 NS 2P W+1 -140 1 3.33
6 NS 5C E-1 100 18 60.00 µ Tbl = 34,44 %
b.8 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 56,11 %
7 NS 3C S+1 170 5 16.67
8 NS 4P W+1 -450 8 26.67
9 NS 3P N = 140 10 33.33 µ Tbl = 25,56 %
b.7 Francoise Duren -Gaetan van de Werve 51,53 %
10 NS 3P S+2 200 13 43.33
11 NS 5P E = -450 13 43.33
12 NS 1C N+3 170 27 90.00 µ Tbl = 58,89 %
b.6 Pierina Di Vito -Helene Christiaens 51,11 %
13 NS 6C E-1 100 30 100.00
14 NS 3K S+2 150 12 40.00
15 NS 3P S = 140 28 93.33 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
b.5 Veronique Englebienne -Therese Roland 43,89 %
16 NS 6K N = 920 26 86.67
17 NS 3T S = 110 24 80.00
18 NS 1S E = -90 22 73.33 µ Tbl = 80,00 %
b.4 Jeannine Thys -Christiane Huby 52,92 %
19 NS 3T W = -110 13 43.33
20 NS 1S E+1 -120 1 3.33
21 NS 3S N-2 -200 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 34,44 %
b.3 Aida Zumot -Claire de Quirini 44,86 %
22 NS 5C E+2 -710 21 70.00
23 NS 2K S+1 110 16 53.33
24 NS 4P E-1 50 20 66.67 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
Total : 394,0 / 720 = 54,72 %
PAIRE B.2 Patrick Gilles -Philippe van der Gracht
b.3 Aida Zumot -Claire de Quirini 44,86 %
1 NS 2C N-2 -100 0 0.00
2 NS 1S E-3 150 25 83.33
3 NS 2P S+1 140 28 93.33 µ Tbl = 58,89 %
b.2 Diane de Meeus -Ghislain le Hardy de B. 56,25 %
4 NS 4C E+2 -680 12 40.00
5 NS 3T S = 110 29 96.67
6 NS 4P S-1 -50 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
b.1 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 49,86 %
7 NS 4C S+2 680 29 96.67
8 NS 4P W+1 -450 8 26.67
9 NS 2P N+2 170 20 66.67 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
b.8 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 56,11 %
10 NS 5P S-1 -100 5 16.67
11 NS 4P W+1 -450 13 43.33
12 NS 1S W = -90 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
b.7 Francoise Duren -Gaetan van de Werve 51,53 %
13 NS 5C E = -650 14 46.67
14 NS 3K S+3 170 23 76.67
15 NS 1S E+1 -120 3 10.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
b.6 Pierina Di Vito -Helene Christiaens 51,11 %
16 NS 4S N+1 460 22 73.33
17 NS 3T S = 110 24 80.00
18 NS 2K S-2 -200 10 33.33 µ Tbl = 62,22 %
b.5 Veronique Englebienne -Therese Roland 43,89 %
19 NS 3C N-2 -100 16 53.33
20 NS 1S E-3 300 30 100.00
21 NS 4P N-3 -300 3 10.00 µ Tbl = 54,44 %
b.4 Jeannine Thys -Christiane Huby 52,92 %
22 NS 4C E+3 -710 21 70.00
23 NS 3K S = 110 16 53.33
24 NS 4P E = -420 3 10.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 381,0 / 720 = 52,92 %
PAIRE A.4 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Myriam de Timary
a.7 Jean Chabotier -Marc Bauherz 51,25 %
1 NS 2P N+1 140 15 50.00
2 NS 4K S-1 -100 3 10.00
3 NS 3P S = 140 28 93.33 µ Tbl = 51,11 %
a.6 Teresa Dekoster -Serge Alard 48,75 %
4 NS 4C E+2 -680 12 40.00
5 NS 2P W = -110 9 30.00
6 NS 5C W-2 200 27 90.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
a.5 Annie Legrand -Prisca Tondreau 60,00 %
7 NS 2C S+4 230 18 60.00
8 NS 4P W+1 -450 8 26.67
9 NS 4P N-2 -100 1 3.33 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
a.4 Francine Dozin -Nancy De Brabandere 48,89 %
10 NS 4T E = -130 1 3.33
11 NS 4P W+1 -450 13 43.33
12 NS 1C N+2 140 23 76.67 µ Tbl = 41,11 %
a.3 Danielle Wybauw -Helene Schyns 47,92 %
13 NS 4C E+1 -650 14 46.67
14 NS 4K S = 130 3 10.00
15 NS 2S E-1 50 18 60.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Christian Neve 50,97 %
16 NS 4S N = 430 14 46.67
17 NS 3K E = -110 11 36.67
18 NS 1S E+2 -150 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
a.1 Marianne Borsu -Muriel de Ceuninck 49,17 %
19 NS 2C N-1 -50 18 60.00
20 NS 3T E-2 200 28 93.33
21 NS 3S N-2 -200 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
a.8 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 36,53 %
22 NS 3C E+4 -260 30 100.00
23 NS 2K S+2 130 28 93.33
24 NS 4P W-1 50 20 66.67 µ Tbl = 86,67 %
Total : 376,0 / 720 = 52,22 %
PAIRE B.8 Stan Tabor -Annie Zeimes
b.8 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 56,11 %
1 NS 3P S = 140 15 50.00
2 NS 3K W-1 50 7 23.33
3 NS 3P S-1 -50 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
b.7 Francoise Duren -Gaetan van de Werve 51,53 %
4 NS 4C E+2 -680 12 40.00
5 NS 3P W-1 50 20 66.67
6 NS 5C W-2 200 27 90.00 µ Tbl = 65,56 %
b.6 Pierina Di Vito -Helene Christiaens 51,11 %
7 NS 1C S+3 170 5 16.67
8 NS 4P W-2 100 28 93.33
9 NS 2P N+2 170 20 66.67 µ Tbl = 58,89 %
b.5 Veronique Englebienne -Therese Roland 43,89 %
10 NS 5T E-2 200 13 43.33
11 NS 4P W+1 -450 13 43.33
12 NS 1C N+3 170 27 90.00 µ Tbl = 58,89 %
b.4 Jeannine Thys -Christiane Huby 52,92 %
13 NS 4C E+1 -650 14 46.67
14 NS 4K S+1 150 12 40.00
15 NS 3P N = 140 28 93.33 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
b.3 Aida Zumot -Claire de Quirini 44,86 %
16 NS 6S N-2 -100 3 10.00
17 NS 5KcW-1 100 19 63.33
18 NS 2K S-3 -300 4 13.33 µ Tbl = 28,89 %
b.2 Diane de Meeus -Ghislain le Hardy de B. 56,25 %
19 NS 3T W+1 -130 8 26.67
20 NS 2K S-1 -100 7 23.33
21 NS 3S N+1 630 30 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
b.1 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 49,86 %
22 NS 6C E+1 -1460 6 20.00
23 NS 2K S+1 110 16 53.33
24 NS 4P E-1 50 20 66.67 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
Total : 367,0 / 720 = 50,97 %
PAIRE A.7 Giuseppe Napoli -Sylvette Kahaleh
a.6 Teresa Dekoster -Serge Alard 48,75 %
1 NS 2KcE-1 100 10 33.33
2 NS 2S E-2 100 11 36.67
3 NS 3P S-2 -100 8 26.67 µ Tbl = 32,22 %
a.5 Annie Legrand -Prisca Tondreau 60,00 %
4 NS 4C E+2 -680 12 40.00
5 NS 2P W = -110 9 30.00
6 NS 4C W-1 100 18 60.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
a.4 Francine Dozin -Nancy De Brabandere 48,89 %
7 NS 4C S+1 650 23 76.67
8 NS 4P W+2 -480 2 6.67
9 NS 3P N = 140 10 33.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.3 Danielle Wybauw -Helene Schyns 47,92 %
10 NS 4P S = 620 19 63.33
11 NS 3P E+2 -200 29 96.67
12 NS 3K N = 110 18 60.00 µ Tbl = 73,33 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Christian Neve 50,97 %
13 NS 5C E = -650 14 46.67
14 NS 3K S+2 150 12 40.00
15 NS 2S E-1 50 18 60.00 µ Tbl = 48,89 %
a.1 Marianne Borsu -Muriel de Ceuninck 49,17 %
16 NS 6S N-2 -100 3 10.00
17 NS 3P E-2 100 19 63.33
18 NS 1S S-2 -200 10 33.33 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
a.8 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 36,53 %
19 NS 3T W-1 100 21 70.00
20 NS 2T W-1 100 20 66.67
21 NS 3S N-2 -200 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
a.7 Jean Chabotier -Marc Bauherz 51,25 %
22 NS 6C E+1 -1460 6 20.00
23 NS 2K S+1 110 16 53.33
24 NS 4P E-1 50 20 66.67 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
Total : 345,0 / 720 = 47,92 %
PAIRE A.8 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten
a.8 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 36,53 %
1 NS 2C N-1 -50 5 16.67
2 NS 2K S+2 130 18 60.00
3 NS 4T W = -130 3 10.00 µ Tbl = 28,89 %
a.7 Jean Chabotier -Marc Bauherz 51,25 %
4 NS 5PcN-4 -1100 1 3.33
5 NS 3P W-1 50 20 66.67
6 NS 3P S = 140 23 76.67 µ Tbl = 48,89 %
a.6 Teresa Dekoster -Serge Alard 48,75 %
7 NS 4C S+1 650 23 76.67
8 NS 5P W-1 50 22 73.33
9 NS 2P N+2 170 20 66.67 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
a.5 Annie Legrand -Prisca Tondreau 60,00 %
10 NS 4P S+1 650 26 86.67
11 NS 4P E+1 -450 13 43.33
12 NS 3S S-1 -100 7 23.33 µ Tbl = 51,11 %
a.4 Francine Dozin -Nancy De Brabandere 48,89 %
13 NS 4C E+1 -650 14 46.67
14 NS 2K S+2 130 3 10.00
15 NS 4K E-1 50 18 60.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.3 Danielle Wybauw -Helene Schyns 47,92 %
16 NS 6S N = 990 29 96.67
17 NS 3K E = -110 11 36.67
18 NS 2K S-2 -200 10 33.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Christian Neve 50,97 %
19 NS 3S W-3 300 28 93.33
20 NS 1P N = 80 18 60.00
21 NS 3S N-3 -300 3 10.00 µ Tbl = 54,44 %
a.1 Marianne Borsu -Muriel de Ceuninck 49,17 %
22 NS 5C E+2 -710 21 70.00
23 NS 3S N-2 -200 0 0.00
24 NS 4P E = -420 3 10.00 µ Tbl = 26,67 %
Total : 339,0 / 720 = 47,08 %
PAIRE A.3 Eliane de Ceuninck -Colette Heerinckx
a.5 Annie Legrand -Prisca Tondreau 60,00 %
1 NS 1S N+1 120 12 40.00
2 NS 4K S-1 -100 3 10.00
3 NS 2P S = 110 21 70.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a.4 Francine Dozin -Nancy De Brabandere 48,89 %
4 NS 4C E+2 -680 12 40.00
5 NS 2P W = -110 9 30.00
6 NS 4C W = -620 1 3.33 µ Tbl = 24,44 %
a.3 Danielle Wybauw -Helene Schyns 47,92 %
7 NS 2C S+3 200 13 43.33
8 NS 4P E-3 150 30 100.00
9 NS 2P N+1 140 10 33.33 µ Tbl = 58,89 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Christian Neve 50,97 %
10 NS 4P S+1 650 26 86.67
11 NS 3P E+2 -200 29 96.67
12 NS 2K N+1 110 18 60.00 µ Tbl = 81,11 %
a.1 Marianne Borsu -Muriel de Ceuninck 49,17 %
13 NS 4C E+1 -650 14 46.67
14 NS 2C E-2 100 0 0.00
15 NS 3T W-1 50 18 60.00 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
a.8 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 36,53 %
16 NS 4S N+1 460 22 73.33
17 NS 4T S-1 -50 14 46.67
18 NS 2S E-2 100 26 86.67 µ Tbl = 68,89 %
a.7 Jean Chabotier -Marc Bauherz 51,25 %
19 NS 3T W+1 -130 8 26.67
20 NS 2T E+1 -110 4 13.33
21 NS 3S N-3 -300 3 10.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
a.6 Teresa Dekoster -Serge Alard 48,75 %
22 NS 4C E+3 -710 21 70.00
23 NS 2K S = 90 4 13.33
24 NS 4P E-1 50 20 66.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 338,0 / 720 = 46,94 %
PAIRE B.4 Liliane Baptista -Michele Berrier
b.7 Francoise Duren -Gaetan van de Werve 51,53 %
1 NS 1S N-1 -50 5 16.67
2 NS 3C E-3 150 25 83.33
3 NS 3P S-1 -50 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 47,78 %
b.6 Pierina Di Vito -Helene Christiaens 51,11 %
4 NS 4C E+2 -680 12 40.00
5 NS 2P E = -110 9 30.00
6 NS 3C W+1 -170 6 20.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
b.5 Veronique Englebienne -Therese Roland 43,89 %
7 NS 3C S+1 170 5 16.67
8 NS 6P W-1 50 22 73.33
9 NS 4P N-1 -50 5 16.67 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
b.4 Jeannine Thys -Christiane Huby 52,92 %
10 NS 4T E = -130 1 3.33
11 NS 4P E+1 -450 13 43.33
12 NS 1C N+2 140 23 76.67 µ Tbl = 41,11 %
b.3 Aida Zumot -Claire de Quirini 44,86 %
13 NS 4C E+1 -650 14 46.67
14 NS 3K S+2 150 12 40.00
15 NS 1S E = -90 12 40.00 µ Tbl = 42,22 %
b.2 Diane de Meeus -Ghislain le Hardy de B. 56,25 %
16 NS 4S N+1 460 22 73.33
17 NS 4K W = -130 6 20.00
18 NS 2S E = -120 20 66.67 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
b.1 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 49,86 %
19 NS 3S W-3 300 28 93.33
20 NS 2T E = -90 13 43.33
21 NS 3S N-2 -200 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
b.8 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 56,11 %
22 NS 6C E+1 -1460 6 20.00
23 NS 2K S+2 130 28 93.33
24 NS 4P E-1 50 20 66.67 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
Total : 337,0 / 720 = 46,81 %
PAIRE B.7 Jean Verelst -Christiane Verelst
b.6 Pierina Di Vito -Helene Christiaens 51,11 %
1 NS 2P S+2 170 27 90.00
2 NS 1S E-1 50 7 23.33
3 NS 3P S-1 -50 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 52,22 %
b.5 Veronique Englebienne -Therese Roland 43,89 %
4 NS 3P N-1 -100 28 93.33
5 NS 3T S = 110 29 96.67
6 NS 4P S-1 -50 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
b.4 Jeannine Thys -Christiane Huby 52,92 %
7 NS 3C S+1 170 5 16.67
8 NS 4P W+1 -450 8 26.67
9 NS 3P N+1 170 20 66.67 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
b.3 Aida Zumot -Claire de Quirini 44,86 %
10 NS 4P S+1 650 26 86.67
11 NS 4P W+1 -450 13 43.33
12 NS 4P S-1 -100 7 23.33 µ Tbl = 51,11 %
b.2 Diane de Meeus -Ghislain le Hardy de B. 56,25 %
13 NS 4C E+1 -650 14 46.67
14 NS 2C N+2 170 23 76.67
15 NS 4P S-1 -100 8 26.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
b.1 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 49,86 %
16 NS 6S N-2 -100 3 10.00
17 NS 3K W+1 -130 6 20.00
18 NS 3K S-4 -400 2 6.67 µ Tbl = 12,22 %
b.8 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 56,11 %
19 NS 3T W+1 -130 8 26.67
20 NS 1P N+2 140 26 86.67
21 NS 3S S-2 -200 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
b.7 Francoise Duren -Gaetan van de Werve 51,53 %
22 NS 6C E+1 -1460 6 20.00
23 NS 2K S = 90 4 13.33
24 NS 4P E-1 50 20 66.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 333,0 / 720 = 46,25 %
PAIRE A.6 Dilva Haym -Jeannine Wanderpepen
a.4 Francine Dozin -Nancy De Brabandere 48,89 %
1 NS 4P N-1 -50 5 16.67
2 NS 1S E-3 150 25 83.33
3 NS 3P S-1 -50 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 47,78 %
a.3 Danielle Wybauw -Helene Schyns 47,92 %
4 NS 5C E+1 -680 12 40.00
5 NS 3P W-1 50 20 66.67
6 NS 5PcS-2 -300 4 13.33 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Christian Neve 50,97 %
7 NS 3C S+2 200 13 43.33
8 NS 3S E-1 50 22 73.33
9 NS 4P N-1 -50 5 16.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a.1 Marianne Borsu -Muriel de Ceuninck 49,17 %
10 NS 5TcE-1 200 13 43.33
11 NS 4P W+1 -450 13 43.33
12 NS 4C N-1 -100 7 23.33 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
a.8 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 36,53 %
13 NS 4C E+1 -650 14 46.67
14 NS 3K S+2 150 12 40.00
15 NS 3T W-2 100 24 80.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.7 Jean Chabotier -Marc Bauherz 51,25 %
16 NS 4S N = 430 14 46.67
17 NS 3P E+1 -170 2 6.67
18 NS 3S E-1 50 24 80.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a.6 Teresa Dekoster -Serge Alard 48,75 %
19 NS 5T W-2 200 24 80.00
20 NS 2P N-1 -100 7 23.33
21 NS 3S N-3 -300 3 10.00 µ Tbl = 37,78 %
a.5 Annie Legrand -Prisca Tondreau 60,00 %
22 NS 5C E+2 -710 21 70.00
23 NS 2K S+1 110 16 53.33
24 NS 4P E-1 50 20 66.67 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
Total : 333,0 / 720 = 46,25 %
PAIRE B.6 Marie Claire Vienne -Bernadette Regout
b.4 Jeannine Thys -Christiane Huby 52,92 %
1 NS 2C N-1 -50 5 16.67
2 NS 5T W-3 150 25 83.33
3 NS 2P N = 110 21 70.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
b.3 Aida Zumot -Claire de Quirini 44,86 %
4 NS 4C E+1 -650 22 73.33
5 NS 2T S = 90 26 86.67
6 NS 4C E-1 100 18 60.00 µ Tbl = 73,33 %
b.2 Diane de Meeus -Ghislain le Hardy de B. 56,25 %
7 NS 3C S = 140 0 0.00
8 NS 4P W-1 50 22 73.33
9 NS 3T N-2 -100 1 3.33 µ Tbl = 25,56 %
b.1 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 49,86 %
10 NS 4P S = 620 19 63.33
11 NS 4P W+1 -450 13 43.33
12 NS 4C N-1 -100 7 23.33 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
b.8 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 56,11 %
13 NS 4C E+1 -650 14 46.67
14 NS 4T E-3 150 12 40.00
15 NS 3P N-1 -100 8 26.67 µ Tbl = 37,78 %
b.7 Francoise Duren -Gaetan van de Werve 51,53 %
16 NS 3K N+1 130 8 26.67
17 NS 2P E-1 50 16 53.33
18 NS 2KcS-2 -500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 26,67 %
b.6 Pierina Di Vito -Helene Christiaens 51,11 %
19 NS 4C N-3 -150 3 10.00
20 NS 1S E = -90 13 43.33
21 NS 3S N-2 -200 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
b.5 Veronique Englebienne -Therese Roland 43,89 %
22 NS 4C E+3 -710 21 70.00
23 NS 2K S+1 110 16 53.33
24 NS 3S W = -400 6 20.00 µ Tbl = 47,78 %
Total : 313,0 / 720 = 43,47 %
PAIRE A.1 Nicole Leclere -Sophie Tilemans
a.1 Marianne Borsu -Muriel de Ceuninck 49,17 %
1 NS 2K E-3 150 21 70.00
2 NS 4C N-2 -200 0 0.00
3 NS 2P S = 110 21 70.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
a.8 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 36,53 %
4 NS 3P N-2 -200 25 83.33
5 NS 2P W = -110 9 30.00
6 NS 3P S = 140 23 76.67 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
a.7 Jean Chabotier -Marc Bauherz 51,25 %
7 NS 2C S+3 200 13 43.33
8 NS 6P W = -980 0 0.00
9 NS 3P N+1 170 20 66.67 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
a.6 Teresa Dekoster -Serge Alard 48,75 %
10 NS 3P S+1 170 8 26.67
11 NS 4P W+1 -450 13 43.33
12 NS 4C N-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 23,33 %
a.5 Annie Legrand -Prisca Tondreau 60,00 %
13 NS 5C E = -650 14 46.67
14 NS 3K S+2 150 12 40.00
15 NS 1S E+2 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 28,89 %
a.4 Francine Dozin -Nancy De Brabandere 48,89 %
16 NS 4S N = 430 14 46.67
17 NS 3T S+1 130 29 96.67
18 NS 1S E+2 -150 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.3 Danielle Wybauw -Helene Schyns 47,92 %
19 NS 3S W = -600 0 0.00
20 NS 1S E+1 -120 1 3.33
21 NS 3K N+1 130 28 93.33 µ Tbl = 32,22 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Christian Neve 50,97 %
22 NS 6C E+1 -1460 6 20.00
23 NS 2K S+1 110 16 53.33
24 NS 4P E-1 50 20 66.67 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
Total : 310,0 / 720 = 43,06 %
PAIRE B.3 Sandra Dallemagne -Andre Delacroix
b.5 Veronique Englebienne -Therese Roland 43,89 %
1 NS 1S N+2 150 21 70.00
2 NS 1S E-2 100 11 36.67
3 NS 3T W+1 -130 3 10.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
b.4 Jeannine Thys -Christiane Huby 52,92 %
4 NS 4P N-2 -200 25 83.33
5 NS 2P W+1 -140 1 3.33
6 NS 4C W = -620 1 3.33 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
b.3 Aida Zumot -Claire de Quirini 44,86 %
7 NS 3P E-2 200 13 43.33
8 NS 3P W+1 -170 16 53.33
9 NS 2P N+2 170 20 66.67 µ Tbl = 54,44 %
b.2 Diane de Meeus -Ghislain le Hardy de B. 56,25 %
10 NS 4P S-1 -100 5 16.67
11 NS 4P W+1 -450 13 43.33
12 NS 3C N-1 -100 7 23.33 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
b.1 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 49,86 %
13 NS 4C E+1 -650 14 46.67
14 NS 3K S+3 170 23 76.67
15 NS 1S E+1 -120 3 10.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
b.8 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 56,11 %
16 NS 6S N = 990 29 96.67
17 NS 3K E+1 -130 6 20.00
18 NS 2K S-2 -200 10 33.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
b.7 Francoise Duren -Gaetan van de Werve 51,53 %
19 NS 2T W+1 -110 13 43.33
20 NS 1S E = -90 13 43.33
21 NS 3S N-2 -200 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 47,78 %
b.6 Pierina Di Vito -Helene Christiaens 51,11 %
22 NS 6C E+1 -1460 6 20.00
23 NS 2K S+1 110 16 53.33
24 NS 4P E+2 -480 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 24,44 %
Total : 286,0 / 720 = 39,72 %
PAIRE a.5 Annie Legrand -Prisca Tondreau
A.3 Eliane de Ceuninck -Colette Heerinckx 46,94 %
1 EO 1S N+1 120 18 60.00
2 EO 4K S-1 -100 27 90.00
3 EO 2P S = 110 9 30.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A.7 Giuseppe Napoli -Sylvette Kahaleh 47,92 %
4 EO 4C E+2 -680 18 60.00
5 EO 2P W = -110 21 70.00
6 EO 4C W-1 100 12 40.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
A.4 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Myriam de Timary 52,22 %
7 EO 2C S+4 230 12 40.00
8 EO 4P W+1 -450 22 73.33
9 EO 4P N-2 -100 29 96.67 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
A.8 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten 47,08 %
10 EO 4P S+1 650 4 13.33
11 EO 4P E+1 -450 17 56.67
12 EO 3S S-1 -100 23 76.67 µ Tbl = 48,89 %
A.1 Nicole Leclere -Sophie Tilemans 43,06 %
13 EO 5C E = -650 16 53.33
14 EO 3K S+2 150 18 60.00
15 EO 1S E+2 -150 30 100.00 µ Tbl = 71,11 %
A.5 Grazia Neuenschwander -Jacques Podevyn 67,64 %
16 EO 4S N = 430 16 53.33
17 EO 4KcW+1 -610 30 100.00
18 EO 2K S-2 -200 20 66.67 µ Tbl = 73,33 %
A.2 Michel Paquot -Lydia Wildiers 55,42 %
19 EO 3C N-3 -150 27 90.00
20 EO 1S W = -90 17 56.67
21 EO 3S N-2 -200 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
A.6 Dilva Haym -Jeannine Wanderpepen 46,25 %
22 EO 5C E+2 -710 9 30.00
23 EO 2K S+1 110 14 46.67
24 EO 4P E-1 50 10 33.33 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
Total : 432,0 / 720 = 60,00 %
PAIRE b.2 Diane de Meeus -Ghislain le Hardy de B.
B.5 Nicole Blondeau -Elena Valsesia 54,72 %
1 EO 1S E-3 150 9 30.00
2 EO 3K N = 110 15 50.00
3 EO 2P S = 110 9 30.00 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
B.2 Patrick Gilles -Philippe van der Gracht 52,92 %
4 EO 4C E+2 -680 18 60.00
5 EO 3T S = 110 1 3.33
6 EO 4P S-1 -50 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
B.6 Marie Claire Vienne -Bernadette Regout 43,47 %
7 EO 3C S = 140 30 100.00
8 EO 4P W-1 50 8 26.67
9 EO 3T N-2 -100 29 96.67 µ Tbl = 74,44 %
B.3 Sandra Dallemagne -Andre Delacroix 39,72 %
10 EO 4P S-1 -100 25 83.33
11 EO 4P W+1 -450 17 56.67
12 EO 3C N-1 -100 23 76.67 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
B.7 Jean Verelst -Christiane Verelst 46,25 %
13 EO 4C E+1 -650 16 53.33
14 EO 2C N+2 170 7 23.33
15 EO 4P S-1 -100 22 73.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
B.4 Liliane Baptista -Michele Berrier 46,81 %
16 EO 4S N+1 460 8 26.67
17 EO 4K W = -130 24 80.00
18 EO 2S E = -120 10 33.33 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
B.8 Stan Tabor -Annie Zeimes 50,97 %
19 EO 3T W+1 -130 22 73.33
20 EO 2K S-1 -100 23 76.67
21 EO 3S N+1 630 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
B.1 Jerome Claessens -Chantal Barro 58,61 %
22 EO 6C E+1 -1460 24 80.00
23 EO 2K S = 90 26 86.67
24 EO 5K N-2 -100 22 73.33 µ Tbl = 80,00 %
Total : 405,0 / 720 = 56,25 %
PAIRE b.8 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille
B.8 Stan Tabor -Annie Zeimes 50,97 %
1 EO 3P S = 140 15 50.00
2 EO 3K W-1 50 23 76.67
3 EO 3P S-1 -50 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
B.1 Jerome Claessens -Chantal Barro 58,61 %
4 EO 5C E+1 -680 18 60.00
5 EO 3P W-1 50 10 33.33
6 EO 4P S-2 -100 20 66.67 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
B.5 Nicole Blondeau -Elena Valsesia 54,72 %
7 EO 3C S+1 170 25 83.33
8 EO 4P W+1 -450 22 73.33
9 EO 3P N = 140 20 66.67 µ Tbl = 74,44 %
B.2 Patrick Gilles -Philippe van der Gracht 52,92 %
10 EO 5P S-1 -100 25 83.33
11 EO 4P W+1 -450 17 56.67
12 EO 1S W = -90 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
B.6 Marie Claire Vienne -Bernadette Regout 43,47 %
13 EO 4C E+1 -650 16 53.33
14 EO 4T E-3 150 18 60.00
15 EO 3P N-1 -100 22 73.33 µ Tbl = 62,22 %
B.3 Sandra Dallemagne -Andre Delacroix 39,72 %
16 EO 6S N = 990 1 3.33
17 EO 3K E+1 -130 24 80.00
18 EO 2K S-2 -200 20 66.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
B.7 Jean Verelst -Christiane Verelst 46,25 %
19 EO 3T W+1 -130 22 73.33
20 EO 1P N+2 140 4 13.33
21 EO 3S S-2 -200 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
B.4 Liliane Baptista -Michele Berrier 46,81 %
22 EO 6C E+1 -1460 24 80.00
23 EO 2K S+2 130 2 6.67
24 EO 4P E-1 50 10 33.33 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
Total : 404,0 / 720 = 56,11 %
PAIRE b.4 Jeannine Thys -Christiane Huby
B.6 Marie Claire Vienne -Bernadette Regout 43,47 %
1 EO 2C N-1 -50 25 83.33
2 EO 5T W-3 150 5 16.67
3 EO 2P N = 110 9 30.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
B.3 Sandra Dallemagne -Andre Delacroix 39,72 %
4 EO 4P N-2 -200 5 16.67
5 EO 2P W+1 -140 29 96.67
6 EO 4C W = -620 29 96.67 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
B.7 Jean Verelst -Christiane Verelst 46,25 %
7 EO 3C S+1 170 25 83.33
8 EO 4P W+1 -450 22 73.33
9 EO 3P N+1 170 10 33.33 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
B.4 Liliane Baptista -Michele Berrier 46,81 %
10 EO 4T E = -130 29 96.67
11 EO 4P E+1 -450 17 56.67
12 EO 1C N+2 140 7 23.33 µ Tbl = 58,89 %
B.8 Stan Tabor -Annie Zeimes 50,97 %
13 EO 4C E+1 -650 16 53.33
14 EO 4K S+1 150 18 60.00
15 EO 3P N = 140 2 6.67 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
B.1 Jerome Claessens -Chantal Barro 58,61 %
16 EO 4S N = 430 16 53.33
17 EO 3T S = 110 6 20.00
18 EO 3T W-3 150 2 6.67 µ Tbl = 26,67 %
B.5 Nicole Blondeau -Elena Valsesia 54,72 %
19 EO 3T W = -110 17 56.67
20 EO 1S E+1 -120 29 96.67
21 EO 3S N-2 -200 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 65,56 %
B.2 Patrick Gilles -Philippe van der Gracht 52,92 %
22 EO 4C E+3 -710 9 30.00
23 EO 3K S = 110 14 46.67
24 EO 4P E = -420 27 90.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 381,0 / 720 = 52,92 %
PAIRE b.7 Francoise Duren -Gaetan van de Werve
B.4 Liliane Baptista -Michele Berrier 46,81 %
1 EO 1S N-1 -50 25 83.33
2 EO 3C E-3 150 5 16.67
3 EO 3P S-1 -50 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 52,22 %
B.8 Stan Tabor -Annie Zeimes 50,97 %
4 EO 4C E+2 -680 18 60.00
5 EO 3P W-1 50 10 33.33
6 EO 5C W-2 200 3 10.00 µ Tbl = 34,44 %
B.1 Jerome Claessens -Chantal Barro 58,61 %
7 EO 4C S+1 650 7 23.33
8 EO 4P W = -420 16 53.33
9 EO 3P N+1 170 10 33.33 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
B.5 Nicole Blondeau -Elena Valsesia 54,72 %
10 EO 3P S+2 200 17 56.67
11 EO 5P E = -450 17 56.67
12 EO 1C N+3 170 3 10.00 µ Tbl = 41,11 %
B.2 Patrick Gilles -Philippe van der Gracht 52,92 %
13 EO 5C E = -650 16 53.33
14 EO 3K S+3 170 7 23.33
15 EO 1S E+1 -120 27 90.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
B.6 Marie Claire Vienne -Bernadette Regout 43,47 %
16 EO 3K N+1 130 22 73.33
17 EO 2P E-1 50 14 46.67
18 EO 2KcS-2 -500 30 100.00 µ Tbl = 73,33 %
B.3 Sandra Dallemagne -Andre Delacroix 39,72 %
19 EO 2T W+1 -110 17 56.67
20 EO 1S E = -90 17 56.67
21 EO 3S N-2 -200 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 52,22 %
B.7 Jean Verelst -Christiane Verelst 46,25 %
22 EO 6C E+1 -1460 24 80.00
23 EO 2K S = 90 26 86.67
24 EO 4P E-1 50 10 33.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 371,0 / 720 = 51,53 %
PAIRE a.7 Jean Chabotier -Marc Bauherz
A.4 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Myriam de Timary 52,22 %
1 EO 2P N+1 140 15 50.00
2 EO 4K S-1 -100 27 90.00
3 EO 3P S = 140 2 6.67 µ Tbl = 48,89 %
A.8 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten 47,08 %
4 EO 5PcN-4 -1100 29 96.67
5 EO 3P W-1 50 10 33.33
6 EO 3P S = 140 7 23.33 µ Tbl = 51,11 %
A.1 Nicole Leclere -Sophie Tilemans 43,06 %
7 EO 2C S+3 200 17 56.67
8 EO 6P W = -980 30 100.00
9 EO 3P N+1 170 10 33.33 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
A.5 Grazia Neuenschwander -Jacques Podevyn 67,64 %
10 EO 4P S+1 650 4 13.33
11 EO 4P W+1 -450 17 56.67
12 EO 1C N+4 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 23,33 %
A.2 Michel Paquot -Lydia Wildiers 55,42 %
13 EO 4C E+1 -650 16 53.33
14 EO 4TcE-3 500 0 0.00
15 EO 1S W-1 50 12 40.00 µ Tbl = 31,11 %
A.6 Dilva Haym -Jeannine Wanderpepen 46,25 %
16 EO 4S N = 430 16 53.33
17 EO 3P E+1 -170 28 93.33
18 EO 3S E-1 50 6 20.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A.3 Eliane de Ceuninck -Colette Heerinckx 46,94 %
19 EO 3T W+1 -130 22 73.33
20 EO 2T E+1 -110 26 86.67
21 EO 3S N-3 -300 27 90.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
A.7 Giuseppe Napoli -Sylvette Kahaleh 47,92 %
22 EO 6C E+1 -1460 24 80.00
23 EO 2K S+1 110 14 46.67
24 EO 4P E-1 50 10 33.33 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
Total : 369,0 / 720 = 51,25 %
PAIRE b.6 Pierina Di Vito -Helene Christiaens
B.7 Jean Verelst -Christiane Verelst 46,25 %
1 EO 2P S+2 170 3 10.00
2 EO 1S E-1 50 23 76.67
3 EO 3P S-1 -50 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 47,78 %
B.4 Liliane Baptista -Michele Berrier 46,81 %
4 EO 4C E+2 -680 18 60.00
5 EO 2P E = -110 21 70.00
6 EO 3C W+1 -170 24 80.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
B.8 Stan Tabor -Annie Zeimes 50,97 %
7 EO 1C S+3 170 25 83.33
8 EO 4P W-2 100 2 6.67
9 EO 2P N+2 170 10 33.33 µ Tbl = 41,11 %
B.1 Jerome Claessens -Chantal Barro 58,61 %
10 EO 3P S+2 200 17 56.67
11 EO 4P W+1 -450 17 56.67
12 EO 3K N = 110 12 40.00 µ Tbl = 51,11 %
B.5 Nicole Blondeau -Elena Valsesia 54,72 %
13 EO 6C E-1 100 0 0.00
14 EO 3K S+2 150 18 60.00
15 EO 3P S = 140 2 6.67 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
B.2 Patrick Gilles -Philippe van der Gracht 52,92 %
16 EO 4S N+1 460 8 26.67
17 EO 3T S = 110 6 20.00
18 EO 2K S-2 -200 20 66.67 µ Tbl = 37,78 %
B.6 Marie Claire Vienne -Bernadette Regout 43,47 %
19 EO 4C N-3 -150 27 90.00
20 EO 1S E = -90 17 56.67
21 EO 3S N-2 -200 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
B.3 Sandra Dallemagne -Andre Delacroix 39,72 %
22 EO 6C E+1 -1460 24 80.00
23 EO 2K S+1 110 14 46.67
24 EO 4P E+2 -480 30 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,56 %
Total : 368,0 / 720 = 51,11 %
PAIRE a.2 Dominique Sassen -Christian Neve
A.5 Grazia Neuenschwander -Jacques Podevyn 67,64 %
1 EO 2P N+2 170 3 10.00
2 EO 2K S+1 110 15 50.00
3 EO 3T W+1 -130 27 90.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.2 Michel Paquot -Lydia Wildiers 55,42 %
4 EO 5PcN-4 -1100 29 96.67
5 EO 2P E = -110 21 70.00
6 EO 3C W = -140 22 73.33 µ Tbl = 80,00 %
A.6 Dilva Haym -Jeannine Wanderpepen 46,25 %
7 EO 3C S+2 200 17 56.67
8 EO 3S E-1 50 8 26.67
9 EO 4P N-1 -50 25 83.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A.3 Eliane de Ceuninck -Colette Heerinckx 46,94 %
10 EO 4P S+1 650 4 13.33
11 EO 3P E+2 -200 1 3.33
12 EO 2K N+1 110 12 40.00 µ Tbl = 18,89 %
A.7 Giuseppe Napoli -Sylvette Kahaleh 47,92 %
13 EO 5C E = -650 16 53.33
14 EO 3K S+2 150 18 60.00
15 EO 2S E-1 50 12 40.00 µ Tbl = 51,11 %
A.4 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Myriam de Timary 52,22 %
16 EO 4S N = 430 16 53.33
17 EO 3K E = -110 19 63.33
18 EO 1S E+2 -150 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
A.8 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten 47,08 %
19 EO 3S W-3 300 2 6.67
20 EO 1P N = 80 12 40.00
21 EO 3S N-3 -300 27 90.00 µ Tbl = 45,56 %
A.1 Nicole Leclere -Sophie Tilemans 43,06 %
22 EO 6C E+1 -1460 24 80.00
23 EO 2K S+1 110 14 46.67
24 EO 4P E-1 50 10 33.33 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
Total : 367,0 / 720 = 50,97 %
PAIRE b.1 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru
B.1 Jerome Claessens -Chantal Barro 58,61 %
1 EO 2P N+3 200 0 0.00
2 EO 5T W-3 150 5 16.67
3 EO 3P N = 140 2 6.67 µ Tbl = 7,78 %
B.5 Nicole Blondeau -Elena Valsesia 54,72 %
4 EO 5C E+1 -680 18 60.00
5 EO 2P W+1 -140 29 96.67
6 EO 5C E-1 100 12 40.00 µ Tbl = 65,56 %
B.2 Patrick Gilles -Philippe van der Gracht 52,92 %
7 EO 4C S+2 680 1 3.33
8 EO 4P W+1 -450 22 73.33
9 EO 2P N+2 170 10 33.33 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
B.6 Marie Claire Vienne -Bernadette Regout 43,47 %
10 EO 4P S = 620 11 36.67
11 EO 4P W+1 -450 17 56.67
12 EO 4C N-1 -100 23 76.67 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
B.3 Sandra Dallemagne -Andre Delacroix 39,72 %
13 EO 4C E+1 -650 16 53.33
14 EO 3K S+3 170 7 23.33
15 EO 1S E+1 -120 27 90.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
B.7 Jean Verelst -Christiane Verelst 46,25 %
16 EO 6S N-2 -100 27 90.00
17 EO 3K W+1 -130 24 80.00
18 EO 3K S-4 -400 28 93.33 µ Tbl = 87,78 %
B.4 Liliane Baptista -Michele Berrier 46,81 %
19 EO 3S W-3 300 2 6.67
20 EO 2T E = -90 17 56.67
21 EO 3S N-2 -200 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
B.8 Stan Tabor -Annie Zeimes 50,97 %
22 EO 6C E+1 -1460 24 80.00
23 EO 2K S+1 110 14 46.67
24 EO 4P E-1 50 10 33.33 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
Total : 359,0 / 720 = 49,86 %
PAIRE a.1 Marianne Borsu -Muriel de Ceuninck
A.1 Nicole Leclere -Sophie Tilemans 43,06 %
1 EO 2K E-3 150 9 30.00
2 EO 4C N-2 -200 30 100.00
3 EO 2P S = 110 9 30.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
A.5 Grazia Neuenschwander -Jacques Podevyn 67,64 %
4 EO 3P N+1 170 0 0.00
5 EO 3P W-1 50 10 33.33
6 EO 3PcS = 530 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
A.2 Michel Paquot -Lydia Wildiers 55,42 %
7 EO 4C S+1 650 7 23.33
8 EO 4P W+1 -450 22 73.33
9 EO 3P N+2 200 1 3.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.6 Dilva Haym -Jeannine Wanderpepen 46,25 %
10 EO 5TcE-1 200 17 56.67
11 EO 4P W+1 -450 17 56.67
12 EO 4C N-1 -100 23 76.67 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
A.3 Eliane de Ceuninck -Colette Heerinckx 46,94 %
13 EO 4C E+1 -650 16 53.33
14 EO 2C E-2 100 30 100.00
15 EO 3T W-1 50 12 40.00 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
A.7 Giuseppe Napoli -Sylvette Kahaleh 47,92 %
16 EO 6S N-2 -100 27 90.00
17 EO 3P E-2 100 11 36.67
18 EO 1S S-2 -200 20 66.67 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
A.4 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Myriam de Timary 52,22 %
19 EO 2C N-1 -50 12 40.00
20 EO 3T E-2 200 2 6.67
21 EO 3S N-2 -200 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
A.8 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten 47,08 %
22 EO 5C E+2 -710 9 30.00
23 EO 3S N-2 -200 30 100.00
24 EO 4P E = -420 27 90.00 µ Tbl = 73,33 %
Total : 354,0 / 720 = 49,17 %
PAIRE a.4 Francine Dozin -Nancy De Brabandere
A.6 Dilva Haym -Jeannine Wanderpepen 46,25 %
1 EO 4P N-1 -50 25 83.33
2 EO 1S E-3 150 5 16.67
3 EO 3P S-1 -50 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 52,22 %
A.3 Eliane de Ceuninck -Colette Heerinckx 46,94 %
4 EO 4C E+2 -680 18 60.00
5 EO 2P W = -110 21 70.00
6 EO 4C W = -620 29 96.67 µ Tbl = 75,56 %
A.7 Giuseppe Napoli -Sylvette Kahaleh 47,92 %
7 EO 4C S+1 650 7 23.33
8 EO 4P W+2 -480 28 93.33
9 EO 3P N = 140 20 66.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.4 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Myriam de Timary 52,22 %
10 EO 4T E = -130 29 96.67
11 EO 4P W+1 -450 17 56.67
12 EO 1C N+2 140 7 23.33 µ Tbl = 58,89 %
A.8 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten 47,08 %
13 EO 4C E+1 -650 16 53.33
14 EO 2K S+2 130 27 90.00
15 EO 4K E-1 50 12 40.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.1 Nicole Leclere -Sophie Tilemans 43,06 %
16 EO 4S N = 430 16 53.33
17 EO 3T S+1 130 1 3.33
18 EO 1S E+2 -150 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.5 Grazia Neuenschwander -Jacques Podevyn 67,64 %
19 EO 3S W-3 300 2 6.67
20 EO 1P N+1 110 8 26.67
21 EO 3S N-2 -200 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 25,56 %
A.2 Michel Paquot -Lydia Wildiers 55,42 %
22 EO 4C W+3 -710 9 30.00
23 EO 2K S+2 130 2 6.67
24 EO 4P W-1 50 10 33.33 µ Tbl = 23,33 %
Total : 352,0 / 720 = 48,89 %
PAIRE a.6 Teresa Dekoster -Serge Alard
A.7 Giuseppe Napoli -Sylvette Kahaleh 47,92 %
1 EO 2KcE-1 100 20 66.67
2 EO 2S E-2 100 19 63.33
3 EO 3P S-2 -100 22 73.33 µ Tbl = 67,78 %
A.4 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Myriam de Timary 52,22 %
4 EO 4C E+2 -680 18 60.00
5 EO 2P W = -110 21 70.00
6 EO 5C W-2 200 3 10.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
A.8 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten 47,08 %
7 EO 4C S+1 650 7 23.33
8 EO 5P W-1 50 8 26.67
9 EO 2P N+2 170 10 33.33 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
A.1 Nicole Leclere -Sophie Tilemans 43,06 %
10 EO 3P S+1 170 22 73.33
11 EO 4P W+1 -450 17 56.67
12 EO 4C N-2 -200 30 100.00 µ Tbl = 76,67 %
A.5 Grazia Neuenschwander -Jacques Podevyn 67,64 %
13 EO 5C E = -650 16 53.33
14 EO 4K S+2 170 7 23.33
15 EO 2P S+1 140 2 6.67 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
A.2 Michel Paquot -Lydia Wildiers 55,42 %
16 EO 6S N-2 -100 27 90.00
17 EO 4T S = 130 1 3.33
18 EO 2KcS+1 380 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,11 %
A.6 Dilva Haym -Jeannine Wanderpepen 46,25 %
19 EO 5T W-2 200 6 20.00
20 EO 2P N-1 -100 23 76.67
21 EO 3S N-3 -300 27 90.00 µ Tbl = 62,22 %
A.3 Eliane de Ceuninck -Colette Heerinckx 46,94 %
22 EO 4C E+3 -710 9 30.00
23 EO 2K S = 90 26 86.67
24 EO 4P E-1 50 10 33.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 351,0 / 720 = 48,75 %
PAIRE a.3 Danielle Wybauw -Helene Schyns
A.2 Michel Paquot -Lydia Wildiers 55,42 %
1 EO 2K W-3 150 9 30.00
2 EO 3K S+2 150 5 16.67
3 EO 4T E = -130 27 90.00 µ Tbl = 45,56 %
A.6 Dilva Haym -Jeannine Wanderpepen 46,25 %
4 EO 5C E+1 -680 18 60.00
5 EO 3P W-1 50 10 33.33
6 EO 5PcS-2 -300 26 86.67 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A.3 Eliane de Ceuninck -Colette Heerinckx 46,94 %
7 EO 2C S+3 200 17 56.67
8 EO 4P E-3 150 0 0.00
9 EO 2P N+1 140 20 66.67 µ Tbl = 41,11 %
A.7 Giuseppe Napoli -Sylvette Kahaleh 47,92 %
10 EO 4P S = 620 11 36.67
11 EO 3P E+2 -200 1 3.33
12 EO 3K N = 110 12 40.00 µ Tbl = 26,67 %
A.4 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Myriam de Timary 52,22 %
13 EO 4C E+1 -650 16 53.33
14 EO 4K S = 130 27 90.00
15 EO 2S E-1 50 12 40.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.8 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten 47,08 %
16 EO 6S N = 990 1 3.33
17 EO 3K E = -110 19 63.33
18 EO 2K S-2 -200 20 66.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.1 Nicole Leclere -Sophie Tilemans 43,06 %
19 EO 3S W = -600 30 100.00
20 EO 1S E+1 -120 29 96.67
21 EO 3K N+1 130 2 6.67 µ Tbl = 67,78 %
A.5 Grazia Neuenschwander -Jacques Podevyn 67,64 %
22 EO 4C E+3 -710 9 30.00
23 EO 2K S+1 110 14 46.67
24 EO 4P E-1 50 10 33.33 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
Total : 345,0 / 720 = 47,92 %
PAIRE b.3 Aida Zumot -Claire de Quirini
B.2 Patrick Gilles -Philippe van der Gracht 52,92 %
1 EO 2C N-2 -100 30 100.00
2 EO 1S E-3 150 5 16.67
3 EO 2P S+1 140 2 6.67 µ Tbl = 41,11 %
B.6 Marie Claire Vienne -Bernadette Regout 43,47 %
4 EO 4C E+1 -650 8 26.67
5 EO 2T S = 90 4 13.33
6 EO 4C E-1 100 12 40.00 µ Tbl = 26,67 %
B.3 Sandra Dallemagne -Andre Delacroix 39,72 %
7 EO 3P E-2 200 17 56.67
8 EO 3P W+1 -170 14 46.67
9 EO 2P N+2 170 10 33.33 µ Tbl = 45,56 %
B.7 Jean Verelst -Christiane Verelst 46,25 %
10 EO 4P S+1 650 4 13.33
11 EO 4P W+1 -450 17 56.67
12 EO 4P S-1 -100 23 76.67 µ Tbl = 48,89 %
B.4 Liliane Baptista -Michele Berrier 46,81 %
13 EO 4C E+1 -650 16 53.33
14 EO 3K S+2 150 18 60.00
15 EO 1S E = -90 18 60.00 µ Tbl = 57,78 %
B.8 Stan Tabor -Annie Zeimes 50,97 %
16 EO 6S N-2 -100 27 90.00
17 EO 5KcW-1 100 11 36.67
18 EO 2K S-3 -300 26 86.67 µ Tbl = 71,11 %
B.1 Jerome Claessens -Chantal Barro 58,61 %
19 EO 3T W-1 100 9 30.00
20 EO 1S S+1 120 6 20.00
21 EO 3S N-2 -200 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 31,11 %
B.5 Nicole Blondeau -Elena Valsesia 54,72 %
22 EO 5C E+2 -710 9 30.00
23 EO 2K S+1 110 14 46.67
24 EO 4P E-1 50 10 33.33 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
Total : 323,0 / 720 = 44,86 %
PAIRE b.5 Veronique Englebienne -Therese Roland
B.3 Sandra Dallemagne -Andre Delacroix 39,72 %
1 EO 1S N+2 150 9 30.00
2 EO 1S E-2 100 19 63.33
3 EO 3T W+1 -130 27 90.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
B.7 Jean Verelst -Christiane Verelst 46,25 %
4 EO 3P N-1 -100 2 6.67
5 EO 3T S = 110 1 3.33
6 EO 4P S-1 -50 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
B.4 Liliane Baptista -Michele Berrier 46,81 %
7 EO 3C S+1 170 25 83.33
8 EO 6P W-1 50 8 26.67
9 EO 4P N-1 -50 25 83.33 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
B.8 Stan Tabor -Annie Zeimes 50,97 %
10 EO 5T E-2 200 17 56.67
11 EO 4P W+1 -450 17 56.67
12 EO 1C N+3 170 3 10.00 µ Tbl = 41,11 %
B.1 Jerome Claessens -Chantal Barro 58,61 %
13 EO 4C E+1 -650 16 53.33
14 EO 5K S+1 420 2 6.67
15 EO 4P N-1 -100 22 73.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
B.5 Nicole Blondeau -Elena Valsesia 54,72 %
16 EO 6K N = 920 4 13.33
17 EO 3T S = 110 6 20.00
18 EO 1S E = -90 8 26.67 µ Tbl = 20,00 %
B.2 Patrick Gilles -Philippe van der Gracht 52,92 %
19 EO 3C N-2 -100 14 46.67
20 EO 1S E-3 300 0 0.00
21 EO 4P N-3 -300 27 90.00 µ Tbl = 45,56 %
B.6 Marie Claire Vienne -Bernadette Regout 43,47 %
22 EO 4C E+3 -710 9 30.00
23 EO 2K S+1 110 14 46.67
24 EO 3S W = -400 24 80.00 µ Tbl = 52,22 %
Total : 316,0 / 720 = 43,89 %
PAIRE a.8 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck
A.8 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten 47,08 %
1 EO 2C N-1 -50 25 83.33
2 EO 2K S+2 130 12 40.00
3 EO 4T W = -130 27 90.00 µ Tbl = 71,11 %
A.1 Nicole Leclere -Sophie Tilemans 43,06 %
4 EO 3P N-2 -200 5 16.67
5 EO 2P W = -110 21 70.00
6 EO 3P S = 140 7 23.33 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
A.5 Grazia Neuenschwander -Jacques Podevyn 67,64 %
7 EO 4C N+2 680 1 3.33
8 EO 4P W-1 50 8 26.67
9 EO 2P N+3 200 1 3.33 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
A.2 Michel Paquot -Lydia Wildiers 55,42 %
10 EO 4P S+1 650 4 13.33
11 EO 4P W+1 -450 17 56.67
12 EO 4P S-1 -100 23 76.67 µ Tbl = 48,89 %
A.6 Dilva Haym -Jeannine Wanderpepen 46,25 %
13 EO 4C E+1 -650 16 53.33
14 EO 3K S+2 150 18 60.00
15 EO 3T W-2 100 6 20.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.3 Eliane de Ceuninck -Colette Heerinckx 46,94 %
16 EO 4S N+1 460 8 26.67
17 EO 4T S-1 -50 16 53.33
18 EO 2S E-2 100 4 13.33 µ Tbl = 31,11 %
A.7 Giuseppe Napoli -Sylvette Kahaleh 47,92 %
19 EO 3T W-1 100 9 30.00
20 EO 2T W-1 100 10 33.33
21 EO 3S N-2 -200 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
A.4 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Myriam de Timary 52,22 %
22 EO 3C E+4 -260 0 0.00
23 EO 2K S+2 130 2 6.67
24 EO 4P W-1 50 10 33.33 µ Tbl = 13,33 %
Total : 263,0 / 720 = 36,53 %
|